The Carbon Dioxide-Induced Bioluminescence Increase In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Carbon Dioxide-Induced Bioluminescence Increase In bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.12.989616; this version posted March 13, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 The Carbon Dioxide-induced Bioluminescence Increase in 2 Arachnocampa Larvae 3 4 Hamish Richard Charlton and David John Merritt1 5 School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4072 Australia 6 1Author for Correspondence 7 [email protected] 8 9 WORD COUNT: 7718 10 11 Short title: Bioluminescence regulation in glow-worms 12 13 Key-words: glow-worm, anaesthesia, fungus gnat, light organ, photocyte 14 15 Abbreviations: 16 Carbon dioxide (CO2) 17 Nitrogen (N2) 18 Light:dark (LD) 19 Single lens reflex (SLR) 20 Terminal abdominal ganglion (TAG) 21 Summary Statement 22 CO2 was thought to act as an anaesthetic producing elevated bioluminescence in 23 Arachnocampa. Here we show it acts directly on the light organ and does not act as an 24 anaesthetic. bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.12.989616; this version posted March 13, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 25 Abstract 26 Arachnocampa larvae utilise bioluminescence to lure small arthropod prey into their web- 27 like silk snares. The luciferin-luciferase light-producing reaction occurs in a specialised light 28 organ composed of Malpighian tubule cells in association with a tracheal mass. The 29 accepted model for bioluminescence regulation is that light is actively repressed during the 30 non-glowing period and released when glowing through the night. The model is based upon 31 foregoing observations that carbon dioxide (CO2) – a commonly-used insect anaesthetic – 32 produces elevated light output in whole, live larvae as well as isolated light organs. 33 Alternative anaesthetics were reported to have a similar light-releasing effect. We set out to 34 test this model in Arachnocampa flava larvae by exposing them to a range of anaesthetics 35 and gas mixtures. The anaesthetics isoflurane, ethyl acetate, and diethyl ether did not 36 produce high bioluminescence responses in the same way as CO2. Ligation and dissection 37 experiments localised the CO2 response to the light organ rather than it being a response to 38 general anaesthesia. Exposure to hypoxia through the introduction of nitrogen gas 39 combined with CO2 exposures highlighted that continuity between the longitudinal tracheal 40 trunks and the light organ tracheal mass is necessary for recovery of the CO2-induced light 41 response. The physiological basis of the CO2-induced bioluminescence increase remains 42 unresolved but is most likely related to access of oxygen to the photocytes. The results 43 suggest that the repression model for bioluminescence control can be rejected. An 44 alternative is proposed based on neural upregulation modulating bioluminescence intensity. 45 Count: 242 2 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.12.989616; this version posted March 13, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 46 Introduction 47 Bioluminescence, the emission of visible light by a living organism as a result of a chemical 48 reaction, occurs in a remarkable diversity of organisms spanning terrestrial and marine 49 environments (Wilson and Hastings, 1998). Among arthropods, bioluminescence has been 50 observed in crustaceans, insects, and myriapods with functions including sexual 51 communication, aposematic signalling, and prey attraction. In all bioluminescent 52 arthropods, light is produced as the result of the luciferin-luciferase chemical reaction 53 (Viviani, 2002). In this reaction, luciferase enzymes catalyse the oxygenation of luciferins to 54 produce electrically excited compounds and photons of visible light (Kahlke and Umbers, 55 2016). 56 The best-characterised and most conspicuous terrestrial bioluminescent insects are the 57 fireflies (Order Coleoptera: Family Lampyridae) and the members of the genus 58 Arachnocampa (Order Diptera: Family Keroplatidae) (Branham and Wenzel, 2001; Meyer- 59 Rochow, 2007). Among these insects, significant differences in bioluminescence production, 60 utilisation, and regulation have been observed (Lloyd, 1966; Meyer-Rochow and Waldvogel, 61 1979; Meyer-Rochow, 2007). Adult lampyrid beetles emit light in controlled, periodic, 62 patterned flashes to detect and communicate with potential mates (Copeland and Lloyd, 63 1983; Lloyd, 1966). Lampyrid larvae release a steady glow, believed to be used 64 aposematically, corelating with distastefulness (Matthysen, 1999). Arachnocampa larvae are 65 predators that produce light continuously throughout the night to lure arthropods into web- 66 like silk snares (Broadley and Stringer, 2001; Mills et al., 2016). The light-producing organs in 67 Arachnocampa and fireflies are evolutionarily independent and morphologically distinct so 68 bioluminescence production and regulation are expected to differ (Viviani et al., 2002). 69 The genus Arachnocampa is comprised of 9 species endemic to Australia and New Zealand 70 (Baker, 2010; Baker et al., 2008; Meyer-Rochow, 2007). The larvae inhabit cool, dark places 71 including rainforest embankments and the inside of wet caves (Berry et al., 2017; Merritt et 72 al., 2012; Meyer-Rochow, 2007). The lifespan of an adult Arachnocampa is very short with 73 adult males living for a maximum of 6 days and adult females living for 2-5 days. The larval 74 state has the longest duration, lasting for many months, during which it utilises its 75 bioluminescence to attract prey (Baker and Merritt, 2003; Merritt and Baker, 2001; Willis et 76 al., 2011). The larvae are relatively immobile and construct snares consisting of mucous- 3 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.12.989616; this version posted March 13, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 77 dotted silk lines that hang downward from mucous tubes anchored to a rocky or earthen 78 substrate (Baker and Merritt, 2003; Broadley and Stringer, 2001; Merritt and Baker, 2001; 79 Mills et al., 2016; Willis et al., 2011). The species used in this study, Arachnocampa flava, is 80 endemic to south-east Queensland with large epigean populations at Springbrook National 81 Park (Wilson et al., 2004). 82 Morphology of the light organ 83 Light is produced by a posteriorly-located light organ (LO), composed of the modified, large- 84 diameter distal cells of the Malpighian tubules in association with a tracheal mass (Green, 85 1979; Wheeler and Williams, 1915). The photocytes have a dense cytoplasm with synaptic 86 contacts on the cells of the light organ containing dense-core vesicles that are indicative of 87 neurosecretory regulation (Green, 1979). A single nerve runs from the terminal abdominal 88 ganglion (TAG), separating into neural processes that innervate the LO (Gatenby, 1959; 89 Rigby and Merritt, 2011). The lateral and ventral surfaces of the LO are covered by a mass of 90 tracheoles with interspersed nuclei, taking on a silvery appearance visible through the 91 cuticle (Green, 1979; Rigby and Merritt, 2011). The tracheal layer is closely associated with 92 the photocytes (Green, 1979), suggesting that access to oxygen is a critical factor in 93 bioluminescence output just as it is in fireflies (Ghiradella and Schmidt, 2004); however, the 94 firefly LO is evolutionary derived from a different tissue, believed to be fat body (Amaral et 95 al., 2017). 96 Neural control of bioluminescence and effect of anaesthetics 97 While the regulatory mechanism of firefly bioluminescence is well-known (Ghiradella and 98 Schmidt, 2004; Lloyd, 1966; Timmins et al., 2001; Trimmer et al., 2001), the regulation and 99 production of light by Arachnocampa larvae is less well-known. Prior to this study, the 100 prevailing model for bioluminescence regulation in Arachnocampa was that 101 bioluminescence is actively repressed when larvae are not glowing such as under daylight or 102 when disturbed, and that the repression is released under darkness (Gatenby, 1959; Rigby 103 and Merritt, 2011). The repression is re-initiated if larvae are exposed to light (Mills et al., 104 2016). The fact that larvae have a capacity to increase their bioluminescence when 105 stimulated by vibration or the presence of prey in their webs led Mills et al (2015) to 106 propose a two-part system where bioluminescence can also be actively promoted. Evidence 107 for the repression-based model came from ligation and gas exposure experiments. Ligating 4 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.12.989616; this version posted March 13, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 108 larvae behind the terminal abdominal ganglion anterior to the LO caused the LO to emit 109 light (Gatenby, 1959) and isolated LOs with neural connections removed emitted low levels 110 of light (Rigby and Merritt, 2011), interpreted as being due to the release of inhibition. The 111 model was reinforced by the response to anaesthetics. In A. richardsae, the anaesthetics 112 CO2, ether and chloroform caused light release in whole larvae while methanol and ethyl 113 acetate were ineffective (Lee, 1976).
Recommended publications
  • Bioluminescence Is Produced by a Firefly-Like Luciferase but an Entirely
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN New Zealand glowworm (Arachnocampa luminosa) bioluminescence is produced by a Received: 8 November 2017 Accepted: 1 February 2018 frefy-like luciferase but an entirely Published: xx xx xxxx new luciferin Oliver C. Watkins1,2, Miriam L. Sharpe 1, Nigel B. Perry 2 & Kurt L. Krause 1 The New Zealand glowworm, Arachnocampa luminosa, is well-known for displays of blue-green bioluminescence, but details of its bioluminescent chemistry have been elusive. The glowworm is evolutionarily distant from other bioluminescent creatures studied in detail, including the frefy. We have isolated and characterised the molecular components of the glowworm luciferase-luciferin system using chromatography, mass spectrometry and 1H NMR spectroscopy. The purifed luciferase enzyme is in the same protein family as frefy luciferase (31% sequence identity). However, the luciferin substrate of this enzyme is produced from xanthurenic acid and tyrosine, and is entirely diferent to that of the frefy and known luciferins of other glowing creatures. A candidate luciferin structure is proposed, which needs to be confrmed by chemical synthesis and bioluminescence assays. These fndings show that luciferases can evolve independently from the same family of enzymes to produce light using structurally diferent luciferins. Glowworms are found in New Zealand and Australia, and are a major tourist attraction at sites located across both countries. In contrast to luminescent beetles such as the frefy (Coleoptera), whose bioluminescence has been well characterised (reviewed by ref.1), the molecular details of glowworm bioluminescence have remained elusive. Tese glowworms are the larvae of fungus gnats of the genus Arachnocampa, with eight species endemic to Australia and a single species found only in New Zealand2.
    [Show full text]
  • Biomechanical Properties of Fishing Lines of the Glowworm
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Biomechanical properties of fshing lines of the glowworm Arachnocampa luminosa (Diptera; Received: 4 June 2018 Accepted: 9 January 2019 Keroplatidae) Published: xx xx xxxx Janek von Byern 1,2, Pete Chandler3, David Merritt4, Wolfram Adlassnig2, Ian Stringer5, Victor Benno Meyer-Rochow6, Alexander Kovalev 7, Victoria Dorrer8, Simone Dimartino 9, Martina Marchetti-Deschmann 8 & Stanislav Gorb7 Animals use adhesive secretions in highly diverse ways, such as for settlement, egg anchorage, mating, active or passive defence, etc. One of the most interesting functions is the use of bioadhesives to capture prey, as the bonding has to be performed within milliseconds and often under unfavourable conditions. While much is understood about the adhesive and biomechanical properties of the threads of other hunters such as spiders, barely anything is documented about those of the New Zealand glowworm Arachnocampa luminosa. We analysed tensile properties of the fshing lines of the New Zealand glowworm Arachnocampa luminosa under natural and dry conditions and measured their adhesion energy to diferent surfaces. The capture system of A. luminosa is highly adapted to the prevailing conditions (13–15 °C, relative humidity of 98%) whereby the wet fshing lines only show a bonding ability at high relative humidity (>80%) with a mean adhesive energy from 20–45 N/m and a stronger adhesion to polar surfaces. Wet threads show a slightly higher breaking strain value than dried threads, whereas the tensile strength of wet threads was much lower. The analyses show that breaking stress and strain values in Arachnocampa luminosa were very low in comparison to related Arachnocampa species and spider silk threads but exhibit much higher adhesion energy values.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Basis for the Blue Bioluminescence of the Australian Glow-Worm Arachnocampa Richardsae (Diptera: Keroplatidae)
    Accepted Manuscript Molecular basis for the blue bioluminescence of the Australian glow-worm Arachnocampa richardsae (Diptera: Keroplatidae) Stephen C. Trowell, Helen Dacres, Mira M. Dumancic, Virginia Leitch, Rodney W. Rickards PII: S0006-291X(16)31203-7 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.07.081 Reference: YBBRC 36158 To appear in: Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications Received Date: 8 July 2016 Accepted Date: 19 July 2016 Please cite this article as: S.C. Trowell, H. Dacres, M.M. Dumancic, V. Leitch, R.W. Rickards, Molecular basis for the blue bioluminescence of the Australian glow-worm Arachnocampa richardsae (Diptera: Keroplatidae), Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications (2016), doi: 10.1016/ j.bbrc.2016.07.081. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Molecular basis for the blue bioluminescence of the Australian glow-worm Arachnocampa richardsae (Diptera: Keroplatidae) Stephen C. Trowell 1* , Helen Dacres 2, Mira M. Dumancic 1, Virginia Leitch 1, Rodney W. Rickards 3#. 1. CSIRO, Black Mountain Laboratories, Canberra, ACT2601. 2. CSIRO, 671 Sneydes Road, Werribee, VIC3030. 3. Research School of Chemistry, ANU, Canberra, ACT2601. * Corresponding author – [email protected] # Deceased MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTED 1 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ABSTRACT Bioluminescence is the emission of visible light by living organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent 19 11 Patent Number: 5,766,941 Cormier Et Al
    USO05766941A United States Patent 19 11 Patent Number: 5,766,941 Cormier et al. 45) Date of Patent: Jun. 16, 1998 54 RECOMBINANT DNA VECTORS CAPABLE Inouye. S. et al., "Cloning and sequence analysis of cDNA OF EXPRESSINGAPOAEQUORIN for the luminescent protein aequorin." Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 82, pp. 3154-3158. (May 1985). (75) Inventors: Milton J. Cormier, Bogart. Ga.; Tsuji, F.I. et al., "Site-specific mutagenesis of the calci Douglas Prasher. East Falmouth, Mass. um-binding photoprotein aequorin.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 83, pp. 8107-8111. (Nov. 1986). 73) Assignee: University of Georgia Research Charbonneau, H. et al., "Amino Acid Sequence of the Foundation, Inc., Athens. Ga. Calcium-Dependent Photoprotein Aequorin ." Biochemis try, vol. 24, No. 24. pp. 6762-6771. (Nov. 19, 1985). (21) Appl. No.: 487,779 Shimomura, O. et al., “Resistivity to denaturation of the apoprotein of aequorin and reconstitution of the luminescent 22 Filed: Jun. 7, 1995 photoprotein from the partially denatured apoprotein." Bio chem. J. vol. 199, pp. 825-828. (Dec. 1981). Related U.S. Application Data Prendergast, F.G. et al., "Chemical and Physical Properties 63 Continuation of Ser. No. 346,379, Nov. 29, 1994, which is of Aequorin and the Green Fluorescent Protein Isolated from a continuation of Ser. No. 960,195, Oct. 9, 1992, Pat. No. Aequorea forskalea." American Chemical Society, vol. 17. 5,422,266, which is a continuation of Ser, No. 569,362, Aug. No. 17. pp. 3449-3453. (Aug. 1978). 13, 1990, abandoned, which is a continuation of Ser. No. Shimomura. O. et al., "Chemical Nature of Bioluminescence 165,422, Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • Brazilian Bioluminescent Beetles: Reflections on Catching Glimpses of Light in the Atlantic Forest and Cerrado
    Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (2018) 90(1 Suppl. 1): 663-679 (Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences) Printed version ISSN 0001-3765 / Online version ISSN 1678-2690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201820170504 www.scielo.br/aabc | www.fb.com/aabcjournal Brazilian Bioluminescent Beetles: Reflections on Catching Glimpses of Light in the Atlantic Forest and Cerrado ETELVINO J.H. BECHARA and CASSIUS V. STEVANI Departamento de Química Fundamental, Instituto de Química, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 748, 05508-000 São Paulo, SP, Brazil Manuscript received on July 4, 2017; accepted for publication on August 11, 2017 ABSTRACT Bioluminescence - visible and cold light emission by living organisms - is a worldwide phenomenon, reported in terrestrial and marine environments since ancient times. Light emission from microorganisms, fungi, plants and animals may have arisen as an evolutionary response against oxygen toxicity and was appropriated for sexual attraction, predation, aposematism, and camouflage. Light emission results from the oxidation of a substrate, luciferin, by molecular oxygen, catalyzed by a luciferase, producing oxyluciferin in the excited singlet state, which decays to the ground state by fluorescence emission. Brazilian Atlantic forests and Cerrados are rich in luminescent beetles, which produce the same luciferin but slightly mutated luciferases, which result in distinct color emissions from green to red depending on the species. This review focuses on chemical and biological aspects of Brazilian luminescent beetles (Coleoptera) belonging to the Lampyridae (fireflies), Elateridae (click-beetles), and Phengodidae (railroad-worms) families. The ATP- dependent mechanism of bioluminescence, the role of luciferase tuning the color of light emission, the “luminous termite mounds” in Central Brazil, the cooperative roles of luciferase and superoxide dismutase against oxygen toxicity, and the hypothesis on the evolutionary origin of luciferases are highlighted.
    [Show full text]
  • Cell Junctions in the Excitable Epithelium of Bioluminescent Scales on a Polynoid Worm: a Freeze-Fracture and Electrophysiological Study
    J. Cell Sci. 41, 341-368 (1980) 341 Printed in Great Britain © Company of Biologists Limited 1980 CELL JUNCTIONS IN THE EXCITABLE EPITHELIUM OF BIOLUMINESCENT SCALES ON A POLYNOID WORM: A FREEZE-FRACTURE AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL STUDY A. BILBAUT Laboratoire d'Histologie et Biologie Tissulaire, University Claude Bernard, 43 Bd. du 11 Novembre 1918 69621, ViUeurbairne, France. SUMMARY The bioluminescent scales of the polynoid worm Acholoe are covered by a dorsal and ventral monolayer of epithelium. The luminous activity is intracellular and arises from the ventral epithelial cells, which are modified as photocytes. Photogenic and non-photogenic epithelial cells have been examined with regard to intercellular junctions and electrophysiological properties. Desmosomes, septate and gap junctions are described between all the epithelial cells. Lan- thanum impregnation and freeze-fracture reveal that the septate junctions belong to the pleated- type found in molluscs, arthropods and other annelid tissues. Freeze-fractured gap junctions show polygonal arrays of membrane particles on the P face and complementary pits on the E face. Gap junctions are of the P type as reported in vertebrate, mollusc and some annelid tissues, d.c. pulses injected intracellularly into an epithelial cell are recorded in neighbouring cells. Intracellular current passage also induces propagated non-overshooting action potentials in all the epithelial cells; in photocytes, an increase of injected current elicits another response which is a propagated 2-component overshooting action potential correlated with luminous activity. This study shows the coexistence of septate and gap junctions in a conducting and excitable invertebrate epithelium. The results are discussed in relation to the functional roles of inter- cellular junctions in invertebrate epithelia.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioluminescence and 16Th Century Caravaggism
    NATIONAL CENTER FOR CASE STUDY TEACHING IN SCIENCE Bioluminescence and 16th-century Caravaggism: The Glowing Intersection between Art and Science by Yunqiu (Daniel) Wang The Department of Biology University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL Part I – A New Artistic Technique In this case study, which makes use of several short embedded videos, we will explore one of the oldest fields of scientific study, dating from the first written records of the ancient Greeks, namely, bioluminescence, which is a classic example of the chemistry of life. Before the mid-1800s, the night brought complete darkness, modulated only by star light or moon light. Occasionally, the darkness of night could be illuminated by a form of light generated by insects or luminous mushrooms. This form of “living light” was later termed bioluminescence. Apart from illuminating the darkness of the night, a recent news report has pointed out that this form of “living light” may also have contributed to the success of a famous artistic style developed in the 16th century known as Caravaggism. Watch the video below, which defines bioluminescence and provides a brief introduction to the 16th-century artist Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio (1571–1610); Caravaggio’s chiaroscuro style of painting; and the plausible connection between bioluminescence and Caravaggism. Video #1: Bioluminescence and Caravaggism. Running time: 5:06 min. <https://youtu.be/SVYNzSxFf9c> In fine art painting, the termCaravaggism refers to techniques popularized by the radical Italian mannerist painter Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio. Caravaggio’s style of painting was based on an early form of photography developed 200 years before the invention of the camera, known as the camera obscura technique.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Characterization of the Light
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Characterization of the light producing system from the luminous brittlestar Ophiopsila californica (Echinodermata) A Thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Marine Biology by Leeann Alferness Committee in charge: Dimitri D. Deheyn, Chair Michael Latz Deirdre C. Lyons 2017 Copyright Leeann Alferness, 2017 All rights reserved. The Thesis of Leeann Alferness is approved and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Chair University of California, San Diego 2017 iii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my mother Karen Oberkamper for unconditional support throughout my journey in pursuing my passion of marine biology as well as my father Phil Alferness for his scientific guidance and encouraging me to challenge myself with a focus in biochemistry. I would also like to dedicate my thesis to classmate and roommate Kimberly Chang for who I am forever grateful for our friendship and ability to help each other though this journey together. Lastly I would like to dedicate this work to my advisor Dimitri Deheyn and the Deheyn lab for their continued support through this challenging project. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page……………………………………………………………………………iii Dedication Page……………………………………………………………………….….iv Table of Contents………………………………………………………………………….v List of Figures…………………………………………………………………..………...vi List of Tables……………………………………………………………………...……...ix Acknowledgement………………………………………………………………………...x Abstract of
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Dioxide-Induced Bioluminescence Increase in Arachnocampa Larvae Hamish Richard Charlton and David John Merritt*
    © 2020. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Experimental Biology (2020) 223, jeb225151. doi:10.1242/jeb.225151 RESEARCH ARTICLE Carbon dioxide-induced bioluminescence increase in Arachnocampa larvae Hamish Richard Charlton and David John Merritt* ABSTRACT The best-known bioluminescent insects are the fireflies (Order Arachnocampa larvae utilise bioluminescence to lure small arthropod Coleoptera: Family Lampyridae) and the members of the genus prey into their web-like silk snares. The luciferin–luciferase light- Arachnocampa (Order Diptera: Family Keroplatidae) (Branham producing reaction occurs in a specialised light organ composed of and Wenzel, 2001; Meyer-Rochow, 2007). Among these insects, Malpighian tubule cells in association with a tracheal mass. The significant differences in bioluminescence production, utilisation accepted model for bioluminescence regulation is that light is actively and regulation have been observed (Lloyd, 1966; Meyer-Rochow repressed during the non-glowing period and released when glowing and Waldvogel, 1979; Meyer-Rochow, 2007). Adult lampyrid through the night. The model is based upon foregoing observations beetles emit light in controlled, periodic, patterned flashes to detect and communicate with potential mates (Copeland and Lloyd, 1983; that carbon dioxide (CO2) – a commonly used insect anaesthetic – produces elevated light output in whole, live larvae as well as isolated Lloyd, 1966). Lampyrid larvae release a steady glow, believed to be light organs. Alternative anaesthetics were reported to have a similar used aposematically, correlating with distastefulness (De Cock and light-releasing effect. We set out to test this model in Arachnocampa Matthysen, 1999). Arachnocampa larvae are predators that produce flava larvae by exposing them to a range of anaesthetics and gas light continuously throughout the night to lure arthropods into web- mixtures.
    [Show full text]
  • Cave and Karst Management in Australasia XX
    Glowworms are more diverse than we thought: cave and forest-adapted species in Australia David J Merritt School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Qld 4072, Australia. Email: [email protected] Abstract glowworms of Australia and New Zealand. The main finding is that cave-adapted species such as Glowworms emit light to attract prey into their webs. Arachnocampa tasmaniensis synchronise their They are found in suitable wet caves as well as in bioluminescence in caves, a form of cooperation that forests. In wild caves of Tasmania and New Zealand, appears to give the participants an advantage in being glowworm populations ( Arachnocampa tasmaniensis and able to attract prey more efficiently. In essence, it is Arachnocampa luminosa , respectively) maintain an approach known as group foraging. synchronised rhythmic light output, waxing and waning together in a 24 hour cycle. Here I show how First, I’ll present some background on glowworms. the Tasmanian species (and also probably the New They are members of the genus Arachnocampa . They Zealand species) is capable of synchronizing the produce light to attract prey into their sticky snares. bioluminescence cycle. In laboratory experiments we Light (bioluminescence) is produced in cells located at exposed a single larva to three others that were on a the tips of internal tubular structures branching from different cycle. The single larva shifted its time of the gut, known as Malpighian tubules. In most insects glowing to match the others over about eight days. they function solely as excretory structures, but in This synchronisation capability probably allows the glowworms they have taken on a dual function; glowworm colonies in caves to glow most brightly all excretion and light production.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioluminescent Glow-Worms: Is There a Difference Between Cave and Rainforest Populations?
    BIOLUMINESCENT GLOW-WORMS: IS THERE A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CAVE AND RAINFOREST POPULATIONS? David Merritt, Niu Changying, Claire Baker and Glenn Graham School of Integrative Biology, The University of Queensland PHOTO: ARTHUR CLARKE PHOTO: Arachnocampa tasmaniensis. INTRODUCTION Glow-worms are the larvae of a fly from the family Kero- of fishing lines is a very stereotyped behaviour, originally platidae. The unique feature of glow-worms is their ability described by Stringer (1967) for Arachnocampa luminosa, the to bioluminesce—to produce light. Because they are not New Zealand glow-worm. Larvae glow very brightly when very mobile the larvae must trap flying insects in their webs, an insect is caught in their web, although we are not sure and they use light to bait the trap. The larvae build a struc- exactly why. ture composed of a horizontal mucous tube suspended by a network of threads from the earth or rock substrate. The LIFE CYCLE larva moves back and forwards in the tube and can turn in The larval stage lasts many months, finally forming a its own length. The larvae spend a considerable amount of pupa that lasts about a week. The pupa is suspended from time maintaining their “snares”—the many fine silken fishing the hardened thread-like remnants of the mucous tube that lines that hang downwards, decorated by periodically placed held the larva. One of the most obvious differences between sticky droplets. We have made artificial glow-worm habitats A. luminosa and the Australian species is that A. luminosa pu- to keep larvae in the laboratory and used invisible infrared pae hang vertically from a single thread while all Australian illumination to video record them as they maintain their species hang horizontally from a front and rear thread.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Glow-Worms
    AUSTRALIAN GLOW-WORMS David J. Merritt and Claire Baker, Department of Zoology & Entomology, School of Life Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4072. INTRODUCTION Bioluminescence output can be rapidly modulated, for example, when disturbed or exposed to bright light Glow-worms are the larvae of a fly from the family larvae will douse their light. They bioluminesce Keroplatidae (Matile, 1981). While the biology of the continuously under anaesthesia (Lee, 1976) or when the New Zealand glow-worm, Arachnocampa luminosa, is body is ligated, separating the terminal light-producing well known (Gatenby, 1959), Australian glow-worms organ from the control centres in the brain (Gatenby, have not been studied in detail. The emergence of cave- 1959). based tourism featuring glow-worms has led to a demand for knowledge about their biology and potential GLOW-WORMS IN AUSTRALIAN CAVES tourism impacts. Also, the diversity of glow-worms in Australia is only partly known—no comprehensive Glow-worms are found in caves or rainforest gullies, survey has been carried out—and a knowledge of however it is in caves that they reach their highest species identities is crucial for management of cave density producing spectacular displays of biolumin- biota. escence. The hypogean and epigean environments expose glow-worms to different conditions. In the BIOLOGY epigean environment they are exposed to climatic extremes. Experiments have shown that they are very From our studies, the behaviour and habitat preferences sensitive to desiccation due to reduced relative humidity of Australian glow-worms are very similar to those of or excessive air movement hence they are restricted to Arachnocampa luminosa (Richards, 1960; Gatenby, the most sheltered habitats such as heavily treed, moist 1960; Stringer, 1967; Meyer-Rochow, 1990).
    [Show full text]