Review of Log Sort Yards

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Review of Log Sort Yards United States Department of Agriculture Review of Forest Service Forest Log Sort Yards Products Laboratory General Technical John Rusty Dramm Report Gerry L. Jackson FPLGTR132 Jenny Wong Abstract About the Authors This report provides a general overview of current log sort yard John Rusty Dramm is a Forest Products Utilization Specialist in operations in the United States, including an extensive literature the Technology Marketing Unit located at the USDA Forest review and information collected during on-site visits to several Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wisconsin. operations throughout the nation. Log sort yards provide many Current focus of Mr. Dramm’s work is on potential applications services in marketing wood and fiber by concentrating, mer- of log sort yards to improve the viability of forestland restora- chandising, processing, sorting, and adding value to logs. Such tion and fuels reduction activities on public and private forests. operations supply forest products firms with desired raw materi- He is a recognized expert in sawmill efficiency and quality and als, which helps improve their bottom line by reducing the productivity improvement. In addition to his tenure with the number of marginal logs processed. Ultimately, sorting logs USDA Forest Service, he has a total of 20 years experience in leads to better use of the available timber resources. Successful lumber manufacturing quality control, hardwood forest man- log sort yards are self-sufficient and have well-established agement and harvest operations, and wood treating plant man- markets and a steady supply of wood. Log sort yard concepts agement. He holds a Master of Forestry Degree from Oregon and analyses described in this report have broad applications. State University and a Bachelor of Science Degree in Forest Management, from University of Wisconsin–Stevens Point. Keywords: log sort yard, small diameter, underutilized species, value-added, sorting, log scaling, log grading, log Gerry Jackson is a Forest Products Marketing Specialist with merchandising the Technology Marketing Unit in Madison, Wisconsin. Mr. Jackson provides marketing assistance to state and commu- nity groups engaged in rural community assistance as well as Cover Photograph the forest products industry. His industrial experience includes Weyerhaeuser Company’s management trainee program in the Libby Log Sort Yard, Libby, Montana—Logs from small timber southeastern United States. He received his Master’s Degree in producers and private landowners are purchased and sorted for Forest Products Marketing from Virginia Tech and a Bachelor various log products and concentrated for more efficient ship- of Science Degree in Marketing from Alabama A&M ping to mills by truck. The essentials of the small log sort yard University. are shown: log decks, yard office, and utility hookups. Small log sort yards such as this may hold the key to effective forestland Jenny Wong is a summer student with the Forest Products restoration and fuels reduction treatment while providing rural Laboratory. She compiled the extensive literature review of log jobs and opportunities for value-added options for small- sort yards. She is working toward a pre-law undergraduate diameter and underutilized trees. degree at the University of Minnesota. Acknowledgments October 2002 Coordination of log sort yard site visits was made possible by efforts of Federal and state utilization and marketing specialists Dramm, John Rusty; Jackson, Gerry L.; Wong, Jenny. 2002. Review of log throughout the country. We especially recognize the efforts by sort yards. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-GTR-132. Madison, WI: U.S. Department Peter Lammert, Maine Department of Conservation; Dean of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. 39 p. Huber, USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area; and Bill von A limited number of free copies of this publication are available to the Segen, USDA Forest Service, Region 6, State & Private For- public from the Forest Products Laboratory, One Gifford Pinchot Drive, estry. The authors also thank several individuals, companies, Madison, WI 53726–2398. This publication is also available online at and organizations who contributed their insights into log sort www.fpl.fs.fed.us. Laboratory publications are sent to hundreds of libraries in the United States and elsewhere. yard operations. We are most grateful for contributions from the following individuals and organizations: The Forest Products Laboratory is maintained in cooperation with the University of Wisconsin. Terry Larimer, Libby Log Yard; Roger Jaegel, Watershed Research and Training Center; Mark Stella, Rogue Institute; Terry Mace, Wisconsin The use of trade or firm names is for information only and does not imply Department of Natural Resources; Dr. Robert Govett, University of Wis- endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or consin–Stevens Point; Chris Edwards, Western Wood Products, Inc.; Bob service. McCarty, Weyerhaeuser Company; Carl Henderson, Huber Resources Corporation; Peter Honey, Champion International; Norm Steve, Prentiss The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimina- and Carlisle; Ed Kimball, Penley Corporation; George Parke, Northeast tion in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or Bio Recovery, Inc.; Ray Emery, Emery Forest Products; Earl Pelletier, marital or familial status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Oak Brokers, Inc.; Dick Pierce, Timber Resources Group, LLC; Scott Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication Thomas, GT&S Logging, Inc.; Howard Miller, Jackman Lumber— of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact Somerset Log Yard; Bruce Edwards, E.D. Besse & Son; Peter Holman, the USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD). To file a Maxiwood; Reiny Krause, Algoma Lumber Company; Byron Hawkins, complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Webster Lumber Company; Jamie Barbour, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Wash- Northwest Research Station; Dean L. Parry, USDA Forest Service, Pacific ington, DC 20250–9410, or call (202) 720–5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is Northwest Research Station; Steve Schmieding, USDA Forest Service, an equal opportunity provider and employer. Forest Products Laboratory. Contents Page Page Introduction........................................................................... 1 Appendix: Selected Bibliography of Log Sort Yard and Related References.............................................................. 22 Log Sort Yard Project....................................................... 1 Categories ....................................................................... 22 Types of Log Yards .......................................................... 3 Log Sort Yards................................................................ 22 Origins of the Log Sort Yard ............................................ 3 Log Rules and Scaling .................................................... 23 Benefits of Sorting Logs ................................................... 4 Log Grading.................................................................... 23 Log Sorting Alternatives................................................... 5 Economics–Costs–Productivity ...................................... 24 Advantages of Log Sort Yards.......................................... 6 Marketing........................................................................ 25 Log Sort Yard Goals and Objectives ................................... 7 Exporting ........................................................................ 26 Log Sort Yard Operations..................................................... 7 Debris–Disposal and Use of Residues ............................ 27 Materials Handling............................................................ 8 Bucking and Merchandising—General........................... 28 Log Processing.................................................................. 9 Optimal Softwood Bucking ............................................ 29 Sorting............................................................................. 11 Hardwood Bucking ......................................................... 30 Log Storage and Inventory.............................................. 11 Log Manufacture............................................................. 31 Log Sort Yard Equipment and Sorting Systems ................ 11 Harvesting–Logging–Timber Sales ................................ 31 Front-End Loaders .......................................................... 12 Transportation—Loading and Unloading ....................... 32 Log Stackers ................................................................... 12 Log Allocation ................................................................ 33 Log Loaders .................................................................... 13 Log Procurement............................................................. 34 Sorting Systems and Log Merchandisers........................ 13 Inventory Control and Storage........................................ 35 Timber Processors and Cut-To-Length Systems............ 14 Protection and Insect Control.......................................... 35 Sorting Bunks ................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 296-78 WAC, Sawmills and Woodworking
    Chapter 296-78 WAC Introduction Sawmills and Woodworking Operations _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Chapter 296-78 WAC Sawmills and Woodworking Operations (Form Number F414-010-000) This book contains rules for Safety Standards for sawmills and woodworking operations, as adopted under the Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act of 1973 (Chapter 49.17 RCW). The rules in this book are effective March 2018. A brief promulgation history, set within brackets at the end of this chapter, gives statutory authority, administrative order of promulgation, and date of adoption of filing. TO RECEIVE E-MAIL UPDATES: Sign up at https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/WADLI/subscriber/new?topic_id=WADLI_19 TO PRINT YOUR OWN PAPER COPY OR TO VIEW THE RULE ONLINE: Go to https://www.lni.wa.gov/safety-health/safety-rules/rules-by-chapter/?chapter=78/ DOSH CONTACT INFORMATION: Physical address: 7273 Linderson Way Tumwater, WA 98501-5414 (Located off I-5 Exit 101 south of Tumwater.) Mailing address: DOSH Standards and Information PO Box 44810 Olympia, WA 98504-4810 Telephone: 1-800-423-7233 For all L&I Contact information, visit https://www.lni.wa.gov/agency/contact/ Also available on the L&I Safety & Health website: DOSH Core Rules Other General Workplace Safety & Health Rules Industry and Task-Specific Rules Proposed Rules and Hearings Newly Adopted Rules and New Rule Information DOSH Directives (DD’s) See http://www.lni.wa.gov/Safety-Health/ Chapter 296-78 WAC Table of Contents Sawmills and Woodworking Operations _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Chapter 296-78 WAC SAFETY STANDARDS FOR SAWMILLS AND WOODWORKING OPERATIONS WAC Page WAC 296-78-500 Foreword.
    [Show full text]
  • Lec11 for 373 Bucking Logs-20B [Compatibility Mode]
    Improving Value Recovery Through Optimal Bucking Objectives for Today Cover Page •Short paragraph announcing offer of timber sale, location, • Timber Sale Prospectus samples acreage and general volume with species •Day of timber showing •Day of bid opening • Discuss the high stakes world of log •Paragraph detailing bidding deadline and where bids should bucking with presentation from: be sent • Announcement: – No Class on Wednesday – No Lab on ThursdayImproving Value Recovery....Through 2 Optimal Bucking Cover Cover Page Page 3 4 Cover Cover Page Page 5 6 1 Improving Value Recovery Through Optimal Bucking Cover Cover Page Page 7 8 Volume Table Cover •User-friendly table detailing timber sale Page volume by species; should include species DBH class, # of trees, average volume per tree; total by species and grand total •Disclosure statement informing potential buyers that said volumes are only an estimate and that potential are buyers are encouraged to determine individual estimates •Paragraph describing how trees are marked 9 (saw logs, pulpwood, cull) 10 Volume Table Volume Table 11 12 2 Improving Value Recovery Through Optimal Bucking Stipulations • insurance (general liability Stipulations at $500,000) and workman’s compensation requirements; • Amount of performance bond (i.e., $5,000; 10 - 20% of bid amount) held until successful completion of job • Payment schedule (i.e., 100% up front, 15% up front then remainder before starting the job, payment by working block) • restrictions that may influence amount of bid – timeline, stipulations
    [Show full text]
  • Creation of Value Through a Harvester On-Board Bucking Optimization System Operated in a Spruce Stand
    Silva Fennica vol. 52 no. 3 article id 9947 Category: research article https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.9947 SILVA FENNICA http://www.silvafennica.fi Licenced CC BY-SA 4.0 ISSN-L 0037-5330 | ISSN 2242-4075 (Online) The Finnish Society of Forest Science Eric R. Labelle and Linus Huß Creation of value through a harvester on-board bucking optimization system operated in a spruce stand Labelle E.R., Huß L. (2018). Creation of value through a harvester on-board bucking optimiza- tion system operated in a spruce stand. Silva Fennica vol. 52 no. 3 article id 9947. 22 p. https:// doi.org/10.14214/sf.9947 Highlights • Use of harvester on-board computer bucking optimization remains highly under-utilized in German forestry. • Revenue per tree and harvesting productivity were both statistically higher with automatic bucking as compared to quality bucking during a thinning operation in a spruce dominated stand. Abstract Tree bucking, defined as the process in which a stem is segmented into shorter logs of varying lengths, has a significant effect on the value adding potential of a forest enterprise. Because of its importance in terms of correct product and length combinations, improper bucking can lead to financial losses. In this study, two treatments (OFF: quality bucking performed by the opera- tor while using hot keys and ON: automatic bucking using the optimized suggestions from the harvester on-board computer; OBC) were tested in a Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) dominated stand located in Germany. Both treatments had the aim to maximize the value of a stem.
    [Show full text]
  • DEVELOPMENT of a 3D LOG SAWING OPTIMIZATION SYSTEM for SMALL SAWMILLS in CENTRAL APPALACHIA, US Wenshu Lin{ Jingxin Wang*{ Edwar
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Wood and Fiber Science (E-Journal) DEVELOPMENT OF A 3D LOG SAWING OPTIMIZATION SYSTEM FOR SMALL SAWMILLS IN CENTRAL APPALACHIA, US Wenshu Lin{ Graduate Research Assistant E-mail: [email protected] Jingxin Wang*{ Professor West Virginia University Division of Forestry and Natural Resources Morgantown, WV 26506 E-mail: [email protected] Edward Thomas Research Scientist USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station Princeton, WV 24740 E-mail: [email protected] (Received April 2011) Abstract. A 3D log sawing optimization system was developed to perform log generation, opening face determination, sawing simulation, and lumber grading using 3D modeling techniques. Heuristic and dynamic programming algorithms were used to determine opening face and grade sawing optimization. Positions and shapes of internal log defects were predicted using a model developed by the USDA Forest Service. Lumber grading procedures were based on National Hardwood Lumber Association rules. The system was validated through comparisons with sawmill lumber values. External characteristics of logs, including length, large- end and small-end diameters, diameters at each foot, and defects were collected from five local sawmills in central Appalachia. Results indicated that hardwood sawmills have the potential to increase lumber value through optimal opening face and sawing optimizations. With these optimizations, average lumber value recovery could be increased by 10.01% using the heuristic algorithm or 14.21% using the dynamic program- ming algorithm. Lumber grade was improved significantly by using the optimal algorithms. For example, recovery of select or higher grade lumber increased 16-30%. This optimization system would help small sawmill operators improve their processing performance and improve industry competitiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Intensive Hardwood Log Bucker Training Using HW Buck Dramatically Improves Value Recovery
    Intensive Hardwood Log Bucker Training using HW Buck Dramatically Improves Value Recovery James B. Pickens, School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, [email protected] Aaron Everett, Black Hills Forest Resource Association, Rapid City, SD Scott Noble, Noble Forestry Consulting, Chassell, MI John Baumgras (retired), Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, Princeton, WV Philip Araman, Southern Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, Blacksburg, VA Conrad Waniger, forest harvesting contractor, Shawano, WI Al Steele, Wood Education and Resource Center (WERC) of the USDA Forest Service, Princeton, WV ABSTRACT It has long been recognized that inappropriate placement of crosscuts when manufacturing hardwood logs from harvested stems (log bucking) reduces the value of logs produced. Recent studies have estimated losses in the range from 28% to 38% in the lake states region. It has not, however, been clear how to correct the problem. Efforts to improve value recovery have followed two general approaches: using technological methods to actually optimize the bucking of each log or having recognized experts train log buckers to make better bucking decisions. This article describes the state-of-the-art for optimizing the bucking of hardwood logs, and documents a log bucker training approach that resulted in improved value recovery of over 30%. Field buckers underwent an intensive training process to help them make better bucking decisions. This training integrated use of HW Buck, a computerized tool to optimize the choice of bucking cuts for hardwood logs, with other more traditional training approaches. Sample hardwood stems were felled and entered into the HW Buck software to determine the individual bucking options that maximized the value of the resulting logs.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Status of Logger Training and Education (LT&E
    Report on the Status of Logger Training and Education (LT&E) Programs in 35 Forested U.S. States & 3 Canadian Provinces 2019 Actuals – 2020 Estimates Compiled by September 8, 2020 2 September 8, 2020 FOREWORD This Report on the Status of Logger Training and Education (LT&E) Programs in 35 Forested U.S. States & 3 Canadian Provinces was compiled from updates submitted by LT&E Program Coordinators. Each state logger training program report is included in alphabetical order beginning on page 6. A Training Summary Table on page 4 reports the number of persons attending continuing education courses in 2019 and expected to attend continuing education courses in 2020. A total of 6,236 loggers and others completed LT&E programs and 20,666 attended at least one training session in 2019. On page 5, you will find a table that summarizes the number of logging contractors, logging employees, and others that participated in LT&E programs in 2019. Although some programs do not track the job classification of trainees, the programs that do track it report that 2,482 logging contractors, 1,736 logging employees, and 268 non-loggers completed their LT&E Program requirements in 2019. Others participating in LT&E Programs include: foresters, landowners, consultants, students, government officials and natural resource managers. Most LT&E Programs now require continuing education to fulfill licensing or to maintain certification status. For more information about each training program, please contact the person(s) listed at the top of each LT&E report. Jacob
    [Show full text]
  • AP-42, CH 10.5: Plywood Manufacturing
    10.5 Plywood Manufacturing 10.5.1 General Plywood is a building material consisting of veneers (thin wood layers or plies) bonded with an adhesive. There are two types of plywood: softwood plywood and hardwood plywood. Softwoods generally correspond to coniferous species. The most commonly used softwoods for manufacturing plywood are firs and pines. Hardwoods generally correspond to deciduous species. For hardwood plywood, commonly used wood species include oak, poplar, maple, cherry, and larch. Softwood plywood is manufactured by gluing several layers of dry softwood veneers together with an adhesive. Softwood plywood is used for wall siding, sheathing, roof decking, concrete formboards, floors, and containers. Softwood plywood is classified under Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code 2436, and North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) code 321212 for “Softwood Plywood and Veneer”. Hardwood plywood is made of hardwood veneers bonded with an adhesive. The outer layers (face and back) surround a core which is usually lumber, veneer, particleboard, or medium density fiberboard. Hardwood plywood may be pressed into panels or plywood components (e.g., curved hardwood plywood, seat backs, chair arms, etc.). Hardwood plywood is used for interior applications such as furniture, cabinets, architectural millwork, paneling, flooring, store fixtures, and doors. Hardwood plywood is classified under SIC code 2435 and NAICS code 321211, for “Hardwood Plywood and Veneer”. Softwood plywood plants typically produce softwood veneers and softwood plywood on the same plant site. However, most hardwood plywood and veneer plants either produce hardwood plywood or hardwood veneer. Hardwood veneer plants cut and dry hardwood veneers. Hardwood plywood plants typically purchase hardwood veneers and press the veneers onto a purchased core material.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Low Velocity Impact Response of Composite Plates
    Mechanics, Materials Science & Engineering, September 2017 – ISSN 2412-5954 Analyzing the Antecedents and Consequences of Manual Log Bucking in Mechanized Wood Harvesting Kalle Kärhä1, a, Jyri Änäkkälä1, 2, Ollipekka Hakonen1, 2, Teijo Palander2, Juha-Antti Sorsa3, Tapio Räsänen3, Tuomo Moilanen4 1 – Stora Enso Wood Supply Finland, Helsinki, Finland 2 – University of Eastern Finland, Faculty of Science and Forestry, Joensuu, Finland 3 – Metsäteho Ltd.,Vantaa, Finland 4 – Ponsse Plc., Vieremä, Finland a – [email protected] DOI 10.2412/mmse.45.20.957 provided by Seo4U.link Keywords: forest engineering, cross-cutting, cut-to-length (CTL) method, softwood, value recovery, Big Data, sawmill- ing industry, Finland. ABSTRACT. The study focused on the frequency of applying a manual tree-stem bucking to logs in coniferous forests of Finland. The aim of the study was to clarify harvesting conditions where manual log bucking is utilized most and the effects of the utilization of manual bucking on the log bucking outcome. In addition to the stm Big Data of harvesters, in order to investigate the consequences of manual log bucking, data from the enterprise resource production (ERP) systems of wood procurement organization and sawmills was collected, as well as harvester operators were interviewed. The study results illustrated that the share of manual bucking of Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.) logs was, on average, 46% and with Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) logs 67%. The operators used manual bucking more frequently in thinning stands with small-sized and defected log stems. When the utilization degree of manual log bucking was high, the utilization of log sections with spruce and pine log stems was lower, logs were shorter and the volume of logs was smaller.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Forest Concessions Improving the Allocation of State-Owned Forests for Better Economic, Social and Environmental Outcomes
    Rethinking forest concessions Improving the allocation of state-owned forests for better economic, social and environmental outcomes FORESTRY WORKING PAPER 4 Rethinking forest concessions Improving the allocation of state-owned forests for better economic, social and environmental outcomes FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2018 iii Contents Acronyms and abbreviations .................................................................................... vi Executive summary .................................................................................................. vii 1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 1 Objective................................................................................................................... 2 Concession systems .................................................................................................. 2 Forest tenure and forest rights ..................................................................................... 5 Concessions and responsibilities ................................................................................... 5 Concessions and their benefits ..................................................................................... 6 Concessions and sustainable forest management....................................................... 6 Poor forest management .............................................................................................. 7 Are expectations
    [Show full text]
  • ARBORNOVALT, (Forestry & Forest Industry Consultants) July, 1999
    , , L , S . , TIMBERE ORTDEVELOPMENTBOARD EDB MANPOWERDEVELOPMENTFOR'I'llEGllANAWOOD unUSTRYTRAININGCENTRE(WITC FD12/98Rev. 2(I) o S 0.10 T Ok^".^ by F'. K. Odoon Forestry Consultant ARBORNOVALT, (Forestry & Forest Industry Consultants) July, 1999 , Acknowledgements The Consultant would like to express his sincere gratitude and thanks allthose who in diverse ways have provided support during the implementation of this study. This includes allthose who were visited and contacted in the wood industry and the TEDB Special thanks go to the following: TEDB Mr. S. K. Appiah Managing Director WITC F. Hans Gstrein -Technical Director 1.0. K. Gyamfi -Dop. Director, Ag. Head, Wood Processing Department J. A. Sagoe -Kiln Drying Consultant KwasiLumor -Head, Saw doctoring/Saw milling S. A. Boyd-Awuah -Principal Instructor, Saw doctoring E. Adu-Fukuo -Srir. Engineer, Kiln Drying Sammy Dolphine -Assistant Training Officer, Computer Dept George Graham-Smith -Assistant Training Officer, Computer Dept Joseph Oduro -Principal Technician, Furniture Production Mensah K. Sampson -Principal Technician, Furniture Production . ~ , Acronyms BRM Binm Wood Complex CAAST College of Applied Arts Science and Technology CDl Centre for Development of Industry ERP Econoinic Rehabilitation Project ESS Ehwia Saw doctoring School FIRA Furniture Industry Research Association FMSC Forest Management Support Centre FORTG Forestry Research Institute of Ghana FPIB Forest Products Inspection Bureau FRMP Forest Resources Management Project GDC General Development Corporation GIS
    [Show full text]
  • HW Buck for Windows: the Optimal Hardwood Log Bucking Decision Simulator with Expanded Capabilities
    HW Buck for Windows: The Optimal Hardwood Log Bucking Decision Simulator with Expanded Capabilities Scott Noble, Noble Forestry Consulting, Chassell, Michigan Blair Orr, School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI James B. Pickens, , School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, [email protected] Philip Araman, Southern Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, Blacksburg, VA John Baumgras (retired), Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, Princeton, WV Al Steele, Wood Education Resource Center (WERC) of the USDA Forest Service, Princeton, WV ABSTRACT It has long been recognized that inappropriate placement of crosscuts when manufacturing hardwood logs from harvested stems (log bucking) reduces the value of logs produced. Recent studies have estimated losses in the range from 28% to 38% in the lake states region. These estimates were developed by evaluating the bucking cuts chosen by harvesting crews and comparing them to the optimal bucking pattern chosen by HW Buck, a computerize tool to optimize the choice of bucking cuts for hardwood logs. These losses are not surprising because the hardwood log bucking problem is very complicated. Hardwood log grading and scaling rules are complex. Furthermore, hardwood stems tend to be less straight than softwoods, and have grade and scale reducing defects scattered along the entire stem. The original DOS version of HW Buck, which was recognized by the NHLA Hardwood Research Award in 1996, was very useful. However, it was written to run on the DOS operating system, which limits its current utility. The DOS version also did not have the flexibility required to accurately depict the complexity of hardwood markets, which vary by species, region, and even organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri Logging School Flyer
    MFPA LOGGING SCHOOL Missouri Forest Products Association Logging School gives you the skills needed to succeed in the logging industry. FOREST MANAGEMENT • TIMBER HARVESTING MARKETING • UTILIZATION 573-634-3252 www.moforest.org/logging-school/ MFPA LOGGING SCHOOL The Missouri Forest Products Association Logging School is The MFPA Logging School is a “hands on” program where now accepting applications for the 2020 spring session. The you will operate logging equipment during your time in the Logging School is a 10-week course of study. A maximum of field. Professionals in the industry will be delivering the 12 students per session will be accepted into the program to instruction throughout the 10-week session so you will learn maximize the student to instructor ratio for depth of instruc- from professional loggers, certified foresters, and leaders in tion and safety. The logging school tuition covers your the timber industry. personal protective equipment, week day lodging/meals, instruction, and logging equipment for the 10-week training. The logging profession is an exciting and rewarding ca- reer but can also be a hazardous one. The MFPA Logging You will learn the logging profession in both the classroom School was designed around learning how to safely harvest and in the field and will graduate with an education that will timber by following management practices which ensure the prepare you to become a competent member of an existing sustainability and long-term health of the forest. logging company while understanding what it takes to run a logging company. You will learn the business side of log- To receive additional information, application materials, ging while also developing the skills required to operate and tuition assistance, and scholarship opportunities please maintain the equipment used in the logging industry.
    [Show full text]