Ahe Atoll and Pearl Oyster Aquaculture in the Tuamotu Archipelago
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN Volume 65 Issues 10–12 2012 Ahe Atoll and Pearl Oyster Aquaculture in the Tuamotu Archipelago Serge Andréfouët and Loic Charpy Editor J. Pearce, Falmouth, MA, USA Charles Sheppard D.J.H. Phillips, Vidauban, France Department of Biological Sciences, University of Warwick J.W. Readman, Plymouth, UK Coventry CV4 7AL, UK K. Schiff, California, USA e-mail: [email protected] M.H. Schleyer, Durban, South Africa S. Tanabe, Matsuyama, Japan Baseline Editor R. Tjeerdema, California, USA B. Richardson V. Wepener, Johannesberg, South Africa City University of Hong Kong, Department of Biology and Chemistry 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Republic of China e-mail: [email protected] News Editor P. Kingston Ship Cottage, Low Causeway, Torryburn, Fife, KY12 8LP, UK e-mail: [email protected] Editorial Board A. Borja, Pasaia, Spain P. Chapman, Vancouver, BC, Canada The Boulevard Langford Lane Kidlington Oxford OX5 1GB G. Cognetti, Pisa, Italy J.-C. Dauvin, Lille, France Whilst every effort is made by the publishers and editorial board to see M. Elliott, Hull, UK that no inaccurate or misleading data, opinions or statements appear in D.A. Holdway, Ontario, Canada this journal, they wish to make it clear that the data and opinions P. Hutchings, Sydney, Australia appearing in the articles and advertisements herein are the sole R.J. Law, Lowestoft, UK responsibility of the contributor or advertiser concerned. Accordingly, K.M.Y. Leung, Hong Kong the publishers, the editorial board and editors, and their respective M. Martin, Mariposa, CA, USA employees, officers and agents accept no responsibility or liability T. McClanahan, Mombassa, Kenya whatsoever for the consequences of any such inaccurate or misleading B. Morton, London, UK data, opinions or statements. Amsterdam • Boston • London • New York • Oxford • Paris • Philadelphia • San Diego • St. Louis Marine Pollution Bulletin 65 (2012) 407–414 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Marine Pollution Bulletin journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/marpolbul Editorial Recent research for pearl oyster aquaculture management in French Polynesia 1. Introduction the beauty of the myriad of colors, lusters and shapes, beyond the prized value, beyond the unique human culture and know- The papers on Ahe Atoll (Fig. 1) compiled in this volume release how found around pearl farms, black pearls are fascinating for sci- fresh scientific information relevant for a fairly specific human entists because they represent the ultimate product of both an activity, currently developed mostly in the South Pacific and espe- exploited lagoon ecosystem and an exploited bivalve, the black cially in atolls: black pearl aquaculture. Pearl farming is a commer- lip oyster Pinctada margaritifera (Linnaeus, 1758) var. cumingii cial activity more than a century-old. It includes the farming of (Jameson, 1901). white and gold pearls in Asia and Australia, in both fresh and mar- Pearl production has always been challenging for the suite of ine waters. Conversely, black pearl farming is more recent, and numerous factors and processes that need to be understood and mostly associated with Pacific Islands where the production is mastered before a black pearl materialize in the hand of a farmer. the highest, and especially from French Polynesia which has dom- Throughout the 19th and first half of the 20th century, P. margari- inated the market for the past 20 years (Southgate and Lucas, tifera oysters were harvested by free-divers only for the nacre, and 2008). button, industry. Sometimes, natural black pearls were found. In As a human activity conducted in natural lagoon environments, French Polynesia, in 1961, the first attempt to graft oysters with the general topic is of interest for Marine Pollution Bulletin. This the goal of producing cultivated round pearls was successfully journal has published papers on a wide array of topics describing achieved in Hikueru atoll by Jean-Marie Domard and Churoku the marine environment, its use by human activities, and the re- Muroi. The first farm was established in Manihi atoll in 1968. lated impacts. The suite of manuscripts presented on this special The two following decades saw the slow rise of a new commercial issue on ‘‘Ahe Atoll and Pearl Oyster Aquaculture in the Tuamotu activity with production in Tuamotu and Gambier archipelagos Archipelago’’ investigated Ahe Atoll’s oceanic wave regime, lagoon (e.g., Marutea Sud), with black pearls acquiring the status of high hydrodynamics, oyster larval dispersal, reproduction of oysters, la- quality gems in international jewellery markets. By the end of goon hydrology, phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, the eighties, both archipelagos experienced a black pearl rush, with oyster’s diet, planktonic food webs, and impacts of the farming thousands of Polynesian and foreigners workers returning to re- activity on the lagoon sediments and picoplankton communities. mote atolls. Hundreds of new concessions were granted per year Several of the papers published in this volume tackle subjects that on a variety of lagoons. Production rose quickly. Experiments of are generally published in journals specialized in aquaculture and all kind followed to achieve the most efficient collecting and farm- biology, but with the huge emergence of aquaculture in recent dec- ing possible, often in logistically challenging remote conditions. ades has come greater recognition that the practice is commonly Spat collecting was critical. Indeed, the pearl industry required be- accompanied by deleterious changes. The papers here include eco- fore all the provision of oysters. They were initially harvested from physiological papers focused on the pearl oyster Pinctada margari- wild stocks, and spat collecting developed rapidly in suitable la- tifera and the description of plankton communities. However, all goons to steadily provide to farmers the oysters needed for graft- the papers are connected (see below a synthesis of the results) ing. Enhanced farming practices yielded an average successful and collectively provide a multidisciplinary and integrated view rate of 300–400 sellable pearls for 1000 grafted oysters. On the of a lagoon ecosystem which is seldom available. We are pleased other hand, transfers of oysters between atolls were frequent, mak- that these papers are published side by side in this issue, for the ing local populations and lagoons vulnerable to extinction, dis- benefits of scientists and managers interested by human activities eases, and spread of invasive epibionts species. Dedicated in lagoon environments. governmental services were created to manage and monitor the environmental and socio-economic consequences of what was vir- 2. The aquaculture of pearl oyster in French Polynesia tually an entire new field of economic activity coming out of the blue of the Tuamotu and Gambier lagoons. Quickly, despite the Black pearl production in French Polynesia tropical lagoons growing empirical knowledge developing among farmers, better turned in 40 years from the status of a South Seas adventure to knowledge of lagoon ecosystem functioning and suitability for the status of an industry, as the second source of income for the pearl farming were needed. This included better knowledge on country at the end of 1990s, after tourism. In the best years the physiology of P. margaritifera. Scientific research programs (Fig. 2), black pearl represented 60 MUS$ of income for a country were launched, and both lagoon ecosystems and organisms came of 250.000 inhabitants. Beyond the magnificent jewel, beyond under the scrutiny of applied and fundamental studies. 0025-326X Ó 2012 Elsevier Ltd. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.06.021 408 Editorial / Marine Pollution Bulletin 65 (2012) 407–414 Fig. 1. Top: location map of French Polynesia and Ahe atoll, as well as other sites mentioned in the text. Bottom: map of marine concessions in Ahe atoll, as in 2012. To be compared with the same map in Andréfouët et al. (2006). In 2011, time came to take a pause and look at the evolution Prices collapsed in the year 2000s, due primarily to overproduc- of the situation 20 years after the industry boom. It was also time tion of lowest quality pearls and poor management and control of to assess the status of knowledge and what would be the new the commercial distribution towards international Asian, American priorities. Indeed, like a natural ecosystem, the French Polynesia and European markets. Prices plummeted from around 100US$ per black pearl industry has reached its climax, collapsed, and is gram in 1985 down to less than 5US$ in 2010. Consequently, the now in a recovery stage. The official numbers from the Institut number of concessions decreased steadily throughout the Tuamotu de la Statistique de Polynésie Française (ISPF) show the changes and Gambier. In 2010, respectively 425, 102 and 28 concessions in total exported production, monetary value per gram and total were granted for respectively Tuamotu, Gambier (mostly in Man- number of concessions since these variables are monitored (Figs. 2 gareva, a high island with a wide lagoon) and Society Archipelagos, and 3). thus a total of 555 concessions. In 2011, the last available overall Editorial / Marine Pollution Bulletin 65 (2012) 407–414 409 18 000 35 Export value (10K 16 000 Weight (kg) 30 Pearl price / g ( 14 000 25 12 000 20 10 000 ) and Weight (kg) and Weight ) 8 000 15 6 000 10 ( gram per price Pearl 4 000 Export value (10K value Export 5 2 000 0 0 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Year Fig. 2. Evolution from 1993 to 2011 of key indicators: total export value, total weight, and price per gram. Data source: Institut Polynésien de la Statistique. number is 541. In 1999, 2745 concessions were active. Small family buildings, pontoons and boats appearing and disappearing along businesses took a heavy toll with the collapse of the prices.