DOCSLIB.ORG

Government Aviation Policy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Government Aviation Policy Agenda item no. 7(c) GATCOM 18 OCTOBER 2012 GOVERNMENT AVIATION POLICY REPORT BY SECRETARIAT SUMMARY This report provides an update on the new aviation ministerial team and recent developments on the preparation of the Government’s aviation policy framework. It also considers the DfT’s consultation on the draft Aviation Policy Framework and sets out for consideration GATCOM’s suggested response. GATCOM is asked to approve the response appended to this report. 1. BACKGROUND 1.1 In March 2011 the Government published its Scoping Document “Developing a Sustainable Framework for UK Aviation”. The objective of this document was to identify the issues and accrue evidence to inform the development of draft framework for consultation. 1.2 Following the scoping document exercise the DfT produced a draft Aviation Policy Framework (APF) for consultation which was published in July 2012. The draft APF sets out the Government’s developing policy position in relation to a number of issues, but particularly aviation’s contribution to economy, noise, CO2 and community engagement. The consultation runs until 31 October. 3. During this time the All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on Aviation held a short Inquiry into how Government policy can help to maintain and enhance the UK aviation industry’s international competitiveness and its contribution to the economy. Its report was published in August and can be found on the UKACCs website at: http://www.ukaccs.info/aapgreport0812.pdf. 1.3 Since the launch of the draft APF consultation the Prime Minister carried out his first major Cabinet reshuffle and a new Ministerial team is now in place (see section 2 below). A number of other developments have since followed the Cabinet reshuffle, including the establishment of an Independent Commission on Aviation Connectivity, and these are summarised below. 1.4 The DfT has confirmed that the draft APF remains an important document and will set the parameters within which the Commission will consider the airport capacity issue and make recommendations. GATCOM is asked to consider the suggested draft response to the consultation appended to this report. 2. CABINET RESHUFFLE INSOFAR AS IT RELATES TO DFT MINISTERS 2.1 On 4 September, the Prime Minster carried out his first major reshuffle of his cabinet making 13 changes in total. The Secretary of State for Transport is now the Rt. Hon. Patrick McLoughlin MP1 with: • Rt. Hon. Simon Burns MP - Minister of State for Transport • Norman Baker MP – Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport 1 Conservative MP for Derbyshire Dale, former Chief Whip and was Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State in 1989, and served in the Department for Transport until 1992 • Stephen Hammond - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport The aviation portfolio currently remains with the Minster for State, Rt. Hon Simon Burns. 3. RECENT ACTIVITY ON DEVELOPING THE NATIONAL AVIATION POLICY Independent Commission on Aviation Connectivity 3.1 The Government believes that maintaining the UK’s status as a leading global aviation hub is fundamental to the UK’s long term international competitiveness. But the Government is also mindful of the need to take full account of the social, environmental and other impacts of any expansion in airport capacity. 3.2 Recognising the difficult debate around future runway capacity in the South East and the fact that Heathrow the UK’s largest and only hub airport is already operating at capacity, Gatwick will be full early in the next decade, and spare capacity at Stansted is forecast to run out in the early 2030s, the Government announced that an Independent Commission on Aviation Connectivity would be set up. 3.3 The Government has asked Sir Howard Davies2 to chair the Commission which will identify and recommend options for maintaining the UK’s status as an international hub for aviation. 3.4 The Commission will: • examine the scale and timing of any requirement for additional capacity to maintain the UK’s position as Europe’s most important aviation hub • identify and evaluate how any need for additional capacity should be met in the short-, medium- and long-term 3.5 The Commission will compile an interim report for ministers no later than the end of 2013 setting out its assessment of the evidence on the nature, scale and timing of the steps needed to maintain the UK’s global hub status. This preliminary report will recommend immediate actions to improve the use of existing runway capacity in the next five years – consistent with credible long-term options. 3.6 The Commission will then publish by the summer of 2015 a final report, for consideration by both the Government and the Opposition. This will provide an assessment of the options for meeting the UK’s international connectivity needs, including their economic, social and environmental impact as well as its recommendation(s) for the optimum approach to meeting any need. 3.7 The final report will also provide the context and material to help the Government prepare a National Policy Statement on aviation for planning purposes. The Government has stressed that any decision on new capacity at any existing airport or the development of new facilities will be taken by the next administration post 2015. 3.8 Further details on the full membership of the Commission and its terms of reference are to be issued shortly. The Department for Transport’s representative, Tim May, has been asked to provide an update at the meeting. Call for Evidence on UK International Air Connectivity 3.9 In the DfT’s draft aviation policy framework it states that the Government intends to publish later this year a Call for Evidence on maintaining the UK’s international aviation connectivity with a focus on both the medium and long term. The Call for Evidence was due to be issued in September but in view of the Government’s decision to set up an Independent Commission, the publication has been delayed. It is likely that the 2 Sir Howard Davies - a former deputy governor of the Bank of England and director of the London School of Economics Independent Commission will as part of its work undertake the Call for Evidence. Tim May, DfT, will provide an update at the meeting. House of Commons Transport Committee 3.10 The House of Commons’ Transport Committee has also launched its own Inquiry into airport capacity in the UK. On 13 September, the terms of reference for the Committee’s Inquiry were published. More detail about this Inquiry is considered at agenda item no. 7(d). London Mayor Aviation Inquiry 3.11 London Mayor, Boris Johnson, announced earlier this month that he was launching an Inquiry into UK airport capacity which is expected to be completed two years earlier than the Independent Commission’s Inquiry. As members will be aware, the London Mayor favours a new hub airport in the Thames Estuary over a third runway at London Heathrow. 4. DFT CONSULTATION ON THE DRAFT AVIATION POLICY FRAMEWORK 4.1 The Government has split its consideration of its future aviation/airports policy in two parts. The first part is the draft APF. This looks at issues such as climate change, noise and other environmental impacts, and collaboration between organisations. The consultation document sets out a high-level strategy, including the Government’s overall objectives for aviation and its policies to achieve those objectives. The Government seeks views and information relating to a set of questions. These are presented in the Appendix to this report, together with the draft responses to the questions. 4.2 The second part of the Government’s consideration will focus on future airport capacity. Comments on airport capacity are outside the scope of the current consultation, which the Government intends to address through the newly announced Independent Commission. 4.3 The draft APF is underpinned by two core principles: collaboration: the Government believes that by working together with the industry, regulators, experts, local communities and others at all levels – international, national and local – it will be better able to identify workable solutions to challenges and share the benefits of aviation in a fairer way than in the past. [One of the suggested ways of achieving this is through strengthening the role of airport consultative committees]; and transparency: the Government states that it is crucial, in facilitating improved collaboration, to have clear and independent information and processes in place. 4.4 The consultation questions are set out in the Appendix, together with the draft responses which take into account the advice of GATCOM’s Independent Technical Adviser, the views received from members and the views of the GATCOM Steering Group. Members will recall that a copy of the suggested draft response was emailed to all GATCOM members on 20 September 2012 with a request that any views be forwarded to the Secretariat so that they can be reported to and taken into account by the Steering Group. GATCOM is asked to consider the revised draft response (significant revisions shown in bold italics) set out in the Appendix. 4.5 As part of the DfT’s consultation a number of stakeholders engagement sessions have been arranged. The Secretariat attended the stakeholder event on 9 October targeted specifically at local authority stakeholders and airport consultative committees. The DfT also held separate events for industry, business and environmental stakeholders. 4.6 The DfT also held a specific event to discuss technical aspects of the draft APF on 8 October which was attended by GATCOM’s lead member for noise, Alan Jones, and GATCOM’s Independent Technical Adviser, Ros Howell. 4.7 In respect of the night flights regime at the three London airports, it was the Government’s intention to launch Stage 1 of the consultation for the next regime this Autumn.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FDN-274688 Disclosure
    FDN-274688 Disclosure MP Total Adam Afriyie 5 Adam Holloway 4 Adrian Bailey 7 Alan Campbell 3 Alan Duncan 2 Alan Haselhurst 5 Alan Johnson 5 Alan Meale 2 Alan Whitehead 1 Alasdair McDonnell 1 Albert Owen 5 Alberto Costa 7 Alec Shelbrooke 3 Alex Chalk 6 Alex Cunningham 1 Alex Salmond 2 Alison McGovern 2 Alison Thewliss 1 Alistair Burt 6 Alistair Carmichael 1 Alok Sharma 4 Alun Cairns 3 Amanda Solloway 1 Amber Rudd 10 Andrea Jenkyns 9 Andrea Leadsom 3 Andrew Bingham 6 Andrew Bridgen 1 Andrew Griffiths 4 Andrew Gwynne 2 Andrew Jones 1 Andrew Mitchell 9 Andrew Murrison 4 Andrew Percy 4 Andrew Rosindell 4 Andrew Selous 10 Andrew Smith 5 Andrew Stephenson 4 Andrew Turner 3 Andrew Tyrie 8 Andy Burnham 1 Andy McDonald 2 Andy Slaughter 8 FDN-274688 Disclosure Angela Crawley 3 Angela Eagle 3 Angela Rayner 7 Angela Smith 3 Angela Watkinson 1 Angus MacNeil 1 Ann Clwyd 3 Ann Coffey 5 Anna Soubry 1 Anna Turley 6 Anne Main 4 Anne McLaughlin 3 Anne Milton 4 Anne-Marie Morris 1 Anne-Marie Trevelyan 3 Antoinette Sandbach 1 Barry Gardiner 9 Barry Sheerman 3 Ben Bradshaw 6 Ben Gummer 3 Ben Howlett 2 Ben Wallace 8 Bernard Jenkin 45 Bill Wiggin 4 Bob Blackman 3 Bob Stewart 4 Boris Johnson 5 Brandon Lewis 1 Brendan O'Hara 5 Bridget Phillipson 2 Byron Davies 1 Callum McCaig 6 Calum Kerr 3 Carol Monaghan 6 Caroline Ansell 4 Caroline Dinenage 4 Caroline Flint 2 Caroline Johnson 4 Caroline Lucas 7 Caroline Nokes 2 Caroline Spelman 3 Carolyn Harris 3 Cat Smith 4 Catherine McKinnell 1 FDN-274688 Disclosure Catherine West 7 Charles Walker 8 Charlie Elphicke 7 Charlotte
    [Show full text]
  • Liver Disease
    LIVER DISEASE: TO da Y ’ S COMP la C E NCY , TOMO rr OW ’ S C A T as T R OPH E The All-Party Parliamentary Hepatology Group (APPHG) Inquiry into Improving Outcomes in Liver Disease March 2014 About the All-Party Parliamentary Hepatology Group (APPHG) The APPHG is a group of cross-party MPs and Peers with an interest in liver disease. Its purpose is “to promote discussion of hepatology, including viral hepatitis and related public health issues, and to raise matters of concern with, and make representations to, government and other policy makers”. The Group is co-chaired by David Amess MP and Baroness Masham of Ilton. Jason McCartney MP and Virendra Sharma MP are vice-chairs of the group. The Hepatitis C Trust provides secretariat support to the group, helping to arrange meetings and to conduct research and write reports. The APPGH Inquiry Committee The APPHG Inquiry into Improving Outcomes from Liver Disease was chaired by David Amess MP, supported by Baroness Masham and the chief executives of two patient organisations, Charles Gore of The Hepatitis C Trust and Andrew Langford of the British Liver Trust. The analysis of the evidence and writing of the report was supported by Jane Cox of The Hepatitis C Trust. Acknowledgements The APPHG would like to thank all of the organisations and individuals who submitted written evidence to this Inquiry, or who took part in the oral evidence sessions. We are delighted with the depth and breadth of evidence submitted and for the participation of such a wide variety of key organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates House of Commons Official Report General Committees
    PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT GENERAL COMMITTEES Public Bill Committee HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE (RE-COMMITTED) BILL Eighth Sitting Thursday 7 July 2011 (Afternoon) CONTENTS Clause 55 agreed to. Schedule 8 agreed to. Clauses 56, 58, 59 and 63 agreed to, some with amendments. Adjourned till Tuesday 12 July at half-past Ten o’clock. PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS LONDON – THE STATIONERY OFFICE LIMITED £5·00 PBC (Bill 177) 2010 - 2012 Members who wish to have copies of the Official Report of Proceedings in General Committees sent to them are requested to give notice to that effect at the Vote Office. No proofs can be supplied. Corrigenda slips may be published with Bound Volume editions. Corrigenda that Members suggest should be clearly marked in a copy of the report—not telephoned—and must be received in the Editor’s Room, House of Commons, not later than Monday 11 July 2011 STRICT ADHERENCE TO THIS ARRANGEMENT WILL GREATLY FACILITATE THE PROMPT PUBLICATION OF THE BOUND VOLUMES OF PROCEEDINGS IN GENERAL COMMITTEES © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2011 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through The National Archives website at www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/our-services/parliamentary-licence-information.htm Enquiries to The National Archives, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 331 Public Bill Committee7 JULY 2011 Health and Social Care 332 (Re-committed) Bill The Committee consisted of the following Members: Chairs: †MR ROGER GALE,MR MIKE HANCOCK,MR JIM HOOD,DR WILLIAM MCCREA † Abrahams, Debbie (Oldham East and Saddleworth) † Morris, Grahame M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oxford Dictionary of New Words: a Popular Guide to Words in the News
    The Oxford Dictionary of New Words: A popular guide to words in the news PREFACE Preface This is the first dictionary entirely devoted to new words and meanings to have been published by the Oxford University Press. It follows in the tradition of the Supplement to the Oxford English Dictionary in attempting to record the history of some recent additions to the language, but, unlike the Supplement, it is necessarily very selective in the words, phrases, and meanings whose stories it sets out to tell and it stands as an independent work, unrelated (except in the resources it draws upon) to the Oxford English Dictionary. The aim of the Oxford Dictionary of New Words is to provide an informative and readable guide to about two thousand high-profile words and phrases which have been in the news during the past decade; rather than simply defining these words (as dictionaries of new words have tended to do in the past), it also explains their derivation and the events which brought them to prominence, illustrated by examples of their use in journalism and fiction. In order to do this, it draws on the published and unpublished resources of the Oxford English Dictionary, the research that is routinely carried out in preparing new entries for that work, and the word-files and databases of the Oxford Dictionary Department. What is a new word? This, of course, is a question which can never be answered satisfactorily, any more than one can answer the question "How long is a piece of string?" It is a commonplace to point out that the language is a constantly changing resource, growing in some areas and shrinking in others from day to day.
    [Show full text]
  • Holders of Ministerial Office in the Conservative Governments 1979-1997
    Holders of Ministerial Office in the Conservative Governments 1979-1997 Parliamentary Information List Standard Note: SN/PC/04657 Last updated: 11 March 2008 Author: Department of Information Services All efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of this data. Nevertheless the complexity of Ministerial appointments, changes in the machinery of government and the very large number of Ministerial changes between 1979 and 1997 mean that there may be some omissions from this list. Where an individual was a Minister at the time of the May 1997 general election the end of his/her term of office has been given as 2 May. Finally, where possible the exact dates of service have been given although when this information was unavailable only the month is given. The Parliamentary Information List series covers various topics relating to Parliament; they include Bills, Committees, Constitution, Debates, Divisions, The House of Commons, Parliament and procedure. Also available: Research papers – impartial briefings on major bills and other topics of public and parliamentary concern, available as printed documents and on the Intranet and Internet. Standard notes – a selection of less formal briefings, often produced in response to frequently asked questions, are accessible via the Internet. Guides to Parliament – The House of Commons Information Office answers enquiries on the work, history and membership of the House of Commons. It also produces a range of publications about the House which are available for free in hard copy on request Education web site – a web site for children and schools with information and activities about Parliament. Any comments or corrections to the lists would be gratefully received and should be sent to: Parliamentary Information Lists Editor, Parliament & Constitution Centre, House of Commons, London SW1A OAA.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Tuesday Volume 600 20 October 2015 No. 53 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 20 October 2015 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2015 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 793 20 OCTOBER 2015 794 healthcare. Then there are those who are coming from House of Commons countries where, frankly, life is very hard, and we have to work with those countries of origin to ensure economic Tuesday 20 October 2015 development that gives everybody a chance to do something that gives them an incentive and a reason to want to stay. The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock Sir Simon Burns: Does my right hon. Friend agree PRAYERS that, important as it is to address the long-term causes of mass migration from outside the EU, it is equally critical to address the problems of mass migration [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] within the EU caused by the artificial pull factor of our welfare system? Oral Answers to Questions Mr Hammond: I agree. As I said in my opening response, that is where we are focused—dealing with the very generous access to benefits and public services that acts as a distortion in the labour market, and which FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH OFFICE encourages people to come to the UK in anticipation of net earnings far higher than the wages they could otherwise earn. The Secretary of State was asked— Mass Migration Wendy Morton: Does my right hon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Air League Newsletter
    The Air League Newsletter Issue 4: July/August 2013 ABOVE - The British Airways A380 dominates the static aircraft park towering over the Eurocopter line up at the recent Paris Air Show. (Editor’s photo) CIVIL AEROSPACE BOOMING BUT DEFENCE IN DECLINE he 2013 Paris Air Show may have been memorable for its dramatic thunderstorms, but the show demonstrated once again that civil aerospace is booming, with delivery backlogs reaching up to seven years ahead and worth tens of $billions. Prospects for new defence programmes, however, are looking Tless positive, as companies struggle to maintain momentum in the face of shrinking budgets, in real terms, and stretched-out procurement schedules. All are campaigning hard to increase exports to try and compensate for falling domestic military orders. The first flight of the new Airbus A350, on the eve of the advanced cockpit. It also announced launch orders and show, highlighted the remarkable upsurge in the civil sector commitments for 365 aircraft. which has seen contracts signed for hundreds of aircraft in recent weeks. This is excellent news for Rolls-Royce and Much confusion reigns in the European market for Airbus UK. New show announcements covered firm sales Remotely Piloted Air Systems, or as they are more widely and commitments for 630 Airbus and 342 Boeing aircraft. known, UAVs. Political commitment seems to have The big two planemakers simply can’t make their products evaporated during the three years since the signing of an quick enough to satisfy airline growth and replacement Anglo-French agreement to co-develop a Medium Altitude needs, and this in turn is placing great strains right down Long Endurance (MALE) UAV known as Telemos, and the supply chain.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Huddersfield Repository
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Huddersfield Repository University of Huddersfield Repository Hill, Michael The Parliamentary Conservative Party: The leadership elections of William Hague and Iain Duncan Smith Original Citation Hill, Michael (2007) The Parliamentary Conservative Party: The leadership elections of William Hague and Iain Duncan Smith. Doctoral thesis, University of Huddersfield. This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/741/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ The Parliamentary Conservative Party: The Leadership Elections of William Hague and Iain Duncan Smith Michael Hill A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Huddersfield Dedication This thesis is dedicated to the memory of my father, David Leyland Hill.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics Revision Guide Uk Government and Politics
    POLITICS REVISION GUIDE UK GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS Contents UK Politics Topic 1- Democracy and Participation • Key ideas in Politics o What is Politics? o What is power? o What is authority? • Forms and functions of democracy? • Development of the franchise • Participation • Is there a participation crisis? • Rights and Responsibilities • Is the UK a liberal democracy? • How do different groups vote? • Explaining voter choice • Election case studies Topic 2- Elections and Direct Democracy • Functions of elections • Elections in the UK • Types of electoral systems • Positives and negatives of different electoral systems • Referendums • Types of referendums • Should we use more referendums? Topic 3- Political Parties • Introduction and roles of political parties • Ideologies and Party Systems • Conservatives • Labour • Minor Parties • Ideological Convergence • Party Finance • Are parties still relevant? Topic 4- Pressure Groups • What are pressure groups? • Functions of pressure groups • Why are pressure groups important? • Why do people join pressure groups and why have they increased in number? • Classifying pressure groups • Pressure group methods • Direct Action • Factors influencing success • Pressure groups and pluralism • Are pressure groups good for democracy? Topic 5- The European Union • What is the EU? • Aims of the EU? • How has the UK seen the EU? • Key Institutions • Is there a democratic deficit? • EU Policy-making • The impact of the EU on UK politics UK Government Topic 1- The Constitution • Feature of the UK constitution
    [Show full text]
  • Report. Post-Euref Poll. Why Leave Won.Latest Draft
    Disbanding the tribes: What the referendum told us about Britain (and what it didn’t) Sunder Katwala, Jill Rutter and Steve Ballinger British Future July 2016 1. Introduction: Why Leave Won On 23rd June 2016, Britain voted to leave the European Union, by 17,410,742 votes to 16,141,241. It was a closely contested referendum campaign. Even as the polls closed, nobody could be sure which way the decision would go. Leave won a narrow but decisive victory – yet could easily have narrowly lost the referendum too. It was a referendum where the campaigns mattered. A campaign that ended in a narrow 52% to 48% verdict could easily have resulted in a 49% to 51% decision the other way around. The political consequences would have been very different, in terms of our membership of the European Union, though the challenges of responding to the economic, political and social divides illuminated by the referendum would have been pretty similar. Indeed, if you had told those leading either campaign, a month before polling day, that there would be over 16 million votes for Remain, both sides would have guessed that that would be enough to deliver a narrow victory to stay in. That would have been the case, had turnout remained similar to the 65% level of the General Election. But almost three million more people cast a vote in the 2016 referendum than the General Election a year earlier, boosting turnout to 72%, the strongest level of participation in a UK-wide vote since 1992. This expanded electorate was crucial to Leave’s million-plus vote margin of victory - contrary to prevailing assumptions about how turnout could affect the outcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Invest, Don't Cut the Predicted Impact of Government Policy on Funding For
    Invest, Don’t Cut The predicted impact of Government policy on funding for schools and academies by 2020 A report by NUT and ATL This report presents findings from an NUT / ATL interactive website which demonstrates the likely impact on schools and academies of the Government’s current school funding policies and its plan to redistribute existing funding between schools in England - www.schoolcuts.org.uk The interactive website allows users to access detailed predictions for every school’s funding per pupil in real terms, as affected by the Government’s proposal to implement a new funding formula for schools alongside a freeze in funding per pupil and cost increases imposed by Government. The predictions are based on publicly available government data and the most robustly constructed proposed funding formula for schools currently available. With schools already struggling to cope, the Government plans what the Institute for Fiscal Studies has described as the largest real terms cut in school funding in a generation. We know that children are already suffering – class sizes are rising, curriculum choices are being cut, pupils with special educational needs and disabilities are losing vital support and school staff are losing their jobs. Instead of investing more money in education to address the funding shortages already hitting schools and academies, the Government plans only to move existing money around the country through a new funding formula. For every school which gains from this, others will lose – and almost every school will lose when the impact of inflation and other cost increases, against which the funding freeze offers no protection, are also taken into account.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark Garnett
    The journal of the Conservative History Group | Summer 2003 | £7.50 Conservative History Journal DAVID WILLETTS THE CONSERVATIVES IN OPPOSITION: LESSONS FROM HISTORY JOHN CHARMLEY THE CONSERVATIVE TRADITION IN FOREIGN POLICY NICHOLAS HILLMAN ENOCH POWELL’S PHILIP COWLEY AND VITAL STATISTICS MATTHEW BAILEY CHOOSING THE LADY: ANDREW LOWNIE ANOTHER LOOK ON THE JOHN BUCHAN: 1975 LEADERSHIP CONSERVATIVE CONTEST POLITICIAN BALDWIN Ian Pendlington on the original quiet man Plus: Mark Garnett on the art of political biography, Leslie Mutch on Lord MacKay of Ardbrechnish, Sheila Moore on Rab Butler and the suicide act, Memories of Alan Clark, how the Tory party got that name, book reviews, future events and research in progress Contents Conservative History Journal The Conservative History Journal is published twice Contents yearly by the Conservative History Group ISSN 14798026 Welcome to the Conservative History Journal 1 Joint Editors: John Barnes and Iain Dale John Barnes and Iain Dale Advertisements About the Conservative History Group 2 To advertise in the next issue call Iain Dale on 07768 254690 Research in Progress 3 Editorial/Correspondence Enoch Powell’s Vital Statistics 4 Contributions to the Journal – letters, articles and Nicholas Hillman book reviews are invited. The Journal is a refereed publication; all articles submitted will be reviewed The Conservative Tradition in Foreign Policy 6 and publication is not guaranteed. Contributions John Charmley should be emailed or posted to the addresses below. All articles remain copyright © their authors John Buchan, Conservative Politician 8 Andrew Lownie Subscriptions/Membership An annual subscription to the Conservative History A Farewell to Biography 10 Group costs £15.
    [Show full text]