Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 147 / Tuesday, July 31, 2012 / Notices 45375

following respondents: Coby Electronics Issued: July 25, 2012. by reason of infringement of various Corp. (‘‘Coby’’) of Lake Success, NY; Lisa R. Barton, claims of United States Patent Nos. Curtis International LTD (‘‘Curtis’’) of Acting Secretary to the Commission. 6,121,941 (‘‘the ’941 patent’’); 5,978,063 Ontario, Canada; E&S International [FR Doc. 2012–18597 Filed 7–30–12; 8:45 am] (‘‘the ’063 patent’’); 5,648,674 (‘‘the ’674 Enterprises, Inc. of Van Nuys, CA; BILLING CODE 7020–02–P patent’’); 5,621,556 (‘‘the ’556 patent’’); MStar Semiconductor, Inc. of ChuPei and 5,375,006 (‘‘the ’006 patent’’). The Hsinchu Hsien, Taiwan; On Corp US, Commission instituted Inv. No. 337– Inc. of San Diego, California; Renesas INTERNATIONAL TRADE TA–749 on November 30, 2010, based Electronics Corporation of Kanagawa, COMMISSION on a complaint filed by Thomson. 75 FR Japan, Renesas Electronics America, Inc. 74080 (Nov. 30, 2010). The complaint of Santa Clara, California; Sceptre Inc. [Investigation Nos. 337–TA–741/749] alleged violations of section 337 of the (‘‘Sceptre’’) of City of Industry, Certain Liquid Crystal Display Devices, Tariff Act of 1930 by reason of infringement of various claims of the California; and Westinghouse Digital, Including Monitors, Televisions, ’063, ’556, and ’006 patents. On January LLC of Orange, California. All Modules, and Components Thereof; 5, 2011, the Commission consolidated respondents except for Coby, Curtis, and Commission Determination Not To the two investigations. The respondents Sceptre have been terminated from the Review an Initial Determination are Chimei InnoLux Corporation of investigation. Terminating the Investigation as to Taiwan and InnoLux Corportation of On June 11, 2012, Vizio and U.S. Patent No. 6,121,941; Termination Austin, Texas (collectively, ‘‘CMI’’); respondent Sceptre filed a joint motion of Investigation MStar Semiconductor Inc. of Taiwan under Commission Rule 210.21(a)(2) to (‘‘MStar’’); Qisda Corporation of Taiwan terminate the investigation on the basis AGENCY: U.S. International Trade and Qisda America Corporation of of a settlement agreement that resolves Commission. Irvine, California (collectively, their litigation. On the same day, Vizio ACTION: Notice. ‘‘Qisda’’); BenQ Corporation of Taiwan, and respondent Coby filed a joint SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that BenQ America Corporation of Irvine, motion under Commission Rule the U.S. International Trade California, and BenQ Latin America 210.21(a)(2) to terminate the Commission has determined not to Corporation of Miami, Florida investigation on the basis of a settlement review initial determinations (‘‘ID’’) (collectively ‘‘BenQ’’); Realtek agreement that resolves their litigation. (Order No. 31) granting a joint motion Semicondustor Corp. of Taiwan On June 12, 2012, Vizio and Curtis filed to terminate the above-captioned (‘‘Realtek’’); and AU Optronics Corp. of a joint motion under Commission Rule investigation with respect to U.S. Patent Taiwan and AU Optronics Corp. 210.21(a)(2) to terminate the No. 6,121,941. The investigation is America of Houston, Texas. investigation on the basis of a settlement terminated in its entirety. On January 12, 2012, the ALJ issued agreement that resolves their litigation. his final ID finding no violation with FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jia Public and confidential versions of the respect to the ’941, ’063, ’556, and ’006 agreements were attached to the Chen, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, patents and a violation with respect to motions. The motions stated that there the ’674 patent. On June 14, 2012, the 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC are no other agreements, written or oral, Commission affirmed the ALJ’s finding 20436, telephone (202) 708–4737. express or implied, between the parties of no violation with respect to the ’063, Copies of non-confidential documents concerning the subject matter of this ’556, and ’006 patents. 77 FR 47067 filed in connection with this investigation. The Commission (June 20, 2012). The Commission investigation are or will be available for investigative attorney supported the reversed the ALJ’s finding of violation inspection during official business motions. On June 25, 2012, the ALJ with respect to the ’674 patent and hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the issued Order No. 69 granting the joint remanded the investigation to the ALJ to Office of the Secretary, U.S. motion filed by Vizio and Sceptre. On determine whether the ’941 patent is International Trade Commission, 500 E the same day, the ALJ issued Order No. anticipated. Id. 70 granting the joint motion filed by Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, On July 6, 2012, complainant Vizio and Coby. On June 26, 2012, the telephone (202) 205–2000. General Thomson and respondents Qisda, BenQ, ALJ issued Order No. 71 granting the information concerning the Commission CMI, Realtek, and MStar filed a joint joint motion filed by Vizio and Curtis may also be obtained by accessing its motion under Commission Rule and terminating the investigation in its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 210.21(a)(1) to terminate the entirety. The ALJ found that no The public record for this investigation investigation with respect to the ’941 extraordinary circumstances exist that may be viewed on the Commission’s patent. The motion stated that there are would prevent the requested electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// no other agreements, written or oral, terminations and that the motions fully edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired express or implied, between the parties comply with Commission Rule 210.21. persons are advised that information on concerning the subject matter of this No petitions for review were received. this matter can be obtained by investigation. On July 9, 2012, the ALJ contacting the Commission’s TDD issued the subject ID granting the joint The Commission has determined not terminal on (202) 205–1810. to review the subject IDs. The motion. The ALJ found that no investigation is terminated in its SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The extraordinary circumstances exist that entirety. Commission instituted Inv. No. 337– would prevent the requested TA–741 on October 18, 2010, based on termination and that the motion fully This action is taken under the a complaint filed by Thomson Licensing complies with Commission Rule authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act SAS of France and Thomson Licensing 210.21(a)(1). No petitions for review of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), LLC of Princeton, New Jersey were received. and Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules (collectively ‘‘Thomson’’). 75 FR. 63856 The Commission has determined not of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Part (Oct. 18, 2010). The complaint alleged to review the subject ID. The 210). violations of section 337 of the Tariff investigation is terminated in its By order of the Commission. Act of 1930, as amended 19 U.S.C. 1337, entirety.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:48 Jul 30, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM 31JYN1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 45376 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 147 / Tuesday, July 31, 2012 / Notices

This action is taken under the on this matter can be obtained by U.S. International Trade Commission, authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act contacting the Commission’s TDD shall designate the presiding of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons Administrative Law Judge. and Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules with mobility impairments who will Responses to the complaint and the of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part need special assistance in gaining access notice of investigation must be 210). to the Commission should contact the submitted by the named respondent in By order of the Commission. Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and William R. Bishop, 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to Hearings and Meetings Coordinator. by accessing its internet server at 19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), [FR Doc. 2012–18671 Filed 7–30–12; 8:45 am] http://www.usitc.gov. The public record such responses will be considered by BILLING CODE P for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission if received not later the Commission’s electronic docket than 20 days after the date of service by (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. the Commission of the complaint and INTERNATIONAL TRADE the notice of investigation. Extensions of COMMISSION FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, time for submitting responses to the [Investigation No. 337–TA–852] U.S. International Trade Commission, complaint and the notice of telephone (202) 205–2560. investigation will not be granted unless Certain Video Analytics Software, Authority: The authority for good cause therefor is shown. Systems, Components Thereof, and institution of this investigation is Failure of the respondent to file a Products Containing Same Institution contained in section 337 of the Tariff timely response to each allegation in the of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. Act of 1930, as amended, and in section complaint and in this notice may be 1337 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of deemed to constitute a waiver of the AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 right to appear and contest the Commission. (2012). allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the ACTION: Notice. Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. administrative law judge and the SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a International Trade Commission, on Commission, without further notice to complaint was filed with the U.S. July 24, 2012, ordered that— the respondent, to find the facts to be as International Trade Commission on June (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of alleged in the complaint and this notice 27, 2012, under section 337 of the Tariff section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as and to enter an initial determination Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. amended, an investigation be instituted and a final determination containing 1337, on behalf of ObjectVideo, Inc. of to determine whether there is a such findings, and may result in the Reston, Virginia. A letter supplementing violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of issuance of an exclusion order or a cease the complaint was filed on July 9, 2012. section 337 in the importation into the and desist order or both directed against The complaint alleges violations of United States, the sale for importation, the respondent. section 337 based upon the importation or the sale within the United States after By order of the Commission. into the United States, the sale for importation of certain video analytics Issued: July 25, 2012. importation, and the sale within the software, systems, components thereof, Lisa R. Barton, United States after importation of and products containing same that Acting Secretary to the Commission. certain video analytics software, infringe one or more of claims 1–8, 11, [FR Doc. 2012–18595 Filed 7–30–12; 8:45 am] systems, components thereof, and 12, 25, 30, 33, and 35–37 of the ‘945 products containing same by reason of patent; claims 1–24 and 28 of the ‘083 BILLING CODE 7020–02–P infringement of certain claims of U.S. patent; claims 12–16 and 18–21 of the Patent No. 6,696,945 (‘‘the ‘945 patent’’); ‘912 patent; and claim 20 of the ‘923 INTERNATIONAL TRADE U.S. Patent No. 6,970,083 (‘‘the ‘083 patent, and whether an industry in the COMMISSION patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,868,912 (‘‘the United States exists as required by ‘912 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. subsection (a)(2) of section 337; [USITC SE–12–023] 7,932,923 (‘‘the ‘923 patent’’). The (2) For the purpose of the complaint further alleges that an investigation so instituted, the following Sunshine Act Meeting industry in the United States exists as are hereby named as parties upon which AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United required by subsection (a)(2) of section this notice of investigation shall be States International Trade Commission. 337. served: TIME AND DATE: The complainant requests that the (a) The complainant is: August 9, 2012 at Commission institute an investigation ObjectVideo, Inc., 11600 Sunrise Valley 1:00 p.m. and, after the investigation, issue an Drive, Suite 290, Reston, VA 20191. PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., exclusion order and a cease and desist (b) The respondent is the following Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: order. entity alleged to be in violation of (202) 205–2000. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for section 337, and is the party upon STATUS: Open to the public. any confidential information contained which the complaint is to be served: MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: therein, is available for inspection Pelco, Inc., 3500 Pelco Way, Clovis, CA 1. Agendas for future meetings: None during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 93612–5999. 2. Minutes to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the (c) The Office of Unfair Import 3. Ratification List Secretary, U.S. International Trade Investigations, U.S. International Trade 4. Vote in Inv. No. 731–TA–1189 Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite (Final)(Large Power Transformers from 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 401, Washington, DC 20436; and Korea). The Commission is currently (202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired (3) For the investigation so instituted, scheduled to transmit its determination individuals are advised that information the Chief Administrative Law Judge, and Commissioners’ opinions to the

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:48 Jul 30, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM 31JYN1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES