Pricing the Planet Nick Hanley Weighs up a Study That Probes the Economic Value of Nature

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pricing the Planet Nick Hanley Weighs up a Study That Probes the Economic Value of Nature The ecosystem services — and value — provided by mangrove forests range from coastal protection from storms to natural fisheries. ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS Pricing the planet Nick Hanley weighs up a study that probes the economic value of nature. an economics help to save us from population and the predictions recalled Malthus. This, along environmental­ catastrophe? In fixed amount of farm­ with the two oil-price peaks of the 1970s Natural Capital, economist Dieter land, which meant that and growing public interest in the damaging CHelm offers a timely reminder of the con­ food supplies could implications of economic growth, returned tribution that his discipline can make to not keep up. However, the environment to centre stage in econom­ understanding and solving environmental disaster failed to mat­ ics. The Journal of Environmental Economics problems. The book hinges on the economic erialize, population and Management was founded in 1974. ZIEGLER/GETTY CHRISTIAN value of gifts of nature, from oil fields to wet­ and average living The late, great David Pearce was perhaps lands, which in combination with inputs standards continued the first academic economist to convince peo­ such as labour and produced capital pro­ to rise, and the envi­ Natural Capital: ple outside the field of its relevance for under­ vide humanity with valuable benefits from ronment largely dis­ Valuing the Planet standing the relationships between people, ecosystem services. Helm’s main message appeared from the DIETER HELM money and the environment — and for devel­ is that the apparent conflict between eco­ thinking and writing Yale Univ. Press: 2015. oping tools to help to manage the apparent nomic growth and environmental quality of economists, give conflict between economic growth and envi­ can be managed by preventing declines in or take the contributions of Arthur Pigou ronmental quality. The influence of his 1989 this natural capital. on the economics of pollution in 1920 and Blueprint for a Green Economy (Routledge), The concept of natural capital has quite Harold Hotelling on the management of non- co-written with Anil Markandya and Edward a backstory, although Helm does not delve renewable natural resources in 1931. By 1970, Barbier, reached beyond academia and gov­ into it too deeply. The environment was of environmental problems were no longer the ernment to the informed public. Pearce had central concern to the classical economists of professional concern of economists. three main messages. First, economic benefits the nineteenth century. The scarcity of pro­ Then everything changed. In 1972, environ­ from the environment need to be measured ductive agricultural land and coal reserves, mental scientist Donella Meadows and and recognized. Second, economics could for instance, was seen as a brake on economic co-authors published The Limits to Growth improve environmental policy by develop­ growth by pioneers such as David Ricardo (Universe), commissioned by the Club of ing market-like mechanisms through which and John Stuart Mill. Slightly earlier, Thomas Rome think tank. This influential book used a price could be put on pollution. Third, Robert Malthus had famously predicted systems dynamics modelling to predict prob­ national accounting conventions needed to a gloomy future as a result of the conflict able future paths for global population, food show up the gains and losses in a country’s between an exponentially growing human production and pollution. Some of these natural capital over time. 434 | NATURE | VOL 520 | 23 APRIL 2015 © 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved BOOKS & ARTS COMMENT These ideas are all taken up and expanded LIBRARY SCIENCE in Natural Capital. This is important, because the empirical evidence is that most countries do not account for the economic value of depreciating natural capital; nor The word on our have they put in place measures to hold the line. Helm’s arguments bring the main problem raised by Malthus into a sharp archival future new focus. Given current rates of world economic growth, incredible numbers of Michael Lesk assesses a work on the fate of the library people, demands for resources and levels of at a time of economic and technological upheaval. pollution now loom, increasing pressures on ecosystems and biodiversity. Evidence is growing of the importance of ecosystem ohn Palfrey loves libraries and is optimis­ have equal access to services such as clean water and pollination, tic about their future. In BiblioTech, he information online. and of the erosion of human well-being that Jdescribes that future. In his vision, public The increasing results when those services are disturbed. libraries, as a mainstay of informed demo­ commercialization That does not mean that economic growth cratic societies, will share access to online of information raises should be stopped (even if that were pos­ material as well as to the physical books and further barriers. sible), but it does demand a fundamental spaces that resonate emotionally with users. Palfrey is especially change in government policies globally. Palfrey — who helped to set up the Digital concerned about the As Helm drives home, these changes relate Public Library of America at Harvard Uni­ copyright status of most fundamentally to a new goal of eco­ versity in Boston, Massachusetts — shows BiblioTech: Why out-of-print books. nomic policy: keeping natural capital from that most libraries are facing a “perfect Libraries Matter Nobody makes declining. Many of the assets that make up storm”: waning use, inadequate resources More Than Ever in money from them, natural capital deliver benefits that the mar­ and users satisfied with easy personal access the Age of Google but legal problems ket does not value, but which are important to online information. Although the book JOHN PALFREY such as the dilemma Basic: 2015. for well-being. So adopting such a policy does not focus on academic libraries, US of ‘orphan books’ would mean that as a country depletes its research libraries saw a 69% decline in the (volumes in copyright, but for which the oil reserves, for example, it would reinvest a number of queries handled between 1991 owner is unlocatable) prevent libraries from proportion of the returns from this activity and 2012. US research librarians answer providing such volumes online. Finally, in promoting renewable alternatives. some 7 million questions each year; Inter­ Palfrey, echoing the concerns of Google That demands a number of moves. A net search engines handle that many every vice-president Vint Cerf among others, feels country must change the way it undertakes two minutes. Academic-library budgets are that digital preservation of library holdings its national accounting to reflect the year-on- shrinking: spending has dropped from 3.7% is riskier than traditional methods. In my year changes in the value of all of its assets, of the total budget of a typical US university view, this is not entirely accurate: a single including natural capital; it must tax pollu­ in the early 1980s to 1.8% in 2011. paper copy can fade or go up in smoke, tion while removing perverse subsidies for Roughly half whereas multiple digital copies can stay safe activities that deplete natural capital; it must of an academic- “The school and affordable. enforce strict limits on the use of renewable library budget is library should At a time of austerity and belt-tightening, resources to maintain them above critical spent on acquisi­ be as important will governments recognize the importance thresholds; it must require general offsetting­ tions, and that is as the school of libraries and librarians? The school of the negative effects of infrastructure pro­ increasingly con­ sports team.” library should be as important as the school jects. Moreover, it must increase the provi­ sumed by journal- sports team, I feel. Political will is essential, sion of public goods such as national parks subscription prices. However, open-access as is innovative energy among librarians. and green spaces. publishers such as the Public Library of Sci­ Palfrey hopes that conventional and new These are not new ideas (most were dis­ ence (PLOS) provide information with no library technologies will sit side by side. This cussed in Blueprint for a Green Economy), reader fee, changing the economics entirely. is not common in technological change: car- but Natural Capital provides a very useful As Palfrey notes, school libraries — which rental companies do not run livery stables. update and pulls together the past 20 years still have a key role in teaching scholarly I suspect that a more likely future is that of economic insight in language that non- habits and propelling children towards a libraries (and museums) will be divided into economists will easily understand. For life in science — are suffering, often losing the ‘wholesalers’ that have large historic col­ example, since 1989 economists have made their staff. The 2010 Google Map ‘A Nation lections, such as the US Library of Congress great progress in estimating the values Without School Librarians’ is a grim indica­ or the British Library, and the ‘retailers’ such of ecosystem-service benefits. Helm has tor of the trend, showing the districts that as university libraries, which serve faculties. thought carefully about the practicalities of have eliminated certified school-librarian Anyone interested in the future of librar­ tracking changes in natural capital, of fund­ positions. As for public libraries, the Pew ies — and whether there is one at all — will ing reinvestment in habitats, and of prioritiz­ Research Center reports that only about find much to mull over in this book. I hope ing actions through a focus on thresholds. half of people in the United States used one its effectiveness will match its enthusiasm. ■ As such, the book is a valuable contribution, in 2013. Palfrey is fearful that in the future, written by an author who knows his subject not everyone will Michael Lesk is professor of information and cares deeply about his message.
Recommended publications
  • April 2, 2015 Probabilistic Voting in Models of Electoral Competition By
    April 2, 2015 Probabilistic Voting in Models of Electoral Competition by Peter Coughlin Department of Economics University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742 Abstract The pioneering model of electoral competition was developed by Harold Hotelling and Anthony Downs. The model developed by Hotelling and Downs and many subsequent models in the literature about electoral competition have assumed that candidates embody policies and, if a voter is not indifferent between the policies embodied by two candidates, then the voter’s choices are fully determined by his preferences on possible polices. More specifically, those models have assumed that if a voter prefers the policies embodied by one candidate then the voter will definitely vote for that candidate. Various authors have argued that i) factors other than policy can affect a voter’s decision and ii) those other factors cause candidates to be uncertain about who a voter will vote for. These authors have modeled the candidates’ uncertainty by using a probabilistic description of the voters’ choice behavior. This paper provides a framework that is useful for discussing the model developed by Hotelling and Downs and for discussing other models of electoral competition. Using that framework, the paper discusses work that has been done on the implications of candidates being uncertain about whom the individual voters in the electorate will vote for. 1. An overview The initial step toward the development of the first model of electoral competition was taken by Hotelling (1929), who developed a model of duopolists in which each firm chooses a location for its store. Near the end of his paper, he briefly described how his duopoly model could be reinterpreted as a model of competition between two political parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Harold Hotelling 1895–1973
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES HAROLD HOTELLING 1895–1973 A Biographical Memoir by K. J. ARROW AND E. L. LEHMANN Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoirs, VOLUME 87 PUBLISHED 2005 BY THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS WASHINGTON, D.C. HAROLD HOTELLING September 29, 1895–December 26, 1973 BY K. J. ARROW AND E. L. LEHMANN AROLD HOTELLING WAS A man of many interests and talents. HAfter majoring in journalism at the University of Washington and obtaining his B.A in that field in 1919, he did his graduate work in mathematics at Princeton, where he received his Ph.D. in 1924 with a thesis on topology. Upon leaving Princeton, he took a position as research associate at the Food Research Institute of Stanford Univer- sity, from where he moved to the Stanford Mathematics Department as an associate professor in 1927. It was during his Stanford period that he began to focus on the two fields— statistics and economics—in which he would do his life’s work. He was one of the few Americans who in the 1920s realized the revolution that R. A. Fisher had brought about in statistics and he spent six months in 1929 at the Rothamstead (United Kingdom) agricultural research station to work with Fisher. In 1931 Hotelling accepted a professorship in the Eco- nomics Department of Columbia University. He taught a course in mathematical economics, but most of his energy during his 15 years there was spent developing the first program in the modern (Fisherian) theory of statistics.
    [Show full text]
  • An Experimental Investigation of the Hotelling Rule
    Price Formation Of Exhaustible Resources: An Experimental Investigation of the Hotelling Rule Christoph Neumann1, Energy Economics, Energy Research Center of Lower Saxony, 38640 Goslar, Germany, +49 (5321) 3816 8067, [email protected] Mathias Erlei, Institute of Management and Economics, Clausthal University of Technology, 38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany +49 (5323) 72 7625, [email protected] Keywords Non-renewable resource, Hotelling rule, Experiment, Continuous Double Auction Overview Although Germany has an ambitious energy strategy with the aim of a low carbon economy, around 87% of the primary energy consumption was based on the fossil energies oil, coal, gas and uranium in 2012, which all belong to the category of exhaustible resources (BMWi 2013). Harold Hotelling described in 1931 the economic theory of exhaustible resources (Hotelling 1931). The Hotelling rule states that the prices of exhaustible resources - more specifically the scarcity rent - will rise at the rate of interest, and consumption will decline over time. The equilibrium implies social optimality. However, empirical analysis shows that market prices of exhaustible resources rarely follow theoretical price paths. Nevertheless, Hotelling´s rule “continues to be a central feature of models of non-renewable resource markets” (Livernois 2009). We believe that there are difficulties in the (traditional) empirical verification but this should not lead to the invalidity of the theory in general. Our research, by using experimental methods, shows that the Hotelling rule has its justification. Furthermore, we think that the logic according to the Hotelling rule is one influencing factor among others in the price formation of exhaustible resources, therefore deviations are possible in real markets.
    [Show full text]
  • IMS Presidential Address Teaching Statistics in the Age of Data Science
    IMS Presidential Address Teaching Statistics in the Age of Data Science Jon A. Wellner University of Washington, Seattle IMS Annual Meeting, & JSM, Baltimore, July 31, 2017 IMS Annual Meeting and JSM Baltimore STATISTICS and DATA SCIENCE • What has happened and is happening? B Changes in degree structures: many new MS degree programs in Data Science. B Changes in Program and Department Names; 2+ programs with the name \Statistics and Data Science" Yale and Univ Texas at Austin. B New pathways in Data Science and Machine Learning at the PhD level: UW, CMU, and ::: • Changes (needed?) in curricula / teaching? IMS Presidential Address, Baltimore, 31 July 2017 1.2 ? Full Disclosure: 1. Task from my department chair: a. Review the theory course offerings in the Ph.D. program in Statistics at the UW. b. Recommend changes in the curriculum, if needed. 2. I will be teaching Statistics 581 and 582, Advanced Statistical Theory during Fall and Winter quarters 2017-2018. What should I be teaching? ? IMS Presidential Address, Baltimore, 31 July 2017 1.3 Exciting times for Statistics and Data Science: • Increasing demand! • Challenges of \big data": B challenges for computation B challenges for theory • Changes needed in statistical education? IMS Presidential Address, Baltimore, 31 July 2017 1.4 Exciting times for Statistics and Data Science: • Increasing demand! Projections, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2014-24: Job Description Increase % • Statisticians 34% • Mathematicians 21% • Software Developer 17% • Computer and Information Research Scientists
    [Show full text]
  • Asymptotic Theory for Canonical Correlation Analysis
    Journal of Multivariate Analysis 70, 129 (1999) Article ID jmva.1999.1810, available online at http:ÂÂwww.idealibrary.com on Asymptotic Theory for Canonical Correlation Analysis T. W. Anderson Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-4065 Received November 30, 1998 The asymptotic distribution of the sample canonical correlations and coefficients of the canonical variates is obtained when the nonzero population canonical correlations are distinct and sampling is from the normal distribution. The asymptotic distributions are also obtained for reduced rank regression when one set of variables is treated as independent (stochastic or nonstochastic) and the other set View metadata,as dependent. citation Earlier and similar work papers is corrected. at core.ac.uk 1999 Academic Press brought to you by CORE AMS 1991 subject classifications: 62H10, 62H20. provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Key Words: canonical variates; reduced rank regression; maximum likelihood estimators; test of rank. 1. INTRODUCTION Hotelling (1936) proposed canonical correlations as invariant measures of relationships between two sets of variates. Suppose that the two random vectors Y and X of p and q components ( pq), respectively, have the covariance matrix 7 7 7= YY YX (1.1) \7XY 7XX+ with 7YY and 7XX nonsingular. The first canonical correlation, say \1 ,is the maximum correlation between linear combinations U=:$Y and V=#$X. The maximizing linear combinations normalized so var U= var V=1 and denoted U1=:$1 Y and V1=#$1 X are the first canonical variates. The second canonical correlation \2 is the maximum correlation between linear combinations U=:$Y and V=#$X uncorrelated with U1 and V1 .
    [Show full text]
  • Subsidies, Savings and Sustainable Technology Adoption: Field Experimental Evidence from Mozambique∗
    Subsidies, Savings and Sustainable Technology Adoption: Field Experimental Evidence from Mozambique∗ Michael R. Carter University of California, Davis, NBER, BREAD and the Giannini Foundation Rachid Laajaj Universidad de los Andes Dean Yang University of Michigan, NBER and BREAD July 6, 2016 Abstract We conducted a randomized experiment in Mozambique exploring the inter- action of technology adoption subsidies with savings interventions. Theoretically, combining technology subsidies with savings interventions could either promote technology adoption (dynamic enhancement), or reduce adoption by encouraging savings accumulation for self-insurance and other purposes (dynamic substitution). Empirically, the latter possibility dominates. Subsidy-only recipients raised fertil- izer use in the subsidized season and for two subsequent unsubsidized seasons. Consumption rose, but was accompanied by higher consumption risk. By con- trast, when paired with savings interventions, subsidy impacts on fertilizer use disappear. Instead, households accumulate bank savings, which appear to serve as self-insurance. Keywords: Savings, subsidies, technology adoption, fertilizer, risk, agriculture, Mozam- bique JEL classification: C93, D24, D91, G21, O12, O13, O16, Q12, Q14 ∗Contacts: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]. Acknowlegements: An- iceto Matias and Ines Vilela provided outstanding field management. This research was conducted in collabora- tion with the International Fertilizer Development Corporation (IFDC), and in particular we thank Alexander Fernando, Robert Groot, Erik Schmidt, and Marcel Vandenberg. We appreciate the feedback we received from seminar participants at Brown, PACDEV 2015, the University of Washington, Erasmus, the Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Development Economics Network Berlin (DENeB), the \Improving Productivity in De- veloping Countries" conference (Goodenough College London), UC Berkeley, Stanford, and Yale.
    [Show full text]
  • Price Formation of Exhaustible Resources: an Experimental Investigation of the Hotelling Rule
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Neumann, Christoph; Erlei, Mathias Working Paper Price Formation of Exhaustible Resources: An Experimental Investigation of the Hotelling Rule TUC Working Papers in Economics, No. 13 Provided in Cooperation with: Clausthal University of Technology, Department of Economics Suggested Citation: Neumann, Christoph; Erlei, Mathias (2014) : Price Formation of Exhaustible Resources: An Experimental Investigation of the Hotelling Rule, TUC Working Papers in Economics, No. 13, Technische Universität Clausthal, Abteilung für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Clausthal-Zellerfeld, http://dx.doi.org/10.21268/20161213-152658 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/107454 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung
    [Show full text]
  • A Non-Normal Principal Components Model for Security Returns
    A Non-Normal Principal Components Model for Security Returns Sander Gerber Babak Javid Harry Markowitz Paul Sargen David Starer February 21, 2019 Abstract We introduce a principal components model for securities' returns. The components are non-normal, exhibiting significant skewness and kurtosis. The model can explain a large proportion of the variance of the securities' returns with only one or two components. Third and higher-order components individually contribute so little that they can be considered to be noise terms. 1 Introduction In this paper, we propose a non-normal principal component model of the stock market. We create the model from a statistical study of a broad cross-section of approximately 5,000 US equities daily for 20 years. In our analysis, we find that only a small number of components can explain a significant amount of the variance of the securities' return. Generally, third and higher-order compo- nents (essentially, the idiosyncratic terms) individually contribute so little to the variance that they can be considered to be noise terms. Importantly, we find that neither the significant components nor the idiosyncratic terms are normally distributed. Both sets exhibit significant skewness and kurtosis. Therefore, traditional models based on normal distributions are not fully descriptive of security returns. They can neither represent the extreme movements and comovements that security returns often exhibit, nor the low-level economically insignificant noise that security returns also often exhibit. However, these characteristics can be represented by the model presented in this paper. The finding of non-normality implies that meaningful security analysis requires statistical measures (1) that are insensitive to extreme moves, (2) that are also not influenced by small movements that may be noise, but (3) that still capture information in movements when such movements are meaningful.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial Highlights Newsfront
    Editorial ¾ The 50th Anniversary of the Treaty of Rome and official statistics ......... 2 Highlights ¾ Euro-IND statistical news............................................................................ 4 ¾ Insight on: Celebrating Europe! A Statistical portrait of the European Union 2007 .................................................................................................. 10 Newsfront ¾ News from the Member States .................................................................. 11 ¾ Forthcoming events.................................................................................... 14 ¾ Cool tools and sites: Celebrating Europe! 50thAnniversary of the treaty of Rome........................................................................................................ 20 ¾ Webtrends................................................................................................... 22 ¾ Contact us.................................................................................................... 22 EUROINDICATORS Editorial ¾ The 50th Anniversary of the Treaty of Rome and official statistics The 50th anniversary of the Treaty of Rome is a good reason to look back at what official European statisticians have achieved over the last fifty years. In the early days they put together those national statistics that helped to shape specific EU policies, initially for coal and steel and later for agriculture. For the customs union they harmonised external trade statistics, and for the Common Market they evolved the basis for European
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Valuation of Cultural Heritage: Application of Travel Cost Method to the National Museum and Research Center of Altamira
    sustainability Article Economic Valuation of Cultural Heritage: Application of Travel Cost Method to the National Museum and Research Center of Altamira Saúl Torres-Ortega 1,* ID , Rubén Pérez-Álvarez 2 ID , Pedro Díaz-Simal 1 ID , Julio Manuel de Luis-Ruiz 2 and Felipe Piña-García 2 1 Environmental Hydraulics Institute, University of Cantabria, 39011 Santander, Spain; [email protected] 2 Cartographic Engineering and Mining Exploitation R+D+i Group, University of Cantabria, 39316 Torrelavega, Spain; [email protected] (R.P.-Á.); [email protected] (J.M.d.L.-R.); [email protected] (F.P.-G.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-942-201616 (ext. 1218) Received: 11 June 2018; Accepted: 19 July 2018; Published: 20 July 2018 Abstract: The economic assessment of non-marketed resources (i.e., cultural heritage) can be developed with stated or revealed preference methods. Travel cost method (TCM) is based on the demand theory and assumes that the demand for a recreational site is inversely related to the travel costs that a certain visitor must face to enjoy it. Its application requires data about the tourist’s origin. This work aims to analyze the economic value of the National Museum and Research Center of Altamira, which was created to research, conserve, and broadcast the Cave of Altamira (UNESCO World Heritage Site since 1985). It includes an accurate replica known as the “Neocave”. Two different TCM approaches have been applied to obtain the demand curve of the museum, which is a powerful tool that helps to assess past and future investments.
    [Show full text]
  • Computing Exact Power and Sample Size for Hotelling's T2-Test And
    Computing Exact Power and Sample Size for Hotelling’s T2-test and Related Multivariate Procedures Jimmy Thomas Efird, Ph.D., M.Sc.1,2 Kavitha Alimineti, B.Sc.1 1Biostatistics and Data Management Facility, John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, HI; 2Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA ABSTRACT Multiple comparisons often arise in medical and epidemiologic research and several methods exist for adjusting statistical significance levels. In this paper, we discuss the multivariate method attributed to Harold Hotelling for handling multiplicity in the p- variate two-sample case. A generalized method is derived for computing the exact power for this test. The technique may be easily adapted to other multivariate procedures that utilize the T2-statistic. INTRODUCTION Given the case of p-variate observations from two multivariate normally-distributed populations with common covariance matrix, Hotelling’s T2-statistic may be used to test the equality of the vector of means associated with the above samples. If the null hypothesis of equal means is rejected, then simultaneous confidence intervals may be constructed to determine which components of the mean vector differ between the two groups. Below, we derive the exact power for Hotelling’s T2-test. METHODOLOGY Let d denote the vector of mean differences and S the common sample covariance matrix based on random samples of sizes n1 and n2 from two p–variate normally-distributed populations. A direct extension of the univariate pooled t-test to multivariate space (Kelsey, et al., 1996; Kramer, 1972) gives the exact power for Hotelling’s T-test as (n + n2 − 2)p = ( ) /( + )dS-1d'− 1 (1) T power n1n2 n1 n2 Fp,n1+ n2-p-1, (n1+ n2 − p −1) where is the 100 (1−α) centile of the F-distribution with p and n +n -p-1 Fp,n1+ n2-p-1 1 2 degrees of freedom (Johnson and Wichern, 1982).
    [Show full text]
  • THE EPIC STORY of MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD 3 Error Probabilities Follow a Curve
    Statistical Science 2007, Vol. 22, No. 4, 598–620 DOI: 10.1214/07-STS249 c Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2007 The Epic Story of Maximum Likelihood Stephen M. Stigler Abstract. At a superficial level, the idea of maximum likelihood must be prehistoric: early hunters and gatherers may not have used the words “method of maximum likelihood” to describe their choice of where and how to hunt and gather, but it is hard to believe they would have been surprised if their method had been described in those terms. It seems a simple, even unassailable idea: Who would rise to argue in favor of a method of minimum likelihood, or even mediocre likelihood? And yet the mathematical history of the topic shows this “simple idea” is really anything but simple. Joseph Louis Lagrange, Daniel Bernoulli, Leonard Euler, Pierre Simon Laplace and Carl Friedrich Gauss are only some of those who explored the topic, not always in ways we would sanction today. In this article, that history is reviewed from back well before Fisher to the time of Lucien Le Cam’s dissertation. In the process Fisher’s unpublished 1930 characterization of conditions for the consistency and efficiency of maximum likelihood estimates is presented, and the mathematical basis of his three proofs discussed. In particular, Fisher’s derivation of the information inequality is seen to be derived from his work on the analysis of variance, and his later approach via estimating functions was derived from Euler’s Relation for homogeneous functions. The reaction to Fisher’s work is reviewed, and some lessons drawn.
    [Show full text]