DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix D Cultural Resources Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix D Cultural Resources Study Appendix D Cultural Resources Study CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY FOR THE CENTRAL PARK BUILDOUT PROJECT 27150 Bouquet Canyon Road City of Santa Clarita, Los Angeles County, California PREPARED FOR: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA Community Development Department 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 302 Santa Clarita, California 91355 Contact: Patrick Leclair, Senior Planner PREPARED BY: Linda Kry, BA, RA; Adriane Gusick, BA; Kira Archipov, BS; and Micah Hale, Ph.D., RPA DUDEK 38 North Marengo Avenue Pasadena, California 91101 ARPIL 2021 CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY THE CENTRAL PARK BUILDOUT PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................III 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Personnel .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Project Location ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Project Description .............................................................................................................................. 2 2 REGULATORY SETTING ........................................................................................ 7 2.1 State ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 3 PROJECT SETTING ............................................................................................. 13 3.1 Geologic Setting ................................................................................................................................. 13 3.2 Prehistoric Setting .............................................................................................................................. 13 3.3 Ethnographic Overview .................................................................................................................... 24 3.4 Historic Setting ................................................................................................................................... 26 4 BACKGROUND RESEARCH .................................................................................. 31 4.1 CHRIS Records Search...................................................................................................................... 31 4.2 Geotechnical Report Review ............................................................................................................ 34 4.3 Historical Topographic Maps and Aerial Photographs Review .................................................. 35 4.4 Native American Coordination ........................................................................................................ 36 5 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY ........................................................................ 37 5.1 Survey Methods .................................................................................................................................. 37 5.2 Survey Results ..................................................................................................................................... 37 6 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................ 41 6.1 Summary of Findings ......................................................................................................................... 41 6.2 Management Recommendations ...................................................................................................... 41 7 BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................................................................. 43 APPENDICES A CONFIDENTIAL SCCIC Records Search Results B NAHC SLF Results C Geotechnical Testing Locations 13280.02 i DUDEK APRIL 2021 CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY THE CENTRAL PARK BUILDOUT PROJECT IMAGES 1 Showing Existing Conditions Within Northern Portion of Proposed Sports Fields Area of Project Site. View Facing South. .................................................................................................................... 38 2 Overview of Southern Portion of Proposed Sports Fields Area of Project Site. View Facing Southeast. ............................................................................................................................................... 38 3 Overview of Proposed Parking Lot Portion of Project Site Showing Previous Ground Disturbance in Foreground. View Facing East. .......................................................................................... 39 4 Showing Existing Conditions Within Proposed Dog Park Area of Project Site. View Facing Southwest............................................................................................................................................... 39 TABLES 1 Previously Conducted Cultural Resource Studies Within 0.5 Miles of the Proposed Project Site ...... 31 2 Previously Recorded Cultural Resources Within 0.5-Miles of the Proposed Project Site..................... 34 13280.02 ii DUDEK APRIL 2021 CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY THE CENTRAL PARK BUILDOUT PROJECT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dudek was retained by the City of Santa Clarita (City) to conduct a cultural resources study in support of the environmental impact analysis for the proposed Central Park Buildout Project (Project). This Project is subject to compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and thus requires consideration of impacts to cultural resources and tribal cultural resources. This cultural resources study includes background research, a California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) records search, a search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF), an intensive-level pedestrian survey, and management recommendations. Dudek conducted a California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) on March 17, 2021. The records search identified 21 previously conducted cultural resources technical investigations within the records search area with three studies that overlapped the proposed Project site. Additionally, the SCCIC records indicate that no previously recorded built environment resources, prehistoric, or historic-era archaeological resources were identified within the proposed Project site. Dudek contacted the NAHC on February 16, 2021 to request a search of the SLF. Results of the SLF (received March 2, 2021) were negative. Because the SLF search does not include an exhaustive list of Native American cultural resources, the NAHC suggesting contacting 16 Native American individuals and/or tribal organizations who may have direct knowledge of cultural resources in or near the proposed Project site. No informal tribal consultation was initiated by Dudek for the proposed Project; however, in compliance with Assembly Bill (AB) 52, all NAHC-listed California Native American Tribal representatives that have requested project notification pursuant to AB 52 were sent Project notification letters by the City on March 16, 2021. Dudek reviewed a geotechnical report that was prepared for the Project in June 2020 (Ninyo & Moore 2020) finding that fill soils overlay portions of the Project site at depths of 1 to 7 feet. Additionally, numerous uncompacted soil stockpiles were observed near areas with deeper fill, collectively indicating that the Project site had been previously prepared. An archaeological pedestrian survey of the Project site was conducted on April 7, 2021, which involved walking parallel transects, spaced no more than 15 meters apart (approximately 49 feet), in areas of exposed ground surface when possible. Much of the 17-acre Project site consists of unmaintained and previously disturbed open land constructed park amenities, confirming that the native soils in the Project site were subject to moderate to heavy disturbance, reducing the probability of identifying cultural resources. No prehistoric or historic-era archaeological resources were identified within the Project site through a search of the CHRIS database, NAHC SLF review, or as a result of the intensive-level archaeological pedestrian survey. Considering that the Project site has been previously disturbed, the potential to find unknown intact archaeological deposits is considered low, unless native soils are encountered during Project related ground disturbance. To ensure proper treatment of inadvertent discoveries of archaeological resources it is recommended that preconstruction cultural resources awareness training is completed prior to project 13280.02 iii DUDEK APRIL 2021 CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY THE CENTRAL PARK BUILDOUT PROJECT construction, and that a qualified archaeologist be retained to address any such discoveries. These measures should be noted on all construction plans to ensure the potential Project impacts to archaeological resources and human remains would be less than significant. 13280.02 iv DUDEK APRIL 2021 CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY THE CENTRAL PARK BUILDOUT PROJECT 1 INTRODUCTION The City of Santa Clarita (City) retained Dudek to complete a CEQA-compliant cultural resources study for the proposed Central Park Buildout Project (Project). This report includes the results of a California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ANALYSIS This Ordinance Amends the Water Pipeline Franchise Granted to Valencia Water Company by Ordinance No. 91-0042F, by Exte
    ANALYSIS This ordinance amends the water pipeline franchise granted to Valencia Water Company by Ordinance No. 91-0042F, by extending the term of the franchise to December 31, 2018, clarifying the exclusion on the transportation of hazardous substances or hazardous waste; expanding the franchise area southerly boundary; and making other minor changes to clarify certain provisions in the ordinance. MARY C. WICKHAM Counsel KATHY BRAMWELL Principal Deputy County Counsel Contracts Division KB:pt Requested: 7/9/15 Revised: 7/20/15 HOA. 1178251.1 ORDINANCE NO. _____________ An ordinance amending Ordinance No. 91-0042F, as amended, a water pipeline franchise granted to Valencia Water Company. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles ordains as follows: SECTIO 1. Section 1 of Ordinance No. 91-0042F, as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows: SECTION 1. Franchise Term; Grant. The right, privilege, and franchise is granted to Valencia Water Company (“Franchisee”), its successors and assigns~ to lay or construct from time to time and for the period of twenty five (25) years through December 31, 2018, to lay, construct, reconstruct, maintain, operate, repair, renew, change the size of, remove or abandon in place pipes and pipelines for the transportation and distribution of water, waste water, mud, steam and other liquid substances, except excluding any hazardous substances or hazardous waste within the meaning of the “Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980”, 42 U.S.C. section 9601 et seq., as it may hereafter be amended, the “Federal Pollution Water Pollution Control Act”, 33 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Grants of Land in California Made by Spanish Or Mexican Authorities
    -::, » . .• f Grants of Land in California Made by Spanish or Mexican Authorities Prepared by the Staff of the State Lands Commission ----- -- -·- PREFACE This report was prepared by Cris Perez under direction of Lou Shafer. There were three main reasons for its preparation. First, it provides a convenient reference to patent data used by staff Boundary Officers and others who may find the information helpful. Secondly, this report provides a background for newer members who may be unfamiliar with Spanish and Mexican land grants and the general circumstances surrounding the transfer of land from Mexican to American dominion. Lastly, it provides sources for additional reading for those who may wish to study further. The report has not been reviewed by the Executive Staff of the Commission and has not been approved by the State Lands Commission. If there are any questions regarding this report, direct them to Cris Perez or myself at the Office of the State Lands Commission, 1807 - 13th Street, Sacramento, California 95814. ROY MINNICK, Supervisor Boundary Investigation Unit 0401L VI TABLE OF CONTENlS Preface UI List of Maps x Introduction 1 Private Land Claims in California 2 Missions, Presidios, and Pueblos 7 Explanation of Terms Used in This Report 14 GRANTS OF LAND BY COUNTY AlamE:1da County 15 Amador County 19 Butte County 21 Calaveras County 23 Colusa County 25 Contra Costa County 27 Fresno County 31 Glenn County 33 Kern County 35 Kings County 39 Lake County 41 Los Angeles County 43 Marin County 53 Mariposa County 57 Mendocino County
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION
    CALIFORNIA HISTORIC MILITARY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES INVENTORY VOLUME II: THE HISTORY AND HISTORIC RESOURCES OF THE MILITARY IN CALIFORNIA, 1769-1989 by Stephen D. Mikesell Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION Prepared by: JRP JRP HISTORICAL CONSULTING SERVICES Davis, California 95616 March 2000 California llistoric Military Buildings and Stnictures Inventory, Volume II CONTENTS CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................... i FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................. iv PREFACE .................................................................................................................................... viii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1-1 2.0 COLONIAL ERA (1769-1846) .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Spanish-Mexican Era Buildings Owned by the Military ............................................... 2-8 2.2 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2019, Volume 65, Number 2
    The Journal of The Journal of SanSan DiegoDiego HistoryHistory The Journal of San Diego History The San Diego History Center, founded as the San Diego Historical Society in 1928, has always been the catalyst for the preservation and promotion of the history of the San Diego region. The San Diego History Center makes history interesting and fun and seeks to engage audiences of all ages in connecting the past to the present and to set the stage for where our community is headed in the future. The organization operates museums in two National Historic Districts, the San Diego History Center and Research Archives in Balboa Park, and the Junípero Serra Museum in Presidio Park. The History Center is a lifelong learning center for all members of the community, providing outstanding educational programs for schoolchildren and popular programs for families and adults. The Research Archives serves residents, scholars, students, and researchers onsite and online. With its rich historical content, archived material, and online photo gallery, the San Diego History Center’s website is used by more than 1 million visitors annually. The San Diego History Center is a Smithsonian Affiliate and one of the oldest and largest historical organizations on the West Coast. Front Cover: Illustration by contemporary artist Gene Locklear of Kumeyaay observing the settlement on Presidio Hill, c. 1770. Back Cover: View of Presidio Hill looking southwest, c. 1874 (SDHC #11675-2). Design and Layout: Allen Wynar Printing: Crest Offset Printing Copy Edits: Samantha Alberts Articles appearing in The Journal of San Diego History are abstracted and indexed in Historical Abstracts and America: History and Life.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.3 Cultural Resources
    4.3 CULTURAL RESOURCES INTRODUCTION W & S Consultants, (W&S) conducted an archaeological survey of the project site that included an archival record search conducted at the local California Historic Resource Information System (CHRIS) repository at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) located on the campus of California State University, Fullerton. In July 2010, a field survey of the 1.2-mile proposed project site was conducted. The archaeological survey report can be found in Appendix 4.3. Mitigation measures are recommended which would reduce potential impacts to unknown archeological resources within the project site, potential impacts to paleontological resources, and the discovery of human remains during construction to less than significant. PROJECT BACKGROUND Ethnographic Setting Tataviam The upper Santa Clara Valley region, including the study area, was inhabited during the ethnographic past by an ethnolinguistic group known as the Tataviam.1 Their language represents a member of the Takic branch of the Uto-Aztecan linguistic family.2 In this sense, it was related to other Takic languages in the Los Angeles County region, such as Gabrielino/Fernandeño (Tongva) of the Los Angeles Basin proper, and Kitanemuk of the Antelope Valley. The Tataviam are thought to have inhabited the upper Santa Clara River drainage from about Piru eastwards to just beyond the Vasquez Rocks/Agua Dulce area; southwards as far as Newhall and the crests of the San Gabriel and Santa Susana Mountains; and northwards to include the middle reaches of Piru Creek, the Liebre Mountains, and the southwesternmost fringe of Antelope Valley.3 Their northern boundary most likely ran along the northern foothills of the Liebre Mountains (i.e., the edge of Antelope Valley), and then crossed to the southern slopes of the Sawmill Mountains and Sierra Pelona, extending 1 NEA, and King, Chester.
    [Show full text]
  • February 24, 2009
    PHASE I ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED WILLIAM S. HART UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT ROMERO CANYON HIGH SCHOOL SITE APN 3247-068-001 and 3247-068-004 (TENTATIVE TRACT 47807) LOCATED IN THE CASTAIC AREA OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Donna Hebert Project Manager Padre Associates, Inc. 1861 Knoll Drive Ventura, CA 93003 Prepared by: Gwen R. Romani, M.A. Principal Investigator April 28, 2010 Table of Contents 1.0 Project Location and Description 1 2.0 Study Findings 1 3.0 Introduction 2 4.0 Regulatory Requirements 2 4.1 California Register of Historical Resources 2 5.0 Background Information 2 5.1 Environmental Setting 2 5.2 Prehistoric Overview 4 5.3 Ethnographic Overview 5 5.4 Historical Overview 6 6.0 Records Search 8 6.1 Introduction 8 6.2 Native American Coordination 9 6.3 Results of the Records Search 9 7.0 Field Investigation 10 7.1 Results of the Field Survey 11 8.0 Recommendations 12 9.0 Certification 12 10.0 References 13 Appendices Appendix A: Figures Figure 1: Project Location and Vicinity Map Figure 2: Proposed Grading Plan for the Romero Canyon High School Site Appendix B: Native American Consultation Appendix C: Photographs 1-10 i PHASE I ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED WILLIAM S. HART UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT ROMERO CANYON HIGH SCHOOL SITE APN 3247-068-001 and 3247-068-004 (TENTATIVE TRACT 47807) LOCATED IN THE CASTAIC AREA OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. 1.0 Project Location and Description At the request of Donna Hebert, Project Manager for Padre Associates, Inc., Compass Rose Archaeological, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Backgrounds of Range Land Use in California
    While accounts of contemporary Historical Backgrounds of Range Land Use travelers are of great value in giv- ing us an appraisal of the general in California nature of the forage cover at the time California was being settled L. T. BURCHAM they afford few details of its bo- Senior Forest Technician, Ccrlifomia Division of Forestry, tanical composition or floristic Sawamento, California. characteristics. It is to early bo- tanical collections that we must In the year 1769 a group of Pedro Fages said: “For flocks and turn for these details. They range Spaniards was riding northward herds there are excellent places all the way from fragmentary col- from San Diego, through the Coast with plenty of water and abun- lections such as those of the Ranges, in search of the Port of dance of pasture” (Fages, 1937). Beechey voyage to the more com- Monterey. Members of that party, At San Luis Obispo, he wrote, prehensive work of the Pacific an expedition led by Don Gaspar “Abundant water is found in every railroad surveys (Hooker and Ar- de Portola, were the first Euro- direction, and pasture for the cat- nott, 1841; Torrey, 1856). In a peans to gain any extensive, accu- tle, so that no matter how large sense early plant collections are rate knowledge of California. On the mission grows to be . the quite disappointing to a range Tuesday, July 18, 1769, one of land promises sustenance” (Fages, man. They were made almost these men, Miguel Costanso, wrote : 1937). But perhaps none of these wholly to serve taxonomic or other “The place where we halted was accounts excelled the simple elo- special purposes; they are chiefly exceedingly beautiful and pleasant, quence of Fray Juan Crespi, who records of occurrence, yielding but a valley remarkable for its size, wrote : “There is much land and meager information as to relative adorned with groves of trees, and good pasture” (Engelhardt, 1920), abundance and area1 distribution covered with the finest pasture .
    [Show full text]
  • To Oral History
    100 E. Main St. [email protected] Ventura, CA 93001 (805) 653-0323 x 320 QUARTERLY JOURNAL SUBJECT INDEX About the Index The index to Quarterly subjects represents journals published from 1955 to 2000. Fully capitalized access terms are from Library of Congress Subject Headings. For further information, contact the Librarian. Subject to availability, some back issues of the Quarterly may be ordered by contacting the Museum Store: 805-653-0323 x 316. A AB 218 (Assembly Bill 218), 17/3:1-29, 21 ill.; 30/4:8 AB 442 (Assembly Bill 442), 17/1:2-15 Abadie, (Señor) Domingo, 1/4:3, 8n3; 17/2:ABA Abadie, William, 17/2:ABA Abbott, Perry, 8/2:23 Abella, (Fray) Ramon, 22/2:7 Ablett, Charles E., 10/3:4; 25/1:5 Absco see RAILROADS, Stations Abplanalp, Edward "Ed," 4/2:17; 23/4:49 ill. Abraham, J., 23/4:13 Abu, 10/1:21-23, 24; 26/2:21 Adams, (rented from Juan Camarillo, 1911), 14/1:48 Adams, (Dr.), 4/3:17, 19 Adams, Alpha, 4/1:12, 13 ph. Adams, Asa, 21/3:49; 21/4:2 map Adams, (Mrs.) Asa (Siren), 21/3:49 Adams Canyon, 1/3:16, 5/3:11, 18-20; 17/2:ADA Adams, Eber, 21/3:49 Adams, (Mrs.) Eber (Freelove), 21/3:49 Adams, George F., 9/4:13, 14 Adams, J. H., 4/3:9, 11 Adams, Joachim, 26/1:13 Adams, (Mrs.) Mable Langevin, 14/1:1, 4 ph., 5 Adams, Olen, 29/3:25 Adams, W. G., 22/3:24 Adams, (Mrs.) W.
    [Show full text]
  • Uto-Aztecan Maize Agriculture: a Linguistic Puzzle from Southern California
    Uto-Aztecan Maize Agriculture: A Linguistic Puzzle from Southern California Jane H. Hill, William L. Merrill Anthropological Linguistics, Volume 59, Number 1, Spring 2017, pp. 1-23 (Article) Published by University of Nebraska Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/anl.2017.0000 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/683122 Access provided by Smithsonian Institution (9 Nov 2018 13:38 GMT) Uto-Aztecan Maize Agriculture: A Linguistic Puzzle from Southern California JANE H. HILL University of Arizona WILLIAM L. MERRILL Smithsonian Institution Abstract. The hypothesis that the members of the Proto—Uto-Aztecan speech community were maize farmers is premised in part on the assumption that a Proto—Uto-Aztecan etymon for ‘maize’ can be reconstructed; this implies that cognates with maize-related meanings should be attested in languages in both the Northern and Southern branches of the language family. A Proto—Southern Uto-Aztecan etymon for ‘maize’ is reconstructible, but the only potential cog- nate for these terms documented in a Northern Uto-Aztecan language is a single Gabrielino word. However, this word cannot be identified definitively as cognate with the Southern Uto-Aztecan terms for ‘maize’; consequently, the existence of a Proto—Uto-Aztecan word for ‘maize’ cannot be postulated. 1. Introduction. Speakers of Uto-Aztecan languages lived across much of western North America at the time of their earliest encounters with Europeans or Euro-Americans. Their communities were distributed from the Columbia River drainage in the north through the Great Basin, southern California, the American Southwest, and most of Mexico, with outliers as far south as Panama (Miller 1983; Campbell 1997:133—38; Caballero 2011; Shaul 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Element 2013
    ADOPTED MAY 8, 2013 Safety Element 2013 This element establishes goals, objectives, and policies to assist the City of Camarillo in assuring that the community is safe from natural and man-made hazards. CAMARILLO CITY OF CAMARILLO SAFETY ELEMENT 2013 Prepared for: City of Camarillo Community Development Department 601 Carmen Drive Camarillo, California 93010 Prepared by: RBF Consulting 14725 Alton Parkway Irvine, California 92618 CITY OF CAMARILLO SAFETY ELEMENT 2013 11.0 City of Camarillo Safety Element Adopted: May 8, 2013 Previously Adopted: November 29, 1989 & August 8, 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS 11.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 11-1 11.1.1 Authority for Element ..................................................................................... 11-1 11.1.2 Element Organization...................................................................................... 11-1 11.1.3 Relationship to Other General Plan Elements .................................................. 11-2 11.2 Camarillo Safety Setting, Regulations, and Related Documents .................................. 11-3 11.2.1 Existing Setting ................................................................................................ 11-3 11.2.2 Regulatory Framework .................................................................................. 11-52 11.3 Context for Safety Element Policy ............................................................................. 11-58 11.4
    [Show full text]
  • 3.7 Biological Resources
    3.7 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This section identifies major plant and animal resources within the City’s Planning Area and assesses the potential impacts of the proposed General Plan on biological resources with the understanding that certain resources, especially wildlife, are transitory and may potentially be present in a wide variety of areas regardless of previous records of observation. The City’s Planning Area consists of its incorporated boundaries and adopted Sphere of Influence (SOI). The County’s Planning Area consists of unincorporated land within the One Valley One Vision (OVOV) Planning Area boundaries that is located outside the City’s boundaries and the adopted SOI. The City and the County Planning Areas together comprise the OVOV Planning Area. A substantial portion of the area within the City has been developed. Species within the remaining natural areas are adapted to the Mediterranean climate of the region, in that they thrive in the cool, wet winters, and dry, hot summers typical of the area. Within the City boundaries, these areas include the Santa Clara River through the City; and portions of San Francisquito Canyon, Sand Canyon, Whitney Canyon, and Placerita Canyon. The major natural features of the City’s adopted SOI include the Liebre Mountains south of the National Forest boundary, including Cruzan Mesa and portions of Tick Canyon, Mint Canyon, Bouquet Canyon and San Francisquito Canyon; and the San Gabriel Mountains north of the National Forest boundary, including portions of Sand Canyon and
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX B Cultural Resources Assessment
    APPENDIX B Cultural Resources Assessment 3700 Riverside Drive Mixed-Use Project Cultural Resources Assessment prepared for City of Burbank 150 North Third Street Burbank, California 91502 Contact: Daniel Villa, Senior Planner prepared by Rincon Consultants, Inc. 250 East 1st Street, Suite 301 Los Angeles, California 90012 August 2020 Please cite this report as follows: Madsen, A., M. Strother, B. Campbell-King, S. Treffers, and S. Carmack 2020 Cultural Resources Assessment for the 3700 Riverside Drive Mixed Use Project, City of Burbank, Los Angeles County, California. Rincon Consultants Project No. 19-08998. Report on file at the South Central Coastal Information Center, California State University, Fullerton. Table of Contents Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ 1 Unanticipated Discovery of Cultural Resources ............................................................................. 1 Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains ................................................................................ 2 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 Project Location and Description ........................................................................................ 3 Personnel ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]