Environmental Threats to Arctic Marine Life and Communities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Threats to Arctic Marine Life and Communities Polar Exposure: Environmental Threats to Arctic Marine Life and Communities Various forms of environmental degradation of the Arctic— some visible to local inhabitants, most ignored by the international community—threaten the people and wildlife of the Arctic region. These threats are too subtle and dispersed for the public to notice ... except in retrospect. Swiss␣ Coalition␣ for␣ the␣ Protection␣ of␣ Whales␣ • Global␣ Survival␣ Network Katherine A. Katherine A. Hanly␣ Greenland, 1997 Various forms of environmental environment and marine mammals— degradation of the Arctic—some visible contamination originating in the more to local inhabitants, most ignored by the southern and industrialized world. By international community—threaten the consuming meat and blubber from marine people and wildlife of the Arctic region. mammals, a significant portion of the These threats are too subtle and dispersed Arctic people are unwittingly exposing for the public to notice ... except in themselves to second-hand pollution retrospect. spread from sources far away. Two marine mammal species—the Arctic people have coexisted with beluga whale and the narwhal—are and consumed whales for centuries. indicators of the myriad threats facing life Factors beyond their region and beyond in the Arctic marine environment today1. their control threaten to destroy that These two cousin cetacean species— balance. The South Greenland beluga toothed whales belonging to the smaller whale is extinct2 and others may follow. cetacean species—are wanderers of the The St. Lawrence Estuary population of Arctic marine environment. Each species beluga whales is suffering from number several separate and distinct environmental degradation. stocks around Greenland, Russia, Canada This changing relationship between and the United States. Within these humans and whales, and the damaging areas, the whales have traditionally health effects on both, should not be coexisted with, and have been sustainably analyzed in the context of who should, or Contents consumed by native peoples. who should not, exploit the Arctic’s Narwhals ...........................1 The beluga and narwhal are now natural resources. Inuits have been Belugas .............................5 under pressure from hunting, environ- affected socially, culturally, and Threats............................11 mental degradation, and atmospheric economically after Norway, Iceland, Contamination of the change. Moreover, both species are part of Canada and Russia depleted the whale Arctic Environment .........15 international trade—narwhals for their stocks on which they subsisted. The Health Policy and ivory tusks, and belugas for the entertain- subsequent and necessary protection of Risk Management ............17 ment industry. These factors, along with the great whales has perpetuated a steady Recomendations ..............18 aboriginal hunting in most ranges of the decline in small cetacean stocks, as native References .......................19 species, may endanger the very existence hunters have been forced to rely primarily of these whales. on small cetaceans such as beluga and front cover: Arctic communities are also narwhal. Uummannaq, Greenland threatened. Health problems have arisen The destruction of the Arctic is an back cover: among indigenous peoples as a result of international crisis that demands Upernavik, Greenland increased contamination of the marine international action. 22 · Polar Exposure: Arctic Environmental Threats Narwhals Male—and some female—narwhals 22 grow a uniquely distinguishing tusk of 23 ivory protruding from their upper jaw. This tusk can grow up to two meters long, 21 while the full body length of an adult narwhal can reach 4.5 meters. The 24 narwhal’s tusk is used for combative interaction with other males and to stir up the ocean bottom for prey. A male 20 narwhal may weigh up to 1,350 kilos and 11 25 a female 900 kilos. The animals feed on 19 1 2 12 Arctic cod fish, squid, and crustaceans. 18 10 3 16 4 26 15 13 5 Range and Population 6 27 17 14 7 Of beluga and narwhal, the narwhal 9 28 has the most limited geographic range of 8 29 the two species. Three distinct popula- 30 tions of narwhal have been provisionally recognized: Baffin Bay and Davis Strait (called the Baffin Bay stock), Northern Hudson Bay, and East Greenland. In 1991, the International Whaling In 1991 scientists estimated that the The Arctic Commission’s (IWC) Scientific narwhal stock of Northern Hudson Bay Committee expressed concern about totaled 1,300 animals, a conservatively 1. Thule narwhal catch levels in Greenland and low number since submerged animals were 2. Melville Bay Canada. In 1992 the IWC made it clear not counted3. Scientists further 3. Upernavik that neither country had reduced this maintained that the stock is a discreet one 4. Maarmorilik mine concern3. In fact, during its meeting in and that it should be managed 5. Nunavik 1992, the Joint Commission on the accordingly. A maximum of 40 narwhals 6. Uummannaq Conservation of the Beluga and Narwhal have been hunted annually from this 7. Ilulissat (JCCBN), a Greenland-Canada bilateral stock between 1974 to 1987, and in more 8. Nuuk body comprised of Arctic researchers and recent years, 14 narwhals were killed 9. Davis Strait community members, acknowledged that between 1993 and 19966. 10. Baffin Bay harvests of narwhal from the Baffin Bay DNA sampling has concluded that 11. Arctic Bay stock was not sustainable and that the East Greenland population of 12. Baffin Island management action should be taken4. narwhals is also discreet, and that in its 13. Cumberland Sound The Baffin Bay narwhal population migration, the stock wanders north to 14. Iqaluit migrates between the Canadian High Svalbard and the Barents Sea region of 15. Lake Harbour Arctic and the West-North/West Coast of the Russian Arctic3. Very little is known 16. Hudson Strait Greenland. Inuit communities on each about the status and distribution of this 17. Ungava Bay coast of the Baffin Bay hunt these stock; there is no population estimate of 18. Sanikiluaq narwhals. It is difficult to say how many these animals. It is known, however, that 19. Hudson Bay animals are taken in the combined hunt. the hunt for narwhals on the east coast of 20. Churchill River There are inadequate or nonexistent Greenland has ranged between 40 and 60 21. Beaufort Sea reporting schemes in both Canada and animals annually, while in 1989 and 1990 22. Chukchi Sea Greenland, though most apparent in the the catch was an estimated 70-80 23. East Siberian Sea West Greenland area where the reporting animals7. It is presumed that the struck 24. Laptev Sea system broke down completely in the and loss rate of animals, especially on 25. Kara Sea 1980s5. The Joint Commission’s Scientific open water, is high. 26. Novaya Zemlya Working Group in 1995 accepted that all As mentioned, narwhal groups are 27. Svalbard reported catches of narwhal within the found in the Barents, White, Kara, 28. Barents Sea Baffin Bay stock are under-reported. Laptev, East Siberia and the Chukchi Seas 29. Murmansk Furthermore the Commission could not with no known or reliable data on harvest 30. Kola Peninsula assign population status to narwhal due to of the species. Reports of narwhals in the uncertainties in stock identity, Eurasian Arctic Ocean have registered the abundance, rate of increase and animals as far as 85˚ North and straying to mortality2. the Bering Sea8, 64. Records and sighting of Polar Exposure: Arctic Environmental Threats · 1 exploitation of the stock, the current lack of a credible quota system in Greenland is disconcerting, especially when one takes Randall R. Reeves␣ Randall R. into account deficient and inadequate reporting of actual catches. Since 1990 no hunting statistics have been available from Greenland’s Avanersuaq District north of Upernavik. Danish scientists report that in Greenland’s Uummannaq District, south of Upernavik, 400-500 narwhals were killed in 1989 but only 275 animals were actually reported. To illustrate the impossibility of relying on dependable trends in, or data from, the Greenland hunt, a recorded 1,019 narwhals were killed in Uummannaq in 1990, while the assumed total from only two months of that year was 1,046 Narwhal narwhal from Alaskan waters are animals12. Greenlanders are able to catch extremely rare and the presence of the beluga and narwhal approximately seven species here is considered exceptional9. months out of the year. The JCCMNB There are no data to suggest that narwhals estimated that the average total annual are being hunted off Alaska. kill between Canada and Greenland is 820 for the years 1983-1993, not counting Hunting 1991, when there were no numbers from Narwhal are hunted for meat, Greenland at all. This does not include blubber, skin and ivory. All of these parts numbers from Avernersuaq where there are bartered and commercially traded are no records kept, but where the locally. Narwhal ivory is sold to tourists in JCCMNB estimated the number of kills Canada and Greenland; some is exported to be around 150-200 annually2. None of primarily to Europe and Asia. Most these numbers assume that there is records of narwhal hunting in Greenland mortality as a result of struck but lost are incomplete or nonexistent. Some data animals. are derived from the amount of ivory tusks In 1992, the IWC Scientific registered as exports, but these do not Committee affirmed that apparent reflect females hunted which do not carry inconsistencies in correlation between tusks10. narwhal catches and documented mattak Methods used to hunt narwhals have sales in villages of northwestern changed considerably. The majority of Greenland meant that the true average both Greenland and Canadian hunters annual catch was, or is, probably twice as have replaced their highly effective and large. The IWC Scientific Committee traditional kayaks and hand-held expressed serious concern in 1992 that harpoons, with using motorboats and the status of the narwhal had been rifles. This modern and preferred method declining3. results in a higher number of whales Canada also concedes that much of landed, but is also more wasteful.
Recommended publications
  • Marine Mammals of Hudson Strait the Following Marine Mammals Are Common to Hudson Strait, However, Other Species May Also Be Seen
    Marine Mammals of Hudson Strait The following marine mammals are common to Hudson Strait, however, other species may also be seen. It’s possible for marine mammals to venture outside of their common habitats and may be seen elsewhere. Bowhead Whale Length: 13-19 m Appearance: Stocky, with large head. Blue-black body with white markings on the chin, belly and just forward of the tail. No dorsal fin or ridge. Two blow holes, no teeth, has baleen. Behaviour: Blow is V-shaped and bushy, reaching 6 m in height. Often alone but sometimes in groups of 2-10. Habitat: Leads and cracks in pack ice during winter and in open water during summer. Status: Special concern Beluga Whale Length: 4-5 m Appearance: Adults are almost entirely white with a tough dorsal ridge and no dorsal fin. Young are grey. Behaviour: Blow is low and hardly visible. Not much of the body is visible out of the water. Found in small groups, but sometimes hundreds to thousands during annual migrations. Habitat: Found in open water year-round. Prefer shallow coastal water during summer and water near pack ice in winter. Killer Whale Status: Endangered Length: 8-9 m Appearance: Black body with white throat, belly and underside and white spot behind eye. Triangular dorsal fin in the middle of the back. Male dorsal fin can be up to 2 m in high. Behaviour: Blow is tall and column shaped; approximately 4 m in height. Narwhal Typically form groups of 2-25. Length: 4-5 m Habitat: Coastal water and open seas, often in water less than 200 m depth.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustained Disruption of Narwhal Habitat Use and Behavior in The
    Sustained disruption of narwhal habitat use and behavior in the presence of Arctic killer whales Greg A. Breeda,1, Cory J. D. Matthewsb, Marianne Marcouxb, Jeff W. Higdonc, Bernard LeBlancd, Stephen D. Petersene, Jack Orrb, Natalie R. Reinhartf, and Steven H. Fergusonb aInstitute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, AK 99775; bArctic Aquatic Research Division, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3T 2N6; cHigdon Wildlife Consulting, Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3G 3C9; dFisheries Management, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Quebec, QC, Canada G1K 7Y7; eAssiniboine Park Zoo, Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3R 0B8; and fDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3T 2N2 Edited by James A. Estes, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, and approved January 10, 2017 (received for review July 17, 2016) Although predators influence behavior of prey, analyses of elec- Electronic tracking tags are also frequently used to track verte- tronic tracking data in marine environments rarely consider how brates in marine systems. Although there is evidence that marine predators affect the behavior of tracked animals. We collected animals adjust their behavior under predation threat (21, 22, 12), an unprecedented dataset by synchronously tracking predator few data or analyses exist showing how predators affect the (killer whales, N = 1; representing a family group) and prey movement of tracked marine animals. These data are lacking (narwhal, N = 7) via satellite telemetry in Admiralty Inlet, a because marine environments are more difficult to observe and large fjord in the Eastern Canadian Arctic. Analyzing the move- tracked animals often move over scales much larger than their ment data with a switching-state space model and a series of terrestrial counterparts, making it difficult to measure predator mixed effects models, we show that the presence of killer whales density in situations where tracking tags are deployed on prey.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Could Impact Narwhal Consumption by Killer Whales
    Nova Southeastern University NSUWorks Student Publications, Projects, and Scientific Communication News Performances 2020 Climate Change Could Impact Narwhal Consumption by Killer Whales Mykenzee L. Munaco Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/sci-com-news Part of the Biology Commons, Earth Sciences Commons, Environmental Sciences Commons, Marine Biology Commons, Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons, and the Science and Mathematics Education Commons Recommended Citation Munaco, Mykenzee L., "Climate Change Could Impact Narwhal Consumption by Killer Whales" (2020). Scientific Communication News. 27. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/sci-com-news/27 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Publications, Projects, and Performances at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scientific Communication News yb an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Climate Change Could Impact Narwhal Consumption by Killer Whales Climate change related differences in killer whale distributions could result in increased predation of narwhals in the northern Baffin Island region. SOURCE: Wiley: Global Change Biology By Mykenzee Munaco 05 November 2020 Climate change is creating warmer ocean temperatures and melting sea ice at polar latitudes. These environmental changes can allow species to expand their normal range to higher latitudes. Killer whales have recently been observed at higher latitudes than they have historically resided in. As a result, there is concern that the narwhal population could experience higher rates of killer whale predation, potentially resulting in the decline of important narwhal populations. Transient killer whales eat marine mammals and are known to visit the Canadian Arctic in summer months.
    [Show full text]
  • Chlorinated Organic Contaminants in Blubber Biopsies from Northwestern Atlantic Balaenopterid Whales Summering in the Gulf of St Lawrence
    Marine Environmental Research, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 201-223, 1997 0 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd All rights reserved. Printed in Great Britain PII: SOl41-1136(97)00004-4 0141-1136/97 $17.00+0.00 Chlorinated Organic Contaminants in Blubber Biopsies from Northwestern Atlantic Balaenopterid Whales Summering in the Gulf of St Lawrence J. M. Gauthier,a* C. D. Metcalfe” & R. Sear@ “Environmental and Resources Studies, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada K9J 7B8 bMingan Island Cetacean Study (MICS), 285 Green, St. Lambert, Quebec, Canada J4P IT3 (Received 16 May 1996; revised version received 16 December 1996; accepted 29 December 1996. Published June 1997) ABSTRACT Concentrations and patterns of chlorinated biphenyls (CBS) and other persistent organochlorine compounds (OCs) were determined from small blubber biopsy samples collected from northwestern Atlantic minke (Balaenoptera acuros- trata) , fin (Balaenoptera physalus), blue (Balaenoptera musculus) , and humpback (Megaptera novaeangliae) whales summering in the Gurf of St. Lawrence, Quebec. Concentrations of CPCB (sum of 19 congeners) in biopsy samples ranged from 0.2-10 pg g-’ lipid, and congeners 52, 101, 118, 153, 138 and 180 accounted for 79% of CPCB. Mean concentration of the sum of non- ortho CB congeners in selected biopsy samples was 2 ng g-t lipid, and relative concentrations of these analytes were: 77 > 126 > 81> 169. Concentrations of XDDT ranged from 0.613 pg g-t lipid, and the average proportion of DDE to CDDT was 72%. All other organochlorine analytes were present at concentra- tions below 2 pg g-t lipid. On average, cis-nonachlor, trans-nonachlor and oxy- chlordane accounted for 27, 26 and 23%, respectively, of the chlordane-related analytes, and cl-hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) comprised 67% of XHCH.
    [Show full text]
  • Whale Watching New South Wales Australia
    Whale Watching New South Wales Australia Including • About Whales • Humpback Whales • Whale Migration • Southern Right Whales • Whale Life Cycle • Blue Whales • Whales in Sydney Harbour • Minke Whales • Aboriginal People & Whales • Dolphins • Typical Whale Behaviour • Orcas • Whale Species • Other Whale Species • Whales in Australia • Other Marine Species About Whales The whale species you are most likely to see along the New South Wales Coastline are • Humpback Whale • Southern Right Whale Throughout June and July Humpback Whales head north for breading before return south with their calves from September to November. Other whale species you may see include: • Minke Whale • Blue Whale • Sei Whale • Fin Whale • False Killer Whale • Orca or Killer Whale • Sperm Whale • Pygmy Right Whale • Pygmy Sperm Whale • Bryde’s Whale Oceans cover about 70% of the Earth’s surface and this vast environment is home to some of the Earth’s most fascinating creatures: whales. Whales are complex, often highly social and intelligent creatures. They are mammals like us. They breath air, have hair on their bodies (though only very little), give birth to live young and suckle their calves through mammary glands. But unlike us, whales are perfectly adapted to the marine environment with strong, muscular and streamlined bodies insulated by thick layers of blubber to keep them warm. Whales are gentle animals that have graced the planet for over 50 million years and are present in all oceans of the world. They capture our imagination like few other animals. The largest species of whales were hunted almost to extinction in the last few hundred years and have survived only thanks to conservation and protection efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Trends in Acoustic Detection of Marine Mammals In
    ARCTIC VOL. 70, NO. 1 (MARCH 2017) P. 59 – 76 https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic4632 Seasonal Trends in Acoustic Detection of Marine Mammals in Baffin Bay and Melville Bay, Northwest Greenland Héloïse Frouin-Mouy,1,2 Katie Kowarski,1 Bruce Martin3 and Koen Bröker4 (Received 20 October 2015; accepted in revised form 8 August 2016) ABSTRACT. The expansion of hydrocarbon exploration in northwest Greenland has made it increasingly important to understand the occurrence of marine mammals in the region. We describe the seasonal occurrence of marine mammals and the spatial distribution of their calls in Baffin Bay and Melville Bay. Four Autonomous Multichannel Acoustic Recorders (AMARs) were deployed during summer 2012 (late July to early October), five recorders during September 2013, and two recorders from late September 2013 to early September 2014. The call presence of several species was analyzed using automatic call detection and manual verification analysis methods. A novel approach to discern narwhal Monodon( monoceros) clicks from beluga (Delphinapterus leucas) clicks was implemented during the verification process. Narwhal calls were detected in spring and fall, showing a south-to-north migration pattern in spring and a north-to-south migration pattern in fall. Few beluga whales were detected during fall 2013 and spring 2014. Bearded seal (Erignathus barbatus) calls were detected mainly during spring (mating period). A small number of bowhead whale calls (Balaena mysticetus) were detected during fall 2013 and spring and summer 2014. For the first time at this latitude in Baffin Bay, long-finned pilot whalesGlobicephala ( melas) and sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) were detected during summer and fall.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 80, No. 162/Friday, August 21, 2015/Notices
    50990 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 162 / Friday, August 21, 2015 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE An authorization for incidental scan sonar, geophysical resistivity takings shall be granted if NMFS finds meters, and magnetometer to National Oceanic and Atmospheric that the taking will have a negligible characterize the bottom surface and Administration impact on the species or stock(s), will subsurface. The planned shallow RIN 0648–XE018 not have an unmitigable adverse impact geotechnical investigations include on the availability of the species or vibracoring, sediment grab sampling, Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to stock(s) for subsistence uses (where and piezo-cone penetration testing Specified Activities; Taking Marine relevant), and if the permissible (PCPT) to directly evaluate seabed Mammals Incidental to Geophysical methods of taking and requirements features and soil conditions. and Geotechnical Survey in Cook Inlet, pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring Geotechnical borings are planned at Alaska and reporting of such takings are set potential shoreline crossings and in the forth. NMFS has defined ‘‘negligible terminal boring subarea within the AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103 as ‘‘an Marine Terminal survey area, and will Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and impact resulting from the specified be used to collect information on the Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), activity that cannot be reasonably mechanical properties of in-situ soils to Commerce. expected to, and is not reasonably likely support feasibility studies for ACTION: Notice; issuance of an incidental to, adversely affect the species or stock construction crossing techniques and harassment authorization. through effects on annual rates of decisions on siting and design of pilings, dolphins, and other marine SUMMARY: NMFS is issuing an recruitment or survival.’’ structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Wildlife Sketches ~;:Z •
    Arctic Wildlife Sketches ~;:z • I; . ·. ·. ·._:.. _:.:_-·:-'··"' L 0 M co co M M 0 0 0 L!) L!) ,....... M .. M ... Alaska Resources Library & Information Services / of the NorthwestTerritories a ---·-- ------ ---- ------- --------- ----- --·--· ·-- - ---- ~~~~-~---- ... .' .. J Bowhead BalaenG mysricerus Bowheads were one of the first arcttc resources to be exploited 'by Europeam. and the most intensely hunted of all arctic whales. This exploitation had 11 profound effect on :he history of the r' Northwest Territories, and particularly on the Inuit. Their long association with whalers parallels that of the fur trade r and the Dene. Whaling began in the 17th century in the eastern arctic, but did not commcrKc on a regular basis until 1719. It was con­ ducted by American and European r whalers in the waters of Davis Strait, II Baffin Bay and Hudson Bay. After tluec li,' centuries of use, the fishery finally died out due to severely depleted stocks and the decreased demand for whale pro­ r ducts. In the western arctic, bowhead L whaling was conducted by Americans, beginning at the middle of the last cen­ tury and concluding about 1915. the r same time as in the east. Due to their slow speed; bowheads were easy targets, even when ships were powered by sail. Prized for their great yield of blubber and whalebone, they ,,~"''"' and a sister species were given the name ! "right whale" becau;;e they were the l ' right whales "to hunt. The label s:ill lingers today, as the bowhead is also known as the Greenland right whale. The bowhead may reach 20 m in length and 50,000 kg i~ weight.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Mammal Taxonomy
    Marine Mammal Taxonomy Kingdom: Animalia (Animals) Phylum: Chordata (Animals with notochords) Subphylum: Vertebrata (Vertebrates) Class: Mammalia (Mammals) Order: Cetacea (Cetaceans) Suborder: Mysticeti (Baleen Whales) Family: Balaenidae (Right Whales) Balaena mysticetus Bowhead whale Eubalaena australis Southern right whale Eubalaena glacialis North Atlantic right whale Eubalaena japonica North Pacific right whale Family: Neobalaenidae (Pygmy Right Whale) Caperea marginata Pygmy right whale Family: Eschrichtiidae (Grey Whale) Eschrichtius robustus Grey whale Family: Balaenopteridae (Rorquals) Balaenoptera acutorostrata Minke whale Balaenoptera bonaerensis Arctic Minke whale Balaenoptera borealis Sei whale Balaenoptera edeni Byrde’s whale Balaenoptera musculus Blue whale Balaenoptera physalus Fin whale Megaptera novaeangliae Humpback whale Order: Cetacea (Cetaceans) Suborder: Odontoceti (Toothed Whales) Family: Physeteridae (Sperm Whale) Physeter macrocephalus Sperm whale Family: Kogiidae (Pygmy and Dwarf Sperm Whales) Kogia breviceps Pygmy sperm whale Kogia sima Dwarf sperm whale DOLPHIN R ESEARCH C ENTER , 58901 Overseas Hwy, Grassy Key, FL 33050 (305) 289 -1121 www.dolphins.org Family: Platanistidae (South Asian River Dolphin) Platanista gangetica gangetica South Asian river dolphin (also known as Ganges and Indus river dolphins) Family: Iniidae (Amazon River Dolphin) Inia geoffrensis Amazon river dolphin (boto) Family: Lipotidae (Chinese River Dolphin) Lipotes vexillifer Chinese river dolphin (baiji) Family: Pontoporiidae (Franciscana)
    [Show full text]
  • Porpoise Protectors
    Porpoise Protectors DISCOVERY WELCOME TO PORPOISE PROTECTORS! Welcome to WDC’s Porpoise Protectors Award for children 8 years old and under. You will learn about dolphins and porpoises and what you can do to help them. Complete all three sections: Discovery, Action and Fundraising to receive your special Award. Harbour porpoise Did you Know? There are 90 different types of whales, dolphins and porpoises. Only 7 of these are porpoises; the porpoise family look very similar to dolphins and are hard to tell apart. Porpoises are just a bit smaller, have blunt shaped noses, small dorsal fins and flat-shaped teeth. Examples are Harbour porpoise, Dall’s porpoise and Spectacled porpoise. Porpoise Protectors: DISCOVERY I am a dolphin I live in the sea With my brothers and sisters And our whole family Porpoise Protectors: DISCOVERY I swim up to breathe And down to feed I catch fish and crabs Amongst the seaweed Porpoise Protectors: DISCOVERY When we are exploring the ocean We sometimes see a huge whale Diving down to the deep With a slap of his tail Porpoise Protectors: DISCOVERY While he is swimming The whale sings a song He swims faster than me And he is very, very long! Porpoise Protectors: DISCOVERY Have you ever wondered How we dolphins sleep? We shut one eye at a time So we can still peep! Porpoise Protectors: DISCOVERY But sometimes it is scary As there are many threats We can get hurt by boats, litter and fishing nets. Porpoise Protectors: DISCOVERY My home is full of plastic That’s dangerous for me to eat I don’t want a plastic bag I want a tasty jellyfish treat! Porpoise Protectors: DISCOVERY The loud boats scare me When my friends and I play Sometimes they chase us And we cannot get away Porpoise Protectors: DISCOVERY It is hard to find food When boats make too much noise We need help from some special girls and boys! Porpoise Protectors: DISCOVERY It is my wonderful home So please look after the sea And all the creatures who live there Like my family and me.
    [Show full text]
  • Dall's Porpoise
    Dall’s Porpoise Phocoenoides dalli, commonly known as the Dall’s porpoise, is most easily recognized by its unique black and white markings similar to those of a killer whale/orca. It was named by the American naturalist William Healey Dall who was the first to collect a specimen. The Dall’s porpoise is capable of swimming in excess of 30 knots and is often seen riding along side the bows of boats. General description: The Dall’s porpoise is black with white markings. Most commonly the animal will be mostly black with large white sections on the sides, belly, on the edges of the flukes, and around the dorsal fin, though there are exceptions to this pattern. The Dall’s porpoise is born at an approximate size of 3ft. The average size of an adult is 6.4 ft and weighs approximately 300 lbs. The body is stocky and more powerful than other members of phocoenidae (porpoises). The head is small and lacks a distinct beak. The flippers are small, pointed, and located near the head. The dorsal fin is triangular in shape with a hooked tip. The mouth of the Dall’s porpoise is small and has a slight underbite. Food habits: Dall’s porpoises eat a wide variety of prey species. In some areas they eat squid, but in other areas they may feed on small schooling fishes such as capelin, lantern fish (Myctophids), and herring. They generally forage at night. Life history: Female Dall’s porpoises reach sexual maturity at between 3 and 6 years of age and males around 5 to 8 years, though there is little known about their mating habits.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Small Cetaceans. Distribution, Behaviour, Migration and Threats
    Review of Small Cetaceans Distribution, Behaviour, Migration and Threats by Boris M. Culik Illustrations by Maurizio Wurtz, Artescienza Marine Mammal Action Plan / Regional Seas Reports and Studies no. 177 Published by United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the Secretariat of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS). Review of Small Cetaceans. Distribution, Behaviour, Migration and Threats. 2004. Compiled for CMS by Boris M. Culik. Illustrations by Maurizio Wurtz, Artescienza. UNEP / CMS Secretariat, Bonn, Germany. 343 pages. Marine Mammal Action Plan / Regional Seas Reports and Studies no. 177 Produced by CMS Secretariat, Bonn, Germany in collaboration with UNEP Coordination team Marco Barbieri, Veronika Lenarz, Laura Meszaros, Hanneke Van Lavieren Editing Rüdiger Strempel Design Karina Waedt The author Boris M. Culik is associate Professor The drawings stem from Prof. Maurizio of Marine Zoology at the Leibnitz Institute of Wurtz, Dept. of Biology at Genova Univer- Marine Sciences at Kiel University (IFM-GEOMAR) sity and illustrator/artist at Artescienza. and works free-lance as a marine biologist. Contact address: Contact address: Prof. Dr. Boris Culik Prof. Maurizio Wurtz F3: Forschung / Fakten / Fantasie Dept. of Biology, Genova University Am Reff 1 Viale Benedetto XV, 5 24226 Heikendorf, Germany 16132 Genova, Italy Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] www.fh3.de www.artescienza.org © 2004 United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) / Convention on Migratory Species (CMS). This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made.
    [Show full text]