DOCSLIB.ORG

Thomas Sheehan Faculty Evaluation 2012-2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Thomas Sheehan Faculty Evaluation 2012-2013 CURRICULUM VITAE August 2013 Thomas Sheehan, Ph.D. Professor Stanford University Department of Religious Studies and by courtesy in Philosophy and in German Professor Emeritus Loyola University Chicago Department of Philosophy Personal information: Born, June 25, 1941, San Francisco, California. American citizen. Married, with three children. Present position: Professor, Department of Religious Studies Stanford University, Stanford, California By courtesy, Professor, Department of Philosophy and Department of German Stanford University Professor Emeritus, Department of Philosophy Loyola University Chicago Education: Ph.D. 1971 Fordham University, New York City M.A. 1968 Fordham University, New York City M.A. course work University of California at Berkeley, Comparative Literature 1965-6 B.A. 1963 St. Patrick’s, Menlo Park, California Philosophy (B.A., 1963); Theology (1963-65) Languages used in research: English, German, French, Italian, Spanish, Attic and Koine Greek, ancient and medieval Latin. Teaching positions: 1999 to present: Stanford University, Professor, Department of Religious Studies 1972 to 1999: Loyola University Chicago: 1999 to present: Professor Emeritus 1984-99: Full Professor 1978-84: Associate Professor 1972-78: Assistant Professor 1971-72: St. Mary’s College, Indiana (at the campus in Rome, Italy), Assistant Professor, Department of Religion and Philosophy. 1970-71: Loyola University Chicago (at the campus in Rome, Italy), Adjunct Assistant Professor, Department of Theology. 1969, summer: Catholic University of America, Adjunct Assistant Professor, Department of Religious Studies. Teaching areas: Areas of Specialization: Heidegger and twentieth-century continental philosophy Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology Phenomenology and hermeneutics Historical Jesus Research and first-century Christianity Classical Metaphysics and the History of Metaphysics Areas of Competence: Ancient Greek Philosophy, especially Aristotle Medieval Christian Philosophy, especially Augustine and Aquinas Ethics and Politics: Issues in Liberation Honors, Grants: 2011: Michaelmas term, Oxford University. Lady Astor Lectureship: lecture series on “Heidegger, Phenomenology, and the Question of Being.” 1983-85: Ford Foundation Grant: research on ethics and right-wing political philosophy in Italy (articles in New York Review of Books, Social Research, Alfabeta, etc.) 1983: Resident Scholar, American Academy in Rome: research on first-century Christianity, preliminary to The First Coming).. 1980: National Endowment for the Humanities Grant for translating M. Heidegger, Logic: Die Frage nach der Wahrheit. 1979-80: Fritz Thyssen Stiftung Grant: research on Martin Heidegger at the Universities of Freiburg and Heidelberg. 1978: Director, Collegium Phenomenologicum, Perugia, Italy: Seminars on Heidegger and hermeneutics by Hans-Georg Gadamer, Werner Marx, William Richardson. 1977: Research Grant, the American Catholic Philosophical Association, for Karl Rahner: The Philosophical Foundations. 1975-76: Mellon Foundation Grant for Teaching Development 1973-74: Post-doctoral research, University of Heidelberg, with Professor Ernst Tugendhat: research on the Heidegger’s course “Einleitung in die Phänomenologie der Religion,’ (1920-21)” (cf. article, The Personalist, 1979). Membership in Professional Organizations: • American Academy of Religion • The Westar Institute / Jesus Seminar • American Philosophical Association • The Heidegger Conference • Society for Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy Membership on Editorial and Advisory Boards: • Editorial Board, Rowman and Littlefield International, New Heidegger Research • Editorial Board, Bulletin heideggérien (Leuven University). • International Board of Advisors, The Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida • Northwestern University Press: Member of the Board of Consulting Editors in the series, Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy. • Indiana University Press: Member of the Board of Consulting Editors of the series, Studies in Continental Philosophy. • Editorial Board, Studies in Practical Philosophy, S.U.N.Y. Stony Brook, 1999-2005. • Editorial Board, Interpretative Studies in Healthcare and the Human Sciences: University of Wisconsin, Madison, School of Nursing, and the University of Wisconsin Press. PUBLICATIONS [A] BOOKS, AND A COURSE ON LINE [B] CHAPTERS IN BOOKS, ARTICLES, NOTES [C] TRANSLATIONS [D] LECTURES, DISCUSSIONS, INTERVIEWS N.B.: NEW MATERIALS ARE MARKED IN COLOR BELOW, UNDER THE HEADINGS: ▪ “BOOKS” (1 new book under review) ▪ “CHAPTERS IN BOOKS” (10 new articles, 2 of them forthcoming) ▪ “TRANSLATIONS” (1 new) ▪ “ LECTURES” (5 new) [A] BOOKS New book ms. completed and under review. See “2012-2013 New Materials.” Published: • New, completely revised edition, Theodore Kisiel and Thomas Sheehan, editors, Becoming Heidegger: On the Trail of his Early Occasional Writings, 1910-1927, Seattle: Noesis Press, 2011. On line via Equinox Press, Sheffield, England: http://www.equinoxpub.com/NYPPP/issue/view/1210 • Thomas Sheehan, editor and translator: Martin Heidegger, Logic: The Question of Truth, Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 2010. • Edmund Husserl, Psychological and Transcendental Phenomenology, and the Confrontation with Heidegger, edited and translated by Thomas Sheehan and Richard E. Palmer, in the series “Edmund Husserl: Collected Works,” Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997. • Thomas Sheehan, Karl Rahner: The Philosophical Foundations, Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press, 1987. Continental Thought Series, Volume 9. • Thomas Sheehan, The First Coming: How the Kingdom of God Became Christianity, New York: Random House, 1986. • British edition: Thorsons Publishing Group Ltd., Wellingborough: Aquarian Press, April 1988. • Paperback edition: Vintage Press, New York City, August 1988. • Published on the Web, March 2000, copyright Thomas Sheehan, at www.infidels.org. • Thomas Sheehan, editor, Heidegger, the Man and the Thinker, Chicago: Precedent Press, 1981. Reprinted, 2010, Transaction Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey. • Thomas Sheehan and Theodore Kisiel, editors and translators, Becoming Heidegger: On the Trail of his Early Occasional Writings, Sheffield, England: Equinox, 2013. Multiply co-authored, with a one-chapter contribution: • The Once and Future Jesus, Robert Funk, Thomas Sheehan, et al., Santa Rosa, CA: Polebridge Press, 2000. Chapter contributed: “From Divinity to Infinity,” 27-44. • An Introduction to the Humanities: Literature, Historical Documents, and Fine Art, John L. Foster, Thomas Sheehan, Peter Gay, et al., contributing co-editors, Glenview, Illinois: ScottForesman, 1996, Chapter introduction: “Judaism and Early Christianity, 1000 B.C. -- A.D. 500,” pp. 82-89. • Thomas Sheehan, Jacques Taminiaux, Samuel Ijsseling, and Edward Casey, contributing co-authors, Heidegger: A Centenary Appraisal, Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, Simon Silverman Center, 1990. Chapter contributed: “Nihilism, Faciticity, and the Economized Lethe,” pp. 28-61. • Thomas Sheehan, Franco Volpi, et al., contributing co-authors, Heidegger et l’idée de la phénoménologie, Phaenomenologica Series, No. 108, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1987: Chapter contributed: “Hermeneia and Apophansis: The Early Heidegger’s Reading of De Interpretatione,” pp. 67-80. Course on-line “The Historical Jesus,” Stanford iTunes, https://itunes.apple.com/us/itunes-u/historical-jesus/id384233911 [B] CHAPTERS IN BOOKS. ARTICLES. NOTES. 2014 “What, After All, Was Heidegger About?” Continental Philosophy Review, forthcoming. (Ms. completed, August 2013.) “A Heidegger Bibliography: The Gesamtausgabe Texts and their Current Translations,” Continental Philosophy Review, forthcoming. (Ms. completed, July 2013.) 2013 “Prolegomeni alla questione di Heidegger e Dio” (“Prolegomena to the Question of Heidegger and God”), in the journal Humanitas (Brescia, Italy), translated into Italian by Alberto Anelli, July, 2013. (I’m still waiting for an offprint from Italy and hence for the page numbers.) “What If Heidegger Were a Phenomenologist?” in Mark Wrathall, editor, The Cambridge Companion to “Being and Time,” Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2013, 381-401. “What Comes After Christianity?” The 4th R, September-October, 2013, 5-10. “The Turn: All Three of Them,” in The Bloomsbury Companion to Heidegger, ed., François Raffoul and Eric S. Nelson. London and New York: Bloomsbury, 2013, 31-38. “US Aid Supports a Protracted Massacre in El Salvador” in Genocide and Persecution: El Salvador and Guatemala, ed., Alexander Cruden and Frank Chalk, Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2013,141-145. “The Legacies of Benedict XVI,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, March 8, 2013. http://chronicle.com/blogs/conversation/2013/03/08/the-legacies-of-benedict-xvi/ Μάρτιν Χάιντεγκερ: ̓Ενας κανονικός Ναζί (“Martin Heidegger: A Normal Nazi”), Αθηναϊκή Επιθεώρηρη του Βιβλίου (The Athens Review of Books), January 2013, vol. 40, no. 36, 55-62. 2012 “Foreword” to John Van Hagen, Rescuing Religion: How Faith Can Survive Its Encounter with Science, Salem, Oregon: Polebridge Press, 2012, pp. vii-xiv. 2011 “Astonishing! Things Make Sense,” in Daniel Dahlstrom, ed. Gatherings: The Heidegger Circle Annual I (2011)1- 25. “Facticity and Ereignis” in Daniel Dahlstrom, ed., Interpreting Heidegger: New Essays, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2011, 42-68. 2010 “Heidegger, Martin,” The Cambridge Dictionary of Christianity, ed. Daniel Patte, Cambridge,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ontotheology? Understanding Heidegger’S Destruktion of Metaphysics* Iain Thomson
    T E D U L G O E R · Internationa l Journal o f Philo sophical Studies Vol.8(3), 297–327; · T a p y u lo o r Gr & Fr ancis Ontotheology? Understanding Heidegger’s Destruktion of Metaphysics* Iain Thomson Abstract Heidegger’s Destruktion of the metaphysical tradition leads him to the view that all Western metaphysical systems make foundational claims best understood as ‘ontotheological’. Metaphysics establishes the conceptual parameters of intelligibility by ontologically grounding and theologically legitimating our changing historical sense of what is. By rst elucidating and then problematizing Heidegger’s claim that all Western metaphysics shares this ontotheological structure, I reconstruct the most important components of the original and provocative account of the history of metaphysics that Heidegger gives in support of his idiosyncratic understanding of metaphysics. Arguing that this historical narrative generates the critical force of Heidegger’s larger philosophical project (namely, his attempt to nd a path beyond our own nihilistic Nietzschean age), I conclude by briey showing how Heidegger’s return to the inception of Western metaphysics allows him to uncover two important aspects of Being’s pre-metaphysical phenomeno- logical self-manifestation, aspects which have long been buried beneath the metaphysical tradition but which are crucial to Heidegger’s attempt to move beyond our late-modern, Nietzschean impasse. Keywords: Heidegger; ontotheology; metaphysics; deconstruction; Nietzsche; nihilism Upon hearing the expression ‘ontotheology’, many philosophers start looking for the door. Those who do not may know that it was under the title of this ‘distasteful neologism’ (for which we have Kant to thank)1 that the later Heidegger elaborated his seemingly ruthless critique of Western metaphysics.
    [Show full text]
  • Kierkegaard on Selfhood and Our Need for Others
    Kierkegaard on Selfhood and Our Need for Others 1. Kierkegaard in a Secular Age Scholars have devoted much attention lately to Kierkegaard’s views on personal identity and, in particular, to his account of selfhood.1 Central to this account is the idea that a self is not something we automatically are. It is rather something we must become. Thus, selfhood is a goal to realize or a project to undertake.2 To put the point another way, while we may already be selves in some sense, we have to work to become real, true, or “authentic” selves.3 The idea that authentic selfhood is a project is not unique to Kierkegaard. It is common fare in modern philosophy. Yet Kierkegaard distances himself from popular ways of thinking about the matter. He denies the view inherited from Rousseau that we can discover our true selves by consulting our innermost feelings, beliefs, and desires. He also rejects the idea developed by the German Romantics that we can invent our true selves in a burst of artistic or poetic creativity. In fact, according to Kierkegaard, becom- ing an authentic self is not something we can do on our own. If we are to succeed at the project, we must look beyond ourselves for assistance. In particular, Kierkegaard thinks, we must rely on God. For God alone can provide us with the content of our real identi- ties.4 A longstanding concern about Kierkegaard arises at this point. His account of au- thentic selfhood, like his accounts of so many concepts, is religious.
    [Show full text]
  • 52 Philosophy in a Dark Time: Martin Heidegger and the Third Reich
    52 Philosophy in a Dark Time: Martin Heidegger and the Third Reich TIMOTHY O’HAGAN Like Oscar Wilde I can resist everything except temptation. So when I re- ceived Anne Meylan’s tempting invitation to contribute to this Festschrift for Pascal Engel I accepted without hesitation, before I had time to think whether I had anything for the occasion. Finally I suggested to Anne the text of a pub- lic lecture which I delivered in 2008 and which I had shown to Pascal, who responded to it with his customary enthusiasm and barrage of papers of his own on similar topics. But when I re-read it, I realized that it had been written for the general public rather than the professional philosophers who would be likely to read this collection of essays. So what was I to do with it? I’ve decided to present it in two parts. In Part One I reproduce the original lecture, unchanged except for a few minor corrections. In Part Two I engage with a tiny fraction of the vast secondary literature which has built up over the years and which shows no sign of abating. 1. Part One: The 2008 Lecture Curtain-Raiser Let us start with two dates, 1927 and 1933. In 1927 Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf (volume II) was published. So too was Martin Heidegger’s magnum opus Being and Time. In 1933 two appointments were made: Hitler as Chancellor of the German Reich and Heidegger as Rector of Freiburg University. In 1927 it was a case of sheer coincidence; in 1933 the two events were closely linked.
    [Show full text]
  • The Authenticity of Faith in Kierkegaard's Philosophy
    The Authenticity of Faith in Kierkegaard’s Philosophy The Authenticity of Faith in Kierkegaard’s Philosophy Edited by Tamar Aylat-Yaguri and Jon Stewart The Authenticity of Faith in Kierkegaard’s Philosophy, Edited by Tamar Aylat-Yaguri and Jon Stewart This book first published 2013 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Layout and cover design by K.Nun Design, Denmark 12 Back Chapman Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2XX, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2013 by Tamar Aylat-Yaguri, Jon Stewart and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-4990-1, ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-4990-6 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Contributors vi Introduction vii Acknowledgements xvi List of Abbreviations xvii Chapter One Jacob Golomb: Was Kierkegaard an Authentic Believer? 1 Chapter Two Shai Frogel: Acoustical Illusion as Self-Deception 12 Chapter Three Roi Benbassat: Faith as a Struggle against Ethical Self-Deception 18 Chapter Four Edward F. Mooney: A Faith that Defies Self-Deception 27 Chapter Five Darío González: Faith and the Uncertainty of Historical Experience 38 Chapter Six Jerome (Yehuda) Gellman: Constancy of Faith? Symmetry and Asymmetry in Kierkegaard’s Leap of Faith 49 Chapter Seven Peter Šajda: Does Anti-Climacus’ Ethical-Religious Theory of Selfhood Imply a Discontinuity of the Self? 60 Chapter Eight Tamar Aylat-Yaguri: Being in Truth and Being a Jew: Kierkegaard’s View of Judaism 68 Chapter Nine Jon Stewart, Kierkegaard and Hegel on Faith and Knowledge 77 Notes 93 CONTRIBUTORS Tamar Aylat-Yaguri, Department of Philosophy, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, P.O.B 39040, Tel-Aviv 61390, Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Temporality and Historicality of Dasein at Martin Heidegger
    Sincronía ISSN: 1562-384X [email protected] Universidad de Guadalajara México Temporality and historicality of dasein at martin heidegger. Javorská, Andrea Temporality and historicality of dasein at martin heidegger. Sincronía, no. 69, 2016 Universidad de Guadalajara, México Available in: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=513852378011 This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. PDF generated from XML JATS4R by Redalyc Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative Filosofía Temporality and historicality of dasein at martin heidegger. Andrea Javorská [email protected] Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Eslovaquia Abstract: Analysis of Heidegger's work around historicity as an ontological problem through the existential analytic of Being Dasein. It seeks to find the significant structure of temporality represented by the historicity of Dasein. Keywords: Heidegger, Existentialism, Dasein, Temporality. Resumen: Análisis de la obra de Heidegger en tornoa la historicidad como problema ontológico a través de la analítica existencial del Ser Dasein. Se pretende encontrar la estructura significativa de temporalidad representada por la historicidad del Dasein. Palabras clave: Heidegger, Existencialismo, Dasein, Temporalidad. Sincronía, no. 69, 2016 Universidad de Guadalajara, México Martin Heidegger and his fundamental ontology shows that the question Received: 03 August 2015 Revised: 28 August 2015 of history belongs among the most fundamental questions of human Accepted:
    [Show full text]
  • Life Is Suffering: Thrownness, Duhkha, Gaps, and the Origin of Existential-Spiritual Needs for Information
    Roger Chabot The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada LIFE IS SUFFERING: THROWNNESS, DUHKHA, GAPS, AND THE ORIGIN OF EXISTENTIAL-SPIRITUAL NEEDS FOR INFORMATION Abstract: LIS scholars have spent considerable time investigating the incipient stages of information seeking: the so-called “information need” as well as a host of other motivators. A study of twenty New Kadampa Buddhists, whose experiences were collected through semi-structured interviews, sought to explore their spiritual information practices and their motivations for engaging in such behaviour. An analysis of these interviews suggests that Martin Heidegger’s concept of thrownness can be paralleled with Buddhism’s First Noble Truth and Dervin’s gap metaphor, all which identify existential-level faults as inherent to the human condition. This paper offers that it is these closely-related problematic elements of human existence that are the origin of spiritual and existential motivations for engaging in spiritual information practices. 1. Introduction A need for information can be understood as “the motivation people think and feel to seek information” (Cole, 2012, p. 3). LIS scholars have spent considerable time unravelling the complex web of needs, wants, desires, and states that have been used to describe the incipient stages of information seeking. In a similar manner, psychology of religion scholars sought to explain the origins of the motivations behind individuals’ pursuit of religious or spiritual paths, concluding that they satisfy one or more ‘fundamental’ or ‘basic’ human needs or motives (Kirkpatrick, 2013) and that they are a manner of “facilitat[ing] dealing with fundamental existential issues” (Oman, 2013, p. 36). Spiritual teachings, understood as information, play a large role in the everyday practice of spiritual paths and thus could be similarly motivated by these concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • Heidegger, Being and Time
    Heidegger's Being and Time 1 Karsten Harries Heidegger's Being and Time Seminar Notes Spring Semester 2014 Yale University Heidegger's Being and Time 2 Copyright Karsten Harries [email protected] Heidegger's Being and Time 3 Contents 1. Introduction 4 2. Ontology and Fundamental Ontology 16 3. Methodological Considerations 30 4. Being-in-the-World 43 5. The World 55 6. Who am I? 69 7. Understanding, Interpretation, Language 82 8. Care and Truth 96 9. The Entirety of Dasein 113 10. Conscience, Guilt, Resolve 128 11. Time and Subjectivity 145 12. History and the Hero 158 13. Conclusion 169 Heidegger's Being and Time 4 1. Introduction 1 In this seminar I shall be concerned with Heidegger's Being and Time. I shall refer to other works by Heidegger, but the discussion will center on Being and Time. In reading the book, some of you, especially those with a reading knowledge of German, may find the lectures of the twenties helpful, which have appeared now as volumes of the Gesamtausgabe. Many of these have by now been translated. I am thinking especially of GA 17 Einführung in die phänomenologische Forschung (1923/24); Introduction to Phenomenological Research, trans. Daniel O. Dahlstrom (Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 2005) GA 20 Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs (1925); History of the Concept of Time, trans. Theodore Kisiel (Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1985) GA 21 Logik. Die Frage nach der Wahrheit (1925/26). Logic: The Question of Truth, trans. Thomas Sheehan GA 24 Die Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie (1927); The Basic Problems of Phenomenology, trans.
    [Show full text]
  • Arendt's Critical Dialogue with Heidegger KOISHIKAWA Kazue
    Thinking and Transcendence: Arendt’s Critical Dialogue with Heidegger KOISHIKAWA Kazue Adjunct Faculty, University of Tsukuba Abstract : In the introduction to The Life of the Mind: Thinking (1977), Hannah Arendt explains that it was her observation of Adolf Eichmann’s “thoughtlessness” — his inability to think — at his trial in Jerusalem that led her to reexamine the human faculty of thinking, particularly in respect to its relation to moral judgment. Yet, it is not an easy task for her readers to follow how Arendt actually constructs her arguments on this topic in this text. The purpose of this paper is to delineate Arendt’s criticisms of Heidegger in order to articulate the characteristics of her own account of thinking in relation to morality. The paper first suggests the parallelism between Heidegger’s “wonder” and Arendt’s “love” as the beginning of philosophizing, i.e., thinking, and point out a peculiar circularity in Heidegger’s account of thinking. Secondly, the paper traces Arendt’s criticism of Heidegger’s account of thinking in §18 of the LM 1. Thirdly, the paper discusses why Arendt thinks Heidegger’s account of thinking is problematic by examining Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics (1929). Finally, based on the above analyses and discussions, the paper explores the nature of Arendt’s account of thinking to show how her conception of thinking provides a basis for moral judgment. In the introduction to The Life of the Mind: Thinking (1977), Hannah Arendt explains that it was her observation of Adolf Eichmann’s “thoughtlessness” — his inability to think — at his trial in Jerusalem that led her to reexamine the human faculty of thinking, particularly in respect to its relation to moral judgment.
    [Show full text]
  • Death in Martin Heidegger's Being and Time Mark A. Menaldo
    Death in Martin Heidegger’s Being and Time1 Mark A. Menaldo Forthcoming in “Political Philosophies of Aging, Dying, and Death”: Routledge (Taylor and Francis), with expected publication in Spring 2021 Edited by Erin A. Dolgoy, Kimberly Hurd Hale, and Bruce Peabody Martin Heidegger (1889–1976), who was born in Germany, is the 20th century's most influential philosopher.2 He is also a dedicated and unrepentant Nazi.3 He joined the Nazi party in 1933, the same year he assumed his position of Rector at Freiburg University. Although he gave up the rectorship in 1934 and began to distance himself from Nazism, he remained a member of the party until 1945. As the precursor to all postmodern thought, his ideas changed the way people approach philosophy, history, literature, and art. In our time, one cannot open a book on literary criticism, aesthetics, linguistics, or philosophy without reading echoes of Heidegger’s teaching. Heidegger’s thought is complicated, detailed, and often confusing. His writing is not only obscure, but he invents terminology that has no precedent in the history of Western philosophy. The challenges of reading Heidegger’s work are worsened when translated from the original German. There is much dispute among academics whether Heidegger’s philosophy centers on “a turn,” or a shift, from phenomenology to ontology, from human existence to Being.4 Heidegger’s later works are steeped in discussions of language, technology, art, and the dawn of a new spirituality. This chapter concerns Heidegger’s philosophy of death in Being and Time (1927), his magnum opus. In Being and Time, Heidegger advances the idea that authentic being toward death enables the person to experience genuine freedom and resolve.
    [Show full text]
  • Being and Time
    BEING AND TIME MARTIN HEIDEGGER Translated by John Macquarrie & Edward Robinson HARPER & ROW. PUBLISHERS New York. Hagerstown, San Francisco, London BEING AND TIME Copyright © 1962 by Harper & Row, Publishers, Incorporated. Printed in the United States of America. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or repro­ duced in any manner whatsoever without written pennission except in the case of brief quotations em­ bodied in critical articles and reviews. For infonna­ tion address Harper &: Row. Publishers, Incorporated. 10 East 53rd Street, New York, N. Y. 1002~ Translated from the Gennan Sein und Zeit (Seventh edition, Neomarius Verlag, Tiibingen) LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOG CARD NUMBER: 62-7289 INT. II Being and Time , 6. The Task oj Destroying the History of Ontology All research-and not least that which operates within the range of the central question of Being-is an ontical possibility of Dasein. Dasein's Being finds its meaning in temporality. But temporality is also the con­ --which makes historicality possible as a temporal kind of Being . which Dasein itself possesses, regardless of whether or how Dasein is an entity 'in time'. Historicality, as a determinate character, is prior to what is called "history" (world-historical historizing).l "Historicality" stands for the state of Being that is constitutive for 20 Dasein's 'historizing' as such; only on the basis of such 'historizing' is anything like 'world-history' possible or can anything belong historically to world-history. In its factical Being, any Dasein is as it already was, and it is 'what' it already was. It is its past, whether explicitly or not.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of Action and Responsibility in Heidegger's Early
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2009 The concept of ca tion and responsibility in Heidegger's early thought Christian Hans Pedersen University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons Scholar Commons Citation Pedersen, Christian Hans, "The oncc ept of action and responsibility in Heidegger's early thought" (2009). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/2135 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Concept of Action and Responsibility in Heidegger’s Early Thought by Christian Hans Pedersen A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Charles Guignon, Ph.D. Stephen Tuner, Ph.D. Joann Waugh, Ph.D. Rebecca Kukla, Ph.D. Ofelia Schutte, Ph.D. Date of Approval: April 3, 2009 Keywords: Heidegerrian, Being and Time , Authentic, Inauthentic, Conscience, Resoluteness © Copyright 2009, Christian Hans Pedersen TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS iii ABSTRACT iv PREFACE v Dissertation Introduction 1 Chapter 1. Developing a Heideggerian Conception of Action 15 Heidegger’s
    [Show full text]
  • Elusiveness of the Particular: Hannah Arendt, Walter Benjamin, And
    The Elusiveness of the Particular Exile, Statelessness, and Migration Seyla Benhabib Print publication date: 2018 Print ISBN-13: 9780691167251 Published to Princeton Scholarship Online: May 2019 DOI: 10.23943/princeton/9780691167251.001.0001 The Elusiveness of the Particular Hannah Arendt, Walter Benjamin, and Theodor Adorno Seyla Benhabib DOI:10.23943/princeton/9780691167251.003.0003 Abstract and Keywords This chapter examines the subterranean affinities between Hannah Arendt and Theodor Adorno, two of the most famous exiles of the last century, through the so-called “Benjaminian moment” present in their work. It is widely known that any consideration of Arendt and Adorno as thinkers who share intellectual affinities is likely to be thwarted by the profound dislike that Arendt seems to harbor toward Adorno. However, such psychological attitudes and personal animosities cannot guide the evaluations of a thinker's work. This is particularly true in the case of Arendt and Adorno, who both shared a profound sense that one must learn to think anew, beyond the traditional schools of philosophy and methodology—a concept that will be referred to as their Benjaminian moment. Keywords: Hannah Arendt, Theodor Adorno, Walter Benjamin, Benjaminian moment, exiles, think anew, traditional philosophy, traditional methodology Benjamin and the Chess Master Chess appears to have been not just a pastime for Walter Benjamin but a complex metaphor for thinking about history, progress, teleology, and the ironies of fate. The first thesis of Benjamin’s “Theses on the Philosophy of History,” composed in shock at the signing of the Hitler-Stalin pact, reads as follows: “The story is told of an automaton constructed in such a way that it could play a winning game of chess, answering each move of an opponent with a countermove.
    [Show full text]