Co-Simulation of a Smart Home Model Based on a Micro Electricity Market

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Fifth German-Austrian IBPSA Conference RWTH Aachen University CO-SIMULATION OF A SMART HOME MODEL BASED ON A MICRO ELECTRICITY MARKET W. El-Baz1, and P. Tzscheutschler2 1,2Institute of Energy Economics and Application Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT Torreglosa, Fernández, & Jurado, 2013) a fuzzy logic based EMS has been presented, while in (Gudi, Wang, Demand Side Management (DSM) represents one of & Devabhaktuni, 2012; Pollhammer & Kupzog, 2011) the most important factors in increasing the overall heuristic optimization approaches were used to electrical system efficiency. To achieve an automated optimizes the DSM operation. Others have handled DSM, an Energy Management System (EMS) must be the problem as a linear programing problem such as applied within the building. Throughout this (Kang, Park, Oh, Noh, & Park, 2014). Also, genetic contribution, an EMS based on a micro electricity algorithms techniques have been applied as presented market model, in which all the devices interact based in (Jayasekara & Wolfs, 2011). Furthermore, some on the energy costs to minimize the overall energy researchers were interested in basing their decision costs, will be presented. The EMS calculates the cost based on next two hours or day-ahead forecast for the signal and distributes it over to the supply and demand electricity prices, user’s electrical load or both as side devices so that they can take their own sale or presented in (Leon-garcia, 2010). Also, other purchase decisions. The simulation is based on co- approaches were interested in associating the simulation between SimulationX and Simulink. prediction system with a real-time continuous Keywords: Simulink-Modelica Co-Simulation, User optimization algorithm to make up for the forecast behavior, Decentralized Energy Management System, mismatching or unforeseeable events (Barbato & Micro Market, Micro Cogeneration Carpentieri, 2012; Di Giorgio & Liberati, 2014). INTRODUCTION To sum up, the presented approaches within the literature are interested in a centralized system, where Financial incentives plays an important role in all the devices are controlled by EMS. Then, the EMS encouraging the users to shift their loads according to gathers up all the available requests for scheduling and the grid prices or available energy resources, yet the feeds back an operational signal to the device. Such shifting decision needs a continuous load monitoring. approaches have always assumed an absolute control Such thing represents a significant burden over the over the future smart devices and perfect system user. Also, it would be challenging to optimize the compatibility. In reality, every household appliances load shifting manually. Energy Management Systems manufactures would like to have its own controller (EMS) represent one of the most common solutions that is fully aware of system capabilities so that a for Demand Side Management (DSM) automation pleasant customer experience can be guaranteed. within the residence. The main motive behind the Thus, integrating several devices from different EMS isn’t only to handle the common household manufactures might represent a challenge to the EMS. appliance loads within the house, but also to manage The objective of this contribution is to present a co- the upcoming Electric Vehicles (EVs) or Hybrid simulation between an electricity prediction system Electrical Vehicles (HEVs) loads which will represent and a decentralized micro-market based EMS. The a significant addition on the user’s residence and on whole simulation works on exchanging data between the national grid as well. SimulationX, which represents the home model in Throughout the literature, several EMS approaches addition to the EMS, and Simulink, which provides a have been presented that works towards several goals. day-ahead prediction and continuous prediction Yet, most of them was targeting peak load clipping, correction to the EMS. The modeled EMS is based on minimizing energy costs, minimizing CO2 emissions, the micro market approach. It works on providing the maximizing use of the energy supplies within the household devices a cost signal that is formulated house (Di Giorgio & Pimpinella, 2012; Ikeda et al., based on the electricity demand forecast, electricity 2011; Stluka, Godbole, & Samad, 2011; Warren, stock market price, available in-house energy sources 2014). The approaches used to reach these goals have such as Photovoltaic (PV) and micro Combined Heat varied along with the system installation, the house and Power cycle (CHP). Furthermore, different available devices, and its configuration. In (García, configuration and in-house energy sources capacities - 30 - Fifth German-Austrian IBPSA Conference RWTH Aachen University were tested to show out the optimum system and consequently, they might have a common request configuration that could be applied within a Smart and ask to operate at the same hour, cheapest hour. In Home for the applied operation scenarios. this case, the micro market controller gives the priority to the highest load, then the other devices DECENTRALIZED EMS automatically reschedule their request depending on Overview on the Micro Market Approach the new cost signal provided. Several household devices and micro CHP control Demand Side Devices strategies presented in the literature are designed to All the household appliances can be considered operate according to the real-time prices (RTP) demand side devices as they are all energy consuming (Houwing, 2011; Nyeng & Ostergaard, 2011), but the devices, yet only few of them have the ability to shift RTP presented by the grid aren’t representative their own loads. Within this simulation the freezer, enough to the operating loads inside the house, or the washing machine, dishwasher, tumble dryer and EV in-house energy sources use. The micro market were considered to have the ability to shift their load. adapted approach creates a market among both of the Other household appliance were disconnected from supply side devices (i.e., PV and micro CHP), demand the electricity market, yet their electrical load is side devices (i.e., household appliances) and storages. considered within the grid. Through this market, every supply or demand device For the dishwasher, washing machine, and the tumble can have its own controller which depends on the RTP dryer, the same controller was used. The function of signal proposed by the grid, yet this signal will be this controller is simply to find the minimum cost spot substituted by the micro market signal. and reserve it to its own device. Those devices were The micro market is designed to receive the RTP, considered uninterruptable, in another words, they along with purchase and sale requests from all kind of cannot reserve two different spaced market spots, but devices and storages, then it formulates the cost signal rather consecutive ones. Yet, the electrical vehicle and transmits it back to all the devices, so that every controller have the luxury to reserve multiple spaced device can take its own decision. The cost calculation market spots, as batteries charging can be stopped at function depends basically on equation 1 below, any moment and then resumed at a later time. where D represents the electricity demand, S The freezer controller has been using different represents the electricity supply, and C represents the strategy, since the freezer should be working costs. continuously. Also, the freezer has the advantage of (퐷 −푠 −푠 −푠 )×퐶 + 푅푒푠푖푑푒푛푡 푃푉 퐶퐻푃 퐵푎푡푡푒푟푖푒푠 퐺푟푖푑 thermal storage. The controller of the freezer is 퐶푃푉+퐶퐶퐻푃+퐶퐵푎푡푡푒푟푖푒푠 퐶퐴푣푒푟푎푒 = (1) 퐷푅푒푠푖푑푒푛푡 continuously working on monitoring the market It should be mentioned that all the variables average cost of each hour. Whenever it recognizes an represented in equation 1 are vectors representing increase in the average cost of the upcoming hour, it either the average cost of the next 24 or 48 hours, increases the cooling temperature so that it increases depending on the associated prediction systems. the switching off period of the compressor in the following hour. Micro Market Controller Supply Side Devices The micro market controller has been coded in Modelica and could be divided into two basic Throughout the modeling process, two main types of functions, the cost modifier and the load modifier supply side devices were considered in the analysis, function. The main purpose behind using those two which are the PV and the micro CHPs. Integrating PV functions is to prevent oscillations. These two function into the system was simply through sharing a work co-operatively to blind the device out of predefined PV power output prognosis with the micro recognizing the cost increase due to its own purchase market EMS. Since the PV output is dependent only so that it proceeds with the same purchase order rather on the solar irradiation, PV wouldn’t be interacting than moving to another slot. Figure 8 represents the with the market but rather submitting information high-level topology of the micro market along with all about its feed-in tariff and available capacities for each the devices connection. hour of the day. The micro market doesn’t have any optimization On the contrary of the PV, the micro CHP can function, it is just responsible for the average cost modulate itself depending on the market price, or the signal formulation and transmission to the devices. As user’s need. Since the micro CHP co-generates heat soon as the market receive a purchase request from the and electricity, a heat storage had to be associated. The device, it increases the market cost of this hour and main function of the heat storage is to decouple the transmits it back to all the other devices. If this cost heat generation from the electricity. Consequently, it got relatively higher, the other devices automatically will provide the micro CHP with a space to interact choose different operation hours. Yet, it could happen with the micro market cost signal. that a sudden market cost changes due to In this simulation model, the micro CHP controller unforeseeable user behavior or a false prediction.
Recommended publications
  • Automated Annotation of Simulink Generated C Code Based on the Simulink Model

    Automated Annotation of Simulink Generated C Code Based on the Simulink Model

    DEGREE PROJECT IN COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, SECOND CYCLE, 30 CREDITS STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN 2020 Automated Annotation of Simulink Generated C Code Based on the Simulink Model SREEYA BASU ROY KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE Automated Annotation of Simulink Generated C Code Based on the Simulink Model SREEYA BASU ROY Master in Embedded Systems Date: September 25, 2020 Supervisor: Predrag Filipovikj Examiner: Matthias Becker School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Host company: Scania CV AB Swedish title: Automatisk Kommentar av Simulink Genererad C kod Baserad på Simulink Modellen iii Abstract There has been a wave of transformation in the automotive industry in recent years, with most vehicular functions being controlled electron- ically instead of mechanically. This has led to an exponential increase in the complexity of software functions in vehicles, making it essential for manufactures to guarantee their correctness. Traditional software testing is reaching its limits, consequently pushing the automotive in- dustry to explore other forms of quality assurance. One such technique that has been gaining momentum over the years is a set of verification techniques based on mathematical logic called formal verification tech- niques. Although formal techniques have not yet been adopted on a large scale, these methods offer systematic and possibly more exhaus- tive verification of the software under test, since their fundamentals are based on the principles of mathematics. In order to be able to apply formal verification, the system under test must be transformed into a formal model, and a set of proper- ties over such models, which can then be verified using some of the well-established formal verification techniques, such as model check- ing or deductive verification.
  • Lecture #4: Simulation of Hybrid Systems

    Lecture #4: Simulation of Hybrid Systems

    Embedded Control Systems Lecture 4 – Spring 2018 Knut Åkesson Modelling of Physcial Systems Model knowledge is stored in books and human minds which computers cannot access “The change of motion is proportional to the motive force impressed “ – Newton Newtons second law of motion: F=m*a Slide from: Open Source Modelica Consortium, Copyright © Equation Based Modelling • Equations were used in the third millennium B.C. • Equality sign was introduced by Robert Recorde in 1557 Newton still wrote text (Principia, vol. 1, 1686) “The change of motion is proportional to the motive force impressed ” Programming languages usually do not allow equations! Slide from: Open Source Modelica Consortium, Copyright © Languages for Equation-based Modelling of Physcial Systems Two widely used tools/languages based on the same ideas Modelica + Open standard + Supported by many different vendors, including open source implementations + Many existing libraries + A plant model in Modelica can be imported into Simulink - Matlab is often used for the control design History: The Modelica design effort was initiated in September 1996 by Hilding Elmqvist from Lund, Sweden. Simscape + Easy integration in the Mathworks tool chain (Simulink/Stateflow/Simscape) - Closed implementation What is Modelica A language for modeling of complex cyber-physical systems • Robotics • Automotive • Aircrafts • Satellites • Power plants • Systems biology Slide from: Open Source Modelica Consortium, Copyright © What is Modelica A language for modeling of complex cyber-physical systems
  • Introduction to Simulink

    Introduction to Simulink

    Introduction to Simulink Mariusz Janiak p. 331 C-3, 71 320 26 44 c 2015 Mariusz Janiak All Rights Reserved Contents 1 Introduction 2 Essentials 3 Continuous systems 4 Hardware-in-the-Loop (HIL) Simulation Introduction Simulink is a block diagram environment for multidomain simulation and Model-Based Design. It supports simulation, automatic code generation, and continuous test and verification of embedded systems.1 Graphical editor Customizable block libraries Solvers for modeling and simulating dynamic systems Integrated with Matlab Web page www.mathworks.com 1 The MathWorks, Inc. Introduction Simulink capabilities Building the model (hierarchical subsystems) Simulating the model Analyzing simulation results Managing projects Connecting to hardware Introduction Alternatives to Simulink Xcos (www.scilab.org/en/scilab/features/xcos) OpenModelica (www.openmodelica.org) MapleSim (www.maplesoft.com/products/maplesim) Wolfram SystemModeler (www.wolfram.com/system-modeler) Introduction Model based design with Simulink Modeling and simulation Multidomain dynamic systems Nonlinear systems Continuous-, Discrete-time, Multi-rate systems Plant and controller design Rapidly model what-if scenarios Communicate design ideas Select/Optimize control architecture and parameters Implementation Automatic code generation Rapid prototyping for HIL, SIL Verification and validation Essentials Working with Simulink Launching Simulink Library Browser Finding Blocks Getting Help Context sensitive help Simulink documentation Demo Working with a simple model Changing
  • FMI Target for Simulink Coder, It Is Now Possible to Export Models from Simulink to Any Platform That Supports Fmus for Co-Simulation

    FMI Target for Simulink Coder, It Is Now Possible to Export Models from Simulink to Any Platform That Supports Fmus for Co-Simulation

    Supporting your vision Cross-Platform Modeling with FMI Target for Simulink® Coder™ Open technology standards for an integrated product lifecycle Engine Transmission Thermal EV/HV Chassis Compo- Models Models Systems Models nents Models Functional Mock-Up Interface The challenge for manufacturers of complex machinery that heavily rely on components from suppliers is the seamless exchange of data and specifications during the development. The same holds true for large corporates with multiple R&D departments at various locations using several development tools due to different objectives. Those challenges include different programming languages from the various tools, the lack of standardized model interfaces and the concerns for the protection of intellectual property. The development of the Functional Mock-up Interface (FMI) has enabled software-, model- and hardware-in-the-loop simulations with dynamic system models from different software environments. With the FMI Target for Simulink Coder, it is now possible to export models from Simulink to any platform that supports FMUs for Co-Simulation. FMI for Co-Simulation The goal is to couple two or more models with solvers in a co-simulation environment. The data exchange between subsystems is restricted to discrete communication points. The subsystems are processed independently from each other by their individual solvers during the time interval between two communication points. Master algorithms control the synchronization of all slave simulation solvers and the data exchange between the subsystems. The interface allows for both standard and advanced master algorithms, such as variable communication step sizes, signal extrapolation of higher order and error checking. FMI Target for Simulink® Coder™ FMI for Co-Simulation For the exchange of models across different platforms, the FMI Target for Simulink Coder enables the export of models from Simulink as FMUs for Co-Simulation.
  • Making Simulink Models Robust with Respect to Change Making Simulink Models Robust with Respect to Change

    Making Simulink Models Robust with Respect to Change Making Simulink Models Robust with Respect to Change

    Making Simulink Models Robust with Respect to Change Making Simulink Models Robust with Respect to Change By Monika Jaskolka, B.Co.Sc., M.A.Sc. a thesis submitted to the Department of Computing and Software and the School of Graduate Studies of McMaster University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Doctor of Philosophy (December 2020) McMaster University (Software Engineering) Hamilton, ON, Canada Title: Making Simulink Models Robust with Respect to Change Author: Monika Jaskolka B.Co.Sc. (Laurentian University) M.A.Sc. (McMaster University) Supervisors: Dr. Mark Lawford, Dr. Alan Wassyng Number of Pages: xi, 206 ii For my husband, Jason iii Abstract Model-Based Development (MBD) is an approach that uses software models to describe the behaviour of embedded software and cyber-physical systems. MBD has become an increasingly prevalent paradigm, with Simulink by MathWorks being the most widely used MBD platform for control software. Unlike textual programming languages, visual languages for MBD such as Simulink use block diagrams as their syntax. Thus, some software engineering principles created for textual languages are not easily adapted to this graphical notation or have not yet been supported. A software engineering principle that is not readily supported in Simulink is the modularization of systems using information hiding. As with all software artifacts, Simulink models must be constantly maintained and are subject to evolution over their lifetime. This principle hides likely changes, thus enabling the design to be robust with respect to future changes. In this thesis, we perform repository mining on an industry change management system of Simulink models to understand how they are likely to change.
  • Modeling and Simulation in Scilab/Scicos Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 01-01, 04-01, 11 Axx, 26-01

    Modeling and Simulation in Scilab/Scicos Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 01-01, 04-01, 11 Axx, 26-01

    Stephen L. Campbell, Jean-Philippe Chancelier and Ramine Nikoukhah Modeling and Simulation in Scilab/Scicos Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 01-01, 04-01, 11 Axx, 26-01 Library of Congress Control Number: 2005930797 ISBN-10: 0-387-27802-8 ISBN-13: 978-0387278025 Printed on acid-free paper. © 2006 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media, Inc., 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaption, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights. Printed in the United States of America. (BPR/HAM) 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 springeronline.com Preface Scilab (http://www.scilab.org) is a free open-source software package for scientific com- putation. It includes hundreds of general purpose and specialized functions for numerical computation, organized in libraries called toolboxes that cover such areas as simulation, optimization, systems and control, and signal processing. These functions reduce consid- erably the burden of programming for scientific applications. One important Scilab toolbox is Scicos. Scicos (http://www.scicos.org) provides a block-diagram graphical editor for the construction and simulation of dynamical sys- tems.
  • A Modelica Power System Library for Phasor Time-Domain Simulation

    A Modelica Power System Library for Phasor Time-Domain Simulation

    2013 4th IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT Europe), October 6-9, Copenhagen 1 A Modelica Power System Library for Phasor Time-Domain Simulation T. Bogodorova, Student Member, IEEE, M. Sabate, G. Leon,´ L. Vanfretti, Member, IEEE, M. Halat, J. B. Heyberger, and P. Panciatici, Member, IEEE Abstract— Power system phasor time-domain simulation is the FMI Toolbox; while for Mathematica, SystemModeler often carried out through domain specific tools such as Eurostag, links Modelica models directly with the computation kernel. PSS/E, and others. While these tools are efficient, their individual The aims of this article is to demonstrate the value of sub-component models and solvers cannot be accessed by the users for modification. One of the main goals of the FP7 iTesla Modelica as a convenient language for modeling of complex project [1] is to perform model validation, for which, a modelling physical systems containing electric power subcomponents, and simulation environment that provides model transparency to show results of software-to-software validations in order and extensibility is necessary. 1 To this end, a power system to demonstrate the capability of Modelica for supporting library has been built using the Modelica language. This article phasor time-domain power system models, and to illustrate describes the Power Systems library, and the software-to-software validation carried out for the implemented component as well as how power system Modelica models can be shared across the validation of small-scale power system models constructed different simulation platforms. In addition, several aspects of using different library components. Simulations from the Mo- using Modelica for simulation of complex power systems are delica models are compared with their Eurostag equivalents.
  • OMG Sysphs: Integrating Sysml, Simulink, Modelica And

    OMG Sysphs: Integrating Sysml, Simulink, Modelica And

    OMG SysPhs: Integrating SysML, Simulink, Modelica and FMI | ref.: 3DS_Document_2015 | ref.: 2/13/20 | Confidential Information | Information | Confidential Nerijus Jankevicius Systèmes CATIA | No Magic Dassault © INCOSE IW, Torrance, Jan 27, 2020 3DS.COM System Model as an Integration Framework © 2012-2014 by Sanford Friedenthal SysML as co-simulation environment 35 Reduce and standardize mappings 4 Unified Physics Domain Flowing Substance Flow rate Potential to flow Electrical Charge Current Voltage Hydraulic Volume Volumetric flow rate Pressure Rotational Angular momentum Torque Angular velocity Translational Linear momentum Force Velocity Thermal Entropy Entropy flow Temperature flow rate = amount of substance/time flow rate * potential = energy / time = power The Standard : SysPhs •SysPhS - https://www.omg.org/spec/SysPhS/1.0 • SysML Mapping to SiMulink and Modelica • SysPhS profile • SysPhS library Simulation profile Modelica vs Simulink • Modelica • SiMulink • Language is better suited for physical • Language is well-suited for control modeling (plant) algorithMs • Object oriented approach for • TransforMational seMantics of signals modeling physical and signal processing coMponents (Mechanical, electrical, etc.) • Causal seMantics (inputs -> outputs) • Causal and A-Causal seMantics • Well integrated into the “MATLAB (equations) universe” • Open standard (of the textual • Widely used in industry (standard de- language) facto) • Multi tool support (although DyMola • Many existing tool integrations is doMinant) • Code generation to
  • TPT Tutorial

    TPT Tutorial

    Time Partition Testing Systematic automated testing of embedded systems PikeTec GmbH, http://www.piketec.com There are only a few tools for testing embedded systems in the automotive domain. Their function usually lies in the test-management or automation of tests by means of test scripts. Time Partition Testing (TPT) noticeably exceeds this. It combines a systematic and very graphic modelling technique for test cases with a fully automatic test execution in different environments and automatic test evaluation in a unique way. In doing so, TPT even supports testing of control systems. Time Partition Testing (TPT) was developed to graphically and compactly model tests of embedded systems – especially those with continuous behaviour –, to automate those tests and to offer a systematic that supports the tester in selecting an ideal amount of test cases. The intuitive graphic modelling technique for test cases, the mechanisms for the structuring of complex test problems, the simple integration in any test- bench and a number of additional interesting features makes TPT a unique test solution. All this has contributed to TPT becoming the central testing tool in a large number of development projects at car manufacturers and suppliers and has become an integral part of the process chain. Embedded systems TPT is specialized on testing embedded systems whose inputs and outputs can be represented as signals. Most control systems belong to this system class. The implementation language of the embedded system (e.g. ‘C’ code, C++, MATLAB/Simulink/Stateflow, Statemate or a combination of multiple languages) is irrelevant for TPT. TPT does not require a particular implementation language.
  • Tpt Test Design and Test Generation

    Tpt Test Design and Test Generation

    TPT IN A NUTSHELL TPT TEST DESIGN DASHBOARD ASSESSMENT TRACEABILITY OF TESTING SAFETY TPT is a tool for functional testing of embed- AND TEST User interfaces can be designed for expe- OF TESTS AND REQUIREMENTS AND SYSTEMS PikeTec GmbH ded software interfacing a huge number of riments with a System under Test. Manual standard development tools. GENERATION validation, test observation and interaction REPORTING TEST CASES TPT supports qualified testing and Waldenserstr. 2 - 4 are possible. verification of safety related systems. 10551 Berlin | Germany TPT is suitable for all development phases. Expressing test cases with TPT is both, TPT supports fully automated assessment TPT supports analysis and coverage Tel. +49 30 394 096 830 TPT can be used for MiL, SiL, PiL, HiL powerful and easy to handle. The Dashboard is a powerful feature and documentation of test results including examination of requirements and tests. Safety standard directives can be satisfied Mail. [email protected] and in vehicles. of TPT for many reasons: Requirements can be imported from while testing with TPT up to the highest EMBEDDED TESTING Use automatons for structuring test phases: several formats and tools. safety level. Related standards are: www.piketec.com Back-to-Back testing with relative Tests can be created graphically by the Dashboards can be used for exper- and absolute tolerances STARTS HERE user or generated automatically. INIT imental testing long before test design Requirements can be analyzed, linked ISO 26262 light on Pass and fail criteria Dashboards can also be used to test cases and reported along with IEC 61508 IF Test phase 2 Powerful signal pattern The tests are executed, assessed and bright changing light together with automated tests the tests.
  • Vissim User's Guide

    Vissim User's Guide

    Version 8.0 VisSim User's Guide By Visual Solutions, Inc. Visual Solutions, Inc. VisSim User's Guide Version 8.0 Copyright © 2010 Visual Solutions, Inc. Visual Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. 487 Groton Road Westford, MA 01886 Trademarks VisSim, VisSim/Analyze, VisSim/CAN, VisSim/C-Code, VisSim/C- Code Support Library source, VisSim/Comm, VisSim/Comm C-Code, VisSim/Comm Red Rapids, VisSim/Comm Turbo Codes, VisSim/Comm Wireless LAN, VisSim/Fixed-Point, VisSim/Knobs & Gauges, VisSim/Model-Wizard, VisSim/Motion, VisSim/Neural-Net, VisSim/OPC, VisSim/OptimzePRO, VisSim/Real-TimePRO, VisSim/State Charts, VisSim/Serial, VisSim/UDP, VisSim Viewer,and flexWires are trademarks of Visual Solutions. All other products mentioned in this manual are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective manufacturers. Copyright and use The information in this manual is subject to change without notice and restrictions does not represent a commitment by Visual Solutions. Visual Solutions does not assume any responsibility for errors that may appear in this document. No part of this manual may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means without permission in writing from Visual Solutions. The Software may not be copied or reproduced in any form, except as stated in the terms of the Software License Agreement. Acknowledgements The following engineers contributed significantly to preparation of this manual: Mike Borrello, Allan Corbeil, and Richard Kolk. Contents Introduction 1 What is VisSim.........................................................................................................................
  • FMI TOOLBOX for MATLAB®/Simulink

    FMI TOOLBOX for MATLAB®/Simulink

    FMI TOOLBOX for MATLAB®/Simulink SCOPE KEY FEATURES BENEFITS • Integration of physical models • Export and import of Model Exchange and • Reduced time and cost for development of in MATLAB®/Simulink Co-Simulation FMUs control systems supported by physical models • Dynamic simulation • Simulink blockset and MATLAB script interface • Leverage state of the art physical modeling tools • Control system development • Design of Experiments and design space exploration • Maintain flexibility with the FMI standard • HIL simulation on dSPACE DS1006 systems MI Toolbox for MATLAB®/Simulink MATLAB®/Simulink environment. Fenables easy to use integration of Support for the FMI standard ensures THE FUNCTIONAL physical models developed in state of flexibility and cross-platform inter- MOCK-UP INTERFACE the art modeling tools in the MATLAB®/ operability. The Functional Mock-up Interface Simulink environment. The toolbox (FMI) is an open standard for exchange of The Toolbox enables simulation of dynamic models, targeting tool interoper- relies on the open FMI standard and is FMUs as part of Simulink models and ability and model reuse. FMI compliant ideal for control systems development. in MATLAB scripts. In addition, Simu- models (Functional Mock-up Units (FMUs)), High-fidelity physical models are key link models can be exported into Model are self-contained compiled models components in development of control Exchange or Co-simulation FMUs. which can be integrated in a wide range of applications where dynamic models are systems and contribute to increased Hardware In the Loop (HIL) simulation is needed. Modeling IP is protected since quality and shorter development cycles. supported on dSPACE DS1006 systems. only compiled code and interface defini- Modeling languages such as Modelica tions are distributed in FMUs.