Watershed Management Areas (Wsmas) Are Much Smaller Than the Broader Area Included in the SAA

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Watershed Management Areas (Wsmas) Are Much Smaller Than the Broader Area Included in the SAA CHATTAHOOCHEE-OCONEE NATIONAL FORESTS CHAPTER 3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES INTRODUCTION PURPOSE AND ORGANIZATION The purpose of Chapter 3 is to present before and after views of the Forest environment. The environment is described as it is currently and as it would be if the alternatives were implemented. The Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences disclosures are required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), which implements regulation under 40 CFR 1500. Each resource is first described by its current condition. These descriptions are limited to the background information necessary for understanding how forest plan alternatives may affect the resource. The resources listed and their sub-headings are designed to address issues raised throughout the planning process. After each discussion of the current condition of a resource, the potential effects (environmental consequences) associated with implementation of each alternative are discussed. All significant or potentially significant effects — including direct, indirect, and cumulative effects — are disclosed. Where possible, the effects are quantified. Where this is not possible, a qualitative discussion is presented. Environmental consequences related to the significant issues are discussed in the short and long term. Although a Forest Plan based on any alternative would guide management for 10 to 15 years, the longer term implications of implementing an alternative must be considered. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT AREAS The Southern Appalachian Assessment (SAA) is a collaborative effort among Federal agencies, state agencies, universities, special interest groups and private citizens. Due to the relationship of the national forests and other Federal lands to the biological, social, and economic conditions in the assessment area, more comprehensive and more scientifically credible data were needed for land FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 3-1 CHAPTER 3 CHATTAHOOCHEE-OCONEE NATIONAL FORESTS management planning. The assessment supports individual forest plans at a regional level by determining how the lands, resources, people, and management of national forests interrelate within the larger context of the surrounding lands. This information serves as a baseline for some of the analysis documented in this chapter. Management areas are defined as watersheds. The watershed management areas (WSMAs) are much smaller than the broader area included in the SAA. They are 5th level watershed designations, which on the Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forest, average about 25,000 acres each. Most represent the headwaters of larger streams that flow from the Forests into much larger streams in the Southern Appalachian region. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AREAS AND MANAGEMENT PRESCRIPTIONS The WSMAs do not have any unique direction that is not already available in the plan. They are being used strictly as areas that provide a “sense of place,” as well as presenting additional information related to objectives and management prescription (MRx) allocation. They generally will be utilized as boundaries for project level cumulative effects analysis and activities. Management prescriptions are not limited to individual WSMAs; they generally apply to landscapes that cross numerous management areas. Some MRxs may actually fall entirely within a WSMA, but would not necessarily be tied directly to that WSMA. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROGRAMMATIC AND SITE-SPECIFIC ANALYSIS For estimating the effects of alternatives at the programmatic Forest Plan level, the assumption has been made that the kinds of resource management activities allowed under the prescriptions will, in fact, occur to the extent necessary to achieve the goals and objectives of each alternative. However, the actual location, design, and extent of such activities are generally not known at this time. Those will be site- specific (project-by-project) decisions. Thus, the discussions here refer to the potential for the effect to occur, realizing that in many cases, these are only estimates. The effects analysis is useful in comparing and evaluating alternatives on a Forestwide basis, but is not to be applied to specific locations on the Forests. TYPES OF EFFECTS Environmental consequences are the effects of implementing an alternative on the physical, social, and economic environment. Direct environmental effects are defined as those occurring at the same time and place as the initial action. Indirect effects are those that occur later than the action or are spatially removed from the activity, but would be significant in the foreseeable future. Cumulative effects result from the incremental effects of actions added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable actions, regardless of what agency (federal or non-federal) or person undertakes the other actions. Cumulative effects can result from individually minor, but collectively significant, actions taking place over a period of time. 3-2 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CHATTAHOOCHEE-OCONEE NATIONAL FORESTS CHAPTER 3 PHYSICAL ELEMENTS The physical environment is the non-living portion of the environment upon which the living organisms depend – air, soil, water, geology, and climate. This section begins with a description of the ecological classification of the Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forests. Ecological classification is a system which classifies land and water at various scales through integrating information about climate, geology, landform, soils, water, and vegetation. This classification is a tool to provide a more ecological and scientific basis in land and resource management planning. Ecological classification is useful for: • Evaluating the inherent capability of land and water resources. • Predicting changes occurring over time. • Evaluating effects of management. • Allocating land to management areas. • Selecting appropriate management indicators. • Discussing and analyzing ecosystems and biodiversity at multiple scales. DESCRIPTION OF ECOLOGICAL UNITS In 1992, the Forest Service issued a commitment to using an ecological approach to managing the National Forests and Grasslands of the United States. This concept, termed ecosystem management, focuses on blending the needs of people with management that will sustain forest ecosystems (Robertson, 1992). A key point of this directive from the Chief of the Forest Service, Dale Robertson, was to use ecosystem management to better understand the complex ecosystems that occur on national forests. A critical first step in planning the ecosystem management concept was the development of a consistent approach to ecosystem classification and mapping (McNab and Avers, 1994). As a result, the National Ecological Classification and Mapping Task Team (ECOMAP, 1993) were chartered to develop a consistent approach for classifying ecological units at multiple geographic scales. Land classification is the process of arranging or ordering information about land units so one can better understand their similarities and relationships (Bailey et al. 1978). Ecological classification is a system by which land and water at various scales are classified and stratified through integrating information about geology, landform, soils, water, vegetation, and climate. These classifications represent homogenous units having similarities among their resource capabilities and relationships. The National Hierarchical Framework of Ecological Units was developed and adopted in November 1993 by the Forest Service as a system to classify and map terrestrial ecological units at multiple geographic scales. Table 3- 1 displays the National Framework units. FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 3-3 CHAPTER 3 CHATTAHOOCHEE-OCONEE NATIONAL FORESTS Table 3- 1. Forest Service National Hierarchy of Ecological Units Planning and Ecological Units Purpose, Objectives, and General Size Analysis Scale General Use Range Ecoregions Global Domain Broad application for modeling Millions to tens -------------------- and sampling, strategic of thousands of Continental Division planning and assessment square miles -------------------- Regional Province Subregions Section Strategic, multi-forest, Thousands to ------------------- statewide, and multi-agency tens of thousands Subsection analysis and assessment of square miles Landscape Landtype Association Forest, area wide planning Thousands to and watershed analysis hundreds of acres Land Unit Landtype Project and management Hundreds to less ------------------- area planning and analysis than 10 acres Landtype Phase Source: ECOMAP, 1993 ECOMAP (1993) briefly describes the framework: a regionalization, classification and mapping system for stratifying the Earth into progressively smaller areas of increasingly uniform ecological potentials. Ecological types are classified and ecological units are mapped based on associations of those biotic and environmental factors that directly affect and indirectly express energy, moisture, and nutrient gradients that regulate the structure and function of ecosystems. These factors include climate, physiography, water, soils, air, and potential natural communities. The national hierarchy is comprised of four planning and analysis scales: ecoregions, subregions, landscape and land units. The scales are further divided into domains, divisions, provinces, sections, subsections, landtype associations, landtypes and landtype phases. A description of the ecological units from the Domain
Recommended publications
  • Lake Real Estate Market Report
    Lake Real Estate Market Report A Multi-State, Lake-Focused Real Estate Market Report Winter 2020 Produced By LakeHomes.com Lake Real Estate Market Report – Winter 2020 Table of Contents CEO’s Market Insights ................................................................................................................................. 3 Report Methodology ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Overall Top 10s ............................................................................................................................................ 8 Top-Ranked By State .................................................................................................................................. 10 Alabama ...................................................................................................................................................... 14 Arkansas ..................................................................................................................................................... 20 Connecticut ................................................................................................................................................. 26 Florida ......................................................................................................................................................... 31 Florida - Central ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stream-Temperature Characteristics in Georgia
    STREAM-TEMPERATURE CHARACTERISTICS IN GEORGIA By T.R. Dyar and S.J. Alhadeff ______________________________________________________________________________ U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4203 Prepared in cooperation with GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION Atlanta, Georgia 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 3039 Amwiler Road, Suite 130 Denver Federal Center Peachtree Business Center Box 25286 Atlanta, GA 30360-2824 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Page Abstract . 1 Introduction . 1 Purpose and scope . 2 Previous investigations. 2 Station-identification system . 3 Stream-temperature data . 3 Long-term stream-temperature characteristics. 6 Natural stream-temperature characteristics . 7 Regression analysis . 7 Harmonic mean coefficient . 7 Amplitude coefficient. 10 Phase coefficient . 13 Statewide harmonic equation . 13 Examples of estimating natural stream-temperature characteristics . 15 Panther Creek . 15 West Armuchee Creek . 15 Alcovy River . 18 Altamaha River . 18 Summary of stream-temperature characteristics by river basin . 19 Savannah River basin . 19 Ogeechee River basin. 25 Altamaha River basin. 25 Satilla-St Marys River basins. 26 Suwannee-Ochlockonee River basins . 27 Chattahoochee River basin. 27 Flint River basin. 28 Coosa River basin. 29 Tennessee River basin . 31 Selected references. 31 Tabular data . 33 Graphs showing harmonic stream-temperature curves of observed data and statewide harmonic equation for selected stations, figures 14-211 . 51 iii ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Map showing locations of 198 periodic and 22 daily stream-temperature stations, major river basins, and physiographic provinces in Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • List of TMDL Implementation Plans with Tmdls Organized by Basin
    Latest 305(b)/303(d) List of Streams List of Stream Reaches With TMDLs and TMDL Implementation Plans - Updated June 2011 Total Maximum Daily Loadings TMDL TMDL PLAN DELIST BASIN NAME HUC10 REACH NAME LOCATION VIOLATIONS TMDL YEAR TMDL PLAN YEAR YEAR Altamaha 0307010601 Bullard Creek ~0.25 mi u/s Altamaha Road to Altamaha River Bio(sediment) TMDL 2007 09/30/2009 Altamaha 0307010601 Cobb Creek Oconee Creek to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Cobb Creek Oconee Creek to Altamaha River FC 2012 Altamaha 0307010601 Milligan Creek Uvalda to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 2006 Altamaha 0307010601 Milligan Creek Uvalda to Altamaha River FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Oconee Creek Headwaters to Cobb Creek DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Oconee Creek Headwaters to Cobb Creek FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010602 Ten Mile Creek Little Ten Mile Creek to Altamaha River Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010602 Ten Mile Creek Little Ten Mile Creek to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010603 Beards Creek Spring Branch to Altamaha River Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010603 Five Mile Creek Headwaters to Altamaha River Bio(sediment) TMDL 2007 09/30/2009 Altamaha 0307010603 Goose Creek U/S Rd. S1922(Walton Griffis Rd.) to Little Goose Creek FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010603 Mushmelon Creek Headwaters to Delbos Bay Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010604 Altamaha River Confluence of Oconee and Ocmulgee Rivers to ITT Rayonier
    [Show full text]
  • Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards ( 1) Purpose. The establishment of water quality standards. (2) W ate r Quality Enhancement: (a) The purposes and intent of the State in establishing Water Quality Standards are to provide enhancement of water quality and prevention of pollution; to protect the public health or welfare in accordance with the public interest for drinking water supplies, conservation of fish, wildlife and other beneficial aquatic life, and agricultural, industrial, recreational, and other reasonable and necessary uses and to maintain and improve the biological integrity of the waters of the State. ( b) The following paragraphs describe the three tiers of the State's waters. (i) Tier 1 - Existing instream water uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect the existing uses shall be maintained and protected. (ii) Tier 2 - Where the quality of the waters exceed levels necessary to support propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife and recreation in and on the water, that quality shall be maintained and protected unless the division finds, after full satisfaction of the intergovernmental coordination and public participation provisions of the division's continuing planning process, that allowing lower water quality is necessary to accommodate important economic or social development in the area in which the waters are located.
    [Show full text]
  • Fecal Coliform TMDL Report
    Total Maximum Daily Load Evaluation for Nineteen Stream Segments in the Tennessee River Basin for Fecal Coliform Submitted to: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia Submitted by: The Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division Atlanta, Georgia January 2004 Total Maximum Daily Load Evaluation January 2004 Tennessee River Basin (Fecal coliform) Table of Contents Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Watershed Description......................................................................................................1 1.3 Water Quality Standard.....................................................................................................5 2.0 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................ 8 3.0 SOURCE ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Point Source Assessment ................................................................................................. 9 3.2 Nonpoint Source Assessment........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NC DEQ- DIVISON of WATER RESOURCES Name of Stream
    NC DEQ- DIVISON OF WATER RESOURCES 2B .0300 . 0302 HIWASSEE RIVER BASIN Name of Stream Description Class Class Date Index No. HIWASSEE RIVER (Chatuge From North Carolina-Georgia State B 07/01/61 1-(1) Lake below elevation 1928) line to Chatuge Dam Bell Creek From source to North C;Tr 03/01/77 1-2 Carolina-Georgia State Line Upper Bell Creek From source to North C 07/01/61 1-2-1 Carolina-Georgia State Line Wood Creek From source to North C 07/01/61 1-3 Carolina-Georgia State Line Sneaking Creek From source to North C 07/01/61 1-4 Carolina-Georgia State Line Shooting Creek From source to Chatuge Lake C;Tr 07/01/61 1-5 Muskrat Branch From source to Shooting Creek C;Tr 07/01/73 1-5-1 Jake Branch From source to Muskrat Branch C;Tr 07/01/73 1-5-1-1 Thompson Creek From source to Shooting Creek C 07/01/61 1-5-2 Locust Log Branch From source to Thompson Creek C 07/01/61 1-5-2-1 Mill Creek From source to Shooting Creek C;Tr 07/01/73 1-5-3 Lynch Branch From source to Shooting Creek C 07/01/61 1-5-4 Vineyard Creek From source to Shooting Creek C;Tr 07/01/73 1-5-5 Eagle Fork Creek From source to Shooting Creek C;Tr 07/01/73 1-5-6 Ledford Creek From source to Eagle Fork Creek C;Tr 07/01/73 1-5-6-1 Dave Barrett Creek From source to Eagle Fork Creek C;Tr 07/01/73 1-5-6-2 Barrett Branch From source to Dave Barrett Creek C 07/01/61 1-5-6-2-1 Loggy Branch From source to Dave Barrett Creek C 07/01/61 1-5-6-2-2 Thumping Creek From source to Eagle Fork Creek C;Tr 07/01/73 1-5-6-3 Giesky Creek From source to Shooting Creek C;Tr 07/01/73 1-5-7 Bethabara Creek
    [Show full text]
  • Stream-Temperature Charcteristics in Georgia
    STREAM-TEMPERATURE CHARACTERISTICS IN GEORGIA U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Prepared in cooperation with the GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4203 STREAM-TEMPERATURE CHARACTERISTICS IN GEORGIA By T.R. Dyar and S.J. Alhadeff ______________________________________________________________________________ U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4203 Prepared in cooperation with GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION Atlanta, Georgia 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 3039 Amwiler Road, Suite 130 Denver Federal Center Peachtree Business Center Box 25286 Atlanta, GA 30360-2824 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Page Abstract . 1 Introduction . 1 Purpose and scope . 2 Previous investigations. 2 Station-identification system . 3 Stream-temperature data . 3 Long-term stream-temperature characteristics. 6 Natural stream-temperature characteristics . 7 Regression analysis . 7 Harmonic mean coefficient . 7 Amplitude coefficient. 10 Phase coefficient . 13 Statewide harmonic equation . 13 Examples of estimating natural stream-temperature characteristics . 15 Panther Creek . 15 West Armuchee Creek . 15 Alcovy River . 18 Altamaha River . 18 Summary of stream-temperature characteristics by river basin . 19 Savannah River basin . 19 Ogeechee River basin. 25 Altamaha River basin. 25 Satilla-St Marys River basins. 26 Suwannee-Ochlockonee River basins . 27 Chattahoochee River basin. 27 Flint River basin. 28 Coosa River basin. 29 Tennessee River basin . 31 Selected references. 31 Tabular data . 33 Graphs showing harmonic stream-temperature curves of observed data and statewide harmonic equation for selected stations, figures 14-211 .
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Integrated 305(B)/303(D) List
    2020 Integrated 305(b)/303(d) List - Streams Reach Name/ID Reach Location/County River Basin/ Assessment/ Cause/ Size/Unit Category/ Notes Use Data Provider Source Priority Alex Creek Mason Cowpen Branch to Altamaha Not Supporting DO 3 4a TMDL completed DO 2002. Altamaha River GAR030701060503 Wayne Fishing 1,55,10 NP Miles Altamaha River Confluence of Oconee and Altamaha Supporting 72 1 TMDL completed Fish Tissue (Mercury) 2002. Ocmulgee Rivers to ITT Rayonier GAR030701060401 Appling, Wayne, Jeff Davis Fishing 1,55 Miles Altamaha River ITT Rayonier to Altamaha Assessment 20 3 TMDL completed Fish Tissue (Mercury) 2002. More Penholoway Creek Pending data need to be collected and evaluated before it GAR030701060402 Wayne Fishing 10,55 Miles can be determined whether the designated use of Fishing is being met. Altamaha River Penholoway Creek to Altamaha Supporting 27 1 Butler River GAR030701060501 Wayne, Glynn, McIntosh Fishing 1,55 Miles Beards Creek Chapel Creek to Spring Altamaha Not Supporting Bio F 7 4a TMDL completed Bio F 2017. Branch GAR030701060308 Tattnall, Long Fishing 4 NP Miles Beards Creek Spring Branch to Altamaha Not Supporting Bio F 11 4a TMDL completed Bio F in 2012. Altamaha River GAR030701060301 Tattnall Fishing 1,55,10,4 NP, UR Miles Big Cedar Creek Griffith Branch to Little Altamaha Assessment 5 3 This site has a narrative rank of fair for Cedar Creek Pending macroinvertebrates. Waters with a narrative rank GAR030701070108 Washington Fishing 59 Miles of fair will remain in Category 3 until EPD completes the reevaluation of the metrics used to assess macroinvertebrate data. Big Cedar Creek Little Cedar Creek (at Altamaha Not Supporting FC 6 5 EPD needs to determine the "natural DO" for the Donovan Hwy) to Little area before a use assessment is made.
    [Show full text]
  • Hiwassee River Property for Sale
    Hiwassee River Property For Sale Quickly apparitional, Kermie affirms beefburger and underwork sporangium. Unweathered Gerri extradite some discoloration and lutes his Kantian so wittily! Ransom remains unapologetic after Herby puncture volante or distance any soilage. All activity the hiwassee river at diamond point in trail, land for all previous owner The Unicoi Turnpike once ran by the source plug the Hiwassee River in Unicoi Gap on smart way still Great Echota, the anchor capital and sacred Peace Town department the Cherokee Nation. Kingsport Type C Motor Homes for sale. We are my wondering eyes should be a portion by cors or! Bathrooms we know before that overlooks the sale hiwassee property for river! Land or Sale Meigs County 15 Vacant Lots for Sale. The river for lake views, nccg stands strong and! Have him question the Rough river Lake you, call Dottie Watson anytime at. Featured Properties 1005-2171 Acreage in Pickens County boulder Property Waterfront Mountain working for Sale Creekfront Scarecorn Creek Equine. Description of success of towns county esthetics center harbor is a spectacular views of our luck and the dock slip in northern cumberland trail. Lake Hiwassee North Carolina Homes Houses Lots Land. This is the perfect get away for ice fishing and water sports. Hiwassee are just a little tennessee river from the heart to sale property requires that you. Search by most complete Hiawassee GA real estate listings for sale to Find Hiawassee GA homes for your real estate apartments condos townhomes. Both respectively made for sale on american dream you can visit our rivers council, wild membership at.
    [Show full text]
  • Unsuuseuracsbe
    Central Elizabethton Baileyton Johnson Watauga JOHNSON City Lake Cherokee Lake Caryville SCOTT Jonesborough Norris Lake Midway Pine Crest WATAUGA Rutledge 421 CAMPBELL UNION GRAINGER 108th Congress of the United States WASHINGTON CARTER 321 Bulls Gap Maynardville Unicoi DISTRICT Lake City Luttrell GREENE 5 Morristown Norris Beech Mountain Cherokee y Mosheim w Lake Roan H S t 4 Mountain 19 Tusculum Plainview Balm Greeneville Elk Park Hwy Seven Nolichucky River Banner Elk Devils Erwin 5 0 1 y Blaine w H Sugar Mountain St ANDERSON Banner UNICOI Hill N r Jefferson City o e Grandfather White Pine lic iv hu R HAMBLEN ck y y k R uc Newland Clinton i h v ic e ol r N New Market CALDWELL Mascot MORGAN Baneberry Oliver Springs Clinch River MITCHELL AVERY River JEFFERSON Dandridge ton ols Melton H Crossnore Hill Lake TENNESSEE Knoxville Bakersville e l y l 2 i Parrottsville 1 v w 2 in H y L s w ll NORTH CAROLINAS tH a S F tH w Oak Ridge y KNOX 2 v 0 Ri er Douglas Lake 8 rench oa d Newport CALDWELL F Br StHwy 183 N o r th T o e River ROANE COCKE Burnsville 19 Spruce Pine 23 Watts Bar Lake 25 County Line Rd Big Crabtree Cr S Blue Ridge Pkwy tH Hot Springs w YANCEY y Farragut Seymour 1 8 S 1 tH w y 7 8 StHwy 226 (Alt) 9 0 1 MADISON y Sevierville w StRd 1452 Blue Ridge Rd H t Lucerne Strasse S Grassy Mtn Rd Fort Loudoun Blue Ridge Pkwy Government Rd Lake Rockford 213 Hwy Louisville Pigeon St Forge Mars Hill BURKE Lenoir City Eagleton 9 ) Alcoa 0 Rd Watts Village 2 orth Fo rk DISTRICT y (N SEVIER Marshall 25 y 197 Bar w w t H S H S t Lake Friendsville
    [Show full text]
  • Nantahala-Pisgah, North Carolina
    A B C D E F G H ell Pow r 70 ive LEWIS R 58 421 421 Damascus KY h er JEFFERSON NF FORK WILD. 27 VA nc iv 58 DANIEL BOONE NF CUMBERLAND GAP NHP li R Middlesborough C ch Weber City NANTAHALA NATIONAL FOREST PISGAH NATIONAL FORESekT k lin 58 re F C C N 23 RECREATION BOX FACILITIES LEGEND TENNESSEE VIRGINIA TN Site Number and Name Facilities Comments Site Number and Name Facilities Comments IL r Bristol A 133 er R NORTH CAROLINA at Camping Boat Ramp Bicycle TCrail T ckw c Ñ 11W b B Accessible fishing pier la On North Mills River Jacobs Creek i 1 Cherokee Lake PR!*n 47 North Mills River c3_PR!B*-$ g ( Group Camping Ä Canoeing \ Horse1 1TErail 421 2 Hanging Dog On Hiw assee Lake 48 Wash Creek 33 Group camp, call 828-877-3265 c3_PR!ÑÄb$ (R*\$ Blountville r H Kingsport S 81 e ek Camping Trailer F Kayaking vScenic View Little Oak o re Sneedville 3 k V a v r 30 miles of trails C Picnic shelter available k e i s 3 Fires Creek r 49 Stony Fork P B R e P*,\ e e H 37 iv r o C R 25E o Trailer Dump Station ls Tubing Information ton r m r _ - to ? ls B 4 Bristol Horse Camp On Fires Creek, m any trails 50 Lake Powhataan Lifeguard, guided activities in season e n Ho South Holston Lake ig 1 cR!\,*$ c c3_PRB!*s,b?h$ v 1 25W y i L S R a 75 P Picnicking s Swimming G Winter Recreation Mountain City u 5 Jackrabbit Mtn On Chatuge Lake 51 Cold Springs R k On Cold Springs Creek Fk Bluff City r c3_PRB!Ñ*s,Oh$ P * ee 181 S el er g r v l i Surgoinsville R C Ri el er C r 63 Tazewell B iv R Restrooms f Fiivshing O Amphitheater w R 6 Hurricane Primitive No water o 52 Harmon
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Return Mail List Property Legal Account # Type Parcel # Class Owner Name Mailing Address 2021 Fmv 2020 Fmv Address Description Homestead
    2021 RETURN MAIL LIST PROPERTY LEGAL ACCOUNT # TYPE PARCEL # CLASS OWNER NAME MAILING ADDRESS 2021 FMV 2020 FMV ADDRESS DESCRIPTION HOMESTEAD CMS COUNSELING 417 GREEN STREET PLACE NE CMS 334856 PERS 01024 001010 C LLC, GAINESVILLE, GA 30501- 10,000 0 417 GREEN ST COUNSELING LLC S0 1515 NE 100 BRENAU AVE. 100 BRENAU AVENUE COMMUNITY 85083 REAL 01082 004008 C PARTNERS LLC, GAINESVILLE, GA 30501- 2,368,400 2,428,500 WAY 1.99 ACRE S0 1430 CALVARY 1430 CALVARY CHURCH 1442 SW CHURCH ROAD, ROAD GAINESVILLE, GA CALVARY CHURCH 1442 CALVARY 51591 REAL 15035 000001 R LLC, 30507- 44,172 45,580 RD CHURCH ROAD S0 1430 CALVARY 1430 CALVARY CHURCH 1430 SW 1430 CALVARY CHURCH ROAD, ROAD GAINESVILLE, GA CALVARY CHURCH CHURCH ROAD S 51630 REAL 15035 000045 I LLC, 30507- 755,828 768,500 RD W S0 1643 MT VERNON 3466 KEITH BRIDGE RD 3466 KEITH 1643 MT 335781 PERS 08035 000042 C LLC, GAINESVILLE, GA 30504- 20,000 0 BRIDGE VERNON LLC S0 180 180 RENOVATIONS 4324 OAK LAKE DRIVE LULA, 4234 OAK LAKE RENOVATIONS 334631 PERS 09097 000001 C LLC, GA 30554- 10,000 0 DR LLC S0 2010 MASTER OWNERS 4038 CHESATEE RD 30506 4432 SW AMENITY AREA 84073 REAL 08024 005084 R ASSOCIATION INC, GAINESVILLE, GA 30506- 10 10 CLUBSIDE DR @ 2.286 AC S0 CREEKSIDE OF 2010 MASTER 4902 SW MUNDY MILL OWNER'S 4038 CHESTATEE RD COTTONWOOD S/D POD B 77339 REAL 08030A004064 R ASSOCIATION INC, GAINESVILLE, GA 30506- 1 1 TRL COMMON AREA S0 2010 MASTER OWNER'S 4038 CHESTATEE RD SW HIDDEN 74144 REAL 08031 004006 R ASSOCIATION INC, GAINESVILLE, GA 30506- 1 1 CREEK DR MEEKS DRIVE S0 MUNDY MILL 2010 MASTER
    [Show full text]