DOCSLIB.ORG

A-Level Politics Bridging Course

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A-Level Politics Bridging Course A-Level Politics Bridging Course Welcome to A-Level Politics! In this age of widespread misinformation and political polarisation, there has never been a better time to study in Politics. Over the two year course you will study and compare politics in the UK and US as well as learning about the development of dominant political ideas. Meet the team: If you have any questions about A-Level Politics, please don’t hesitate to send us a question via email. Mr Crabtree j.crabtree@huntington- ed.org.uk Mrs Wood k.wood@huntington- ed.org.uk A-Level Politics – Bridging Course The aim of this course is to give you a taster of some of the main ideas and processes involved with UK Politics. 1) Keeping on top of the news - One of the most important aspects of the course will be following politics in the news and being able to apply news stories to the topics we cover. Therefore, one really useful activity would be to keep a regular weekly journal of UK news stories using the resource provided. 2) 2019 UK General Election case study – In 2019, UK voters went to the polls in surprise ‘snap election’. We will make regular reference to this election over the course of the A-Level. Follow the instructions on the sheet to complete your case study and gain a good background understanding to the election. 3) ‘Left or Right’ – Visit https://uk.isidewith.com/ Take the quiz to find out more about your own political opinions. 4) What do UK parties stand for? In the build up to the 2019 election, the political parties wrote manifestoes – a list of things they would promise to deliver if elected in to government. Follow the instructions on the sheet and gain a good background knowledge to the kind of things each party currently stands for. 5) Who’s who? Use the following link to create profiles of the main members of Boris Johnson’s cabinet: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-49043973 Recommended resources: A-Level Politics – Recommended reading and resources Online news: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news https://www.theguardian.com/uk https://www.independent.co.uk/ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/ TV: Channel 4 News – Channel 4 – Monday-Friday 7pm Question Time – BBC ONE – Thursday 10:45pm Andrew Marr – BBC ONE – Sunday 9am Podcasts: The A-Level Politics Show (Spotify) Keeping on top of the news Record interesting headlines and then make a summary of the main political news stories of the week. Look out for new ideas suggested by the prime minister and the government including in relation to the current public health crisis, responses and ideas from other UK political parties, protests and evidence of people participating in politics, findings from polls and surveys and the way the media shapes UK politics. It is also worth keeping on top of the main headlines coming out of the USA, as we will be studying US politics in Y13. Here are some hand websites to get you started. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news https://www.theguardian.com/uk https://www.independent.co.uk/ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/ The first 15-20 minutes of the Andrew Marr show (available on BBC iPlayer) are also well worth watching as the week’s main political news stories are analysed. Date Headline Summary Date Headline Summary Case study: 2019 UK General Election In 2019, UK voters went to the polls in surprise ‘snap election’. We will make regular reference to this election over the course of the A-Level. Use the following websites to add detailed notes to the mind-map on the following page. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2019/results https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/how-britain-voted-2019-election https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/dec/13/five-reasons-why-labour-lost- the-election https://www.vox.com/world/2019/12/13/21004755/uk-election-2019-jeremy- corbyn-labour-defeat What to look out for: Results: Make a note of the main results of the election – you could think about the popular vote as well as the number of seats won in parliament Turnout: How many people turned out and voted. – you could analyse this by different groups such as by age, gender and race etc. Campaigning: What sort of policies did each party put forward? How successfully did they present their ideas? Context: What were the big political issues in the run up to the election which may have impacted the way people voted? How were the different party leaders being presented in the media? Voting behaviour: How and why did different groups of people vote the way they did? What do UK political parties stand for? Use https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50291676 to find out what the different political parties stood for in the build up to the 2019 General Election. Add key details to the grid. Economic policy Public services Climate change Other and welfare Conservatives Labour Lib Dems Economic policy Public services Climate change Other and welfare SNP Green Brexit party .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • From Public Service Broadcasting to Public Service Media Gregory Ferrell Lowe & Jo Bardoel (Eds.)
    From Public Service Broadcasting to Public Service Media Gregory Ferrell Lowe & Jo Bardoel (eds.) RIPE @ 2007 NORDICOM From Public Service Broadcasting to Public Service Media From Public Service Broadcasting to Public Service Media Gregory Ferrell Lowe & Jo Bardoel (eds.) NORDICOM From Public Service Broadcasting to Public Service Media RIPE@2007 Gregory Ferrell Lowe & Jo Bardoel (eds.) © Editorial matters and selections, the editors; articles, individual con- tributors; Nordicom ISBN 978-91-89471-53-5 Published by: Nordicom Göteborg University Box 713 SE 405 30 GÖTEBORG Sweden Cover by: Roger Palmqvist Cover photo by: Arja Lento Printed by: Livréna AB, Kungälv, Sweden, 2007 Environmental certification according to ISO 14001 Contents Preface 7 Jo Bardoel and Gregory Ferrell Lowe From Public Service Broadcasting to Public Service Media. The Core Challenge 9 PSM platforms: POLICY & strategY Karol Jakubowicz Public Service Broadcasting in the 21st Century. What Chance for a New Beginning? 29 Hallvard Moe Commercial Services, Enclosure and Legitimacy. Comparing Contexts and Strategies for PSM Funding and Development 51 Andra Leurdijk Public Service Media Dilemmas and Regulation in a Converging Media Landscape 71 Steven Barnett Can the Public Service Broadcaster Survive? Renewal and Compromise in the New BBC Charter 87 Richard van der Wurff Focus on Audiences. Public Service Media in the Market Place 105 Teemu Palokangas The Public Service Entertainment Mission. From Historic Periphery to Contemporary Core 119 PSM PROGRAMMES: strategY & tacticS Yngvar Kjus Ideals and Complications in Audience Participation for PSM. Open Up or Hold Back? 135 Brian McNair Current Affairs in British Public Service Broadcasting. Challenges and Opportunities 151 Irene Costera Meijer ‘Checking, Snacking and Bodysnatching’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journey Metaphor in Mediatized Political Discourse Cognitive And
    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS SAPIENTIAE, PHILOLOGICA, 7, 2 (2015) 7–20 DOI: 10.1515/ausp-2015-0043 The Journey Metaphor in Mediatized Political Discourse Cognitive and Critical Perspectives Gyula DÁVID, Bálint Péter FURKÓ Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary Department of English Linguistics [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. The present paper will analyse manifestations of the journey metaphor from a critical discourse analytical perspective in order to observe how the journey metaphor is used as a discourse strategy in mediatized political speeches and interviews whereby political actors manipulate the second-frame interactional participants (the audience) into sharing a (spurious) sense of solidarity with them. There are three hypotheses that will be tested in the course of the analysis: the first is that a wide-variety of real- journey elements are exploited for the political metaphor of journey, and there is a concrete correspondence between journey vehicles and political scenarios. The second hypothesis is that journey metaphors that are used in political speeches, celebrity interviews and confrontational political interviews are of different types and complexity. The third hypothesis is that the manipulative intent behind the use of metaphors is exposed in the latter types of mediatized political discourse to varying degrees as a result of the different degrees of pragmatic accountability adhered to in the two subgenres. We argue that the first two hypotheses are confirmed on the basis of the qualitative analysis presented in the paper, whereas the third hypothesis is not borne out by the data. Keywords: journey metaphor, image schemata, political speeches, political interviews 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prime Ministerial Debates of 2010: Evidence, Evaluation and Some Recommendations
    Coleman cover_Layout 1 27/01/2011 11:26 Page 1 Stephen Coleman RISJ REUTERS REUTERS CHALLENGES INSTITUTE for the STUDY of INSTITUTE for the JOURNALISM CHALLENGES STUDY of JOURNALISM Contributors | Jay G. Blumler in the Living Room Leaders is study explores the first-ever British televised prime Stephen Coleman Leaders in the Living Room ministerial debates with a view to understanding how they were William H. Dutton received by the public; how they were depicted in the press and on Andrew Shipley The Prime Ministerial Debates of 2010: television; and how far they registered online. Rather than asking Fabro Steibel 'who won?', the aim was to understand how far the debates Michael Thelwall Evidence, Evaluation and Some Recommendations contributed to an improved democratic relationship between politicians and citizens. Based on a range of research methods, and involving researchers from three universities, this study contributes innovatively to the global literature on debates research. Edited by Stephen Coleman “Leaders in the Living Room sets out compelling evidence that the election debates energised young voters, better informed those normally less interested in politics and improved knowledge of party policies for a significant majority of the electorate. To those who still doubt whether they were beneficial, the authors have come back with a telling answer: that people felt able to act as more confident citizens because of the debates. e research has captured that sense of engagement in the campaign which the debates generated and will make it much harder to argue that they should not become a permanent feature of British elections and democracy.” Ric Bailey BBC Chief Political Adviser and BBC debate negotiator “A path breaking study that has much to teach scholars and students of debates.” Kathleen Hall Jamieson Director, Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania Stephen Coleman is Professor of Political Communication at the Institute of Communications Studies, University of Leeds.
    [Show full text]
  • BBC Public Complaints Responses 2016.Pdf
    Archived BBC public responses to complaints 2016 BBC News, Coverage of the death of David Bowie, 12 January 2016 Complaint We received complaints from viewers and listeners who felt there was too much coverage of David Bowie’s death during BBC News programmes and bulletins. Response from BBC News David Bowie was by common consent one of our greatest pop stars who attracted a global following. He appealed across the ages and was one of the most influential musicians of his time. His death was both sudden and unexpected, his illness not revealed to anyone but a tight circle of friends. Our coverage tried to reflect his stature as a musician whose capacity for invention changed the shape of the industry, and the shock at his death around the world. Question Time, BBC One, 14 January 2016 Complaint We received complaints from viewers who felt the panel had a right wing bias. Response from Question Time Over the course of a series Question Time aims to achieve balance and hear from a range of voices. Each programme usually consists of one senior politician from both the Labour and Conservative party, as well as representatives from other political parties. The rest of the panel is made of political commentators, journalists, and other public figures that add a different perspective and represent a range of viewpoints across the series. We also aim to ensure that each episode has a divergent and broad range of views from the panel on the likely topics that our audience wish to raise. David Dimbleby moderates the debate to ensure panellists are given the opportunity to make their views known in a fair way.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Complaints Unit (ECU)
    Complaints to the BBC This fortnightly report for the BBC complaints service1 shows for the periods covered: the number of complaints about programmes and those which received more than 1002 at Stage 1 (Audience Services); findings of subsequent investigations made at Stage 2 (by the Executive Complaints Unit)3; the percentage of all complaints dealt with within the target periods for each stage. NB: Figures include, but are not limited to, editorial complaints, and are not comparable with complaint figures published by Ofcom about other broadcasters (which are calculated on a different basis). The number of complaints received is not an indication of how serious an issue is. Stage 1 complaints Between 22 July 2019 – 4 August, BBC Audience Services (Stage 1) received a total of 4,796 complaints about programmes. 7,774 complaints in total were received at Stage 1. No individual BBC programmes received more than 1002complaints during this period. 94% of all complaints dealt with between 22 July – 4 August 2019 received an initial response within the stage 1 target period of 10 working days. Recent BBC public responses to significant complaints at Stage 1 are published at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/complaints/complaint/ Stage 2 complaints – Executive Complaints Unit (ECU) The Executive Complaints Unit made 22 findings at Stage 2 between 22 July – 4 August 2019. Further information on complaints which were upheld or resolved after investigation by the ECU can be found here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/complaints/comp-reports/ecu/ Programme Service Date of Issue Outcome Transmission Climate Change: The BBC One 18/04/2019 Inaccurate on the Not upheld Facts causes and consequences of climate change x2 5 Live Breakfast Radio 5 Live 21/03/2019 Inaccurate to say Not upheld sexuality is genetic 1 Full details of the service are in the BBC Complaints Framework and Procedures document.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BBC and BREXIT
    THE BBC and BREXIT The ‘Today’ Programme’s Coverage of the UK General Election 6 November – 11 December 2019 1 Contents SUMMARY .....................................................................................................................................................3 PART ONE: MONITORING STATISTICS..................................................................................................6 1.1 OVERVIEW – THE BBC, THE ROYAL CHARTER AND OFCOM ......................................................6 1.2 THE POLITICAL BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................... 13 1.3 MAIN UK PARTIES IN THE 2019 GENERAL ELECTION ................................................................ 15 1.4 TODAY’S EU COVERAGE .................................................................................................................. 24 1.5 SPEAKERS AND CODING ................................................................................................................. 24 1.6 CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................................... 31 PART TWO: CONTENT ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................ 35 SUMMARY OF ISSUES RAISED BY PRO-BREXIT COVERAGE ............................................................ 35 SECTION 1: WITHDRAWAL CONTRIBUTIONS ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Complaints
    Analysis of complaints......................................................................................................... 1 Standards of service............................................................................................................. 1 Summaries of upheld complaints ....................................................................................... 2 BBC News (10.00pm), BBC1, 20 November 2008 ............................................................. 2 Top Gear, BBC2, 23 November 2008................................................................................. 2 Our World: Jonah and the Whalers, BBC News, 26 December 2008................................. 3 Liza Tarbuck and Cathy Burke, Radio 2, 17 January 2008................................................. 3 Footloose, Radio Scotland, 19 January 2009 ..................................................................... 3 The Politics Show, BBC1, 25 January 2009 ....................................................................... 4 The Graham Norton Show, BBC2, 12 March...................................................................... 4 “Existing” on the poverty line, BBC News Online, 8 April 2009........................................... 4 Newsbeat, Radio 1, 20 April 2009 ...................................................................................... 5 Analysis of complaints From 1 April to 30 September 2009 the Unit reached findings on 106 complaints concerning 100 items (normally a single broadcast or webpage, but sometimes a broadcast
    [Show full text]
  • Personalised Responses and Equivocation in Political Interviews Waddle, M and Bull, P
    “You’re important, Jeremy, but not that important” : personalised responses and equivocation in political interviews Waddle, M and Bull, P http://dx.doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1095 Title “You’re important, Jeremy, but not that important” : personalised responses and equivocation in political interviews Authors Waddle, M and Bull, P Type Article URL This version is available at: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/58712/ Published Date 2020 USIR is a digital collection of the research output of the University of Salford. Where copyright permits, full text material held in the repository is made freely available online and can be read, downloaded and copied for non-commercial private study or research purposes. Please check the manuscript for any further copyright restrictions. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. Journal of Social and Political Psychology jspp.psychopen.eu | 2195-3325 Original Research Reports “You’re Important, Jeremy, but Not That Important”: Personalised Responses and Equivocation in Political Interviews Maurice Waddle* a, Peter Bull ab [a] Department of Psychology, University of York, York, United Kingdom. [b] Department of Psychology, University of Salford, Manchester, United Kingdom. Abstract This study was an assessment of personalised equivocation in political interviews, namely, politicians’ responses to questions which, in lieu of an explicit reply, are directed personally at the interviewer. Twenty-six interviews with recent UK party leaders were analysed in terms of questions, replies, and personalisation. The majority of personalised responses contained elements of criticism, although over a quarter were more amicable.
    [Show full text]
  • Government and Politics Transition Work Welcome
    Government and Politics Transition Work Welcome to Government and Politics- I look forward to teaching you in September. Below is some useful factual information about the course and how you can be best prepared for September. Course Specification Exam Board Edexcel Options Studied Paper 1: UK Politics and Ideologies Paper 2: UK Government and Feminism Paper 3: Government and Politics of the USA Recommended Textbooks – GCE Edexcel AS/ALevel Politics EITHER (please note whilst 2017 this is expensive it covers the entire two year course By Dr Graham Goodlad, Dr Andrew and all 3 papers) Mitchell, Andrew Colclough, Dr Samantha Laycock, Cathy Schindler and Adam Tomes Pearson Edexcel ALEVEL Politics UK Government and Politics, Political Ideas and US OR (do not buy both!) Government and Politics THERE IS NO EXPECTATION 2019** more updated than TO BUY THESE, BUT CAN BE other one USEFUL AS By Sarah Jenkins, John Jefferies REFERENCES/INDEPENDENT and David Tuck WORK. WE WILL PROVIDE PHOTOCOPIES OF PAGES WHERE RELEVANT Useful websites (you MUST keep up to date with current political events) https://www.parliament.uk/ (use the ABOUT section and explore each part to learn the basics of how our system works there are helpful guides and videos) https://www.parliament.uk/business/commons/- House of Commons events and current legislation https://www.parliament.uk/lords/ House of Lords UK events and current legislation https://www.gov.uk/ official website of the government- useful for keeping track of current issues for debate and legislation which is being considered or passed. https://www.theguardian.com/politics A news website useful for current affairs and scrutiny (criticism) of the government it is a left wing leaning paper (not extreme left wing!) https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/politics A news website useful for current affairs and reports on government developments.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Archived BBC Public Responses to Complaints
    Archived BBC public responses to complaints 2019 This Week, BBC One, 10 January 2019 Summary of complaint We received complaints from people who felt Owen Jones was treated in a disrespectful manner while appearing as a guest on the programme. Our response Following the verbal abuse which he and others had sustained from protesters outside Parliament, Owen Jones, journalist, left wing commentator and activist, used his “Take of the Week” section to give his personal take on the current state of political discourse, the rise of the far right and, as he deemed, the reasons for this. This is a prominent section of the programme in which the author gives their views unchallenged. During his video and the studio discussion which followed, Mr Jones made allegations about the Conservative Party and right wing media which some would consider contentious. As our audience would expect, Andrew scrutinised what Mr Jones said. Michael Portillo, who disagreed with Mr Jones, also gave his opinion. Mr Jones was given ample time to express his views and respond to points made to him. When Mr Jones made allegations about The Spectator magazine and Andrew’s role with the publication. Andrew legitimately pointed out that this was nothing to do with the BBC and it wasn’t right for Mr Jones to use the programme to make personal accusations against him. Today, BBC Radio 4, 26 January 2019 Summary of complaint We received a range of complaints following the interview of Helen McEntee. Some listeners felt the tone and content were not appropriate, suggesting a personal bias from the interviewer.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the ANDREW MARR SHOW (Presented by Eddie Mair) Interview with Boris Johnson MARCH 24Th 2013 Please Note
    1 THE ANDREW MARR SHOW (presented by Eddie Mair) Interview with Boris Johnson MARCH 24th 2013 Please note, “The Andrew Marr Show” must be credited if any part of this transcript is used. NB: This transcript was typed from a recording and not copied from an original script. Because of the possibility of mis-hearing and the difficulty, in some cases, of identifying individual speakers, the BBC cannot vouch for its accuracy. INTERVIEW WITH: BORIS JOHNSON, MAYOR OF LONDON EDDIE MAIR: Good Morning, how are you? BORIS JOHNSON: Very, very good, thank you. EDDIE MAIR: Before we talk about you, let’s talk about immigration which is in the papers today. BORIS JOHNSON: Sure. EDDIE MAIR: David Cameron going to make a speech in which he’s going to talk about keeping immigrant families off council house waiting lists. There’s talk of making immigrants pay to go to see a GP. Is that all good for you? BORIS JOHNSON: I think certainly, you’ve got to address the problem of uncontrolled immigration, that was really I think a function of decisions taken by the Labour Party a long time ago, that has certainly led to huge strains on the social security system, on education budgets, on housing and yes, it’s absolutely right for the Prime Minister and the government now to try and sort that out…. EDDIE MAIR: (over) Do you think it’s a good policy? BORIS JOHNSON: Well, I mean I’d have to look at the details of what they’re proposing but … EDDIE MAIR: (over) Well you’re not rushing at it with enthusiasm.
    [Show full text]
  • A Level Politics (Edexcel)
    Preparing to Study A Level Politics (Edexcel) Mrs Ladly Subject Leader for History and Politics Getting to know the basics…. 1. Who is the current Prime Minister? 2. Which party do they represent? 3. Who did they replace? 4. Name the party leaders: Labour (leader of the official opposition) – Liberal Democrats- SNP – Green Party – 5. How many seats are there in the House of Commons? 6. Who is your local MP and what party do they represent? 7. Who is the Mayor of London and what party do they represent? 8. Who is the Mayor of Manchester and what party do they represent? 9. What is a referendum? 10. Give three examples of referendums held in the UK. - - - 11. What was the result of the 2016 Brexit referendum? 12. What is devolution? 13. Which three regions have devolved assemblies in the UK? 14. When was the UK Supreme Court formed? 15. How many judges sit in the UK Supreme Court? 16. Who is the current President of the UK Supreme Court? Analysing the 2019 General election The last General Election was held on the 12th December 2019. Use the link below to download the House of Commons General Election 2019: results and analysis. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-8749/ In the 2019 General Election make a note of the numbers of seats won and the % of votes cast for each party o Conservatives= …..…..% of seats with …..…..% of the votes. o Labour= …..…..% of seats with …..…..% of the votes. o Liberal Democrats= …..…..% of seats with …..…..% of the votes. o Brexit Party=…..…..% of seats with …..…..% of the votes.
    [Show full text]