Draft Outline

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Draft Outline CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Birmingham Research Archive, E-theses Repository A Study of the Ecumenical Nature of Charismatic Renewal: with particular reference to Roman Catholic and Anglican Charismatic Renewal in England by Philip Clifford Owen A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Theology School of Historical Studies University of Birmingham October 2007 1 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The coming of charismatic renewal in the 1960s brought Pentecostal experience into the historic denominations of the church. From its beginning, there were those who perceived in the charismatic movement an ecumenical quality. Its ability to root across a wide spectrum of traditions, suggested that it might have a significant contribution to make towards the search for the visible unity of the Christian church. This thesis sets out to explore more precisely the ecumenical dimension of the charismatic movement. It largely focuses on the English Ecumenical scene, where there have been significant ecumenical developments in the last twenty years; but account is also taken of the broader canvas of the World Council of Churches and Koinonia ecclesiology. A special focus is made of the Roman Catholic Charismatic Renewal, to see how the movement impacted that church, and was critiqued by its own theologians in the early years of the 1970s. The study looks in some detail at baptism and episcopacy, to see how these traditional ecumenical sticking points could be resolved, when looked at through a charismatic lens. It then moves on to analyse a sample of leaders, who have both experienced charismatic renewal and engaged with it theologically, showing that the personal theological changes are quite significant. Finally the study takes account of where the Charismatic and Ecumenical Movements have reached in their contemporary trajectories; and suggests how the charismatic movement can still make a serious contribution to the search for visible Christian Unity. To do this, attention is still needed in the area of sacramental theology, but in particular to the nature of truth and its revelation through the Spirit. In that connection the thesis includes some samples of fresh biblical exegesis on familiar ecumenically relevant biblical passages. The study concludes that there is indeed an ecumenical dimension of charismatic renewal. However, before that dimension can forward the visible unity of the whole church, something of a largely lost earlier vision needs to be re-captured. When that has been done, there is hope that both the charismatic and ecumenical movements may discover their natural complimentarity and creative engagement. 2 CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 Introduction p6 1.1 Defining the terms: Ecumenism and Charismatic Renewal 1.2 The ecumenical pioneers 1.3 Relevant evidence from previous research theses in British charismatic renewal 1.4 The Emergence of the main Research Question 1.5 Methodology 1.6 Division and Unity from the same Spirit? CHAPTER 2 Setting the Ecumenical Scene in England p40 2.1 The failure of the first Anglican-Methodist scheme 2.2 Two Evangelical approaches to unity: (1) John Wenham 2.3 (2) Nottingham 1977 – Anglican Evangelicals on Unity. 2.4 The Inter-Church process 1984 to 1987. 2.5 The authority of Swanwick 2.6 Charismatics engaging with official ecumenism 2.7 Summary CHAPTER 3 Roman Catholic Charismatic Renewal p60 3.1 The Beginnings after 1967 3.1.1 Early authors 3.1.2. The attenuation of the charismata in the Patristic age 3.1.3 Prayer groups and Catholic culture: 3.2 The Contemporary Picture 3.2.1 Pilot fieldwork interviews 3.2.2 Two Catholic Renewal Masses 3.2.3 CCR Headquarters and Good News 3.2.4 The Pivot of Spirit Baptism in Good News 3.3 Catholics and the Alpha Course 3.4 The movement considers its future 3.4.1 Charles Whitehead outlines the future for CCR 3.4.2 A charismatic Bishop’s response 3.4.3 The Newman Consultation 3.4.4 Summary CHAPTER 4 The World Council of Churches and Koinonia Ecclesiology p118 4.1 Defining Koinonia 4.2 Koinonia in the life of the churches 4.3 Disappointed Reaction to Canberra 4.4 Hollenweger’s Ecumenical Vision for the WCC 4.5 David J. Du Plessis 4.6 Fifth World Conference on Faith and Order 4.7 Describing an interim location for worldwide unity. 4.8 Santer on practical ecumenical issues 4.9 Summary 3 CHAPTER 5 Baptism and Episcopacy p133 Baptism 5.1.1 Baptism: the beginning of Christian life? 5.1.2 ‘Sacramentalised but not Evangelised’ 5.1.3 The Catholic/Pentecostal Dialogue 5.1.4 A fresh theology of baptism 5.1.5 Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry 5.1.6 Summary Episcopacy 5.2.1 A recent book on Church of England ecumenism 5.2.2. The Historic Episcopal issue 5.2.3 The transmission of ecclesial authority 5.2.4 Charism and Institution 5.2.5 The Contemporary Church 5.2.6 The significance of the Porvoo Agreement 5.2.7 Restorationism 5.2.8 The ministries of Ephesians Chapter 4 5.2.9 Apostles of Unity 5.2.10 Ecumenical Episcope in Milton Keynes 5.2.11 Summary CHAPTER 6 Relating Experience to Scripture p176 6.1 The theological shift of individuals 6.2 The Spirit as Revelator. 6.3 A place for the ‘Liberal’ theologian 6.4 The demonic in congregational division 6.5 Scriptural authority from the Roman Catholic side. 6.6 Revisiting scripture on some issues of ecumenical relevance 6.7 Hocken’s exegesis on Messianic Judaism 6.8 The visibility of the Church. 6.9 The Transfiguration motif 6.10 Colin Buchanan 6.11 Summary CHAPTER 7 Reconstructing ecumenical theology: towards a closer visible unity p232 7.1 The indelible ecumenical root of Pentecostalism 7.2 The decline of the charismatic ecumenical vision 7.3 Official Ecumenical pessimism 7.4 From vision and leadership to closer unity 7.5 Summary of main research findings Appendices p249 1. Ecumenical Dialogues in process in 1996 2. 1977 Nottingham Conference of Anglican Evangelicals: statement on the Roman Catholic Church. 3. On the unique place of England in Ecumenism 4. Ecumenical Linkages in Good News 5. The text of the Porvoo Declaration 6. Material from the Orthodox Churches 7. Roman Catholic fieldwork: a.Pilot fieldwork questionnaire b. Interviews with Roman Catholic Charismatics. c Two Renewal masses. 8. Indiscriminate Infant Baptism Bibliography p275 4 Acronymns and Abbreviations used in this study ARM Anglican Renewal Ministries BCC British Council of Churches BEM Baptism Eucharist and Ministry, WCC ‘Lima’ Document CCR Catholic Charismatic Renewal CCU Council for Christian Unity of the General Synod of the Church of England CPD (or VPD) Catholic (Vatican) / Pentecostal dialogue CTBI (CCBI) Churches Together in Britain and Ireland (Council of Churches for BI) CTBO Called to be One Process. CTE Churches Together in England FGBMFI Full Gospel Businessmen’s Fellowship International GS General Synod of the Church of England HTB Holy Trinity Church Brompton, London LEP Local Ecumenical Partnership MD Malines Document 2 Meissen The Meissen Agreement between the Church of England and the German Evangelical Churches NSC National Service Committee for Catholic Charismatic Renewal Porvoo The Porvoo Agreement of the Nordic and Baltic Churches WCC World Council of Churches 5 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Defining the terms: Ecumenism and Charismatic Renewal Does Charismatic Renewal have an inherent ecumenical property, and if it does, how can that property be defined and its effects measured? If in measuring such an ecumenical property of charismatic renewal it is found to be significant, can it be also demonstrated that it has significance for the ‘mainline’ or official ecumenical movement. This thesis sets out to explore this important issue. By ‘charismatic renewal’ is meant that particular movement of the Holy Spirit, which began around 1960, which was first known as ‘neo-Pentecostalism’. Its distinguishing location was the older traditional denominations; its distinguishing experience ‘Spirit Baptism’ and the spiritual gifts, which were a feature of the original Pentecostalism. The words ‘ecumenism’, and its adjective ‘ecumenical’, are common in ecclesiastical parlance, and both words have attracted a variety of meanings and nuances. In some contexts the word ‘ecumenism’ may be used in a rather lightweight sense to describe any activity that reaches out beyond the boundary of a single Christian denomination. In other contexts ‘ecumenism’ may be used to convey something close to its original meaning of ‘oikoumene’, the whole-inhabited world or the global context. There is a strong prima facie expectation that Charismatic Renewal ought to be ecumenical. It has become commonplace to refer to the original Pentecostal Movement emanating from the Azusa Street, Los Angeles, revival of 1906 with the Black Leader William Joseph Seymour as ‘ecumenical’ in the sense of it being multi-ethnic and socially integrating. Hollenweger describes the range as: ‘white bishops and black workers, men and women, Asians and Mexicans, white professors and black laundry-women’ 6 (1997:20). Harvey Cox, in his study of Pentecostal Spirituality (1996:16-17), notes Pentecostalism’s rise from a small sect to ‘a major, world-wide religious movement’.
Recommended publications
  • Baptism: Valid and Invalid
    BAPTISM: VALID AND INVALID The following information has been provided to the Office of Worship and Christian Initiation by Father Jerry Plotkowski, Judicial Vicar. It is our hope that it will help you in discerning the canonical status of your candidates. BAPTISM IN PROTESTANT RELIGIONS Most Protestant baptisms are recognized as valid baptisms. Some are not. It is very difficult to question the validity of a baptism because of an intention either on the part of the minister or on the part of the one being baptized. ADVENTISTS: Water baptism is by immersion with the Trinitarian formula. Valid. Baptism is given at the age of reason. A dedication ceremony is given to infants. The two ceremonies are separate. (Many Protestant religions have the dedication ceremony or other ceremony, which is not a baptism. If the church has the dedication ceremony, baptism is generally not conferred until the age of reason or until the approximate age of 13). AFRICAN METHODIST EPISCOPAL: Baptism with water by sprinkling, pouring, or dunking. Trinitarian form is used. Valid. There is an open door ceremony, which is not baptism. AMISH: This is coupled with Mennonites. No infant baptism. The rite of baptism seems valid. ANGLICAN: Valid baptism. APOSTOLIC CHURCH: An affirmative decision has been granted in one case involving "baptism" in the apostolic church. The minister baptized according to the second chapter of the Acts of the Apostles, and not St. Matthew. The form used was: "We baptize you into the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and you shall receive a gift of the Holy Ghost." No Trinitarian form was used.
    [Show full text]
  • The Charismatic Movement and Lutheran Theology [1972]
    THE CHARISMATIC MOVEMENT AND LUTHERAN THEOLOGY Pre/ace One of the significant developments in American church life during the past decade has been the rapid spread of the neo-Pentecostal or charis­ matic movement within the mainline churches. In the early sixties, experi­ ences and practices usually associated only with Pentecostal denominations began co appear with increasing frequency also in such churches as the Roman Catholic, Episcopalian, and Lutheran. By the mid-nineteen-sixties, it was apparent that this movement had also spread co some pascors and congregations of The Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod. In cerrain areas of the Synod, tensions and even divisions had arisen over such neo-Pente­ costal practices as speaking in tongues, miraculous healings, prophecy, and the claimed possession of a special "baptism in the Holy Spirit." At the request of the president of the Synod, the Commission on Theology and Church Relations in 1968 began a study of the charismatic movement with special reference co the baptism in the Holy Spirit. The 1969 synodical convention specifically directed the commission co "make a comprehensive study of the charismatic movement with special emphasis on its exegetical aspects and theological implications." Ie was further suggested that "the Commission on Theology and Church Relations be encouraged co involve in its study brethren who claim to have received the baptism of the Spirit and related gifts." (Resolution 2-23, 1969 Pro­ ceedings. p. 90) Since that time, the commission has sought in every practical way co acquaint itself with the theology of the charismatic movement. The com­ mission has proceeded on the supposition that Lutherans involved in the charismatic movement do not share all the views of neo-Pentecostalism in general.
    [Show full text]
  • 8Th-June-2014
    SERVICE TIMES THIS WEEK OUR LADY and ALL SAINTS Lancaster Lane - Parbold - Lancashire - WN8 7HS Monday 9 June – Saint Columba 1100 Requiem Mass Web-site: <http://www.ourladysparbold.org.uk> Joe Lewis e-mail: [email protected] Priest: Father Gordon OSB Tuesday 10 June 01257-463248 0915 Morning Prayer with Mass Deacon: Rev David Bennett 01257-462998 Fred Johnston Notre Dame Convent 01257-465069 Wednesday 11 June – Saint Barnabas 1000 Requiem Mass Margaret Heffernan Thursday 12 June 1900 Evening Prayer with Mass Brian Wilson Friday 13 June – Saint Anthony of Padua OFM 0915 No Morning Prayer Celia Hitchen Saturday 14 June 1100 Morning Prayer with Mass English Benedictines 1135 Confessions Sunday 15 June – THE HOLY TRINITY Sunday 8 June 2014 Vigil Saturday Fathers Day 1800 Josef and Anna Wroblewski PENTECOST Sunday VIGIL 1800 Gerald Hitchen 1000 The Parish SUNDAY 1000 The Parish Please take this News Letter home with you Baptisms Matthew Graham Parr Ampleforth Abbey Trust – A Registered Charity No. 1026493 Abigail Erika Parr Ava-Violet Faith Cheetham LEASE PRAY FOR: SUMMER FAIR .FATHER BARRY REGINA COELI the Sick: There will be a Summer Fair/ Father Barry’s personal from Easter until Pentecost Jean Benyon Family Picnic at Parbold Hall on e-mail address has been Sunday 15 June. changed. It is now O Queen of heaven, rejoice! those who have died recently: [email protected] Alleluia. Joe Lewis This will be run by the School Note two tt’s in matthews. For he whom you did merit to Requiem 1100 Monday 9 June and the Parish. bear. Alleluia.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing the Christadelphians Introducing the Christadelphians
    Introducing the Christadelphians Introducing the Christadelphians Walking down the streets of your town, you may have noticed a hall with “CHRISTADELPHIANS” on the sign outside. Who, you may wonder, are these people, and what do they stand for? hristadelphians are found in most to return from heaven to be a king on C countries of the world. We believe the the earth, bringing justice and peace. As Bible is God’s handbook for life, and read this could be any time, we try to live as it daily for comfort and advice. We model pilgrims, ready to leave and be with him. If our beliefs and practices as closely as we die, we hope to be raised back to life we can on the first century church, which when Jesus comes. We believe the Jews makes us different to most other Christian are still God’s people, and will be restored groups. For example, we have no paid to him. And we follow these simple rules priests or pastors, because there were – love God, love each other, love your none in the time of the apostles. We do neighbours, and remember Jesus in bread not feel bound to tithe our income, or keep and wine. If this sounds interesting, please Sabbaths, or burn incense, because these read on to find out more about us! practices were left behind with the Law of Moses, and not repeated in the New THE NAME Testament. We call each other ‘brother’ “Christadelphians” is a bit of a mouthful. or ‘sister’. We practise only adult baptism.
    [Show full text]
  • Birmingham's Evangelical Free Churches and The
    BIRMINGHAM’S EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCHES AND THE FIRST WORLD WAR by ANDY VAIL A Thesis Submitted to The University of Birmingham For the degree of MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY School of History & Cultures College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham 2019 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract This thesis demonstrates that the First World War did not have a major long-term impact on the evangelical free churches of Birmingham. Whilst many members were killed in the conflict, and local church auxiliaries were disrupted, once the participants – civil and military – returned, the work and mission of the churches mostly continued as they had before the conflict, the exception being the Adult School movement, which had been in decline prior to the conflict. It reveals impacts on local church life, including new opportunities for women amongst the Baptist and Congregational churches where they began to serve as deacons. The advent of conscription forced church members to personally face the issue as to whether as Christians they could in conscience bear arms. The conflict also speeded ecumenical co-operation nationally, in areas such as recognition of chaplains, and locally, in organising local prayer meetings and commemorations.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpha: Another Road to Rome?
    Alpha: Another Road To Rome? Commentary by Roger Oakland www.understandthetimes.org The Alpha program, founded by Nicky Gumbel, a former Oxford educated barrister-turned-Anglican priest has become very popular in North America. A brochure published for the Alpha Texas Conference in Austin, Texas, scheduled for January 8th and 9th, 1998 detailed the goals and objectives of the course. It stated: The Alpha Course is a ten-week practical introduction to the Christian faith. It is designed primarily for non-church goers and those who have recently become Christians. Alpha is a flexible and practical model that can work for a group of any size. Churches and Christian organizations of every background and denomination are discovering it to be a simple and effective way of presenting the gospel of Jesus Christ in a non- threatening manner for people of all walks of life.[1] Charisma, December 1999, also contained an article that provided additional information about the Alpha program and how it is being promoted and marketed. The article, written by journalist Clive Price titled “Alpha Course Supporters Urge British To Party With God On New Year’s Eve” was introduced the following way: Lying on a bed of nails? That does not sound like the most orthodox way of spearheading a $1.6 million evangelistic media campaign for the closing days of the twentieth century. But as British pastor Sandy Miller puts it, the aim of the Alpha Project’s millennium initiative is to help people “get the point” of the year 2000.[2] Although Nicky Gumbel’s Alpha course was founded at Holy Trinity Brompton in 1991, the effectiveness of the course was not realized until a few years later after the “Toronto Blessing” was transported to England from Canada in May of 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ampleforth Journal September 2018 to July 2019
    The Ampleforth Journal September 2018 to July 2019 Volume 123 4 THE AMPLEFORTH JOURNAL VOL 123 Contents editorial 6 the ampleforth Community 8 the aims of arCiC iii 10 Working within the United nations Civil affairs department 17 Peace and security in a fractured world 22 My ampleforth connection 27 Being a Magistrate was not for me 29 the new testament of the revised new Jerusalem Bible 35 the ampleforth Gradual 37 the shattering of lonliness 40 Family of the raj by John Morton (C55) 42 right money, right place, right time by Jeremy deedes (W73) 44 the land of the White lotus 46 the Waterside ape by Peter rhys evans (H66) 50 Fr dominic Milroy osB 53 Fr aidan Gilman osB 58 Fr Cyprian smith osB 64 Fr antony Hain osB 66 Fr thomas Cullinan osB 69 richard Gilbert 71 old amplefordian obituaries 73 CONTENTS 5 editorial Fr riCHard FField osB editor oF tHe aMPleFortH JoUrnal here have been various problems with the publishing of the ampleforth Journal and, with the onset of the corona virus we have therefore decided to publish this issue online now without waiting for the printed edition. With the closure of churches it is strange to be celebrating Mass and singing the office each day in our empty abbey Church but we are getting daily emails from people who are appreciating the opportunity to listen to our Mass and office through the live streaming accessible from our website. on sunday, 15th March, about a hundred tuned in; a week later, there were over a thousand.
    [Show full text]
  • Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements Don Fanning Liberty University, [email protected]
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Liberty University Digital Commons Liberty University DigitalCommons@Liberty University Trends and Issues in Missions Center for Global Ministries 2009 Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements Don Fanning Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgm_missions Recommended Citation Fanning, Don, "Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements" (2009). Trends and Issues in Missions. Paper 7. http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgm_missions/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Global Ministries at DigitalCommons@Liberty University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Trends and Issues in Missions by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Liberty University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Pentecostal/Charismatic Movements Page 1 Pentecostal Movement The first two hundred years (100-300 AD) The emphasis on the spiritual gifts was evident in the false movements of Gnosticism and in Montanism. The result of this false emphasis caused the Church to react critically against any who would seek to use the gifts. These groups emphasized the gift of prophecy, however, there is no documentation of any speaking in tongues. Montanus said that “after me there would be no more prophecy, but rather the end of the world” (Philip Schaff, History of the Christian Church, Vol II, p. 418). Since his prophecy was not fulfilled, it is obvious that he was a false prophet (Deut . 18:20-22). Because of his stress on new revelations delivered through the medium of unknown utterances or tongues, he said that he was the Comforter, the title of the Holy Spirit (Eusebius, V, XIV).
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Religion & Society
    ISSN 1522-5668 Journal of Religion & Society The Kripke Center Volume 12 (2010) A Metaphysical Rocket in Gotham The Rise of Christian Science in New York City, 1885-1910 Rolf Swensen, Queens College, City University of New York1 Abstract This article investigates First and Second Churches of Christ, Scientist, New York – the two largest branch (local) congregations of the new indigenous faith Christian Science in the eastern United States. These churches were led by the charismatic Augusta E. Stetson and the more self-effacing Laura Lathrop, who had lively healing practices, taught hundreds of students, and built impressive edifices on Central Park West. After describing the rise of the two competing churches and their leaders, this essay examines several hundred testimonies of healing and the occupations of 1,600 members. This is the first study to scrutinize the internal operations of Christian Science churches and their membership in any large city and as such gives us a hitherto unavailable window into the swift rise and growing pains of a new American religion. Introduction [1] Christian Science appeared on the American scene during the late nineteenth century. Its practice of physical healing by cadres of predominantly newly-empowered women captured 1 The writer is grateful to Judy Huenneke Alan Lester; Seth Kasten; Cathy Gluck; Thomas Bird; the Mary Baker Eddy Collection; the Huntington Library; the Milstein Division, New York Public Library; and the Burke Library, Union Theological Seminary. A fellowship from the Mary Baker Eddy Library for the Betterment of Humanity facilitated research. All sources from the Mary Baker Eddy Collection and The First Church of Christ, Scientist, Boston, are used courtesy of the Mary Baker Eddy Collection, One Norway Street, Boston, MA 02115.
    [Show full text]
  • 290 Other Religions
    289 289 .9 Denominations and sects not provided for elsewhere Including Christadelphians, Christian and Missionary Alliance, Christian Israelite Church, Churches of God, Dukhobors, Evangelical Congregational Church, Evangelical United Brethren Church, Messianic Judaism (Jewish Christians), Plymouth Brethren, United Brethren in Christ Class nondenominational and interdenominational churches in 280; class Protestant nondenominational and interdenominational churches in 280.4 See Manual at 201–209 and 292–299 (Option: Class a specific denomination or sect requiring local emphasis in 289.2) 290 Other religions Limited to specific religions other than Christianity Except for modifications shown under specific entries, add to each subdivision identified by † as follows: 01–05 Standard subdivisions [06] Organizations and management Do not use; class in 6 07 Education, research, related topics 071 Education Class here the religion as an academic subject Class comprehensive works on religious education, religious education to inculcate religious faith and practice in 75 See Manual at 207.5, 268 vs. 200.71, 230.071, 292–299 08–09 Standard subdivisions 1–9 Specific elements Add the numbers following 20 in 201–209, e.g., organizations 65 Class a denomination or sect not explicitly provided for here with the religion, denomination, or movement to which its own members say it belongs Class religion in general, comprehensive works on religions other than Christianity in 200; class specific aspects of religion in 201–209 (Options: To give preferred treatment or shorter numbers to a specific religion, use one of the following: (Option A: Class the sources of the religion in 220, other specific aspects of the religion in 230–280, comprehensive works on the religion in 230; in that case class the Bible and Christianity in 298 (Option B: Class in 210, and add to base number 21 the numbers following the base number for the religion in 292–299, e.g., Hinduism 210, Mahabharata 219.23; in that case class philosophy and theory of religion in 200, its subdivisions 211–218 in 200.1) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Faith and Reason 1 Completed = Test Question on Diocesan Religion Test
    Date Comments and edits Faith and Reason 1 Completed ∆ = Test question on Diocesan Religion Test Faith and Reason as found in the Nicene Creed I. “I believe…” A. Students will articulate the relationship between faith and reason. 1. Faith (CCC 878) a. Heb 11:1 “Faith is the realization of what is hoped for and evidence of things not seen.” ∆ b. Belief is only possible through continuous grace and the Holy Spirit, CCC153 ∆ c. We will be saved by God’s grace if we cooperate with it d. Truly a human act, CCC 154 ∆ e. In faith the human intellect and will cooperate with divine grace, CCC 155 (relationship between faith and freedom is any act of Faith must be made freely) f. There are external proofs of God’s revelation that join the internal helps of the Holy Spirit, CCC 156 g. We profess this revelation in the creed, celebrate it in the sacraments, live by right conduct, and respond to it in prayer. h. Distinction between Fides Quae and Fides Qua : The faith that we believe with (theological virtue) and the faith that we believe in (objective content) 2. Reason and its relationship with faith (see teachings of John Paul II and St. Thomas Aquinas) ∆ 3. Faith is reasonable B. The learner will be able to dialogue regarding challenges about the Catholic Faith through use of the Magisterium, Sacred Scripture, Sacred Tradition and reason. 1. Introduction ∆ a. 1 Pet 3:15-16 “Always be ready to give an explanation to anyone who asks you for a reason for your ∆ hope but do it with gentleness and reverence.” ∆ b.
    [Show full text]
  • SLOW LEARNERS in the CHURCH Last Week’S Column Discussed How a Single Letter in an Esoteric Greek Word Made All the Difference in Defining Catholic Dogma About Jesus
    “THE THIRD TIME’S A CHARM”: SLOW LEARNERS IN THE CHURCH Last week’s column discussed how a single letter in an esoteric Greek word made all the difference in defining Catholic dogma about Jesus. By all accounts, Nicaea was a success. And yet, as is so often the case, people were slow– very slow– to assimilate its decrees. In fact, the Arian crisis continued to brew even after the priest’s teaching was declared heretical. So, we jump ahead for a moment to the Council of Ephesus in 431 A.D. (the 3rd council) which forbade any changes to the Creed promulgated at Nicaea under pain of condemnation. Now, fast forward to Chalcedon in 451 A.D., when an impasse of sorts was reached. In view of the fixed nature of the creed according to Ephesus, bishops felt that to add or change the Creed would violate an earlier council and were extremely hesitant to do so. And yet it was inadequate. Ephesus (431) had decreed: “It is not permitted to produce … any other creed except the one which was defined by the holy fathers who were gathered together in the Holy Spirit at Nicaea. Any who dare to compose… another creed.” They weren’t joking! In the nick of time, an archdeacon in Constantinople rose, and proposed a brilliant way forward. An earlier Council held at Constantinople in 381 A.D. had largely gone unnoticed to the wider Church. This is not unsurprising in its day. It’s not as if the Council decrees were broadcast on EWTN! This is part of the problem in reconstructing historical events accurately.
    [Show full text]