Superposed metric for spinning black hole binaries approaching merger
Luciano Combi,1, 2, ∗ Federico G. Lopez Armengol,2 Manuela Campanelli,2 Brennan Ireland,2, 3 Scott C. Noble,4 Hiroyuki Nakano,5 and Dennis Bowen6, 7 1Instituto Argentino de Radioastronom´ıa (IAR, CCT La Plata, CONICET/CIC), C.C.5, (1984) Villa Elisa, Buenos Aires, Argentina 2Center for Computational Relativity and Gravitation, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623. 3The US Agency for International Development - 1300 Pennsylvania ave NW, Washington, DC, 20004 4Gravitational Astrophysics Laboratory, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771. 5Faculty of Law, Ryukoku University, Kyoto 612-8577, Japan 6Center for Theoretical Astrophysics, Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos, NM 87545. 7X Computational Physics, Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos, NM 87545. (Dated: August 12, 2021) We construct an approximate metric that represents the spacetime of spinning binary black holes (BBH) approaching merger. We build the metric as an analytical superposition of two Kerr metrics in harmonic coordinates, where we transform each black hole term with time-dependent boosts describing an inspiral trajectory. The velocities and trajectories of the boost are obtained by solving the post-Newtonian (PN) equations of motion at 3.5 PN order. We analyze the spacetime scalars of the new metric and we show that it is an accurate approximation of Einstein’s field equations in vacuum for a BBH system in the inspiral regime. Furthermore, to prove the effectiveness of our approach, we test the metric in the context of a 3D general relativistic magneto-hydrodynamical (GRMHD) simulation of accreting mini-disks around the black holes. We compare our results with a previous well-tested spacetime construction based on the asymptotic matching method. We conclude that our new spacetime is well-suited for long-term GRMHD simulations of spinning binary black holes on their way to the merger. Usage: Secondary publications and information retrieval purposes. Structure: You may use the description environment to structure your abstract; use the optional argument of the \item command to give the category of each item.
I. INTRODUCTION be distinct relative to ordinary accreting supermassive black hole holes, such as a single active galactic nucleus There is abundant evidence that most galaxies harbor (AGN) [20–22]. Identifying those signatures, however, supermassive black holes (SMBHs) at their centers [1, requires complex calculations of the SMBH binary merg- 2]. A non-negligible fraction of these galaxies undergoes ers and their associated luminosity, spectrum, and time- one or more mergers within a Hubble time [3, 4]. After dependence. Some numerical calculations have started two galaxies merge, various processes, such as dynamical to reveal interesting properties associated with these EM friction, might drive their SMBHs to close separations of signals [23–27]. However, because they depend strongly sub-parsec scales [5–7]. on the system’s properties such as the total binary mass, In this situation, the binary system starts emitting mass-ratio, spins (magnitude and direction), and accre- gravitational radiation efficiently, losing energy, and tion rate, much work remains to be done. eventually merging [8–10]. The frequencies of these grav- Since the interstellar gas of the merged galaxies is ex- itational waves (GWs) span from nano-Hertz for the in- pected to have a considerable amount of angular momen- arXiv:2103.15707v2 [gr-qc] 11 Aug 2021 spiral phase [11], up to milli-Hertz for the merger. Pulsar tum, a circumbinary disk will form around the BHs [28]. timing array consortiums and LISA are actively working Semi-analytical models of these systems predicted that towards detecting these GW for the first time in the next the binary would decouple from the fluid and coalesce decade [12–15]. in a dry merger; in other words, the inflow time of the Because galaxy mergers can be very efficient at driv- accreted matter would become larger than the inspiral ing interstellar gas toward the galactic center [3, 16, 17], time at short orbital separations [29, 30]. SMBH binary mergers should accrete enough gas and Since the equations of magneto-hydrodynamics emit observable electromagnetic (EM) radiation [18]. (MHD) in dynamical spacetimes are highly non-linear, The total energy radiated is proportional to the gas mass we need numerical simulations to make accurate predic- present during the SMBH binary merger [19], and its tions. In the past decade, α-viscous simulations and 3D characteristic form of this EM emission is expected to MHD simulations demonstrated that accretion onto the binary occurs even in the late inspiral phase [25, 27, 31– 46], with appreciable accretion sustained right up to the time of merger when using relativistic inspiral rates [38]. ∗ [email protected] These simulations also showed that the circumbinary 2 disk is truncated at a distance approximately twice ical matching metric becomes too complex and compu- the binary separation from the system’s center-of-mass. tationally expensive for long-term GRMHD simulations. Outside this truncation radius, mass piles up, forming This motivates the search for more efficient approaches a local peak in the surface density profile; inside this for building an analytical spinning BBH metric. From radius, the accretion flow onto the binary is confined numerical relativity simulations, we know that spins play within two narrow streams traversing a low-density gap. a key role in BBH inspirals and mergers. Spins aligned Each of these streams is associated with one of the BHs, with the orbit, for example, can significantly alter the forming mini-disks around each hole. pace of orbital evolution by gravitational radiation [69– Moreover, most of these simulations revealed the for- 71]. Oblique spins can drive complex precession and nu- mation of a characteristic m = 1 mode overdensity, or tation whose amplitude increases rapidly at smaller sep- lump, in the circumbinary disk for mass-ratios close to arations [72]; spins with partial orbital alignment can re- unity [27, 31, 38–41, 43, 44, 46]. In that case, the lump peatedly flip sign [73–76]; spin-orbit PN resonances can modulates the accretion of the system and feeds the BHs also tilt the orbital orientation [77]. with a single-arm stream. If the mass ratio is small, the In Ref. [56], we introduced a new approach for spin- lump is weak [47], and the lighter BH receives most of ning BBHs, building the approximate metric as a linear the mass, carving a path near the inner edge of the cir- superposition of two boosted Kerr-Schild BHs. We used cumbinary disk. this new approximate spacetime to analyze the accretion Solving Einstein’s field equations for the metric of of a circumbinary disk around the BBH in a Keplerian SMBH binaries coupled to MHD fields is computation- orbit and unveil the influence of the spin in the circumbi- ally challenging. This has been done in the past in the nary flow. We found that streams falling into the binary force-free regime [48–51], or for close binary separations cavity as well as the accretion rate are affected by the [36, 37, 52–54]. Recently, authors in Ref. [55] have magnitude and direction of the BH spins, while other evolved a spinning BBH in full GRMHD for a few orbits properties in the bulk of the circumbinary disk remain in the inspiral regime, focusing on mini-disks dynamics. unaffected. In particular, due to frame dragging effects, In order to model realistic scenarios in these systems, accretion decreases (increases) when the spins are (anti- however, we need first to evolve the circumbinary disk )aligned, with important effects on the overall luminosity for many binary orbits until reaching a steady-state [56]. of the system. We also find that the circumbinary disk is In particular, the presence of the m = 1 lump mode stabilized after more than 100 orbits, which implies that in the circumbinary disk is very important to determine long simulations are required for making realistic pre- the dynamics of what happens in the inner cavity [57]. dictions. In the present work, we formalize and extend An alternative approach to achieve this is to use ap- this previous approach by superposing two boosted Kerr proximate, semi-analytical, solutions of Einstein’s equa- BHs in harmonic coordinates, solving the PN equations tions for spacetime, and evolve the MHD equations on of motion (EOM) for the BH trajectories. This allows us it. This allows one to explore the parameter space of to have a more accurate approximation for the spacetime the spacetime more efficiently and to focus computa- and to analyze the influence of the inspiral on matter or- tional resources (such as the configuration of the grid) biting the BBHs. We test this metric by analyzing its on the MHD fields. As an example of this approach, pre- spacetime scalars and using it in a full 3D GRMHD sim- vious work evolved relativistic circumbinary disks with a ulation of accreting mini-disks. We compare our results post-Newtonian (PN) metric during the inspiral regime with the more expensive and complex matching metric [47, 58, 59]. Since this metric is only valid far from for non-spinning BHs. Having tested the viability and the BHs, these simulations must excise the binary region accuracy of our spacetime, in an upcoming work we will from the computational domain. use our new metric for analyzing the influence of spins in To analyze the strong-field behavior of the plasma near the mini-disk dynamics and their outflows. the BHs, we need a background metric that is valid at We organize the paper as follows: in Section II, we these scales. Such metric can be built, for instance, build the approximate metric in the harmonic gauge by through the so-called asymptotic matching approach [60– boosting and superposing two BH terms. In Section III, 62] that stitches different known analytical approxima- we test the metric by analyzing its spacetime scalars and tions for a binary black hole (BBH) metric. In this ap- comparing them with the asymptotic matching approach. proach, a perturbed Schwarzschild or Kerr solution is In Section IV, we test the metric as a background space- used for the inner-zone, a PN expansion for the near- time for a GRMHD simulation, comparing again with zone, and a post-Minkowskian expansion for the far-zone previous results from the asymptotic matching approach. are glued together via the transition techniques devel- We conclude that the metric is accurate and robust to be oped in Refs. [63, 64]. This metric has been used used in accretion disk simulations of BBH in the inspiral to perform GRMHD simulations of accretion flows with regime. mini-disks around non-spinning BHs for the first time Notation and conventions. We use the signature [57, 65, 66]. ( , +, +, +) and we follow the Misner-Thorne-Wheeler This approach for the spacetime construction can be convention− for tensor signs. We use geometrized units, generalized to spinning BHs [61, 67, 68], but the analyt- G = c = 1. We use Latin letters a, b, c, ... = 0, 1, 2, 3 for 3 four dimensional components of tensors, and i, j, k, ... = with the spin parameter a, the function: 1, 2, 3 for space components. An orthonormal space ba- a 2Mr3 sis is written as ~e(i) = e(i)∂a, where its components are H := 4 2 2 , (3) denoted as (i), (j), (k), ... = 1, 2, 3. r + a zKS where M is the mass of the black hole, and the Boyer- Lindquist radius r is given by II. CONSTRUCTION OF SUPERPOSED BINARY BLACK HOLES METRIC s 2 2 ! 2 1 2 2 4a zKS r := (rKS a ) 1 + 1 + 2 2 2 , (4) To solve Einstein’s field equations with numerical 2 − (rKS a ) − methods, one usually starts from a three-dimensional slice of the spacetime metric and matter fields as ini- where tial data for the problem [78–80]. This initial data can- 2 2 2 2 not be arbitrary since it has to satisfy the constraints rKS := xKS + yKS + zKS. (5) of Einstein’s equations; there is, however, a significant amount of freedom to choose it because the equations This coordinate system was used in our previous work are invariant under diffeomorphisms. In General Rela- [56] to build an approximate spacetime metric for a BBH tivistic simulations, some of these choices are preferred system in a Keplerian orbit, using a simple prescription to over others by their numerical robustness and accuracy. boost the BHs. Since we want to describe an inspiraling For instance, in the Extended Conformal Thin Sandwich BBH using PN trajectories, we must use a coordinate formalism [81, 82] used by the Spectral Einstein Code system compatible with the PN gauge. As we explain in (SpEC) [83], we can freely specify the conformal met- the next subsection, we use the PN trajectories in the ric, the trace of the extrinsic curvature, and their time standard harmonic coordinate system [88] and, for this derivatives. For BBH simulations, a widely used and reason, we build our superposition directly in harmonic well-tested choice for the conformal metric is a superpo- coordinates [91]. sition of two BHs in Kerr-Schild coordinates [84–87]. The Kerr metric has a well-known harmonic coordi- Motivated by this approach, we shall test an ansatz for nate system introduced by Cook and Scheel [92], which is a 4-dimensional BBH metric constructed as a superposi- also horizon penetrating. This is an important feature of (1) (2) the coordinates for doing GRMHD simulations because tion of the form gab(t) ηab + Hab (t) + Hab (t), where η is the Minkowski background∼ metric and the terms the excision can be placed inside the horizon (we ana- ab lyze more features of this harmonic coordinate system H(n)(t), n = 1, 2, correspond to each BH. Each BH term ab in Appendix A) . Using the known transformation from is boosted with a time-dependent transformation follow- in-going Kerr to this harmonic coordinate system (c.f. ing the trajectories of the holes. These trajectories can be Appendix B in Ref. [68]), we express the transformation accurately described by solving the PN equations of mo- a from Kerr-Schild coordinates, xKS , to Cook-Scheel har- tion [88] for orbital separations larger than 10 M. The monic coordinates, xa , as: { } final BBH metric is a simple, time-dependent,∼ analytical { H} function that we can use as a background spacetime for tKS =tH + 2M log (r r−) 2M log(2M), (6) MHD simulations. In this section, we show how to build − − (r M)yH axH this ansatz. x =x + M − − , (7) KS H (r M)2 + a2 − (r M)xH + ayH y =y + M − , (8) A. Kerr black hole in harmonic coordinates KS H (r M)2 + a2 − z z =z + M H , (9) The metric of a spinning BH in Kerr-Schild (KS) co- KS H r M ordinates, tKS, xKS, yKS, zKS , is the natural choice for − building a{ superposed metric} since it has the form of a where we have: background term plus a BH term (see Ref. [89, 90]): q p 2 2 2 r M = (Q + W )/2,W := Q + 4a zH, (10) gab = ηab + 2Hlalb, (1) − and where ηab is the Minkowski metric in Cartesian coordi- nates, and the null covector la is defined as Q := r2 a2, r2 := x2 + y2 + z2 . (11) H − H H H H r x + a y a KS KS The space components are thus related by the elegant ladxKS :=dtKS + dxKS − r2 + a2 relation: r yKS a xKS zKS + 2 − 2 dyKS + dzKS, (2) i i j j 2 r + a r (x x )δij(x x ) = M . (12) KS − H KS − H 4
If we apply this transformation to the Cartesian origin of a (Cartesian) coordinate system , with their Minkowski part of the Kerr-Schild metric (1): trajectories given by: O
0 0 a a b sA(t) = (t, ~sA(t)) (γAτA, ~sA(τA)), (18) H ∂xKS ∂xKS 0 0 ≡ ηab(a, M) = a b ηa b , (13) ∂x ∂x where A BH1, BH2 , ~sA(t) is the spatial trajectory H H ∈ { } of a BH, τA the proper time, and γA the Lorentz factor. H we note that the transformed quantity ηab(a, M) now de- Throughout this work, we assume that the BH spins are pends on the spin and mass of the BHs. However, we can (anti-)aligned, which implies that there is no precession still write this as a flat Cartesian metric plus a source and the orbit lies on the xy plane. term: For our approximate BBH metric, we are going to boost two BH terms ab from Eq. (16) and superpose them, H H ηab(a, M) = ηab + M ab(a, M), (14) as sketched in Eq. (17). We build the time-dependent A boosts as coordinate transformations from the BH frames where ηab is again the Cartesian Minkowski metric. It 0 Xa , to the (global) center of mass frame xa . In can be shown that ab(a, M) is well-behaved at spatial O {a } O{ } A X , the BH is at rest and its metric is locally given infinity: {by Eq.} (16); in the global coordinates xa , on the other hand, the BH is moving according to the{ } worldline (18). 1/r, for r . (15) A ∼ → ∞ This transformation constitutes a generalized boost since The second term of the Kerr-Schild metric can be the BHs are not in uniform motion, i.e., the BH coordi- nates Xa are non-inertial coordinates. transformed in the same manner and is also well behaved { } at infinity. We conclude that the Kerr metric in harmonic The natural (pseudo-Cartesian) coordinate system as- coordinates can be written as a background plus a BH sociated with the frame of an accelerated worldline is term, suitable for superposition, as: called a Fermi Normal coordinate system [94, 95]. These widely used coordinates generalize the boost transforma- tion for time-dependent velocities (see Ref. [96] for de- gab = ηab + M ab, (16) H tails). Let us say we want to build this coordinate trans- H H formation for a given event e in spacetime (see Figure where ab := 2Hla lb + ab. In these coordinates, we shall buildH an effective metricA (superposed harmonic PN, 1). First, find the proper time for which sa(τ) is simul- or SHPN) of the form: taneous to e in the non-inertial BH frame. Then define the time coordinate of the system 0 to be the proper 0 O ∗ (1) ∗ (2) time of the worldline X = T = τ. Finally, assume that gab = ηab + φ M + φ M , (17) (1) (1)Hab (2) (2)Hab the hypersurface orthogonal to the worldline is approxi- mately Euclidean, so the event e described in the global (1) a where M(1) and M(2) are the masses of each BH, ab coordinate system is connected with X as: (2) H O and ab their corresponding tensorial functions ab, and a a i a ∗ H ∗ H x = s (τ) + X e(i)(τ), (19) φ(1) and φ(2) are transformations that boost the BH terms a to describe the global metric of a BBH system, using a where e(i) are the components of the orthonormal basis PN approximation for the trajectories. We show how to carried by the BH, in global coordinates. build this transformation in the next sub-section. To find the coordinate transformation we need to find the components of the orthonormal basis of the BH in the global coordinates. Let us assume that the frame carried B. Moving superposed black holes with PN by the BH is parallel to the axes of the inertial system trajectories . Since at each point the BH has a time-dependent velocityO with respect to , locally we have to boost at The Kerr metric in harmonic coordinates (16) repre- each point in time the spatialO frame to compare this with sents a BH at rest with respect to an asymptotically the global frame. The general Lorentz transformation in inertial frame. To describe a uniformly moving BH, the xy plane, given the spatial velocity ~v = β~n(t) of the we can apply a Lorentz boost transformation and con- BH, can be obtained with the boost generators, K~ , and vert our coordinates to boosted coordinates (c.f. Ref. rapidity, ξ = tanh−1(β), as: [93]). Physical quantities at spatial infinity transform as four-vectors in Minkowski space-time. For instance, Λ(t) = exp (ξ~n(t) K~ ) the asymptotic observer will measure that a boosted BH · γ γβnx γβny 0 has a mass MB = γM, where M is its rest ADM mass. 2 γβnx 1 + (γ 1)nx (γ 1)nxny 0 This is simply a frame transformation, and it does not = − − 2 . γβny (γ 1)nxny 1 + (γ 1)ny 0 change gauge-invariant quantities such as the Ricci or 0− 0 0− 1 Kretschmann scalars. Let us suppose that we have a binary system, where We use this transformation to boost the spatial basis of the BHs move in an inspiraling orbit with respect to the the BH. In the BH coordinates, this basis is simply given 5
a0 a0 by e(i) = δi (i.e. the Cartesian spatial basis). Then, in adiabatic approximation [88]. We also assume that the a a spins of the holes are (anti-)aligned with the orbit and global coordinates this is given by e(i) = Λi (t). thus we ignore orbital precession. In this case, the inspi- ral is driven by the loss of binding energy of the orbit, E, balanced by the gravitational wave flux of energy, , and change in mass M˙ : F E˙ = M,˙ (25) −F − where a dot represents a derivative with respect to the global time t. From this equation, we can obtain the orbital phase, Φ(t), and separation, r12(t), of the system. In the case of quasi-circular orbits, the gauge-dependent separation r12 is linked to the orbital frequency through the relativistic generalization of Kepler’s law [88]. First, we solve for the orbital phase. We rewrite Eq. (25) as two equations in terms of the (gauge invariant) variable v := (MdΦ/dt)1/3:
dv (v) + M˙ (v) = F , (26) FIG. 1. Diagram of the BH rest frame, O0, which is non- dt − dE(v)/dv a inertial, and the global frame, O. The coordinates {X } and dΦ v3 {xa} both describe the event e. = , (27) dt M The coordinate transformation, using (19), is given by: and replace E(v), (v), and M˙ (v), with their explicit expressions at 3.5 PNF order for the case of non-precessing t = γ [T β(nxX + nyY )] , (20) − binaries, as presented in Ref. [97]. 2 x = sx(t) + X 1 + (γ 1)nx + Y [ (γ 1)nxny)] , Following the TaylorT4 scheme [98], we expand the − − − (21) right hand side of Eq. (26) in a Taylor series to the 2 proper PN order, and integrate it to obtain t(v) (see, y = sy(t) + X [ (γ 1)nxny] + Y 1 + (γ 1)n , − − − y e.g., Refs. [99–101] for Taylor PN approximants). Then, (22) we invert this quantity, and solve Eq. (27) for Φ(t). Next, z = Z. (23) we solve for the orbital separation r12(t) within numerical accuracy although it is directly derived from the orbital The non-inertial coordinates Xa in terms of the global frequency in the PN approximation. We write its time coordinates xa are easily obtained inverting these equa- derivative in terms of the orbital energy: tions. Note that this transformation reduces to a stan- dard Lorentz boost if the trajectory of the BH is a dE/dt (r12) + M˙ (r12) r˙12 = F , (28) straight line with uniform rapidity. superposing the two dE/dr12 ≡ − dE/dr12 BH terms and performing this transformation for each a a and integrate to find: term, with worldlines s1(t) and s2(t), we have explicitly our SHPN metric: Z r12 dE/dr˜ t(r ) = t dr˜ 12 , (29) 12 c 12 ˙ a b a b − 0 (˜r12) + M(˜r12) ∂X1 ∂X1 ∂X2 ∂X2 F gab = ηab + M1 a b ab + M2 a b ab , ∂x ∂x H ∂x ∂x H where tc is the time until coalescence. We replace E(r12), (24) (r12), and M˙ (r12) with their explicit expressions, found F where the tensors are transformed through the Jacobian in Ref. [88] and references therein, and solve for t(r12). a of the coordinates XA(x). We still have to supplement Finally, we invert using a Newton-Rawson method to ob- the metric with the position, velocity, and acceleration tain r12(t). With Φ(t) and r12(t) we can reconstruct the of the BHs. In the case of a BBH, we can obtain those worldlines (18) of each spinning hole in harmonic coordi- solving the PN equations of the system in harmonic co- nates, as required by our metric (24). ordinates, as we show in the next section. Note that, even though we use the PN approximation to obtain the BH trajectories, our metric is valid in the inner zone because we are using the full relativistic BH C. Post-Newtonian trajectories for spinning BH terms that include the ergosphere and horizon (see Ap- binaries pendix A). In other words, we are restricted to binaries with separations larger than 10M, but the metric, as We assume for now that the orbit of the binary has cir- we will show now, is accurate∼ in both inner and near cularized and the system is well described by the so-called zones. 6
III. ANALYSIS OF THE SPACETIME METRIC written as: n (NZ) (IZ1) gab = (1 fFZ) fNZ fIZ,1 g + (1 fIZ,1) g In this section, we test the global validity of our SHPN − ab − ab metric (24). The metric of a BBH system must sat- (NZ) (IZ2)o +(1 fNZ) fIZ,2 gab + (1 fIZ,2) gab isfy Einstein’s field equation in a vacuum, and thus the − − (FZ) Ricci tensor must be zero. In numerical relativity, viola- +fFZ gab , (30) tions of Einstein’s equation are tracked using the Hamil- tonian and momentum constraints. Since we intend to where transition functions fi are used to go from one use the four-dimensional form of the metric in our appli- zone to the other. This analytical metric, however, is cations, here we focus first on four-dimensional quanti- computationally expensive and complex to handle. The ties to quantify deviations from the exact solution. In Jacobians required to stitch the different parts of the met- particular, following Ref. [60, 68], we investigate the ric into the same coordinate system are very long, and ab many operations are required to compute them at each Ricci scalar, R := g Rab, where Rab is the Ricci ten- sor. Violations of the Ricci scalar R are not absolute and, timestep. Moreover, for the spinning case, the matching thus, they are only meaningful when compared with other procedure renders the metric prohibitively expensive for MHD simulations. In our new approach, we lose some quantities. For instance, if we have that R(t1) > R(t0) | | | | accuracy in comparison with the matching metric but we for t1 > t0, we can state that the approximate metric has deteriorated or deviated from a vacuum solution over gain much more efficiency. time. Similarly, we can compare the Ricci scalar of dif- ferent systems or at different points in space to assess locally where the metric is a better approximation to a A. Spacetime scalars vacuum solution. Although the metric is analytical, we compute its spacetime scalars numerically as it is faster and more 2.0 practical to incorporate the PN trajectories. The func- Match (χ = 0) tional form of the metric is built using Mathematica [104] SHPN (χ = 0) and exported to C language in an optimized form. We 1.8 SHPN (χ = 0.6) use then a C-based code that implements fourth-order SHPN (χ = 0.9) finite differences in a Cartesian grid for the derivatives of every metric function. We analyze and plot the outputs 1.6 using Numpy and Matplotlib [105, 106] The convergence g analysis of these methods is presented in Appendix B. − We are interested in using the metric in the inspi- √ 1.4 raling regime, where the PN approximation holds, and the system is emitting a significant amount of gravita- tional radiation. We explore the characteristics of the 1.2 system for a fiducial configuration, with a separation of r12(t0) = 20M, equal BH masses, and the adimensional spin parameter, χ := a/M, in the interval 0 < χ < 0.9. 1.0 As a first check of consistency, we analyze the metric 40 20 0 20 40 determinant √ g. In Figure 2, we plot the determinant − − − x[M] for a separation of r12 = 20M and several values of the spin parameter χ, along with the determinant for the FIG. 2. Determinant of superposed metric for different values matching metric. We see that for all these values, the of the spin and separation of r12 = 20M. Note that the curves determinant for the superposed metric is globally well- for different spins are very similar. For comparison, we include behaved, free of pathologies, and similar to the matching the determinant of the matching metric for χ = 0. space-time. In Figure 3, we plot some components of both met- rics. It is interesting to note that the gtt component of We also compare the validity of our solution with the the SHPN metric is globally similar to the matching one, alternative approach presented in Refs. [60, 68], where meaning that the effective PN potential of both space- an analytical metric is built by stitching different approx- times is much akin [65]. The differences between the imated solutions of Einstein’s equations at three charac- two metrics are important in the transition regions and teristics zones of a binary compact system, namely, the the Far-Zone. In the latter, the matching metric incor- Inner-Zone (IZ), the Near-Zone (NZ), and the Far-Zone porates the post-Minkowski background of gravitational (FZ) [102, 103]. This so-called asymptotic matching pro- waves, while our new SHPN is asymptotically flat; how- cedure brings all these different parts into the same har- ever, we do take into account the gravitational radiation monic coordinate system and the global metric can be losses in the trajectories of the BHs. 7
101 100
1 |
| 10−
tt 0 xx 10 g g | | 2 10−
8 10 12 3 1 10− 10− 100 100
2 2 10− 10− | | ty tx g g | | 4 4 10− 10− Match (χ = 0) SHPN (χ = 0) 6 6 10− 10− 100 101 102 103 100 101 102 103 x[M] x[M]
FIG. 3. Absolute value of several metric components for the superposed and matching metric in the fiducial configuration. Note that the superposed metric components are much smoother than the matching metric because there are no transition regions.
In Figure 4, we plot the Ricci scalar of the SHPN met- curvature, andρ ˜ the energy density of matter. For our ric over the positive x axis at z = y = 0, for different BBH vacuum metric, a non-zero means that the space- values of spin, and we compare it with the Ricci scalar of time has “fake mass” due to theH approximation. This the matching metric for a binary of the same characteris- will introduce errors in the true gravitational potential tics. First, we see that R varies very little under different and thus in the geodesic motion of matter. Since we spin parameters, consistent with Ref. [68]. Note that the are interested in using this spacetime as a background matching metric is better in the IZ but the violations are scenario for evolving an MHD fluid, it is important to worse at the transition regions outside the ISCO, where analyze this quantity and its evolution. We consider the the SHPN is smoother and performs better. A good met- volume-integrated value of as a measure of the total ric accuracy in this region is an important feature for de- fake mass introduced by theH approximated metric: termining the correct gas dynamics of an accreting disk Z near the hole. In Figure 5, we show an equatorial plot of 1 Mfake = d . (32) the Ricci scalar. As expected, the higher violations are 16π V H V concentrated in the middle region between the BHs and drop sharply with distance. In Figure 6, we plot the Ricci Considering a cube of radius r = 50M around the cen- ter of mass, we can track the evolution of Mfake for differ- violations for different mass-ratios q := M1/M2. We find the values of R depend smoothly on q, improving in the ent orbital separations. As we show in Figure 7, this fake middle region for smaller q. mass is overall small with respect to the total mass of Besides R, we can explore other curvature scalars to the BBH in both SHPN and matching metric but starts increasing exponentially at 8M, where the PN approx- assess the global behavior of the metric. In particular, ∼ considering the ADM equations for a general spacetime, imation breaks. we can define the Hamiltonian constraint as: Finally, in Figure 8, we plot the Ricci scalar, the H Hamiltonian constraint, the square root of the Momen- 3 ab := R + K KabK = 16πρ,˜ (31) tum constraints, , and the Kretschmann scalar, := abcd M K H − RabcdR , for the SHPN metric. We observe here that 3 where R is the spatial Ricci curvature, Kab the extrinsic the Hamiltonian constraint and the Ricci scalar have sim- 8
100 1 q = 1 10− Match (χ = 0) q = 1/2 2 SHPN (χ = 0) 10− q = 1/5 3 SHPN (χ = 0.6) 10− q = 1/10
SHPN (χ = 0.9) | 4
R 10− |
| 5
R 10− | 6 10−
7 10− 8 10− 40 20 0 20 40 − − 9 10− x[M] 100 101 102 x[M] FIG. 6. Ricci violations of the SHPN metric, for r12 = 20M, FIG. 4. Ricci scalar for the matching and superposed metric χ = 0.5, and different mass-ratio values. with r12 = 20M, equal mass-ratio, and different values of spin. The dashed green lines denote the location of the horizon and the solid green lines the location of the ISCO for a non Superposed spinning BH. ] 5 10− Matching M [ log R
100 fake | | 3.00 7 − 10− M 75 4.26 − 5.53 50 − 6.79 10 20 30 40 25 − r12[M] ] 8.05 −
M 0 [ 9.32 y − FIG. 7. Fake mass introduced in the spacetime by the SHPN 25 10.58 − − and matching metric approximations for different orbital dis- 11.84 50 − tances. − 13.11 − 75 − 14.37 1 − 10− 100 R − 100 50 0 50 100 − − x[M] H 4 10− M FIG. 5. Equatorial logarithmic plot of the Ricci scalar for the K SHPN metric with r12 = 20M, equal masses, and χ = 0.9
Scalars 7 10− ilar behaviors, indicating that the errors of the approxi- mation come essentially from the fake mass component. 10 10− 100 101 102 103 IV. SUPERPOSED METRIC IN GRMHD x[M] SIMULATIONS FIG. 8. The Ricci scalar (R), the Hamiltonian (H) and mo- We built our new superposed metric in harmonic co- mentum (M) constraint, and the Kretschmann scalar K of ordinates, which allows us to use accurate PN trajecto- the SHPN metric, for a BBH with r12 = 20M, equal mass, ries and directly compare our simulations with previous and χ = 0.9. We can notice that the Kretschmann scalar fol- results that use the same gauge. Moreover, the metric lows the decay ∼ 1/r6 typical for a single BH. The solid green is accurate enough near the BH, allowing us to analyze lines denotes the location of the ISCO for a non-spinning BH. what happens with the plasma physics around each BH. The matching metric approach has been tested in 9
FIG. 9. Equatorial plot of the rest-mass density ρ in logarithmic scale for (right) the superposed metric and (left) the matching metric, at T = 1810M, which represents approximately ∼ 3 orbits. simulations, both as a background spacetime for MHD These can be expressed as [57, 66], and in numerical relativity, [107]. MHD simula- i i tions of BBHs accretion disks with the spinning match- P := ρ, u, u˜ ,B , ing metric, as we said, are prohibitively expensive. In t t t t k U (P) := √ g ρu ,T t + ρu ,T j,B , − contrast, the SHPN metric is computationally cheaper, i i i i i i k k i F (P) := √ g ρu ,T t + ρu ,T j, b u b u , allowing us to simulate this type of system for the first − − κ λ κ λ time. In this section, we show the results of a full 3D S (P) := √ g 0,T λΓ tκ t,T λΓ jκ j, 0 , GRMHD simulation with the SHPN metric using the − − F − F c a code Harm3d. In particular, we focus on comparing where Γ ab are the Christoffel symbols, b = t a a b an accretion disk simulation using the SHPN metric for (1/u )(δ b + u ub) B is the magnetic 4-vector projected non-spinning BHs and the analog simulation presented into the fluid’s comoving reference frame, Bi is the mag- in Refs. [23, 25], which uses the non-spinning matching netic field in the reference frame of the space normal metric. We will present full details of the spinning BBH hypersurface, u is the internal energy density, uα are the simulation with the new metric in an upcoming work components of the fluid’s 4-velocity, andu ˜i is the fluid ve- [108]. locity in the zero-angular-momentum observer (ZAMO) frame. The stress-energy tensor is written as
Tab = (ρh + 2pm) uaub + (p + pm) gab babb , (34) A. GRMHD evolution − where h = 1 + + p/ρ is the specific enthalpy, := u/ρ is the specific internal energy, p is the gas pressure, Assuming the surrounding gas does not influence the p = 1 b2 is the magnetic pressure, and ρ is the rest- spacetime dynamics, we can use our superposed metric to m 2 mass density. We include a source term into the simulate the MHD evolution of accretion disks in a BBH ν local energy conservation equation in orderF to approx- system. For that purpose, we implement the new met- imate effects from radiative cooling, designed to preserve ric in the GRMHD code [38, 109–111], which Harm3d the height ratio of the disk [23]. We assume and ideal evolves the ideal GRMHD equations in flux-conservative Γ-law equation of state: p = (Γ 1)ρ, with Γ = 5/3. form, for an arbitrary metric and coordinate system. The Harm3d uses high-resolution− shock-capturing meth- equations of motion are the continuity equation, the local ods to integrate the conservation equations (33). In par- conservation of energy and momentum, and Maxwell’s ticular, we use the piece-wise parabolic reconstruction equations, which can be written as: of primitive variables for the local Lax-Friedrichs fluxes, a Flux-CT scheme to maintain the solenoidal constraint i ∂tU (P) = ∂iF (P) + S (P) , (33) − [112], and a robust recovery procedure from conserved to primitive variables [113]. The code uses fourth-order where P are the primitive variables, U are the conserved finite differences for spatial derivatives of the metric to variables, Fi the fluxes, and S are the source terms. find the Christoffel symbols, and the method of lines for 10 time integration with a Runge-Kutta method of second- transient phase for the superposed, as the equilibrated order (more details of the algorithm in Refs. [111] and mini-tori were set up using the matching metric. We also [38]). observe a good agreement in the behavior of the magnetic energy contained in each mini-disk after the transient.
B. Mini-disk dynamics in a binary black hole 1.0 system: comparison with previous simulations
0.8 In Ref. [25], the matching metric (30) was used to sim- ulate the MHD dynamics of a circumbinary disk around a i BBH and the formation of mini-disks. Ref. [66] showed, 0.6 for the first time, that mini-disks in tight binary systems M are out of inflow equilibrium, filling and depleting their 0.4 BH1 mass in less than an orbital period, showing interesting modulations [26, 57]. BH2 We perform a simulation with the same configuration 0.2 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 and initial data as Refs. [57, 66] but switching the match- ing metric for our superposed metric (30) with zero spin. t[tbin] The simulation uses a double-fisheye spherical grid [114] that focuses more cells in the vicinity of the BHs and maintains a spherical topology at the circumbinary re- FIG. 10. Mass in each BH’s mini-disk region for the super- gion. The initial separation of the BHs is r12 = 20 M posed metric simulation (thick lines) and the matching metric and the initial data for the matter fields are constructed simulation (dashed lines). from a stabilized snapshot of the circumbinary simu- lation performed in Ref. [38], with additional quasi- equilibrated mini-disks around each BH (see Ref. [57] for 0.04 more details). Since we are starting with the same initial BH1 i data and grid, we re-normalize the primitive B field by 0.03 BH2 √ gmatch/√ gsup to maintain the solenoidal constraint of− the field after− switching to the new metric. 2 || 0.02 As shown in Ref. [57], the simulation has an initial b transient that lasts for 2 orbits. We thus evolve the || ∼ system with the new metric for 3.5 orbits as was done 0.01 in [66]. After equilibration, both∼ matching and super- posed metric simulations are in good agreement, as it can 0.00 be seen, for instance, from the equatorial density snap- 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 shots in Figure 9. For a more quantitative assessment t[tbin] of both simulations we analyze the evolution of the mass contained in each mini-disk (Figure 10), defined as the integrated rest-mass density: FIG. 11. Magnetic energy in each BH’s mini-disk region for Z the superposed metric simulation (thick lines) and the match- 0 3 Mi = ρu √ gd x, (35) ing metric simulation (dashed lines). Vi − where we take i as a spherical volume between the BH V horizon, ri = rH, and rf = 0.4a(t), which is close to the Newtonian truncation radius [65]. We also investigate V. CONCLUSIONS the volume integral of the magnetic energy b2 of each mini-disk (see Figure 11). We have presented a new approximate solution of Ein- As we mentioned, for an equal-mass binary, the mini- stein’s field equations for a spinning BBH in the inspi- disks are subject to a filling and depletion cycle. While ral regime. We built this solution as a linear superposi- the circumbinary lump feeds material to one of the mini- tion of boosted Kerr BHs in harmonic coordinates, sup- disks, the plasma in the other BH is completely accreted, plemented with PN trajectories at 3.5 PN order. We and the BH starves. After the initial transient, we see a compared our new metric with the well-tested asymp- remarkable overlap of each mini-disk mass Mi for both totic matching approach through an analysis of spacetime simulations. The cycle is evident earlier in the super- scalars. Although the matching approach has better ac- posed metric simulation. Since we are using the same ini- curacy in some specific regions, we found that the super- tial data for both simulations (not just the same prescrip- posed metric has comparable accuracy, is smoother, and tion), the equilibration of the mini-disks changes in the much cheaper. We also compared the performance of the 11 metric in a GRMHD simulation using the same setup of Energy through the Los Alamos National Laboratory. as previous simulations with the matching metric. We Los Alamos National Laboratory is operated by Triad found that the superposed metric reproduces the same National Security, LLC, for the National Nuclear Secu- physical features of the matching metric simulation. We rity Administration of U.S. Department of Energy (Con- conclude that a superposed metric is a robust approach tract No. 89233218CNA000001). H. N. acknowledges for exploring the MHD plasma on BBH systems. support from JSPS KAKENHI Grant Nos. JP16K05347 Based on these results, in an upcoming paper, we will and JP17H06358. analyze the effects of the BH spins and orbital evolu- Computational resources were provided by the Blue tion on the mini-disk dynamics and outflows of a BBH Waters sustained-petascale computing NSF projects system embedded in a circumbinary disk [108]. When OAC-1811228 and OAC-1516125. Blue Waters is a joint the black holes rotate, jets of entirely new characteris- effort of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign tics may emerge in a BBH system. Any jet launched and its National Center for Supercomputing Applica- should have a helical structure with a diameter equal to tions. Additional resources were provided by the RIT’s the major axis of the responsible black hole’s orbit. If BlueSky and Green Pairie Clusters acquired with NSF each black hole produces a jet, the two jets may collide grants AST-1028087, PHY-0722703, PHY-1229173 and or interact. Because jets are intrinsically unsteady, and PHY-1726215. the minidisks’ mass accretion rates vary with a phase dif- The views and opinions expressed in this paper are ference of π [57], intersection dynamics are expected those of the authors and not the views of the agencies or to be asymmetric' in general even if the black holes have US government. the same mass. This would generate a whole range of un- explored phenomena, such as periodic non-thermal flares produced by the collision region [115]. Appendix A: Horizons in harmonic coordinates One of the main advantages of our approach is that it assumes very little of the BBH properties. Although To perform GRMHD simulations in a BBH space- we have restricted to quasi-circular orbits in this work, time, we need a clear picture of how the BH singularities implementing a general orbital motion is straightforward and horizons behave in the chosen coordinates. In this because the superposition does not assume any symme- appendix, we will show how the harmonic coordinates tries in the trajectories. As long as the trajectories are so- compare with usual Kerr-Schild coordinates defined in lutions of the Post-Newtonian equations, the constraints Eq. (1). should remain low. On the other hand, even though we We are interested in the ergosphere rE and the outer assume that the spins of the BHs are aligned to the or- horizon r+ of our spacetime. In Boyer-Lindquist (BL) bital plane, we can easily generalize this by applying a coordinates, these are given by [89]: rotation to the BH term in (24) before the boost transfor- BL p 2 2 2 mation. Moreover, this rotation can be time-dependent rE = M + M a cos (θBL), (A1) to take into account the Post-Newtonian evolution of − spins. In this way, we will be able to describe the metric p rBL = M + M 2 a2. (A2) of precessing binaries approaching merger in all general- + − ity. The last two points, however, must be tested in the The radius in harmonic coordinates can be related with same way we did here. We leave them for future work. the BL radius, r , as: Finally, using the multi-grid Patchwork MHD code [116], BL we would have the possibility to handle the entire pa- 2 2 2 2 r = (rBL M) + a (1 cos (θBL)), (A3) rameter space of the system for inspiralling binaries in a H − − computationally efficient way. where
zH cos(θBL) , (A4) ≡ rBL M ACKNOWLEDGMENTS − and rBL = r(xH, yH, zH) is calculated from equation (4). We thank Carlos Lousto, Eduardo Guti´errez, and From these expressions, we can derive parametric equa- Mark Avara for useful discussions. L. C., F. L. A, M. C., tions for the horizons and ergosphere in harmonic coor- and B. I acknowledge support from AST-1028087, AST- dinates: 1028087, AST-1516150, PHY-1707946 and from NASA r H 2 2 TCAN grant No. 80NSSC18K1488. L. C also acknowl- rE = M 1 χ 2 cos (θBL) 1 , (A5) edges support from a CONICET (Argentina) fellowship. − − S. C. N. was supported by AST-1028087, AST-1515982 and OAC-1515969, and by an appointment to the NASA H p 2 2 r+ = M 1 χ cos (θBL). (A6) Postdoctoral Program at the Goddard Space Flight Cen- − ter administrated by USRA through a contract with From Eq. (A4), we observe that the harmonic coordi- BL NASA. D. B. B. is supported by the US Department nates become singular at rS = M, which means that 12
1.5 1.5
1.0 1.0
0.5 0.5
0.0 0.0
-0.5 -0.5
-1.0 -1.0
-1.5 -1.5 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
FIG. 12. Left: Ergosphere region of Kerr BH with spin χ = 0.9 for Kerr-Schild coordinates (blue) and harmonic coordinates (orange). Note that the surfaces in harmonic coordinates are more oblique compared with the Kerr-Schild coordinates. The radius of the singularity (green) is the same for both coordinate systems. Right: Ergosphere regions for a x-boosted harmonic Kerr BH with spin χ = 0.9 for different velocities (v/c = 0, 0.1, 0.5, 0.9). The horizon (red) and singularity (green) are the same in each case, but the ergosphere region increases with increasing velocity. there is a disk singularity at zH = 0 with radius given 18 by: 17
16 rH = Mχ. (A7) S 15
14 The radius of the horizon in harmonic coordinates 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 shrinks at the poles as χ increases, while the radius of 18 H 17 the horizon at z = 0 is fixed at r+(z = 0) = M for any 16 value of the spin. Then, the distance between the singu- Q larity and the horizon at z = 0 shrinks with increasing 15 spin as δH := M(1 χ). In contrast, in Kerr-Schild 14 − 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 coordinates, the horizon is further away from the singu- 18 larity, with a separation of δKS := δH + Mg(χ), where q 17 g(χ) := 2 + 2p1 χ2 1 > 0 (see Figure 12). − − 16 To avoid any spurious effect of the inner boundary of 15 the domain, it is usually placed inside the horizon to 14 mask the singularity of the spacetime. In this way, the 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 coordinates must be horizon penetrating and the singu- x[M] larity should be sufficiently far from the horizon. In this regard, the Kerr-Schild coordinate system is more conve- FIG. 13. Convergence factor of our numerical scheme for nient than harmonic coordinates since the distance δKS different regions. In the top panel we use h/M = 0.0125, is bigger than δH. For performing high-spin simulations in the middle panel h/M = 0.1, and in the bottom panel with the harmonic coordinates, one could artificially re- h/M = 0.8. move the singularity by implementing a modification of the metric inside the horizon, e.g., modifying the function rBL(xH). ‘Cartesian Kerr-Schild’ coordinates that we use here are Note that the Cartesian Kerr-Schild coordinates used more common in numerical relativity and appear in the here are not the usual coordinates that accretion disk original work of Kerr [90, 119]. theorists call ‘Kerr-Schild’ [117, 118]. The ‘accretion- Finally, let us note that our spacetime contains moving disk Kerr-Schild’ coordinates are a modification of the BL BHs, boosted with respect to the asymptotically flat re- coordinates that renders the metric horizon-penetrating gion. This means that the morphology of the ergosphere but maintains the singularity at rAKS = rBL = 0. The would be different from a static BH and these differences 13 can be significant for high velocities. As discussed in is well behaved, we have [120]: Ref. [93], even a non-spinning BH acquires an ergosphere when the BH is boosted. In the case of a spinning BH, we can see from Figure 12 that the ergosphere increases h(U) = 2p + (h). (B2) when the BH has higher velocities. Q O
Appendix B: Convergence tests We explore the convergence of the Ricci scalar along Since we are using a finite difference scheme for com- the x axis in the equatorial plane, which is the most rel- puting the metric and connection derivatives, we show evant region. We calculate the derivatives of the metric here the convergence to the analytical solution of the on a uniform Cartesian grid using a fourth-order finite fourth-order discretization. As explained in Ref. [68], difference method, so we use p 4 in (B2). In Figure since the metric spans several length scales, we need dif- 13, we show convergence for different≡ regions. In the top ferent mesh spacing to resolve the solution. Given a nu- panel, for the vicinity of the BH at [0M, 20M], we use merical quantity U, we explore the convergence factor, a mesh spacing given by h/M = 0.0125. Away from the h(U), defined as: BH, a high-resolution mesh drops the convergence be- Q cause of the limited machine precision to represent num- U (4h) U (2h) bers (double precision in our case) [121], so we change h(U) := − , (B1) Q U (2h) U (h) the mesh to h/M = 0.1 at [20M, 60M] and h/M = 0.8 − at [60M, 200M]. From Figure 13 we can check that con- where h is the size of the mesh spacing and U (k) is the vergence is achieved in the different regions, where we numerical approximation with spacing k. If the method expect 16. Q ∼
[1] K. G¨ultekin, D. O. Richstone, K. Gebhardt, T. R. J. van Meter, “Gravitational-wave extraction from an Lauer, S. Tremaine, M. C. Aller, R. Bender, A. Dressler, inspiraling configuration of merging black holes,” Phys. S. M. Faber, A. V. Filippenko, R. Green, L. C. Ho, Rev. Lett., vol. 96, p. 111102, Mar 2006. J. Kormendy, J. Magorrian, J. Pinkney, and C. Siopis, [11] S. Burke-Spolaor, S. R. Taylor, M. Charisi, T. Dolch, “The M-σ and M-L Relations in Galactic Bulges, and J. S. Hazboun, A. M. Holgado, L. Z. Kelley, T. J. W. Determinations of Their Intrinsic Scatter,” Astrophys. Lazio, D. R. Madison, N. McMann, et al., “The J., vol. 698, pp. 198–221, June 2009. astrophysics of nanohertz gravitational waves,” The [2] M. Volonteri, “Formation of supermassive black holes,” Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, vol. 27, no. 1, p. 5, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, vol. 18, no. 3, 2019. pp. 279–315, 2010. [12] W. Del Pozzo, A. Sesana, and A. Klein, “Stellar binary [3] P. F. Hopkins and E. Quataert, “How do massive black black holes in the lisa band: a new class of standard holes get their gas?,” Monthly Notices of the Royal sirens,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Astronomical Society, vol. 407, pp. 1529–1564, Jul 2010. Society, vol. 475, pp. 3485–3492, Jan 2018. [4] T. Naab and J. P. Ostriker, “Theoretical challenges in [13] B. Perera, M. DeCesar, P. Demorest, M. Kerr, galaxy formation,” Annual Review of Astronomy and L. Lentati, D. Nice, S. Os lowski, S. Ransom, M. Keith, Astrophysics, vol. 55, pp. 59–109, Aug 2017. Z. Arzoumanian, et al., “The international pulsar tim- [5] F. M. Khan, D. Fiacconi, L. Mayer, P. Berczik, and ing array: second data release,” Monthly Notices of the A. Just, “Swift Coalescence of Supermassive Black Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 490, no. 4, pp. 4666– Holes in Cosmological Mergers of Massive Galaxies,” 4687, 2019. Astrophys. J., vol. 828, p. 73, Sept. 2016. [14] J. Baker, J. Bellovary, P. L. Bender, E. Berti, R. Cald- [6] L. Z. Kelley, L. Blecha, and L. Hernquist, “Massive well, J. Camp, J. W. Conklin, N. Cornish, C. Cutler, black hole binary mergers in dynamical galactic environ- R. DeRosa, et al., “The laser interferometer space an- ments,” MNRAS, vol. 464, pp. 3131–3157, Jan. 2017. tenna: unveiling the millihertz gravitational wave sky,” [7] H. Pfister, A. Lupi, P. R. Capelo, M. Volonteri, J. M. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.06482, 2019. Bellovary, and M. Dotti, “The birth of a supermas- [15] S. T. McWilliams, R. Caldwell, K. Holley-Bockelmann, sive black hole binary,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., S. L. Larson, and M. Vallisneri, “Astro2020 decadal sci- vol. 471, no. 3, pp. 3646–3656, 2017. ence white paper: The state of gravitational-wave as- [8] F. Pretorius, “Evolution of binary black-hole space- trophysics in 2020,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.04592, times,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 95, p. 121101, Sep 2005. 2019. [9] M. Campanelli, C. O. Lousto, P. Marronetti, and Y. Zlo- [16] D. Chapon, L. Mayer, and R. Teyssier, “Hydrodynam- chower, “Accurate evolutions of orbiting black-hole bi- ics of galaxy mergers with supermassive black holes: is naries without excision,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 96, there a last parsec problem?,” Monthly Notices of the p. 111101, Mar 2006. Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 429, pp. 3114–3122, [10] J. G. Baker, J. Centrella, D.-I. Choi, M. Koppitz, and Jan 2013. 14
[17] M. Tremmel, M. Karcher, F. Governato, M. Volonteri, p. 084007, Apr. 2010. T. R. Quinn, A. Pontzen, L. Anderson, and J. Bellovary, [34] B. D. Farris, Y. T. Liu, and S. L. Shapiro, “Binary black “The romulus cosmological simulations: a physical ap- hole mergers in gaseous disks: Simulations in general proach to the formation, dynamics and accretion models relativity,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 84, p. 024024, July 2011. of smbhs,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical [35] T. Bode, T. Bogdanovi´c,R. Haas, J. Healy, P. Laguna, Society, vol. 470, pp. 1121–1139, May 2017. and D. Shoemaker, “Mergers of Supermassive Black [18] M. Colpi, “Massive Binary Black Holes in Galactic Nu- Holes in Astrophysical Environments,” Astrophys. J., clei and Their Path to Coalescence,” Space Sci. Rev., vol. 744, p. 45, Jan. 2012. vol. 183, pp. 189–221, Sept. 2014. [36] B. D. Farris, R. Gold, V. Paschalidis, Z. B. Etienne, and [19] J. H. Krolik, “Estimating the prompt electromagnetic S. L. Shapiro, “Binary black-hole mergers in magnetized luminosity of a black hole merger,” The Astrophysical disks: Simulations in full general relativity,” Phys. Rev. Journal, vol. 709, pp. 774–779, Jan 2010. Lett., vol. 109, p. 221102, Nov 2012. [20] C. Roedig, J. H. Krolik, and M. C. Miller, “Observa- [37] B. Giacomazzo, J. G. Baker, M. C. Miller, C. S. tional Signatures of Binary Supermassive Black Holes,” Reynolds, and J. R. van Meter, “General Relativistic Astrophys. J., vol. 785, p. 115, Apr. 2014. Simulations of Magnetized Plasmas around Merging Su- [21] D. J. D’Orazio, Z. Haiman, and D. Schiminovich, “Rel- permassive Black Holes,” ApJLetters, vol. 752, p. L15, ativistic boost as the cause of periodicity in a mas- June 2012. sive black-hole binary candidate,” Nature (London), [38] S. C. Noble, B. C. Mundim, H. Nakano, J. H. Kro- vol. 525, pp. 351–353, Sept. 2015. lik, M. Campanelli, Y. Zlochower, and N. Yunes, “Cir- [22] J. H. Krolik, M. Volonteri, Y. Dubois, and J. De- cumbinary magnetohydrodynamic accretion into inspi- vriendt, “Population estimates for electromagnetically raling binary black holes,” The Astrophysical Journal, distinguishable supermassive binary black holes,” The vol. 755, no. 1, p. 51, 2012. Astrophysical Journal, vol. 879, p. 110, jul 2019. [39] J.-M. Shi, J. H. Krolik, S. H. Lubow, and J. F. Haw- [23] D. B. Bowen, M. Campanelli, J. H. Krolik, V. Mewes, ley, “Three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic simula- and S. C. Noble, “Relativistic Dynamics and Mass Ex- tions of circumbinary accretion disks: Disk structures change in Binary Black Hole Mini-disks,” Astrophys. J., and angular momentum transport,” The Astrophysical vol. 838, p. 42, Mar. 2017. Journal, vol. 749, no. 2, p. 118, 2012. [24] G. Ryan and A. MacFadyen, “Minidisks in Binary Black [40] D. J. D’Orazio, Z. Haiman, and A. MacFadyen, “Ac- Hole Accretion,” Astrophys. J., vol. 835, p. 199, Feb. cretion into the central cavity of a circumbinary disc,” 2017. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, [25] D. B. Bowen, V. Mewes, M. Campanelli, S. C. Noble, vol. 436, pp. 2997–3020, Dec. 2013. J. H. Krolik, and M. Zilh˜ao,“Quasi-periodic Behavior of [41] B. D. Farris, P. Duffell, A. I. MacFadyen, and Mini-disks in Binary Black Holes Approaching Merger,” Z. Haiman, “Binary Black Hole Accretion from a Cir- ApJLetters, vol. 853, p. L17, Jan. 2018. cumbinary Disk: Gas Dynamics inside the Central Cav- [26] S. d’Ascoli, S. C. Noble, D. B. Bowen, M. Campanelli, ity,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 783, p. 134, Mar. J. H. Krolik, and V. Mewes, “Electromagnetic Emis- 2014. sion from Supermassive Binary Black Holes Approach- [42] R. Gold, V. Paschalidis, Z. B. Etienne, S. L. Shapiro, ing Merger,” Astrophys. J., vol. 865, no. 2, p. 140, 2018. and H. P. Pfeiffer, “Accretion disks around binary black [27] Y. Tang, Z. Haiman, and A. MacFadyen, “The late in- holes of unequal mass: General relativistic magnetohy- spiral of supermassive black hole binaries with circumbi- drodynamic simulations near decoupling,” Phys. Rev. nary gas discs in the LISA band,” MNRAS, vol. 476, D, vol. 89, p. 064060, Mar 2014. pp. 2249–2257, May 2018. [43] B. D. Farris, P. Duffell, A. I. MacFadyen, and [28] V. Springel, T. D. Matteo, and L. Hernquist, “Black Z. Haiman, “Binary black hole accretion during inspi- holes in galaxy mergers: The formation of red elliptical ral and merger,” MNRAS, vol. 447, pp. L80–L84, Feb. galaxies,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 620, pp. L79– 2015. L82, jan 2005. [44] B. D. Farris, P. Duffell, A. I. MacFadyen, and [29] M. Milosavljevi´cand E. S. Phinney, “The Afterglow of Z. Haiman, “Characteristic signatures in the thermal Massive Black Hole Coalescence,” ApJLetters, vol. 622, emission from accreting binary black holes,” MNRAS, pp. L93–L96, Apr. 2005. vol. 446, pp. L36–L40, Jan. 2015. [30] J. E. Pringle, “The properties of external accretion [45] J.-M. Shi and J. H. Krolik, “Three-dimensional MHD discs,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Simulation of Circumbinary Accretion Disks. II. Net Ac- Society, vol. 248, pp. 754–759, 02 1991. cretion Rate,” Astrophys. J., vol. 807, p. 131, July 2015. [31] A. I. MacFadyen and M. Milosavljevi´c,“An Eccentric [46] D. J. D’Orazio, Z. Haiman, P. Duffell, A. MacFadyen, Circumbinary Accretion Disk and the Detection of Bi- and B. Farris, “A transition in circumbinary accretion nary Massive Black Holes,” Astrophys. J., vol. 672, discs at a binary mass ratio of 1:25,” MNRAS, vol. 459, pp. 83–93, Jan. 2008. pp. 2379–2393, July 2016. [32] T. Bode, R. Haas, T. Bogdanovi´c, P. Laguna, and [47] S. C. Noble, J. H. Krolik, M. Campanelli, Y. Zlochower, D. Shoemaker, “Relativistic Mergers of Supermassive B. C. Mundim, H. Nakano, and M. Zilh˜ao,“Mass-ratio Black Holes and Their Electromagnetic Signatures,” and magnetic flux-dependence of modulated accretion Astrophys. J., vol. 715, pp. 1117–1131, June 2010. from circumbinary disks,” arXiv pre-Print 2103.12100, [33] C. Palenzuela, L. Lehner, and S. Yoshida, “Under- 2021. standing possible electromagnetic counterparts to loud [48] D. Alic, P. Moesta, L. Rezzolla, O. Zanotti, and gravitational wave events: Binary black hole effects J. L. Jaramillo, “Accurate simulations of binary on electromagnetic fields,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, black hole mergers in force-free electrodynamics,” The 15
Astrophysical Journal, vol. 754, no. 1, p. 36, 2012. Newtonian and perturbed black hole solutions,” Phys. [49] P. Moesta, D. Alic, L. Rezzolla, O. Zanotti, and Rev., vol. D74, p. 064013, 2006. C. Palenzuela, “On the detectability of dual jets from [65] D. B. Bowen, M. Campanelli, J. H. Krolik, V. Mewes, binary black holes,” The Astrophysical Journal Letters, and S. C. Noble, “Relativistic Dynamics and Mass Ex- vol. 749, no. 2, p. L32, 2012. change in Binary Black Hole Mini-disks,” Astrophys. J., [50] C. Palenzuela, L. Lehner, and S. L. Liebling, “Dual jets vol. 838, p. 42, Mar. 2017. from binary black holes,” Science, vol. 329, no. 5994, [66] D. B. Bowen, V. Mewes, M. Campanelli, S. C. Noble, pp. 927–930, 2010. J. H. Krolik, and M. Zilh˜ao,“Quasi-periodic Behavior of [51] C. Palenzuela, T. Garrett, L. Lehner, and S. L. Liebling, Mini-disks in Binary Black Holes Approaching Merger,” “Magnetospheres of black hole systems in force-free ApJLetters, vol. 853, p. L17, Jan. 2018. plasma,” Physical Review D, vol. 82, no. 4, p. 044045, [67] L. Gallouin, H. Nakano, N. Yunes, and M. Campan- 2010. elli, “Asymptotically Matched Spacetime Metric for [52] B. D. Farris, P. Duffell, A. I. MacFadyen, and Non-Precessing, Spinning Black Hole Binaries,” Class. Z. Haiman, “Binary Black Hole Accretion from a Cir- Quant. Grav., vol. 29, p. 235013, 2012. cumbinary Disk: Gas Dynamics inside the Central Cav- [68] B. Ireland, B. C. Mundim, H. Nakano, and M. Cam- ity,” Astrophys. J., vol. 783, p. 134, Mar. 2014. panelli, “Inspiralling, nonprecessing, spinning black hole [53] R. Gold, V. Paschalidis, Z. B. Etienne, S. L. Shapiro, binary spacetime via asymptotic matching,” Physical and H. P. Pfeiffer, “Accretion disks around binary black Review D, vol. 93, no. 10, p. 104057, 2016. holes of unequal mass: General relativistic magneto- [69] M. Campanelli, C. O. Lousto, and Y. Zlochower, hydrodynamic simulations near decoupling,” Physical “Spinning-black-hole binaries: The orbital hang up,” Review D, vol. 89, p. 064060, Mar 2014. Phys. Rev., vol. D74, p. 041501, 2006. [54] R. Gold, V. Paschalidis, M. Ruiz, S. L. Shapiro, Z. B. [70] D. A. Hemberger, G. Lovelace, T. J. Loredo, L. E. Kid- Etienne, and H. P. Pfeiffer, “Accretion disks around bi- der, M. A. Scheel, B. Szil´agyi,N. W. Taylor, and S. A. nary black holes of unequal mass: General relativis- Teukolsky, “Final spin and radiated energy in numerical tic mhd simulations of postdecoupling and merger,” simulations of binary black holes with equal masses and Physical Review D, vol. 90, p. 104030, Nov 2014. equal, aligned or antialigned spins,” Physical Review D, [55] V. Paschalidis, J. Bright, M. Ruiz, and R. Gold, “Mini- vol. 88, no. 6, p. 064014, 2013. disk dynamics in accreting, spinning black hole binaries: [71] J. Healy and C. O. Lousto, “Hangup effect in unequal Simulations in full general relativity,” 2021. mass binary black hole mergers and further studies of [56] F. G. L. Armengol, L. Combi, M. Campanelli, S. C. No- their gravitational radiation and remnant properties,” ble, J. H. Krolik, D. B. Bowen, M. J. Avara, V. Mewes, Physical Review D, vol. 97, no. 8, p. 084002, 2018. and H. Nakano, “Circumbinary disk accretion into spin- [72] M. Campanelli, C. O. Lousto, Y. Zlochower, B. Krish- ning black hole binaries,” The Astrophysical Journal, nan, and D. Merritt, “Spin flips and precession in black- vol. 913, no. 1, p. 16, 2021. hole-binary mergers,” Phys. Rev., vol. D75, p. 064030, [57] D. B. Bowen, V. Mewes, S. C. Noble, M. Avara, 2007. M. Campanelli, and J. H. Krolik, “Quasi-periodicity of [73] C. O. Lousto and J. Healy, “Flip-flopping binary black Supermassive Binary Black Hole Accretion Approach- holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 114, no. 14, p. 141101, ing Merger,” Astrophys. J., vol. 879, p. 76, July 2019. 2015. [58] S. C. Noble, B. C. Mundim, H. Nakano, J. H. Kro- [74] C. O. Lousto, J. Healy, and H. Nakano, “Spin flips in lik, M. Campanelli, Y. Zlochower, and N. Yunes, “Cir- generic black hole binaries,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 93, no. 4, cumbinary Magnetohydrodynamic Accretion into Inspi- p. 044031, 2016. raling Binary Black Holes,” Astrophys. J., vol. 755, [75] C. O. Lousto, J. Healy, and H. Nakano, “Spin flips in p. 51, Aug. 2012. generic black hole binaries,” Physical Review D, vol. 93, [59] M. Zilhao, S. C. Noble, M. Campanelli, and Y. Zlo- no. 4, p. 044031, 2016. chower, “Resolving the relative influence of strong field [76] C. O. Lousto and J. Healy, “Gravitational Wave Bea- spacetime dynamics and MHD on circumbinary disk cons,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 99, no. 6, p. 064023, 2019. physics,” Phys. Rev., vol. D91, no. 2, p. 024034, 2015. [77] M. Kesden, D. Gerosa, E. Berti, R. O’Shaughnessy, and [60] B. C. Mundim, H. Nakano, N. Yunes, M. Campanelli, U. Sperhake, “The gravitational-wave signature of bi- S. C. Noble, and Y. Zlochower, “Approximate black hole nary black holes in spin-orbit resonances,” in APS April binary spacetime via asymptotic matching,” Phys. Rev., Meeting Abstracts, vol. 2014, pp. C15–004, 2014. vol. D89, p. 084008, 2014. [78] T. W. Baumgarte and S. L. Shapiro, Numerical [61] H. Nakano, B. Ireland, M. Campanelli, and E. J. West, relativity: solving Einstein’s equations on the computer. “Spinning, Precessing, Black Hole Binary Spacetime via Cambridge University Press, 2010. Asymptotic Matching,” Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 33, [79] J. W. York, “Gravitational degrees of freedom and no. 24, p. 247001, 2016. the initial-value problem,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 26, [62] B. Ireland, B. C. Mundim, H. Nakano, and M. Cam- pp. 1656–1658, Jun 1971. panelli, “Inspiralling, nonprecessing, spinning black hole [80] J. M. Bowen and J. W. York, “Time-asymmetric initial binary spacetime via asymptotic matching,” Phys. Rev. data for black holes and black-hole collisions,” Phys. D, vol. 93, p. 104057, May 2016. Rev. D, vol. 21, pp. 2047–2056, Apr 1980. [63] N. Yunes, W. Tichy, B. J. Owen, and B. Bruegmann, [81] J. W. York Jr, “Conformal “thin-sandwich” data for “Binary black hole initial data from matched asymp- the initial-value problem of general relativity,” Physical totic expansions,” Phys. Rev., vol. D74, p. 104011, 2006. review letters, vol. 82, no. 7, p. 1350, 1999. [64] N. Yunes and W. Tichy, “Improved initial data for [82] H. P. Pfeiffer and J. W. York Jr, “Extrinsic curva- black hole binaries by asymptotic matching of post- ture and the einstein constraints,” Physical Review D, 16
vol. 67, no. 4, p. 044022, 2003. vol. D66, p. 027502, 2002. [83] H. P. Lawrence Kidder and M. Scheel, “Spectral [101] A. Buonanno, B. Iyer, E. Ochsner, Y. Pan, and Einstein Code.” https://www.black-holes.org/code/ B. Sathyaprakash, “Comparison of post-Newtonian SpEC.html, 2020. [Online; accessed 20-July-2020]. templates for compact binary inspiral signals in [84] R. A. Matzner, M. F. Huq, and D. Shoemaker, “Initial gravitational-wave detectors,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 80, data and coordinates for multiple black hole systems,” p. 084043, 2009. Phys. Rev. D, vol. 59, p. 024015, Dec 1998. [102] N. Yunes, W. Tichy, B. J. Owen, and B. Br¨ugmann, [85] G. Lovelace, R. Owen, H. P. Pfeiffer, and T. Chu, “Binary black hole initial data from matched asymp- “Binary-black-hole initial data with nearly extremal totic expansions,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 74, p. 104011, Nov spins,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, no. 8, p. 084017, 2006. 2008. [103] N. Yunes and W. Tichy, “Improved initial data for [86] G. B. Cook and H. P. Pfeiffer, “Excision boundary con- black hole binaries by asymptotic matching of post- ditions for black-hole initial data,” Physical Review D, Newtonian and perturbed black hole solutions,” Phys. vol. 70, no. 10, p. 104016, 2004. Rev., vol. D74, p. 064013, 2006. [87] V. Varma, M. A. Scheel, and H. P. Pfeiffer, “Compar- [104] W. R. Inc., “Mathematica, Version 12.2.” Champaign, ison of binary black hole initial data sets,” Physical IL, 2020. Review D, vol. 98, no. 10, p. 104011, 2018. [105] C. R. Harris, K. J. Millman, S. J. van der Walt, R. Gom- [88] L. Blanchet, “Gravitational Radiation from Post- mers, P. Virtanen, D. Cournapeau, E. Wieser, J. Tay- Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries,” lor, S. Berg, N. J. Smith, R. Kern, M. Picus, S. Hoyer, Living Rev. Rel., vol. 17, p. 2, 2014. M. H. van Kerkwijk, M. Brett, A. Haldane, J. F. del [89] E. Poisson, A relativist’s toolkit: the mathematics of R’ıo, M. Wiebe, P. Peterson, P. G’erard-Marchant, black-hole mechanics. Cambridge university press, 2004. K. Sheppard, T. Reddy, W. Weckesser, H. Abbasi, [90] M. Visser, “The kerr spacetime: A brief introduction,” C. Gohlke, and T. E. Oliphant, “Array programming arXiv preprint arXiv:0706.0622, 2007. with NumPy,” Nature, vol. 585, pp. 357–362, Sept. [91] It was shown recently [87] that building superposed free 2020. initial data in harmonic coordinates, rather than in the [106] J. D. Hunter, “Matplotlib: A 2d graphics environment,” standard Kerr-Schild coordinates, is more accurate for Computing in Science & Engineering, vol. 9, no. 3, numerical simulations of BBH mergers. We also found pp. 90–95, 2007. that our superposed metric in harmonic coordinates is [107] J. Sadiq, Y. Zlochower, and H. Nakano, “Comparing more accurate than the KS gauge. an analytical spacetime metric for a merging binary to [92] G. B. Cook and M. A. Scheel, “Well-behaved harmonic a fully nonlinear numerical evolution using curvature time slices of a charged, rotating, boosted black hole,” scalars,” Physical Review D, vol. 97, no. 8, p. 084007, Physical Review D, vol. 56, no. 8, p. 4775, 1997. 2018. [93] R. F. Penna, “Energy extraction from boosted black [108] L. Combi, F. G. L. Armengol, M. Campanelli, S. C. holes: Penrose process, jets, and the membrane at in- Noble, M. J. Avara, J. H. Krolik, and D. B. Bowen, finity,” Physical Review D, vol. 91, no. 8, p. 084044, “Accretion onto spinning black hole binaries: mini-disk 2015. and outflows,” In prep., 2021. [94] F. Manasse and C. W. Misner, “Fermi normal coordi- [109] C. F. Gammie, J. C. McKinney, and G. T´oth,“Harm: A nates and some basic concepts in differential geometry,” numerical scheme for general relativistic magnetohydro- Journal of mathematical physics, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 735– dynamics,” Astrophys. J., vol. 589, pp. 444–457, May 745, 1963. 2003. [95] E. Poisson, A. Pound, and I. Vega, “The motion of [110] S. C. Noble, C. F. Gammie, J. C. McKinney, and L. Del point particles in curved spacetime,” Living Reviews in Zanna, “Primitive variable solvers for conservative gen- Relativity, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 7, 2011. eral relativistic magnetohydrodynamics,” Astrophys. J., [96] B. Mashhoon and U. Muench, “Length measurement in vol. 641, pp. 626–637, Apr. 2006. accelerated systems,” Annalen der Physik, vol. 11, no. 7, [111] S. C. Noble, J. H. Krolik, and J. F. Hawley, “Direct pp. 532–547, 2002. Calculation of the Radiative Efficiency of an Accretion [97] P. Ajith, M. Boyle, D. A. Brown, B. Brugmann, Disk Around a Black Hole,” Astrophys. J., vol. 692, L. T. Buchman, et al., “The NINJA-2 catalog of pp. 411–421, Feb. 2009. hybrid post-Newtonian/numerical-relativity waveforms [112] G. T´oth, “The ∇ · b = 0 constraint in shock- for non-precessing black-hole binaries,” Class. Quant. capturing magnetohydrodynamics codes,” Journal of Grav., vol. 29, p. 124001, 2012. Computational Physics, vol. 161, no. 2, pp. 605–652, [98] A. Buonanno, Y.-b. Chen, and M. Vallisneri, “De- 2000. tecting gravitational waves from precessing binaries [113] S. C. Noble, C. F. Gammie, J. C. McKinney, and of spinning compact objects: Adiabatic limit,” Phys. L. D. Zanna, “Primitive variable solvers for conserva- Rev., vol. D67, p. 104025, 2003. [Erratum: Phys. tive general relativistic magnetohydrodynamics,” The Rev.D74,029904(2006)]. Astrophysical Journal, vol. 641, pp. 626–637, apr 2006. [99] T. Damour, B. R. Iyer, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “A [114] M. Zilhao and S. C. Noble, “Dynamic fisheye grids for Comparison of search templates for gravitational waves binary black hole simulations,” Classical and Quantum from binary inspiral,” Phys. Rev., vol. D63, p. 044023, Gravity, vol. 31, no. 6, p. 065013, 2014. 2001. [Erratum: Phys. Rev.D72,029902(2005)]. [115] E. Gutierrez, L. Combi, G. E. Romero, and M. Campan- [100] T. Damour, B. R. Iyer, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “A elli, “Repeating flares from jets in supermassive black Comparison of search templates for gravitational waves hole binaries,” In prep., 2021. from binary inspiral - 3.5PN update,” Phys. Rev., [116] M. Avara and et al., “Global 3d grmhd simulations of 17
accreting supermassive black hole binaries approaching [119] R. P. Kerr, “Gravitational field of a spinning mass as merger,” In prep., 2021. an example of algebraically special metrics,” Physical [117] J. C. McKinney and C. F. Gammie, “A measurement review letters, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 237, 1963. of the electromagnetic luminosity of a kerr black hole,” [120] L. Rezzolla and O. Zanotti, Relativistic hydrodynamics. The astrophysical journal, vol. 611, no. 2, p. 977, 2004. Oxford University Press, 2013. [118] B. J. Kelly, Z. B. Etienne, J. Golomb, J. D. Schnittman, [121] We can confirm this using a quadrupole precision code, J. G. Baker, S. C. Noble, and G. Ryan, “Electromag- although it is prohibitively expensive for our current netic emission from a binary black hole merger remnant simulations [68]. in plasma: Field alignment and plasma temperature,” Physical Review D, vol. 103, no. 6, p. 063039, 2021.