!e Allometry of Giant Flightless by Michael R . Dickison Department of Biology Duke University

Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Biology in the Graduate School of Duke University

 Abstract Despite our intuition, birds are no smaller than mammals when the constraints of a flying body plan are taken into account. Nevertheless, the largest mammals are ten times the mass of the largest birds. Allometric equations generated for anseriforms and suggest mid-shaft femur circumference is the best measure to use in estimating avian body mass. $e small sample size of extant ratites makes mass estimate extrapolation to larger extinct species inaccurate. $e division of ratites into cursorial and graviportal groups is supported. Aepyornithids do not show atypical femoral shaft asymmetry. New and more accurate estimates of egg masses, and separate male and female body masses for sexually-dimorphic ratites are generated. Egg mass scaling exponents for individual orders differ from that Aves as a whole, probably due to between-taxa effects. egg mass does not scale with the same exponent as other avian orders, whether are included or excluded. Total clutch mass in ratites, however, scales similarly to egg mass in other birds, perhaps as a consequence of the extreme variation in ratite clutch size. Kiwi and elephant bird eggs are consistent with the allometric trend for ratites as a whole, taking clutch size into account. $us kiwi egg mass is probably an adaptation for a precocial life history, not a side effect of their being a dwarfed descendant of a moa-sized ancestor. Relatively small body size in ancestral kiwis is consistent with a trans-oceanic dispersal to New Zealand in the Tertiary, as suggested by recent molecular trees. $is implies multiple loss of flight in Tertiary ratite lineages, which is supported by biogeographic, molecular, paleontological, and osteological evidence, but which is not the currently prevailing hypothesis. Acknowledgments I first and foremost need to thank my patient and encouraging advisor, Louise Roth, for her support and faith when I was ready to give up on the dissertation process, and her tolerance for a graduate student writing a paper on the of Big Bird (Grandicrocavis viasesamensis). All my committee, especially Dan McShea, have been more than supportive of my desires to pursue a non-standard scientific career. $e Roth and McShea lab groups in addition acted as a sounding board for many of the ideas in this dissertation. It has been said by many that we learn most of what we need in grad school from our fellow students. Fellow Duke Biology students too numerous to name have helped, encouraged, and entertained me over the past eight years, suffered through my presentations, ate my cooking, and listened to me play the ukulele with a straight face, and I look forward to paying them back tenfold in the years to come. Neither would I have reached this point without the support and kind words of Suzanne Kurtzer, Liliana Dávalos, Mary Cromer, and Felicity Turner. My DC friends Mark Mullen and Mary Pickering made it possible for me to spend substantial amounts of time at the Smithsonian, and my visits to the National Museum of Natural History would have have been far less productive were it not for Storrs Olson and Helen James, who stand out among the many generous curators and collection managers around the world that gave me access to rare and precious bones. As well as the financial support of Duke Biology and Duke OIT, I’m grateful to have been funded by the American Museum of Natural History, the Delaware Museum of Natural History, the Society for Systematic Biology, and the Vienna Institute Summer University program, all of which enabled me to traipse through the bone collections of Europe and Oceania. As a New Zealander studying flightless birds in a country which has none, I’m often asked why I came to Duke. $e quality of Biology departments like Duke’s is one of the reasons kiwis are encouraged to leave their homeland for a Ph.D., and the intellectual environment here is something I’ll remember for the rest of my life. No department, though, however smart its faculty can be truly great without an all-knowing and sympathetic administrator like Anne Lacey, who makes the rough way smooth and earns the devotion of hundreds of grad students in the process. Without the encouragement of Phil Millener at the Museum of New Zealand I would never have considered abandoning teaching typography to study flightless birds, without my father’s shared passion for natural history I would never have had a childhood dream like this to follow, and without the support of my mother I would never have been able to finish. I thank them all.

iv 1. !e Ratite Birds $e Paleognathae are traditionally defined as the avian group comprising both ratites and tinamous (Table .). $e ratites include all the Recent giant flightless birds, living and extinct, with two exceptions: Genyornis in the Dromornithidae, now in the Anseriformes (Murray and Vickers-Rich, ), and Silviornis in the Megapodidae (Poplin and Mourer-Chauviré, ), which, along with the similarly-large Tertiary phorusrhacids (Alvarenga and Höfling, ), will not be examined in detail here. Ratites share a flat, raft-like (L. ratis) sternum, though this character is associated with flightlessness and not unique to the group. $ey share with the chicken-sized flighted tinamous (Tinamidae) a paleognathous configuration of the palate, in contrast to the neognathous palate of all other modern birds (or neognaths), to which the paleognaths are the sister group, and which together comprise the modern birds (Neornithes). $e relationships of the different paleognath families remains unclear. Traditionally (Brodkorb, ) the Tinamidae have been considered the sister group to all other extant paleognaths, though recent unpublished nuclear DNA analyses suggest they are in fact nested inside the ratites (J. Harshman, pers. comm.). $e relationships of the ratites also remain controversial, with morphological and molecular analyses disagreeing, and they will be discussed further in Chapter . $e most recent survey of this group considers the single order Struthioniformes to contain both ratites and tinamous (Davies, ), and thus it should strictly be considered the equivalent of the crown-group Paleognathae. Various other taxonomic groupings (Dinornithiformes, encompassing Dinornithidae and Anomalopterygidae, Casuariformes, and Rheiformes) have been recognized as ratite orders by previous authors, but their validity is questionable until agreement has been reached on the higher-level relationships of the ratites; nevertheless, they are useful labels for various ratite clades and will be used as such in the following text. For the purposes of this study, a working phylogeny (Figure .) has been compiled from the mtDNA trees of Haddrath and Baker (), Cooper et al (), Burbidge et al (), and Baker et al (). $is may well change with the publication of further nuclear DNA analysis. $e most distinctive feature of the ratites is their size, and many questions to do with the ratites hinge on size and scaling. $e Elephant Bird Aepyornis, despite being the largest bird known, is only one-twentieth the size of an actual elephant, even though the mean body size of flightless birds is larger than that of non-flying mammals (Chapter ). Because most ratite species are extinct, any study of scaling in this order requires us to estimate their body mass from bone measurements, which often involves extrapolating beyond the masses of living birds. Extinct ratites in addition show a different morphology from most extant species, so allometric changes in body proportions have to be distinguished from adaptations to different locomotory modes (Chapter ). As well as exhibiting a variety of different body shapes, ratites vary enormously in their clutch size. Kiwi (Apteryx) lay a single enormous egg, supposedly a relict of their giant ancestor. To test the assumption that kiwi eggs are oversized, we need to examine the scaling of ratite egg size and clutch mass (Chapter ). 1 If kiwi do not descend from a giant ancestor, they could have dispersed to New Zealand in the Tertiary and later become flightless, as molecular phylogenies suggest. $is is not consistent with the traditional model of ratite evolution, which relies on a Gondwanan radiation from a single flightless ancestor (Chapter ). All these questions rely on different ways of understanding body size, that most obvious and most profound property without which nothing in evolutionary biology makes sense.

2 Order Struthioniformes sensu stricto Family Tinamidae  species in  genera South America Family Rheidae americana Greater rhea South America Pterocnemia pennata Lesser (Darwin’s) rhea South America Family Dromaiidae novaehollandiae Australia † Dromaius ater emu Australia † Dromaius baudinianus emu Australia Family Casuarius casuarius Southern Australia, New Guinea Casuarius bennetti Bennett’s (dwarf) cassowary New Guinea Casuarius papuanus Westerman’s cassowary New Guinea Casuarius unappendiculatus One-wattled cassowary New Guinea Family Anomalopterygidae † Megalapteryx didinus Upland moa New Zealand † Anomalopteryx didiformis Little bush moa New Zealand † Emeus crassus Eastern moa New Zealand † Euryapteryx curtus Coastal moa New Zealand † Euryapteryx geranoides Stout-legged moa New Zealand † Pachyornis elephantopus Heavy-footed moa New Zealand † Pachyornis mappini Mappin’s moa New Zealand † Pachyornis australis Crested moa New Zealand Family Dinornithidae † Dinornis novaezealandiae North Island giant moa New Zealand † Dinornis robustus South Island giant moa New Zealand Family Apterygidae Apteryx mantelli North Island brown kiwi New Zealand Apteryx australis Tokoeka New Zealand Apteryx owenii Little spotted kiwi New Zealand Apteryx haastii Great spotted kiwi New Zealand Apteryx rowii Rowi New Zealand † Apteryx sp. undescribed Eastern kiwi New Zealand Family Struthionidae Struthio camelus Ostrich Africa, † Asia Family Aepyornithidae † Mullerornis agilis Elephant bird Madagascar † Aepyornis maximus Elephant bird Madagascar † Aepyornis hildebrandti Elephant bird Madagascar

Table .: $e Recent paleognaths. Extinct species denoted †.

3 References Alexander, R. McNeill. a. Allometry of the leg bones of moas (Dinornithes) and other birds. Journal of Zoology , –. Alexander, R. McNeill. b. On the massive legs of a Moa (Pachyornis elephantopus, Dinornithes). Journal of Zoology , –. Alexander, R. McNeill. . $e legs of ostriches (Struthio) and moas (Pachyornis). Acta Biotheoretica , – . Alvarenga, Herculano M. F. . Uma ave ratitae do Paleoceno Brasileiro: Bacia Calcária de Itaboraí, estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Boletim do Museu Nacional (Geologia) , – +  figs. Alvarenga, Herculano M. F., and Elizabeth Höfling. . Systematic revision of the Phorusrhacidae (Aves: Ralliformes). Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia , no. : –. Amadon, Dean. . An estimated weight of the largest known bird. Condor , –. Anderson, Atholl J. . Prodigious Birds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Anderson, John F., A. Hall-Martin, and D.A. Russell. . Long-bone circumference and weight in mammals, birds and . Journal of Zoology , –. Andors, Allison V. . Paleobiology and relationships of the giant groundbird Diatryma (Aves: Gastornithiformes). Acta XX Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici I, –. Ar, Amos, Charles V. Paganelli, R. B. Reeves, D. G. Greene, and Hermann Rahn. . $e avian egg: water vapour conductance, shell thickness, and functional pore area. Condor , –. Ar, Amos, Hermann Rahn, and Charles V. Paganelli. . $e avian egg: mass and strength. Condor , – . Atkinson, Ian A. E., and R. M. Greenwood. . Relationships between moas and plants. New Zealand Journal of Ecology (supplement) , –. Atkinson, Ian A. E., and Philip R. Millener. . An ornithological glimpse into New Zealand’s pre-human past. Acta XX Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici I, –. Baker, Allan J., Charles H. Daugherty, Rogan Colbourne, and J. L. McLennan. . Flightless brown kiwis of New Zealand possess extremely subdivided population structure and cryptic species like small mammals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA , –. Baker, Allan J., Leon J. Huynen, Oliver Haddrath, Craig D. Millar, and David M. Lambert. . Reconstructing the tempo and mode of evolution in an extinct clade of birds with ancient DNA: the giant moas of New Zealand. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA , no. : –. Barth, Edvard K. . Calculation of egg volume based on loss of weight during incubation. Auk , –. Baumel, Julian J. . Handbook of Avian Anatomy: Nomina Anatomica Avium. Cambridge, MA: Nuttall Ornithological Club. Blackburn, Daniel G., and Howard E. Evans. . Why are there no viviparous birds? American Naturalist , no. : –. Blackburn, Tim M. a. An interspecific relationship between egg size and clutch size in birds. Auk , – . Blackburn, Tim M. b. $e interspecific relationship between egg size and clutch size in wildfowl. Auk , –. Blackburn, Tim M., and Kevin J. Gaston. . $e distribution of body sizes of the world’s bird species. Oikos , –. Blackburn, Tim M., and Kevin J. Gaston. . $e distribution of mammalian body masses. Diversity and Distributions , –. Bledsoe, Anthony H. . A phylogenetic analysis of postcranial skeletal characters of the ratite birds. Annals of Carnegie Museum , no. : –.

4 Blueweiss, L., H. Fox, V. Kudzma, D. Nakashima, R. Peters, and S. Sams. . Relationships between body size and some life history parameters. Oecologia , –. Boles, Walter E. . Hindlimb proportions and locomotion of Emuarius gidju (Patterson & Rich, ) (Aves: Casuariidae). Memoirs of the Queensland Museum , no. : –. Boles, Walter E. . A new emu (Dromaiinae) from the Late Oligocene Etadunna Formation. Emu , – . Brodkorb, Pierce. . Origin and evolution of birds. In Avian Biology(I), eds. Donald S. Farner, James R. King, and Kenneth C. Parkes, –. New York: Academic Press. Brown, James H. . Macroecology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Brown, James H., P. A. Marquet, and M. L. Taper. . Evolution of body size: consequences of an energetic definition of fitness. American Naturalist , –. Brown, James H., and P. F. Nicoletto. . Spatial scaling of species composition: body masses of North American land mammals. American Naturalist , –. Bunce, Michael, Trevor H. Worthy, Tom Ford, Will Hoppitt, Eske Willerslev, Alexei Drummond, and Alan C. Cooper. . Extreme reversed sexual size dimorphism in the extinct New Zealand moa Dinornis. Nature , –. Burbidge, Maryann L., Rogan Colbourne, Hugh A. Robertson, and Allan J. Baker. . Molecular and other biological evidence supports the recognition of at least three species of brown kiwi. Conservation Genetics , –. Burness, Gary P., Jared M. Diamond, and Timothy F. Flannery. . Dinosaurs, dragons, and dwarfs: the evolution of maximal body size. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA , no. : – . Calder, William A., III. . $e kiwi and egg design: evolution as a package deal. BioScience , no. : – . Calder, William A., III. . Size, Function, and Life History. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Campbell, Kenneth E., and Leslie Marcus. . $e relationship of hindlimb bone dimensions to body weight in birds. Science Series of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County , –. Campbell, Kenneth E., and Eduardo Tonni. . Size and locomotion in Teratorns (Aves: Teratornithidae). Auk , –. Christians, J. K. . Trade-offs between egg size and number in waterfowl: an interspecific test of the van Noordwijk and de Jong model. Functional Ecology , –. Clarke, Julia A., Claudia P. Tambussi, Jorge L. Noriega, Gregory M. Erickson, and Richard A. Ketcham. . Definitive fossil evidence for the extant avian radiation in the Cretaceous. Nature , –. Cockrem, J. F., R. Goudswaard, M. D. Sibley, E. K. Fox, T. M. Johnson, and M. J. Bell. . $e breeding season of the three species of kiwi (Apteryx) in captivity as determined from egg-laying dates. Journal of Zoology , –. Cooper, Alan, and David Penny. . Mass survival of birds across the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary: molecular evidence. Science , –. Cooper, Alan C., Carles Lalueza-Fox, Simon Anderson, Andrew Rambaut, Jeremy J. Austin, and Ryk Ward. . Complete mitochondrial genome sequences of two extinct moas clarify ratite evolution. Nature , –. Cooper, Alan C., Cécile Mourer-Chauviré, Geoffrey K. Chambers, Arndt von Haeseler, Allan C. Wilson, and Svante Pääbo. . Independent origin of New Zealand moas and kiwis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA , –. Cracraft, Joel. . Phylogeny and evolution of the ratite birds. Ibis , –.

5 Cracraft, Joel. . $e species of moa (Aves: Dinornithidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology , –. Cracraft, Joel. . Avian evolution, Gondwana biogeography and the Cretaceous–Tertiary mass event. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B , –. Cracraft, Joel, and Julia A. Clarke. . $e basal clades of modern birds. eds. Jacques Gauthier, and Lawrence F. Gall, –. New Haven: Peabody Museum of Natural History. Cubo, Jorge, and A. Casinos. . Flightlessness and long bone allometry in Palaeognathiformes and Sphenisciformes. Netherlands Journal of Zoology , no. : –. Davies, S. J. J. F. . Ratites and Tinamous. Oxford: Oxford University Press. De Beer, Gavin. . $e evolution of ratites. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) , no. : –. del Hoyo, Josep, Andrew Elliot, and Jordi Sargatal. . Handbook of Birds of the World. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions. Donne-Goussé, Carole, Vincent Laudet, and Catherine Hänni. . A molecular phylogeny of Anseriformes based on mitochondrial DNA analysis. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution , –. Dunning, John B., Jr. . CRC Handbook of Avian Body Masses. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Dyke, Gareth J. . $e fossil record and molecular clocks: basal radiations within the Neornithes. In Telling the Evolutionary Time, eds. Philip C. J. Donoghue, and M. Paul Smith, –. London: Taylor and French. Dyke, Gareth J., and Marcel van Tuinen. . $e evolutionary radiation of modern birds (Neornithes): reconciling molecules, morphology and the fossil record. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society , – . Dzialowski, Edward M., and Paul R. Sotherland. . Maternal effects of egg size on emu Dromaius novaehollandiae egg composition and hatchling phenotype. Journal of Experimental Biology , –. Earls, Kathleen Diane. . Patterns in Avian Evolution: Mechanics of Takeoff and Scaling of Skeletal Shape (Ph.D. Dissertation). Brown University. Fain, Matthew G., and Peter Houde. . Parallel radiations in the primary clades of birds. Evolution , no. : –. Feduccia, Alan. . !e Origin and Evolution of Birds. New Haven: Yale University Press. Fernández, Gustavo J., and Juan C. Reboreda. . Effects of clutch size and timing of breeding on reproductive success of Greater Rheas. Auk , no. : –. Flint, Paul L., James B. Grand, and James S. Sedinger. . Allocation of limited reserves to a clutch: a model explaining the lack of relationship between clutch size and egg size. Auk , no. : –. Fortelius, Mikael, and John Kappelman. . $e largest land mammal ever imagined. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society , –. Fountaine, Toby M. R., Michael J. Benton, Gareth J. Dyke, and Robert L. Nudds. . $e quality of the fossil record of Mesozoic birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B , –. Franklin, Donald C., and Kerry-Jayne Wilson. . Are low reproductive rates characteristic of New Zealand’s native terrestrial birds? Evidence from allometry of nesting parameters in altricial species. New Zealand Journal of Zoology , –. Gatesy, Stephen M., and Kevin M. Middleton. . Bipedalism, flight, and the evolution of theropod locomotor diversity. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology , no. : –. Gould, Stephen Jay. . Of kiwi eggs and the liberty bell. Natural History /, –. Haddrath, Oliver, and Allan J. Baker. . Complete mitochondrial DNA genome sequences of extinct birds: ratite phylogenetics and the vicariance biogeography hypothesis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B , –. Hanssen, Sveinn Are, Dennis Hasselquist, Ivar Folstad, and Kjell Einar Erikstad. . Cost of reproduction in a long-lived bird: incubation effort reduces immune function and future reproduction. Proceedings of the Royal

6 Society of London, Series B , –. Harvey, Paul H., and Mark D. Pagel. . !e Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Heinroth, Oskar. . Die Beziehungen zwischen Vogelgewicht, Eigewicht, Gelegegewicht, und Brutdauer. Journal für Ornithologie , –. Hindwood, K. A. . Nesting of the Cassowary. Emu , –. Holdaway, Richard N., and C. Jacomb. . Rapid extinction of the moas (Aves: Dinornithiformes): model, test, and implications. Science , no.  March: –. Houde, Peter. . Ostrich ancestors found in the Northern Hemisphere suggest new hypothesis of ratite origins. Nature , no.  December: –. Houde, Peter, and Hartmut Haubold. . Palaeotis weigelti restudied: a small Middle Eocene ostrich (Aves: Struthioniformes). Palaeovertebrata , no. : –. Hoyt, Donald F. . Practical methods of estimating volume and fresh weight of bird eggs. Auk , –. Huxley, J. S. . Problems of Relative Growth. London: Methuen. Jones, K. E., and Andy Purvis. . An optimum body size for mammals? Comparative evidence from bats. Functional Ecology , –. Kirchman, Jeremy J., and David W. Steadman. . Rails (Aves: Rallidae: Gallirallus) from prehistoric sites in the Kingdom of Tonga, including a description of a new species. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington , no. : –. Kozlowski, J., and A. T. Gawelczyk. . Why are species’ body size distributions usually skewed to the right? Functional Ecology , –. Lack, David. . $e significance of clutch size in waterfowl. Wildfowl , –. Lee, Krista, Julie Feinstein, and Joel Cracraft. . $e phylogeny of ratite birds: resolving conflicts between molecular and morphological data sets. In Avian Molecular Evolution and Systematics, ed. David P. Mindell, –. San Diego: Academic Press. Livezey, Bradley C. . Heterochrony and the evolution of avian flightlessness. In Evolutionary Change and Heterochrony, ed. Kenneth J. McNamara, –. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Livezey, Bradley C., and Richard L. Zusi. . Higher-order phylogenetics of modern Aves based on comparative anatomy. Netherlands Journal of Zoology , no. : –. Maloiy, G. M. O., R. McNeill Alexander, R. Njau, and A. S. Jayes. . Allometry in the legs of running birds. Journal of Zoology , –. Martin, Larry D. . $e status of the Late Paleocene birds Gastornis and Remiornis. Science Series of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County , –. Maurer, Brian A., James H. Brown, Tamar Dayan, Brian J. Enquist, S. K. Morgan Ernest, Elizabeth A. Hadly, John P. Haskell, David Jablonski, Kate E. Jones, Dawn M. Kaufman, S. Kathleen Lyons, Karl J. Niklas, Warren P. Porter, Kaustuv Roy, Felisa A. Smith, Bruce Tiffney, and Michael R. Willig. . Similarities in body size distributions of small-bodied flying vertebrates. Evolutionary Ecology Research , –. Mayr, Gerald. . $e Paleogene fossil record of birds in Europe. Biological Reviews , –. Mayr, Gerald, and Julia A. Clarke. . $e deep divergences of neornithine birds: a phylogenetic analysis of morphological characters. Cladistics , –. McMahon, $omas. . Size and shape in biology. Science , –. Monnier, L. . Paléontologie de Madagascar VII. Les Æpyornis. Annals de Palaeontologie , –. Morgan, Elaine. . Kiwi’s egg. Nature , . Mourer-Chauviré, Cécile, Brigitte Senut, and Pierre Mein. a. Le plus ancien représentant du genre Struthio (Aves, Struthionidae) Struthio coppensi n. sp. du Miocène inférieur de Namibie. Comptes Rendus de

7 l'Académie des Sciences, série IIa (Paléontologie) , no. : –. Mourer-Chauviré, Cécile, Brigitte Senut, Martin Pickford, Pierre Mein, and Yannicke Dauphin. b. Ostrich legs, eggs and phylogenies. South African Journal of Science , –. Murray, Peter F., and Patricia Vickers-Rich. . Magnificent Mihirungs. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Olmos, M., A. Casinos, and Jorge Cubo. . Limb allometry in birds. Annales des sciences naturelles, Zoologie, e Série , no. : –. Olsen, Penny D., and Andrew Cockburn. . Do large females lay small eggs? Sexual dimorphism and the allometry of egg and clutch volume. Oikos , –. Olsen, Penny D., Ross B. Cunningham, and Christine F. Donnelly. . Avian egg morphometrics: allometric models of egg volume, clutch volume and shape. Australian Journal of Zoology , –. Olson, Storrs L. . $e Fossil Record of Birds. In Avian Biology VIII, eds. Donald S. Farner, James R. King, and Kenneth C. Parkes, –. Orlando: Academic Press. Paganelli, Charles V., A. Olszowka, and Amos Ar. . $e avian egg: surface area, volume, and density. Condor , –. Pimm, Stuart L., Michael P. Moulton, and Lenora J. Justice. . Bird in the central Pacific. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, series B , –. Pole, Mike. . $e New Zealand flora—entirely long-distance dispersal? Journal of Biogeography , – . Poplin, François. . Sylviornis neocaledoniae n.g., n.sp. (Aves), ratite étient de la Nouvelle-Calédonie. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, série D , –. Poplin, François, and Cécile Mourer-Chauviré. . Sylviornis neocaledoniae (Aves, , Megapodiidae), oiseau géant éteint de l'Ile des Pins (Nouvelle-Calédonie). Geobios , no. : –. Poplin, François, Cécile Mourer-Chauviré, and Jacques Evin. . Position systématique et datation de Sylviornis neocaledoniae, Mégapode géant (Aves, Galliformes, Megapodiidae) étient de la Nouvelle Calédonie. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, série III , –. Potter, Murray, and John McLennan. . Kiwi’s egg size and moa. Nature , . Prange, Henry D., John F. Anderson, and Hermann Rahn. . Scaling of skeletal mass to body mass in birds and mammals. American Naturalist , –. Prinzinger, Roland, and Volker Dietz. . Pre- and postnatal energetics of the North island brown kiwi (Apteryx mantelli). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A , –. Proctor, Noble S., and Patrick J. Lynch. . Manual of Ornithology: Avian Structure and Function. New Haven: Yale University Press. Rahn, Hermann, and Amos Ar. . $e avian egg: incubation time and water loss. Condor , –. Rahn, Hermann, and Charles V. Paganelli. . Length, breadth, and elongation of avian eggs from the tables of Schönwetter. Journal für Ornithologie , –. Rahn, Hermann, and Charles V. Paganelli. a. Shell mass, thickness, and density of avian eggs derived from the tables of Schönwetter. Journal für Ornithologie , –. Rahn, Hermann, and Charles V. Paganelli. b. $e initial density of avian eggs derived from the tables of Schönwetter. Journal für Ornithologie , –. Rahn, Hermann, Charles V. Paganelli, and Amos Ar. . Relation of avian egg weight to body weight. Auk , –. Rahn, Hermann, Phyllis Parisi, and Charles V. Paganelli. . Estimating the initial density of birds’ eggs. Condor , –. Rahn, Hermann, Paul R. Sotherland, and Charles V. Paganelli. . Interrelationships between egg mass and adult body mass and metabolism among passerine birds. Journal für Ornithologie , –.

8 Ranta, Esa, Anssi Laurila, and Johan Elmberg. . Reinventing the wheel: analysis of sexual dimorphism in body size. Oikos , –. Rayner, Jeremy M. V. . Linear relations in biomechanics: the statistics of scaling functions. Journal of Zoology , –. Rohwer, Frank C. . Inter- and intraspecific relationships between egg size and clutch size in waterfowl. Auk , –. Sahan, U, O Altan, A Ipek, and B Yilmaz. . Effects of some egg characteristics on the mass loss and hatchability of ostrich (Struthio camelus) eggs. British Poultry Science , no. : –. Schmidt-Nielsen, Knut. . Scaling: why is animal size so important? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Schönwetter, M. . Handbuch der Öologie. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. Seebacher, Frank. . A new method to calculate allometric length-mass relationships of dinosaurs. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology , no. : –. Sibley, Charles G., and Jon E. Ahlquist. . Phylogeny and Classification of Birds. London: Yale University Press. Silva, Marina, and John A. Downing. . CRC Handbook of Mammalian Body Masses. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Smith, Richard J. . Rethinking allometry. Journal of !eoretical Biology , –. Smith, Richard J. . Determination of relative size: the “criterion of subtraction” problem in allometry. Journal of !eoretical Biology , –. Smith, Richard J. . Regression models for prediction equations. Journal of Human Evolution , –. Smith, Richard J. . Statistics of sexual size dimorphism. Journal of Human Evolution , –. Smith, Richard J. . Estimation of body mass in paleontology. Journal of Human Evolution , –. Steadman, David W. . Prehistoric extinctions of Pacific Island birds: biodiversity meets zooarchaeology. Science , no.  February : –. Steadman, David W. . Extinction & Biogeography of Tropical Pacific Birds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Taborsky, Michael, and Barbara Taborsky. . $e kiwi’s parental burden. Natural History /, –. Tambussi, Claudia. . Primer registro de un ave Paleocena en la Repiblica Argentina. Ameghiniana , . Tambussi, Claudia. . $e fossil Rheiformes from Argentina. Courier Forshungsinstitut Senckenberg , –. Tambussi, Claudia, Jorge L. Noriega, Andrzej Gazdzicki, Andrzej Tatur, Marcelo A. Reguero, and Sergio F. Vizcaíno. . Ratite bird from the Paleogene La Meseta Formation, Seymour Island, Antarctica. Polish Polar Research , no. –: –. Taylor, Barry. . Rails: a guide to the rails, crakes, gallinules and coots of the world. New Haven: Yale University Press. Turvey, Samuel T., Owen R. Green, and Richard N. Holdaway. . Cortical growth marks reveal extended juvenile development in New Zealand moa. Nature , doi:.. Unwin, D. M. . Aves. In !e Fossil Record, ed. M. J. Benton, –. London: Chapman and Hall. van Tuinen, Marcel, Charles G. Sibley, and S. Blair Hedges. . Phylogeny and biogeography of ratite birds inferred from DNA sequences of the mitochondrial ribosomal genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution , no. : –. Waters, Jonathan M., and Dave Craw. . Goodbye Gondwana? New Zealand biogeography, geology, and the problem of circularity. Systematic Biology , no. : –. Weatherhead, Patrick J., and Kevin L. Teather. . Sexual size dimorphism and egg-size allometry in birds. Evolution , no. : –. Worth, C. Brook. . Egg volumes and incubation period. Auk , –.

9 Worthy, Trevor H. . Loss of flight ability in the extinct New Zealand duck Euryanas finschi. Journal of Zoology , –. Worthy, Trevor H., and Richard N. Holdaway. . !e Lost World of the Moa. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

10