Experimental Evolution with Yeast Clifford Zeyl

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

MINIREVIEW Experimental evolution with yeast Clifford Zeyl Department of Biology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA Correspondence: Clifford Zeyl, Department Abstract of Biology, Wake Forest University, Winston- Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/femsyr/article/6/5/685/563971 by guest on 27 September 2021 Salem NC 27109, USA. Tel.: 11 336 758-4292; Many of the difficulties of studying evolution in action can be surmounted using fax: 11 336 758-6008; populations of microorganisms, such as yeast. A readily manipulated sexual system e-mail: [email protected] and an increasingly sophisticated array of molecular and genomic tools uniquely qualify Saccharomyces cerevisiae as an experimental subject. This minireview Received 9 September 2005; revised 11 briefly describes some recent contributions of yeast experiments to current November 2005; accepted 9 December 2005. understanding of the evolution of ploidy, sex, mutation, and speciation. First published online 21 March 2006. doi:10.1111/j.1567-1364.2006.00061.x Editor: Teun Boekhout Keywords experimental evolution; adaptation; recombination; ploidy; speciation. recurrent emphasis in yeast experiments has been the Introduction evolution of the eukaryotic genetic system itself. Sex and Evolution is often thought of as being imperceptibly slow. A recombination, ploidy, and speciation are topics of espe- great deal of what we understand about evolution has cially broad evolutionary interest that have been the focus of therefore come from comparisons among existing species yeast experimental tests of theory. and from theoretical studies using modeling and simulation. A typical evolution experiment starts with microbiology But there are also increasingly frequent experimental tests of at its most basic: maintain axenic cultures for hundreds or evolutionary theory, performed on laboratory populations thousands of generations, periodically freezing samples of of organisms with generation times short enough that each population for analysis. Cultures are propagated either evolution can be observed directly, as it occurs. A pioneering by serial transfer (batch culture), in which a sample of each experiment that illustrates the potential scope of experi- population is transferred to a tube or plate of fresh medium mental microbial evolution is an ongoing study of 12 at regular intervals, or by chemostats, which balance inflow Escherichia coli populations through over 30 000 generations of fresh medium with outflow of used medium at constant in Richard Lenski’s laboratory (Table 1). From these popu- rates (Fig. 1). Chemostats are most often used to impose a lations have come rigorous tests of a great deal of evolu- constant selective environment, although periodic changes tionary theory. of medium can also be imposed, for example to induce In addition to short generation times, microbial evolu- meiosis and sporulation (Goddard et al., 2005). tion experiments have exploited the ease with which very The culture conditions define the type of selection to large populations can be maintained (allowing faster adap- which experimental populations will respond. They may tation), and the fact that samples of evolving populations include a specified type of stress, such as high osmolarity or can be frozen for later analysis and compared with their temperature (Goddard et al., 2005), or may simply place ancestor and with each other. Other experiments in evolu- populations in competition for a limiting nutrient such as tionary ecology and genetics have used Pseudomonas fluor- glucose. Whatever the selective pressure, rare mutations that escens (Rainey & Travisano, 1998) and the unicellular alga increase reproductive success will appear and increase in Chlamydomonas (Colegrave et al., 2002; Colegrave, 2002). frequency. Adaptation can then be measured either as a The current array of genetic and genomic technology makes simple growth rate or as competitive ability relative to a budding yeast ideally suited to experimental evolution. A reference genotype such as the ancestor of the experimental FEMS Yeast Res 6 (2006) 685–691 c 2006 Federation of European Microbiological Societies Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved 686 C. Zeyl Table 1. Some contributions of a long-term Escherichia coli evolution experiment Hypotheses and questions Main results Ref. The dynamics of fitness Rapid evolution for 2000 generations, then much slower change Lenski & Travisano (1994); Elena increase Replicate populations diverge in fitness et al. (1996) ‘‘Punctuated equilibrium:’’short periods of rapid change separated by periods of stasis, caused by the dynamics of selection of new mutations The roles of chance and history History and chance strongly affected cell size, which is correlated weakly with Travisano et al. (1995) in adaptation fitness, but not fitness itself The evolution and maintenance Two distinct, monophyletic ecotypes persisted for at least 14 000 generations, Rozen & Lenski (2000); Rozen of diversity fluctuating in frequencies, while both continued to adapt et al. (2005) The decay of metabolic functions Unused catabolic functions decayed due to antagonistic pleiotropy of Cooper & Lenski (2000) that are released from selection adaptive mutations Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/femsyr/article/6/5/685/563971 by guest on 27 September 2021 Mutation rates and effects Elevated mutation rates evolved in three adapting populations Elena & Lenski (1997); Harmful mutations do not generally interact synergistically, as required by Sniegowski et al. (1997) one hypothesis for the evolution of sex Molecular mechanisms of Changes in the expression of 59 genes evolved in parallel in two populations, Cooper et al. (2003) adaptation many of them regulated by cAMP populations. Competitive fitness is calculated from the per- produce homozygotes for that allele. In asexuals this can generation increase in frequency of the fitter genotype. In only occur in the unlikely event of the same mutation nature, it is rarely if ever possible to know the selective occurring again in the other allele (Kirkpatrick & Jenkins, environment in which a trait evolved, so the meaning of 1989). However, most hypotheses try to explain sex through fitness measurements may be uncertain. By contrast, experi- some advantage of randomizing allele combinations at mental evolution allows fitness estimates to be performed in separate loci. Recombining harmful mutations can increase exactly the same environment as that to which the experi- the variation in mutation load of the progeny. If mutation mental population adapted. Another tremendous advantage rates are high enough, and if mutations interact with each is the availability of genetic markers that do not affect other so as to aggravate their harmful effects, then sexual competitive fitness (Goldstein & McCusker, 1999). Cassettes progeny can have more than double the fitness of clones encoding resistance to G418, hygromycin, or nurseothricin (Kondrashov, 1988). Alternative hypotheses focus on adap- can be inserted at the HO locus of an ancestral genotype, tive mutations. Recombination can pair adaptive mutations where they are typically neutral, after that ancestor has been that have arisen in separate lineages. In an asexual popula- used to establish experimental populations. This allows the tion, no more than one adaptive mutation can be selected at competitive fitness of descendents to be quantified relative a time, and any other adaptive mutations present during to that of the ancestor. that interval are lost, a phenomenon known as clonal A simple yeast experiment will serve as an introduction to interference. Recombination can relieve clonal interference the basics of experimental evolution, and to one of the by allowing successive mutations to accumulate in one high- biggest puzzles remaining in evolutionary biology, the origin fitness genotype. Genetic and ecologic variations on this and maintenance of eukaryotic sex. idea are that recombination can separate an adaptive muta- tion from linked harmful mutations, or that the greater genetic diversity of a sexual brood of offspring reduces com- The evolution of sex petition among offspring compared to clones. Finally, accor- The puzzle is most clearly seen in organisms with distinct ding to the popular Red Queen hypothesis, it is antagonistic male and female gamete types, in which females provide co-evolution, such as that between parasites and their hosts, most or all of the resources needed by zygotes, but only half that constantly selects for rare or new allele combinations, as of the alleles they carry. Alleles encoding this behavior are each species adapts to counter the most successful and transmitted half as efficiently as female alleles for cloning. In abundant genotype of the other (Hamilton, 1980). the case of isogamous organisms such as yeast there is no A simple test for an advantage to recombining mutations such cost of sex because MATa and MATa gametes make used two environments: the rich medium YPD, which equal contributions in both alleles and resources, but mating contains abundant glucose and to which laboratory yeast consumes time that could otherwise be allocated to mitotic strains have already adapted, and the same medium with reproduction. Sex also imposes the risk of breaking up galactose substituted for glucose. Otherwise initially identi- successful combinations of alleles during recombination. It cal sexual and asexual populations were maintained on YPD has been suggested that the advantage of sex
Recommended publications
  • E D I T O R I a L

    E D I T O R I a L

    E D I T O R I A L A MECHANISM FOR RAPID CHANGE? In a highly recommended book1 Del Ratzsch notes that creationists and evolutionists often criticize each other for positions that are more imagined than real. One of the most common misconceptions is the alleged creationist belief in fixity of species.2 One may read dogmatic statements that creation theory cannot be true because Noah’s ark could not hold all the species of beetles, etc. Such arguments seem misguided to many creationists. I doubt any creationist believes that the ark needed to hold 250,000 or more species of beetles. One reason this criticism seems misguided is that creation theory includes the expectation of change in species. Whether every species of beetle depended on the ark for survival is an interesting question that will not be pursued here. The Bible includes several statements that indicate that change in species is to be expected. Genesis 3 records the story of the sin of Adam and Eve, followed by the curses pronounced on nature. As a result of those curses, the serpent was to crawl on its belly, and thorns and thistles would be produced. If these conditions already existed, they could not be attributed to the curses resulting from sin. Thus, these species would change. Another suggestion that plants would change is found in Genesis 2:5, which states that certain types of plants had not yet appeared.3 The text seems to be referring to the spiny xerophytic plants now common in Israel, but the changes that produced this type of plant had not yet occurred at the time Adam was created.
  • Spike Protein Mutational Landscape in India: Could Muller’S Ratchet Be a Future Game

    Spike Protein Mutational Landscape in India: Could Muller’S Ratchet Be a Future Game

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.18.255570; this version posted August 18, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Spike protein mutational landscape in India: Could Muller’s ratchet be a future game- changer for COVID-19? Rachana Banerjeea, Kausik Basaka, Anamika Ghoshb, Vyshakh Rajachandranc, Kamakshi Surekaa, Debabani Gangulya,1, Sujay Chattopadhyaya,1 aCentre for Health Science and Technology, JIS Institute of Advanced Studies and Research Kolkata, JIS University, 700091, West Bengal, India. bDepartment of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, 711103, West Bengal, India. cSchool of Biotechnology, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kollam, 690525, Kerala, India. 1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: [email protected] or [email protected] Classification Major: Biological Sciences, Minor: Evolution Keywords: SARS-CoV-2, Muller's ratchet, mutational meltdown, molecular docking, viral evolutionary dynamics 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.18.255570; this version posted August 18, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract The dire need of effective preventive measures and treatment approaches against SARS-CoV-2 virus, causing COVID-19 pandemic, calls for an in-depth understanding of its evolutionary dynamics with attention to specific geographic locations, since lockdown and social distancing to prevent the virus spread could lead to distinct localized dynamics of virus evolution within and between countries owing to different environmental and host-specific selection pressures.
  • Genetic and Demographic Dynamics of Small Populations of Silene Latifolia

    Genetic and Demographic Dynamics of Small Populations of Silene Latifolia

    Heredity (2003) 90, 181–186 & 2003 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0018-067X/03 $25.00 www.nature.com/hdy Genetic and demographic dynamics of small populations of Silene latifolia CM Richards, SN Emery and DE McCauley Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, PO Box 1812, Station B, Nashville, TN 37235, USA Small local populations of Silene alba, a short-lived herbac- populations doubled in size between samples, while others eous plant, were sampled in 1994 and again in 1999. shrank by more than 75%. Similarly, expected heterozygosity Sampling included estimates of population size and genetic and allele number increased by more than two-fold in diversity, as measured at six polymorphic allozyme loci. individual populations and decreased by more than three- When averaged across populations, there was very little fold in others. When population-specific change in number change between samples (about three generations) in and change in measures of genetic diversity were considered population size, measures of within-population genetic together, significant positive correlations were found be- diversity such as number of alleles or expected hetero- tween the demographic and genetic variables. It is specu- zygosity, or in the apportionment of genetic diversity within lated that some populations were released from the and among populations as measured by Fst. However, demographic consequences of inbreeding depression by individual populations changed considerably, both in terms gene flow. of numbers of individuals and genetic composition. Some Heredity (2003) 90, 181–186. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800214 Keywords: genetic diversity; demography; inbreeding depression; gene flow Introduction 1986; Lynch et al, 1995), the interaction of genetics and demography could also influence population persistence How genetics and demography interact to influence in common species, because it is generally accepted that population viability has been a long-standing question in even many abundant species are not uniformly distrib- conservation biology.
  • Genetic Threats to Population Persistence

    Genetic Threats to Population Persistence

    Ann. Zool. Fennici 40: 155–168 ISSN 0003-455X Helsinki 30 April 2003 © Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 2003 Genetic threats to population persistence Oscar E. Gaggiotti Metapopulation Research Group, Department of Ecology and Systematics, P.O. Box 65, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland (e-mail: oscar.gaggiotti@helsinki.fi ) Received 27 Nov. 2002, revised version received 20 Jan. 2003, accepted 20 Jan. 2003 Gaggiotti, O. E. 2003: Genetic threats to population persistence. — Ann. Zool. Fennici 40: 155–168. Human activities are having a devastating effect on the survival of natural popula- tions. The reduction in population size and changes in the connectivity of populations due to human disturbances enhance the effect of demographic and genetic factors that can lead to population extinction. This article provides an overview of our current understanding of the role of genetic factors in the extinction of populations. The three primary genetic factors are loss of genetic variability, inbreeding depression, and accu- mulation of mildly deleterious mutations. The effects of these factors are discussed in the context of three different scenarios: isolated populations, local populations with immigration, and metapopulations. Introduction demographic and genetic factors (Lande 1988). However, the last decade has witnessed much Although the extinction of populations is a natu- progress in this area and there is a general agree- ral phenomenon, human induced habitat loss, ment that, although the most immediate causes pollution and overexploitation have increased of extinction are human predation, introduction extinction rates well above background levels of exotic species and habitat loss, genetic factors and have lead to the mass extinction that we are can still play an important role.
  • Michael Behe Makes the Argument That

    Michael Behe Makes the Argument That

    Opening the Black Box Throughout “Darwin’s Black Box”, Michael Behe makes the argument that Darwinian evolution can’t be used as a universal explanation for all of life, because it can’t account for irreducibly complex organisms. However, Behe also neglects to acknowledge any existing research that suggests otherwise. A study conducted at Michigan State University by scientist Richard Lenski has shown that there could be a scientific explanation for these seemingly irreducibly complex organism, and that Behe shouldn’t be so quick to point to a supernatural solution, or to call it quits so soon when his mousetrap breaks. While Behe may think he has all the answers, contrary research has shown there are other answers worth consideration. Behe begins his argument by introducing the idea of organisms that are irreducibly complex, otherwise defined as a “single system composed of several well-matched, interacting parts that contribute to the basic function of the system, wherein the removal of any one of the parts causes the system to effectively cease functioning” (Darwin’s Black Box, 39). In order to demonstrate this principle, Behe raises the example of a mousetrap. He argues that if you remove one part of a mousetrap, it will cease to function, and because of this, all of the parts must have evolved simultaneously in order for a mousetrap to exist, therefor rendering it irreducibly complex. However, is any of this really true? Besides the holes in Behe’s mousetrap argument, there also lies the fact that mousetraps are not living creatures and therefore are incapable of evolution.
  • Fixation of New Mutations in Small Populations

    Fixation of New Mutations in Small Populations

    Whitlock MC & Bürger R (2004). Fixation of New Mutations in Small Populations. In: Evolutionary Conservation Biology, eds. Ferrière R, Dieckmann U & Couvet D, pp. 155–170. Cambridge University Press. c International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis 9 Fixation of New Mutations in Small Populations Michael C. Whitlock and Reinhard Bürger 9.1 Introduction Evolution proceeds as the result of a balance between a few basic processes: mu- tation, selection, migration, genetic drift, and recombination. Mutation is the ulti- mate source of all the genetic variation on which selection may act; it is therefore essential to evolution. Mutations carry a large cost, though; almost all are delete- rious, reducing the fitness of the organisms in which they occur (see Chapter 7). Mutation is therefore both a source of good and ill for a population (Lande 1995). The overall effect of mutation on a population is strongly dependent on the pop- ulation size. A large population has many new mutations in each generation, and therefore the probability is high that it will obtain new favorable mutations. This large population also has effective selection against the bad mutations that occur; deleterious mutations in a large population are kept at a low frequency within a balance between the forces of selection and those of mutation. A population with relatively fewer individuals, however, will have lower fitness on average, not only because fewer beneficial mutations arise, but also because deleterious mutations are more likely to reach high frequencies through random genetic drift. This shift in the balance between fixation of beneficial and deleterious mutations can result in a decline in the fitness of individuals in a small population and, ultimately, may lead to the extinction of that population.
  • Chapter 6.Qxp

    Chapter 6.Qxp

    Testing Darwin Digital organisms that breed thousands of times faster than common bacteria are beginning to shed light on some of the biggest unanswered questions of evolution BY CARL ZIMMER F YOU WANT TO FIND ALIEN LIFE-FORMS, does this. Metabolism? Maybe not quite yet, but Ihold off on booking that trip to the moons of getting pretty close.” Saturn. You may only need to catch a plane to East Lansing, Michigan. One thing the digital organisms do particularly well is evolve. “Avida is not a simulation of evolu- The aliens of East Lansing are not made of car- tion; it is an instance of it,” Pennock says. “All the bon and water. They have no DNA. Billions of them core parts of the Darwinian process are there. These are quietly colonizing a cluster of 200 computers in things replicate, they mutate, they are competing the basement of the Plant and Soil Sciences building with one another. The very process of natural selec- at Michigan State University. To peer into their tion is happening there. If that’s central to the defi- world, however, you have to walk a few blocks west nition of life, then these things count.” on Wilson Road to the engineering department and visit the Digital Evolution Laboratory. Here you’ll It may seem strange to talk about a chunk of find a crew of computer scientists, biologists, and computer code in the same way you talk about a even a philosopher or two gazing at computer mon- cherry tree or a dolphin. But the more biologists itors, watching the evolution of bizarre new life- think about life, the more compelling the equation forms.
  • Life's Conservation Law: Why Darwinian

    Life's Conservation Law: Why Darwinian

    William A. Dembski and Robert J. Marks II, "Life's Conservation Law: Why Darwinian Evolution Cannot Create Biological Information" in Bruce Gordon and William Dembski, editors, The Nature of Nature (Wilmington, Del.: ISI Books, 2011) pp.360-399 E F E IS an irn:volcaIJ!e selection and exclusion. as when you marry one woman you up all the so when you take one course of action you up all the other courses."4 Intelligence creates information. Bur is the causal power of Darwin's main claim to fame is that he is supposed to have a that could create informa- tion without the need intelligence. Interestingly, he to this mechanism as "natural selection." Sel.e~tion, as understood before had been an activity confined to intelligent agents. Darwll1 s great coup was to the power to nature-hence "natural selection." as conceived Darwin and his acts without is non-teleo- and therefore unintelligent. As genetlClst Coyne puts it in opposing intdlige:nt "If we're to defend we must defend it as a science: a in which the of life results from the action natural selection and on random mutations."5 But do and Darwinists insist that to count as must be non-teleological?6 did that rule come from? The of with the sciences is itselfa well-established science-it's called engineering. conceived, to the engi- ne.:::nng SCIences. 1. THE CREATION OF INFORMATION But to return to the at does nature really possess the power to select and th,>rph" create To answer this we to turn to relation between po~,sit)ilil:ies to create inlonnal:1011.
  • The Landscape of Innovation in Bacteria, Battleships, and Beyond Downloaded by Guest on October 1, 2021 Thus, Fig

    The Landscape of Innovation in Bacteria, Battleships, and Beyond Downloaded by Guest on October 1, 2021 Thus, Fig

    SPECIAL FEATURE: PERSPECTIVE The landscape of innovation in bacteria, battleships, and beyond SPECIAL FEATURE: PERSPECTIVE Terence C. Burnhama,b,1 and Michael Travisanoc,d,1,2 Edited by Simon A. Levin, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and approved November 18, 2020 (received for review August 12, 2020) We draw lessons from microbial experimental evolution and naval warfare to improve the understanding of innovation in financial markets. Major financial innovations often arise without explicit societal planning because novel approaches can be favored by markets, in a manner strikingly parallel to natural selection. We utilize the concept of an adaptive landscape to characterize environments that increase the speed and magnitude of innovation. We apply this adaptive landscape framework to innovation in portfolio management. We create a general taxonomy for understanding and nurturing innovation. adaptation | experimental evolution | finance | innovation What environmental characteristics favor innovation? relationship between design and performance. Con- We begin with an examination of innovation evident in sequently, both battleship and bacterial innovation naval warfare, primarily the design and function of can be represented in a similar adaptive landscape. battleships. Improvements in battleships suggest that We draw general lessons regarding approaches to fierce competition fosters innovation. innovation, aided by the adaptive landscape repre- While the battleship heuristic appears straightfor- sentation. The goal is to understand innovation in ward, the study of any historical set of innovations has finance and other domains. From this perspective, we the challenge of disentangling causation from corre- analyze one area of finance: the management of lation. Without a time machine, we cannot be sure of investment portfolios.
  • Experiments in Digital Evolution Christoph Adami∗ Claus O

    Experiments in Digital Evolution Christoph Adami∗ Claus O

    Experiments in Digital Evolution Christoph Adami∗ Claus O. Wilke (Editors’ Introduction to the Digital Life Laboratory 136-93 Special Issue) California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91125 {adami,wilke}@caltech.edu Whether or not the field of artificial life has succeeded in doing what its name sug- gests, namely synthesizing life from non-living components, is a matter of contention. Clearly, this journal covers a broad range of topics related to the synthesis and sim- ulation of living systems, but only a few articles go so far as to unabashedly study wholly artificial forms of life. The field of digital evolution is an exception: Artificial life forms, in the form of self-replicating computer code inhabiting specially prepared areas of a standard computer, have been used to learn about fundamental aspects of the evolutionary process since Tom Ray introduced us to them [23]. In this issue, we present experiments using digital organisms of the Avida variety (that is, implemented with the Avida software described in this issue [20]), but there are a number of other implementations of digital evolution that have been used for experimental evolution (see, e.g., [31, 32, 22, 5]). Whether or not these digitals are truly alive is ultimately of no concern to us as researchers: We use them because we are interested in complicated and vexing questions of evolutionary biology, and digitals offer us the possibility to attack them. Digital evolution is currently undergoing a boom phase, and public perception of this discipline is steadily increasing [21]. This boom can be traced back in part to a maturation of the Avida software used in the majority of digital evolution experiments, in part to a perceived need for rigor in evolution experiments [7], and in part to the adoption of digitals as experimental organisms alongside bacteria and viruses by a growing number of microbiologists (see, e.g., [16]).
  • Lecture on Positive and Negative Selection

    Lecture on Positive and Negative Selection

    POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE SELECTION (AND RELATED PROBLEMS) CLAUDIA BANK Evolutionary Dynamics @ IGC: ➤ How do populations adapt to challenging environments? E.g., how does drug resistance evolve? ➤ Which processes drive speciation & diversification? ➤ What is the role of interactions in evolution? Mutation Genetic drift Migration Selection What we do ➤ Study evolutionary processes using simple models ➤ Evaluate these models using empirical and simulated data ➤ Use modeling to inform experimental design a priori Evolutionary Dynamics @ IGC: ➤ How do populations adapt to challenging environments? E.g., how does drug resistance evolve? ➤ Which processes drive speciation & diversification? ➤ What is the role of interactions in evolution? Mutation Genetic drift Migration Selection What we do ➤ Study evolutionary processes using simple models ➤ Evaluate these models using empirical and simulated data ➤ Use modeling to inform experimental design a priori It may be said that natural selection is daily and hourly scutinising, throughout the world, every variation, even the slightest; rejecting that which is bad, preserving and adding up all that is good; silently and insensibly working , whenever and “ wherever opportunity offers, at the improvement of each organic being in relation to its organic and inorganic conditions of life. We see nothing of these slow changes in progress, until the hand of time has marked the long lapse of ages. - Darwin, 1859 It may be said that natural selection is daily and hourly scutinising, throughout the world, every variation, even the slightest; rejecting that which is bad, preserving and adding up all that is good; silently and insensibly working , whenever and “ wherever opportunity offers, at the improvement of each organic being in relation to its organic and inorganic conditions of life.
  • Genome Size and the Extinction of Small Populations

    Genome Size and the Extinction of Small Populations

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/173690; this version posted August 8, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Genome size and the extinction of small populations Thomas LaBar1;2;3, Christoph Adami1;2;3;4 1 Department of Microbiology & Molecular Genetics 2 BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action 3 Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, and Behavior 4 Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 Abstract Species extinction is ubiquitous throughout the history of life. Understanding the factors that cause some species to go extinct while others survive will help us manage Earth's present-day biodiversity. Most studies of extinction focus on inferring causal factors from past extinction events, but these studies are constrained by our inability to observe extinction events as they occur. Here, we use digital experimental evolution to avoid these constraints and study \extinction in action". Previous digital evolution experiments have shown that strong genetic drift in small populations led to larger genomes, greater phenotypic complexity, and high extinction rates. Here we show that this elevated extinction rate is a consequence of genome expansions and a con- current increase in the genomic mutation rate. High genomic mutation rates increase the lethal mutation rate, leading to an increase the likelihood of a mutational melt- down. Genome expansions contribute to this lethal mutational load because genome expansions increase the likelihood of lethal mutations.