Eur. Phys. J. C manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor)

HECATE A long-lived concept for the FCC-ee or CEPC

Marcin Chrząszcza,3, Marco Drewesb,4, Jan Hajerc,4 3 Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Radzikowskiego 374, 53–564 Kraków, Poland 4Centre for Cosmology, and Phenomenology, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve B-356:, Belgium

November 4242

Abstract The next generation of circular high energy LHC [8] and other experiments [9] to LLPs. The clean is expected to be a lepton collider, FCC-ee at environment of a lepton collider would offer even better CERN or CEPC in China. However, the civil engineer- perspectives for such searches [3, 5]. ing concepts foresee to equip these with bigger detector caverns than one would need for a lepton col- LLPs are typically searched for at colliders through lider, so that they can be used for a collider that displaced signatures [8]. One constraint in this context may be installed in the same tunnel without further is the volume of the main detectors, which limits the civil engineering. This opens up the possibility to in- potential to search for particles with very long lifetimes. stall extra instrumentation at the cavern walls to search For the LHC, several dedicated detectors have been for new long-lived particles at the lepton collider. We proposed to extend the reach to larger lifetimes, in- use the example of heavy neutral leptons to show that cluding FASER [:], MATHUSLA [;], CODEX-b [32], such an installation could improve the sensitivity to the Al5X[33], MAPP [34], and ANUBIS [35]. While MATH- squared mixing parameter by almost half an order of USLA would be placed at the surface, the other pro- magnitude. posals take advantage of existing cavities that can be instrumented. At a future lepton collider the detectors will be smaller than those of the LHC, which limits 3 Introduction the sensitivity to long lifetimes. However, the current planning for the FCC-ee and CEPC foresees to build a Future lepton colliders such as the FCC-ee [3] or CEPC [4] hadron collider in the same tunnel, namely the FCC-hh have an extremely rich physics program [5, 6]. In partic- or SPPC [36, 37]. For this reason, it has been proposed ular, they are outstanding intensity frontier machines and is widely accepted that the detector caverns for the that can not only study the properties of the electroweak FCC-ee will be much bigger than needed for a lepton and Higgs sector at unprecedented accuracy, but they collider, so that the FCC-hh and its detectors can be can also search for feebly coupled hidden particles that installed in the same tunnel without major civil engineer- have escaped detection at the LHC due to their low ing effort. In this Letter we point out that instrumenting arXiv:2011.01005v3 [hep-ph] 29 Jun 2021 production . Due to their small interaction this extra space could considerably increase the sens- strength hidden particles can have comparably long life- itivity of the FCC-ee (or likewise the CEPC) to LLPs times. Such new long-lived particles (LLPs) appear in at a cost of only a few million Swiss franc (CHF). We many extensions of the Standard Model (SM) of particle therefore propose to include such a HErmetic CAvern physics that can address open questions in particle phys- TrackEr (HECATE) in future FCC-ee and CEPC stud- 3 ics and cosmology, such as the Dark Matter (DM), neut- ies. rino masses or baryogenesis, cf. e.g.[7]. In recent years many studies have investigated the sensitivity of the

a E-mail: [email protected] 3 In a first version of the manuscript the detector concept was b E-mail: [email protected] called HADES. The names has been changed to HECATE to c E-mail: [email protected] avoid confusion with the existing experiment at GSI. 4

4 Possible implementation and cost estimate bars. The main cost of such detector would then be the cost of the scintillators. Assuming a thickness of  cm for A possible implementation of the HECATE detector a single panel the cost would amount to – MCHF with would consist of resistive plate chambers (RPCs) or scin- current prices. This assumes that the used scintillator tillator plates, constructed from extruded scintillating is EJ-422, which has a long optical attenuation length bars, located around the cavern walls and forming a 4π and fast timing. The cost could be significantly reduced detector. Such an hermetic detector design maximizes if a cheaper alternative is used that still matches the the fiducial volume and allows to discriminate against specifications required for such a detector design. The events originating from outside the detector cavern. The cost of the readout electronics can be estimated based inner detector and chambers act as a veto able to on the Sci-Fi detector from LHCb [39]. On this basis, the reject SM particles from the primary vertex. In order to readout electronics together with the clear and wave- obtain timing information and to distinguish particles shifting fibers needed for the scintillator would cost from cosmic background, the HECATE detector should around  CHF per channel. Hence, the total cost of have at least two layers of detector material separated the detector would be below  MCHF per layer. This by a sizable distance. For reliable tracking, at least four estimate assumes present day technology and one can layers, along with a smaller size and/or optimised geo- expect that better technology can be purchased at lower metry of the detector plates, would be required. The prices at the time the FCC-ee will be built. biggest challenge of such detector is the control of the background that will originate from two sources: cos- mics and produced at collision point. The first 5 Sensitivity estimate can be handled using timing information, which permits We estimate the HECATE sensitivity for right-handed to distinguish particles coming from within the cavern neutrinos, a type of heavy neutral leptons (HNLs). The from ones coming from outside the cavern. We expect existence of these HNLs is predicted by well-motivated neutrinos that are produced from cosmic rays and decay extensions of the SM, in particular the type-I seesaw within the cavern volume to be more problematic. How- mechanism [3:–45], leptogenesis [46], and as DM can- ever, this background requires a detailed Monte Carlo didates [47]. They have been a benchmark scenario for simulation, which lies beyond the scope of this Letter. FCC-ee sensitivity estimates from early stages [48]. The On the other hand, the feasibility of such a rejection properties of HNLs are characterised by their Majorana is studied for the MATHUSLA detector, see [38] and mass M and the mixing angles θ that determine the references therein. We expect a lower background for a suppression of their weak interactions relative to that HECATE, as MATHUSLA would be exposed to more of ordinary neutrinos. The implications of the heavy cosmics due to its location on the surface. More danger- neutrinos’ existence strongly depend on the magnitude ous is the background from SM neutrinos produced in of M, see e.g.[49] for a review.4 The seesaw mechanism process such as e+e−→ Z→ νν, as neutrinos may inter- requires at least two HNLs to explain the light act with the detector material resulting in detectable oscillation data. However, for the purpose of the present charged particles. These type of events can be rejected in study a simplified model with a single HNL denoted by different ways, depending on where the interaction takes N suffices, place. Events originating from the beam pipe can be rejected by using the tracker as a veto and interactions m ∗ µ + m ∗ µ L ⊃ − W Nθ γ e W − √ Z Nθ γ ν Z within the inner detectors can be rejected using its outer v a La µ 2v a La µ layers. Additionally, in the case that the background M − θ hν N + h.c. , (3) remains too large, one could install an additional tracker v a La layer outside the detector as a veto system, that would where eLa and νLa are the charged and neutral SM be able to reject SM neutrino interactions in the outer leptons, respectively, Z and W are the weak gauge layers of the usual detector. The present Letter is a bosons with masses mZ and mW , and h is the physical simple proof-of-principle, and we postpone a detailed in- Higgs field after spontaneous breaking of the electroweak vestigation of such backgrounds to future work. We note symmetry by the expectation value v. in passing that the MATHUSLA collaboration, which At a lepton collider the HNLs are primarily pro- faces similar issues, has concluded that they are under duced from the decay of on-shell Z-bosons. The HNL control, see [38] and references therein. 4 For a horizontally cylindrical cavern with a radius of For further details on specific aspects we refer the reader to 2 reviews on leptogenesis [4:, 4;] and the perspectives to test  m and length of  m, plates of 1 m surface would it [52], sterile neutrino DM [53, 54] and experimental searches provide ∼ 6000 readout channels for the scintillating for heavy neutrinos [55–58]. 5

4 production cross section in the process Z → νN can be 10− 5 MATHUSLA estimated as [48] DUNE FASER2 5 CODEXb 2 10− 2 2 2 2 ! 2 ! Ue : Uµ : Uτ 2 M M σN ' 2σZ BR(Z→ νν)U 1 − 1 + , (4) 0 : 1 : 0 2 2 6 mZ mZ 10− FCC-ee 2 5 2 3 FCC-ee 7 CEPC their decay rate is roughly ΓN ' 12U M GF /(96π ) 10− muon 2 P 2 2 HECATE chamber with GF the Fermi constant and U = Ua with Ua = 2 6 2 @ CEPC |θ | . The number of events that can be observed in a U 8 a 10− spherical detector with an integrated luminosity L can 7 then be estimated as 9 10− HECATE      l0 l1 @ FCC-ee Nobs ' LσN exp − − exp − . (5) 10 λN λN 10− SHiP THUNDERDOME

Here λN = βγ/ΓN is the HNL decay length in the 11 10− BBN seesaw laboratory frame, l0 and l1 denote the minimal and maximal distance from the interaction point (IP) where 1 2 5 10 20 50 the detector can detect an HNL decay into charged M [GeV] particles. If the Z-boson decays at rest we can set βγ = (m2 − M 2)/(2m M).8 We then replaced one of the Figure 3: Comparison of the sensitivities for nine signal events Z Z 12 neutrinos with the HNL with a given mass. We have that can be achieved at the FCC-ee with 2.5·10 Z-bosons (red) or CEPC with 3.5 · 1011 Z-bosons (blue). The faint solid curves considered masses spanning from  GeV up to mZ in 9 show the main detector sensitivity (l0 = 5 mm, l1 = 1.22 m). steps of  GeV. The faint dash-dotted curve indicates the additional gain if the In figure 3 we show the expected gain in sensitivity muon chambers are used at the FCC-ee (l0 = 1.22 m, l1 = 4 m). that can be achieved with HECATE (thick curves; red The thick curves show the sensitivity of HECATE with l0 = 4 m, and blue encoding the FCC-ee and CEPC, respectively; l1 = 15 m (solid) and l0 = 4 m, l1 = 25 m (dashed), respectively. Finally, the faint dashed red line shows the FCC-ee main de- 12 solid and dashed, corresponding to l1 = 15 m or l1 = tector sensitivity with 5 · 10 Z-bosons, corresponding to the 25 m) in comparison to using only the inner detector luminosity at two IPs. For comparison we indicate the expected (faint red and blue curve for FCC-ee and CEPC) with sensitivity of selected other experiments with the different green 2.5 · 1012 and 3.5 · 1011 Z-bosons, respectively. These curves as indicated in the plot [:–32, 67, 6:]. The gray areas in the upper part of the plot show the region excluded by past numbers refer to the expected integrated luminosity experiments [6;–79], the grey areas at the bottom mark the during the Z-pole run at one IP. We display lines for regions that are disfavoured by BBN and neutrino oscillation nine detected signal events approximately corresponding data in the νMSM (‘seesaw’). to the  σ discovery region under the assumption of a single background event. The actual sensitivity of the lower left side of the sensitivity region corresponds HECATE should lie somewhere between the two thick to decay lengths that greatly exceed the detector size. red curves, as the approximately cylindrical detector In this regime the exponentials in (5) can be expanded extents from the IP  m in radial direction and  m in l1/λ and l0/λ. For l1  l0 the number of events is in beam direction. The improvement with HECATE is simply given by almost half an order of magnitude in U 2 for given M. Γ l M 5l This can be understood by recalling that the region on N ' Lσ N 1 ∝ LU 4 1 . (6) obs N βγ βγ 5 The sub-dominant N production in the decay of B-mesons 2 generated in the process Z→ b¯b has e.g. been studied in [59]. Hence, the value of U that leads to a given number 6 √ The decay rates of HNLs into SM particles have been computed of events for fixed M scales as ∝ 1/ l1. For the inner by many different authors [55, 5:–67], they overall more or less detector we assume a radius of . m within which agree with each other. 7 In [68] we have confirmed in a proper simulation that the estim- displaced vertices can be detected. This corresponds to ate (5) works reasonably well even at the LHC main detectors the size of the ECAL designed for the ILC [7:], we use if one takes the average over the HNL momentum distribution. it as an estimate for the dimensions of the FCC-ee or In the much cleaner environment of a lepton collider we expect CEPC detectors, which are to be determined.: Hence, that it works even better. 8 We confirmed that this is a good approximation by generating : In [7;] the number . m was used, corresponding to the the HNL momentum distribution with Pythia :.4 [69] (including dimensions of the ILC HCAL. The gain in sensitivity can be es- initial state radiation) and averaging (5) over this distribution. timated with (6), as outlined below, and lies somewhere between 9 Natural units with c = 1 are used throughout this Letter. our main detector and muon chamber lines in figure 3. 6

p one can expect relative sensitivity gains ∝ 1.22 m/l1. It is instructive to compare the HECATE sensitiv- Relation (6) also permits to estimate the sensitivity gain ity to existing constraints and to the reach of other by increasing the integrated luminosity L (e.g. by ex- upcoming or proposed experiments. An updated sum- tending the Z-pole run or by considering more than one mary of relevant experimental constraints can be found IP): Increasing L by a given factor has the same effect in [89].; In figure 3 we display the exclusion region as increasing l1 by the same factor. Hence, for given M, of several experiments under the assumption that the 2 the value of U needed√ to achieve a given number of HNL exclusively mix with the second SM generation 2 2 events scales as ∝ 1/ L. As an example we display the (U = θµ )[6;–79]. Indirect searches, on the other gain in sensitivity that could be achieved with the inner hand, strongly depend on the properties of light neut- detector by doubling the integrated luminosity of the rinos, cf. e.g.[89, 8;–96] for a detailed discussion. In Z-pole run (faint dashed red curve). The scaling of all particular, lower bounds on the individual |θa| from lines in the plot with increased integrated luminosity neutrino oscillation data can only be imposed under spe- can be estimated by comparing the faint dashed red line cific model assumptions, and the lower bound on their 2 to the faint solid red curve, and with relation (6). All sum U scales as mlightest/M. As an indicator, we add HECATE lines would scale with the number of Z-bosons the corresponding lower ‘seesaw’ bound in the Neutrino in the same way as the main detector line, we omit them Minimal Standard Model (νMSM) [97, 98] as a gray here to keep the plot readable. We further do not show area, assuming normal ordering of the light neutrinos. all lines for the CEPC, the omitted ones would give There is also a bound on the lifetime of the N from the similar relative sensitivity gains as for FCC-ee. requirement to decay before big bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) in the early universe, which again depends on Further, we estimate the potential sensitivity gain the flavour mixing pattern. We here display the bound from performing a search in the muon chambers at the 2 2 32 from [99] under the assumption U = θµ . FCC-ee (faint dash-dotted red curve). This idea, ori- To put HECATE into the context of the future ex- ginally proposed in [82, 83], has been applied to HNL perimental program in particle physics, we indicate the searches at the LHC in [84, 85]. As suggested by the sensitivity of selected other proposed or planned experi- scaling above, the gain is considerably lower than what ments, as indicated in the plot [:–32, 67, 6:]. HECATE could be done with HECATE. Finally, one may wonder would be complementary to other proposals and help whether it is worth to dig even bigger caverns to host √ to fill the sensitivity gap between the reach of future dedicated LLP detectors. The scaling ∝ 1/ l of the 1 lepton colliders limited by the volume of their detectors sensitivity to U 2 for given M implies that the costs for and fixed target experiment limited by the D-meson civil engineering would quickly grow. For illustrative threshold, . figure 3. purposes we add the sensitivity that could be achieved cf Finally, one may compare the reach to the parameter with the very unrealistic Totally Hyper-UNrealistic DE- region where leptogenesis is possible in well-motivated tectoR in a huge DOME (THUNDERDOME) concept scenarios. The most updated parameter space scans for at FCC-ee (l0 = 4 m, l1 = 100 m, dotted red line). How- ever, for other LLP models with a different scaling the the νMSM (practically n = 2) and the model with n = 3 return of investment might be better. ; The sensitivity of some experiments depend on the number n It should be said that figure 3 is very conservative as of HNL flavours, the mass of the lightest SM neutrino mlightest, and on the flavour mixing pattern, i.e. the relative size of the far as the sensitivity gain with HECATE relative to the 2 mixings |θa| with individual SM generations. It is therefore inner detector is concerned because we have assumed difficult to make an apple-to-apple comparison. The sensitivity  % efficiency and no backgrounds for both. For HEC- of direct searches for displaced searches at accelerators in good ATE these assumptions are semi-realistic, as the inner approximation only depends on the flavour mixing pattern. In contrast to that, searches that rely on lepton number violating detector can be used as a veto. In contrast, in the in- signatures strongly depend on the HNL mass spectrum and light ner detector the reconstruction efficiency for displaced neutrino properties [8:]. vertices rapidly decreases as a function of displacement. 32 In the recent works [99, 9:] it was assumed that the HNLs This dependence has been studied for the LHC [79, 86, are in thermal equilibrium in the early universe, which is in general not true for small U 2. In [9;] it was, however, pointed 87] and LEP [73, 88], but a realistic estimate for the out that smaller mixing angles are ruled out by the cosmological FCC-ee detectors would require detailed simulations. In history between BBN and the cosmic microwave background the present note, which is a proof-of-principle, we there- (CMB) decoupling [:2], and various other effects of HNL decays fore choose to make the same assumptions for HECATE (dissociation of nuclei [9;], effect the CMB anisotropies [:3] heating up the intergalactic medium [:4]). In the mass range and the inner detector and therefore underestimate the considered here, the bounds from [99, 9:] can therefore be relative sensitivity gain that could be achieved with regarded as ‘hard’ unless one considers U 2 that are so tiny that HECATE. the HNL are never produced in significant quantities. 7 can be found in [:5] and [:6], respectively. In both cases physics and cosmology, including DM, baryogenesis, cos- HECATE can probe regions deep inside the leptogenesis mic inflation and neutrino masses. parameter space. In the future, it would be interesting to study how well HECATE could measure the HNL properties, so that, in case any HNLs are discovered, Acknowledgments one could address the question whether or not these particles are indeed responsible for the origin of matter The authors would like to thank Alain Blondel, David in the universe. For the FCC inner detector this has Curtin, Albert De Roeck, Rebeca Gonzalez Suarez, been done in [:7, :8]. Elena Graverini, and Manqi Ruan for useful comments on this Letter. The work of M.C. is funded by the Pol- ish National Agency for Academic Exchange under the Bekker program. M.C. is also grateful for the funding 6 Discussion and conclusions from the European Union’s Horizon 4242 research and innovation programme under grant № ;73976. In this Letter we point out that an instrumentation of the large detector caverns that are planned at fu- ture circular lepton colliders could considerably increase References the sensitivity of searches for LLPs. The main differ- ence between the HECATE concept and other proposals [3] FCC. ‘FCC-ee: The Lepton Collider: Future Cir- (such as surface detectors [;, :9], forward detectors [;] or cular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume installations on the cavern ceiling [:9]) lies in the approx- 4’. In: Eur. Phys. J. ST 44:.4 (423;), pp. 483– imate 4π solid angle coverage that can be achieved by 845. doi: 32.3362/epjst/e423;-;22267-6. №: covering the cavern walls with detectors. The possibility CERN-ACC-423:-2279. to install a far detector that is sensitive to displacements [4] CEPC Study Group. ‘CEPC Conceptual Design over  m with such large angular coverage without ex- Report: Volume 3 — Accelerator’ (Sept. 423:). tra civil engineering is a unique opportunity resulting arXiv: 3:2;.224:7 [physics.acc-ph]. №: IHEP- from the fact that the caverns for FCC-ee or CEPC are CEPC-DR-423:-23 and IHEP-AC-423:-23. expected to be designed to host a hadron collider. In [5] CEPC Study Group. ‘CEPC Conceptual Design addition to the large caverns, there will also be large Report: Volume 4 — Physics & Detector’ (Nov. vertical shafts over the chambers for the detector install- 423:). Ed. by J. B. Guimarães da Costa et al. ation (16 m diameter planned for the CEPC, and over arXiv: 3:33 . 32767 [hep-ex]. №: IHEP-CEPC-  m for the FCC at at least two IPs), which could be DR-423:-24, IHEP-EP-423:-23, and IHEP-TH- used to install further instrumentation (as proposed for 423:-23. the LHC with ANUBIS). [6] FCC. ‘FCC Physics Opportunities: Future Circu- The proposed solution based on scintillators should lar Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume be regarded as an example and proof-of-principle. There 3’. In: Eur. Phys. J. C 9;.8 (423;), p. 696. doi: are many other detectors that will reach timing and 32.3362/epjc/s32274-23;-8;26-5. №: CERN- efficiency requirements, such as RPCs. The final choice ACC-423:-2278. would be based on detailed study of balance between [7] D. Curtin et al. ‘Long-Lived Particles at the En- the cost and the detector performance. ergy Frontier: The MATHUSLA Physics Case’. In: Using this example, we estimate that a detector of Rept. Prog. Phys. :4.33 (423;), p. 338423. doi: 32. the HECATE type could increase the FCC sensitivity 32::/3583-8855/ab4:d8. arXiv: 3:28.295;8 to heavy neutrinos (or HNLs) with masses below mZ by [hep-ph]. №: -PUB-3:-486-T. almost half an order of magnitude at a cost of the order [8] J. Alimena et al. ‘Searching for Long-Lived of ten million CHF, conservatively assuming present de- Particles beyond the Standard Model at the Large tector technology and prices. This improvement would Hadron Collider’. In: J. Phys. G 69.; (4242), help to fill the sensitivity gap for HNL masses between p. 2;2723. doi: 32.32::/3583- 8693/ab6796. the B-meson mass (below which fixed target experi- arXiv: 3;25.266;9 [hep-ex]. ments are highly sensitive) and the regime that can be [9] J. Beacham et al. ‘Physics Beyond Colliders covered by the FCC-ee or CEPC main detectors. Heavy at CERN: Beyond the Standard Model Work- neutrinos are only one example for LLPs, which we have ing Group Report’. In: J. Phys. G 69.3 (4242), chosen for illustrative purposes here. HECATE could p. 232723. doi: 32.32::/3583- 8693/ab6cd4. open many other portals to dark sectors that can po- arXiv: 3;23 . 2;;88 [hep-ex]. №: CERN-PBC- tentially address some of the ‘big questions’ in particle REPORT-423:-229. 8

[:] J. L. Feng, I. Galon, F. Kling, and S. Tro- C 9;2;49 (3;9;), pp. 537–543. arXiv: 3528.688; janowski. ‘ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the [hep-th]. №: PRINT-:2-2798. LHC’. In: Phys. Rev. D ;9.5 (423:), p. 257223. [42] J. Schechter and J. Valle. ‘Neutrino Masses in doi: 32 . 3325 / PhysRevD . ;9 . 257223. arXiv: SU(4) x U(3) Theories’. In: Phys. Rev. D 44 392:.2;5:; [hep-ph]. №: UCI-TR-4239-2:. (3;:2), p. 4449. doi: 32.3325/PhysRevD.44. [;] J. P. Chou, D. Curtin, and H. Lubatti. ‘New 4449. №: SU-6439-389 and COO-5755-389. Detectors to Explore the Lifetime Frontier’. In: [43] R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic. ‘Neutrino Phys. Lett. B 989 (4239), pp. 4;–58. doi: 32. Mass and Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation’. 3238 / j . physletb . 4239 . 23 . 265. arXiv: 3828 . In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (3;:2), p. ;34. doi: 32. 284;: [hep-ph]. 3325/PhysRevLett.66.;34. №: MDDP-TR-:2- [32] V. V. Gligorov, S. Knapen, M. Papucci, and D. J. 282, MDDP-PP-:2-327, and CCNY-HEP-9;-32. Robinson. ‘Searching for Long-lived Particles: A [44] T. Yanagida. ‘Horizontal Symmetry and Masses Compact Detector for Exotics at LHCb’. In: Phys. of Neutrinos’. In: Prog. Theor. Phys. 86 (3;:2), Rev. D ;9.3 (423:), p. 237245. doi: 32.3325/ p. 3325. doi: 32.3365/PTP.86.3325. №: TU-:2- PhysRevD . ;9 . 237245. arXiv: 392: . 2;5;7 42:. [hep-ph]. [45] J. Schechter and J. Valle. ‘Neutrino Decay and [33] V. V. Gligorov, S. Knapen, B. Nachman, M. Spontaneous Violation of Lepton Number’. In: Papucci, and D. J. Robinson. ‘Leveraging the Phys. Rev. D 47 (3;:4), p. 996. doi: 32.3325/ ALICE/L5 cavern for long-lived particle searches’. PhysRevD.47.996. №: SU-6439-425 and COO- In: Phys. Rev. D ;;.3 (423;), p. 237245. doi: 5755-425. 32.3325/PhysRevD.;;.237245. arXiv: 3:32. [46] M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida. ‘Baryogenesis 25858 [hep-ph]. Without Grand Unification’. In: Phys. Lett. B 396 [34] MoEDAL. ‘MoEDAL physics results and future (3;:8), pp. 67–69. doi: 32.3238/2592-48;5(:8) plans’. In: PoS CORFU 423; (4242), p. 22;. doi: ;3348-5. №: RIFP-863. 32.44545/3.598.222;. [47] S. Dodelson and L. M. Widrow. ‘Sterile-neutrinos [35] M. Bauer, O. Brandt, L. Lee, and C. Ohm. ‘ANU- as dark matter’. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (3;;6), BIS: Proposal to search for long-lived neutral pp. 39–42. doi: 32.3325/PhysRevLett.94.39. particles in CERN service shafts’ (Sept. 423;). arXiv: hep-ph/;5254:9. №: FERMILAB-PUB- arXiv: 3;2;.35244 [physics.ins-det]. ;5-279-A. [36] M. Ahmad et al. ‘CEPC-SPPC Preliminary Con- [48] FCC-ee study Team. ‘Search for Heavy Right ceptual Design Report. 3. Physics and Detector’ Handed Neutrinos at the FCC-ee’. In: Nucl. (Mar. 4237). №: IHEP-CEPC-DR-4237-23, IHEP- Part. Phys. Proc. 495-497 (4238). Ed. by M. TH-4237-23, and IHEP-EP-4237-23. Aguilar-Benítez, J. Fuster, S. Martí-García, and [37] FCC. ‘FCC-hh: The Hadron Collider: Future Cir- A. Santamaría, pp. 3::5–3:;2. doi: 32.3238/ cular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume j.nuclphysbps.4237.2;.526. arXiv: 3633.7452 5’. In: Eur. Phys. J. ST 44:.6 (423;), pp. 977– [hep-ex]. 3329. doi: 32.3362/epjst/e423;-;222:9-2. №: [49] M. Drewes. ‘The Phenomenology of Right Handed CERN-ACC-423:-227:. Neutrinos’. In: Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 44 (4235), [38] MATHUSLA. ‘An Update to the Letter of Intent p. 355223;. doi: 32.3364/S243:5235355223;3. for MATHUSLA: Search for Long-Lived Particles arXiv: 3525.8;34 [hep-ph]. №: TUM-HEP-::3- at the HL-LHC’ (Sept. 4242). arXiv: 422;.238;5 35. [physics.ins-det]. №: CERN-LHCC-4242-236 and [4:] D. Bodeker and W. Buchmuller. ‘Baryogenesis LHCC-I-253-ADD-3. from the weak scale to the GUT scale’ (Sept. [39] LHCb. LHCb Tracker Upgrade Technical Design 4242). arXiv: 422;.294;6 [hep-ph]. №: DESY- Report. Tech. rep. CERN-LHCC-4236-223, LHCB- 42-363. TDR-237. Feb. 4236. [4;] B. Garbrecht. ‘Why is there more matter than [3:] P. Minkowski. ‘µ → eγ at a Rate of One Out of antimatter? Calculational methods for leptogen- 109 Muon Decays?’ In: Phys. Lett. B 89 (3;99), esis and electroweak baryogenesis’. In: Prog. Part. pp. 643–64:. doi: 32 . 3238 / 2592 - 48;5(99 ) Nucl. Phys. 332 (4242), p. 325949. doi: 32 . ;2657-X. №: Print-99-23:4 (BERN). 3238/j.ppnp.423;.325949. arXiv: 3:34.24873 [3;] M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky. ‘Com- [hep-ph]. №: TUM-HEP-3399-3:. plex Spinors and Unified Theories’. In: Conf. Proc. [52] E. Chun et al. ‘Probing Leptogenesis’. In: Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 55.27n28 (423:), p. 3:64227. doi: 9

32 . 3364 /S2439973X3:64227:. arXiv: 3933 . [62] L. Canetti, M. Drewes, T. Frossard, and M. Sha- 24:87 [hep-ph]. poshnikov. ‘Dark Matter, Baryogenesis and Neut- [53] M. Drewes et al. ‘A White Paper on keV Sterile rino Oscillations from Right Handed Neutrinos’. Neutrino Dark Matter’. In: JCAP 23 (4239), In: Phys. Rev. D :9 (4235), p. 2;5228. doi: 32. p. 247. doi: 32.32::/3697-9738/4239/23/247. 3325/PhysRevD.:9.2;5228. arXiv: 342:.6829 arXiv: 3824 . 26:38 [hep-ph]. №: FERMILAB- [hep-ph]. №: TTK-34-27, TUM-HEP-:74-34, and PUB-38-28:-T. CAS-KITPC-ITP-58:. [54] A. Boyarsky, M. Drewes, T. Lasserre, S. Mertens, [63] K. Bondarenko, A. Boyarsky, D. Gorbunov, and O. and O. Ruchayskiy. ‘Sterile neutrino Dark Matter’. Ruchayskiy. ‘Phenomenology of GeV-scale Heavy In: Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 326 (423;), pp. 3– Neutral Leptons’. In: JHEP 33 (423:), p. 254. 67. doi: 32.3238/j.ppnp.423:.29.226. arXiv: doi: 32.3229/JHEP33(423:)254. arXiv: 3:27. 3:29.29;5: [hep-ph]. 2:789 [hep-ph]. [55] A. Atre, T. Han, S. Pascoli, and B. Zhang. ‘The [64] S. Pascoli, R. Ruiz, and C. Weiland. ‘Heavy neutri- Search for Heavy Majorana Neutrinos’. In: nos with dynamic jet vetoes: multilepton searches JHEP √ 27 (422;), p. 252. doi: 32.32::/3348-892:/ at s = 14, 27, and 100 TeV’. In: JHEP 28 422; / 27 / 252. arXiv: 2;23 . 57:; [hep-ph]. (423;), p. 26;. doi: 32.3229/JHEP28(423;) №: FERMILAB-PUB-2:-2:8-T, NSF-KITP-2:- 26;. arXiv: 3:34.2:972 [hep-ph]. №: CP5-3:-99, 76, MADPH-28-3688, DCPT-29-3;:, and IPPP- IPPP/3:/333, PITT-PACC-3:43, and VBSCAN- 29-;;. PUB-32-3:. [56] F. F. Deppisch, P. Bhupal Dev, and A. Pilaft- [65] P. Coloma, E. Fernández-Martínez, M. González- sis. ‘Neutrinos and Collider Physics’. In: New López, J. Hernández-García, and Z. Pavlovic. J. Phys. 39.9 (4237), p. 29723;. doi: 32.32::/ ‘GeV-scale neutrinos: interactions with mesons 3589-4852/39/9/29723;. arXiv: 3724.28763 and DUNE sensitivity’ (July 4242). arXiv: 4229. [hep-ph]. №: MAN-HEP-4236-37. 25923 [hep-ph]. №: FERMILAB-PUB-42-48;- [57] S. Antusch, E. Cazzato, and O. Fischer. ‘Sterile ND. neutrino searches at future e−e+, pp, and e−p [66] J. de Vries, H. K. Dreiner, J. Y. Günther, Z. S. colliders’. In: Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 54.36 (4239), Wang, and G. Zhou. ‘Long-lived Sterile Neutri- p. 397229:. doi: 32.3364/S2439973X397229:8. nos at the LHC in Effective Field Theory’ (Oct. arXiv: 3834.2494: [hep-ph]. 4242). arXiv: 4232.29527 [hep-ph]. №: APCTP [58] Y. Cai, T. Han, T. Li, and R. Ruiz. ‘Lepton Num- Pre4242-249, BONN-TH-4242-32, and RBRC- ber Violation: Seesaw Models and Their Collider 354:. Tests’. In: Front. in Phys. 8 (423:), p. 62. doi: [67] P. Ballett, T. Boschi, and S. Pascoli. ‘Heavy 32.55:;/fphy.423:.22262. arXiv: 3933.243:2 Neutral Leptons from low-scale seesaws at the [hep-ph]. №: PITT-PACC-3934, IPPP-39-96, and DUNE Near Detector’. In: JHEP 25 (4242), p. 333. COEPP-MN-39-39. doi: 32.3229/JHEP25(4242)333. arXiv: 3;27. [59] E. J. Chun, A. Das, S. Mandal, M. Mitra, and N. 224:6 [hep-ph]. №: IPPP/3:/98. Sinha. ‘Sensitivity of Lepton Number Violating [68] M. Drewes, A. Giammanco, J. Hajer, and M. Lu- Meson Decays in Different Experiments’. In: Phys. cente. ‘New long-lived particle searches in heavy- Rev. D 322.; (423;), p. 2;7244. doi: 32.3325/ ion collisions at the LHC’. In: Phys. Rev. D 323.7 PhysRevD . 322 . 2;7244. arXiv: 3;2: . 2;784 (4242), p. 277224. doi: 32 . 3325 / PhysRevD . [hep-ph]. №: OU-HEP-3238 and IP/BBSR/423;- 323.277224. arXiv: 3;27.2;:4: [hep-ph]. №: 6. CP5-3;-48. [5:] L. M. Johnson, D. W. McKay, and T. Bolton. [69] T. Sjöstrand et al. ‘An introduction to PYTHIA ‘Extending sensitivity for low mass neutral heavy :.4’. In: Comput. Phys. Commun. 3;3 (4237), lepton searches’. In: Phys. Rev. D 78 (3;;9), pp. 37;–399. doi: 32 . 3238 / j . cpc . 4237 . 23 . pp. 4;92–4;:3. doi: 32 . 3325 / PhysRevD . 78 . 246. arXiv: 3632 . 5234 [hep-ph]. №: LU-TP- 4;92. arXiv: hep-ph/;925555. 36-58, MCNET-36-44, CERN-PH-TH-4236-3;2, [5;] D. Gorbunov and M. Shaposhnikov. ‘How to FERMILAB-PUB-36-538-CD, DESY-36-39:, and find neutral leptons of the νMSM?’ In: JHEP SLAC-PUB-38344. 32 (4229), p. 237. doi: 32.32::/3348- 892:/ [6:] SHiP. ‘Sensitivity of the SHiP experiment to 4229/32/237. arXiv: 2927.394; [hep-ph]. Er- Heavy Neutral Leptons’. In: JHEP 26 (423;), ratum in: JHEP 33 (4235), p. 323. doi: 32.3229/ p. 299. doi: 32.3229/JHEP26(423;)299. arXiv: JHEP33(4235)323. 3:33.22;52 [hep-ph]. :

[6;] CHARM. ‘A Search for Decays of Heavy Neutrinos DESY-35-284, FERMILAB-TM-4776, IHEP-AC- in the Mass Range 2.7 to 4.: GeV’. In: Phys. Lett. ILC-4235-223, INFN-35-26-LNF, JAI-4235-223, B 388 (3;:8), pp. 695–69:. doi: 32.3238/2592- JINR-E;-4235-57, JLAB-R-4235-23, KEK- 48;5(:8);3823-3. №: CERN-EP-:7-3;2. REPORT-4235-3, KNU-CHEP-ILC-4235-3, [72] G. Bernardi et al. ‘Further Limits on Heavy Neut- LLNL-TR-85775;, SLAC-R-3226, and ILC- rino Couplings’. In: Phys. Lett. B 425 (3;::), HIGRADE-REPORT-4235-225. pp. 554–556. doi: 32 . 3238 / 2592 - 48;5(:: ) [7;] S. Antusch, E. Cazzato, and O. Fischer. ‘Dis- ;2785-3. №: CERN-EP/:9-456. placed vertex searches for sterile neutrinos at fu- [73] DELPHI. ‘Search for neutral heavy leptons pro- ture lepton colliders’. In: JHEP 34 (4238), p. 229. duced in Z decays’. In: Z. Phys. C 96 (3;;9), doi: 32.3229/JHEP34(4238)229. arXiv: 3826. pp. 79–93. doi: 32.3229/s224::2272592. №: 24642 [hep-ph]. CERN-PPE-;8-3;7. Erratum in: Z. Phys. C 97 [82] S. Bobrovskyi, W. Buchmuller, J. Hajer, and J. (3;;9), p. 7:2. doi: 32.3229/BF257683:3. Schmidt. ‘Quasi-stable neutralinos at the LHC’. [74] NuTeV, E:37. ‘Search for neutral heavy leptons In: JHEP 2; (4233), p. 33;. doi: 32 . 3229 / in a high-energy neutrino beam’. In: Phys. Rev. JHEP2;(4233)33;. arXiv: 3329.2;48 [hep-ph]. Lett. :5 (3;;;), pp. 6;65–6;68. doi: 32.3325/ №: DESY-33-299. PhysRevLett.:5.6;65. arXiv: hep-ex/;;2:233. [83] S. Bobrovskyi, J. Hajer, and S. Rydbeck. ‘Long- №: FERMILAB-PUB-;;-445-E. lived higgsinos as probes of gravitino dark matter + + [75] E;6;. ‘Search for heavy neutrinos in K → µ νH at the LHC’. In: JHEP 24 (4235), p. 355. doi: decays’. In: Phys. Rev. D ;3.7 (4237), p. 274223. 32.3229/JHEP24(4235)355. arXiv: 3433.77:6 doi: 32 . 3325 / PhysRevD . ;3 . 274223. arXiv: [hep-ph]. №: DESY-34-397. 3633 . 5;85 [hep-ex]. №: FERMILAB-PUB-36- [84] I. Boiarska, K. Bondarenko, A. Boyarsky, S. 82;-E. Eijima, M. Ovchynnikov, O. Ruchayskiy, and I. [76] LHCb. ‘Search for massive long-lived particles de- Timiryasov. ‘Probing baryon asymmetry of the caying semileptonically in the LHCb detector’. Universe at LHC and SHiP’ (Feb. 423;). arXiv: In: Eur. Phys. J. C 99.6 (4239), p. 446. doi: 3;24.26757 [hep-ph]. 32 . 3362 / epjc / s32274 - 239 - 6966 - 8. arXiv: [85] M. Drewes and J. Hajer. ‘Heavy Neutrinos in 3834 . 22;67 [hep-ex]. №: CERN-EP-4238-4:5 displaced vertex searches at the LHC and HL- and LHCB-PAPER-4238-269. LHC’. In: JHEP 24 (4242), p. 292. doi: 32 . [77] S. Antusch, E. Cazzato, and O. Fischer. ‘Sterile 3229/JHEP24(4242)292. arXiv: 3;25.28322 neutrino searches via displaced vertices at LHCb’. [hep-ph]. №: CP5-3;-33. In: Phys. Lett. B 996 (4239), pp. 336–33:. doi: [86] ATLAS. ‘Search for long-lived, massive particles . arXiv: in events with displaced vertices and missing trans- 32.3238/j.physletb.4239.2;.279 3928. √ 27;;2 [hep-ph]. verse momentum in s = 35 TeV pp collisions [78] CMS. ‘Search for heavy neutral leptons in events with the ATLAS detector’. In: Phys. Rev. D ;9.7 with three charged leptons in proton-proton colli- (423:), p. 274234. : √ doi 32.3325/PhysRevD.;9. sions at s = 35 TeV’. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 342.44 274234. arXiv: 3932.26;23 [hep-ex]. №: CERN- (423:), p. 443:23. doi: 32.3325/PhysRevLett. EP-4239-424. 342 . 443:23. arXiv: 3:24 . 24;87 [hep-ex]. №: [87] ATLAS. Performance of vertex reconstruction al- CMS-EXO-39-234 and CERN-EP-423:-228. gorithms for detection of new long-lived particle [79] ATLAS. ‘Search for heavy neutral leptons in de- decays within the ATLAS inner detector. Tech. cays of W bosons produced in 35 TeV pp collisions rep. ATL-PHYS-PUB-423;-235. 423;. using prompt and displaced signatures with the [88] ALEPH. ‘Performance of the ALEPH detector at ATLAS detector’. In: JHEP 32 (423;), p. 487. LEP’. In: Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 582 (3;;7), doi: 32.3229/JHEP32(423;)487. arXiv: 3;27. pp. 6:3–728. doi: 32 . 3238 / 238: - ;224(;7 ) 2;9:9 [hep-ex]. №: CERN-EP-423;-293. 2235:-9. №: CERN-PPE-;6-392 and FSU-SCRI- [7:] H. Abramowicz et al. ‘The International Linear ;7-92. Collider Technical Design Report - Volume [89] M. Chrzaszcz, M. Drewes, T. E. Gonzalo, J. Harz, 6: Detectors’ (4235). Ed. by T. Behnke et S. Krishnamurthy, and C. Weniger. ‘A frequent- al. arXiv: 3528 . 854; [physics.ins-det]. №: ist analysis of three right-handed neutrinos with ILC-REPORT-4235-262, ANL-HEP-TR-35-42, GAMBIT’. In: Eur. Phys. J. C :2.8 (4242), BNL-322825-4235-IR, IRFU-35-7;, CERN-ATS- p. 78;. doi: 32.3362/epjc/s32274-242-:295-;. 4235-259, COCKCROFT-35-32, CLNS-35-42:7, ;

arXiv: 3;2:.24524 [hep-ph]. №: gambit-physics- [9:] N. Sabti, A. Magalich, and A. Filimonova. ‘An Ex- 423;. tended Analysis of Heavy Neutral Leptons during [8:] M. Drewes, J. Klarić, and P. Klose. ‘On Lepton Big Bang Nucleosynthesis’ (June 4242). arXiv: Number Violation in Heavy Neutrino Decays at 4228.295:9 [hep-ph]. №: KCL-4242-2;. Colliders’. In: JHEP 3; (4242), p. 254. doi: 32. [9;] V. Domcke, M. Drewes, M. Hufnagel, and M. Lu- 3229/JHEP33(423;)254. arXiv: 3;29.35256 cente. ‘MeV-scale Seesaw and Leptogenesis’ (Sept. [hep-ph]. 4242). arXiv: 422;.3389: [hep-ph]. №: CERN- [8;] S. Antusch and O. Fischer. ‘Non-unitarity of the TH-4242-37: and DESY-42-37;. leptonic mixing matrix: Present bounds and fu- [:2] A. C. Vincent, E. F. Martinez, P. Hernández, M. ture sensitivities’. In: JHEP 32 (4236), p. 2;6. doi: Lattanzi, and O. Mena. ‘Revisiting cosmological 32.3229/JHEP32(4236)2;6. arXiv: 3629.8829 bounds on sterile neutrinos’. In: JCAP 26 (4237), [hep-ph]. №: MPP-4236-535. p. 228. doi: 32.32::/3697-9738/4237/26/228. [92] D. Gorbunov and I. Timiryasov. ‘Testing νMSM arXiv: 362:.3;78 [astro-ph.CO]. №: IFIC-36-75, with indirect searches’. In: Phys. Lett. B 967 FTUAM-36-54, and IFT-UAM-CSIC-36-297. (4237), pp. 4;–56. doi: 32 . 3238 / j . physletb . [:3] V. Poulin, J. Lesgourgues, and P. D. Serpico. ‘Cos- 4237.24.282. arXiv: 3634.9973 [hep-ph]. №: mological constraints on exotic injection of elec- INR-TH-4236-257. tromagnetic energy’. In: JCAP 25 (4239), p. 265. [93] E. Fernandez-Martinez, J. Hernandez-Garcia, and doi: 32.32::/3697-9738/4239/25/265. arXiv: J. Lopez-Pavon. ‘Global constraints on heavy 3832.32273 [astro-ph.CO]. neutrino mixing’. In: JHEP 2: (4238), p. 255. [:4] R. Diamanti, L. Lopez-Honorez, O. Mena, S. doi: 32.3229/JHEP2:(4238)255. arXiv: 3827. Palomares-Ruiz, and A. C. Vincent. ‘Constraining 2:996 [hep-ph]. Dark Matter Late-Time Energy Injection: Decays [94] P. Hernández, M. Kekic, J. López-Pavón, J. and P-Wave Annihilations’. In: JCAP 24 (4236), Racker, and J. Salvado. ‘Testable Baryogenesis p. 239. doi: 32.32::/3697-9738/4236/24/239. in Seesaw Models’. In: JHEP 2: (4238), p. 379. arXiv: 352:.479: [astro-ph.CO]. №: IFIC-35-76. doi: 32.3229/JHEP2:(4238)379. arXiv: 3828. [:5] J. Klarić, M. Shaposhnikov, and I. Timiryasov. 2893; [hep-ph]. ‘Uniting low-scale leptogeneses’ (Aug. 4242). [95] M. Drewes and B. Garbrecht. ‘Combining exper- arXiv: 422:.35993 [hep-ph]. imental and cosmological constraints on heavy [:6] A. Abada, G. Arcadi, V. Domcke, M. Drewes, J. neutrinos’. In: Nucl. Phys. B ;43 (4239), pp. 472– Klaric, and M. Lucente. ‘Low-scale leptogenesis 537. doi: 32.3238/j.nuclphysb.4239.27.223. with three heavy neutrinos’. In: JHEP 23 (423;), arXiv: 3724.22699 [hep-ph]. №: TUM-HEP-;9;- p. 386. doi: 32.3229/JHEP23(423;)386. arXiv: 37. 3:32.34685 [hep-ph]. №: CP5-3:-7;, DESY 3:- [96] M. Drewes, B. Garbrecht, D. Gueter, and J. 396, DESY-3:-396, and LPT-Orsay-3:-:7. Klaric. ‘Testing the low scale seesaw and lepto- [:7] A. Caputo, P. Hernandez, M. Kekic, J. López- genesis’. In: JHEP 2: (4239), p. 23:. doi: 32. Pavón, and J. Salvado. ‘The seesaw path to 3229/JHEP2:(4239)23:. arXiv: 382;.2;28; leptonic CP violation’. In: Eur. Phys. J. C 99.6 [hep-ph]. №: TUM-HEP-3284-38. (4239), p. 47:. doi: 32.3362/epjc/s32274-239- [97] T. Asaka, S. Blanchet, and M. Shaposhnikov. ‘The 6:45-:. arXiv: 3833.27222 [hep-ph]. №: CERN- νMSM, dark matter and neutrino masses’. In: TH-4238-45:. Phys. Lett. B 853 (4227), pp. 373–378. doi: 32. [:8] S. Antusch, E. Cazzato, M. Drewes, O. Fischer, 3238/j.physletb.4227.2;.292. arXiv: hep-ph/ B. Garbrecht, D. Gueter, and J. Klaric. ‘Probing 2725287 [hep-ph]. Leptogenesis at Future Colliders’. In: JHEP 2; [98] T. Asaka and M. Shaposhnikov. ‘The νMSM, dark (423:), p. 346. doi: 32.3229/JHEP2;(423:)346. matter and baryon asymmetry of the universe’. arXiv: 3932.25966 [hep-ph]. №: TUM-3382/3: In: Phys. Lett. B 842 (4227), pp. 39–48. doi: and CP5-39-6:. 32.3238/j.physletb.4227.28.242. arXiv: hep- [:9] Z. S. Wang and K. Wang. ‘Physics with far ph/2727235 [hep-ph]. detectors at future lepton colliders’. In: Phys. [99] A. Boyarsky, M. Ovchynnikov, O. Ruchayskiy, and Rev. D 323.9 (4242), p. 297268. doi: 32.3325/ V. Syvolap. ‘Improved BBN constraints on Heavy PhysRevD . 323 . 297268. arXiv: 3;33 . 28798 Neutral Leptons’ (Aug. 4242). arXiv: 422: . [hep-ph]. №: APCTP Pre423;-246. 2296; [hep-ph].