DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Nonmotorized Transportation System Plan | Approved by the PPACG Board of Directors on July 8, 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Nonmotorized Transportation System Plan | Approved by the PPACG Board of Directors on July 8, 2015 Regional Nonmotorized Pikes Peak Area Council of Transportation System Governments Plan Approved by the PPACG Board of Directors on July 8, 2015 Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Plan purpose, goals and objectives ........................................................................................ 3 1.2 The study area ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.3 Planning process ..................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Community and stakeholder outreach ................................................................................... 6 1.5 Structure of the Plan ............................................................................................................... 8 2 Existing Nonmotorized Conditions .......................................................................................... 10 2.1 Climate .................................................................................................................................. 11 2.2 Nonmotorized Mode-Share .................................................................................................. 11 2.3 Physical Barriers to nonmotorized travel ............................................................................. 11 2.4 Pedestrian conditions ........................................................................................................... 12 2.5 On-road biking conditions .................................................................................................... 13 2.6 Nonmotorized urban trail conditions ................................................................................... 15 2.7 Other nonmotorized modes ................................................................................................. 16 2.8 Nonmotorized signage and wayfinding ................................................................................ 17 2.9 Nonmotorized travel in rural areas ...................................................................................... 17 2.10 Bicycle parking ...................................................................................................................... 18 2.11 Nonmotorized accidents ....................................................................................................... 18 2.12 Nonmotorized transportation issues and opportunities ...................................................... 19 3 Regional Nonmotorized Improvement Corridors ..................................................................... 21 3.1 Improvement corridor criteria .............................................................................................. 21 3.2 Description of improvement corridors ................................................................................. 24 4 Regional Nonmotorized Improvement Corridor Prioritization .................................................. 96 4.1 Improvement corridor prioritization criteria ........................................................................ 96 4.2 Improvement corridor prioritization results ........................................................................ 99 5 Regional Routes ................................................................................................................... 101 5.1 Improvements across all Regional Routes .......................................................................... 101 5.2 Regional Route Network ..................................................................................................... 102 5.4 Regional Route 12 ............................................................................................................... 104 5.5 Regional Route 13 ............................................................................................................... 109 5.6 Regional Route 18 ............................................................................................................... 115 5.7 Regional Route 23 ............................................................................................................... 119 5.8 Regional Route 29 ............................................................................................................... 124 5.9 Regional Route 33 ............................................................................................................... 132 5.10 Regional Route 35 ............................................................................................................... 137 5.11 Regional Route 41 ............................................................................................................... 143 5.12 Regional Route 43 ............................................................................................................... 148 5.13 Regional Route 44 ............................................................................................................... 153 5.14 Regional Route 71 ............................................................................................................... 158 6 Implementation ................................................................................................................... 164 6.1 Implementation timeframe ................................................................................................ 164 6.2 Funding sources .................................................................................................................. 167 6.3 Complementary programs and initiatives .......................................................................... 169 Figures Figure 1.1: PPACG Nonmotorized Regional Transportation Planning Area........................................ 4 Figure 1.2: Planning Process ............................................................................................................... 5 Figure 2.1: No sidewalk at a transit stop – Manitou Avenue, Manitou Springs ............................... 11 Figure 2.2: Wide crossing distances at intersection of Milton E Proby and South Powers Boulevard near Colorado Springs Airport, Colorado Springs ............................................................................. 12 Figure 2.3: Manitou Springs Pedestrianization, Manitou Springs .................................................... 12 Figure 3.1: Regional Improvement Corridors ................................................................................... 25 Figure 4.1: Regional Priority Improvement Corridors .................................................................... 100 Figure 5.1: Regional Route Map ..................................................................................................... 103 Figure 5.2: Regional Route 12 ......................................................................................................... 104 Figure 5.3: Regional Route 12: Improvements reference (1 of 3) .................................................. 106 Figure 5.4: Regional Route 12: Improvements reference (2 of 3) ................................................. 106 Figure 5.5: Regional Route 12: Improvements reference (3 of 3) ................................................. 107 Figure 5.6: Regional Route 12: Barrier to development ................................................................. 108 Figure 5.7: Regional Route 13 ......................................................................................................... 109 Figure 5.8: Regional Route 13: Improvements reference (1 of 3) .................................................. 111 Figure 5.9: Regional Route 13: Improvements reference (2 of 3) .................................................. 112 Figure 5.10: Regional Route 13: Improvements reference (3 of 3) ................................................ 112 Figure 5.11: Route 13: Barriers to development (1 of 2) ................................................................ 113 Figure 5.12: Route 13: Barriers to development (2 of 2) ................................................................ 114 Figure 5.13: Regional Route 18 ....................................................................................................... 115 Figure 5.14: Regional Route 18: Improvements Reference (1 of 2) ............................................... 117 Figure 5.15: Regional Route 18: Improvements reference (2 of 2) ................................................ 117 Figure 5.16: Regional Route 18: Barriers to route development ................................................... 118 Figure 5.17: Regional Route 23 ....................................................................................................... 119 Figure 5.18: Regional Route 23: Improvements reference (1 of 3) ................................................ 121 Figure 5.19: Regional Route 23: Improvements reference (2 of 3) ................................................ 122 Figure 5.20: Regional Route 23: Improvements reference (3 of 3) ................................................ 122 Figure 5.21: Regional Route 23: Barrier to route development ..................................................... 123 Figure 5.22: Regional Route 29 ....................................................................................................... 124 Figure 5.23: Regional Route
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Your Guide to Arts and Culture in Colorado's Pikes Peak Region
    2014 - 2015 Your Guide to Arts and Culture in Colorado’s Pikes Peak Region PB Find arts listings updated daily at www.peakradar.com 1 2 3 About Us Every day, COPPeR connects residents and visitors to arts and culture to enrich the Pikes Peak region. We work strategically to ensure that cultural services reach all people and that the arts are used to positively address issues of economic development, education, tourism, regional branding and civic life. As a nonprofit with a special role in our community, we work to achieve more than any one gallery, artist or performance group can do alone. Our vision: A community united by creativity. Want to support arts and culture in far-reaching, exciting ways? Give or get involved at www.coppercolo.org COPPeR’s Staff: Andy Vick, Executive Director Angela Seals, Director of Community Partnerships Brittney McDonald-Lantzer, Peak Radar Manager Lila Pickus, Colorado College Public Interest Fellow 2013-2014 Fiona Horner, Colorado College Public Interest Fellow, Summer 2014 Katherine Smith, Bee Vradenburg Fellow, Summer 2014 2014 Board of Directors: Gary Bain Andrea Barker Lara Garritano Andrew Hershberger Sally Hybl Kevin Johnson Martha Marzolf Deborah Muehleisen (Treasurer) Nathan Newbrough Cyndi Parr Mike Selix David Siegel Brenda Speer (Secretary) Jenny Stafford (Chair) Herman Tiemens (Vice Chair) Visit COPPeR’s Office and Arts Info Space Amy Triandiflou at 121 S. Tejon St., Colo Spgs, CO 80903 Joshua Waymire or call 719.634.2204. Cover photo and all photos in this issue beginning on page 10 are by stellarpropellerstudio.com. Learn more on pg. 69. 2 Find arts listings updated daily at www.peakradar.com 3 Welcome Welcome from El Paso County The Board of El Paso County Commissioners welcomes you to Colorado’s most populous county.
    [Show full text]
  • Asbestos Disposal Information
    For additional disposal and landfill information, call the Hazardous Waste Public Assistance Line at 303-692- 3322. To change the information listed for the landfill, please call the Asbestos Compliance Assistance Group at 303-692- 3100 or email [email protected] . It is recommended that you contact any landfill prior to disposal, some require that you call first. An effort was made to list mandatory packaging/additional costs and/or paperwork, but requirements change. Landfill County Landfill Name and Location Landfill Information Landfills that will accept FRIABLE and/or NON-FRIABLE Asbestos-Containing Materials: ADAMS Conservation Services, Inc. Will not accept waste from general public, must call first th 41800 East 88 for permission, manifest Bennett, Colorado 80102 (303) 280 – 9336 ADAMS Tower Landfill, Inc Call for information 8480 Tower Road Commerce City, Colorado 81503 (303) 371 – 5115 ARAPAHOE Denver-Arapahoe Disposal Call for information Site 3500 S. Gun Club Road Aurora, Colorado 80013 (303) 690 – 4303 EL PASO Colorado Springs Landfill Call for information 1010 Blaney Road Colorado Springs, Colorado 80929 (719) 683 - 2600 MESA Mesa County Landfill Only accepts waste generated in Mesa County 3071 Highway 50 Grand Junction, Colorado 81503 (970) 280 – 9336 ROUTT Milner Landfill Call for information 1051 Crawford Ave Milner, Colorado (970) 875 – 0355 NOT Asbestos Transport Systems, Private Company APPLICABLE Inc Will pick up and transport ACM to approved landfill for 5780 Hooker Street a fee. Denver, Colorado 80221 (303) 433 – 0641 Landfill County Landfill Name and Location Landfill Information Landfills that will accept only NON-FRIABLE Asbestos-Containing Materials: ARCHULETA Archuleta Landfill At present, will not accept non-friable ACWM.
    [Show full text]
  • The PDF File
    N Happy New Year! from the all-volunteer staff of Free W E Our Community News S Reporting on community issues in Monument, Palmer Lake, and the surrounding Tri-Lakes area. Volume 2 Number 1 — Saturday, January 5, 2002 Monument Board Dec 17 3 Palmer Lake Town Council Dec 13 4 Tri-Lakes Olympic Torch events planned for Monument Board Dec 27 5 January 31 Monument Planning Commission Dec 5 By Roy Getchell Old Denver Highway. A “Post Torch Rally” will com- 12 Chairman, Tri-Lakes Olympic Torch Committee mence at 2:45 pm in the Lewis-Palmer High School Triview Board Dec 13 6 In what promises to be one of the most memorable auditorium. events for the Tri-Lakes community, the Olympic Names of the local torchbearers will be released in Tri-Rec seeks developer funds 7 Torch will make a stop in Monument on January 31. In mid-January. Each torchbearer will carry the torch a commemoration of the torch passing through the Tri- fifth of a mile before passing it on. After the torch Heritage grant used to fund Tri-Lakes 7 area studies Lakes area, celebrations are planned in Palmer Lake leaves Colorado Springs on February 1, it will be car- and Monument. ried through Manitou Springs, Woodland Park, Divide, Congressional reapportionment goes 8 to court Festivities will begin at 9 am in front of the Palmer Florissant, Lake George, Johnson Village, Buena Vista, LP school board appoints new 8 Lake Town Hall. The celebration will move to the Leadville, Minturn, and Vail. On Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • Climatology of Colorado Tornadoes Are Colorado Tornadoes Growing Longer and Stronger in Time?
    Climatology of Colorado Tornadoes Are Colorado Tornadoes growing longer and stronger in time? CHRISTOPHER K. SPEARS Graduate Student, Mississippi State University ABSTRACT Over the past half century, the number of tornadoes reported in the United States has doubled from roughly 600 per year in the 1950s, to around 1,200 per year in the 2000s (Verbout et al. 2006). The trend in Colorado has been more aggressive with the number of average annual tornadoes quadrupling during the same time period, from 12 to 48 per year on average. This trend can be attributed to a number of factors, including an improvement in record keeping and better tornado detection through Doppler radar. It is also widely accepted throughout the meteorological community that a growing population and more public awareness are contributing factors. There are numerous studies about U.S. tornado trends, but few that focus specifically on potential trends in Colorado. When posing the question ‘are tornadoes growing longer and stronger with time,’ a long-time resident might be inclined to say yes, simply due to recent back- to-back killer tornadoes in the late 2000s. One of those storms stuck in late March 2007. Typically, Coloradoans are more concerned about a blizzard rather than a killer tornado that early in the spring season. So are we seeing tornadoes grow longer and stronger with time? It is the goal of this paper to answer this question and more through a detailed analysis of all documented Colorado tornadoes between 1950 and 2012. Having a better understanding of this weather hazard will help improve public awareness and preparedness that could potentially save lives.
    [Show full text]
  • El Paso County Community Assets for Youth Development Introduction
    El Paso County Community Assets for Youth Development Introduction The number of suicides among youth under age 18 in El Paso County has increased in recent years; 7 in 2014, 14 in 2015 and 15 in 2016. El Paso County Public Health aims to address this issue by focusing on prevention and early intervention efforts in the community. These efforts often focus on promoting protective factors. A protective factor is defined as something that can lower the likelihood of a negative health outcome. Protective factors such as connectedness, resiliency, problem-solving skills, conflict resolution, and non-violent ways of handling disputes, can protect youth from suicidal thoughts and behaviors. This document identifies assets in our community including collaborations, programming and resources that promote protective factors for youth. This is a living document. Any agency or service listed here is not necessarily endorsed by El Paso County Public Health, but is provided solely as a resource for public and community partners. El Paso County Public Health assumes no liability for the use of any service mentioned. For questions or updates please contact the Maternal Child Health Program at El Paso County Public Health (719) 578-3199. Prevent Promote Protect www.elpasocountyhealth.org 1 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 About Us ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Military Resources Name Address Phone Number Hours Website Email Notes
    Military Resources Name Address Phone Number Hours Website Email Notes 80014 To preserve and promote the history and traditions of women Marines. 3066 South Granby St Aurora, To provide assistance to hospitalized veterans and members of the CO Columbine - WM History Chapter CO 80014 303-766-9023 Call for Hours www.wmaco1.org [email protected] Armed Forces. To promote the civic and social welfare of the community. 80110 Freedom Service Dogs is a nonprofit organization that enhances the lives of people with disabilities by rescuing dogs and custom training them for individual client needs. Clients include children, veterans and active duty military, and other adults. Their disabilities include autism, traumatic 2000 W Union Ave brain injury, cerebral palsy, spinal cord injuries, muscular dystrophy, Freedom Service Dogs of America Englewood, CO 80110 303-922-6231 Call for pricing and hours http://www.freedomservicedogs.org/ [email protected] multiple sclerosis, and post-traumatic stress disorder. 80104 CanyonQuests for Vets seeks to connect American veterans to the sport of canyoneering. We help returning veterans readjust to life at home through powerful canyoneering adventures that rely upon collaboration, communication and technical skills. By connecting veterans to one another and the natural world, CanyonQuests for Vets honors those who 228 Hill Court Castle Rock, CO have honored us CanyonQuests for Vets 80104 303-522-4453 Call for Schedule www.canyonquestsforvets.org [email protected] 80601 American Military Family provides emergency financial aid, therapeutic mental health relief, reintegration assistance and peer support to our PO Box 1101 Brighton, CO troops and their families. American Military Family Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 02-03-12 -- 01 Front-News Layout 1
    Vol. 70 No. 5 Feb. 3, 2012 Word of the month: Communicate Pvts. Ryan McCulloch, left, and Julio Saunders, World Class Athlete Program, spar during a practice session at the WCAP taekwondo facility in Colorado Springs. Both Soldiers are trying to Kicking earn a spot in the 2016 Olympics. See pages 20 and 21 for gold for more on WCAP. Photo by Staff Sgt. Wayne Barnett Construction begins on new training center By Andrea Sutherland signifying the start of construction of the Mission scenarios, which will “enable Soldiers to prepare Mountaineer staff Command Training Center. for all types of conflict.” “This facility gets to the heart of our mission: The MCTC, formerly known as the Battle Fort Carson leaders and representatives from the training Soldiers,” said Col. Robert F. McLaughlin, Command Training Center, will offer courses U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Native garrison commander. for individual, collective and leader training in American Services Corp shoveled the first scoop of McLaughlin added that the MCTC would dirt in a Jan. 27 ceremonial groundbreaking event, train Soldiers in both digital and practical training See Construction on Page 4 Message board INSIDEINSIDE 2011 Army photo of the year — see Page 10. Page 15 Page 8 Page 29 2 MOUNTAINEER — Feb. 3, 2012 MOUNTAINEER WLC honors Commanding General: Maj. Gen. Joseph Anderson Garrison Commander: Col. Robert F. McLaughlin Ethos sets Soldiers apart Fort Carson Public Affairs Officer: Commentary by Spc. Justin Kelly jungle-shrouded mountains Dee McNutt Warrior Leader Course graduate of South Vietnam. This Chief, Print and Web Communications: hilltop was heavily manned Rick Emert Throughout the course of human history there have and had very limiting terrain Editor: Devin Fisher been many great nations and many great armies.
    [Show full text]
  • A Water Conservation Plan for the Town of Monument, the Town of Palmer Lake and Triview Metropolitan District
    A Water Conservation Plan For The Town of Monument, The Town of Palmer Lake and TriView Metropolitan District Prepared by: Photography by: Water Matters! Delia Tharnish 2419 West Bijou Street Colorado Springs, CO 80904 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary 4 Profile of Existing Water Supply Systems 6 Water Supply Reliability 14 Profile Water Demands and Historical Demand Management 14 Integrated Planning and Water Efficiency Benefits and Goals 23 Implementation Plan 32 Public Participation and Plan Adoption 36 Monitoring and Evaluation 36 Appendix A Public Review Advertisement Appendix B Public Comment Appendix C Water Conservation Plan Adoption Appendix D Worksheets for Monitoring Conservation Activities Appendix E About the local Student Photographer Tables 1 Population and Water Use for Five Years 8 2 Town of Palmer Lake Tap Fees, Rates and Pricing 17 3 Town of Monument Tap Fees, Rates and Pricing 17 4 TriView Metropolitan District Tap Fees, Rates and Pricing 18 5 Summary of Current Conservation Activities – Palmer Lake 19 6 Summary of Current Conservation Activities-Monument 20 7 Summary of Current Conservation Activities – TriView 21 8 Population and Water Use Projections – Palmer Lake 22 9 Population and Water Use Projections – Monument 23 10 Population and Water Use Projections – TriView 23 11 Activity Evaluation – Palmer Lake, Monument and TriView 25 12 Screening Criteria Categories 27 13 Water Savings From Selected Conservation Activities and Expected Water Savings – All Entities 28 2 Figures 1 Palmer Lake Annual Per Capita Use
    [Show full text]
  • Lucretia Vaile Museum
    Volume XV Number 1 A Newsletter of the April 2021 through July 2021 Palmer Lake Historical Society Website: www.palmerdividehistory.org and the Email: [email protected] Museum: 719-559-0837 Lucretia Vaile Museum 2021: Celebrating the Santa Fe Trail Bicentennial America’s Route of Commerce and Conquest Was Central to Western Expansion The Santa Fe Trail served the nation for six decades – from 1821 until 1880. This historic road between Missouri and New Mexico evolved as a route of commerce and trade. It was traversed primarily by freight caravans and military supply wagons, while the Oregon and California trails were more emigrant-oriented. The Santa Fe Trail was also an international road before the Mexican War (1846- Palmer Lake Historical Society 1848). During and after the war, it served as a military road, connecting military posts and western forts. Although not officially a part of the trail, the El Camino Real, 2021 Board of Directors extending south from Santa Fe, New Mexico, deep into Mexico, added to the richness of the cultural exchange. President – Su Ketchmark Marc Simmons in The Old Trail to Santa Fe: Collected Essays (1996) writes: Vice President – Wayne Russert Secretary – Patricia Atkins It was the profit motive, pure and simple, that gave birth to and nourished the overland trade to Santa Fe.... Yet there was something beyond profit that in time drew travelers to Treasurer – Maggie Williamson the Santa Fe Trail. It seems an added attraction was to be found in the entire Museum Director - Rogers Davis experience itself—the forming up of a caravan on the Missouri border, the unwinding 2021 Directors-at-Large journey across the sunlit plains, the excitement of a buffalo hunt or even an Indian attack that quickened the blood, and at last the arrival at the foot of the trail in a foreign land.
    [Show full text]
  • Denver 36 9 Idaho Springs 36 Arikaree R
    26 287 385 Wheatland Scotts Bluff NM 30 Res. 85 Rawlins Gering 80 25 Bridgeport 130 Harrisburg Arthur 80 385 Green River North Platte R. 26 789 80 Oshkosh 130 Laramie 191 Lake 230 Kimball McConaugh 30 Lodgepole Creek Flaming 80 Sidney Gorge 230 Cheyenne Ogallala Reservoir Wyoming 70 N ebraska Chappell 30 80 Manila A BCDEFG230 HIJKL MNOP Laramie R. Ovid Big Creek Virginia Dale Peetz Julesburg Res. Lake Julesburg 1 Sedgwick 125 Pawnee National Grassland South Platte Grant Glendevey Livermore Pawnee North 138 Crook Delany Butte Red Feather Lakes 25 85 71 Sterling River Trail Lake Pioneer Res. Iliff Clark Elk R. N. Platte R. Walden Res. Canadian R. Cache La Poudre R. Walden 287 Wellington Nunn Trails Fleming 318 13 14 Rustic Pierce Green R. Bellvue Haxtun Michigan R. 14 Sterling Little Snake R. Cache la Poudre- Fort Collins Ault 14 6 Dinosaur NM Craig North Park Horsetooth 144 2 Maybell Hayden Res. Timnath Eaton Holyoke 6 Imperial 40 Steamboat Springs Trail Ridge Road Boyd Windsor 392 Merino Vernal Yampa R. Lake Drake Frenchman Creek 14 Loveland Greeley Jackson 52 Prewitt Res. 76 40 Rocky 34 Kersey Riverside Res. Estes Park Johnstown Evans Res. 131 125 Mountain NP Carter Milliken La Salle Log Lane Hilrose 13 Lake 34 Village 385 Morrison Creek 7 25 Gilcrest South Platte R. Green R. Dinosaur Oak Creek Grand Lake 36 Berthoud Empire 59 Milton Res. Brush Stagecoach Grand Lyons Mead Lake Lake Allenspark 85 Res. Wiggins 3 White R. Flat Tops Trail Res. South Platte R. 34 Akron Otis Granby 66 Platteville Fort Morgan Yuma 64 Peak to Peak Longmont 76 Eckley 64 Yampa Hot Sulphur 72 Frederick 34 134 Springs Highway Jamestown Fort Lupton White R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Enemy in Colorado: German Prisoners of War, 1943-46
    The Enemy in Colorado: German Prisoners of War, 1943-46 BY ALLEN W. PASCHAL On 7 December 1941 , the day that would "live in infamy," the United States became directly involved in World War II. Many events and deeds, heroic or not, have been preserved as historic reminders of that presence in the world conflict. The imprisonment of American sol­ diers captured in combat was a postwar curiosity to many Americans. Their survival, living conditions, and treatment by the Germans became major considerations in intensive and highly publicized investigations. However, the issue of German prisoners of war (POWs) interned within the United States has been consistently overlooked. The internment centers for the POWs were located throughout the United States, with different criteria determining the locations of the camps. The first camps were extensions of large military bases where security was more easily accomplished. When the German prisoners proved to be more docile than originally believed, the camps were moved to new locations . The need for laborers most specifically dic­ tated the locations of the camps. The manpower that was available for needs other than the armed forces and the war industries was insuffi­ cient, and Colorado, in particular, had a large agricultural industry that desperately needed workers. German prisoners filled this void. There were forty-eight POW camps in Colorado between 1943 and 1946.1 Three of these were major base camps, capable of handling large numbers of prisoners. The remaining forty-five were agricultural or other work-related camps . The major base camps in Colorado were at Colorado Springs, Trinidad, and Greeley.
    [Show full text]
  • Water and Growth in Colorado: a Review of Legal and Policy Issues
    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Books, Reports, and Studies Resources, Energy, and the Environment 2001 Water and Growth in Colorado: A Review of Legal and Policy Issues Peter D. Nichols Megan K. Murphy Douglas S. Kenney University of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/books_reports_studies Part of the Public Policy Commons, Water Law Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Citation Information Peter D. Nichols, Megan K. Murphy & Douglas S. Kenney, Water and Growth in Colorado: A Review of Legal and Policy Issues (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2001). PETER D. NICHOLS, MEGAN K. MURPHY & DOUGLAS S. KENNEY, WATER AND GROWTH IN COLORADO: A REVIEW OF LEGAL AND POLICY ISSUES (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2001). Reproduced with permission of the Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment (formerly the Natural Resources Law Center) at the University of Colorado Law School. WATER AND GROWTH IN COLORADO A REVIEW OF LEGAL AND POLICY ISSUES by Peter D. Nichols, Megan K. Murphy, and Douglas S. Kenney Natural Resources Law Center University of Colorado School of Law © Natural Resources Law Center, University of Colorado School of Law, 2001 The mission of the Natural Resources Law Center is to “promote sustainability in the rapidly changing American West by informing and influencing natural resource laws, policies, and decisions.” Peter D. Nichols, J.D. Megan K. Murphy, J.D. Douglas S. Kenney, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]