Mathematics 2, Number Theory______3

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mathematics 2, Number Theory______3 MMaatthhemeamtics a2 tics Number Theory Prepared by Paul Cheqe African Virtual university Université Virtuelle Africaine Universidade Virtual Africana African Virtual University NOTICE This document is published under the conditions of the Creative Commons http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons Attribution http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ License (abbreviated “cc-by”), Version 2.5. African Virtual University Table of ConTenTs I. Mathematics 2, Number Theory _______________________________ 3 II. Prerequisite Course or Knowledge _____________________________ 3 III. Time ____________________________________________________ 3 IV. Materials _________________________________________________ 3 V. Module Rationale __________________________________________ 3 VI. Overview _________________________________________________ 3 6.1 Outline _____________________________________________ 4 6.2 Graphic Organizer _____________________________________ 4 VII. General Objective(s) ________________________________________ 5 VIII. Specific Learning Objectives __________________________________ 5 IX. Pre-Assessment ___________________________________________ 7 9.1 Rationale : This pretest aims to: __________________________ 7 9.2 Answer Key __________________________________________ 9 9.3 Pedagogical Comment For The Learners ___________________ 9 X. Key Concepts (Glossary) ____________________________________ 10 XI. Compulsory Readings ______________________________________ 11 XII. Compulsory Ressources ____________________________________ 12 XIII. Useful Links _____________________________________________ 13 XIV. Learning Activities _________________________________________ 16 XV. Synthesis Of The Module ___________________________________ 53 XIV. Summative Evaluation ______________________________________ 54 XVII. References ______________________________________________ 55 XVIII. Student Records _________________________________________ 56 XIX. Main Author of the Module _________________________________ 57 XX. File Structure _____________________________________________ 58 African Virtual University I. Mathematics 2, number Theory By Paul Cheqe, Amoud University II. Prerequisite Course or Knowledge Basic Mathematics III. Time 120 hours IV. Materials Study book online or on CD; ICT activity files online or on CD, References online, Pre-assessment materials,Necessary freely distributed software V. Module Rationale Number theory is an essential module that assists teachers in understanding and interpreting the properties of numbers. It forms a background to the numerous proofs and solutions of various mathematical equations. It forms the backbone of theory crucial for the teaching of secondary school mathematics and is an important building block in the study of higher-level mathematics. VI. Overview The number theory module consists of two units. It pre-supposes the teacher trainee is conversant with Basic mathematics. The first unit deals with properties of integers and linear diophantine equations. It progresses from properties of in- tegers through divisibility with remainder, prime numbers and their distribution, Euclid’s proof of infinitely many primes and Euclid’s algorithm and its application in solving linear diophantine equations. The unit is concluded with Pythagorean triplets and Fermat’s last theorem for the vitas powers and the proof of Wiles African Virtual University The second unit assumes unit one as a prerequisite for the trainees. It introduces the field of integers( mod p), squares and quadratic residues, Alar’s criterion, Legendre symbol, Gauss lemma and quadratic reciprocity law, Euclid’s algorithm and unique factorisation of Gaussian integers, arithmetic of quadratic fields and application of diophantine equations, and is concluded with Fermat’s last theorem for cubes, Pell’s equation and units in real quadratic fields. 6.1 Outline Unit 1: Properties of integers and linear Diophantine equations Level 1. Priority B. Basic Mathematics 2 is prerequisite. Properties of integers. Divisibility with remainder. Prime numbers and their distribution. Euclid’s proof of infinitely many primes. Euclid’s algorithm. Conse- quences, residue classes, the integers (mod n). The case of prime n. Primitive roots and indices. Use of Euclid’s algorithm in solving linear Diophantine equations. Pythagorean triplets and Fermat’s last theorem for the vitas powers. Unit 2: Theory of congruences and quadratic fields Level 2. Priority B. Number Theory 1 is prerequisite. The field of integers (mod p). Squares and quadratic residues. Alar’s criterion. Legendre symbol. Gauss lemma and quadratic reciprocity law. Evaluation of quadratic character by the reciprocity law. Quadratic fields. Norm and trace. Euclid’s algorithm and unique factorisation of Gaussian integers. Arithmetic of quadratic fields and application of Diophantine equations. Fermat’is last theorem for cubes. Pell’s equation and units in real quadratic fields. African Virtual University 6.2 Graphic Organizer African Virtual University VII. General objective(s) The trainee is equipped with knowledge of the properties of numbers and the relationships among numbers necessary to effectively teaching mathematics in secondary schools. VIII. Specific learning objectives (Instructional objectives) Unit 1: By the end of this unit, the learners should be able to: - Have a knowledge and understanding of the basic concepts related to and the properties of numbers - Have knowledge and understanding of the relationships and recurring patterns among numbers. - Illustrate the properties of Integers and divisibility with remainders - Compute the greatest common divisor and least common multiple by factorisation - Compute the greatest common divisor using Euclidean algorithm - Illustrate properties of prime numbers and their distribution - Illustrate Euclid’s proof of infinitely many primes - Evaluate integers (mod n), the case of prime n, primitive roots and indi- ces - Use and apply Euclid’s algorithm in solving linear Diophantine equations of the nature - Illustrate Pythagorean triplets and Fermat’s last theorem - Analise pythagorean triplets and Fermat’s last theorem. Unit 2: By the end of this unit, the learners should be able to: - Illustrate the field of integers mod p, squares and quadratic residues - Outline Euler’s criterion - Use Legendre symbol, Gauss Lemma and quadratic reciprocity law - Evaluate quadratic character by the quadratic reciprocity law - Define the Norm - Apply Eucliud’s algorithm in the factorisation of Gaussian integers - Explore arithmetic of quadratic fieldsand application of Diophantine equations - Investigate Pell’s equation and units in real quadratic fields. African Virtual University IX. Pre-assessment Title of Pre-assessment : Review of Basic Mathematics 9.1 Rationale: Basic mathematics is the pre-requisite for Number theory QUESTIONS 1. Find the value of x in 2(2x + 2) = 64 a) 3 b) 5 c) 1 d) 2 2. Solve the simultaneous 3x + 2y = 22 x + y = 9 a) 7, 2 b) 1, 8 c) 4, 5 d) 6, 2 3. Solve the quadratic x2 – 3x – 10 = 0 a) -5, 2 b) 5, -2 c) -5, -2 d) 5, 2 4. Find the inverse of the function g(x) = 2x – 3 a) g-1(x) = b) g-1(x) = c) g-1(x) = d) g-1(x) = 5. Find the greatest common divisor(gcd) of 986 and 289 a) 17 b) 58 c) 9 d) 3 6. Solve the equation a) -2 b) 4 c) 2 d) 3 7. Work out (2 – í)(4 + 3 í) a) 8 + í b) 13 c) 11 + 2í d) 10í - 3 í2 African Virtual University 8. Find ( 4i + 2) a) 6 b) 26 c) 84 d) 97 8 9. Evaluate C2 a) 20 b) 28 c) 16 d) 4 10. The third term of a geometric sequence is equal to 1 and the 5th term is 16. Find the seventh term. a) 4 b) 128 c) 256 d) 4096 11. If s= ut + ½ at², evaluate s when u = –3, a = 10 and t = 5 ma) 30 b) 60 c) 110 d) 140 12. Given the equation y = x2 + 5x – 14, find the turning point. a) -2, 7 b) -7, 2 c) -2½, 14 1/8 d) -2½, -20 1/4 13. When factorised 36j – 48 becomes: a) 12(3j – 4) b) 12(24j – 36) c) 9(4j – 7) d) 8(4j – 6) 14. The solution to - 11 = - 2 is a) 56 b) 64 c) 72 d) 96 15. Solving the equation 6(7+y)-2(5y-1)=12(3y+5)-16(y-5) yields a) -2 b) -4 c) -3 d) 2 16. A 20 cm long straw is the longest that can fit into a cylindrical can with radius of 6 cm. The height of the can in centimetres is closest to: a) 8 b) 15 c) 16 d) 9 17. Given the equation y = - x² + 2x + 8, find the x-intercepts. a) - 2, 4 b) 2, - 4 c) 2, 4 d) -2, - 4 18. African Virtual University 19. For the sequence 7, 16, 25, 34, …. ……… the 56th term is a) 495 b) 640 c) 55 d) 502 20. Each interior angle of a regular polygon is 1400 .How many sides does it have a) 5 b) 9 c) 11 d) 7 9.2 Answer Key 1. d 11. c 2. c 12. d 3. b 13. a 4. a 14. c 5. a 15. b 6. a 16. c 7. c 17. a 8. d 18. b 9. b 19. d 10. c 20. b 9.3 Pedagogical Comment For the Learners A learner’s entering behaviour determines whether he / she will have grasp of the Number theory module. Number theory module builds on basic mathematics. Thus, the pre-assessment is a gauge of how well you are conversant with basic mathematics. It indicates your level of preparedness. Learners should revise basic mathematics if they have problems in scoring the pre-assessment. It is highly recommended that learners revise basic mathematics before and after the pre-testing so as to improve on their perfomance in this module. Number theory is a branch of abstract mathematics that utilises many mathematical notations. Before starting the module, revise all the mathematical notations encountered from secondary schools and in basic mathematics. African Virtual University 0 X. Key Concepts (Glossary) 1. ALGORITHM: An algorithm is a procedure for solving a problem in a finite number of steps 2. INTEGER: Integers mean any element of the set { …-3, -2, -1, 0, 1,2,3,…} 3. PRIME NUMBERS: A prime number is a number that has only two divisors: 1 and itself. 4. EVEN NUMBERS: Even numbers are numbers that can be divided by 2 without remainders. 5. ODD NUMBERS: Odd numbers are numbers that have remainders when divided by 2 6. EUCLIDEAN ALGORITHM: Is a systematic procedureí for finding the greatest common divisor of two integers.
Recommended publications
  • Number Theoretic Symbols in K-Theory and Motivic Homotopy Theory
    Number Theoretic Symbols in K-theory and Motivic Homotopy Theory Håkon Kolderup Master’s Thesis, Spring 2016 Abstract We start out by reviewing the theory of symbols over number fields, emphasizing how this notion relates to classical reciprocity lawsp and algebraic pK-theory. Then we compute the second algebraic K-group of the fields pQ( −1) and Q( −3) based on Tate’s technique for K2(Q), and relate the result for Q( −1) to the law of biquadratic reciprocity. We then move into the realm of motivic homotopy theory, aiming to explain how symbols in number theory and relations in K-theory and Witt theory can be described as certain operations in stable motivic homotopy theory. We discuss Hu and Kriz’ proof of the fact that the Steinberg relation holds in the ring π∗α1 of stable motivic homotopy groups of the sphere spectrum 1. Based on this result, Morel identified the ring π∗α1 as MW the Milnor-Witt K-theory K∗ (F ) of the ground field F . Our last aim is to compute this ring in a few basic examples. i Contents Introduction iii 1 Results from Algebraic Number Theory 1 1.1 Reciprocity laws . 1 1.2 Preliminary results on quadratic fields . 4 1.3 The Gaussian integers . 6 1.3.1 Local structure . 8 1.4 The Eisenstein integers . 9 1.5 Class field theory . 11 1.5.1 On the higher unit groups . 12 1.5.2 Frobenius . 13 1.5.3 Local and global class field theory . 14 1.6 Symbols over number fields .
    [Show full text]
  • Cubic and Biquadratic Reciprocity
    Rational (!) Cubic and Biquadratic Reciprocity Paul Pollack 2005 Ross Summer Mathematics Program It is ordinary rational arithmetic which attracts the ordinary man ... G.H. Hardy, An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers, Bulletin of the AMS 35, 1929 1 Quadratic Reciprocity Law (Gauss). If p and q are distinct odd primes, then q p 1 q 1 p = ( 1) −2 −2 . p − q We also have the supplementary laws: 1 (p 1)/2 − = ( 1) − , p − 2 (p2 1)/8 and = ( 1) − . p − These laws enable us to completely character- ize the primes p for which a given prime q is a square. Question: Can we characterize the primes p for which a given prime q is a cube? a fourth power? We will focus on cubes in this talk. 2 QR in Action: From the supplementary law we know that 2 is a square modulo an odd prime p if and only if p 1 (mod 8). ≡± Or take q = 11. We have 11 = p for p 1 p 11 ≡ (mod 4), and 11 = p for p 1 (mod 4). p − 11 6≡ So solve the system of congruences p 1 (mod 4), p (mod 11). ≡ ≡ OR p 1 (mod 4), p (mod 11). ≡− 6≡ Computing which nonzero elements mod p are squares and nonsquares, we find that 11 is a square modulo a prime p = 2, 11 if and only if 6 p 1, 5, 7, 9, 19, 25, 35, 37, 39, 43 (mod 44). ≡ q Observe that the p with p = 1 are exactly the primes in certain arithmetic progressions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eleventh Power Residue Symbol
    The Eleventh Power Residue Symbol Marc Joye1, Oleksandra Lapiha2, Ky Nguyen2, and David Naccache2 1 OneSpan, Brussels, Belgium [email protected] 2 DIENS, Ecole´ normale sup´erieure,Paris, France foleksandra.lapiha,ky.nguyen,[email protected] Abstract. This paper presents an efficient algorithm for computing 11th-power residue symbols in the th cyclotomic field Q(ζ11), where ζ11 is a primitive 11 root of unity. It extends an earlier algorithm due to Caranay and Scheidler (Int. J. Number Theory, 2010) for the 7th-power residue symbol. The new algorithm finds applications in the implementation of certain cryptographic schemes. Keywords: Power residue symbol · Cyclotomic field · Reciprocity law · Cryptography 1 Introduction Quadratic and higher-order residuosity is a useful tool that finds applications in several cryptographic con- structions. Examples include [6, 19, 14, 13] for encryption schemes and [1, 12,2] for authentication schemes hαi and digital signatures. A central operation therein is the evaluation of a residue symbol of the form λ th without factoring the modulus λ in the cyclotomic field Q(ζp), where ζp is a primitive p root of unity. For the case p = 2, it is well known that the Jacobi symbol can be computed by combining Euclid's algorithm with quadratic reciprocity and the complementary laws for −1 and 2; see e.g. [10, Chapter 1]. a This eliminates the necessity to factor the modulus. In a nutshell, the computation of the Jacobi symbol n 2 proceeds by repeatedly performing 3 steps: (i) reduce a modulo n so that the result (in absolute value) is smaller than n=2, (ii) extract the sign and the powers of 2 for which the symbol is calculated explicitly with the complementary laws, and (iii) apply the reciprocity law resulting in the `numerator' and `denominator' of the symbol being flipped.
    [Show full text]
  • Reciprocity Laws Through Formal Groups
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 141, Number 5, May 2013, Pages 1591–1596 S 0002-9939(2012)11632-6 Article electronically published on November 8, 2012 RECIPROCITY LAWS THROUGH FORMAL GROUPS OLEG DEMCHENKO AND ALEXANDER GUREVICH (Communicated by Matthew A. Papanikolas) Abstract. A relation between formal groups and reciprocity laws is studied following the approach initiated by Honda. Let ξ denote an mth primitive root of unity. For a character χ of order m, we define two one-dimensional formal groups over Z[ξ] and prove the existence of an integral homomorphism between them with linear coefficient equal to the Gauss sum of χ. This allows us to deduce a reciprocity formula for the mth residue symbol which, in particular, implies the cubic reciprocity law. Introduction In the pioneering work [H2], Honda related the quadratic reciprocity law to an isomorphism between certain formal groups. More precisely, he showed that the multiplicative formal group twisted by the Gauss sum of a quadratic character is strongly isomorphic to a formal group corresponding to the L-series attached to this character (the so-called L-series of Hecke type). From this result, Honda deduced a reciprocity formula which implies the quadratic reciprocity law. Moreover he explained that the idea of this proof comes from the fact that the Gauss sum generates a quadratic extension of Q, and hence, the twist of the multiplicative formal group corresponds to the L-series of this quadratic extension (the so-called L-series of Artin type). Proving the existence of the strong isomorphism, Honda, in fact, shows that these two L-series coincide, which gives the reciprocity law.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Patterns in Prime Numbers: the Quadratic Reciprocity Law
    4 Patterns in Prime Numbers: The Quadratic Reciprocity Law 4.1 Introduction The ancient Greek philosopher Empedocles (c. 495–c. 435 b.c.e.) postulated that all known substances are composed of four basic elements: air, earth, fire, and water. Leucippus (fifth century b.c.e.) thought that these four were indecomposable. And Aristotle (384–322 b.c.e.) introduced four properties that characterize, in various combinations, these four elements: for example, fire possessed dryness and heat. The properties of compound substances were aggregates of these. This classical Greek concept of an element was upheld for almost two thousand years. But by the end of the nineteenth century, 83 chem- ical elements were known to exist, and these formed the basic building blocks of more complex substances. The European chemists Dmitry I. Mendeleyev (1834–1907) and Julius L. Meyer (1830–1895) arranged the elements approx- imately in the order of increasing atomic weight (now known to be the order of increasing atomic numbers), which exhibited a periodic recurrence of their chemical properties [205, 248]. This pattern in properties became known as the periodic law of chemical elements, and the arrangement as the periodic table. The periodic table is now at the center of every introductory chemistry course, and was a major breakthrough into the laws governing elements, the basic building blocks of all chemical compounds in the universe (Exercise 4.1). The prime numbers can be considered numerical analogues of the chemical elements. Recall that these are the numbers that are multiplicatively indecom- posable, i.e., divisible only by 1 and by themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • GENERALIZED EXPLICIT RECIPROCITY LAWS Contents 1
    GENERALIZED EXPLICIT RECIPROCITY LAWS KAZUYA KATO Contents 1. Review on the classical explicit reciprocity law 4 2. Review on BdR 6 3. p-divisible groups and norm compatible systems in K-groups 16 4. Generalized explicit reciprocity law 19 5. Proof of the generalized explicit reciprocity law 27 6. Another generalized explicit reciprocity law 57 References 64 Introduction 0.1. In this paper, we give generalizations of the explicit reciprocity law to p-adically complete discrete valuation fields whose residue fields are not necessarily perfect. The main theorems are 4.3.1, 4.3.4, and 6.1.9. In subsequent papers, we will apply our gen- eralized explicit reciprocity laws to p-adic completions of the function fields of modular curves, whose residue fields are function fields in one variable over finite fields and hence imperfect, and will study the Iwasawa theory of modular forms. I outline in 0.3 what is done in this paper in the case of p-adic completions of the function fields of modular curves, comparing it with the case of classical explicit reciprocity law outlined in 0.2. I then explain in 0.4 how the results of this paper will be applied in the Iwasawa theory of modular forms, for these applications are the motivations of this paper, comparing it with the role of the classical explicit reciprocity laws in the classical Iwasawa theory and in related known theories. 0.2. The classical explicit reciprocity law established by Artin, Hasse, Iwasawa, and many other people is the theory to give explicit descriptions of Hilbert symbols.
    [Show full text]
  • On Rational Reciprocity
    proceedings of the american mathematical society Volume 108, Number 4, April 1990 ON RATIONAL RECIPROCITY CHARLES HELOU (Communicated by William Adams) Abstract. A method for deriving "rational" «th power reciprocity laws from general ones is described. It is applied in the cases n = 3,4, 8 , yielding results of von Lienen, Bürde, Williams. Introduction Let n be a natural number greater than 1, and p, q two distinct prime numbers = 1 (mod n). Let Ç denote a primitive «th root of unity in C (the field of complex numbers), K = Q(£), with Q the field of rational numbers, and A = Z[Q, with Z the ring of rational integers. Since p = 1 (mod n), it splits completely in K ; so, if P is a prime ideal of A dividing p, the residue fields Z/pZ and A/P are naturally isomorphic, and P has absolute norm p . For a in A not divisible by P, the nth power residue symbol in K, modulo P, [a/P)n K , is then the unique «th root of unity satisfying the congruence (a/P)nK = a{p-l)/n (modP). In particular, due to the residue fields isomorphism, for a in Z not divisible by p, (a/P)n K = 1 if and only if a is an «th power residue modulo p in Z. Thus, if Q is a prime ideal of A dividing q, an expression for the "rational inversion factor" (p/Q)n K • (q/P)"n K may be considered as a rational reciprocity law between p and q .
    [Show full text]
  • 1. General Reciprocity for Power Residue Symbols
    POWER RECIPROCITY YIHANG ZHU 1. General reciprocity for power residue symbols 1.1. The product formula. Let K be a number eld. Suppose K ⊃ µm. We will consider the m-th norm-residue symbols for the localizations Kv of K. We will omit m from the notation when convenient. Let be a place of . Recall that for ×, we dene v K a; b 2 Kv ρ (a)b1=m (a; b) = (a; b) := v 2 µ ; Kv v b1=m m where ρ : K× ! Gab is the local Artin map. Recall, when v = p is a non- v v Kv archimedean place coprime to m, we have the following formula (tame symbol) bα (q−1)=m (a; b) ≡ (−1)αβ mod p; v aβ where q = N p = jOK =pj ; α = v(a); β = v(b).(v is normalized so that its image is Z.) In particular, if × then ; if is a uniformizer in and a; b 2 Ov ; (a; b)v = 1 a = π Kv ×, b 2 Ov (q−1)=m (π; b)v ≡ b mod p: Suppose v is an archimedean place. If v is complex, then (; )v = 1. If v is real, then by assumption , so . In this case we easily see that R ⊃ µm m = 2 ( −1; a < 0; b < 0 × (a; b)v = ; 8a; b 2 R : 1; otherwise The following statement is an incarnation of Artin reciprocity. Proposition 1.2 (Product formula). Let a; b 2 K×. Then for almost all places v, we have (a; b)v = 1, and we have Y (a; b)v = 1: v Proof.
    [Show full text]
  • Cubic Reciprocity and Explicit Primality Tests for H3^K+-1
    DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS UNIVERSITY OF NIJMEGEN The Netherlands Cubic reciprocity and explicit primality tests for h 3k 1 · Wieb Bosma Report No. 05.15 (2005) DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS UNIVERSITY OF NIJMEGEN Toernooiveld 6525 ED Nijmegen The Netherlands Cubic reciprocity and explicit primality tests for h 3k 1 · Wieb Bosma Abstract As a direct generalization of the Lucas-Lehmer test for the Mersenne numbers 2k −1, explicit primality tests for numbers of the form N = h·3k 1 are derived, for fixed h, and all k with 3k > h. The result is that N is prime if and only if 2 wk−1 ≡ 1 mod N, where w is given by the recursion wj = wj−1(wj−1 − 3); the main difference with the original Lucas-Lehmer test is that the starting value k w0 of this recursion may depend on k, (as is the case in tests for h · 2 1). For h =6 27m 1 it is usually easy to determine a finite covering prescribing a starting value depending only on the residue class of k modulo some auxiliary integer. We show how this can be done using cubic reciprocity and give some examples, drawing from the cases h ≤ 105, which were all computed explicitly for this paper. 1 Introduction This paper was written with the intention of serving several purposes, besides marking the birthday of Hugh Williams. One of these purposes was to show that results from [4] for numbers of the form h 2k 1 could easily be adapted to h 3k 1. Assuming only the cubic reciprocity law ·(replacing quadratic reciprocity) it w·as intended to give an entirely elementary exposition from a computational point of view, leading up to a generalization of the famous Lucas-Lehmer test, but avoiding the language of `Lucas functions'.
    [Show full text]
  • Artin Reciprocity and Mersenne Primes H.W
    44 NAW 5/1 nr.1 maart 2000 Artin reciprocity and Mersenne primes H.W. Lenstra, Jr., P. Stevenhagen H.W. Lenstra, Jr. P. Stevenhagen Department of Mathematics # 3840, University of Mathematisch Instituut, Universiteit Leiden, California, Berkeley, CA 94720–3840, U.S.A. Postbus 9512, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands Mathematisch Instituut, Universiteit Leiden, [email protected] Postbus 9512, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected], [email protected] Artin reciprocity and Emil Artin was born on March 3, 1898 in Vienna, as the son of an the factor 2 in 2ab is interpreted as 1 + 1. It takes an especially art dealer and an opera singer, and he died on December 20, 1962 simple form if the term 2ab drops out: in Hamburg. He was one of the founding fathers of modern al- 2 2 2 gebra. Van der Waerden acknowledged his debt to Artin and to (a + b) = a + b if 2 = 0. Emmy Noether (1882–1935) on the title page of his Moderne Alge- Likewise, the general ring-theoretic identity bra (1930–31), which indeed was originally conceived to be jointly written with Artin. The single volume that contains Artin’s col- (a + b)3 = a3 + 3a2b + 3ab2 + b3 lected papers, published in 1965 [1], is one of the other classics of twentieth century mathematics. (where 3 = 1 + 1 + 1) assumes the simple form Artin’s two greatest accomplishments are to be found in alge- 3 3 3 braic number theory. Here he introduced the Artin L-functions (a + b) = a + b if 3 = 0.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Class Field Theory
    AN OVERVIEW OF CLASS FIELD THEORY THOMAS R. SHEMANSKE 1. Introduction In these notes, we try to give a reasonably simple exposition on the question of what is Class Field Theory. We strive more for an intuitive discussion rather than complete accuracy on all points. A great deal of what follows has been lifted without proper reference from the two very informative papers by Garbanati and Wyman [?],[?]. The questions which we shall pose and try to answer in the next section are: 1. What is Class Field Theory? 2. What are the goals of Class Field Theory? 3. What are the main results of Class Field Theory over Q? 2. The Origins of Class Field Theory In examining the work of Abel, Kronecker (1821 { 1891) observed that certain abelian extensions of imaginary quadratic number fields are generated by the ad- junction of special values of automorphic functions arising from elliptic curves. For example, if K is an imaginary quadratic number field and A = Z!1 + Z!2 is an ideal of K with Im(!1=!2) > 0, then K(j(!1=!2)) is an abelian extension of K, where j is the modular function. Kronecker wondered whether all abelian extensions of K could be obtained in this manner (Kronecker's Jugendtraum). This leads to the question of “finding” all abelian extensions of number fields. Kronecker conjectured and Weber (1842 { 1913) proved: Theorem (Kronecker{Weber (1886{1887)). Every abelian extension of Q is con- tained in a cyclotomic extension of Q. To Kronecker and Weber, Class Field Theory was the task of finding all abelian ex- tensions, and of finding a generalization of Dirichlet's theorem on primes in arithmetic progressions which is valid in number fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Research News: the Nonabelian Reciprocity Law for Local Fields
    comm-rogawski.qxp 11/12/99 1:15 PM Page 35 Research News The Nonabelian Reciprocity Law for Local Fields Jonathan Rogawski This note reports on the Local Langlands Corre- sible to formulate a unified and general reciproc- spondence for GLn over a p-adic field, which was ity law until the notion of a reciprocity law itself proved by Michael Harris and Richard Taylor in was reformulated within the context of class field 1998. A second proof was given by Guy Henniart theory. This theory was initiated by Kronecker in shortly thereafter. The Local Langlands Corre- the case of quadratic imaginary fields. It was de- spondence is a nonabelian generalization of the rec- veloped into a general framework by Weber and iprocity law of local class field theory. It gives a re- Hilbert in the 1890s and was proven by Furtwan- markable relationship between nonabelian Galois gler, Takagi, and Artin in the first quarter of the groups and infinite-dimensional representation twentieth century. theory. Posed as an open problem thirty years ago In simple terms, class field theory seeks to de- in [L1], its proof in full generality represents a scribe all of the finite abelian extensions of a num- milestone in algebraic number theory. The goal of ber field F, that is, the finite Galois extensions this note, aimed at the nonspecialist, is to state the K/F such that Gal(K/F) abelian.1 The theory ac- main result with some motivations and necessary complishes its goal by establishing a deep relation definitions. between generalized ideal class groups attached to F and decomposition laws for prime ideals in Reciprocity Laws abelian extensions K/F.
    [Show full text]