Combined Assessment Program Review of VA Regional Office Nashville, Tennessee

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Combined Assessment Program Review of VA Regional Office Nashville, Tennessee Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General Combined Assessment Program Review of the VA Regional Office Nashville, Tennessee Report No. 02-02248-31 December 13, 2002 VA Office of Inspector General Washington, DC 20420 Office of Inspector General Combined Assessment Program Reviews Combined Assessment Program (CAP) reviews are part of the Office of Inspector General's (OIG's) efforts to ensure that high quality health care and benefits services are provided to our Nation's veterans. CAP reviews combine the knowledge and skills of the OIG's Offices of Healthcare Inspections, Audit, and Investigations to provide collaborative assessments of VA medical facilities and regional offices on a cyclical basis. The purposes of CAP reviews are to: • Evaluate how well VA facilities are accomplishing their missions of providing veterans convenient access to high quality medical and benefits services. • Determine if management controls ensure compliance with regulations and VA policies, assist management in achieving program goals, and minimize vulnerability to fraud, waste, and abuse. • Conduct fraud and integrity awareness training for facility staff. In addition to this typical coverage, CAP reviews may examine issues or allegations referred by VA employees, patients, Members of Congress, or others. To Report Suspected Wrongdoing in VA Programs and Operations Call the OIG Hotline – (800) 488-8244 Combined Assessment Program Review of VA Regional Office Nashville, Tennessee Contents Page Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... i Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 Regional Office Profile ................................................................................................... 1 Objectives and Scope of CAP Review ............................................................................ 1 Results of Review ............................................................................................................ 3 Organizational Strengths.................................................................................................. 3 Opportunities for Improvement ....................................................................................... 4 Fiduciary and Field Examination Activities .............................................................. 4 Compensation and Pension Claims Processing ......................................................... 6 Compensation and Pension One-Time Payments Under $25,000............................. 7 Compensation and Pension System Error Messages ................................................. 8 Automated Information Systems Security................................................................. 8 Agent Cashier............................................................................................................. 9 Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment Claims Processing ............................... 10 Appendixes A. VARO Nashville Director Comments ............................................................................. 11 B. Report Distribution .......................................................................................................... 14 VA Office of Inspector General Combined Assessment Program Review of VA Regional Office Nashville, Tennessee Executive Summary Introduction The Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducted a Combined Assessment Program (CAP) review of the VA Regional Office (VARO) Nashville, Tennessee from June 17–21, 2002. The purpose of the review was to evaluate benefits claims processing, Benefits Delivery Network (BDN) security, and selected financial and administrative activities. Results of Review Financial and administrative activities were generally operating satisfactorily, and management controls were generally effective. We found that the management control used to ensure payment accuracy by requiring third-signatures for one-time benefit payments over $25,000 was effective, Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment (VR&E) Division provided quality service and payment transactions were appropriate, and controls over the assignment of BDN passwords and authorizations reduced the risk of fraudulent or improper use of the system. However, VARO Nashville needed to improve: • Monitoring of Fiduciary and Field Examination (F&FE) activities. • Timeliness of compensation and pension (C&P) claims processing. • Oversight of third-signature authorizations for C&P awards made by one-time payments under $25,000 and also retroactive for more than 2 years. • Timeliness and accuracy of actions on C&P system error messages. • Automated information systems (AIS) contingency plan. • Documentation of justification for Loan Guaranty convenience checks issued by the Agent Cashier. • Timeliness of VR&E claims processing. Regional Office Director Comments The Regional Office Director agreed with the findings and recommendations and provided acceptable improvement plans. We may follow up on the implementation of planned improvement actions until they are completed. RICHARD J. GRIFFIN Inspector General VA Office of Inspector General i Combined Assessment Program Review of VA Regional Office Nashville, Tennessee Introduction Regional Office Profile Organization. VARO Nashville provides C&P and VR&E services to eligible veterans, dependents, and beneficiaries residing in Tennessee. The VARO has itinerant Veterans Benefits Counselors who provide claims assistance services to veterans at VA Medical Centers (VAMCs) Memphis, Mountain Home, Murfreesboro, and Nashville. In addition, a C&P Pre-Discharge Program claims processing team is located at the U.S. Army Base, Fort Campbell, Kentucky. VR&E has out-based counselors at offices in Murfreesboro, Knoxville, Memphis, and Clarksville, Tennessee; and Fort Campbell, Kentucky. Most Loan Guaranty (LGY) program activities were consolidated at the VARO Atlanta, Georgia Regional Loan Center. VARO Nashville underwrites and approves the loans. VARO Atlanta processes, guarantees, and services loans; and, provides property management services for veterans in Tennessee. In addition, VARO Atlanta provides education benefits for veterans residing in Tennessee. Resources. The VARO’s general operating expenses for Fiscal Year (FY) 2001 totaled about $13.9 million, and the staffing level was 248 full-time equivalent employees. Workload. VARO Nashville serves a veteran population of about 543,000. During FY 2001, almost $504 million in C&P benefits were paid to approximately 74,000 beneficiaries. VR&E services were provided to about 1,830 beneficiaries, with estimated benefits totaling over $33 million. Objectives and Scope of CAP Review Objectives. The objectives of the CAP review were to evaluate selected claims processing and administrative operations. Scope. We reviewed selected VARO operations, focusing on the efficiency, effectiveness, quality, and timeliness of the VARO’s delivery of benefits and the associated management controls. Management controls are the policies, procedures, and information systems used to safeguard assets, prevent errors and fraud, and ensure that organizational goals are met. In performing the review, we interviewed managers and employees, inspected work areas, and reviewed benefits, and financial and administrative records. The review covered the following activities: C&P Claims Processing VR&E Services C&P One-Time Payments Agent Cashier C&P System Error Messages AIS Security Fiduciary & Field Examinations BDN Security VA Office of Inspector General 1 Combined Assessment Program Review of VA Regional Office Nashville, Tennessee We did not provide fraud and integrity awareness training to VARO employees during this CAP review because we had provided this training in October 2001 when we visited the VARO to perform work on the OIG’s Special Review of One-Time Compensation and Pension Payments and Related Security Controls. About 250 employees attended the 2 training sessions given in October 2001. The CAP review covered VARO operations from April 1, 2000 through June 30, 2002, and was conducted in accordance with the OIG’s Standard Operating Procedures for CAP reviews. To evaluate the timeliness of C&P claims processing at the VARO, we randomly sampled 100 of the 5,177 (2 percent) original and reopened claims that had processing actions completed during the period January 1 through March 31, 2002. In this report we make recommendations and suggestions for improvement. Recommendations pertain to issues that are significant enough to be monitored by the OIG until corrective actions are implemented. Suggestions pertain to issues that should be monitored by VARO management until corrective actions are completed. VA Office of Inspector General 2 Combined Assessment Program Review of VA Regional Office Nashville, Tennessee Results of Review Organizational Strengths The administrative, VR&E, and BDN security activities reviewed were generally operating satisfactorily, and management controls were generally effective. The Director’s C&P One-time Payment Reviews Were Effective. Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) policy requires the Director or Assistant Director to review all one-time C&P payments of $25,000 or more. The purpose of this review is to ensure that these payments are appropriate and that the internal control requirements relating to these payments have been met. The most important
Recommended publications
  • Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File
    Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Honorary Host Committee Belmont University
    Belmont University Belmont Digital Repository Debate '08 Special Events 2008 Honorary Host Committee Belmont University Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.belmont.edu/debate08 Part of the American Politics Commons, and the Social Influence and Political Communication Commons Recommended Citation Belmont University, "Honorary Host Committee" (2008). Debate '08. 13. https://repository.belmont.edu/debate08/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Events at Belmont Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Debate '08 by an authorized administrator of Belmont Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2008 Town Hall Presidential Debate Honorary Host Committee Marty Dickens, Chair Honorary Chairs The Honorable Phil Bredesen, Governor, State of Tennessee The Honorable Karl Dean, Mayor, City of Nashville The Honorable Mike Curb, Chairman, Curb Records Honorary Committee Members Kent Adams, President, Caterpillar Financial Services The Honorable Lamar Alexander, U.S. Senator The Honorable Howard Baker Lee Barfield, Partner, Bass, Berry & Sims Lee Beaman, Chairman, Beaman Automotive Group Belmont University Board of Trustees The Honorable Marsha Blackburn, U.S. Congressman Jack Bovender, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Hospital Corporation of America T. B. Boyd, Chairman, R. H. Boyd Company The Honorable William Brock Kix Brooks, Recording Artist The Most Reverend Bishop David Raymond Choby, Diocese of Nashville The Honorable Steve Cohen, U.S. Congressman The Honorable Jim Cooper, U.S. Congressman The Honorable Bob Corker, U.S. Senator The Honorable David Davis, U.S. Congressman The Honorable Lincoln Davis, U.S. Congressman The Honorable Lois DeBerry, Speaker Pro Tempore, State Representative Richard W.
    [Show full text]
  • America's Political System Is Broken
    We can fix this. © 2015 Lynford Morton America’s political system is broken. Money has too much power in politics. Our nation faces We are the ReFormers Caucus: A bipartisan group of a governing crisis, and polls confirm an overwhelming former members of Congress and governors dedicated to majority of Americans know it. We deserve solutions now. building a better democracy – one where Americans from The 2016 election must be the last of its kind. all walks of life are represented and are empowered to tackle our nation’s most pressing challenges. That’s why we are coming together – Republicans and Democrats – to renew the promise of self-governance. We have the solutions. Let’s get to work. The ReFormers Caucus We are more than 100 strong and growing. Join us. Rep. Les Aucoin (D-OR) Rep. Tom Downey (D-NY) Rep. Barbara Kennelly (D-CT) Rep. John Edward Porter (R-IL) Sec. Bruce Babbitt (D-AZ) Rep. Karan English (D-AZ) Sen. Bob Kerrey (D-NE) Sen. Larry Pressler (R-SD) Sen. Nancy Kassebaum Baker (R-KS) Rep. Victor Fazio (D-CA) Rep. Ron Klein (D-FL) Sen. Mark Pryor (D-AR) Rep. Michael Barnes (D-MD) Rep. Harold Ford, Jr. (D-TN) Rep. Mike Kopetski (D-OR) Gov. Bill Ritter (D-CO) Rep. Charles Bass (R-NH) Amb. Wyche Fowler (D-GA) Rep. Peter Kostmayer (D-PA) Amb. Tim Roemer (D-IN) Rep. Berkley Bedell (D-IA) Rep. Martin Frost (D-TX) Amb. Madeleine Kunin (D-VT) Rep. Bill Sarpalius (D-TX) Rep. Tony Beilenson (D-CA) Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Scorecard 109Th Congress 2 0 0 5 - 2006
    IRANIAN AMERICAN POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE Congressional Scorecard 109th Congress 2 0 0 5 - 2006 Please visit us on the web at www.iranianamericanpac.org About IAPAC IAPAC is a registered bipartisan political action committee that contributes to candidates for public office who are attuned to the domestic concerns of the Iranian American community. IAPAC focuses exclusively on domestic policy issues such as civil rights and immigration, and it encourages Americans of Iranian descent to actively participate in civic affairs. Mission • To support and promote the election of candidates for federal, state and local office, regardless of party affiliation, who are attuned to the domestic needs and issues of the Iranian American community • To support and promote Iranian American participation in civic affairs Issue Advocacy Civil Liberties: Balancing Civil Liberties and National Security in the Post-9/11 Era. Protecting our security and ensuring that the government does not infringe upon basic constitutional rights have long been important issues for civil libertarians and certain ethnic communities. IAPAC believes that our government must take the appropriate measures to protect our nation from further atrocities, but that it can do so without eliminating basic constitutional rights. Immigration: Immigration reform that is driven by proper national security concerns and remedies based on a fair and accurate appraisal of deficiencies in the immigration process, and not simply on national origin. Specifically, IAPAC advocates for a fair and measured execution of federal regulations governing the issuance of non-immigrant and immigrant visas for Iranian nationals. Congressional Scorecard The IAPAC 2005-2006 Congressional Scorecard rates members of Congress on votes and other positions taken in the House of Representatives and the Senate in the 109th Congress, which affect the domestic needs of the Iranian American community.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General Healthcare Inspection
    Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General Healthcare Inspection Alleged Inpatient Care Issues Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Alvin C. York Campus Murfreesboro, Tennessee Report No. 08-01993-177 July 31, 2008 VA Office of Inspector General Washington, DC 20420 To Report Suspected Wrongdoing in VA Programs and Operations Call the OIG Hotline – (800) 488-8244 Alleged Inpatient Care Issues, TN Valley Healthcare System, Alvin C. York Campus, Murfreesboro, TN Executive Summary The purpose of the review was to determine the validity of allegations regarding a patient’s care while hospitalized at the Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Alvin C. York Campus, in Murfreesboro, Tennessee. At the request of the Chairman, U.S. House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, we reviewed allegations from a patient and his wife that during an April 24, 2008, medical center admission: the inpatient unit reeked of feces. the patient was not given any food or fluids for several hours. the patient had to request that a catheter be removed because it was painful. the patient never received pain medication for a pre-existing condition. the patient did not receive a nicotine patch he was promised. a physician was rude and uncaring. We did not substantiate any of the allegations. On June 5, 2008, we toured the unit where the patient had been hospitalized and found it was clean and well maintained; there was no odor present at the time of our inspection. Medical records document that the patient received intravenous fluids while in the emergency room and when admitted. Nursing notes document that the patient was taking oral fluids during the inpatient admission.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Calendar No. 512 107Th Congress, 2D Session –––––––––– House Report 107–811
    1 Union Calendar No. 512 107th Congress, 2d Session –––––––––– House Report 107–811 ACTIVITIES AND SUMMARY REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES One Hundred Seventh Congress (Pursuant to House Rule XI, Cl. 1.(d)) JANUARY 2, 2003.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 19–006 WASHINGTON : 2003 VerDate Jan 31 2003 01:23 May 01, 2003 Jkt 019006 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HR811.XXX HR811 E:\seals\congress.#13 COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET JIM NUSSLE, Iowa, Chairman JOHN E. SUNUNU, New Hampshire JOHN M. SPRATT, JR., South Carolina, Vice Chairman Ranking Minority Member PETER HOEKSTRA, Michigan JIM MCDERMOTT, Washington Vice Chairman BENNIE G. THOMPSON, Mississippi CHARLES F. BASS, New Hampshire KEN BENTSEN, Texas GIL GUTKNECHT, Minnesota JIM DAVIS, Florida VAN HILLEARY, Tennessee EVA M. CLAYTON, North Carolina MAC THORNBERRY, Texas DAVID E. PRICE, North Carolina JIM RYUN, Kansas GERALD D. KLECZKA, Wisconsin MAC COLLINS, Georgia BOB CLEMENT, Tennessee GARY G. MILLER, California JAMES P. MORAN, Virginia PAT TOOMEY, Pennsylvania DARLENE HOOLEY, Oregon WES WATKINS, Oklahoma TAMMY BALDWIN, Wisconsin DOC HASTINGS, Washington CAROLYN MCCARTHY, New York JOHN T. DOOLITTLE, California DENNIS MOORE, Kansas ROB PORTMAN, Ohio MICHAEL M. HONDA, California RAY LAHOOD, Illinois JOSEPH M. HOEFFEL III, Pennsylvania KAY GRANGER, Texas RUSH D. HOLT, New Jersey EDWARD SCHROCK, Virginia JIM MATHESON, Utah JOHN CULBERSON, Texas [Vacant] HENRY E. BROWN, JR., South Carolina ANDER CRENSHAW, Florida ADAM PUTNAM, Florida MARK KIRK, Illinois [Vacant] PROFESSIONAL STAFF RICH MEADE, Chief of Staff THOMAS S.
    [Show full text]
  • Aug 3, 2006 Election Results
    Aug 3, 2006 Election Results Race Primary Candidates Paper Absentee Early ElectionTotal Votes GOVERNOR DEM Phil Bredesen 0 75 746 2366 3187 DEM John Jay Hooker 0 13 24 128 165 DEM Tim Sevier 0 3 11 63 77 DEM Walt Ward 0 1 10 30 41 UNITED STATES SENATE DEM Gary G. Davis 0 13 45 178 236 DEM Harold Ford, Jr. 0 50 671 2115 2836 DEM John Jay Hooker 0 13 29 116 158 DEM Charles E. Smith 0 3 21 69 93 DEM Al Strauss 0 2 3 20 25 UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2nd Congressional District DEM John Greene 0 35 353 1041 1429 DEM Robert R. Scott 0 25 223 740 988 STATE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEEMAN 8th Senatorial District DEM Daniel J. Lawson 0 56 488 1355 1899 GOVERNOR REP Mark Albertini 0 11 126 321 458 REP Wayne Thomas Bailey 0 14 128 343 485 REP Jim Bryson 0 42 845 2193 3080 REP David M. Farmer 0 21 256 813 1090 REP Joe Kirkpatrick 0 16 202 687 905 REP Timothy Thomas 0 4 82 258 344 REP Wayne Young 0 14 123 481 618 UNITED STATES SENATE REP Ed Bryant 0 31 747 2354 3132 REP Bob Corker 1 89 1516 4275 5881 REP Tate Harrison 0 5 27 140 172 REP Van Hilleary 1 66 376 1376 1819 UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2nd Congressional District REP John J. Duncan, Jr. 2 173 2324 7159 9658 REP Ralph McGill 0 22 318 936 1276 TENNESSEE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 8th Representative District REP Joe McCord 1 37 875 3085 3998 TENNESSEE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 20th Representative District REP Doug Overbey 1 122 1460 3974 5557 STATE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEEMAN 8th Senatorial District REP Thomas E.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste, Fraud, Abuse, and Mismanagement Hearings Task Force on Education and Training Committee on the Budget House of Representa
    WASTE, FRAUD, ABUSE, AND MISMANAGEMENT HEARINGS BEFORE THE TASK FORCE ON EDUCATION AND TRAINING OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION HEARINGS HELD IN WASHINGTON, DC: MAY 24 & JUNE 14, 2000 Serial No. 10–3 ( Printed for the use of the Committee on the Budget U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 64–702cc WASHINGTON : 2000 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 14:14 Sep 13, 2000 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 H:\DOCS\HEARINGS\10-3\64702.TXT HBUDGET1 PsN: HBUDGET1 COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET JOHN R. KASICH, Ohio, Chairman SAXBY CHAMBLISS, Georgia, JOHN M. SPRATT, Jr., South Carolina, Speaker’s Designee Ranking Minority Member CHRISTOPHER SHAYS, Connecticut JIM MCDERMOTT, Washington, WALLY HERGER, California Leadership Designee BOB FRANKS, New Jersey LYNN N. RIVERS, Michigan NICK SMITH, Michigan BENNIE G. THOMPSON, Mississippi JIM NUSSLE, Iowa DAVID MINGE, Minnesota PETER HOEKSTRA, Michigan KEN BENTSEN, Texas GEORGE P. RADANOVICH, California JIM DAVIS, Florida CHARLES F. BASS, New Hampshire ROBERT A. WEYGAND, Rhode Island GIL GUTKNECHT, Minnesota EVA M. CLAYTON, North Carolina VAN HILLEARY, Tennessee DAVID E. PRICE, North Carolina JOHN E. SUNUNU, New Hampshire EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts JOSEPH PITTS, Pennsylvania GERALD D. KLECZKA, Wisconsin JOE KNOLLENBERG, Michigan BOB CLEMENT, Tennessee MAC THORNBERRY, Texas JAMES P. MORAN, Virginia JIM RYUN, Kansas DARLENE HOOLEY, Oregon MAC COLLINS, Georgia KEN LUCAS, Kentucky ZACH WAMP, Tennessee RUSH D. HOLT, New Jersey MARK GREEN, Wisconsin JOSEPH M. HOEFFEL III, Pennsylvania ERNIE FLETCHER, Kentucky TAMMY BALDWIN, Wisconsin GARY MILLER, California PAUL RYAN, Wisconsin PAT TOOMEY, Pennsylvania TASK FORCE ON EDUCATION AND TRAINING PETER HOEKSTRA, Michigan, Chairman MARK GREEN, Wisconson Vice Chairman LYNN N.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Districts of the 110Th Congress of the Untied States
    160°E 170°E 180° 70°N 170°W 160°W 150°W 140°W 130°W 115°W 110°W 105°W 100°W 95°W 90°W 85°W 80°W 75°W 70°W 65°W 60°W 65°N 60°N 50°N 55°N U S C E N S U S B U R E A U 55°N Congressional Districts of the 110th Congress 0 100 200 300 Kilometers 0 100 200 Miles 1:15,000,000 50°N of the United States 130°W 125°W 120°W January 2007 2009 45°N 45°N 40°N U.S. SENATE MEMBERSHIP U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES MEMBERSHIP 40°N ALABAMA MONTANA Jeff Sessions (R) Max Baucus (D) CONNECTICUT MICHIGAN OREGON Richard C. Shelby (R) Jon Tester (D) 1 John B. Larson (D) 1 Bart Stupak (D) 1 David Wu (D) 2 Joe Courtney (D) 2 Peter Hoekstra (R) 2 Greg Walden (R) 3 Rosa L. DeLauro (D) 3 Vernon J. Ehlers (R) 3 Earl Blumenauer (D) ALASKA NEBRASKA 4 Christopher Shays (R) 4 Dave Camp (R) 4 Peter A. DeFazio (D) Lisa Murkowski (R) Chuck Hagel (R) 5 Christopher S. Murphy (D) 5 Dale E. Kildee (D) 5 Darlene Hooley (D) Ted Stevens (R) Ben Nelson (D) 6 Fred Upton (R) DELAWARE 7 Timothy Walberg (R) PENNSYLVANIA ARIZONA NEVADA Michael N. Castle (R) 8 Mike Rogers (R) 1 Robert A. Brady (D) Jon Kyl (R) John Ensign (R) 9 Joe Knollenberg (R) 2 Chaka Fattah (D) John McCain (R) Harry Reid (D) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 10 Candice S.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Calendar No. 61
    Union Calendar No. 61 105TH CONGRESS REPORT 1st Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 105±100 "! CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGETÐFISCAL YEAR 1998 R E P O R T OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TO ACCOMPANY H. Con. Res. 84 SETTING FORTH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET FOR THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOR THE FISCAL YEARS 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, AND 2002 TOGETHER WITH ADDITIONAL AND DISSENTING VIEWS MAY 18, 1997.ÐCommitted to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed 1 Union Calendar No. 61 105TH CONGRESS REPORT 1st Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 105±100 "! CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGETÐFISCAL YEAR 1998 R E P O R T OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TO ACCOMPANY H. Con. Res. 84 SETTING FORTH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET FOR THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOR THE FISCAL YEARS 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, AND 2002 TOGETHER WITH ADDITIONAL AND DISSENTING VIEWS MAY 18, 1997.ÐCommitted to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 40±634 WASHINGTON : 1997 COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET JOHN R. KASICH, Ohio, Chairman DAVID L. HOBSON, Ohio JOHN M. SPRATT, JR., South Carolina CHRISTOPHER SHAYS, Connecticut JIM MCDERMOTT, Washington WALLY HERGER, California ALAN B. MOLLOHAN, West Virginia JIM BUNNING, Kentucky JERRY F. COSTELLO, Illinois LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas PATSY T. MINK, Hawaii DAN MILLER, Florida EARL POMEROY, North Dakota BOB FRANKS, New Jersey LYNN C. WOOLSEY, California NICK SMITH, Michigan LUCILLE ROYBAL-ALLARD, California BOB INGLIS, South Carolina LYNN N.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the Librarian of Congress
    ANNUAL REPO R T O F THE LIBR ARIAN OF CONGRESS ANNUAL REPORT OF T HE L IBRARIAN OF CONGRESS For the Fiscal Year Ending September , Washington Library of Congress Independence Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC For the Library of Congress on the World Wide Web visit: <www.loc.gov>. The annual report is published through the Public Affairs Office, Office of the Librarian, Library of Congress, Washington, DC -, and the Publishing Office, Library Services, Library of Congress, Washington, DC -. Telephone () - (Public Affairs) or () - (Publishing). Managing Editor: Audrey Fischer Copyediting: Publications Professionals LLC Indexer: Victoria Agee, Agee Indexing Design and Composition: Anne Theilgard, Kachergis Book Design Production Manager: Gloria Baskerville-Holmes Assistant Production Manager: Clarke Allen Library of Congress Catalog Card Number - - Key title: Annual Report of the Librarian of Congress For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop: SSOP Washington, DC - A Letter from the Librarian of Congress / vii Library of Congress Officers and Consultants / ix Organization Chart / x Library of Congress Committees / xiii Highlights of / Library of Congress Bicentennial / Bicentennial Chronology / Congressional Research Service / Copyright Office / Law Library of Congress / Library Services / National Digital Library Program / Office of the Librarian / A. Bicentennial / . Steering Committee / . Local Legacies / . Exhibitions / . Publications / . Symposia / . Concerts: I Hear America Singing / . Living Legends / . Commemorative Coins / . Commemorative Stamp: Second-Day Issue Sites / . Gifts to the Nation / . International Gifts to the Nation / v vi Contents B. Major Events at the Library / C. The Librarian’s Testimony / D. Advisory Bodies / E. Honors / F. Selected Acquisitions / G. Exhibitions / H. Online Collections and Exhibitions / I.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Justice Center
    TennesseeThe Journal The weekly insiders newsletter on Tennessee government, politics, and business Vol. 31, No. 40 October 3, 2005 Bredesen won’t let income tax be an issue — except in his favor It wasn’t a bad day’s work. showed $2.5 million in his ’06 reelection fund. He had First, Gov. Phil Bredesen neutralized a potential issue another $211,000 in his still-open 2002 campaign against him by declaring that he wouldn’t support a state account, which also showed an unpaid loan of nearly $3 income tax in a second term. Then, the governor deftly million — reflecting money the candidate himself threw suggested that his biggest political vulnerability — fallout into his ’02 race against Republican Van Hilleary. from the enrollment and benefit cuts in TennCare — The $6 million target by year’s end, after about 20 exists because of his determination to block new taxes. fund-raisers this year, is not unrealistic. Bredesen could well With these pronouncements last Monday, Bredesen in have more. He spent more than $11 million in 2002, effect donned his reelection armor. counting personal funds, and in a serious race he might spend $15 million in 2006. In a best-case scenario for Har- His campaign war chest is swelling from a series of well, she likely would be outspent at least two to one, and fund-raisers throughout the state. By New Year’s Eve, he it could be much worse. But Democrats worry that outside is counting on being the Six Million Dollar Man. He will organizations might help the well-connected Republican.
    [Show full text]