The Growth of Equity Crowdfunding

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Growth of Equity Crowdfunding A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL for the CONSULTING DISCIPLINES VALUATION • The Growth of Equity Crowdfunding CROWDFINANCE OPTIONS FOR PRIVATE COMPANIES —AND SECONDARY MARKETS FOR INVESTORS—WILL KEEP EXPANDING By David M. Freedman, Editorial Adviser to The Value Examiner and Matthew R. Nutting, Esq. • ost Americans either the New York Stock Exchange and THE “NEW” don’t know what crowd- Euronext NV). Niederauer predicted NEW INTERMEDIARY funding is or still think that equity crowdfunding, if properly Crowdfunding is a method of crowdfunding is nar- done, “will become the future of how collecting many small contributions, by rowly confined to Kickstarter and other most small businesses are going to means of an online funding platform, 3 Mrewards-based fundraising websites. In be financed. ” Mary Jo White, the to finance or capitalize a popular polite company, the terms “securities SEC chair since April 2013, said that enterprise. Thanks to the phenomenal crowdfunding” or “equity crowdfund- crowdfunding is “the start of what success of rewards-based crowdfunding ing” typically evoke bewilderment, promises to be a period of transformative platforms like Kickstarter and Indiegogo 4 derision, or fear of fraud, oh my. change in capital formation. " since 2008, and donation-based sites Meanwhile, start-ups and growing If equity crowdfunding goes well for like GoFundMe since 2010, it was companies have raised billions of dollars issuers and investors, a surging supply only natural that intermediaries in through equity-based offering platforms (of early-stage equity offerings) and the angel capital world would exploit 1 on the Internet. Some exuberant demand (for investment opportunities and adapt the crowdfunding platform pioneers in this new investment class have in those offerings by investors who want infrastructure, harnessing the power of predicted that crowdfunding will spark to diversify into alternative asset classes) social networking and e-commerce to a revolution in private capital markets, could result in not only phenomenal accomplish the following objectives: if not the redefinition of Wall Street.2 growth of private capital markets but A moderate optimist, and one with also “transformative” innovations. • Unite start-ups and growing whom we agree, is Duncan Niederauer, Innovation might include not only Web companies with angel investors CEO of NYSE Euronext (a merger of technology that better connects issuers • Announce equity offerings, and to investors and facilitates disclosures disclose risks and deal terms and transactions, but also simplified deal • Enable potential investors to 1 Equity-based offering platforms, featuring terms, automated valuation “calculators” Regulation D offerings, were at first reluctant to call collaborate with one another on deal their operations “crowdfunding” because (before (see sidebar on page 10), and new selection and due diligence June 2015) they were not open to the “crowd” of business entities (like a Subchapter CF • Facilitate investment transactions. nonaccredited investors. The SEC generally uses corporation) structured specifically for • the term equity crowdfunding portals in reference Accomplish all of that in a matter to Title III of the JOBS Act of 2012, which allows equity crowdfunding transactions. of weeks or days, sometimes nonaccredited investors to participate, but which even hours, at little cost has not yet been implemented. Gradually, however, Reg. D platforms have come to be referred to in the media, and in the crowdfunding industry as well, as 3 “The New Thundering Herd,” The Economist, The Jumpstart Our Business Startups equity crowdfunding platforms. June 16, 2012, p. 71 2 A December 17, 2013, conference in New York 4 Mary Jo White, SEC chairwoman, speech to Act of 2012 accelerated the growth of City, cosponsored by Thomson Reuters, was called the 41st Annual Securities Regulation Institute, equity crowdfunding. Title II of the JOBS “Crowdfinance 2013: Redefining Wall Street.” Coronado, California, January 27, 2014 6 July/August 2015 the value examiner A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL for the CONSULTING DISCIPLINES Act lifted the ban on general solicitation where issuers with headquarters in a it lifts the ban on general solicitation. for securities offerings under Regulation particular state may sell securities to But only accredited investors may D, Rule 506(c), which allows equity all investors (nonaccredited as well as participate, on- or off-platform. This crowdfunding platforms to advertise accredited) who live in that state. At this is where consumer product and retail those offerings, and thereby publicize moment, at least seventeen states have companies tend to congregate. equity crowdfunding itself, much such exemptions in place, and at least one more widely than before. On-platform more is awaiting the governor’s signature. Title II went into effect in 2013 with the Reg. D offerings are still open only to Some of these exemptions are variations full implementation of SEC regulations. accredited investors, about seven percent of Title III of the JOBS Act, in terms of Now you might see 506(b) offerings, of the population. the dollar limits on raises and investment 506(c) offerings, and Reg. A+ offerings all Title III of the JOBS Act will someday limits for nonaccredited investors. listed on the same equity crowdfunding let nonaccredited investors, the other Securities crowdfunding also includes platforms. But the tendency among ninety-three percent, participate in peer-to-peer lending (P2P), more successful platforms these days is to private securities offerings, but this recently known as marketplace lending specialize in one kind of exemption exemption (also called Regulation CF) because true peers (individuals) are or another. So, for example, you will has not yet become effective. The SEC being overwhelmed by institutional see some tech-oriented crowdfunding may issue final rules under Title III this lenders. Debt-based crowdfunding is a platforms with predominantly 506(b) year, although it is possible that Congress hot sector of the securities markets in the “quiet deals.” Consumer product will revise Title III before the SEC blesses United States and some other countries, companies naturally tend to gravitate it. The U.K. and Australia are way ahead including China. to platforms that focus on 506(c) deals. of the United States in letting average or You will also find platforms that focus on “unsophisticated” investors participate REGULATION D PLATFORMS particular industries, such as real estate— in equity crowdfunding, but investor Issuers have raised tens of billions of which is the hottest sector of securities demand for crowdfunded securities is dollars through Reg. D offering platforms crowdfunding after P2P. still fairly weak in those countries.5 since they launched in 2011 in the United According to Crowdnetic’s Q1 2015 Title IV of the JOBS Act, which States. These early-equity offerings used Report,7 in the first quarter of 2015 alone, became effective in June 2015, does the Rule 506 exemption under Reg. D. the seventeen most prominent securities allow nonaccredited investors to invest That was before the JOBS Act, which offering platforms (not including P2P) in “Regulation A+ offerings,” some of most argue will boost overall volume in the United States recorded capital which will be made via crowdfunding of capital formation, now that the non- commitments totaling about $650 platforms. The Title IV exemption is solicitation rules have been relaxed. million—a thirty-five percent increase structured primarily for growth- and What Title II of the JOBS Act did from the previous quarter. These figures later-stage companies that want to file was prompt the SEC to split Rule 506 represent the performance of offerings “mini-IPOs,” not ideal for seed-stage into parts: under Rule 506(c); they do not include start-ups since compliance costs alone Rule 506(b) offerings, some of which may overwhelm the amount of capital • Rule 506(b) is the “traditional” are listed on crowdfunding platforms being sought. part, also known as the “quiet deal,” as well. It is likely that the numbers of Another form of equity crowdfunding because it retains the ban on general 506(b) offerings, and the amount of is the intrastate securities exemption,6 solicitation. For off-platform offerings capital raised thereby, are higher than it permits up to thirty-five non- that of 506(c) offerings. Rule 506(c) allows 5 Richard Swart, “Challenges in SME Access to accredited investors to participate general solicitation, while Rule 506(b) Capital,” Roosevelt Institute, July 6, 2015 (https:// in each deal. This is where many does not. nextamericaneconomy.squarespace.com/thought- high-tech start-ups have tended briefs/2015/7/7/challenges-to-sme-access-to- capital) to congregate. 6 Under Section 3(a)(11) of the Securities Act of • Rule 506(c) is the “new” part, because 7 http://www.crowdnetic.com/reports/apr-2015- 1933 report (accessed July 8, 2015) the value examiner July/August 2015 7 A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL for the CONSULTING DISCIPLINES Significantly for the valuation Regulation A+” at http://www.sec.gov/ Professionals in the securities industry profession, the types of securities offerings news/pressrelease/2015-49.html. are calling Reg. A+ offerings “mini-IPOs,” that received capital commitments were: Some Regulation A+ offerings will be as issuers are required to go through a equity (sixty-two percent), convertible listed through online offering platforms.
Recommended publications
  • CEP Discussion Paper No 1498 September 2017 Equity
    ISSN 2042-2695 CEP Discussion Paper No 1498 September 2017 Equity Crowdfunding and Early Stage Entrepreneurial Finance: Damaging or Disruptive? Saul Estrin Daniel Gozman Susanna Khavul Abstract Equity crowdfunding (ECF) offers founders of new ventures an online social media marketplace where they can access a large number of investors who, in exchange for an ownership stake, provide finance for business opportunities that they find attractive. In this paper, we first quantify the evolution of the ECF market in the UK, the world leader, as well as the benign regulatory environment. ECF already represents more than 15% of British early stage entrepreneurial finance. We then use qualitative methods to explore three research questions. First, do these large financial flows via ECF platforms supplement or merely divert more traditional forms of funding for entrepreneurs? Second, do investors understand and appropriately evaluate the risks that they are bearing by investing in this new asset class? Finally, does ECF finance bring with it the spillovers, e.g. advice and guidance critical to entrepreneurial success, associated with other sources of funding such as Venture Capital? Our study is based on extensive interviews with investors, entrepreneurs (including some who chose not to use ECF in favour of traditional funding sources) and regulators. We conclude that ECF provides real additionality to the sources of entrepreneurial finance while not bringing major new risks for investors. This suggests other jurisdictions might consider implementing the British “principles based” regulatory framework. Keywords: equity crowdfunding, early stage entrepreneurial finance, financial regulation, investor choices JEL: G3; G21; L26; M21 This paper was produced as part of the Centre’s Growth Programme.
    [Show full text]
  • I Investigations Into the Structure of Crowdfunding Research
    Investigations into the Structure of Crowdfunding Research and the Role of the Content and Linguistic Cues in Risk Disclosure in Crowdfunding Campaigns A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Ahmad Ridhuwan Abdullah Master of Science in Finance (Northern University of Malaysia) Bachelor of Business Administration in Finance (MARA University of Technology) School of Economics Finance and Marketing College of Business RMIT University March 2019 i DECLARATION I certify that except where due acknowledgement has been made, the work is that of the author alone; the work has not been submitted previously, in whole or in part, to qualify for any other academic award; the content of the thesis is the result of work which has been carried out since the official commencement date of the approved research program; any editorial work, paid or unpaid, carried out by a third party is acknowledged; and, ethics procedures and guidelines have been followed. Ahmad Ridhuwan Abdullah 25 March 2019 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisors, Professor Jason Potts, Dr Nthati Rametse, and Dr Joanne Laban for their wisdom and constructive supervision, consistent encouragement, and intellectual commitment in guiding me since the first day of my study and upon finishing writing this thesis. Special thanks to Professor Jason Potts who is kind- hearted enough to allow me to develop my own academic interests. I must thank my family members, especially my wife Siti Salwani Abdullah and my daughter Dhia Alia for their support and encouragement throughout my study. They went through hard times throughout the research process and I am grateful for their patience and understanding.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Crowdfunding in Reducing the Equity Gap in Poland
    RUCH PRAWNICZY, EKONOMICZNY I SOCJOLOGICZNY Rok LXXXI – zeszyt 3 – 2019 MICHAŁ ŁUKOWSKI, PIOTR ZYGMANOWSKI THE ROLE OF CROWDFUNDING IN REDUCING THE EQUITY GAP IN POLAND I. INTRODUCTION Technology changes the way financial intermediaries act. It is notice- able especially in Western European countries, both in the banking sector (for example Revolut or N26) and the capital market sector, where the use of equity crowdfunding platforms (for example Seeders and Crowdcube) by early stage companies for capital raising is becoming increasingly popular. These platforms are connecting entrepreneurs (issuers) and investors, acting as intermediaries in the conclusion of transactions on financial instruments. The importance of equity crowdfunding can be demonstrated by the value of transactions carried out with the use of such platforms, which in 2017 reached GBP333 million in the UK, and EUR211 million in the countries of continen- tal Europe. The growing importance of equity crowdfunding has made it the subject of many studies, such as those carried out by Agrwal, Catalini and Goldfarb,1 or Ashlers, Cumming, Guenther and Schweizer.2 This technological revolution has also reached the Polish capital market with the recent regu- lation from 21 April 2018, which allows public offerings up to EUR1 million to be carried out without a prospectus or memorandum. This enables public offerings organized by equity crowdfunding platforms. Taking the above into consideration, we decided to analyse the development of equity crowdfunding in Poland due to its growing popularity and the changes to Polish law. The main purpose of the article is to characterize equity crowdfunding in Poland and place it among other sources of equity capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Real Estate Crowdfunding – Modern Trend Or Restructured Investment Model?: Have the SEC’S Proposed Rules on Crowdfunding Created a Closed-Market System?
    The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law Volume 9 Issue 1 Article 2 4-1-2016 Real Estate Crowdfunding – Modern Trend or Restructured Investment Model?: Have the SEC’s Proposed Rules on Crowdfunding Created a Closed-market System? Cory Baker Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/jbel Part of the Property Law and Real Estate Commons, and the Securities Law Commons Recommended Citation Cory Baker, Real Estate Crowdfunding – Modern Trend or Restructured Investment Model?: Have the SEC’s Proposed Rules on Crowdfunding Created a Closed-market System?, 9 J. Bus. Entrepreneurship & L. 21 (2016) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/jbel/vol9/iss1/2 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Caruso School of Law at Pepperdine Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law by an authorized editor of Pepperdine Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. REAL ESTATE CROWDFUNDING – MODERN TREND OR RESTRUCTURED INVESTMENT MODEL?: HAVE THE SEC’S PROPOSED RULES ON CROWDFUNDING CREATED A CLOSED- MARKET SYSTEM? 1 CORY BAKER Abstract ............................................................................................................. 22 I. Introduction ................................................................................................... 22 A. What is Crowdfunding? ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Ourcrowd Takes Lead in Equity Crowdfunding
    Embargo until 6AM PST May 22, 2013 Israel’s OurCrowd takes lead in equity crowdfunding Has raised more funds than any other platform worldwide Latest round for Jeff Pulver's Zula breaks $12M in funding for companies Jerusalem, Israel May 22, 2013: Israel's hybrid VC­crowdfunding platform OurCrowd announced today that it closed financing for Jeff Pulver's latest startup, Zula, pushing its total raised for early stage companies above $12 million. This $12 million is in addition to the $5.5 million in funding OurCrowd raised for its own platform in February this year. Zula is OurCrowd's 18th completed funding round. OurCrowd CEO Jon Medved says "Passing this funding milestone makes OurCrowd this year’s fastest­growing vehicle for angels and accredited investors to find and back early stage companies online. From our roots in Israel we have actually taken the global lead in funds raised." Zula co­founder Jeff Pulver said, "I am excited about the value that OurCrowd brings to early stage investors who invest in startup companies. Not only did we raise our seed round online in less than a week, but we had people from all over the world invest in Zula thanks to this platform." Zula provides an innovative cloud­based mobile collaboration platform for teams. It is lead by Jacob Ner­David, who co­founded DeltaThree, and Pulver, who is a well­known early investor in Twitter and FourSquare. "While initially focusing on the Israeli early stage ecosystem, OurCrowd has now brought together investors and companies from around the world," explained Medved.
    [Show full text]
  • Resources for Startups and Entrepreneurs Microwork
    Resources for Startups and Entrepreneurs 1. Microwork 2. Sharing Economy 3. The Investment Cycle 4. EU SME and Startup Funds 5. Microlending, Microfinancing, and Microcredit 6. Crowdfunding (P2P Financing) 7. Alternative Lending 8. Vendor/PO Financing and Online Factoring 9. Other Sources of Financing 10 Resources Microwork (get paid for fulfilling tasks online) Amazon Mechanical Turk LiveOps InnoCentive Samasource Paid online survey sites Kindle Direct Publishing (self-publishing) Craiglist (classified ads) Monster (find a job) Newsy or CNN iReport (citizen journalism) YouTube Partner (share ad revenues) CCNow (accept credit cards and PayPal payments) Amazon Associates (get a commission on referred sales) EBay or Etsy or Alibaba (sell things, including handicrafts) Shareconomy (Sharing Economy) View introductory video AirBnB or Couchsurfing (share your home for a fee) Eatwith or Kitchensurfing (host a meal and get paid) Vayable (become a tour guide) Uber or Lyft or Sidecar (give rides in your car) BorrowedBling or Girl Meets Dress or Rent the Runway (lend your jewelry and haute couture for a fee) Yerdle or Snap Goods (Simplist) or Open Shed (swap, rent, or borrow things) Relay Rides or Getaround (rent out your car) Favor Delivery (get deliveries – or deliver) Task Rabbit (handyman services) Waze (community rides) The Investment Cycle Register firm in target market Doing Business Equity structure Common stock Stock options Convertible debt Series A Preferred Stock (convertible to common stock on IPO/sale) Investment Cycle - Overview Seed
    [Show full text]
  • Equity Crowdfunding: a Market for Lemons? Darian M
    College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications Faculty and Deans 2015 Equity Crowdfunding: A Market for Lemons? Darian M. Ibrahim William & Mary Law School, [email protected] Repository Citation Ibrahim, Darian M., "Equity Crowdfunding: A Market for Lemons?" (2015). Faculty Publications. 1792. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/1792 Copyright c 2015 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs IBRAHIM_4fmt 1/3/2016 1:00 PM Article Equity Crowdfunding: A Market for Lemons? Darian M. Ibrahim† INTRODUCTION Everything is online now—the way we connect with others, the way we shop, even some forms of education. We keep up with friends on Facebook we cannot see in person, buy light bulbs from Amazon rather than making a trip to the hardware store,1 and obtain an MBA at night on our computers from the comfort of our own home after the kids have gone to bed.2 One area that has initially resisted the move to cyberspace, howev- er—eschewing the virtual world for the real one—is entrepre- neurial finance. Venture capitalists (VCs) and angel investors have long valued close networks and personal relationships when select- ing which entrepreneurs to fund, and they closely monitor their investments in person after they fund.3 These practices lead to intense locality in funding—i.e., investors funding entrepre- † Professor of Law, William & Mary Law School. My thanks to Brian Broughman, Joan Heminway, Don Langevoort, Alan Meese, Nate Oman, Ja- son Parsont, Gordon Smith, participants in a faculty workshop at Washington & Lee for helpful feedback on this Article.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Things You Need to Know Before Engaging in Accredited Crowdfunding
    BOSTON CONNECTICUT NEW JERSEY NEW YORK WASHINGTON, DC www.daypitney.com Ten Things You Need to Know Before Engaging in Accredited Crowdfunding By Eliza Sporn Fromberg and Norbert Mehl It has been over a year since the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) permitted securities issuers to market their capital raises using general solicitation and general advertising while still qualifying for an exemption from public registration. During this time, hundreds of online crowdfunding platforms have launched – seemingly overnight – offering investment opportunities in private companies. For a company seeking to raise capital, these “accredited crowdfunding”1 platforms offer the tantalizing possibility of raising funds with the click of a button. As this new industry grows and develops, it’s conceivable certain accredited crowdfunding platforms may become as ubiquitous as traditional broker-dealers. But in this nascent industry, how should a company seeking to raise capital for a new or existing venture go about selecting the most suitable crowdfunding solution? The following are 10 things you should know before engaging in accredited crowdfunding. 1. Who is eligible to raise funds through accredited crowdfunding? In the United States, securities offerings made pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933 are not deemed “public” offerings under the securities laws and are therefore exempt from public registration with the SEC. With one exception, any company can make this type of “private” offering of its securities – and raise an unlimited amount of money from accredited investors – using general solicitation and general advertising, either on its own or using an intermediary such as an accredited crowdfunding platform.
    [Show full text]
  • TIPS for STARTUPS – UNDERSTANDING the STAGES of EQUITY FINANCING Posted on July 11, 2016
    TIPS FOR STARTUPS – UNDERSTANDING THE STAGES OF EQUITY FINANCING Posted on July 11, 2016 Categories: Insights, Publications In the earliest stages of a new venture, founders will often seek to bootstrap (i.e., self-finance) operations in order to build value through their own sweat equity. Once bootstrapping is no longer enough to sustain their pre-revenue startup, or the need for financing to grow the business outstrips modest initial revenues or friends and family contributions, it becomes essential for these founders to begin looking for external sources of financing. If conventional bank loans and lines of credit are not desirable or sufficient, then they may consider seeking private investment. For founders unfamiliar with fundraising, it can be very daunting when terms like "angel investing", "venture capital", "series B financing", and "seed round" are being thrown around. Understanding the terminology surrounding the financing process is essential for startup leaders hoping to secure financing, or for individuals in the business world hoping to understand the startup landscape. What is equity financing? Who participates? When many people hear terms like "venture capital", they think of television programs like Dragons' Den, in which business founders pitch their ideas to a group of wealthy and successful business personalities. Much like in Dragons' Den, the process of early-stage financing involves investors providing funds to startup companies that have potential for long-term growth. Early-stage equity financing is a great option for startups that are not in a position to seek funding through public capital markets, and wish to avoid being loaded with debt.
    [Show full text]
  • Crowdfunding and Crowdsourcing
    Crowdfunding and Crowdsourcing Drew Tulchin July 13, 2016 Training Objec-ves • Understand possibili-es, limitaons of crowdfunding & crowdsourcing • Explore different types of crowdfunding models; when each appropriate • Gain familiarity with some online plaorms • Learn best prac-ces • Check out case studies Have fun! Please ask ques/ons at any /me About UpSpring www.upspringassociates.com Network of seasoned consultants for impact investment and development to help businesses, organizations, foundations and governments "Do well by doing good" • Certified HubZone Small Business • ‘B Corporation’ since 2010, the first in New Mexico • Honors: 2015, ‘14 & ‘11 “One of the Best for the World” One of 119 companies from 20 countries 2012 Honoree NM Sustainable Business of the Year Drew Tulchin, MBA, Managing Partner 16 years experience building start-ups and growing organizaons. Specializing in the 'triple boOom line,’ focus is market driven business success that generates social, community, and environmental value Consul-ng experience with numerous Nave American Tribes and in 40+ countries from A (Afghanistan) to Z (Zambia) Recent capital raises: Ohkay Owingeh Housing Authority in NM, US MFI from the U.S. Dept. of Treasury, Koolkids in Vietnam, Solar and Energy Loan Fund (SELF) in Florida, and Sea2Table in NY 100+ publicaons and presentaons on these topics 100+ strategic and business plans Efforts >$100 mil in socially mo-vated capital Biz plan winner, Global Social Venture Comp; Prisma Microfinance raised venture $1.2 mil Helped raise $2.7 mil
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Investments 2020: the Future of Capital for Entrepreneurs and Smes Contents Executive Summary
    Alternative Investments 2020 The Future of Capital for Entrepreneurs and SMEs February 2016 World Economic Forum 2015 – All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system. B Alternative Investments 2020: The Future of Capital for Entrepreneurs and SMEs Contents Executive summary 1 Executive summary Over the past decade, the external environment for alternative investments has seen 2 1. Introduction enormous changes. The areas affected the most are start-up capital and venture 3 1.1. Background funding for entrepreneurs, crowdfunding and marketplace lending for small businesses, 3 1.2. Scope and private debt for mid-market enterprises. 6 2. The shake-up of traditional start-up capital 6 2.1. Overview In all three cases, a set of interlocking factors is driving the emergence of new 8 2.2. What you need to know capital sources: 11 2.3. What to look out for 11 2.4. Take-away Regulation: where regulation constrains a capital flow for which there 1. is demand, a new source of capital will emerge to fulfil that demand; 12 3. The rise of crowdfunding 12 3.1. Overview 14 3.2. What you need to know Changes in demand for capital: where capital destinations develop 16 3.3. What to look out for 2. demand for new forms of funding, investors will innovate to meet it; 17 3.4. Take-away Technology: where technology enables new types of origination, 18 4. Mid-market capital 18 4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting Startup Crowdfunding Success Through Longitudinal Social Engagement Analysis
    Predicting Startup Crowdfunding Success through Longitudinal Social Engagement Analysis Qizhen Zhang, Tengyuan Ye, Meryem Essaidi, Shivani Agarwal, Vincent Liu and Boon Thau Loo University of Pennsylvania {qizhen,tengyy,essaidim,ashivani,liuv,boonloo}@seas.upenn.edu ABSTRACT concerning opinions on their industry and the background of their A key ingredient to a startup’s success is its ability to raise funding team. “Buyers” correspond to accredited investors that can choose at an early stage. Crowdfunding has emerged as an exciting new to make small risky investments in growing companies. mechanism for connecting startups with potentially thousands of Since this funding mechanism is a relatively new phenomenon, it investors. Nonetheless, little is known about its effectiveness, nor is unclear whether crowdfunding is as effective for entrepreneurs to the strategies that entrepreneurs should adopt in order to maximize raise funding as more traditional approaches, which rely on word- their rate of success. In this paper, we perform a longitudinal data of-mouth introductions and face-time with professional investors. collection and analysis of AngelList - a popular crowdfunding social On the one hand, the barrier to success is lower. Indeed, investors platform for connecting investors and entrepreneurs. Over a 7-10 in crowdfunded companies often perform less due diligence (com- month period, we track companies that are actively fund-raising on pared to traditional investors), due to the small amounts of capital AngelList, and record their level of social engagement on AngelList, they invest and their general lack of expertise. Companies seeking Twitter, and Facebook. Through a series of measures on social en- to raise capital via crowdfunding mechanisms also benefit from the gagement (e.g.
    [Show full text]