DOCSLIB.ORG

Refugio Beach Oil Spill Draft Damage Assessment and Restoration Plan/Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Refugio Beach Oil Spill Draft Damage Assessment and Restoration Plan/Environmental Assessment Prepared by: California Department of Fish and Wildlife California State Lands Commission California Department of Parks and Recreation University of California Te Department of Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (BLM); the CDFW-OSPR; the California Executive Summary Department of Parks and Recreation (CDPR); the California State Lands Commission (CSLC); and the Regents About the Spill of the University of California (the Trustees). On May 19, 2015 a 24-inch diameter on- shore pipeline (Line 901) that extends As a designated Trustee, each of approximately 10.7 miles along the Santa these agencies is authorized to act on Barbara County coastline in California behalf of the public under state and/ ruptured resulting in the release of or federal law to assess and recover approximately 2,934 barrels (bbl) of natural resource damages and to plan heavy crude oil (Pipeline and Hazardous and implement actions to restore, Materials Safety Administration 2016). rehabilitate, replace, or acquire the Western snowy plovers are one of the shore bird species that equivalent of the affected natural Line 901 is a buried, insulated pipeline Natural Resource Damage Assessment scientists track were affected by the Refugio Oil Spill in 2015. Photo by Hazel resources injured as a result of a that transports heated crude oil from changes in rocky intertidal habitats following the Refugio Rodriguez/USFWS. discharge of oil. Exxon Mobil’s storage tanks in Las Flores spill. Photo by Jenny Marek/USFWS. response, the Incident Commanders Canyon westward to Plains’ Gaviota consisted of the United States Coast Pumping Station. The pipeline is owned discharged into the Pacific Ocean at Guard (USCG), California Department of Draft Damage and operated by Plains Pipeline, L.P. (a Refugio State Beach. Fish and Wildlife (CDFW-OSPR), Santa subsidiary of Plains All-American Pipeline Assessment and The crude oil that entered the ocean Barbara County, and Plains Pipeline. Company). posed a significant risk to and injured The Unified Command officially declared Restoration Plan marine plants and wildlife, including the response to be complete on March Under the Oil Pollution Act regulations seagrasses, kelp, invertebrates, fish, 2, 2017, 653 days after the spill (U.S. ((33 U.S.C. 2706(b)), the Trustees birds, and mammals. In addition Coast Guard 2017). have cooperatively gathered to direct natural resource impacts, information for this Draft Damage the closure of beaches and fisheries Assessment and Restoration Plan occurred days before the Memorial Day Natural Resource (DARP)/Environmental Assessment weekend resulting in losses for local (EA) for public review and comment. businesses and lost opportunities for Damage Assessment This document describes the injuries the public to visit and enjoy the shore In parallel with the response and clean- resulting from the spill and proposes and offshore areas. up effort, the natural resources trustee restoration projects intended to agencies (Trustees) conducted a Natural Some tar balls attributable to the Line compensate the public for those Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA) 901 release were carried by southerly injuries. Bruce Joab with California Department of Fish and Wildlife ocean currents and eventually reached to quantify the injuries to natural This document is also an preps with NRDA field teams for tar ball sampling the morning some beaches in Los Angeles County resources from the spill and to seek Environmental Assessment intended of May 26, 2015. Photo courtesy of NRDA Field Teams. (California Department of Fish and compensation in the form of restoration to satisfy the Federal Trustees’ Wildlife 2016). projects. The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials requirement to evaluate the In this case, the Trustees for the natural Safety Administration (PHMSA) The clean-up of this significant spill environmental impacts of the proposed resources injured by the spill include the determined that the cause of the Line brought together a large number of restoration projects under the National United States Department of Commerce 901 failure was external corrosion that federal, state, local agencies, and Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). This represented by the National Oceanic and thinned the pipe wall to a level where it Native American tribes operating under document is therefore called a DARP/ Atmospheric Administration (NOAA); ruptured suddenly and released heavy a Unified Command. For the Refugio EA. crude oil. Crude oil from the buried the United States Department of the pipeline saturated the soil and flowed ON THE COVER: Oiled Beach by U.S. Coast Guard. Photo of oiled Interior represented by the United into a culvert that crosses under Highwa o ctopus by NOAA, dolphins by NRDA, pelicans by USFWS, and States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) harbor seal by Santa Barbara ChannelKeeper. 101 and railroad tracks and ultimately and the Bureau of Land Management considered part of the official record. Comments should be sent by email to [email protected] or by letter Refugio Beach Oil Spill Natural Resource to: Damage Assessment Summary: Refugio Oil Spill Natural Resource Trustees C/O Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office 2493 Portola Road, Suite B Shoreline Habitats Human Uses California sea lion sunbathing off the Channel Islands. Ventura, California 93004 $5.5 million $3.9 million Photo by Lara Drizd/USFWS. Attn: Injury: Approximately 1,500 acres of shoreline Injury: The Trustees estimate over 140,000 lost Full environmental review would be habitat were impacted including sandy beach recreational user days in Santa Barbara and premature for some of the proposed Michael Anderson, California Departmen and rocky intertidal habitats. Ventura Counties; six days of beach closures projects in the document, particularly of Fish and Wildlife in Los Angeles County; and lost research, 2nd tier projects. Additional review Restoration: Remove Ellwood seawall, enhance education, and outreach opportunities at the Laurie Sullivan, National Oceanic and black abalone populations, and restore University of California, Santa Barbara Coal Oil may be required if those projects Atmospheric Administration degraded sand dune habitats. Point Natural Reserve. Affected recreational are implemented, and the need activities included camping, sunbathing, beach Jenny Marek, U.S. Fish and Wildlife for additional NEPA review will be combing, exercising, swimming, wildlife viewing, Service determined once detailed engineering Subtidal and Fish Habitats fishing, diving, boating and surfing. design work or operational plans are $6.1 million developed for those projects. Under The trustess will hold a public webinar Restoration: Injury: Approximately 2,200 acres of benthic Restoration funds (53%) will be administered OPA, the responsible party (RP) is on May 13, 2020 from 1:00 - 3:00 subtidal habitat were impacted. by State Parks for use on projects benefiting liable for the cost of implementing pm (PST), and later that evening from camping and shore-based recreation from restoration projects, as well as the 6:00 - 8:00 p.m. (PST). In this virtual Restoration: Restore abalone populations in Gaviota State Park to El Capitan State Beach. costs incurred by the Trustees to public meeting, trustees will present the Marine Protected Areas, restore eelgrass beds in undertake this damage assessment. draft plan, have an “open house” writte Refugio cove, remove Ellwood seawall, restore Restoration funds (46%) will be administered sand dwelling kelp offshore of Goleta Beach. by State Trustees for use on projects benefiting The Trustees have settled this claim question and answer session, take coastal recreation in Ventura County, Los for natural resource damages with the written public comments. Angeles County, and Santa Barbara County RP for $22.3 million, subject to Court outside of State Park property upcoast of El Both written questions, and written Birds approval. $2.2 million Capitan State Beach. public comments will be submitted The Trustees have prepared this draft through the webinar platform. Injury: 558 birds were estimated killed, repre- Restoration funds (aproximately 1%) will be DARP/EA to inform the public about the senting over 28 different species. administered by the University of California for natural resource damage assessment use on projects benefiting research, education, Register for the webinar at: Restoration: Remove invasive plants from or outreach at the Coal Oil Point Reserve. and restoration planning efforts that brown pelican nesting colonies on Anacapa have been conducted following the oil https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/ Island, reduce seabird injuries from recreational spill. t/5071390037067886094 fishing, and implement conservation actions for Restoration Planning, western snowy plovers. Implementation, and After registering, participants will Public Input receive a confirmation email with Marine Mammals Oversight $2 million The Trustees seek comments on the instructions for joining the webinar. $2.3 million restoration alternatives presented A GoToWebinar system check is Injury: 156 pinnipeds and 76 cetaceans were here. Public review of this draft recommended before attending. estimated injured or killed. Public Input DARP/EA is an integral component Full Document: https://go.usa.gov/xvWEg of the restoration planning process. Restoration: Increase the capability to recover and rehabilitate marine mammals in distress Administrative Record: https://go.usa.gov/xvWEc A public review period is being held in Santa Barbra and Ventura County, and Comment Period: April 22, 2020 to June 8, 2020 on this draft plan from April 22, 2020 Increase the capability to respond to instances Virtual Public Meetings: May 13, 2020,1:00 pm to June 5, 2020. Written comments of cetacean entanglement in the Santa and 6:00 pm (PST) Barbara Channel. must be received by that date to be Submit Comments: [email protected] .
Recommended publications
  • Refugio Oil Spill Response & Recovery

    Refugio Oil Spill Response & Recovery

    Refugio Oil Spill Response & Recovery Incident Summary • On 19 May 2015 at 1243, report to the Governor’s Office of Emergency Services • The report indicated a pipeline rupture had occurred near Refugio State Beach in Santa Barbara County, CA • The responsible party (Plains All American Pipeline) estimated the total release at 500 barrels (21,000 gallons) of crude oil on the shoreside of Hwy 101 which then flowed into the Pacific Ocean • 23x7 mile (138 square mile) fishery closure Incident Summary (con’t) • Initial reports estimated a sheen to be 3.5 NM along the beach and 50-100 yards into the water • Revised worst-case release: 101,000 gal (2,400 bbl) • On May 19, Governor Brown declared a State of Emergency for Santa Barbara County • On June 5, Governor Brown issued a subsequent Executive Order to Further Expedite Oil Spill Recovery Efforts in Santa Barbara County Location of Incident (Approximately 25 miles west of Santa Barbara) Incident Command Post Shoreline below the cliff Photo Courtesy of CDFW‐OSPR Refugio State Beach Photo Courtesy of NOAA Significant Environmental, Cultural, Historical & Social Concerns • 2 Marine Protected Areas (Kashtayit & Naples) • 23‐mile by 7‐mile mile fishery closure • Wildlife impacts – birds, mammals, Grunion Spawning • Chumash Indian Tribe – 2,000 ‐ 5,000 members coastal members – Inhabitants of SB Coast for over 13,000 years • Varied Beach composition & environments: – Cobble, Rock, Sand, Cliffs, Kelp, Marinas, Parks Areas of Special Interest/Concerns Volunteers Extensive Fisheries Closure Zone Cultural and Tribal Integration Wildlife Operation - marine mammals NGO and community involvement At Maximum Effort • Personnel – 1287 in field – 129 in ICP • Vessels on water – 21 skimmers – 2 support barges • 6,000 ft boom deployed • 5 SCAT teams deployed • 23 x 7 mile fishery closure • 1000‐ft temporary flight restriction within a 5‐mile radius of Refugio Beach – Daily responder overflights Unified Command Established USCG Sector LA‐LB Sector Commander, EPA Region 9, CA DFW, Santa Barbara Co OEM, Plains All American.
  • Surfers Beach and Miramar Half Moon Bay (El Granada and Half Moon Bay, CA)

    Surfers Beach and Miramar Half Moon Bay (El Granada and Half Moon Bay, CA)

    Surfers Beach and Miramar Half Moon Bay (El Granada and Half Moon Bay, CA) Bob Battalio, PE Chief Engineer, Vice President Environmental Science Associates (ESA) [email protected] Coastside Sea Rise & Erosion Forum Douglas Beach House in Miramar, May 24, 2016 Photograph © Colin Brown Who is this dude ? Professional Civil Engineer (CA,WA,LA,OR,FL) practicing 30 years Coastal Processes training from UCB, 1985 Chief Engineer, VP @ Environmental Science Associates (ESA), San Francisco http://www.esassoc.com/bios/robert‐battalio‐pe Practices management and enhancement of natural aquatic ecosystems, primarily shores, inlets, lagoons and tidal wetlands, also hazard mapping Surfer since 1970s Favorite location ‐ Taraval Street, OB Inducted, Double Overhead Association (DOA) at Wise Surf Shop, late 1980’s Pacifica resident since 1989 Started surfing Mavericks in early 1990’s Photograph © Colin Brown Problem(s) statement • Pillar point harbor – Traps sand supply to HMB littoral subcell, causing sediment deficit and erosion – Breakwater causes wave reflection which increases longshore transport toward south • Shore armoring on Coast Highway and Mirada Road – Increase wave reflection, increase longshore transport south and offshore, lowers beach – Erosion will accelerate in unarmored areas • Climate change, Sea level rise – everything gets worse (maybe not depths for navigation) • Result – Shoaling in Pillar Point Harbor – Erosion hot spot at surfers beach and Miramar – Increased erosion in southern HMB – Wave reflection from breakwater improves
  • The Goleta Slough Watershed a Review of Data Collected from October 2005 Through September 2006 by Santa Barbara Channelkeeper's Goleta Stream Team by Al Leydecker

    The Goleta Slough Watershed a Review of Data Collected from October 2005 Through September 2006 by Santa Barbara Channelkeeper's Goleta Stream Team by Al Leydecker

    The Goleta Slough Watershed A review of data collected from October 2005 through September 2006 by Santa Barbara Channelkeeper's Goleta Stream Team by Al Leydecker Introduction The streams that drain the Goleta Slough watershed transport pollutants such as bacteria and excess nutrients down to the slough and ocean, and the purpose of Santa Barbara Channelkeeper's Stream Team program is to provide comprehensive monitoring of this ecologically important catchment. The Goleta Stream Team began in the summer of 2002 as a partnership program of Santa Barbara Channelkeeper and the Isla Vista Chapter of the Surfrider Foundation. The program has three goals: to collect baseline information about the health of the watershed; to help identify sources of pollution; and to educate and train a force of watershed stewards in the local community. Stream Team conducts monthly on-site testing at designated locations on streams tributary to the Goleta Slough and in the slough itself. Near the beginning of each month, teams of volunteers measure physical and chemical parameters using portable, hand-held instruments. Data collected include on-site measurements of dissolved oxygen, turbidity, conductivity, pH, temperature and flow. Water samples are collected at each site and later processed in Channelkeeper's laboratory for three Public Health bacterial indicators using approved standard methodology (Colilert-18 and Enterolert-24, manufactured by Idexx Laboratories; US-EPA, 2003). Additional samples are analyzed for nutrients through the cooperation of the Santa Barbara Channel – Long Term Ecological Research Project (SBC-LTER) at the University of California, Santa Barbara. The nutrient parameters measured are ammonium, nitrite plus nitrate, orthophosphate, total dissolved nitrogen and total dissolved phosphorus.
  • UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT of TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ) in Re: ) Chapter 11 ) WHITING PETROLEUM CORPORATION, ) Case No

    UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT of TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ) in Re: ) Chapter 11 ) WHITING PETROLEUM CORPORATION, ) Case No

    Case 20-32021 Document 362 Filed in TXSB on 05/21/20 Page 1 of 147 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) WHITING PETROLEUM CORPORATION, ) Case No. 20-32021 (DRJ) et al.,1 ) ) Debtors. ) (Jointly Administered) ) GLOBAL NOTES AND STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS, METHODOLOGIES, AND DISCLAIMERS REGARDING THE DEBTORS’ SCHEDULES OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES AND STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL AFFAIRS The Schedules of Assets and Liabilities (collectively with attachments, the “Schedules”) and the Statements of Financial Affairs (collectively with attachments, the “Statements,” and together with the Schedules, the “Schedules and Statements”), filed by the above-captioned debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, the “Debtors”), were prepared pursuant to section 521 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) and rule 1007 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Bankruptcy Rules”) by the Debtors’ management, with the assistance of the Debtors’ advisors, and are unaudited. These Global Notes and Statement of Limitations, Methodologies, and Disclaimers Regarding the Debtors’ Schedules of Assets and Liabilities and Statements of Financial Affairs (the “Global Notes”) are incorporated by reference in, and comprise an integral part of, each Debtor’s respective Schedules and Statements, and should be referred to and considered in connection with any review of the Schedules and Statements. While the Debtors’ management has made reasonable efforts to ensure that the Schedules and Statements are as accurate and complete as possible under the circumstances, based on information that was available at the time of preparation, inadvertent errors, inaccuracies, or omissions may have occurred or the Debtors may discover subsequent information that requires material changes to the Schedules and Statements.
  • Check out This Factsheet on the Project

    Check out This Factsheet on the Project

    The GETFACTS ABOUT PLAINSPIPELINE’S NEW THREAT TO COASTAL CALIFORNIA Plains All American Pipeline caused California’s worst coastal oil spill in 25 years – the Refugio Oil Spill of 2015 – and now it wants a second chance to spill again. anta Barbara County is processing Plains’ application to build another coastal oil pipeline that would restart Sdrilling from six decrepit offshore oil platforms in the Santa Barbara Channel. Houston-based Plains was criminally negligent in allowing its previous coastal oil pipeline to become corroded and fail, coating Santa Barbara area beaches in crude and killing hundreds of birds and marine mammals. It doesn’t deserve another opportunity to kill threatened wildlife, poison our communities and wreck the climate. THE PROJECT • Plains All American Pipeline is proposing to build more than 123 miles of new oil pipeline through Santa Barbara (73 miles), San Luis Obispo (37 miles) and Kern counties (14 miles), transporting heavy crude pumped from offshore drilling platforms to onshore processing facilities. Plains also proposes to abandon in place about 123 miles of its old failed oil pipelines. • The new pipeline will mostly follow the same route as the old broken pipeline – which was built based on environmental studies done in the late ‘80s – in a rapidly changing coastal zone that is now being affected by coastal erosion, sea level rise and other impacts from climate change. HISTORY OF VIOLATIONS • Investigators responding to a massive coastal oil spill near Refugio State Beach in 2015 found the source, Plains’ Pipeline 901, to be severely corroded and poorly maintained. In September 2018, a Santa Barbara jury found Plains guilty of a felony for failing to properly maintain its pipeline and eight misdemeanor charges for a delay in reporting the spill and for its deadly impact on protected wildlife.
  • 2019-2024 Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Program

    2019-2024 Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Program

    NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL August 17, 2017 Ms. Kelly Hammerle National Program Manager Bureau of Ocean Energy Management 45600 Woodland Road Sterling, VA 20166 Submitted online at http:www.regulations.gov Re: NRDC Comments on the Request for Information and Comments on the Preparation of the 2019-2024 Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Program. Dear Ms. Hammerle: On behalf of the Natural Resources Defense Council (“NRDC”) and its more than 2.5 million members and online activists, we submit this letter to the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation, and Enforcement (“BOEM”) regarding the Request for Information for the Preparation of the 2019-2024 Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Program (“Program”). For more than three decades, NRDC has monitored and engaged in policy processes related to leasing, exploring and producing oil and gas from our nation’s oceans. We object to the Administration’s initiation of a whole new process to develop a Five-Year Program so soon after the current Outer Continental Shelf Offshore Oil and Gas Leasing Program (2017-2022) was put in place (January 2017). An extensive, multi-year public process preceded the adoption of the current program, during which over 1.4 million comments were submitted opposing new drilling. The program finalized at the end of this lengthy public process contains no lease sales in the following areas: the Atlantic, Pacific, Arctic, Bristol Bay or Eastern Gulf. New offshore drilling and leasing threatens billion dollar coastal economies, would open fragile and priceless coastal ecosystems to damage from pollution and spills, and would accelerate global climate disruption.
  • David Revell, Ph.D

    David Revell, Ph.D

    David L. Revell, Ph.D. Principal Professional Profile Dr. David Revell is a coastal geomorphologist with more than 25 years of experience studying marine, coastal, and estuarine processes, working to integrate science and management of coastal processes and climate change. He has served as a technical advisor and facilitator to multiple federal, state, and local jurisdictions related to ocean and coastal management especially at the intersection of how physical processes and human alterations affect Education and hazards, habitats, and human use. He has been involved in a wide Credentials variety of contentious community stakeholder processes ranging Ph.D., Earth Sciences, University from evaluating erosion hazard alternatives to climate change of California, Santa Cruz, 2007 vulnerability impacts to lagoon and fisheries management, water M.S., Oceanography and Marine quality, and marine spatial planning. Much of his work involves Resource Management, Oregon State University, Corvallis, physical process research and spatial analysis to facilitate Oregon, 2000 communication of science to inform decision-making. Dr. Revell B.A., Geography, and B.A. currently advises multiple local jurisdictions and agencies on dune Environmental Studies, University of California, Santa Barbara, and sediment management, climate change, estuary processes, inlet California, 1998 and 1996 management, and local coastal program updates. Continuing Education Relevant Experience and Training Postdoctoral Research, Institute Coastal Resiliency of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, April West Cliff Drive Adaptation and Management Plan, Santa Cruz, 2007–April 2008. California—Developing a neighborhood scale/transportation corridor adaptation plan along iconic West Cliff Drive in Santa Cruz, balancing coastal erosion, transportation, recreation, and community visioning. Specific work tasks included hazard modeling, local coastal program policy development, and social vulnerability and economic and engineering analyses.
  • Introduction Planning Implications

    Introduction Planning Implications

    DRAFT 4 City of Goleta, California May 2004 BACKGROUND REPORT NO. 24 Hydrology and Water Quality INTRODUCTION This background report describes the hydrological characteristics of the City of Goleta. The City of Goleta’s hydrological features consist of creeks and associated flood plains, ponds, wetlands, and the Ocean. While this report provides an overview of these resources, other reports examine particular areas or issues in the City in greater depth. These reports include Ellwood Mesa Open Space Plan and the related Environmental Impact Report; Comstock Homes Development and Ellwood Mesa Open Space Plan, March 2004, Goleta Slough Ecosystem Management Plan, December 1997, and Water Quality Analysis Report, County of Santa Barbara, December 2003. PLANNING IMPLICATIONS Since hydrological features shape the land forms of an area, these features contribute to the physical character of the community. Hydrological forces create these land forms through processes such as erosion and flooding. These processes in turn pose constraints and hazards for use and development. Water, as the basis for all life, creates the environment for the community’s biological resources and ecology. Modification of the hydrological system, either by physical alteration or by change in water quality, will affect these biological systems. The potential of adverse impacts associated with development is an important constraint on how land might be used, developed or managed. Water and its quality affects other aspects of the quality of life since water is the basis of many recreational activities. City of Goleta, California XXIV-1 General Plan Report: Hydrology GENERAL TOPOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE The City of Goleta is situated in the western portion of the Goleta Valley.
  • Part 2 – Background (Through 2014)

    Part 2 – Background (Through 2014)

    Goleta Slough Area Sea Level Rise and Management Plan Background PART 2 – BACKGROUND (THROUGH 2014) 2.1 Location and Relationship to Surrounding Areas 2.1.1 Goleta Slough Goleta Slough is located in southern Santa Barbara County between the Santa Ynez Mountains and the Pacific Ocean. The Slough is the northernmost example of a large Southern California estuary and represents the northern limit of distribution for several plant and animal species (Zedler, 1982). It includes the Goleta Slough Ecological Reserve and the Goleta Slough State Marine Conservation Area, both of which are managed by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). The general location of the Slough is shown in Figure 2-1, General Location of the GSEMP Area. In addition to its biological importance, Goleta Slough provides many other functions and values including floodwater storage capacity, filtering of pollutants contained in stormwater runoff, open space, and educational and scientific opportunities. The area is also rich in cultural and historic resources. The Slough is designated an Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area (ESHA) in planning documents, as are most of the creeks that drain into it. The Slough’s watershed is about 45 square miles and includes the drainages of seven creeks: Atascadero, Carneros, Las Vegas, Maria Ygnacia, San Jose, San Pedro and Tecolotito Creeks (See Figure 2-14, Watersheds). Goleta Slough was historically an embayment of approximately 18 square miles in size. The name “Goleta” means schooner in Spanish, reflecting the history of the area when Goleta Slough was a bay with boats sailing inland close to what is now Hollister Avenue.
  • Inline Inspection / Integrity Management

    Inline Inspection / Integrity Management

    e Journal 1 / 2019 Issue Issue Pipeline Technology Journal INLINE INSPECTION / INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT www.pipeline-journal.net ISSN 2196-4300 Advanced in Sealing. DENSOLEN ® DENSOMAT ® Tapes and Systems Wrapping Devices ■ Reliable corrosion prevention and strong ■ For fast and secure application mechanical resistance ■ High flexibility for all diameters ■ For extreme temperatures: -50 °C to +100 °C (-58 °F to +212 °F) www.denso.de PIPELINE TECHNOLOGY JOURNAL 3 EDITORIAL We face many challenges – together we must find solutions Oil and gas pipelines around the world are facing a number of challenges that will shape our industry in a severe way and require us to work even more closely to- gether than ever before in order to develop innovative solutions to these challenges. At the annual Pipeline Technology Conference (ptc) in Berlin and in the Pipeline Technology Journal (prj), we regularly cover topics, lead them into international discussion and thus support pipeline developers and operators around the Admir Celovic world to make their pipelines safer, more reliable and more economical. Director Publications In addition to some 80 presentations on the further development of material, technology, construction and operation of pipelines, the 14th ptc will also include the two new side conferences Public Perception / Qualification & Recruitment, as well as panel discussions and plenary sessions about a number of current pipeline topics: Illegal Tapping Just a short while ago, a devastating pipeline explosion killed about 100 people in Mexico. The explosion was caused by illegal tapping of a fuel pipeline. This problem may be extreme in Mexico, but it certainly is not limited to this county.
  • Kinross Gold Corporation 2010 Annual Report

    Kinross Gold Corporation 2010 Annual Report

    TRANSFORMING OUR FUTURE KINROSS GOLD CORPORATION 2010 ANNUAL REPORT In 2010, Kinross established itself as the new growth leader among senior 2010 HIGHLIGHTS gold producers while delivering record operational and fi nancial results. We signifi cantly upgraded our portfolio by acquiring strategic assets in high- Acquired Red Back Mining The transformational combination with Red Back expanded our global portfolio, including potential gold regions — including Tasiast in Mauritania, one of the world’s the addition of the spectacular Tasiast project, giving Kinross the best growth profi le among fastest-growing gold resources. At the same time, we continued to build our senior gold producers. capacity to deliver on our ambitious growth plans by adding new strength to Increased Revenue, Cash Flow and Earnings For the fi rst time, annual revenue exceeded $3 billion, an increase of 25% over 2009, while our global organization. adjusted operating cash fl ow exceeded $1 billion. Adjusted net earnings increased by 57% and adjusted net earnings per share increased by 32%. With a balanced global portfolio of ten operating mines and four high-quality Advanced Growth Projects growth projects, Kinross expects to double its share of world gold production With new studies completed at Tasiast, Fruta del Norte, Lobo-Marte and Dvoinoye, we are in the next fi ve years. making signifi cant and steady progress advancing the projects that will fuel our next round of growth. By 2015 we expect production to grow to 4.5 — 4.9 million ounces, double our 2010 production. Expanded Gold Reserves and Resources In 2010, Kinross increased total proven and probable gold reserves by 23% to 62.4 million gold ounces.
  • R-09-DMA-0066-12-18.Pdf

    R-09-DMA-0066-12-18.Pdf

    Estudio de Riesgo Ambiental Área Contractual 3, Cuenca Salina, Golfo de México Estudio de Riesgo Ambiental Evaluación de los Riesgos Ambientales Relacionados con la Perforación Exploratoria, Área Contractual 3 del Contrato CNH-R01-L04-A3.CS/2016, Cuenca Salina, Golfo de México Fecha: 30 de noviembre del 2018 Nombre y firma de persona física. Información protegida bajo los artículos 113 fracción I de la LFTAIP y 116 primer párrafo de la LGTAIP. Líder de Offshore Oil and Gas México Nombre y firma de persona física. Información protegida bajo los artículos 113 fracción I de la LFTAIP y 116 primer párrafo de la LGTAIP. Líder de Evaluación de Impacto Ambiental Estudio de Riesgo Ambiental Área Contractual 3, Cuenca Salina, Golfo de México Tabla de Contenidos 1.0 Escenarios de los Riesgos Ambientales Relacionados con el Proyecto ........................................ 1-1 1.1 Bases de Diseño .......................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.1 Información General del Proyecto .................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.1.1 Descripción del Proyecto ................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.1.2 Alcance del ERA................................................................................................ 1-3 1.1.2 Características del Sitio y Susceptibilidad a Fenómenos Naturales y Efectos Meteorológicos Adversos................................................................................................