Reaction of Different Vaccinium Species to the Blueberry Leaf Rust
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Conservation Assessment for the Bigleaf Snowbell (Styrax Grandifolius Ait.)
Conservation Assessment for the Bigleaf Snowbell (Styrax grandifolius Ait.) Steven R. Hill, Ph.D. Division of Biodiversity and Ecological Entomology Biotic Surveys and Monitoring Section 1816 South Oak Street Champaign, Illinois 61820 Prepared for the U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Eastern Region (Region 9), Shawnee and Hoosier National Forests INHS Technical Report 2007 (65) Date of Issue: 17 December 2007 Cover photo: Styrax grandifolius Ait., from the website: In Bloom – A Monthly Record of Plants in Alabama; Landscape Horticulture at Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama. http://www.ag.auburn.edu/hort/landscape/inbloomapril99.html This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile the published and unpublished information on the subject taxon or community; or this document was prepared by another organization and provides information to serve as a Conservation Assessment for the Eastern Region of the Forest Service. It does not represent a management decision by the U.S. Forest Service. Though the best scientific information available was used and subject experts were consulted in preparation of this document, it is expected that new information will arise. In the spirit of continuous learning and adaptive management, if you have information that will assist in conserving the subject taxon, please contact the Eastern Region of the Forest Service - Threatened and Endangered Species Program at 310 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 580 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203. 2 Conservation Assessment for the Bigleaf Snowbell (Styrax grandifolius Ait.) Table of Contents -
Blueberry Scorch Virus Identification
Blueberry Scorch Virus A BC Small-Scale Farmer’s IPM Guide- Guide series, March 2021 Blueberry scorch is an aphid-vectored virus that is spread through and between fields by winged aphids. Infected plants will generally become symptomatic the year after infection, and die within two to three years. Plants may appear healthy in the spring each year, but symptoms usually start to show during bloom. Different varieties manifest different symptoms, with Bluecrop having the least obvious symptoms. This manual contains integrated pest management (IPM) guidelines geared towards small-scale production, but they are applicable to any operation wanting to improve pest identification, monitoring and management. Identification Description of symptoms • Blossoms and leaves wilt and then turn brown/orange/black. • Stems around wilted areas initially remain green (contrary to bacterial stem blight), but some blueberry varieties will show dark stem blighting. • Some leaves will yellow around leaf margins. • Symptoms may only appear on one or two branches even though the whole bush is still infected with virus. • Some infected bushes may not show any of the wilting/blighting symptoms. They may only appear off- colour or have fewer flower clusters than neighbouring healthy bushes – this is more common in Bluecrop. Scorch vs shock virus • Visual scorch virus symptoms are almost identical to shock virus, which is vectored by pollen. A lab test is required to differentiate between these two viruses. • Scorch virus will eventually kill the plants, whereas plants will recover from shock virus. Blueberry Scorch Virus IPM Guide 1 The vector - aphids • Aphids can be many colours, including black, green, orange, and brown. -
Phytochemicals from the Roots of Northern Highbush Blueberry (Vaccinium Corymbosum)
University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Open Access Master's Theses 2013 Phytochemicals from the Roots of Northern Highbush Blueberry (Vaccinium Corymbosum) Amanda Cirello University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/theses Recommended Citation Cirello, Amanda, "Phytochemicals from the Roots of Northern Highbush Blueberry (Vaccinium Corymbosum)" (2013). Open Access Master's Theses. Paper 716. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/theses/716 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PHYTOCHEMICALS FROM THE ROOTS OF NORTHERN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY ( VACCINIUM CORYMBOSUM ) BY AMANDA CIRELLO A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTERS OF SCIENCE IN PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND 2013 MASTER OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES THESIS OF AMANDA CIRELLO APPROVED: Thesis Committee: Major Professor Navindra Seeram David Worthen Joanna Norris Clinton Chichester Nasser H. Zawia DEAN OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND 2013 ABSTRACT Growing evidence from many in vitro studies suggest that plants produce secondary metabolites which may have potential physiological properties. The northern highbush blueberry ( Vaccinium corymbosum L.) plant is commercially cultivated for its valuable dark-blue fruit, which has been extensively researched and has been shown to contain phenolic compounds recognized to have positive health benefits. Thus, an evaluation of other parts of the plant, that as of yet have not been investigated, could be worthwhile. -
Native Plants for Your Backyard
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Native Plants for Your Backyard Native plants of the Southeastern United States are more diverse in number and kind than in most other countries, prized for their beauty worldwide. Our native plants are an integral part of a healthy ecosystem, providing the energy that sustains our forests and wildlife, including important pollinators and migratory birds. By “growing native” you can help support native wildlife. This helps sustain the natural connections that have developed between plants and animals over thousands of years. Consider turning your lawn into a native garden. You’ll help the local environment and often use less water and spend less time and money maintaining your yard if the plants are properly planted. The plants listed are appealing to many species of wildlife and will look attractive in your yard. To maximize your success with these plants, match the right plants with the right site conditions (soil, pH, sun, and moisture). Check out the resources on the back of this factsheet for assistance or contact your local extension office for soil testing and more information about these plants. Shrubs Trees Vines Wildflowers Grasses American beautyberry Serviceberry Trumpet creeper Bee balm Big bluestem Callicarpa americana Amelanchier arborea Campsis radicans Monarda didyma Andropogon gerardii Sweetshrub Redbud Carolina jasmine Fire pink Little bluestem Calycanthus floridus Cercis canadensis Gelsemium sempervirens Silene virginica Schizachyrium scoparium Blueberry Red buckeye Crossvine Cardinal flower -
Natural Community Fact Sheet Coastal Forests, Maritime Forests, and Maritime Shrublands
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Natural Heritage Division of Fisheries & Wildlife Endangered Species Route 135 Westborough, MA 01581 Program www.nhesp.org (508) 792-7270 ext. 200/fax (508)792-7821 Natural Community Fact Sheet Coastal Forests, Maritime Forests, and Maritime Shrublands Community Descriptions Coastal and maritime communities occur very near the ocean. Coastal and maritime forests and maritime shrublands are within the northeastern oak and oak-pine forest, and are variants of those prevailing forest types. Species of these communities are species of the oak forest, including species with southern distributions, such as American holly (Ilex opaca) and tupelo (Nyssa sylvatica), the result of the more moderate temperatures along the coast. The coastal vegetation of the state includes a variety of fairly distinct, but repeated, plant groupings that can be classed separately as Maritime forest behind beach and salt marsh, with shrubs, Juniper and deciduous trees behind. distinct associations within the community T. Huguenin photo. types. The differences among the communities and associations are often gradual, making differentiation on the ground difficult at times. Northeast: Ammophla --------------,:1- Arctostoph y/OS Pinus rlgido Fogus Co/die Lothyrus Quercus i/icifolio ---------~ Qiercis veluhno ------------:1- Solidago spp. --------Ame/Qnchler Ouercus o/t:>o ----------~ Xon fh/um Vacclnlum co,ymbosum Voce. voci/lon, vocNlons Acerrut:>rum HuCJsonta---------------+Prunus serohno ----------... Sa ssafras Lechea Comptonia Mitche/lo Myrica pensy/von.:o Prunusmaritimo ----------------~ l?husfoxieodendron--------------- Chimphi/0 Porlhenocissus -----------------~ Rre island: flex opaco Ame1oncn;er Sassafras From Godfrey, 1976b, in Bellis, 1995. Ecology of Maritime Forests of the Southern Atlantic Coast: A Community Profile. USNBS. The heights of Coastal Forests are variable but often 10-20m (about 30 to 60 feet); not as tall as further inland, but taller than maritime forests. -
Plant Collecting Expedition for Berry Crop Species Through Southeastern
Plant Collecting Expedition for Berry Crop Species through Southeastern and Midwestern United States June and July 2007 Glassy Mountain, South Carolina Participants: Kim E. Hummer, Research Leader, Curator, USDA ARS NCGR 33447 Peoria Road, Corvallis, Oregon 97333-2521 phone 541.738.4201 [email protected] Chad E. Finn, Research Geneticist, USDA ARS HCRL, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, Oregon 97330 phone 541.738.4037 [email protected] Michael Dossett Graduate Student, Oregon State University, Department of Horticulture, Corvallis, OR 97330 phone 541.738.4038 [email protected] Plant Collecting Expedition for Berry Crops through the Southeastern and Midwestern United States, June and July 2007 Table of Contents Table of Contents.................................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgements:................................................................................................................ 3 Executive Summary................................................................................................................ 4 Part I – Southeastern United States ...................................................................................... 5 Summary.............................................................................................................................. 5 Travelog May-June 2007.................................................................................................... 6 Conclusions for part 1 ..................................................................................................... -
Natural Communities of Virginia: Ecological Groups and Community Types
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA The Natural Communities of Virginia: Ecological Groups and Community Types Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Division of Natural Heritage Natural Heritage Technical Report 21-15 July 2021 Cover photos by Gary Fleming This report can be cited as: Fleming, Gary P. and Karen D. Patterson 2021. Natural Communities of Virginia: Ecological Groups and Community Types: a listing with conservation status ranks. Natural Heritage Technical Report 21-15. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, Virginia. 31 pages. The Natural Communities of Virginia: Ecological Groups and Community Types a listing with conservation status ranks July 2021 Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Division of Natural Heritage 600 East Main Street, 24th Floor Richmond, Virginia 23219 List Compiled by Gary P. Fleming, Vegetation Ecologist Karen D. Patterson, Vegetation Ecologist Table of Contents Page INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................................. I CLASSIFICATION STRUCTURE ......................................................................................................................................................... i RELATIONSHIP TO THE USNVC AND OTHER CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM .......................................................................................... iii CHANGES TO CLASSES, ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY GROUPS AND COMMUNITY -
Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- ERICACEAE
Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- ERICACEAE ERICACEAE (Heath Family) A family of about 107 genera and 3400 species, primarily shrubs, small trees, and subshrubs, nearly cosmopolitan. The Ericaceae is very important in our area, with a great diversity of genera and species, many of them rather narrowly endemic. Our area is one of the north temperate centers of diversity for the Ericaceae. Along with Quercus and Pinus, various members of this family are dominant in much of our landscape. References: Kron et al. (2002); Wood (1961); Judd & Kron (1993); Kron & Chase (1993); Luteyn et al. (1996)=L; Dorr & Barrie (1993); Cullings & Hileman (1997). Main Key, for use with flowering or fruiting material 1 Plant an herb, subshrub, or sprawling shrub, not clonal by underground rhizomes (except Gaultheria procumbens and Epigaea repens), rarely more than 3 dm tall; plants mycotrophic or hemi-mycotrophic (except Epigaea, Gaultheria, and Arctostaphylos). 2 Plants without chlorophyll (fully mycotrophic); stems fleshy; leaves represented by bract-like scales, white or variously colored, but not green; pollen grains single; [subfamily Monotropoideae; section Monotropeae]. 3 Petals united; fruit nodding, a berry; flower and fruit several per stem . Monotropsis 3 Petals separate; fruit erect, a capsule; flower and fruit 1-several per stem. 4 Flowers few to many, racemose; stem pubescent, at least in the inflorescence; plant yellow, orange, or red when fresh, aging or drying dark brown ...............................................Hypopitys 4 Flower solitary; stem glabrous; plant white (rarely pink) when fresh, aging or drying black . Monotropa 2 Plants with chlorophyll (hemi-mycotrophic or autotrophic); stems woody; leaves present and well-developed, green; pollen grains in tetrads (single in Orthilia). -
ABSTRACT BIAN, YANG. Genetic Diversity And
ABSTRACT BIAN, YANG. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Cultivated Blueberries (Vaccinium section Cyanococcus spp.). (Under the direction of Dr. Allan Brown). Blueberry (Vaccinium section Cyanococcus spp.) is an important small fruit crop native to North America with an incredible amount of genetic diversity that has yet to be efficiently characterized. Through broad natural and directed hybridization, the primary and secondary genepools currently utilized includes several distinct species and species hybrids in the section Cyanococcus. To date, only a limited number of cultivated blueberries have been assessed for genetic diversity in individual taxonomic groups using a limited number of molecular markers. A source of genomic SSRs is currently available through the generation and assembly of a draft genomic sequence of diploid V. corymbosum (‘W8520’). This genomic resource allows for a genome-wide survey of SSRs and the large scale development of molecular markers for blueberry genetic diversity studies and beyond. Of ~ 358 Mb genomic sequence surveyed, a total number of 43,594 SSRs were identified in 7,609 SSR-containing scaffolds (~ 122 counts per Mb). Dinucleotide repeats appeared the most abundant repeat types in all genomic regions except the predicted gene coding sequences (CDS). SSRs were most frequent and longest in 5’ untranslated region (5’ UTR), followed by 3’ UTR, while CDS contained the least frequent and shortest SSRs on average. AG/CT and AAG/CTT motifs were most frequent while CG/CG and CCG/CGG motifs were the least frequent for dinucleotide and trinucleotide motifs, respectively, in transcribed DNA. AAT/ATT motif was the most frequent trinucleotide motif in the nontranscribed DNA. -
WRA Species Report
Designation = Evaluate WRA Score = 2 Family: Ericaceae Taxon: Vaccinium virgatum Synonym: Vaccinium amoenum Aiton Common Name: Rabbit-eye blueberry Vaccinium ashei J. M. Reade Southern black blueberry Questionaire : current 20090513 Assessor: Chuck Chimera Designation: EVALUATE Status: Assessor Approved Data Entry Person: Chuck Chimera WRA Score 2 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? y=1, n=-1 103 Does the species have weedy races? y=1, n=-1 201 Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If island is primarily wet habitat, then (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2- High substitute "wet tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" high) (See Appendix 2) 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2- High high) (See Appendix 2) 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 y 204 Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or subtropical climates y=1, n=0 n 205 Does the species have a history of repeated introductions outside its natural range? y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 ? 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see n Appendix 2), n= question 205 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see n Appendix 2) 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see n Appendix 2) 304 Environmental weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see n Appendix 2) 305 Congeneric weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see y Appendix 2) 401 Produces spines, thorns or burrs y=1, n=0 n 402 Allelopathic y=1, n=0 n 403 Parasitic y=1, n=0 n 404 Unpalatable -
Propagation of Vaccinium Arboreum by Stem Cuttings for Use As a Rootstock for Commercial Blueberry Production
Propagation of Vaccinium arboreum by Stem Cuttings for Use as a Rootstock for Commercial Blueberry Production by Jessica Rose Bowerman A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Auburn, Alabama May 6, 2012 Keywords: sparkleberry, asexual, clonal, auxin, softwood, hardwood Copyright 2012 by Jessica Rose Bowerman Approved by James Spiers, Chair, Assistant Professor of Horticulture Eugene Blythe, Assistant Professor of Horticulture Elina Coneva, Associate Professor of Horticulture Kenneth Tilt, Professor of Horticulture ! ! Abstract Commercial blueberries, including V. corymbosum and V. ashei, have very specific needs for optimum growth; hence, growing sites are limited. They require acidic soil (pH 4.0-5.5), good drainage, thorough aeration, and a constant moderate amount of moisture. To overcome these restrictions they could be grafted onto V. arboreum, a species adapted to less desirable growing conditions. Currently, V. arboreum plants are commercially propagated from seeds. Successful asexual propagation techniques will be necessary for rapid clonal propagation of selected cultivars of V. arboreum. The objective of this experiment was to identify an efficient way to propagate V. arboreum using stem cuttings. We found that IBA quick-dip concentration (0, 1000, 2500, 5000, or 7500 ppm IBA) did not influence rooting percentage of V. arboreum. The factors that influenced rooting the most were the source of the cutting and the cutting type (softwood, semi- hardwood, or hardwood). The greatest rooting success was observed with softwood cuttings; there was also success using semi-hardwood cuttings from plants that had been cut back in February 2010 and allowed to sprout new shoots. -
Vaccinium Virgatum 'Premier'
Next generation sequencing of rabbiteye blueberry (Vaccinium virgatum ‘Premier’) and transcriptome comparisons to blueberry genomic resources Tim Rinehart 810 Highway 26 West [email protected] USDA-ARS, Southern Horticultural Laboratory Poplarville, MS 39470 228-224-2666 Abstract Tissues that were collected from Vaccinium virgatum ‘Premier’ for transcriptome analyses. Vaccinium virgatum (syn V. ashei) is commonly known as rabbiteye blueberry and native to the Southeastern United States. Cultivars are typically grown from North Carolina south to Florida and west to Texas for commercial blueberry production. In the Southeast, plants exhibit superior environmental tolerance and have fewer disease and insect concerns that highbush varieties (Vaccinium corymbosum), although some southern highbush (Vaccinium corymbosum x Vaccinium darrowii ) include V. virgatum in their genetic backgrounds. Extensive genomic work has been done on V. corymbosum, both diploid and tetraploid, but not much has been done with V. virgatum, which is hexaploid. Our study included five V. virgatum cultivars; TifBlue, Climax, PowderBlue, Austin, and Premier. Tissues were collected and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen from clonally propagated plants for each cultivar at multiple developmental stages including buds, berries, leaves, and roots. Tissue was also collected from root and leaves roots during drought treatments. First sequencing results were produced for several growth stages of ‘Premier’ using Nextera Total RNA kit and Illumina MiSeq instruments. Transcriptomes were compared to existing genomic resources for highbush. Rabbiteye Blueberry Breeding started by George Darrow in the 1930s for Vaccinium virgatum blueberry production in the southeast. Cultivars show V. ashei RNAseq Ann Loraine syn. improved heat, drought, poor soil tolerance and disease Can we use the diploid V.