The Theme of Love and Marriage in Jane Austen's Mansfield Park

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Theme of Love and Marriage in Jane Austen's Mansfield Park Aayvagam an International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research | Volume No. 4 | Issue 7 | August 2016 8 ISSN – Online: 2321-5259 Print: 2321-5739 The Theme of Love and Marriage in Jane Austen’s Mansfield Park Dr. J. Sobhana Devi Asst. Professor of English, S.F.R.College for Women, Sivakasi The romantic period is a term applied to the literature of approximately the first third of the nineteenth century. During this time, literature began to move in channels that were not entirely new but were in strong contrast to the standard literary practice of the eighteenth century. It is intensely interesting to note how literature at first reflected the political turmoil of the age. And then, when the turmoil was over and England began her mighty work of reform, how literature suddenly developed a new creative spirit, which shows itself in the poetry of Wordsworth, Coleridge, Byron, Shelley, Keats, and in the prose of Scott, Jane Austen, Lamb, and De Quincey. A wonderful group of writers, whose patriotic enthusiasm suggests the Elizabethan days, and whose genius has caused their age to be known as the second creative period of our literature. Jane Austen's time seems to have been a golden age for women writers. She is the first English writer who infused the novel with modern character through the treatment of everyday life. She takes love marriage as the central theme for her novels. Through her vivacious and spirited heroines and their social circles, Austen portrays English middle- class life. Almost all of her works explore the precarious economic situation in which women of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries found themselves. Her novels are the stories of marriage for love, financial security and social status. As a novelist, Jane Austen worked in a narrow field. Except for short visits to neighbouring places, she lived a static life but she had such a keen power of observation that the simple country people became the characters of her novels. The chief duties of these people were of the household, their chief pleasures were in country gatherings and their chief interest was in matrimony. It is the small, quiet world of these people, free from the mighty interests, passions, ambitious and tragic struggles of life that Jane Austen depicts in her six novels—Pride and Prejudice, Sense and Sensibility, Emma, Mansfield Park, Northanger Abbey and Persuasion. But inspite of these limitations, she has achieved wonderful perfection in that narrow field on account of her acute power of observation, her fine impartiality and self-detachment and her quiet, delicate and ironical humour. Her circumstances helped her to give that finish and delicacy to her work, which have made them artistically prefect. Novel-writing was a part of her everyday life, to be placed aside should a visitor come, to be resumed when he left, to be pursued unostentatiously and tranquilly in the midst of the family circle. Jane Austen takes love and marriage as the central theme for her novels. She considers love and marriage to be the fundamental problem of human life. Human nature in its essence unfolds itself through this most intimate of personal relationships. The theme of love is capable of highly emotional treatment. Jane Austen took a sober and balanced view of life. Love, in her novels, is never an explosive passion. Many of Jane Austen’s critics and readers have found her novels unreadable because they deal with a highly emotional theme in a very cold manner. Aayvagam an International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research | Volume No. 4 | Issue 7 | August 2016 9 ISSN – Online: 2321-5259 Print: 2321-5739 In Mansfield Park, the theme of love and marriage is tightly intertwined with female sexuality. She presents different kinds of marriages in the novel. There are four marriages that take place over the course of events and there are four significantly different views on marriage. Mansfield Park is centered on Fanny Price, the poor ward and niece of Sir Thomas and Lady Bertram. She is taken from her parents to be raised by her rich relatives and comes to Mansfield Park as a child of nine. It is a more socially- aware novel than Austen’s other works, focusing, as it does on the slave trade and the roots of the British upper crust’s wealth in corruption and exploitation. The story contains much social satire, targeted particularly at the two aunts, Lady Bertram and Mrs.Norris. Jane Austen was distrustful of emotional love and viewed it as a disturbing factor in human life. Her aim was to give an authentic picture of life of most men and women, being a mere prelude to marriage. Jane Austen deliberately robs love of all its romantic glamour. The readers find her taking in very practical view of life. Love in her novels, therefore always result in successful marriage. It is significant that Jane Austen suggested a sober view of love when in the romanticism, reason had yielded place to feeling and emotion. The oft quoted sentence from Jane Austen’s letter to Cassandra, “Now I will try to write of something else and it should be a complete change of subject ordination and I am glad to find your enquiries have ended so well” (qtd. in. Reddy 50) pointed to her concern with the principle that is to govern a genteel society, a concern that provides a clue to the understanding of the novel. When the novel Mansfield Park begins, a young girl named Fanny Price comes to live with her uncle and aunt, Sir Thomas Bertram. Fanny is a romantic heroine. Fanny grows up shy and deferential, caught as she typically is between members of the Bertram family. Fanny finds kindness in Edmund Bertram, which is the source of great solace and comfort for her. However, Edmund remains friendly and encouraging to Fanny and she gradually falls in love with him as she grows up. His active kindness, then and later, has a natural result, that “…she loved him better than anybody in the world except William; her heart was divided between the two.” (20) The arrival of the lively, attractive Henry and Mary Crawford disrupts the staid world of Mansfield and sparks a series of romantic entanglements. Mary is beautiful and charming. Edmund is fascinated by her, and speaks to Fanny of her the next day. They agree on her improprieties, but Fanny does not find her as charming as Edmund does. While Edmund falls in love with Mary, even neglecting Fanny sometimes in his attempts to please Mary. Mary finds Edmund’s company increasingly pleasant and his growing admiration for her increasingly troubles Fanny. Fanny fears that Mary has enchanted Edmund, and that has blinded him to her flaws. Fanny’s own secret devotion to Edmund is the one contrast attachment from the beginning to the end of the novel. She regarded her cousin as an example of everything good and great as possessing worth, which no one but herself could ever appreciate….Her sentiments towards him were compounded of all that was respectful, grateful, confiding, and tender. (35) Aayvagam an International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research | Volume No. 4 | Issue 7 | August 2016 10 ISSN – Online: 2321-5259 Print: 2321-5739 The feelings of Fanny herself are even more complicated. At this point, she is clearly beginning to feel a romantic interest in Edmund, although she cannot admit this to anyone, even herself. Abused by all and pulled in every direction, she must try to please everyone at once, leaving her in position where she cannot be herself, save perhaps at odd moments with the understanding Edmund. Very likely, Fanny annoys herself as much as she annoys us, and when the readers step back and look at her overall situation, she emerges as a very realistic and sympathetic character. The novels of Jane Austen abound in loving sisters and brothers. Fanny deeply loves her brother William. In the beginning of the novel Jane Austen, tells us that Fanny’s heart was divided between Edmund and her brother. There are many instances of Fanny adoration of William’s presents and also how much she likes to spend her time with her brother. When Tom was seriously ill, Edmund devoted all his energies to the nursing of his brother. There is real family feeling and affection between Mary and Henry and their half-sister, and there are many pleasant scene between them. Within the three hours of Mary’s arrival, Mrs. Grant unfolds her plan that her sister should marry Tom Bertram. Mary immediately sets her eye on Tom Bertram, and his large estate, although she finds him dull. She considers forming match with Tom Bertram, heir of a baronet. She finds him to be a suitable match for a young lady such as herself with afortune of 20,000 pounds. Despite her best efforts, Mary has made no progress with Tom, and she is disappointed when he leaves to Mansfield to Carouse with friends. However her feelings do not obey her financial goals as she finds herself preferring instead his young brother, Edmund Bertram. Though Mary Crawford is charming, she has certain immoral views and opinions which mean in the end that she loses Edmund. In Sotherton, Mary finds the idea of going chapel is disagreeable and, unaware that Edmund is to become a priest, makes snide comment about clergymen. She encourages Edmund to become a soldier or a lawyer instead, but to no avail. Edmund is also greatly upset when he discovers that Mary is opposed to him becoming a clergyman. But Edmund is still attracted to her despite her flawed reasoning and her generally disturbing outlook is proof that passionate love is not a positive thing in this society.
Recommended publications
  • Mansfield Park
    Mansfield Park D. D. DEVLIN 'At the still point of the turning world.' T. S. Eliot, Burnt Norton ANSFIELD PARK tells the story of Fanny Price's rise from insignificance to importance. When we first meet M her — timid, in tears and physically weak — she is the poor relation, the adopted child in the great strange house. By the end of the novel she has moved from the fringe to the centre and is needed by everyone. The book shows us a complete reversal of position; and the dramatic irony and distinctive shape of the narrative lie in this reversal. The first chapter makes plain to us the special interests, the 'areas of experience' that Jane Austen will deal with, and the chapter begins with a reminder of the importance of money: About thirty years ago, Miss Maria Ward, of Huntingdon, with only seven thousand pounds, had the good luck to captivate Sir Thomas Bertram, of Mansfield Park, in the county of Northampton, and to be thereby raised to the rank of a baronet's lady, with all the comforts and consequences of an handsome house and large income. All Huntingdon exclaimed on the greatness of the match, and her uncle, the lawyer, himself, allowed her to be at least three thousand pounds short of any equitable claim to it. Her sister, Mrs Norris, was less lucky: 'Miss Ward, at the end of half a dozen years, found herself obliged to be attached to the Rev. Mr Norris, a friend of her brother-in-law, with scarcely any private fortune...' 'Felt herself obliged to be attached': the words sum up the attitude of Charlotte Lucas towards Mr Collins in Pride and Prejudice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Surprising Consistency of Fanny Price
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 5-2019 "I Was Quiet, But I Was Not Blind": The urS prising Consistency of Fanny Price Blake Elizabeth Bowens Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Recommended Citation Bowens, Blake Elizabeth, ""I Was Quiet, But I Was Not Blind": The urS prising Consistency of Fanny Price" (2019). All Theses. 3081. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/3081 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “I WAS QUIET, BUT I WAS NOT BLIND”: THE SURPRISING CONSISTENCY OF FANNY PRICE ——————————————————————————————————— A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University ——————————————————————————————————— In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts English ——————————————————————————————————— by Blake Elizabeth Bowens May 2019 ——————————————————————————————————— Accepted by: Dr. Erin Goss, Committee Chair Dr. Kim Manganelli Dr. David Coombs ABSTRACT Mansfield Park’s Fanny is not the heroine most readers expect to encounter in a Jane Austen novel. Unlike the heroines of Pride and Prejudice, or Emma, for example, she does not have to undergo any period of being wrong, and she does not have to change in order for her position to be accepted. In the midst of conversations about Fanny as a model of perfect conduct book activity, exemplary Christian morals, or Regency era femininity, readers and scholars often focus on whether or not Fanny exists as a perfect and consistent heroine, providing very strong and polarizing opinions on either side.
    [Show full text]
  • Fanny's Heart Desire Described in Jane Austen's
    FANNY’S HEART DESIRE DESCRIBED IN JANE AUSTEN’S MANSFIELD PARK THESIS Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the completion of Strata I Program of the English Language Department Specialized in Literature By: RIRIN HANDAYANI C11.2007.00841 FACULTY OF LANGUAGES AND LETTERS DIAN NUSWANTORO UNIVERSITY SEMARANG 2012 1 PAGE OF APPROVAL This thesis has been approved by Board of Examiners, Strata 1 Study Program of English Department, Faculty of Languages and Letters, Dian Nuswantoro University on February 21st 2012. Board of Examiners Chairperson The 1st Examiner Haryati Sulistyorini, S.S., M.Hum. R. Asmarani S.S., M.Hum. The 2nd Examiner as 2nd Adviser The 3rd Examiner Sarif Syamsu Rizal, S.S., M.Hum. Valentina Widya, S.S., M.Hum. Approved by Dean of Faculty of Languages and Letters Achmad Basari, S.S., M.Pd. 2 MOTTO I hope you live a life you’re proud of, but if you find that you’re not. I hope you have strength to start all over again. Benjamin Button All our knowledge begins with the senses, proceeds then to the understanding, and ends with reason. Immanuel Kant Imagination is stronger than knowledge; myth is more potent than history, dreams are more powerful than facts, hope always triumphs over experience, laughter is the cure for grief, love is stronger than death. Robert Fulghum 3 DEDICATION To : - My beloved parents and siblings - Rinchun 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT At this happiest moment, I wish a prayer to the almighty who has blessed me during the writing of this paper. I would like, furthermore, to express my sincere thanks to: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Courting Revitalization: Companionate Marriage and the Problem of the Landed Gentry's Reform in Jane Austen
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 7-2012 Courting Revitalization: Companionate Marriage and the Problem of the Landed Gentry's Reform in Jane Austen Meredith Paige Luze College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Recommended Citation Luze, Meredith Paige, "Courting Revitalization: Companionate Marriage and the Problem of the Landed Gentry's Reform in Jane Austen" (2012). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 540. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/540 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Courting Revitalization: Companionate Marriage and the Problem of the Landed Gentry’s Reform in Jane Austen A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in English from The College of William and Mary by Meredith Paige Luze Accepted for ___________________________________ (Honors, High Honors, Highest Honors) ________________________________________ Kim Wheatley, Director ________________________________________ Elizabeth Barnes ________________________________________ Brett Wilson ________________________________________ Kathrin Levitan Williamsburg, VA May 1, 2012 Luze 1 “Why was it so much worse that Harriet should be in love with Mr. Knightley, than with Frank Churchill? Why was the evil so dreadfully increased by Harriet’s having some hope of a return? It darted through her, with the speed of an arrow, that Mr. Knightley must marry no one but herself!” –Emma (444) When Emma Woodhouse finally discovers her own feelings and realizes “that Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crisis of Mansfield Park
    SUMMARY ― 29 ― The Crisis of Mansfi eld Park KITAWAKI Tokuko Mansfi eld Park is the most serious and challenging of Jane Austen’s novels, though it may not be the greatest. It is the name of the stately country house owned by Sir Thomas Bertram in the county of Northampton. Sir Thomas gets most of his fi nancial profi ts from the West Indies sugar trade based on slavery, which“indicates a dangerous split in his loyalties.” (Tanner149) Moreover, he is personally and economically at risk as a result of Napoleonic Wars, during the visit to Antigua of the West Indies. Mansfi eld Park, which is ruled by the tradition of Paternal Authority, is at risk during his absence. The attractive Crawfords with London ethics threaten“everything Mansfield Park represents.” (Monagham94) The Bertram children yield themselves up to the Crawfords, who are living in the world of liberty, amusement and fashion and have no virtues. Maria Bertram, who has married Mr Rushworth only for money, runs away with Henry Crawford, and Julia elopes with Mr Yates. Mansfi eld Park is in crisis as a result of Maria’s guilt, Julia’s folly and Tom’s serious illness. Sir Thomas himself brings about the ruin of Mansfi eld. Though he is a truly anxious father, he fails in the education of his eldest son and two daughters. Sir Thomas cares about their elegance and accomplishments and neglects their defi ciency of“self-knowledge, generosity, and humility.”(MP55) He allows Maria to marry the foolish Mr Rushworth, because he is rich. Lady Bertram is entirely incapable of independent judgement.
    [Show full text]
  • Mansfield Park Character Descriptions
    MANSFIELD PARK CHARACTER DESCRIPTIONS WOMEN’S ROLES Fanny Price: (able to play Young Adult) Full of spirit. Her circumstances force her to “be good," but she has strong opinions and a big imagination. She may come off as shy, but she’s smart and wants to learn everything. She has a strong moral compass which keeps her out of trouble and makes her trustworthy to others. Hopelessly in love with Edmund Bertram. Mary Crawford: (able to play Young Adult) Mary is witty and capable of being hollow and flippant, but not fundamentally bad natured. She is ambitious and clear eyed about the truths of the world and society. She guards her heart, but is a bit of a flirt who intends to marry well. (Sister to Henry Crawford, no blood connection to Fanny Price). Maria Bertram: (able to play Young Adult) Maria is an elegant, mannered, accomplished and fashionable young woman who knows she has to marry Mr. Rushford- but later falls hard for Henry. (Sister to Tom and Edmund, Fanny’s cousin) Mrs. Norris/Mrs. Price: (DOUBLES- able to play 40-65) MRS. NORRIS is bossy and condescending with those who have no power; she feels as if she's in charge of the world. She sucks up to anyone of higher status than herself. A somewhat vicious, indomitable battleship of a woman. MRS. PRICE is a working class woman from Portsmouth. She’s fundamentally forward-looking, but a lifetime of disappointments have worn her down. She’s developed a certain brusque, vaguely-cheerful emotional-remove to deal with it all.
    [Show full text]
  • The Irony of Economics in Jane Austen's Mansfield Park by Kandice
    “A Creditable Establishment”: The Irony of Economics in Jane Austen’s Mansfield Park by Kandice Sharren Bachelor of Arts, University of Victoria, 2009 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of English Kandice Sharren, 2011 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l'édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-82539-6 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-82539-6 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l'Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distrbute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriété du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette thèse.
    [Show full text]
  • Mansfield Park
    This is a reproduction of a library book that was digitized by Google as part of an ongoing effort to preserve the information in books and make it universally accessible. https://books.google.com XM 15-/ [M«ui] 1 I MANSFIELD PARK A NOVEL. IN THREE VOLUMES. BY THE AUTHOR OF " SENSE AND SENSIBILITY;' and " PRIDE AND PREJUDICE." VOL. II. Hon&on : SR1NTEO IOR T. E6ERT0K, WHITEHAtt. 1814. MANSFIELD PARK, CHAPTER I. How is the consternation of the party to be described ? To the greater num ber it was a moment of absolute horror. Sir Thomas in the house ! All felt the instantaneous conviction . Not a hope of imposition or mistake was harboured any where. Julia's looks were an evi dence of the fact that made it indis putable ; and after the first starts and exclamations, not a word was spoken for half a minute; each with an altered countenance was looking at some other, and almost each was feeling it a stroke the most unwelcome, most ill-timed, most appalling! Mr. Yates might consider it only as a vexatious inter- vol. ii. b ruption ( 2 ) ruption for the evening, and Mr. Rush- worth might imagine it a blessing, but every other heart was sinking under some degree of self-condemnation or undefined alarm, every other heart was suggesting " What will become of us? what is to be done now?" It was a terrible pause; and terrible to every ear were the corroborating sounds of opening doors and passing footsteps. Julia was the first to move and speak again.
    [Show full text]
  • And Mansfield Park
    "Entering the World" of Regency Society: the Ballroom Scenes rn Northanger Abbey, "The Watsons" and Mansfield Park JACQUELINE REID-WALSH 4800 de MaisonneuveWestmount, Boulevard WQuebec Westmount, PQ H32 lM2 Ballroom scenes are central to Jane Austen's novels for they provide public arenas where the characters reveal both their degree of accomplishment in surface manners and their inner courtesy or vulgarity. My focus is on how the young women who are just "entering the world" of society conduct them- selves in the public arenas of the assembly or ball (Gregory 3l). Their entrances are moments of public scrutiny when their gestures, actions and words are studied and discussed by the company at large. I examine three heroines who are making their social debuts, Catherine Morland, Emma Watson, and Fanny Price. All manage their entrances virtually unaided for even if there is an older woman companion she provides little guidance, being more concerned about herself than about her proteg6e. Mrs. Allen, worrying about her dress, comes instantly to mind. These heroines do manage their entrances successfully, however, and negotiate their course with varying degrees of aplomb. Unlike Evelina in Frances Burney's novel, Austen's heroines are not publicly humiliated, but neither are they equally adept. Catherine must learn by experience about the implications of ball- room etiquette, while Emma and Fanny apply their knowledge in different ways. It was commonly accepted during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries that ballrooms were arenas of courtship. Henry Tilney's witty comparison of the country dance to marriage expresses the notion of dancing as being a form of trial marriage, although Catherine sees only differences between the two.
    [Show full text]
  • In Defense of Patricia Rozema's Mansfield Park
    In Defense of Patricia t Rozema’s Mansfield Park :Li DAVID MONAGHAN David Monaghan is Professor of English at Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, Nova Scotia. He is the author of Jane Austen: Structure and Social Vision and editor of two books of essays on Austen. His other books deal with John le Carré and the literature of the Falklands War. MANSFIELD PARK is the most controversial of all Jane Austen’s novels, mainly because readers are unable to agree in their assessment of the novel’s heroine, Fanny Price. In adapting the novel to the screen, Patricia Rozema adopts two positions that plunge her into the midst of this debate. First, as Alison Shea points out in the essay to which I am responding, she creates a heroine intended to correct the supposed inadequacies of Austen’s original, whom she judges to be “annoying,” “not fully drawn,” and “too slight and retiring and internal” (Herlevi). Second, she proposes that Mansfield Park is a novel about slavery, lesbianism, and incest. Not surprisingly, then, her film version of Mansfield Park has generated more heated discussion than any other adaptation of an Austen novel. At one extreme, Claudia Johnson describes the film as “an audacious and perceptive cinematic evocation of Jane Austen’s distinctively sharp yet forgiving vision” (10), while at the other John Wiltshire argues that “what the film represents is the marketing of a new ‘Jane Austen’ to a post-feminist audience now receptive to its reinvention of the novel” (135). It would be very difficult, in my view, to defend Rozema’s rather eccen- tric interpretation of Mansfield Park against the extremely effective critique offered by Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Jane Austen's Mansfield Park
    Connotations Vol. 20.2-3 (2010/2011) “The road to happiness”: Jane Austen’s Mansfield Park*1 ANGELIKA ZIRKER At first glance, Jane Austen’s novels seem to be fairly similar: at the end, after many trials and tribulations, the heroine finds the husband who suits her perfectly, according to the plot structure of comedy.2 The obstacles she meets make her realize what she really wants in life, and she is eventually able to find happiness and fulfilment. But this configuration seems to undergo a characteristic variation in Mansfield Park (1814). At its centre, we find a heroine who is very consistent and does not need to change,3 and who also knows whom she loves and would like to marry from very early on in the novel, namely her cousin Edmund Bertram.4 But as Edmund falls in love with Mary Crawford, and Henry Crawford with Fanny, an alternative outcome suddenly seems possible despite the fact that, in Jane Austen’s works, it seems generally out of the question that a heroine marry a ‘minor’ character—both in the sense of character constellations within the novel and in the sense of moral inferiority. The possibility of Fanny marrying Henry Crawford is, at least for some time, not entirely excluded from the novel: at some point he begins to improve and to develop into a man that might eventually deserve Fanny.5 Mansfield Park therefore offers a plot structure that is seemingly paradoxical: it presents a heroine whose obvious constancy is juxtaposed with the suggestion of an alternative outcome that we do not find in any other of Jane Austen’s novels.
    [Show full text]
  • Mansfield Park
    Mansfield Park Jane Austen Chapter 1 ABOUT THIRTY YEARS AGO Miss Maria Ward, of Huntingdon, with only seven thousand pounds, had the good luck to captivate Sir Thomas Bertram, of Mansfield Park, in the county of Northampton, and to be thereby raised to the rank of a baronet’s lady, with all the comforts and consequences of an handsome house and large income. All Huntingdon exclaimed on the greatness of the match, and her uncle, the lawyer, himself, allowed her to be at least three thousand pounds short of any equitable claim to it. She had two sisters to be benefited by her elevation; and such of their acquaintance as thought Miss Ward and Miss Frances quite as handsome as Miss Maria, did not scruple to predict their marrying with almost equal advantage. But there certainly are not so many men of large fortune in the world as there are pretty women to deserve them. Miss Ward, at the end of half a dozen years, found herself obliged to be attached to the Rev. Mr. Norris, a friend of her brother-in-law, with scarcely any private fortune, and Miss Frances fared yet worse. Miss Ward’s match, indeed, when it came to the point, was not contemptible: Sir Thomas being happily able to give his friend an income in the living of Mansfield; and Mr. and Mrs. Norris began their career of conjugal felicity with very little less than a thousand a year. But Miss Frances married, in the common phrase, to disoblige her family, and by fixing on a lieutenant of marines, without education, fortune, or connexions, did it very thoroughly.
    [Show full text]