Biblical Scholarship and the Passion Surrounding the Passion of the Christ

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biblical Scholarship and the Passion Surrounding the Passion of the Christ Journal of Religion & Film Volume 8 Issue 1 Special Issue: Passion of the Christ (February Article 10 2004) 12-12-2016 Biblical Scholarship and the Passion Surrounding The aP ssion of the Christ Frances Flannery-Dailey Hendrix College, [email protected] Recommended Citation Flannery-Dailey, Frances (2016) "Biblical Scholarship and the Passion Surrounding The asP sion of the Christ," Journal of Religion & Film: Vol. 8 : Iss. 1 , Article 10. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol8/iss1/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Religion & Film by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Biblical Scholarship and the Passion Surrounding The aP ssion of the Christ Abstract The er lease of the film has engendered a spectrum of fervent responses, becoming in itself atheological event shaped by merchandising, media, and audience reception. For a long while, images from a movie will inform the lens through which many of our students and the general public read the Gospels, as well as influence the ways in which some Jews and Christians view one another. Reactions to the film will differ markedly, magnifying and possibly reifying the various theological stances of audience members. Since much of the furor revolves around issues of interpretation of Scripture, biblical scholars can provide informed and thoughtful contributions to the debate. In other words, the release of The Passion, as well as other films with religious themes, provides a valuable opportunity for raising the level of public discourse on religion, enabling us to foster careful inquiry in our classrooms, writings, churches and synagogues. From my point of view as a biblical scholar, this filmic event raises four points deserving of discussion that illuminate the divide between the conclusions of mainstream biblical scholarship and public understandings of biblical texts. This article is available in Journal of Religion & Film: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol8/iss1/10 Flannery-Dailey: Biblical Scholarship and the Passion Surrounding The Passion of the Christ The U.S. cinematic release of Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ (Icon Productions, 2004) last Ash Wednesday has vividly demonstrated the degree to which film can inform popular religion. The film, which depicts the final twelve hours of Jesus' life in super-gory, Friday the Thirteenth fashion, has garnered an enormous outpouring of support from conservative Christian groups. Numerous websites have appeared in support of the film, urging churches to buy blocks of tickets, and many conservative Catholic and evangelical Protestant leaders seem to view the film as a tremendous opportunity to evangelize.1 Cleverly, the production company Icon has intentionally merchandised the film as a religious opportunity to save souls and strengthen faith. The official website includes a button for "Spread the Word,"2 which includes merchandise such as "Witnessing Tools," as well as Passion cross or nail jewelry (also available in Aramaic), coffee mugs, framed photos, and lapel pins. The company also sent out pre-screenings to approximately 15,000 selected Christian church leaders, some of whom received an instructional DVD on how evangelize with the film.3 By contrast, others have expressed grave concerns about theological bias in this film that could occasion anti-Semitism. Some Jews, Christians, and persons of no particular faith who have seen the film have argued that the interpretation portrays Jews excessively negatively.4 Prominent Jewish leaders such as Rabbi Marvin Hier of the Simon Wiesenthal Center and Abraham Foxman of the Anti- Defamation League have publicly expressed concerns that the film could occasion Published by DigitalCommons@UNO, 2004 1 Journal of Religion & Film, Vol. 8 [2004], Iss. 1, Art. 10 acts of retaliation or negative attitudes against Jews.5 Prior to the film's release, the tension had been exacerbated by Gibson, who declined to give the Jewish leaders copies of the film, denied them access to the special pre-screenings arranged for Christian pastors,6 and refused invitations to meet and discuss their concerns.7Those who worry over the film's ability to spark anti-Semitism note that violence against Jews has been legitimized from before the First Crusade to well beyond the Holocaust by appeals to the misguided dictum that "the Jews killed Christ," and that for a thousand years some passion plays have helped fuel hatred of Jews.8 Given the rise of anti-Semitism in many parts of the world, these fears do not appear to be unfounded, particularly since the very expression of concern about the film by the ADL has resulted in volumes of hate mail.9 Thus, the release of the film has engendered a spectrum of fervent responses, becoming in itself atheological event shaped by merchandising, media, and audience reception. For a long while, images from a movie will inform the lens through which many of our students and the general public read the Gospels, as well as influence the ways in which some Jews and Christians view one another. Reactions to the film will differ markedly, magnifying and possibly reifying the various theological stances of audience members. Since much of the furor revolves around issues of interpretation of Scripture, biblical scholars can provide informed and thoughtful contributions to the debate. In other words, the release of The Passion, as well as other films with religious themes, provides a valuable https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol8/iss1/10 2 Flannery-Dailey: Biblical Scholarship and the Passion Surrounding The Passion of the Christ opportunity for raising the level of public discourse on religion, enabling us to foster careful inquiry in our classrooms, writings, churches and synagogues. From my point of view as a biblical scholar, this filmic event raises four points deserving of discussion10 that illuminate the divide between the conclusions of mainstream biblical scholarship and public understandings of biblical texts. First, concerns that anti-Semitism is inherent in the film or could result from the film seem to have a legitimate basis, if one considers how the plot is constructed. Most audience members recognize that the film is drawn from the Gospels, which in part it is, and for some the issue of possible anti-Semitism simply ends there in favor of "faithfully" depicting the Gospels. Gibson himself seems to hold this view; his assurances that he is not trying to foster anti-Semitism are repeatedly punctuated with afterthoughts such as, "It's true that, as the Bible says, He came unto his own and his own received him not; I can't hide that."11 However, what needs to be noted is that the plot of the film is a fictionalized interpretation and harmonization from selected parts of the passion stories in the Gospels, and that when strewn together in a new fashion, the bits portray the Roman procurator Pilate positively and the Jews extremely negatively. The Passion of the Christ draws much of its portrait of Pilate (Hristo Naumov Shopov) from the Gospel of Luke, portraying the Roman leader Pilate as deeply reluctant to convict Jesus (James Caviezel) at the behest of a bloodthirsty crowd. In Luke, Pilate's multiple attempts to free Jesus include sending him to the Published by DigitalCommons@UNO, 2004 3 Journal of Religion & Film, Vol. 8 [2004], Iss. 1, Art. 10 Jewish leader Herod, who is thus partially responsible for Jesus' eventual conviction (Luke 23:1-12). The film includes this addition, unique in the Gospels, and goes further: it shows Pilate as helpless against the High Priest Caiaphas (Mattia Sbragia) and incredulous at the Jewish crowd's rabid demands. The official website interprets one scene thusly: "[Jesus] is brought back before Pilate, who presents him to the crowd as if to say, 'Is this not enough?' It is not." To even greater effect, the film conflates this with the scene from Matthew in which Pilate washes his hands of the crime. Moreover, Pilate's wife apparently shows kindness to Mary (Maia Morgenstern) and Mary Magdalene (Monica Belluci).12 Thus, Pilate's most positive moments from various Gospels are interwoven in a new story that portrays him even more sympathetically, as a weak man controlled by an insatiable Jewish mob and an evil, powerful Jewish High Priest. Yet this scenario is certainly not mandated by a combined account of the Gospels, which could have been explored with greater sensitivity both to history and to contemporary Jewish-Christian relations. For instance, the Gospel of John clearly does not portray Caiaphas as a figure who intimidates Pilate, but rather as a fearful leader anticipating Roman reprisals against the Jews and hence willing to sacrifice Jesus' one life to save the many (John 18:14). In contrast to Gibson's film, the Gospel of Mark, probably the earliest Gospel and hence the most historically accurate, depicts Pilate as a Roman official who realizes that the accusations against Jesus stem from envy, but who does little to nothing to protect him. In other words, https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol8/iss1/10 4 Flannery-Dailey: Biblical Scholarship and the Passion Surrounding The Passion of the Christ Pilate is a ruthless leader in control who, "wishing to satisfy the crowd," gives in rather easily, while adding floggings for good measure (Mark 15:1-20). This squares very well with what we know of Pilate historically, a cruel dictator who crucified thousands of Jews for the merest hint of rebellion. Such Roman brutality certainly makes sense of the later passage in which Roman soldiers torture Jesus with mock royal garb. Moreover, attention to the contextualization of "the crowd" in each Gospel could have resulted in a more sensitive and more theologically responsible filmic portrayal of those present at the passion.13 In the Gospel of Mark, for example, "the crowd," far from representing all Jews, is the same stock character of "the crowd" that swarms Jesus throughout the Gospel.
Recommended publications
  • Film Review: the Passion of the Christ (Director Mel Gibson 2004)
    114 Australian Religion Studies Review Film Review: The Passion of the Christ (Director Mel Gibson 2004) Ecce Vir: Conceit, Homophobia and Irony in Gibson's Passion Michael Carden, University ofQueensland My favourite Jesus film is Pier Paolo Pasolini's "The Gospel According to St. Matthew." Mel Gibson's Passion shows that it still takes a gay Marxist to make an effective movie about Jesus. Passion hit the cinemas on a tide of controversy. Arguments raged over the film's violence, possible anti-Semitism and the question of Gibson's own traditionalist Catholic perspective. This latter point particularly bemused me, as the film seemed most eagerly expected and promoted by conservative evangelical Protestant communities. I am not a fan of Gibson as an actor and have not seen most of his films, but, as a biblical scholar, I knew that I had to see the film. Furthermore, as I regard most Jesus films as being too sanitized in representing his execution, I was interested in seeing a film that claimed to show it as it was. Finally the film offered the rare prospect of being played in Latin and Aramaic. However, like the Tower of Babel, the film failed in this conceit, which was symptomatic of a deeper problem. Playing the film in Aramaic and Latin irked me as an attempt to conscript a documentary sense to what was on screen, to make the screen into a window into 30 CE Jerusalem. No film, no text is a simple window onto an unmediated and uninterpreted reality and Gibson's film had not only to harmonize the differing gospel accounts but was also partly based on Katherine Emmerich's 19th century visionary accounts.
    [Show full text]
  • Kol Ami Building for Sale by Barbara Bayer Editor
    $1.00 The KANSAS CITY Volume 92, Number 17 www.kcjc.com April 26, 2012 jewish chronicle Kol Ami building for sale By Barbara Bayer Editor Congregation Kol Ami has put its building up for sale. The listing price for the 16,000 square-foot building located at 7501 Belinder Avenue in Prairie Village is $1.4 million. The Reform congrega- tion purchased the building in the sum- mer of 2005 from Zion Lutheran Church for $1.1 million. Nadine Gordon, president of the 90-member congregation, said the board of directors decided to put the building up for sale because “it no longer meets our needs.” She declined to make any further comments regarding the sale or the congregation’s future. Kol Ami is being represented by Da- vid Block and Max Kosoglad of Block & Company, Inc., the exclusive agent for the building and property. It sits on 3.49 acres and features five creative class- rooms, a large social hall, worship space, PHOTOS BY BEN MCCALL kitchen and an outdoor playground. The board of directors of Congregation Kol Ami recently decided to sell the building located at 7501 Belinder Avenue in Prairie Village. The congregation currently leases space in the building to three tenants has leased space to tenants for at least the late summer of 2005 after minor locations before establishing its perma- — Mercy Church, Kansas City Autism three years. repairs were completed following its nent home in Prairie Village. Training Center and a Montessori Kol Ami began holding worship ser- purchase. The congregation was estab- school.
    [Show full text]
  • 02-26-2004.Pdf
    Dance Theatre of Harlem )R[ ENTERTAINMENT! Inserted section Your hometown newspaper serving Canton for 29 years Go fish j SZ1\4 CANTON Favorite fillets ! hit the plate \ THURSDAY ?nt * February 26,2004 Taste, D1 75 cents VOLUME 29 NUMBER 68 ODbscruewww.hometownJife.com r ©2004 HOMETOWN COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK Win a $500 Farmer Jack Ball group: The games will continue See Page C8 for details With the president of the District Court last week with He said the situation came to already been made in the way summer league play last year, . Canton Community Junior embezzlement of funds in the board's attention when purchases are handled. he said the group takes in about Baseball/Softball Association excess of $20,000. He was some vendors did not get paid "A purchase order must be $250,000 a year. facing felony embezzlement released on a $20,000 personal and the money was not there to voted on and signed by a major- Are the charges against Hill charges, association vice presi- bond and faces a preliminary pay them. ity of board members before putting the organization under dent Rich Rohn wants parents exam on March 5. He acknowledged that the any order is placed," he said. a cloud? Memo and players to know that the "Invoices will not be paid with- "You always have rainy days," Rohn said the board has been accounting practices in the out receipts against the pur- Road Rally games will go on. aware of the accusations against group were somewhat loose, he said. "But the sun will shine "Everything this year will go Hill since last November, but in but said that at the moment the chase order." again.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Religion & Society
    Journal of Religion & Society Volume 7 (2005) ISSN 1522-5658 A Kinder, Gentler Teaching of Contempt? Jews and Judaism in Contemporary Protestant Evangelical Children’s Fiction Mark Stover, San Diego State University Abstract This article analyzes contemporary American evangelical children’s fiction with respect to the portrayal of Jews and Judaism. Some of the themes that appear in these novels for children include Jewish religiosity, anti-Semitism, Christian proselytizing, the Holocaust, the Jewishness of Jesus, Jews converting to Christianity, and the implicit emptiness of Jewish spirituality. The author argues that these books, many of which contain conversion narratives, reflect the ambivalence of modern Protestant evangelical Christianity concerning Jews and Judaism. On the one hand, evangelicals respect Jews and condemn all forms of anti-Semitism. On the other hand, evangelicals promote and encourage the conversion of Jews to Christianity through evangelism, which seems to imply a lack of respect or even a subtle contempt for Jewish faith and practice. Introduction [1] Utilizing Jews as major characters in religious Christian fiction written for children is not a new device. A number of children’s stories were written in the nineteenth century depicting Jews who (in the course of the narrative) converted to Christianity (Cutt: 92). Throughout the twentieth century, Jews occasionally appeared in evangelical children’s fiction (Grant; Palmer). Over the years, Jews have also been depicted in fictional settings in Christian Sunday School materials (Rausch 1987). However, the past twelve years have seen a proliferation of evangelical1 Christian novels written for children and young adults that feature Jewish characters. [2] In my research, I examined twenty-nine books published in the United States between 1992 and 2003 that fit this description.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract in the First Years of the Twentieth Century, an Anti-Semitic Document Appeared in Russia That Profoundly Shaped The
    Abstract In the first years of the twentieth century, an anti-Semitic document appeared in Russia that profoundly shaped the course of the entire century. Despite being quickly discredited as a plagiarized forgery, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion spread across the world, being translated into dozens of languages and utilized as hateful rhetoric by leaders of many religions and nationalities. While the effects of the document were felt internationally, the Protocols also helped to reshape centuries old prejudices about Jews in a country still in its infancy, Germany. This “hoax of the twentieth century” helped to redefine age-old anti- Semitic values firmly ingrained within German society, and helped Adolf Hitler and his Nazi Party justify committing the landmark genocide of world history, the Holocaust. Utilizing a variety of sources, particularly the actual text of the Protocols and the writings of Adolf Hitler, this examination argues that Hitler and his cabinet became progressively more radicalized towards extermination of the Jews due to their belief in the Jewish world conspiracy outlined within the Protocols. 1 Introduction: Jews in Europe “The weapons in our hands are limitless ambitions, burning greediness, merciless vengeance, hatreds, and malace.”1 This phrase is attributed to a collection of omnipotent Jews supposedly bent on world domination. Collectively called the “Elders of Zion,” this group outlined how it will accomplish its goals of global supremacy in a forged book titled The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. The weapons these Elders claimed to hold were substantial: they asserted control over all aspects of the media and world-banking systems, and maintained their agents had already infiltrated international governments.
    [Show full text]
  • Au Nom Du Père Mad Mel, Vraiment
    5 AU NOM DU PÈRE 12 MAD MEL, VRAIMENT ? 22 LARMES FATALES 28 LA NAISSANCE D’UNE ICON 36 CINÉASTE APRÈS TOUT 44 LA PATIENCE ET LA PASSION 54 APRÈS LUI, L’APOCALYPSE 64 LE COMPLEXE DU REPENTI 70 TU NE CHANGERAS POINT AU NOM DU PÈRE 4 novembre 1968. Le Herald, journal de l’après- midi connu des habitants de Melbourne pour ses petites annonces et ses cartoons de William Ellis Green, publie une photo s’étirant sur toute la lon- gueur de son format tabloïd. Le cliché présente une famille nombreuse, très nombreuse, et sa légende annonce : « Faites connaissance avec chacun des douze Gibson ! » Hutton “Red” Gibson, sa femme Anne et leurs dix enfants viennent à peine de poser le pied en Australie qu’un photographe de l’aéroport de Melbourne a voulu immortaliser l’occasion. Après tout, ça n’est pas tous les jours qu’on croise une fratrie capable de constituer une équipe de foot- ball — ou une Cène, c’est selon — à elle toute seule. Le texte qui joint la photo décrit Hutton Gibson 5 comme un programmeur informatique américain venu s’installer en Australie parce qu’il « pense que ce pays offre d’assez bonnes chances pour moi et pour mes enfants ». Pour mieux saisir la personna- lité pour le moins paradoxale — pour ne pas dire autre chose — de l’acteur et réalisateur américain révélé par la trilogie Mad Max, il faut se pencher sur son enfance, sur la personnalité de “Red” le patriarche, sur l’éducation prodiguée par ce der- nier. Un homme qui disait, et qui dit sans doute encore du bout de ses 100 ans que « le plus grand avantage qu’un homme peut avoir est d’être catholique, car cela donne la satisfaction d’avoir raison à vie ».
    [Show full text]
  • Uvic Thesis Template
    Fathers, Sons and the Holo-Ghost: Reframing Post-Shoah Male Jewish Identity in Doron Rabinovici’s Suche nach M by Michael Moses Gans BA, Cleveland State University, 1976 MS, University of Massachusetts, 1981 MSW, Barry University, 2008 MA, Central European University, 2009 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Germanic and Slavic Studies Michael Moses Gans, 2012 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee Fathers, Sons and the Holo-Ghost: Reframing Post-Shoah Male Jewish Identity in Doron Rabinovici’s Suche nach M by Michael Moses Gans BA, Cleveland State University, 1976 MS, University of Massachusetts, 1981 MSW, Barry University, 2008 MA, Central European University, 2009 Supervisory Committee Dr. Charlotte Schallié, (Department of Germanic and Slavic Studies) Supervisor Dr. Matthew Pollard, (Department of Germanic and Slavic Studies) Departmental Member iii Abstract Supervisory Committee Dr. Charlotte Schallié, (Department of Germanic and Slavic Studies) Supervisor Dr. Matthew Pollard, (Department of Germanic and Slavic Studies) Departmental Member The enduring, mythical and antisemitic figure of Ahasuerus is central to the unraveling and reframing of post-Shoah Jewish identity in Rabinovici’s novel Suche nach M for it serves as the mythological color palette from which Rabinovici draws his characters and, to extend that metaphor, how the Jews have been immortalized in European culture. There is no escape in Suche nach M. When painting the Jew, both Jews and non-Jews can only use brush strokes of color from the Christian-created palette of the mythic, wandering Jew, Ahasuerus, who is stained in the blood of deicide, emasculated, treacherous, and evil.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Semitism Through the Centuries
    Anti-Semitism through the Centuries First to Third century 50 Jews ordered by Roman Emperor Claudius "not to hold meetings", in the words of Cassius Dio (Roman History, 60.6.6). Claudius later expelled Jews from Rome, according to both Suetonius ("Lives of the Twelve Caesars", Claudius, Section 25.4) and Acts 18:2. 66–73 Great Jewish Revolt against the Romans is crushed by Vespasian and Titus. Titus refuses to accept a wreath of victory, as there is "no merit in vanquishing people forsaken by their own God." (Philostratus, Vita Apollonii). The events of this period were recorded in detail by the Jewish-Roman historian Josephus. His record is largely sympathetic to the Roman view and was written in Rome under Roman protection; hence it is considered a controversial source. Josephus describes the Jewish revolt as being led by "tyrants," to the detriment of the city, and of Titus as having "moderation" in his escalation of the Siege of Jerusalem (70). c. 119 Roman emperor Hadrian bans circumcision, making Judaism de facto illegal. c. 132–135 Crushing of the Bar Kokhba revolt. According to Cassius Dio 580,000 Jews are killed. Hadrian orders the expulsion of Jews from Judea, which is merged with Galilee to form the province Syria Palaestina. Although large Jewish populations remain in Samaria and Galilee, with Tiberias as the headquarters of exiled Jewish patriarchs, this is the start of the Jewish diaspora. Hadrian constructs a pagan temple to Jupiter at the site of the Temple in Jerusalem, builds Aelia Capitolina among ruins of Jerusalem.[4] 167 Earliest known accusation of Jewish deicide (the notion that Jews were held responsible for the death of Jesus) made in a sermon On the Passover attributed to Melito of Sardis.
    [Show full text]
  • Intermittente Materiale: Alcune Stanze Effetto: Adattarsi Moquette E Carta Da Parati
    adattarsi Sistemare una stanza Durata: intermittente Materiale: alcune stanze Effetto: adattarsi Moquette e carta da parati, piastrelle e intonaco, impianto elettrico, fasci di luce, porte, finestre, tende, cuscini, mobili, piante... Bisogna decidere il posto degli oggetti, il colore e lo stile. Ciò che è interessante è che non si sa come fare. Imparate ad ascoltare quello che dice la stanza. Ogni luogo vuole una certa forma e una certa sistemazione. Non si può averne una conoscenza globale né razionale. È come se in ogni posto lo spirito del luogo parlasse una propria lingua, che voi dovete imparare utilizzando le vostre risorse. Bisogna quindi lasciarsi impregnare dalle caratteristiche del luogo: volume, luci, superfici, materiali, trama. E poi procedere a tentoni. Una buona sistemazione non nasce mai da una prima intuizione. Bisogna procedere per approssimazione, passo dopo passo, per tentativi ed errori. Saper tacere e dimenticare, riscoprire, agire al di là delle parole e delle rappresentazioni. Non completamente in modo teorico e astratto. Posate un colore e gli altri tutt'intorno si trasformano. Mettete un mobile e i volumi cambiano, talvolta anche i colori e le luci. Ogni cosa è sempre in stretto rapporto con il resto. Per questo non dovete lasciarvi ingannare, quando non conoscete esattamente l'itinerario da seguire. L'esperienza obbedisce a regole ogni volta diverse. Voi dovete lasciar fare e agire al tempo stesso. Siete voi al centro delle manovre, ma avrete successo se non im¬porrete nulla. D'altro canto le conseguenze di questa relativa passività saranno in ragione di quello che siete. Ciò che il luogo suggerisce, ciò che esige su misura non è evidentemente identico per tutte le persone: il luogo è la guida, ma siete voi il conducente e non qualcun altro.
    [Show full text]
  • Biblical Scholarship and the Passion Surrounding the Passion of the Christ
    Journal of Religion & Film Volume 8 Issue 1 Special Issue: Passion of the Christ Article 10 (February 2004) February 2004 Biblical Scholarship and the Passion Surrounding The Passion of the Christ Frances Flannery-Dailey Hendrix College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf Recommended Citation Flannery-Dailey, Frances (2004) "Biblical Scholarship and the Passion Surrounding The Passion of the Christ," Journal of Religion & Film: Vol. 8 : Iss. 1 , Article 10. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol8/iss1/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Religion & Film by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Biblical Scholarship and the Passion Surrounding The Passion of the Christ Abstract The release of the film has engendered a spectrum of fervent responses, becoming in itself atheological event shaped by merchandising, media, and audience reception. For a long while, images from a movie will inform the lens through which many of our students and the general public read the Gospels, as well as influence the ways in which some Jews and Christians view one another. Reactions to the film will differ markedly, magnifying and possibly reifying the various theological stances of audience members. Since much of the furor revolves around issues of interpretation of Scripture, biblical scholars can provide informed and thoughtful contributions to the debate. In other words, the release of The Passion, as well as other films with eligiousr themes, provides a valuable opportunity for raising the level of public discourse on religion, enabling us to foster careful inquiry in our classrooms, writings, churches and synagogues.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 30 AFP Master 2003
    See if Your Representative Voted to Slash U.S. Veterans’ Medical Benefits. Page 7. AMERICA FIRST WEEKLY NEWSPAPER: DO NOT DELAY—DATE MAILED: 8-1-03 Orthodox Rabbis Protest Ariel Sharon’s Visit to the States. Say Israel “Illegitimate.” Page 11. ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ CIAWanted Saddam’s Sons Taken Alive. AmericanFreePressAmericanFreePress Page 3. ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★For Life & Liberty . Against the New World Order ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ VOLUME III NUMBER 30 AUGUST 11, 2003 www.americanfreepress.net $1.50 EACH Voting Machines Exposed Prisoners Experts Cast Doubt on Veracity of Computer Voting Brutalized An independent team of computer experts has exposed how electronic voting machines In Baghdad are insecurely programmed and are vulnera- ble to hackers who can manipulate data and steal elections without leaving a trace. Gulag Prison EXCLUSIVE TO AMERICAN FREE PRESS Former prisoners and aid workers By Christopher Bollyn provide insight into the brutal living conditions of those held in makeshift team of computer security experts has examined the software that runs one of the leading touch- prison camps in Iraq. screen voting systems currently being used in the A United States and discovered “significant security EXCLUSIVE TO AMERICAN FREE PRESS flaws.” The voting system examined fell “far below even the By Gordon Thomas most minimal security standards.” Three experts from the Information Security Institute ach prisoner receives six pints of dank, (ISI) at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore and a fourth tepid water a day. He uses it to wash and from Rice University in Houston analyzed the source code— drink in summer noonday temperatures of programming that makes up software which runs a comput- E120 degrees Fahrenheit.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacramental Intention and Masonic Bishops (2003)
    Sacramental Intention and Masonic Bishops (2003) by Rev. Anthony Cekada An old canard about Abp. Lefebvre’s ordination “People who are not theologians never seem to understand how little intention is wanted for a sacrament… The ‘implicit intention of doing what Christ instituted’ means so vague and small a thing that one can hardly help having it — unless one deliberately excludes it. At the time when everyone was talk- ing about Anglican orders, numbers of Catholics confused in- tention with faith. Faith is not wanted. It is heresy to say that it is. (This was the error of St Cyprian and Firmilian against which Pope Stephen I [254–257] protested.) A man may have utterly wrong, heretical and blasphemous views about a sac- rament and yet confer or receive it quite validly.” — Adrian Fortescue The Greek Fathers IN THE LATE 1970s, as priests of the Society of St. Pius X began to offer Mass in more and more cities, certain controversialists in the U.S. traditionalist movement began to circulate the story that the Society’s founder, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre (1905–1991) had been ordained to both the priesthood and the episcopacy by a Mason, that the Archbishop’s own priestly ordination and episcopal consecration were therefore invalid, and that conse- quently, all SSPX priests were invalidly ordained as well. The alleged Mason in question was Achille Cardinal Liénart (1884–1973), Archbishop of Lille (Abp. Lefebvre’s native city), and later one of the leading modernists at the Second Vatican Council (1962–1965). The late Hugo Maria Kellner, the now-defunct publication Veritas, Hutton Gibson and a few others — the “Liénartists,” we could call them — argued that, since Masonry despised the Church, its adepts among the clergy would naturally want to destroy the priesthood by withholding the required sacramental intention when conferring Holy Orders.
    [Show full text]