Preliminary Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Preliminary Assessment PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT APALACHICOLA NATIONAL FOREST FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY BURIAL SITE NO. 2 Prepared For: United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service 1720 Peachtree Road, NW Suite 710W Atlanta, Georgia 30367-9102 FINAL - December 1, 1998 Prepared By: BAT Associates, Inc. 704 South Illinois Avenue Suite C-202 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 BAT Associates, Inc. Preliminary Assessment - Apalachicola National Forest FSU Burial Site No. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................. i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION, OPERATIONAL HISTORY, AND WASTE CHARACTERISTICS ........................................................................................ 2 3.0 GROUND WATER PATHWAY ...................................................................................... 7 4.0 SURFACE WATER PATHWAY ................................................................................... 11 5.0 SOIL EXPOSURE AND AIR PATHWAYS .................................................................. 12 6.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................ 13 7.0 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................. 14 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 6-1 Sampling Recommendations and Parameters ...................................................... 13 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 2-1 Site Location .......................................................................................................... 3 FIGURE 2-2 Site Sketch ............................................................................................................. 4 FIGURE 2-1 Typical Waste Pit and Existing Monitoring Well Details ..................................... 6 FIGURE 3-4 Regional Stratigraphy ............................................................................................ 8 973002 Final - December 1, 1998 i BAT Associates, Inc. Preliminary Assessment - Apalachicola National Forest FSU Burial Site No. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont.) APPENDICES APPENDIX A - PA Score Sheets APPENDIX B - Copies of References 973002 Final - December 1, 1998 ii BAT Associates, Inc. Preliminary Assessment - Apalachicola National Forest FSU Burial Site No. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In accordance with the requirements of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, and the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986, BAT Associates, Inc. conducted a Preliminary Assessment (PA) of the FSU Burial Site No. 2 located in the Apalachicola National Forest, in Leon County west of Tallahassee, Florida. The purpose of the PA is to differentiate sites that pose little or no potential threat to human health and the environment from sites that warrant further investigation. The PA also supports emergency response and removal activities, fulfills public information needs, and generally furnishes appropriate information about the site early in the site assessment process. The scope of the investigation included a review of available file information, a comprehensive target survey, and a site and environs reconnaissance that was conducted on December 9, 1997. Florida State University (FSU) Burial Site No. 2 covers approximately 0.36 acres in a remote area in the Apalachicola National Forest. The site is a relatively flat area measuring 80 feet x 120 feet inside a 6-foot high chain-link security fence topped with barbed wire. Radioactive contaminated solids, containerized liquids, and animal remains were deposited in 26 pits between March 16, 1967 and June 14, 1979. Waste disposal activities were conducted on the southern-half area of the site. No disposals have been made since June 14, 1979. There is no record of this site being listed on the CERCLIS database. The pits are 8 feet long by 7 feet wide, and are 8 feet deep. Waste was placed in the lower 4 foot depth of the pit by a backhoe, covered with approximately 4 inches of earth fill, and covered by a 4-inch concrete slab in pits 1 through 15. Each pit was then backfilled to grade with approximately 4 feet of soil. No concrete slab was installed in pits 16 - 26, only soil was used as backfill. The remaining pits, numbers 27 - 40, have not been used and are assumed to be empty and free of any disposed wastes as indicated in waste disposal records obtained from FSU. Six groundwater monitoring wells have been installed along the perimeter of the site. Monitoring well samples taken over a period of fifteen years show an average activity of 15 dpm/ml. A release of hazardous substances to groundwater is suspected due to lack of containment, high soil permeability, heavy precipitation, and the presence of karst terrain. There is no information on whether the contamination has migrated beyond the monitoring wells. It is also unknown if any additional chemical analysis of the groundwater has been conducted in the past. Although none of the pits have runoff control, there are no indications of a release from the site through the surface water pathway. It is possible that, because of the slope to the southwest of the central pits, precipitation could percolate through the landfill and later emerge into surface water. 973002 Final - December 1, 1998 iii BAT Associates, Inc. Preliminary Assessment - Apalachicola National Forest FSU Burial Site No. 2 Potentially contaminated ground water may also discharge to surface water along these slopes. However, the high soil permeability should cause much of this flow to migrate downwards, minimizing this effect on surface water. No stressed vegetation or other evidence of contamination at the site or along the runoff path was found. Therefore, a release to surface water is considered possible, but not likely. The soil exposure pathway does not appear to present a substantial risk at this site, because of the amount of soil and concrete covering the disposed material in the pits and current use of the property, which limits public access. A release through the air pathway is not suspected due to the soil and vegetation covering the pits, which prevent release of dust or gases. Score sheets, developed by EPA, were used to evaluate a site disposition based on the site score. In general, sites that score 28.50 or greater receive a further action recommendation, while sites that score less than 28.50 receive no further recommended action. Based on existing information gathered and professional judgement, this site received a PA score of 38.16 (Appendix A). During the hazard scoring phase of this PA, the hazard ranking values for this site were estimated, and a number of uncertainties exist. These uncertainties, which contributed to the high site score, are: • No data are available on how far contamination in the groundwater may have spread. • No data are available on whether or not local wetlands and the Lost Creek receive water from groundwater filtering through the site. • Very little data are available on what specific contaminants, other than radioisotopes, may be present, and therefore it is impossible to determine mobility factors. Based on these and other potential uncertainties, the scoring was developed using a worst case scenario. It was assumed that the areas around the site are critical habitats and are used by endangered species identified by the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. It was also assumed that the groundwater contamination from the site is impacting local surface water resources and terrestrial habitats. These assumptions may or may not be valid, however only additional study and sampling will eliminate these uncertainties. Based on the site score received, and the lack of additional waste information, it is recommended that additional groundwater and soil sampling be conducted at the site to identify and determine the presence of RCRA listed wastes (in addition to verifying low-level radiological contamination), and to indicate possible contamination migration in the groundwater and soil. 973002 Final - December 1, 1998 iv BAT Associates, Inc. Preliminary Assessment - Apalachicola National Forest FSU Burial Site No. 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION In accordance with the requirements of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, and the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986, BAT Associates, Inc. conducted a Preliminary Assessment (PA) of the FSU Burial Site No. 2 located in the Apalachicola National Forest, in Leon County west of Tallahassee, Florida. The purpose of this investigation was to collect information concerning conditions at the site sufficient to assess the threat posed to human health and the environment, and to determine the need for additional CERCLA/SARA activities or other appropriate actions. The scope of the investigation included a review of available file information, a comprehensive target survey, and a site and environs reconnaissance that was conducted on December 9, 1997. 973002 Final - December 1, 1998 1 BAT Associates, Inc. Preliminary Assessment - Apalachicola National Forest FSU Burial Site No. 2 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION, OPERATIONAL HISTORY, AND WASTE CHARACTERISTICS 2.1 Location The site is located
Recommended publications
  • Florida State Parks Data by 2021 House District
    30, Florida State Parks FY 2019-20 Data by 2021 House Districts This compilation was produced by the Florida State Parks Foundation . FloridaStateParksFoundation.org Statewide Totals • 175 Florida State Parks and Trails (164 Parks / 11 Trails) comprising nearly 800,000 Acres • $2.2 billion direct impact to Florida’s economy • $150 million in sales tax revenue • 31,810 jobs supported • 25 million visitors served # of Economic Jobs Park House Districts Parks Impact Supported Visitors 1 Salzman, Michelle 0 2 Andrade, Robert Alexander “Alex” 3 31,073,188 436 349,462 Big Lagoon State Park 10,336,536 145 110,254 Perdido Key State Park 17,191,206 241 198,276 Tarklin Bayou Preserve State Park 3,545,446 50 40,932 3 Williamson, Jayer 3 26,651,285 416 362,492 Blackwater Heritage State Trail 18,971,114 266 218,287 Blackwater River State Park 7,101,563 99 78,680 Yellow River Marsh Preserve State Park 578,608 51 65,525 4 Maney, Thomas Patterson “Patt” 2 41,626,278 583 469,477 Fred Gannon Rocky Bayou State Park 7,558,966 106 83,636 Henderson Beach State Park 34,067,312 477 385,841 5 Drake, Brad 9 64,140,859 897 696,022 Camp Helen State Park 3,133,710 44 32,773 Deer Lake State Park 1,738,073 24 19,557 Eden Gardens State Park 3,235,182 45 36,128 Falling Waters State Park 5,510,029 77 58,866 Florida Caverns State Park 4,090,576 57 39,405 Grayton Beach State Park 17,072,108 239 186,686 Ponce de Leon Springs State Park 6,911,495 97 78,277 Three Rivers State Park 2,916,005 41 30,637 Topsail Hill Preserve State Park 19,533,681 273 213,693 6 Trumbull, Jay 2 45,103,015 632 504,860 Camp Helen State Park 3,133,710 44 32,773 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Talquin State Park
    LAKE TALQUIN STATE PARK UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN APPROVED STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Recreation and Parks FEBRUARY 15, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF PLAN .........................................................................................1 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW...........................................................................4 Management Authority and Responsibility................................................................................4 Park Goals and Objectives..........................................................................................................5 Management Coordination.........................................................................................................8 Public Participation....................................................................................................................9 Other Designations.....................................................................................................................9 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................11 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT ............................................................11 Natural Resources.....................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Apalachicola National Forest Wildfire Response Priority Zones
    85°10'W 85°5'W 85°0'W 84°55'W 84°50'W 84°45'W 84°40'W 84°35'W 84°30'W 84°25'W 84°20'W 84°15'W 84°10'W TMH !!G Apalachicola Lake Talquin State Forest Helipad !!G !Ã!G National Forest Ñ× Tallahassee Bristol Ñ× Blountstown Wildfire Ñ× > 3 2 6 308 N ' Ñ× N 8 ' 5 2 3 5 2 2 ° 3 ° Response 2 0 5 0 3 0 7 3 3 3 26 A 3 301 301 1- 3 37 ÑØ 1 301 Ñ§Ô Priority Zones 0 7 2 6 6 Ñ× §Ô 4 Ñ 3 3 3 ÑØ ÑØ !Ä 3 ÑØ 7 6 7 Ñ× 3 3 H1 (KTLH) KTLH 74 3 3 ÑØ324 3 2 5 3 8 8 3 3 ÑØ 305 0 6 3 381 ÑØ 375 7 1 3 3 05 379 3 3 9 7 7 0 ÑØ 6 8 â 3 3 5 05 (Pvt.) 0 Clear Lake 305 !· 3 ÑØ 3 2 Wilderness 0 H2 1 6 Study Area - N L ' N F ' 0 10 3 304 3 0 2 1 2 ° 9 4 300-A 3 ÑØ ° 0 4 6 3 6 0 3 6 7 3 0 3 ÑØ 0 3 22 322 3 D . - 3 7 3 0 1 36 6 0 Ø 4 Ñ 3 Ñ× 1 ÑØ 9 6 3 3 6 9 3 32 6 2 1 Ø Ñ ÑØ 2 1 1 - - C 0 63 L 3 3 â F - E H23 Legend 28 â 9 1 1 09 0 5 B Ø 3 3 0 - Ñ H3 373-X -A 5 WildfireResponsePriorityAreas H21 0 0 5 1 6 â 6 1 318 1 1 3 1 2 1 105 1 1 1 Ñ× O PRIORITY 1 4 0 -A - 136 0 5 5 - 0 N 18 1 ÑØ 7 1 -E 187 ÑØ 36 ÑØ 105 348-A PRIORITY 2 30 9 3 7 8 5 × 1 8 â 4 Wakulla State Ñ 1 2 0 3 5 3 - 1 H9 5 PRIORITY 3 1 H C 31 1 - 0 N Forest ' 7 â 7 1 7 5 Woodville N H22 1 ' 8 5 - 3 A Ø 1Ñ 3 5 1 â 1 ° 08 1 311 ° 0 ÑØ MUTUAL AID 0 3 Ñ× H24 133 2 ÑØ 3 H35 2 Ø 3 1 Ñ 6 â 1 7 3 1 347 ÑØ Aviation Point 1 312 1 3 â 2 5 FH 11 - -13 30 2 3 W ÑØ1 112-A H AK -36 â HELISPOT W 9 112 H5 F -V H-13 A K Edward Ball 107 3 H-1 - F 3 ÑØ Ø 6 WATER SOURCE 185 Ñ 8 Wakulla Springs - A B - 3 ÑØ 5 355 4 State Park 5 7 8 FH 3 !Ä 7 -1 AIRPORT 1 3 0 1 ÑØ 2 7 5 98 09 1 3 1 3 1 · 1 1 1 - ! 8 4 H > AIR FIELD 141 Ø 2 F ÑØ 1 Ñ 188 6 Ñ× 5 × -E Ñ ! CHECK POINT 3 H30 1 7 â ÑØ 6 1 8 Bradwell Bay Crawfordville 111 N × ' S Ñ - N ÑØ Wilderness Area 9 ' FIRE STATION 0 1 186 2 1 3 0 1 3 9 1 ° 3 0 ° 0 1 34 H29 2 8 0 3 3 § â 1 1 Ô - 3 Ñ FH HELIBASE 18 9 9 4 8 Ø Ñ3 8 3 !à HELIPORT 365 2 57 7 3 ÑØ 1 H28 1 3 Ø 3 Ñâ 4 3 WR-H1 7 6 5 â > INCIDENT COMMAND POST H27 6 1 ÑØ â 17 ÑØ 6 A Ø -S ÑØ 2 - Ñ 3 ÑØ 1 7 4 G -A F 3 3 1 !! 171 H- 1 32 MEDIVAC SITE 13 152 180 329 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Carex Austrodeflexa (Cyperaceae), a New Species of Carex Sect
    CAREX AUSTRODEFLEXA (CYPERACEAE), A NEW SPECIES OF CAREX SECT. ACROCYSTIS FROM THE ATLANTIC COASTAL PLAIN OF THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES Bruce A. Sorrie Patrick D. McMillan Brian van Eerden NC Natural Heritage Program Museum of Natural History The Nature Conservancy and UNC Herbarium, CB 3280 Clemson University 530 East Main Street Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, U.S.A. Clemson, South Carolina 29634, U.S.A. Richmond, Virginia 23219-2428, U.S.A. [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Richard J. LeBlond Philip E. Hyatt Loran C. Anderson PO Box 787 610 East Sixth Street R.K. Godfrey Herbarium Richlands, North Carolina 28574, U.S.A. Mountain Home, Arkansas 72653, U.S.A. Florida State University [email protected] [email protected] Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4370, U.S.A. [email protected] ABSTRACT Carex austrodeflexa (sect. Acrocystis) is described from the coastal plain of the southeastern United States. This species inhabits distinc- tive wetland communities in streamheads and small-stream swamps, usually under seepage influence. It is the only wetland member of section Acrocystis found in the southern Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain. It may be told from the morphologically similar Carex deflexa on the basis of its loosely cespitose habit with long, slender, reddish rhizomes, papillose, glabrate, elliptic perigynium, longer perigynium beak, and longer staminate scales and spikes. RESUMEN Se describe Carex austrodeflexa (sect. Acrocystis) de la llanura costera del sureste de los Estados Unidos. Esta especie vive en comunidades de humedales en cabeceras de arroyos y pantanos de pequeños arroyos, usualmente bajo influencia de filtraciones.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Talquin State Park Unit Management Plan November 2019 Draft
    Lake Talquin State Park Unit Management Plan November 2019 Draft INTRODUCTION Purpose and Significance of the Park ................................................ 1 Purpose and Scope of the Plan ......................................................... 1 Resource Management Component ......................................... 2 Land Use Component ............................................................ 2 Secondary Uses Consideration ................................................ 7 Contract Services .................................................................. 7 Management Program Overview ...................................................... 7 Management Authority and Responsibility ................................ 7 General Park Management Goals ............................................ 8 Management Coordination ..................................................... 8 Public Participation ................................................................ 9 Other Designations ............................................................... 9 PAST ACOMPLISHMENTS AND FUTURE OBJECTIVES Past Accomplishments .................................................................... 11 Park Administration and Operations ........................................ 11 Resource Management .......................................................... 11 Recreation and Visitor Services ............................................... 11 Park Facilities ....................................................................... 11 Future Objectives ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Outdoor Recreation in Florida — 2008
    State of Florida DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Michael W. Sole Secretary Bob Ballard Deputy Secretary, Land & Recreation DIVISION OF RECREATION AND PARKS Mike Bullock Director and State Liaison Officer Florida Department of Environmental Protection Division of Recreation and Parks Marjory Stoneman Douglas Building 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 The Florida Department of Environmental Protection is an equal opportunity agency, offering all persons the benefits of participating in each of its programs and competing in all areas of employment regardless of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability or other non-merit factors. OUTDOOR RECREATION IN FLORIDA — 2008 A Comprehensive Program For Meeting Florida’s Outdoor Recreation Needs State of Florida, Department of Environmental Protection Division of Recreation and Parks Tallahassee, Florida Outdoor Recreation in Florida, 2008 Table of Contents PAGE Chapter 1: Introduction and Background.............................................................................. 1-1 Purpose and Scope of the Plan ........................................................................................1-1 Outdoor Recreation - A Legitimate Role for Government................................................1-3 Outdoor Recreation Defined..............................................................................................1-3 Roles in Providing Outdoor Recreation ............................................................................1-4 Need
    [Show full text]
  • Panhandle Birding Trail
    The Great Florida Birding Trail is a project of the Florida Fish and Wildlife PANHANDLE FLORIDA Conservation Commission BIRDING TRAIL In partnership with : Wildlife Foundation of Florida U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Florida Park Service Florida Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Many thanks to our generous sponsors : www.gulfpower.com The Great Florida Birding Trail www.nfwf.org www.FloridaBirdingTrail.com 05/06 Printed on recycled paper Getting Started... Ciity Locator Loaner optics are available free of charge at all Gateways, as well as at City Map City Map additional sites as marked in the site Apalachicola I Laguna Beach G descriptions! Bristol J Marianna F Carrabelle I Mexico Beach H Chattahoochee J Milton C Trail Tips Chipley F Panama City G When birding: Crawfordville M Pensacola B Crestview C Port St. Joe H • Take sunscreen, water and bug spray. De Funiak Springs E Quincy K • Make reservations in advance for "by-appointment Destin D Sopchoppy M only" sites. Ft. Walton Beach D St. Marks M • Check seasonality of site; are you visiting at the Grayton Beach D Sumatra I right time of year? Gulf Beach A Tallahassee L Gulf Breeze B Birder Vocabulary Some words used in this guide are specific to bird- How were these sites selected? ers and birdwatching. Bone-up on the following lingo Each of the sites in this guide was chosen for its bird- so you’ll blend in at your next birding dinner party! watching characteristics, accessibility and ability to Birding by ear: the ability to identify birds by their withstand birder use.
    [Show full text]
  • Hiking Trails a Guide to Florida’S Top Hiking Trails Florida Hiking Trails
    FloridaHiking Trails A Guide to Florida’s Top Hiking Trails Florida Hiking Trails Hiking Florida Blessed with an abundance of sunshine and foliage, Florida presents the perfect destination for hikers to explore and experience the Sunshine State’s natural and historic diversity. In Florida, hiking opens your eyes to the dynamic environmental changes that occur as elevation increases from below sea level to only 345 feet. With more than 80 different natural communities, Florida presents more botanical diversity than any other state on the East Coast, and does so with grace along its thousands of miles of hiking trails. From the tropical hammocks of the Keys to the pine forests of the Panhandle, Florida’s hiking trails provide more to explore, including 10,000 years of cultural history. From short self-guided nature trails to overnight hiking trips along the National Scenic Trail, Florida has it all. You’ll find hiking trails for every season and for every experience. So grab your pack and water bottle, and Hike Florida! How to use this Guide: Each destination listed in the brochure may have multiple types of trails. Each trail mentioned for the destination is color-coded based on the type of trail. Trails marked in blue are gentle strolls on nature trails. Green signifies the opportunity to take a longer hike, of up to 10 miles in a day. Trails marked red are best for an overnight backpacking experience. The destination itself is color- coded to signify the easiest type of hike available at that destination. Parking Picnic Area Restrooms Camping Area Wheelchair Access Cabins Water Fountain Bird Watching Food and/or Bottled Water All times listed are EST (Eastern Standard Time) unless otherwise noted CST (Central Standard Time).
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Talquin State Forest Brochure
    STATE FOREST SPOTLIGHT Tings to Know When Visiting Florida Forest Service Slopes and Blufs Florida’s State Forests Lake Talquin State Forest covers approximately 19,400 acres in Leon, Gadsden, Wakulla and Te Florida Forest Service’s mission is to protect Liberty counties. The forest is composed of and manage Florida’s forest resources for the Lake Talquin many tracts of land, most of which are adjacent present and future enjoyment of all Floridians and to Lake Talquin and the Ochlockonee River. visitors. Tank you for helping to conserve our forests. Located in the southern extent of the State Forest Tallahassee Hills physiographic region of • Please take all garbage with you when you Florida, the topography at the forest can differ leave. as much as 100 feet, in some cases. The ravine • Overnight camping is allowed in designated slopes and high river bluffs at the Ft. Braden areas. Sites are available at High Bluf Tract provide some of Florida’s best trail campground, Ft. Braden, Bear Creek and Lines experiences. The Bear Creek Educational Center Tracts. Campsites can be reserved Trough and Forest provide an opportunity to learn Reserve America at FloridaStateForests. about the local natural resources including ReserveAmerica.com or by calling 877- plants and animals. 879-3859. Non-reserved campsites are also available at High Bluf Campground and Ft. Braden. • Hunting is permitted in Wildlife Management Areas with appropriate licenses and permits Love the state forests? So do we! during the designated hunting season. Hunting is regulated by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Te Friends of Florida State Forests is a direct- Conservation Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • 100 FIELD OBSERVATIONS Winter Report: December 1997-February
    100 FIELD OBSERVATIONS Florida Field Nat. 25(3):100-108, 1997. Winter Report: December 1997-February 1998—The observations listed here are based on rare or unusual species or significant numbers of birds reported to the Florida Ornithological Society (FOS) Field Observations Committee (FOC). As these reports are not reviewed formally, they may be considered tentative. Significant reports are welcomed for inclusion in future issues of this section. Reports should include the following information: species, number of individuals, age and sex of the bird(s), color morph if applicable, location (including county), date, observer(s), and significance of the report. Reporting periods are winter (December-February), spring (March-May), summer (June-July), and fall (August-November). Submit reports to re- gional compilers within 2 weeks after the close of each period, or to the state compiler within 1 month. Reports may be E-mailed to the state compiler at billpranty@hot- mail.com. Following the examples set by Florida Bird Species: An Annotated List (Robertson and Woolfenden 1992, FOS Spec. Publ. No. 6) and The Birdlife of Florida (Stevenson and Anderson 1994, Univ. Press of Florida), sight-only observations are considered “reports,” while only those supported by verifiable evidence (photographs, video or audio tapes, or specimens) are called “records.” The FOS Records Committee (FOSRC) revised the list of birds for which they require documentation, in FFN 24(4):132-133, 1996. These species are marked in this report with an asterisk (*) to alert the observers of their need to supply the FOSRC with details of their sightings. (Some reports that lack documentation may have been omitted from this report).
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Annual Meeting SEE Page 3 “The Current” March/April 2021 Hello Annual Meeting and Vol
    March/April 2021 SAVE THE DATE TALQUIN’S 81ST ANNUAL MEETING OF THE MEMBERS SATURDAY, APRIL 24, 2021 2021 Annual Meeting SEE Page 3 “The Current” March/April 2021 Hello Annual Meeting and Vol. MMXIX No. 14 USPS #356-710 “The Current” is the official newsletter of Talquin Best Wishes, President Durden! Electric Cooperative, Inc., published bi-monthly as an informational and educational service to the Members of the Cooperative. Periodical postage paid at Tallahassee, The 2020 Annual Meeting became one for the history books when Florida. Talquin’s Board decided to host drive-thru voting and a virtual SUBSCRIPTION RATE business meeting. The 2021 Annual Meeting will mark another Cooperative Member $2.00 per year. Talquin Electric Cooperative, Inc. is an equal opportunity provider and employer. historical event for the co-op as Talquin’s Board elected to utilize mail-in voting for the first time. Up EDITORIAL OFFICE P.O. Box 1679 until last year, Talquin’s Bylaws only allowed for in- 1640 West Jefferson Street Quincy, Florida 32353-1679 person voting, but during the 2020 Annual Meeting, Tracy Bensley, General Manager Blake Flowers, Director of Member Services/Editor Talquin’s Membership voted on Bylaw changes that Megan Smith, Communications and Outreach/Co-Editor Sara Khan, Communications and Outreach/Co-Editor include a process to facilitate mail-in voting. PRINTED BY: Although we will miss seeing you face-to-face at Graphic Press Corporation, Tallahassee, Florida Tracy Bensley the Annual Meeting, the safety of our Members and POSTMASTER General Manager staff are of the utmost importance to Talquin.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Guide to Eating Fish Caught in Florida
    Fish Consumption Advisories are published periodically by the Your Guide State of Florida to alert consumers about the possibility of chemically contaminated fish in Florida waters. To Eating The advisories are meant to inform the public of potential health risks of specific fish species from specific Fish Caught water bodies. In Florida Florida Department of Health Prepared in cooperation with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and Agriculture and Consumer Services, and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission 2016 Florida Fish Advisories • Table 1: Eating Guidelines for Fresh Water Fish from Florida Waters page 1-33 • Table 2: Eating Guidelines for Marine and Estuarine Fish from Florida Waters page 34-35 • Table 3: Eating Guidelines for species from Florida Waters with Heavy Metals, Dioxin, Pesticides, Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), or Saxitoxin Contamination page 36 Eating Fish is an important part of a healthy diet. Rich in vitamins and low in fat, fish contains protein we need for strong bodies. It is also an excellent source of nutrition for proper growth and development. In fact, the American Heart Association recommends that you eat two meals of fish or seafood every week. At the same time, most Florida seafood has low to medium levels of mercury. Depending on the age of the fish, the type of fish, and the condition of the water the fish lives in, the levels of mercury found in fish are different. While mercury in rivers, creeks, ponds, and lakes can build up in some fish to levels that can be harmful, most fish caught in Florida can be eaten without harm.
    [Show full text]