DOCSLIB.ORG

UC Santa Barbara UC Santa Barbara Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UC Santa Barbara UC Santa Barbara Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Probing the relationship between extension and magmatism in the lower Colorado River Extensional Corridor: Field, geochronological, and geochemical studies of Miocene volcanic rocks in the vicinity of the Whipple Mountains, CA and AZ Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6kc9p3wz Author Fidler, Mary Katherine Publication Date 2018 Supplemental Material https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6kc9p3wz#supplemental Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Probing the relationship between extension and magmatism in the lower Colorado River Extensional Corridor: Field, geochronological, and geochemical studies of Miocene volcanic rocks in the vicinity of the Whipple Mountains, CA and AZ A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Geological Sciences by Mary Katherine Fidler Committee in charge: Professor Phillip B. Gans, Chair Professor Bradley Hacker Professor Matt Jackson January 2018 The dissertation of Mary Katherine Fidler is approved. ____________________________________________ Bradley Hacker ____________________________________________ Matthew Jackson ____________________________________________ Phillip B. Gans, Committee Chair December 2017 The relationship between extension and magmatism in the Lower Colorado River Extensional Corridor: Field, geochronological, and geochemical studies of Miocene volcanic rocks in the vicinity of the Whipple Mountains, CA and AZ Copyright © 2018 by Mary Katherine Fidler iii I dedicate this dissertation to the fiery women who raised me, my mom, Kathleen Fidler, and my grandmothers (by blood and in practice), Eugenia Taylor and Donna Kearney iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Throughout graduate school, I have been the lucky recipient of help, mentorship, advice, and teaching from a great number of individuals. First, I would like to thank my advisor, Phil Gans, who has been a great mentor, colleague, and friend. Through his teaching and by watching his example, I have gained innumerable skills as a researcher, writer, and field geologist. But most importantly, Phil is an exemplary teacher, and his care and passion for teaching carries over into his student advising and has greatly inspired the development of my own teaching philosophy. He encouraged me to pursue every teaching opportunity available to me. Thank you for your patience and unwavering support of my academic growth and career goals. I would also like to thank Brad Hacker, Matt Jackson, and John Cottle for serving on my committees throughout graduate school, particularly Brad and Matt for serving on my dissertation committee. Their advice, ideas, and insightful questions have greatly improved this dissertation and promoted my growth as a scientist. I owe a debt of gratitude to several people and organizations who provided financial support for my education and for this research. I would like to especially thank Rachel Haymon and Ken MacDonald for their support through the UCSB Earth Science Department Graduate Student Opportunity Award. Their generosity gave this project a kick-start at a time when funds were tight and hope was desperately needed! Funding for tuition expenses were provided by the Earth Science Department at UCSB through the Harry Glicken Memorial Fellowship and by Shawn Byers through her generous donation to the STEM Student Support Fund. The Geological Society of America and EdMap (a component of the v USGS National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program) also provided generous financial support for this research. I have greatly benefited from my interactions and close friendships with a number of graduate students, particularly those in the Gans, Cottle, Hacker, Spera, and Simms research groups. I am especially thankful for the friendship and support of my housemates and colleagues, Will Junkin, Sophie Briggs, Elisabeth Steel, Josh Garber, Tyson McKinney, Alex Wrobel, and Diane Seely. Their friendship created a sense of family for me at UCSB that has carried me through every new challenge. Finally, I would like to thank my family for their encouragement and support. My parents have always encouraged me to pursue my passions and goals with abandon. Their words of love and support have comforted and empowered me throughout my life, but especially during these five years of graduate school. vi VITA OF MARY KATHERINE FIDLER January 2018 EDUCATION: Doctor of Philosophy in Geology University of California Santa Barbara, January 2018 Certificate of College and University Teaching University of California Santa Barbara, January 2018 Bachelor of Science in Environmental Geoscience University of Notre Dame, May 2012 (Cum Laude) PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYMENT: 2018-present Lecturer, Department of Environmental Engineering and Earth Science, Clemson University 2016-2017 Graduate Student Researcher, Department of Earth Science, University of California, Santa Barbara 2015-2017 Associate Instructor, Department of Earth Science, University of California, Santa Barbara 2012-2016 Teaching Assistant, Department of Earth Science, University of California, Santa Barbara 2009-2012 Undergraduate Student Researcher, University of Notre Dame TEACHING EXPERIENCE Winter 2017 and 2016 Associate Instructor, Structural Geology, Department of Earth Science, University of California, Santa Barbara Summer 2015 Associate Instructor, Physical Geology, Department of Earth Science, University of California, Santa Barbara PUBLICATIONS: M.K. Fidler, P.B. Gans, J.S. Lackey (2016). Geologic map of the western Whipple Mountains and the eastern Mopah Range, southeast California: unraveling the eruptive and structural history of a synextensional Miocene volcanic province. Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America, 48(7), Abstract no. 266-6 vii M.K. Fidler, P.B. Gans (2016). Exploring the link between crustal melting and extensional collapse; field, geochemical, and Sr-Nd isotopic evidence from pre-, syn-, and post- extensional lavas of the Whipple Mountains region, lower Colorado River extensional corridor, CA and AZ. American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting, 2016, Abstract V53D- 3161. M.K. Fidler, P.B. Gans (2014). Magmatic trigger for extensional collapse? Character and significance of pre-extensional volcanic activity in the Whipple Mountains region, lower Colorado River Extensional Corridor. American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting, 2014, Abstract V31E-4812 E. Steel, L. Reynolds, L. Simkins, M.K. Fidler (2014). Characterization of the Elephant Trees Formation, Anza Borrego with implications for determining the depositional environments of conglomeratic debris flows. Abstracts with Programs – Geological Society of America, 46(6), 147 M.K. Fidler & P.B. Gans (2013). Spatiotemporal patterns in the inception of Miocene volcanism and upper plate extensional block rotation in the vicinity of the Whipple Mountains, CA and AZ. Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America,45(7), 171. C. Ohlin, S. Harley, J. McAlpin, R. Hocking, B. Mercado, R. Johnson, E. Villa, M.K. Fidler, M. Olmstead, L. Spiccia, R.D. Britt, and W.H. Casey (2011). Rates of water exchange for two cobalt(II) heteropolyoxotungstate compounds in aqueous solution, Chemistry - a European Journal,17(16), 4408-4417. ACADEMIC HONORS: 2013 Harry Glicken Memorial Graduate Fellowship, UC Santa Barbara 2014 Preston Cloud Award, UC Santa Barbara 2014 Global Field Travel Award, UC Santa Barbara 2015 Alumni Graduate Award for Research Excellence, UC Santa Barbara 2016 Global Field Travel Award, UC Santa Barbara 2016 Lloyd and Mary Edwards Field Studies Fellowship in Earth Science, UC Santa Barbara 2016 Special Fellowship in the Stem Disciplines, UC Santa Barbara 2016 3rd place in the Best Student Geologic Mapping Competition, Geological Society of America, Fall Meeting 2017 Alumni Graduate Award for Research Excellence 2017 Muckers’ Coterie Lifetime Achievement Award viii GRANTS: M.K. Fidler. Geological Society of America Graduate Student Research Grant: Using isotopes and trace element chemistry to understand source of magmatism in the vicinity of the Whipple Mountains, CA & AZ. $1777. 3/15-3/16. P.B. Gans, M.K.Fidler, and B. Gentry. EDMAP, United States Geological Survey (USGS): Geologic Mapping of the Southwestern Whipple Mountains and Eastern Mopah Range, Southeastern California: Unraveling the Eruptive and Structural History of a Synextensional Miocene Volcanic Center. $25,677. 4/14-4/15. M.K. Fidler. UCSB Earth Science Dept., Graduate Student Opportunity Award: Exploring the temporal and spatial relationships between extension and magmatism in the lower Colorado River extensional corridor, CA and AZ. $3,880. 6/13-6/16. E. Steel, L. Reynolds, L. Miller, and M.K. Fidler. UCSB Earth Science Dept., Graduate Student Opportunity Award: Characterization of deep and shallow marine conglomerates with implications for determining the depositional environments of the Matilija Formation, southern California. $2,066. 6/13-6/14. ix ABSTRACT Probing the relationship between extension and magmatism in the lower Colorado River Extensional Corridor: Field, geochronological, and geochemical studies of Miocene volcanic rocks in the vicinity of the Whipple Mountains, CA and AZ by Mary Katherine Fidler New geologic mapping, 40Ar/39Ar geochronology, and whole rock major and trace element and Sr-Nd isotopic data of pre-, syn-, and post-extensional volcanic rocks shed
Recommended publications
  • Pamphlet SIM 3411: Geologic Map of the Castle Rock 7.5' Quadrangle

    Pamphlet SIM 3411: Geologic Map of the Castle Rock 7.5' Quadrangle

    Geologic Map of the Castle Rock 7.5’ Quadrangle, Arizona and California By P. Kyle House, Barbara E. John, Daniel V. Malmon, Debra Block, L. Sue Beard, Tracey J. Felger, Ryan S. Crow, Jonathan E. Schwing, and Colleen E. Cassidy Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3411 Kayaker's view of Castle Rock (unit Tac) looking north-northeast from Castle Rock Bay, Arizona. The northern Mohave Mountains are visible in left background, and sediments of the Chemehuevi Formation (unit Qch) are seen along right edge of photo. Photograph taken August 27, 2014, by Kyle House, USGS. 2018 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2018 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov/ or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747). For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. To order USGS information products, visit https://store.usgs.gov/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: House, P.K., John, B.E., Malmon, D.V., Block, Debra, Beard, L.S., Felger, T.J., Crow, R.S., Schwing, J.E., and Cassidy, C.E., 2018, Geologic map of the Castle Rock 7.5’ quadrangle: U.S.
  • Chemehuevi Valley Special Recreation Management Area (SRMA)

    Chemehuevi Valley Special Recreation Management Area (SRMA)

    Chemehuevi Valley Special Recreation Management Area (SRMA) The Chemehuevi Valley Viewshed with the Turtle Mountains National Natural Landmark is directly west of the communities of Havasu Landing, California and Lake Havasu City, Arizona. The Turtle Mountains Natural Landmark is an excellent illustration of volcanic phenomena with superimposed sculpturing of mountain landforms. In combination, the eastern and western sections present some of the finest geological formations in the Mohave Desert. The site is of scenic value and interest; it also contains excellent examples of Mohave Desert flora and fauna. From October to April each year hundreds of travelers “snowbirds” from the northeastern United States, Canada and Europe journey to the area to enjoy the mild winter climate seeking new experiences, enjoying vast landscape which have not existed in European Nations for hundreds of years. Visitors participate in backcountry touring adventure and the discovery of new hiking trails, rock hounding sites and camping opportunities. The Chemehuevi Reservation Havasu Landing Resort depends on the naturalness of the Chemehuevi Valley to support the recreation pursuits of their visitors. The Needles Field Office has developed a system of designated trails entitled the Mojave Adventure Routes in regards to the 2002 Northern and Eastern Colorado Desert Coordinated Management Plan item 3.8.7. These routes are an outstanding network of 4x4 vehicle backcountry touring routes for motorized recreation. These routes were developed for the purpose of traveling to areas not often seen by many people. This network is a shared-use trail system providing recreation opportunities for all persons, including those who use street-legal and non-street legal (Green Sticker) vehicles, hikers, bicyclists, and equestrians.
  • Elmer C. Aldrich

    Elmer C. Aldrich

    PLANNING MILESTONES FOR THE PARK UNITS AND MAJOR PROPERTIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS SYSTEM July 1, 2010 Planning Division California State Parks P. O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 PLANNING MILESTONES FOR THE PARK UNITS AND MAJOR PROPERTIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CALIFORNIA STATE PARK SYSTEM July 1, 2010 OVERVIEW This document is a compendium providing selected information on the classified units and major unclassified properties which currently are or have in the past been associated with the California State Park System. The main purposes of this compendium are to provide, in a single source: 1. a record of the major milestones and achievements in unit-level land use and management planning which have been accomplished through the years by the Department, with the major accomplishments of the last year summarized in Chapter II; 2. a variety of other information useful to understanding the past history or current status of these units and properties, and of the evolution of unit-level land use and resource management planning in the Department; and 3. The definitive number and the specific identity of those basic classified units and major unclassified properties which constitute the official State Park System as of the date of this report’s publication. As of July 1, 2010, the California State Park System consists of 278 basic classified units and major unclassified properties. These are identified on Lists 1 and 2 in Chapter III. To have data current to July 1, 2010, this total will be the Department’s official figure until the next edition of this report.
  • Chemehuevi Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118

    Chemehuevi Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118

    Hydrologic Region Colorado River California’s Groundwater Chemehuevi Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118 Chemehuevi Valley Groundwater Basin • Groundwater Basin Number: 7-43 • County: San Bernardino • Surface Area: 273,000 acres (427 square miles) Basin Boundaries and Hydrology This basin underlies Chemehuevi Valley in eastern San Bernardino County. The basin is bounded by Havasu Lake on the east and by nonwater-bearing rocks of the Sacramento Mountains on the north, of the Chemehuevi Mountains on the northeast, of the Whipple Mountains on the southeast, of the Turtle Mountains on the west and south (Bishop 1963). The valley is drained by Chemehuevi Wash to Havasu Lake. Annual average precipitation ranges from about 4 to 6 inches. Hydrogeologic Information Water Bearing Formations Groundwater in the basin is found in alluvium and the Bouse Formation. Alluvium. Holocene age younger alluvium, which is found in washes and the floodplain of the Colorado River, is composed of sand, silt and gravel (Metzger and Loeltz 1973). Older alluvium consists of unconsolidated, fine- to coarse-grained sand, pebbles, and boulders with variable amounts of silt and clay. Bouse Formation. The Pliocene age Bouse Formation is composed of a basal limestone bed overlain by interbedded clay, silt, and sand. Thickness of the formation reaches 254 feet (Metzger and Loeltz 1973). The formation is underlain by locally derived fanglomerate and overlain by alluviums of the Colorado River and its tributaries. Restrictive Structures An unnamed fault crosses a portion of the southern side of the basin (Bishop 1963), but it is not known whether or not this fault impedes groundwater flow in the basin.
  • Newberry Springs BUREAU of LAND MANAGEMENT

    Newberry Springs BUREAU of LAND MANAGEMENT

    BLM SPECIAL EDITION 1998 EXAMPLES OF AGENCY SIGNS SURFACE MANAGEMENT STATUS DESERT ACCESS GUIDE Newberry Springs BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT USDA FOREST SERVICE I:100,000-Scale topographic map showing: • Highways, roads and other manmade structures • Water features • Contours and elevations in meters • Recreation sites • Coverage of former desert access guide #11 Johnson Valley NATIONAL PARK SERVICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OF f AND MANAGEMENT CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS Edited and published by the Bureau of Land Management National Applied Resource Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado in cooperation with the Bureau of Land Management California State Office. Planimetry partially revised by BLM from various source material. Revised information not field checked. Base map prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey. Compiled from USGS 1:24,000 and l:62,500-scale I -i >|i <i ! . • Kips dated 1953 1971, and from advance T" materials. Partially revised from aerial photographs taken 1976 and other source data. Bev'sed information not CALIFORNIA STATE field checked. Map edited 1977. Map photoinspected VEHICULAR RECREATION AREA using 1989 photographs. No major culture or drainage changes found. Help protect your public lands by observing posted Projection and 10,000-meter grid, zone 11: Universal OHV designations. Watch for OHV signs and read Transverse Mercator. 25,000-foot grid ticks based on them carefully. California coordinate system, zone 5. 1927 North American Datum. For more information contact the BLM, USDA Forest Service, National Park Service, California State Park, Land lines are omitted in areas of extensive tract surveys. or California State Motorized Vechicle Recreation Area Office (see back panel for address and phone There may be private inholdings within the boundaries of numbers).
  • Beolobical Survey

    Beolobical Survey

    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BEOLOBICAL SURVEY Generalized geologic map of the Big Maria Mountains region, northeastern Riverside County, southeastern California by Warren Hamilton* Open-File Report 84-407 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature 1984 *Denver, Colorado MAP EXPLANATION SURFICIAL MATERIALS Quaternary Qa Alluvium, mostly silt and sand, of modern Hoiocene Colorado River floodplain. Pleistocene Qe Eolian sand. Tertiary Of Fanglomerate and alluvium, mostly of local PIi ocene origin and of diverse Quaternary ages. Includes algal travertine and brackish-water strata of Bouse Formation of Pliocene age along east and south sides of Big Maria and Riverside Mountains, Fanglomerate may locally be as old as Pliocene. MIOCENE INTRUSIVE ROCKS Tertiary In Riverside Mountains, dikes of 1 e u c o r h y o 1 i t e Miocene intruded along detachment fault. In northern Big Maria Mountains, plugs and dikes of hornbl ende-bi at i te and bioti te-hornbl ende rhyodacite and quartz latite. These predate steep normal faults, and may include rocks both older and younger than low-angle detachment faults. Two hornblende K-Ar determinations by' Donna L. Martin yield calculated ages of 10. 1 ±4.5 and' 21.7 + 2 m.y ROCKS ABOVE DETACHMENT FAULTS ROCKS DEPOSITED SYNCHRONOUSLY WITH EXTENSIONAL FAULTING L o w e r Tob Slide breccias, partly monolithologic, and Mi ocene Jos extremely coarse fanglomerate. or upper Tos Fluvial and lacustrine strata, mostly red. 01i gocene Tob T o v Calc-alkalic volcanic rocks: quartz latitic ignimbrite, and altered dacitic and andesitic flow rocks.
  • Rice Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118

    Rice Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118

    Colorado River Hydrologic Region California’s Groundwater Rice Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118 Rice Valley Groundwater Basin • Groundwater Basin Number: 7-4 • County: Riverside, San Bernardino • Surface Area: 189,000 acres (295 square miles) Basin Boundaries and Hydrology This groundwater basin underlies Rice Valley in northeast Riverside and southeast San Bernardino Counties. Elevation of the valley floor ranges from about 675 feet above sea level near the center of the valley to about 1,000 feet along the outer margins. The basin is bounded by nonwater- bearing rocks of the Turtle Mountains on the north, the Little Maria and Big Maria Mountains on the south, the Arica Mountains on the west, and by the West Riverside and Riverside Mountains on the east. Low-lying alluvial drainage divides form a portion of the basin boundaries on the northwest and northeast, and the Colorado River bounds a portion of the basin on the east. Maximum elevations of the surrounding mountains range to about 2,000 feet in the Arica Mountains, about 3,000 feet in the Big Maria Mountains, and 5,866 feet at Horn Peak in the Turtle Mountains (Bishop 1963; Jennings 1967; USGS 1971a, 1971b, 1983a, 1983b, 1983c). Annual average precipitation ranges from about 3 to 5 inches. Surface runoff from the mountains drains towards the center of the valley, except in the eastern part of the valley, where Big Wash drains to the Colorado River (USGS 1971a, 1971b, 1983a, 1983b, 1983c). Hydrogeologic Information Water Bearing Formations Alluvium is the water-bearing material that forms the basin and includes unconsolidated Holocene age deposits and underlying unconsolidated to semi-consolidated Pleistocene deposits (DWR 1954, 1963).
  • Utah Geological Association Publication 30.Pub

    Utah Geological Association Publication 30.Pub

    Utah Geological Association Publication 30 - Pacific Section American Association of Petroleum Geologists Publication GB78 239 CENOZOIC EVOLUTION OF THE NORTHERN COLORADO RIVER EXTEN- SIONAL CORRIDOR, SOUTHERN NEVADA AND NORTHWEST ARIZONA JAMES E. FAULDS1, DANIEL L. FEUERBACH2*, CALVIN F. MILLER3, 4 AND EUGENE I. SMITH 1Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada, Mail Stop 178, Reno, NV 89557 2Department of Geology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 *Now at Exxon Mobil Development Company, 16825 Northchase Drive, Houston, TX 77060 3Department of Geology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235 4Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154 ABSTRACT The northern Colorado River extensional corridor is a 70- to 100-km-wide region of moderately to highly extended crust along the eastern margin of the Basin and Range province in southern Nevada and northwestern Arizona. It has occupied a criti- cal structural position in the western Cordillera since Mesozoic time. In the Cretaceous through early Tertiary, it stood just east and north of major fold and thrust belts and also marked the northern end of a broad, gently (~15o) north-plunging uplift (Kingman arch) that extended southeastward through much of central Arizona. Mesozoic and Paleozoic strata were stripped from the arch by northeast-flowing streams. Peraluminous 65 to 73 Ma granites were emplaced at depths of at least 10 km and exposed in the core of the arch by earliest Miocene time. Calc-alkaline magmatism swept northward through the northern Colorado River extensional corridor during early to middle Miocene time, beginning at ~22 Ma in the south and ~12 Ma in the north.
  • Status and Distribution of the Elf Owl in California

    Status and Distribution of the Elf Owl in California

    STATUS AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE ELF OWL IN CALIFORNIA MARY D. HALTERMAN, Department of BiologicalSciences, California State University,Chico, California95929 STEPHEN A. LAYMON, Departmentof Forestryand ResourceManagement, 145 Mulford Hall, Universityof California, Berkeley, California94720 MARY J. WHITFIELD, Department of BiologicalSciences, California State University,Chico, California95929 In California,the Elf Owl (Micrathenewhitneyi) has been found only in riparianhabitats and scatteredstands of Saguaro(Carnegiea gigantea) along the lower Colorado River and at a few desert oases (Grinnell and Miller 1944). Although the specieshas never been numerousin California, there hasapparently been a populationdecline. Surveys in 1978 and 1979 located 11 and 6 pairsof Elf Owls, respectively,at two locationsalong the lower Col- orado River (Cardiff1978, 1979). Cardiff's(1978) completerecord of the 28 Elf Owl sightingsmade in California prior to 1978 identified eight locations where the specieshas been found. We gathered10 additionalrecords made since 1979 (Table 1). All recent records were for either Soto Ranch or near Water Wheel Camp. Since 1979, habitatdestruction has continued, resulting in the loss of much of the remainingcottonwood-willow and mesquite bosques(C. Hunter and B. Andersonpers. comm.). This lossis due to the proliferationof tamarisk (Tamarix chinensis),agricultural clearing, bank stabilizationprojects, urbanization, and recentsustained flooding (Laymon and Halterman1987). This lossand itspotential effect on Elf Owlsprompted thissurvey
  • Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan Proposed Land

    Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan Proposed Land

    DRECP Proposed LUPA and Final EIS CHAPTER III.8. CULTURAL RESOURCES III.8 CULTURAL RESOURCES This chapter presents the Affected Environment for the Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA) Decision Area and the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP) area for cultural resources. These areas overlap, and in the following programmatic discussion are referred to broadly as the “California Desert Region.” More than 32,000 cultural resources are known in the DRECP area in every existing environmental context ⎼ from mountain crests to dry lake beds ⎼ and include both surface and subsurface deposits. Cultural resources are categorized as buildings, sites, structures, objects, and districts (including cultural landscapes and Traditional Cultural Properties) under the federal National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). Historic properties are cultural resources included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), maintained by the Secretary of the Interior (36 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 60.4). See Section III.8.1.1 for more information on federal regulations and historic properties. This chapter discusses three types of cultural resources classified by their origins: prehistoric, ethnographic, and historic. Prehistoric cultural resources are associated with the human occupation of California prior to prolonged European contact. These resources may include sites and deposits, structures, artifacts, rock art, trails, and other traces of Native American human behavior. In California, the prehistoric period began over 12,000 years ago and extended through the eighteenth century until 1769, when the first Europeans settled in California. Ethnographic resources represent the heritage of a particular ethnic or cultural group, such as Native Americans or African, European, Latino, or Asian immigrants.
  • Anderson-Hamilton-P357-448

    Anderson-Hamilton-P357-448

    UPPER-PLATE STRUCTURE AND SEDIllliNTATION OF THE BAKER PEAKS AREA, Yill1A COUNTY, ARIZONA Cynthia L. Pridmore and Christy Craig San Diego State University San Diego, California 92182 ABSTR,<\CT The Baker Peaks of south,,,estern Arizona are gation because of the large section of Tertiary composed of reddish arkosic sandstone and granitic­ strata exposed there. Such an accumulation of sedi­ boulder conglomerate units deposited in an alluvial­ mentary rock should provide at least a partial record fan environment with a provenance located to the of the depositional and deformational history for south. Deposition of these units was coeval with that time. Therefore, the purpose of this investiga­ rotation along northeast-dipping growth faults inter­ tion was to describe the stratigraphy and structure preted to merge into the low-angle detachment fault and their interrelationship, and to propose a tenta­ observed to the south of the range. The Tertiary tive depositional model. The development of this strata (upper plate) lying above the detachment fault model was intimately associated with the structural appear to have been affected by northeast-southwest character of the range because the deposition and extension with transport of the upper plate to the deformation appear to have been coeval. northeast. A regional reconstruction provides a model depicting the interrelationship between The presence of regional Tertiary detachment Tertiary sedimentation and structure for this area. faulting described to the north, northwest, and east Alluvial-fan formation appears to have been initiated of the Baker Peaks (Frost and Mueller, pers. commun., along northeast-dipping growth faults in close asso­ 1981) further suggests that this area should provide ciation with the dmmwarping of the Gila Trough to a record of this regional extensional event.
  • Vidal Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118

    Vidal Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118

    Hydrologic Region Colorado River California’s Groundwater Vidal Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118 Vidal Valley Groundwater Basin • Groundwater Basin Number: 7-42 • County: Riverside, San Bernardino • Surface Area: 138,000 acres (216 square miles) Basin Boundaries and Hydrology This basin underlies Vidal Valley in southeastern San Bernardino County and northeastern Riverside County. The basin is bounded by the nonwater- bearing rocks of the West Riverside and Riverside Mountains on the south, of the Turtle Mountains on the west, of the Turtle and Whipple Mountains on the north, and by a diffuse drainage divide on the east (DWR 1963; Bishop 1963). The surface is drained southeastward by Vidal Wash to the Colorado River. Hydrogeologic Information Water Bearing Formations Groundwater in the basin is found in younger and older alluvium. The older alluvium is of Pleistocene age and consists of fine to coarse sand interbedded with gravel, silt, and clay. The older alluvium yields water freely to wells and is the most important aquifer in the basin (DWR 1963). The younger alluvium is of Holocene age and consists of poorly sorted gravel, sand, silt, and clay. The younger alluvium is generally a thin veneer above the water table (DWR 1963). Lithologic logs for wells drilled in the basin indicate that water-bearing sediments typically extend at least 600 to 700 feet in depth (DWR 1963). Restrictive Structures A south-trending fault may cut the basin near the Turtle Mountains (Bishop 1963); however, is unknown whether or not this fault is a barrier to groundwater movement. Recharge Areas The primary source of recharge to the basin is runoff from the surrounding mountain ranges that percolates through unconsolidated deposits at the edges of the valley floor (DWR 1963).