DOCSLIB.ORG

Classical World

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CLASSICAL WORLD Published for the Classical Association of the Atlantic States by the Johns Hopkins University Press CO-EDITORS Robin Mitchell-Boyask, Lee T. Pearcy, Temple University Bryn Mawr College ASSOCIATE EDITOR Judith P. Hallett, University of Maryland, College Park ASSOCIATE EDITOR Victoria Pedrick, Georgetown University ASSOCIATE EDITOR James Romm, Bard College REVIEWS EDITOR David Sider, New York University ASSISTANT EDITOR Sarah Wahlberg, The Episcopal Academy EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Abbe Walker, Bryn Mawr College CAAS PRESIDENT Janet M. Martin, Princeton University CAAS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Mary Brown, Valley Forge Military Academy CCLWLW 1107.407.4 11stst ppages.inddages.indd i 77/3/2014/3/2014 33:18:55:18:55 PPMM Classical World ISSN 0009-8418 © 2014 by The Classical Association of the Atlantic States, Inc. All rights reserved. Classical World (ISSN 0009-8418), formerly The Classical Weekly (est. 1907), is pub- lished four times a year (Fall: September–November, Winter: December–February, Spring: March–May, Summer: June–August) ) for The Classical Association of the Atlantic States, Inc., by The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2715 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218-4363, USA. Periodicals Postage paid at Baltimore, Maryland, and additional mail- ing offi ces. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Classical World, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Journals Division, 2715 N. Charles Street, Baltimore MD 21218-4363. Submissions. All articles should be sent to Robin Mitchell-Boyask, 327 Anderson Hall, Department of Classics, Temple University, 1114 West Berks St., Philadelphia, Pennsyl- vania 19122; email: [email protected]. Books for review should be sent to Gareth Wil- liams, Department of Classics, Columbia University, 1130 Amsterdam Ave., 617 Hamilton Hall, MC 2861, New York, NY 10027, email: [email protected]. Authors of articles should send submissions electronically as PDFs. Since submissions are judged anonymous- ly, authorship and affi liation should be revealed only in an accompanying e-mail. Authors of accepted articles will be expected to submit their fi nal versions in a Word document for- matted in accordance with a style sheet which will be sent to them. Acceptance of an arti- cle is contingent upon the author’s signing a standard publication agreement, and Classical World reserves the right to make or require edits for style, clarity, and editorial consistency. Permissions. No portion of this journal may be reproduced by any process or technique without the formal consent of the publisher. Copies for personal or internal use may be made on the condition that the copier pay a fee of $8.00 per copy through the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Dr., Danvers, MA 01970, for copying beyond that per- mitted by Section 107 or 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law. This consent does not extend to other kinds of copying, such as copying for general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes, for creating new collective works, or for resale. (0009-8418/13) $8.00. Direct all other permissions requests to Permissions Manager at www.press.jhu. edu/cgi-bin/permissions.cgi. Subscription Prices. Individual membership rate is $35 (print). Institutional rate per year is $65.00 (print); $72.00 (online); $91.00 (print and online). Print subscribers in Canada or Mexico, please add $10.00 postage; all other countries, add $13.00 airfreight. Prepay- ment is required for shipment or access. Send subscription inquiries, orders, and business correspondence to: The Johns Hopkins University Press, Journals Division P.O. Box 19966 Baltimore, MD 21211-0966 (USA) (410) 516-6987 Tollfree 1-800-548-1784 (US and Canada only) Fax (410) 516-6968 E-mail [email protected] Or visit our website: https://www.press.jhu.edu/journals/classical_world/ Advertisers. Please see our website above for details and deadlines. This publication was designed by The Johns Hopkins University Press, Journals Division. The paper used in this publication meets the requirements of ANSI-NISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper). CCLWLW 1107.407.4 11stst ppages.inddages.indd iiii 77/3/2014/3/2014 33:18:59:18:59 PPMM CLASSICAL WORLD SPECIAL SECTION: RECENT WORK ON TIBULLUS Introduction: Recent Work on Tibullus Erika Zimmermann Damer | 443 Metrical Feet on the Road of Poetry: Foot Puns and Literary Polemic in Tibullus John Henkel | 451 Imperial Geographies in Tibullan Elegy Alison Keith | 477 Gender Reversals and Intertextuality in Tibullus Erika Zimmermann Damer | 493 ARTICLE Sexual Promiscuity of Non-Greeks in Herodotus’ Histories Richard Wenghofer | 515 SCHOLIA Croesus, Xerxes, and the Denial of Death (Hdt. 1.29-34; 7.44-53) William N. Turpin | 535 IN MEMORIAM | 543 OVATIONES ET GRATULATIO | 545 REVIEWS | 553 BOOKS RECEIVED | 571 INDEX TO VOLUME 107 | 579 WHOLE NUMBER 1592 CCLWLW 1107.407.4 11stst ppages.inddages.indd iiiiii 77/3/2014/3/2014 33:18:59:18:59 PPMM Robin Mitchell Boyask Temple University 1114 West Berks St. Philadelphia, PA 19122 email: [email protected] CCLWLW 1107.407.4 11stst ppages.inddages.indd iivv 77/3/2014/3/2014 33:18:59:18:59 PPMM INTRODUCTION Recent Work on Tibullus* ERIKA ZIMMERMANN DAMER ABSTRACT: This introduction provides an overview of Tibullus’ life, his poetry, and his style, and offers a bibliographical survey of emerging critical trends in interpreting this relatively neglected Roman elegist. Roman poets and literary critics widely praised Tibullus’ poetry: Horace teases the elegist (Carm. 1.33, Ep. 1.4); Ovid praises his poetry (Am. 1.15.28, Ars 3.334, Rem. 763, Tr. 4.10.51–53) and eulogizes him after his death (Am. 3.9); and both Velleius Paterculus (2.36.3) and Quin- tilian (Inst. 10.1.93) elevate him to the top of the elegiac canon. Yet despite the ancients’ high esteem for him, Tibullus has done less well among moderns. Both in the classroom and in Anglo-American scholar- ship, he has garnered far less praise and attention than either Propertius or Ovid. This tide may now be turning: we have two new translations1 and a new reader,2 all of which promise to bring Tibullus’ poems to a wider student audience. The two translations feature the work of two of Tibullus’ great commentators: the posthumous translation of Rod- ney Dennis completed and expanded by Michael Putnam attempts to reproduce Tibullus’ “immediate, unpretentious, but deceptively simple *Many thanks are due to our audience members and to my fellow panelists at the APA’s 2009 panel on “New Approaches to Tibullus”: Alison Keith, John Henkel and David Wray; to Sharon James and Jim O’Hara for their generous and acute feedback throughout different stages of this project; and to Megan Drinkwater and Konstantinos Nikoloutsos for sharing advance copies of their work. The Faculty Research Council at the University of Richmond provided generous support for this project. I wish also to thank CW’s anon- ymous referees for their helpful feedback and its editors (both previous and current) Mat- thew Santirocco, Judith Hallett, Robin Mitchell-Boyask, and Lee Pearcy for being effi cient, thorough, and fair. Any errors that remain in this collection are mine alone. 1 A. M. Juster, tr., Tibullus Elegies. With an introduction and notes by R. Maltby (Oxford 2012); R. Dennis and M. Putnam, trs., The Complete Poems of Tibullus. An En Face Bilingual Edition. With an introduction by J. H. Gaisser (Berkeley 2012). 2 P. A. Miller. A Tibullus Reader. Seven Selected Elegies (Mundelein, Ill. 2013). Classical World, vol. 107, no. 4 (2014) Pp.443–450 CCLWLW 1107.407.4 11stst ppages.inddages.indd 444343 77/3/2014/3/2014 33:18:59:18:59 PPMM 444 Classical World style,”3 while A. M. Juster, in a new Oxford World’s Classics edition introduced and annotated by Robert Maltby, seeks to capture internal and end-rhyme as well as to imitate Tibullus’ alliteration and assonance.4 Since these new publications promise to improve Tibullus’ fortunes in the classroom, the time is ripe to refocus scholarly attention on this un- der-appreciated Augustan elegist. We have therefore brought together in one place several innovative critical approaches to Tibullus’ poetry in hopes of fostering many more fruitful conversations. The essays that follow formed the core of an APA panel on “New Approaches to Tibullus” and represent several of the new avenues that have emerged in the study of Tibullus’ poetry in the decade since the publication of Maltby’s scholarly commentary in 2002. John Henkel’s essay on foot puns offers a philological study of Tibullus’ references to feet, which builds upon the groundwork of Keith and Fineberg to at- tempt a metapoetic reading of poem 1.1.5 Alison Keith’s essay examines Tibullus’ aestheticization of imperialism, engaging in dialogue along the way with Keith’s own work on Propertius and with Lowell Bowditch’s recent series of articles on post-colonialism and imperialism in Roman love elegy.6 Finally, Erika Zimmermann Damer’s essay on Tibullan allu- sion and gender reversals brings continued attention to the Marathus poems (1.4, 1.8, 1.9), where elegy offers its most intense experiment in representing male-male love.7 3 Dennis (above, n.1) x. 4 Juster (above, n.1) xxviii. 5 A. Keith, “Slender Verse: Roman Elegy and Ancient Rhetorical Theory,” Mnemo- syne 52 (1999) 41–62; B. Fineberg, “From a Sure Foot to Faltering Meters: the Dark Ladies of Tibullan Elegy,” in M. DeForest, ed., Woman’s Power, Man’s Game: Essays on Classical Antiquity in Honor of Joy K. King (Wauconda, Ill. 1993) 249–56; B. Fineberg, “Repetition and the Poetics of Desire in Tibullus 1.4,” CW 92 (2000) 419–28. 6 A. Keith, Propertius, Poet of Love and Leisure (London 2008); L. Bowditch, “Prop- ertius and the Gendered Rhetoric of Luxury and Empire: A Reading of 2.16,” CLS 43 (2006) 306–25; L.
Recommended publications
  • Journeys to Byzantium? Roman Senators Between Rome and Constantinople

    Journeys to Byzantium? Roman Senators Between Rome and Constantinople

    Journeys to Byzantium? Roman Senators Between Rome and Constantinople Master’s Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Michael Anthony Carrozzo, B.A Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2010 Thesis Committee: Kristina Sessa, Advisor Timothy Gregory Anthony Kaldellis Copyright by Michael Anthony Carrozzo 2010 Abstract For over a thousand years, the members of the Roman senatorial aristocracy played a pivotal role in the political and social life of the Roman state. Despite being eclipsed by the power of the emperors in the first century BC, the men who made up this order continued to act as the keepers of Roman civilization for the next four hundred years, maintaining their traditions even beyond the disappearance of an emperor in the West. Despite their longevity, the members of the senatorial aristocracy faced an existential crisis following the Ostrogothic conquest of the Italian peninsula, when the forces of the Byzantine emperor Justinian I invaded their homeland to contest its ownership. Considering the role they played in the later Roman Empire, the disappearance of the Roman senatorial aristocracy following this conflict is a seminal event in the history of Italy and Western Europe, as well as Late Antiquity. Two explanations have been offered to explain the subsequent disappearance of the Roman senatorial aristocracy. The first involves a series of migrations, beginning before the Gothic War, from Italy to Constantinople, in which members of this body abandoned their homes and settled in the eastern capital.
  • 1 ETHNICITY and JEWISH IDENTITY in JOSEPHUS by DAVID

    1 ETHNICITY and JEWISH IDENTITY in JOSEPHUS by DAVID

    ETHNICITY AND JEWISH IDENTITY IN JOSEPHUS By DAVID McCLISTER A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2008 1 © 2008 David McClister 2 To the memory of my father, Dorval L. McClister, who instilled in me a love of learning; to the memory of Dr. Phil Roberts, my esteemed colleague; and to my wife, Lisa, without whose support this dissertation, or much else that I do, would not have been possible. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I gladly recognize my supervisory committee chair (Dr. Konstantinos Kapparis, Associate Professor in the Classics Department at the University of Florida). I also wish to thank the other supervisory commiteee members (Dr. Jennifer Rea, Dr. Gareth Schmeling, and Dr. Gwynn Kessler as a reader from the Religious Studies Department). It is an honor to have their contributions and to work under their guidance. I also wish to thank the library staff at the University of Florida and at Florida College (especially Ashley Barlar) who did their work so well and retrieved the research materials necessary for this project. I also wish to thank my family for their patient indulgence as I have robbed them of time to give attention to the work necessary to pursue my academic interests. BWGRKL [Greek] Postscript® Type 1 and TrueTypeT font Copyright © 1994-2006 BibleWorks, LLC. All rights reserved. These Biblical Greek and Hebrew fonts are used with permission and are from BibleWorks, software for Biblical
  • TRADITIONAL POETRY and the ANNALES of QUINTUS ENNIUS John Francis Fisher A

    TRADITIONAL POETRY and the ANNALES of QUINTUS ENNIUS John Francis Fisher A

    REINVENTING EPIC: TRADITIONAL POETRY AND THE ANNALES OF QUINTUS ENNIUS John Francis Fisher A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE FACULTY OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY RECOMMENDED FOR ACCEPTANCE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CLASSICS SEPTEMBER 2006 UMI Number: 3223832 UMI Microform 3223832 Copyright 2006 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 © Copyright by John Francis Fisher, 2006. All rights reserved. ii Reinventing Epic: Traditional Poetry and the Annales of Quintus Ennius John Francis Fisher Abstract The present scholarship views the Annales of Quintus Ennius as a hybrid of the Latin Saturnian and Greek hexameter traditions. This configuration overlooks the influence of a larger and older tradition of Italic verbal art which manifests itself in documents such as the prayers preserved in Cato’s De agricultura in Latin, the Iguvine Tables in Umbrian, and documents in other Italic languages including Oscan and South Picene. These documents are marked by three salient features: alliterative doubling figures, figurae etymologicae, and a pool of traditional phraseology which may be traced back to Proto-Italic, the reconstructed ancestor of the Italic languages. A close examination of the fragments of the Annales reveals that all three of these markers of Italic verbal art are integral parts of the diction the poem. Ennius famously remarked that he possessed three hearts, one Latin, one Greek and one Oscan, which the second century writer Aulus Gellius understands as ability to speak three languages.
  • Lucan's Natural Questions: Landscape and Geography in the Bellum Civile Laura Zientek a Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulf

    Lucan's Natural Questions: Landscape and Geography in the Bellum Civile Laura Zientek a Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulf

    Lucan’s Natural Questions: Landscape and Geography in the Bellum Civile Laura Zientek A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2014 Reading Committee: Catherine Connors, Chair Alain Gowing Stephen Hinds Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Classics © Copyright 2014 Laura Zientek University of Washington Abstract Lucan’s Natural Questions: Landscape and Geography in the Bellum Civile Laura Zientek Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Catherine Connors Department of Classics This dissertation is an analysis of the role of landscape and the natural world in Lucan’s Bellum Civile. I investigate digressions and excurses on mountains, rivers, and certain myths associated aetiologically with the land, and demonstrate how Stoic physics and cosmology – in particular the concepts of cosmic (dis)order, collapse, and conflagration – play a role in the way Lucan writes about the landscape in the context of a civil war poem. Building on previous analyses of the Bellum Civile that provide background on its literary context (Ahl, 1976), on Lucan’s poetic technique (Masters, 1992), and on landscape in Roman literature (Spencer, 2010), I approach Lucan’s depiction of the natural world by focusing on the mutual effect of humanity and landscape on each other. Thus, hardships posed by the land against characters like Caesar and Cato, gloomy and threatening atmospheres, and dangerous or unusual weather phenomena all have places in my study. I also explore how Lucan’s landscapes engage with the tropes of the locus amoenus or horridus (Schiesaro, 2006) and elements of the sublime (Day, 2013).
  • Epic Anger, and the State of the (Roman) Soul in Virgil's First Simile1

    Epic Anger, and the State of the (Roman) Soul in Virgil's First Simile1

    Epic Anger, and the State of the (Roman) Soul in Virgil’s First Simile1 Kirk Freudenburg Yale University Virgil’s Aeneid begins with the goddess, Juno, both ‘still’ and ‘already’ angry: mene incepto desistere victam? ‘Am I to desist from what I’ve begun, beaten?’ Rivers of Trojan blood have been spilt, and Priam’s city has been looted and leveled. Extreme revenge has been exacted in the form of retaliatory rapes, forced enslavements, and so on. And yet somehow Juno thinks that her project of paying back the Trojans is not only not f nished, but only just begun. T e famous, translinguistic pun that issues from her f rst words (mene incepto) reminds us of Achilles’ rage, certainly, but by the Iliad’s end Achilles has gained some 1 T is paper is a heuristic ‘f rst go’ at an idea that I have been mulling over for years, on the problem of anger in ancient epic, and the soul work of Virgil’s f rst simile. Since I plan to do a larger workup of these ideas for a (distantly) forthcoming book, I will be more than happy to receive feedback on the paper’s contents and arguments. T e paper’s core ideas were tested at the annual Latin Day Colloquium held at Yale University on April 16, 2016. For helpful com- ments and criticisms, I wish to thank the day’s star and colloquium leader, Denis Feeney, as well as the event’s invited speakers, Jay Reed, Tom Biggs, and Irene Peirano. T anks also to Christina Kraus for organizing the event, and to the group of graduate respondents who were active participants throughout the day: Niek Janssen, Rachel Love, Kyle Conrau-Lewis, and Treasa Bell.
  • A New Era in the Study of Global History Is Born but It Needs to Be Nurtured

    A New Era in the Study of Global History Is Born but It Needs to Be Nurtured

    [JCH 5.1-2 (2018–19)] JCH (print) ISSN 2051-9672 https://doi.org/10.1558/jch.39422 JCH (online) ISSN 2051-9680 A New Era in the Study of Global History is Born but It Needs to be Nurtured Harvey Whitehouse1 University of Oxford, UK Email: [email protected] (corresponding author) Peter Turchin2 University of Connecticut Email: [email protected] (corresponding author) Pieter François3, Patrick E. Savage4, Thomas E. Currie5, Kevin C. Feeney6, Enrico Cioni7, Rosalind Purcell8, Robert M. Ross9, Jennifer Larson10, John Baines11, Barend ter Haar12, R. Alan Covey13 Abstract: Thisa rticle is a response to Slingerland e t al. who criticize the quality of the data from Seshat: Global History Databank utilized in our Nature paper entitled “Complex Societies Precede Moralizing Gods throughout World History”. Their cri- tique centres around the roles played by research assistants and experts in procuring and curating data, periodization structure, and so-called “data pasting” and “data fill- ing”. We show that these criticisms are based on misunderstandings or misrepresenta- tions of the methods used by Seshat researchers. Overall, Slingerland et al.’s critique (which is crosslinked online here) does not call into question any of our main findings, but it does highlight various shortcomings of Slingerland et al.’s database project. Our collective efforts to code and quantify features of global history hold out the promise of a new era in the study of global history but only if critique can be conducted con- structively in good faith and both the benefitsa nd the pitfalls of open science fully recognized.
  • Barbarians at the Gate: Herodotus, Bisotun, and a Persian Punishment in Egypt

    Barbarians at the Gate: Herodotus, Bisotun, and a Persian Punishment in Egypt

    Barbarians at the Gate: Herodotus, Bisotun, and a Persian Punishment in Egypt Keating P. J. McKeon American Journal of Philology, Volume 141, Number 3 (Whole Number 563), Fall 2020, pp. 349-380 (Article) Published by Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/ajp.2020.0020 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/763624 [ Access provided at 27 Jan 2021 06:13 GMT from Harvard Library ] BARBARIANS AT THE GATE: HERODOTUS, BISOTUN, AND A PERSIAN PUNISHMENT IN EGYPT KEATING P. J. MCKEON u Abstract: This paper argues that Cambyses’ treatment of Psammenitus in Book 3 of Herodotus’ Histories constitutes the adaptation of a punishment recorded in the Old Persian text of the Bisotun inscription. By outlining a typology for the practice, the article demonstrates the primacy of a Persian source, and proposes a series of specific, programmatically significant alterations made by Herodotus in the constructi on of the punishment. The resulting episode represents a complex engagement with questions arising from the Persian invasion of Egypt both in the Histories and in the wider historical record concerning Cambyses’ legitimacy as Egyptian ruler. RECENT WOrk ON HERODOTUS has done much to elucidate his incorporation, and deliberate modification, of Near Eastern material.1 Rather than obvious processes of either direct insertion or uneasy Hel- lenization, the appearance of such material often reflects a sophisticated attempt to tailor raw sources to fit the wider context of the Histories and address the author’s recurrent concerns. The treatment of Psammenitus by Cambyses detailed in Book 3 has been studied more often for its lachrymose outcome than its punitive design.2 Closer examination reveals a particularly striking example of non-Greek practice subtly refashioned to accommodate a Greek narrative pattern.
  • Latin Grammar in the Cathedral School: Fulbert of Chartres, Bonipert of Pécs, and the Way of a Lost Priscian Manuscript

    Latin Grammar in the Cathedral School: Fulbert of Chartres, Bonipert of Pécs, and the Way of a Lost Priscian Manuscript

    Quidditas Volume 22 Article 4 2001 Latin Grammar in the Cathedral School: Fulbert of Chartres, Bonipert of Pécs, and the Way of a Lost Priscian Manuscript Elöd Nemerkényi Erasmus Institute, Notre Dame Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/rmmra Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, History Commons, Philosophy Commons, and the Renaissance Studies Commons Recommended Citation Nemerkényi, Elöd (2001) "Latin Grammar in the Cathedral School: Fulbert of Chartres, Bonipert of Pécs, and the Way of a Lost Priscian Manuscript," Quidditas: Vol. 22 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/rmmra/vol22/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Quidditas by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Latin Grammar in the Cathedral School: Fulbert of Chartres, Bonipert of Pécs, and the Way of a Lost Priscian Manuscript Elöd Nemerkényi Erasmus Institute, Notre Dame HE STARTING POINT OF THE CLASSICAL tradition in medieval Hun- gary is marked by a letter written by Bishop Fulbert of Chartres in TNorthern France to Bishop Bonipert of Pécs in Southern Hun- gary.1 In this letter, dated by its editor to 1023, Fulbert assured his col- league, Bonipert that he was going to send him one of his copies of Priscian: “Our son and your faithful servant Hilduin has told us of your gestures of charity toward us and dutifully stated that you would like one of our copies of Priscian.
  • Some Latin Authors from the Greek East Author(S): Joseph Geiger Source: the Classical Quarterly, Vol. 49, No. 2 (1999), Pp. 606

    Some Latin Authors from the Greek East Author(S): Joseph Geiger Source: the Classical Quarterly, Vol. 49, No. 2 (1999), Pp. 606

    Some Latin Authors from the Greek East Author(s): Joseph Geiger Source: The Classical Quarterly, Vol. 49, No. 2 (1999), pp. 606-617 Published by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of Classical Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/639882 Accessed: 05-01-2016 14:09 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Classical Association and Cambridge University Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Classical Quarterly. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 147.52.9.57 on Tue, 05 Jan 2016 14:09:53 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions ClassicalQuarterly 49.2 606-617 (1999)Printed in GreatBritain 606 SOME LATIN AUTHORS FROM THE GREEK EAST' 1. THE PATRIA OF PRISCIAN A In a discussion of the spread of Latin in ancient Palestine it has been argued that, apart from Westerners like Jerome who settled in the province and a number of translators from Greek into Latin and from Latin into Greek, three Latin authors whose works are extant may have been, with various degrees of probability, natives of the country. These are
  • The Ghosts of Monotheism: Heaven, Fortune, and Universalism in Early Chinese and Greco-Roman Historiography

    The Ghosts of Monotheism: Heaven, Fortune, and Universalism in Early Chinese and Greco-Roman Historiography

    The Ghosts of Monotheism: Heaven, Fortune, and Universalism in Early Chinese and Greco-Roman Historiography FILIPPO MARSILI Saint Louis University [email protected] Abstract: This essay analyzes the creation of the empires of Rome over the Medi- terranean and of the Han dynasty over the Central Plains between the third and the second centuries BCE. It focuses on the historiographical oeuvres of Polybius and Sima Qian, as the two men tried to make sense of the unification of the world as they knew it. The essay does away with the subsequent methodological and conceptual biases introduced by interpreters who approached the material from the vantage point of Abrahamic religions, according to which transcendent per- sonal entities could favor the foundation of unitary political and moral systems. By considering the impact of the different contexts and of the two authors’ sub- jective experiences, the essay tries to ascertain the extent to which Polybius and Sima Qian tended to associate unified rule with the triumph of universal values and the establishment of superior, divine justice. All profound changes in consciousness, by their very nature, bring with them characteristic amnesias. Out of such oblivions, in specific historical circumstances, spring narratives.—Benedict Anderson1 The nation as the subject of History is never able to completely bridge the aporia between the past and the present.—Prasenjit Duara2 Any structure is the ingenuous re-proposition of a hidden god; any systemic approach might actually constitute a crypto-theology.—Benedetto Croce3 Introduction: Monotheism, Systemic Unities, and Ethnocentrism Scholars who engage in comparisons are often wary of the ethnocentric biases that lurk behind their endeavors.
  • Hannibal's Gaze and Ekphrasis in the Punica Of

    Hannibal's Gaze and Ekphrasis in the Punica Of

    VISIONS OF GRANDEUR: HANNIBAL’S GAZE AND EKPHRASIS IN THE PUNICA OF SILIUS ITALICUS by SEAN MATHIS (Under the Direction of Mario Erasmo) ABSTRACT This is a thesis about Silius Italicus, a Latin poet, who wrote his epic poem, the Punica, during the reign of the emperor Domitian. Silius wrote his epic poem in the period after Vergil’s Aeneid, and, like his literary contemporaries, was forced to contend with his poetic forebears in order to insert his own poem into the Latin epic tradition. Thus, the poet looks back to Vergil, his principal poetic predecessor, through his use of allusion, metaphor, and other poetic imagery. The poem is also historical in nature, covering the period leading up to the Second Punic War, and Silius necessarily looks back to his historical predecessors, notably the Latin historian Livy. Silius creates, within the Punica, an interesting allusive technique that allows for a literary dialogue between the historical and epic genres, thus guaranteeing his position as a successor to both Vergil and Livy. INDEX WORDS: Silius Italicus, Punica, Second Punic War, Ekphrasis, Silver Age Latin, Silver Epic, Imperial Epic, Hannibal, Saguntum, Allusion, Successors of Vergil VISIONS OF GRANDEUR: HANNIBAL’S GAZE AND EKPHRASIS IN THE PUNICA OF SILIUS ITALICUS by SEAN MATHIS A.B., Baylor University, 2002 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS ATHENS, GEORGIA 2004 © 2004 Sean Mathis All Rights Reserved VISIONS OF GRANDEUR: HANNIBAL’S GAZE AND EKPHRASIS IN THE PUNICA OF SILIUS ITALICUS by SEAN MATHIS Major Professor: Mario Erasmo Committee: Robert Curtis Keith Dix Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia May 2004 DEDICATION This being my first publication to have the honor of being bound in a hard cover, I dedicate it to you, my loving wife, Amanda.
  • Response to Reviewers on How the Gospels Became History

    Response to Reviewers on How the Gospels Became History

    M. David Litwa. SBL Draft Paper. December 2020 M. David Litwa, Australian Catholic University, Institute for Religion and Critical Inquiry How the Gospels Became History: Reflections on a Recent Monograph (20 min) Tag(s): History of Christianity (History & Culture), New Testament (Ideology & Theology), Myth (Ancient Near Eastern Literature - Genre) My work How the Gospels Became History: Jesus and Mediterranean Myths was published by Yale University Press in June of 2019. In this brief paper, I address its reception in recent academic reviews, responding in particular to criticisms. These days—when there is such a flood of new books to read—it is an honor to receive a review at all, and I am deeply grateful for those who took the time to write them. First, a brief summary of my thesis. In the book, I argue that the canonical gospels contain a host of mythoi, a term by which ancient Greeks understood fantastical tales. Ancient historians included fantastical tales in their writings on a regular basis, but they did their best to give them the air of historicality through a set of historiographical tropes. Among these I include (1) objectification (describing individually experienced phenomena as if they were fully knowable and observable by others); (2) synchrony (noting well- known persons or occurrences); (3) syntopy (mentioning known places on the map); (4) straightforward, matter-of-fact presentation (which often frames the description of fantastical or anomalous events); (5) vivid presentation (which includes the addition of random and circumstantial details); the rhetoric of accuracy (akribeia), which includes (6) the introduction of literary eyewitnesses (such as the Beloved Disciple) and (7) staged skepticism among the eyewitnesses (as in Matt.