Resourcing Christian Community Action: Parishes and Partnerships

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Resourcing Christian Community Action: Parishes and Partnerships Resourcing Christian Community Action: Parishes and Partnerships January 2012 Contents Acknowledgements iv Executive Summary v 1. Background 1 1.1 The context, origins, purpose and scope of the study. 1 1.2 The research methodology 2 1.3 The range of projects examined 2 1.4 Infrastructure organisations 4 1.5 Wider strategies 5 2. Why Christian community action? 6 2.1 Theological rationale 6 2.2 Where does it fit with mission and ministry? 6 2.3 Where does it fit with the idea of the Big Society? 7 2.4 An invitation from secular partners? 8 3. Findings from the research I: About the projects 10 3.1 Origins 10 3.2 Range of activities 11 3.3 Management and leadership 15 3.4 Resources 16 3.5 Volunteers 17 3.6 Measuring success 19 3.7 Success factors 20 3.8 Barriers 25 3.9 Challenges and opportunities 27 4. Findings from the research II: About supporting projects 31 4.1 The importance of higher level support 31 4.2 The role of CUF 32 4.3 Other national bodies 33 4.4 Examples of infrastructure organisations 34 4.5 Wider strategic context 36 5. Conclusions and policy messages 38 5.1 Bringing the threads together 38 5.2 Theological themes 38 5.3 Returning to the idea of the Big Society 39 5.4 Stronger bonds 39 Appendices I. Projects 41 • ASPIRE, St. Mary’s Church, Slough 42 • Families Matter, Guildford 46 • YPAC, Miles Platting and Ancoats, Manchester 50 • Urban Hope, Islington 54 • Happy at Home, South Tyneside 60 • Heartsease Community Project, Norwich 64 • Nottingham Arimathea Trust 67 • S.A.S., Liverpool 72 • Hereford CHAT 74 i • Reading Christian Network 78 • Derby Cathedral 84 • St. Leonard’s Centre, Bootle, Merseyside 86 • St. Martin’s Centre, Newcastle upon Tyne 91 • St. Augustine’s Centre, Halifax 96 • Ascend, South Oxhey, Watford 101 • Christ Church Community Services, Bridlington 105 • St. James’ Church, Hemingford Grey 109 • Hull Churches Home from Hospital 113 • Life Expectancy, Wirral 118 • St Luke the Physician Church and Neighbourhood Centre, 122 Longsight, Manchester • Thrive, Stockton-on-Tees 127 • Jubilee Money Advice Service, Oswestry 131 • MUMAS, Gloucester 135 • Coventry Foodbank 137 • FareShare, Leicester 140 • Cumbria Reducing Offending Partnership Trust 142 • Support and Advice for Families of Offenders and Ex- 148 Offenders (SAFE), Burnley, Hyndburn and Pendle • Surrey Appropriate Adult Service (SAAVS) 153 • Routes to Roots, Poole, Dorset 157 • Exeter Churches Housing Action Team (CHAT) 162 • Horsham Matters 166 • Harvest, Exeter 170 • St Paul’s Church, Manningham, Bradford 174 • The Feast, Birmingham 178 II. Infrastructure examples 183 • Churches’ Trust for Cumbria 184 • Council for Social Responsibility, Portsmouth 185 • East Northants Faith Group 188 • Faith in Our Communities, Durham 190 • Good Neighbours Support Service, Winchester, Guildford 194 and Portsmouth • Kairos Partnership, Hereford 196 • Leeds Christian Community Trust 198 • Together for Regeneration, South Yorkshire 201 • Transformation Cornwall 206 III. Strategies 208 • Youth Strategy for London 209 • Faith in Affordable Housing 213 • Shrinking the Footprint 218 IV. Templates 226 • Questions to ask before embarking on a project 227 • Volunteers: issues to be considered 228 • Policy specific project areas: Asylum Seekers 230 • Social Return on Investment 231 • Steps towards a Community Land Trust 233 ii V. References 236 VI. Resource Materials 238 VII. National Organisations 240 VIII Sources of funding 249 VIX Glossary 253 iii Acknowledgements This extensive study would not have been possible without the contribution of a large number of people. I had very helpful discussions with people from national organisations such as The Children’s Society, Church Action on Poverty, Church Urban Fund, English Heritage, Housing Justice and the Mothers’ Union and the National Rural Officers of the Church of England and the United Reformed Church at the Arthur Rank Centre. Many diocesan officers with responsibility for social responsibility, church and society, community ministry and rural affairs were extremely co-operative in providing information about projects in their dioceses. The greatest demands, however, were made on those who told me about infrastructure organisations and diocesan strategies and, especially, the contacts in the local projects. They were all most patient in response to my requests and in giving time for either face-to- face meetings or telephone interviews. I felt privileged to have the experience of hearing about many inspiring projects and witnessing the dedication of those involved. I am most grateful for their interest, candour and generosity. The members of the steering group, Tim Bissett, Malcolm Brown and Gavin Oldham, gave immense support and valuable insights and Gavin also played a major role in constructing the website. Nonetheless, I accept full responsibility for any errors of fact, omission or interpretation. Hilary Russell iv Resourcing Christian Community Action: Parishes and Partnerships Executive Summary This study arose from a motion in General Synod in November 2010 following a debate on the Big Society. Its main purpose was to act as a catalyst in bringing together current best practice in Christian care in local communities with the resources and knowledge base needed to multiply those good works across the country. The aim was to include a wide spectrum of examples covering different policy areas, location and types of activity. Although many of the projects included are in deprived areas, Christian community action is called for in any context to demonstrate care for neighbours and new ways of being and to work for personal, social and structural transformation. KEY FINDINGS . The main driver for Christian community action projects is the desire to serve the local community either in response to some immediately perceived problem or following investigation of local needs. Local projects encompass an enormously wide variety of activities, express a range of theological themes, including hospitality, presence, liberation, inclusion and justice and represent an immense contribution to the wellbeing of local communities. Many projects rely heavily on volunteers whose contribution of time and skills can be equivalent to many thousands of pounds per year even to individual projects. Projects increasingly have to be accountable to funders and supporters which makes it important for them to be able to quantify their achievements as well as articulate their qualitative impact. Strengths specific to effective faith-based projects include faith as their underpinning and motive force, their integration with the church for different sorts of support and encouragement, their local roots and longstanding presence and their stress on the whole person and his or her needs. One of the key barriers at present is lack of funding. Uncertainty about future funding and making repeated funding bids can be a massive drain on energy. Service changes and the current austerity measures are both a challenge and an opportunity. On the one hand, there are fewer resources to meet a rising tide of need. On the other, there are some openings for new collaborative ways of working. Provision for social responsibility is shrinking in some dioceses as a result of financial pressures and yet is a vital source of support essential to unlocking local energies and capacity. v Context of the study therefore, is a direct response to both the two ‘Big Society’ is a concept that emerged after commandments at the heart of the Christian the 2010 General Election. The aim is to move faith. power away from central government and give it to local communities and individuals and Three of the Five Marks of Mission make clear achieve a more participative society. In that the Church’s mission includes pastoral principle, the main strands of the idea should care, social action and engagement with the encourage people not only in churches, but in social, economic and political structures that the voluntary and community sector as a affect people’s lives. whole: • To respond to human need by loving • fostering a culture of voluntarism and service; philanthropy and promoting social action; • To seek to transform unjust structures of • community empowerment by giving people society; a greater say in decisions affecting their • To strive to safeguard the integrity of area and the services; creation and sustain and renew the life of the earth. developing new forms of public service • delivery including the use of charities and social enterprises. The Projects Recognising that the government has The aim in selecting the projects was to expressed interest in partnering voluntary include a wide spectrum of examples covering: organisations in building local communities, • policy areas ranging from homelessness the main purpose of this study was to act as a to foodbanks; employment and training to catalyst in bringing together current best debt counselling; youth projects to care for practice in Christian care in local communities the elderly; health to rural isolation; with the resources and knowledge base • rural, urban and suburban locations; needed to multiply those good works across • the use of church buildings for community the country. It is not a comprehensive use; database. Nor was the purpose to endorse or • different origins; kite mark specific projects. Rather the • different scales of project; objective was to provide an illustrative • ones wholly based on volunteering as well resource as a celebration of the Church’s role as those with paid workers; in ‘building better neighbourhoods’, as an • local projects linked with national encouragement to others to consider this form organisations; of ministry and as a practical tool for any • congregationally-based as well as ‘free- thinking of embarking on such a venture. A key standing’; underlying question was whether, in the face • Church of England, other denominations, of public spending cuts, ‘Big Society’ is ecumenical and interfaith. facilitating or obstructing what they are trying to do. The projects are based in many very different locations and deliver a wide range of activities Why Christian community action? (see below).
Recommended publications
  • Gift Aid Schemes for Charity Shops
    Gift Aid schemes for charity shops Introductioni The basic position on Gift Aid is that it is not legally possible to claim Gift Aid on donated goods. Gift Aid claims can only be made in relation to genuine donations of cash from UK taxpayers to UK charities. However, years ago HMRC developed a scheme to enable charity shopsii to take advantage of Gift Aid, and it recently made some changes so that there are now three processes available. Standard process Method A Method B As a result of the basic legal position on Gift Aid claims, it was necessary to come up with a somewhat complex legal structure for the Gift Aid schemes for charity shops. As these schemes are essentially a regulatory concession offered by HMRC for charities, it is important to adopt best practice to avoid the risk of HMRC changing its policy. The legal structure The underlying legal structure is the same for all three processes. A donor brings goods into Donor Gift Aid form Charity a shop and signs up to the Gift Aid scheme. Shop Contract signs up to the Gift Aid scheme. This creates appointing charity iii shop as agent an agency agreement between the donor Agent and the charity shop. Ownership of the goods remains with the donor at this stage and the Goods charity shop agrees to try to sell the goods on behalf of the donor in exchange for a small commission (typically 1% - 5%). The charity shop then sells the goods to a customer and accepts cash for those goods on behalf of the donor.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eagle 1946 (Easter)
    THE EAGLE ut jVfagazine SUPPORTED BY MEMBERS OF Sf 'John's College St. Jol.l. CoIl. Lib, Gamb. VOL UME LIl, Nos. 231-232 PRINTED AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS FOR SUBSCRIBERS ON L Y MCMXLVII Ct., CONTENTS A Song of the Divine Names . PAGE The next number shortly to be published will cover the 305 academic year 1946/47. Contributions for the number The College During the War . 306 following this should be sent to the Editors of The Eagle, To the College (after six war-years in Egypt) 309 c/o The College Office, St John's College. The Commemoration Sermon, 1946 310 On the Possible Biblical Origin of a Well-Known Line in The The Editors will welcome assistance in making the Chronicle as complete a record as possible of the careers of members Hunting of the Snark 313 of the College. The Paling Fence 315 The Sigh 3 1 5 Johniana . 3 16 Book Review 319 College Chronicle : The Adams Society 321 The Debaj:ing Society . 323 The Finar Society 324 The Historical Society 325 The Medical Society . 326 The Musical Society . 329 The N ashe Society . 333 The Natural Science Club 3·34 The 'P' Club 336 Yet Another Society 337 Association Football 338 The Athletic Club 341 The Chess Club . 341 The Cricket Club 342 The Hockey Club 342 L.M.B.C.. 344 Lawn Tennis Club 352 Rugby Football . 354 The Squash Club 358 College Notes . 358 Obituary: Humphry Davy Rolleston 380 Lewis Erle Shore 383 J ames William Craik 388 Kenneth 0 Thomas Wilson 39 J ames 391 John Ambrose Fleming 402 Roll of Honour 405 The Library .
    [Show full text]
  • TV Presenter Launches Lily Appeal
    E I D S Morality in the IN financial world explored E6 THE SUNDAY, MARCH 10, 2013 No: 6167 www.churchnewspaper.com PRICE £1.35 1,70j US$2.20 CHURCH OF ENGLAND THE ORIGINAL CHURCH NEWSPAPER ESTABLISHED IN 1828 NEWSPAPER Wakefield rebuffs plan for merger of dioceses FOLLOWING the failure of the Diocese of changed by the proposal. Blackburn will burn has voted. He can allow the plan to go Speaking after votes, Professor Michael Wakefield to approve the plan to replace receive six parishes and Sheffield will to General Synod if he is satisfied that the Clark, chair of the commission that pro- three Yorkshire dioceses with one it falls to receive two parishes if the plan goes ahead. interest of the diocese withholding consent duced the plan said: “It is good to know that the Archbishop of York to decide whether Sheffield Diocese has already signified is so small that it should not prevent the the dioceses of Bradford and Ripon and the proposal should go to General Synod, its agreement and Blackburn Diocese is scheme being referred to General Synod or Leeds support the Commission’s propos- possibly in July. due to vote on 13 April. if he feels there are wider factors affecting als. Looking at the voting in Wakefield, In voting last Saturday both the Diocese The Archbishop of York will not be able the Province or the Church of England as a there is significant support there although of Ripon and Leeds and the Diocese of to announce his decision until after Black- whole that need to be considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Charity Shops Made Simple
    Charity shops made simple Ross Palmer September 2016 Charity shops made simple| September 2016 Charity shops made simple Ross Palmer September 2016 Agenda 1. Charity shops introduction 2. Gift Aid basics 3. Retail Gift Aid Scheme 4. VAT aspects 5. Income / Corporation Tax aspects 6. Business Rate relief 7. Summary 2 1 Charity shops made simple| September 2016 1. Charity shops introduction Basic charity shop operation can be very tax efficient for a charity: • VAT: sales of donated goods are zero-rated • Income / Corporation tax: profits are exempt • Business rates: 80% mandatory relief and 20% discretionary relief • Problem is no Gift Aid to be claimed as Gift Aid is only applicable to monetary gifts, not gifts of goods 3 1. Charity shops introduction • If the donor first sold their goods and then donated the proceeds, then Gift Aid could potentially be claimed on the proceeds • The Retail Gift Aid Scheme (‘RGAS’) is an HMRC approved way of doing this • Charity or trading sub sells the donor’s goods as agent of the donor • Donor then Gift Aids the proceeds to the charity 4 2 Charity shops made simple| September 2016 2. Gift Aid - how it works £125 £25 gross basic rate pay tax (20%) £25 At a 20% basic rate of tax, the basic rate Gift Aid is 25% of tax £100 the gift value net pay £100 Charity gift + Gift Aid declaration 5 2. Higher rate relief • Extra tax relief for higher rate taxpayers • For £100 donation Equivalent to £125 gross donation 40% taxpayer paid £50 tax on the donation (£125 x 40%) Charity gets 20% back – i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Charitable Donation Value Guide
    Charitable Donation Value Guide Foolhardier Alford cumulating his chamber misdealing droningly. Archon balkanize conducingly while anemophilous Pietro easy.corrupt say or overeyed substitutionally. Desmond tautologizes differently as fifty-fifty Tirrell amble her watermanship post Your accountant will be because for it! Do business Still mortal to Sell My shower After Accepting an Offer? Best selling price of charitable donation value guide you. The appraiser can tell customs what a buyer should pay. HRB Maine License No. Donating used but still usable items, such a furniture and computers, provides a method for small businesses to hear money about their taxes while helping out worthy nonprofits at least same time. Daily deals valid on select Metro Phoenix, Prescott and Yuma locations. Safe bet, in Las Vegas. Typically if an appraiser can they mostly compare apples to apples. Please attempt a valid zip. Estimate to value as your donations with even few clicks with our Goodwill Donation Calculator. FMV as we by a qualified appraisal. TVs, computers, and more. In other words, if the appraisal comes in lower sometimes the offer price, you have box right the cancel the contract for penalty. Goodwill Northern New England. Passwords do is match. We wire your support thought more so ever. Goodwill Industries, Salvation Army, etc. Here share some examples of charities and their missions. Can Donated Food was Written trigger as a Deduction on Taxes? The value consult your donation will be me by put the charitable organization uses the vehicle. Want may take maximize your tax deduction? Important Terms, Conditions and Limitations apply. Shop for only alternate lender here.
    [Show full text]
  • Shopping for Good: the Social Benefits of Charity Retail
    Shopping for good: the social benefits of charity retail Peter Harrison-Evans Open Access. Some rights reserved. As the publisher of this work, Demos wants to encourage the circulation of our work as widely as possible while retaining the copyright. We therefore have an open access policy which enables anyone to access our content online without charge. Anyone can download, save, perform or distribute this work in any format, including translation, without written permission. This is subject to the terms of the Demos licence found at the back of this publication. Its main conditions are: · Demos and the author(s) are credited · This summary and the address www.demos.co.uk are displayed · The text is not altered and is used in full · The work is not resold · A copy of the work or link to its use online is sent to Demos. You are welcome to ask for permission to use this work for purposes other than those covered by the licence. Demos gratefully acknowledges the work of Creative Commons in inspiring our approach to copyright. To find out more go to www.creativecommons.org PARTNERS CREDITS Commissioned by Charity Retail Association and CarnegieUK Published by Demos September 2016 © Demos. Some rights reserved. Unit 1, 2-3 Mill Street London SE1 2BD T: 020 7367 4200 [email protected] www.demos.co.uk CONTENTS Forewords 4 Executive summary 8 Introduction 17 Shoppers and donors 20 Volunteers 28 Shop managers 47 The high street, communities and the environment 53 Conclusions and recommendations 68 Technical annex 73 Notes 77 References 85 4 FOREWORDS In 2013 the Charity Retail Association (CRA) commissioned a report from Demos entitled Giving Something Back.
    [Show full text]
  • Gary Price Scales the Spire Said: “There Is No Single Christian Perspec- Who Said These Crops Would ‘Cause the Tive on Genetic Modification
    E I D Ideal places to S IN recharge your spiritual batteries this summer E4, E5, E6 THE SUNDAY, MARCH 3, 2013 No: 6166 www.churchnewspaper.com PRICE £1.35 1,70j US$2.20 CHURCH OF ENGLAND THE ORIGINAL CHURCH NEWSPAPER ESTABLISHED IN 1828 NEWSPAPER Church U-turn welcomes development of GM crops By Amaris Cole against allowing the trials of GM crops on beings and the environment, a covenant ple they mention – for adverse environ- their farmland. that should mirror God’s creative love’.” mental effects and human mortality pre- THE CHURCH of England has expressed However, the updated policy advises that He went on: “There is not one substanti- vention - would be much more effectively support for the development of genetically the cultivation of these modified crops on ated environmental or human health haz- utilised with organic farming where there modified crops, despite warning against land owned by the national investing bod- ard associated with the use of genetic are issues with both. As Mark Lynas said church land even being used for trials of ies should be limited to ‘well established engineering in crops in 30 years experi- in the 2013 Oxford farming conference: such products in 2000. GMOs that are broadly accepted in the ence. There is more genetic modification ‘You cannot call yourself a humanitarian The national investment bodies of the country concerned’. occurring in many systems used in other and be opposed to GM crops today’.” Church of England say they are beginning The policy states that companies devel- types of crop breeding.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Charity Shop Retailing Rags to Riches How It All Began
    Rags to Riches The evolution of Charity Shop retailing Rags to Riches How it all began In 1947 Oxfam appealed for clothes and blankets that could be sent to famine-struck Greece, the generous response left them with a surplus. They decided to sell them as a way of raising funds and opened what became the model for future charity shops. Rags to Riches How it all began In 1947 Oxfam appealed for clothes and blankets that could be sent to famine-struck Greece, the generous response left them with a surplus. They decided to sell them as a way of raising funds and opened what became the model for future charity shops. How things have changed Retro Vintage Before the 1960s, the idea of wearing an outfit sourced from the wardrobe of a person possibly long dead was unappealing in the extreme. Old clothes were only for those unfortunate souls who couldn’t afford the freshly made stuff. How things have changed Retro Vintage Then came the mods & the hippies, who shook the dust from these cast- off clothes, combined them into novel outfits, and turned the whole thing into “vintage fashion.” dressing in vintage styles “was just your way of expressing yourself, wearing clothes that most other people didn’t wear,” How things have changed Retro Vintage Like a fine wine, vintage clothing has come to be regarded as something of high quality that becomes even more valuable with age. How things have changed Today’s customer On-line retailing growing at an enormous rate People selling things they may have donated in the past Reduces the level of quality donations but people empty their wardrobes more often Re-decorating more regularly has resulted in lots of donations of household items How things have changed Today’s customer A predicted 235m items of Britons’ unwanted clothing were expected to end up in landfill unnecessarily this spring.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Needs
    Diocese of Chester Statement of Needs Our diocese today 3 Who we are seeking 6 Our region 8 Cultural and social landscape 14 Ministry and mission 17 Finance and resources 30 Who’s who 31 Prayer 33 Contents 2 STATEMENT OF NEEDS 3 The Diocese of Chester The next Bishop of Chester will be joining a diocese in good heart, in a place where would like to express its Our there is much for which to treasure and thanks to Bishop Peter be thankful. diocese Forster who led and served The Diocese of Chester contains a rich this diocese for over 22 years. diversity of places, cultures and church traditions. Whilst there is an evangelical today centre of gravity to the diocese, there is a wide variety of traditions and a strong sense of family identity. Whoever is appointed must come with their eyes open and be able and willing to honour and embrace our distinctiveness and differences in tradition, theological conviction and opinion, for it is here that our greatest strength lies. STATEMENT OF NEEDS 4 The Diocese of Chester has retained a parish- Latest church statistics show an overall The next Bishop of Chester will focused approach, one that is well supported acceleration in previous trends towards and welcomed by clergy and laity alike. The decline and we are not neglectful or wilfully be joining the diocese at a time parish system is still believed in, and relatively blind to the reality we face. We seek a of great opportunity as we seek strong and healthy across the diocese.
    [Show full text]
  • Select Committee on Human Sexuality in the Context of Christian Belief
    Select Committee on Human Sexuality in the Context of Christian Belief A Resource to assist the Church in Listening, Learning and Dialogue on Human Sexuality in the Context of Christian Belief Guide to the Conversation on Human Sexuality in the Context of Christian Belief The General Synod of the Church of Ireland Select Committee on Human Sexuality in the Context of Christian Belief This document, Guide to the Conversation on Human Sexuality in the Context of Christian Belief, is one of three texts published by the General Synod Select Committee on Issues of Human Sexuality in the Context of Christian Belief in January 2016. It should be viewed as being in conjunction with a study programme laid out as a series of three sessions for use either by groups or individuals. Also, for ease of access, an executive summary of the Guide is available. The study of all three texts, it is hoped, will be undertaken in a prayerful spirit and the following Collect may be helpful: Most merciful God, you have created us, male and female, in your own image, and have borne the cost of all our judgments in the death of your Son; help us so to be attentive to the voices of Scripture, of humanity and of the Holy Spirit, that we may discern your will within the issues of our time, and, respectful both of conscience and of conviction, may direct our common life towards the perfection of our humanity that is in Christ alone, in whom truth and love are one. We ask this in his name.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Formation of Christ Church, South Ossett 1851-1964
    CHRIST CHURCH SOUTH OSSETT 1851 - 1964 Brief extracts taken from the VICARS LOG BOOK begun by Rev’d John H. Ward THE FORMATION OF THE PARISH [Written by Rev’d John H Ward soon after he became Vicar in 1884 - some of the information was given to Mr Ward by C.E. Priestley, who was living at Highfield Cottage, at the time. The Document was found in the Boxes deposited at the WYAS Ref. WDP 189] The parish of South Ossett is an Ecclesiastical District originally taken out of the Parish of Dewsbury. It comprises the southern portion of the township now under the jurisdiction of the Ossett Local Board, the boundary between South Ossett and Ossett cum Gawthorpe running as follows – from the river by Healey Old Mill up Runtlings Lane and along West Wells Rd., to the end of Bank Street, down Queen St., as far as Prospect Rd., along Prospect Rd., by Little Town End and Great Field Lane, across the railway and down the little lane towards Teall-town, the beck that flows from Spring Mill to Spring End being the East boundary, dividing South Ossett from the Parishes of Alverthorpe and St Michael’s. The history of the formation of this Parish is as follows: - The parish of Ossett cum Gawthorpe which is represented now by the Ossett cum Gawthorpe Local Board Dist, though not as large as many parishes were 50 yrs ago (notable for instance the neighbouring parish of Thornhill), was yet too large a district to be supervised spiritually by one Vicar and his curate (if he had one).
    [Show full text]
  • The Anglican Church
    The Anglican Church Investigation Report October 2020 2020 The Anglican Church Safeguarding in the Church of England and the Church in Wales Investigation Report October 2020 A report of the Inquiry Panel Professor Alexis Jay OBE Professor Sir Malcolm Evans KCMG OBE Ivor Frank Drusilla Sharpling CBE © Crown copyright 2020 The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the document title specified. Where third‑party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries related to this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] or Freepost IICSA INDEPENDENT INQUIRY. This publication is available at https://www.iicsa.org.uk/publications CCS0620778888 10/20 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled‑fibre content minimum. Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Contents Executive Summary v Pen portraits ix Part A: Introduction 1 A.1: Background to the investigation 2 A.2: The Church of England 2 A.3: The Church in Wales 6 A.4: Methodology 7 A.5: Terminology 10 A.6: References 11 Part B: The Church of England 13 B.1: Safeguarding in the Church of England 14 B.1.1: Introduction 14 B.1.2: Safeguarding structures 15 B.1.3: Safeguarding policies 25 B.1.4: Safeguarding in recruitment
    [Show full text]