Mobility 2045 Vision

Table of Contents

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...... 1.1

1.1 BACKGROUND ...... 1.1 1.2 FEDERAL LEGISLATION ...... 1.2 1.3 MOBILITY 2045 VISION ...... 1.5 1.4 MOBILITY 2045 GOALS ...... 1.5 1.5 COMPONENTS OF THE PLAN ...... 1.6 1.6 FINANCIAL CONSTRAINT ...... 1.13

2 INTRODUCTION ...... 2-1

2.1 PURPOSE OF THE PLAN ...... 2-2 2.2 LEGISLATIVE BACKGROUND FOR THE PLAN ...... 2-2 2.3 MOBILITY 2045 VISION ...... 2-8 2.4 METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN GOALS ...... 2-8 2.5 PLANNING PROCESS ...... 2-9 2.6 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT ...... 2-10 2.7 CONSISTENCY WITH OTHER LOCAL PLANS AND PROGRAMS ...... 2-10

3 DEMOGRAPHICS ...... 3-1

3.1 ACCOMPLISHMENTS OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS ...... 3-1 3.2 BACKGROUND ...... 3-2

4 EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES ...... 4-1

4.1 ACCOMPLISHMENTS OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS ...... 4-1 4.2 OVERVIEW ...... 4-3 4.3 WHAT CAN WE EXPECT? ...... 4-3 4.4 LOCAL EFFORTS ...... 4-5 4.5 IMPACTS ...... 4-10 4.6 MPO POLICY BOARD ACTIONS ...... 4-13 4.7 DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES ...... 4-14 4.8 IMPACTS TO THE MPO PLANNING PROCESS ...... 4-15 4.9 PRIORITIES OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS ...... 4-15

5 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ...... 5-1

5.1 ACCOMPLISHMENTS OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS ...... 5-1 5.2 BACKGROUND ...... 5-3 5.3 TITLE VI AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ...... 5-4

i 5.4 MTP PUBLIC MEETINGS ...... 5-6 5.5 PHASE I: REVIEW OF VISION, GOALS AND DEMOGRAPHIC FORECASTS ...... 5-9 5.6 PHASE II: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION ATTITUDE SURVEY III ...... 5-25 5.7 PHASE III: PRESENTATION OF DRAFT PLAN AND INFORMATION ON TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY ...... 5-27 5.8 PHASE IV: PRESENTATION TO THE TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TRANSPORTATION POLICY BOARD 5-29

6 ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ...... 6-1

6.1 ACCOMPLISHMENTS OVER THE LAST FIVE YEARS ...... 6-1 6.2 CURRENT MPO POLICIES ...... 6-3 6.3 MPO ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS ...... 6-5 6.4 FUNDING AND IMPLEMENTING ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS...... 6-8 6.5 ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION TRENDS IN THE ALAMO AREA ...... 6-11 6.6 THE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN NETWORK ...... 6-13 6.7 PLANNED NETWORK ...... 6-17 6.8 FOCUS AREAS FOR THE NEXT FIVE YEARS ...... 6-20

7 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ...... 7-1

7.1 ACCOMPLISHMENTS OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS ...... 7-1 7.2 THE IMPORTANCE OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ...... 7-4 7.3 EXISTING PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PROVIDERS ...... 7-5 7.4 VIA PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SERVICES ...... 7-9 7.5 FACILITIES AND FLEET ...... 7-12 7.6 ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENT ...... 7-15 7.7 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION NEEDS AND ISSUES ...... 7-17 7.8 GOALS: VIA’S LONG RANGE PLAN ...... 7-19 7.9 LEVEL OF PUBLIC INVESTMENT: TRANSIT FINANCIAL FORECAST ...... 7-23 7.10 CONCLUSIONS ...... 7-25

8 ROADWAY SYSTEM ...... 8-1

8.1 ACCOMPLISHMENTS OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS ...... 8-1 8.2 ROADWAY SYSTEM POLICIES ...... 8-2 8.3 ROADWAY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION ...... 8-3 8.4 MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLANS ...... 8-5 8.5 REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT ROADWAY NETWORK ...... 8-5 8.6 BASE YEAR AND FUTURE YEAR ROADWAY SYSTEMS ...... 8-7 8.7 REGIONAL TOLL ANALYSIS ...... 8-12 8.8 SECURITY ...... 8-12 8.9 CONCLUSIONS ...... 8-14

9 FREIGHT ...... 9-1

9.1 ACCOMPLISHMENTS OVER THE LAST FIVE YEARS ...... 9-1

ii 9.2 FREIGHT POLICY AND PLANNING ...... 9-3 9.3 FREIGHT: NOW AND FUTURE IN TEXAS AND THE ALAMO AREA ...... 9-6 9.4 LOCAL FREIGHT PLANNING ...... 9-10 9.5 FOCUS AREAS FOR THE NEXT FIVE YEARS ...... 9-12

10 ENVIRONMENTAL ...... 10-1

10.1 ACCOMPLISHMENTS OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS ...... 10-1 10.2 LINKING PLANNING AND NEPA ...... 10-3 10.3 MPO PROJECT ASSESSMENT TOOL: IMAP ...... 10-3 10.4 AIR QUALITY ...... 10-4 10.5 WATER RESOURCES ...... 10-9 10.6 OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS ...... 10-11 10.7 RESILIENCY AND RISK MANAGEMENT...... 10-13 10.8 OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS ...... 10-14

11 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCESS ...... 11-1

11.1 REGIONAL OBJECTIVES FOR CONGESTION MANAGEMENT ...... 11-9 11.2 CMP NETWORK ...... 11-9 11.3 MULTIMODAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES ...... 11-12 11.4 COLLECTING DATA AND MONITORING THE SYSTEM ...... 11-15 11.5 ANALYSIS OF CONGESTION PROBLEMS AND NEEDS ...... 11-18 11.6 STRATEGY IDENTIFICATION ...... 11-22 11.7 STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION ...... 11-31 11.8 EVALUATING STRATEGY EFFECTIVENESS...... 11-31 11.9 FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS ...... 11-32

12 SAFETY & SECURITY ...... 12-1

12.1 SAFETY ...... 12-1 12.2 SECURITY ...... 12-9

13 PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT ...... 13-1

13.1 ACCOMPLISHMENTS OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS ...... 13-1 13.2 BACKGROUND ...... 13-4 13.3 PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT ...... 13-4 13.4 PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND TARGETS...... 13-6

14 FINANCIAL INFORMATION...... 14-1

14.1 ACCOMPLISHMENTS OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS ...... 14-1 14.2 BACKGROUND ...... 14-2 14.3 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION GOALS ...... 14-2 14.4 SELECTED FUNDING SOURCES...... 14-3

iii 14.5 TRANSPORTATION PARTNERS ...... 14-6 14.6 ADDITIONAL FINANCING ...... 14-8 14.7 FUNDING GAP ...... 14-8

15 ROADWAY PROJECT LIST ...... 15-1

16 TRANSIT PROJECT LIST ...... 16-1

17 REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT PROJECT LIST ...... 17-1

18 UNFUNDED PROJECT LIST ...... 18-1

iv List of Figures

FIGURE 2-1. ALAMO AREA MPO STUDY AREA BOUNDARY ...... 2-4 FIGURE 3-1. 2045 POPULATION DENSITY MAP...... 3-5 FIGURE 3-2. 2045 EMPLOYMENT DENSITY MAP ...... 3-5 FIGURE 3-3. 2015 POPULATION DOT DENSITY MAP ...... 3-6 FIGURE 3-4. 2045 POPULATION FORECAST DOT DENSITY MAP ...... 3-6 FIGURE 3-5. 2015 EMPLOYMENT DOT DENSITY MAP ...... 3-7 FIGURE 3-6. 2045 EMPLOYMENT FORECAST DOT DENSITY MAP ...... 3-7 FIGURE 4-1. MPO GOAL AREAS ...... 4-10 FIGURE 4-2. TPB RESOLUTION SUPPORTING INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES ON IH 35 N ...... 4-13 FIGURE 5-1. RELATIONSHIP BUILDING WITH AVENIDA GUADALUPE ASSOCIATION ...... 5-3 FIGURE 5-2. UNDERSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE AND TITLE VI ...... 5-5 FIGURE 5-3. OVERALL RESPONSES TO TODAY’S TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ...... 5-12 FIGURE 5-4. RESPONSES TO TODAY’S TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM BY COUNTY ...... 5-12 FIGURE 5-5. OVERALL RESPONSES TO HOPES FOR FUTURE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ...... 5-13 FIGURE 5-6. RESPONSES TO HOPES FOR FUTURE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM BY COUNTY ...... 5-13 FIGURE 5-7. HOW SAFE DO YOU FEEL WALKING IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD? ...... 5-16 FIGURE 5-8. HOW SAFE DO YOU FEEL WALKING IN YOUR DOWNTOWN? ...... 5-17 FIGURE 5-9. HOW SAFE DO YOU FEEL RIDING A BICYCLE IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD? ...... 5-17 FIGURE 5-10. HOW SAFE DO YOU FEEL RIDING A BICYCLE ON MAJOR CORRIDORS? ...... 5-17 FIGURE 5-11. HOW SAFE DO YOU FEEL RIDING A BICYCLE ON A GREENWAY OR HIKE & BIKE TRAILS? ...... 5-18 FIGURE 5-12. HOW SAFE DO YOU FEEL CROSSING YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS? ...... 5-18 FIGURE 5-13. HOW SAFE DO YOU FEEL CROSSING MAJOR CORRIDORS? ...... 5-18 FIGURE 5-14. HOW SAFE DO YOU FEEL DRIVING ON HIGHWAYS IN RUSH HOUR? ...... 5-19 FIGURE 5-15. HOW SAFE DO YOU FEEL DRIVING ON HIGHWAYS DURING NORMAL TRAFFIC? ...... 5-19 FIGURE 5-16. HOW SAFE DO YOU FEEL DRIVING ON MAJOR CORRIDORS DURING RUSH HOUR? ...... 5-19 FIGURE 5-17. HOW SAFE DO YOU FEEL DRIVING ON MAJOR CORRIDORS DURING NORMAL TRAFFIC? ...... 5-20 FIGURE 5-18. SATISFACTION WITH TODAY’S TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM BY COUNTY ...... 5-20 FIGURE 6-1. BIKE LANE ON MAIN STREET, SAN ANTONIO ...... 6-3 FIGURE 6-2. CITY OF SAN ANTONIO SEVERE PEDESTRIAN INJURY AREAS, 2011-2015 ...... 6-4 FIGURE 6-3. VISION ZERO SUMMIT LEADERSHIP PANEL ...... 6-4 FIGURE 6-4. WALKABLE COMMUNITY WORKSHOP IN NEW BRAUNFELS ...... 6-5 FIGURE 6-5. STREET SKILLS PARTICIPANTS AT A BEXAR COUNTY LUNCH & LEARN ...... 6-6 FIGURE 6-6. WALKING SCHOOL BUS AT SARAH KING (PICTURE CREDIT: KSAT12 NEWS)...... 6-7 FIGURE 6-7. THE MPO’S 21ST ANNUAL WALK & ROLL RALLY IN 2016 ...... 6-8 FIGURE 6-8. THIS STRAVA MAP SHOWS INDIVIDUAL RIDES LOGGED INTO STRAVA WITHIN A ONE-YEAR TIMEFRAME ...... 6-12 FIGURE 6-9. BICYCLIST & PEDESTRIAN FATALITIES AND SERIOUS INJURIES IN THE MPO STUDY AREA FROM 2013-2017 6-13 FIGURE 6-10. BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE IN MPO STUDY AREA ...... 6-14

v FIGURE 6-11. TYPES OF BICYCLE FACILITIES IN BEXAR COUNTY ...... 6-15 FIGURE 6-12. 5TH EDITION LTS BIKE MAP ...... 6-16 FIGURE 6-13. REGIONAL BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN PLANNING STUDY, 2016 ...... 6-17 FIGURE 6-14. PLANNED NETWORK FROM THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO'S 2011 BIKE PLAN ...... 6-18 FIGURE 6-15. POTENTIAL REGIONAL BICYCLING CONNECTIONS ...... 6-20 FIGURE 7-1. ART SERVICE AREA ...... 7-7 FIGURE 7-2. VIA METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SERVICE AREA ...... 7-9 FIGURE 7-3. VIA METROPOLITAN TRANSIT FIXED ROUTE SERVICE, AUGUST 2018 ...... 7-11 FIGURE 7-4. VIA BUS FLEET: VEHICLE TYPES ...... 7-13 FIGURE 7-5. SOUTH TEXAS MEDICAL CENTER TRANSIT CENTER ...... 7-14 FIGURE 7-6. CENTRO PLAZA AT VIA VILLA IN THE CATTLEMAN SQUARE HISTORIC DISTRICT ...... 7-14 FIGURE 7-7. VISION 2040 LONG RANGE PLAN ...... 7-20 FIGURE 7-8. DOWNTOWN TRANSIT STOP ...... 7-21 FIGURE 8-1. REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT ROADWAY NETWORK ...... 8-7 FIGURE 8-2. 2015 VOLUME/CAPACITY ...... 8-9 FIGURE 8-3. 2045 VOLUME/CAPACITY – NO BUILD ...... 8-10 FIGURE 8-4. 2025 VOLUME/CAPACITY – BUILD ...... 8-10 FIGURE 8-5. 2035 VOLUME/CAPACITY – BUILD ...... 8-11 FIGURE 8-6. 2045 VOLUME/CAPACITY – BUILD ...... 8-11 FIGURE 9-1. TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN (TFMP) GOALS ALIGN WITH OTHER STATE AND FEDERAL GOALS ...... 9-4 FIGURE 9-2. TEXAS MULTIMODAL FREIGHT NETWORK WITHIN THE MPO BOUNDARY ...... 9-5 FIGURE 9-3. 2015 ALAMO AREA MPO FREIGHT TONNAGE FLOWS ...... 9-7 FIGURE 9-4. 2045 ALAMO AREA MPO FREIGHT TONNAGE FLOWS ...... 9-8 FIGURE 9-5. RAIL FLOWS THROUGH THE ALAMO AREA...... 9-9 FIGURE 9-6. FREIGHT INDUSTRY STAKEHOLDERS WRITE COLOR-CODED COMMENTS ON MAPS OF THE MPO STUDY AREA. 9-10 FIGURE 9-6. CENTRAL TEXAS GRADE CROSSING STUDY ...... 9-11 FIGURE 10-1. OZONE FORMATION ...... 10-6 FIGURE 10-2. SAN ANTONIO EIGHT-HOUR DESIGN VALUE TRENDS BY MONITOR SITE 2006 - 2018 ...... 10-7 FIGURE 11-1. CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCESS ...... 11-2 FIGURE 11-2. ANNUAL HOURS OF DELAY PER COMMUTER ...... 11-3 FIGURE 11-3. TRAVEL TIME INDEX ...... 11-4 FIGURE 11-4. FHWA CATEGORIZES FIVE CAUSES OF CONGESTION...... 11-5 FIGURE 11-5. CMP COMMUNITY PRIORITIES – ONLINE SURVEY ...... 11-8 FIGURE 11-6. MAP OF REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT ROADWAYS IN THE ALAMO AREA ...... 11-11 FIGURE 11-7. CORRIDOR SCORING BY CATEGORY ...... 11-19 FIGURE 12-1. EXAMPLE OF SOCIAL MEDIA SAFETY MESSAGING ...... 12-5 FIGURE 13-1. MPO SAFETY PERFORMANCE MEASURE DASHBOARD OVERVIEW ...... 13-3 FIGURE 13-2. MPO SAFETY PERFORMANCE MEASURE DASHBOARD ...... 13-3

vi List of Tables

TABLE 1-1. ROADWAY AND TRANSIT PROJECT FUNDING TABLE ...... 1.15 TABLE 2-1. TRANSPORTATION BILLS ...... 2-5 TABLE 3-1. POPULATION CONTROL TOTALS BY COUNTY ...... 3-3 TABLE 3-2. EMPLOYMENT CONTROL TOTALS BY COUNTY ...... 3-4 TABLE 5-1. LEVEL OF IMPORTANCE EXERCISE ...... 5-14 TABLE 5-2. VISION STATEMENT FEEDBACK ...... 5-21 TABLE 5-3. GOAL FEEDBACK STATION ...... 5-23 TABLE 5-4. COMMUTE OPTIONS READINESS FEEDBACK ...... 5-20 TABLE 5-5. TRANSPORTATION CHALLENGES INPUT ...... 5-21 TABLE 6-1. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCES FOR BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN INFRASTRUCTURE ...... 6-9 TABLE 7-1. TRANSIT RIDERSHIP FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 ...... 7-15 TABLE 7-2. VIA FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS ...... 7-25 TABLE 8-1. FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM DESCRIPTION ...... 8-4 TABLE 8-2. NUMBER OF LANE MILES BY FACILITY TYPE ...... 8-8 TABLE 8-3. COMPARISON OF WEEKDAY VEHICLE MILES OF TRAVEL BY FACILITY TYPE (IN MILLIONS) ...... 8-8 TABLE 8-4. COMPARISON OF AVERAGE SPEED AND WEEKDAY VEHICLE HOURS (IN THOUSANDS) BY FACILITY TYPE ...... 8-9 TABLE 9-1. CRITICAL URBAN FREIGHT CORRIDORS IN THE MPO STUDY AREA ...... 9-6 TABLE 10-1. 2017 OZONE SEASON WEEKDAY ANTHROPOGENIC VOC AND NOX EMISSIONS FOR THE MSA ...... 10-9 TABLE 11-2. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ...... 11-12 TABLE 11-3. DETAILED CMP CORRIDOR SCORING CRITERIA ...... 11-20 TABLE 11-4. STRATEGIES FOR MANAGING CONGESTION ...... 11-28 TABLE 13-1. SAFETY PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND TARGETS ...... 13-6 TABLE 13-2. PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND TARGETS ...... 13-8 TABLE 13-3. ROADWAY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND TARGETS ...... 13-10 TABLE 14-1. ROADWAY AND TRANSIT FUNDING TABLE ...... 14-10

vii

Pg. 1.1 Executive Summary

1 Executive Summary

As the Alamo Area adds an additional 1.5 million people by 2045, policy makers must make important decisions about when and where to invest transportation funding in the region. Mobility 2045 is a living document that sets forth a vision and the policies guiding these decisions over the next four years and also identifies the challenges we face in the coming decades.

1.1 Background Planning for the future transportation needs of the Alamo Area region requires a comprehensive look at the current transportation system, future population and employment, and the anticipated available funding for the area for transportation projects. Although this seems like a simple exercise, there is extensive work involved in improving the region’s transportation infrastructure. The metropolitan area's economy and environment depend heavily on the condition and efficient performance of the regional transportation system. Recognizing the mobility needs of the community and addressing those needs will lead to improvements in the economy and quality of life. This update to the

Pg. 1.2 Executive Summary

Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), Mobility 2045, takes steps in that direction. Public involvement in the planning process is necessary to ensure that transportation decisions are not made independently and that Federal tax dollars are used in accordance with legitimate public needs and desires.

In August 1977, the Governor of Texas designated the San Antonio – Bexar County Transportation Steering Committee as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for San Antonio and Bexar County. This organization is the forum for cooperative transportation planning and decision-making by officials of the urban area's local governments and transportation agencies. In 2013 the MPO expanded its boundaries to include all of Bexar, Comal, Guadalupe counties and a portion of Kendall County, and became known as the Alamo Area MPO. The MPO Transportation Policy Board (TPB) is comprised of 21 elected and appointed officials representing the following entities: Bexar, Comal and Guadalupe counties and a portion of Kendall County; Cities of New Braunfels, San Antonio and Seguin; the Advanced Transportation District, the Alamo Regional Mobility Authority, Greater Bexar County Council of Cities, Northeast Partnership, the Texas Department of Transportation, and VIA Metropolitan Transit.

1.2 Federal Legislation The signing of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) on December 18, marked a significant change in the planning and development of metropolitan transportation systems. In its Declaration of Policy, ISTEA mandated "a National Intermodal Transportation System that is economically efficient and environmentally sound...and will move people and goods in an energy efficient manner." Specifically, "the National Intermodal Transportation System shall consist of all forms of transportation in a unified, interconnected manner . . . to reduce energy consumption and air pollution while promoting economic development . . ."

Pg. 1.3 Executive Summary

On June 9, 1998, the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) was enacted, authorizing highway, highway safety, transit and other surface transportation programs for the next six years. TEA-21 built on the initiatives established in ISTEA. TEA-21 combined the continuation and improvement of current programs with new initiatives to meet the challenges of improving safety as traffic continues to increase at record levels, protecting and enhancing communities and the natural environment, and advancing America’s economic growth and competitiveness domestically and internationally through efficient and flexible transportation.

To further build and strengthen TEA-21 legislation, the President signed the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) on August 10, 2005. SAFETEA-LU focused on several of the programs and initiatives put in place under TEA-21 and continued the authorization of highway, transit and other surface transportation programs. SAFETEA-LU was the largest transportation authorization bill passed into law and continued the focus on eight planning factors.

Following SAFETEA-LU, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) was signed into law on July 6, 2012 and took effect on October 1, 2012. MAP-21 focuses on a streamlined and performance-based surface transportation program and builds on many of the highway, transit, bike, and pedestrian programs and policies established in 1991. MAP-21 was a two-year bill.

The current transportation bill, signed into law on December 4, 2015, is the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act. The FAST Act is the first law enacted in over ten years that provides long-term funding certainty for surface transportation projects, meaning MPOs, States and local governments can better plan for critical transportation improvements, including larger highway and transit infrastructure projects.

Pg. 1.4 Executive Summary

The FAST Act mostly maintains the current funding structures and funding shares between highways and transit. However, some of the key differences in this transportation bill are outlined below.

• Provides a dedicated source of federal dollars for freight projects. The FAST Act establishes both formula and discretionary grant programs to fund transportation projects that directly benefit the movement of freight. • Supports an outcome-oriented, performance-based approach to the evaluation of proposed transportation projects. The FAST Act continues the performance management approach adopted by MAP- 21 and requires the US Department of Transportation (DOT) to begin developing new tools (and improve existing tools) to better manage project performance within one year of enactment.

Under the FAST Act, MPOs are now required to address ten planning factors, rather than the previous eight. The ten planning factors are listed below.

• Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency. • Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users. • Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users. • Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and for freight. • Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns. • Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, people and freight. • Promote efficient system management and operation.

Pg. 1.5 Executive Summary

• Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system. • Improve the resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surface transportation. • Enhance travel and tourism.

1.3 Mobility 2045 Vision The 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan will meet growing needs while:

• Ensuring environmental quality; • Enhancing the safety of the traveling public; • Fostering appropriate land use patterns; • Advancing alternative modes of transportation; and, • Increasing accessibility for all users.

1.4 Mobility 2045 Goals The following goals reflect the goals and values of citizens and stakeholders and guide the development of the long-range transportation plan for the region:

• Identify opportunities to improve and enhance the regional transportation system and preserve the investment in the existing transportation system. • Increase the efficiency of the transportation system and manage traffic congestion. • Maintain a focus on safety. • Address the social and environmental issues of the region in transportation planning efforts. • Support economic activity, employment growth and encourage innovative partnerships. • Facilitate the involvement and participation of communities, agencies, organizations and the general public in the transportation planning process.

Pg. 1.6 Executive Summary

• Ensure the transportation planning efforts are coordinated with local land use plans to support future growth and development patterns.

1.5 Components of the Plan Demographics The basis of any effective planning effort rests primarily on a determination of the area’s base year demographics (population, household size, employment, household income, and land use) and future projections of these demographics. The MPO used 2015 as the base year for this update of the MTP. Population is forecast to increase by nearly 1.5 million people (to 3.7 million people) by 2045; employment is forecast to increase by over 800,000 (to over 1.8 million) in the region.

Emerging Technologies Transportation is rapidly being changed by new technologies. Over the duration of this long-range transportation plan, technology and automation could make significant improvements in roadway capacity without the addition of pavement, generate better travel time reliability, and tackle safety challenges. The extent that technology impacts will be felt over the next 25 years, will likely depend on decisions made by both public and private entities as well as the cost and benefits of the technological advances.

The Alamo Area is a high growth region and the challenge will be to continue to build, operate and maintain a safe, reliable multimodal transportation system. Technological advancements will be integral to being able to move people and goods. But, at this time, no agency knows exactly what, where and how significant advancements in technology will impact our current and planned systems. Expected elements of transportation technology in the timeframe of Mobility 2045 include:

• Autonomous and Connected Vehicles (cars and trucks platooning) • 5G, or the fifth generation of cellular mobile communications

Pg. 1.7 Executive Summary

• Increasingly smarter phones (handheld communication technology) • Collision warning systems • Enhanced traffic signal control technology • Expanded traveler information systems • Increases in rideshare and car sharing • Land use impacts • Low cost, same and next day delivery (by drones) • More alternatively fueled vehicles • More mobility/navigation apps • Smart cards (payment system) • Trackless transit vehicles • Wireless traffic management • Implications to revenue – federal and state gas tax impacts

Public Involvement The MPO believes in the proactive involvement of citizens, affected public agencies, representatives of transportation agency employees, private providers of transportation, and other interested parties in the development and updates of the MTP, the Transportation Improvement Program and significant transportation studies.

A proactive approach to an effective public involvement process requires several elements:

• Early, continuous, and meaningful public involvement; • Reasonable public access to technical planning information; • Collaborative input on transportation alternatives, evaluation criteria and mitigation needs; • Transportation planning meetings that are open to the public; and • Access to the planning and decision-making process.

Pg. 1.8 Executive Summary

The public has been involved in the planning process early, continuously, and in a meaningful way. Members of the public were provided reasonable technical information and collaboratively determined alternatives and solutions. The MPO used innovative outreach techniques and social media to encourage participation in the plan development. This process made the public true partners in creating the metropolitan area’s updated long-range transportation plan.

Active Transportation In the last five years the region has continued to see significant expansion of bicycle and pedestrian plans (Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, Bike Share Master Plan Study, as examples), projects and programs, such as Vision Zero. Regional leaders understand the importance of creating and maintaining a safe multimodal transportation system.

Bicycling and walking are cost effective, energy efficient, clean, and healthy ways to travel. With the growing concerns of congestion, air quality and the public interest in promoting alternative transportation modes, active transportation is critical to achieving the region’s goals.

Public Transportation VIA Metropolitan Transit (VIA) is a political subdivision of the State of Texas, authorized by State Enabling Legislation to receive locally-generated sales tax income, fare box revenue, Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funding, advertising revenue, and interest income.

VIA is governed by an eleven-member Board of Trustees. Five of the Trustees are appointed by the City of San Antonio, three by Bexar County and two by the Greater Bexar County Council of Cities. These appointed Trustees elect an eleventh person to serve as Board Chairman.

The VIA service area is 1,226 square miles in size, which is equivalent to 98% of Bexar County. It currently includes the City of San Antonio, thirteen

Pg. 1.9 Executive Summary

suburban cities and the unincorporated areas of Bexar County. Suburban cities located within the service area are Alamo Heights, Balcones Heights, Castle Hills, China Grove, Cibolo, Sandy Oaks, Converse, Elmendorf, Kirby, Leon Valley, Olmos Park, St. Hedwig, Shavano Park, and Terrell Hills.

As of 2018, VIA operates 95 bus lines, with 7,700 bus stops, along 1.100 miles of roadways. VIA also operates from 14 transit centers and park and ride facilities.

VIA’s fleet, consists of 508 buses, comprising 48 North American Bus Industries (NABI) diesel buses, 4 NABI compressed natural gas buses, 107 New Flyer diesel buses, 30 New Flyer diesel-electric hybrid buses, 3 Proterra electric buses, 19 NABI 60-foot CNG buses, 270 NOVA CNG buses, 15 New Flyer CNG buses (VIVA), and 17 Optima streetcars. All buses purchased by VIA are low-floor, kneeling vehicles with ramps to accommodate patrons with limited mobility, and the replica trolleys in the downtown area are equipped with lifts.

The active VIAtrans fleet consists of 159 vehicles owned by VIA, all of which are equipped with wheelchair lifts. Each vehicle has the capacity to carry 5 ambulatory and 2 wheelchair patrons or 4 ambulatory and 3 wheelchair patrons.

The Alamo Area faces many challenges in the area of public transportation. While VIA has long been one of the most financially efficient transit systems in the country, its fiscal constraints and service area characteristics somewhat limit what it can offer. However, VIA recently adopted its Vision 2040 Plan that looks at the needs of the region and how the region is best served with different modes of traditional transit and high-capacity transit. VIA has also partnered with other regional transportation agencies, including the MPO, the Alamo Regional Mobility Authority, Bexar County, City of San Antonio, and TXDOT, to develop ConnectSA, a framework for implementing planned

Pg. 1.10 Executive Summary

multimodal transportation projects. The MPO has also funded a study to analyze the feasibility of fixed route transit service in New Braunfels.

Additionally, work continues on the High-Speed Rail Study as another future transportation option for the region.

Roadway System As population and employment continue to grow in the San Antonio metropolitan area, a greater burden will be placed on the transportation system. To accommodate traffic increases on the roadway system, additional travel lanes, including High Occupancy Vehicle lanes, and operational improvements will be needed. In addition to congestion levels, factors considered when developing the future year roadway network included impacts to neighborhoods, acceptability by the public, environmental concerns and fiscal constraint.

The proposed roadway system improvements in the long range plan are limited by the amount of funding available, or revenue that can be reasonably expected over the 25-year life of the MTP. While more improvements are necessary than funding available, the roadway projects selected address the most congested areas of the MPO study area.

Even with the anticipated investment made over the next twenty-five years in transportation infrastructure, regional traffic congestion is expected to increase. Transportation demand management strategies will become increasingly important and, when implemented, can have a positive effect on air quality, growth, land use, travel patterns and travel behavior.

Freight Movement There has been a dramatic increase in goods movement across the United States via heavy duty trucks and an accompanying increase in truck traffic in the San Antonio region, especially along IH 35 and IH10. In January 2017 the MPO hosted two freight workshops at which regional freight and logistics

Pg. 1.11 Executive Summary

stakeholders provided input, generating a large amount of data needed for the Mobility 2045 plan, including the identification of Critical Urban Freight Corridors.

NAFTA related trade as well as freight and goods movements from the East and West coasts along IH 10 will continue to impact the San Antonio metropolitan area. The growth in freight movement and the growth in local population and employment will increase the level of service on local expressways. Planning agencies in this region understand that transportation planning efforts must increase the focus on freight movement in order to improve the area’s transportation system.

Environmental Concerns Environmental issues in transportation planning continue to be a priority. Environmental issues are required to be considered in the transportation planning process in order to mitigate negative impacts to valued resources including wildlife, water sources, agricultural land and floodplains.

Air quality issues also play a major role in metropolitan transportation planning. In July 2018, Bexar County was designated non-attainment for ozone, effective September 2018. Being non-attainment, the MPO is now required to demonstrate transportation conformity: ensuring that vehicles emissions from transportation projects will not adversely impact the county’s air quality.

Congestion Management Process Although the San Antonio region is not considered one of the most congested areas in the country, it has been identified as having one of the fastest growing congestion levels. Congestion is a major contributor to air quality concerns and overall efficiency of the area wide transportation system. Since Bexar County has been designated non-attainment for ozone, congestion management strategies and transportation control measures must be applied effectively, relieving congestion throughout the region.

Pg. 1.12 Executive Summary

The MPO’s Congestion Management Process outlines eight specific congestion management objectives that work toward the Mobility 2045 goal to increase the efficiency of the transportation system and manage traffic congestion. These include:

• Maintain congested VMT per capita through 2022 • Maintain current level of congested hours through 2022 • At least 65% of the Interstate should be reliable by 2022 • At least 45% of the Non-Interstate NHS should be reliable by 2022 • Average reliability of the transit system should be 85% by 2040 • Double the population and employment within a quarter-mile access of frequent transit by 2040 • Maintain 60 minutes or less incident clearance time on expressways through 2022 • Maintain travel time for freight moved on highways through 2022

Performance Measurement The Alamo Area recognizes the importance of transportation performance tracking, goal setting and measurement to provide greater accountability and transparency and to achieve a more efficient and effective investment of transportation resources. To date, the MPO has met all of the deadlines as set forth for the adoption of performance measures and has developed innovative ways of communicating the performance measurement tracking to partner agencies and the public.

For development of Mobility 2045, it was extremely important in planning to know the travel demand on the transportation system and to determine how people will travel throughout the region. Two computer models are used to analyze regional data for transportation planning purposes: the Travel Demand Model and the Mode Choice Model.

Pg. 1.13 Executive Summary

Geographic Information Systems, or GIS, uses computer hardware, software and data capturing to display geographically referenced information. GIS allows people to view, analyze and, most importantly, visualize data related to transportation programs and projects.

1.6 Financial Constraint The transportation system in the MPO study area requires maintenance and enhancement to meet the mobility needs of people and goods for the 25-year horizon of this plan. To meet the growing travel needs, it was necessary to identify reasonable and available federal, state, and local transportation funds, both public and private. Traditional transportation funds are available through a variety of sources, many of which contain restrictions on how they can be used and/or allocated. In addition, it is also necessary to estimate relevant expenses including capital for both maintenance and operation of the system. The Funding Summary is provided in Table 1-1.

A number of issues and events occurred that have brought great awareness to the state of transportation financing and future funding streams. Even with billions of dollars investment in our region’s transportation infrastructure, the congestion levels will continue to increase at a faster rate than funding is made available. The fact remains that transportation needs far outweigh available funding resources, but as demand increases, it is essential to develop a fiscally constrained, prioritized and acceptable list of transportation improvement projects for the community.

Project List The project lists reflect consultation with the public, implementing agencies and other affected stakeholders. The MPO has undertaken an extensive amount of technical and financial analysis to arrive at the list of projects contained in this plan. The roadway and transit project lists meet FAST Act planning requirements of financial constraint with projected financial resources available over the next 25 years. The financially constrained revenue and expenditure

Pg. 1.14 Executive Summary

summary can be found in Table 1-1. Lump sum figures have been included in the project list to allow for some flexibility in safety, bicycle and pedestrian projects as well as roadway preservation over the next 25 years. The MTP and the project list can be revised, as necessary, to meet the changing needs of the community. It is important to note this financially constrained plan will not eliminate congestion. Levels of congestion are projected to continue to grow.

Pg. 1.15 Executive Summary

Table 1-1. Roadway and Transit Project Funding Table

Pg. 2-1 Introduction

2 Introduction

“Over the next 25 Transportation is one of the most important factors to maintaining years, the Alamo and enhancing both individual and regional quality of life. It is a core Area Metropolitan facet of the region’s economic success, essential for accessing jobs Planning Organization’s and services, and impactful on safety and environmental quality. study area will add around The Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization’s (MPO) study area is 760,000 new jobs currently home to over 2 million residents and 10,000 lane miles, with over 50 and welcome million miles traveled daily. Over the next 25 years, our region will add around around 1.5 M new 760,000 new jobs and welcome around 1.5 million new residents, increasing residents, the estimated population to 3.7 million. This continued growth requires planning increasing the for a transportation system that supports the movement of people and goods estimated population to over while enhancing quality of life. 3.7 M.” Our region developed this Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), with the horizon year of 2045, to plan for the movement of people and goods in one of the nation’s fastest growing regions. This plan builds on the national vision set forth by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to create a locally-appropriate, regional transportation system that improves quality of life and promotes sustainability by facilitating

Pg. 2-2 Introduction

multimodal transportation, system connectivity, and preservation of existing transportation infrastructure. This plan looks to provide a wide range of transportation options including transit routes, high occupancy vehicle lanes, and a network of bicycle lanes, sidewalks, and shared-use paths. Moving people throughout our region means making connections between the places where people live and where they go to work, to school, to shop, and to play. CONTINUOUS The Mobility 2045: Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), also known as the Ongoing planning to address short long-range transportation plan, was developed in collaboration with the region’s and long-term needs transportation partners and the public. It reflects the ongoing planning and project development efforts for implementation of transportation policies, programs and projects. The MTP sets the framework for the MPO’s continuous, comprehensive, and coordinated regional transportation planning efforts for the next 25 years. The plan provides for the efficient, safe and convenient transportation of people and goods while helping to achieve the metropolitan area's overall economic, social, energy and environmental goals.

COMPREHENSIVE 2.1 Purpose of the Plan Encompassing all This document represents the planning efforts of numerous transportation transportation modes agency staff working with technical and public involvement consultant teams, elected and appointed governmental officials, community-based organizations, and private citizens over a three-year period. The planning process has been continuous, comprehensive, cooperative, and inclusive. Mobility 2045 aims to improve the transportation system through new and efficient connections, as well as exploring opportunities to move more people. The document will be reviewed and formally updated every four years as required by federal regulations. COORDINATED

No single agency 2.2 Legislative Background for the Plan is responsible for the entire system Transportation planning by MPOs dates to the passage of the Federal Highway Act of 1962, which required urbanized areas with populations of 50,000 or more to develop and maintain a comprehensive, cooperative and continuing

Pg. 2-3 Introduction

regional transportation planning process undertaken by states and local governments. Accordingly, in 1963, San Antonio, Bexar County and the Texas Department of Highways (now the Texas Department of Transportation, or TxDOT) established the San Antonio - Bexar County Urban Transportation Study (SABCUTS). In August 1977, the Governor of Texas designated the SABCUTS Steering Committee as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the San Antonio and Bexar County area. In 2013, the MPO expanded its boundaries to include all of Bexar, Comal, and Guadalupe Counties and a portion of Kendall County as shown in Figure 2-1. Alamo Area MPO Study Area BoundaryFigure 2-1 and was renamed the “Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The MPO serves as the forum for cooperative and regional transportation planning and decision-making by officials of the area's local governments and transportation agencies.

Pg. 2-4 Introduction

Figure 2-1. Alamo Area MPO Study Area Boundary

Alamo Area MPO Region

MPO Study Area Boundary

Pg. 2-5 Introduction

In addition to the Federal Highway Act of 1962, several transportation bills have been passed by the United States Congress to guide the transportation planning process. Bills authorize government spending for transportation and also provide federal policy directives. Table 2-1 below lists each recent federal transportation bill and summarizes the significance of each.

Table 2-1. Transportation Bills Bill, Year Passed Significance

Marked a significant change in the roles for MPOs and the Metropolitan Transportation Plan. The role of planning by the MPO was Intermodal Surface strengthened to serve as a centralized Transportation Efficiency decision-making process for the development Act (ISTEA), 1991 of metropolitan transportation systems. A major focus of ISTEA was financial constraint of adopted plans.

Affirmed key priorities such as improving safety, protecting public health and the Transportation Equity environment. Authorized federal surface Act for the 21st Century transportation funding programs for (TEA-21), 1998 highways, highway safety, and transit for the 6-year period from 1998 to 2003.

Safe, Accountable, Contained a host of provisions intended to Flexible, and Efficient improve and maintain the surface Transportation Equity transportation infrastructure, including the Act: A Legacy for Users Interstate Highway System, transit systems, (SAFETEA-LU), 2005 bicycling and pedestrian facilities and freight rail operations. It expired in 2009 and was

Pg. 2-6 Introduction

Bill, Year Passed Significance

renewed ten times after its expiration date until it was replaced by MAP-21.

Focused on a streamlined and performance- based surface transportation program. Enhanced many of the highway, transit, bike, Moving Ahead for and pedestrian programs and policies Progress in the 21st established in 1991. MAP-21 also instituted Century Act (MAP-21), performance management to provide greater 2012 accountability and transparency and help achieve the most efficient and effective investment of transportation resources.

Current Transportation Bill The current transportation bill is the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act. The FAST Act authorizes $305 billion nationwide over fiscal years 2016 through 2020 for highway construction, highway and motor vehicle safety, public transportation, motor carrier safety, hazardous materials safety, rail, research, and technology programs.

The FAST Act is the first law enacted in over ten years that provides long-term funding certainty for surface transportation, meaning States and local governments can better plan for critical transportation projects, including larger projects such as highways and transit infrastructure.

The FAST Act mostly maintains the current funding structures and funding shares between highways and transit. However, some of the key differences in this transportation bill are outlined below.

Pg. 2-7 Introduction

• Reduces institutional barriers that can stall and delay critical transportation projects. The FAST Act adopted several proposals to expedite the permitting process while still protecting the environment. • Provides a dedicated source of federal dollars for freight projects. The FAST Act establishes both formula and discretionary grant programs to fund transportation projects that directly benefit the movement of freight. • Supports an outcome-oriented, performance-based approach to the evaluation of proposed transportation projects. The FAST Act continues the performance management approach adopted by MAP-21 and requires the US Department of Transportation (DOT) to begin developing new tools (and improve existing tools) to better manage project performance within one year of enactment.

Under the FAST Act, MPOs are required to address ten planning factors. This includes eight planning factors in place under MAP-21 and two that were added by the FAST Act. The ten planning factors used in the development of this plan are shown below.

1. Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency. 2. Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users. 3. Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users. 4. Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and for freight. 5. Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns. 6. Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, people and freight. 7. Promote efficient system management and operation. 8. Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system. 9. Improve the resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surface transportation. 10. Enhance travel and tourism.

Pg. 2-8 Introduction

2.3 Mobility 2045 Vision Mobility 2045 will meet growing transportation needs while:

o Ensuring environmental quality; o Enhancing the safety of the traveling public; o Fostering appropriate land use patterns; o Advancing sustainable modes of transportation; and, o Increasing accessibility of all users.

2.4 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Goals

The following goals reflect the values of citizens and stakeholders and guide the development of the long-range transportation plan for the region:

Identify opportunities to improve and enhance the regional transportation system and preserve the investment in the existing transportation system.

Increase the efficiency of the transportation system and manage traffic congestion.

Maintain a focus on safety.

Address the social and environmental issues of the region in transportation planning efforts.

Support economic activity, employment growth and encourage innovative partnerships.

Facilitate the involvement and participation of communities, agencies, organizations and the public in the transportation planning process.

Ensure the transportation planning efforts are coordinated with local land use plans to support future growth and development patterns.

Pg. 2-9 Introduction

2.5 Planning Process The MPO is charged with coordinating transportation planning and programming for the region. The MPO is led by the Transportation Policy Board (TPB), and tasked with development of the long-range transportation plan, the Metropolitan Transportation Plan, or MTP. The TPB provides coordination with regional stakeholders therefore making the MTP a collaborative effort between the MPO, technical staff, city and county governments, local transportation partners, community-based organizations, interest groups and stakeholders, and citizens.

MPOs’ long-range plans are updated every four to five years. This is the first plan the MPO has updated following the designation on July 18, 2018 (effective designation date of September 24, 2018) by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that Bexar County is in “non-attainment” of (or not meeting) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) standards for ground level

ozone (O3). Going forward, the MPO will formally update this long-range plan every four years, until Bexar County again meets, and maintains for two decades, clean air standards.

To develop this plan, the MPO used the same growth scenario adopted for our last long-range plan, Mobility 2040. This scenario maintained recent growth trends in Bexar County of rising infill development that is primarily medium- to higher-density and supports increased use of active modes of transportation. Several major planning efforts in the region – the City of San Antonio’s SA Tomorrow and VIA Metropolitan Transit’s Vision 2040 are supportive of this demographic scenario. For Comal, Guadalupe, and Kendall Counties, preferred growth followed the Counties’ 15-year trend. Demographic assumptions for Mobility 2045 were interpolated and extrapolated from Mobility 2040 for our new milestone years of 2015, 2025, 2035, and 2045.

Mobility 2045 recognizes that growth and change will continue and reflects the desired growth and transportation goals and values for the region. An important

Pg. 2-10 Introduction

element of the plan is to determine how billions of dollars in federal and state transportation funds should be spent over the next 25 years.

2.6 Performance Management

MAP-21 instituted performance management to provide greater accountability and transparency and help achieve the most efficient and effective investment of transportation resources. The FAST Act continued performance management with the establishment of national goals for safety, infrastructure condition, congestion reduction, system reliability, freight movement and economic vitality, environmental sustainability, and reduced project delivery delays. To date, the The MPO has adopted performance measures associated with Safety (PM1), Bridge/Pavement Condition (PM2) and Roadway System Performance (PM3), and Transit Asset Management. The MPO will continue to work with the state and transportation partners to adopt additional goals and targets by the required deadlines.

2.7 Consistency with Other Local Plans and Programs Numerous plans and studies were reviewed as part of the development of this plan to ensure consistency with planning efforts throughout the region. A list of these plans is shown below:

Pg. 2-11 Introduction

City of San Antonio TxDOT 5 Year Regional Bicycle Master Plan + ITS Implementation VIA Vision 2040, 2016 Thoroughfare Plan Implementation, 2011 Plan Study, 2019

SA Tomorrow SA Tomorrow SA Tomorrow AAMPO Regional Multimodal Comprehensive Plan, Sustainability Plan Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation Plan, 2016 2016 Study, 2016 2016

City of Seguin Joint Base San Bike Share Master Planning for Growth Comprehensive Antonio Joint Land Plan Study, 2019 in Comal County, 2017 Master Plan, 2017 Use Study, 2015

City of New Braunfels City of Bulverde New Braunfels EDC Envision New Stormwater Transportation Demographic Profile, Braunfels,Comp Plan, Management Master Plan, 2015 2016 2018 Program, 2014

The MPO will continue to work with partners as they develop transportation related plans and programs in the region.

Pg. 3-1 Demographics

3 Demographics

Forecasting population and employment growth for the region helps transportation planners understand what the potential impact of that growth will be on the regional transportation network. By getting a sense of future travel demand, planners can help policy makers make decisions about which projects and programs may be needed to meet future demand. This chapter outlines the process used to develop demographic projections for Mobility 2045.

3.1 Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years Since the last plan update, several partner agencies have been working to enact policies and initiatives that support the growth scenario adopted under Mobility 2040. The City of San Antonio embarked on a long range planning effort based on this scenario to develop SA Tomorrow, a three-pronged planning effort to guide the city toward smart, sustainable growth. SA Tomorrow was adopted on August 11, 2016, and consists of a Comprehensive Plan, Sustainability Plan, and a Multimodal Transportation Plan. Similarly, VIA Metropolitan Transit also developed their long-range plan using the growth

Pg. 3-2 Demographics

scenario adopted in Mobility 2040. Their plan was adopted by the VIA Board on August 23, 2016. The City of New Braunfels is on track to adopt Envision New Braunfels which is a city-wide effort to develop a vision and roadway plan for New Braunfels through 2030.

3.2 Background The basis of any effective planning effort rests primarily on a determination of the area’s demographics (population, household size, employment, household income, and land use) and future projections of these demographics.

The process for forecasting future growth in population and employment is not an exact science. What is needed for the transportation planning process is a “comfort level” with the demographic control totals used to predict future travel. The tendency is to be more comfortable with the recent trends. If the economy is doing well and jobs and housing are expanding, the tendency is to select an optimistic forecast. The tendency to select a conservative forecast usually occurs if the current or most recent trend is decreasing or if a flat economy exists. Upturns and downturns in the economy occur in cycles that, over a 20 or 30-year time span, tend to counteract each other.

If a conservative approach is taken and selected control totals are too low then the risk is to be behind in planning for needed infrastructure. If the control totals are too optimistic, this could result in a false or premature justification for roadway and/or transit infrastructure improvements.

Given 1) the amount of time and resources expended to develop the growth scenario adopted by the Transportation Policy Board under Mobility 2040, 2) the extent of other planning efforts conducted using this data, 3) the knowledge that forecasting future growth in population and employment is not an exact science, and 4) the MPO expected to be designated nonattainment for ozone in October 2017 and there was a need to expedite the planning process, the MPO opted to maintain the adopted growth scenario and interpolate and extrapolate future milestone years and check for reasonableness.

Pg. 3-3 Demographics

Mobility 2040 used 2010 as the base year to include 2010 census data and workforce development data. The source of future year population control totals at the county level was the Texas State Data Center. The scenario was based on a five-year population trend that indicated a greater amount of infill development and growth in the urban core. Employment projections were calculated using a locally developed formula that more realistically linked population with employment data for both the urban, suburban and rural counties. Population and employment projections were made at ten-year intervals: 2020, 2030 and 2040.

For Mobility 2045, population and employment data was interpolated from the previously adopted data points. To coincide with network years needed for a transportation conformity determination, the 2015 and 2017 demographics were interpolated from the 2010 and 2020 data. Similarly, the 2024 and 2025 demographics were interpolated from the 2020 and 2030 data. The 2035 were interpolated from 2030 and 2040 data. Finally, the 2045 demographics were extrapolated beyond the 2040 data. These demographics were checked for their reasonableness given the extreme growth of the region. Population and employment control totals by county are shown in Table 3-1 and Table 3-2.

Table 3-1. Population Control Totals by County Population 2015 2045 Growth % Change Bexar County 1,898,173 3,004,011 1,105,838 58%

Comal County 134,019 287,655 153,636 115%

Guadalupe County 165,183 365,048 199,865 121%

Kendall County 38,314 67,539 29,225 76%

Total Region 2,235,689 3,724,253 1,488,564 67%

Pg. 3-4 Demographics

Table 3-2. Employment Control Totals by County Employment 2015 2045 Growth % Change Bexar County 893,782 1,571,410 677,628 76%

Comal County 52,683 119,352 66,669 127%

Guadalupe County 41,862 102,824 60,962 146%

Kendall County 13,707 24,728 11,021 80%

Total Region 1,002,034 1,818,314 816,280 81%

Figure 3-1Figure 3-2 show the 2045 population and employment density while Figure 3-3 through Figure 3-6 show the 2015 population, 2045 population, 2015 employment and 2045 employment distribution used for this update of the plan.

Pg. 3-5 Demographics

Figure 3-1. 2045 Population Density Map

Figure 3-2. 2045 Employment Density Map

Pg. 3-6 Demographics

Figure 3-3. 2015 Population Dot Density Map

Figure 3-4. 2045 Population Forecast Dot Density Map

Pg. 3-7 Demographics

Figure 3-5. 2015 Employment Dot Density Map

Figure 3-6. 2045 Employment Forecast Dot Density Map

Pg. 4-1 Emerging Technologies

4 Emerging Technologies

Technology is advancing at an exponential rate. Two years ago, the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) began a Bike Share Master Plan Study to consider expanding bike share services within Bexar County and to study the feasibility of implementing bike share services in Boerne, New Braunfels and Seguin. Overnight, 2,000 app-driven scooters appeared in San Antonio, changing the landscape and causing a new evaluation of dockless type mobility solutions as part of the MPO study.

4.1 Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years The appearance of 2,000 scooters overnight on San Antonio city streets is just one example of the proliferation of technology in the field of transportation. Over the last five years technology driven Transportation Network Companies (known as TNCs), such as Uber and Lyft, have made their presence felt in the region. The City of San Antonio (CoSA) and the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) are using emerging technologies to monitor congestion (event and incident management) and to collect and share real time

Pg. 4-2 Emerging Technologies

travel data. Other agencies, including Comal County, are using technology in the form of high-water detection systems to keep roadways safe during and after extreme weather events.

In 2016, the MPO participated in the first Texas Mobility Summit convened by the Texas Department of Transportation to take the Smart City concept and turn it into a nationwide initiative. As a result of the summit, the MPO partnered with Texas A&M Transportation Institute, the University of Texas at Austin’s Center for Transportation Research, and the Southwest Research Institute, as well as multiple local partners including the CoSA and VIA Metropolitan Transit to form the Texas Automated Vehicle (AV) Proving Ground Partnership. Together, the group submitted a proposal and was selected as a national proving ground by US Department of Transportation in early 2017. The MPO attended a second Texas Mobility Summit in 2017 and began participating in the organization’s Communities of Practice around new technologies in 2018.

Also, in June 2017, VIA Metropolitan Transit launched their goMobile app, which allows riders to pay for their trip via their phone. That same year, VIA worked to tackle the challenge of big data by convening and hosting their very first GoCodeSA Codeathon. The goal of the event is to spark innovation by providing local entrepreneurs and coders with transportation data they can use to create technological solutions in a short period of time. The event has since become an annual event and developed ideas for how to connect transit data to Amazon’s Alexa and applications for more comprehensive trip planning.

In 2017, the MPO funded two projects with Surface Transportation Block Grant funding seeking to make smart ITS improvements in the region. The first was

Pg. 4-3 Emerging Technologies

a smart signal upgrade for the City of New Braunfels that will install advanced controllers, networking equipment and control software for 179 traffic signals at a cost of $2 million. The second involved ITS enhancements for the CoSA to implement communication network improvements at a cost of $4.5 million.

In 2018, the City of San Antonio in partnership with USAA launched the Safest Driver Contest using mobile technology created by Cambridge Mobile Telematics. The mobile app was downloaded over 14,000 times. This same year, the City of San Antonio also launched their 311SA mobile application which uses gamification to encourage city residents to take pictures of and log areas in need of city services.

4.2 Overview Transportation is rapidly being changed by new technologies. Over the duration of this long-range transportation plan, technology and automation could make significant improvements in roadway capacity without the addition of pavement, generate better travel time reliability, and tackle safety challenges. The extent that technology impacts will be felt over the next 25 years, will likely depend on decisions made by both public and private entities as well as the cost and benefits of the technological advances.

4.3 What can we expect? Expected elements of transportation technology in the timeframe of Mobility 2045:

• Autonomous and Connected Vehicles (cars and trucks platooning) • 5G, or the fifth generation of cellular mobile communications

Pg. 4-4 Emerging Technologies

Pg. 4-5 Emerging Technologies

4.4 Local Efforts VIA goMobile App VIA Metropolitan Transit launched its new goMobile app in June 2017. The new mobile ticketing and trip- planning app, powered by moovel North America, will allow bus and VIAtrans patrons to purchase fares using their smartphone, and activate them when they are ready to ride. The digital ticketing process expedites boarding and reduces the need for cash and transfer cards. The app's trip-planning feature provides bus arrival information to help riders plan more easily and accurately.

VIA’s goMobile is the next in a series of technological advancements VIA has introduced to enhance passenger amenities and modernize the agency's programs and services. The goMobile app is free to download for Apple and Android devices. Fares and passes can be purchased using credit cards. The app was designed in partnership with moovel, a transit technology provider, and features local landmarks and iconography that become animated once the ticket is activated. Passengers will simply show their phone screen to the operator when boarding.

VIA GoCodeSA Codeathon GoCodeSA Codeathon is a partnership event hosted by VIA Metropolitan Transit that challenged area tech talent to imagine new transit solutions for the region. The first event was held May 20-21, 2017 where teams spent 24 intense hours of strategic thinking and creative coding. The first-place team was selected from more than 50 participants with an

Pg. 4-6 Emerging Technologies

integration that allows users to utilize Amazon Echo and its Alexa Voice Service for trip-planning assistance, using next-bus arrival information at a specified stop. Contestants competed for $4,500 in cash and prizes, provided by various sponsors. VIA maintains access to Codeathon projects for possible development and future reference.

The idea for the codeathon was part of the agency’s ongoing investment in smart transit solutions that expand access to service, increase mobility, and enhance the passenger experience. Codeathon teams could work on any type of project, such as web apps, mobile apps, wearable solutions, data visualizations, algorithms, or visual mock-ups. Challenges, data sets, and other resources focused on public transportation. This event was held again in 2018 and will likely become an annual event for VIA.

City of San Antonio Automated Vehicle Pilot Request for Proposals In July 2018, the City of San Antonio issued a Request for Information (RFI) for an Automated Vehicle Pilot Program. The intent of this RFI was to gather data to assist the City in understanding the feasibility of using autonomous vehicles for specific use cases within the City. The City identified potential multiple uses including:

• Innovation Zones – The City of San Antonio is developing Innovation Zones in several key areas of the city. The Innovation Zones will be used as proving grounds to test various types of smart city technology, including autonomous vehicles, smart streetlights,

Pg. 4-7 Emerging Technologies

various sensors, and Wi-Fi connectivity. The following areas are two of the initial Innovation Zones to be considered. o Brooks – Brooks is a 1,300-acre mixed use campus that includes various options to live, learn, work and play. This area has attracted over 3,000 jobs and includes facilities for institutions of higher learning, light manufacturing, retail, and residential living. The potential use case is the transportation of employees, visitors, and residents in and around the campus. Consideration should be given on how to integrate the VIA Metropolitan Transit (VIA) Brooks Transit Center and VIA’s new Primo operation on SW Military Drive in 2019. o Medical Center – The South Texas Medical Center is a 900- acre campus which includes over 27,000 medical facility employees, over 29,000 employees at associated business, and over 300,000 vehicles daily. The potential use case is the first mile/last mile transportation of employees, visitors, and patients in and around the medical center. Consideration should be given on how to integrate the VIA Metropolitan Transit (VIA) Medical Center Transit Center and VIA’s existing Primo operation on Fredericksburg Road. • City Employee Shuttle (Point-to-Point) – The City of San Antonio has approximately 12,000 employees with approximately 2,000 located in various locations within downtown. The potential use case is the transportation of employees from one building location to another. • City Fleet Integration – The City of San Antonio builds and maintains San Antonio’s streets, storm water, and transportation infrastructure, as well as provides solid waste management services. The potential use case is incorporating autonomous vehicles into municipal fleets. • Military Base Shuttle (Point-to-Point) – Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) was created in 2005, and is the largest joint base in the Department of Defense. JBSA is comprised of three primary locations: Fort Sam Houston, Lackland, and Randolph, plus eight

Pg. 4-8 Emerging Technologies

other operating locations. JBSA supports over 250,000 personnel with 80,000 of those enlisted within the military. The potential use case is the transportation of employees from one building location to another. • USDOT Designated Proving Ground (Fredericksburg Road) – In November 2016, the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) initiated a notice soliciting proposals for a pilot program to designate automated vehicle proving grounds. In January 2017, Fredericksburg Road, as part of the Texas Innovation Alliance statewide partnership, was selected as one of 10 designees nationally. As a test-bed site, Fredericksburg Road will offer the City and other transportation partners an ability to evaluate autonomous vehicle technology and its ability to reduce pedestrian and vehicle conflicts. In addition, this corridor from downtown to the Medical Center includes VIA Metropolitan Transit’s Primo Bus Rapid Transit Route. The test-bed will explore possible technology to optimize bus interval spacing along this high frequency route, which could improve the consistency and efficiency of rider service.

City of San Antonio Safest Driver Application The City of San Antonio Transportation and Capital Improvements department worked with Cambridge Mobile Telematics and USAA on a mobile app contest. The mobile app was developed by Cambridge Mobile Telematics in support of the City’s Vision Zero Initiative. The app provided participants with helpful feedback on their driving based on five metrics: speed, acceleration, braking, cornering, and phone distraction. USAA provided the incentives for the contest including three grand prizes of $10,000 each and multiple weekly prizes of up to $2,000 each. The app tracked the driving habits of participants in the background without them having to log on each time. In addition to hoping to spark better driving

Pg. 4-9 Emerging Technologies

behaviors, the app served as a data collection tool for the City of San Antonio who plans to use the information to implement countermeasures in some of the areas where behaviors such as speeding seem to be an issue or improve operations in areas where people may be experiencing an unusually high level of delay.

City of San Antonio 311SA Mobile App In August 2018 the City of San Antonio launched the new 311SA mobile app at an interactive event that brought together residents and community leaders while showcasing app functionality, highlights and community participation. A component of the City of San Antonio’s Smart Cities initiative, the new 311SA mobile app illustrates how San Antonio is utilizing technology to promote growth and help create positive change in the community. The app provides an alternative to calling 311 through a user- friendly experience and allow s residents to report issues easily, check the status of their service requests, get badges for their engagement on services and view other requests submitted in their area.

Designed by Cityflag Inc., the app transforms the way residents and government collaborate, contributes to social welfare and builds a more inclusive and transparent public process. The gamified public service app uses game dynamics and mechanics based on incentives and rewards to engage citizens with their community, creating a more informed and committed active citizen.

Pg. 4-10 Emerging Technologies

4.5 Impacts Figure 4-1 graphically shows the MPO’s goal areas. The MPO has identified elements of technology that will impact these major goal/focus areas.

Figure 4-1. MPO Goal Areas

System Preservation: Being able to maintain infrastructure that has already been constructed • Enhanced traffic signal control technology • Increases in rideshare and car sharing • Wireless traffic management

System Efficiency: Being able to operate the transportation system effectively • Enhanced traffic signal control technology • Expanded traveler information systems

Pg. 4-11 Emerging Technologies

• Delivery on demand / by drones • Increases in rideshare and car sharing • More mobility/navigation apps • Smart cards (payment system) • Wireless traffic management • Trackless transit vehicles

Transit: Including shared ride services to move people • Smart cards (payment system) • Trackless transit vehicles • Expanded traveler information systems • More mobility/navigation apps

Environment: Ensuring implementation does not harm air quality, water quantity or water quality • More alternatively fueled vehicles • Enhanced traffic signal control technology

Economic Development: Ensuring jobs and educational opportunities are available • Potential for higher density development • More mobility/navigation apps

Public Involvement: Ensuring the public has input into the plans, policies and processes that are developed • Social media • Use of smart phones and iPads for polls and other public input

Land Use: Fostering appropriate, context sensitive land use patterns • Potential for higher density development • More mobility/navigation apps

Pg. 4-12 Emerging Technologies

Safety: Reducing fatalities and serious injuries • Autonomous and Connected Vehicles (cars and trucks platooning) • Collision warning systems • Trackless transit vehicles • Enhanced traffic signal control technology

Sustainable Funding: Ensuring all available financial tools are available to build, operate and maintain the transportation system • More alternatively fueled vehicles may impact federal and state gas tax

Pg. 4-13 Emerging Technologies

4.6 MPO Policy Board Actions At their meeting in March 2018, the Alamo Area MPO Transportation Policy Board acted on a resolution of support shown in Figure 4-2 for implementing emerging technologies including infrastructure supporting Autonomous Vehicles in the IH 35 North Corridor.

Figure 4-2. TPB Resolution Supporting Innovative Technologies on IH 35 N

Pg. 4-14 Emerging Technologies

4.7 Disruptive Technologies Of the technologies with the greatest potential to disrupt transportation planning and infrastructure, the ones expected to have the greatest impact are autonomous vehicles, electrification, and shared-use mobility.

Automated Vehicle Technology Automated technology has the potential to be disruptive in a number of ways. First, the technology is largely being developed by the private sector and numerous corporations are in a race to see who can develop the best automated technology. This is problematic from a planning standpoint because it has the potential to introduce a number of different infrastructure needs or requirements. Automated technology is also hoped to be able to address significant concerns around safety, specifically crashes caused by driver error which make up approximately 94% of all crashes.

Electrification Vehicles are already significantly cleaner than they were 30, 20, even 10 years ago but many believe we will continue to see an increase in electric vehicles with Europe expecting that all new cars sold will be electric by 2035. Given our region’s recent nonattainment status, this could help us meet National Ambient Air Quality Standards. Both Volvo and General Motors have publicly stated they envision an all-electric future. This shift not only impacts the demand for charging stations but it also threatens funding for transportation projects currently tied to the motor vehicle fuel tax.

Shared Use Mobility Millennials have already shown us that vehicle ownership is not a top priority for everyone. TNCs like Uber and Lyft are increasing in popularity and many futurists believe we are transitioning away from vehicle ownership to shared- use mobility. Shared mobility includes transportation services and resources that are shared among users, either concurrently or one after another – this includes things like public transit, taxis, bikesharing, carsharing, ridesharing, ride-hailing, scooter sharing, microtransit, and more. Shared use mobility has the potential to reduce the number of vehicles on our roads by allowing people

Pg. 4-15 Emerging Technologies

more transportation options and reducing the need for car ownership. Ride- hailing also has the potential to reduce public transit, biking, and walking and thus has the potential to increase both congestion and vehicle miles traveled.

4.8 Impacts to the MPO Planning Process At this time, the MPO has not made any changes to its travel demand model to reflect significant changes in travel technologies. With the advent of Connected and Automated Vehicles, it can be expected that new assumptions in the MPO’s modeling may need to be updated, including:

• Travel Demand Model Networks: potential vehicle use restrictions and revised speed and capacity assumptions • Trip Generation: potential increase in travel of persons with disabilities, unaccompanied children and elderly • Mode Choice: impact of shared vehicles and auto occupancy • Trip Distribution: reduced travel times • Trip Assignment: revised volume/delay function and lane use restrictions

4.9 Priorities Over the Next Five Years Over the next five years, the MPO plans to:

• continue to review best practices in autonomous and connected vehicle policies in order to understand future considerations for these types of technologies. • continue to stay involved with local, state, and federal efforts to explore the potential impacts, timelines, and costs associated with the deployment of automated vehicle technology. • incorporate fiber technology wherever possible. • work to set policies around the topic of connected and autonomous vehicles. • work to educate the public around connected and autonomous vehicle technology in advance of any initial deployment in our region.

Pg. 5-1 Public Involvement

5 Public Involvement

Public involvement is one of the cornerstones of transportation planning. At the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), our goal is to inform, involve, and engage with people in a two-way conversation about transportation needs, challenges, and most importantly – solutions. This chapter focuses on the outreach conducted as part of the long-range planning process but it only captures a snapshot of all the MPO’s public involvement efforts in the region.

5.1 Accomplishments over the Past Five Years The Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) continues to have a strong public participation program by taking advantage of new technologies and opportunities. The MPO continues its Walkable Community Program with workshops, Street Skills classes, bike rodeos and bicycle helmet and light distribution; in-house development of English and Spanish language videos and public service announcements as well as English and Spanish language

Pg. 5-2 Public Involvement

brochures; and the MPO continues to publish its bi-weekly e-newsletter FastTrack. The MPO is also active on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and YouTube and continually enhances its website format and content (mobile friendly). All committee (Transportation Policy Board, Technical Advisory Committee, Bicycle Mobility Advisory Committee and Pedestrian Mobility Advisory Committee) meeting materials are posted on the website one week prior to the meetings. Transportation Policy Board meetings are livestreamed in accordance with state law.

In December 2017, the MPO adopted an updated Public Participation Plan that aligns with the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act requirements. The MPO also has adopted a Limited English Proficiency Plan. The MPO continues to host the monthly regional Public Information Officers meeting where information is shared and transportation-related events are cross-promoted. The MPO also participates several times a month with other organizations’ activities such as health fairs, Earth Day, Fresh Air Friday, Solar Fest and other events. The MPO also conducts outreach to school age children through the annual GIS Day event and bicycle and pedestrian safety classes. The MPO continues to produce its own videos in house highlighting upcoming events and activities throughout the month.

The MPO completed successful public outreach efforts in the development of the FY 2017-2020 and FY 2019-2022 Transportation Improvement Programs, two Transportation Alternative project calls, this update of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan and the Transportation Conformity documentation, each with an active online public input component. In FY 2018, the MPO also hosted and highlighted public outreach activities at the National Conference of the Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations. In FY 2018, the MPO was selected by the Federal Highway Administration’s On Ramp to Innovation: Every Day Counts 5 as an innovative practitioner in the area of Virtual Public Involvement for online public meetings, production of videos for social media, and incorporating Story Maps and online mapping tools as part of the public involvement process.

Pg. 5-3 Public Involvement

In FY 2018, the MPO also worked to strengthen relationships with two low- income and minority communities by attending their monthly meetings and participating in community events. These include the Avenida Guadalupe Association on the near-westside of San Antonio and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People on the near-eastside. Figure 5-1 illustrates the results of some of that ongoing engagement.

Figure 5-1. Relationship Building with Avenida Guadalupe Association

5.2 Background The MPO’s mission is to provide a continuous, comprehensive and coordinated (“3-C”) regional transportation planning process for the safe and efficient movement of people and goods consistent with the community’s overall economic, social and environmental goals.

The MPO believes in the proactive involvement of citizens, affected public agencies, and representatives of transportation agency employees, private providers of transportation, and other interested parties in the development and updates of the MTP. Effective public involvement is integrated throughout the

Pg. 5-4 Public Involvement

entire process. A proactive approach to an effective public involvement process requires several elements:

5.3 Title VI and Environmental Justice Section 601 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination “on the basis of race, color, or national origin” in any “program of activity receiving federal financial assistance.” The U.S. DOT’s Title VI regulations prohibit, among other things, actions that would have the “purpose or effect” of discriminating against individuals on the basis of race, color, or national origin. Thus, rather than only prohibiting intentional discrimination, the U.S. DOT Title VI regulations also prohibit actions that have a disparate effect on minorities. The U.S. DOT’s disparate-impact regulations were upheld by the Supreme Court in the early 1980s. Title VI applies to all programs and activities of Federal-aid recipients, subrecipients and contractors whether those programs and activities are federally funded or not.

In 1994 President Bill Clinton signed Executive Order No. 12898: Federal Action to Address Environmental Justice (EJ) in Minority Populations and Low- Income Populations. Executive Order 12898 expands on the Title VI Civil Rights Legislation and promotes nondiscrimination in federal programs that substantially affect human health and the environment. In addition, the order provides minority and low-income communities access to public information and opportunity for public participation in related matters. All programs that receive funding from federal agencies require Environmental Justice consideration in accordance with federal law.

Pg. 5-5 Public Involvement

While Title VI and Environmental Justice overlap, they are not one in the same as shown in Figure 5-2.

Figure 5-2. Understanding Environmental Justice and Title VI

The MPO’s public involvement activities work to meet and exceed both Title VI and Environmental Justice requirements which seek to:

• Avoid, minimize or mitigate disproportionally high and adverse human health and environmental effects, including social and economic effects, on minority and low-income populations. • Ensure the full and fair participation by all potentially affected communities in the transportation decision-making process. • Prevent the denial of, reduction in, or significant delay in the receipt of benefits by minority and low-income populations. • Avoid discrimination of any kind against individuals on the basis of race, color, or national origin.

In addition to the definition above, the United States Department of Transportation (DOT) issued specific guidelines to MPOs regarding Environmental Justice. MPOs are to:

• Explore needs within minority communities. • Involve minority communities and disabled persons in the transportation planning process.

Pg. 5-6 Public Involvement

• Include minorities/disabled persons on boards and committees in leadership roles. • Document Title VI efforts. • Advertise public meetings in places where minorities/disabled persons go. • Hold meetings at times and places convenient for the minority community. • Communicate in languages other than English. • Consider special needs in public accommodations. • Follow up with the minority community after public meetings, when decisions are made and after project implementation.

The MPO adheres to the Department of Transportation guidelines by conducting specific outreach in underserved communities by hosting public meetings in strategic locations, using the ‘go to them’ meeting approach, taking into account available transit service in determining meeting locations, translating information into Spanish, having Spanish speaking staff members available at all meetings, including minorities/disabled persons on committees, advertising public meetings and information in a variety of print media and documenting efforts.

5.4 MTP Public Meetings In accordance with our Public Participation Plan (PPP), public involvement strategies for the long-range transportation plan consisted of partner agency coordination, news releases to local and regional media, newspaper ads advertising public comment opportunities, social media outreach, information distributed via e-newsletters, development of videos for use online, and neighborhood presentations. In addition to this, we also incorporated online public meetings, interactive survey tools, in-person and online polling, and gamification techniques. The MPO also hosted two formal rounds of public meetings throughout the region and completed its third Regional Transportation Attitude Survey, which has been conducted every ten years

Pg. 5-7 Public Involvement

since 1997. Following is a brief summary of each public involvement phase of the project.

Phase 1: The MPO held a public meeting to provide input on the regional vision statement and goals and review the population and employment forecasts for the region. This meeting was supported by the outreach strategies outlined in our PPP as well as virtual public involvement tools listed in the paragraph above.

Phase 2: The MPO conducted the third Regional Transportation Attitude Survey for the region. These surveys have been conducted every ten years and help indicate changing attitudes or behaviors related to transportation that in turn help inform the planning process.

Phase 3: The MPO conducted a public meeting supported by the outreach strategies outlined in our PPP as well as virtual public involvement tools listed in the paragraph above so that members of the public had an opportunity to review the draft plan and hear about the development of the Transportation Conformity Document.

Phase 4: The MPO conducted a two-step approval process of the long-range transportation process which includes a 30-day comment period for review and approval of the revised document that incorporated comments received during Phase 3. During the two-step process, information on the requested action is presented in the first month for information and discussion and then it is presented again in the second month for discussion and appropriate action. Additional opportunities for the public to provide input on the MTP and Transportation Conformity document occurred at each MPO Technical Advisory Committee meeting and each Transportation Policy Board meeting between July 2018 and April 2019.

Pg. 5-8 Public Involvement

Measures of Effectiveness In-person participation for Phase I was considerably higher than it was for Phase III. Staff members participated in debriefs after each event to discuss what worked and what needed to be improved. Overall, online participation is proving to be a cost-effective means of reaching a larger and more diverse audience for the MPO. Suggestions for increasing participation included shifting from a quarterly printed newsletter to a grass-roots flyer distribution in lower-income and minority communities. This idea has moved forward to implementation and is currently being tested. Another recommendation was to increase the use of Facebook live streaming which is something the MPO hopes to do for future public meetings.

Pg. 5-9 Public Involvement

5.5 Phase I: Review of Vision, Goals and Demographic Forecasts Public meetings were held to kick-off the MTP development process, obtain feedback on the draft vision and goals for the region, to review the population and employment projections, and provide opportunities for the public to get involved in the process. From October 25, 2013 through November 2, 2017, four public workshops were held – one in each of the counties on the MPO study area. The meeting held in Bexar County was also live streamed and an online public input opportunity, in both English and Spanish, was also provided.

Meeting times and locations were selected to allow meaningful coverage of the d iPads and paper study area. The study team was also careful to identify locations that were ADA ople to participate accessible with good access to transit, where available. Following is a list of most comfortable. the meeting locations, dates, and times.

Kendall County Public Meeting • Wednesday, October 25, 2017, 6:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. • Boerne Middle School South, 10 Cascade Caverns, Boerne, TX 78006

Pg. 5-10 Public Involvement

Bexar County Public Meeting (also live streamed) • Thursday, October 26, 2017, 6:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. • VIA Metro Center, 1021 San Pedro Ave., San Antonio, TX 78212

Comal County Public Meeting • Monday, October 30, 2017, 6:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. • New Braunfels Civic Center, 375 S. Castell Ave., New Braunfels, TX 78130

Guadalupe County Public Meeting • Thursday, November 2, 2017, 6:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. • Seguin - Guadalupe County Coliseum, 950 S. Austin St., Seguin, TX 78155

The four public meetings were similar in format and content and included a high level of audience participation. The input exercises were qualitative in nature and input was received using a smart phone or an iPad which were made available to the public for their use. Paper copies were also available for use. Participants were asked to respond to the following.

• Give one word that describes:  Today’s transportation system  The transportation system you hope we’ll have in 2045  The walking environment you would like to see in 2045  The bicycling environment you would like to see in 2045  Transit you would like to see in 2045  The highways you would like to see in 2045  The major corridors, non-highway roadways you would like to see in 2045

Pg. 5-11 Public Involvement

From the responses, word clouds were developed live. Some regional results and results by county are shown in Figure 5-3 through Figure 5-6.

Pg. 5-12 Public Involvement

Figure 5-3. Overall Responses to Today’s Transportation System

Figure 5-4. Responses to Today’s Transportation System by County

Pg. 5-13 Public Involvement

Figure 5-5. Overall Responses to Hopes for Future Transportation System

Figure 5-6. Responses to Hopes for Future Transportation System by County

Pg. 5-14 Public Involvement

Level of Importance Exercise Next, participants were asked to respond to the following.

• On a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 means "highest level of importance" and 5 means "lowest level of importance", please indicate what level of importance should be placed on:  building a network of bicycle lanes to make commuting by bicycle a better option  building or widening sidewalks  relieving congestion by adding lanes  relieving congestion by encouraging shared trips  expanding bus service hours  providing more frequent bus service

Responses by county, all counties combined, and for online responses are shown in Table 5-1.

Table 5-1. Level of Importance Exercise All Bexar Comal Guadalupe Kendall Online Meetings Building a network of bicycle lanes to make commuting by 2.00 2.63 3.62 3.38 2.91 3.15 bicycle a better option Building or widening 2.00 2.08 2.85 2.77 2.42 2.51 sidewalks Relieving congestion 3.23 1.93 2.31 1.54 2.25 2.04 by adding lanes Relieving congestion by encouraging 2.46 2.68 3.15 2.77 2.77 2.89 shared trips Expanding bus 2.42 2.58 4.00 2.90 2.97 2.91 service hours Providing more 2.00 2.05 3.92 2.90 2.72 2.72 frequent bus service. Highlighting indicates highest priorities for that meeting or grouping.

Pg. 5-15 Public Involvement

Emoji Exercise Similarly, the next series of questions asked about safety in different travel situations. People were asked to indicate how safe they felt by clicking on or circling an emoji that went from a dark green happy emoji to a bright red unhappy emoji. The various scenarios are described below and the results are shown in Figure 5-7 through

Pg. 5-16 Public Involvement

Figure 5-17.

• How safe do you feel walking in your neighborhood? • How safe do you feel walking in your downtown? • How safe do you feel riding a bicycle in your neighborhood? • How safe do you feel riding a bicycle on major corridors? • How safe do you feel riding a bicycle on a greenway or hike & bike trails? • How safe do you feel crossing your neighborhood streets? • How safe do you feel crossing major corridors? • How safe do you feel driving on highways in rush hour? • How safe do you feel driving on highways during normal traffic? • How safe do you feel driving on major corridors during rush hour? • How safe do you feel driving on major corridors during normal traffic? • How would you rate our transportation system TODAY?

Figure 5-7. How safe do you feel walking in your neighborhood?

Pg. 5-17 Public Involvement

Figure 5-8. How safe do you feel walking in your downtown?

Figure 5-9. How safe do you feel riding a bicycle in your neighborhood?

Figure 5-10. How safe do you feel riding a bicycle on major corridors?

Pg. 5-18 Public Involvement

Figure 5-11. How safe do you feel riding a bicycle on a greenway or hike & bike trails?

Figure 5-12. How safe do you feel crossing your neighborhood streets?

Figure 5-13. How safe do you feel crossing major corridors?

Pg. 5-19 Public Involvement

Figure 5-14. How safe do you feel driving on highways in rush hour?

Figure 5-15. How safe do you feel driving on highways during normal traffic?

Figure 5-16. How safe do you feel driving on major corridors during rush hour?

Pg. 5-20 Public Involvement

Figure 5-17. How safe do you feel driving on major corridors during normal traffic?

Finally, participants were asked to indicate their current level of satisfaction with the transportation system currently in place. While some people indicated they were somewhat satisfied, the majority felt less than satisfied as shown in Figure 5-18 below.

Figure 5-18. Satisfaction with Today’s Transportation System by County

Station Exercises Following the exercises and a brief presentation, participants were also asked to visit four stations and provide additional feedback on the Metropolitan Transportation Plan goals, readiness for different types of commuting options, and regional transportation challenges. The results for each of these exercises can be found on the following pages.

Pg. 5-21 Public Involvement

Station 1: Vision Statement At this station, participants were asked to tell us what was missing from our vision statement, what was most important from the vision statement, and what, if anything, might need to be changed or come out. No one at any of the meetings held felt something should come out of the long-range plan vision statement. The results are shown in Table 5-2.

Table 5-2. Vision Statement Feedback Boerne San Antonio New Braunfels Seguin October 25, 2017 October 27, 2017 October 30, 2017 November 2, 2017 • Develop long-term • Keep transit affordable • Efficiency • You do not mention integrated transportation • Private/Public • Get people where they need retain individual plans and acquire right Ridesharing commuting to go more quickly rights (esp. land of ways solutions • Bike lanes (bike owners own owners) • Long-term maintenance • Private Companies need cars too and should be able to • Rural property • Thinking about how our more involvement travel safely) protection 25-year plan fits into • Better funding for road What’s Missing longer term (maybe out improvements 100 years?) • Equity • Financing & sidewalks • Multiple routes in/out of areas (dead ends) • Financing • Connected within the city and to other cities

Pg. 5-22 Public Involvement

Boerne San Antonio New Braunfels Seguin October 25, 2017 October 27, 2017 October 30, 2017 November 2, 2017 • Land use patterns • Affordable • Ensuring environmental quality - • All goals are • Enhancing safety of the transportation using low impact development; admirable but public • Safety avoiding new roads on Edwards difficult to achieve • Safety of the traveling • Environmental recharge • Don't confuse rural public Quality: Air (federal • Advancing sustainable modes of & urban areas • Advancing sustainable penalties and cost for transportation modes of transportation infrastructure) and • Emphasis should remain on • Advancing sustainable Water (aquifer) mode 95-97% of commuters use, modes • Vision Zero which is roads. Bikes and • Land use and emphasis pedestrians shouldn't be getting sustainable modes of • County Land Use highway dollars. Those modes transportation Patterns should be addressed at city level • Foster appropriate land • Bike/Ped Safety • One size doesn't fit all. MPO is a use diverse area What’s Really • Bike lanes are not used. Stop Important implementing them • Integration of govt agencies (TCEQ, TxDOT, EPA, city and county officials) • We as young people don't prefer bikes and walking. I love the independence of my vehicle! • Quarries killing Comal County. Institute impact tax • Put the money under the road pavements - do not waste it on toll roads (?) • Safe ways to walk or bike from neighborhoods to parks, destinations and work/school What Needs to • Nothing listed • Nothing listed • Nothing listed • Nothing listed Come out?

Pg. 5-23 Public Involvement

Station 2: Goals At this station participants were given three dots and asked to put the dots next to the goals that were most important to them. What we hoped to learn: Do these goals still reflect the community’s priorities? The results are shown in Table 5-3.

Table 5-3. Goal Feedback Station Location System System Economic Public Sustainable Transit Environment Land use Safety Other: None Total Respondents Preservation Efficiency Development Involvement Funding Boerne 11 26 28 5 11 0 0% 3 7% 3 7% 4 9% 12 2 5% 3 7% 0 0% 43 % % % San Antonio 16 11 11 11 21 11 1 5% 1 5% 3 2 2 2 1 5% 4 2 1 5% 19 % % % % % % New Braunfels 27 12 12 15 7 9% 22 10 10 2 3% 12 7 9% 6 7% 3 4% 1 1% 81 % % % % Seguin 17 17 10 13 17 5 5 1 3% 2 7% 1 3% 2 7% 3 4 2 7% 5 30 % % % % % Siclovia 16 10 10 18 12 33 8% 65 40 26 7% 38 23 6% 27 7% 73 29 7% 46 400 % % % % % Total 18 16 51 9% 104 54 9% 43 8% 46 8% 43 8% 50 9% 89 39 7% 53 9% 573 % % Highlights denote highest ranked goal for that meeting, event, or total.

Boerne Other Seguin • None • Preserve the rights of land owners above all else (1 / 3%) San Antonio Other • Multimodal (1 / 5%) Siclovia • Expand greenways for bikes (31/ 8%) New Braunfels Other • Address animal control cyclists and pedestrian • Get more funds to fund better roads (1 / 1%) safety (4/ 1%) • Maintain roads for safe biking (11/ 3%)

Pg. 5-20 Public Involvement

Station 3: Reducing Vehicle Miles of Travel Next, we asked participants to tell us which, if any, of the following commuting options they would be willing to consider as an alternative to being in a single occupancy vehicle on their commute to work. What we hoped to learn: What options other than driving alone are most palatable to people today? Results are shown in Table 5-4.

Table 5-4. Commute Options Readiness Feedback Location Flexible work Work from Carpool with Carpool with Walking Biking Transit None Total schedule home friends strangers Boerne 5 17% 6 20% 4 13% 1 3% 2 7% 1 3% 1 3% 10 33% 30 San Antonio 2 7% 4 15% 3 12% 3 12% 4 15% 3 12% 6 23% 1 4% 26 New Braunfels 4 8% 5 10% 5 10% 1 2% 6 12% 6 12% 6 12% 16 33% 49 Seguin 5 17% 5 17% 0 0% 1 3% 1 3% 3 10% 0 0% 5 17% 30 Total 16 13% 20 15% 12 9% 6 4% 13 10% 13 10% 13 10% 32 24% 135 Highlights denote highest ranked alternative for that meeting, event, or total.

Pg. 5-21 Public Involvement

Station 4: Transportation Challenges The final station asked participants to identify transportation challenges they experience on a daily basis and to categorize them by the goal they felt covered the challenge. What we hoped to learn: Are there projects suggested that should be included as “unfunded” or that we should think about including in future? Results are shown in Table 5-5.

TABLE LEGEND San New Boerne Seguin Antonio Braunfels

Table 5-5. Transportation Challenges Input System System Economic Public Sustainable Transit Environment Land Use Safety None Apply Preservation Efficiency Development Involvement Funding Complete Congestion on Need transit LID & other Public transport Residents Long term Lack of safe bike No ITS on IH 10 sidewalks are roads to/from from Boerne to storm water so people can complain about planning for corridors into measurement between San needed. town San Antonio quality measures get to work reckless future roadway and out of major with added land Antonio and motorists on dedication employment value with Boerne to warn online areas and transportation of accidents and neighborhood employers investment less barricades forums but don't so that traffic can attend public be diverted informational quicker meetings.

Build more lanes Light Commuter rail Am seeing Park, ride, and Need more or Preservation of Crossing main Increase gas tax synchronization increasing do - park and different routes streets in small exhaust fumes ride that is more outreach to non- towns, especially on the road and than a lot - English Boerne fuel inefficient coffee, dry speakers. vehicles cleaner, day care Do not spend Traffic on IH 10 Lack of light rail No new roads Public More folk need Secure roadway Son getting to Put all road road funds on over Edwards transportation so to update their land for the school safely on funds on non-toll bike lanes and Aquifer people can keep knowledge of future his bike roads - non-HOV sidewalks Recharge zone their jobs! vehicle safety roads (bikes, cars) Preventative Congestion Bus system Bioswails Public Stakeholders Secure land for Bike lanes and Maintenance transportation to from low-income future roadways sidewalks for

Pg. 5-22 Public Involvement

System System Economic Public Sustainable Transit Environment Land Use Safety None Apply Preservation Efficiency Development Involvement Funding stores, jobs, areas need to be kids to get to sometimes you library, food involved from the school safely have to spend banks for all. beginning money to save money later Congestion on Public Low priority The public has Coordination A car has more Funding roads 2 lane transportation in repeatedly with land use rights than you prioritized on roads can no Boerne rejected tolling planning to or I walking or non-toll longer support and the tax ensure safe and biking highways the growth in the burden and realistic expansion as area restrictions on transportation road/ our gas travel it creates, needs are met - taxes are so it needs to be Quarry industry intended to do! off the table. killing Comal Listen! County Incentives for Light-rail Protect the Use all possible Direct route bike Not enough Funding that you faster project environment and outreach lanes from north protected bike can forecast completion rural areas methods. (social to south to east lanes especially on IH media) to west 10

Roundabouts Signing up for Not my land Too many Funding work! Less less expensive cyclists and frontage roads! senior transit pedestrians injured and killed FM 306/2673 at Hours need to Preserve private Too many pot Horseshoe be extended it is property rights holes and hard to catch (no to eminent uneven "line up" when domain) pavement for you're 64 biking

725 coming and Transit transfers Transportation FM 3009 - high going traffic light not explained solutions that traffic, no any where don't increase shoulders, no urban sprawl turning lanes, no bicycle lanes, no lights at intersections SH 46 at I-35 Keeping Preserve private Walkways on intersection frequency and residential Hwy 306 are needs flyovers - late hour service property ridiculous all directions

Pg. 5-23 Public Involvement

System System Economic Public Sustainable Transit Environment Land Use Safety None Apply Preservation Efficiency Development Involvement Funding Help FM 1863 My Do not use Conrads/Kohlen be more flood - neighborhood eminent domain berg exit and proof! bus does not run yields - late enough to elementary get home from future 7 evening subdivisions meetings. DPS megacenter SH 46 no lights - Light rail in the I- No street light at narrow freeway 35 corridor Hwy 46/3009, no bike lanes, 2- way lanes need to expand non-toll lanes Park, ride, do - Monitor speeds carry more than park and rides on highway and restricted lanes that have more streets and are more than a parking efficient - so lot restricted lanes need to be nixed! Lanes need to Rapid transit Natural Bridge be wider for cars from New Caverns - heavy Braunfels to congestion at Austin peak vacation season, weekends, holidays Getting thru Transit to-from Crosswalks intersection of IH Austin to NB 35 and SH 46 ITS Bus within NB Safe ways to bike and wlak to work, school, and parks. Upgrades of Full connection Safer traffic signals from Austin to transportation San Antonio Widen IH-10 Stand alone (much too bike/walk lane to congested) connect the city parks,

Pg. 5-24 Public Involvement

System System Economic Public Sustainable Transit Environment Land Use Safety None Apply Preservation Efficiency Development Involvement Funding communities and extend around the city as well Widen IH-10 Transit in New Braunfels to San Antonio, San Marcos and Austin Planning for Bus technologies transportation in such as self- New Braunfels driving cars Need to use more of our rails for transportation from San Antonio to Houston Need way to get from San Marcos to New Braunfels Waste of money in Guadalupe County As we grow and as we age, are there plans for public trans. To airports in SA and Austin? Regional mass transit, light rail

Pg. 5-25 Public Involvement

5.6 Phase II: Regional Transportation Attitude Survey III Building a good plan requires a statistically valid benchmark or starting point regarding attitudes and perceptions concerning the region’s current transportation system. Accordingly, a third Regional Transportation Attitude Survey (RTAS III) was conducted in the Winter of 2017. The purpose of the RTAS’ are to gather statistically valid data on the public’s opinions, attitudes, beliefs and values about existing transportation issues, changes in travel behavior, lifestyles, and perceptions about future multimodal transportation systems. The survey was previously conducted in 1997-1998 and in 2006- 2007. This study was the first for the expanded MPO study area.

The survey is actually three surveys: residents, employers and underserved populations. The results of the survey will be used to help set long range transportation priorities for the MPO study area, which includes all of Bexar, Comal, and Guadalupe Counties as well as a portion of Kendall County. The survey will also help the MPO better understand the level of satisfaction with the region’s transportation system and attitudes toward prioritizing transportation improvements. All three reports are posted on the MPO’s website but selected findings of the resident survey are below.

Findings of the Resident Survey How Residents Thought Traffic Congestion Has Changed Compared to Five Years Ago: Seventy-one percent (71%) of the residents surveyed indicated they thought traffic congestion has “increased a great deal” in the San Antonio/Alamo area compared to five years ago; another 17% indicated they thought it has “increased somewhat.” In 2008, 73% of respondents thought traffic congestion has “increased a great deal” and another 15% indicated they thought traffic congestion has “increased somewhat.” Overall, the results from 2008 to 2018 did not significantly change.

Satisfaction with Aspects of the Region’s Transportation System: The aspects of the region’s transportation system with the highest levels of satisfaction, based upon the combined percentage of “very satisfied” and “satisfied”

Pg. 5-26 Public Involvement

responses among residents, who had an opinion, were: ease of travel from your home to work (40%), ease of travel between your home and Seguin (37%), and the ease of travel between your home and Downtown San Antonio (35%). Residents were least satisfied with the ease of travel by bicycle in the region (14%). When analyzing the trends in responses from 2018 and 2008 the most significant change is a 9% decrease in the number of respondents who gave either “very satisfied” or “satisfied” responses when indicating their overall satisfaction with the ease of travel between home and Downtown San Antonio. In 2018, 40% of respondents indicated they were “very satisfied” or “satisfied” with the ease of travel between home and Downtown San Antonio compared to 49% in 2008.

Current and Emerging Problems in the Region: Based on the combined percentage of “current problem” and “emerging problem” responses from residents, who had an opinion, the following items are considered to be the largest problem areas in the region moving forward: the capacity of major roads not keeping up with new development (87%), congestion between home and Downtown San Antonio (81%), truck traffic (79%), and congestion between home and New Braunfels (70%). Residents were least concerned with traffic delays caused by trains (30%).

Satisfaction with Efforts to Address Long Range Transportation Planning Issues in the Region: The long range transportation issues with the highest levels of satisfaction, based upon the combined percentage of “very satisfied” and “satisfied” responses among residents, who had an opinion, were: preserving historical sites (51%), protecting sources of drinking water (43%), protecting trees and other features of the natural landscape (32%), and protecting and preserving air quality (31%). Residents were least satisfied with the relief of traffic congestion in the region (12%) and the reduction of urban sprawl (13%).

Pg. 5-27 Public Involvement

5.7 Phase III: Presentation of Draft Plan and Information on Transportation Conformity

A second round of public meetings were held in the fall of 2018 to present the draft version of Mobility 2045, the MPO’s long range transportation plan. The meetings were also used to present on requirements related to air quality regulations tied to Bexar County’s nonattainment designation and the development of a Transportation Conformity Document.

From November 1, 2018 to November 15, 2018, four public meetings were held – one in each of the counties in the MPO study area. The meeting held in Bexar County was also live streamed and an online public input opportunity, in both English and Spanish, was provided from October 28, 2018 through November 19, 2018.

Meeting times and locations were selected to allow meaningful coverage of the study area. The study team was also careful to identify locations that were ADA accessible with good access to transit, where available. Following is a list of the meeting locations, dates, and times.

Comal County Public Meeting • Thursday, November 1, 2018, 6:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. • New Braunfels Civic Center, 375 S. Castell Ave., New Braunfels, TX 78130

Kendall County Public Meeting • Thursday, November 8, 2018, 6:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m.

Pg. 5-28 Public Involvement

• Boerne Middle School South, 10 Cascade Caverns, Boerne, TX 78006

Guadalupe County Public Meeting • Thursday, November 13, 2018, 6:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. • Seguin Public Library, 313 W. Nolte Street, Seguin, TX 78155

Bexar County Public Meeting (also live streamed) • Thursday, November 15, 2018, 6:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. • VIA Metro Center, 1021 San Pedro Ave., San Antonio, TX 78212

The format for the public meetings consisted of a 20-minute presentation followed by an open house with stations and exhibits on each of the chapters in Mobility 2045, as well as exhibits displaying the funded and unfunded projects to be included in the plan.

The MPO’s virtual public involvement strategies were recently recognized as

part of the FHWA On Ramp to Innovation – Every Day Counts 5 initiative. MPO virtual public meetings allow participants to take part in the planning process from the comfort of their home 24 hours a day, 7

days a week. They include videos of the presentations given at in-person public me etings, as well as documents and exhibits. They also allow people to comment online to the same questions posed to in-person participants.

Pg. 5-29 Public Involvement

5.8 Phase IV: Presentation to the Technical Advisory Committee and Transportation Policy Board Formally, the MPO has a two-step process for adopting a new Metropolitan Transportation Plan. In addition to the required two step approval process, the Metropolitan Transportation Plan was agendized at each of the Technical Advisory Committee meetings and Transportation Policy Board meetings from September 2018 to April 2019 allowing for public comment at each of those meetings. The final draft of Mobility 2045 was presented to the Technical Advisory Committee on March 8, 2019 and to the Transportation Policy Board on March 25, 2019. The Technical Advisory Committee took action recommending adoption of Mobility 2045 on April 5, 2019. The Transportation Policy Board adopted Mobility 2045 on April 22, 2019. The Transportation Conformity document was also presented and acted upon on these same meeting dates.

Pg. 6-1 Active Transportation

6 Active Transportation

Bicycling and walking are vital components of a transportation system. Riding a bike and walking can improve physical and mental health, curb air and water pollution, reduce traffic congestion, preserve natural resources, promote equity, and create social bonds. These benefits warrant the development of a transportation system that enables people to travel safely and comfortably by bike or on foot.

6.1 Accomplishments Over the Last Five Years Ten years ago, it would have been a rare sight to see someone walking to work or riding a bicycle on a weekday in downtown San Antonio. Today, a casual glance at Main Street reveals an entirely different picture, punctuated by buffered bike lanes and wide, shaded sidewalks.

The Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) and its partner agencies continue to educate, encourage, and engineer bicycle and pedestrian facilities to increase the number of people riding bicycles and walking as a preferred mode of choice.

Pg. 6-2 Active Transportation

Since 2013, the MPO has conducted nine Walkable Community Workshops, assisting residents in identifying the barriers to a more walkable and bikeable community. The workshops have increased awareness of the importance of pedestrian and cyclist mobility and access, and led to engineering improvements in infrastructure. The workshops are supplemented by more frequent and informal walkability audits, conducted by request.

Since 2014, the MPO has reached 820 people through a partnership with the City of San Antonio to provide free Street Skills classes to teach adults and mature teens the rules of the road for cyclists and deliver helpful tips for riding safely.

In the fall of 2014, the City of San Antonio was declared a Bronze-level Bicycle Friendly Community by the League of American Bicyclists and the MPO was designated a Silver-level Bicycle Friendly Business in 2015.

In 2015, San Antonio became the first city in Texas to launch a Vision Zero initiative. Vision Zero is a traffic safety approach to eliminate traffic-related deaths and severe injuries. The MPO’s Transportation Policy Board and the Cities of Kirby and Leon Valley have since approved resolutions in support of Vision Zero initiatives within the Alamo Area. In 2018, the MPO co-hosted the region’s first Vision Zero Summit.

In 2016, the MPO made several strides towards a bicycle and pedestrian friendly region by completing its first Regional Bike/Pedestrian Planning Study which included recommendations for enhancing bicycle and pedestrian mobility and access in San Antonio, New Braunfels, Seguin, and Boerne. That same year, the MPO also published its 5th Bicycle Map that categorized the streets in Bexar County according to the Level of Traffic Stress for people on bikes, and a correlating online map that covered the entire study area.

In 2017, the MPO initiated the Regional Bike Share Master Plan to evaluate the feasibility of expanding the current SWell Cycle bike share program in in Bexar County, as well as explore the possibility of implementing bike share in Comal,

Pg. 6-3 Active Transportation

Guadalupe, and Kendall Counties. In 2017, the MPO also convened a subcommittee of the Bicycle Mobility Advisory Committee (BMAC) for the purpose of encouraging businesses to participate in the League of American Bicyclists Bicycle Friendly Business Program.

As of 2018, the regional bicycle network includes over 230 miles of bike lanes in Bexar County and 68 miles (and counting) of shared use paths along the Leon Creek, Salado Creek, Medina River, and San Antonio River with another 10 miles of shared-use paths providing access through Boerne, New Braunfels and Seguin.

6.2 Current MPO Policies Complete Streets Policy Since its inception, the MPO’s Transportation Policy Board (TPB) has strived to fund projects that included safe and convenient access for all roadway users, including people driving cars, walking, biking, and using transit.

In 2009, the TPB formally Figure 6-1. Bike lane on Main Street, San Antonio adopted a Complete Streets Policy, aimed at ensuring that people of all ages and abilities are able to use roadways safely and comfortably. The MPO’s Complete Streets policy also encourages the MPO’s partner agencies to adopt similar policies. In 2011, the City of San Antonio adopted a Complete Streets policy and in 2017, the City of Seguin adopted a similar policy in its Master Thoroughfare Plan. Figure 6-1 shows new bike facilities in downtown San Antonio.

Vision Zero In 2015, the City of San Antonio adopted a Vision Zero Initiative, which calls for eliminating traffic fatalities and serious injuries. That same year, the TPB passed a similar resolution in support of Vision Zero. Since then, the MPO has

Pg. 6-4 Active Transportation

worked closely with the City of San Antonio and other partner agencies to enhance roadway safety through education, encouragement, and engineering initiatives. The MPO has also worked to incorporate safety considerations into its activities, most notably in scoring projects for potential MPO funding.

In 2016, the City of San Antonio began its study of Severe Pedestrian Injury Areas (SPIAs), identifying locations where two or more severe pedestrian injuries occurred in close proximity. These locations are shown in Figure 6-2. The study has

helped the City of San Figure 6-2. City of San Antonio Severe Antonio to identify and Pedestrian Injury Areas, 2011-2015 prioritize pedestrian improvements for high-need areas. Similar studies are expected for bicycle and vehicular crashes in the future. The MPO is currently conducting a similar analysis for Guadalupe, Comal, and Kendall Counties to guide safety projects in those areas as well.

In July 2018, the MPO co- hosted San Antonio’s inaugural Vision Zero Summit, alongside our transportation partners in the region. The sold-out event featured regional and national speakers, including Leah Shahum, founder of the Figure 6-3. Vision Zero Summit Leadership Panel Vision Zero Network; Gabe Klein, founder of CityFi; and Lilly O’Brien, with the Los Angeles Department of Transportation. Regional leaders, including San Antonio Councilwoman Shirley Gonzalez and City of San Antonio

Pg. 6-5 Active Transportation

Transportation and Capital Improvements Director, Mike Frisbie, provided local insight. Panel members are show in Figure 6-3.

6.3 MPO Active Transportation Programs Walkable Community Workshop Technical Assistance Program The Walkable Community Workshop program is a regional technical assistance program that works with community groups to identify barriers to walkability and bikeability within a geographic area.

Since 2013, the MPO has conducted nine Walkable Figure 6-4. Walkable Community Workshop in New Braunfels Community Workshops. The workshops educate participants about the benefits of active transportation, assist communities in identifying infrastructure improvements, and provide the community with an opportunity for two-way communication with local transportation agency staff, as shown in Figure 6-4. After the workshop, MPO staff compile the findings into a report, which includes recommended strategies for enhancing neighborhood mobility. Projects that stem from these reports are then given additional consideration if submitted for MPO funding. The workshop reports are available at the MPO’s website at www.alamoareampo.org/wcp.

Pg. 6-6 Active Transportation

Community Education and Encouragement Street Skills Program The Street Skills program is a partnership between the MPO and the City of San Antonio.

Street Skills classes are classroom- style sessions, shown in Figure 6-5 Since 2016, over where adults and mature teens can 800 area residents learn the rules of the road for people Figure 6-5. Street Skills participants at a Bexar have attended street on bikes, including bicycle safety tips County Lunch & Learn skills classes and and best practices for handling potentially dangerous situations. Attendees are received new bicycle given a free helmet and set of bike lights to help them stay safe while riding. helmets and lights. Bicycle & Pedestrian Mobility Advisory Committees The MPO Bicycle Mobility Advisory Committee (BMAC, created in 1995) and the Pedestrian Mobility Advisory Committee (PMAC, created in 1997) advise the MPO’s Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and Transportation Policy Board (TPB) on technical and policy issues related to active transportation. Each committee meets monthly, and is comprised of a variety of agency representatives, bicycle organizations, and citizens who are interested in and knowledgeable about active transportation. The committees provide a centralized forum for discussion, interagency coordination, and citizen input on bicycle- and pedestrian-related matters.

Bicycle Friendly Business Program The League of American Bicyclists’ Bicycle Friendly Business Program is a nationwide recognition program for employers that support traveling by bicycle. In 2017, there were only six bicycle friendly businesses designated in San Antonio, including the Alamo Area MPO. That’s why in 2016, the MPO launched an effort to make more businesses aware of the program and encourage them to apply for designation. SWell Cycle was one of the businesses to apply and in 2018 they were declared a Bronze Level Bicycle Friendly Business.

Pg. 6-7 Active Transportation

Defensive Driving The MPO partners with the City of San Antonio’s Risk Management Division to educate city-employed drivers about sharing the road with people biking and walking. This information is shared at approximately 45 classes annually, reaching more than 1,000 people each year.

Community Events It is the MPO’s goal to actively participate in and promote various community events that educate and encourage residents about healthy transportation and environmental sustainability. MPO staff attend events and distribute educational materials related to bicycling, walking, and air quality. Each year, MPO staff attends over 20 community events, reaching thousands of residents within the MPO study area.

Youth Outreach Bicycle Rodeos & Safety Talks The MPO provides support for bicycle rodeos by helping children fit their helmets properly, distributing helmets to children who do not own one, and sharing important safety information with parents, teachers, and students. MPO staff also provide bicycle and pedestrian safety talks to schools and other youth groups.

Safe Routes to School Program In 2017, the MPO joined its partner agencies in establishing a Walking School Bus program, as shown in Figure 6-6 at Sarah King Elementary School. The

Figure 6-6. Walking School Bus at Sarah King (Picture Credit: KSAT12 News)

Pg. 6-8 Active Transportation

MPO provided spatial data analysis that aided in the selection of the school and also conducted a walkability audit. The MPO will increase collaboration with local and regional partners to promote International Walk to School Day each October and foster the development of more Walking School Bus programs around the region.

Walk & Roll Program The MPO’s Walk & Roll Program encourages residents to use active, healthy forms of transportation. Walk & Roll efforts typically take place during National Bike Month in May, with the annual Walk & Roll

Rally, as shown in Figure 6-7. The MPO’s 21st annual Walk & Roll Rally in 2016 Figure 6-7 kicking off the festivities.

Averaging 300 attendees annually, the Walk & Roll Rally educates the public on the benefits of active transportation, shares information on active transportation programs and resources, and encourages people to walk, bike, and ride transit more often. In 2018, the MPO also debuted “Energizer Stations”, which celebrate National Bike to Work Day by providing free snacks, giveaways, and educational materials to cyclists on their way to work.

6.4 Funding and Implementing Active Transportation Projects Bicycle networks are funded and developed by a variety of agencies responsible for the transportation system. Leveraging various sources of funding is often necessary to complete bicycle projects.

Pg. 6-9 Active Transportation

Table 6-1 shows some of the common sources of funding for bicycle projects and programs in the Alamo region.

Table 6-1. Primary Funding Sources for Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure Agency Funding Program

The MPO awards federal funds through a competitive project selection process. The MPO currently has two federal funding programs that fund bicycle and pedestrian projects.

Surface Transportation Program-Metropolitan Mobility (STP- MM):

Over $80 million in federal funding is available approximately Alamo Area every two years. Approximately $170 million dollars were Metropolitan awarded during the 2017 call for projects. Standalone bicycle Planning and pedestrian facilities are eligible for funding. Organization (MPO)

Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP):

Transportation Alternatives is a funding program intended specifically for bicycle and pedestrian projects. Approximately $15 million was available during the 2016 call for projects. Calls for projects are issued about every two years as funding becomes available.

Pg. 6-10 Active Transportation

Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ):

Bexar County was designated marginal nonattainment in July 2018 and will begin receiving CMAQ funding beginning in FY 2020. Approximately $20 million will be available annually. Bicycle and pedestrian projects are eligible for this funding source.

Texas TxDOT’s Statewide Transportation Alternatives Program is Department of intended specifically for bicycle and pedestrian projects. Calls Transportation for projects are issued approximately every two years and are (TxDOT) open to projects outside urbanized areas.

The City of San Antonio has two major programs for funding bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure projects:

Infrastructure Management Program (IMP):

City of San The Infrastructure Management Program (IMP) is a five-year Antonio rolling program which focuses on the maintenance of the City’s infrastructure.

City of San Antonio Bond Program:

Since 2007, the City of San Antonio has initiated five-year bond programs to finance large capital improvements throughout the

Pg. 6-11 Active Transportation

City. The 2017-2022 bond program allocated over $445 million San Antonio ranks 42nd in the U.S. for towards Street, Bridge, & Sidewalks Improvements. bicycle commuting, with 0.3% of San Antonio residents commuting to work by bike.

2016 Benchmarking Report, Alliance for City of Seguin Bond Program: Biking and Walking The City of Seguin typically puts aside $50,000 annually to fund City of Seguin sidewalk construction and maintenance. The city also aggressively pursues grants to fund bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure.

6.5 Active Transportation Trends in the Alamo Area Bicycle Ridership & Walking Trends People living in the Alamo region ride bicycles and walk for a variety of reasons.

In 2010, an estimated 93 percent of adult residents in Bexar County who rode a bicycle in the last 30 days did so for recreational purposes. Meanwhile, 17 percent bicycled to run errands, 7 percent bicycled to go to work, and 4 percent bicycled to go to school (San Antonio Regional Bicycling Travel Patterns Survey, 2010).

Commuting by bicycle is also on the rise. Between 2007 and 2013, the percentage of San Antonians who commuted to work by bike increased from 0.1 percent to 0.3 percent. While these are gains to be celebrated, there is much room for improvement. As of 2016, an estimated 1.9 percent of San Antonio commuters walk to work – a 0.4 percent decrease since 2007. Of the

Pg. 6-12 Active Transportation

fifty most populous cities in the US, San Antonio ranked 40th and 42nd in terms 69% of people in of share of people who commute by foot and bike, respectively (2016 our region always Benchmarking Report, Alliance for Biking and Walking). or often feel concerned about The Alamo Area has the potential to increase overall ridership and foot traffic. safety when In a 2015 survey, over 86 percent of respondents indicated they would like to walking or biking. ride a bicycle more (Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning Study, 2015).

2010 Regional Similarly, in the MPO’s 2018 Regional Transportation Attitude Survey, 37% Safety Study were satisfied with the availability of sidewalks and pedestrian facilities.

Strava In 2017, the Texas Department of Transportation purchased Strava Metro data to share with MPOs and other public The use of Strava agencies. Metro data will As shown in Figure 6-8, enable the MPO and its partner the MPO plans to use this information to Figure 6-8. This Strava map shows individual rides logged into agencies to better Strava within a one-year timeframe understand bicycle better inform its and pedestrian planning process, including project selection and community outreach. For travel patterns and example, in 2018, the MPO used Strava data to identify the most popular behavior, from the locations for National Bike to Work Day “Energizer Stations”. The MPO’s most-highly used roadways to wait partner agencies can also use this data to prioritize bicycle and pedestrian times at projects, build support for more infrastructure, and evaluate usage before and intersections. after project implementation.

Pg. 6-13 Active Transportation

Safety Bicyclist & Pedestrian Fatalities and Serious Injuries in the MPO Study Area (2013-2017) According to the Alliance 300 for Biking & Walking 2016 200 Benchmarking Report, 100 the rate of bicyclist and 0 pedestrian fatalities in 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

San Antonio is higher Pedestrian Fatalities & Serious Injuries than the national Bicyclist Fatalities & Serious Injuries 1 average. Since 2013, 33 Figure 6-9. Bicyclist & Pedestrian Fatalities and Serious Injuries in cyclists and 307 the MPO study area from 2013-2017 pedestrians were killed in the MPO study area, and another 778 were seriously injured (CRIS, 2018). Many more crashes are less severe or do not get reported. Safety concerns remain a major barrier to many people who currently ride a bicycle or are considering riding. Trends in bicycle and pedestrian crashes are shown in Figure 6-9.

6.6 The Bicycle and Pedestrian Network Existing Conditions The existing bicycle network in Bexar County contains diverse bicycle and pedestrian facilities. In 2000, there were approximately 34 miles of on-street bicycle facilities in Bexar County. By 2017, the number had increased to over 280, not including wide shoulders.

1 While the MPO boundary includes Bexar, Comal, Guadalupe, and Kendall Counties, data from this report was only available for the City of San Antonio.

Pg. 6-14 Active Transportation

There are also over 115 miles of off-street multi-use trails, serving people who bike for both transportation as well as recreation. In terms of total number of miles of bicycle facilities, San Antonio outpaces the national average. However, it falls below the national average in terms of bike facilities per square mile. Types of bicycle facilities in San Antonio are shown in Figure 6-10 and bicycle infrastructure is shown in Figure 6-11.

Currently, there are no on-street bicycle facilities in the City of Boerne in Kendall County. There are, however, 11.5 miles of multi-use trails and side paths. Over 64 percent of survey respondents from Boerne said that the lack of bicycle lanes, trails, or paths prevents them from riding more often than they currently do, and 21 percent of respondents used the word “dangerous” to describe bicycling in Boerne. Boerne’s Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan includes goals to develop more pedestrian and bicycle facilities throughout the city, and over 85 miles of bicycle facilities were proposed in the MPO’s Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Planning Study for Boerne.

Figure 6-10. Bicycle Infrastructure in MPO Study Area

Pg. 6-15 Active Transportation

Figure 6-11. Types of Bicycle Facilities in Bexar County

Two-Way Protected Bike Shared Side Paths Buffered Bike Lane Lane

Conventional Bike Lane Shared Lane Markings Bike Route Signage

Off-Street Trails

The City of New Braunfels has over 10 miles of bicycle lanes and nearly 24 miles of wide shoulders. The City’s off-street bicycle network consists of 5.7 miles of multi-use trails and 6 miles of side paths. Over 80 percent of survey respondents in New Braunfels said that the lack of bicycle facilities prevented them from riding a bicycle more often. The 2017 Strategic Parks and Recreation Master Plan calls for a network of off-street trails throughout the City as well as on-street facilities. Over 123 miles of bicycle facilities are also proposed in the MPO Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning Study for the City of New Braunfels.

The City of Seguin has 0.9 miles of bicycle lanes and 31.1 miles of wide shoulders. The City’s off-street bicycle network is comprised of 1.4 miles of multi-use trails. Over 78 percent of survey respondents in Seguin said that the lack of bicycle facilities prevents them from riding a bicycle more often. Over 117 miles of bicycle facilities are proposed in the MPO Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning Study for the City.

Pg. 6-16 Active Transportation

Bike Map The MPO, in partnership with the City of San Antonio Office of Sustainability, created the area’s 5th Bike Map to help the public and other transportation agencies better understand people’s experiences when cycling in the region by including the level of traffic stress on different roadways.

The Bike Map, see Figure 6-12, shows the Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) for people on bikes on various roadways in the MPO study area. The LTS score was calculated based on several factors:

• Number of travel lanes, • Posted speed limit Figure 6-12. 5th Edition LTS Bike Map • Traffic volumes • Type of bicycle facility present

LTS maps help bike riders consider the full roadway context when choosing their route and enables them to select routes that are appropriate for their skill and comfort level. The map is available online at www.alamoareampo.org/bikemap.

Pg. 6-17 Active Transportation

6.7 Planned Network Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning Study The MPO completed the Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning Study, see Figure 6-13, in 2016. With input from the community, transportation agency partners, and the MPO Bicycle and Pedestrian Figure 6-13. Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Planning Study, 2016 Mobility Advisory Committees, the study included a review of existing conditions and needs as well as bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure recommendations for five areas:

• City of San Antonio (pedestrian recommendations) • San Antonio Missions National Historic Park • City of Boerne • City of New Braunfels • City of Seguin

The final report documents the growing interest in bicycling in the region and provides guidance for implementing a safe, accessible, and comprehensive bicycle and pedestrian network for the MPO study area.

Pg. 6-18 Active Transportation

2011 Bike Plan In 2011, the City of San Antonio adopted its San Antonio Bike Plan & Implementation Strategy. The plan, shown in Figure 6-14, mapped the existing network of on- and off-street bicycle facilities in Bexar County, included recommendations for types and locations of new bicycle facilities, and prioritized network recommendations. The plan also listed opportunities for education and encouragement, as well Figure 6-14. Planned Network from the City of San Antonio's 2011 Bike Plan as potential funding sources for expanding the existing bicycle network.

In total, the plan proposed 1,718 miles of new bicycle facilities. Some of these projects have already been implemented in the six years since the plan was adopted, but continued interagency collaboration, funding, and public engagement will be necessary to further realize the vision network outlined in the plan.

2016 SA Tomorrow Multimodal Transportation Plan In 2016, the City of San Antonio adopted its SA Tomorrow Multimodal Transportation Plan. This Transportation Plan outlines goals and guidelines for building a regional transportation system that is “sustainable, safe, convenient, and efficient”. The plan focuses on a balanced distribution of transportation modes by investing in a well-connected network of vehicle, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. The plan also evaluates different scenarios for growth, concluding that a diverse network of transportation options (including bicycle and pedestrian facilities) most cost-effectively reduces congestion.

Pg. 6-19 Active Transportation

Off-Street Trail Network The City of San Antonio and the San Antonio River Authority collectively have implemented and manage over 100 miles of paved multi-use trails throughout Bexar County. The City of San Antonio is currently planning to expand the The San Antonio Howard Peak Greenways Trail System. Bike Share system Off-street trails are planned for other parts of the region as well. The City of began with 14 New Braunfels is developing a Master Plan for the Dry Comal Creek Hike & stations and 140 Bike Trail, which, once complete, will span over five miles and connect parks, bikes in 2011. Six neighborhoods, and downtown. Also, the City of Seguin plans to extend the years later, it has Walnut Springs Hike & Bike Trail within the next few years. over 60 stations and 500 bikes. Bike Share San Antonio became the first city in Texas to initiate a bike share system in 2011. In 2017, the MPO initiated the Bike Share Master Plan to seek opportunities to expand the existing system within the City of San Antonio and potentially into the Cities of Boerne, New Braunfels, and Seguin. Since the start of the plan, dockless electric scooters were introduced in downtown San Antonio. This prompted the City of San Antonio to begin work on a regulatory framework to manage dockless vehicles in anticipation of other dockless technologies. The impact on the docked bike share system is still unknown but the MPO will continue to work with all parties to promote safe forms of active transportation in the region.

Integration with Transit Integrating bicycle infrastructure with public transit is an important step to increase mobility and accessibility for the region’s residents. Eighty-five percent of transit riders access VIA bus service by walking or bicycling (VIA Origin and Destination Study, 2015). Therefore, increasing safe access to bus stops has the potential to increase ridership, which helps the region achieve community goals such as improved air quality and reduced traffic congestion.

Interagency coordination is key to making these crucial connections. Today, the majority of bike share stations are located within a ¼ mile of a bus stop.

Pg. 6-20 Active Transportation

Additionally, all VIA buses are equipped with at least two bike racks. Whether a project makes multimodal connections is also a key part of the process for reviewing projects for potential funding through the MPO.

In 2015, VIA began the MyLink project to improve pedestrian connectivity by identifying high priority areas for sidewalk completion projects. Areas were identified using a variety of criteria including average daily transit boardings, proximity to bus stops, known accessibility issues, and number of routes at the stop.

Regional Connections As our region continues to grow, the MPO and its partners will increasingly need to look for regional bicycle connections to improve interregional mobility. In 2017, the Alamo Area MPO and Capital Area MPO sought public input on potential bicycle connections between San Antonio and Austin.

The Texas Department of Figure 6-15. Potential Regional Bicycling Connections Transportation also initiated a Bicycle Tourism Trails Study in 2017. The goal of the study is to identify a proposed statewide network of bikeways that connects cities in Texas, New Mexico, and Oklahoma. While these routes are only conceptual, they represent a good first step to expanding the reach of regional bicycle infrastructure.

6.8 Focus Areas for the Next Five Years In such a large region, transportation needs undoubtedly exceed available funding. Therefore, it is necessary to prioritize key actions and projects that can

Pg. 6-21 Active Transportation

have a strong positive impact on bicycle mobility, access, safety, comfort, and therefore, ridership.

Prioritize funding for improvements that enhance safety in areas with high concentrations of bicycle and pedestrian crashes. In accordance with MPO’s support for Vision Zero, MPO will prioritize bicycle and pedestrian projects that have the greatest potential to improve safety for users.

Increase connectivity within and between activity centers. MPO will look to fund bicycle projects that create high quality connections within and between high activity areas to enhance access between key destinations.

Enhance regional connectivity. Local governments throughout the region are seeking to expand the bicycle network within their own jurisdictions. MPO will work with its regional partners to pursue regional bicycle connections between these areas.

Collect more data on bicycle and pedestrian use and facilities. The MPO will work with its partners to expand opportunities to collect and use data on bicycle and pedestrian activity, including by measuring the impacts of new facilities on travel patterns.

Expand educational programs on bicycle safety. MPO will work with its partners to expand opportunities for people to learn what the rights and responsibilities are for people who bike through in-person engagement, media coverage, and social media outreach.

Pg. 7-1 Public Transportation

7 Public Transportation

Public transportation plays an important role in the regional transportation system and hence, the regional economy. The additional automobile volume and congestion that the area would experience without transit, would cause an increase in on-road air emissions, resulting in negative impacts to air quality for the entire region. Beyond these indirect benefits, for people who chose to utilize public transportation versus their personal vehicles, public transportation provides a direct benefit reducing operating and maintenance costs of personal vehicles, the cost of parking and the stress of driving on congested roadways.

7.1 Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years VIA has enjoyed many accomplishments over the past five years. These accomplishments include four passenger facilities, implementation of a passenger amenities program, a CNG Fueling Station, the purchase of a new CNG fleet, and the expansion of Primo service on two corridors.

Pg. 7-2 Public Transportation

Brooks Transit Center is located on Brooks City Base and will serve growing population and new employment and retail opportunities in that part of the region. The Brooks Transit Center will provide a safe indoor waiting facility, where customers can obtain information on next bus arrival time and other system services. VIA currently operates five (5) bus routes in the vicinity of Brooks City Base, which sometimes require riders to make complicated transfers between multiple routes, and the Transit Center will bring these routes together at a central location. VIA also proposes to add a new Express route that will provide people with the choice to park at or near the facility, and ride an express service into downtown, which will begin service when the Transit Center opens. The center will also serve the new Primo service expansion as part of the South/West Corridor project. The service is planned to open in early 2019.

Five Points is a newly renovated area that includes significant updates for passenger comfort and accessibility at the busy service station. A ceramic sculpture installation by San Antonio artist Diana Kersey provides an eye- catching landmark for the neighborhood gateway. The Five Points project transformed an underutilized lot into an oasis of trees and native plants, providing a welcome respite to the nearly 1,000 VIA passengers who board its six west and northbound routes there daily. It is marked by an illuminated, 18- foot branded pillar that serves as a beacon for travelers. The area features Next-Gen shelters, a bicycle parking and repair station, digital bus arrival information, free WiFi, and natural and native shade and landscaping.

Centro Plaza opened in 2015 just and is located just west of downtown and serves passengers with 83 buses per hour. It has amenities such as, Wi-Fi- equipped waiting area, a customer service center, outdoor seating and public parking. A lighted 85-foot tower — a piece of public art — illuminates the area at night.

Stone Oak Park & Ride is designed and located to provide convenient, affordable transportation options for commuters along the U.S. 281 corridor.

Pg. 7-3 Public Transportation

The first phase of the project has been completed and includes a 4 story, 400 space structured parking garage and air-conditioned transit center on the first floor. The next phase of the Stone Oak facility will be a direct connection into the U.S. 281 high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, providing a flyover from frontage road traffic. This connection will allow transit vehicles to bypass traffic into downtown, giving riders back time from their daily commute. The direct connection is being built as part of the Texas Department of Transportation’s construction project on U.S. 281 and is expected to be completed in 2021.

VIA officially dedicated its new Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) fueling station April 18, 2018. With a 10,980-square foot compressor compound, it stands as the largest in North America. The 10-lane station began operating in 2017 to support the first of VIA’s new CNG-powered fleet that debuted in observance of Earth Day. VIA’s full fleet conversion will be complete in 2025. More than half of VIA’s diesel revenue vehicles have been replaced with CNG buses to date.

Since it began operation, the station has saved over $1 million in fuel costs. Installation of the new fueling station on 1720 N. Flores St. and continued procurement of lower-emissions vehicles will make VIA the largest customer of CPS Energy’s CNG fuel program.

VIA’s CNG program is part of a multi-year, community-driven plan to build a better bus system while significantly reducing vehicle emissions, decreasing operating costs, and planning service enhancements. Once complete, the transformed fleet will bring a 97-percent reduction of nitrogen oxide, or NOx, emissions and further support the agency’s commitment to environmental stewardship. The annual fuel cost savings are estimated at $8.5 million, and the maintenance savings, over a five-year period, are estimated at $2 million.

The new CNG station includes the addition of 10 CNG dispensers operated by seven 700-horsepower compressors, with a total flow rate of more than 85 gallons per minute. The existing dispensers – 10 diesel fuel and 6 propane – will be phased out once the conversion to CNG is complete. VIA’s new CNG buses are manufactured by Nova. The 40-foot buses have a 67-passenger

Pg. 7-4 Public Transportation

capacity. The contract with Nova Bus calls for the delivery of 425 vehicles over a five-year period.

VIA’s Passenger Amenities Program was formally developed in early 2014 with the primary goal to improve the passenger experience at the stop level at 1000 of VIA’s busiest bus stops. Since that time improvements have been made to over 1050 bus stops and that number continues to grow with an additional 100 stop improvements planned in the next 12 months. An improvement can consist of simply adding concrete behind an existing sidewalk for shelter placement, to adding a curb ramp at the corner, filling a gap in the sidewalk, or rebuilding a section of sidewalk; to everything in between. The Passenger Amenities Program continues through partnerships with TxDOT, the City of San Antonio and others on the improvement of nearly 200 additional bus stops over the next five years. In addition, VIA the installation of solar powered lighting systems began in FY 2018 and will continue through FY 2020.

The South/West Corridor includes S.W. Military Primo and Zarzamora Primo routes. These new Primo corridors will connect the Kel-Lac Transit Center with the planned Brooks Transit Center on S.W. Military and Crossroads Transit Center to Madla Transit Center along Zarzamora. The work will allow VIA to provide faster, more reliable service along these high ridership corridors. Plans call for construction of 20 new stops along the route that will feature Next-Gen lighted shelters with seating; free 4G LTE WiFi service, a digital screen with next bus arrival information, and a security camera system. The project includes various sidewalk improvements to provide safe and convenient pedestrian crossings along the corridor.

7.2 The Importance of Public Transportation Public transportation benefits all persons who live, work, or travel in the service area, whether or not they use it. According to the American Community Survey’s 2012-2016 five-year estimate, 3% of households in Bexar County do not have an automobile available and must rely on another form of transportation. More recently, VIA’s 2016 “Who is the Rider” survey showed

Pg. 7-5 Public Transportation

that 46% of riders are in households with an automobile and 25% of VIA riders having a car in the household have a vehicle as an alternative mode for their own daily commute. Furthermore, if no bus was available 31% of riders said they couldn’t make their trip. Therefore, VIA is providing an invaluable mobility choice for many.

The Census also reflects that 15% of the Bexar County population is below the poverty threshold, while 48% of VIA’s riders are under the poverty threshold. A recent VIA survey found that 36.7% of bus riders have an annual household income of less than $10,000 (Who is the Rider Survey, 2016).

In addition to income, both age and health conditions also affect the community’s need for public transportation. According to the American Community Survey’s 2012-2016 five-year estimate, 10% of the Bexar County population reported having at least one disability. VIA provided more than 1.2 million trips in fiscal year 2017 to those disabled individuals that met VIA’s paratransit criteria.

For Bexar County, according to the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey, it is estimated that 11.8% of the population is age 65 and older. The Texas state demographer projects the population of Bexar County age 65+ will increase significantly by 2045 from 204,740 in 2014 to 315,072 in 2045. That will make the proportion of age 60+ “seniors” 22,1% of the county’s population in 2045. Providing safe, reliable, and affordable transportation will be extremely important for this section of the population.

About 25% of Bexar County’s population is younger than 18, and therefore too young to drive. Without public transportation, the younger population misses opportunities to personally develop or participate in community activities. Often, they must rely on parental or other adult support for transportation.

7.3 Existing Public Transportation Providers Two public transportation providers serve the Alamo Area MPO study area: VIA Metropolitan Transit and the Alamo Regional Transit System. The Lone

Pg. 7-6 Public Transportation

Star Rail District is another existing public transportation entity, but it does not yet operate service.

Alamo Regional Transit Alamo Regional Transit (ART), a rural public transit provider operated through the Alamo Area Council of Governments (AACOG), provides public transportation to the 11,255 square miles cover 12 rural counties overlapping the MPO study area. These counties include Atascosa, Bandera, Comal, Frio, Gillespie, Guadalupe, Karnes, Kendall, Kerr, Medina, McMullen and Wilson. Figure 7-1 shows the service area for ART. ART provides its service to the public using a predominately demand-response, curb-to-curb format during weekdays. Trips may originate anywhere within the 12-county service area. The service transports riders between all points within that service area, as well as into and out of Bexar County. In Fiscal Year 2014, ART provided 112,861 one-way trips.

In April 2013, ART launched Connect Seguin, a deviated fixed-route bus system serving major designation in Seguin and Guadalupe County on weekdays. The Connect Seguin system is in addition to the established demand-response service for Seguin and is funded with City of Seguin general funds and ART local funds.

Until 2013, the Cities of New Braunfels, Cibolo, Marion, Schertz Selma, and Garden Ridge, as well as the McQueeney census designed place, fell within ART’s rural service area. However, the designation of these areas as urbanized by the US Census Bureau changed the eligibility for rural transportation services and funding.

During 2013 and 2014, VIA Metropolitan Transit contracted with ART, through AACOG, to continue the demand-response service in these areas as a result of this change. Service for these areas is now for with VIA urban transit funding which is matched by local funds from ART and the seven newly designated urbanized service areas. For FY 2014, 16.26%, or 18,349, of ART’s total trips originated within these areas.

Pg. 7-7 Public Transportation

Though ART serves the entire public, it places special emphasis on serving the needs of low-income individuals, senior citizens, persons with disabilities, and veterans who have limited or no means of personal transportation. Nearly 55% of the total ridership of ART are senior citizens.

While ART’s demand-response service takes riders directly to destinations for any purpose, approximately 53% of the trips are for medical appointments, including dialysis treatments. Other frequently requested destinations include shopping, school, child and adult day care, nutrition centers and participation in senior center activities.

Figure 7-1. ART Service Area

VIA Metropolitan Transit VIA Metropolitan Transit (VIA) is a political subdivision of the State of Texas, authorized by state enabling legislation, to receive locally-generated sales tax

Pg. 7-8 Public Transportation

income at a rate not to exceed one percent (1%) and subject to approval by voters within the VIA service area. VIA is governed by a Board of Trustees with eleven appointees. Board members are appointed to staggered two-year terms by the following entities: San Antonio City Council (appoints five), Bexar County Commissioners Court (appoints three), and the Suburban Mayors (appoints two). The Chair of the Board is elected by the Board members and serves a two-year term. The 11-member VIA Board of Trustees meets monthly to discuss policy issues and hear comments from the community. VIA Board meetings are generally held on the 4th Tuesday of each month.

The VIA service area depicted in Figure 7-2, is 1,226 square miles and represents 98% of the Bexar County area. It currently includes the City of San Antonio, the unincorporated areas of Bexar County, and 14 suburban cities: Alamo Heights, Balcones Heights, Castle Hills, China Grove, Cibolo (Bexar County), Converse, Elmendorf, Kirby, Leon Valley, Olmos Park, Shavano Park, St. Hedwig, Sandy Oaks, and Terrell Hills. While the unincorporated cities may be labeled as ‘suburban,’ many of them are now entirely encircled by the City of San Antonio. Despite their integrated geography, suburban cities may vote to exclude themselves from the VIA service area. Currently, cities that are either entirely or partially located within Bexar County, but which are not part of the VIA service area, include Cibolo (Guadalupe County), Fair Oaks Ranch, Grey Forest, Helotes, Hill Country Village, Hollywood Park, Live Oak, Lytle, Somerset, Universal City, Von Ormy and Windcrest.

Advanced Transportation District In 2004 San Antonio citizens voted to improve traffic, streets and public transit by creating the Advanced Transportation District (ATD). The ATD funds are distributed as follows: ½ to VIA, ¼ to the City of San Antonio (CoSA), and ¼ to the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). In 2005, funding began and so did the improvements. The ATD is governed by the identical board members as the VIA Board of Trustees.

Pg. 7-9 Public Transportation

The ATD purpose is to develop a regional multimodal vision and strategic plan for managed and/or transit priority lanes on high capacity and express bus route corridors.

Figure 7-2. VIA Metropolitan Transit Service Area

7.4 VIA Public Transportation Services Fixed Route Service VIA currently operates 95 fixed bus routes along 1,100 miles of roadway. These routes are depicted in Figure 7-3. In fiscal year 2017, totals for vehicle

Pg. 7-10 Public Transportation

hours and passenger trips for VIA’s scheduled services were 1,747,733 and 36,493,791, respectively. These figures include the downtown circulation service as described below.

As part of the fixed route bus service, VIA also operates a Bike & Ride program, which allows riders to transport their bicycles for no extra cost on racks attached to the fronts of buses or inside VIA Primo vehicles.

VIA’s major transit activity centers include the San Antonio central business district, San Antonio College, North Star Mall, the South Texas Medical Center, the Deco District, Las Palmas, Naco Pass, University Family Health Center - Southwest, Southwest General Hospital, and both campuses of the University of Texas at San Antonio.

Downtown Circulation VIA operates one downtown circulator route branded as VIVA Centro. This route operates with rubber-tired, propane-powered replica trolleys and battery- powered electric buses. These routes operate on a twelve-minute average frequency. VIA Primo also provides circulator service in the San Antonio central business district along Market Street and Commerce Street.

Pg. 7-11 Public Transportation

Figure 7-3. VIA Metropolitan Transit Fixed Route Service, August 2018

Note: Major gaps in fixed route coverage indicate cities which are not part of the VIA service area, military facilities, airports, undeveloped land, and areas which, due to ridership and land-use characteristics, are not conductive to efficient bus service.

Pg. 7-12 Public Transportation

VIAtrans Service As a complementary service to fixed route bus service, VIA operates VIAtrans, an advance reservation, shared-ride, demand-response paratransit service for people with disabilities who cannot navigate the fixed route bus service for some or all of their trips. VIAtrans currently operates with a fleet of over 250 directly operated and contracted vehicles, which provide approximately 1.2 million trips each year. Currently 16,647 people are authorized to use VIAtrans service.

7.5 Facilities and Fleet As of 2018, VIA serves 7,200 bus stops and 14 transit centers and park & ride facilities, as depicted in Figure 7-3.

VIA’s fleet, shown Figure 7-4, consists of 508 buses, comprising 48 North American Bus Industries (NABI) diesel buses, 4 NABI compressed natural gas busses, 107 New Flyer diesel buses, 30 New Flyer diesel-electric hybrid buses, 3 Proterra electric buses, 19 NABI 60-foot CNG buses, 270 NOVA CNG buses, 15 New Flyer CNG buses (VIVA), and 17 Optima streetcars. All buses purchased by VIA are low-floor, kneeling vehicles with ramps to accommodate patrons with limited mobility, and the replica trolleys in the downtown area are equipped with lifts.

The Nova, NABI and New Flyer buses are 40-foot vehicles that have a low- floor design and a retractable ramp for wheelchair access. The VIA Primo vehicles are 60 feet long with an articulated middle section.

All of VIA’s service vehicles are equipped with an automated vehicle location and secure voice communication system, allowing VIA to provide efficient service by adjusting for delays, overloading, or unforeseen occurrences.

Pg. 7-13 Public Transportation

Figure 7-4. VIA Bus Fleet: Vehicle Types

VIA’s High Capacity Transit Service – Primo In 2005, the MPO, through the Northwest Corridor Alternatives Analysis determined that roadway expansion alone is not a viable option to handle future travel demand on the Northwest corridor. The study concluded that there were no plans for major capacity expansion in the area. Furthermore, given these constraints, it was determined that an alternative to auto travel would be required to increase trip capacity through the congested corridor. As auto travel time increases and auto trip capacity becomes more constrained, alternative transportation options become more attractive, thus shifting travel modes from single-occupant vehicles (SOV) to VIA Primo, enabling greater trip capacity through the corridor. Furthermore, the proposed VIA Primo would improve transportation services to the numerous employment centers located within the corridor.

In December 2012, VIA launched Primo service on the Fredericksburg Road corridor. The VIA Primo is defined as an alignment approximately nine miles long from the South Texas Medical Center (STMC), southeast to the west side of downtown San Antonio via Fredericksburg Road and IH 10.

Pg. 7-14 Public Transportation

Eight paired in-line stations (16 platforms, see image above) were constructed curbside in the Medical Center (on Medical Drive) and along the Fredericksburg Road corridor. In addition to constructing in-line stations at key intersections along the Fredericksburg Road corridor, VIA has constructed major transit centers at each end of the corridor – the South Texas Medical Center Transit Center (as shown in Figure 7-5) at the intersection of Babcock Road and Medical Drive and Centro Plaza (shown in Figure 7-6) in the Cattleman Square Historic District. Both of these transit centers serve multiple VIA routes

Figure 7-5. South Texas Medical Center Transit Center

Figure 7-6. Centro Plaza at VIA Villa in the Cattleman Square Historic District

Pg. 7-15 Public Transportation

Ridership VIA measures ridership based on the number of boardings, also known as unlinked passenger trips. All of VIA’s services carried 37.8 million passenger trips during FY 2016-17, see Table 7-1.

Table 7-1. Transit Ridership for Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Type of Service Total Ridership Weekday Average

Scheduled Line 36,493,791 114,744

VIAtrans 1,203,025 N/A

Primo 2,012,077 6,247

7.6 Environmental Commitment VIA continually seeks out ways to reduce pollution, waste, and energy demands. As an operator of a fleet of buses and vans, the agency’s primary environmental efforts are focused on the reduction of vehicle emissions. VIA will continue to monitor the development of fuel and propulsion technologies that can help reduce local air pollution.

VIA employs rigorous recycling efforts, focusing on waste oil and lubricants, batteries, paint solvents, office paper, cardboard, scrap metals, refrigerant, and plastics.

In 2014 the VIA Board of Trustees formally committed to the implementation an Environmental & Sustainability Management System (ESMS) to provide a strategic and systematic approach to the management of environmental impacts. Implementation of an ESMS maximizes organizational benefit through risk mitigation, prevention of pollution, and regulatory compliance, and will help VIA to provide the community with safe, reliable and sustainable transportation.

Each of VIA’s employees is entrusted with incorporating the actions necessary in their work to fulfill this commitment.

By enacting this Environmental & Sustainability Management System, VIA commits to:

Pg. 7-16 Public Transportation

• Implementation and continual improvement of environmental management practices and solutions • Prevention of pollution and utilization of environmentally safe methods of disposal and recycling to maintain a safe and clean environment • Compliance with applicable legal and other requirements to which VIA subscribes which relate to its environmental aspects • Minimization of significant environmental impacts by establishing environmental objectives and targets • Evaluation of environmental performance and progress through periodic review of the ESMS and related objectives and targets • Integration of sustainable practices during planning and decision- making processes and in all other work conducted at VIA

VIA is committed to becoming an environmental leader in the industry and pledges to provide necessary education and tools to all persons working for or on behalf of VIA to successfully carry out this program. VIA promotes implementation of goals and programs that will continually reduce our environmental impact on the community and environment. This environmental and sustainability management system policy will be documented, regularly reviewed, communicated to all persons working for or on behalf of VIA, and be made available to the public

Conservation is also a high priority. VIA has retrofitted its facilities with energy efficient lighting, installed upgrades to the HVAC systems and windows, and reduced the energy requirements for the climate control system of the maintenance garage.

VIA is also exploring the use of renewable energy, where feasible. The agency obtains 100 percent of its electricity from CPS Energy’s Windtricity program. Solar panels power the lighting at new bus shelters, and solar-panel systems have been installed to provide power at five transit centers and over 903 bus

Pg. 7-17 Public Transportation

shelters. A small solar farm is also in use at the South Texas Medical Center Transit Center to provide power to the site.

VIA is converting its entire fleet to cleaner, “greener” buses as part of its multi- year plan to significantly reduce vehicle emissions, decrease operating costs, and allow the agency to carry out planned service enhancements. The new buses will replace aging buses in the current fleet, which are between 12 and 15 years old. VIA has replaced more than half of its existing fleet in late 2017, with the ongoing fleet conversion expected to be complete by 2025.

VIA is also working to reduce water pollution through the use of an on-site industrial wastewater treatment facility and the installation of stormwater interceptors, in order to prevent contaminated bus yard runoff from infiltrating the local watershed.

7.7 Public Transportation Needs and Issues The San Antonio region faces many challenges in the public transportation arena. While VIA has long been one of the most financially efficient transit systems in the country, its fiscal constraints and service area characteristics have limited its offerings to the community.

Land Use Patterns The suburban development patterns prevalent in San Antonio areas of high growth pose a challenge for efficient operation of bus service. Gated communities and residential subdivisions with low-density and poor street connectivity are not conducive to efficient transit service for either the pedestrian or VIA and, therefore, not “transit friendly”. Poor street connectivity and low-density development patterns create longer, indirect distances between destinations, making transit options less viable for potential riders, and transit service more expensive to provide, when not impossible to do so, thus creating ‘auto-dependent’ communities.

Transit access to commercial development also poses challenges. Development on one-way frontage roads, as experienced along many portions

Pg. 7-18 Public Transportation

of IH 10 West, Loop 410, and Loop 1604, are difficult to serve by transit, due to the circuitous routing that is required. In addition, riders are forced to decide whether to either ride ‘out of direction’ for much longer distances to reach their destination, in order to stay on the same side of an expressway, or, to walk long distances under expressway ‘turnarounds,’ in generally very pedestrian- unfriendly environments, in order to arrive at the opposing (returning) direction bus stop.

Pedestrian Infrastructure The region’s pedestrian network lags behind that of its road network. A short trip that can be completed relatively quick and safe by vehicle may be more difficult and less safe if travelled on foot. Transit service, although delivered through the use of a vehicle and operated on a roadway, is dependent upon use by the pedestrian.

The current trend of regional land use patterns, along with the lack of pedestrian facilities and amenities, create conditions that are uninviting, and oftentimes, unsafe to pedestrians. Wide streets with narrow sidewalks placed against a curb, the absence of trees or building awnings for shade, and deep building setbacks, represent a streetscape designed to the scale of the automobile, not the pedestrian. Auto-oriented frontage-road development, in which storefronts are separated from the street by vast, non-shaded parking lots are not ideal pedestrian environments and serve as additional incentives to choose driving over pedestrian and/or transit modes. A non-existent or unsafe pedestrian system is a barrier to the walking experience and hence, a barrier to transit use.

Narrow streets with wide sidewalks, separated from the curb by landscaping/street trees, pedestrian islands or medians, buildings close to the street with shading devices and parking areas located behind buildings, are design considerations that provide safer pedestrian environments and are incentives for increased pedestrian and transit use. Without a safe, comfortable, and continuous pedestrian network that links origins and

Pg. 7-19 Public Transportation

destinations, transit use will never reach its full potential, and driving will continue to be the travel mode of choice for those who can afford it or have no other viable travel mode option.

Addressing the Challenges and Issues Efforts to address some of the pedestrian network challenges are already underway. The Advanced Transportation District (ATD) allows for additional investment in public transportation, more sidewalks, and other infrastructure projects. As described in Chapter 5 (Pedestrian System), other initiatives are being developed to improve the pedestrian infrastructure within the region. Alternative approaches to current development patterns, as outlined in the City of San Antonio Unified Development Code, may lead to urban conditions that are more conducive to transit use. However, many improvements and policy changes are still needed in order to make transit a travel mode of choice for residents in the San Antonio metropolitan area, and to reduce the level of impending environmental challenges facing the region. Together with local partners, VIA is facilitating planning efforts to identify opportunities where implementation of pedestrian infrastructure improvements can make the greatest gains in addressing a pedestrian network that supports increased transit use.

7.8 Goals: VIA’s Long Range Plan The Vision 2040 strategic plan reflects the community’s priorities and is based upon input received from 275 public meetings and events, and more than 10,000 survey responses and 6,300 individual comments. An ongoing community conversation with VIA customers, stakeholders, and residents of San Antonio, Bexar County, and surrounding communities helped shape the plan that calls for adaptive solutions today to meet tomorrow’s transportation needs.

VIA will continue collaborating with regional partners and stakeholders to implement the community’s vision and advance multimodal transit options for the region. The agency encourages community members, businesses and

Pg. 7-20 Public Transportation

transit patrons to remain engaged and involved as this important community conversation continues.

Figure 7-7. VISION 2040 Long Range Plan

Derived from VIA’s VISION 2040 are a number of key projects that make up VIA’s Capital Program. Following are updates of several of the projects in progress.

Pg. 7-21 Public Transportation

Figure 7-8. Downtown Transit Stop

Patron Amenities VIA’s Passenger Amenities Program was formally developed in early 2014 with the primary goal to improve the passenger experience at the stop level at 1000 of VIA’s busiest bus stops. Since that time improvements have been made to over 1050 bus stops and that number continues to grow with an additional 100 stop improvements planned in the next 12 months. An improvement can consist of simply adding concrete behind an existing sidewalk for shelter placement, to adding a curb ramp at the corner, filling a gap in the sidewalk, or rebuilding a section of sidewalk; to everything in between. The Passenger Amenities Program continues through partnerships with TxDOT, the City of San Antonio and others on the improvement of nearly 200 additional bus stops

Pg. 7-22 Public Transportation

over the next five years. In addition, VIA the installation of solar powered lighting systems began in FY 2018 and will continue through FY 2020.

Robert Thompson Transit Center The Robert Thompson Transit Station facility was originally designed to accommodate special event transit service for attendees at the Alamodome. The future plan is to transform the Transit Station into a full-service multimodal Transit Center, serving as a transfer location for daily transit service, special events service, and be known in the future as the Robert Thompson Transit Center (RTTC). In addition to the required transit operations on VIA property, there is an opportunity for prospective developers to propose a larger transit- oriented development (TOD) project to be located above the station and/or on nearby parcels. Upgrades are planned for pedestrian facilities along Montana Street, in order to accommodate customer transfer activity and the increased foot traffic. Specific improvements include updates to the exhaust ventilation system, real-time bus arrival information, an indoor conditioned waiting area, and landscaping and pedestrian amenity upgrades. In the future, Primo service will provide for additional connections to/from the eastside and Downtown.

Naco Pass Transfer Center Naco Pass has been an area that has become an unofficial transfer location for VIA passengers. Due to the current activity at the on-street locations, VIA is seeking to provide passengers with more amenities on a permanent site. VIA staff is working to identify the optimal site to accommodate the 1,430 daily passengers, and then will proceed with due diligence. Possible passenger amenities include interior waiting area, security, restroom facilities, automatic ticket vending machines, real time bus arrivals, and public art.

IH 10 West Park and Ride The proposed IH 10 West facility, as identified in the LRCTP, will serve as a collector to serve commuters coming from outlying cities such as Boerne and Fair Oaks Ranch and north/west counties such as Kendall, Kerr, Gillespie and

Pg. 7-23 Public Transportation

potentially portions of Comal and Bandera. This planned facility will provide commuters the opportunity to ride share and connect to activity centers such as the South Texas Medical Center, UTSA, the San Antonio central business district, and the greater airport area.

SH 151 Park and Ride The proposed SH 151 Park and Ride facility, as identified in the LRCTP, is proposed to serve commuters originating in the western suburbs destined for the San Antonio central business district; and positioned to tie in to service major activity centers. This facility will potentially serve routes 64 US 90 Express and 65 Lackland AFB/USO Express, as well as other possible metro routes. The site selection process will include studying sites near the Loop 1604 and SH 151 area in order to study opportunities of commuters traveling from the area and providing reliable trips on the managed lanes to the San Antonio central business district.

High Capacity Transit VISION 2040 identified a number of High Capacity Transit corridors for implementation by the year 2040. Funding is allocated to provide flexibility with developing the appropriate investment. All of the transit technologies represented in VISION 2040 will continue to be explored, to maximize the investment.

7.9 Level of Public Investment: Transit Financial Forecast Financial projections through 2040 show that sources of transit funds are essentially equal to uses of funds, as shown in Table 7-2. Sales taxes account for more than 70% of VIA’s funding. VIA receives sales taxes totaling 5/8-cent per dollar (1/2-cent MTA tax and a 1/8-cent share of the Advanced Transportation District tax); peer transit agencies in Houston, Dallas, and Austin all receive the full 1-cent tax. The uses of funds figures show that operating expenses account for 78% of total uses, with capital expenditures and related debt service accounting for the remaining amount.

Pg. 7-24 Public Transportation

Recently, VIA began utilizing debt to finance some capital projects, so that transit benefits can be delivered to the community more quickly. VIA will be using debt to finance transit facility projects and the replacement of its bus fleet over the next several years. VIA will also be replacing diesel-powered buses with buses powered by compressed natural gas.

VIA’s financial projections reflect the agency continuing to remain a very cost- efficient organization. VIA’s cost per hour for delivering bus service is lower than that of most peer agencies, in some cases by 25% or more. VIA has received a variety of awards in recent years recognizing the dedication and commitment of the agency’s employees.

VIA is committed to continue seeking additional funding so that services to a rapidly growing community can be expanded. VIA actively pursues various federal and other grant opportunities, and has been successful in the past at competing for discretionary grants. “Formula funds” (grant apportionments) that VIA receives have been included in financial projections. Discretionary grant awards are not as predictable, have been greatly reduced by the federal government in recent years, and are not reflected.

Pg. 7-25 Public Transportation

Table 7-2. VIA Financial Projections

7.10 Conclusions In the past five years, VIA has enjoyed many accomplishments including four passenger facilities, implementation of a passenger amenities program, a CNG Fueling Station, the purchase of a new CNG fleet, and expanded Primo service. VIA completed an update to the Long-Range Comprehensive Transportation Plan called VISION 2040. This regional plan included extensive community involvement and outlined the regions public transportation priorities in the next 25 years. The plan identified three pillars for future improvement including better bus system, rapid transit network, and innovative solutions. With these priorities VIA serves the growing San Antonio region with a better customer experience. In late 2016 VIA launched a Rapid Transit Network study that is a detailed look at corridors identified in VISION 2040. VIA is in the process of taking public input to identify needs in individual corridors to make recommendation on improvements including high capacity transit mode.

Pg. 7-26 Public Transportation

Despite these numerous accomplishments, public transportation is still not a mode of choice among most commuters in the metropolitan area. Land development patterns, the lack of an accessible pedestrian system, the relatively low cost of owning and operating a vehicle, and limited transit options continue to make travel by automobile the preferred mode of choice.

However, future scenarios indicate, that by the year 2040, increases in population and employment, as well as the regional costs associated with increased congestion, reduced air quality and water sources, will affect an increase in demand for public transportation services. Financial projections through 2040 show that current revenue sources are insufficient to meet any public transportation demand beyond that currently experienced. It is evident that new, creative and non-traditional revenue sources are needed to guarantee that increased public transportation service and modes will continue to play a vital role in the regional economy as San Antonio continues to establish itself as a desirable location for high-tech and creative class opportunities, and compete on a national scale.

Pg. 8-1 Roadway System

8 Roadway System

The region’s roadway system transports people and goods locally and to other parts of the state. Located on two major freight corridors, IH 10 and IH 35, our region is fortunate to have relatively good mobility as compared to other Metropolitan Statistical Areas with comparable populations. However, with another 1.5 million new residents expected by 2045, resiliency and reliability of the roadway system will increase in priority as we work to maintain current levels of congestion and the region’s quality of life.

8.1 Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years Since the update of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) in December 2014, several roadway-related developments have occurred. With the passage of Proposition 1 and Proposition 7 funding proposals by the State of Texas, more projects have been able be let to expand the roadway system in this rapidly growing region. Additionally, the 84th Session of the Texas Legislature HB 1 ended diversions from the state’s gas tax which resulted in an additional

Pg. 8-2 Roadway System

$620 million/year statewide. Locally, Bexar County was successful in seeking authority from the State to increase the vehicle registration fees by $10 which has helped them fund multiple projects in Bexar County. The additional local and state funding has resulted in the conversion of most toll lane projects that were previously adopted in the MPO’s Plan to non-toll and high occupancy vehicle lanes.

The TxDOT San According to TxDOT’s Project Tracker, In the past five years, the TxDOT San Antonio District Antonio District had 179 projects under construction or beginning construction has constructed within the MPO study area for a total estimated cost of $1,544,756,427. and/or started Another 140 projects will begin with the next four years for a total estimated construction of 179 projects in cost of $1,206,590,988. the MPO study The San Antonio Mobility Coalition (SAMCo) continues to help with the area over the past five years. education and funding processes at the federal, state and local levels.

Source: TxDOT Online 8.2 Roadway System Policies Project Tracker The pace of population and employment growth in the Alamo Area will continue to put pressure on the capacity of the roadway network. While it is recognized that building the region out of current and future congestion is not possible, adding new lanes and making operational improvements will be part of the comprehensive strategy to improve the transportation system.

Roadway system improvements proposed in the MTP are constrained to the amount of funding available, or those revenues that can be reasonably expected over the 25-year horizon of the MTP. The anticipated revenues fall short of covering all desired roadway projects, so the funded roadway projects included in the MTP address the region’s most congested areas. The policies proposed below will assist in developing the best transportation system for the area.

• Support the design, planning, maintenance and operation of a roadway system that is compatible with the needs of other modes

Pg. 8-3 Roadway System

such as bicycles, pedestrians, public transportation, and truck and rail freight • Using performance measures, monitor the functionality of the roadways in the region • Analyze and display crash information for the roadway system and use this quantitative information and the goals of the State Highway Safety Plan as factors in the project selection process • Leverage transportation asset management data and methods to make informed, cost-effective program decisions and optimize the use of existing transportation assets • Use technology such as intelligent transportation systems and signal prioritization to optimize the roadway operations • Require land developers to preserve the necessary rights-of-way in future travel corridors • Require private developer contributions in roadway construction in undeveloped areas through the development process • Ensure a process exists for maintaining roadways through their life cycle • Support travel demand management techniques that reduce single occupancy vehicle trips and vehicle miles of travel throughout the system, including ride share/car share, parking pricing/policies, land use policies, and employer trip reduction programs • Support the integrated development and implementation of transportation, land use and economic development plans by ensuring consistent collaboration between local, regional and statewide transportation partners

8.3 Roadway Functional Classification The MTP is primarily concerned with those roadways that will be built or expanded using federal funding sources. These roadways are part of the “functionally classified roadway system.” A functionally classified roadway

Pg. 8-4 Roadway System

system allows for urban streets to be grouped by their purpose or function. There are three main functions for urban streets: 1) movement of traffic, 2) distribution or collection of traffic, and 3) provide access to terminal points. Freeways provide maximum movement of vehicles, but allow limited access to the adjacent land use. Arterial streets have lower vehicular capacity and speed, but allow for direct access to surrounding land use. Collector and residential streets primarily provide access to larger facilities, as each class of urban street serves as a collection device for the next lower class of street. The functional classification system is further defined in Table 8-1.

Functionally classified roadways describe the various levels of vehicular mobility. Using functional class in the transportation planning process ensures that general land use and local development are considered in evaluation of both existing and future transportation needs. Another purpose for using the functional classification system is to help determine which roadways should be included in a regional transportation system.

Table 8-1. Functional Classification System Description Functional Level of Mobility System Access Level of Classificati Accessibility on Connects all urban To other freeways, Long trips at high speed Freeway subregions together; principal arterials, and within and through the connects urban and rural selected arterials; no metro area; express service areas with metro direct land access. transit trips. major activity centers; connects to other cities. Connects two or more To freeways, other Medium distance to long Principal Arterial subregions; provides principal arterials, and trips at high to moderate secondary connections high-volume collectors; speeds within the urban outside cities; no direct land access area; express transit complements freeways in except major traffic trips. high volume corridors. generators. Arterial Connects adjacent To freeways, principal Medium to short trips at subregions and activity arterials, other arterials, moderate to low speeds; centers within and collectors; restricted local transit trips. subregions. direct land access. Collector Connects neighborhoods To arterial, other Primarily serves within and between collectors, and local collection and distribution subregions. streets; direct land function for the arterial access. system at low speeds; local transit trips.

Pg. 8-5 Roadway System

Functional Level of Mobility System Access Level of Classificati Accessibility on Connects blocks within To collectors and other Almost exclusively Local neighborhoods and local streets; direct land collection and specific activities within access. distribution; short trips at homogeneous land use low speeds. areas.

8.4 Major Thoroughfare Plans The area’s Major Thoroughfare Plans are composed primarily of principal and major arterial streets and provides the necessary transportation support and access to and from local land uses. Since many major expressway corridors are constrained from acquiring additional right-of-way, much of the additional Comal and out-year demand will likely have to be accommodated through a better Kendall Counties connected and more efficient arterial street system. Many of the major and are two of the minor arterials are expected to be constructed by developers interested in fastest growing expanding commercial and residential development outside of built portions of counties in the the cities within the MPO study area. country. Further, most of their To help local partners plan for this and think about regional connections, the growth is a result MPO commissioned the Regional Thoroughfare Plan Study. The purpose of of domestic the study was to review existing major thoroughfare plans to identify migration and as a result more differences between plans in the MPO study area, determine constraints that impactful to their impact the constructability of proposed thoroughfares, perform a needs study roadway networks that used both capacity and connectivity criteria to identify areas in the region that were built for that should be the focus of further study, and develop a “bridge” to understand rural traffic. how individual jurisdictions’ existing classification system align with the regional system.

Local jurisdictions were involved in this process and were given the tools they need to revise their major thoroughfare plans if deemed necessary.

8.5 Regionally Significant Roadway Network In anticipation of a nonattainment designation for ozone, the MPO began work in January 2016 to. develop a definition for “regionally significant projects.”

Pg. 8-6 Roadway System

Over a series of discussions and presentations to the region’s Technical Advisory Committee and was ultimately approved by the MPO Transportation Policy Board on September 26, 2016. The MPO’s adopted, regionally significant roadway definition is as follows:

• Those facilities federally functionally classified as interstate freeways, other freeways or expressways • Those facilities federally functionally classified as principal arterials • Roadways and intermodal connectors included in the federally adopted National Highway System • Roads designated as SH or US routes • Community connections that provide direct, continuously signed connections between nearby or adjacent census defined urbanized areas, urban clusters and population centers with more than 5,000 people • Roadways between activity centers that serve as primary regional connectors to an otherwise unserved regional activity center • Extensions of Regionally Significant Roadways to connect non- connecting termini

While not mapped because none currently exist, the MPO’s regionally Significant Roadways definition also includes the following:

• Fixed guideway transit facilities that offer an alternative to regional highway travel • Tollways • Grade-separated interchange projects on Regionally Significant Roadways where no access existed previously

The regionally Significant Roadways system is shown in Figure 8-1. These roadways are serving the region’s transportation needs by providing access to major activity centers and employers that include military bases, Brooks, Port

Pg. 8-7 Roadway System

San Antonio, Toyota, major shopping malls, the South Texas Medical Center, colleges and universities and communities of 5,000 or more in population.

Figure 8-1. Regionally Significant Roadway Network

8.6 Base Year and Future Year Roadway Systems The future year (2045) roadway system was developed using an extensive technical and financial analysis and public input. Agencies’ priorities and projected transportation usage were evaluated to develop a network of the future year highway and street system. The number of lane miles, vehicle miles of travel, and average speeds for facility types are summarized in Table 8-2 through Table 8-4. Also, Figure 8-2 through Figure 8-6 illustrates the volume over capacity for the years 2015, 2025, 2035, and 2045 build scenarios, as well as the 2045 no build.

Pg. 8-8 Roadway System

Table 8-2. Number of Lane Miles by Facility Type % of % of % of % of % of Facility Type 2017 Total 2024 Total 2025 Total 2035 Total 2045 Total Interstate 1,294 12% 1,428 13% 1,461 13% 1,590 13% 1,616 14% Freeways Other Freeways 451 4% 581 5% 673 6% 756 6% 756 6%

Expressways 312 3% 325 3% 335 3% 385 3% 385 3%

Principal Arterials 1,682 16% 1,655 15% 1,667 15% 1,692 14% 1,702 14%

Minor Arterials 2,094 20% 2,118 19% 2,145 19% 2,193 19% 2,205 19%

Collectors 3,359 32% 3,548 32% 3,564 31% 3,571 30% 3,571 30%

Frontage Roads 1,127 11% 1,249 11% 1,259 11% 1,259 11% 1,260 11%

Ramps 312 3% 329 3% 339 3% 351 3% 351 3%

Totals 10,631 100% 11,233 100% 11,443 100% 11,797 100% 11,846 100%

Table 8-3. Comparison of Weekday Vehicle Miles of Travel by Facility Type (in millions) % of % of % of % of % of Facility Type 2017 Total 2024 Total 2025 Total 2035 Total 2045 Total Interstate 20.447 35% 24.379 35% 24.685 34% 28.962 34% 33.948 33% Freeways Other Freeways 6.625 11% 9.221 13% 9.811 14% 12.241 14% 14.581 14%

Expressways 1.990 3% 2.004 3% 2.068 3% 2.945 3% 3.429 3%

Principal Arterials 10.302 18% 11.189 16% 11.307 16% 13.547 16% 15.748 16%

Minor Arterials 7.585 13% 8.594 12% 8.713 12% 10.436 12% 12.083 12%

Collectors 6.265 11% 8.127 12% 8.241 12% 10.378 12% 12.877 13%

Frontage Roads 2.736 5% 3.754 5% 3.758 5% 4.393 5% 5.387 5%

Ramps 2.129 4% 2.547 4% 2.652 4% 3.173 4% 3.690 4%

101.74 Totals 58.079 100% 69.815 100% 71.235 100% 86.055 100% 100% 3

Pg. 8-9 Roadway System

Table 8-4. Comparison of Average Speed and Weekday Vehicle Hours (in thousands) by Facility Type 2017 2017 2024 2024 2025 2025 2035 2035 2045 2045 Facility Type Speed Veh Hrs Speed Veh Hrs Speed Veh Hrs Speed Veh Hrs Speed Veh Hrs Interstate Freeways 40.6 504 39.1 624 39.3 628 37.5 772 33.0 1,029 Other Freeways 41.5 160 38.4 240 40.2 244 38.3 320 35.3 413

Expressways 34.2 58 33.0 61 33.2 62 30.8 96 28.4 121

Principal Arterials 25.2 409 23.8 470 23.9 473 21.8 621 19.4 812

Minor Arterials 22.5 337 20.9 411 21.0 415 18.9 552 16.6 728

Collectors 21.7 289 20.1 404 20.2 408 17.9 580 15.2 847

Frontage Roads 22.1 124 20.8 180 20.9 180 18.9 232 16.6 324

Ramps 26.7 80 25.6 99 25.4 104 24.3 131 22.8 162

Totals 29.7 1,961 28.0 2,489 28.3 2,514 26.1 3,304 22.9 4,436

Figure 8-2. 2015 Volume/Capacity

Pg. 8-10 Roadway System

Figure 8-3. 2045 Volume/Capacity – No Build

Figure 8-4. 2025 Volume/Capacity – Build

Pg. 8-11 Roadway System

Figure 8-5. 2035 Volume/Capacity – Build

Figure 8-6. 2045 Volume/Capacity – Build

Pg. 8-12 Roadway System

8.7 Regional Toll Analysis Mobility 2040 outlined a robust toll lane system, requiring the MPO to conduct a Regional Toll Analysis to ensure the toll lane system did not cause an adverse impact to traditionally disadvantaged residents. With the availability of new funding sources, all previous toll lanes have been converted to special use (non-toll) lanes in Mobility 2045 with the exception of Cibolo Parkway (planned) and SH 130 (operating). Since these two facilities do not intersect, creating a system, the MPO is not required to conduct a new Regional Toll Analysis.

8.8 Security Security of critical infrastructure and cybersecurity are increasingly important to transportation and is a priority for the Alamo Area. Natural disasters and the possibility of both domestic and international terrorism against public infrastructure increased the emphasis on transportation security. Similarly, as our world becomes ever more dependent on technology and data, the integrity of that data and how we secure it from attack is increasing in importance. With regards to our critical infrastructure, this chapter will address some of the work being done to advance the prevention, detection, management, and analysis of traffic incidents and emergency situations. It will also talk about cybersecurity efforts at a very high level and the commitment our region has made to ensuring the integrity of our information systems.

Pg. 8-13 Roadway System

would repurpose the existing space to provide better coordination between Texas Department of Transportation San Antonio District (TxDOT-SAT), VIA Metropolitan Transit, San Antonio Policy Department, and potentially future partners. The upgrade would also improve security aspects of the building and computer equipment.

Traffic Incident Management The Alamo Area has one of the model programs in the country for Traffic Incident Management (TIM) since TIM procedures have been formalized, and they are continuously enhanced by regional stakeholders to respond to changing best practices and technologies. The TxDOT-SAT and regional TIM stakeholders recently completed a Concept of Operations – Enhance Incident Management Plan which outlines improvements for pre-event planning, traffic incident management, and post event analysis. One of the recommendations from this plan was to reestablish a roadside assistance program in San Antonio. This proposal was funded for three corridors in San Antonio as part of the FY 2019-2022 Transportation Improvement Program.

Critical Infrastructure Regional transportation partners annually assess transportation and other assets in their operations to nominate to the inventory of critical infrastructure and key resources maintained by the US Department of Homeland Security. Top secret inventory is used to develop security measures for surveillance and protection of identified regional assets. The MPO contacted regional partners and received a positive affirmation of their participation in this program and will continue to monitor for compliance.

Cybersecurity San Antonio is home to the nation’s second-largest concentration of cybersecurity experts, and growing. Cybersecurity operations at Port San Antonio are anchored by the national headquarters for the Air Forces Cyber, also known as the Cyber Command. Hundreds of uniformed and civilian personnel protect the integrity of the Air Force’s IT assets around the world.

Pg. 8-14 Roadway System

Private-sector firms are also growing at the Port, supporting Department of Defense cyber operations throughout the region as well as a growing private- sector clientele.

Each of the MPO’s regional transportation partners manages their own internal policy with regards to cybersecurity. The MPO has communicated with regional partners regarding the importance of maintaining a cybersecurity policy and conducting appropriate training with employees to ensure the integrity of transportation related data information systems. The MPO contacted regional partners and received a positive affirmation of their commitment to best practices in cybersecurity and to actively providing training for their employees. The MPO also employs extensive firewalls for MPO systems and began conducting yearly cybersecurity training with employees in FY 2019.

Security priorities for over the next five years • Work with regional partners to learn what is required to employ the Security Credentialing Management System specifications for connected and automated vehicles. • Conduct a regional round table discussion around cybersecurity and transportation to identify potential risks or areas of vulnerability. • Identify and bring appropriate training resources to the region. • Improve situational awareness, understanding, and collaboration in the area of cybersecurity across the region.

8.9 Conclusions Despite the significant investment in roadway projects and policies over the past three years, congestion on the region’s roadways is expected to increase in the future. The roadway projects outlined in the funded project list begin to mitigate the expected growth in congestion. However, to accommodate the higher burden that will be placed on the transportation system, not just expansion of the roadways, but operational improvements (such as signal re- timings and intersection modifications) and enhancements to the transit, bicycle and pedestrian systems must occur. This includes exploring new and

Pg. 8-15 Roadway System

emerging technologies for their potential to help the existing roadway system run more efficiently and reliably. Other potential improvements to relieve congestion and improve quality of life are documented in Chapter 10 Congestion Management Process.

Pg. 9-1 Freight

9 Freight

MPOs plan for the safe and efficient movement of people and goods. The center of the Alamo Area MPO region sits at the intersection of IH 10 and IH 35, two of the most heavily used interstates for highway freight movement, as well as a major nexus for rail freight. It is necessary to integrate freight needs into transportation planning processes to ensure that freight moves safely and efficiently to, from and through our region now and decades into the future.

9.1 Accomplishments over the Last Five Years Over the past five years, MPO staff has closely followed the publication of federal guidance for the national freight performance measure and target setting. Through attending the Texas Department of Transportation’s (TxDOT) statewide Freight Advisory Committee meetings and two rounds of Texas Freight Mobility Plan 2017 stakeholder workshops, the MPO keeps current with TxDOT’s update and implementation of the statewide freight plan driven by MAP-21 and FAST Act requirements. In January 2017, the MPO hosted a

Pg. 9-2 Freight

regional Freight Stakeholders Workshop to follow up on similar local workshops held in November 2013. Among other feedback, freight stakeholders gave input on the MPO’s local process for recommending regional roadways to be designated as Critical Urban Freight Corridors (CUFC). The MPO developed its CUFC recommendation through successive presentations to the MPO Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and specific CUFC workshops for TAC members and industry stakeholders.

To further support the freight planning process, in 2016 the MPO developed a public web viewer specific to freight data. Staff continues to work with the Freight Analysis Framework 4 (FAF4) data from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and attends applicable technology-related training, such as a tutorial on Transearch® data made available through TxDOT’s Transportation Planning and Programming Division (March 2018) and an FHWA-supported Regional Freight Data Collaboration and Standardization Forum (January 2017). Staff participated in freight-focused studies spearheaded by partner agencies, such as TxDOT’s Central Texas Grade Crossing Study, and is working to bolster comprehensive freight planning efforts using lessons learned at an FHWA’s Freight Planning 101 training for small- to mid-sized MPOs in April 2018. Several freight-related studies are under development by TxDOT and are expected to conclude in 2019: an update of the Texas Rail Plan, Freight Infrastructure Design Considerations and Texas Statewide Truck Parking Study.

A representative of the trucking industry actively serves on MPO’s TAC, and MPO staff regularly attend events and meetings of the San Antonio Manufacturers Association, San Antonio Transportation Association, Texas Innovation Alliance’s Freight & Logistics Community of Practice and (until dissolved in Fall 2016) Union Pacific Advisory Committee. Additionally, in January 2019, MPO staff had the opportunity to meet with the Vice President of Transportation and the Director of Delivery Operations for HEB to better understand the needs of large commercial retailers in the region.

Pg. 9-3 Freight

9.2 Freight Policy and Planning The FAST Act established a national policy of maintaining and improving the condition and performance of an inaugural National Multimodal Freight Network (NMFN). It also specified goals related to the policy for the condition, safety, security, efficiency, productivity, resiliency, and reliability of the NMFN as well as for reducing the adverse environmental impacts of freight movement. Further, the FAST Act required the development of the country’s first National Freight Strategic Plan. For states to receive formula funding under the National Highway Freight Program, the FAST Act required states to develop their own State Freight Plan that is fiscally constrained and addresses how the plan will help the state meet the NMFN goals. Finally, the FAST Act required that new tools be made available to help with performance-based planning. One of the federal performance measures specifically addresses travel time reliability for highway freight. Taken together, these are an unprecedented step in the direction of multimodal and performance-based planning for freight movement. Implementation of these requirements in Texas is described below.

Texas Freight Mobility Plan and Goals Taken together, the Eight goal areas provide a framework for the objectives of the Texas Freight freight-related policies Mobility Plan (TFMP): of the FAST Act are • an unprecedented Safety step in the direction of • Asset Preservation multimodal and • Mobility & Reliability performance-based • Multimodal Connectivity planning for freight • Stewardship movement. • Customer Service • Sustainable Funding • Economic Competitiveness

Pg. 9-4 Freight

The goals align with the FAST Act’s National Multimodal Freight Network goals and the goals of the Texas Transportation Plan (TTP 2040) and TxDOT Strategic Plan (2017-2021 Strategic Plan). Figure 9-1 illustrates the alignment:

Figure 9-1. Texas Freight Mobility Plan (TFMP) Goals align with other state and federal goals

Source: Texas Freight Mobility Plan, pg. 2-8.

Texas Multimodal Freight Network The FAST Act established the need for the first National Multimodal Freight Network shown in Figure 9-2. Texas Multimodal Freight Network within the MPO boundary. A multimodal network includes highway, rail, port and waterway and air cargo modes. In conjunction with the Texas Freight Mobility Plan, TxDOT developed the Texas Multimodal Freight Network.

Pg. 9-5 Freight

Figure 9-2. Texas Multimodal Freight Network within the MPO boundary

The Alamo Area MPO’s Designation of Critical Urban Freight Corridors MPOs with populations greater than 500,000 worked to designate Critical Urban Freight Corridors (CUFCs) to their region. CUFCs must meet certain requirements such as connecting an intermodal facility to the Interstate System or serving a major freight generator. Once designated, they become part of the National Multimodal Freight Network eligible for National Highway Freight Program formula funds.

The MPO’s process began at the October 7, 2016 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meeting with presentations by state officials on state and federal freight transportation planning requirements. On November 16, 2016, a TAC Freight, Rail and Transit Subcommittee Workshop was held to begin the process of identifying potential CUFCs. Through a facilitated process, subcommittee members identified 50 potential miles of CUFCs. Members of the freight industry were able to give their feedback on the proposed CUFCs during the two freight stakeholder workshops held on January 25, 2017 (described above). Feedback supported the initial CUFC recommendations and was then presented to the TAC Freight, Rail and Transit Subcommittee on

Pg. 9-6 Freight

February 22, 2017 and to the TAC and the Transportation Policy Board (TPB) in March 2017. The following month, the TPB unanimously adopted the 50 miles of Freight Corridors identified during MPO’s outreach process to submit to TxDOT. Additionally, all staff presentations and freight-related data informing the CUFC designation process is publicly available at www.alamoareampo.org/freight. In July 2017, the Texas Transportation Commission adopted 372 miles of Critical Urban Freight Corridors statewide. Over 45 miles are within the MPO. Table 9-1 outlines the corridors ultimately approved by the Texas Transportation Commission.

Table 9-1. Critical Urban Freight Corridors in the MPO Study Area Route From To Centerline Miles

Freight moved on the Loop 1604 North IH 10 West IH 10 East 25.69 Texas Multimodal Freight Network for Loop 410 North IH 35 North Loop 410 NE 1.83 highway, rail, water and air is forecasted Rittiman Road Loop 410 North FM 78 2.58 to grow from 2.2 billion tons in 2016 to Foster Road FM 78 IH 10 East 2.46 4 billion tons in 2045.

- Texas Freight Mobility Plan General Hudnell Frio City Road Brazos Street 2.40 2017 Dr

SH 46 IH 35 North IH 10 East 10.20

Total Centerline Miles 45.16

9.3 Freight: Now and Future in Texas and the Alamo Area Texas Highway Freight Movements According to the Texas Freight Mobility Plan 2017, freight moved on the Texas Multimodal Freight Network for highway, rail, water and air is forecasted to grow from 2.2 billion tons (worth $2.9 trillion in 2016) to 4.0 billion tons (worth $7.5 trillion in 2045). This change represents a 79% growth in tonnage (2.0%

Pg. 9-7 Freight

annually) and 159% growth in value (3.3% annually). Trucking intrastate, where freight transported between origin and destination is entirely within Texas, is forecasted to make up the largest share of tonnage growth, accounting for almost half of the increase projected through 2045.

Figure 9-3 shows 2015 freight tonnage flows on highways in the Alamo Area. Nearly 100 million tons of freight were hauled on sections of IH 35 north and south of Loop 410. By 2045 (Figure 9-4), the MPO’s highway system is projected to carry more than double the tonnage of freight that it did in 2015.

A suite of capacity improvements and Transportation Systems Management & Operations solutions will be necessary to maintain highway freight mobility through and beyond 2045.

Figure 9-3. 2015 Alamo Area MPO Freight Tonnage Flows

Pg. 9-8 Freight

Figure 9-4. 2045 Alamo Area MPO Freight Tonnage Flows

Source: IHS Markit/Transearch

The Texas Clear Lanes program, for instance, targets congestion and freight bottlenecks in the state’s major metro areas. Two MPO-area projects funded through the program are Loop 410 improvements from US 90 to SH 151 and US 281 expansion from Stone Oak Parkway to the Bexar/Comal County line. Both are estimated to be completed in Winter 2020. Additionally, TxDOT began developing Freight Infrastructure Design Considerations, a recommendation of the earlier Texas Freight Mobility Plan 2016. Among its objectives, the report will identify current accessibility issues of the Texas Multimodal Freight Network and develop strategies to implement higher vertical clearance minimums and accommodate connected and autonomous freight vehicles.

Rail Freight Rail accounted for 441 million tons of freight in Texas in 2016, according to the Texas Freight Mobility Plan 2017. Figure 9-5 illustrates the volume of tons transported by rail to, from, within and through the Alamo Area.

Pg. 9-9 Freight

Figure 9-5. Rail flows through the Alamo Area.

Sources: 2014 Rail Tonnage OD Data estimated based on 2014 Carload Waybill Sample for Texas; 2014 Rail Tonnage OD Data assigned to the rail network using the Texas Statewide Analysis Model version 3 (SAM-V3)

Railroads are primarily privately owned and operated, and companies generally keep growth forecasts internal. Thus, forecasts for statewide rail movements should be taken as planning-level only. With that said, it is estimated that rail- transported freight will grow significantly into 2045 to 668 tons and at a faster rate than truck freight. Growth is expected to be especially pronounced for outbound transportation, where freight originating in Texas is transported to destinations outside of the state.

The state plan recognizes that expanding international trade, containerized traffic, the key industries of petrochemical and manufacturing as well as traffic between freight generators and attractors in Texas will be driving factors behind the escalation of rail traffic over the next decades. With growing volumes on the rail network, railroad capacity and coordination with existing land uses will also need to grow. More pressure will be placed on existing at- grade highway/rail crossings and connections to seaports, industrial parks, warehouses and railyards where shipments are transferred between modes.

Pg. 9-10 Freight

9.4 Local Freight Planning Freight Stakeholder Workshops MPO held two identical freight workshops the morning and afternoon of January 25, 2017 at the Northeast Service Center (Tool Yard) in San Antonio, Texas shown in Figure 9-6.

Figure 9-6. Freight industry stakeholders write color-coded The meetings were held in a comments on maps of the MPO study area. workshop format, beginning with a presentation by the MPO that set the stage for the meeting and laid out the meeting objectives. Participants then heard two presentations by researchers working on projects that could impact the future of freight movement: The Freight Shuttle System and technologies enabling truck automation.

Afterwards, attendees worked in small groups to 1) identify the routes most frequently used by their organizations, 2) identify areas of concern regarding freight transportation in the region, 3) provide feedback on the Critical Urban Freight Corridors, and 4) come to consensus on the top three priorities for their group. Approximately 30 people participated in the workshops.

Central Texas Grade Crossing Study TxDOT’s 2018 Central Texas Grade Crossing Study recommended railroad- highway improvements ranging from warning device upgrades to grade separations. Locations for recommended solutions in the three MPO-area counties are shown in Figure 9-7.

Pg. 9-11 Freight

Figure 9-7. Central Texas Grade Crossing Study

Source: TranSystems and TRIMS

Pg. 9-12 Freight

A process intended to develop candidate projects that could potentially help to improve rail and vehicle mobility through potential improvements to highway- railroad at-grade crossings, it focused on the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) freight railroad system located in the counties of Williamson, Travis, Hays, Comal, and Bexar. An extension into Guadalupe County was also studied. In total, the study analyzed 207.1 miles of UPRR track in MPO-area counties.

TxDOT undertook this study to provide planning support to its partners in rapidly growing communities along these important freight railroad corridors, and MPO and partner agency staff participated actively in meetings held in Bexar and Comal Counties. While many of the potential improvements are not under TxDOT’s jurisdiction, TxDOT can assist with coordination with UPRR and when projects are multi-jurisdictional. The full report is available at http://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/rail/central-texas-grade-crossing- study.pdf.

Texas Innovation Alliance Freight & Logistics The Texas Innovation Alliance (TIA), a network of local, regional, and state agencies and research institutions, launched in 2016 to leverage resources and create solutions to address community mobility challenges through innovation. The TIA formed a Freight & Logistics Community of Practice (CoP) in 2018 to focus on needs specific to freight transportation. MPO staff have actively participated in monthly conference calls, helping develop a list of problem statements particularly meaningful for the CoP membership. The focus areas include freight queuing and routing; truck parking; developing a model for collaborative relationships between public and private entities; and proactively preparing for connected/autonomous vehicle technology.

9.5 Focus Areas for the Next Five Years With freight tonnage expected to nearly double over the life of this plan, it is critical to integrate consideration of freight needs into the transportation planning process. The key actions and projects below will be prioritized over the next five years in order to keep freight moving into, out of, through and within the Alamo Area.

Pg. 9-13 Freight

Solidify links with local freight stakeholders MPO will continue attending meetings and events held by freight transportation providers and related manufacturing and warehousing stakeholders and will formalize and grow its email list of interested stakeholders. Another freight stakeholder workshop will be held during the next 1-3 years.

Collate recommended and desired freight transportation improvements outlined in state and regional plans and studies. The MPO will streamline existing lists of recommended and desired freight transportation improvements on our public freight web viewer and webpage.

Track freight-related performance. The MPO will annually track the Truck Travel Time Reliability Index on the Interstate per federal performance measure requirements and participate in tracking other state-level performance measures, where possible (see Chapter 11 Performance Measurement).

Develop a freight portrait for the MPO study area, updated annually. Without a detailed freight plan for the region, MPO staff will work with transportation agency partners, the private sector and with existing Transearch and FAF4 data to develop a portrait of freight (ex. commodities, movements, generators and attractors) at the MPO level. The MPO will also seek opportunities to partner with state and/or regional partners on a freight-specific plan for the region.

Pg. 10-1 Environmental

10 Environmental

The environment is important to everyone, especially the air we breathe and the water we drink. And not just for today, but to ensure clean air and water is available in the future. Over the years, the MPO and its partners have implemented a variety of plans, programs and projects that avoid and minimize environmental impacts to the greatest extent practicable for a more sustainable future.

10.1 Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years Until July 18, 2018, San Antonio had been the largest city in the United States that was in compliance with federal ozone standards. On that date, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated Bexar County in marginal nonattainment for ozone. The effective date of designation was September 24, 2018. Bexar County has until September 24, 2021 to meet the ozone standard. At the same time, Comal, Guadalupe and Kendall Counties were designated attainment/unclassifiable under the October 2015 standard.

Pg. 10-2 Environmental

Over the years, the region has been actively implementing measures to stay in attainment. Some examples include implementing intersection improvements and improved signal re-timings, implementing vehicle idling restrictions, conducting educational and public outreach campaigns, improving transit service coverage and frequency, purchasing alternatively fueled fleets, expanding the scope of the Alamo Area Commute Solutions Program, increasing the coverage of bicycle and pedestrian facilities and amenities, and adding vehicle travel lanes to reduce delay.

The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient, Transportation Equity Act - A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) and subsequent Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) acts have better defined environmental goals that include more integration of metropolitan and statewide planning with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) activities. From 2013-2015, the TxDOT San Antonio District worked with regional stakeholders on two Planning and Environmental Linkages (PEL) studies. In September 2015, the MPO adopted resolutions supporting the work completed on the two PEL studies completed for sections of IH 35.

Over the past five years, the MPO staff has developed and refined its online iMap tool. iMap is a user-friendly mapping application that is available to the public on the MPO website at http://www.alamoareampo.org/imap/. iMap contains a wide variety of transportation, geographic and environmental data layers. By using iMap, users can assess traffic volumes, vehicle crashes, floodplains, Edwards Aquifer impacts, transit service, environmental justice impacts, and other important data elements for geographic areas or transportation projects.

Environmental issues in transportation planning continue to be a priority. This chapter discusses local environmental issues: Linking NEPA and Planning, environmental analyses, air quality, water availability and sustainability.

Pg. 10-3 Environmental

10.2 Linking Planning and NEPA Planning and Environment Linkages or PEL is an umbrella term for the many environmental issues that should be considered and used in the planning process to improve the environment. PEL addresses many of the concerns addressed under NEPA, such as environmental effects, endangered species, wetlands, and cultural preservation. It also includes Linking Planning and NEPA activities and concepts regarding how to conduct transportation planning-level choices and analyses so they may be adopted or incorporated into the process required by NEPA. PEL pertains to a wider array of issues and topics, including planning-level interagency consultation and coordination.

The MPO utilizes PEL as an approach to transportation decision-making that considers environmental, community, and economic goals early in the planning stage, and carries them through project development, design, and construction. The MPO strives for a seamless decision-making process that minimizes duplication of effort, promotes environmental stewardship, and reduces delays in project implementation. In September 2015, the MPO adopted resolutions supporting the work completed on the two PEL studies completed for sections of IH 35.

10.3 MPO Project Assessment Tool: iMap When considering a transportation project for funding, the MPO, agency partners, public and stakeholders, can take into general account potential impacts to the environment and community and consider, where appropriate and necessary, environmental mitigation activities. The MPO does this through its iMap online mapping application. MPO has developed iMap through publicly available datasets and geocoded data elements specific to transportation and the environment. iMap does not include an exhaustive listing of factors however, and each project sponsor is still responsible for the relevant environmental clearance documentation to comply with NEPA or appropriate state level environmental clearance, where applicable. Additionally, factors such as air quality may be a regional concern and not specifically limited to individual travel corridors.

Pg. 10-4 Environmental

The following are some of the environmental concerns that can be analyzed using iMap within the project development process:

• Environmental Justice • Edwards Aquifer Impacts • Floodplains • Watershed areas • Places of community interest • Project locations and adjacent feature

As noted previously, it is still the responsibility of the sponsoring agency, in conducting the environmental analysis for proposed projects, to accurately and fully identify any impacts covering social, economic and environmental concerns, and proposed mitigation approaches, as applicable and warranted, to ensure compliance with relevant state and federal requirements.

10.4 Air Quality The ratification of the Clean Air Act of 1970 authorized the development of comprehensive federal and state regulations to limit emissions from both stationary (industrial) sources and mobile sources. Four major regulatory programs were initiated: the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), State Implementation Plans (SIPs), New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs). The EPA was created on May 2, 1971 in order to implement the various requirements included in the Clean Air Act.

The Clean Air Act required areas to create plans to meet the air quality standards and set deadlines for achieving those standards. Using this authority, the EPA has promulgated air quality standards for six air pollutants:

sulfur dioxide (SO2), particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), nitrogen dioxide

(NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), ozone, and lead. The Act required the EPA to review the scientific data upon which the standards are based every five years. The EPA may revise the standards if necessary to protect public health with “an adequate margin of safety”.

Pg. 10-5 Environmental

The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments group nonattainment areas into classifications based on the severity of exceedance and establish specific pollution controls and attainment dates for each classification: Marginal, Moderate, Serious, Severe, and Extreme. Areas with more severe air pollution problems have a longer time to meet the standards, but also have more stringent control requirements placed on them.

The Ozone Standard Unlike the other pollutants, ozone is not directly emitted from any source. Instead, it is formed when volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) react in the presence of sunlight. Figure 10-1 illustrates examples of on-road mobile, non-road mobile, point and area sources of VOCs and NOx. Control of ozone is based on decreasing emissions from those sources.

On October 1, 2015, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) strengthened the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level ozone by lowering the standard from 75 parts per billion (ppb) to 70 ppb, based on scientific evidence about ozone’s effects on public health and welfare. The updated standards aim to protect public health, particularly for at-risk groups including children, older adults, people of all ages who have lung diseases such as asthma, and people who are active outdoors. The San Antonio area was not able to achieve the lower standard and was designated marginal nonattainment for ozone on July 18, 2018.

Pg. 10-6 Environmental

Figure 10-1. Ozone Formation

Air Quality Conditions The MPO study area currently has several Continuous Air Quality Monitoring Systems (CAMS), which record ozone levels daily. The regulatory ozone CAMS include the San Antonio Northwest (C23), Camp Bullis (C58), and Calaveras Lake (C59). In addition, the Alamo Area Council of Governments (AACOG) operates non-regulatory ozone monitoring sites across the region during the ozone season.

Figure 10-2 illustrates that monitor readings have been trending downward over time; however, it was not sufficient to meet the new 70 ppb standard, promulgated in 2015.

Pg. 10-7 Environmental

Figure 10-2. San Antonio Eight-Hour Design Value Trends by Monitor Site 2006 - 2018

(Source: MPO interpretation of data from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality)

Transportation Conformity Now that Bexar County has been designated nonattainment for ozone, the MPO takes on the responsibility, known as transportation conformity, of analyzing expected emissions from on-road mobile sources. The transportation conformity requirements ensure that transportation projects and plans outlined in the MPO’s long- and short-range plans (currently Mobility 2045 and the 2019-2022 Transportation Improvement Program) do not cause new air quality violations, exacerbate existing ones, or delay attainment of the air quality standards.

Transportation conformity is a two-step process that begins with a local finding of conformity by the MPO’s Transportation Policy Board and a final determination of conformity made by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). The 2019 Transportation Conformity document describes the transportation conformity process in greater detail and provides local findings on VOC and NOx

Pg. 10-8 Environmental

emissions. It can be found online at online at www.alamoareampo.org/airquality/conformity.

The MPO has one year from the effective designation date of nonattainment designation (September 24, 2018) to complete the initial transportation conformity process. A conformity determination is required, at a minimum, every time a new or amended long-range plan (MTP) or short-range plan (TIP) is adopted, unless only adding exempted projects.

Air Quality Mitigation Efforts In the Alamo Area, on-road vehicles have historically been the most significant source of NOx and the third largest source of VOCs. Fortunately, improvements in technology have had a considerable effect on the reduction of air pollution (emissions from new vehicles have declined over time as emission controls and fuel efficiency have improved). Even though cleaner vehicles are in operation, reducing vehicle miles of travel is one way to reduce emissions and improve air quality. A downward trend in VMT brings significant benefits in reducing mobile source emissions. Reduction in the growth of vehicle miles of travel requires behavioral changes rather than solely relying on improvements in technology. The challenge is to reduce the length of most trips and to identify and implement strategies to encourage walking, bicycling and transit use. Clearing bottlenecks, and therefore reducing engine idling, is another major means of reducing vehicle emissions.

As shown in Table 10-1, vehicles are not the only source however, according to the AACOG Emissions Trend Analysis for the San Antonio-New Braunfels Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) of ozone forming pollutants, there are 275.36 tons of VOCs and 240.26 tons of NOx emitted daily in from all man- made sources (power generation, vehicles, aircraft, etc.) in 2012.

Pg. 10-9 Environmental

Table 10-1. 2017 Ozone Season Weekday Anthropogenic VOC and NOx Emissions for the MSA VOC (tons/weekday) NOx (tons/weekday) Source Tons/Weekda Tons/Weekda Type Percentage Percentage y y On- 24.7 13.7% 44.1 27.4% Road Point 9.2 5.1% 61.1 37.9% Area 89.0 49.3% 6.9 4.3% Non- 16.9 9.3% 18.4 11.4% Road Other (Oil & Gas; 40.8 22.6% 30.6 19.0% Off- Road) Total 180.6 100.0% 161.1 100.0% Source: AACOG, June 2018. “Regional Air Quality Plan: 2018 to 2023 San Antonio-New Braunfels Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA)”

10.5 Water Resources There is a continued interest in the protection of natural resources, especially water. Due to the development and expansion in the recharge zone of the Edwards Aquifer area and recent weather conditions, including drought, concerns regarding the importance of looking after and preserving the water resources in the Alamo Area continues. The Edwards Aquifer is the primary source of drinking water for the area. It is important for governmental entities, private corporations and citizens to work together to address urban development that impacts the aquifer. Plans such as the Edwards Aquifer Sustainability Initiative specify preferred restrictions on impervious cover percentages that will sustain existing water quality, as well as other measures that will assist in protecting the aquifer.

The Edwards Aquifer is one of the major groundwater systems in Texas. It has been a source of water for people in south central Texas for more than 12,000 years. Today, it is the primary source of water for approximately 1.7 million people. Geographically, the Aquifer extends through parts of Kinney, Uvalde, Zavala, Medina, Frio, Atascosa, Bexar, Comal, Guadalupe, and Hays counties and covers an area approximately 180 miles long and five to 40 miles wide.

Pg. 10-10 Environmental

The total surface area overlying the Aquifer is approximately 3,600 square miles. The Aquifer is the primary water source for much of this area, including the City of San Antonio and its surrounding communities.

Historically, the cities of Uvalde, San Antonio, New Braunfels, and San Marcos were founded around large springs that discharged from the Aquifer. As the region grew, wells were drilled into the Aquifer in order to supplement the water supplied by those springs. The Aquifer also serves as the principal source of water for the region’s agricultural and industrial activities and provides necessary spring flow for endangered species habitat, as well as recreational purposes and downstream uses in the Guadalupe, Nueces, and San Antonio river basins. During the 1970s and 1980s, residential development in the San Antonio Metropolitan Area occurred predominantly in the northern part of the region. Because of the concern of continued development over the Recharge Zone, construction in the 1990s occurred in the western and northeastern areas of the County, slightly curbing the expansion to the north.

As the metropolitan area continues to grow, the needed transportation projects will impact surface water flow and infiltration, especially during storm or flood conditions. The Aquifer is divided into three main zones: the contributing zone, the recharge zone, and the artesian zone. The contributing zone is also called the drainage area or the catchment area. Here the land surface "catches" water from rainfall that averages about 30" per year, and water runs off into streams or infiltrates into the water table aquifer of the plateau. Runoff from the land surface and water table springs then both feed streams that flow over relatively impermeable limestone until they reach the recharge zone. Because transportation facilities generally cause an increase in the impermeable surface area, roadways can result in increasing local surface runoff and reducing water infiltration into the soil. Roadway construction projects can also cause the altering of drainage patterns at stream crossings, by changing the speed, direction and amount of storm water flow.

Pg. 10-11 Environmental

Aquifer Mitigation Efforts There are several mitigation strategies that could be used to reduce storm water runoff and degradation of the Edwards Aquifer by minimizing the impact of transportation improvements. Most of these can be directly incorporated into the design of the transportation facility. Engineering on new projects, and redesign and retrofit of existing facilities could include:

• erosion control measures and runoff management techniques used to prevent pollution of adjacent waterways and the Edwards Aquifer • adjustments to the alignments of transportation facilities used to avoid flood hazards • greater use of permeable surfaces employed to reduce impacts on ground water recharge • cost/pricing strategies to reduce demand for paved parking or increasing fines for intentional discharge

Other mitigation strategies could include compliance with federal, state and local policies, standards and land use strategies that address water resources.

10.6 Other Environmental Considerations Endangered Karst Invertebrates Other environmental considerations unique to the Alamo Area include the presence of endangered Karst invertebrates. Nine Bexar County karst invertebrates were listed as endangered species on 26 December 2000 (65 FR 81419 81433). These species inhabit caves and mesocaverns (humanly impassable voids in karst limestone) in Bexar County, Texas. Five karst zones have been defined within Bexar County and are defined as follows:

• Zone 1. Areas known to contain listed karst invertebrate species. • Zone 2. Areas having a high probability of containing habitat suitable for listed karst invertebrate species. • Zone 3. Areas that probably do not contain listed karst invertebrate species.

Pg. 10-12 Environmental

• Zone 4. Areas that require further research but are generally equivalent to Zone 3, although they may include sections that could be classified as Zone 2 or Zone 5 as more information becomes available. • Zone 5. Areas that do not contain listed karst invertebrate species

A layer containing the five karst zones can be found on our online iMap tool at http://www.alamoareampo.org/imap/.

In October 2012, TxDOT encountered an endangered karst invertebrate species while excavating for the planned construction at the interchange of Loop 1604 and SH 151. This finding caused the project to be delayed and additional costs to be incurred while the project was redesigned to minimize potential impacts.

TxDOT and engineering consultants use borehole data, trenching, electrical resistivity surveys to test for the presence and karst voids with a high likelihood of being inhabited. This is a significant construction consideration for roadway work in Bexar County but can be planned for and addressed if identified early.

Texas Hill Country The Texas Hill Country spans a 17-county area and encompasses approximately 11.3 million acres. Each of the counties within the MPO study area contain a portion of the Hill Country. It is a geographic region located in the Edwards Plateau. Native vegetation in the region includes various yucca, prickly pear cactus, desert spoon, and wildflowers in the Llano Uplift. The predominant trees are Ashe juniper and Texas live oak.

The region is also notable for its karst topography and tall rugged hills of limestone or granite. The terrain throughout the region is punctuated by a thin layer of topsoil and a large number of exposed rocks and boulders, making the region very dry and prone to flash flooding. It also features a number of caverns, three of which are within our study area – Natural Bridge Caverns, Bracken Cave, and Cascade Caverns.

Pg. 10-13 Environmental

The Texas Hill Country is well known for its unique ecosystems supporting several endangered species (e.g., Texas blind salamander, San Marcos salamander, black-capped vireo, golden-cheeked warbler, and Tobusch fishhook cactus).

Quarry Row The Hill Country is the source of 80% of all limestone quarried in Texas. Currently, there is a stretch of operations along the IH 35 corridor in Comal County that has approximately 40,000 acres of aggregate operations, referred to locally as “Quarry Row”.

Limestone quarrying, crushing, and cement manufacturing creates air pollution in the form of particulate matter (PM). While our region is currently in attainment for PM, health effects from exposure could include coughing, shortness of breath, tightness in the chest and irritation of the eyes from short- term exposure. Long-term exposure can result in reduced lung function, and respiratory diseases such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, autoimmune disease, and mortality.

10.7 Resiliency and Risk Management According to the Texas State Collaborative, the top three hazards for south central Texas are hail, flash floods, and thunderstorm winds. Cold fronts often bring high winds, flooding and hail. Hailstorms in San Antonio throughout April 2016 topped $2 billion in losses. The entire MPO study area has seen its fair share of flash flood events with historic floods in 1998, 2002 and 2013. Finally, wind often accompanies thunderstorms, but the storms that came through in 2012 also brought with them hail and tornados injuring dozens of residents and destroying several homes. Hazards such as these take an emotional toll on those affected, cost the region millions of dollars in repairs

Pg. 10-14 Environmental

and lost productivity, and have the potential to interrupt operations on key corridors in the region.

The City of San Antonio’s Hazard Mitigation Plan identified several additional hazards including extreme heat, tornados, winter storms, droughts, dam failures, hazardous materials, terrorism, pipeline failures, and infections diseases. Of this list, droughts, flooding, and wildfires were identified as posing the highest risk.

Bexar County has a Regional Watershed Management partnership that was created to provide improved coordination in planning and capital improvement programs for flood control, storm water management and water quality. This partnership includes the City of San Antonio, the San Antonio Authority, and the 20 suburban cities within Bexar County. Through their work, the partnership has created improved watershed models and flood maps that assess flood risk in all areas of the county.

Comal County’s Hazard Mitigation Plan identifies extreme heat, hail, lightning, thunderstorm wind, tornadoes, winter storm, drought, floods, wildfires, expansive soils and dam failures as potential hazards.

10.8 Over the Next Five Years With increased population and vehicle miles traveled projected, it is important the region be proactive on regulations concerning water quality and air quality. The area will need to be proactive in its protective measures and getting information out to the general public in order to help reduce potential negative impacts to both sensitivities and in order to:

• Reduce vehicle emissions by increasing non-single occupancy vehicle mode share. • Increase the number of electric vehicles and electric vehicle charging stations in the Alamo Area. • Reduce the number of vehicle miles traveled per capita. • Continue to coordinate with partner agencies regarding air quality issues to include both ozone and particulate matter.

Pg. 11-1 Congestion Management Process

11 Congestion Management Process

Traffic congestion impacts how easy - or not - it is to get around. While traffic will grow as more people and jobs move to the Alamo Area, we can and should try to manage the challenge ahead of us. One way is by reducing the demand for space on the same road at the same time. Another way is by improving the efficiency of the transportation system overall.

Congestion Management is the act of using a mix of strategies to reduce traffic. Metropolitan areas like ours with populations over 200,000 are known as transportation management areas (TMAs). TMAs are required by the federal government to have an ongoing Congestion Management Process (CMP). The process includes eight actions:

1. Develop regional congestion management objectives 2. Define the CMP network 3. Develop multimodal performance measures 4. Collect data and monitors system performance 5. Analyze congestion problems and needs 6. Identify and assess strategies

Pg. 11-2 Congestion Management Process

7. Program and implement strategies 8. Evaluate strategy effectiveness

Figure 11-1 shows the connections between the CMP and other elements of The Congestion management process the MPO’s transportation planning process. informs and is informed Figure 11-1. Congestion Management Process by the MPO’s three transportation planning products: our Metropolitan Transportation Plan, Transportation Improvement Program and Unified Planning Work Program

In TMAs that are not meeting federal requirements for air quality, federal funds cannot be used for projects that build new roads or expand the number of lanes for single-occupant vehicles (SOV) unless the area’s CMP addresses the need for additional roadway space by other multimodal strategies first. Since the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated Bexar County as a nonattainment area for ozone (effective September 24, 2018), the CMP is especially important for the future of transportation in our region.

Additional information can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations for the CMP on pg. 11-32 or online at 23 CFR 450.322.

Pg. 11-3 Congestion Management Process

Comparing the Alamo Area to other Regions Traffic studies show that the Alamo Area is not yet one of the most congested regions in the country or state, but it has been identified as having one of the fastest growing congestion levels. The average commuter in San Antonio spends more than 44 hours in traffic each year, burning through $1,000 in costs associated with congestion and an extra 20 gallons of fuel that expels ozone-forming pollutants into the air (Urban Mobility Report, Texas Transportation Institute (TTI), 2015).

Figure 11-2 and Figure 11-3 compare San Antonio’s congestion with other major Texas cities using two common measures: Annual Hours of Delay per The figure to the right shows how two Commuter and Travel Time Index. common measures of congestion have changed over time in Figure 11-2. Annual Hours of Delay per Commuter major Texas Cities. ANNUAL HOURS OF DELAY PER COMMUTER Annual Hours of Delay per Commuter San Antonio Austin Houston is the extra travel time during the year Dallas/Fort Worth National Average divided by the number of people 70 who commute in private vehicles in 60 the urban area.

Travel Time Index is 50 the ratio of travel time in the peak period to the travel 40 time at free-flow conditions. A value

HOURS 30 of 1.30 indicates a 20-minute free-flow trip takes 26 minutes 20 in the peak period. Source: Texas A&M 10 Transportation Institute (TTI) 2015 0 Metro Mobility 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 Scorecard YEAR

Pg. 11-4 Congestion Management Process

Figure 11-3. Travel Time Index

TRAVEL TIME INDEX

San Antonio Austin Houston DFW National Average

1.35

1.30

1.25

1.20

INDEX 1.15

1.10

1.05

1.00 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014

YEAR Causes of Traffic Congestion Congestion occurs when travel demand is greater than the available roadway space, transit vehicle or other transportation facility. Typical causes of traffic congestion include:

• Bottlenecks that occur at intersections, interchanges, and other locations where traffic signals, traffic merging or special events cause a change in traffic flow • Weather events, such as flash flooding • Temporary capacity-reducing roadway conditions, such as work zones • Crashes and other incidents that either partially block roadways or cause passing motorists to slow down

The national distribution of these causes is shown in Figure 11-4. Nationally, 60% of all congestion is “non-recurring”. It is caused by occasional traffic incidents, bad weather, work zones, poor signal timing, and special events.

Pg. 11-5 Congestion Management Process

The remaining 40% of congestion is “recurring” and is usually an effect of bottlenecks.

Figure 11-4. FHWA Categorizes Five Causes of Congestion. CAUSES OF TRAFFIC CONGESTION

Bad Weather 15%

Work Zones Bottlenecks 10% 40% Special Events 5%

Poor Signal Timing 5% Traffic Incidents 25%

Source: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/otps/bottlenecks/chap2.cfm

Accomplishments Over the past five years, the Alamo Area has paid significant attention to reducing demand and improving the flow of the transportation system. MPO took a major step forward with the overhaul of the region’s CMP in early 2017. Our TMA reviewed each action required by the federal government for our Congestion Management Process using a step-by-step approach.

MPO began by conducting an online public survey in February 2017 that focused on current commuting habits and community priorities. MPO led a workshop for partner agency staff in March 2017. Feedback from both the self- selected public survey and agency staff workshop shaped our congestion management objectives. At the workshop, consensus was also reached on the CMP network, and discussion helped inform meaningful congestion indicators

Pg. 11-6 Congestion Management Process

and a data and monitoring plan. Figure 11-5 illustrates outcomes of the online survey and agency staff workshop.

In the fall of 2018, MPO staff presented a recommended path forward to the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and incorporated feedback from the TAC members into a final CMP. This chapter represents the region’s Congestion Management Process, which is also available at www.alamoareampo.org/CMP.

Since approving our region’s previous long-range plan, the MPO has enhanced the regional Travel Demand Model with four time-period traffic assignment and developed a micro-model capable of better small-area analysis and active transportation planning.

Additionally, all Texas MPOs gained access to the National Performance Measures Research Data Set and a suite of roadway speed analytics tools when TxDOT joined the Traffic Performance Metrics Pooled Fund Study.

The Regional Transportation Attitude Survey was completed in early 2018. It is the third of its type to be conducted for the MPO in the past decade. A Regional Bike Share Master Plan was also completed in 2018, identifying potential future SWell Cycle bike share station locations in Bexar County and exploring the possibility of bike share in Comal, Guadalupe and Kendall Counties. The MPO initiated a Regional Thoroughfare Plan Study in 2017 with the resulting product goal being a single classification system for the region’s major thoroughfares. This study builds off of the Multimodal Transportation Plan, a City of San Antonio plan awarded MPO Surface Transportation Program – Metro Mobility funds in 2014.

In October 2018, the MPO launched Alamo Commutes. Previously “Commute Solutions” under the Alamo Area Council of Governments, the program emphasizes travel demand management for employers and commuters.

The region’s Intelligent Transportation System (ITS), TransGuide, celebrated its 20th anniversary in 2015. Since its start in 1995, the original 26 miles of

Pg. 11-7 Congestion Management Process

freeway coverage by TransGuide has expanded to over 126 miles, outgrowing the TransGuide facility technology and layout. MPO STP-MM funding awarded in 2018 will support major upgrades and expansion of TransGuide as well as the creation of a Safety Service Patrol (SSP) which will begin operating on controlled access highways in Bexar, Comal and Kendall Counties in 2019. The SSP will assist stranded motorists with minor emergencies and provide light-duty traffic control.

The City of San Antonio implemented an innovative towing management contract in 2015 with the help of the multi-agency Traffic Incident Management group. This program has reduced the average arrival time of a tow truck when called by the San Antonio Police Department from 45 minutes to under 15 minutes, helping to achieve the ultimate goal of reducing clearance time for freeway crashes.

The TxDOT San Antonio District and City of San Antonio are increasingly piloting different technologies to optimize traffic cameras on arterials and highways and track signal performance metrics.

In 2015, VIA Metropolitan Transit opened Centro Plaza at VIA Villa, transportation hub servicing most downtown routes, improving traffic flow and transfers. VIA also opened a 400-vehicle capacity Park and Ride in the Stone Oak area in 2018 and worked with the City of San Antonio to secure funding that increased frequency of a dozen transit routes.

Pg. 11-8 Congestion Management Process

Figure 11-5. CMP Community Priorities – Online Survey

Pg. 11-9 Congestion Management Process

11.1 Regional Objectives for Congestion Management How did we develop The CMP outlines eight specific congestion management objectives that work objectives? toward the Mobility 2045 goal to increase the efficiency of the transportation system and manage traffic congestion. These include: 1 • Maintain congested VMT per capita through 2022 An online survey and • Maintain current level of congested hours through 2022 stakeholder workshop • At least 65% of the Interstate should be reliable by 2022 identified important congestion concerns • At least 45% of the Non-Interstate NHS should be reliable by 2022 • Average reliability of the transit system should be 85% by 2040 • Double the population and employment within a quarter-mile access 2 of frequent transit by 2040 This feedback focused • Maintain 60 minutes or less incident clearance time on expressways our efforts on the through 2022 places and timing of congestion that most • Maintain travel time for freight moved on highways through 2022 needs to be addressed 11.2 CMP Network The MPO analyzes congestion on and defines its CMP network as all 3 Regionally Significant roadways, shown in Figure 11-6, within our planning We determined what area. Over months of collaboration with state and local transportation planning data is available to partners in 2016, the MPO defined Regionally Significant roadways as those track what we wanted that are: to measure • federally functionally classified as interstate freeways, other freeways or

4 expressways • federally functionally classified as principal arterials We looked at what • intermodal connectors included in the federally adopted National was realistic based on regional growth trends, Highway System fiscal constraints and • designated as SH or US routes other Mobility 2045 • community connections that provide direct, continuously signed goals connections between nearby or adjacent census defined urbanized

Pg. 11-10 Congestion Management Process

areas, urban clusters and population centers with more than 5,000 people • between activity centers that serve as primary regional connectors to an otherwise unserved regional activity center • extensions of Regionally Significant Roadways to connect non- connecting termini

Pg. 11-11 Congestion Management Process

Figure 11-6. Map of Regionally Significant Roadways in the Alamo Area

Visit www.alamoareampo.org/imap to view these roadways online

Pg. 11-12 Congestion Management Process

11.3 Multimodal Performance Measures In 2018, MPO staff developed baseline data for these eight performance measures, shown in Table 11-1, tracking congestion at the regional level. (Note, performance measures are regional, not limited to the CMP network.) Updates are published on our online performance measure dashboard at www.alamoareampo.org/TPM and in the Performance Measurement Chapter of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan found on page 13-1.

Table 11-1. Performance Measures GOOD TO KNOW Type of Measure Performance Measures

Collecting data Objective: Maintain congested VMT per capita through 2022

on system performance is a Intensity: The relative Number of road miles operating at V/C < 1.0 and responsibility of severity of congestion ≥ 1.0 facility owners that affects travel and operators. Extent: The number of Percent of vehicle miles traveled at V/C ≥ 1.0 The MPO’s system users or primary role is components (e.g. that of collator, vehicles, pedestrians, coordinator, and transit routes, lane analyzer of data miles) affected by collected by congestion agencies across

the region. Objective: Maintain current level of congested hours through 2022

Duration: The amount Congested hours of time the congested conditions persist

Pg. 11-13 Congestion Management Process

before returning to an uncongested state

Objective: At least 65% of the Interstate should be reliable by 2022

Objective: At least 45% of the Non-Interstate NHS should be reliable by 2022

Objective: Average reliability of the transit system should be 85% by 2040

Reliability: The Percent of person-miles traveled on the Interstate changes in congestion that are reliable that occur on different

days or at different times of day. Percent of person-miles traveled on the Non- Interstate NHS that are reliable

Number of HOV lane miles

Transit system average reliability

Percent of transit trips on dedicated lanes

Pg. 11-14 Congestion Management Process

Objective: Double the population and employment within a quarter-mile access of frequent transit by 2040

Land Use and Population within quarter-mile access of frequent Accessibility transit service Measures

Employment within quarter-mile access of frequent transit service

Objective: Maintain 60 minutes or less incident clearance time on expressways through 2022

Safety Incident clearance time

Objective: Maintain travel time for freight moved on highways through 2022

Freight Measures Truck Travel Time Reliability (TTTR) Index on the Interstate

Number of Top 100 truck bottlenecks

Pg. 11-15 Congestion Management Process

11.4 Collecting Data and Monitoring the System The MPO brings together, organizes and analyzes data collected by our transportation partners in order to:

• Define the extent and duration of congestion • Help determine causes of congestion • Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of implemented actions.

Read more in the Performance Measurement Chapter on page 13-1 about data sources used by the MPO.

As part of the congestion management process, the MPO inventories our CMP network at the corridor level. A database is compiled relating attributes of the CMP network corridors that include several characteristics organized under four categories:

Alternative Roadway Infrastructure: Factors that influence access to/from the region, between regional activity centers, and to/from local land uses

• Parallel expressways (within 5 mi) • Parallel arterials (frontage roads, major and minor arterials within 1 mi) • Direct connections (interchanges) to other highways

Modal Options: Factors that influence the viability of traveling by alternative modes on the corridor

• Public Transportation • Rideshare (Park-and-Ride, Transit Center, Park-and-Pool) • Managed/HOV lanes • Bike or pedestrian facility

System Demand: Factors that influence the size of demand for roadway space on the corridor

Pg. 11-16 Congestion Management Process

• Peak volume over capacity (V/C) • Truck volume percentage • Area Type

System Reliability: Factors that influence occasional (non-recurring) traffic congestion on the corridor

• Crash rate • Shoulders • Safety Service Patrol coverage • Truck lane restrictions • Intelligent Transportation System technology

A map of the CMP network and database are at www.alamoareampo.org/CMP. MPO staff reviews the CMP network database for accuracy during updates to the long-range Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Agencies proposing a project for MPO funding that would add vehicle capacity to a corridor must confirm that the project is on the MPO’s CMP network or complete a Corridor Fact Sheet form with their project application, if it is not.

Performance Data How Responsible Definition Alignment Measure Source Often it is Partner with Other Collected Plans

Number of road Travel At the time of MPO miles operating at Demand TDM update V/C < 1.0 and ≥ 1.0 Model (TDM) Percent of vehicle TDM At the time of MPO miles traveled at TDM update V/C ≥ 1.0 Congested hours Urban Quarterly TTI Average Congestion number of Report hours during specified time periods in which road sections are congested — speeds less than 90 percent of free-

Pg. 11-17 Congestion Management Process

Performance Data How Responsible Definition Alignment Measure Source Often it is Partner with Other Collected Plans

flow speed (e.g., 54 mph if free-flow speed is 60 mph). Reported for weekdays (6 am to 10 pm). Averages are weighted across road sections and urban areas by VMT using volume estimates derived from FHWA's HPMS. Percent of person- National Monthly MPO & TTI National miles traveled on Performance performance the Interstate that Measure measure are reliable Research Data Set (NPMRDS) Percent of person- NPMRDS Monthly MPO & TTI National miles traveled on performance the Non-Interstate measure NHS that are reliable Number of HOV TDM Annually MPO lane miles Transit system Automated Monthly VIA average reliability Vehicle Locating System Percent of transit Automated Annually VIA trips on dedicated Passenger lanes Counter Percent of VIA and TDM At the time of MPO & VIA population within TDM update quarter-mile distance of frequent transit service Percent of VIA and TDM At the time of MPO & VIA employment within TDM update quarter-mile distance of frequent transit service

Pg. 11-18 Congestion Management Process

Performance Data How Responsible Definition Alignment Measure Source Often it is Partner with Other Collected Plans

Incident clearance TransGuide Annually TxDOT Average time TxDOT time observations in minutes from statewide incident performance detection to measure clearance of collisions and disabled vehicles Truck Travel Time NPMRDS Monthly MPO & TTI National Reliability (TTTR) performance Index on the measure Interstate Number of Top 100 American Annually TxDOT Texas Freight truck bottlenecks Transportation Mobility Plan Research performance Institute measure

11.5 Analysis of Congestion Problems and Needs The information collected through the corridor inventory described previously is used to score each corridor based on its capacity to handle congestion.

The maximum score a corridor can receive is 100 points (25 points per category). Corridors with higher scores are equipped with more travel options to alleviate congestion from the main roadway facility. Corridors with lower scores should be considered for improvements based on the sufficiency score of each category.

Figure 11-7 illustrates how the total corridor score is summed from the four categories used to understand the corridor’s capacity to handle congestion. Detailed CMP Corridor Scoring Criteria is outlined in Table 11-2.

Pg. 11-19 Congestion Management Process

Figure 11-7. Corridor Scoring by Category

Alternative Roadway Infrastructure

14 points or less: Needs Improvement 15-25 points: Sufficient

Modal Options 14 points or less: Needs Improvement 15-25 points: Sufficient

System Demand 14 points or less: Needs Improvement 15-25 points: Sufficient

System Reliability 14 points or less: Needs Improvement 15-25 points: Sufficient

Total Corridor Score

Pg. 11-20 Congestion Management Process

Table 11-2. Detailed CMP Corridor Scoring Criteria

Max Number Category Inventory Measure Points of Points

Parallel Yes 11 Expressways1 (within 5 mi) None 0

Entire and Partial Parallel Arterials1 10 Limits Alternative (frontage roads, Entire Limits 7 Roadway major and minor 25 Infrastructure arterials within 1 Partial Limits 3 mi) None 0

Direct Connections Yes 4 (Interchanges) to other highways1 None 0

Rapid Transit and 10 Bus Public Rapid Transit 7 Transportation2 Bus 5 None 0

Rideshare2 Yes 7 (Park-and-Ride, Transit Center, None 0 Modal Options Park-and-Pool) 25

Managed/HOV Yes 6 Lanes3 None 0

Bike Lane and 2 Bike or Pedestrian Sidewalk Facility1 Bike Lane 1 (entire corridor) Sidewalk 1 None 0

Below 10 System 3 2015 Peak V/C 25 Demand Regional Average = 0.85

Pg. 11-21 Congestion Management Process

Max Number Category Inventory Measure Points of Points

(Recurring) Above 3

Below 10

2015 Truck Volume Regional Average = 11.54% Percentage

Above 3

System Demand Rural 8 25 (Recurring) Continued Suburban 6

Area Type Urban 4

Urban Intense 2

Urban Core 1

Below or Average 10 4 2017 Crash Rate (Regional Average Rate = 289) Above 3

Full Outside and 6 Shoulders1 Inside System Full Outside or (For emergency 3 Inside Reliability stopping or Partial Limits 1 25 (Non- congestion None 0 Recurring) bypass) Refuge areas (for 3 surface streets)

Entire Limits 3 Safety Service Patrol Coverage5 Partial Limits 1 None 0

Pg. 11-22 Congestion Management Process

Max Number Category Inventory Measure Points of Points

Entire Limits 3 Truck Lane Restrictions Partial Limits 1 None 0

Intelligent Entire Limits 3 Transportation Partial Limits 1 Systems None 0 Source: 1Google Maps Imagery 2VIA Metropolitan Transit 3MPO Data; 4MPO interpretation of TxDOT CRIS Data 5TxDOT

11.6 Strategy Identification There are many ways (“strategies”) to manage congestion. This section defines those strategy types that fit the character of our region and can help achieve our congestion management objectives

Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) TransGuide, an Intelligent Transportation System, was designed by the San Antonio District of the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). This "smart highway" project provides information to motorists about traffic conditions, such as accidents, congestion and construction. With the use of cameras, message signs and fiber optics, TransGuide can detect travel times and provide that information to motorists not only with the message signs on the highways, but also with the use of the Internet and a Low-Power Television Station. TransGuide helps emergency responders rapidly respond to crashes and emergencies. Partners in the TransGuide project include TxDOT, the City of San Antonio (police/fire/EMS/traffic), and VIA Metropolitan Transit. ITS focuses on communication and real time information of traffic conditions. Components of ITS include:

• Advanced Traffic Management: dynamically managing roadway conditions based on prevailing and predicted traffic conditions. Examples include lane assignment, dynamic speed limits, adaptive

Pg. 11-23 Congestion Management Process

ramp metering and real-time travel information. “TransGuide” is the traffic management system in the Alamo Area • Advanced Public Transit Systems: on-board vehicle locating system to ensure travel time reliability and communications between buses and headquarters • Emergency Management: related to disaster threats and marshalling resources

Policy Management includes existing and new ordinances and regulations that impact the transportation system. Policy management includes:

• Land Use: land use decisions to discourage urban sprawl and promote higher density levels and mixed use development to encourage travel by walking, bicycling and transit • Preservation of Green Space: preserve undeveloped land and open spaces to provide for continuation of landscape character, scenic beauty and recreational opportunities so as not to worsen congestion, air and water quality • Parking Management: includes policies that encourage more efficient use of existing public and private parking facilities (shared parking and improved parking facility design) • Preserve Neighborhood Aesthetic: refers to congestion mitigation with improvements complementing and protecting the cultural and historical nature of a corridor, neighborhood or geographic area • Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) clusters housing and commercial uses to encourage public transit ridership

Corridor Improvements are strategies for corridors that are at least one mile in length. These improvements include:

• Capacity Improvements: add more travel lanes to roads for vehicles in both directions; if there is high rush travel flow in one direction

Pg. 11-24 Congestion Management Process

consider adding reversible lanes that will change direction depending on the peak travel • Congestion Relief Corridors: new roadways on new alignments that will relieve congestion on parallel roadways • Bottleneck Removal: This includes improvements such as roadway widening to provide shoulders and improved sight lines or auxiliary lanes to improve merging and diverging. This also includes interchange modifications to decrease weaving sections on a freeway and intersection modifications such as adding dedicated turn lanes and realigning intersection streets, • Roadway Rehabilitation: includes improving the roadway surface through filling potholes, resurfacing, or stabilizing the roadway structure • Bicycle Facilities: addition of bicycle lanes, protected or buffered bicycle lanes, multi-use paths, and bicycle racks and lockers • Pedestrian Facilities: includes improving sidewalks, adding countdown and/or audible signals and crosswalks

Advanced Transportation Systems are new strategies and technologies for the region including:

• Premium Transit: such as enhanced bus (Primo), Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), and Light Rail Transit (LRT) • Managed Lanes: includes High Occupancy Vehicle lanes, express lanes or other special lanes • Passenger Rail Service: between regional hubs such as San Antonio and Austin • High Speed Rail: TxDOT completed the first phase of a Texas- Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study in 2017 and found high speed passenger rail between San Antonio and Dallas-Fort Worth feasible. The next step would be a project-level environmental study.

Pg. 11-25 Congestion Management Process

• Active Parking Management: The dynamic management of parking facilities in a region to optimize performance and utilization of those facilities while influencing travel behavior at various stages along the trip making process. Examples include dynamic pricing, dynamic wayfinding and dynamic parking reservation

Operational Management includes techniques to optimize capacity and improve safety and reliability of the roadway system. Operational Management includes the following:

• Connected and Automated Vehicle (CAV) technology • Incident Management: clearing incidents, crashes and major events to allow traffic flow to resume • Access Management: limiting the number and placement of access points such as driveways on major roads; also includes the use of roadway medians and turning restrictions to improve safety and traffic flow • Signalization & Traffic Flow Improvements: optimizing traffic signals, adding turn lanes or making lanes reversible to improve efficiency (to include the Superstreet concept) • Railroad Crossing Improvements: installing gates and warning signals at railroad crossings or closing some at-grade (surface street) crossings to improve safety • Construction Coordination: coordinating construction with other known projects in an area and scheduling the work during non-rush hour periods; inform the public and improve signage for safer travel • Freight Management: monitoring freight travel patterns and identifying preferred truck routes or truck lanes.

The aim of Travel Demand Management Campaigns is to reduce automobile use and congestion. The MPO’s “Alamo Commutes” and Walkable Community Programs educate employers and community members about these efforts:

Pg. 11-26 Congestion Management Process

• Rideshare Program: includes informal and employer sponsored carpool and vanpool programs • Flexible Work Hours: includes staggered schedules, flexible hours and compressed work weeks that allow employees to arrive and leave work outside the traditional rush hour • Guaranteed Ride Home Program: assures commuters who take alternative transportation a ride home in the event of a medical or family emergency • Telecommuting: working full or part time at home, at a satellite or branch facility • Walkable Community Program: the MPO hosts Walkable Community Workshops to help identify challenges and barriers to walking and identify potential improvements to help make walking a safer, more attractive option for people.

Public Transportation Improvements include the following activities:

• Transit Service Enhancements: includes expanding service areas, adding new transit routes, improving service frequency on existing routes, extending routes to serve more areas, expanding hours of service, and better timing to allow for faster transfers • Transit Facilities: improving amenities such as adding benches, passenger shelters, and real time bus arrival information; also includes enhancing and constructing passenger facilities such as transfer centers, park & rides, or multi-modal terminals • Ridership Incentives: includes programs to encourage transit use such as reduced fares, monthly passes and employer subsidies for the passes

Table 11-3 matches up strategies to the relevant corridor scoring categories introduced on page 11-22. For example, “advanced traffic management” is one of the identified Intelligent Transportation Systems strategies to reduce congestion through:

Pg. 11-27 Congestion Management Process

• Sharing real-time travel information of alternative paralleling routes (Alternative Route Infrastructure); • Managing access to a highway through ramp metering (System Demand); and • Notifying the public about a crash ahead in time to take an alternative route (System Reliability)

But, “advanced traffic management” will not be the strategy that improves congestion by expanding Modal Options along a corridor. “Advanced public transit systems”, though, can mitigate congestion by making public transportation more attractive to roadway users (Modal Options), decreasing the demand of roadway space by SOV drivers (System Demand).

Pg. 11-28 Congestion Management Process

Table 11-3. Strategies for Managing Congestion Strategy type Strategy CMP Corridor Scoring Category Alternative Route

Infrastructure Modal Options System Demand System Reliability

Intelligent Advanced traffic management Transportation Advanced public transit systems Systems Emergency management Land use Preservation of green infrastructure Policy Management Parking management Preserve neighborhood aesthetic Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Capacity improvements Congestion relief corridors Bottleneck removal Corridor Improvements Roadway rehabilitation Bicycle facilities Pedestrian facilities Premium transit

Pg. 11-29 Congestion Management Process

Strategy type Strategy CMP Corridor Scoring Category Alternative Route

Infrastructure Modal Options System Demand System Reliability

Advanced Managed lanes Transportation Passenger rail service Systems High speed rail

Advanced Transportation Active parking management Systems (cont…) Connected and Automated Vehicle (CAV)

technology Incident management system Access management Operational Signalization and traffic flow Management improvements Railroad crossing improvements Construction coordination Freight management Rideshare program

Pg. 11-30 Congestion Management Process

Strategy type Strategy CMP Corridor Scoring Category Alternative Route

Infrastructure Modal Options System Demand System Reliability

Flexible work hours Travel Demand Telecommuting Management Campaigns Guaranteed ride home Walkable Community Program Transit service enhancements Public Transportation Transit facilities Improvements Transit ridership incentives

Pg. 11-31 Congestion Management Process

11.7 Strategy Implementation As the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Metropolitan Transportation Plan are updated, CMP objectives and performance measures become part of the technical scoring process used to prioritize and select projects in those short- and long-range plans. CMP corridor scoring criteria does not replace the existing TIP and MTP project selection process used by the MPO. It offers an additional tool for decision-making by the Technical Advisory Committee and Transportation Policy Board.

To enact these strategies, the MPO relies on the actions of our transportation partners such as the Alamo Area Council of Governments, Alamo Regional Mobility Authority, cities and counties throughout the region, TxDOT and VIA Metropolitan Transit/Advanced Transportation District. During project planning and design, project sponsors can select appropriate strategies for addressing local congestion issues on the CMP network.

11.8 Evaluating Strategy Effectiveness Strategies are generally evaluated for their potential and actual success through staff-level technical analysis. New mobility data from the National Performance Management Research Data Set (NPMRDS) allows the MPO to study current and historic speeds on hundreds of roadway segments within the study area using user-generated travel data. For operational and infrastructure projects on roadways included in the NPMRDS, the MPO can now prepare before-and-after effects of the investment.

Because projects are built or coordinated by agencies other than the MPO, it is critical that the MPO make robust use of our own committees and those of our partner agencies to relay the effectiveness of strategies and to maintain consistency between planned/programmed projects and the CMP.

Over time, the MPO’s online dashboard at www.alamoareampo.org/TPM and Performance Report chapter of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan will be a valuable tool for tracking performance toward reaching CMP goals.

Pg. 11-32 Congestion Management Process

11.9 Federal Requirements § 450.322 Congestion management process in transportation management areas.

(a) The transportation planning process in a TMA shall address congestion management through a process that provides for safe and effective integrated management and operation of the multimodal transportation system, based on a cooperatively developed and implemented metropolitan- wide strategy, of new and existing transportation facilities eligible for funding under title 23 U.S.C. and title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 through the use of travel demand reduction (including intercity bus operators, employer-based commuting programs such as a carpool program, vanpool program, transit benefit program, parking cash-out program, shuttle program, or telework program), job access projects, and operational management strategies.

(b) The development of a congestion management process should result in multimodal system performance measures and strategies that can be reflected in the metropolitan transportation plan and the TIP.

(c) The level of system performance deemed acceptable by State and local transportation officials may vary by type of transportation facility, geographic location (metropolitan area or subarea), and/or time of day. In addition, consideration should be given to strategies that manage demand, reduce single occupant vehicle (SOV) travel, improve transportation system management and operations, and improve efficient service integration within and across modes, including highway, transit, passenger and freight rail operations, and non-motorized transport. Where the addition of general purpose lanes is determined to be an appropriate congestion management strategy, explicit consideration is to be given to the incorporation of appropriate features into the SOV project to facilitate future demand management strategies and operational improvements that will maintain the functional integrity and safety of those lanes.

Pg. 11-33 Congestion Management Process

(d) The congestion management process shall be developed, established, and implemented as part of the metropolitan transportation planning process that includes coordination with transportation system management and operations activities. The congestion management process shall include:

(1) Methods to monitor and evaluate the performance of the multimodal transportation system, identify the underlying causes of recurring and non-recurring congestion, identify and evaluate alternative strategies, provide information supporting the implementation of actions, and evaluate the effectiveness of implemented actions;

(2) Definition of congestion management objectives and appropriate performance measures to assess the extent of congestion and support the evaluation of the effectiveness of congestion reduction and mobility enhancement strategies for the movement of people and goods. Since levels of acceptable system performance may vary among local communities, performance measures should be tailored to the specific needs of the area and established cooperatively by the State(s), affected MPO(s), and local officials in consultation with the operators of major modes of transportation in the coverage area, including providers of public transportation;

(3) Establishment of a coordinated program for data collection and system performance monitoring to define the extent and duration of congestion, to contribute in determining the causes of congestion, and evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of implemented actions. To the extent possible, this data collection program should be coordinated with existing data sources (including archived operational/ITS data) and coordinated with operations managers in the metropolitan area;

(4) Identification and evaluation of the anticipated performance and expected benefits of appropriate congestion management strategies that will contribute to the more effective use and improved safety of existing

Pg. 11-34 Congestion Management Process

and future transportation systems based on the established performance measures. The following categories of strategies, or combinations of strategies, are some examples of what should be appropriately considered for each area:

(i) Demand management measures, including growth management, and congestion pricing;

(ii) Traffic operational improvements;

(iii) Public transportation improvements;

(iv) ITS technologies as related to the regional ITS architecture; and

(v) Where necessary, additional system capacity.

(5) Identification of an implementation schedule, implementation responsibilities, and possible funding sources for each strategy (or combination of strategies) proposed for implementation; and

(6) Implementation of a process for periodic assessment of the effectiveness of implemented strategies, in terms of the area's established performance measures. The results of this evaluation shall be provided to decision makers and the public to provide guidance on selection of effective strategies for future implementation.

(e) In a TMA designated as nonattainment area for ozone or carbon monoxide pursuant to the Clean Air Act, Federal funds may not be programmed for any project that will result in a significant increase in the carrying capacity for SOVs (i.e., a new general purpose highway on a new location or adding general purpose lanes, with the exception of safety improvements or the elimination of bottlenecks), unless the project is addressed through a congestion management process meeting the requirements of this section.

Pg. 11-35 Congestion Management Process

(f) In TMAs designated as nonattainment for ozone or carbon monoxide, the congestion management process shall provide an appropriate analysis of reasonable (including multimodal) travel demand reduction and operational management strategies for the corridor in which a project that will result in a significant increase in capacity for SOVs (as described in paragraph (d) of this section) is proposed to be advanced with Federal funds. If the analysis demonstrates that travel demand reduction and operational management strategies cannot fully satisfy the need for additional capacity in the corridor and additional SOV capacity is warranted, then the congestion management process shall identify all reasonable strategies to manage the SOV facility safely and effectively (or to facilitate its management in the future). Other travel demand reduction and operational management strategies appropriate for the corridor, but not appropriate for incorporation into the SOV facility itself, shall also be identified through the congestion management process. All identified reasonable travel demand reduction and operational management strategies shall be incorporated into the SOV project or committed to by the State and MPO for implementation.

(g) State laws, rules, or regulations pertaining to congestion management systems or programs may constitute the congestion management process, if the FHWA and the FTA find that the State laws, rules, or regulations are consistent with, and fulfill the intent of, the purposes of 23 U.S.C. 134 and 49 U.S.C. 5303.

(h) Congestion management plan. A MPO serving a TMA may develop a plan that includes projects and strategies that will be considered in the TIP of such MPO.

(1) Such plan shall:

(i) Develop regional goals to reduce vehicle miles traveled during peak commuting hours and improve transportation connections between areas with high job concentration and areas with high concentrations of low-income households;

Pg. 11-36 Congestion Management Process

(ii) Identify existing public transportation services, employer based commuter programs, and other existing transportation services that support access to jobs in the region; and

(iii) Identify proposed projects and programs to reduce congestion and increase job access opportunities.

(2) In developing the congestion management plan, an MPO shall consult with employers, private and nonprofit providers of public transportation, transportation management organizations, and organizations that provide job access reverse commute projects or job- related services to low-income individuals.

Pg. 12-1 Safety & Security

12 Safety & Security

12.1 Safety Starting with MAP-21, safety transitioned to a performance and outcome-based program. The MPO coordinates closely with the Texas Department of Transportation’s Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) and other safety-related programs to ensure the MPO’s work is consistent with and supports statewide initiatives. The MPO and their partner agencies work to ensure the overall safety of the multimodal transportation system.

Regional Crash Stats Dashboard A key component of the MPO’s safety program centers on transportation safety data for use in evaluating safety issues and planning for the implementation of safety improvements. Further, MAP-21 and the subsequent FAST-Act both emphasized the need for a data-driven approach to safety planning. The Texas Department of Transportation

Pg. 12-2 Safety & Security

manages and makes available the Crash Record Information System (CRIS). CRIS data reports on crash reports submitted by law enforcement responding to crashes. It includes the crash location, contributing factors, driver vehicle, and vulnerable road user characteristics. This information can be useful in identifying the characteristics of crashes. The MPO has taken this information and put it into a “Crash Stats Dashboard” so that transportation partners and members of the public can access the site to view information.

Vision Zero San Antonio In 2015, the City of San Antonio adopted a Vision Zero Initiative, which calls for eliminating traffic fatalities and serious injuries. That same year, the MPO’s Transportation Policy Board passed a similar resolution in support of Vision Zero. Since then, the MPO has worked closely with the City of San Antonio and other partner agencies to enhance roadway safety through education, encouragement, and engineering initiatives. The MPO has also worked to incorporate safety considerations into its activities, most notably in scoring projects for potential MPO funding.

Severe Pedestrian Injury Areas Report The City of San Antonio’s Transportation & Capital Improvements (TCI) Department staff analyzed crash data from 2011 through 2015 to identify Severe Pedestrian Injury Areas (SPIAs). SPIAs are locations where two or more crashes resulting in a severe pedestrian injury (fatal or incapacitating) have occurred in close proximity, defined in this report as no more than one-half mile apart on the same street. The analysis of the crash data resulted in identifying 76 SPIAs in San Antonio consisting of about 37 roadway miles. These areas represent about 1% of San Antonio roadways but account for about one third or 33% of all fatal and incapacitating pedestrian crashes over the five year period.

Pg. 12-3 Safety & Security

With 1% of roadways accounting for approximately one-third of all severe pedestrian crashes in San Antonio from 2011 through 2015, the SPIA analysis demonstrates that a significant portion of all severe pedestrian injury crashes are not happening randomly throughout San Antonio, but rather are occurring in concentrated areas. Thirty-six percent (36%) of the SPIAs identified in this report are located within more than one city council district, typically at the boundary line.

This analysis is the first step in identifying locations where Vision Zero efforts to reduce severe pedestrian injuries in San Antonio may have the greatest impact. Further analysis of the crashes within the SPIAs is necessary to understand the reasons crashes are occurring in greater concentration in these areas and what interventions may be necessary to achieve Vision Zero. The MPO is planning to conducting a similar analysis for Guadalupe, Comal, and Kendall Counties to guide safety projects in those areas as well.

Vision Zero Summit In July 2018, the MPO co-hosted San Antonio’s inaugural Vision Zero Summit, alongside our transportation partners in the region. The sold-out event featured regional and national speakers, including Leah Shahum, founder of the Vision Zero Network; Gabe Klein, founder of CityFi; and Lilly O’Brien, with the Los Angeles Department of Transportation. Regional leaders, including San Antonio Councilwoman Shirley Gonzalez and City of San Antonio Transportation and Capital Improvements Director, Mike Frisbie, provided local insight.

Safety Education and Messaging The MPO plays an important role in safety education and messaging in the region. Following are our focus areas and messaging for each.

Pg. 12-4 Safety & Security

Bicycle Safety The MPO provides bicycle safety information in two ways. The first is through regularly scheduled Street Skills classes. This is a 45 minute classroom taught course that teaches people the rules of the road and how to stay safe when riding with traffic. Participants for this class are asked to be 14 and older and upon completion they receive a free helmet and a free set of bicycle lights. The MPO also regularly participates in community events and speaks on bicycle riding safety, proper helmet use, and visibility. MPO staff also participates in school bicycle rodeos to teach children how to properly wear their helmets and assist the San Antonio Police Department in administering and scoring the bicycle rodeo.

Scooter Safety With the recent arrival of e-scooters to the urban landscape, the MPO was quick to add them to the educational materials, specifically social media and as part of the Street Skills curriculum. In fact, the first class that included an e- scooter component received almost double the attendance of typical classes.

Pedestrian Safety Pedestrian safety messaging is typically geared more towards drivers and driver awareness. Recent social media campaigns, as shown in Figure 12-1, have talked about the issue of watching for pedestrians when turning right or left because the pedestrians might also have a walk signal. We also remind people that everyone is a pedestrian at some point of the day. We do also talk to pedestrians about crossing at crosswalks and wearing visible clothing especially when walking at night.

Pg. 12-5 Safety & Security

Figure 12-1. Example of Social Media Safety Messaging

Distracted Driving The MPO did an entire Fiesta medal campaign around the topic of distracted driving that reached 1,000 people over the course of one week. The purpose of the campaign was to make people aware of the dangers of distracted driving, what qualified as distracted driving, and how quickly a crash can occur when you take your eyes off the road for even 5 seconds.

Pg. 12-6 Safety & Security

City of San Antonio Safest Driver Contest The City of San Antonio Transportation and Capital Improvements department worked with Cambridge Mobile Telematics and USAA on a mobile app contest. The mobile app was developed by Cambridge Mobile Telematics in support of the City’s Vision Zero Initiative. The app provided participants with helpful feedback on their driving based on five metrics: speed, acceleration, braking, cornering, and phone distraction. USAA provided the incentives for the contest including three grand prizes of $10,000 each and multiple weekly prizes of up to $2,000 each. The app tracked the driving habits of participants in the background without them having to log on each time. In addition to hoping to spark better driving behaviors, the app served as a data collection tool for the City of San Antonio who plans to use the information to implement countermeasures in some of the areas where behaviors such as speeding seem to be an issue or improve operations in areas where people may be experiencing an unusually high level of delay.

San Antonio Wrong Way Driver Program The Wrong Way Driver Program is a partnership between the San Antonio Police Department and the Texas Department of Transportation. Using the CCTV, TransGuide System Operators monitor for wrong way drivers. Once a wrong way driver is identified, the San Antonio Policy Department is notified and the Dynamic Message Signs are updated to make other drivers aware that there has been a wrong way driver reported in the area and urging them to use extreme caution. This program has resulted in the interception of numerous wrong way drivers each year. It keeps people safe, saves t

Pg. 12-7 Safety & Security

Safety Committees Traffic Jam The MPO actively participates in TxDOT’s Traffic Jam Coalition. The San Antonio Traffic Jam Coalition's purpose is to educate and bring awareness for a safer community by focusing on issues, such as drinking and driving, texting and driving, drowsy driving, motorcycle safety and bicycle/pedestrian safety. The Coalition's primary responsibility is to save lives. Its mission statement is "To educate the community by providing safe and reliable information for all modes of transportation through collaboration and partnership, thereby saving lives."

Safe Kids Coalition The MPO is also a member of the Safe Kids San Antonio Coalition which is led by University Health System. Based on the needs of the community, this coalition implements evidence-based programs, such as car-seat checkups, safety workshops and sports clinics, that help parents and caregivers prevent childhood injuries.

Vision Zero Work Groups The MPO participates in several work groups and periodic crash report review meetings with the City of San Antonio and other stakeholders to support of the Vision Zero initiative. These work groups use a combined approach using the five essential elements for a safe transportation system: Education, Encouragement, Engineering, Enforcement, and Evaluation.

Related Planning Processes TxDOT Strategic Highway Safety Plan The 2017 Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), developed through collaboration across disciplines, modes, and public and private sector agencies and organizations, represents an effort to stem the tide and begin reducing traffic fatalities and injuries. It includes the following seven emphasis areas: distracted driving; impaired driving; intersection safety; older road users; pedestrian safety; roadway and lane departures, and speeding.

Pg. 12-8 Safety & Security

San Antonio Vision Zero Action Plan The action plan is the City of San Antonio’s roadmap to achieving zero fatalities or serious injuries on their roadways. It is data-driven and action-oriented. San Antonio is expected to increase in population by over 1 million people by 2040. The City of San Antonio is committed to enhancing safety through strengthened programs and implementation.

Safety priorities supporting the HSIP for the next five years • Continue to build partnerships between agencies and stakeholders. • Integrate safety at all levels of planning. • Continue offering free and accessible community education and training opportunities on distracted driving, impaired driving, and speeding. • Increase the number of walkability/bikeability audits conducted by 25% per year. • Develop educational curriculum targeting older road users to deal with limitations brought on by aging process. • Improve pedestrian and bicycle involved crash reporting.

Safety performance measurement • Information on safety performance measurement can be found in the Performance Measurement chapter.

Pg. 12-9 Safety & Security

12.2 Security Security of critical infrastructure and cybersecurity are increasingly important to transportation and is a priority for the Alamo Area. Natural disasters and the possibility of both domestic and international terrorism against public infrastructure increased the emphasis on transportation security. Similarly, as our world becomes ever more dependent on technology and data, the integrity of that data and how we secure it from attack is increasing in importance. With regards to our critical infrastructure, this chapter will address some of the work being done to advance the prevention, detection, management, and analysis of traffic incidents and emergency situations. It will also talk about cybersecurity efforts at a very high level and the commitment our region has made to ensuring the integrity of our information systems.

Pg. 12-10 Safety & Security

TransGuide Upgrades Upgrades to the region’s TransGuide Building (located at 3500 Northwest IH 410, San Antonio, Texas 78229) have been long overdue. The building was state of the art when it was initially commissioned in 1995. Since then, the City of San Antonio has developed a Traffic Management Center on the third floor and the Department of Motor Vehicles has relocated to the first floor. These changes, along with years of technological advances resulting in reduced space requirements for computing equipment in the control room and computer room, provide an opportunity to more efficiently use the space. The new plan which was funded in the FY 2019-2022 Transportation Improvement Program would repurpose the existing space to provide better coordination between Texas Department of Transportation San Antonio District (TxDOT-SAT), VIA Metropolitan Transit, San Antonio Policy Department, and potentially future partners. The upgrade would also improve security aspects of the building and computer equipment.

Pg. 12-11 Safety & Security

Cybersecurity San Antonio is home to the nation’s second-largest concentration of cybersecurity experts and growing. Cybersecurity operations at Port San Antonio are anchored by the national headquarters for the Air Forces Cyber, also known as the Cyber Command. Hundreds of uniformed and civilian personnel protect the integrity of the Air Force’s IT assets around the world. Private-sector firms are also growing at the Port, supporting Department of Defense cyber operations throughout the region as well as a growing private-sector clientele.

Pg. 12-12 Safety & Security

Pg. 13-1 Performance Measurement

13 Performance Measurement

The Alamo Area recognizes the importance of transportation performance tracking, goal setting and measurement to provide greater accountability and transparency and to achieve a more efficient and effective investment of transportation resources. To date, the MPO has met all of the deadlines as set forth of the adoption of performance measures and has developed innovative ways of communicating the performance measurement tracking to partner agencies and the public.

13.1 Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years With the adoption of Mobility 2040 in December 2014, the MPO recognized the importance of performance measurement and tracking and responded by adopting initial performance measures to measure progress over time. Performance measures adopted in Mobility 2040 included:

• minimize system degradation • increase transit modal share • decrease overall travel delay • decrease truck/freight delay

Pg. 13-2 Performance Measurement

• increase transit ridership per revenue hour • reduce the frequency and severity of crashes • increase stakeholder involvement and • improve access to jobs.

These performance measures supported the MPOs overall goals related to:

• System preservation • Congestion/travel demand reduction • Invest in transit quality and effectiveness • Safety • Collaboration • Social/environmental stewardship • Economic development • Support mixed use development

While many of the performance measure adopted in Mobility 2040 were no the final measures adopted at the federal level, the MPO, nevertheless, did participate in planning activities, programs, and project selection processes that supported the MPO’s overall goals with the intent of improving the adopted performance measures outlined in the Plan.

To date, the MPO has adopted performance measures associated with Safety (PM1), Bridge/Pavement Condition (PM2) and Roadway System Performance (PM3), and Transit Asset Management. MPO staff has mastered the use of TxDOT’s Crash Record Information System (CRIS database) and the National Performance Management Research Data Set (NPMRDS) as these performance targets are set.

As shown in Figure 13-1 and Figure 13-2, MPO staff has also established online crash statistics dashboards to share data with the public and transportation stakeholders.

Pg. 13-3 Performance Measurement

Figure 13-1. MPO Safety Performance Measure Dashboard Overview

Figure 13-2. MPO Safety Performance Measure Dashboard

Pg. 13-4 Performance Measurement

13.2 Background The federal transportation bill, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) instituted Performance Management to provide greater accountability and transparency and help achieve the most efficient and effective investment of transportation resources. The MPO has closely watched performance measures at the state and federal level.

13.3 Performance Measurement The United States Department of Transportation recognizes that it is important to continuously monitor the performance of the nation’s transportation improvements and programs to determine if the nation is achieving its national goals and objectives related to transportation. Monitoring progress towards achieving these goals and objectives is accomplished through the use of performance measures. Performance measurement provides various transportation agencies with a better ability to identify and mitigate issues with their respective transportation networks.

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) On July 6, 2012, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP- 21) transportation bill was signed into law, creating a streamlined, performance-based, multimodal program in an effort to address challenges facing the U.S. transportation system. In relation to performance management, MAP-21 aimed to increase the accountability and transparency of Federal highway programs by improving transportation investment decision-making through performance-based planning and programming. Furthermore, the Act states: “…Performance management will transform the Federal-aid highway program and provide a means to the most efficient investment of Federal transportation funds by refocusing on national transportation goals, increasing the accountability and transparency of the Federal-aid highway program, and improving project decision-making through performance-based planning and programming…”

Pg. 13-5 Performance Measurement

As a result of MAP-21, performance measures to chart progress toward accomplishment of national goals established in MAP-21 include safety, infrastructure condition, congestion reduction, system reliability, freight movement and economic vitality, environmental sustainability, and reduced project delivery delays as outlined below:

• Safety - To achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. • Infrastructure Condition - To maintain the highway infrastructure asset system in a state of good repair. • Congestion Reduction - To achieve a significant reduction in congestion on the National Highway System (NHS). • System Reliability - To improve the efficiency of the surface transportation system. • Freight Movement and Economic Vitality - To improve the national freight network, strengthen the ability of rural communities to access national and international trade markets, and support regional economic development. • Environmental Sustainability - To enhance the performance of the transportation system while protecting and enhancing the natural environment. • Reduced Project Delivery Delays - To reduce project costs, promote jobs and the economy, and expedite the movement of people and goods by accelerating project completion through eliminating delays in the project development and delivery process, including reducing regulatory burdens and improving agencies' work practices.

Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act of 2015, or FAST Act, was signed into law on December 4, 2015. The FAST Act provides for new planning requirements such as providing for the development and integrated management of intermodal facilities that support intercity transportation; encouraging consultation with State agencies that plan for tourism and natural

Pg. 13-6 Performance Measurement

disaster risk reduction; planning for system resiliency and reliability and reducing storm-water impacts of surface transportation; and improving freight mobility.

The FAST Act continues MAP-21’s overall performance approach, and ensures that State DOTs and MPOs invest in projects that collectively make progress toward the National Goals that were established by Congress.

The FAST Act also allows MPOs serving a transportation management area to voluntarily develop a Congestion Management Plan that shall include regional goals to reduce vehicle miles traveled during peak commuting hours and improve transportation connections between areas with high job concentration and areas with high concentrations of low-income households.

13.4 Performance Measures and Targets Currently, under the FAST Act, State DOTs and MPOs are required to establish performance targets and report on the progress made toward achieving each of these performance targets for the following performance measures:

Safety (PM1) In 2017, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) began establishing targets based on five-year rolling averages for five federally-required Safety performance measures. TxDOT most recently set targets for 2019 as shown in Table 13-1.

Table 13-1. Safety Performance Measures and Targets Performance Measure 2019 Statewide Target (Expressed as Five-Year 2015-2019 Average) 3,791 Total number of traffic related fatalities on all public roads 1.414 Rate of traffic related fatalities on all public roads per 100 million VMT 17,751 Total number of traffic related serious injuries on all public roads

Pg. 13-7 Performance Measurement

6.550 Rate of traffic related serious injuries on all public roads per 100 million VMT 2,237.6 Total number of non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads

These targets were developed using a data-driven, collaborative process during the update of Texas’ 2017-2022 Strategic Highway Safety Plan. The targets are aligned with the state’s Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Plan and reflect a 2% reduction from the original trendline projection for 2022. When a trendline is decreasing, the target mirrors that projection.

On January 28, 2019, the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Policy Board adopted TxDOT’s Safety targets, committing to plan and program projects that contribute to the accomplishments of those targets.

For STP-MM project selection, safety is one of the criteria where technical points are awarded based on the crash rate. Numerous projects adopted in the FY 2019-2022 Transportation Improvement Program support achieving the targets established for safety. These include: stand-alone safe bicycle and pedestrian projects and Complete Streets projects; added capacity and operational projects that also include safe bicycle and pedestrian facilities; conversion of frontage roads from two-way to one-way; intersection improvements; safety lighting; pavement markings; wrong way driver technologies; improved traffic signals; grade separated overpasses; improved low water crossings; flashing beacons; and Intelligent Transportation Systems projects.

The MPO began monitoring data for these five Safety performance measures in 2017 and will continue to report achievements to the Transportation Policy Board annually in the fall.

Pg. 13-8 Performance Measurement

Transit State of Good Repair VIA Metropolitan Transit has adopted targets for four Transit Asset Management Performance measures for:

• Equipment State of Good Repair: rehab or replace equipment based on the VIA Metropolitan Transit Board of Trustees approved capital plan to maintain an overall state of good repair rating of 3 or better • Rolling Stock State of Good Repair: by June 2018, replace 270 fixed route buses with an age of 14 years or greater • Infrastructure State of Good Repair: zero, no passenger rail infrastructure; and • Facilities State of Good Repair: rehab facilities based on the VIA Metropolitan Transit Board of Trustees approved capital plan to maintain an overall state of good repair rating of 3 or better

On January 22, 2018, the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Policy Board adopted VIA Metropolitan Transit’s performance measurement targets. The Transportation Policy Board commits to supporting, planning and programming projects that contribute to the accomplishments of said targets.

Numerous transit projects adopted in Mobility 2045 support achieving the targets established for transit state of good repair, including: the purchase of maintenance tools and equipment; the purchase of revenue vehicles; the purchase of replacement components for revenue vehicles; new and upgrades to existing passenger facilities; and upgrades to the operational facilities.

Pavement and Bridge Condition (PM2) TxDOT has adopted targets for six performance measures related to pavement and bridge condition as shown in Table 13-2.

Table 13-2. Pavement Performance Measures and Targets Performance Measure 2022 Statewide Target 66.4% Percentage of Interstate pavements in Good condition 0.3% Percentage of Interstate pavements in Poor condition

Pg. 13-9 Performance Measurement

Performance Measure 2022 Statewide Target 52.3% Percentage of non-Interstate NHS pavements in Good condition 14.3% Percentage of non-Interstate NHS pavements in Poor condition 50.42% Percentage of NHS bridges in Good condition 0.80% Percentage of NHS bridges in Poor condition

On December 10, 2018, the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Policy Board took action to support TxDOT’s 2022 statewide targets, committing to plan and program projects locally that contribute to the accomplishment of these targets statewide.

Numerous roadway projects adopted in Mobility 2045 do support achieving the targets established for pavement and bridge condition through the preservation and upgrade of existing roadways and bridges. Additionally, pavement and bridge condition data made available by TxDOT will allow the MPO to begin examining pavement and bridge condition with future project calls. Where pavements and bridges in Poor condition are located on off-system roadways, the MPO will coordinate with local governments to identify potential improvements.

Roadway System Performance (PM3) When developing statewide targets for three roadway system performance measures, TxDOT teamed up with the Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI). After a data-driven, collaborative process, TTI identified estimated future trend lines and achievable targets for each MPO in Texas. MPO staff and Technical Advisory Committee members reviewed and concurred with the methodology used to develop targets for the Alamo Area. Statewide targets took into account each of the MPOs’ region-specific targets. Statewide and MPO-region targets are outlined in Table 13-3.

Pg. 13-10 Performance Measurement

Table 13-3. Roadway System Performance Measures and Targets Performance Measure 2022 Statewide 2022 MPO Region Target Target 56.6% 65.0% Interstate Reliability 55.4% 45.0% Non-Interstate NHS Reliability 1.79 2.20 Truck Travel Time Reliability Index

Three additional System Performance measures include Annual Hours of Peak Hour Excess Delay per Capita; Percent Non-SOV Travel; and Total Emissions Reduction, are not yet applicable to the MPO. At the time of applicability determination on October 1, 2017, the MPO was not identified as one of the MPOs required to set targets for these measures.

On December 10, 2018, the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Policy Board took action supporting the three regional 2022 targets developed by TTI for the study area that contribute to the State meeting its adopted targets.

Numerous projects adopted in Mobility 2045 support achieving the targets established for system performance including added capacity projects on NHS- designated routes; the implementation of a Safety Service Patrol; Intelligent Transportation Systems projects; corridor studies; and new and enhanced transit service and facilities.

Pg. 14-1 Financial Information

14 Financial Information

The Alamo Area has done an incredible job of working together to seek new, innovative funding mechanisms to help advance needed transportation projects as soon as possible. This includes pursuing and securing several local funding options to better leverage federal funding dollars. As a financially constrained plan, the Metropolitan Transportation Plan includes projects which our region believes to be able to fund with available funding over the next 25 years. Following are the expected funding sources and how they are allocated within the plan.

14.1 Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years Since the adoption of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) in December 2014, several financial mechanisms, such as the additional $10 Bexar County vehicle registration fee, Proposition 1, Proposition 7 and ending of diversion in state funding have been used successfully to advance construction projects.

Pg. 14-2 Financial Information

In 2013, a $10 per vehicle increase in the Bexar County vehicle registration was approved and in August 2013, the 83rd Texas Legislature approved SJR 1, a proposed Constitutional Amendment expected to provide $1.4 billion for non- toll transportation projects by dedicating a portion of oil and gas severance taxes to this purpose. SJR 1 was overwhelmingly approved by voters on November 4, 2014. The enabling legislation (HB 1) calls for the new funding to be allocated “consistent with existing formulas” adopted by TxDOT.

14.2 Background Fiscal constraint remains a key component of transportation plan and program development since enactment of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) in 1991 followed by the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) in 1998, the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) on August 10, 2005, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), and the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act.

The MPO generally uses the Texas Department of Transportation’s Unified Transportation Program (UTP) as a funding guideline for the first ten years of the MTP. While the UTP is neither a budget nor a guarantee of project funding, it is a critical tool for project planning. Beyond ten years, funding levels are extrapolated out to the MTP horizon year. No new funding sources have been included in this funding analysis; the MPO makes no assumptions about new funding sources in the development of this Plan and so this plan is a rather conservative one.

14.3 Project Implementation Goals The following project financing goals support the vision of a workable, cost beneficial transportation system that efficiently serves area mobility and accessibility needs:

• Deliver the best projects for the region • Ensure efficient use of financial resources

Pg. 14-3 Financial Information

• Promote safety • Preserve infrastructure assets • Ensure a seamless multimodal transportation system • Optimize system performance • Leverage all available funding sources

14.4 Selected Funding Sources Proposition 1 Proposition 1 (Prop 1), approved by voters on November 4, 2014, authorizes annual disbursements from the state’s oil and gas production tax collections to the State Highway Fund if certain conditions are met. For Prop 1, the Joint Select Committee to Study the Balance of the Economic Stabilization Fund determines and adopts a sufficient balance of the Economic Stabilization Fund (also known as the Rainy Day Fund) in the month prior to the start of each legislative session. The first 25% of oil and gas severance tax deposits above the Rainy Day Fund sufficient balance are deposited into the state’s General Revenue Fund. The remaining 75% of the severance tax is distributed evenly between the Rainy Day Fund and the State Highway Fund. The volatility of oil and gas production in the state creates difficulty in reliability projecting revenues. Prop 1 funding can only be used for construction, maintenance, rehabilitation, and acquiring right-of-way for non-toll, public roads.

Proposition 7 Proposition 7 (Prop 7) was approved by the voters on November 3, 2015. For FYs 2018 and 2019 Prop 7 allows for $2.5B to be deposited into the State Highway Fund after an initial threshold of $28B of sales and use tax is met. In future years the Prop 7 amount may increase. Also, beginning in FY 2020, 35% of the amount over $5B of the Motor Vehicle Sales and Rental Tax will go into the State Highway Fund.

Transit Formula Funds (FTA Section 5307) For transit projects, these revenues are provided directly to VIA Metropolitan Transi., through a funding formula. The program is also known as Section

Pg. 14-4 Financial Information

5307 funds and come from federal gas taxes and the general fund. The funds are primarily for transit capital purchases such as buses and transit maintenance facilities and fund 80% of a total project’s cost and require a 20% local match.

VIA Metropolitan Transit Sales Tax A transit sales tax of ½ % is collected within VIA Metropolitan Transit’s service area. The revenues from the sales tax are administered by VIA and support operation, maintenance and capital expenditures for transit.

Advanced Transportation District Creation of an Advanced Transportation District and authorization of the imposition of a local sales and use tax for advanced transportation (Senate Bill 769) was enacted by the Texas Legislature during the 76th session in 1999. The Texas Legislature amended this legislation in 2003. Advanced transportation as defined in the legislation includes light rail, commuter rail, fixed guideways, traffic management systems, busways, bus lanes, technologically advanced bus transit vehicles and systems, bus rapid transit vehicles and systems, passenger amenities, transit centers, stations, electronic transit-related information, fare, and operating systems, high occupancy vehicle lanes, traffic signal prioritization and coordination systems, monitoring systems, and other advanced transportation facilities, equipment, operations, systems, and services, including planning, feasibility studies, operations, and professional and other services in connection with such facilities, equipment, operations, systems, and services.

This legislation authorizes that the board of an authority in which the sales and use tax is imposed at a rate of one-half of one percent and in which the principal municipality has a population of more that 700,000 (VIA Metropolitan Transit) may order an election to create an advanced transportation district within the authority's boundaries and to impose a sales and use tax for advanced transportation under this subchapter. Locally, VIA ordered an election for November 2, 2004. Voters in Bexar County approved the sales tax

Pg. 14-5 Financial Information

increase at the rate of one-fourth of one percent. Half of the revenue generated from this sales tax is allocated to VIA Metropolitan Transit to fund transit projects, with the remainder equally divided between the City of San Antonio and the Texas Department of Transportation (Bexar County) to fund streets, roads and interstate projects.

Transit Discretionary Capital Funds (FTA Section 5309) These funds are available for major new capital projects. The funding comes from federal gas taxes and the federal general fund. Transit service providers apply directly to the FTA for these funds to build a particular project.

Federal Transit Administration New Starts Program The FTA’s discretionary “New Starts” program is the Federal government’s primary funding source for supporting locally planned, implemented, and operated transit guideway capital investments. Transit guideway capital investments include heavy rail, light rail, commuter rail, bus rapid transit systems and streetcars. The New Starts program has helped to make possible hundreds of new or extended transit fixed guideway systems across the country. These rail and bus investments, in turn, have improved the mobility of millions of Americans, have helped to reduce congestion and improve air quality in the areas they serve.

Surface Transportation Block Grant Funds from the Surface Transportation Block Grant, formerly Surface Transportation Program – Metropolitan Mobility (STP-MM) program, are allocated by the MPO. The original source of these monies is primarily the federal gas tax and various truck taxes. Funds from this source are flexible and can be spent on various transportation projects.

Transportation Alternatives The Transportation Alternatives (TA) is a funding program under the FAST Act that is an evolution of the previous Transportation Enhancement Program, Safe Routes to Schools and other programs. MPOs over 200,000 in population receive an allocation by formula. Projects undertaken with TA funds are

Pg. 14-6 Financial Information

eligible for reimbursement of up to 80% of allowable costs. The governmental entity nominating a project is responsible for the remaining cost share, including all cost overruns and project

Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Funding The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement program (CMAQ) was created in 1991 by the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration. The intent of the program is to help fund areas with poor air quality. Although not yet available to the MPO Study Area, CMAQ funding is a future potential revenue source. This funding is available to states for distribution to metropolitan areas in non-attainment of national ambient air quality standards.

14.5 Transportation Partners San Antonio Mobility Coalition An important partner in transportation is the San Antonio Mobility Coalition, Inc., more commonly referred to as SAMCo. Organized in December 2001 as a non-profit corporation, SAMCo's purpose is "to identify and advocate transportation and mobility solutions for the San Antonio Metropolitan area." Funding for this endeavor is provided by public agencies (Bexar County, City of San Antonio, VIA Metropolitan Transit) and private interests (area chambers of commerce, major San Antonio corporations, transportation construction and supply companies, real estate developers, consulting engineers, and other interested organizations). Examples of SAMCo’s efforts include expressing the funding and mobility needs of the region to the greater San Antonio Legislative delegation. More information on SAMCo can be found at www.samcoinc.org.

Alamo Regional Mobility Authority Approval of Proposition 15 (which established the Texas Mobility Fund) and passage of Texas Senate Bill 342 in 2001 allowed for the creation of Regional Mobility Authorities (RMA). On August 12, 2003, Bexar County Commissioners Court adopted a resolution supporting the formation of a RMA and authorized the County Judge to execute a petition to the Texas Transportation

Pg. 14-7 Financial Information

Commission to form the RMA. Bexar County formed the RMA in January 2004. Today, the Alamo RMA (ARMA) is overseen by a seven-member board of directors and is a local transportation authority that can build, operate and maintain transportation projects including toll and managed lane facilities. Information specific to the Alamo Regional Mobility Authority can be found at www.alamorma.org.

Bexar County Transportation improvement projects and funding for these projects (including highway and transit projects involving County financing or property) within the jurisdiction of Bexar County must be approved by Commissioners Court. The Public Works Division of the Bexar County Infrastructure Services Department has primary responsibility for administering transportation improvements for the County. The County Engineer administers the road funds for County projects.

Bexar County roadway maintenance and improvement projects are primarily budgeted through four dedicated funds: (1) Special Road and Bridge Fund, (2) Farm-to-Market and Lateral Road Fund, (3) Economic Capital Projects Fund, and (4) November 2003 Bond Referendum Fund.

City of San Antonio In May 2017, voters in the City of San Antonio approved a bond program in the amount of $850 million for streets, bridges and sidewalks as well as drainage and flood control.

The revenue sources that contribute to the city’s general fund are: (1) sales tax, (2) property tax, (3) CPS Energy, and (4) other fees. The City of San Antonio also receives a share of the revenues generated by the sales tax increase for the Advanced Transportation District. VIA Metropolitan Transit also contributes to the maintenance of the street system. Street reconstruction augments the street maintenance program, extending the life expectancy of city streets. This is inclusive of seal coat, rehabilitation, crack seal, asphalt overlay and base failure.

Pg. 14-8 Financial Information

Other Local Funding Programs

Suburban cities and surrounding cities and counties may use local general funds, as well as dedicated road-building funds to match or complete regional transportation improvements. These funds rely on revenues from various sources including local sales and property taxes, fees, fines, bond levies, and private sector contributions including right-of-way dedication.

14.6 Additional Financing In addition, new, “but reasonably expected to be available” funding sources can be explored as alternatives. New revenue sources usually require some degree of official action, (enabling legislation, referendum, or jurisdictional decision). In order to be considered a strategy for funding sources must ensure the availability of the new revenue in the years when the funds are needed for project development and implementation. Structures to administer new revenue sources may also need to be established if not already in place. New initiatives will continue to be considered during the process of developing the Financial Plan of the MTP Update. Financial planning is a dynamic process, and should always be adaptable to new innovations as they are identified. In a tight economy, the challenge is finding creative ways to optimize and/or augment existing financing strategies.

14.7 Funding Gap Reducing future traffic congestion and improving quality of life in the region will require continuation of innovative financing techniques that increase the funding amount that the area currently receives from traditional funding sources. In order to implement this plan, leaders in this region must explore various funding and project implementation strategies, including:

• Phase projects – with limited funds, search for ways to build critical sections of roadway with logical termini and not necessarily construct the ultimate build-out of a roadway in the near term. Additionally,

Pg. 14-9 Financial Information

local funding options have been pursued in previous state legislative sessions: o Develop new local revenue sources, such as a local gas tax or local sales tax such as the Advanced Transportation District o Raise the state gas tax or impose a region wide gas tax o Increase vehicle registration fees o Mileage based road user fee o Assessing traffic impact fees/systems development charges for new development (based on expected trips that will be generated by the development) • Capture a larger portion of State and Federal transportation funding: o Pursue additional federal discretionary funding including FTA 5309 funding o Work with the Texas Transportation Commission to receive a larger portion of funding allocated at their discretion

And finally, increasing the use of Local Improvement Districts, Business Improvement Districts, Tax Increment Financing Districts and other special taxing districts can also increase the transportation funding levels for the region.

The roadway and transit funding levels are shown in Table 14-1.

Pg. 14-10 Financial Information

Table 14-1. Roadway and Transit Funding Table

Pg. 15-1 Roadway Project List

15 Roadway Project List

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2019 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0000-00-000 CR C Other ARMA 5546.1 $7,650,000 Limits From: In Bexar County on Foster Road Last Revision Date: 2/2019 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: From IH 10 to FM 1346 Proj 1/19 - add ARMA project to TIP/MTP for AQ Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with operational and drainage improvements Hist: purposes

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $2,295,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $7,650,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $7,650,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 3 - LC $0 $0 $0 $7,650,000 $7,650,000 Construction Engineering: $488,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $382,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $439,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $442,000 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $7,650,000 $7,650,000 Total Project Cost: $11,696,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0000-00-000 CR C Other BC 5547.0 $3,707,055 Limits From: In Bexar County on Marshall Road Last Revision Date: 2/2019 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: from US 281 to Bulverde Road Proj 1/19 - correct project name; 10/18 - add Description: Expand from 2 to 2 lanes with a continuous center left turn lane and/or concrete median Hist: Bexar County project to TIP/MTP for AQ purposes Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $607,565 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $3,707,055 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $3,707,055 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 3 - LC $0 $0 $0 $3,707,055 $3,707,055 Construction Engineering: $222,423 N/A Other Contingencies: $185,353 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $148,282 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $3,707,055 $3,707,055 Total Project Cost: $4,870,678 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0000-00-000 CR C Other ARMA 5433.0 $7,500,000 Limits From: In Bexar County on Evans Road Last Revision Date: 2/2019 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: From TPC Parkway/Dusty Canyon to Hanging Oak Proj 1/19 - add ARMA project to TIP/MTP for AQ Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with operational and drainage improvements Hist: purposes

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $2,200,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $7,500,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $7,500,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 3 - LC $0 $0 $0 $7,500,000 $7,500,000 Construction Engineering: $479,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $375,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $431,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $430,000 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $7,500,000 $7,500,000 Total Project Cost: $11,415,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 13 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2019 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0000-00-000 CS R San Antonio CoSA 5408.3 $200,000 Limits From: In San Antonio on Bulverde Road Last Revision Date: 2/2019 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: from Briar Crest to North of Quiet Meadow Street Proj 1/19 - add project (ROW) Description: Expand from 2 lanes and CTL to 4 lanes and CTL Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $1,400,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $200,000 Funding Local $200,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $9,700,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 3 - LC $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Construction Engineering: $619,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $557,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $561,000 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Total Project Cost: $13,162,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0000-00-000 CS C,E San Antonio CoSA 5421.1 $11,500,000 Limits From: In San Antonio on West Military Dr & Ingram Road Last Revision Date: 2/2019 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: from W. Military Dead End to Potranco Road Proj 9/19 - ADM clarify description (acc); 1/19 - Description: Construct road extension on new alignment (0 to 4 lanes) with bike accommodation and sidewalks Hist: add CoSA 2017 Bond project to TIP/MTP for AQ purposes Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $1,500,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $11,500,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $10,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 3 - LC $0 $0 $0 $11,500,000 $11,500,000 Construction Engineering: $638,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $574,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $578,000 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $11,500,000 $11,500,000 Total Project Cost: $13,790,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0000-00-000 CS C,E,R San Antonio CoSA 5420.1 $23,700,000 Limits From: In San Antonio on Prue Road Last Revision Date: 2/2019 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: from Babcock Road to Laureate Drive Proj 1/19 - add CoSA 2017 Bond project to Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with CTL, Bike lanes and sidewalks Hist: TIP/MTP for AQ purposes

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $3,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $700,000 Funding Local $23,700,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $20,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 3 - LC $0 $0 $0 $23,700,000 $23,700,000 Construction Engineering: $1,276,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $1,148,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $1,156,000 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $23,700,000 $23,700,000 Total Project Cost: $28,280,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 14 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2019 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0000-00-000 CS C,E San Antonio CoSA 5419.1 $1,760,000 Limits From: In San Antonio on Ingram Road Last Revision Date: 2/2019 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: from Potranco Road to Ingram Road Dead End Proj 9/19 - ADM clarify description (acc); 1/19 - Description: Construct road extension on new alignment (0 to 4 lanes) with bike accommodation and sidewalks Hist: add CoSA 2017 Bond project to TIP/MTP for AQ purposes Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $160,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $1,760,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $1,600,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 3 - LC $0 $0 $0 $1,760,000 $1,760,000 Construction Engineering: $102,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $92,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $92,000 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $1,760,000 $1,760,000 Total Project Cost: $2,066,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0000-00-000 CS C San Antonio CoSA 5417.0 $10,000,000 Limits From: In San Antonio on Commerce Street Last Revision Date: 2/2019 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: from Frio to Colorado Proj 1/19 - add CoSA 2017 Bond project to Description: Reconstruct roadway, add CTL, bike lanes and sidewalks Hist: TIP/MTP for AQ purposes

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $490,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $10,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $10,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 3 - LC $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 Construction Engineering: $638,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $574,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $578,000 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 Total Project Cost: $12,780,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0000-00-000 CS C San Antonio CoSA 5413.0 $9,000,000 Limits From: In San Antonio on Commerce Street Last Revision Date: 2/2019 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: from St. Mary's Street to Santa Rosa Street Proj 1/19 - add CoSA 2017 Bond project to Description: Reduce from 4 travel lanes to 3 travel lanes with sidewalks Hist: TIP/MTP for AQ purposes

Remarks: Road diet project

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $441,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $9,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $9,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 3 - LC $0 $0 $0 $9,000,000 $9,000,000 Construction Engineering: $574,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $517,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $520,000 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $9,000,000 $9,000,000 Total Project Cost: $11,502,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 15 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2019 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Comal 0016-04-116 IH 35 C Other TxDOT 5550.0 $12,000,000 Limits From: 1.2 Miles South of FM 306 Last Revision Date: 11/2018 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: FM 306 Proj 10/18 - add project, created from 0016-04- Description: Ramp revisions, intersection and frontage road operational improvements Hist: 112

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $588,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $12,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $12,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 4 - Connectivity $9,600,000 $2,400,000 $0 $0 $12,000,000 Construction Engineering: $766,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $155,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $689,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $694,000 CMP Score Totals $9,600,000 $2,400,000 $0 $0 $12,000,000 Total Project Cost: $14,892,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Comal 0016-04-117 IH 35 C Other TxDOT 5551.0 $63,000,000 Limits From: FM 306 Last Revision Date: 11/2018 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: Hays/Comal County Line Proj 10/18 - add project, created from 0016-04- Description: Ramp revisions, intersection operational improvements and convert frontage road to one way operation Hist: 112

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $3,087,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $63,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $63,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 4 - Connectivity $50,400,000 $12,600,000 $0 $0 $63,000,000 Construction Engineering: $4,019,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $813,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $3,616,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $3,641,000 CMP Score Totals $50,400,000 $12,600,000 $0 $0 $63,000,000 Total Project Cost: $78,176,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Comal 0016-05-119 IH 35 C Other TxDOT 5548.0 $25,000,000 Limits From: FM 2252 Last Revision Date: 11/2018 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: Schwab Road Proj 10/18 - add project, created from 0016-05- Description: Ramp revisions, intersection and frontage road operational improvements Hist: 114

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $1,225,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $25,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $25,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 2 - Metro Corridor $20,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $25,000,000 Construction Engineering: $1,595,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $322,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $1,435,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $1,445,000 CMP Score Totals $20,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $25,000,000 Total Project Cost: $31,022,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 16 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2019 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0025-02-215 IH 10 E,R Other TxDOT 5396.2 $33,880,000 Limits From: Graytown Rd Last Revision Date: 2/2019 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Guadalupe/Bexar County Line Proj 1/19 - rev descr to incl FR lanes; 10/18 - add Description: Expand from 4 lane to 6 lane expressway and from 4 to 4 FR lanes Hist: phases (Engr, ROW)

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $15,400,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $18,480,000 Funding Local $33,880,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $154,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day SBPE $0 $15,400,000 $0 $0 $15,400,000 Construction Engineering: $6,840,000 N/A S102 Contingencies: $11,970,000 $16,632,000 $1,848,000 $0 $0 $18,480,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $3,420,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $6,840,000 CMP Score Totals $16,632,000 $17,248,000 $0 $0 $33,880,000 Total Project Cost: $216,950,000 23

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0025-02-219 IH 10 E,R Other TxDOT 5552.2 $12,100,000 Limits From: Loop 1604 Last Revision Date: 2/2019 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Graytown Rd Proj 1/19 - rev descr to incl FR lanes; 10/18 - add Description: Expand from 4 lane to 6 lane expressway and from 4 to 4 FR lanes Hist: phases (Engr, ROW)

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $5,500,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $6,600,000 Funding Local $12,100,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $55,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day SBPE $0 $5,500,000 $0 $0 $5,500,000 Construction Engineering: $3,509,000 N/A S102 Contingencies: $709,000 $5,940,000 $660,000 $0 $0 $6,600,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $3,157,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $3,179,000 CMP Score Totals $5,940,000 $6,160,000 $0 $0 $12,100,000 Total Project Cost: $77,654,000 23

15 - San Antonio Kendall 0072-06-074 IH 10 C Other TxDOT 5403.0 $20,000,000 Limits From: Cascade Caverns/Scenic Loop Last Revision Date: TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: Kendall/Bexar County Line Proj 10/18 - move from FY 2027 to FY 2019; Description: Reconfigure ramps and widen frontage road (4 lanes) to convert to one way operation Hist: 3/18 - revise funding distribution; 4/17 - add project to MTP with Prop 1/Prop 7; portion of Remarks: None project may have already been in the MTP

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $1,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $20,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $20,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 4 - Connectivity $16,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $20,000,000 Construction Engineering: $750,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $1,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $390,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $760,000 CMP Score Totals $16,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $20,000,000 Total Project Cost: $24,300,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 17 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2019 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0521-04-204 IH 410 E,R San Antonio TxDOT 5372.2 $22,000,000 Limits From: Ingram Rd Last Revision Date: 2/2019 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: US 90 Proj 9/19 - ADM clarify description; 1/19 - rev Description: Expand from 8 to 10 lanes from Ingram to 151 & 6 to 8 lanes from 151 to 90 - add 2 new lanes, & from 6 to 6 Hist: descr to incl FR lanes; 10/18 - add phases FR lanes; reconstruct SH 151 interchange - (Engr, ROW) Remarks: NB 410 to WB 151 & EB 151 to SB 410

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $10,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $12,000,000 Funding Local $22,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $100,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day SBPE $0 $10,000,000 $0 $0 $10,000,000 Construction Engineering: $6,380,000 N/A S102 Contingencies: $1,290,000 $10,800,000 $1,200,000 $0 $0 $12,000,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $5,740,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $5,780,000 CMP Score Totals $10,800,000 $11,200,000 $0 $0 $22,000,000 Total Project Cost: $141,190,000 58

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0521-04-204 IH 410 C San Antonio TxDOT 5372.0 $100,000,000 Limits From: Ingram Rd Last Revision Date: 2/2019 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: US 90 Proj 9/19 - ADM clarify descr; 1/19 - rev descr to Description: Expand from 8 to 10 lanes from Ingram to 151 & 6 to 8 lanes from 151 to 90 - add 2 new lanes, & from 6 to 6 Hist: incl FR lanes; 10/18 - rev limits, descr and FR lanes; reconstruct SH 151 interchange - funding; consolidate from 0521-04-275 and Remarks: NB 410 to WB 151 & EB 151 to SB 410 0521-04-279; 4/18 - move from 21 to FY 19; 3/18 - rev funding distribution; 4/17 - 2017

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $10,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $12,000,000 Funding Local $100,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $100,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 12 - CL $80,000,000 $20,000,000 $0 $0 $100,000,000 Construction Engineering: $6,380,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $1,290,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $5,740,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $5,780,000 CMP Score Totals $80,000,000 $20,000,000 $0 $0 $100,000,000 Total Project Cost: $141,190,000 58

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0658-01-044 FM 1535 E San Antonio TxDOT 5310.2 $750,000 Limits From: Shavano Ranch Road Last Revision Date: 11/2018 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Lp 1604 Proj 10/18 - add phase (Engr) Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with raised median, or center turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $750,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $750,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $7,500,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day SBPE $0 $750,000 $0 $0 $750,000 Construction Engineering: $372,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $149,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $430,500 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $280,500 CMP Score Totals $0 $750,000 $0 $0 $750,000 Total Project Cost: $9,482,250 34

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 18 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2019 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-00-195 NR C Other AAMPO 5301.0 $300,000 Limits From: Alamo Area MPO: Bexar, Comal Last Revision Date: 11/2018 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Guadalupe & partial Kendall County Proj 10/18 - increase cost (from 0915-12-546 and Description: Alamo Area Commute Solutions Program Hist: 0915-00-196) and move to FY 2019; 4/18 - change agency and reduce cost; 4/16 - Remarks: None funded through STP-MM project selection process; fixed amount

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Rideshare Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $300,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $300,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STP-MM $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Construction Engineering: $0 N/A Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Total Project Cost: $300,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-00-211 VA C Other TxDOT 5539.3 $1,617,950 Limits From: Various locations in Comal and Last Revision Date: 7/2018 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Bexar Counties Proj 4/18 - funded through the 19-22 STP-MM Description: Install advanced signal controllers, networking equipment and control software for traffic signals Hist: Call for Projects

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: ITS Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $1,617,950 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $1,617,950 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STP-MM $1,294,360 $323,590 $0 $0 $1,617,950 Construction Engineering: $0 N/A Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $1,294,360 $323,590 $0 $0 $1,617,950 Total Project Cost: $1,617,950 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-520 CS E,R,C San Antonio Port SA 4005.0 $7,800,000 Limits From: On Quintana Road from Harmon Avenue Last Revision Date: 7/2018 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: McKenna Avenue Proj 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019; 1/17 - Description: Rehab and realign roadway, intersection and flood control improvements Hist: move from FY 2017 to FY 2018; 4/16 - revise match (EDCP project); 1/16 - move Remarks: None from FY 16 to FY 17; 1/14 - included PE and ROW as funded phases; 4/12 - funded

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Maint/Rehab Status: Non-RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $353,200 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $1,600,000 Funding Local $7,800,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $5,846,800 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STP-MM $6,240,000 $670,800 $889,200 $0 $7,800,000 Construction Engineering: $286,500 N/A Other Contingencies: $267,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $282,400 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $6,240,000 $670,800 $889,200 $0 $7,800,000 Total Project Cost: $8,636,100 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 19 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2019 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-543 NR C Other AAMPO 5102.0 $100,000 Limits From: Alamo Area MPO: In Bexar, Comal Last Revision Date: 7/2018 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Guadalupe & partial Kendall County Proj 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019, Description: Alamo Area Commute Solutions Pgm - FY 2018 Hist: change agency and reduce cost; 10/15 - project has $53,400 in TDCs; 4/14 - funded Remarks: None through STP-MM project selection process; fixed amount

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Rideshare Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $100,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $100,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STP-MM $80,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $100,000 Construction Engineering: $0 N/A Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $80,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $100,000 Total Project Cost: $100,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-547 NR C Other AACOG 5101.0 $100,000 Limits From: Alamo Area MPO: In Bexar, Comal Last Revision Date: 7/2018 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Guadalupe & partial Kendall County Proj 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019 and Description: Alamo Area Commute Solutions Pgm - FY 2017 Hist: reduce cost; 10/17 - move from 17 to 18; 10/15 - project has $53,400 in TDCs which Remarks: None are not calculated in the funding total; 4/14 - funded through STP-MM project selection

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Rideshare Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $100,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $100,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STP-MM $80,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $100,000 Construction Engineering: $0 N/A Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $80,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $100,000 Total Project Cost: $100,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-562 CR R Other BxCo 5106.3 $1,440,000 Limits From: On Watson Road from FM 2790-Somerset Road Last Revision Date: 11/2018 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: 0.62 Mi East of Somerset Road Proj 9/19 - ADM clarify limits and description; Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with traffic circle at Southwest Verano Parkway, multi-use path and drainage Hist: 10/18 - add phase (ROW)

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $739,184 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $1,440,000 Funding Local $1,440,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $4,886,116 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 3 - LC $0 $0 $0 $1,440,000 $1,440,000 Construction Engineering: $195,445 N/A Other Contingencies: $342,028 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $97,722 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $195,445 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $1,440,000 $1,440,000 Total Project Cost: $7,895,940 26

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 20 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2019 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-595 VA C San Antonio SARA 4977.0 $6,000,000 Limits From: in San Antonio, from Lombrano St Last Revision Date: TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Laredo St Proj 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019; 6/17 - Description: Extend the Alazan Creek section of the Greenway Trail System Hist: add TA project

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Bicycle/Pedestrian Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $294,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $6,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $6,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 9 - TA $2,500,000 $0 $625,000 $0 $3,125,000 Construction Engineering: $382,800 N/A 3 - LC Contingencies: $77,400 $0 $0 $0 $2,875,000 $2,875,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $289,800 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $346,800 CMP Score Totals $2,500,000 $0 $625,000 $2,875,000 $6,000,000 Total Project Cost: $7,390,800 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-602 VA C San Antonio TxDOT 5426.0 $4,000,000 Limits From: In San Antonio Last Revision Date: TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: at TransGuide Center Proj 9/19 - ADM clarify description; 10/17 - add Description: Upgrade TransGuide Facility to include new operator workstations, network cabling, video monitoring wall Hist: project; created from 0915-12-577 ($3M) and associated software and 0915-12-580 ($1M) Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $196,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $4,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $4,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STP-MM $3,200,000 $800,000 $0 $0 $4,000,000 Construction Engineering: $240,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $200,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $240,000 CMP Score Totals $3,200,000 $800,000 $0 $0 $4,000,000 Total Project Cost: $4,996,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-612 VA T San Antonio VIA 3768.3 $10,000,000 Limits From: Rapid Transit Corridor Study Last Revision Date: 11/2018 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: . Proj 10/18 - consolidate 0915-00-172, 0915-12- Description: Rapid Transit Corridor Study Hist: 613, -614, -616 into 0915-12-612 and move to FY 2019; 4/18 - new CSJ (project) created Remarks: None from 0915-00-172

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Transit Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $10,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $10,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STP-MM $8,000,000 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $10,000,000 Construction Engineering: $0 N/A Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $8,000,000 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $10,000,000 Total Project Cost: $10,000,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 21 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2019 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Comal 0915-17-066 CS C New Braunfels New Braunfels 4973.0 $1,344,828 Limits From: In New Braunfels on San Antonio St, Last Revision Date: TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Walnut, McQueeney, near Seele Elem Proj 6/17 - add TA project Description: Construct sidewalks, ramps & other pedestrian related infrastructure Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Bicycle/Pedestrian Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $74,300 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $1,344,828 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $1,344,828 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 9 - TA $1,075,862 $0 $268,966 $0 $1,344,828 Construction Engineering: $60,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $19,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $30,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $60,000 CMP Score Totals $1,075,862 $0 $268,966 $0 $1,344,828 Total Project Cost: $1,588,628 N/A

15 - San Antonio Comal 0915-17-068 VA C New Braunfels New Braunfels 5539.1 $200,000 Limits From: Various locations in New Braunfels Last Revision Date: 7/2018 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: . Proj 4/18 - funded through the 19-22 STP-MM Description: Purchase of control software for traffic signals Hist: Call for Projects

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: ITS Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $200,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $200,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STP-MM $160,000 $0 $40,000 $0 $200,000 Construction Engineering: $0 N/A Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $160,000 $0 $40,000 $0 $200,000 Total Project Cost: $200,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Comal 0915-17-069 VA C New Braunfels New Braunfels 5539.2 $200,000 Limits From: Various locations in New Braunfels Last Revision Date: 7/2018 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: . Proj 4/18 - funded through the 19-22 STP-MM Description: Install advanced signal controllers, networking equipment and control software for traffic signals Hist: Call for Projects

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: ITS Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $200,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $200,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STP-MM $160,000 $0 $40,000 $0 $200,000 Construction Engineering: $0 N/A Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $160,000 $0 $40,000 $0 $200,000 Total Project Cost: $200,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 22 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2019 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 2452-04-016 SL 1604 E,R Other TxDOT 5549.2 $4,400,000 Limits From: IH 10 E Last Revision Date: 11/2018 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Martinez Creek Proj 10/18 - add phases (Engr, ROW) Description: Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes divided Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $2,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $2,400,000 Funding Local $4,400,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $20,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day SBPE $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000 Construction Engineering: $1,276,000 N/A S102 Contingencies: $258,000 $1,920,000 $480,000 $0 $0 $2,400,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $114,800 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $1,156,000 CMP Score Totals $1,920,000 $2,480,000 $0 $0 $4,400,000 Total Project Cost: $27,204,800 50

15 - San Antonio Bexar 2452-04-016 SL 1604 C Other TxDOT 5549.0 $20,000,000 Limits From: IH 10 E Last Revision Date: 11/2018 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: Martinez Creek Proj 10/18 - add project, created from 2452-04- Description: Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes divided Hist: 014

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $2,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $2,400,000 Funding Local $20,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $20,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 2 - Metro Corridor $16,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $20,000,000 Construction Engineering: $1,276,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $258,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $114,800 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $1,156,000 CMP Score Totals $16,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $20,000,000 Total Project Cost: $27,204,800 50

15 - San Antonio Bexar 3508-01-029 SH 151 E,R San Antonio TxDOT 5382.2 $17,600,000 Limits From: LP 1604 Last Revision Date: 2/2019 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: IH 410 Proj 1/19 - rev descr to incl FR lanes; 10/18 - add Description: Expand from 4 lane to 6 lane expressway and from 4/6 to 4/6 FR lanes including WB SH 151 to NB LP 1604 Hist: phases (Engr, ROW) 2 lane direct connector Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $8,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $9,600,000 Funding Local $17,600,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $80,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day SBPE $0 $8,000,000 $0 $0 $8,000,000 Construction Engineering: $3,200,000 N/A S102 Contingencies: $5,600,000 $7,680,000 $1,920,000 $0 $0 $9,600,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $1,600,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $3,200,000 CMP Score Totals $7,680,000 $9,920,000 $0 $0 $17,600,000 Total Project Cost: $111,200,000 49

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 23 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2019 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 3544-04-002 SH 211 E,R Other BxCo 3153.2 $2,620,000 Limits From: FM 1957 (Potranco Rd), N 2.9 MI Last Revision Date: 11/2018 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Medina County Line Proj 10/18 - add phases (Engr, ROW) Description: Construct two lane rural highway on new location Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $840,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $1,780,000 Funding Local $2,620,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $7,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 3 - LC $0 $0 $0 $840,000 $840,000 Construction Engineering: $340,704 N/A 3 - LC Contingencies: $492,128 $0 $0 $0 $1,780,000 $1,780,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $383,860 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $2,620,000 $2,620,000 Total Project Cost: $10,367,681 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 3544-05-001 SH 211 E,R Other BxCo 3154.2 $1,012,000 Limits From: Medina Co. Line, 4.5 Mi N of FM 1957, N Last Revision Date: 11/2018 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Medina Co. Line, 2.0 Mi S of FM 471 Proj 10/18 - add phases (Engr, ROW) Description: Construct two lane rural highway on new location Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $312,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $700,000 Funding Local $1,012,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $2,600,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 3 - LC $0 $0 $0 $312,000 $312,000 Construction Engineering: $126,547 N/A 3 - LC Contingencies: $182,790 $0 $0 $0 $700,000 $700,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $142,577 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $1,012,000 $1,012,000 Total Project Cost: $3,889,710 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 7774-01-001 PA 1502 E,R San Antonio TxDOT 5315.4 $1,150,000 Limits From: Lockhill Selma Road Last Revision Date: 11/2018 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: FM 1535-NW Military Proj 11/19 - ADM clarify description; 10/18 - add Description: Expand 4 to 6 lanes divided & intersection operational improvements including new turn lanes and improved Hist: phases (Engr, ROW) signal operation at FM 1535 Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $900,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $250,000 Funding Local $1,150,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $9,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day SBPE $0 $900,000 $0 $0 $900,000 Construction Engineering: $360,000 N/A S102 Contingencies: $630,000 $200,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $250,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $180,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $360,000 CMP Score Totals $200,000 $950,000 $0 $0 $1,150,000 Total Project Cost: $11,680,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 24 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2020 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost

15 - San Antonio Guadalupe 0016-06-047 IH 35 R Other TxDOT 4013.2 $10,000,000 Limits From: Bexar/Guadalupe County Line Last Revision Date: 11/2019 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: FM 3009 Proj 10/19 - add project (ROW phase) Description: Expand from 8 ln to 14 ln expy - add 6 new express lanes, including 2 HOV-Special Use lanes & from 4 to 4 Hist: FR lanes Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $35,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $10,000,000 Funding Local $10,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $80,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day S102 $8,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $10,000,000 Construction Engineering: $35,000,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $4,800,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $8,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $10,000,000 Total Project Cost: $164,800,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0000-00-000 CR C Other ARMA 5431.0 $20,632,739 Limits From: In Bexar County on Talley Road Last Revision Date: 2/2019 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: from FM 1957 to Wiseman Blvd Proj 10/18 - add ARMA project to TIP/MTP for AQ Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with operational and drainage improvements including curb and sidewalk Hist: purposes

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $1,540,330 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $20,632,739 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $20,632,739 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 3 - LC $0 $0 $0 $20,632,739 $20,632,739 Construction Engineering: $1,237,964 N/A Other Contingencies: $1,031,637 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $825,310 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $20,632,739 $20,632,739 Total Project Cost: $25,267,980 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0000-00-000 Old FM 471 C Other ARMA 5429.0 $13,759,473 Limits From: FM 471 (West) Last Revision Date: 2/2019 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: FM 471 (East) Proj 10/18 - add ARMA project to TIP/MTP for AQ Description: Add continuous left turn lane with operational and drainage improvements including curb, sidewalk and bike Hist: purposes lanes Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: Non-RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $1,573,257 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $13,759,473 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $13,759,473 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 3 - LC $0 $0 $0 $13,759,473 $13,759,473 Construction Engineering: $825,568 N/A Other Contingencies: $687,974 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $550,379 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $13,759,473 $13,759,473 Total Project Cost: $17,396,651 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 25 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2020 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0016-07-113 IH 35 North R Other TxDOT 3477.2 $34,923,000 Limits From: IH 410 N Last Revision Date: 11/2019 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Guadalupe/Bexar County Line Proj 10/19 - rev cost; 9/19 - ADM clarify Description: Expand from 8 ln to 14 ln expy - add 6 new express lanes incl 2 HOV-special use lns, & from 4/6 to 4/6 FR Hist: description; 1/19 - rev descr to incl FR lanes; lanes & DCs at IH 410N & LP 1604 10/18 - add phases (Engr, ROW) Remarks: 1 lane DC: NB 35 to WB 1604; EB 1604 to SB 35;2 lane DC: SB 35 to WB 1604; EB 1604 to NB 35; EB 410N to NB 35;SB 35 to WB 410N

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $50,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $34,923,000 Funding Local $34,923,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $715,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day S102 $31,430,700 $3,492,300 $0 $0 $34,923,000 Construction Engineering: $50,000,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $42,900,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $31,430,700 $3,192,300 $0 $0 $34,923,000 Total Project Cost: $892,823,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0025-02-215 IH 10 C Other TxDOT 5396.0 $154,000,000 Limits From: Graytown Rd Last Revision Date: 5/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: Guadalupe/Bexar County Line Proj 4/20 - rev cost alloc; 10/19 - move 21 to 20; Description: Expand from 4 lane to 6 lane expressway and from 4 to 4 FR lanes Hist: 1/19 - rev descr to incl FR; 10/18 - rev limits, cost & TPC; 3/18 - move 29 to 21 and rev Remarks: May 2020 revision to FY 2019-2022 TIP funding distrib; 4/17 - add project to MTP with Prop 1/Prop 7; portion of project may

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $15,400,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $18,480,000 Funding Local $154,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $154,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 12 - Strat Priority $0 $154,000,000 $0 $0 $154,000,000 Construction Engineering: $6,840,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $11,970,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $3,420,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $6,840,000 CMP Score Totals $0 $154,000,000 $0 $0 $154,000,000 Total Project Cost: $216,950,000 23

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0025-02-219 IH 10 C Other TxDOT 5552.0 $55,000,000 Limits From: Loop 1604 Last Revision Date: 2/2019 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: Graytown Rd Proj 1/19 - rev descr to incl FR lanes; 10/18 - add Description: Expand from 4 lane to 6 lane expressway and from 4 to 4 FR lanes Hist: project, created from 0025-02-215

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $5,500,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $6,600,000 Funding Local $55,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $55,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 12 - Strat Priority $44,000,000 $11,000,000 $0 $0 $55,000,000 Construction Engineering: $3,509,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $709,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $3,157,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $3,179,000 CMP Score Totals $44,000,000 $11,000,000 $0 $0 $55,000,000 Total Project Cost: $77,654,000 23

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 26 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2020 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Comal 0216-01-057 SL 337 C New Braunfels TxDOT 5543.0 $10,400,000 Limits From: at River Road Last Revision Date: 11/2018 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: . Proj 4/18 - funded through the 19-22 STP-MM Description: Construct grade separation Hist: Call for Projects

Remarks: Part of the expansion of Loop 337; see #9111.1 and #9111.2 let in 2017

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $509,600 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $10,400,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $10,400,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STP-MM $8,320,000 $2,080,000 $0 $0 $10,400,000 Construction Engineering: $624,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $728,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $520,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $416,000 CMP Score Totals $8,320,000 $2,080,000 $0 $0 $10,400,000 Total Project Cost: $13,197,600 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0658-01-044 FM 1535 C San Antonio TxDOT 5310.0 $7,500,000 Limits From: Shavano Ranch Road Last Revision Date: 11/2018 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: Lp 1604 Proj 10/18 - revise TPC; 4/18 - move from FY Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with raised median, or center turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks Hist: 2021 to FY 2020; 4/16 - funded through STP- MM project selection process Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $750,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $7,500,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $7,500,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STP-MM $6,000,000 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $7,500,000 Construction Engineering: $372,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $149,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $430,500 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $280,500 CMP Score Totals $6,000,000 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $7,500,000 Total Project Cost: $9,482,250 34

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-550 CS C San Antonio CoSA 5110.0 $17,177,000 Limits From: Harry Wurzbach Last Revision Date: 11/2019 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: at Austin Highway Proj 10/19 - 19 to 20; 4/18 - 18 to 19; 14/17 - rev Description: Construct entrance and exit ramps between Harry Wurzbach and Austin Highway Hist: limits & funding; 1/17 - 19 to18 & rev funding distr; 4/16 - comb with new STP-MM proj & Remarks: An innovative intersection project rev match (EDCP proj); 10/15 - rev fund; 4/14 - funded through STP-MM project

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $842,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $17,177,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $17,177,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $13,741,600 $1,477,222 $1,958,178 $0 $17,177,000 Construction Engineering: $852,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $342,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $986,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $642,000 CMP Score Totals $13,741,600 $1,477,222 $1,958,178 $0 $17,177,000 Total Project Cost: $20,841,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 27 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2020 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-578 CS C UC UC 5325.0 $8,632,561 Limits From: In Universal City, on E. Aviation Last Revision Date: 11/2019 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: Houston Drive to Aztec Way Proj 10/19 - move from FY 2019 to FY 2020; Description: Widen to provide operational improvements, bike lanes, sidewalks and drainage Hist: 1/17 - revise limits and description; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection Remarks: None process

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: Non-RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $422,995 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $8,632,561 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $8,632,561 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STP-MM $5,955,339 $0 $1,488,835 $0 $7,444,174 Construction Engineering: $428,175 N/A 3 - LC Contingencies: $171,788 $0 $0 $0 $1,188,387 $1,188,387 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $495,509 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $322,858 CMP Score Totals $5,955,339 $0 $1,488,835 $1,188,387 $8,632,561 Total Project Cost: $10,473,886 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-582 CS E Converse Converse 5319.2 $266,094 Limits From: On Rocket/Schaeffer, from E. Norris Last Revision Date: 11/2018 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Lp 1604 Proj 10/18 - add phase (Engr) Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lane roadway with continuous center turn lane, sidewalks and bike lane/multi-use path Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $266,094 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $266,094 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $5,430,481 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 3 - LC $0 $0 $0 $266,094 $266,094 Construction Engineering: $269,352 N/A Other Contingencies: $108,067 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $311,710 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $203,100 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $266,094 $266,094 Total Project Cost: $6,588,804 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-594 VA C Converse Converse 4972.0 $1,382,725 Limits From: In Converse, from Converse Park N Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: to FM 78 Proj 10/19 - move from FY 2019 to FY 2020; Description: Construct multi use path Hist: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019; 6/17 - add TA project Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Bicycle/Pedestrian Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $67,800 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $1,382,725 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $1,382,725 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 9 - TA $1,092,352 $0 $273,088 $0 $1,365,440 Construction Engineering: $88,200 N/A 3 - LC Contingencies: $17,800 $0 $0 $0 $17,285 $17,285 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $66,800 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $79,900 CMP Score Totals $1,092,352 $0 $273,088 $17,285 $1,382,725 Total Project Cost: $1,703,225 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 28 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2020 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-601 VA C San Antonio CoSA 5425.0 $1,500,000 Limits From: In City of San Antonio Last Revision Date: 11/2019 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: . Proj 10/19 - move from FY 2019 to FY 2020; Description: Intelligent Transportation Systems - Enhancements; Upgrade Traffic Signal Controllers Hist: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019; 1/18 - update project description; 10/17 - add Remarks: None project; created from 0915-12-580

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: ITS Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $73,500 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $1,500,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $1,500,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $1,200,000 $0 $300,000 $0 $1,500,000 Construction Engineering: $90,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $75,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $90,000 CMP Score Totals $1,200,000 $0 $300,000 $0 $1,500,000 Total Project Cost: $1,873,500 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-603 CS C San Antonio CoSA 5428.0 $1,000,000 Limits From: In City of San Antonio on Judson Road Last Revision Date: 11/2019 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: from Independence to IH 35 Proj 10/19 - move from FY 2019 to FY 2020; Description: Construct sidewalk along west side of Judson Road Hist: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019; 10/17 - add project; configured from $1M Remarks: None from 0915-12-579

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Pedestrian Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $49,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $1,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $1,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $800,000 $0 $200,000 $0 $1,000,000 Construction Engineering: $60,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $50,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $60,000 CMP Score Totals $800,000 $0 $200,000 $0 $1,000,000 Total Project Cost: $1,249,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-672 VA T Other VIA 5580.1 $7,553,334 Limits From: In VIA service area Last Revision Date: 8/2019 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: . Proj 6/19 - added through CMAQ project call Description: VIA Fleet Replacement Program. Purchase 14 CNG buses. FY 2020 Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Transit Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $7,553,334 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $7,553,334 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 5 - CMAQ $5,493,334 $0 $1,373,333 $0 $6,866,667 Construction Engineering: $0 36.092 3 - LC Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $686,667 $686,667 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 3.761 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $5,493,334 $0 $1,373,333 $686,667 $7,553,334 Total Project Cost: $7,553,334 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 29 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2020 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-673 VA T Other VIA 5581.1 $7,037,144 Limits From: In VIA service area Last Revision Date: 8/2019 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: . Proj 6/19 - added through CMAQ project call Description: VIA Bus Frequency Program. Purchase 9 CNG buses. Increase service on #7 and #552 routes. FY 2020 Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Transit Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $7,037,144 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $7,037,144 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 5 - CMAQ $5,076,382 $0 $1,269,095 $0 $6,345,477 Construction Engineering: $0 4.156 3 - LC Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $691,667 $691,667 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 3.709 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $5,076,382 $0 $1,269,095 $691,667 $7,037,144 Total Project Cost: $7,037,144 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 1433-01-029 FM 2252 C Other TxDOT 5324.0 $7,500,000 Limits From: at Evans Road Last Revision Date: 11/2018 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: . Proj 1/20 - let in 1/20 not 2021; 11/19 - ADM Description: Improvements include widening of Cibolo Creek bridge to allow for intersection operational improvements Hist: clarify description; 10/18 - revise funding including turn lanes distribution; 4/17 - move from FY 2019 to FY Remarks: None 2021 and revise funding; 1/17 - revise funding distribution; 4/16 - funded through

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $368,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $7,500,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $7,500,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STP-MM $3,360,000 $840,000 $0 $0 $4,200,000 Construction Engineering: $479,000 N/A 2 - Metro Corridor Contingencies: $97,000 $2,640,000 $660,000 $0 $0 $1,812,430 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $431,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $434,000 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Project Cost: $9,309,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 2452-02-083 SL 1604 E San Antonio TxDOT 3913.2 $18,500,000 Limits From: SH 16 Last Revision Date: 11/2019 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: IH 10 Proj 10/19 - revise cost, limits, description and Description: Expand from 4 to 10 lane expressway - including 2 HOV-special use lanes, & from 4 to 4 FR lanes Hist: move from FY 2019 to FY 2020; reference #4049 and #5556; 1/19 - rev descr to incl FR Remarks: Reference #4049 and #5556 lanes; 10/18 - add phases (Engr, ROW)

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $18,500,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $18,500,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $185,500,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day SBPE $14,800,000 $3,700,000 $0 $0 $18,500,000 Construction Engineering: $8,200,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $14,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $4,100,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $8,200,000 CMP Score Totals $14,800,000 $3,700,000 $0 $0 $18,500,000 Total Project Cost: $238,900,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 30 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2020 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 7774-01-001 PA 1502 C San Antonio TxDOT 5315.0 $9,000,000 Limits From: Lockhill Selma Road Last Revision Date: 11/2018 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: FM 1535-NW Military Proj 11/19 - ADM clarify description; 10/18 - Description: Expand from 4 to 6 lanes divided & intersection operational improvements including new turn lanes and Hist: revise description & TPC; 3/18 - revise CSJ improved signal operation at FM 1535 from 1502-03-003 and decrease cost; 4/17 - Remarks: None move from FY 18 to FY 20, revise funding and limits; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $900,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $250,000 Funding Local $9,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $9,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STP-MM $6,400,000 $1,600,000 $0 $0 $8,000,000 Construction Engineering: $360,000 N/A 2 - Metro Corridor Contingencies: $630,000 $800,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $1,000,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $180,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $360,000 CMP Score Totals $7,200,000 $1,800,000 $0 $0 $9,000,000 Total Project Cost: $11,680,000 40

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 31 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2021 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0465-02-027 FM 1518 E Other TxDOT 5309.3 $2,194,000 Limits From: FM 78 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: IH 10 Proj 5/20 - add E phase; 4/18 - move from FY Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with raised median or center turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks Hist: 2021 to FY 2023 and combine with STP-MM selected project; 4/16 - funded through STP- Remarks: None MM project selection process

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $2,194,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $8,194,000 Funding Local $2,194,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $44,780,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day SWPE $0 $2,194,000 $0 $0 $2,194,000 Construction Engineering: $2,687,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $3,135,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $2,239,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $1,791,000 CMP Score Totals $0 $2,194,000 $0 $0 $2,194,000 Total Project Cost: $65,020,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 2230-01-021 FM 1560 E Other TxDOT 5391.3 $1,900,000 Limits From: Galm/Shaenfield Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: SH 16 Proj 5/20 - add E phase; 4/18 - funded through Description: Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes with turn lanes, bike accommodation and sidewalks Hist: the 19-22 STP-MM Call for Projects; 4/17 - add project to MTP with Prop 1/Prop 7; Remarks: None portion of project may have already been in the MTP

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $1,900,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $11,800,000 Funding Local $1,900,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $19,750,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day SWPE $0 $1,900,000 $0 $0 $1,900,000 Construction Engineering: $900,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $400,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $900,000 CMP Score Totals $0 $1,900,000 $0 $0 $1,900,000 Total Project Cost: $37,150,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 2452-02-128 SL 1604 E San Antonio TxDOT 4049.2 $18,800,000 Limits From: IH 10 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: US 281 Proj 10/19 - add project (E); spin off of 2452-02- Description: Expand from 4 to 10 lane expressway - including 2 HOV - special use lanes & from 4 to 4 frontage roads Hist: 083 (MPO #3913); no impact to conformity

Remarks: 10/19 - add project (E); spin off of 2452-02-083 (MPO #3913); no impact to conformity

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $18,800,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $18,800,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $187,800,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day SWPE $15,040,000 $3,760,000 $0 $0 $18,800,000 Construction Engineering: $8,300,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $14,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $4,100,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $8,300,000 CMP Score Totals $15,040,000 $3,760,000 $0 $0 $18,800,000 Total Project Cost: $241,900,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 32 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2021 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0000-00-000 CS C San Antonio CoSA 5408.1 $9,700,000 Limits From: In San Antonio on Bulverde Road Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: from Briar Crest to North of Quiet Meadow Street Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2021; 1/19 - Description: Expand from 2 lanes and CTL to 4 lanes and CTL Hist: add CoSA 2017 Bond project to TIP/MTP for AQ purposes Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $1,400,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $200,000 Funding Local $9,700,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $9,700,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 3 - LC $0 $0 $0 $9,700,000 $9,700,000 Construction Engineering: $619,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $557,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $561,000 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $9,700,000 $9,700,000 Total Project Cost: $13,162,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0000-00-000 CS C San Antonio CoSA 5423.0 $2,000,000 Limits From: In San Antonio on Alamo/Commerce/Losoya Intersection Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: from Commerce to Market Proj 1/19 - add CoSA 2017 Bond project to Description: Close Alamo Street to vehicle traffic Hist: TIP/MTP for AQ purposes

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $98,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $2,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $2,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 3 - LC $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 Construction Engineering: $128,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $115,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $116,000 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 Total Project Cost: $2,557,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0000-00-000 CS C San Antonio CoSA 5415.0 $8,500,000 Limits From: In San Antonio on Santa Rosa Street Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: from Cesar Chavez Blvd to Martin Street Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2021; 9/19 - Description: Reduce from 6 lanes with CTL to 4 lanes with CTL, bike accommodation and sidewalks Hist: ADM clarify description (acc); 1/19 - add CoSA 2017 Bond project to TIP/MTP for AQ Remarks: Road diet project purposes

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $416,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $8,500,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $8,500,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 3 - LC $0 $0 $0 $8,500,000 $8,500,000 Construction Engineering: $542,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $425,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $488,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $491,000 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $8,500,000 $8,500,000 Total Project Cost: $10,862,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 33 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2021 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0000-00-000 CS C San Antonio CoSA 5414.0 $6,000,000 Limits From: In San Antonio on North Main & Soledad Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: from Pecan Street to Navarro Street Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2021; 1/19 - Description: Reduce from 7 to 4 travel lanes with CTL, bike lanes, sidewalks and traffic circle at Navarro Hist: add CoSA 2017 Bond project to TIP/MTP for AQ purposes Remarks: Road diet project

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $294,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $6,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $6,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 3 - LC $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 Construction Engineering: $383,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $344,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $347,000 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 Total Project Cost: $7,668,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0000-00-000 CS C San Antonio CoSA 5410.0 $2,100,000 Limits From: In San Antonio on Rittiman Road Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: from IH 35 to Castle Cross Drive Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2021; 1/19 - Description: Extend right turn lane from Rittiman to IH 35 Hist: add CoSA 2017 Bond project to TIP/MTP for AQ purposes Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: Non-RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $103,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $2,100,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $2,100,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 3 - LC $0 $0 $0 $2,100,000 $2,100,000 Construction Engineering: $134,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $27,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $120,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $121,000 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $2,100,000 $2,100,000 Total Project Cost: $2,605,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0000-00-000 CS C San Antonio CoSA 5409.0 $4,500,000 Limits From: In San Antonio on N. New Braunfels Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: from Houston Street to Burleson Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2021; 1/19 - Description: Reduce from 4 travel lanes to 2 travel lanes with a CTL and sidewalks Hist: add CoSA 2017 Bond project to TIP/MTP for AQ purposes Remarks: Road diet project

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: Non-RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $220,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $4,500,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $4,500,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 3 - LC $0 $0 $0 $4,500,000 $4,500,000 Construction Engineering: $287,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $58,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $258,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $260,000 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $4,500,000 $4,500,000 Total Project Cost: $5,583,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 34 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2021 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0000-00-000 CS C San Antonio CoSA 5407.0 $5,300,000 Limits From: In San Antonio on Fredericksburg Road Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: From N. Flores to Woodlawn Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2021; 1/19 - Description: Reduce from 4 to 2 lanes, upgrade drainage, add new traffic signals and provide sidewalks Hist: add CoSA 2017 Bond project to TIP/MTP for AQ purposes Remarks: Road diet project

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $260,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $5,300,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $5,300,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 3 - LC $0 $0 $0 $5,300,000 $5,300,000 Construction Engineering: $338,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $68,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $304,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $306,000 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $5,300,000 $5,300,000 Total Project Cost: $6,576,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0000-00-000 CS C San Antonio CoSA 5416.0 $9,000,000 Limits From: In San Antonio on South Alamo Street Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: from Market Street to Cesar Chavez Blvd Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2021; 1/19 - Description: Reduce from 6 lanes with CTL to 4 lanes with CTL, bike accommodation and sidewalks Hist: add CoSA 2017 Bond project to TIP/MTP for AQ purposes Remarks: Road diet project

15 - San Antonio Comal 0016-05-120 IH 35 C Other TxDOT 5553.0 $6,000,000 Limits From: at FM 725 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: - Proj 11/19 - ADM clarify description; 10/18 - add Description: Intersection operational improvements including turn lanes Hist: project, created from 0016-05-114

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $294,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $6,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $6,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 4 - Connectivity $4,800,000 $1,200,000 $0 $0 $6,000,000 Construction Engineering: $383,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $78,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $344,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $347,000 CMP Score Totals $4,800,000 $1,200,000 $0 $0 $6,000,000 Total Project Cost: $7,446,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 35 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2021 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Guadalupe 0016-06-047 IH 35 C,E Other TxDOT 4013.0 $150,000,000 Limits From: Bexar/Guadalupe County Line Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2024, 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: FM 3009 Proj 10/19 - move 20 to 21 and rev cost; 1/19 - Description: Expand from 8 ln to 14 ln expy - add 6 new express lanes, including 2 HOV-Special Use lanes; from 4 to 4 FR Hist: rev descr to incl FR lanes; 10/18 - move 25 lanes to 20; rev limits, descr and cost; 4/18 - move Remarks: None 20 to 25 (out of TIP); 10/13 - rev descr; 4/13 - add project to MTP (Env document)

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $35,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $10,000,000 Funding Local $150,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $80,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 4 - Connectivity $40,800,000 $10,200,000 $0 $0 $51,000,000 Construction Engineering: $35,000,000 N/A 12 - CL Contingencies: $0 $23,200,000 $5,800,000 $0 $0 $29,000,000 VOC lbs/day 3 - DB $56,000,000 $14,000,000 $0 $0 $70,000,000 Indirect Costs: $4,800,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $120,000,000 $30,000,000 $0 $0 $150,000,000 Total Project Cost: $164,800,000 47

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0016-07-113 IH 35 North C,E Other TxDOT 3477.0 $815,000,000 Limits From: IH 410 N Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2024,2025,2035,2045 Limits To: Guadalupe/Bexar County Line Proj 10/19 - move 20 to 21 and rev cost; 9/19 - Description: Expand from 8 ln to 14 ln expy - add 6 new express lanes incl 2 HOV-special use lns, & from 4/6 to 4/6 FR Hist: ADM clarify descr; 1/19 - rev descr to incl FR lanes & DCs at IH 410N & LP 1604 lanes; 10/18 - 25 to 20, rev descr and TPC; Remarks: 1 lane DC: NB 35 to WB 1604; EB 1604 to SB 35; 2 lane DC: SB 35 to WB 1604; EB 1604 to NB 35; EB 410N to 4/18 - move 20 to 25 (out of TIP); 10/13 - rev NB 35;SB 35 to WB 410N limits and descr; 04/13 - rev limits

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $50,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $34,923,000 Funding Local $815,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $715,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 2 - Metro Corridor $209,120,000 $52,280,000 $0 $0 $261,400,000 Construction Engineering: $50,000,000 N/A 4 - Connectivity Contingencies: $0 $80,480,000 $20,120,000 $0 $0 $100,600,000 VOC lbs/day Indirect Costs: 3-DB/11 - Distr Disc $82,400,000 $20,600,000 $0 $0 $103,000,000 $42,900,000 N/A r 12 - CL $280,000,000 $70,000,000 $0 $0 $350,000,000 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $652,000,000 $163,000,000 $0 $0 $815,000,000 Total Project Cost: $892,823,000 42

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0016-08-034 SL 368 C San Antonio CoSA 5313.0 $14,000,000 Limits From: Burr Road Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: IH 35 Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2021; Description: Reduce from 6 to 4 travel lanes; roadway rehabilitation, bicycle and pedestrian facilities Hist: 10/19 - revise project sponsor; 9/19 - ADM clarify description; 4/17 - revise funding; Remarks: Road diet project 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $686,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $14,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $14,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $7,200,000 $1,800,000 $0 $0 $9,000,000 Construction Engineering: $694,400 N/A 1 - Prvnt Mnt/Rehab Contingencies: $278,600 $4,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $5,000,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $803,600 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $523,600 CMP Score Totals $11,200,000 $2,800,000 $0 $0 $14,000,000 Total Project Cost: $16,986,200 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 36 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2021 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0253-06-037 SS 536 C San Antonio CoSA 5536.2 $2,000,000 Limits From: at San Antonio River Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: . Proj 4/18 - funded through the 19-22 STP-MM Description: Construct bicycle and pedestrian bridge Hist: Call for Projects

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Bicycle/Pedestrian Status: Non-RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $98,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $2,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $2,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $1,600,000 $0 $400,000 $0 $2,000,000 Construction Engineering: $120,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $140,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $100,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $80,000 CMP Score Totals $1,600,000 $0 $400,000 $0 $2,000,000 Total Project Cost: $2,538,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0521-05-148 IH 410 C San Antonio TxDOT 5542.0 $19,100,000 Limits From: FM 2536 - Pearsall Road Last Revision Date: 5/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: Valley Hi Drive Proj 4/20 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2021 and Description: Operational improvements, including ramp revisions, intersection improvements and reconstruct frontage Hist: revise cost; 4/19 - increase cost and revise roads decription; 4/18 - funded through the 19-22 Remarks: May 2020 revision to FY 2019-2022 TIP; also included in FY 2021-2023 TIP STP-MM Call for Projects

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $1,900,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $19,100,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $19,100,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $6,480,000 $1,620,000 $0 $0 $8,100,000 Construction Engineering: $850,000 N/A 1 - Prvnt Mnt/Rehab Contingencies: $1,500,000 $8,800,000 $2,200,000 $0 $0 $11,000,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $400,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $850,000 CMP Score Totals $15,280,000 $3,820,000 $0 $0 $19,100,000 Total Project Cost: $24,600,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0521-06-138 IH 410 C San Antonio TxDOT 5371.0 $100,000,000 Limits From: at IH 10 E Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: . Proj 4/20 - rev descr and move FY 21 to FY 25; Description: Construct direct connectors: Phase 1 - Priority Connectors - NB 410 to EB 10; WB 10 to SB 410 Hist: 9/19 - ADM clarify description; 3/18 - revise funding distribution; 4/17 - add project Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Interchange Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $4,800,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $100,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $100,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 2 - Metro Corridor $45,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $50,000,000 Construction Engineering: $4,000,000 N/A 4 - Connectivity Contingencies: $7,000,000 $22,500,000 $2,500,000 $0 $0 $25,000,000 VOC lbs/day 12 - CL $22,500,000 $2,500,000 $0 $0 $25,000,000 Indirect Costs: $2,000,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $4,000,000 CMP Score Totals $90,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 $0 $100,000,000 Total Project Cost: $121,800,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 37 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2021 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0658-01-045 FM 1535 C San Antonio TxDOT 5323.0 $9,600,000 Limits From: Lp 1604 Last Revision Date: 5/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: Huebner Road Proj 4/20 - revise cost; 4/18 - move from FY 2020 Description: Construct 2 way left turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks Hist: to FY 2021; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process Remarks: May 2020 revision to FY 2019-2022 TIP; also included in FY 2021-2023 TIP

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $960,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $9,600,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $9,600,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $5,200,000 $1,300,000 $0 $0 $6,500,000 Construction Engineering: $400,000 N/A 1 - Prvnt Mnt/Rehab Contingencies: $750,000 $2,480,000 $620,000 $0 $0 $3,100,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $200,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $425,000 CMP Score Totals $7,680,000 $1,920,000 $0 $0 $9,600,000 Total Project Cost: $12,335,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0849-01-055 FM 471 E, R San Antonio TxDOT 5377.2 $4,620,000 Limits From: Old FM 471 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Medina County Line Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2019 to FY 2021; Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lane divided with bike lanes and sidewalks Hist: 10/18 - add phases (Engr, ROW)

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $2,100,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $2,520,000 Funding Local $4,620,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $21,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day SWPE $0 $2,100,000 $0 $0 $2,100,000 Construction Engineering: $840,000 N/A SWROW Contingencies: $1,470,000 $2,016,000 $504,000 $0 $0 $2,520,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $420,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $840,000 CMP Score Totals $2,016,000 $2,604,000 $0 $0 $4,620,000 Total Project Cost: $29,190,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-00-212 VA C Other TxDOT 5544.1 $2,500,000 Limits From: Various locations within Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Bexar, Comal and Kendall counties Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2021; Description: Safety Service Patrol on controlled access highways in Bexar, Comal and Kendall Counties-FY 2019 Hist: 10/19 - move from FY 2019 to FY 2020; 10/18 - revise funding distribution; 4/18 - Remarks: None funded through the 19-22 STP-MM Call for Projects

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Safety Service Patrol Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $2,500,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $2,500,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $2,000,000 $167,500 $332,500 $0 $2,500,000 Construction Engineering: $0 N/A Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $2,000,000 $167,500 $332,500 $0 $2,500,000 Total Project Cost: $2,500,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 38 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2021 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-00-213 VA C Other TxDOT 5544.2 $5,500,000 Limits From: Various locations within Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Bexar, Comal and Kendall counties Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2021; 6/19 - Description: Safety Service Patrol on controlled access highways in Bexar, Comal and Kendall Counties-FY 2020 Hist: revise cost (+$1M from #5316.3); 10/18 - revise funding distribution; 4/18 - funded Remarks: None through the 19-22 STP-MM Call for Projects

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Safety Service Patrol Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $5,500,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $5,500,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $4,400,000 $368,500 $731,500 $0 $5,500,000 Construction Engineering: $0 N/A Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $4,400,000 $368,500 $731,500 $0 $5,500,000 Total Project Cost: $5,500,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-00-214 VA C Other TxDOT 5544.3 $5,500,000 Limits From: Various locations within Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Bexar, Comal and Kendall counties Proj 6/19 - revise cost (+$1M from #5316.3); Description: Safety Service Patrol on controlled access highways in Bexar, Comal and Kendall Counties-FY 2021 Hist: 10/18 - revise funding distribution; 4/18 - funded through the 19-22 STP-MM Call for Remarks: None Projects

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Safety Service Patrol Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $5,500,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $5,500,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $4,400,000 $368,500 $731,500 $0 $5,500,000 Construction Engineering: $0 N/A Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $4,400,000 $368,500 $731,500 $0 $5,500,000 Total Project Cost: $5,500,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-509 CR C Other BxCo 3988.0 $8,097,480 Limits From: On Bulverde Road from Marshall Road Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: Wilderness Oak Proj 5/20 - move 20 to 21; 9/19 - ADM clarify Description: Reconstruct and expand from 2 to 4 lanes with shoulder, pedestrian ramps, curb, bridge construction and Hist: descr; 4/19 - 19 to 20 and rev proj sponsor; drainage improvements 4/18 - 18 to 19; 1/17 - 17 to 18; 4/15 - 15 to Remarks: None 16 and update descr; 1/14 - 14 to 15; 4/13 - 13 to 14 and rev funding cats; 4/12 - funded

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $396,777 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $8,097,480 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $8,097,480 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $6,477,984 $0 $1,619,496 $0 $8,097,480 Construction Engineering: $401,635 N/A Other Contingencies: $463,986 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $554,677 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $6,477,984 $0 $1,619,496 $0 $8,097,480 Total Project Cost: $9,914,555 33

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 39 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2021 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-514 CS C Leon Valley LV 3992.0 $933,000 Limits From: SH 16 - Bandera Road Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Crystal Hills Park Proj 5/20 - move 20 to 21; 10/18 - move 19 to 20; Description: Construction of a hike and bike trail along Huebner Creek Hist: 4/17 - move 17 to 19; 10/15 - move 15 to 17 and revise limits; 4/14 - rev limits and move Remarks: None 14 to 15; 4/12 - funded through STP-MM project selection process

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Bicycle/Pedestrian Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $45,717 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $933,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $933,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $746,400 $0 $186,600 $0 $933,000 Construction Engineering: $59,525 N/A Other Contingencies: $65,963 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $63,911 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $746,400 $0 $186,600 $0 $933,000 Total Project Cost: $1,168,116 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-544 CS C Other BxCo 5105.0 $7,323,351 Limits From: On Galm Road, from FM 471 (Culebra Road) Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: Government Canyon State Park Proj 5/20 - move 20 to 21; 4/19 - move 19 to FY Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lanes, including drainage improvements, bike & pedestrian amenities Hist: 20; 10/18 - rev TPC; 4/18 - move 18 to FY 19; 1/16 - rev funding; 4/14 - funded through Remarks: None STP-MM project selection process

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $1,181,757 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $7,323,351 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $7,323,351 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $2,578,681 $0 $644,670 $0 $3,223,351 Construction Engineering: $363,238 N/A 12S - STP-MM Rec Contingencies: $145,735 $3,280,000 $0 $820,000 $0 $4,100,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $353,718 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $273,893 CMP Score Totals $5,858,681 $0 $1,464,670 $0 $7,323,351 Total Project Cost: $9,641,692 44

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-562 CR C Other BxCo 5106.0 $4,886,116 Limits From: On Watson Road from FM 2790-Somerset Road Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: 0.62 Mi East of Somerset Road Proj 5/20 - move 20 to 21; 9/19 - ADM clarify Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with traffic circle at Southwest Verano Parkway, multi-use path and drainage Hist: limits and description; 1/19 - move 19 to 20; 10/18 - rev TPC; 4/14 - funded through STP- Remarks: None MM project selection process

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $739,184 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $1,440,000 Funding Local $4,886,116 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $4,886,116 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $3,908,893 $0 $977,223 $0 $4,886,116 Construction Engineering: $195,445 N/A Other Contingencies: $342,028 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $97,722 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $195,445 CMP Score Totals $3,908,893 $0 $977,223 $0 $4,886,116 Total Project Cost: $7,895,940 26

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 40 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2021 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-579 VA C San Antonio CoSA 5305.0 $2,000,000 Limits From: In City of San Antonio Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: . Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2021; 1/19 - Description: Construct citywide pedestrian and bicycle improvements Hist: move from FY 19 to FY 20; 10/17 - reduce project cost by $1M to fund 0915-12-603; Remarks: None 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Bicycle/Pedestrian Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $98,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $2,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $2,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $1,600,000 $0 $400,000 $0 $2,000,000 Construction Engineering: $99,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $115,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $75,000 CMP Score Totals $1,600,000 $0 $400,000 $0 $2,000,000 Total Project Cost: $2,427,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-580 VA C San Antonio CoSA 5306.0 $1,500,000 Limits From: In City of San Antonio Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: . Proj 5/20 - move 20 to 21; 10/19 - move 19 to FY Description: Intelligent Transportation System - Enhancements to include controller hardware and software and CCTV Hist: 20; 9/19 - ADM clarify description; 10/17 - cameras reduce cost from $4M to $1.5M and move 20 Remarks: None to 19; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-581 CR C Other BxCo 5304.0 $20,917,924 Limits From: In Bexar County, on Talley Road Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: From Wiseman Blvd to Tamaron Pass Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2021; 4/18 Description: Expand from 2 lane to 4 lane divided roadway with medians, curbs, bicycle facilities, pedestrian Hist: and 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project improvements, operational improvements and drainage selection processes Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $1,025,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $20,917,924 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $20,917,924 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $15,534,339 $0 $3,883,585 $0 $19,417,924 Construction Engineering: $1,255,000 N/A 3 - LC Contingencies: $1,464,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $1,046,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $837,000 CMP Score Totals $15,534,339 $0 $3,883,585 $1,500,000 $20,917,924 Total Project Cost: $26,544,924 40

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 41 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2021 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-582 CS C Converse Converse 5319.0 $5,430,481 Limits From: On Rocket/Schaeffer, from E. Norris Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: Lp 1604 Proj 4/18 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2021; 4/16 - Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lane roadway with continuous center turn lane, sidewalks and bike lane/multi-use path Hist: funded through STP-MM project selection process Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $266,094 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $5,430,481 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $5,430,481 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $4,344,385 $0 $1,086,096 $0 $5,430,481 Construction Engineering: $269,352 N/A Other Contingencies: $108,067 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $311,710 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $203,100 CMP Score Totals $4,344,385 $0 $1,086,096 $0 $5,430,481 Total Project Cost: $6,588,804 40

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-585 CR C Other ARMA 5317.0 $14,661,235 Limits From: In Bexar County, on Blanco Rd Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: From West Oak Estates to Borgfeld Proj 5/20 - move 20 to 21; 10/19 - move 19 to 20; Description: Expand from a 2 to 4 lane divided roadway with raised median, bike lanes, sidewalks, curbs and drainage Hist: 4/17 - rev funding; 1/17 - TIP: add project; MTP: move 23 to FY 19; 4/16 - funded Remarks: None through STP-MM project selection process

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $718,401 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $14,661,235 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $14,661,235 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $11,728,988 $0 $2,932,247 $0 $14,661,235 Construction Engineering: $727,197 N/A Other Contingencies: $291,759 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $841,555 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $548,330 CMP Score Totals $11,728,988 $0 $2,932,247 $0 $14,661,235 Total Project Cost: $17,788,477 30

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-596 CS C San Antonio CoSA 4974.0 $5,000,000 Limits From: In San Antonio, on Zarzamora Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: From Fredericksburg Rd to Loop 13 Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2021; 6/17 - Description: Construct sidewalks, remove unused utility poles, and implement pedestian detection ITS Hist: add TA project

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Pedestrian Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $245,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $5,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $5,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 9 - TA $3,600,000 $0 $900,000 $0 $4,500,000 Construction Engineering: $319,000 N/A 3 - LC Contingencies: $64,500 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $241,500 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $289,000 CMP Score Totals $3,600,000 $0 $900,000 $500,000 $5,000,000 Total Project Cost: $6,159,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 42 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2021 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-604 CS C San Antonio CoSA 5434.0 $10,000,000 Limits From: in San Antonio on Presa Street Last Revision Date: 7/2018 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: from W. Boyer to SE Military Drive (Lp 13) Proj 9/19 - ADM clarify description; 4/18 - move Description: Bike and Pedestrian Corridor enhancements to implement Complete Streets Hist: from FY 2019 to FY 2021; 10/17 - add project per CoSA, funding is from 0025-02- Remarks: 2 travel lanes throughout the corridor 204; 4/16 - revise match (EDCP project); 4/14 - funded through STP-MM project

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Bicycle/Pedestrian Status: Non-RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $490,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $10,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $10,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $7,200,000 $0 $1,800,000 $0 $9,000,000 Construction Engineering: $600,000 N/A 3 - LC Contingencies: $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $500,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $600,000 CMP Score Totals $7,200,000 $0 $1,800,000 $1,000,000 $10,000,000 Total Project Cost: $12,490,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-609 CS C San Antonio CoSA 5545.1 $1,000,000 Limits From: In San Antonio Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: . Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2021; Description: Multimodal planning study on one arterial to accommodate travel modes including higher capacity transit Hist: 10/19 - move from FY 2019 to FY 2020; 4/18 - funded through the 19-22 STP-MM Remarks: None Call for Projects

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Planning Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $1,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $1,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $800,000 $0 $200,000 $0 $1,000,000 Construction Engineering: $0 N/A Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $800,000 $0 $200,000 $0 $1,000,000 Total Project Cost: $1,000,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-610 CS C San Antonio CoSA 5536.1 $1,000,000 Limits From: In San Antonio Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Along San Pedro Avenue Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2021; 4/19 - Description: Construct sidewalks and pedestrian infrastructure Hist: move from FY 2019 to FY 2020; 4/18 - funded through the 19-22 STP-MM Call for Remarks: None Projects

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Pedestrian Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $49,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $1,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $1,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $800,000 $0 $200,000 $0 $1,000,000 Construction Engineering: $60,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $50,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $40,000 CMP Score Totals $800,000 $0 $200,000 $0 $1,000,000 Total Project Cost: $1,269,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 43 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2021 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-611 VA C San Antonio CoSA 5545.2 $3,000,000 Limits From: In San Antonio Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: at various locations Proj 4/18 - funded through the 19-22 STP-MM Description: Multimodal planning study on three arterials to accommodate travel modes including higher capacity transit Hist: Call for Projects

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Planning Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $3,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $3,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $2,400,000 $0 $600,000 $0 $3,000,000 Construction Engineering: $0 N/A Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $2,400,000 $0 $600,000 $0 $3,000,000 Total Project Cost: $3,000,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-664 VA C Other TxDOT 5570.0 $5,400,000 Limits From: Various locations on Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: IH 35 S and IH 37 S Proj 6/19 - added through CMAQ project call Description: Install ITS equipment on IH 35 South and IH 37 South Corridors Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: ITS Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $264,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $5,400,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $5,400,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 5 - CMAQ $4,860,000 $540,000 $0 $0 $5,400,000 Construction Engineering: $270,000 91.029 Other Contingencies: $540,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $216,000 16.777 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $162,000 CMP Score Totals $4,860,000 $540,000 $0 $0 $5,400,000 Total Project Cost: $6,852,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-665 VA C Other TxDOT 5578.0 $75,000 Limits From: In Bexar County Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: . Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2021; 6/19 - Description: Traffic Incident Management Training Program Hist: added through CMAQ project call

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Training Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $75,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $75,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 5 - CMAQ $60,000 $15,000 $0 $0 $75,000 Construction Engineering: $0 4.365 Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 0.507 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $60,000 $15,000 $0 $0 $75,000 Total Project Cost: $75,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 44 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2021 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-667 VA C San Antonio CoSA 5573.1 $1,500,000 Limits From: Various locations within Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: the City of San Antonio Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2021; 6/19 - Description: Traffic signal optimization on congested corridors in the City of San Antonio. Data collection and Hist: added through CMAQ project call implementation of updated signal timing plans. FY 2020 Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Traffic Signals Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $1,500,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $1,500,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 5 - CMAQ $1,200,000 $0 $300,000 $0 $1,500,000 Construction Engineering: $0 31.360 Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 8.557 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $1,200,000 $0 $300,000 $0 $1,500,000 Total Project Cost: $1,500,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-668 VA C San Antonio CoSA 5574.1 $1,000,000 Limits From: Various locations within Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: the City of San Antonio Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2021; 6/19 - Description: Install ITS equipment on congested corridors in the City of San Antonio - FY 2020 Hist: added through CMAQ project call

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: ITS Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $49,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $1,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $1,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 5 - CMAQ $800,000 $0 $200,000 $0 $1,000,000 Construction Engineering: $50,000 13.272 Other Contingencies: $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $30,000 15.587 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $30,000 CMP Score Totals $800,000 $0 $200,000 $0 $1,000,000 Total Project Cost: $1,259,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-669 VA C San Antonio CoSA 5575.1 $250,000 Limits From: In the City of San Antonio Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: . Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2021; 6/19 - Description: City of San Antonio Travel Demand Management Program. To support efforts in vanpool, carpool, Hist: added through CMAQ project call telecommuting and education. FY 2020 Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: TDM Program Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $250,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $250,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 5 - CMAQ $200,000 $0 $50,000 $0 $250,000 Construction Engineering: $0 10.140 Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 4.947 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $200,000 $0 $50,000 $0 $250,000 Total Project Cost: $250,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 45 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2021 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-670 VA C San Antonio CoSA 5576.1 $150,000 Limits From: In the City of San Antonio Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: . Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2021; 6/19 - Description: City of San Antonio Vehicle Emissions Reductions Program. Series of targeted outreach and education Hist: added through CMAQ project call programs. Gas cap replacement program. FY 2020 Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: TDM Program Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $150,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $150,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 5 - CMAQ $120,000 $0 $30,000 $0 $150,000 Construction Engineering: $0 0.152 Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 499.810 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $120,000 $0 $30,000 $0 $150,000 Total Project Cost: $150,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-671 VA C Other UTSA 5577.1 $129,225 Limits From: University of Texas at San Antonio Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: . Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2021; 6/19 - Description: Make UTSA Walkable Program. Support UTSA's efforts to establish programs to increase alternate forms of Hist: added through CMAQ project call transportation. FY 2020 Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: TDM Program Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $129,225 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $129,225 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 5 - CMAQ $90,433 $0 $22,608 $0 $113,041 Construction Engineering: $0 0.922 3 - LC (UTSA) Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,184 $16,184 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 0.628 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $90,433 $0 $22,608 $16,184 $129,225 Total Project Cost: $129,225 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-674 VA C San Antonio CoSA 5574.2 $1,000,000 Limits From: Various locations within Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: the City of San Antonio Proj 6/19 - added through CMAQ project call Description: Install ITS equipment on congested corridors in the City of San Antonio - FY 2021 Hist:

Remarks: None

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 46 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2021 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-675 VA C San Antonio CoSA 5573.2 $1,500,000 Limits From: Various locations within Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: the City of San Antonio Proj 6/19 - added through CMAQ project call Description: Traffic signal optimization on congested corridors in the City of San Antonio. Data collection and Hist: implementation of updated signal timing plans. FY 2021 Remarks: None

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-676 VA C San Antonio CoSA 5575.2 $250,000 Limits From: In the City of San Antonio Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: . Proj 6/19 - added through CMAQ project call Description: City of San Antonio Travel Demand Management Program. To support efforts in vanpool, carpool, Hist: telecommuting and education. FY 2021 Remarks: None

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-677 VA C San Antonio CoSA 5576.2 $150,000 Limits From: In the City of San Antonio Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: . Proj 6/19 - added through CMAQ project call Description: City of San Antonio Vehicle Emissions Reductions Program. Series of targeted outreach and education Hist: programs. Gas cap replacement program. FY 2021 Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: TDM Program Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $150,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $150,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 5 - CMAQ $120,000 $0 $30,000 $0 $150,000 Construction Engineering: $0 0.152 Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 499.810 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $120,000 $0 $30,000 $0 $150,000 Total Project Cost: $150,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 47 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2021 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-678 VA C Other UTSA 5577.2 $129,225 Limits From: University of Texas at San Antonio Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: . Proj 6/19 - added through CMAQ project call Description: Make UTSA Walkable Program. Support UTSA's efforts to establish programs to increase alternate forms of Hist: transportation. FY 2021 Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: TDM Program Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $129,225 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $129,225 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 5 - CMAQ $90,434 $0 $22,608 $0 $113,042 Construction Engineering: $0 0.922 3 - LC (UTSA) Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,183 $16,183 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 0.628 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $90,434 $0 $22,608 $16,183 $129,225 Total Project Cost: $129,225 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-679 VA T Other VIA 5580.2 $7,553,334 Limits From: In VIA service area Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: . Proj 6/19 - added through CMAQ project call Description: VIA Fleet Replacement Program. Purchase 14 CNG buses. FY 2021 Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Transit Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $7,553,334 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $7,553,334 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 5 - CMAQ $5,493,334 $0 $1,373,333 $0 $6,866,667 Construction Engineering: $0 36.092 3 - LC Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $686,667 $686,667 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 3.761 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $5,493,334 $0 $1,373,333 $686,667 $7,553,334 Total Project Cost: $7,553,334 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-680 VA T Other VIA 5581.2 $2,181,429 Limits From: In VIA service area Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: . Proj 6/19 - added through CMAQ project call Description: VIA Bus Frequency Program. Increase service on #7 and #552 routes. FY 2021 Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Transit Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $2,181,429 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $2,181,429 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 5 - CMAQ $1,191,810 $0 $297,952 $0 $1,489,762 Construction Engineering: $0 4.156 3 - LC Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $691,667 $691,667 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 3.709 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $1,191,810 $0 $297,952 $691,667 $2,181,429 Total Project Cost: $2,181,429 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 48 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2021 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Guadalupe 0915-46-045 CS C Seguin Seguin 5322.0 $6,316,658 Limits From: In Seguin, on Rudeloff Rd. Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: From SH 46 to Huber Rd. Proj 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with center turn lane, bicycle and pedestian facilities Hist: selection process

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $309,516 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $6,316,658 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $6,316,658 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $5,053,326 $0 $1,263,332 $0 $6,316,658 Construction Engineering: $313,306 N/A Other Contingencies: $125,701 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $263,576 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $236,243 CMP Score Totals $5,053,326 $0 $1,263,332 $0 $6,316,658 Total Project Cost: $7,565,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Guadalupe 0915-46-046 VA C Seguin Seguin 4976.0 $2,801,246 Limits From: in Seguin from Vaughan Bridge Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: to Max Starcke Park East Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2021; 1/19 - Description: Extend Walnut Springs multi use trail, including retaining walls, hand and guard rails and below grade Hist: move from FY 2019 to FY 2020; 6/17 - add crossing TA project Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Bicycle/Pedestrian Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $137,300 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $2,801,246 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $2,801,246 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 9 - TA $2,218,587 $0 $554,647 $0 $2,773,234 Construction Engineering: $178,700 N/A 3 - LC Contingencies: $36,100 $0 $0 $0 $28,012 $28,012 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $135,300 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $162,000 CMP Score Totals $2,218,587 $0 $554,647 $28,012 $2,801,246 Total Project Cost: $3,450,646 N/A

15 - San Antonio Guadalupe 0915-46-050 CS C Schertz Schertz 4975.0 $1,158,266 Limits From: in Schertz on Woodland Oaks Dr, Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Savannah Dr & Live Oak Rd Proj 5/20 - move 20 to 21; 4/19 - move 19 to 20; Description: Construct sidewalks, bike lanes and off-road trail Hist: 10/18 - adm rev CSJ from 0915-17-065 to 0915-46-050; 4/18 - move 18 to FY 19; Remarks: None 6/17 - add TA project

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Bicycle/Pedestrian Status: Non-RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $56,800 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $1,158,266 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $1,158,266 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 9 - TA $926,613 $0 $231,653 $0 $1,158,266 Construction Engineering: $73,900 N/A Other Contingencies: $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $56,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $67,000 CMP Score Totals $926,613 $0 $231,653 $0 $1,158,266 Total Project Cost: $1,426,966 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 49 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2021 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Comal 1268-01-013 FM 1103 C Other TxDOT 4970.0 $2,000,000 Limits From: IH 35 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: Guadalupe C/L Proj 5/20 - move 20 to 21; 10/19 - rev Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with medians, turn lanes, sidewalk and bike lanes Hist: cost/funding; 9/19 - ADM clarify description; 4/17 - move 19 to 20; 1/17 - move 18 to 19; Remarks: None 10/15 - add project

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $200,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $870,000 Funding Local $2,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $2,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 1 - Prvnt Mnt/Rehab $560,000 $140,000 $0 $0 $700,000 Construction Engineering: $89,000 N/A 11 - Distr Discr Contingencies: $455,000 $640,000 $160,000 $0 $0 $800,000 VOC lbs/day 3 - LC $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000 Indirect Costs: $44,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $89,000 CMP Score Totals $1,200,000 $300,000 $0 $500,000 $2,000,000 Total Project Cost: $3,747,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Guadalupe 1268-02-027 FM 1103 C Other TxDOT 4971.0 $37,500,000 Limits From: Comal C/L Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: Rodeo Way Proj 5/20 - move 20 to 21; 10/19 - rev Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with medians, turn lanes, sidewalk and bike lanes Hist: cost/funding; 9/19 - ADM clarify description; 4/17 - move 19 to 20 and rev funding; 1/17 - Remarks: None move 18 to19 and rev funding; 10/15 - add project

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $3,750,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $3,285,000 Funding Local $37,500,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $37,500,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 1 - Prvnt Mnt/Rehab $14,489,482 $3,622,370 $0 $0 $18,111,852 Construction Engineering: $1,666,000 N/A 11 - Distr Discr Contingencies: $2,915,000 $9,538,000 $2,384,500 $0 $0 $11,922,500 VOC lbs/day 3 - LC $0 $0 $0 $7,465,648 $7,465,648 Indirect Costs: $833,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $1,666,000 CMP Score Totals $24,027,482 $6,006,870 $0 $7,465,648 $37,500,000 Total Project Cost: $51,615,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 1433-01-028 FM 2252 E San Antonio TxDOT 5329.2 $50,000 Limits From: Evans Road Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Comal/Bexar County Line Proj 10/18 - add phase (Engr) Description: Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes with raised median or continuous left turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalk Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $50,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $50,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $500,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day SWPE $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $50,000 Construction Engineering: $32,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $7,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $29,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $29,000 CMP Score Totals $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $50,000 Total Project Cost: $647,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 50 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2021 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 1477-01-043 FM 1516 E,R Other TxDOT 5379.2 $11,905,500 Limits From: FM 78 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: IH 10 Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2021; Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lane divided with bike lanes and sidewalks Hist: 10/18 - add phases (Engr, ROW)

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $1,151,500 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $10,754,000 Funding Local $11,905,500 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $23,500,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day SWPE $0 $1,151,500 $0 $0 $1,151,500 Construction Engineering: $940,000 N/A SWROW Contingencies: $1,645,000 $8,603,200 $2,150,800 $0 $0 $10,754,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $470,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $940,000 CMP Score Totals $8,603,200 $3,302,300 $0 $0 $11,905,500 Total Project Cost: $39,400,500 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 2230-01-020 FM 1560 E,R Other TxDOT 5311.2 $13,467,333 Limits From: FM 471 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Galm/Shaenfield Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2021; Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with raised median, or center turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks Hist: 10/18 - add phases E & R

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $1,210,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $12,257,333 Funding Local $13,467,333 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $12,100,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day SWPE $0 $1,210,000 $0 $0 $1,210,000 Construction Engineering: $600,160 N/A SWROW Contingencies: $240,790 $9,805,866 $2,451,467 $0 $0 $12,257,333 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $694,540 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $452,540 CMP Score Totals $9,805,866 $3,661,467 $0 $0 $13,467,333 Total Project Cost: $27,555,363 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 2452-01-066 SL 1604 E,R Other TxDOT 9110.4 $8,800,000 Limits From: Macdona-Lacoste Rd Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: US 90 W Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2019 to FY 2021; Description: Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lane divided Hist: 10/18 - add phases (Engr, ROW)

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $4,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $4,800,000 Funding Local $8,800,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $40,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day SWPE $0 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $4,000,000 Construction Engineering: $2,552,000 N/A SWROW Contingencies: $516,000 $3,840,000 $960,000 $0 $0 $4,800,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $2,296,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $2,312,000 CMP Score Totals $3,840,000 $4,960,000 $0 $0 $8,800,000 Total Project Cost: $56,476,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 51 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2021 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 2452-02-083 SL 1604 C San Antonio TxDOT 3913.0 $185,500,000 Limits From: SH 16 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: IH 10 Proj 10/19 - move 19 to 21 and rev cost, limits Description: Expand from 4 to 10 lane expressway - including 2 HOV-special use lanes, & from 4 to 4 FR lanes Hist: and descr; see #4049 and #5556; 1/19 - rev descr to incl FR lanes; 10/18 - 20 to 21, rev Remarks: Reference #4049 and #5556 descr & fund, move to TxDOT; 4/17 - rev limits, descr, cost (has $398.3M in Cat 2: '17-

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $18,500,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $185,500,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $185,500,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 2 - Metro Corridor $148,400,000 $37,100,000 $0 $0 $185,500,000 Construction Engineering: $8,200,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $14,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $4,100,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $8,200,000 CMP Score Totals $148,400,000 $37,100,000 $0 $0 $185,500,000 Total Project Cost: $238,900,000 42

15 - San Antonio Bexar 2452-02-117 SL 1604 C San Antonio TxDOT 5332.0 $40,600,000 Limits From: at FM 2696 - Blanco Road Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: . Proj 11/19 - ADM* clarify description; 10/19 - rev Description: Intersection operational improvements including construction of a diverging diamond interchange (DDI) Hist: cost; 10/18 - move 22 to 21; 3/18 - incr cost from $30M; 10/17 - move 20 to 22; 4/17 - Remarks: None TIP: add project; MTP - move 27 to 20; 4/16 - funded in 17-20 TIP Call for Projects

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $4,100,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $40,600,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $40,600,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 2 - Metro Corridor $32,480,000 $8,120,000 $0 $0 $40,600,000 Construction Engineering: $1,800,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $3,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $900,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $1,800,000 CMP Score Totals $32,480,000 $8,120,000 $0 $0 $40,600,000 Total Project Cost: $52,300,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 2452-02-128 SL 1604 C San Antonio TxDOT 4049.0 $187,800,000 Limits From: IH 10 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: US 281 Proj 10/19 - add project; spin off of 2452-02-083 Description: Expand from 4 to 10 lane expressway - including 2 HOV - special use lanes & from 4 to 4 frontage roads Hist: (MPO #3913); no impact to conformity

Remarks: 10/19 - add project; spin off of 2452-02-083 (MPO #3913); no impact to conformity

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $18,800,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $187,800,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $187,800,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 2 - Metro Corridor $150,240,000 $37,560,000 $0 $0 $187,800,000 Construction Engineering: $8,300,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $14,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $4,100,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $8,300,000 CMP Score Totals $150,240,000 $37,560,000 $0 $0 $187,800,000 Total Project Cost: $241,900,000 42

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 52 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2021 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Medina 3544-03-002 SH 211 C Other BxCo 3152.0 $4,400,000 Limits From: Bexar C/L, 2.0 Mi S of FM 471, N Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: FM 471 (Culebra Rd) Proj 5/20 - move 20 to 21; 10/19 - move 19 to 20; Description: Construct two lane rural highway on new location Hist: 4/18 - move 18 to 19; 10/17 - move 17 to 18; 4/15 - move 15 to 16; Pass through financing Remarks: None project to be reimbursed from Cat 12

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $233,193 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $1,100,000 Funding Local $4,400,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $4,400,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 3 - PTF $0 $0 $0 $4,400,000 $4,400,000 Construction Engineering: $214,157 N/A Other Contingencies: $309,338 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $241,283 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $4,400,000 $4,400,000 Total Project Cost: $6,497,971 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 3544-04-002 SH 211 C Other BxCo 3153.0 $7,000,000 Limits From: FM 1957 (Potranco Rd), N 2.9 MI Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: Medina County Line Proj 5/20 - move 20 to 21; 10/19 - move 19 to FY Description: Construct two lane rural highway on new location Hist: 20; 4/18 - move 18 to 19; 10/17 - move 17 to 18; 4/15 - move 15 to 16; Pass through Remarks: None financing project to be reimbursed from Cat 12

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $840,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $1,780,000 Funding Local $7,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $7,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 3 - PTF $0 $0 $0 $7,000,000 $7,000,000 Construction Engineering: $340,704 N/A Other Contingencies: $492,128 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $383,860 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $7,000,000 $7,000,000 Total Project Cost: $10,836,692 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 3544-05-001 SH 211 C Other BxCo 3154.0 $2,600,000 Limits From: Medina Co. Line, 4.5 Mi N of FM 1957, N Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: Medina Co. Line, 2.0 Mi S of FM 471 Proj 5/20 - move 20 to 21; 10/19 - move 19 to 20; Description: Construct two lane rural highway on new location Hist: 10/18 - revise TPC; 4/18 - move 18 to 19;10/17 - move 17 to 18; 4/15 - move 15 to Remarks: None 16; Pass through financing project to be reimbursed from Cat 12

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $137,796 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $700,000 Funding Local $2,600,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $2,600,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 3 - PTF $0 $0 $0 $2,600,000 $2,600,000 Construction Engineering: $126,547 N/A Other Contingencies: $182,790 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $142,577 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $2,600,000 $2,600,000 Total Project Cost: $3,889,710 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 53 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2021 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Medina 3544-06-001 SH 211 C Other BxCo 3155.0 $4,100,000 Limits From: Bexar C/L, 2.9 MI N of FM 1957, N Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: Bexar C/L, 4.5 MI N of FM 1957 Proj 5/20 - move 20 to 21; 10/19 - move 19 to 20; Description: Construct two lane rural highway on new location Hist: 4/18 - move 18 to 19; 10/17 - move 17 to FY 18; 4/15 - move 15 to 16; Pass through Remarks: None financing project to be reimbursed from Cat 12

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $217,293 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $1,000,000 Funding Local $4,100,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $4,100,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 3 - PTF $0 $0 $0 $4,100,000 $4,100,000 Construction Engineering: $199,555 N/A Other Contingencies: $288,246 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $224,832 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $4,100,000 $4,100,000 Total Project Cost: $6,029,926 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 54 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2022 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0465-02-027 FM 1518 R Other TxDOT 5309.2 $8,194,000 Limits From: FM 78 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: IH 10 Proj 5/20 - add R phase to TIP: 4/18 - move from Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with raised median or center turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks Hist: FY 2021 to FY 2023 and combine with STP- MM selected project; 4/16 - funded through Remarks: None STP-MM project selection process

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $2,194,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $8,194,000 Funding Local $8,194,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $44,780,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day SWROW $6,555,200 $1,638,800 $0 $0 $8,194,000 Construction Engineering: $2,687,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $3,135,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $2,239,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $1,791,000 CMP Score Totals $6,555,200 $1,638,800 $0 $0 $8,194,000 Total Project Cost: $65,020,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 2230-01-021 FM 1560 R Other TxDOT 5391.2 $11,800,000 Limits From: Galm/Shaenfield Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: SH 16 Proj 5/20 - add R phase to TIP; 4/18 - funded Description: Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes with turn lanes, bike accommodation and sidewalks Hist: through the 19-22 STP-MM Call for Projects; 4/17 - add project to MTP with Prop 1/Prop Remarks: None 7; portion of project may have already been in the MTP

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $1,900,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $11,800,000 Funding Local $11,800,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $19,750,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day SWROW $9,440,000 $2,360,000 $0 $0 $11,800,000 Construction Engineering: $900,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $400,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $900,000 CMP Score Totals $9,440,000 $2,360,000 $0 $0 $11,800,000 Total Project Cost: $37,150,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0024-08-138 US 90 E San Antonio TxDOT 5381.2 $890,000 Limits From: 0.8 Miles W of IH 410 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: IH 410 Proj 5/20 - add E phase to TIP; 1/19 - rev descr Description: Expand from 4 lane divided to 6 lane expressway and from 4 to 4 FR lanes Hist: to incl FR lanes; 4/18 - correct funding distribution; 4/17 - add project Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non-Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $490,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $1,000,000 Funding Local $890,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $10,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day SWPE $0 $890,000 $0 $0 $890,000 Construction Engineering: $400,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $200,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $400,000 CMP Score Totals $0 $890,000 $0 $0 $890,000 Total Project Cost: $13,190,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 55 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2022 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0024-07-059 US 90 E Other TxDOT 5380.2 $12,408,000 Limits From: SH 211 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: 0.8 Miles W of IH 410 Proj 5/20 - add E phase to TIP; 9/19 - ADM clarify Description: Expand from 4 lane divided to 6 lane expressway and 4 FR lanes (LP 1604 to SH 211) Hist: description; 1/19 - rev descr to incl FR lanes and update cost; 4/18 - correct funding Remarks: None distribution; 4/17 - add project

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non-Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $5,390,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $7,500,000 Funding Local $12,408,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $110,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day SWPE $0 $12,408,000 $0 $0 $12,408,000 Construction Engineering: $7,018,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $5,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $6,314,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $6,358,000 CMP Score Totals $0 $12,408,000 $0 $0 $12,408,000 Total Project Cost: $148,080,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0017-10-168 IH 35 North C,E San Antonio TxDOT 61.2 $638,700,000 Limits From: IH 410 S Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: IH 410 N Proj 5/20 - move 21 to 22; 10/19 - move 25 to 21 Description: Expand from 8 ln to 14 ln expy - add 6 new express lanes incl 2 HOV-special use lns, & from 4/6 to 4/6 FR Hist: & rev cost; 9/19 - ADM clarify descr; 1/19 - lanes & DCs at IH 410 S & IH 410 N rev descr to incl FR lanes; 10/18 - rev descr Remarks: 1 lane DC: NB 35 to WB 410N; 2 lane DC: NB 410S to NB 35; SB 35 to SB 410S; EB 410N to SB 35 & cost; 4/18 - move 20 to 25 (out of TIP); 10/13 - rev descr; 4/13 - rev limits and descr

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $50,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $638,700,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $538,700,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 12 - Strat Priority $295,200,000 $73,800,000 $0 $0 $369,000,000 Construction Engineering: $50,000,000 N/A 12 - CL Contingencies: $0 $106,400,000 $26,600,000 $0 $0 $133,000,000 VOC lbs/day 6 - Structures $33,030,000 $3,670,000 $0 $0 $36,700,000 Indirect Costs: $32,000,000 N/A 3 - DB $80,000,000 $20,000,000 $0 $0 $100,000,000 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $514,630,000 $124,070,000 $0 $0 $638,700,000 Total Project Cost: $670,700,000 58

15 - San Antonio Guadalupe 0025-03-097 IH 10 C Other TxDOT 5395.0 $150,000,000 Limits From: Bexar/Guadalupe County Line Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: FM 465 Proj 5/20 - move 21 to 22; 10/19 - move 28 to 21, Description: Expand from 4 lane to 6 lane expressway and from 4 to 4 FR lanes Hist: rev funding & limits; 1/19 - rev descr to incl FR lanes & update cost; 10/18 - move 29 to Remarks: Move from MTP to TIP; no impact to conformity; see companion project #4008 28; 6/18 - correct fund distrib; 4/17 - add proj to MTP with P1/P7; portion of project may

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $15,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $150,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $150,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 12 - Strat Priority $120,000,000 $30,000,000 $0 $0 $150,000,000 Construction Engineering: $6,700,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $11,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $3,300,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $6,700,000 CMP Score Totals $120,000,000 $30,000,000 $0 $0 $150,000,000 Total Project Cost: $193,300,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 56 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2022 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0072-08-144 IH 10 C San Antonio TxDOT 5556.0 $279,400,000 Limits From: at Loop 1604 North Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: - Proj 10/19 - move from FY 2026 to FY 2022, Description: Construct Direct Connectors - 1 lane DC - NB 10 to EB 1604; EB 1604 to NB 10; SB 10 to WB 1604; WB Hist: revise funding, revise CSJ from 2452-02- 1604 to SB 10; 127; 9/19 - ADM clarify description; 1/19 - Remarks: 2 lane - NB 10 to WB 1604; EB 1604 to SB 10; SB 10 to EB 1604 & WB 1604 to NB 10 update cost; 10/18 - add project

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Interchange Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $27,900,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $279,400,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $279,400,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 2 - Metro Corridor $196,320,000 $49,080,000 $0 $0 $245,400,000 Construction Engineering: $12,400,000 N/A 4 - Connectivity Contingencies: $21,700,000 $13,600,000 $3,400,000 $0 $0 $17,000,000 VOC lbs/day 12 - CL $13,600,000 $3,400,000 $0 $0 $17,000,000 Indirect Costs: $6,200,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $12,400,000 CMP Score Totals $223,520,000 $55,880,000 $0 $0 $279,400,000 Total Project Cost: $360,000,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Comal 0215-01-044 SH 46 C Other TxDOT 9114.2 $14,000,000 Limits From: US 281 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: Bentwood Dr Proj 3/18 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2022 and Description: Expand from 2 lanes to 6 lanes with raised median or CLTL Hist: revise funding distribution; 4/17 - revise limits and funding; added w/ 12/8/14 Remarks: None adoption of the MTP

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $686,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $14,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $14,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 4 - Connectivity $11,200,000 $2,800,000 $0 $0 $14,000,000 Construction Engineering: $560,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $980,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $280,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $560,000 CMP Score Totals $11,200,000 $2,800,000 $0 $0 $14,000,000 Total Project Cost: $17,066,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Comal 0215-07-027 SH 46 C Other TxDOT 9114.1 $26,000,000 Limits From: Farhills Dr Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: US 281 Proj 3/18 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2022 and Description: Expand from 2 lanes to 6 lanes with raised median or CLTL Hist: revise funding distribution; 4/17 - revise limits and funding; added w/ 12/8/14 Remarks: None adoption of the MTP

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $1,274,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $26,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $26,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 4 - Connectivity $20,800,000 $5,200,000 $0 $0 $26,000,000 Construction Engineering: $1,040,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $1,820,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $520,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $1,040,000 CMP Score Totals $20,800,000 $5,200,000 $0 $0 $26,000,000 Total Project Cost: $31,694,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 57 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2022 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0291-10-114 SH 16 C Helotes TxDOT 5571.0 $8,600,000 Limits From: 0.3 Mi West of FM 1560/Leslie Rd Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: LP 1604 Proj 11/19 - ADM clarify description; 6/19 - added Description: Operational improvements including implementation of median U-turns and R-cut intersections Hist: through CMAQ project call

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $421,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $8,600,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $8,600,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 5 - CMAQ $6,880,000 $1,720,000 $0 $0 $8,600,000 Construction Engineering: $430,000 10.097 Other Contingencies: $516,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $430,000 6.945 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $258,000 CMP Score Totals $6,880,000 $1,720,000 $0 $0 $8,600,000 Total Project Cost: $10,655,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Guadalupe 0535-01-074 IH 10 C Other TxDOT 5385.0 $200,000,000 Limits From: FM 464 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: SH 123 Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2021 to FY 2022 and Description: Expand from 4 lane to 6 lane expressway and from 4 to 4 FR lanes Hist: rev limits; 1/19 - rev descr to incl FR lanes; 10/18 - move from FY 2025 to FY 2021 and Remarks: See also 0535-01-077 and 0535-01-078 as spin offs to original project increase cost; 4/18 - correct funding distribution; 4/17 - add project

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $9,800,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $200,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $200,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 2 - Metro Corridor $45,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $50,000,000 Construction Engineering: $8,000,000 N/A 12 - Strat Priority Contingencies: $14,000,000 $135,000,000 $15,000,000 $0 $0 $150,000,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $4,000,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $8,000,000 CMP Score Totals $180,000,000 $20,000,000 $0 $0 $200,000,000 Total Project Cost: $243,800,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0849-01-055 FM 471 C Other TxDOT 5377.0 $21,000,000 Limits From: Old FM 471 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: Medina County Line Proj 10/18 - revise TPC Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lane divided with bike lanes and sidewalks Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $2,100,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $2,520,000 Funding Local $21,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $21,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 2 - Metro Corridor $8,400,000 $2,100,000 $0 $0 $10,500,000 Construction Engineering: $840,000 N/A 3 - LC Contingencies: $1,470,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,500,000 $10,500,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $420,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $840,000 CMP Score Totals $8,400,000 $2,100,000 $0 $10,500,000 $21,000,000 Total Project Cost: $29,190,000 23

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 58 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2022 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Medina 0849-02-045 FM 471 C Other TxDOT 5378.0 $375,000 Limits From: Medina County Line Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: SH 211 Proj 3/18 - revise funding distribution Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lane divided with bike lanes and sidewalks Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $18,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $375,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $375,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 2 - Metro Corridor $300,000 $75,000 $0 $0 $375,000 Construction Engineering: $15,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $26,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $8,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $15,000 CMP Score Totals $300,000 $75,000 $0 $0 $375,000 Total Project Cost: $457,000 23

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-00-197 NR C Other AAMPO 5303.1 $100,000 Limits From: Alamo Area MPO: Bexar, Comal Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Guadalupe & partial Kendall County Proj 4/18 - change agency and reduce cost; Description: Alamo Area Commute Solutions Pgm - FY 2022 Hist: 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process; project has $53,400 in Remarks: None TDCs which are not calculated in the funding total; fixed amount

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Rideshare Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $100,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $100,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $80,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $100,000 Construction Engineering: $0 N/A Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $80,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $100,000 Total Project Cost: $100,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-00-227 VA C Other TxDOT 5579.0 $5,500,000 Limits From: Various locations within Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Bexar, Comal and Kendall counties Proj 6/19 - added through CMAQ project call Description: Safety service patrol on controlled access highways in Bexar, Comal and Kendall Counties Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Safety Service Patrol Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $5,500,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $5,500,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 5 - CMAQ $3,960,000 $990,000 $0 $0 $4,950,000 Construction Engineering: $0 4.365 3 - LC Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $550,000 $550,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 0.507 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $3,960,000 $990,000 $0 $550,000 $5,500,000 Total Project Cost: $5,500,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 59 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2022 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-576 VA C Other TxDOT 5316.3 $7,073,444 Limits From: Various locations in Bexar County Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: on state system Proj 10/18 - move from FY 2019 to FY 2022 and Description: Construct curb ramps, sidewalks and other pedestrian related infrastructure Hist: reduce cost; 4/18 - move from FY 2022 to FY 2019; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM Remarks: None project selection process

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Pedestrian Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $346,600 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $7,073,444 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $7,073,444 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $5,018,755 $1,254,689 $0 $0 $6,273,444 Construction Engineering: $451,000 N/A 3 - LC Contingencies: $91,000 $0 $0 $0 $800,000 $800,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $406,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $409,000 CMP Score Totals $5,018,755 $1,254,689 $0 $800,000 $7,073,444 Total Project Cost: $8,777,044 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-584 CS C Other BxCo 5318.0 $7,791,571 Limits From: In Bexar County, on Crestway Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: From Kitty Hawk Rd to FM 1976 Proj 4/19 - revise description; 4/16 - funded Description: Reconstruct to provide operational improvements including bike lanes and sidewalks Hist: through STP-MM project selection process

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Bicycle/Pedestrian Status: Non-RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $381,787 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $7,791,571 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $7,791,571 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $6,233,257 $0 $1,558,314 $0 $7,791,571 Construction Engineering: $386,462 N/A Other Contingencies: $155,052 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $447,236 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $291,405 CMP Score Totals $6,233,257 $0 $1,558,314 $0 $7,791,571 Total Project Cost: $9,453,513 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-666 VA C San Antonio CoSA 5572.0 $6,000,000 Limits From: Various locations in San Antonio Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: on Hamilton Wolfe and Ewing Halsell Proj 6/19 - added through CMAQ project call Description: Construct cycle track on Hamilton Wolff Rd from Babcock to Ewing Halsell. And on Ewing Halsell from Hist: Hamilton Wolff to Sid Katz Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Bicycle Status: Non-RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $294,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $6,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $6,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 5 - CMAQ $4,800,000 $0 $1,200,000 $0 $6,000,000 Construction Engineering: $180,000 0.132 Other Contingencies: $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $240,000 0.090 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $180,000 CMP Score Totals $4,800,000 $0 $1,200,000 $0 $6,000,000 Total Project Cost: $7,194,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 60 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2022 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-681 VA C San Antonio CoSA 5573.3 $1,500,000 Limits From: Various locations within Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: the City of San Antonio Proj 6/19 - added through CMAQ project call Description: Traffic signal optimization on congested corridors in the City of San Antonio. Data collection and Hist: implementation of updated signal timing plans. FY 2022 Remarks: None

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-682 VA C San Antonio CoSA 5575.3 $250,000 Limits From: In the City of San Antonio Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: . Proj 6/19 - added through CMAQ project call Description: City of San Antonio Travel Demand Management Program. To support efforts in vanpool, carpool, Hist: telecommuting and education. FY 2022 Remarks: None

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-683 VA C San Antonio CoSA 5576.3 $150,000 Limits From: In the City of San Antonio Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: . Proj 6/19 - added through CMAQ project call Description: City of San Antonio Vehicle Emissions Reductions Program. Series of targeted outreach and education Hist: programs. Gas cap replacement program. FY 2022 Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: TDM Program Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $150,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $150,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 5 - CMAQ $120,000 $0 $30,000 $0 $150,000 Construction Engineering: $0 0.152 Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 499.810 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $120,000 $0 $30,000 $0 $150,000 Total Project Cost: $150,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 61 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2022 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-684 VA C Other UTSA 5577.3 $129,225 Limits From: University of Texas at San Antonio Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: . Proj 6/19 - added through CMAQ project call Description: Make UTSA Walkable Program. Support UTSA's efforts to establish programs to increase alternate forms of Hist: transportation. FY 2022 Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: TDM Program Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $129,225 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $129,225 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 5 - CMAQ $90,434 $0 $22,608 $0 $113,042 Construction Engineering: $0 0.922 3 - LC (UTSA) Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,183 $16,183 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 0.628 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $90,434 $0 $22,608 $16,183 $129,225 Total Project Cost: $129,225 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-685 VA T Other VIA 5580.3 $7,553,332 Limits From: In VIA service area Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: . Proj 6/19 - added through CMAQ project call Description: VIA Fleet Replacement Program. Purchase 14 CNG buses. FY 2022 Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Transit Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $7,553,332 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $7,553,332 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 5 - CMAQ $5,493,333 $0 $1,373,333 $0 $6,866,666 Construction Engineering: $0 36.092 3 - LC Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $686,666 $686,666 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 3.761 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $5,493,333 $0 $1,373,333 $686,666 $7,553,332 Total Project Cost: $7,553,332 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-686 VA T Other VIA 5581.3 $2,181,427 Limits From: In VIA service area Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: . Proj 6/19 - added through CMAQ project call Description: VIA Bus Frequency Program. Increase service on #7 and #552 routes. FY 2022 Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Transit Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $2,181,427 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $2,181,427 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 5 - CMAQ $1,191,809 $0 $297,952 $0 $1,489,761 Construction Engineering: $0 4.156 3 - LC Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $691,666 $691,666 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 3.709 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $1,191,809 $0 $297,952 $691,666 $2,181,427 Total Project Cost: $2,181,427 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 62 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2022 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 1477-01-043 FM 1516 C Other TxDOT 5379.0 $23,500,000 Limits From: FM 78 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: IH 10 Proj 10/18 - revise TPC; 3/18 - revise funding Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lane divided with bike lanes and sidewalks Hist: distribution; 4/17 - 2017 UTP revisions

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $1,151,500 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $10,754,000 Funding Local $23,500,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $23,500,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 2 - Metro Corridor $9,400,000 $2,350,000 $0 $0 $11,750,000 Construction Engineering: $940,000 N/A 3 - LC Contingencies: $1,645,000 $0 $0 $0 $11,750,000 $11,750,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $470,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $940,000 CMP Score Totals $9,400,000 $2,350,000 $0 $11,750,000 $23,500,000 Total Project Cost: $39,400,500 41

15 - San Antonio Bexar 2230-01-020 FM 1560 C Other TxDOT 5311.0 $12,100,000 Limits From: FM 471 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: Galm/Shaenfield Proj 10/18 - revise TPC; 4/16 - funded through Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with raised median, or center turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks Hist: STP-MM project selection process

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $1,210,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $12,257,333 Funding Local $12,100,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $12,100,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $8,464,000 $2,116,000 $0 $0 $10,580,000 Construction Engineering: $600,160 N/A 3 - LC Contingencies: $240,790 $0 $0 $0 $1,520,000 $1,520,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $694,540 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $452,540 CMP Score Totals $8,464,000 $2,116,000 $0 $1,520,000 $12,100,000 Total Project Cost: $27,555,363 31

15 - San Antonio Bexar 2452-01-066 SL 1604 C Other TxDOT 9110.2 $40,000,000 Limits From: Macdona-Lacoste Rd Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: US 90 W Proj 10/18 - revise cost, TPC and limits; 3/18 - Description: Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes divided Hist: revise funding distribution; 4/17 - revise project; added w/ 12/8/14 adoption of the Remarks: None MTP

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $4,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $4,800,000 Funding Local $40,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $40,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 2 - Metro Corridor $32,000,000 $8,000,000 $0 $0 $40,000,000 Construction Engineering: $2,552,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $516,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $2,296,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $2,312,000 CMP Score Totals $32,000,000 $8,000,000 $0 $0 $40,000,000 Total Project Cost: $56,476,000 47

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 63 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2022 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 2452-03-113 SL 1604 E,R San Antonio TxDOT 3786.2 $9,400,000 Limits From: US 281 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Redland Road Proj 10/19 - move from FY 2021 to FY 2024 and Description: Expand from 4 to 10 lane expressway - including 2 HOV - special use lanes & from 4 to 4 FR lanes Hist: revise funding; 1/19 - rev descr to incl FR lanes; 10/18 - add phases (Engr, ROW) Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $5,800,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $3,600,000 Funding Local $9,400,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $58,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day SWPE $4,640,000 $1,160,000 $0 $0 $5,800,000 Construction Engineering: $2,600,000 N/A SWROW Contingencies: $4,500,000 $2,880,000 $720,000 $0 $0 $3,600,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $1,300,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $2,600,000 CMP Score Totals $7,520,000 $1,880,000 $0 $0 $9,400,000 Total Project Cost: $78,400,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 3508-01-029 SH 151 C San Antonio TxDOT 5382.0 $80,000,000 Limits From: LP 1604 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: IH 410 Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2021 to FY 2022; 9/19 - Description: Expand from 4 lane to 6 lane expressway and from 4/6 to 4/6 FR lanes including WB SH 151 to NB LP 1604 Hist: ADM clarify description; 1/19 - rev descr to 2 lane direct connector incl FR lanes; 10/18 - move from 24 to 21, Remarks: None rev TPC; 4/18 - correct funding distribution; 4/17 - add project

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $8,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $9,600,000 Funding Local $80,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $80,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 4 - Connectivity $72,000,000 $8,000,000 $0 $0 $80,000,000 Construction Engineering: $3,200,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $5,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $1,600,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $3,200,000 CMP Score Totals $72,000,000 $8,000,000 $0 $0 $80,000,000 Total Project Cost: $111,200,000 49

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 64 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2023 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0072-07-075 IH 10 E Other TxDOT 5401.2 $12,900,000 Limits From: Kendall/Bexar County Line Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: FM 3351 Proj 5/20 - rev cost and move 28 to 25 & add E Description: Expand from 4 to 8 lane expressway - 2 new general purpose, 2 new HOV lanes & from 4 to 4 FR lanes Hist: phase to TIP ; 1/19 - rev descr to incl FR lanes; 10/18 - move 29 to 28; 6/18 - correct Remarks: None funding distrib; 4/17 - add project to MTP with P1/P7; portion of project may have

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $12,900,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $12,900,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $129,020,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day SWPE $10,320,000 $2,580,000 $0 $0 $12,900,000 Construction Engineering: $5,700,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $10,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $2,900,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $5,700,000 CMP Score Totals $10,320,000 $2,580,000 $0 $0 $12,900,000 Total Project Cost: $166,220,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 2452-04-017 SL 1604 E Other TxDOT 5554.2 $588,000 Limits From: Martinez Creek Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: FM 1346 - Houston Street Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2023 to FY 2025 & add Description: Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes divided Hist: E phase to TIP; 10/18 - add project, created from 2452-04-016 Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $588,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $588,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $12,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day SWPE $470,400 $117,600 $0 $0 $588,000 Construction Engineering: $766,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $155,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $689,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $694,000 CMP Score Totals $470,400 $117,600 $0 $0 $588,000 Total Project Cost: $14,892,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 2452-03-087 SL 1604 E Other TxDOT 3530.2 $23,000,000 Limits From: Redland Road Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: IH 35 North Proj 5/20 - add E phase to TIP; 9/19 - ADM clarify Description: Expand from 4 to 10 lane expressway - including 2 HOV - special use lanes & from 4 to 4 FR lanes Hist: description; 1/19 - incl FR lanes & update cost; 10/18 - move 27 to 25 & rev descr; Remarks: None 4/17 - move 30 to 27 and rev funding; 4/14 - move18 to 30, rev limits and descr; 8/12 -

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $23,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $23,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $230,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day SWPE $18,400,000 $4,600,000 $0 $0 $23,000,000 Construction Engineering: $10,000,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $17,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $5,100,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $10,200,000 CMP Score Totals $18,400,000 $4,600,000 $0 $0 $23,000,000 Total Project Cost: $296,400,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 65 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2023 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 2452-03-111 SL 1604 E,R Other TxDOT 9107.2 $47,500,000 Limits From: FM 78 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: IH 10 East Proj 5/20 - add E,R phases to TIP; 1/19 - update Description: Expand from 4 lane divided to 4 lane expressway and from 0 to 4 FR lanes Hist: funding; 4/18 - correct funding distribution; 4/17 - add project; removed from 10/15 Prop Remarks: None 1 list due to financial constraint issues

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $30,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $4,200,000 Funding Local $47,500,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $300,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day SBPE $0 $43,300,000 $0 $0 $43,300,000 Construction Engineering: $13,300,000 N/A SWROW Contingencies: $23,300,000 $3,360,000 $840,000 $0 $0 $4,200,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $6,700,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $13,300,000 CMP Score Totals $3,360,000 $44,140,000 $0 $0 $47,500,000 Total Project Cost: $390,800,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0024-07-059 US 90 R Other TxDOT 5380.3 $7,500,000 Limits From: SH 211 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: 0.8 Miles W of IH 410 Proj 5/20 - add R phase to TIP; 9/19 - ADM Description: Expand from 4 lane divided to 6 lane expressway and 4 FR lanes (LP 1604 to SH 211) Hist: clarify description; 1/19 - rev descr to incl FR lanes and update cost; 4/18 - correct funding Remarks: None distribution; 4/17 - add project

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non-Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $5,390,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $7,500,000 Funding Local $7,500,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $110,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day SWROW $6,000,000 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $7,500,000 Construction Engineering: $7,018,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $5,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $6,314,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $6,358,000 CMP Score Totals $6,000,000 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $7,500,000 Total Project Cost: $148,080,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0024-08-138 US 90 R San Antonio TxDOT 5381.3 $1,000,000 Limits From: 0.8 Miles W of IH 410 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: IH 410 Proj 5/20 - add R phase to TIP; 1/19 - rev descr Description: Expand from 4 lane divided to 6 lane expressway and from 4 to 4 FR lanes Hist: to incl FR lanes; 4/18 - correct funding distribution; 4/17 - add project Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non-Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $490,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $1,000,000 Funding Local $1,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $10,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day SWROW $800,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $1,000,000 Construction Engineering: $400,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $200,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $400,000 CMP Score Totals $800,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $1,000,000 Total Project Cost: $13,190,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 66 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2023 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Guadalupe 0215-09-029 FM 725 C New Braunfels TxDOT 5308.0 $10,600,000 Limits From: Zipp Rd Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: County Line Road Proj 4/20 - move from FY 2022 to FY 2023; 9/19 - Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with median, sidewalks and bike lanes Hist: ADM clarify From limit; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $519,400 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $10,600,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $10,600,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $8,480,000 $2,120,000 $0 $0 $10,600,000 Construction Engineering: $525,760 N/A Other Contingencies: $210,940 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $608,440 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $396,440 CMP Score Totals $8,480,000 $2,120,000 $0 $0 $10,600,000 Total Project Cost: $12,860,980 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0465-02-027 FM 1518 C Other TxDOT 5309.0 $44,780,000 Limits From: FM 78 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: IH 10 Proj 4/18 - move from FY 2021 to FY 2023 and Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with raised median or center turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks Hist: combine with STP-MM selected project; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project Remarks: None selection process

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $2,194,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $8,194,000 Funding Local $44,780,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $44,780,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 1 - Prvnt Mnt/Rehab $6,400,000 $1,600,000 $0 $0 $8,000,000 Construction Engineering: $2,687,000 N/A 7 - STBG Contingencies: $3,135,000 $17,424,000 $4,356,000 $0 $0 $21,780,000 VOC lbs/day 3 - LC (Schertz) $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 Indirect Costs: $2,239,000 N/A 3 - LC (BC) $0 $0 $0 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 Other Field: $1,791,000 CMP Score Totals $23,824,000 $5,956,000 $0 $15,000,000 $44,780,000 Total Project Cost: $65,020,000 41

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0521-04-285 IH 410 C San Antonio TxDOT 5376.0 $70,000,000 Limits From: at US 281/San Pedro Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: . Proj 5/20 - move 22 to 23; 11/19 - ADM clarify Description: Operational improvements to include direct connector improvement from US 281 to IH 410 WB ; ramp Hist: description; 10/18 - incr cost; 4/18 - rev proj revisions, frontage road and intersection improvements (STP-MM project selection process); 3/18 - Remarks: None incr cost and rev fund distrib; 4/17 - add project

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $3,430,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $70,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $70,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 2 - Metro Corridor $19,200,000 $4,800,000 $0 $0 $24,000,000 Construction Engineering: $4,466,000 N/A 7 - STBG Contingencies: $903,000 $8,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $10,000,000 VOC lbs/day 4 - Connectivity $28,800,000 $7,200,000 $0 $0 $36,000,000 Indirect Costs: $4,018,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $4,046,000 CMP Score Totals $56,000,000 $14,000,000 $0 $0 $70,000,000 Total Project Cost: $86,863,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 67 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2023 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-00-216 NR C Other AAMPO 5303.2 $100,000 Limits From: Alamo Area MPO: in Bexar, Comal Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Guadalupe & partial Kendall County Proj 4/18 - add project Description: Alamo Area Commute Solutions Pgm - FY 2023 Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Rideshare Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $100,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $100,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $80,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $100,000 Construction Engineering: $0 N/A Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $80,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $100,000 Total Project Cost: $100,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-574 VA C Other TxDOT 5316.1 $4,000,000 Limits From: Various locations in Bexar County Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: on state system Proj 10/18 - move from FY 2021 to FY 2023 Description: Construct curb ramps, sidewalks and other pedestrian related infrastructure Hist: (outside of the TIP); 1/17 - revise description and reduce cost from $5M to $4M and move Remarks: None $1M to 0915-12-586; 3rd Qtr 16 - new project in FY 2017-2020 TIP

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Pedestrian Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $196,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $4,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $4,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $2,800,000 $700,000 $0 $0 $3,500,000 Construction Engineering: $240,000 N/A 3 - LC Contingencies: $280,000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $226,800 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $149,600 CMP Score Totals $2,800,000 $700,000 $0 $500,000 $4,000,000 Total Project Cost: $5,092,400 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-575 VA C Other TxDOT 5316.2 $4,000,000 Limits From: Various locations in Bexar County Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: on state system Proj 4/18 - move from FY 2021 to FY 2023; 4/16 - Description: Construct curb ramps, sidewalks and other pedestrian related infrastructure Hist: funded through STP-MM project selection process Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Pedestrian Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $196,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $4,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $4,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $2,880,000 $720,000 $0 $0 $3,600,000 Construction Engineering: $198,400 N/A 3 - LC Contingencies: $79,600 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 $400,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $229,600 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $149,600 CMP Score Totals $2,880,000 $720,000 $0 $400,000 $4,000,000 Total Project Cost: $4,853,200 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 68 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2023 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-615 VA C San Antonio CoSA 5540.0 $4,500,000 Limits From: In San Antonio Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: at various locations Proj 4/18 - funded through the 19-22 STP-MM Description: Implement communication network improvements Hist: Call for Projects

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: ITS Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $220,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $4,500,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $4,500,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $3,600,000 $0 $900,000 $0 $4,500,000 Construction Engineering: $270,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $315,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $225,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $180,000 CMP Score Totals $3,600,000 $0 $900,000 $0 $4,500,000 Total Project Cost: $5,710,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 1433-01-028 FM 2252 C San Antonio TxDOT 5329.0 $500,000 Limits From: Evans Road Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: Comal/Bexar County Line Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2021 to FY 2023; Description: Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes with raised median or continuous left turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalk Hist: 10/18 - revise funding distribution & TPC; 3/18 - revise funding distribution; 4/17 - Remarks: None move from FY 2027 to FY 2021

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $50,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $500,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $500,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 11 - Distr Discr $400,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $500,000 Construction Engineering: $32,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $7,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $29,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $29,000 CMP Score Totals $400,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $500,000 Total Project Cost: $647,000 43

15 - San Antonio Comal 1433-02-044 FM 2252 C Other TxDOT 9115.0 $21,700,000 Limits From: Bexar/Comal County Line Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: FM 3009 Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2021 to FY 2023; Description: Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes with raised median or continuous left turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalk Hist: 10/18 - revise funding distribution; 3/18 - reverse limits and revise funding distribution; Remarks: None 4/17 - move from FY 2023 to FY 2021; added w/ 12/8/14 adoption of the MTP

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $931,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $21,700,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $21,700,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 2 - Metro Corridor $17,360,000 $4,340,000 $0 $0 $21,700,000 Construction Engineering: $760,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $1,330,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $380,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $760,000 CMP Score Totals $17,360,000 $4,340,000 $0 $0 $21,700,000 Total Project Cost: $25,861,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 69 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2023 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 2230-01-021 FM 1560 C Other TxDOT 5391.0 $19,750,000 Limits From: Galm/Shaenfield Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: SH 16 Proj 4/18 - funded through the 19-22 STP-MM Description: Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes with turn lanes, bike accommodation and sidewalks Hist: Call for Projects; 4/17 - add project to MTP with Prop 1/Prop 7; portion of project may Remarks: None have already been in the MTP

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $1,900,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $11,800,000 Funding Local $19,750,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $19,750,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $11,800,000 $2,950,000 $0 $0 $14,750,000 Construction Engineering: $900,000 N/A 3 - LC Contingencies: $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $400,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $900,000 CMP Score Totals $11,800,000 $2,950,000 $0 $5,000,000 $19,750,000 Total Project Cost: $37,150,000 38

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 70 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2024 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0016-08-041 SL 368 C Alamo Heights TxDOT 5535.0 $14,000,000 Limits From: New Braunfels St. Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: Burr Road Proj 4/18 - funded through the 19-22 STP-MM Description: Roadway rehabilitation and reduce travel lanes from 6 to 4 lanes, bicycle and pedestrian facilities Hist: Call for Projects

Remarks: Road diet project

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Bicycle/Pedestrian Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $686,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $14,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $14,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $8,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $10,000,000 Construction Engineering: $840,000 N/A 1 - Prvnt Mnt/Rehab Contingencies: $980,000 $3,200,000 $800,000 $0 $0 $4,000,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $700,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $560,000 CMP Score Totals $11,200,000 $2,800,000 $0 $0 $14,000,000 Total Project Cost: $17,766,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0024-07-059 US 90 C Other TxDOT 5380.0 $110,000,000 Limits From: SH 211 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: 0.8 Miles W of IH 410 Proj 9/19 - ADM clarify description; 1/19 - rev Description: Expand from 4 lane divided to 6 lane expressway and 4 FR lanes (LP 1604 to SH 211) Hist: descr to incl FR lanes and update cost; 4/18 - correct funding distribution; 4/17 - add Remarks: None project

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $5,390,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $7,500,000 Funding Local $110,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $110,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 2 - Metro Corridor $36,000,000 $9,000,000 $0 $0 $45,000,000 Construction Engineering: $7,018,000 N/A 12 - Strat Pri Contingencies: $5,500,000 $52,000,000 $13,000,000 $0 $0 $65,000,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $6,314,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $6,358,000 CMP Score Totals $88,000,000 $22,000,000 $0 $0 $110,000,000 Total Project Cost: $148,080,000 45

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0024-08-138 US 90 C San Antonio TxDOT 5381.0 $10,000,000 Limits From: 0.8 Miles W of IH 410 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: IH 410 Proj 1/19 - rev descr to incl FR lanes; 4/18 - Description: Expand from 4 lane divided to 6 lane expressway and from 4 to 4 FR lanes Hist: correct funding distribution; 4/17 - add project

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $490,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $1,000,000 Funding Local $10,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $10,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 2 - Metro Corridor $4,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $5,000,000 Construction Engineering: $400,000 N/A 12 - Strat Pri Contingencies: $700,000 $4,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $5,000,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $200,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $400,000 CMP Score Totals $8,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $10,000,000 Total Project Cost: $13,190,000 45

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 71 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2024 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-00-217 NR C Other AAMPO 5303.3 $100,000 Limits From: Alamo Area MPO: in Bexar, Comal Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Guadalupe & partial Kendall County Proj 4/18 - add project Description: Alamo Area Commute Solutions Pgm - FY 2024 Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Rideshare Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $100,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $100,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $80,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $100,000 Construction Engineering: $0 N/A Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $80,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $100,000 Total Project Cost: $100,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-617 CS C San Antonio CoSA 5538.0 $23,000,000 Limits From: In San Antonio, on Zarzamora Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: From US 90 to Jennings Proj 11/19 - ADM clarify description; 6/18 - revise Description: Construct 4 lane grade separation at UPRR/Frio City Rd Hist: funding to include local contribution; 4/18 - funded through the 19-22 STP-MM Call for Remarks: 4 lane underlying roadway remains Projects

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $955,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $23,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $23,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $15,600,000 $0 $3,900,000 $0 $19,500,000 Construction Engineering: $1,170,000 N/A 3 - LC Contingencies: $1,365,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000 $3,500,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $975,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $780,000 CMP Score Totals $15,600,000 $0 $3,900,000 $3,500,000 $23,000,000 Total Project Cost: $28,245,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Guadalupe 0915-46-049 CS C Seguin Seguin 5533.0 $12,000,000 Limits From: In Seguin, on Rudeloff Road Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: From Huber Road to SH 123 (at FM 20) Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2025 to FY 2024; 9/19 - Description: Construct new alignment 4 lane roadway (0 to 4 lanes) with center left turn lane, bicycle and pedestrian Hist: ADM clarify description; 4/18 - funded facilities through the 19-22 STP-MM Call for Projects Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $588,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $12,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $12,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $9,600,000 $0 $2,400,000 $0 $12,000,000 Construction Engineering: $720,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $840,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $600,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $480,000 CMP Score Totals $9,600,000 $0 $2,400,000 $0 $12,000,000 Total Project Cost: $15,228,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 72 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2024 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 2452-03-113 SL 1604 C San Antonio TxDOT 3786.0 $58,000,000 Limits From: US 281 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: Redland Road Proj 10/19 - move from 21 to 24 and rev Description: Expand from 4 to 10 lane expressway - including 2 HOV - special use lanes & from 4 to 4 FR lanes Hist: funding/cost; 1/19 - rev descr to incl FR lns; 10/18 - move 20 to 21, rev descr, TPC & Remarks: None funding, move to TxDOT; 4/17 - rev cost; 4/14 - rev limits, year ('15 to '20), descr and

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $5,800,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $3,600,000 Funding Local $58,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $58,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 3 - LC $0 $0 $0 $58,000,000 $58,000,000 Construction Engineering: $2,600,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $4,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $1,300,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $2,600,000 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $58,000,000 $58,000,000 Total Project Cost: $78,400,000 47

15 - San Antonio Comal 3212-05-013 FM 3351 C Fair Oaks Ranch TxDOT 5541.0 $11,900,000 Limits From: at Cibolo Creek Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: . Proj 4/18 - funded through the 19-22 STP-MM Description: Reconstruct existing bridge and expand from 2 to 6 lanes Hist: Call for Projects

Remarks: Approaches remain 2 lanes

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Bridge Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $583,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $11,900,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $11,900,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $9,520,000 $2,380,000 $0 $0 $11,900,000 Construction Engineering: $714,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $833,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $595,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $476,000 CMP Score Totals $9,520,000 $2,380,000 $0 $0 $11,900,000 Total Project Cost: $15,101,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 73 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2025 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost

15 - San Antonio Guadalupe 0000-00-000 FM 306 Extensi C Other TBD 9123.0 $15,000,000 Limits From: FM 1101 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: FM 758 Proj 5/20 - revise funding source; 9/19 - ADM Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with turn lanes at intersections Hist: clarify description; added w/ 12/8/14 adoption of the MTP Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $735,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $15,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $15,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day LC $0 $0 $0 $15,000,000 $0 Construction Engineering: $600,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $1,050,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $300,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $600,000 CMP Score Totals $0 $0 $0 $15,000,000 $15,000,000 Total Project Cost: $18,285,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Comal 0016-05-111 IH 35 C,E Other TxDOT 4014.0 $225,000,000 Limits From: Guadalupe/Comal County Line Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: FM 1103 Proj 5/20 - rev cost; 1/19 - rev descr to incl FR Description: Expand from 6 ln to 10 ln expy - add 4 new express lanes including 2 HOV-special use lanes & from 4 to 4 Hist: lanes; 10/18 - rev descr and cost; 4/18 - FR lanes move from FY 2020 to FY 2025 (out of TIP); Remarks: Design Build project 10/13 - revise description; 4/13 - add project to MTP (Env document)

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $25,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $225,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $175,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $180,000,000 $45,000,000 $0 $0 $225,000,000 Construction Engineering: $25,000,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $13,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $3,900,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $7,800,000 CMP Score Totals $128,000,000 $32,000,000 $0 $0 $225,000,000 Total Project Cost: $250,300,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Guadalupe 0016-06-115 IH 35 C,E,R Other TxDOT 5555.0 $192,000,000 Limits From: FM 3009 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: Guadalupe Comal County Line Proj 5/20 - revise cost; 1/19 - rev descr to incl FR Description: Expand from 6 ln to 10 lane expy - add 4 new express lanes including 2 HOV-Special Use Lanes & from 4 to Hist: lanes; 10/18 - add project 4 FR lanes Remarks: Design Build project

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $11,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $22,000,000 Funding Local $192,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $148,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $153,600,000 $38,400,000 $0 $0 $192,000,000 Construction Engineering: $11,000,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $11,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $3,300,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $6,600,000 CMP Score Totals $153,600,000 $38,400,000 $0 $0 $192,000,000 Total Project Cost: $213,400,000 47

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 74 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2025 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Guadalupe 0025-03-101 IH 10 C Other TxDOT 4008.0 $210,000,000 Limits From: Santa Clara Road Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: US 90A Proj 5/20 - revise cost, limit and move from FY 28 Description: Expand from 4 lane to 6 lane expressway and from 4 to 4 frontage road lanes Hist: to FY 25; 10/19 - add project; companion project to #5395; no impact to conformity Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $21,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $210,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $210,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $168,000,000 $42,000,000 $0 $0 $210,000,000 Construction Engineering: $9,300,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $16,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $4,700,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $9,300,000 CMP Score Totals $168,000,000 $42,000,000 $0 $0 $210,000,000 Total Project Cost: $270,600,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Guadalupe 0025-03-102 IH 10 C Other TxDOT 5590.0 $84,000,000 Limits From: FM 775 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: US 90A Proj 5/20 - add project Description: Expand from 4 to 6 lane expressway and from 4 to 4 frontage road lanes Hist:

Remarks: Overlap with 0025-03-101

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $8,400,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $84,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $84,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $67,200,000 $16,800,000 $0 $0 $84,000,000 Construction Engineering: $3,700,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $6,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $1,900,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $3,700,000 CMP Score Totals $67,200,000 $16,800,000 $0 $0 $84,000,000 Total Project Cost: $108,200,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Kendall 0072-06-082 IH 10 C Other TxDOT 5400.0 $110,000,000 Limits From: SH 46 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: 0.25 Mi W of Bexar/Kendall County Line Proj 5/20 - move 28 to 25, rev limit and cost; Description: Expand from 4 to 8 lanes expressway - 2 new general purpose, 2 new HOV lanes & from 4 to 4 FR lanes Hist: 1/19 - rev descr to incl FR lanes; 10/18 - move 29 to 28; 6/18 - correct funding Remarks: None distribution; 4/17 - add project to MTP with Prop 1/Prop 7; portion of project may have

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $11,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $110,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $110,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $88,000,000 $22,000,000 $0 $0 $110,000,000 Construction Engineering: $4,900,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $8,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $2,400,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $4,900,000 CMP Score Totals $66,400,000 $16,600,000 $0 $0 $110,000,000 Total Project Cost: $141,700,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 75 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2025 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Kendall 0072-06-089 IH 10 C Other TxDOT 5591.0 $980,000 Limits From: 0.25 M W of Bexar/Kendall County Line Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: Kendall/Bexar County Line Proj 5/20 - add project; spin off of 0072-06-082 Description: Expand from 4 to 8 lane expressway - 2 new general purpose & 2 new HOV lanes; from 4 to 4 frontage road Hist: lanes Remarks: Spin off of 0072-06-082

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $98,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $980,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $980,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $784,000 $196,000 $0 $0 $980,000 Construction Engineering: $43,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $76,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $22,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $43,000 CMP Score Totals $784,000 $196,000 $0 $0 $980,000 Total Project Cost: $1,262,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0072-07-075 IH 10 C Other TxDOT 5401.0 $129,020,000 Limits From: Kendall/Bexar County Line Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: FM 3351 Proj 5/20 - rev cost and move 28 to 25; 1/19 - rev Description: Expand from 4 to 8 lane expressway - 2 new general purpose, 2 new HOV lanes & from 4 to 4 FR lanes Hist: descr to incl FR lanes; 10/18 - move 29 to 28; 6/18 - correct funding distrib; 4/17 - add Remarks: None project to MTP with Prop 1/Prop 7; portion of project may have already been in the MTP

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $12,900,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $129,020,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $129,020,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $103,216,000 $25,804,000 $0 $0 $129,020,000 Construction Engineering: $5,700,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $10,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $2,900,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $5,700,000 CMP Score Totals $85,600,000 $21,400,000 $0 $0 $129,020,000 Total Project Cost: $166,220,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0073-08-183 IH 37 C San Antonio TxDOT 4969.0 $2,900,000 Limits From: LP 13 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: IH 410 Proj 5/20 - move 20 to 25; 10/19 - rev fund Description: Construction of a SB 2 lane frontage road from Lp 13 to relocated entrance ramp to SB IH 37 and intersection Hist: distrib; 9/19 - ADM clarify descr (partial); improvements 1/19 - rev descr to incl FR lanes; 10/18 - Remarks: None move 19 to 20 and rev funding; 4/18 - move 18 to 19; 10/17 - move 17 to 18; 10/15 - add

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $290,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $2,900,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $2,900,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 3 - BC Local $0 $0 $0 $2,175,000 $2,175,000 Construction Engineering: $129,000 N/A 1 - Prvnt Maint Contingencies: $225,000 $652,500 $72,500 $0 $0 $725,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $64,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $129,000 CMP Score Totals $652,500 $72,500 $0 $2,175,000 $2,900,000 Total Project Cost: $3,737,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 76 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2025 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0521-06-142 IH 410 C San Antonio TxDOT 5384.0 $450,000,000 Limits From: at IH 10 E Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: . Proj 5/20 - revise cost; 9/19 - ADM clarify Description: Phase 2 interchange improvements - 1-lane DC: SB 410 to WB 10; SB 410 to EB 10; NB 410 to WB 10; WB Hist: description; 1/19 - update cost; 4/18 - reduce 10 to NB 410; EB 10 to NB 410; EB 10 to SB 410; cost; 4/17 - add project Remarks: 2 lane DC: WB 10 to SB 410 & NB 410 to EB 10

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Interchange Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $45,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $450,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $450,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $360,000,000 $90,000,000 $0 $0 $450,000,000 Construction Engineering: $20,000,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $35,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $10,000,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $20,000,000 CMP Score Totals $360,000,000 $90,000,000 $0 $0 $450,000,000 Total Project Cost: $580,000,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Guadalupe 0535-01-077 IH 10 C Other TxDOT 5592.0 $106,000,000 Limits From: US 90A Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: FM 464 Proj 5/20 - add project; spin off of 0535-01-074 Description: Expand from 4 to 6 lane expressway and from 4 to 4 frontage road lanes Hist:

Remarks: Spin off of 0535-01-074

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $10,600,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $106,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $106,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $84,800,000 $21,200,000 $0 $0 $106,000,000 Construction Engineering: $4,700,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $8,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $2,400,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $4,700,000 CMP Score Totals $84,800,000 $21,200,000 $0 $0 $106,000,000 Total Project Cost: $136,600,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Guadalupe 0535-01-078 IH 10 C Other TxDOT 5593.0 $205,000,000 Limits From: SH 123 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: SH 130 Proj 5/20 - add project; spin off of 0535-01-074 Description: Expand from 4 to 6 lane expressway and from 4 to 4 frontage road lanes Hist:

Remarks: Spin off of 0535-01-074

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $20,500,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $205,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $205,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $164,000,000 $41,000,000 $0 $0 $205,000,000 Construction Engineering: $9,100,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $15,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $4,600,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $9,100,000 CMP Score Totals $164,000,000 $41,000,000 $0 $0 $205,000,000 Total Project Cost: $264,200,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 77 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2025 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-00-173 VA C,E,R Other AAMPO 3768.2 $10,000,000 Limits From: Austin-San Antonio Regional Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Corridor Project Proj 4/18 - split project into 4 projs, red from Description: Studies, plans and projects associated with multimodal transportation solutions Hist: $16M to $10M; 1/17 - rev limit,cost,agency, descr, and move 18 to 20; 4/15 - move 17 to Remarks: None 18 and correct limits; 1/13 - move 14 to 16; fixed amount; portion of $20M for Passenger

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Passenger Rail Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $10,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $10,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $8,000,000 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $10,000,000 Construction Engineering: $0 N/A Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $8,000,000 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $10,000,000 Total Project Cost: $10,000,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-00-218 NR C Other AAMPO 5303.4 $100,000 Limits From: Alamo Area MPO: in Bexar, Comal Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Guadalupe & partial Kendall County Proj 4/18 - add project Description: Alamo Area Commute Solutions Pgm - FY 2025 Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Rideshare Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $100,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $100,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $80,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $100,000 Construction Engineering: $0 N/A Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $0 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $80,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $100,000 Total Project Cost: $100,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-593 CS C San Antonio CoSA 5534.0 $19,500,000 Limits From: In San Antonio on South New Braunfels Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: From Lyster Road to IH 410 Proj 11/19 - ADM clarify description; 4/18 - Description: Construct new alignment 4 lane roadway (0 to 4 lanes) with multiuse path and sidewalks Hist: funded through the 19-22 STP-MM Call for Projects Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $955,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $19,500,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $19,500,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $7,600,000 $0 $1,900,000 $0 $9,500,000 Construction Engineering: $1,170,000 N/A 3-LC Contingencies: $1,365,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $975,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $780,000 CMP Score Totals $7,600,000 $0 $1,900,000 $10,000,000 $19,500,000 Total Project Cost: $24,745,000 53

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 78 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2025 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0915-12-618 CR C Other BC 5532.0 $16,791,743 Limits From: In Bexar County, on Blanco Road Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: Borgfeld to Bexar/Comal County Line Proj 4/18 - funded through the 19-22 STP-MM Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lane divided roadway with a raised median, bike lanes, sidewalk, curbs and drainage Hist: Call for Projects

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $823,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $16,791,743 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $16,791,743 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $13,433,394 $0 $3,358,349 $0 $16,791,743 Construction Engineering: $1,007,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $1,175,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $840,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $672,000 CMP Score Totals $13,433,394 $0 $3,358,349 $0 $16,791,743 Total Project Cost: $21,308,743 18

15 - San Antonio Guadalupe 1268-02-030 FM 1103 C Other TxDOT 5560.0 $23,500,000 Limits From: Rodeo Way Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: FM 78 Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2024 to FY 2025 and Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with median, turn lanes, sidewalk and bike lanes Hist: revise cost; 10/18 - add project

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: Non-RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $2,350,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $23,500,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $23,500,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $18,800,000 $4,700,000 $0 $0 $23,500,000 Construction Engineering: $1,044,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $1,826,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $522,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $1,044,000 CMP Score Totals $18,800,000 $4,700,000 $0 $0 $23,500,000 Total Project Cost: $30,286,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 2452-03-087 SL 1604 C Other TxDOT 3530.0 $230,000,000 Limits From: Redland Road Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: IH 35 North Proj 9/19 - ADM clarify description; 1/19 - incl FR Description: Expand from 4 to 10 lane expressway - including 2 HOV - special use lanes & from 4 to 4 FR lanes Hist: lanes & update cost; 10/18 - move 27 to 25 & rev descr; 4/17 - move 30 to 27 and rev Remarks: None funding; 4/14- move18 to 30, rev limits and descr; 8/12 - revise description

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $23,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $230,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $230,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $184,000,000 $46,000,000 $0 $0 $230,000,000 Construction Engineering: $10,000,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $17,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $5,100,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $10,200,000 CMP Score Totals $184,000,000 $46,000,000 $0 $0 $230,000,000 Total Project Cost: $296,400,000 47

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 79 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2025 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 2452-03-111 SL 1604 C Other TxDOT 9107.0 $300,000,000 Limits From: FM 78 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: IH 10 East Proj 4/20 - move from 2024 to 2025; 1/19 - Description: Expand from 4 lane divided to 4 lane expressway and from 0 to 4 FR lanes Hist: update funding; 4/18 - correct funding distribution; 4/17 - add project; removed from Remarks: None 10/15 Prop 1 list due to financial constraint issues

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $30,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $4,200,000 Funding Local $300,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $300,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $240,000,000 $60,000,000 $0 $0 $300,000,000 Construction Engineering: $13,300,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $23,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $6,700,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $13,300,000 CMP Score Totals $240,000,000 $60,000,000 $0 $0 $300,000,000 Total Project Cost: $390,800,000 35

15 - San Antonio Bexar 2452-04-017 SL 1604 C Other TxDOT 5554.0 $12,000,000 Limits From: Martinez Creek Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2025,2035,2045 Limits To: FM 1346 - Houston Street Proj 4/20 - move from FY 2023 to FY 2025; Description: Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes divided Hist: 10/18 - add project, created from 2452-04- 016 Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $588,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $12,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $12,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $9,600,000 $2,400,000 $0 $0 $12,000,000 Construction Engineering: $766,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $155,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $689,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $694,000 CMP Score Totals $9,600,000 $2,400,000 $0 $0 $12,000,000 Total Project Cost: $14,892,000 50

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 80 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2026 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost

15 - San Antonio Guadalupe 0366-02-089 SH 123 C Other TxDOT 5337.0 $16,200,000 Limits From: Cordova Ln Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: IH 10 Proj 4/18 - correct funding distribution; 4/17 - Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with center left turn lane Hist: move from FY 2027 to FY 2026; 4/16 - funded through 17-20 TIP Call for Projects Remarks: None (P1/P7); temporarily placed in FY 2027

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $794,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $16,200,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $16,200,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 2 - Metro Corridor $12,960,000 $3,240,000 $0 $0 $16,200,000 Construction Engineering: $648,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $1,134,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $324,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $648,000 CMP Score Totals $12,960,000 $3,240,000 $0 $0 $16,200,000 Total Project Cost: $19,748,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 2255-01-084 SL 1604 C Other TxDOT 5386.0 $1,800,000 Limits From: 0.38 Mi North of FM 1303 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: FM 1303 Proj 4/18 - correct funding distribution; 4/17 - add Description: Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes divided Hist: project

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $180,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $1,800,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $1,800,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $1,440,000 $360,000 $0 $0 $1,800,000 Construction Engineering: $80,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $140,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $40,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $80,000 CMP Score Totals $1,440,000 $360,000 $0 $0 $1,800,000 Total Project Cost: $2,320,000 50

15 - San Antonio Bexar 2255-02-027 SL 1604 C Other TxDOT 5387.0 $40,000,000 Limits From: US 87 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: US 181 Proj 4/18 - correct funding distribution; 4/17 - add Description: Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes divided Hist: project

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $1,960,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $40,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $40,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $32,000,000 $8,000,000 $0 $0 $40,000,000 Construction Engineering: $1,600,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $2,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $800,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $1,600,000 CMP Score Totals $32,000,000 $8,000,000 $0 $0 $40,000,000 Total Project Cost: $48,760,000 50

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 81 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2026 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 2255-02-028 SL 1604 C Other TxDOT 5388.0 $23,200,000 Limits From: US 181 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: 0.38 Mi North of FM 1303 Proj 9/19 - ADM clarify limits; 4/18 - correct Description: Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes divided Hist: funding distribution; 4/17 - add project

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $1,137,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $23,200,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $23,200,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $18,560,000 $4,640,000 $0 $0 $23,200,000 Construction Engineering: $928,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $1,624,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $464,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $928,000 CMP Score Totals $18,560,000 $4,640,000 $0 $0 $23,200,000 Total Project Cost: $28,281,000 50

15 - San Antonio Bexar 2452-04-015 SL 1604 C Other TxDOT 5389.0 $20,000,000 Limits From: FM 1346 - Houston Street Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: US 87 Proj 4/18 - correct funding dictribution; 4/17 - add Description: Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes divided Hist: project

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $980,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $20,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $20,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $16,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $20,000,000 Construction Engineering: $800,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $1,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $400,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $800,000 CMP Score Totals $16,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $20,000,000 Total Project Cost: $24,380,000 50

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 82 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2027 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost

15 - San Antonio Comal 3212-05-011 FM 3351 C Other TxDOT 5330.1 $5,000,000 Limits From: Kenneland Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: Bexar/Comal County Line Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2023 to FY 2027; 4/18 - Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with turn lanes, bike lanes & sidewalks Hist: correct funding distribution; 4/17 - move project from FY 2027 to FY 2023; 4/16 - Remarks: None funded through 17-20 TIP Call for Projects (P1/P7); temporarily placed in FY 2027

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $245,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $5,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $5,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $4,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $5,000,000 Construction Engineering: $200,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $100,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $200,000 CMP Score Totals $4,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $5,000,000 Total Project Cost: $6,095,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 3212-06-017 FM 3351 C Other TxDOT 5330.2 $35,000,000 Limits From: Comal/Bexar County Line Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: IH 10 Proj 5/20 - move from FY 2023 to FY 2027; 4/18 - Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with turn lanes, bike lanes & sidewalks Hist: correct funding distribution; 4/17 - add project

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $1,715,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $35,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $35,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $28,000,000 $7,000,000 $0 $0 $35,000,000 Construction Engineering: $1,400,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $2,450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $700,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $1,400,000 CMP Score Totals $28,000,000 $7,000,000 $0 $0 $35,000,000 Total Project Cost: $42,665,000 21

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 83 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2028 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost

15 - San Antonio Comal 0215-01-051 SH 46 C Other TxDOT 5392.0 $70,000,000 Limits From: Bentwood Dr Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: FM 3159 Proj 5/20 - revise cost; 10/18 - move FY 37 to FY Description: Expand from 2 lanes to 6 lanes with raised median or CLTL Hist: 28; 6/18 - correct funding distrib; 4/17 - add project to MTP with Prop 1/Prop 7; portion of Remarks: None project may have already been in the MTP

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $7,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $70,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $70,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $56,000,000 $14,000,000 $0 $0 $70,000,000 Construction Engineering: $3,100,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $5,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $1,600,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $3,100,000 CMP Score Totals $56,000,000 $14,000,000 $0 $0 $70,000,000 Total Project Cost: $90,200,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Comal 0215-07-049 SH 46 C Other TxDOT 5393.0 $35,000,000 Limits From: Bulverde Rd Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: Farhills Dr Proj 5/20 - revise cost; 10/18 - move FY 37 to FY Description: Expand from 2 lanes to 6 lanes with raised median or CLTL Hist: 28; 6/18 - correct funding distrib; 4/17 - add project to MTP with Prop 1/Prop 7; portion of Remarks: None project may have already been in the MTP

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $3,500,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $35,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $35,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $28,000,000 $7,000,000 $0 $0 $35,000,000 Construction Engineering: $1,500,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $2,700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $800,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $1,500,000 CMP Score Totals $28,000,000 $7,000,000 $0 $0 $35,000,000 Total Project Cost: $45,000,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0521-05-144 IH 410 C San Antonio TxDOT 5402.0 $490,000,000 Limits From: US 90 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: IH 35 S Proj 5/20 - revise cost; 11/19 - ADM clarify Description: Exp fr 6 to 8 lns btwn US 90 & Valley Hi; frm 4 to 6 lns btwn Valley Hi & IH 35 S; frm 4/6 to 4/6 FR ln; Hist: description; 1/19 - rev descr to incl FR lanes; construct all DCs at IH 35 S; 10/18 - move FY 37 to FY 28; /18 - correct Remarks: all DCs are 1 lane; cloverleaf remains for FR connectivity funding distrib; 4/17 - add project to MTP with Prop 1/Prop 7; portion of project may

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $49,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $490,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $490,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $392,000,000 $98,000,000 $0 $0 $490,000,000 Construction Engineering: $21,800,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $38,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $10,900,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $21,800,000 CMP Score Totals $392,000,000 $98,000,000 $0 $0 $490,000,000 Total Project Cost: $631,500,000 41

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 84 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2028 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Guadalupe 0535-02-047 IH 10 C Other TxDOT 5397.0 $375,000,000 Limits From: SH 130 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: SH 80 Proj 1/19 - rev descr to incl FR lanes and update Description: Expand from 4 lane to 6 lane expressway Hist: cost; 10/18 - move 29 to 28; 6/18 - correct funding distrib; 4/17 - add proj to MTP with Remarks: None Prop 1/Prop 7; portion of proj may have already been in the MTP

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $18,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $375,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $375,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $300,000,000 $75,000,000 $0 $0 $375,000,000 Construction Engineering: $24,000,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $19,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $21,000,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $22,000,000 CMP Score Totals $300,000,000 $75,000,000 $0 $0 $375,000,000 Total Project Cost: $479,000,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 85 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2029 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost

15 - San Antonio Guadalupe 0366-02-088 SH 123 C Other TxDOT 5398.0 $50,000,000 Limits From: Guadalupe/Hays County Line Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: Cordova Ln Proj 6/18 - correct funding distribution; 4/17 - add Description: Widen roadway to provide operational improvements including shoulders Hist: project to MTP with Prop 1/Prop 7; portion of project may have already been in the MTP Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $2,450,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $50,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $50,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $40,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 $0 $50,000,000 Construction Engineering: $2,000,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $3,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $1,000,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $2,000,000 CMP Score Totals $40,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 $0 $50,000,000 Total Project Cost: $60,950,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Guadalupe 0366-03-066 SH 123 C Other TxDOT 5399.0 $180,000,000 Limits From: SH 123B in Seguin Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: Wilson/Guadalupe County Line Proj 9/19 - ADM clarify description; 6/18 - correct Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lane divided roadway Hist: funding distribution; 4/17 - add project to MTP with Prop 1/Prop 7; portion of project Remarks: None may have already been in the MTP

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $8,820,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $180,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $180,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $144,000,000 $36,000,000 $0 $0 $180,000,000 Construction Engineering: $7,200,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $12,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $3,600,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $7,200,000 CMP Score Totals $144,000,000 $36,000,000 $0 $0 $180,000,000 Total Project Cost: $219,420,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 86 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2030 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost

15 - San Antonio Bexar 2452-01-029 Loop 1604 C San Antonio TxDOT 2020.0 $118,486,058 Limits From: US 90 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: West Military Drive Proj 9/19 - ADM clarify description; 1/19 - rev Description: Expand from 4 to 6 lane expressway & from 4 to 4 FR lanes Hist: descr to incl FR lanes; 10/18 - revise description and move to TxDOT; 4/14 - Remarks: None revise limits, year, description and funding; 8/13 - revise description and funding

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $7,328,076 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $118,486,058 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $118,486,058 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $94,788,846 $23,697,212 $0 $0 $118,486,058 Construction Engineering: $7,103,748 N/A Other Contingencies: $13,998,121 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $7,627,182 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $94,788,846 $23,697,212 $0 $0 $118,486,058 Total Project Cost: $154,553,185 50

15 - San Antonio Bexar 2452-01-052 Loop 1604 C San Antonio TxDOT 3911.0 $16,897,467 Limits From: West Military Dr. Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: Braun Road Proj 9/19 - ADM clarify description; 1/19 - rev Description: Expand from 4 to 6 lane expressway & from 4/6 to 4/6 FR lanes, including 1 lane direct connectors at SH Hist: descr to incl FR lanes; 10/18 - rev descr & 151 - NB 1604 to EB 151; WB 151 to SB 1604 move to TxDOT; 4/14 - rev year, limits, descr Remarks: None and fund; 8/2012 - proj receives portion of $2B; 1/2013 - rev descr, fund sources & year

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $827,976 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $34,128,554 Funding Local $16,897,467 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $16,897,467 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $13,517,974 $3,379,493 $0 $0 $16,897,467 Construction Engineering: $802,630 N/A Other Contingencies: $1,581,603 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $861,770 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $13,517,974 $3,379,493 $0 $0 $16,897,467 Total Project Cost: $55,100,000 50

15 - San Antonio Bexar 2452-01-053 Loop 1604 C San Antonio TxDOT 3912.0 $47,417,043 Limits From: Braun Road Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: SH 16 Proj 1/19 - rev descr to incl FR lanes; 10/18 - rev Description: Expand from 4 to 8 lane expressway and from 6 to 6 FR lanes Hist: descr and move to TxDOT; 4/14 - rev year, descr and funding; 8/2012 - proj receives Remarks: None portion of $2B; 7/2013 - project had $10.8M in Category 2 funding (years 2016-2020)

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $2,323,435 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $3,737,251 Funding Local $47,417,043 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $47,417,043 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $37,933,634 $9,483,409 $0 $0 $47,417,043 Construction Engineering: $2,252,310 N/A Other Contingencies: $4,438,235 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $2,418,269 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Totals $37,933,634 $9,483,409 $0 $0 $47,417,043 Total Project Cost: $62,586,543 50

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 87 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2030 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Comal 3212-04-008 FM 3351 C Other TxDOT 5558.0 $24,000,000 Limits From: SH 46 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: Kendall/Comal County Line Proj 10/18 - add project Description: Expand from 2 to 6 lanes with center turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $1,176,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $24,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $24,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $19,200,000 $4,800,000 $0 $0 $24,000,000 Construction Engineering: $1,531,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $310,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $1,378,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $1,387,000 CMP Score Totals $19,200,000 $4,800,000 $0 $0 $24,000,000 Total Project Cost: $29,782,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Comal 3212-05-014 FM 3351 C Other TxDOT 5559.0 $23,200,000 Limits From: Kendall/Comal County Line Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: Keeneland Dr Proj 10/18 - add project Description: Expand from 2 to 6 lanes with center turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $1,137,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $23,200,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $23,200,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $18,560,000 $4,640,000 $0 $0 $23,200,000 Construction Engineering: $1,480,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $1,332,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $1,341,000 CMP Score Totals $18,560,000 $4,640,000 $0 $0 $23,200,000 Total Project Cost: $28,790,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 88 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2031 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0024-07-064 US 90 C San Antonio TxDOT 5561.0 $310,000,000 Limits From: at Lp 1604 W Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: - Proj 5/20 - add project - spin off of 0024-07-059 Description: Construct direct connectors: 1 lane DC - SB 1604 to WB 90; NB 1604 to EB 90; NB 1604 to WB 90; EB 90 to Hist: NB 1604 & EB 90 to SB 1604; 2 lane DC: WB 90 to NB 1604 & WB 90 to SB 1604 Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Interchange Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $31,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $310,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $310,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $248,000,000 $62,000,000 $0 $0 $310,000,000 Construction Engineering: $13,800,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $24,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $6,900,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $13,800,000 CMP Score Totals $248,000,000 $62,000,000 $0 $0 $310,000,000 Total Project Cost: $399,500,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0024-08-143 US 90 C San Antonio TxDOT 5562.0 $40,000,000 Limits From: IH 410 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Lp 13 Proj 5/20 - add project Description: Ramp revisions and rehabilitate mainlanes Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $4,000,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $40,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $40,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $32,000,000 $8,000,000 $0 $0 $40,000,000 Construction Engineering: $1,800,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $3,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $1,000,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $1,800,000 CMP Score Totals $32,000,000 $8,000,000 $0 $0 $40,000,000 Total Project Cost: $51,600,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Comal 0000-00-000 Transit Station C New Braunfels VIA 9129.0 $5,000,000 Limits From: - Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: - Proj added w/ 12/8/14 adoption of the MTP Description: Construct transit station in New Braunfels, Texas Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Transit Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $245,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $5,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $5,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $4,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $5,000,000 Construction Engineering: $200,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $100,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $200,000 CMP Score Totals $4,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $5,000,000 Total Project Cost: $6,095,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 89 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2031 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 2020-02-031 SL 1604 C Other TxDOT 9110.1 $34,000,000 Limits From: IH 35 S Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: 0.7 Mi North of FM 2536 Proj 5/20 - revise cost; 10/18 - move FY 22 to FY Description: Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes divided Hist: 31 and rev cost; 3/18 - revise funding distribution; 4/17 - add project; added w/ Remarks: None 12/8/14 adoption of the MTP

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $1,372,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $34,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $34,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $27,200,000 $6,800,000 $0 $0 $34,000,000 Construction Engineering: $1,786,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $362,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $1,607,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $1,618,000 CMP Score Totals $27,200,000 $6,800,000 $0 $0 $34,000,000 Total Project Cost: $40,745,000 47

15 - San Antonio Bexar 2452-01-070 SL 1604 C Other TxDOT 5557.0 $15,000,000 Limits From: 0.7 Mi North of FM 2536 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2035,2045 Limits To: Macdona-Lacoste Rd Proj 5/20 - revise cost; 10/18 - add project Description: Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes divided Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $1,500,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $15,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $15,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $12,000,000 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $15,000,000 Construction Engineering: $7,000,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $1,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $300,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $7,000,000 CMP Score Totals $12,000,000 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $15,000,000 Total Project Cost: $19,400,000 47

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 90 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2032 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost

15 - San Antonio Kendall 0000-00-000 Transit Station C Boerne VIA 9117.0 $5,000,000 Limits From: - Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: - Proj added w/ 12/8/14 adoption of the MTP Description: Construct transit station in Boerne, Texas Hist:

Remarks: None

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 91 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2034 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost

15 - San Antonio Guadalupe 0000-00-000 Transit Station C Seguin VIA 9132.0 $5,000,000 Limits From: - Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: - Proj added w/ 12/8/14 adoption of the MTP Description: Construct transit station in Seguin, Texas Hist:

Remarks: None

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 92 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2035 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost

15 - San Antonio Comal 0000-00-000 FM 306 C Other TxDOT 9122.0 $26,000,000 Limits From: River Chase Way Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2045 Limits To: FM 2673 Proj 9/19 - ADM clarify description; added w/ Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with turn lanes at intersections Hist: 12/8/14 adoption of the MTP

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $1,274,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $26,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $26,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG $20,800,000 $5,200,000 $0 $0 $26,000,000 Construction Engineering: $1,040,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $1,820,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $520,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $1,040,000 CMP Score Totals $20,800,000 $5,200,000 $0 $0 $26,000,000 Total Project Cost: $31,694,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Comal 0016-04-112 IH 35 C Other TxDOT 5375.0 $60,000,000 Limits From: Guadalupe River Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2045 Limits To: Hays/Comal County Line Proj 10/18 - move from FY 2021 to FY 2035; Description: Operational improvements including ramp revisions and intersection improvements - convert frontage roads Hist: 3/18 - rev funding distrib; 1/18 - move from to one way FY 22 to FY 21 and incr cost from $50M to Remarks: None $75M in Cat 4; 4/17 - add project

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $3,675,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $60,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $60,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $48,000,000 $12,000,000 $0 $0 $60,000,000 Construction Engineering: $3,000,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $5,250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $1,500,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $3,000,000 CMP Score Totals $48,000,000 $12,000,000 $0 $0 $60,000,000 Total Project Cost: $76,425,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Comal 0016-05-114 IH 35 C Other TxDOT 5383.0 $89,000,000 Limits From: Guadalupe River Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2045 Limits To: FM 1103 Proj 10/18 - move from FY 2025 to FY 2035; Description: Operational improvements including ramp revisions & intersection improvements Hist: 4/17 - add project

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $2,450,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $89,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $89,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $71,200,000 $17,800,000 $0 $0 $89,000,000 Construction Engineering: $2,000,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $3,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $1,000,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $2,000,000 CMP Score Totals $71,200,000 $17,800,000 $0 $0 $89,000,000 Total Project Cost: $99,950,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 93 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2035 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Bexar 0024-08-139 US 90 C San Antonio TxDOT 5338.0 $16,000,000 Limits From: at Zarzamora Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2045 Limits To: . Proj 10/18 - move from FY 2028 to FY 2035; Description: Construct westbound entrance ramp Hist: 6/18 - move from FY 2026 to FY 2028 and correct funding distribution; 4/17 - move from Remarks: None FY 2027 to FY 2026; 4/16 - funded through 17-20 TIP Call for Projects (P1/P7);

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $784,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $16,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $16,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $12,800,000 $3,200,000 $0 $0 $16,000,000 Construction Engineering: $640,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $1,120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $320,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $640,000 CMP Score Totals $12,800,000 $3,200,000 $0 $0 $16,000,000 Total Project Cost: $19,504,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 94 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2037 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost

15 - San Antonio Guadalupe 0215-09-033 FM 725 C Other TxDOT 5390.0 $26,900,000 Limits From: Zipp Rd Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2045 Limits To: FM 78 Proj 6/18 - correct funding distribution; 4/17 - add Description: Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lane divided and intersection improvements Hist: project to MTP with Prop 1/Prop 7; portion of project may have already been in the MTP Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $1,318,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $26,900,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $26,900,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $21,520,000 $5,380,000 $0 $0 $26,900,000 Construction Engineering: $1,076,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $1,883,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $538,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $1,076,000 CMP Score Totals $21,520,000 $5,380,000 $0 $0 $26,900,000 Total Project Cost: $32,791,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 95 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2040 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0017-10-180 IH 35 North C San Antonio TxDOT 3514.0 $225,000,000 Limits From: US 281/IH 37, East Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: 2045 Limits To: IH 410 S Proj 5/20 - revise descr; 1/19 - rev descr to incl Description: Expand from 6 lane to 10 lane expy - including 2 HOV - special use lanes & from 6 to 6 FR lanes Hist: FR lanes; 10/18 - revise description; 10/13 - revise description Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non Toll Status: RSR Non-Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $22,500,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $225,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $225,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $180,000,000 $45,000,000 $0 $0 $225,000,000 Construction Engineering: $10,000,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $17,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $5,000,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $10,000,000 CMP Score Totals $180,000,000 $45,000,000 $0 $0 $225,000,000 Total Project Cost: $290,000,000 58

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 96 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY 2044 Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0291-10-099 SH 16 C San Antonio TxDOT 9112.2 $35,000,000 Limits From: Guilbeau Rd Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: past 2045 Limits To: Loop 1604 Proj 9/19 - ADM clarify let date; 10/18 - move Description: Operational improvements Hist: from FY 2023 to FY 2025; 4/18 - correct funding distribution; 4/17 - revise description Remarks: Feasibility study is underway; partnership between TxDOT, CoSA and Leon Valley and funding; added w/ 12/8/14 adoption of the MTP

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $1,715,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $35,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $35,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $28,000,000 $7,000,000 $0 $0 $35,000,000 Construction Engineering: $1,400,000 N/ Other Contingencies: $2,450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $700,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $1,400,000 CMP Score Totals $28,000,000 $7,000,000 $0 $0 $35,000,000 Total Project Cost: $42,665,000 N/A

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0291-10-100 SH 16 C Leon Valley TxDOT 9112.1 $65,000,000 Limits From: IH 410 Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: past 2045 Limits To: Guilbeau Road Proj 9/19 - ADM clarify let date; 10/18 - move Description: Operational improvements Hist: from FY 2023 to FY 2025; 4/18 - correct funding dostribution; 4/17 - revise Remarks: Feasibility study is underway; partnership between TxDOT, CoSA and Leon Valley description and funding; added w/ 12/8/14 adoption of the MTP

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Operational Status: RSR Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $3,185,000 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $65,000,000 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $65,000,000 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Prop 1/Prop 7 $52,000,000 $13,000,000 $0 $0 $65,000,000 Construction Engineering: $2,600,000 N/A Other Contingencies: $4,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Costs: $1,300,000 N/A Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $2,600,000 CMP Score Totals $52,000,000 $13,000,000 $0 $0 $65,000,000 Total Project Cost: $79,235,000 N/A

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 97 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY Grouped Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost

15 - San Antonio Various 5000-00-916 Various C TxDOT 6910.0 $0 Limits From: Grouped Project Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: - Proj Description: Bicycle and Pedestrian Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Bicycle/Pedestrian Status: Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $0 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $0 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Other Construction Engineering: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other Indirect Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Total Project Cost: $0 Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

15 - San Antonio Various 5000-00-917 Various C TxDOT 6911.0 $0 Limits From: Grouped Project Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: - Proj Description: Safety Rest Areas and Truck Weigh Stations Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Other Status: Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $0 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $0 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Other Construction Engineering: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other Indirect Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Total Project Cost: $0 Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

15 - San Antonio Various 5000-00-918 Various C TxDOT 6912.0 $0 Limits From: Grouped Project Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: - Proj Description: Transit Improvements Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Transit Status: Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $0 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $0 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Other Construction Engineering: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other Indirect Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Total Project Cost: $0 Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 98 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY Grouped Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Various 5000-00-950 Various PE TxDOT 6906.0 $0 Limits From: Grouped Project Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: - Proj Description: Preliminary Engineering Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Proj Development Status: Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $0 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $0 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Other Construction Engineering: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other Indirect Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Total Project Cost: $0 Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

15 - San Antonio Various 5000-00-951 Various R TxDOT 6907.0 $0 Limits From: Grouped Project Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: - Proj Description: Right of Way Acquisition Hist:

Remarks: None

15 - San Antonio Various 5000-00-952 Various C TxDOT 6902.0 $0 Limits From: Grouped Project Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: - Proj Description: Preventive Maintenance and Rehabilitation Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Maint/Rehab Status: Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $0 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $0 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Other Construction Engineering: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other Indirect Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Total Project Cost: $0 Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 99 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY Grouped Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Various 5000-00-953 Various C TxDOT 6902.0 $0 Limits From: Grouped Project Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: - Proj Description: Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Bridge Status: Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $0 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $0 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Other Construction Engineering: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other Indirect Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Total Project Cost: $0 Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

15 - San Antonio Various 5000-00-954 Various C TxDOT 6904.0 $0 Limits From: Grouped Project Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: - Proj Description: Railroad Grade Separations Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: RR Grade Sep Status: Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $0 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $0 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Other Construction Engineering: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other Indirect Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Total Project Cost: $0 Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

15 - San Antonio Various 5000-00-956 Various C TxDOT 6905.0 $0 Limits From: Grouped Project Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: - Proj Description: Landscaping Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Landscaping Status: Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $0 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $0 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Other Construction Engineering: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other Indirect Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Total Project Cost: $0 Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 100 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY Grouped Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Various 5000-00-957 Various C TxDOT 6908.0 $0 Limits From: Grouped Project Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: - Proj Description: Preventive Maintenance and Rehabilitation Hist:

Remarks: None

15 - San Antonio Various 5000-00-958 Various C TxDOT 6909.0 $0 Limits From: Grouped Project Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: - Proj Description: Preventive Maintenance and Rehabilitation Hist:

Remarks: None

15 - San Antonio Various 5800-00-915 Various C TxDOT 6901.0 $0 Limits From: Grouped Project Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: - Proj Description: Intelligent Transportation Systems Deployment Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: ITS Status: Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $0 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $0 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Other Construction Engineering: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other Indirect Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Total Project Cost: $0 Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 101 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY Grouped Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio Various 5800-00-950 Various C TxDOT 6900.0 $0 Limits From: Grouped Project Last Revision Date: 7/2020 TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: - Proj Description: Safety Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Safety Status: Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $0 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $0 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Other Construction Engineering: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other Indirect Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Total Project Cost: $0 Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 102 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY Lump Sum Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost

15 - San Antonio Bexar 0000-00-000 Lump Sum C MPO 7001.0 $0 Limits From: Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) Last Revision Date: TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: - Proj Description: Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Lump Sum Status: Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $0 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $0 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 5 - CMAQ Construction Engineering: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $549,575,000 Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other Indirect Costs: $0 $0 Other $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Total Project Cost: $0 Totals $549,575,000 $0 $0 $0 $549,575,000

15 - San Antonio MPO 0000-00-000 Various C Varies TxDOT 4980.0 $0 Limits From: Metro Corridor Last Revision Date: TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: - Proj Projects are selected by the State Description: Preventive Maintenance and Rehabilitation Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Maint/Rehab Status: Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $0 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $0 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 1 - Prvnt Mnt/Rehab Construction Engineering: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other Indirect Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Total Project Cost: $0 Totals $1,346,952,040 $0 $0 $0 $1,346,952,040

15 - San Antonio MPO 0000-00-000 Various C Varies TxDOT 4982.0 $0 Limits From: Safety Last Revision Date: TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: - Proj Projects are selected by the State Description: Safety Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Safety Status: Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $0 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $0 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 8 - Safety Construction Engineering: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other Indirect Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Total Project Cost: $0 Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 103 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY Lump Sum Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio MPO 0000-00-000 Various C Varies TxDOT 4981.0 $0 Limits From: Structures Repl and Rehab Last Revision Date: TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: - Proj Projects are selected by the State Description: Structures Repl and Rehab Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Structures Repl and Rehab Status: Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $0 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $0 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 6 - Struct Rehab Construction Engineering: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other Indirect Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Total Project Cost: $0 Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

15 - San Antonio MPO 0000-00-000 Various C Varies TxDOT 4988.0 $65,061,049 Limits From: Transportation Alternatives Last Revision Date: TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: - Proj Projects are selected by the MPO through a Description: Transportation Alternatives Hist: project call

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Transportation Alternatives Status: Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $65,061,049 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $0 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 9 - TA Construction Engineering: $0 $52,048,840 $0 $13,012,209 $0 $65,061,049 Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other Indirect Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Total Project Cost: $0 Totals $52,048,840 $0 $13,012,209 $0 $65,061,049

15 - San Antonio MPO 0000-00-000 Various Locatio MPO $0 Limits From: Last Revision Date: TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Proj Description: Lump Sum: Alamo Area Commute Solutions Program Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: TSMO: Rideshare Status: Exempt Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $0 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $0 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG Construction Engineering: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,000,000 MPO Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 VOC lbs/day Other Indirect Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Total Project Cost: $0 Totals $8,000,000 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $10,000,000

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 104 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY Lump Sum Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio MPO 0000-00-000 Various C Varies TxDOT 4984.0 $0 Limits From: Varies Last Revision Date: TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: - Proj Projects are selected by the State Description: District Discretionary Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Varies Status: Varies Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $0 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $0 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 11 - Distr Discretion Construction Engineering: $111,020,000 $27,755,000 $0 $0 $138,775,000 $0 ary Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other Indirect Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Total Project Cost: $0 Totals $111,020,000 $27,755,000 $0 $0 $138,775,000

15 - San Antonio MPO 0000-00-000 Various C Varies TxDOT 4983.0 $0 Limits From: Varies Last Revision Date: TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: - Proj Projects are selected by the State Description: Miscellaneous Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Varies Status: Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $0 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $0 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 10 - Misc Construction Engineering: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other Indirect Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Total Project Cost: $0 Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

15 - San Antonio MPO 0000-00-000 Lump Sum C MPO 7003.0 $0 Limits From: Commission Strategic Priority Last Revision Date: TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Proj Projects are selected by the State Description: Commission Strategic Priority Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Commission Strat Status: Varies Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $0 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $0 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day Construction Engineering: 12 - Strategic Priorit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 y Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other Indirect Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Total Project Cost: $0 Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 105 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY Lump Sum Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost 15 - San Antonio MPO 0000-00-000 Lump Sum C TxDOT 7005.0 $0 Limits From: Preventative Maintenance Last Revision Date: TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Proj Projects are selected by the State Description: Preventative Maintenance Hist:

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Preventative Maintenance Status: Exempt Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local $0 Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $0 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 1 - Prvnt Mnt/Rehab Construction Engineering: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other Indirect Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Total Project Cost: Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

15 - San Antonio MPO 0000-00-000 Various C Varies MPO 4985.0 Limits From: Surface Transportation Block Grant Last Revision Date: TDM Network Years: N/A Limits To: Metro Mobility Funding Proj Projects are selected by the MPO through a Description: Surface Transporation Block Grant Hist: project call

Remarks: None

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Cost of Type of Work: Varies Status: Varies Approved Preliminary Engineering: $0 Phases: Authorized Funding by Category/Share ROW Purchase: $0 Funding Local Categories Contrib Construction Cost: $0 Federal State Local Total NOX lbs/day 7 - STBG Construction Engineering: $0 $598,050,298 $0############ $0 $747,562,873 Other Contingencies: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VOC lbs/day Other Indirect Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Field: $0 CMP Score Total Project Cost: $0 Totals $598,050,298 $0############ $0 $747,562,873

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 106 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2045" Updated: ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION May 18, 2020

FY Lump Sum Year of Expenditure TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Cost

Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW, T=Transfer 107 Emissions reductions are provided for CMAQ projects only.

Pg. 16-1 Transit Project List

16 Transit Project List

Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 3768.3 Federal (FTA) Funds: $8,000,000 Apportionment Year: 2019 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: T Other Funds: $2,000,000 Project Description: Transit: Rapid Transit Project Fiscal Year Cost: $10,000,000 Total Project Cost: $10,000,000 Rapid Transit Corridor Study - STP-MM TDC Requested: $0 Transfer CSJ 0915-12-612 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 10201 Federal (FTA) Funds: $23,916,131 Apportionment Year: 2019 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: O Other Funds: $5,979,033 Project Description: Transit: Operating Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $29,895,164 Total Project Cost: $29,895,164 Capital Cost of Contracting, ADA, Preventive TDC Requested: $0 Maintenance TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 10201.1 Federal (FTA) Funds: $1,409,698 Apportionment Year: 2017 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $352,425 Project Description: Transit: Operating Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $1,762,123 Preventive Maintenance Total Project Cost: $1,762,123 TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 10201.2 Federal (FTA) Funds: $490,639 Apportionment Year: 2016 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $122,660 Project Description: Transit: Operating Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $613,299 Preventive Maintenance Total Project Cost: $613,299 TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 1 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 10201.3 Federal (FTA) Funds: $313,170 Apportionment Year: 2016 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $75,793 Project Description: Capital Improvements Fiscal Year Cost: $388,963 Bus Stop Improvements Total Project Cost: $388,963 Hardware/Software TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 10201.4 Federal (FTA) Funds: $1,401,221 Apportionment Year: 2015 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $350,305 Project Description: Transit: Operating Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $1,751,526 Preventive Maintenance Total Project Cost: $1,751,526 TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 10201.5 Federal (FTA) Funds: $1,209,234 Apportionment Year: 2015 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $302,309 Project Description: Capital Improvements Fiscal Year Cost: $1,511,543 Bus Stop Improvements Total Project Cost: $1,511,543 Hardware/Software TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 10202 Federal (FTA) Funds: $45,228 Apportionment Year: 2019 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: O Other Funds: $11,307 Project Description: Transit: JARC Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $56,535 Total Project Cost: $56,535 VIA Job Access Reverse Commute Services TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 2 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 10203 Federal (FTA) Funds: $626,756 Apportionment Year: 2019 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: O Other Funds: $626,756 Project Description: Transit: AACOG Operating Projects Fiscal Year Cost: $1,253,512 Total Project Cost: $1,253,512 Transportation Services for New Braunfels, TDC Requested: $0 Cibolo, McQueeney, Marion, Schertz, etc TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5310 MPO Project Number: 10204 Federal (FTA) Funds: $1,903,950 Apportionment Year: 2019 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: O Other Funds: $1,025,541 Project Description: Transit: Mobility of Seniors and Persons Fiscal Year Cost: $2,929,491 with Disabilities Total Project Cost: $2,929,491 Other Programs Pass through to TDC Requested: $0 Subrecipients TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5310 MPO Project Number: 10205 Federal (FTA) Funds: $100,792 Apportionment Year: 2019 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: A Other Funds: $0 Project Description: Transit: Mobility of Seniors and Persons Fiscal Year Cost: $100,792 with Disabilities Total Project Cost: $100,792 Program Administration TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10206 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2019 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $677,821 Project Description: Transit: Paratransit Facility Fiscal Year Cost: $677,821 Total Project Cost: $677,821 Paratransit Facility TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 3 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10207 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2019 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $101,865 Project Description: Transit: Service Vehicles Fiscal Year Cost: $101,865 Total Project Cost: $101,865 TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category:FTA - Section 5307/5339 MPO Project Number: 10208 Federal (FTA) Funds: $1,202,765 Apportionment Year: 2019 State Funds from TxDOT: $12,790,529 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $2,577,017 Project Description: Transit: Passenger Facilities Fiscal Year Cost: $16,570,221 Total Project Cost: $16,570,221 TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category:FTA - Section 5307/5339 MPO Project Number: 10209 Federal (FTA) Funds: $146,920 Apportionment Year: 2019 State Funds from TxDOT: $18,752 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $869,843 Project Description: Transit: Operational Facilities Fiscal Year Cost: $1,035,515 Total Project Cost: $1,035,515 TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10210 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2019 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $12,000,000 Project Description: Transit: Rapid Transit Project Fiscal Year Cost: $12,000,000 Total Project Cost: $12,000,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 4 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5339 MPO Project Number: 10211 Federal (FTA) Funds: $10,770 Apportionment Year: 2019 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $40,982 Project Description: Transit: Maintenance Tools and Equipment Fiscal Year Cost: $51,752 Total Project Cost: $51,752 TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 10212 Federal (FTA) Funds: $21,449 Apportionment Year: 2019 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $191,100 Project Description: Transit: Replacement Components for Fiscal Year Cost: $212,549 Revenue Vehicles Total Project Cost: $212,549 TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5339 MPO Project Number: 10213 Federal (FTA) Funds: $620,662 Apportionment Year: 2019 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $4,670,194 Project Description: Transit: Computer Hardware/Software Fiscal Year Cost: $5,290,856 Total Project Cost: $5,290,856 TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10214 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2019 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $160,057 Project Description: Transit: Joint Development Fiscal Year Cost: $160,057 Total Project Cost: $160,057 TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 5 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 10301 Federal (FTA) Funds: $33,495,000 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: O Other Funds: $8,373,750 Project Description: Transit: Operating Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $41,868,750 Total Project Cost: $41,868,750 Capital Cost of Contracting, ADA, Preventive TDC Requested: $0 Maintenance TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 10302 Federal (FTA) Funds: $1,155,000 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: O Other Funds: $1,155,000 Project Description: Transit: JARC Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $2,310,000 Total Project Cost: $2,310,000 VIA Job Access Reverse Commute Services TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 10303 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: O Other Funds: $0 Project Description: Transit: AACOG Operating Projects Fiscal Year Cost: $0 Total Project Cost: $0 Transportation Services for New Braunfels, TDC Requested: $0 Cibolo, McQueeney, Marion, Schertz, etc TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 10303.1 Federal (FTA) Funds: $493,500 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: O Other Funds: $493,500 Project Description: Transit: AACOG Operating Projects Fiscal Year Cost: $987,000 Public Transportation for the Total Project Cost: $987,000 City of New Braunfels, Texas TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 6 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 10303.2 Federal (FTA) Funds: $42,666 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: O Other Funds: $42,666 Project Description: Transit: AACOG Operating Projects Fiscal Year Cost: $85,332 Public Transportation for the Total Project Cost: $85,332 City of Schertz, Texas TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 10303.3 Federal (FTA) Funds: $16,045 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: O Other Funds: $16,045 Project Description: Transit: AACOG Operating Projects Fiscal Year Cost: $32,090 Public Transportation for the Total Project Cost: $32,090 City of Cibolo, Texas TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 10303.4 Federal (FTA) Funds: $8,023 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: O Other Funds: $8,023 Project Description: Transit: AACOG Operating Projects Fiscal Year Cost: $16,046 Public Transportation for the Total Project Cost: $16,046 City of McQueeney, Texas TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 10303.5 Federal (FTA) Funds: $10,031 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: O Other Funds: $10,031 Project Description: Transit: AACOG Operating Projects Fiscal Year Cost: $20,062 Public Transportation for the Total Project Cost: $20,062 City of Marion, Texas TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 7 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5310 MPO Project Number: 10304 Federal (FTA) Funds: $1,680,000 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: O Other Funds: $420,000 Project Description: Transit: Mobility of Seniors and Persons Fiscal Year Cost: $2,100,000 with Disabilities Total Project Cost: $2,100,000 Other Programs Pass through to TDC Requested: $0 Subrecipients TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5310 MPO Project Number: 10305 Federal (FTA) Funds: $168,000 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: A Other Funds: $0 Project Description: Transit: Mobility of Seniors and Persons Fiscal Year Cost: $168,000 with Disabilities Total Project Cost: $168,000 Program Administration TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5339 MPO Project Number: 10306 Federal (FTA) Funds: $6,000,000 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: $12,160,034 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $89,966 Project Description: Transit: Paratransit Facility Fiscal Year Cost: $18,250,000 FY 2018 5339b Total Project Cost: $18,250,000 Paratransit Facility TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10307 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $377,000 Project Description: Transit: Service Vehicles Fiscal Year Cost: $377,000 Total Project Cost: $377,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 8 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5339 MPO Project Number: 10308 Federal (FTA) Funds: $2,074,000 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: $2,780,268 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $1,983,685 Project Description: Transit: Passenger Facilities Fiscal Year Cost: $6,837,953 Total Project Cost: $6,837,953 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10309 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $910,000 Project Description: Transit: Operational Facilities Fiscal Year Cost: $910,000 Total Project Cost: $910,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10310 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $24,000,000 Project Description: Transit: Rapid Transit Project Fiscal Year Cost: $24,000,000 Total Project Cost: $24,000,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10311 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $800,000 Project Description: Transit: Administrative Facilities Fiscal Year Cost: $800,000 Total Project Cost: $800,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 9 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10312 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $882,000 Project Description: Transit: Maintenance Tools and Equipment Fiscal Year Cost: $882,000 Total Project Cost: $882,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10313 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $1,246,110 Project Description: Transit: Replacement Components for Fiscal Year Cost: $1,246,110 Revenue Vehicles Total Project Cost: $1,246,110 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10314 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $2,610,000 Project Description: Transit: Computer Hardware/Software Fiscal Year Cost: $2,610,000 Total Project Cost: $2,610,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10315 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $500,000 Project Description: Transit: Joint Development Fiscal Year Cost: $500,000 Total Project Cost: $500,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 10 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5339 MPO Project Number: 10316 Federal (FTA) Funds: $12,363,531 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $5,946,429 Project Description: Transit: Revenue Vehicles Fiscal Year Cost: $18,309,960 FY 2018 / FY 2019 / FY 2020 5339a Total Project Cost: $18,309,960 Purchase 139 Paratransit Vehicles TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 5580.1 Federal (FTA) Funds: $5,493,334 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $2,060,000 Project Description: Transit: Revenue Vehicles Fiscal Year Cost: $7,553,334 Fleet Replacement Program CSJ 0915-12-672 Total Project Cost: $7,553,334 Purchase 14 CNG Buses TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: Note: CMAQ flexed in 2020

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 5580.2 Federal (FTA) Funds: $5,493,334 Apportionment Year: 2021 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $2,060,000 Project Description: Transit: Revenue Vehicles Fiscal Year Cost: $7,553,334 Fleet Replacement Program CSJ 0915-12-679 Total Project Cost: $7,553,334 Purchase 14 CNG Buses TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 5581.1 Federal (FTA) Funds: $5,076,382 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C,O Other Funds: $1,960,762 Project Description: Transit: Revenue Vehicles and Service Fiscal Year Cost: $7,037,144 Bus Frequency Program CSJ 0915-12-673 Total Project Cost: $7,037,144 Purchase 9 CNG buses and increase service TDC Requested: $0 on #7 and #552 routes TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: Note: CMAQ flexed in 2020

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 11 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 5581.2 Federal (FTA) Funds: $1,191,810 Apportionment Year: 2021 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: O Other Funds: $989,619 Project Description: Transit: Service Fiscal Year Cost: $2,181,429 Bus Frequency Program CSJ 0915-12-680 Total Project Cost: $2,181,429 Increase service on #7 and #552 routes TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5307 MPO Project Number: 10401 Federal (FTA) Funds: $34,545,420 Apportionment Year: 2021 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: O Other Funds: $8,636,355 Project Description: Transit: Operating Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $43,181,775 Total Project Cost: $43,181,775 Capital Cost of Contracting, ADA, Preventive TDC Requested: $0 Maintenance TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5307 MPO Project Number: 10403 Federal (FTA) Funds: $570,315 Apportionment Year: 2021 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: O Other Funds: $570,315 Project Description: Transit: JARC Operating Projects Fiscal Year Cost: $1,140,630 Pass Through to AACOG Total Project Cost: $1,140,630 Transportation Services for New Braunfels, TDC Requested: $0 Cibolo, McQueeney, Marion, Schertz, etc TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5310 MPO Project Number: 10405 Federal (FTA) Funds: $1,592,778 Apportionment Year: 2021 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: O Other Funds: $398,195 Project Description: Transit: Mobility of Seniors and Persons Fiscal Year Cost: $1,990,973 with Disabilities Total Project Cost: $1,990,973 Other Programs Pass through to TDC Requested: $0 Subrecipients TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 12 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5310 MPO Project Number: 10406 Federal (FTA) Funds: $176,975 Apportionment Year: 2021 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: A Other Funds: $0 Project Description: Transit: Mobility of Seniors and Persons Fiscal Year Cost: $176,975 with Disabilities Total Project Cost: $176,975 Program Administration TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5339 MPO Project Number: 10407 Federal (FTA) Funds: $421,396 Apportionment Year: 2021 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $15,668,850 Project Description: Transit: Revenue Vehicles Fiscal Year Cost: $16,090,246 Total Project Cost: $16,090,246 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10408 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2021 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $454,781 Project Description: Transit: Service Vehicles Fiscal Year Cost: $454,781 Total Project Cost: $454,781 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5307 MPO Project Number: 10409 Federal (FTA) Funds: $7,129,990 Apportionment Year: 2021 State Funds from TxDOT: $11,509,167 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $527,439 Project Description: Transit: Passenger Facilities Fiscal Year Cost: $19,166,596 Total Project Cost: $19,166,596 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 13 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5339 MPO Project Number: 10410 Federal (FTA) Funds: $3,140,447 Apportionment Year: 2021 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $791,494 Project Description: Transit: Operational Facilities Fiscal Year Cost: $3,931,941 Total Project Cost: $3,931,941 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10411 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2021 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $18,650,000 Project Description: Transit: Advanced Rapid Transit Project Fiscal Year Cost: $18,650,000 Total Project Cost: $18,650,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5339 MPO Project Number: 10412 Federal (FTA) Funds: $439,122 Apportionment Year: 2021 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $510,878 Project Description: Transit: Maintenance Tools and Equipment Fiscal Year Cost: $950,000 Total Project Cost: $950,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5339 MPO Project Number: 10413 Federal (FTA) Funds: $324,000 Apportionment Year: 2021 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $2,511,000 Project Description: Transit: Replacement Components for Fiscal Year Cost: $2,835,000 Revenue Vehicles Total Project Cost: $2,835,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 14 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10414 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2021 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $1,227,000 Project Description: Transit: Computer Hardware/Software Fiscal Year Cost: $1,227,000 Total Project Cost: $1,227,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10415 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2021 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $18,850,000 Project Description: Transit: Bus Operations and Fiscal Year Cost: $18,850,000 Maintenance Facility Total Project Cost: $18,850,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 5580.3 Federal (FTA) Funds: $5,493,333 Apportionment Year: 2022 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $2,059,999 Project Description: Transit: Revenue Vehicles Fiscal Year Cost: $7,553,332 Fleet Replacement Program CSJ 0915-12-685 Total Project Cost: $7,553,332 Purchase 14 CNG Buses TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 5581.3 Federal (FTA) Funds: $1,191,809 Apportionment Year: 2022 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: O Other Funds: $989,618 Project Description: Transit: Service Fiscal Year Cost: $2,181,427 Bus Frequency Program CSJ 0915-12-686 Total Project Cost: $2,181,427 Increase service on #7 and #552 routes TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 15 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5307 MPO Project Number: 10501 Federal (FTA) Funds: $36,301,207 Apportionment Year: 2022 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: O Other Funds: $9,075,302 Project Description: Transit: Operating Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $45,376,509 Total Project Cost: $45,376,509 Capital Cost of Contracting, ADA, Preventive TDC Requested: $0 Maintenance TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5307 MPO Project Number: 10503 Federal (FTA) Funds: $570,315 Apportionment Year: 2022 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: O Other Funds: $570,315 Project Description: Transit: JARC Operating Projects Fiscal Year Cost: $1,140,630 Pass Through to AACOG Total Project Cost: $1,140,630 Transportation Services for New Braunfels, TDC Requested: $0 Cibolo, McQueeney, Marion, Schertz, etc TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5310 MPO Project Number: 10504 Federal (FTA) Funds: $1,672,417 Apportionment Year: 2022 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: O Other Funds: $418,104 Project Description: Transit: Mobility of Seniors and Persons Fiscal Year Cost: $2,090,521 with Disabilities Total Project Cost: $2,090,521 Other Programs Pass through to TDC Requested: $0 Subrecipients TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5310 MPO Project Number: 10505 Federal (FTA) Funds: $185,824 Apportionment Year: 2022 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: A Other Funds: $0 Project Description: Transit: Mobility of Seniors and Persons Fiscal Year Cost: $185,824 with Disabilities Total Project Cost: $185,824 Program Administration TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 16 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5339 MPO Project Number: 10506 Federal (FTA) Funds: $8,362,878 Apportionment Year: 2022 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $14,765,185 Project Description: Transit: Revenue Vehicles Fiscal Year Cost: $23,128,063 Total Project Cost: $23,128,063 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5307,5339 MPO Project Number: 10507 Federal (FTA) Funds: $7,981,301 Apportionment Year: 2022 State Funds from TxDOT: $10,004,417 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $764,253 Project Description: Transit: Passenger Facilities Fiscal Year Cost: $18,749,971 Total Project Cost: $18,749,971 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10508 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2022 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $280,000 Project Description: Transit: Operational Facilities Fiscal Year Cost: $280,000 Total Project Cost: $280,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10509 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2022 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $31,509,000 Project Description: Transit: Advanced Rapid Transit Project Fiscal Year Cost: $31,509,000 Total Project Cost: $31,509,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 17 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5339 MPO Project Number: 10510 Federal (FTA) Funds: $40,000 Apportionment Year: 2022 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $1,060,000 Project Description: Transit: Maintenance Tools and Equipment Fiscal Year Cost: $1,100,000 Total Project Cost: $1,100,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10511 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2022 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $1,235,000 Project Description: Transit: Replacement Components for Fiscal Year Cost: $1,235,000 Revenue Vehicles Total Project Cost: $1,235,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10512 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2022 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $2,050,000 Project Description: Transit: Computer Hardware/Software Fiscal Year Cost: $2,050,000 Total Project Cost: $2,050,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10513 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2022 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $256,282 Project Description: Transit: Service Vehicles Fiscal Year Cost: $256,282 Total Project Cost: $256,282 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 18 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10514 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2022 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $5,150,000 Project Description: Transit: Bus Operations and Fiscal Year Cost: $5,150,000 Maintenance Facility Total Project Cost: $5,150,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5307 MPO Project Number: 10601 Federal (FTA) Funds: $38,144,783 Apportionment Year: 2023 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: O Other Funds: $9,536,196 Project Description: Transit: Operating Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $47,680,979 Total Project Cost: $47,680,979 Capital Cost of Contracting, ADA, Preventive TDC Requested: $0 Maintenance TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5307 MPO Project Number: 10603 Federal (FTA) Funds: $570,315 Apportionment Year: 2023 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: O Other Funds: $570,315 Project Description: Transit: JARC Operating Projects Fiscal Year Cost: $1,140,630 Pass Through to AACOG Total Project Cost: $1,140,630 Transportation Services for New Braunfels, TDC Requested: $0 Cibolo, McQueeney, Marion, Schertz, etc TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5310 MPO Project Number: 10604 Federal (FTA) Funds: $1,756,038 Apportionment Year: 2023 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: O Other Funds: $439,010 Project Description: Transit: Mobility of Seniors and Persons Fiscal Year Cost: $2,195,048 with Disabilities Total Project Cost: $2,195,048 Other Programs Pass through to TDC Requested: $0 Subrecipients TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 19 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5310 MPO Project Number: 10605 Federal (FTA) Funds: $195,115 Apportionment Year: 2023 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: A Other Funds: $0 Project Description: Transit: Mobility of Seniors and Persons Fiscal Year Cost: $195,115 with Disabilities Total Project Cost: $195,115 Program Administration TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10606 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2023 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $483,167 Project Description: Transit: Service Vehicles Fiscal Year Cost: $483,167 Total Project Cost: $483,167 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5339 MPO Project Number: 10607 Federal (FTA) Funds: $896,274 Apportionment Year: 2023 State Funds from TxDOT: $345,711 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $1,501,250 Project Description: Transit: Passenger Facilities Fiscal Year Cost: $2,743,235 Total Project Cost: $2,743,235 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5339 MPO Project Number: 10608 Federal (FTA) Funds: $2,084,000 Apportionment Year: 2023 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $521,000 Project Description: Transit: Operational Facilities Fiscal Year Cost: $2,605,000 Total Project Cost: $2,605,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 20 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10609 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2023 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $53,093,000 Project Description: Transit: Advanced Rapid Transit Project Fiscal Year Cost: $53,093,000 Total Project Cost: $53,093,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10610 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2023 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $150,000 Project Description: Transit: Maintenance Tools and Equipment Fiscal Year Cost: $150,000 Total Project Cost: $150,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5339 MPO Project Number: 10611 Federal (FTA) Funds: $1,788,000 Apportionment Year: 2023 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $447,000 Project Description: Transit: Replacement Components for Fiscal Year Cost: $2,235,000 Revenue Vehicles Total Project Cost: $2,235,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10612 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2023 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $1,005,000 Project Description: Transit: Computer Hardware/Software Fiscal Year Cost: $1,005,000 Total Project Cost: $1,005,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 21 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10613 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2023 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $4,805,000 Project Description: Transit: Bus Operations and Fiscal Year Cost: $4,805,000 Maintenance Facility Total Project Cost: $4,805,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5307 MPO Project Number: 10701 Federal (FTA) Funds: $40,080,538 Apportionment Year: 2024 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: O Other Funds: $10,020,134 Project Description: Transit: Operating Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $50,100,672 Total Project Cost: $50,100,672 Capital Cost of Contracting, ADA, Preventive TDC Requested: $0 Maintenance TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5307 MPO Project Number: 10703 Federal (FTA) Funds: $570,315 Apportionment Year: 2024 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: O Other Funds: $570,315 Project Description: Transit: JARC Operating Projects Fiscal Year Cost: $1,140,630 Pass Through to AACOG Total Project Cost: $1,140,630 Transportation Services for New Braunfels, TDC Requested: $0 Cibolo, McQueeney, Marion, Schertz, etc TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5310 MPO Project Number: 10704 Federal (FTA) Funds: $1,843,640 Apportionment Year: 2024 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: O Other Funds: $460,960 Project Description: Transit: Mobility of Seniors and Persons Fiscal Year Cost: $2,304,800 with Disabilities Total Project Cost: $2,304,800 Other Programs Pass through to TDC Requested: $0 Subrecipients TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 22 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5310 MPO Project Number: 10705 Federal (FTA) Funds: $204,871 Apportionment Year: 2024 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: A Other Funds: $0 Project Description: Transit: Mobility of Seniors and Persons Fiscal Year Cost: $204,871 with Disabilities Total Project Cost: $204,871 Program Administration TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10706 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2024 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $711,041 Project Description: Transit: Service Vehicles Fiscal Year Cost: $711,041 Total Project Cost: $711,041 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5339 MPO Project Number: 10707 Federal (FTA) Funds: $26,989 Apportionment Year: 2024 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $460,346 Project Description: Transit: Passenger Facilities Fiscal Year Cost: $487,335 Total Project Cost: $487,335 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5339 MPO Project Number: 10708 Federal (FTA) Funds: $80,000 Apportionment Year: 2024 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $20,000 Project Description: Transit: Operational Facilities Fiscal Year Cost: $100,000 Total Project Cost: $100,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 23 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10709 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2024 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $56,457,000 Project Description: Transit: Advanced Rapid Transit Project Fiscal Year Cost: $56,457,000 Total Project Cost: $56,457,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10710 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2024 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $182,000 Project Description: Transit: Maintenance Tools and Equipment Fiscal Year Cost: $182,000 Total Project Cost: $182,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5339 MPO Project Number: 10711 Federal (FTA) Funds: $48,000 Apportionment Year: 2024 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $12,000 Project Description: Transit: Replacement Components for Fiscal Year Cost: $60,000 Revenue Vehicles Total Project Cost: $60,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - 5339 MPO Project Number: 10712 Federal (FTA) Funds: $3,200,000 Apportionment Year: 2024 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $1,745,000 Project Description: Transit: Computer Hardware/Software Fiscal Year Cost: $4,945,000 Total Project Cost: $4,945,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 24 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: 10713 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2024 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $34,270,000 Project Description: Transit: Bus Operations and Fiscal Year Cost: $34,270,000 Maintenance Facility Total Project Cost: $34,270,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 9060 Federal (FTA) Funds: $37,680,000 Apportionment Year: 2025 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $9,420,000 Project Description: Transit: Vehicle Acquisition Fiscal Year Cost: $47,100,000 Years 2021-2025 * Total Project Cost: $47,100,000 Lump Sum Amount: Revenue Vehicles TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 9160 Federal (FTA) Funds: $1,056,000 Apportionment Year: 2025 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $264,000 Project Description: Transit: Vehicle Acquisition Fiscal Year Cost: $1,320,000 Years 2021-2025 * Total Project Cost: $1,320,000 Lump Sum Amount: Non-Revenue Vehicles TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 9260 Federal (FTA) Funds: $146,616,000 Apportionment Year: 2025 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $36,654,000 Project Description: Transit: Facility Rehabilitation & Equipment Fiscal Year Cost: $183,270,000 Years 2021-2025 * Total Project Cost: $183,270,000 Lump Sum Amount: Buildings & Equipment TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 25 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 9270 Federal (FTA) Funds: $54,576,000 Apportionment Year: 2025 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $13,644,000 Project Description: Transit: Facility Rehabilitation & Equipment Fiscal Year Cost: $68,220,000 Years 2026-2030 * Total Project Cost: $68,220,000 Lump Sum Amount: Buildings & Equipment TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: Local MPO Project Number: 9300 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2025 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $1,001,150,000 Project Description: Transit: Operating Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $1,001,150,000 Years 2021-2025 * Total Project Cost: $1,001,150,000 Lump Sum Amount: Line Service TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: Local MPO Project Number: 9400 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2025 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $258,870,000 Project Description: Transit: Operating Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $258,870,000 Years 2021-2025 * Total Project Cost: $258,870,000 Lump Sum Amount: VIAtrans Service TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: Local MPO Project Number: 9500 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2025 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $45,120,000 Project Description: Transit: Operating Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $45,120,000 Years 2021-2025 * Total Project Cost: $45,120,000 Lump Sum Amount: Other Services TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 26 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 9070 Federal (FTA) Funds: $45,912,000 Apportionment Year: 2030 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $11,478,000 Project Description: Transit: Vehicle Acquisition Fiscal Year Cost: $57,390,000 Years 2026-2030 * Total Project Cost: $57,390,000 Lump Sum Amount: Revenue Vehicles TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 9170 Federal (FTA) Funds: $1,088,000 Apportionment Year: 2030 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $272,000 Project Description: Transit: Vehicle Acquisition Fiscal Year Cost: $1,360,000 Years 2026-2030 * Total Project Cost: $1,360,000 Lump Sum Amount: Non-Revenue Vehicles TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: Local MPO Project Number: 9300 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2030 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $1,135,480,000 Project Description: Transit: Operating Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $1,135,480,000 Years 2026-2030 * Total Project Cost: $1,135,480,000 Lump Sum Amount: Line Service TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: Local MPO Project Number: 9400 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2030 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $293,190,000 Project Description: Transit: Operating Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $293,190,000 Years 2026-2030 * Total Project Cost: $293,190,000 Lump Sum Amount: VIAtrans Service TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 27 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: Local MPO Project Number: 9500 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2030 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $67,020,000 Project Description: Transit: Operating Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $67,020,000 Years 2026-2030 * Total Project Cost: $67,020,000 Lump Sum Amount: Other Services TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 9080 Federal (FTA) Funds: $213,200,000 Apportionment Year: 2035 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $53,300,000 Project Description: Transit: Vehicle Acquisition Fiscal Year Cost: $266,500,000 Years 2031-2035 * Total Project Cost: $266,500,000 Lump Sum Amount: Revenue Vehicles TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 9180 Federal (FTA) Funds: $1,192,000 Apportionment Year: 2035 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $298,000 Project Description: Transit: Vehicle Acquisition Fiscal Year Cost: $1,490,000 Years 2031-2035 * Total Project Cost: $1,490,000 Lump Sum Amount: Non-Revenue Vehicles TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 9280 Federal (FTA) Funds: $60,264,000 Apportionment Year: 2035 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $15,066,000 Project Description: Transit: Facility Rehabilitation & Equipment Fiscal Year Cost: $75,330,000 Years 2031-2035 * Total Project Cost: $75,330,000 Lump Sum Amount: Buildings & Equipment TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 28 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: Local MPO Project Number: 9300 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2035 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $1,284,670,000 Project Description: Transit: Operating Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $1,284,670,000 Years 2031-2035 * Total Project Cost: $1,284,670,000 Lump Sum Amount: Line Service TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: Local MPO Project Number: 9400 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2035 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $331,730,000 Project Description: Transit: Operating Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $331,730,000 Years 2031-2035 * Total Project Cost: $331,730,000 Lump Sum Amount: VIAtrans Service TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: Local MPO Project Number: 9500 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2035 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $69,470,000 Project Description: Transit: Operating Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $69,470,000 Years 2031-2035 * Total Project Cost: $69,470,000 Lump Sum Amount: Other Services TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 9090 Federal (FTA) Funds: $42,160,000 Apportionment Year: 2040 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $10,540,000 Project Description: Transit: Vehicle Acquisition Fiscal Year Cost: $52,700,000 Years 2036-2040 * Total Project Cost: $52,700,000 Lump Sum Amount: Revenue Vehicles TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 29 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 9190 Federal (FTA) Funds: $1,320,000 Apportionment Year: 2040 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $330,000 Project Description: Transit: Vehicle Acquisition Fiscal Year Cost: $1,650,000 Years 2036-2040 * Total Project Cost: $1,650,000 Lump Sum Amount: Non-Revenue Vehicles TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 9290 Federal (FTA) Funds: $66,528,000 Apportionment Year: 2040 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $16,632,000 Project Description: Transit: Facility Rehabilitation & Equipment Fiscal Year Cost: $83,160,000 Years 2036-2040 * Total Project Cost: $83,160,000 Lump Sum Amount: Buildings & Equipment TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: Local MPO Project Number: 9310 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2040 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $1,453,490,000 Project Description: Transit: Operating Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $1,453,490,000 Years 2036-2040 * Total Project Cost: $1,453,490,000 Lump Sum Amount: Line Service TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: Local MPO Project Number: 9410 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2040 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $375,320,000 Project Description: Transit: Operating Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $375,320,000 Years 2036-2040 * Total Project Cost: $375,320,000 Lump Sum Amount: VIAtrans Service TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 30 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: Local MPO Project Number: 9510 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2040 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $78,600,000 Project Description: Transit: Operating Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $78,600,000 Years 2036-2040 * Total Project Cost: $78,600,000 Lump Sum Amount: Other Services TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 9095 Federal (FTA) Funds: $74,440,000 Apportionment Year: 2045 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $18,610,000 Project Description: Transit: Vehicle Acquisition Fiscal Year Cost: $93,050,000 Years 2041-2045 * Total Project Cost: $93,050,000 Lump Sum Amount: Revenue Vehicles TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 9195 Federal (FTA) Funds: $1,456,000 Apportionment Year: 2045 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $364,000 Project Description: Transit: Vehicle Acquisition Fiscal Year Cost: $1,820,000 Years 2041-2045 * Total Project Cost: $1,820,000 Lump Sum Amount: Non-Revenue Vehicles TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: 9295 Federal (FTA) Funds: $73,448,000 Apportionment Year: 2045 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $18,362,000 Project Description: Transit: Facility Rehabilitation & Equipment Fiscal Year Cost: $91,810,000 Years 2041-2045 * Total Project Cost: $91,810,000 Lump Sum Amount: Buildings & Equipment TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 31 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Transit Projects San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: Local MPO Project Number: 9320 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2045 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $1,644,490,000 Project Description: Transit: Operating Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $1,644,490,000 Years 2041-2045 * Total Project Cost: $1,644,490,000 Lump Sum Amount: Line Service TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: Local MPO Project Number: 9420 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2045 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $424,650,000 Project Description: Transit: Operating Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $424,650,000 Years 2041-2045 * Total Project Cost: $424,650,000 Lump Sum Amount: VIAtrans Service TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: Local MPO Project Number: 9520 Federal (FTA) Funds: $0 Apportionment Year: 2045 State Funds from TxDOT: $0 Project Phase: N/A Other Funds: $88,950,000 Project Description: Transit: Operating Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $88,950,000 Years 2041-2045 * Total Project Cost: $88,950,000 Lump Sum Amount: Other Services TDC Requested: $0 TDC Awarded: $0 Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project detail is listed separately. 11 - 32

Pg. 17-1 Regionally Significant Project List

17 Regionally Significant Project List

Regionally Significant Project List August 24, 2020

2017 Main 2024 Main 2025 Main 2035 Main 2045 Main MPO Number Roadway Name Limit From Limit To Project Description 2017 FR Lanes 2024 FR Lanes 2025 FR Lanes 2035 FR Lanes 2045 FR Lanes Phase Network Years Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes

Expand from 8 ln to 14 ln expy - add 6 new express lanes incl 2 HOV-special use lns, & 61.2 IH 35 North IH 410 S IH 410 N from 4/6 to 4/6 FR lanes & DCs at IH 410 S & IH 410 N; 1 lane DC: NB 35 to WB 410N; 8 8 8 14 14 4/6 4/6 4/6 4/6 4/6 C 2035,2045 2 lane DC: NB 410S to NB 35; SB 35 to SB 410S; EB 410N to SB 35

2020 Loop 1604 US 90 West Military Dr. Expand 4 to 6 lane expressway & from 4 to 4 FR lanes 4 4 4 6 6 4 4 4 4 4 C 2035,2045

3153 SH 211 (TX Research Pkwy) FM 1957 (Potranco Rd), N 2.9 Mi Medina County Line Construct two lane rural highway on new location 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 C 2025,2035,2045 Medina Co. Line, 4.5 Mi N of FM 3154 SH 211 (TX Research Pkwy) Medina Co. Line, 2.0 Mi S of FM 471 Construct two lane rural highway on new location 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 C 2025,2035,2045 1957, N Expand from 8 ln to 14 ln expy - add 6 new express lanes - incl 2 HOV-special use lns, & from 4/6 to 4/6 FR lanes & DCs @ IH 410N & LP 1604; 1 lane DC: NB 35 to WB 3477 IH 35 IH 410 N Guadalupe/Bexar County Line 8 14 14 14 14 4/6 4/6 4/6 4/6 4/6 C 2024,2025,2035,2045 1604; EB 1604 to SB 35;2 lane DC: SB 35 to WB 1604; EB 1604 to NB 35; EB 410N to NB 35;SB 35 to WB 410N

Expand from 6 lane to 10 lane expy - add 4 new express lanes including 2 HOV - 3514 IH 35 North US 281/IH 37, East IH 410 S 6 6 6 6 10 6 6 6 6 6 C 2045 special use lanes & from 6 to 6 FR lanes

Expand from 4 to 10 lane expressway - including 4 General Purpose and 2 HOV - 3530 Loop 1604 Redland Road IH 35 North 4 4 4 10 10 4 4 4 4 4 E,C 2035,2045 special use lanes & from 4 to 4 FR lanes;

Expand from 4 to 10 lane expressway - including 2 HOV-special use lanes & from 4 to 4 3786 Loop 1604 US 281 Redland Road 4 4 10 10 10 4 4 4 4 4 C 2025,2035,2045 FR lanes

Expand 4 to 6 lane expressway & from 4/6 to 4/6 FR lanes, including direct connectors 3911 Loop 1604 West Military Drive Braun Rd 4 4 4 6 6 4/6 4/6 4/6 4/6 4/6 C 2035,2045 at SH 151 - NB 1604 to EB 151; WB 151 to SB 1604

3912 Loop 1604 Braun Rd SH 16 Expand 4 to 8 lane expressway and from 6 to 6 FR lanes 4 4 4 8 8 6 6 6 6 6 C 2035,2045

Expand from 4 to 10 lane expressway - including 2 HOV-special use lanes, & from 4 to 3913 Loop 1604 SH 16 IH 10 4 4 10 10 10 4 4 4 4 4 C 2025,2035,2045 4 FR lanes; Reference #4049 and #5556 (in TIP/MTP)

Reconstruct and expand from 2 to 4 lanes with shoulder, pedestrian ramps, curb, bridge 3988 Bulverde Road Marshall Road Wilderness Oak 2 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 C 2024,2025,2035,2045 construction and drainage improvements Expand from 4 to 10 lane expy - including 2 HOV special use lanes; from 4 to 4 4049 SL 1604 IH 10 US 281 frontage roads; 10/19 - add project; spin off of 2452-02-083 (MPO #3913); no impact to 4 4 10 10 10 4 4 4 4 4 C 2025,2035,2045 conformity Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with raised median or center turn lane, bike lanes and 5309 FM 1518 FM 78 IH 10 E 2 2 2 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 C 2035,2045 sidewalks Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with raised median, or center turn lane, bike lanes and 5310 NW Military Highway Shavano Ranch Road Lp 1604 2 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 C 2024,2025,2035,2045 sidewalks Expand 4 to 6 lanes divided & intersection operational improvements including new turn 5315 Wurzbach Parkway Lockhill Selma Road FM 1535-NW Military 4 6 6 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 C 2024,2025,2035,2045 lanes and improved signal operation at FM 1535 Expand from a 2 to 4 lane divided roadway with raised median, bike lanes, sidewalks, 5317 Blanco Road West Oak Estates Borgfeld Rd 2 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 C 2024,2025,2035,2045 curbs and drainage Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes with raised median or continuous left turn lane, bike 5329 FM 2252 Evans Road Comal/Bexar County Line 2 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 C 2024,2025,2035,2045 lanes and sidewalk

5330.2 FM 3351 Comal/Bexar County Line IH 10 Expand 2 to 4 lanes with turn lanes, bike lanes & sidewalks 2 2 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 C 2025,2035,2045

Expand from 8 to 10 lanes from Ingram to 151 & 6 to 8 lanes from 151 to 90 - add 2 5372 Loop 410 Ingram Rd US 90 new lanes, & from 6 to 6 FR lanes; reconstruct SH 151 interchange - NB 410 to WB 151 6/8 8/10 8/10 8/10 8/10 6 6 6 6 6 C 2024,2025,2035,2045 & EB 151 to SB 410

5377 FM 471 Old FM 471 Medina County Line Expand 2 to 4 lane divided with bike lanes and sidewalks 2 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 C 2024,2025,2035,2045 5379 FM 1516 FM 78 IH 10 Expand 2 to 4 lane divided with bike lanes and sidewalks 2 2 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 C 2025,2035,2045

Expand from 4 lane divided to 6 lane expressway and 4 FR lanes (LP 1604 to SH 211) - 5380 US 90 SH 211 0.8 Miles W of IH 410 1 lane DC - SB 1604 to WB 90; NB 1604 to EB 90; NB 1604 to WB 90; EB 90 to NB 4 4 4 6 6 0 0 0 4 4 C 2035,2045 1604 & EB 90 to SB 1604; 2 lane DC: WB 90 to NB 1604 & WB 90 to SB 1604

5381 US 90 0.8 Miles W of IH 410 IH 410 Expand from 4 lane divided to 6 lane expressway and from 4 to 4 FR lanes 4 4 4 6 6 4 4 4 4 4 C 2035,2045 Expand from 4 lane to 6 lane expressway and from 4/6 to 4/6 FR lanes, with WB 151 to 5382 SH 151 LP 1604 IH 410 4 4 6 6 6 4/6 4/6 4/6 4/6 4/6 C 2025,2035,2045 NB 1604 2 lane DC 5386 SL 1604 0.38 Mi North of FM 1303 FM 1303 Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes divided 2 2 2 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 C 2035,2045 5387 SL 1604 US 87 US 181 Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes divided 2 2 2 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 C 2035,2045 5388 SL 1604 US 181 0.8 Mi North of FM 1303 Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes divided 2 2 2 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 C 2035,2045 5389 SL 1604 FM 1346- Houston Street US 87 Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes divided 2 2 2 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 C 2035,2045

5396 IH 10 Graytown Rd Guadalupe/Bexar County Line Expand from 4 lane to 6 lane expressway and from 4 to 4 FR lanes 4 4 6 6 6 4 4 4 4 4 C 2025,2035,2045

Expand from 4 to 8 lane expressway - 2 new general purpose, 2 new HOV lanes & from 5401 IH 10 Kendall/Bexar County Line FM 3351 4 4 4 8 8 4 4 4 4 4 C 2035,2045 4 to 4 FR lanes

Exp fr 6 to 8 lns btwn US 90 & Valley Hi; frm 4 to 6 lns btwn Valley Hi & IH 35 S; frm 4/6 5402 IH 410 US 90 IH 35 S to 4/6 FR ln; construct all DCs at IH 35 S; all DCs are 1 lane; cloverleaf remains for FR 4/6 4/6 4/6 6/8 6/8 4/6 4/6 4/6 4/6 4/6 C 2035,2045 connectivity

5408.1 Bulverde Road Briar Crest North of Quiet Meadow Street Expand from 2 travel lanes and CTL to 4 travel lanes and CTL 2 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 C 2024,2025,2035,2045

5433 Evans Road TPC Parkway/Dusty Canyon Hanging Oak Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with operational and drainage improvements 2 2 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 C 2025,2035,2045

Expand from 2 to 4 lane divided roadway with a raised median, bike lanes, sidewalk, 5532 FM 2696 (Blanco Road) Borgfeld Bexar/Comal County Line 2 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 C 2024,2025,2035,2045 curbs and drainage

5549 SL 1604 IH 10 E. Martinez Creek Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes divided 2 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 C 2024,2025,2035,2045 5552 IH 10 Loop 1604 Graytown Rd Expand from 4 lane to 6 lane expressway and from 4 to 4 FR lanes 4 6 6 6 6 4 4 4 4 4 C 2024,2025,2035,2045 5554 SL 1604 Martinez Creek FM 1346 - Houston Street Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lane divided 2 2 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 C 2025,2035,2045 5557 SL 1604 0.7 Mi North of FM 2536 Macdona-Lacoste Rd Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lane divided 2 2 2 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 C 2035,2045 9107 SL 1604 FM 78 IH 10 East Expand from 4 lane divided to 4 lane expressway 4 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 C 2035,2045 9110.1 Loop 1604 IH 35 S 0.7 Mi North of FM 2536 Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lane divided 2 2 2 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 C 2035,2045 9110.2 Loop 1604 Macdona-Lacoste Rd US 90 W Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lane divided 2 2 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 C 2025,2035,2045

Pg. 18-1 Unfunded Project List

18 Unfunded Project List

AAMPO Mobility 2045 Unfunded Project List (DRAFT)

No. Agency Class Corridor/Project From To Description 1TxDOT Expy I‐10 W Loop 1604 IH 35 (Downtown) Operational Improvements and Transit Priority/HOV Lanes 2TxDOT Expy I‐10 WSH 46 FM 3351 Expand to 8 Lane Expressway (6 GP + 2 HOV) 3TxDOT Expy I‐10 E Bexar/Guadalupe CL US 90A Expand to 6 Lane Expressway 4TxDOT Expy I‐10 ESH 130 SH 80 Expand to 6 Lane Expressway 5TxDOT Expy I‐35 NE FM 1103 SL 337 Expand to 8 Lane Expressway Expand to Add 4 GP and 2 HOV lanes and Interchange Improvements at I‐410 S & 6TxDOT Expy I‐35 NE IH 410 SIH 410 N I‐410 N 7TxDOT Expy I‐35 NE FM 3009 FM 1103 Expand to Add 2 GP and 2 HOV lanes 8TxDOT Expy I‐35 Central US 90 IH 410 S Expand to 10 Lane Expressway 9TxDOT Expy I‐35 South Loop 1604 SUS 90A Expand to 10 Lane Expressway 10 TxDOT Expy I‐35 South LaSalle County Line Loop 1604 Expand to 6 & 8 Lane Expressway 11 TxDOT Expy Loop 1604 Nat IH 10 W Interchange Improvements (Phase 2)

12 TxDOT Expy Loop 1604 NRedland Road IH 35 N Expand to 10 Lane Expresway (4 GP + 1 HOV/Special‐Use Lane Each Direction) 13 TxDOT Expy Loop 1604 NE FM 78 IH 10 E Expand to 4 Lane Expressway with Frontage Roads 14 TxDOT Expy Loop 1604 NE at IH 10 E Interchange Improvements 15 TxDOT Expy Loop 1604 SUS 90 IH 10 E Expand to 4 Lane Expressway with Frontage Roads 16 TxDOT Expy Loop 1604 Wat US 90 West Interchange Improvements 17 TxDOT Expy US 90 West SH 211 IH 410 Expansion to Expressway 18 TxDOT Expy I‐410 East at IH 10 E Interchange Improvements 19 TxDOT Expy I‐37 SSH 97 SL 13 Expand to 6 Lane Expressway 20 TxDOT Expy I‐410 NIngram Road Broadway Operational Improvements 21 TxDOT Expy I‐410 SW US 90 IH 35 SW Expand to 6 and 8 Lane Expressway * is this the HNTB project? 22 TxDOT Expy I‐410 SW IH 35 SW Interchange Improvements 23 TxDOT Expy I‐410 SW at US 90 West Interchange Improvements (Phase 2) 24 TxDOT Expy I‐410 SW at SH 151 Interchange Improvements (Phase 3) 25 TxDOT Expy I‐410 SE IH 35 SW IH 10 E Expand to 6 Lane Expressway 26 TxDOT Arterial US 281 North Borgfeld FM 306 Expand to 4 Lane Expressway with Frontage Roads 27 TxDOT Expy US 281 North Loop 1604 IH 35 (Downtown) Operational Improvements and Transit Priority/HOV Lanes 28 TxDOT Arterial SH 16 IH 410 Loop 1604 W Add Capacity 29 TxDOT Expy SH 151 IH 410 US 90 Expand to 6 Lane Expressway 30 TxDOT Arterial SH 123 Guadalupe/Hays CL Cordova Lane Expand to 4 Lane Divided Highway 31 TxDOT Arterial SH 46 Amman Road (Boerne) Farhills Road (Bulverde) Expand to 4 Lane Divided Highway 32 TxDOT Arterial SH 46 Bentwood (Bulverde) Range Road (New Braunfels) Expand to 4 Lane Divided Highway 33 TxDOT Arterial SH 46 IH 35 (New Braunfels) IH 10 (Seguin) Expansion/Operational Improvements with Access Management 34 TxDOT Arterial SH 46 SH 16 IH 10 (Boerne) Expansion to 4 Lane Divided Highway 35 TxDOT Arterial FM 3351 SH 46 IH 10 Expansion 36 TxDOT Arterial FM 1863 US 281 SH 46 Expansion 37 TxDOT Arterial SH 211 FM 471 US 90 expand to 4 lane freeway with frontage roads expand to 4/6 lane roadway with medians, turnlanes, bike and sidewalk 38 TxDOT Arterial FM 1957 FM 471 SH 211 accomodations expand to 6 lane roadway with medians, turnlanes, bike and sidewalk 39 TxDOT Arterial FM 1957 Loop 1604 Culebra Road accomodations

40 TxDOT Expy US 90 Hunt Lane SH 151 Upgrade expressway, operational improvements, drainage improvements 41 TxDOT Arterial US 181 IH 37 FM 775 expansion 42 TxDOT Arterial US 87 IH 410 FM 775 expansion expand to 4/6 lane roadway with medians, turnlanes, bike and sidewalk 43 TxDOT Arterial FM 3009 FM 2252 SH 46 accomodations AAMPO Mobility 2045 Unfunded Project List (DRAFT)

No. Agency Class Corridor/Project From To Description expand to 4/6 lane roadway with medians, turnlanes, bike and sidewalk 44 TxDOT Arterial FM 1346 IH 410 Loop 1604 accomodations expand to 4/6 lane roadway with medians, turnlanes, bike and sidewalk 45 TxDOT Arterial FM 1518 IH 10 E Loop 1604 SE accomodations expand to 4 lane roadway with medians, turnlanes, bike and sidewalk 46 TxDOT Arterial FM 1516 IH 10 EUS 87 accomodations expand to 4 lane roadway with medians, turnlanes, bike and sidewalk 47 TxDOT Arterial FM 2536 IH 410 Loop 1604 accomodations 48 TxDOT Arterial FM 306 FM 2673 US 281 expansion expand to 4 lane roadway with medians, turnlanes, bike and sidewalk 49 TxDOT Arterial FM 1103 FM 78 Rodeo Way accomodations expand to 4 lane roadway with medians, turnlanes, bike and sidewalk 50 TxDOT Arterial FM 725 Zipp Road FM 78 accomodations Widen existing roadway to 4 lanes with median, sidewalks, drainage and bike Ackerman Road IH 10 Kirby City Limits 51 CoSA Arterial lanes

52 CoSA Arterial Babcock Loop 1604 Hausman Street reconstruction and widening to four lanes with median and multi‐use path Narrow road to 24' cross section and add curb and 6' sidewalk on the north side 53 CoSA Arterial Burr Road New Braunfels Harry Wurzbach of Burr Road 54 CoSA Arterial E‐W Connector La Cantera Parkway Blanco Road (FM 2696) Construct new extension of roadway to match current typical section Widen existing roadway to 4 lanes with median, sidewalks, drainage and bike 55 CoSA Arterial Gillette Road Zarzamora Commercial lanes 56 CoSA Arterial Gold Canyon Sonterra Redland Construct new extension of roadway to match current typical section 57 CoSA Arterial Gold Canyon Red River Trail Bulverde Road Construct new extension of roadway to match current typical section

58 CoSA Arterial Goliad Road Southeast Military Loop 410 Street reconstruction and widening to 4 lanes with median and multi‐use path 59 CoSA Arterial Guilbeau Road Bandera Road/Guilbeau Road Eckhert Road Construct new extension of roadway to match current typical section Widen to 5 lanes from 800' south of Rittiman to Harry Wurzbach East ACP gate 60 CoSA Arterial Harry Wurzbach Winans Road Fort Sam Houston Gate and implement revserible lanes 61 CoSA Arterial Harry Wurzbach Rittiman Loop 410 Widen Harry Wurzbach from 800' south of Rittiman to Loop 410 Widen road to 5 lanes and provide curbs, sidewalks, driveway approaches, bicycle 62 CoSA Arterial Medina Base Road Five Palms Military Drive (Loop 13) facilities, drainage and traffic signals 63 CoSA Arterial Military Drive (Loop 13) US 90 Old Pearsall Road (FM 2536) Widen road and provide curbs, sidewalks, bicycle facilities Prue Road Cedar Park Old Prue Widen road to 4 lanes with median and provide curbs, sidewalks, bicycle facilities 64 CoSA Arterial Roadway expansion from 2 lanes to 4 lanes w/ curb & sidewalks and drainage Grosenbacher Phase IPotranco Rd Canthree 65 Bexar County Arterial improvements Roadway expansion from 2 lanes to 3 lanes w/ curb & sidewalks and drainage Grosenbacher Phase II Canthree US 90 66 Bexar County Arterial improvements). 67 Bexar County Arterial Masterson Road US 90 1 mile south? Reconstruct to 24' Roadway Section with 4' shoulders and bar ditches Roadway expansion from 2 lanes to 2‐12' lanes with a 14' turning lane and Pearsall Road Phase I Kearney Rd LP 1604 68 Bexar County Arterial drainage improvements Roadway expansion from 2 lanes to 2‐12' lanes with a 14' turning lane and Pearsall Road Phase II Shepherd Rd Kearney Rd 69 Bexar County Arterial drainage improvements Roadway expansion from 2 lanes to 2‐12' lanes with a 14' turning lane and Pearsall Road Phase III Luckey Road (480ft South) Shepherd Rd 70 Bexar County Arterial drainage improvements Roadway expansion from 2 lanes to 2‐12' lanes with a 14' turning lane and Pearsall Road Phase IV County Line Luckey Road 71 Bexar County Arterial drainage improvements Full reconstruct of 44' roadway with curb and sidwalks. Remove islands. Possible Spurs Ranch Phase IUS 90 N. Cagnon Rd. 72 Bexar County Arterial concrete section. AAMPO Mobility 2045 Unfunded Project List (DRAFT)

No. Agency Class Corridor/Project From To Description Full reconstruct of 44' roadway with curb and sidwalks. Remove islands. Possible Spurs Ranch Phase II N. Cagnon Rd. LP1604 73 Bexar County Arterial concrete section. N. Old Talley (verify end limit w/ Roadway expansion to a secondary arterial (Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes w/ Talley Rd Phase III Tamaron Pass 74 Bexar County Arterial Old FM 471 project) curb & sidewalks and drainage improvements). Talley Rd Phase IV New section from 1st bend north of Kallison Bend Roadway extension to 4‐12' lanes with curb and sidewalk 75 Bexar County Arterial (New Talley Rd) Cartwright Trail Roadway expansion from 2 lanes to 2‐12' lanes with 6' shoulders and including W T Montgomery II St. Lucas Creek Macdona Lacoste Lucas Creek bridge improvements. (Tony is going to emulsify this road this year 76 Bexar County Arterial 2015.) 77 Bexar County Arterial West Grosenbacher (Arcadia Path Extension) Dead End (Arcadia Path Extension) Canthree Roadway expansion to a ~44' roadway seciton with curb and sidewalks. 78 Bexar County Arterial WT Montgomery Extension US 90 Cantree/Grosenbacher Roadway extension to 4‐12' lanes with curb and sidewalk 79 Bexar County Arterial Wildhorse Pkwy Shaenfield Road Arabian Gate Subdivision arterial street reconstruction. Roadway expansion from 2 lanes to 4 lanes, to provide turn lane, shoulders, Blanco Rd Phase III Borgfeld Dr County Line 80 Bexar County Arterial sidewalks and drainage improvements Boerne Stage Rd Phase II 1200' West of River Ranch Cross Mountain Widen to provide center turn lane, shoulders, and drainage improvements 81 Bexar County Arterial Boerne Stage Rd Phase III Scenic Loop 1200' West of River Ranch Widen to provide center turn lane, shoulders, and drainage improvements 82 Bexar County Arterial Roadway resonctruction to 2‐12ft lanes w/ 14ft center turn lane and 4 ft Bulverde Phase VI Borgfeld County Line 83 Bexar County Arterial shoulders Roadway expansion from 2 lanes to 4 lanes, to provide turn lane, shoulders, Evans Rd Phase III Hanging Oak Green Mtn sidewalks, drainage improvements and improvements to the Green Mountain 84 Bexar County Arterial Intersection Roadway expansion from 2 lanes to 4 lanes, to provide turn lane, shoulders, Evans Rd Phase IV Green Mtn Wagon Road 85 Bexar County Arterial sidewalks and drainage improvements Roadway recontruction to 3‐12ft lanes w/ 4 ft shoulders and drainage Old Fredericksburg Rd Ralph Fair IH‐10 86 Bexar County Arterial improvements Scenic Loop Babcock Boerne Stage Road Roadway recontruction to 2‐12ft lanes w/ 14ft center turn lane and 4 ft shoulders 87 Bexar County Arterial 88 Bexar County Arterial Montgomery Drive Melbury Forest FM 1976(Gibbs Sprawl) Roadway recontruction 89 Bexar County Arterial Richter Road Old Corpus Christi Rd SH 181 Roadway recontruction to 2‐3 Lanes 90 VIA Arterial North‐Central Bus Rapid Transit (Phase I) Airport/North Star Mall Southtown High Capacity Transit 91 VIA Arterial East‐West Bus Rapid Transit (Phase I) General McMullen AT&T Center High Capacity Transit 92 VIA Arterial Southeast Primo (Phase I) Centro Plaza Brooks Transit Center High Capacity Transit 93 VIA Arterial Near West Primo extension (Phase I) Madla Transit Center Texas A&M University High Capacity Transit 94 VIA Arterial Northwest Bus Rapid Transit (Phase II) Medical Center Downtown High Capacity Transit 95 VIA Arterial Northeast Bus Rapid Transit (Phase II) Southtown Thousand Oaks High Capacity Transit 96 VIA Arterial North‐Central Bus Rapid Transit extension (Phase III) Airport/North Star Mall Stone Oak High Capacity Transit 97 VIA Arterial South‐Central Bus Rapid Transit (Phase III) Southtown Brooks Transit Center High Capacity Transit 98 VIA Arterial East‐West Bus Rapid Transit extension (Phase III) Kel‐Lac Transit Center I‐410 E High Capacity Transit 99 VIA Arterial Northwest Bus Rapid Transit exetension (Phase III) Medical Center The Rim/UTSA High Capacity Transit 100 VIA Arterial Northeast Bus Rapid Transit extension (Phase III) Thousand Oaks Rolling Oaks High Capacity Transit 101 VIA Other Rapid Transit Maintenance Facility N/A N/A Bus Rapid Transit Maintenance Facility 102 VIA Other MyLink on‐state roadways N/A N/A Pedestrian and transit improvements on state roadways 103 VIA Other MyLink off‐state roadways N/A N/A Pedestrian and transit improvements on state roadways 104 Other Arterial UPRR at Basse, Sunset and Jones Maltsberger Grade separations at these locations (Austin Sub) 104a Other Arterial UPRR at Basse 104b Other Arterial UPRR at Sunset 104c Other Arterial UPRR at Jones Maltsberger 105 Other Arterial Rittiman at Walzem Road Grade separation (Glidden Sub) AAMPO Mobility 2045 Unfunded Project List (DRAFT)

No. Agency Class Corridor/Project From To Description 105a Other Arterial Railroad at Rittiman 105b Other Arterial Railroad at Walzem 106 Comal County Arterial SH 46 at FM 3009, FM 311 and S. Cranes Mill Rd. Intersection improvements 106a Comal County Arterial SH 46 at FM 311 106b Comal County Arterial SH 46 at FM 3009 106c Comal County Arterial SH 46 at S Cranes Mill 107 Comal County Arterial FM 306 TxDOT Roadside Park Cannan Rd. Improve 108a Comal County Arterial SH 46 Bulverde Rd Comal/Kendall Co. line Improve 108b Comal County Arterial SH 46 Range Rd. FM 3159 Improve 109 Comal County Arterial FM 1863 US 281 Smithson Valley Rd. Improve 110 Comal County Arterial FM 3009 FM 2252 SH 46 Shoulders 111 Comal County Arterial NW Connector SH 46 Schwab Rd New Hwy 112 Comal County Arterial Blanco Rd Bexar Comal CL SH 46 Expand 113 Com/Gua Co Arterial SH 46 at IH 35 Direct Connect 114 Com/Gua Co Arterial SH 46 at IH 10 Direct Connect 115 Com/Gua Co Arterial SH 46 IH 35 IH 10 Expand 116 Com/Gua Co Arterial FM 758 SH 123 FM 725 Expand 117 Seguin Arterial Cordova Rd SH 123 SH 46 Expand 118 Com/Gua Co Arterial FM 306 FM 1101 FM 758 Extend 119 Com/Gua Co Arterial FM 1044 IH 35 Weil Rd Realignment 120 Com/Gua Co Arterial FM 1101 FM 306 SH 123 Expand