Nesting by One-Year-Old Black-Crowned Night Herons on Hope

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nesting by One-Year-Old Black-Crowned Night Herons on Hope 784 Short Communications [Auk, Vol. 99 STINSON,C. H. 1976. On the recognitionof off- VEHERENCAMP,S. L. 1977. Relativefecundity and springby raptors.Raptor Res. 10: 30-32. parental effort in communallynesting Anis (Cro- --. 1977. Familiallongevity in Ospreys.Bird- tophagasulcirostris). Science 197: 403-405. Banding 48: 72-73. Received18 January1982, accepted6 May 1982. WILSON,E. O. 1975. Sociobiology.Cambridge, Massachusetts,Belnap Press. Notes on the Breedingof the Chestnut-belliedHeron (Agamiaagami) in Venezuela CRISTINA RAMO AND BENJAMIN BUSTO UniversidadNacional Experimental de losLlanos Occidentales, Ezequiel Zamora, Guanare,Estado Portuguesa, Venezuela Althoughsome information on the breedingof the This small colony (80 breeding pairs) was about 75 Chestnut-bellied Heron (Agamia agami) in other m from a much larger heronry (2,000pairs) that con- countrieshas been published (Michener et al. 1964, tained the following breeding species:Great Egret Haverschmidt 1968, J. Hancock and H. Elliot 1978), (Casmerodiusalbus), Snowy Egret (Egretta thula), Lit- no previousbreeding records have been reportedfor tle Blue Heron (Floridacaerulea), Cattle Egret, and Venezuela. On 26 July 1980, we located three nests Bare-facedIbis. Michener et al. (1964)found a colony of this heron, eachwith two nestlings,in a seasonal of Agamiaagami with about 12 nests in Veracruz, marsh surroundedby forest closeto the village of M•xico near somenests of Great Egretsand Anhin- Santa Rosa, Estado Barinas. The surface area of the gas (Anhingaanhinga). marsh was about 2 ha, and its depth was 60 cm. The On 9 August the young Chestnut-belliedHerons vegetationwas dominatedby Rhandiaaculeata (Ru- were able to climb into the branches of their nest biac.), a shrubabout 3 m high, and by Thaliagenic- bushes, and on 18 September they were completely ulata (Maranth.),a typicalmarsh perennial. A num- feathered and found in the canopy of the bushes. ber of small trees under 6 m tall were sparsely Our last visit to the colonywas on 23 September,at distributed over the marsh. The nests were found in which time we were not able to find any Agamia a smallarea containingR. aculeataand were approx- agami.Therefore, the period of nestingat this site in imately 1.5-2 m above the water level. Venezuelawas from June to September,the time of At our secondvisit on 31 July, we discoveredsix maximum annual rainfall in this area. nests, eachwith two downy chicks.There were nine We thank BetsyTrent Thomasfor translatingthis adults in the immediate area. In later observations note into English. at the same site, we found no more nests or nest- lings, and thus we believe that there were but six LITERATURE CITED breeding pairs. Each nest was placed in a separate HANCOCk(,J., & H. ELLIOT. 1978. The herons of the bush. world. New York, Harper and Row. In this sameheronry we alsofound activenests of HAVERSCHMIDT, F. 1968. Birds of Surinam. Lon- Black-crownedNight-Herons (Nycticoraxnycticor- don, Oliver and Boyd. ax), Yellow-crownedNight-Herons (Nyctanassavio- MICHENER,M. C., J. S. WES•(E,& R. B. CLAPP. 1964. lacea), Boat-billed Herons (Cochleariuscochlearius), A breeding colony of Agami Herons in Vera- and Bare-facedIbis (Phimosusinfuscatus). When the cruz. Condor 66: 77-78. Chestnut-bellied Herons abandoned the colony, it wasoccupied by breedingCattle Egrets (Bubulcus ibis). Received8 February1982, accepted18 May 1982. Nesting by One-year-oldBlack-crowned Night Heronson Hope Island, Rhode Island THOMASW. CVSTER1 AND WILLIAM E. DAviS, JR.2 •U.S. Fishand Wildlife Service, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, Maryland 20708 USA, and ZBostonUniversity, College of BasicStudies, 871 CommonwealthAvenue, Boston, Massachusetts02215 USA Therehave been few consistentreports concerning mature night heronsof the genusNycticorax. One- the frequencyand successof nestingattempts by ira- year-old Black-crownedNight Herons (Nycticorax October1982] ShortCommunications 785 • 4 o• 3 • • 2 = • 1 •'-•z o 2-yr-old male -'--]1-yr-old female • neitheradult lOO 80 õ 60 20 10 15 21 I 5 10 Day of Incubation Day of Nestling Period Fig. 1. Percentagetime on the nest and number of nest reliefsby a 1-yr-old femaleand 2-yr-old male Black-crownedNight Heron during the incubation and nestling period. nycticorax)mated to 2-yr-old or olderbirds built nests number 352004,Osborn and Custer 1978)on 30 May, and incubatedeggs in the wild (Gross1923). In a 9 June, and 19 June 1979. The blind was set up on captive colony,many 1-yr-old pairs of night herons 10 May 1979in an areawhere nestswere not being courted and built nests, and one pair successfully studied for reproductivesuccess. From 1 to 24 June raisedfour young (Noble and Wurm 1942).One pair 1979, a time-lapse Canon 814 super-8 movie camera of 1-yr-old night heronslaid eggsbut did not pro- set to take one photographevery minute recorded duceyoung in a captivecolony at PatuxentWildlife diurnal incubationand broodingbehavior of a mixed- ResearchCenter (H. Ohlendorf pers. comm.). Breed- agepair of youngnight heronsnesting near the blind. ing among1-yr-old birds of the closelyrelated Nan- A clock was attached below the nest so that the time keen Night Heron (Nycticoraxcaledonicus) is appar- of each exposedframe was recorded.The film was ently common (Braithwaite and Clayton 1976). In analyzedwith a KodakEktagraphic MFS-8 projector. contrast, in a 3-yr study of a colony of about 350 Heronswere agedby plumagecoloration (Gross 1923, Black-crownedNight Heron pairs on Long Island, Palmer1962) and sexedby cranialplume length (No- New York, no l~yr-old breederswere observed(Al- ble et al. 1938). The criteria for age and sex identi- len and Mangels1940). fication appear to be adequate, becauseplumage col- While involved in studies of environmental con- oration of known-age birds in the Patuxent colony taminants and successin night herons (TC) and of was consistentwith the categoriesidentified by Gross heron vocalizations (WD), we had the opportunity (1923) and Palmer (1962) (J. $pann pers. comm.) and to observetwo instancesof nestingby 1-yr-oldnight plume length was longer in malesthan femalesin 52 herons. We report here the first documentationof a pairs, the samein 3 pairs, and shorterin only 1 pair 1-yr-old mated pair breedingin the wild, alongwith in a night heron colonyat GreatNeck, Long Island, more detailed observations of the incubation behav- New York (Noble et al. 1938). Also, cranial plumes ior and nestingsuccess of a 1- and 2-yr-old mated were significantlylonger in male than female night pair. heronsin the Patuxentcolony (J. Spann pers. comm.). Nesting behavior of Black-crownedNight Herons On 30 May 1981 a pair of 1-yr-old night herons was recorded from an observation blind within the with eggswas observedand photographedfrom the Hope Island, Rhode Island heron colony (colony blind. Neither individual had cranial plumes. Nest- 786 ShortCommunications [Auk, Vol. 99 lings of 2-5 days of age were observedin this nest 1979 (Custer in prep.) are as follows: first clutch 7 on 19 June. Becauseour emphasiswas on the mixed- April, medianclutch 25 April, lastclutch 4 June.These age pair, we did not determine the exactnumber of results support earlier studies of night herons eggsor young producedin this nest. This is the first (Braithwaiteand Clayton 1976,Gross 1923) and co- documentationof a 1-yr-old mated pair of Black- lonialnesting seabirds (Ryder 1980) that revealedthat crowned Night Herons nesting in the wild. Mixed- younger individuals nest later in the seasonthan older age breeding pairs have been observedin the wild ones. (Gross1923), but 1-yr-old mated pairs have been ob- We do not know the frequencyof 1-yr-oldnesting servedonly in captivity (Noble and Wurm 1942). on Hope Island in 1979, but we suspectthat it was A secondpair, observedfrom the blind and re- not rare. The two instanceswe observed1-yr-old cordedon film, consistedof a 1-yr-old female and night heronsnesting were in an areawhere only a 2-yr-old male.Both of thesebirds had cranialplumes. smallfraction (less than 1%) of the colonycould be The cranial plumes of the 1-yr-old bird were about observed. two-thirds the length of those of the 2-yr-old, and, We thankLorrae Fuentes and James Myers for as- on that basis, we suspectthat the youngerbird was sistancein the field; DeniseClearwater for analysis the female.Two of the threeeggs in this nesthatched, of the film; and R. Michael Erwin, Donald Mc- and the nestlingssurvived to at least 12 days of age. Crimmon, Harry Ohlendorf, and JamesSpann for The mixed-age pair was filmed from 1-24 June, a reviewing the manuscript. period that included the last 12 days of incubation and 12 days after hatching of the first egg (Fig. 1). LXTERATUaE CITEV During that time, there were 5 days with no nest ALLE•, R. P., & F. P. MaWgELS. 1940. Studies of exchanges,14 with 1 exchange,2 with 2 exchanges, thenesting behavior of theBlack-crowned Night 2 with 3 exchanges,and 1 with 4. Infrequent nest Heron. Proc. Linnean Soc. New York. Nos. 50- exchangesobserved in our study are consistentwith 51: 1-28. observationsmade while studying heron vocaliza- BR•IT•IwaITE, L. W., & M. CLa¾TO•. 1976. Breed- tions from blinds in this and anothercolony (W. Da- ing of the NankeenNight Heron Nycticoraxca- vis pers. obs.). Lowe (1954) reported that nest ex- ledonicuswhile in juvenileplumage. Ibis 118:584- changes occurred every 4-6 h in the Grey Heron 586. (Ardeacinerea). In contrast,Milstein et al. (1970)found incubation spellsgreater than 9 h. In the Patuxent GRoss,A. O. 1923. The Black-crownedNight Her- on (Nycticoraxnycticorax naevius ) of SandyNeck. colony, a male night heron incubatedfor 5 consec- Auk 40: 1-30, 191-214. utive days following the escapeof the female. The Kus•ILa•, J. A. 1976. Feedingrhythm in nestling female was recaptured, and the nest was successful White Ibis. Wilson Bull. 88: 656-658. (J. Spann pers. comm.). We suspectthat the long 1981. Resourceuse strategiesof wading periods of incubation and brooding by each adult birds.
Recommended publications
  • Yellow-Crowned Night-Heron Nyctanassa Violacea
    Yellow-crowned Night-Heron Nyctanassa violacea Bob Moul Photo CURRENT STATUS: In Pennsylvania, the yellow-crowned night-heron is listed as state endangered and protected under the Game and Wildlife Code. Nationally, they are not listed as an endangered or threat- ened species. All migratory birds are protected under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918. POPULATION TREND: Yellow-crowned night-herons (Nyctanassa violacea) are one of the state’s rarest nesting birds). They are rare, regular visitors or residents in the Piedmont region of southeastern Penn- sylvania (all or parts of Bucks, Northampton, Lehigh, Berks, Lebanon, Lancaster, Dauphin, York, Adams and Cumberland counties), where they breed locally. In the coastal plain area along the Delaware River near Philadelphia, they are rare, irregular visitors. They are accidental visitors elsewhere in the state, particularly in late summer following the breeding season. Currently, the only known breeding sites are in Cumberland, Dauphin and York counties. They nest singly and in loose colonies regularly along Conodo- quinet Creek. A few yellow-crowned night-herons also nest on private property in an urban setting in Dauphin County and at Kiwanis Lake in York. Nests were once also found along Conestoga and Little Conestoga creeks in Lancaster County. Surveys in the 1990s counted not more than eight to 12 nests in any year in the state. Yellow-crowned night-herons were first listed as threat- ened species in 1990 because of their limited popula- tion and restricted range. They were downgraded to endangered in 1999 because of their small and vulner- able population. IDENTIFYING CHARACTERISTICS: Adults are me- dium-sized, 22 to 28 inches in length from bill tip to tail tip, gray with a black head and whitish cheek patch and crown.
    [Show full text]
  • The Solomon Islands
    THE SOLOMON ISLANDS 14 SEPTEMBER – 7 OCTOBER 2007 TOUR REPORT LEADER: MARK VAN BEIRS Rain, mud, sweat, steep mountains, shy, skulky birds, shaky logistics and an airline with a dubious reputation, that is what the Solomon Islands tour is all about, but these forgotten islands in the southwest Pacific also hold some very rarely observed birds that very few birders will ever have the privilege to add to their lifelist. Birdquest’s fourth tour to the Solomons went without a hiccup. Solomon Airlines did a great job and never let us down, it rained regularly and we cursed quite a bit on the steep mountain trails, but the birds were out of this world. We birded the islands of Guadalcanal, Rennell, Gizo and Malaita by road, cruised into Ranongga and Vella Lavella by boat, and trekked up into the mountains of Kolombangara, Makira and Santa Isabel. The bird of the tour was the incredible and truly bizarre Solomon Islands Frogmouth that posed so very, very well for us. The fantastic series of endemics ranged from Solomon Sea Eagles, through the many pigeons and doves - including scope views of the very rare Yellow-legged Pigeon and the bizarre Crested Cuckoo- Dove - and parrots, from cockatoos to pygmy parrots, to a biogeographer’s dream array of myzomelas, monarchs and white-eyes. A total of 146 species were seen (and another 5 heard) and included most of the available endemics, but we also enjoyed a close insight into the lifestyle and culture of this traditional Pacific country, and into the complex geography of the beautiful forests and islet-studded reefs.
    [Show full text]
  • Birding Oxley Creek Common Brisbane, Australia
    Birding Oxley Creek Common Brisbane, Australia Hugh Possingham and Mat Gilfedder – January 2011 [email protected] www.ecology.uq.edu.au 3379 9388 (h) Other photos, records and comments contributed by: Cathy Gilfedder, Mike Bennett, David Niland, Mark Roberts, Pete Kyne, Conrad Hoskin, Chris Sanderson, Angela Wardell-Johnson, Denis Mollison. This guide provides information about the birds, and how to bird on, Oxley Creek Common. This is a public park (access restricted to the yellow parts of the map, page 6). Over 185 species have been recorded on Oxley Creek Common in the last 83 years, making it one of the best birding spots in Brisbane. This guide is complimented by a full annotated list of the species seen in, or from, the Common. How to get there Oxley Creek Common is in the suburb of Rocklea and is well signposted from Sherwood Road. If approaching from the east (Ipswich Road side), pass the Rocklea Markets and turn left before the bridge crossing Oxley Creek. If approaching from the west (Sherwood side) turn right about 100 m after the bridge over Oxley Creek. The gate is always open. Amenities The main development at Oxley Creek Common is the Red Shed, which is beside the car park (plenty of space). The Red Shed has toilets (composting), water, covered seating, and BBQ facilities. The toilets close about 8pm and open very early. The paths are flat, wide and easy to walk or cycle. When to arrive The diversity of waterbirds is a feature of the Common and these can be good at any time of the day.
    [Show full text]
  • OBSERVATIONS on a GREAT EGRET Ardea Alba and NANKEEN NIGHT HERON Nycticorax Caledonicus COLONY at the PERTH ZOO, WESTERN AUSTRALIA
    Corella, 2004, 28(3): 82-86 OBSERVATIONS ON A GREAT EGRET Ardea alba AND NANKEEN NIGHT HERON Nycticorax caledonicus COLONY AT THE PERTH ZOO, WESTERN AUSTRALIA ROBYN L. PHILLIMORE' and HARRY F. RECHER2 'School of Natural Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia 6027 email: [email protected]: [email protected] 'Corresponding author. Present address: P.O. Box 154, Brooklyn, New South Wales, Australia 2083 Received: I I Augusr 2003 A colony of Great Egrets Ardea alba and Nankeen Night Herons Nycticorax caledonicus has existed at the Perth Zoo, Western Australia for over 25 years. The colony of egrets is one of very few in the region and hence is significant for the conservation and management of Great Egrets in Western Australia. From 1996 to 1998, surveys were conducted to determine the number of breeding pairs, clutch size, breeding success, and nest site selection of birds in the colony. Most observations were ground based, but a 30-metre cherry picker was used to inspect nests and determine clutch size. One hundred and thirty night heron and 49 egret nests were found in 1996; 92 night heron and 41 egret nests in 1997; and, 153 night heron and 36 egret nests in 1998. Nesting commenced in September, with peak numbers in early November. Both species nested in tall trees well above zoo visitors and animals. Egrets nested only in pines, whereas night herons nested mainly in figs. Great Egrets had an average clutch size of 2.6-2.7 by early November compared with a clutch of 1.6-1.8 for Nankeen Night Herons.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Vulnerability Assessments
    Assessing the vulnerability of native vertebrate fauna under climate change, to inform wetland and floodplain management of the River Murray in South Australia: Bird Vulnerability Assessments Attachment (2) to the Final Report June 2011 Citation: Gonzalez, D., Scott, A. & Miles, M. (2011) Bird vulnerability assessments- Attachment (2) to ‘Assessing the vulnerability of native vertebrate fauna under climate change to inform wetland and floodplain management of the River Murray in South Australia’. Report prepared for the South Australian Murray-Darling Basin Natural Resources Management Board. For further information please contact: Department of Environment and Natural Resources Phone Information Line (08) 8204 1910, or see SA White Pages for your local Department of Environment and Natural Resources office. Online information available at: http://www.environment.sa.gov.au Permissive Licence © State of South Australia through the Department of Environment and Natural Resources. You may copy, distribute, display, download and otherwise freely deal with this publication for any purpose subject to the conditions that you (1) attribute the Department as the copyright owner of this publication and that (2) you obtain the prior written consent of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources if you wish to modify the work or offer the publication for sale or otherwise use it or any part of it for a commercial purpose. Written requests for permission should be addressed to: Design and Production Manager Department of Environment and Natural Resources GPO Box 1047 Adelaide SA 5001 Disclaimer While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources makes no representations and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or fitness for any particular purpose of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • California Red-Legged Frog (Rana Aurora Draytonii)
    AMPHIBIANS California Red-Legged Frog (Rana aurora draytonii) California Red-Legged Frog (Rana aurora draytonii) Status State: Meets requirements as a “rare, threatened or endangered species” under CEQA Federal: Threatened Critical Habitat: Designated in 2001 (USFWS 2001) but rescinded in 2002 by court order except for one unit in the Sierra Nevada; proposed again in 2004 (USFWS 2004) Population Trend Global: State endemic; declining State: Declining Within Inventory Area: Apparently stable in some areas Data Characterization The location database for the California red-legged frog (Rana aurora draytonii) within its known range in California includes 419 data records dated from 1919 to 2001. Of these records, 344 were documented within the past 10 years; of these, 203 are of high precision and may be accurately located within the inventory area. Approximately 81 of these high-precision records are located within or near the inventory area. These records occur within non-native grassland, riparian forest, riparian woodland, riparian scrub, freshwater marsh, and wetland. A moderate amount of literature is available regarding the California red-legged frog because of its threatened status and the recent trend in global decline in amphibians. Most of the literature pertains to habitat requirements, population trends, ecological relationships, threats, and conservation efforts. A final recovery plan for the California red-legged frog has been published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2002). Range The historical range of the California red-legged frog extended along the coast from the vicinity of Point Reyes National Seashore, Marin County, California and inland from Redding, Shasta County southward to northwestern Baja California, Mexico (Jennings and Hayes 1985, Hayes and Krempels 1986).
    [Show full text]
  • Black-Crowned Night-Heron (Nycticorax Nycticorax) William C
    Black-crowned Night-Heron (Nycticorax nycticorax) William C. Scharf Status: Special Concern (MNFI) Detroit Zoo, MI. 6/11/2008 © Joan Tisdale (Click to view a comparison of Atlas I to II) Known by the elegant black and white of its Distribution Black-crowned Night-Herons in Michigan adult plumage and its red-eyed stare, the Black- historically have had their colonies along the crowned Night-Heron is a voracious and shores and islands of Lake Erie, the Detroit stealthy predator of fish, frogs, mice, and River, Lake St. Clair and Lake Huron with new especially young gulls, terns and other birds. colonies since Scharf (1998) expanding into Many potential prey animals should heed its northern Lake Michigan, Lake Huron, the St. “quawk” call in the night. A widespread species, Marys River and eastern Lake Superior. They it is found nesting on every continent except seek nesting on islands or other similar insulated Australia and Antarctica (Davis 1993). They are spots protected from predators. Twelve breeding colonial breeders, and are often found breeding colonies were documented on the Great Lakes and foraging with other species of herons as islands or along the shoreline of the NLP and well as other species of colonial nesting UP during MBBA II. This seems to indicate an waterbirds. increase in northward nesting for this species. A noteworthy coincident change has been that new Suitable wetland habitat for nesting and colonies established in Ontario are northward of foraging influences Black-crowned Night Heron the traditional nesting areas by 72 km (48 mi) distribution. Sites of Black-crowned Night (Cadman 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • The Maintenance Behavior of the Black-Crowned Night Heron
    THE MAINTENANCE BEHAVIOR OF THE BLACK-CROWNED NIGHT HERON GEORGER. MAXWELL AND LOREN S. PUTNAM HIS paper is concerned with a three month study of the maintenance T behavior of the Black-crowned Night Heron (Nycticorax nycticorax) and includes a description and interpretation of the activities observed. Maintenance behavior, as used in this paper includes movements concerned with locomotion, preening, scratching, care of feet, shaking, stretching, defecation, bill-wiping, sleeping, throat pulsation, yawning, resting, and feeding. The Black-crowned Night Heron is well suited to this type of study due to its colonial nesting habit. The work by Meyerriecks (1960) reinforced our interest in herons and this paper follows the style established in his monograph, so that these data may be utilized more easily. Specific com- parisons of night heron with Green Heron behaviors are made whenever the differences or similarities are striking enough to merit them. Some work has been done on the food preference of the night heron (see Palmer, 1962 and Teal, 1965), but little on the feeding behavior of im- mature herons. A detailed description of the behavior leading to the food transfer, as well as the food transfer itself, has not been available. Field observations were made in Foxs’ Marsh on North Bass Island, Ottawa County, Ohio, in western Lake Erie during the summer of 1963. Further observations were planned but the colony failed to breed in the marsh the following year. The marsh, about 1500 feet by 500 feet, is located at the south-west corner of the island. In the past it has been connected with the lake, but due to low water and wave action, it is now separated by a gravel bar.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Cerebrotypes in Birds
    Original Paper Brain Behav Evol 2005;65:215–230 Received: June 23, 2004 Returned for revision: July 20, 2004 DOI: 10.1159/000084313 Accepted after revision: September 14, 2004 Published online: March 8, 2005 The Evolution of Cerebrotypes in Birds Andrew N. Iwaniuk Peter L. Hurd Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada Key Words tionships among species, but there is a tendency for spe- Birds W Wulst W Nidopallium W Brainstem W Cerebellum W cies within an order to clump together. There may also Evolution W Prey capture W Cognition be a weak relationship between cerebrotype and devel- opmental differences, but two of the main clusters con- tained species with both altricial and precocial develop- Abstract mental patterns. As a whole, the groupings do agree Multivariate analyses of brain composition in mammals, with behavioral and ecological similarities among spe- amphibians and fish have revealed the evolution of ‘cer- cies. Most notably, species that share similarities in loco- ebrotypes’ that reflect specific niches and/or clades. motor behavior, mode of prey capture or cognitive abili- Here, we present the first demonstration of similar cere- ty are clustered together. The relationship between cere- brotypes in birds. Using principal component analysis brotype and behavior/ecology in birds suggests that and hierarchical clustering methods to analyze a data set future comparative studies of brain-behavior relation- of 67 species, we demonstrate that five main cerebro- ships will benefit from adopting a multivariate ap- types can be recognized. One type is dominated by galli- proach. forms and pigeons, among other species, that all share Copyright © 2005 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultimate Papua New Guinea Ii
    The fantastic Forest Bittern showed memorably well at Varirata during this tour! (JM) ULTIMATE PAPUA NEW GUINEA II 25 AUGUST – 11 / 15 SEPTEMBER 2019 LEADER: JULIEN MAZENAUER Our second Ultimate Papua New Guinea tour in 2019, including New Britain, was an immense success and provided us with fantastic sightings throughout. A total of 19 Birds-of-paradise (BoPs), one of the most striking and extraordinairy bird families in the world, were seen. The most amazing one must have been the male Blue BoP, admired through the scope near Kumul lodge. A few females were seen previously at Rondon Ridge, but this male was just too much. Several males King-of-Saxony BoP – seen displaying – ranked high in our most memorable moments of the tour, especially walk-away views of a male obtained at Rondon Ridge. Along the Ketu River, we were able to observe the full display and mating of another cosmis species, Twelve-wired BoP. Despite the closing of Ambua, we obtained good views of a calling male Black Sicklebill, sighted along a new road close to Tabubil. Brown Sicklebill males were seen even better and for as long as we wanted, uttering their machine-gun like calls through the forest. The adult male Stephanie’s Astrapia at Rondon Ridge will never be forgotten, showing his incredible glossy green head colours. At Kumul, Ribbon-tailed Astrapia, one of the most striking BoP, amazed us down to a few meters thanks to a feeder especially created for birdwatchers. Additionally, great views of the small and incredible King BoP delighted us near Kiunga, as well as males Magnificent BoPs below Kumul.
    [Show full text]
  • 14 References
    14 REFERENCES Afik, D. and Ward, D. ( 1989). Incubation of dead eggs. Auk. 106 : 726 - 728. Ali. S. (1943). The Birds of Mysore. J. Bombay nat. Hist. Soc. 44: 206-220 . ...................... (1953). The Keoladeo Ghana of Bharatpur (Rajasthan). J. Bombay nat. Hist Soc., 51 : 531 - 536 . ..................... (2002). The book of Indian Birds. Bombay Natural History Society. Oxform University Press. Ali S. & Ripley, S.D. (1968). Handbook of the birds of India and Pakistan vol. 1 Bombay : Oxford University Press. Altmann, J. ( 1974) . ObseNational study of behaviour : sampling methods. Behaviour, 49: 227-267. Anderson, D. W. and Keith, J. 0. (1980). The human influence on seabird nesting success . Conservation implications. Bioi. Conserv.. 18 : 65- 80. Anderson, D. W. (1988). Dose-response relationship between human disturbance and brown pelican breeding success. Wild/. Soc. Bull., 16: 339-45. Baker, E.C.S. (1922-1929). Fauna of British India, Birds (2nd ed.). Voi.I-VI. Taylor and Francis, London . ......................... (1935). The indification of birds of the Indian Empire Vol. 4. Taylor and Francis. London. Baker, R.H. ( 1940). Crow predation on heron nesting colonies. Wilson Bull., 52: 124- 125. Barrows, W. B. (1912). Michigan Bird Life, pp. 146- 147. 105 Birkhead, T. R. (1977). The effect of habitat and density on breeding success tr1e common guillemot (Uria aa/ge). J. Anim. Ecol.. 46: 751-764. Blanford, W. T. (1895-1898): Fauna of British India, Birds Vols. 3 and 4. London. Boekelheide, R. J. and Ainley, D. J. (1989). Age, resource availability and breeding effort in Brandts' cormorant. Auk, 106: 389-401. Bongiorno, S. F.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Success, Growth and Survival of Black-Crowned Night-Heron (Nycticorax Nycticorax) and Snowy Egret (Egretta Thula) Chicks in Coastal Virginia
    The Auk 113(1):119-130, 1996 REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS, GROWTH AND SURVIVAL OF BLACK-CROWNED NIGHT-HERON (NYCTICORAX NYCTICORAX) AND SNOWY EGRET (EGRETTA THULA) CHICKS IN COASTAL VIRGINIA R. MICHAEL ERWIN, JOHN G. HAIG, DANIEL B. $TOTTS,AND JEFF$. HATFIELD NationalBiological Service, Patuxent Environmental Science Center, 11410American Holly Drive, Laurel,Maryland 20708, USA ABSTRACT.--Westudied reproductive success, growth, and survivalof Black-crownedNight- Heron (Nycticoraxnycticorax) and Snowy Egret (Egrettathula) chicksin two mixed-species heronries on marsh islands in ChincoteagueBay, AccomackCounty, Virginia in 1992 and 1993. We attachedradio transmitterswith mortality sensorsto the oldest chicks (A-chicks) in 11 to 22 nestsof both speciesto monitor survival during the mid- to late nestlingperiod and into the postnestingdispersal period. For both species,we found significantdifferences between 1992and 1993in growth ratesand survival. Massgrowth ratesof chickswere higher in 1993 than in 1992for both species.Culmen-length growth ratesvaried significantlydue to year-colonyeffects for night-herons,but only for hatching order for egrets.Differences in survival rates due to hatching order were found for the egrets in both years, but were found only in 1992for night-herons.As with massgrowth rates, survival of chickswas higher in 1993 than 1992.Survival of radio-markedA-chicks did not differ between speciesor years for the period from hatchingto fledging or from fledging through the end of the study (ca. two monthspostfledging). Survival ranged from 0.80 to 1.00from the time radio transmitters were attached(ca. two weeksof age) until dispersalage (53-55 daysfor egrets;55-60 days for night-herons).After birds left the colony,survival rateswere lower during the next 40 to 55 days,ranging from 0.25 to 0.60.
    [Show full text]