Guide to the Brooklyn Maps Collection, 1666-2002
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Brooklyn Transit Primary Source Packet
BROOKLYN TRANSIT PRIMARY SOURCE PACKET Student Name 1 2 INTRODUCTORY READING "New York City Transit - History and Chronology." Mta.info. Metropolitan Transit Authority. Web. 28 Dec. 2015. Adaptation In the early stages of the development of public transportation systems in New York City, all operations were run by private companies. Abraham Brower established New York City's first public transportation route in 1827, a 12-seat stagecoach that ran along Broadway in Manhattan from the Battery to Bleecker Street. By 1831, Brower had added the omnibus to his fleet. The next year, John Mason organized the New York and Harlem Railroad, a street railway that used horse-drawn cars with metal wheels and ran on a metal track. By 1855, 593 omnibuses traveled on 27 Manhattan routes and horse-drawn cars ran on street railways on Third, Fourth, Sixth, and Eighth Avenues. Toward the end of the 19th century, electricity allowed for the development of electric trolley cars, which soon replaced horses. Trolley bus lines, also called trackless trolley coaches, used overhead lines for power. Staten Island was the first borough outside Manhattan to receive these electric trolley cars in the 1920s, and then finally Brooklyn joined the fun in 1930. By 1960, however, motor buses completely replaced New York City public transit trolley cars and trolley buses. The city's first regular elevated railway (el) service began on February 14, 1870. The El ran along Greenwich Street and Ninth Avenue in Manhattan. Elevated train service dominated rapid transit for the next few decades. On September 24, 1883, a Brooklyn Bridge cable-powered railway opened between Park Row in Manhattan and Sands Street in Brooklyn, carrying passengers over the bridge and back. -
Wanderings Newsletter of the OUTDOORS CLUB INC
Wanderings newsletter of the OUTDOORS CLUB INC. http://www.outdoorsclubny.org ISSUE NUMBER 108 PUBLISHED TRI-ANNUALLY Jul-Oct 2014 The Outdoors Club is a non-profit 501(c) (3) volunteer-run organization open to all adults 18 and over which engages in hiking, biking, wilderness trekking, canoeing, mountaineering, snowshoeing and skiing, nature and educational city walking tours of varying difficulty. Individual participants are expected to engage in activities suitable to their ability, experience and physical condition. Leaders may refuse to take anyone who lacks ability or is not properly dressed or equipped. These precautions are for your safety, and the wellbeing of the group. Your participation is voluntary and at your own risk. Remember to bring lunch and water on all full day activities. Telephone the leader or Lenny if unsure what to wear or bring with you on an activity. Nonmembers pay one-day membership dues of $3. It is with sorrow that we say goodbye to Robert Kaye, the brother of Alan Kaye, who died in January. We have been able to keep the dues the same, and publish the Newsletter because of Robert’s benevolence to the Club. Robert wanted to make sure that the Club would continue after Alan’s death. Please join Bob Susser and Helen Yee on Saturday, October 18th, at the New York Botanical Gardens for a memorial walk in honor of Robert Kaye. CHECK THE MAILING LABEL ON YOUR SCHEDULE FOR EXPIRATION DATE! RENEWAL NOTICES WILL NO LONGER BE SENT. It takes 4-6 weeks to process your renewal. Some leaders will be asking members for proof of membership, so please carry your membership card or schedule on activities (the expiration date is on the top line of your mailing label). -
Gowanus Gentrified?
Gowanus Gentrified? Community Responses to Gentrification and Economic Development in the Shadow of the Superfund Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein Senior Thesis for the Urban Studies Program Barnard College, Columbia University Submitted April 18, 2012 Thesis Advisor: Meredith Linn Abstract Gowanus is an industrial neighborhood changing into a gentrified area, but it faces such severe pollution that the EPA designated the Gowanus Canal, which bisects the area, a Superfund site in 2010. The industry still in Gowanus includes a mix of traditional industrial businesses, craft industries, and artists, but they might disappear if developers build luxury condos in the neighborhood. This study looks at the clash between activists over how the community has and will change, focusing on the pro-development Gowanus Canal Community Development Corporation and the preservationist and pro-Superfund Friends and Residents of Greater Gowanus. Many local activists embrace the vision of Gowanus as a place for making things and hope to maintain industry. Even though industry left the neighborhood polluted, most do not connect the two. The Superfund seeks to clean up the neighborhood but it may pave the way for environmental gentrification, which is the pollution cleanup causing gentrification. However, fears of the Superfund harming home prices do not appear to be true; GIS analysis shows that land closest to environmental hazards increased the most in value. Residents also hope to avoid the experiences of other New York neighborhoods, which saw gentrification cause displacement. More than residential displacement, though, activists worry about the culture of Gowanus disappearing and hope to save it. Their remedies such as historic preservation and zoning Gowanus for mixed use may not be effective or viable, though. -
Cultural Guide for Seniors: Brooklyn PHOTOGRAPHY
ART / DESIGN ARCHITECTURE DANCE / SING THEATRE / LIVE MONUMENTS GALLERIES / ® PARKSCultural Guide for Seniors: Brooklyn PHOTOGRAPHY Acknowledgments NYC-ARTS in primetime is made possible in part by First Republic Bank and by the Rubin Museum of Art. Funding for NYC-ARTS is also made possible by Rosalind P. Walter, The Paul and Irma Milstein Foundation, The Philip & Janice Levin Foundation, Elise Jaffe and Jeffrey Brown, Jody and John Arnhold, and The Lemberg Foundation. This program is NYC-ARTS.org supported, in part, by public funds from the New York City Department of Cultural Affairs in partnership with the City Council. On multiple platforms, Thirteen/WNET’s Additional funding provided by members of NYC-ARTS aims to increase awareness of THIRTEEN. New York City’s nonprofit cultural organizations, whose offerings greatly benefit We are grateful to Megan Flood for residents and visitors—from children to adults, contributing the design of the cover of this and teenagers to senior citizens. publication. NYC-ARTS promotes cultural groups’ We are grateful for the cooperation of the activities and events to tri-state, national and cultural organizations that supplied information international audiences through nonprint media, for this guide. using new technologies as they develop. Through websites, television, mobile applications and social media, NYC-ARTS This program is supported, in part, by nurtures New York City’s position as a public funds from the New York City thriving cultural capital of the world, one that Department of Cultural Affairs. has both world renowned institutions and those that are focused on local communities. WNET 825 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10019 http://WNET.org (212) 560-2000 Cover Design: Megan Flood Copyright © 2012 WNET Table of Contents A.I.R./Artists in Residence Gallery............................................................................. -
Second Quarter 2021 Residential Market Report
Cooperatives & Condominiums Second Quarter 2021 Residential Market Report Second Quarter 2021 Residential Market Report Cooperatives & Condominiums Brooklyn BHSID 20845406 Message from Bess Freedman CEO of Brown Harris Stevens Brooklyn apartment prices averaged a record $965,575 in the second quarter, as demand remained incredibly strong. Closings more than doubled compared to a year ago, and were also up 26% from 2021’s first quarter. The number of contracts signed during the second quarter set a new record, so expect the number of closings to rise sharply in 3Q21. I’m also happy to announce we have made two major changes to our Brooklyn quarterly report beginning with this issue. First, instead of reporting on just four major areas, we now have data for 12 neighborhood groupings. This will allow us to present more localized and relevant data to you. Secondly, we are now just reporting on apartments, as townhouses will now have their own semiannual report. BHSID 20873538 BHS 2 Q2 2021 All Brooklyn Brooklyn apartment prices averaged a record $965,575 in the second quarter, which was 10% higher than a year ago. The average condo price per square foot also set a record, crossing the $1,000 mark for All Brooklyn BHSID 20221010 the first time. BHS 3 Q2 2021 All Brooklyn* BHSID 20828157 Cooperatives & Condominiums Average & Median Sales Price $1 ,200 ,0 00 $1,000,000 $965,575 $936,985 $880,729 $874,892 $835,030 $810,000 $792,000 $800,000 $760,000 $700,000 $692,410 $600,000 $400,000 2Q20 3Q20 4Q20 1Q 21 2Q21 Average Price Median Price Cooperative Condominium Average Price Per Room Average Price Per Square Foot $250,000 $1,2 50 $1,008 $200,000 $1,000 $969 $181,808 $162,425 $150,000 $750 $100,000 $500 $50,000 $250 2Q20 2Q21 2Q20 2Q21 * Includes new development and resale apartments. -
Leaders in Rebted Agencies for Discussion Of: (1) Identified Needs and Projects Evaluation Techniques
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 022 509 LI 000 972 SUMMARY (HARRIMAN, NEW CONFERENCE ON LIBRARY SERVICES FORTHE DISADVANTAGED, PROCEEDINGS YORK, DECEMBER 10-11, 1964). New York State Library, Albany. Pub Date [64] Note-26p. EDRS Price MF -$025 HC-$1.12 *LIBRARY Descriptors-CONFERENCE REPORTS, *CULTURALLYDISADVANTAGED, *LIBRARY PROGRAMS, SERVICES, *POVERTY PROGRAMS, PROGRAMCOORDINATION, *PUBLIC LIBRARIES Identifiers-Library Services and Construction Act,*New York An invitational conference washeld to bring togetherlibrary system staff members immediately concerned with projectsfinanced under the LibraryServices ant...: Construction Act, representativesfrom the New York StateEducation Department, and leaders in rebted agenciesfor discussion of: (1) identifiedneeds and projects designed to meet these needs,(2) cooperation and coordinationof projects, (3) evaluation techniques, and (4)publicity about the projects.This summary of the proceedings includes descriptions of projectsfor the disadvantaged inpublic library systems in the state ofNew York, along with critiquesand comments on these projects. Summaries of remarks by principalspeakers are also included, coveringthe subjects of library participation in the war onpoverty, characteristicsof the disadvantaged child, and service to the disadvantaged.(JB) 000972 SEP 2 3'68 di CONFERENCE ON LI BRARY SERVICES FOR THE DISADVANTAGED PROCEEDINGS SUMMARY 0% rj U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION (Z) THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE LIU PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGINATING IT.POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY. ARDEN HOUSE HARRIMAN, NEW YORK tcl. DECEMBER 10 AND 11, 1964 tc: THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK/THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT THE NEW YORK STATE LIBRARY/DIVISION OF LIBRARY EXTENSION/ALBANY, NEW YORK THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OFNEW YORK Regents of the University (with yearswhen terms expire) Edgar W. -
44 City Council District Profiles
BROOKLYN CITY Borough Park, Ocean Parkway South, COUNCIL 2009 DISTRICT 44 Bensonhurst West, Bensonhurst East, Homecrest Parks are an essential city service. They are the barometers of our city. From Flatbush to Flushing and Morrisania to Midtown, parks are the front and backyards of all New Yorkers. Well-maintained and designed parks offer recreation and solace, improve property values, reduce crime, and contribute to healthy communities. SHOWCASE : Gravesend Park The 2008 Spotlight on Recreation is a new project of New Yorkers for Parks award-winning Report Card on Parks. This report examines the conditions of athletic fields, courts, and playgrounds in a ran- dom selection of neighborhood parks. Each outdoor recreation feature was inspected on three separate site visits, once each in June, July, and August to show the performance of these specific features over the course of the summer. The baseball fields in Gravesend Park were surveyed Friends Field, Ocean Parkway for this project. The fields’ scores The Bloomberg Administration’s physical barriers or crime. As a result, reflected the need for improve- ment. Visit www.ny4p.org for PlaNYC is the first-ever effort to studies show significant increases in more information on the Spotlight sustainably address the many infra- nearby real estate values. Greenways on Recreation: A Report Card on structure needs of New York City, are expanding waterfront access Parks Project. including parks. With targets set for while creating safer routes for cyclists stormwater management, air quality and pedestrians, and the new initia- and more, the City is working to tive to reclaim streets for public use update infrastructure for a growing brings fresh vibrancy to the city. -
Appendix C: Puma Groupings Used in Weekday Weighting
APPENDIX C: PUMA GROUPINGS USED IN WEEKDAY WEIGHTING PUMA PUMA NAME(S) NUMBER(S) NYC-Bronx Community District 8 & Bronx Community District 7– Riverdale, 3701 and 3706 Fieldston & Kingsbridge & Bedford Park, Fordham North & Norwood. NYC-Bronx Community District 12 & Bronx Community District 11– Wakefield, 3702 and 3704 Williamsbridge & Woodlawn & Pelham Parkway, Morris Park & Laconia. 3703 NYC-Bronx Community District 10–Co-op City, Pelham Bay & Schuylerville PUMA. NYC-Bronx Community District 3 & 6–Belmont, Crotona Park East & East Tremont 3705 PUMA. NYC-Bronx Community District 5 & Bronx Community District 4– Morris Heights, 3707 and 3708 Fordham South & Mount Hope & Concourse, Highbridge & Mount Eden. NYC-Bronx Community District 9 & Bronx Community District 1 & 2– Castle Hill, 3709 and 3710 Clason Point & Parkchester & Hunts Point, Longwood & Melrose. NYC-Manhattan Community District 12 & Manhattan Community District 9– 3801 and 3802 Washington Heights, Inwood & Marble Hill & Hamilton Heights, Manhattanville & West Harlem. NYC-Manhattan Community District 10 & Manhattan Community District 11– Central 3803 Harlem. 3804 Manhattan Community District 11– East Harlem. 3805 NYC-Manhattan Community District 8–Upper East Side PUMA. 3806 NYC-Manhattan Community District 7–Upper West Side & West Side PUMA. NYC-Manhattan Community District 4 & 5–Chelsea, Clinton & Midtown Business 3807 District PUMA. NYC-Manhattan Community District 6–Murray Hill, Gramercy & Stuyvesant Town 3808 PUMA. PUMA PUMA NAME(S) NUMBER(S) 3809 NYC-Manhattan Community District 3–Chinatown & Lower East Side PUMA. NYC-Manhattan Community District 1 & 2–Battery Park City, Greenwich Village & 3810 Soho PUMA. NYC-Staten Island Community District 3 & NYC-Staten Island Community District 2 3901 and 3902 –Tottenville, Great Kills & Annadale PUMA & New Springville & South Beach PUMA. -
July 8 Grants Press Release
CITY PARKS FOUNDATION ANNOUNCES 109 GRANTS THROUGH NYC GREEN RELIEF & RECOVERY FUND AND GREEN / ARTS LIVE NYC GRANT APPLICATION NOW OPEN FOR PARK VOLUNTEER GROUPS Funding Awarded For Maintenance and Stewardship of Parks by Nonprofit Organizations and For Free Live Performances in Parks, Plazas, and Gardens Across NYC July 8, 2021 - NEW YORK, NY - City Parks Foundation announced today the selection of 109 grants through two competitive funding opportunities - the NYC Green Relief & Recovery Fund and GREEN / ARTS LIVE NYC. More than ever before, New Yorkers have come to rely on parks and open spaces, the most fundamentally democratic and accessible of public resources. Parks are critical to our city’s recovery and reopening – offering fresh air, recreation, and creativity - and a crucial part of New York’s equitable economic recovery and environmental resilience. These grant programs will help to support artists in hosting free, public performances and programs in parks, plazas, and gardens across NYC, along with the nonprofit organizations that help maintain many of our city’s open spaces. Both grant programs are administered by City Parks Foundation. The NYC Green Relief & Recovery Fund will award nearly $2M via 64 grants to NYC-based small and medium-sized nonprofit organizations. Grants will help to support basic maintenance and operations within heavily-used parks and open spaces during a busy summer and fall with the city’s reopening. Notable projects supported by this fund include the Harlem Youth Gardener Program founded during summer 2020 through a collaboration between Friends of Morningside Park Inc., Friends of St. Nicholas Park, Marcus Garvey Park Alliance, & Jackie Robinson Park Conservancy to engage neighborhood youth ages 14-19 in paid horticulture along with the Bronx River Alliance’s EELS Youth Internship Program and Volunteer Program to invite thousands of Bronxites to participate in stewardship of the parks lining the river banks. -
Prospect Park Primary Source Packet
PROSPECT PARK PRIMARY SOURCE PACKET Student Name Prospect Park Primary Source Packet INTRODUCTORY READING "Timeline." Park History. Prospect Park Alliance, Web. 28 Jan 2014. ADAPTATION In 1834, the City of Brooklyn was chartered, and during the next 30 years it became the third largest city in the country, following only New York (Manhattan) and Philadelphia. Thousands of European immigrants settled in the growing city and sprawling farms gave way to homes. At the same time public parks were gaining popularity in America. Beginning in 1858, the design team of Frederick Law Olmsted and Calvert Vaux transformed more than 800 acres of jagged rock into Central Park in Manhattan. It was the first landscaped public park in the United States. Soon after a movement grew in Brooklyn for a park of its own. Leading the effort was James Stranahan, a businessman and civic leader. In the early 1860s, Stranahan argued that a park in Brooklyn "would become a favorite resort for all classes of our community, enabling thousands to enjoy pure air, with healthful exercise, at all seasons of the year…." Calvert Vaux sketched Prospect Park’s present layout for Stranahan. Vaux convinced Olmsted to join the effort, and construction of the park began on July 1, 1866 under their supervision. Olmsted and Vaux’s plan included rolling green meadows, carriage drives with scenic lookouts, waterfalls, springs and a forest. Organized sports gained popularity throughout the first half of the 1900s and the Park continued to host parades and celebrations that drew huge crowds. Parks Commissioner Robert Moses opened the zoo, bandshell and several playgrounds in the 1930s. -
Report Measures the State of Parks in Brooklyn
P a g e | 1 Table of Contents Introduction Page 2 Methodology Page 2 Park Breakdown Page 5 Multiple/No Community District Jurisdictions Page 5 Brooklyn Community District 1 Page 6 Brooklyn Community District 2 Page 12 Brooklyn Community District 3 Page 18 Brooklyn Community District 4 Page 23 Brooklyn Community District 5 Page 26 Brooklyn Community District 6 Page 30 Brooklyn Community District 7 Page 34 Brooklyn Community District 8 Page 36 Brooklyn Community District 9 Page 38 Brooklyn Community District 10 Page 39 Brooklyn Community District 11 Page 42 Brooklyn Community District 12 Page 43 Brooklyn Community District 13 Page 45 Brooklyn Community District 14 Page 49 Brooklyn Community District 15 Page 50 Brooklyn Community District 16 Page 53 Brooklyn Community District 17 Page 57 Brooklyn Community District 18 Page 59 Assessment Outcomes Page 62 Summary Recommendations Page 63 Appendix 1: Survey Questions Page 64 P a g e | 2 Introduction There are 877 parks in Brooklyn, of varying sizes and amenities. This report measures the state of parks in Brooklyn. There are many different kinds of parks — active, passive, and pocket — and this report focuses on active parks that have a mix of amenities and uses. It is important for Brooklynites to have a pleasant park in their neighborhood to enjoy open space, meet their neighbors, play, and relax. While park equity is integral to creating One Brooklyn — a place where all residents can enjoy outdoor recreation and relaxation — fulfilling the vision of community parks first depends on measuring our current state of parks. This report will be used as a tool to guide my parks capital allocations and recommendations to the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation (NYC Parks), as well as to identify recommendations to improve advocacy for parks at the community and grassroots level in order to improve neighborhoods across the borough. -
PROSPECT PARK (Excluding the Friends' Cemetery), Borough of Brooklyn
Landmarks Preservation Commission November 25, 1975, Number 6 LP-0901 PROSPECT PARK (excluding the Friends' Cemetery), Borough of Brooklyn. Landmark Site: Tax Map Block 1117, Lot 1. BOUNDARIES The Prospect Park Scenic Landmark consists of the property bounded by the eastern curb line of Prospect Park We st, Bartel-Pritchard Circle roadway, the inner curb line of Bartel-Pritchard Circle enclosing the central island, Bartel-Pritchard Circle roadway, the northern and eastern curb lines of Prospect Park Southwest, Park Circle roadway, the inner curb line of Park Circle enclosing the central island, Park Circle roadway, the northern curb line of Parkside Avenue, the western curb line of Ocean Ave nue, the western curb line of Flatbush Avenue, Grand Army Plaza roadway, the inner curb lines of the outer roadway enclosing the raised mall areas of Grand Army Plaza, Grand Army Plaza roadway, to the eastern curb line of of Prospect Park West . TESTIMONY AT PUBLIC HEARING On September 25, 1975, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation of this Scenic Landmark (Item No.6) . The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the pro visions of law. Ten witnesses, including Thomas Cuite, Vice President of the City Council, a representative of Brooklyn Borough President Sebastian Leone, Joseph Merz, Curator of Prospect Park, and Joseph Bresnan, Director of Historic Parks, spoke in favor of designation. There were no speakers in opposition to designation . The witnesses favoring designa tion clearly indicate that there is great support for the designation of this Scenic Landmark. The Commission has also received many letters and other expressions of support for this designation.