DOCSLIB.ORG

Proterozoic Unconformity and Stratabound Uranium Deposits

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

IAEA-TECDOC-315 PROTEROZOIC UNCONFORMITY AND STRATABOUND URANIUM DEPOSITS REPOR WORKINE TH F TO G GROU URANIUN PO M GEOLOGY ORGANIZED BY THE INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY EDITEY DB JOHN FERGUSON A TECHNICAL DOCUMENT ISSUED BY THE INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, VIENNA, 1984 PROTEROZOIC UNCONFORMITY AND STRATABOUND URANIUM DEPOSITS IAEA, VIENNA, 1984 IAEA-TECDOC-315 Printe IAEe th AustriAn y i d b a October 1984 PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ALL OF THE MISSING PAGES IN THIS DOCUMENT WERE ORIGINALLY BLANK The IAEA does not normally maintain stocks of reports in this series. However, microfiche copies of these reports can be obtained from IN IS Clearinghouse International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramerstrasse5 P.O. Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria Orders shoul accompaniee db prepaymeny db f Austriao t n Schillings 100, for e forcheque a th f m IAEth f mo n i o n i r Aeo microfiche service coupons which may be ordered separately from the INIS Clearinghouse. FOREWORD e greaTh t surg interesf eo d activittan n exploratioi y uraniur nfo m deposits over the last decade has added significantly to our knowledge of uranium nature geologth uraniuf d eo an y m deposits informatioe . th Muc f o h n that has been developed by government and industry programmes has not been widel ybenefie availablth d systematif mann o ti ha yd t ean no case s csha gathering, organisatio publicationd nan . Witcurrene th h t cut-bacn i k uranium exploratio d researcnan h efforts therreaa s li e danger that much knowledge oth f e gained wil lose lb t and, witanticipatee th h d resurgence of activities, will again have to be developed, with a consequent loss of time, money and effort. In an effort to gather together the most important informatio e type th uraniuf o sn no m deposits ,seriea reportf o s beins i s g prepared, each covering a specific type of deposit. These reports are a producAgency'e th f o t s Working Grou Uraniun o p m Geology. This group, which has been active since 1970, has gathered and exchanged information on key questions of uranium geology and coordinated investigations on important geological questions. The Working Group has been carrying on several projects to prepare comprehensive report majon o s r type uraniuf so m deposits. These report plannee ar s completior fo d d releasnan 1984n ei . Finding wore th k f so will be presented at the International Geologic Congress in Moscow in August 1984. The topics of the Working Group on Uranium Geology projects and the projece nameth f so t leaders are: Sedimentary Basin Sandstond san e Type Deposits- Warren Finch Uranium Deposit Proterozoin i s c Quartz-Pebble Conglomerates- Desmond Pretorius Vein Type Uranium Deposits - Helmut Fuchs Proterozoic Unconformity and Stratabound Uranium Deposits - John Ferguson Surficial Deposits - Dennis Toens. e dedicatioth o e succest projecte Th th e d effort ndu an f so s i sf o s the project leader d theian s r organisations e activth d e, an participatio n and contribution of world experts on the types of deposits involved. The Agency wishe exteno t s s l thankinvolve projecte it al d th o t sn r i d fo s their efforts e reportTh . s constitut n importanea t additioe th o t n literatur uraniun o e m geolog sucs e expectea har d an y havo t d warea m reception by the member states of the Agency and the uranium community, world-wide. I.A.E.A., Vienna 198y ,Ma 4 EDITORIAL NOTE The authors who have contributed to this project are all actively engaged in research wor n areai k s relatin theio t g r respective contributions. This advantag s alloweeha updater fo d d syntheses which frequently includes work that has a restricted distribution and additionally incorporates new data. It is hoped that this report wil exploratior lfo held ai p Proterozoir n serva fo n s ea c unconformity and stratabound uranium deposits. m indebtea I Delo t d l Staffor typinr fo d g mos f thito s manuscripo t d an t DraftinR theBM g productio e Officth r fo e numberouf no s line drawing mapsd san , in particular woul,I d lik thano et k Ivon Chertok, Ingo Hartig, Natasha Kozin and Diana Pillinger. John Ferguson CONTENTS STRATIFOR STRATA-BOUND MAN D TYPES Proterozoic strata-bound uranium deposit f Zambio s Zaird aan e ...................................7 . L. Meneghel Uranium in Early Proterozoic Aillik Group, Labrador .................................................... 35 S.S. Gandhi Olympie Th copper-uranium-golm cDa d deposit, Roxby Downs, South Australia ...........9 6 . D.E. Roberts, G.R.T. Hudson Strata-bound uranium deposits in the Dripping Spring Quartzite, Gila County, Arizona, USA: A model for their formation ................................................................ 95 C.J. Nutt Lianshanguae Th n uranium deposit, Northeast China: Some petrologicad an l geochemical constraints on genesis ................................................................................ 115 Zhong Jiarong, Guo Zhitian UNCONFORMITY-RELATED TYPES Pine Creek Geosyncline, N.T. ...........................................................................................5 13 . G.R. Ewers, Ferguson,J. R.S. Needham, T.H. Donnelly Uranium mineralizatio t Turena e Creek, Western Australia ...............................................7 20 . G.N. Lustig, G.R. Ewers, C.R. Williams, FergusonJ. Unconformity-related uranium deposit Athabasce th n si a basin region, Saskatchewa7 n 21 ...... V. Ruzicka Uranium geology, Beaverlodge Area ................................................................................ 269 D.M. Ward Geology and discovery of Proterozoic uranium deposits, central district of Keewatin, Northwest Territories, Canada .................................................................................... 285 A.R. Miller, J.D. Blackwell, L. Curtis, W. Hilger, R.H. McMillan, E. Nutter The RioPreto uranium occurrences, Goiâs, Brazil ............................................................ 313 P.M. Figueiredode Filho Proterozoic unconformity and strata-bound uranium deposits: Epilogue ........................ 325 . Ferguson/ PROTEROZOIC STRATA-BOUND URANIUM DEPOSITS OF ZAMBI ZAIRD AAN E . MENEGHEL L AGIP Nucleare, Milan, Italy Abstract e KatangTh a System, hos o uraniut t d coppean m r mineraliz- ation, is several thousands of metres thick ana rests unconform- ably on an older complex of crystalline rocks and meta-sediments and is locally covered by Karoo sandstones or Kalahari sands. e depositioTh e Katangth f o na System took place durin e Latth ge Proterozoic in a wide complex basin extending from Shaba provinc n Zairi e e throug a largh e par f Zambio t d intan a o eastern Angola. The sediments were affected by different grades of metamorphism, tectonic events, and by thermal events associated with post-tectonic metamorphism. e bas th f Katango e t A a syste m4 know8 ther e nar e copper deposit 2 uraniu4 d an s m occurrences s suggestei t I . d thal al t the known uranium and copper occurrences are of an essentially syngenetic sedimentary origin. The mineralisation is found in the Lower Roan Formatio ne Katang neath e bas th f ro e a System occurrin n rocki g s produce n similai d r environmental conditions and thus being stratigraphie controlled, however, their areal distributio s localisei n d producin a regionag l metal zonation. e uraniuth Man f o ym occurrences hav a typicae l vein aspect. These transgressive relationships are not inconsistent with a syngenetic origi s evidencea n e veith n y b morphologyd . Exploration activitie d genetian s c studie e ongoinar s g throughout this metallogenic province. INTRODUCTION The Copperbelt areas of Zaire (Shaba Province) and Zambia which host the uranium deposits are located on the southern flank e Congoth f oe majo Cratoth rf o structurane whicon s i h l blocks e Africath f o n continent sout f Saharao h . 00 TABLE 1. Correlation of the Katanga System of the Domes, Zambian, and Shaban Copperbelt Areas Domes area Zambian Copperbelt area Shaban Copperbelt area McGregor, 1964; Edwards, 1974; Arthur, 1974; Mendelsohn, 1961; Bind d Mulgrewan a , 1974 Francois, 1974; Cahen, 1974; Cailteux, 1977 Klinck, in press; and Appleton, in press Stratigraphie units Rock type Stratigraphie units Rock type Stratigraphie type Rock type Shale Sandston d shalan e e Tillite Tillite West Lunga Kundelungu Shale Kundelungu Sandstone and shale formation Limestone and dolomite group Dolomite and shale supergroup Dolomite (Tillite) Tillite Tillite Grand Conglomerate and Mwashya Carbonaceous shale Carbonaceous shale supergroup Black shale Mwashya group Luigishi Schists Argillite (Roan unit 4.2) formation Dolomite and magnesite Dolomite Dolomite Wamikumbi formation Dolomitic schists (Roan unit 1) (Roan unit 4.1) Talc-specularitic quartzite Roan group Argillite, shale dolotnitic schists Roan supergroup Dolomitic sandstone (Roan units 2,3, and 4) Dolomite Quartzite (marker) Quartzite (Roan uni) 5 t Shale (Roan units 3(?) and 2.3) Wushingwi Mica schists Argillite, micaceous quartzite, Siliceous dolomite formation Biotite schists impure dolomite (Roan uni) 6 t (Roan units 2.1 and 2.2) Local conglomerate (Quartzite, conglomerate) Dolomitic sandstone (Roan unit 7) (Roan uni) 1 t Basement complex: granites, schists, gneisses, etc. Uranium mineralisatio s firswa n t discovere e Shabth n ai d Province of Zaire in 1915 and sometime later in the Zambian Copperbelt e discoverieth , e North-Westerth n i s n Zambian Domes Area are fairly recent. For sometime these three districts (Fig. 1) have been regarde s indépendana d e anotheon f o t r forming three separate depositional basins s suggestea , e facth ty b dtha t there ar e marked differences betwee e threth n e areas A mor. e careful examination of the geological environments demonstrates however tha n eac i tf thes o h e area e lithologieth s s merge into each other indicating that they form a single depositional domain. The three areas are considered to be a part of a single geo- logical e unitmineraliseTh . d area e thoughar s o havt t a e commo e same linkeb nth e o origi o t t importand d an n t metallogen- etic epoch; later tectonic overprinting has masked their petrogenetic links.
Recommended publications
  • Mammal Footprints from the Miocene-Pliocene Ogallala

    Mammal Footprints from the Miocene-Pliocene Ogallala

    Mammalfootprints from the Miocene-Pliocene Ogallala Formation, easternNew Mexico by ThomasE. Williamsonand SpencerG. Lucas, New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science,1801 Mountain Road NW Albuquerque, New Mexico 87104-7375 Abstract well-develooed mudcracks. The track- ways are diveloped on the mudstone Mammal trackways preserved in the drape but are preserved as infillings at the Miocene-Pliocene Ogallala Formation of base of the overlying conglomerate (Figs. eastern New Mexico represent the first 2-4). Most tracks are preserved on the report of mammal fossils-from this unit in underside of a single, thick conglomerate New Mexico. These trackwavs are Dre- block (Fig. 3). A few isolated mammal served as infillings in a conglomerate near the base of the Ogallala Formation. At least prints were also observed on the under- four mammalian ichnotaxa are represented, side of adjacent blocks.he depth of the including a single trackway of a large camel infillings suggest that tracks were made in (Gambapessp. A), several prints of an uncer- a relatively soft substrate. Some prints are tain family of artiodactyl (Gambapessp B), a accompanied by marks indicating slip- single trackway of a large feloid carnivoran page on a slick, wet substrate (Fig. 5C). (Bestiopeda sp.), and several indistinct im- Infillings of mudcracks and narrow, cylin- pressions, probably representing more than drical burrows and raindrop impressions one trackway of a small canid carnivoran are Dreserved over some areas of the (Chelipus sp ). The footprints are preserved in a channel-margin facies of an Ogallala tracliway slab. Mammal trackways repre- braided stream. sent at least four ichnotaxa.
  • 71St Annual Meeting Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Paris Las Vegas Las Vegas, Nevada, USA November 2 – 5, 2011 SESSION CONCURRENT SESSION CONCURRENT

    71St Annual Meeting Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Paris Las Vegas Las Vegas, Nevada, USA November 2 – 5, 2011 SESSION CONCURRENT SESSION CONCURRENT

    ISSN 1937-2809 online Journal of Supplement to the November 2011 Vertebrate Paleontology Vertebrate Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Society of Vertebrate 71st Annual Meeting Paleontology Society of Vertebrate Las Vegas Paris Nevada, USA Las Vegas, November 2 – 5, 2011 Program and Abstracts Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 71st Annual Meeting Program and Abstracts COMMITTEE MEETING ROOM POSTER SESSION/ CONCURRENT CONCURRENT SESSION EXHIBITS SESSION COMMITTEE MEETING ROOMS AUCTION EVENT REGISTRATION, CONCURRENT MERCHANDISE SESSION LOUNGE, EDUCATION & OUTREACH SPEAKER READY COMMITTEE MEETING POSTER SESSION ROOM ROOM SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS SEVENTY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING PARIS LAS VEGAS HOTEL LAS VEGAS, NV, USA NOVEMBER 2–5, 2011 HOST COMMITTEE Stephen Rowland, Co-Chair; Aubrey Bonde, Co-Chair; Joshua Bonde; David Elliott; Lee Hall; Jerry Harris; Andrew Milner; Eric Roberts EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Philip Currie, President; Blaire Van Valkenburgh, Past President; Catherine Forster, Vice President; Christopher Bell, Secretary; Ted Vlamis, Treasurer; Julia Clarke, Member at Large; Kristina Curry Rogers, Member at Large; Lars Werdelin, Member at Large SYMPOSIUM CONVENORS Roger B.J. Benson, Richard J. Butler, Nadia B. Fröbisch, Hans C.E. Larsson, Mark A. Loewen, Philip D. Mannion, Jim I. Mead, Eric M. Roberts, Scott D. Sampson, Eric D. Scott, Kathleen Springer PROGRAM COMMITTEE Jonathan Bloch, Co-Chair; Anjali Goswami, Co-Chair; Jason Anderson; Paul Barrett; Brian Beatty; Kerin Claeson; Kristina Curry Rogers; Ted Daeschler; David Evans; David Fox; Nadia B. Fröbisch; Christian Kammerer; Johannes Müller; Emily Rayfield; William Sanders; Bruce Shockey; Mary Silcox; Michelle Stocker; Rebecca Terry November 2011—PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS 1 Members and Friends of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, The Host Committee cordially welcomes you to the 71st Annual Meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology in Las Vegas.
  • Nickeline Nias C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1

    Nickeline Nias C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1

    Nickeline NiAs c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Hexagonal. Point Group: 6/m 2/m 2/m. Commonly in granular aggregates, reniform masses with radial structure, and reticulated and arborescent growths. Rarely as distorted, horizontally striated, {1011} terminated crystals, to 1.5 cm. Twinning: On {1011} producing fourlings; possibly on {3141}. Physical Properties: Fracture: Conchoidal. Tenacity: Brittle. Hardness = 5–5.5 VHN = n.d. D(meas.) = 7.784 D(calc.) = 7.834 Optical Properties: Opaque. Color: Pale copper-red, tarnishes gray to blackish; white with strong yellowish pink hue in reflected light. Streak: Pale brownish black. Luster: Metallic. Pleochroism: Strong; whitish, yellow-pink to pale brownish pink. Anisotropism: Very strong, pale greenish yellow to slate-gray in air. R1–R2: (400) 39.2–45.4, (420) 38.0–44.2, (440) 36.8–43.5, (460) 36.2–43.2, (480) 37.2–44.3, (500) 39.6–46.4, (520) 42.3–48.6, (540) 45.3–50.7, (560) 48.2–52.8, (580) 51.0–54.8, (600) 53.7–56.7, (620) 55.9–58.4, (640) 57.8–59.9, (660) 59.4–61.3, (680) 61.0–62.5, (700) 62.2–63.6 Cell Data: Space Group: P 63/mmc. a = 3.621(1) c = 5.042(1) Z = 2 X-ray Powder Pattern: Unknown locality. 2.66 (100), 1.961 (90), 1.811 (80), 1.071 (40), 1.328 (30), 1.033 (30), 0.821 (30) Chemistry: (1) (2) Ni 43.2 43.93 Co 0.4 Fe 0.2 As 55.9 56.07 Sb 0.1 S 0.1 Total 99.9 100.00 (1) J´achymov, Czech Republic; by electron microprobe, corresponds to (Ni0.98Co0.01 Fe0.01)Σ=1.00As1.00.
  • Phytoliths of the Barstow Formation Through the Middle Miocene Climatic Optimum: Preliminary Findings Katharine M

    Phytoliths of the Barstow Formation Through the Middle Miocene Climatic Optimum: Preliminary Findings Katharine M

    Phytoliths of the Barstow Formation through the Middle Miocene Climatic Optimum: preliminary findings Katharine M. Loughney 1,2 and Selena Y. Smith 1, 1 Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, 1109 Geddes Ave., Ann Arbor, MI 48109 2 Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, 1100 North University Ave., Ann Arbor, MI 48109 abstract—The Middle Miocene Climatic Optimum (MMCO) was an interval of signif- icant warming between 17.0 – 14.0 Ma, and a record of the interval is preserved in its entirety in the type Barstow Formation (19.3 – 13.3 Ma) of southern California. In order to understand the biotic impacts of the MMCO, it is necessary to understand vegetation; however, macrofloral records from the middle Miocene in this region are rare and do not span the MMCO. Phytoliths (plant silica) can be preserved in continental sediments even when macrofossil or pollen remains are not, and they can be diagnostic of specific plant clades and/or functional groups, some of which are useful environmental indica- tors. Sixty-eight sediment samples were collected from 12 stratigraphic sections measured within the Barstow Formation in the Mud Hills, Calico Mountains, and Daggett Ridge, and 39 samples were processed for phytoliths. Ten samples yielded phytoliths, although phytoliths were rare in most of these samples. Paleosols from the uppermost part of the Barstow Formation yielded the most abundant and most diverse phytolith assemblages, including grass bilobates and echinate spheres of palms; grass phytoliths were also identi- fied in samples from the Owl Conglomerate and Middle members but were rare. These phytolith data provide evidence that grasses were present throughout deposition of the Barstow Formation, and that they coexisted with palms in mixed-vegetation habitats.
  • Geologic Mapping, Rainbow Basin Field Trip Information

    Geologic Mapping, Rainbow Basin Field Trip Information

    FIELD TRIP 1 Geologic Mapping, Rainbow Basin (Vicinity Barstow, California) Ge 101 Fall Quarter 2013 General Information: We will be departing at 8:00 a.m. on Friday, November 1 from the parking area in front of Arms ("Arms Circle"). Please arrive by 7:45 so there is time to get the trucks packed etc. Attached is a map of how to get to the field area. We will be staying in a motel in Barstow on Friday and Saturday nights (California Inn). We will depart from the motel parking lot for the field area at 8 a.m. on Saturday and Sunday mornings. We will leave the field area at 4 p.m. Sunday, and arrive back at Caltech by 7 p.m. Meals: Rainbow basin is remote and there are no options to purchase food there. We will make a brief stop at a supermarket in Barstow Friday morning to purchase lunch food, snacks and drinks. You may however opt to bring your own food and pack it in ice chests before we leave, up to and including three lunches, two breakfasts and two dinners. Prof. and TAs usually opt for breakfast at Carrows (a short drive from the motel) at 7 a.m., but the California Inn has a free breakfast. There are lots of restaurant options for dinner, from McDonalds up to various moderately priced restaurants. If you opt to purchase lunch food Friday morning in Barstow and otherwise eat in restaurants, you should budget about $80-100. Report: The field report will be an inked and colored geologic map with a map legend and cross section, plus a short description of the geologic history of the map area, listing events depicted on the geologic map, plus additional information compiled in Lab.
  • Minerals Found in Michigan Listed by County

    Minerals Found in Michigan Listed by County

    Michigan Minerals Listed by Mineral Name Based on MI DEQ GSD Bulletin 6 “Mineralogy of Michigan” Actinolite, Dickinson, Gogebic, Gratiot, and Anthonyite, Houghton County Marquette counties Anthophyllite, Dickinson, and Marquette counties Aegirinaugite, Marquette County Antigorite, Dickinson, and Marquette counties Aegirine, Marquette County Apatite, Baraga, Dickinson, Houghton, Iron, Albite, Dickinson, Gratiot, Houghton, Keweenaw, Kalkaska, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Monroe and Marquette counties counties Algodonite, Baraga, Houghton, Keweenaw, and Aphrosiderite, Gogebic, Iron, and Marquette Ontonagon counties counties Allanite, Gogebic, Iron, and Marquette counties Apophyllite, Houghton, and Keweenaw counties Almandite, Dickinson, Keweenaw, and Marquette Aragonite, Gogebic, Iron, Jackson, Marquette, and counties Monroe counties Alunite, Iron County Arsenopyrite, Marquette, and Menominee counties Analcite, Houghton, Keweenaw, and Ontonagon counties Atacamite, Houghton, Keweenaw, and Ontonagon counties Anatase, Gratiot, Houghton, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Ontonagon counties Augite, Dickinson, Genesee, Gratiot, Houghton, Iron, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Ontonagon counties Andalusite, Iron, and Marquette counties Awarurite, Marquette County Andesine, Keweenaw County Axinite, Gogebic, and Marquette counties Andradite, Dickinson County Azurite, Dickinson, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Anglesite, Marquette County Ontonagon counties Anhydrite, Bay, Berrien, Gratiot, Houghton, Babingtonite, Keweenaw County Isabella, Kalamazoo, Kent, Keweenaw, Macomb, Manistee,
  • Structural and Stratigraphic Evolution of the Calico Mountains

    Structural and Stratigraphic Evolution of the Calico Mountains

    Structural and stratigraphic evolution of the Calico Mountains: Implications for early Miocene extension and Neogene transpression in the central Mojave Desert, California John S. Singleton* Phillip B. Gans Department of Earth Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA ABSTRACT rapid unroofi ng of the central Mojave meta- (the Waterman Hills detachment fault) that morphic core complex, yet extension in the juxtaposes tilted early Miocene volcanic and New geologic mapping, structural data, Calico Mountains is minor and is overprinted sedimentary rocks in the hanging wall against and 40Ar/39Ar geochronology document early by dextral faulting and transpression. variably mylonitized basement rocks in the Miocene sedimentation and volcanism and Calico Member beds north of the Calico footwall. Based on apparent offsets of pre-Ter- Neogene deformation in the Calico Moun- fault are intensely folded into numerous tiary markers, several workers (Glazner et al., tains, located in a complexly deformed region east-west–trending, upright anticlines and 1989; Walker et al., 1990; Martin et al., 1993) of California’s central Mojave Desert. Across synclines that represent 25%–33% (up to proposed that 40–60 km of northeast-directed most of the Calico Mountains, volcaniclastic ~0.5 km) north-south shortening. Folds are normal slip occurred along the Waterman Hills sediments and dacitic rocks of the Pickhan- detached along the base of the Calico Mem- detachment fault. The distribution of exten- dle Formation accumulated rapidly between ber and thrust over the Pickhandle Forma- sion is controversial. Dokka (1989) argued that ca. 19.4 and 19 Ma. Overlying fi ne-grained tion, which dips homoclinally ~15–30°S to regional extension occurred within an east- lacustrine beds (here referred to as the Cal- SE.
  • Primary Minerals of the Jáchymov Ore District

    Primary Minerals of the Jáchymov Ore District

    Journal of the Czech Geological Society 48/34(2003) 19 Primary minerals of the Jáchymov ore district Primární minerály jáchymovského rudního revíru (237 figs, 160 tabs) PETR ONDRU1 FRANTIEK VESELOVSKÝ1 ANANDA GABAOVÁ1 JAN HLOUEK2 VLADIMÍR REIN3 IVAN VAVØÍN1 ROMAN SKÁLA1 JIØÍ SEJKORA4 MILAN DRÁBEK1 1 Czech Geological Survey, Klárov 3, CZ-118 21 Prague 1 2 U Roháèových kasáren 24, CZ-100 00 Prague 10 3 Institute of Rock Structure and Mechanics, V Holeovièkách 41, CZ-182 09, Prague 8 4 National Museum, Václavské námìstí 68, CZ-115 79, Prague 1 One hundred and seventeen primary mineral species are described and/or referenced. Approximately seventy primary minerals were known from the district before the present study. All known reliable data on the individual minerals from Jáchymov are presented. New and more complete X-ray powder diffraction data for argentopyrite, sternbergite, and an unusual (Co,Fe)-rammelsbergite are presented. The follow- ing chapters describe some unknown minerals, erroneously quoted minerals and imperfectly identified minerals. The present work increases the number of all identified, described and/or referenced minerals in the Jáchymov ore district to 384. Key words: primary minerals, XRD, microprobe, unit-cell parameters, Jáchymov. History of mineralogical research of the Jáchymov Chemical analyses ore district Polished sections were first studied under the micro- A systematic study of Jáchymov minerals commenced scope for the identification of minerals and definition early after World War II, during the period of 19471950. of their relations. Suitable sections were selected for This work was aimed at supporting uranium exploitation. electron microprobe (EMP) study and analyses, and in- However, due to the general political situation and the teresting domains were marked.
  • Tr-98-04 30-26

    Tr-98-04 30-26

    SE9900227 Technical Report TR-98-04 Volume I MAQARIN natural analogue study: Phase III Edited by J A T Smellie December 1998 Svensk Karnbranslehantering AB Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co Box 5864 SE-102 40 Stockholm Sweden Tel 08-459 84 00 +46 8 459 84 00 Fax 08-661 57 19 +46 8 661 57 19 30-26 MAQARIN natural analogue study: Phase III Edited by J.A.T. Smellie December 1998 VOLUME!: Chapters 1-13 VOLUME II: Appendices A-R This report concerns a study which was conducted for SKB. The conclusions and viewpoints presented in the report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily coincide with those of the client. Information on SKB technical reports from 1977-1978 (TR 121), 1979 (TR 79-28), 1980 (TR 80-26), 1981 (TR 81-17), 1982 (TR 82-28), 1983 (TR 83-77), 1984 (TR 85-01), 1985 (TR 85-20), 1986 (TR 86-31), 1987 (TR 87-33), 1988 (TR 88-32), 1989 (TR 89-40), 1990 (TR 90-46), 1991 (TR 91-64), 1992 (TR 92-46), 1993 (TR 93-34), 1994 (TR 94-33), 1995 (TR 95-37) and 1996 (TR 96-25) is available through SKB. m^ffm?^ AKE TIBERIAS Qarfah , . /olbta' ? / .-V- ) had Set L^ Shafeni ," • '., Haiyan' /""•' ,. ^_ .I-...-- oel. MuiSti £1 Husetntya /..'" oHaiyan '• o £1 Jazza umman ,.-;p"i>EI Majarra A^ Ucn Pd Oananir t-^jAb'u Nuseir ,•"' ' ftaiib ..;•-•—.. | Jcbel el Adorn ; ,.-",' -•\' °Hawwara"-. / \ Bartholomew 1995 \ Reproduced with kind permission \ . , .,„ , . ''..\A::;..._ \ ««* '''a, •' / ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS his study has been funded by Nagra (Switzerland), Nirex (U.K.), SKB (Sweden) Tand the Environment Agency (U.K.); their active support is gratefully acknowledged.
  • Bulletin 65, the Minerals of Franklin and Sterling Hill, New Jersey, 1962

    Bulletin 65, the Minerals of Franklin and Sterling Hill, New Jersey, 1962

    THEMINERALSOF FRANKLINAND STERLINGHILL NEWJERSEY BULLETIN 65 NEW JERSEYGEOLOGICALSURVEY DEPARTMENTOF CONSERVATIONAND ECONOMICDEVELOPMENT NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 65 THE MINERALS OF FRANKLIN AND STERLING HILL, NEW JERSEY bY ALBERT S. WILKERSON Professor of Geology Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey STATE OF NEw JERSEY Department of Conservation and Economic Development H. MAT ADAMS, Commissioner Division of Resource Development KE_rr_ H. CR_V_LINCDirector, Bureau of Geology and Topography KEMBLEWIDX_, State Geologist TRENTON, NEW JERSEY --1962-- NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CONTENTS PAGE Introduction ......................................... 5 History of Area ................................... 7 General Geology ................................... 9 Origin of the Ore Deposits .......................... 10 The Rowe Collection ................................ 11 List of 42 Mineral Species and Varieties First Found at Franklin or Sterling Hill .......................... 13 Other Mineral Species and Varieties at Franklin or Sterling Hill ............................................ 14 Tabular Summary of Mineral Discoveries ................. 17 The Luminescent Minerals ............................ 22 Corrections to Franklln-Sterling Hill Mineral List of Dis- credited Species, Incorrect Names, Usages, Spelling and Identification .................................... 23 Description of Minerals: Bementite ......................................... 25 Cahnite ..........................................
  • Mojave Miocene Robert E

    Mojave Miocene Robert E

    Mojave Miocene Robert E. Reynolds, editor California State University Desert Studies Center 2015 Desert Symposium April 2015 Front cover: Rainbow Basin syncline, with rendering of saber cat by Katura Reynolds. Back cover: Cajon Pass Title page: Jedediah Smith’s party crossing the burning Mojave Desert during the 1826 trek to California by Frederic Remington Past volumes in the Desert Symposium series may be accessed at <http://nsm.fullerton.edu/dsc/desert-studies-center-additional-information> 2 2015 desert symposium Table of contents Mojave Miocene: the field trip 7 Robert E. Reynolds and David M. Miller Miocene mammal diversity of the Mojave region in the context of Great Basin mammal history 34 Catherine Badgley, Tara M. Smiley, Katherine Loughney Regional and local correlations of feldspar geochemistry of the Peach Spring Tuff, Alvord Mountain, California 44 David C. Buesch Phytoliths of the Barstow Formation through the Middle Miocene Climatic Optimum: preliminary findings 51 Katharine M. Loughney and Selena Y. Smith A fresh look at the Pickhandle Formation: Pyroclastic flows and fossiliferous lacustrine sediments 59 Jennifer Garrison and Robert E. Reynolds Biochronology of Brachycrus (Artiodactyla, Oreodontidae) and downward relocation of the Hemingfordian– Barstovian North American Land Mammal Age boundary in the respective type areas 63 E. Bruce Lander Mediochoerus (Mammalia, Artiodactyla, Oreodontidae, Ticholeptinae) from the Barstow and Hector Formations of the central Mojave Desert Province, southern California, and the Runningwater and Olcott Formations of the northern Nebraska Panhandle—Implications of changes in average adult body size through time and faunal provincialism 83 E. Bruce Lander Review of peccaries from the Barstow Formation of California 108 Donald L.
  • Uraninite-Bearing Granitic Pegmatite, Moore Lakes, Saskatchewan: Petrology and U-Th-Pb Chemical Ages

    Uraninite-Bearing Granitic Pegmatite, Moore Lakes, Saskatchewan: Petrology and U-Th-Pb Chemical Ages

    Uraninite-bearing Granitic Pegmatite, Moore Lakes, Saskatchewan: Petrology and U-Th-Pb Chemical Ages 1 1 1 3 Irvine R. Annesley , Catherine Madore , Richard T Kusmirski , and Tom Bonli Anm:slcv. l.R .. Madore. C .. Kusmirski, R.T.. and Bonli. T. (2000): lJraninite-bearing granitic pegmat1tc, Moore Lakes, . Saskatcl1ewan: Petrology and l!-Th-Pb chcmic,tl ages: in Summary of Investigations 2000, Volume 2. Saskatchewan Gcolog1cal Survey. Sask. Energy Mines, Misc. Rep. 2000-4.2. attribute their genesis to some variation of the Abstract diagenctic-hydrothermal model proposed by Hoeve This paper documents the.fir.1·t results ofa detailed and Sibbald ( 1978), which invokes the mixing of study of uraninite-bearing granitic pegmatite, which highly saline oxidized basinal fluids with variably occurs near unconj(Jrmity-lJpe uranium mineralizalion reduced basement fluids. More recent research shows in the Moore Lakes area in the southeastern part ofthe that the transport and precipitation of uranium is Athabasca Basin. Drilling has revealed that wanitic controlled by basin paleohydrology, basement pegmatites comprise <5 to 10% ofthe basement topography, large-scale reactivated basement cornplex with hallestimated being radioactive. structures, fluid flow, heat flow, and physiochemical Relatively fresh, radioactive granitic pegmatite, the traps (Hoeve and Quirt, 1984, 1987; Wilson and Kyser, subject of this investigation, was intersected in drill 1987; Kotzcr and Kyser, l 991, 1992. 1995; Fayek and hole ML00-08. The pegmatite is JO m thick and occurs Kyser, 1997; Quirt. 1997). There are several 55 m he/ow the unconformity with sandstones olthe hypotheses as to the source of the uranium. Pagel et al.