arXiv:1704.07243v3 [math.DS] 5 Oct 2017 ihtplgclqaidsrt pcrmo order of spectrum quasi-discrete topological with ewl eto n eueti eutfo u result our from result this deduce and mention will we hc ti rvdta h siltn eune forder of sequences oscillating the that proved is it which h eunei adt ehge re oscil- order higher be to said is sequence The ( seTerm11). Theorem (see r oyoil fdgrea most at degeree of polynomials a are evdaealfo .Fnwt tahdppr[9 in [19] paper attached with Fan A. from email a ceived [18] [18],[35], Following from uRury-France. Etienne - Saint Rouvray 76801 du BP.12, l’Université, de Avenue CNRS, n o n elpolynomial real any for and aigsqec fi sa siltn sequence oscillating an is it if sequence lating rels hno qa to equal or than less gree d n k siltn eune,Gwr norms Gowers sequences, Oscillating ∑ c N = ( = n 1 1 k ) ∗ hnti ae a lotray h uhrre- author the ready, almost was paper this When | eateto ahmtc,LR M 6085 UMR LMRS Mathematics, of Department t ≥ c sotooa oaydnleuneaiigfo h kwpro skew the from arising d-nilsequence est any further to We orthogonal zero. is entropy topological with flow dynamical öisfnto ntesotitra yapaigt Bourga to further appealing by We interval short norms. the Gowers on large function with Möbius order higher orth of is spectr sequence quasi-discrete order with higher systems of dynamical sequence topological oscillating any that yields ssi ob siltn euneo order of sequence oscillating be to said is . s n F | sotooa oaydnmclsqec fthe of sequence dynamical any to orthogonal is )if 1) ti hw htteei noclaigsqec fhge or higher of sequence oscillating an is there that shown is It ( λ T N 1 q = .S I. 1 ( n n ∑ O N ) = x 1 , ( · · · c N tigadtools and etting n ) e , 2 T n anksconjecture Sarnak’s and π q iP k ( n ( ) n x ) − − − − → where , N 1 o some for k → h sequence the ehave we + ∞ P [email protected] q s ∈ i omnyUiest fRouen, of University Normandy .(2) 0. ( and n ) R , λ k e i T [ = H. . ≥ z samap a is ] 1, t ,(1) 1, fde- of Here, . · · · c el Abstract = , k A 1 bdalaoui h uhr hri ie loa xml of example an also gives therein authors The shge re siltn.Cneunl,the Consequently, sequence oscillating. order higher is re siltn euneif sequence oscillating order o each for htif that variables on independent Kahane [36]. of random result subnormal classical a deep the appeal- to by ing sequences oscillating order higher of class zero. entropy the topological to with flow orthogonal dynamical not establish is higher will of which sequence we order oscillating an as is there order But, here, higher Möbius-Liouville law. the any randomness in by sequence of function oscillating class Möbius the replace the Möbius- to propose to the They sequences. of law oscillating study randomness the extend Liouville to order in order. higher any of admvralswt omnma zero mean uniformly common and with variables random p m oee,w rvd neapeo oscillating of example an provide we however, um. > ee esrnte hi eutb showing by result their strengthen we Here, notion this introduced [18] in authors The gnlt n yaia euneaiigfrom arising sequence dynamical any to ogonal uto h -iesoa torus d-dimensional the on duct bihta n siltn euneo re d order of sequence oscillating any that ablish nsdul euec argument. recurence double in’s hnams ueytesequence the surely almost then 2 e hc sntotooa otecasof class the to orthogonal not is which der bananwetmto fteaeaeof average the of estimation new a obtain ( n X ∗ . ( n X ) n sasqec findependent of sequence a is ( ω L )) p nr one o some for bounded -norm sams ueyhigher surely almost is X T n d ssubnormal, is h proof The . X n ( ω ) Oscillating sequences and Gowers norms November 2016 •
Here, we will apply same classical ingredi- We remind that the Möbius-Liouville ran- ents to establish that the higher order oscil- domness law [34] assert that for any “reason- lating sequences are orthogonal to the wide able" sequence of complex numbers (an) we class of nilsequences and to the affine linear have maps on the Abelian group. Indeed, our proof yields that the higher order oscillating 1 N ∑ λ(n)an 0, (3) sequences are orthogonal to any dynamical se- N −−−−→N +∞ n n=1 → quence ( f (T x)) provided that T has a quasi- discrete spectrum. where λ is the Liouville function given by At this point one may ask if the previous result can be extended to the all nilsequences. 1 if n = 1; Since, as pointed out by W. parry [46], ”the λ(n) = r ( 1) if n is the product of r nilflows and nilmanifold unipotent affines − not necessarily distinct prime numbers. should be viewed as models generalizing the models defining quasi-discrete spectra” . Applying Chowla-Batman trick [10], the Liouville function can be replaced in (3) by We answer this question by establishing that the Möbius function µ. We remind that the there is an almost nilsequence which is higher Möbius function is defined by order oscillating. It follows that there is a higher order oscillating sequence with high λ(n) if n is not divisible by Gowers norms. We thus get that the notion of higher order oscillating sequence is not µ(n) = the square of any prime; adapted to generalize the spirit of the Möbius- 0 if not. Liouville randomness law and Sarnak’s conjec- ture. In his seminal paper [50], P. Sarnak consider Although, the orthogonality of the higher the Möbius-Liouville randomness law for a order oscillating sequences and the quasi- class of deterministic sequences which arise discrete spectrum is in the spirit of Liu & P. from topological dynamical system with topo- Sarnak’s result, since the Möbius function is logical entropy zero. Precisely, the sequence n higher order oscillating sequence by Hua’s the- (an) is given by an = f (T x), for any n 1, ≥ orem [31]. Of Course, in the particular case of where T is homeomorphism acting on a G = Rd and Γ = Zd, the proof yields that the compact space X with topological entropy oscillating sequence of order d are orthogonal zero, f is a continuous function on X and x a to the standard homogeneous space (Td, T), point in X. where T is an affine map. We thus get the result of Jiang [35]. This is nowadays known as Sarnak’s con- jecture. At now, as far as the author is aware, We remind that the dynamical system (X, , µ, T) is said to have a measurable this conjecture was established only for many B particular case of zero topological entropy quasi-discrete spectra if the closed linear dynamical systems (see [51] and the reference subspace spanned by H = n 0 Hn is all L2(X µ) H ≥ therein, see also [6]). , , where 0 is the set ofS the constant complex valued function of modulus 1, and 2 In particular, Liu & P. Sarnak proved that for any n 1, Hn = f L (X, µ) : f = ≥f T ∈ | | Sarnak’s conjecture holds for an affine linear 1 a.e.and ◦ Hn 1 . If for some d 1, f ∈ − ≥ map of nilmanifold [41] by applying a slightly Hd = Hd+1 we say that T has a discrete- strengthen version of Green-tao’s theorem spectrum of order d. [24] combined with a classical result from [15]. This class was defined and studied by L.
2 Oscillating sequences and Gowers norms November 2016 •
M. Abramov [7]. Subsequently, F. Hahn & W. of all quasi-eigenvectors. By putting Hn = Parry introduced and studied the notion of Λ(Gn+1), we see that the elements of Gn are quasi-discrete spectrum in the topological dy- precisely the unimodular solutions f of the namics for a homeomorphism T of a compact equation Λ( f ) = g, where g Gn 1. The el- ∈ − set X that is assumed to be completely min- ements of the subgroup Hn are called a quasi- imal (that is, all its powers are minimal) [47], eigenvalue of order n 1 and − [48]. The quasi-eigen-functions are assumed to be continuous and separate the points of X. H = Hn, n 0 Therefore, by the Stone-Weierstrass theorem, [≥ the subalgebra generated by the quasi-eigen- is the group of all quasi-eigenvalues. Ob- functions is dense in C(X). Ten years later, R. viously, ι : f G f (x ) T where ∈ 1 7→ 0 ∈ J. Zimmer shows that a totally ergodic system x X is an isomorphism of groups. A triple 0 ∈ (X, , T, µ) has quasi-discrete spectrum if (H, Λ, ι) is called the signature of the dynami- B and only if it is distal and isomorphic to a cal system (X, T). According to Hahn-Parry’s totally ergodic affine transformation on a Theorem [29], if (X, T) is totally minimal compact connected Abelian group (G, S), that topological system with quasi-discrete spec- is, S : G G has the form Sx = x Ax, trum and signature (H, Λ, ι), then (X, T) → 0 where A : G G is an automorphism of is isomorphic to the affine automorphism → the group G and x G [55]. system (H, φ , η) where H is the dual group 0 ∈ ∗ of H, φ(h) = hΛ(h), for h H, and η denotes ∈ Applying some algebraic arguments, one any homomorphicb extensionb of η : H T 1 −→ can define for any n 1 the subgroup Gn = to all of H. ≥ ker(Λn) where λ is the derived homomor- phism on the multiplicative group C(X, T) = The popular example of maps with quasi- f C(X) : f = 1 given by λ( f ) = discrete spectrum is given by the following ∈ | | f T transformation of the d-dimensional torus of ◦f = f T. f and G0 = 1 . Therefore ◦ { } the form G = n 1 Gn is an Abelian group and Λ is a quasi-nilpotent≥ homomorphism on it. We re- S T(x1,..., xd)=(x1 + α, x2 + x1,..., xd + xd 1). mind that Λ is called nilpotent if G = Gn for − some n and quasi-nilpotent if G = n 1 Gn. This transformation is an affine transfor- ≥ Notice also that the subspace of the invariantS mation, it can be written as x Ax + b d 7→ continuous functions is the subspace of the where A = [aij]i,j=1 is the matrix defined C constant functions .G0 by minimality. We fur- by a1,1 := 1, ai 1,i = aii := 1, i = 2, , d 2 − ··· ther have by the binomial theorem and all other coefficients equal to zero, and n b := (α,0,...,0). Taking again α irrational, (n) f Tn = ∏ Λj( f ) j (4) (Td, T) is a uniquely ergodic dynamical ◦ j=0 system, and it is totally ergodic with respect to the Haar measure on Td, which is the for each f C(X, T), where the binomial co- ∈ unique invariant measure [21]. More gener- efficients (n) are defined by j ally, H. Hoare and W. Parry established that
n(n 1) (n j+1) if T is a minimal affine transformation of n − ··· − if 0 j n = j! ≤ ≤ a compact connected abelian group X, that j (0 if not is, T(x) = a.A(x), x X, where A is an ∈ automorphism of X and a X then T has ∈ The elements of Gn are called quasi- quasi-discrete spectrum [30]. For a recent eigenvectors of order n 1 and G is the group − exposition and analysis of the subject, we 2There is an analogy between this formula and Hall- refer the reader to [28]. Petresco identity for the nilpotent groups (see [52, p.118].
3 Oscillating sequences and Gowers norms November 2016 •
Let us further remind that the authors in Table 1: the Möbius-Liouville randomness law [2] proved that Sarnak’s conjecture holds for vs Sarnak’s conjecture. any uniquely ergodic model of a dynamical Z 1,1 , S is a shift map, system with quasi-discrete spectrum. The {− } proof is based on the joining property of the (X, T), htop(T) = 0 Y = O(λ) the powers called Asymptotical Orthogonal x = Tnx y = Snλ ? Powers (AOP). This later property insure n n ⊥ f C(X) and π (y) = y that Katai-Bourgain-Sarnak-Ziegler criterion ∈ 0 0 holds. is the 1th projection, O(λ) is the orbit closure.
We end this section by pointing out that the cn = Xn(ω) is almost surely higher order oscillat- Möbius-Liouville randomness law can be seen ing sequence. as a weaker version of the following notion of independence introduced by Rauzy in [49]. For the proof of Theorem 2, we need the following classical inequalities due to J. Let X, Y be two metric spaces, we say that Marcinkiewicz and A. Zygmund. the sequence (xn) X and (yn) X are ⊂ ⊂ Theorem 4. [42] If Xn, n = 0, N, are indepen- independent if for any continuous functions ··· dent C-valued random variables with mean zero f C(X) and g C(Y) we have and finite Lp-norm, p 1. Then ∈ ∈ ≥ 1 N 1 N N N − f (x )g(y ) ∑ n n Ap ∑ Xj ∑ Xj Bp ∑ Xj , N n=0 2 ≤ p ≤ 2 n=1 n=1 n=1 N 1 N 1 1 − 1 − ∑ f (xn) ∑ g(yn) 0. for positive constants Ap and Bp depending only − N N −−−−→N +∞ n=0 n=0 → on p.
the main results Marcinkiewicz-Zygmund inequalities gen- II. eralize the well-known Khintchine inequalities which assert that the Lp-norms are equivalent We start by stating our first main result. for the Rademacher variables. The proof Theorem 1. There exist a dynamical system given in [42] is in French language. For the (X, T) with topological entropy zero and a higher more recent proof and for its extension to the order oscillating sequence which is not orthogonal martingale setting, we refer to [23, Chap. 3. to (X, T) p.73] and [14, Chap.11. p.412].
Our second main result is the following We are now able to proof Theorem 2.
Theorem 2. Let (Xn) be any sequence of indepen- Proof of Theorem 2. Let us assume, without E dent random variables (Xj) such that (Xj) = 0 2 any loss of generality that supn 0 E( Xn ) E p < ∞ > ≥ | | ≤ and supj 0 ( Xj ) + , for some p 2. 1. Then, by our assumption combined with ≥ | | Then the sequence cn = Xn(ω) is almost surely Marcinkiewicz-Zygmund inequalities it fol- higher order oscillating sequence. lows that for any p > 1,
It follows that if Xn is a subnormal random 1 N 1 p 1 2 E − 2πiP(n) λ ∑ Xne Bp p . E λ.Xn 2 variable for each n 1, that is, (e ) e , N ≤ N 2 ≥ ≤ n=0 for any λ R. Then, we have ∈ Hence, for p > 2, we have Corollary 3 ([18]). Let (Xn) be any sequence N 1 p of independent random variables such that Xn is 1 − 2πiP(n) E ∑ ∑ Xne < ∞. subnormal for each n 1. Then, the sequence N 1 N n=0 ≥ ≥
4 Oscillating sequences and Gowers norms November 2016 •
A standard argument yields the desired prop- The proof of (5) follows as a consequence of erty. the fact that the Koksma general metric crite- rion is valid for the short interval. Indeed, ap- The proof of Corollary 3 follows from the plying Cauchy-Schwarz inequality it suffices following well-know fact. to establish the following key inequality. For Fact 5. Let X be a random variable such that any 1 < a < b, E(X) = 0. Then the following are equivalent b 2 1 2πiℓ f (h) 1. There exist c > 0 such that for any λ 0, ∑ e α,β dβ ≥ a H < P X λ 2exp( λ2c). Z m h m+H | | ≥ ≤ − ≤ b a log(3H) 2. There exist c > 0 such that for any p 1, − + C. , ′ ≥ ≤ H ℓ .H X c √p. | | p ≤ ′ for same absolute constant C > 0. 3. There exist c > 0 such that for any t R, ′′ ∈ E(exp(tX)) exp c .t2/2 . ≤ ′′ This inequality is valid by the same argu- Remark 6. Applying Koksma classical re- ments as in the proof of Theorem 4.3 in [38]. sult combined with the well-know criterion of van der Corput, S. Akiyama & Y. Jiang established Before stating our third main result, let us in [8] that for any positive real valued 2-times remind the notion of nilsequences and some continuously differentiable function g on (1, +∞) tools. (that is, g(x) > 0, g (x), g (x) 0), for any ′ ′′ ≥ α R , for almost all real numbers β > 1 and ∈ ∗ I. Nilsequences and nilsystems for any real polynomials Q, the sequences A sequence (b ) is said to be a k-step basic f (n) = αβng(β) + Q(n) n α,β nilsequence if there is a nilpotent Lie group is higher order oscillating. Let us notice that the G of order k and a discrete co-compact n proof of the previous result can be obtained in the subgroup H of G such that bn = F(Tg xΓ) same spirit as the proof of Theorem 2 by the general where T : x.Γ G/H (gx).Γ, g G, g ∈ 7→ ∈ principle stated in [38, Theorem 4.2,p.33]. F is continuous function on X = G/H. The homogeneous space X = G/Γ equipped Applying further the Koksma general met- with the Haar measure h and the canonical ric criterion (Theorem 4.3 in [38]), one can eas- X complete σ-algebra c. the dynamical system ily seen for any α R∗, for almost all real B ∈ (X, c, h , Tg) is called a k-step nilsystem and numbers β > 1 and for any real polynomials B X X is a k-step nilmanifold. For a nice account Q, for any ℓ = 0, we have 6 of the theory of the homogeneous space we 1 1 ℓ refer the reader to [15]. Let us notice that ∑ ∑ e2πi f α,β(h) M H < any affine linear map on X has zero entropy M m 2M m h m+H ≤ ≤ ≤ if and only if if it is quasi-unipotent. So 0. (5) −−−−−−−−−−→H +∞, H/M 0 we assume here that the affine linear maps → → are quasi-unipotent. We further assume that or, equivalently [1], for any α R∗, for al- ∈ G most all real numbers β > 1, for any real poly- is connected and simply-connected by Leibman’s arguments [40]. If X is Abelian we nomials Q and for any increasing sequence (b ) of integers 0 = b < b < b < with say that the nilsequence n is an Abelian 0 1 2 ··· b b ∞, for almost all β > 1, for any nilsequence. k+1 − k → ℓ = 0, we have 6 Let us further point out that (bn) is any 1 πiℓ f (n) ℓ∞ Z ∑ ∑ e2 α,β 0. (6) element of ( ), the space of bounded bK < < −−−→K ∞ sequences, equipped with uniform norm k K bk n bk+1 → ≤
5 Oscillating sequences and Gowers norms November 2016 •
d (an) ∞ = sup an .A k-step nilsequence, is and for any x T put Tx = Ax + b, k k n Z | | ∈ ∈ where b = (bd, , b1) and the matrix A = a uniform limit of basic k-step nilsequences. d ··· A[i, j] is defined by A[1,1] := 1, A[i We remind that X is said to be a k-step i,j=1 − 1, i] = A[i, i] := 1, for i = 2, , d and all other nilmanifold. ··· coefficients equal to zero. Then, a straightfor- Let G be a nilpotent Lie group with a co- ward computation by induction on n yields compact lattice Γ and a Γ-rational filtration G • n 2πiP(n) of length l, so that Γ = Γ G is a cocompact χd(T (x0)) = e , i ∩ i lattice in Gi for each i = 1, , l. 2πix ··· where x0 =(0, ,0, b0) and χd(x) = e d. We remind that the sequence of subgroups ··· (G ) of G is a filtration if G = G, G G , n 1 n+1 ⊂ n Furthermore, by Bergelson-Leibman’s ar- and [G , G ] G + , where [G , G ] denotes n p ⊂ n p n p gument [40], the map T can be viewed as the subgroup of G generated by the commu- a nilrotation. Indeed, Let G be the group 1 1 tators [x, y] = xyx y with x Gn and d+1 − − ∈ of upper trianglar matrix T = T[i, j] y Gp. The lower central filtration is given i,j=1 ∈ with T[i, i] = 1, i = 1, , d + 1, T[i, j] Z, by G1 = G and Gn+1 = [G, Gn]. It is well ··· ∈ 1 i < j d and T[i, d + 1] R, for know that the lower central filtration allows ≤ ≤ ∈ i = 1, , d. Consider Γ the subgroup of to construct a Lie algebra gr(G) over the ··· ring Z of integers. gr(G) is called a graded G consisting of the matrices with integer Lie algebra associated to G [12, p.38]. The entries. Then G is a nilpotent non-connected Tk filtration is said to be of length l if G = e , Lie group with X = G/Γ , and define l+1 { } ≃ where e is the identity of G. the nilrotation Tg on X by Tg(x) = gx where g[i, i] = 1, for i = 1, , d + 1, g[i 1, i] = 1, ··· − i = 2, , d, g[j, d + 1] = b , for j = 1, , d An example of k-nilsequence is given ··· j ··· by a continuous function F which satisfy and all other coefficients equal to zero. We thus get that the nilrotation Tg is isomorphic F(gly) = χ(glΓl)F(y), for any y G, gl Gl ∈ ∈ to the skew product T defined on Td. and χ G\/Γ where G\/Γ is the dual group ∈ l l l l of the Abelian group G /Γ . The function F is l l We can thus consider the dynamical se- called a vertical nilcharater. It follows that the n 2 quence F(T x), where F is a continuous Hilbert space L (X, hX) can be decomposed and T is a skew product on the d-torus as a into a sum of G-invariant orthogonal Hilbert d-nilsequence up to isomorphism. subspaces. Let us also point out that the quasi-unipotent case can be reduced to the Following [25], the 1-bounded sequence unipotent case, and for more details on the (a(n)) is said to be an almost nilsequence of Fourier analysis theory on the nilspaces we degree s with complexity O (1), where M > refer to [52]. M 1 is a given complexity parameter, if for any ε > 0 there is a nilsequence (aε(n)) with com- plexity Os,ε,M(1) such that A. Furstenberg’s argument and Bergel- son-Leibman’s observation. Acoording to 1 N ∑ a(n) aε(n) < ε. Furstenberg’s argument [22, p.23], if P(n) N − ∈ n=1 R [X], d 1, then the sequence e2πiP(n) is a d ≥ dynamical sequence. Indeed, write Roughly speaking, the L1 closure of the space of the nilsequences of degree s is the space of P(n) = a + a n + a n2 + + a nd the almost nilsequences of degree s. In [25], 0 1 2 ··· d n n the authors gives various examples of almost = b + b n + b + + b , 0 1 2 2 ··· d d nilsequences of degree s 3. ≤
6 Oscillating sequences and Gowers norms November 2016 •
Applying the fundamental tools of this the- This achieve the proof of the theorem. ory combined with some ingredients and re- sults due to A. Liebman, V. Bergelson & A. At this point let us mention the result of A. Liebman [40], we can establish the following Fan [19] and gives its proof. Theorem 7. There exist a higher order oscillating Theorem 11 ([19]). The sequence (cn) of os- sequence wich is an almost nilsequence. cillating order d = t.s, t, s N is or- ∈ ∗ However, by Lemma 3.4 from [25], it is easy thogonal to any dynamical sequence of the form to check that the oscillating sequences of order F Tq1(n)x, , Tqk(n)x , where T is a homeomor- ··· 1 are orthogonal to the almost nilsequence of phic map on a compact set X with quasi-discret degree 1. Moreover, we can easily check the spectrum of order t, F is a continuous function on following. Xk and q (n), i = 1, , k are a polynomials of i ··· degeree at most s. Theorem 8. The sequence (cn) of oscillating order d is orthogonal to any nilsequence of order d aris- Proof. By density argument it is suffices to ing from skew product on the d-dimensional torus check the orthogonality for the function F of Td. the form Proof. A straightforward by Furstenberg’s ar- gument (see subsection A.). F(x , x , , x ) = f (x ). f (x ) f (x ), 1 2 ··· k 1 1 2 2 ··· k k We thus get, by applying the classical den- where f , i = 1, , k are a eigen-functions. In i ··· sity argument, the following the same manner as before, we apply (4) to get
Corollary 9. The sequence (cn) of oscillating or- N 1 der d is orthogonal to any affine transformation on 1 − c F Tq1(n)x, , Tqk(n)x Td ∑ n the d-dimensional torus . N n=0 ··· N 1 Applying the same reasoning, we have 1 − 2πiQ(n) = F(x, , x) ∑ cne , N Theorem 10. The sequence (cn) of oscillating or- ··· n=0 der d is orthogonal to any quasi-discret system of order d. where Q(n) is a polynomials with at most d degree. We thus conclude that Proof. By the density argument, it suffices to establish the orthogonality for a functions f N 1 ∈ 1 − q (n) q (n) G , k 0. Let f G G , then, by (4), for ∑ cnF T 1 x, , T k x 0. k ≥ ∈ k+1 \ k N ··· −−−−→N +∞ n k, x X, we have n=1 → ≥ ∈ k n ( j ) The proof of the theorem is complete. f (Tnx) = ∏ Λj f (x) j=0 The poof of (5) can be adapted to obtain the k (n) j following = ∏ Λj f (x) j=0 Theorem 12. For any dynamical flow (X, T), for ( ) = f (x)e2πiP n , any continuous function f , for any x X, for any > ∈ k α = 0 and for almost all β 1, we have n R 6 Where P(n) = ∑ θj and θj is such j ∈ 1 1 ( ) j=1 ∑ ∑ f (Thx)e2πi fα,β h j 2πiθj that Λ f (x) = e . Therefore, by (2), it M M m 2M H m h