Mathematical Sciences 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mathematical Sciences 2015 Mathematical Sciences 2015 “The instinct that there is a kind of structure underlying • M.Sc. in Mathematics Prof. Mahan has made a substantial impact is what we call instinct or intuition. That’s probably from Indian Institute of in the fields of geometric group theory, the most powerful thing in the doing of mathematics. Technology, Kanpur low-dimensional topology and complex Without that I don’t think a person can be a practicing • Ph.D. in Mathematics from geometry. His work in all these fields is mathematician really. The formal reasoning comes University of California, characterized by its creativity and clever use Berkeley of delicate geometric arguments. afterwards. The intuition tells you that this is the direction that I ought to look in. Otherwise a computer would be doing mathematics!” Mahan Mj Professor, School of Mathematics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai Uncovering structures beyond the observable universe While Euclid only worked assuming all five postulates, mathematicians through the centuries have been trying to prove or disprove the fifth Mahan’s work lies at the One way that mathematicians postulate assuming only the first four. While complicated and intersection of hyperbolic study 3- manifolds is to study Prof. Mahan Mj works in the A consequence of this quest was the complex, hyperbolic geometry and topology, and them by considering the field of hyperbolic geometry Topology is often discovery of several non-Euclidean geometry and topology also specifically low-dimensional special ‘surfaces’ embedded on and topology. Most of us called ‘rubber sheet geometries, including hyperbolic translate into hypnotically topology—the study of abstract them. A ‘surface’ in topology are familiar with Euclidean th geometry’. Topologists geometry in the 19 century. beautiful visual patterns and mathematical shapes called is a 2- dimensional topological geometry—the geometry of tend to see the world Hyperbolic geometry is a geometry shapes. Among these are manifolds in four or lower manifold. Mahan’s work was flat surfaces. When Euclid of in terms of stretchy, on a surface that is everywhere fractals which are never- dimensions. Mahan was able to proof that every Kleinian Alexandria first formulated the twisty objects i.e. shapes saddle-shaped. Shapes behave in ending self-similar patterns establish a central conjecture surface group admits a Cannon- principles of what is now called that can be twisted and peculiar and particular ways in the which repeat infinitely. They in a program which was Thurston map (mapping in Euclidean geometry around glued together without hyperbolic plane. In mathematical are found everywhere around established in the 1970’s by topology is a function with 300 BCE, he came up with five tearing. terms, while on a flat surface, the us in nature, in geometry the theoretical mathematician a special structure). He has postulates. Of these, the fifth sum of angles of a triangle is always and even in the visualization William Thurston to study recently extended this to postulate stated that “In a 180 degrees, in a hyperbolic plane, of algebraic formulae. The hyperbolic 3-manifolds to include all finitely generated plane, through any point not on the sum of angles of the triangle principles of hyperbolic complement his approach to Kleinian groups. Mahan’s work a given line only one new line will always be less than 180 degrees. geometry has also been his famous Geometricization has many applications in the can be drawn that is parallel to Around the same time in the used in art by artists like M.C. Conjecture—which says that all study of hyperbolic manifolds. the original one.” th 19 century, the field of topology Escher in his paintings such possible 3- dimensional spaces developed as a way of trying to as Snakes, Circle Limit III and are made up of eight types of understand geometry and set theory. Ascending and Descending. geometric pieces. Infosys Science Foundation .
Recommended publications
  • Arxiv:1006.1489V2 [Math.GT] 8 Aug 2010 Ril.Ias Rfie Rmraigtesre Rils[14 Articles Survey the Reading from Profited Also I Article
    Pure and Applied Mathematics Quarterly Volume 8, Number 1 (Special Issue: In honor of F. Thomas Farrell and Lowell E. Jones, Part 1 of 2 ) 1—14, 2012 The Work of Tom Farrell and Lowell Jones in Topology and Geometry James F. Davis∗ Tom Farrell and Lowell Jones caused a paradigm shift in high-dimensional topology, away from the view that high-dimensional topology was, at its core, an algebraic subject, to the current view that geometry, dynamics, and analysis, as well as algebra, are key for classifying manifolds whose fundamental group is infinite. Their collaboration produced about fifty papers over a twenty-five year period. In this tribute for the special issue of Pure and Applied Mathematics Quarterly in their honor, I will survey some of the impact of their joint work and mention briefly their individual contributions – they have written about one hundred non-joint papers. 1 Setting the stage arXiv:1006.1489v2 [math.GT] 8 Aug 2010 In order to indicate the Farrell–Jones shift, it is necessary to describe the situation before the onset of their collaboration. This is intimidating – during the period of twenty-five years starting in the early fifties, manifold theory was perhaps the most active and dynamic area of mathematics. Any narrative will have omissions and be non-linear. Manifold theory deals with the classification of ∗I thank Shmuel Weinberger and Tom Farrell for their helpful comments on a draft of this article. I also profited from reading the survey articles [14] and [4]. 2 James F. Davis manifolds. There is an existence question – when is there a closed manifold within a particular homotopy type, and a uniqueness question, what is the classification of manifolds within a homotopy type? The fifties were the foundational decade of manifold theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2006.00374V4 [Math.GT] 28 May 2021
    CONTROLLED MATHER-THURSTON THEOREMS MICHAEL FREEDMAN ABSTRACT. Classical results of Milnor, Wood, Mather, and Thurston produce flat connections in surprising places. The Milnor-Wood inequality is for circle bundles over surfaces, whereas the Mather-Thurston Theorem is about cobording general manifold bundles to ones admitting a flat connection. The surprise comes from the close encounter with obstructions from Chern-Weil theory and other smooth obstructions such as the Bott classes and the Godbillion-Vey invariant. Contradic- tion is avoided because the structure groups for the positive results are larger than required for the obstructions, e.g. PSL(2,R) versus U(1) in the former case and C1 versus C2 in the latter. This paper adds two types of control strengthening the positive results: In many cases we are able to (1) refine the Mather-Thurston cobordism to a semi-s-cobordism (ssc) and (2) provide detail about how, and to what extent, transition functions must wander from an initial, small, structure group into a larger one. The motivation is to lay mathematical foundations for a physical program. The philosophy is that living in the IR we cannot expect to know, for a given bundle, if it has curvature or is flat, because we can’t resolve the fine scale topology which may be present in the base, introduced by a ssc, nor minute symmetry violating distortions of the fiber. Small scale, UV, “distortions” of the base topology and structure group allow flat connections to simulate curvature at larger scales. The goal is to find a duality under which curvature terms, such as Maxwell’s F F and Hilbert’s R dvol ∧ ∗ are replaced by an action which measures such “distortions.” In this view, curvature resultsR from renormalizing a discrete, group theoretic, structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Dishant M Pancholi
    Dishant M Pancholi Contact Chennai Mathematical Institute Phone: +91 44 67 48 09 59 Information H1 SIPCOT IT Park, Siruseri Fax: +91 44 27 47 02 25 Kelambakkam 603103 E-mail: [email protected] India Research • Contact and symplectic topology Interests Employment Assitant Professor June 2011 - Present Chennai Mathematical Institute, Kelambakkam, India Post doctoral Fellow (January 2008 - January 2010) International Centre for Theoratical physics,Trieste, Italy. Visiting Fellow, (October 2006 - December 2007) TIFR Centre, Bangalore, India. Education School of Mathematics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India. Ph.D, August 1999 - September 2006. Thesis title: Knots, mapping class groups and Kirby calculus. Department of Mathematics, M.S. University of Baroda, Vadodara, India. M.Sc (Mathematics), 1996 - 1998. M.S. University of Baroda, Vadodara, India B.Sc, 1993 - 1996. Awards and • Shree Ranchodlal Chotalal Shah gold medal for scoring highest marks in mathematics Scholarships at M S University of Baroda, Vadodara in M.Sc. (1998) • Research Scholarship at TIFR, Mumbai. (1999) • Best Thesis award TIFR, Mumbai (2007) Research • ( With Siddhartha Gadgil) Publications Homeomorphism and homology of non-orientable surfaces Proceedings of Indian Acad. of Sciences, 115 (2005), no. 3, 251{257. • ( With Siddhartha Gadgil) Non-orientable Thom-Pontryagin construction and Seifert surfaces. Journal of RMS 23 (2008), no. 2, 143{149. • ( With John Etnyre) On generalizing Lutz twists. Journal of the London Mathematical Society (84) 2011, Issue 3, p670{688 Preprints • (With Indranil Biswas and Mahan Mj) Homotopical height. arXiv:1302.0607v1 [math.GT] • (With Roger Casals and Francisco Presas) Almost contact 5{folds are contact. arXiv:1203.2166v3 [math.SG] (2012)(submitted) • (With Roger Casals and Francisco Presas) Contact blow-up.
    [Show full text]
  • Debashish Goswami Jyotishman Bhowmick Quantum Isometry Groups Infosys Science Foundation Series
    Infosys Science Foundation Series in Mathematical Sciences Debashish Goswami Jyotishman Bhowmick Quantum Isometry Groups Infosys Science Foundation Series Infosys Science Foundation Series in Mathematical Sciences Series editors Gopal Prasad, University of Michigan, USA Irene Fonseca, Mellon College of Science, USA Editorial Board Chandrasekhar Khare, University of California, USA Mahan Mj, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India Manindra Agrawal, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, India S.R.S. Varadhan, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, USA Weinan E, Princeton University, USA The Infosys Science Foundation Series in Mathematical Sciences is a sub-series of The Infosys Science Foundation Series. This sub-series focuses on high quality content in the domain of mathematical sciences and various disciplines of mathematics, statistics, bio-mathematics, financial mathematics, applied mathematics, operations research, applies statistics and computer science. All content published in the sub-series are written, edited, or vetted by the laureates or jury members of the Infosys Prize. With the Series, Springer and the Infosys Science Foundation hope to provide readers with monographs, handbooks, professional books and textbooks of the highest academic quality on current topics in relevant disciplines. Literature in this sub-series will appeal to a wide audience of researchers, students, educators, and professionals across mathematics, applied mathematics, statistics and computer science disciplines. More information
    [Show full text]
  • Committee to Select the Winner of the Veblen Prize
    Committee to Select the Winner of the Veblen Prize General Description · Committee is standing · Number of members is three · A new committee is appointed for each award Principal Activities The award is made every three years at the Annual (January) Meeting, in a cycle including the years 2001, 2004, and so forth. The award is made for a notable research work in geometry or topology that has appeared in the last six years. The work must be published in a recognized, peer-reviewed venue. The committee recommends a winner and communicates this recommendation to the Secretary for approval by the Executive Committee of the Council. Past winners are listed in the November issue of the Notices in odd-numbered years. About this Prize This prize was established in 1961 in memory of Professor Oswald Veblen through a fund contributed by former students and colleagues. The fund was later doubled by a gift from Elizabeth Veblen, widow of Professor Veblen. In honor of her late father, John L. Synge, who knew and admired Oswald Veblen, Cathleen Synge Morawetz and her husband, Herbert, substantially increased the endowed fund in 2013. The award is supplemented by a Steele Prize from the AMS under the name of the Veblen Prize. The current prize amount is $5,000. Miscellaneous Information The business of this committee can be done by mail, electronic mail, or telephone, expenses which may be reimbursed by the Society. Note to the Chair Work done by committees on recurring problems may have value as precedent or work done may have historical interest.
    [Show full text]
  • William M. Goldman June 24, 2021 CURRICULUM VITÆ
    William M. Goldman June 24, 2021 CURRICULUM VITÆ Professional Preparation: Princeton Univ. A. B. 1977 Univ. Cal. Berkeley Ph.D. 1980 Univ. Colorado NSF Postdoc. 1980{1981 M.I.T. C.L.E. Moore Inst. 1981{1983 Appointments: I.C.E.R.M. Member Sep. 2019 M.S.R.I. Member Oct.{Dec. 2019 Brown Univ. Distinguished Visiting Prof. Sep.{Dec. 2017 M.S.R.I. Member Jan.{May 2015 Institute for Advanced Study Member Spring 2008 Princeton University Visitor Spring 2008 M.S.R.I. Member Nov.{Dec. 2007 Univ. Maryland Assoc. Chair for Grad. Studies 1995{1998 Univ. Maryland Professor 1990{present Oxford Univ. Visiting Professor Spring 1989 Univ. Maryland Assoc. Professor 1986{1990 M.I.T. Assoc. Professor 1986 M.S.R.I. Member 1983{1984 Univ. Maryland Visiting Asst. Professor Fall 1983 M.I.T. Asst. Professor 1983 { 1986 1 2 W. GOLDMAN Publications (1) (with D. Fried and M. Hirsch) Affine manifolds and solvable groups, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 3 (1980), 1045{1047. (2) (with M. Hirsch) Flat bundles with solvable holonomy, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 82 (1981), 491{494. (3) (with M. Hirsch) Flat bundles with solvable holonomy II: Ob- struction theory, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 83 (1981), 175{178. (4) Two examples of affine manifolds, Pac. J. Math.94 (1981), 327{ 330. (5) (with M. Hirsch) A generalization of Bieberbach's theorem, Inv. Math. , 65 (1981), 1{11. (6) (with D. Fried and M. Hirsch) Affine manifolds with nilpotent holonomy, Comm. Math. Helv. 56 (1981), 487{523. (7) Characteristic classes and representations of discrete subgroups of Lie groups, Bull.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University Schreyer Honors College
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS SPHERE EVERSION: ANALYSIS OF A VERIDICAL PARADOX MATTHEW LITMAN SPRING 2017 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in Mathematics with honors in Mathematics Reviewed and approved* by the following: Sergei Tabachnikov Professor of Mathematics Thesis Supervisor Nathanial Brown Professor of Mathematics Associate Head for Equity & Diversity Honors Adviser *Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i Abstract In this honors thesis, we investigate the topological problem of everting the 2-sphere in 3-space, i.e. turning a sphere inside out via continuous change allowing self-intersection but not allowing tearing, creasing, or pinching. The result was shown to exist by an abstract theorem proven in the 1950s, but the first explicit construction was not published until almost a decade later. Throughout the past 60 years, many constructions have been made, each providing their own insight into the theory behind the problem. In the following pages, we study the history surrounding the problem, the theory that made it possible, and a myriad of explicit examples giving a solid foundation in descriptive topology. ii Table of Contents List of Figures iii Acknowledgements iv 1 Introduction1 2 The Paradoxical Problem of Everting the Sphere3 2.1 Mathematical Paradoxes.............................4 2.2 Literature Review.................................5 3 Homotopies and Regular Homotopies of the Sphere7 3.1 Definitions.....................................8 3.2 Examples.....................................9 4 Smale’s Proof of Existence 12 4.1 Smale’s Main Result & its Consequences.................... 13 5 “Roll and Pull” Method 15 5.1 Explanation & Execution............................
    [Show full text]
  • ANNEXURE 1 School of Mathematics Sciences —A Profile As in March 2010
    University Yearbook (Academic Audit Report 2005-10) ANNEXURE 1 School of Mathematics Sciences —A Profile as in March 2010 Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Science Education: A synthesis of two paradigms 2 2. Faculty 3 2.1. Mathematics 4 2.2. Physics 12 2.3. Computer Science 18 3. International Links 18 3.1. Collaborations Set Up 18 3.2. Visits by our faculty abroad for research purposes 19 3.3. Visits by faculty abroad to Belur for research purposes 19 4. Service at the National Level 20 4.1. Links at the level of faculty 20 5. Student Placement 21 5.1. 2006-8 MSc Mathematics Batch 21 5.2. 2008-10 MSc Mathematics Batch 22 6. Research 23 1. Introduction Swami Vivekananda envisioned a University at Belur Math, West Bengal, the headquarters of the Ramakrishna Mission. In his conversation with Jamshedji Tata, it was indicated that the spirit of austerity, service and renun- ciation, traditionally associated with monasticism could be united with the quest for Truth and Universality that Science embodies. An inevitable fruit of such a synthesis would be a vigorous pursuit of science as an aspect of Karma Yoga. Truth would be sought by research and the knowledge obtained disseminated through teach- ing, making knowledge universally available. The VivekanandaSchool of Mathematical Sciences at the fledgling Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda University, headquartered at Belur, has been set up keeping these twin ide- als in mind. We shall first indicate that at the National level, a realization of these objectives would fulfill a deeply felt National need. 1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Intellectual Generosity & the Reward Structure of Mathematics
    This is a preprint of an article published in Synthese. The final authenticated version is available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02660-w Intellectual Generosity & The Reward Structure Of Mathematics Rebecca Lea Morris August 7, 2020 Abstract Prominent mathematician William Thurston was praised by other mathematicians for his intellectual generosity. But what does it mean to say Thurston was intellectually generous? And is being intellectually generous beneficial? To answer these questions I turn to virtue epistemology and, in particular, Roberts and Wood's (2007) analysis of intellectual generosity. By appealing to Thurston's own writings and interviewing mathematicians who knew and worked with him, I argue that Roberts and Wood's analysis nicely captures the sense in which he was intellectually generous. I then argue that intellectual generosity is beneficial because it counteracts negative effects of the reward structure of mathematics that can stymie mathematical progress. Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Virtue Epistemology 2 3 William Thurston 4 4 Reflections on Thurston & Intellectual Generosity 10 5 The Benefits of Intellectual Generosity: Overcoming Problems with the Reward Structure of Mathematics 13 6 Concluding Remarks 19 1 Introduction William Thurston (1946 { 2012) was described by his fellow mathematicians as an intel- lectually generous person. This raises two questions: (i) What does it mean to say that Thurston was intellectually generous?; (ii) Is being intellectually generous beneficial? To answer these questions I turn to virtue epistemology. I answer question (i) by showing that Roberts and Wood's (2007) analysis nicely captures Thurston's intellectual generosity. To answer question (ii) I first show that the reward structure of mathematics can hinder 1 This is a preprint of an article published in Synthese.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Approach to Understanding Explanatory Proofs Based on Mathematical Practices
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School February 2019 A Historical Approach to Understanding Explanatory Proofs Based on Mathematical Practices Erika Oshiro University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Philosophy Commons Scholar Commons Citation Oshiro, Erika, "A Historical Approach to Understanding Explanatory Proofs Based on Mathematical Practices" (2019). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7882 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Historical Approach to Understanding Explanatory Proofs Based on Mathematical Practices by: Erika Oshiro A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Co-Major Professor: Alexander Levine, Ph.D. Co-Major Professor: Douglas Jesseph, Ph.D. Roger Ariew, Ph.D. William Goodwin, Ph.D. Date of Approval: December 5, 2018 Keywords: Philosophy of Mathematics, Explanation, History, Four Color Theorem Copyright © 2018, Erika Oshiro DEDICATION To Himeko. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my gratitude to Dr. Alexander Levine, who was always very encouraging and supportive throughout my time at USF. I would also like to thank Dr. Douglas Jesseph, Dr. Roger Ariew, and Dr. William Goodwin for their guidance and insights. I am grateful to Dr. Dmitry Khavinson for sharing his knowledge and motivation during my time as a math student.
    [Show full text]
  • LIST of PUBLICATIONS (1) (With S. Ramanan), an Infinitesimal Study of the Moduli of Hitchin Pairs. Journal of the London Mathema
    LIST OF PUBLICATIONS INDRANIL BISWAS (1) (With S. Ramanan), An infinitesimal study of the moduli of Hitchin pairs. Journal of the London Mathematical Society, Vol. 49, No. 2, (1994), 219{231. (2) A remark on a deformation theory of Green and Lazarsfeld. Journal f¨urdie Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, Vol. 449 (1994), 103{124. (3) (With N. Raghavendra), Determinants of parabolic bundles on Riemann surfaces. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences (Math. Sci.), Vol. 103, No. 1, (1993), 41{71. (4) (With K. Guruprasad), Principal bundles on open surfaces and invariant functions on Lie groups. International Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 4, No. 4, (1993), 535{ 544. (5) Secondary invariants of Higgs bundles. International Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 6, No. 2, (1995), 193{204. (6) On the mapping class group action on the cohomology of the representation space of a surface. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Vol. 124, No. 6, (1996), 1959{1965. (7) (With K. Guruprasad), On some geometric invariants associated to the space of flat connections on an open surface. Canadian Mathematical Bulletin, Vol. 39, No. 2, (1996), 169{177. (8) A remark on Hodge cycles on moduli spaces of rank 2 bundles over curves. Journal f¨urdie Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, Vol. 370 (1996), 143{152. (9) On Harder{Narasimhan filtration of the tangent bundle. Communications in Anal- ysis and Geometry, Vol. 3, No. 1, (1995), 1{10. (10) (With N. Raghavendra), Canonical generators of the cohomology of moduli of parabolic bundles on curves. Mathematische Annalen, Vol. 306, No. 1, (1996), 1{14. (11) (With M.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematics of the Gateway Arch Page 220
    ISSN 0002-9920 Notices of the American Mathematical Society ABCD springer.com Highlights in Springer’s eBook of the American Mathematical Society Collection February 2010 Volume 57, Number 2 An Invitation to Cauchy-Riemann NEW 4TH NEW NEW EDITION and Sub-Riemannian Geometries 2010. XIX, 294 p. 25 illus. 4th ed. 2010. VIII, 274 p. 250 2010. XII, 475 p. 79 illus., 76 in 2010. XII, 376 p. 8 illus. (Copernicus) Dustjacket illus., 6 in color. Hardcover color. (Undergraduate Texts in (Problem Books in Mathematics) page 208 ISBN 978-1-84882-538-3 ISBN 978-3-642-00855-9 Mathematics) Hardcover Hardcover $27.50 $49.95 ISBN 978-1-4419-1620-4 ISBN 978-0-387-87861-4 $69.95 $69.95 Mathematics of the Gateway Arch page 220 Model Theory and Complex Geometry 2ND page 230 JOURNAL JOURNAL EDITION NEW 2nd ed. 1993. Corr. 3rd printing 2010. XVIII, 326 p. 49 illus. ISSN 1139-1138 (print version) ISSN 0019-5588 (print version) St. Paul Meeting 2010. XVI, 528 p. (Springer Series (Universitext) Softcover ISSN 1988-2807 (electronic Journal No. 13226 in Computational Mathematics, ISBN 978-0-387-09638-4 version) page 315 Volume 8) Softcover $59.95 Journal No. 13163 ISBN 978-3-642-05163-0 Volume 57, Number 2, Pages 201–328, February 2010 $79.95 Albuquerque Meeting page 318 For access check with your librarian Easy Ways to Order for the Americas Write: Springer Order Department, PO Box 2485, Secaucus, NJ 07096-2485, USA Call: (toll free) 1-800-SPRINGER Fax: 1-201-348-4505 Email: [email protected] or for outside the Americas Write: Springer Customer Service Center GmbH, Haberstrasse 7, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany Call: +49 (0) 6221-345-4301 Fax : +49 (0) 6221-345-4229 Email: [email protected] Prices are subject to change without notice.
    [Show full text]