The Prevalence of Oral Mucosal Lesions in Patients Visiting a Dental School in Southern India
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
[Downloaded free from http://www.ijdr.in on Wednesday, January 07, 2015, IP: 14.96.59.215] || Click here to download free Android application for this journal ORIGINAL RESEARCH The prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in patients visiting a dental school in Southern India Anuna Laila Mathew, Keerthilatha M Pai, Amar A Sholapurkar, Manoj Vengal Department of Oral Medicine AABSTRACTBSTRACT and Radiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in Karnataka - 576 104, India Manipal, Karnataka State, India. A total of 1190 subjects who visited the department of oral medicine and radiology for diagnosis of various oral complaints over a period of 3 months were interviewed and clinically examined for oral mucosal lesions. The result showed the presence of one or more mucosal lesions in (41.2%) of the population. Fordyce’s condition was observed most frequently (6.55%) followed by frictional keratosis (5.79%), fissured tongue (5.71%), leukoedema (3.78%), smoker’s palate (2.77%), recurrent aphthae, oral submucous fibrosis (2.01%), oral malignancies (1.76%), leukoplakia (1.59%), median rhomboid glossitis (1.50%), candidiasis (1.3%), lichen planus (1.20%), varices (1.17%), traumatic ulcer and oral hairy leukoplakia (1.008%), denture stomatitis, geographic tongue, betel chewer’s mucosa and irritational fibroma (0.84%), herpes labialis, angular cheilitis (0.58%), and mucocele (0.16%). Mucosal lesions like tobacco-related lesions (leukoplakia, smoker’s palate, oral submucous fibrosis, and oral Received : 21-07-07 malignancies) were more prevalent among men than among women. Denture stomatitis, herpes Review completed : 02-09-07 labialis, and angular cheilitis occurred more frequently in the female population. Accepted : 21-11-07 PubMed ID : ???????? Key words: Abnormalities, mucosal lesions, prevalence Although the terms dental health and oral health are used 2005 to 1st June 2005 were included in the study. The patients almost synonymously when stating the goals for oral health, were divided into four groups based on age: 2-20 years, such statements are usually valid only for dental health. This 21-40 years, 41-60 years, and 61-80 years old. All the subjects may lead to severe underestimation of the need for total oral were examined clinically and questioned regarding any health care.[1] When planning measures for improving oral habits like smoking, pan chewing, and alcohol intake, and health, the lack of data may lead to a risk of overlooking the frequency and duration of the habit. Patients in whom diseases of the soft tissues in, and adjacent to, the oral cavity. an intraoral examination was not possible due to inadequate Prevalence data of oral mucosal lesions are available from mouth opening were excluded from the study. History many countries, but the information is usually restricted to was obtained from parents or relatives for patients who very few lesions in each survey. Only two studies,[2,3] with were not able to communicate either due to age or disease. sufÞ ciently large number of individuals, have presented data The patients were examined clinically by two trained on a broad spectrum of oral mucosal lesions in a general examiners using artiÞ cial light, mouth mirror, gauze, etc.; population. the diagnosis was made based on history, clinical features, and investigations, according to the WHO guidelines and Hence, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the color atlas. Biopsies were advised for suspicious lesions. prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in patients who visited the Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Manipal RESULTS AND DISCUSSION College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, India. A total of 1190 patients (747 men and 443 women) in the age MATERIALS AND METHODS range 2-80 years represented the population in this 3-month study conducted in our department. The different age- A total of 1190 outpatients seeking dental treatment at groups and the number of subjects in each was as follows: the Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Manipal 2-20 years old (n = 243, 21-40 years old (n = 527), 41-60 years st College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, India, from 1 March old (n = 325), 61-80 years old (n = 95). Reference to the color Correspondence: atlas while making the clinical examination and diagnosis Dr. Amar A Sholapurkar, resulted in a high proportion of both intra-examiner and E-mail: [email protected] inter-examiner agreement for the presence of lesions 99 Indian J Dent Res, 19(2), 2008 [Downloaded free from http://www.ijdr.in on Wednesday, January 07, 2015, IP: 14.96.59.215] || Click here to download free Android application for this journal Prevalence of oral mucosal lesions Mathew, et al. and their categorization. Out of 1190 subjects, 1167 were Fordyce’s condition dentulous and 13 were totally edentulous (1.1%). Forty-Þ ve Fordyce’s condition was observed in 6.5% of our population subjects were denture wearers. One hundred and Þ fteen and was more frequently observed on the buccal and lip (9.7%) were presently smokers, 22 (1.9%) were ex-smokers, mucosa. It was more prevalent in men (8.9%) than in women and 1053 (88.4%) were nonsmokers. Among the current (2.48%). Corbet,[4] however, had reported a prevalence of smokers, there was a high proportion of heavy smokers 0.6%, which was very different from our Þ nding. (21 or more cigarettes/day). The habit of tobacco chewing was present in 123 subjects. The frequency of tobacco Fissured tongue chewing was more prevalent in males than in females (98 Fissured tongue was seen in 5.7% of our population. This males and 25 females) and was more prevalent in the 21-40 included all subjects with Þ ssures of at least 2-mm depth age-group. Ex-pan chewers were 21 in number. on the dorsal aspect of the tongue. This prevalence is lower than that found by Darwazeh and Pillai (11.4%)[5] and also Table 1 shows the demographic data. Tables 2 and 3 shows by Marij a in Slovenia[6] (21.1%). In our population, the the prevalence of oral mucosal variants and abnormalities presence of Þ ssured tongue increased with age and was more according to age and gender. No mucosal abnormalities prevalent among men than in women which is in accordance were detected in 58.8% of subjects. The most prevalent with the Þ ndings of Aboyons and Ghaemma Ghami in Iran[6] normal variant was Fordyce’s granules (6.55%), followed and Darwazeh and Pillai in Jordan.[5] by Þ ssured tongue (5.71%), Leukoedema (3.78%), and varices (1.17%).The most prevalent lesion was frictional Leukoedema keratosis (5.79%), followed by smoker’s palate (2.77%), In our study population, the prevalence of leukoedema aphthous stomatitis (2.1%), oral submucous fibrosis was 3.7%. Males were more affected than females. It was (2.01%), oral malignancies (1.76%), leukoplakia (1.59%), especially prevalent in the 41-60 years age-group (5.35% and median rhomboid glossitis (1.5%), oral candidiasis (1.3%), 1.1%, respectively, in males and females). The prevalence lichen planus (1.26%), traumatic ulcer (1.01%), denture was more among smokers than nonsmokers, with an increase stomatitis (0.84%), geographic tongue (0.84%), betel in age. A correlation between leukoedema and smoking, chewers mucosa (0.84%), irritational Þ broma (0.84%), tobacco chewing, and alcoholism could be demonstrated in angular cheilitis (0.58%), herpes labialis (0.58%), and our study as was seen in some groups of people in the study mucocele (0.16%). by Karen in Thailand.[7] Table 1: Demographic data of 1190 patients (2-80 years old) Patients no. according to 2-20 21-40 41-60 61-80 Total Total age and gender M - 135; F - 108 M - 332; F - 195 M - 210; F - 114 M - 70; F - 26 M - 747; F - 443 1190 Dentate patients M - 135 M - 332 M - 206 M - 63 M - 736 1177 F - 108 F - 195 F - 113 F - 25 F - 441 Totally edentulous M - 0 M - 0 M - 4 M - 7 M - 11 13 F - 0 F - 0 F - 1 F - 1 F - 2 Denture wearers M - 1 M - 4 M - 8 M - 10 M - 23 45 F - 0 F - 2 F - 15 F - 5 F - 22 Present smokers M - 5 M - 50 M - 55 M - 5 M - 115 115 F - 0 F - 0 F - 0 F - 0 F - 0 Ex- smokers M - 0 M - 5 M - 10 M - 7 M - 22 22 F - 0 F - 0 F - 0 F - 0 F - 0 Tobacco chewers M - 5 M - 46 M - 39 M - 8 M - 98 123 F - 0 F - 5 F - 15 F - 5 F - 25 Ex-pan chewers M - 0 M - 7 M - 6 M - 4 M - 17 21 F - 0 F - 0 F - 1 F - 3 F - 4 Alcoholics M - 1 M - 10 M - 9 M - 0 M - 20 20 F - 0 F - 0 F - 0 F - 0 F - 0 Table 2: Prevalence of oral mucosal variants in 1190 patients (2-80 years old) Mucosal fi ndings Gender 2-20, n (%) 21-40, n (%) 41-60, n (%) 61-80, n (%) Total, n (%) Total, n (%) Fordyce’s granules M 3 (2.2) 30 (9.03) 28 (13.3) 6 (8.5) 67 (8.9) 78 (6.55) F 3 (2.77) 6 (3.07) 2 (1.73) 0 11 (2.48) Fissured tongue M 1 (0.74) 11(3.37) 18 (8.57) 14 (20) 44 (57.14) 68 (5.71) F 3 (2.77) 7 (3.58) 10 (8.69) 4 (16) 24 (5.41) Leukoedema M 0 7 (2.10) 29 (13.3) 4 (5.7) 40 (5.35) 45 (3.78) F 1 (0.9) 2 (1.02) 1 (0.86) 1 (4) 5 (1.12) Varices M 0 1 (0.30) 3 (1.42) 10 (14.2) 14 (1.87) 14 (1.17) F 0 0 0 0 0 Indian J Dent Res, 19(2), 2008 100 [Downloaded free from http://www.ijdr.in on Wednesday, January 07, 2015, IP: 14.96.59.215] || Click here to download free Android application for this journal Prevalence of oral mucosal lesions Mathew, et al.