DOCSLIB.ORG

Southern Diablo Mountain Range and Central Coast of California Resource Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Southern Diablo Mountain Range and Central Coast of California Resource Management Plan September 2007 SOUTHERN DIABLO MOUNTAIN RANGE AND CENTRAL COAST OF CALIFORNIA RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN RECORD OF DECISION Prepared by: U. S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Hollister Field Office 20 Hamilton Court Hollister, CA 95023 September 2007 Recommended by: August 31, 2007 Date Approved by: September 7, 2007 Mike Pool, State Director, California Date BLM Hollister Field Office Table of Contents Hollister RMP Record of Decision TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary............................................................................................................................................... i 1.0 RECORD OF DECISION .................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 ALTERNATIVES .................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS AND DECISION RATIONALE..........................1-3 1.3 CHANGES TO PROPOSED ACTION ................................................................................1-5 1.4 MITIGATION AND MONITORING...................................................................................1-5 1.5 AGENCY AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ......................................................................1-5 2.0 PLANNING FRAMEWORK............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Purpose and Need..............................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Planning Area....................................................................................................................2-2 2.2.1 Area Profile...................................................................................................................2-3 2.3 Background.......................................................................................................................2-3 2.3.1 Planning History ...........................................................................................................2-4 2.3.2 Scoping / Issues ............................................................................................................2-4 2.3.3 Summary of Major Planning Issues..............................................................................2-5 2.3.4 Issues Considered, but Not Further Analyzed ..............................................................2-6 2.4 Planning Criteria ...............................................................................................................2-6 2.5 Planning process ...............................................................................................................2-7 2.6 Relationship to BLM Policies, Plans, and Programs ........................................................2-8 3.0 Hollister RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN.............................................................. 3-1 3.1 Air Quality .........................................................................................................................3-1 3.2 Soil Resources....................................................................................................................3-2 3.3 Water Resources ................................................................................................................3-3 3.4 Biological Resources – Vegetation Resources...................................................................3-4 3.5 Biological Resources – Wildlife Habitat............................................................................3-5 3.6 Biological Resources – Special Status Species..................................................................3-6 3.7 Fire Management ...............................................................................................................3-7 3.8 Recreation ........................................................................................................................3-11 3.9 Visual Resources Management........................................................................................3-16 3.10 Special Management Areas..............................................................................................3-17 3.11 Livestock Grazing...........................................................................................................3-24 3.12 Energy and Minerals ........................................................................................................3-28 3.13 Cultural Resources ...........................................................................................................3-29 3.14 Paleontological Resources ...............................................................................................3-31 3.15 Social and Economic Conditions .....................................................................................3-32 3.16 Transportation and Access ...............................................................................................3-33 3.17 Hazardous Materials and Public Safety ...........................................................................3-34 3.18 Land and Realty ...............................................................................................................3-35 4.0 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW AND APPEALS ............................................................ 4-1 4.1 APPEALS....................................................................................................................................4-1 4.2 CONTACT INFORMATION.....................................................................................................4-2 5.0 LIST OF PREPARERS ...................................................................................................... 5-1 Table of Contents August 2007 BLM Hollister Field Office Table of Contents Hollister RMP Record of Decision List of Appendices A Figures (MAPS) B Wild & Scenic River Inventory C Best Management Practices Outlined in the June 2005 Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement on Wind Energy Development on BLM-Administered Lands in the Western United States D Oil and Gas Stipulations E Special Status Species Information F Hollister Field Office Area Reasonably Foreseeable Development Scenario for Oil and Gas Table of Contents August 2007 BLM Hollister Field Office Hollister RMP Record of Decision Summary RECORD OF DECISION Summary The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is adopting decisions identified in the Hollister Field Office Proposed Resource Management Plan (RMP) for the Southern Diablo Mountain Range and Central Coast of California to allocate land use on approximately 274,000 acres of public land and an additional 443,806 acres of subsurface mineral estate located in Alameda, Contra Costa, Monterey, San Benito, San Mateo, Santa Clara, and Santa Cruz counties, and portions of Fresno, Merced, Stanislaus, and San Joaquin counties. In accordance with 43 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1610.5-2(b), all protests to the Director were resolved prior to approving this Record of Decision (ROD). Alternatives The Draft RMP and Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Southern Diablo Mountain Range and Central Coast of California analyzed four alternatives. BLM developed these alternatives on the basis of, and in response to, substantive public input on the existing environment, existing uses, desired future uses, and desired environmental conditions of the public lands administered by the Hollister Field Office. Alternative A was the no action alternative, which would continue current management under BLM’s existing 1984 Hollister RMP as amended. Management of resources and sensitive habitats would not address emerging issues concerning public lands. Furthermore, management of land acquired after the 1984 Hollister RMP was completed would be based on interim management strategies approved upon acquisition to protect public safety and resource values. Alternative B emphasized conserving natural resources, maintaining functioning natural systems, and restoring degraded natural systems. Management would focus on protecting sensitive resources while limiting or excluding certain uses in sensitive areas. Alternative C (Preferred Alternative) balanced resource conservation and ecosystem health with commodity production and public use of the land. This alternative placed importance on collaboration with landowners, permit holders, and other land managers to provide opportunities for sustainable use of the resources while maintaining key ecological, visual, and recreational values. Alternative D emphasized commodity production and public uses (recreation, grazing, mining, and oil/gas leasing, etc.) consistent with BLM guidance and constraints. Potential impacts on sensitive resources would be mitigated on a case-by-case basis. Emphasis would be on maintaining resource conditions where required. Restoration actions that would enhance resource use or commodity production would be utilized. Summary i August 2007 BLM Hollister Field Office Hollister RMP Record of Decision Summary Management Considerations and Decision Rationale BLM has determined that the decisions described in this ROD best meet the purpose and need for administering the public lands managed by the Hollister Field Office. The factors considered by BLM in approving this ROD include: alternatives described in the Draft RMP/EIS; impacts from those alternatives; the purpose and need for the action; and public comments and agency input provided
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Petition to List Mountain Lion As Threatened Or Endangered Species
    BEFORE THE CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME COMMISSION A Petition to List the Southern California/Central Coast Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) of Mountain Lions as Threatened under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) A Mountain Lion in the Verdugo Mountains with Glendale and Los Angeles in the background. Photo: NPS Center for Biological Diversity and the Mountain Lion Foundation June 25, 2019 Notice of Petition For action pursuant to Section 670.1, Title 14, California Code of Regulations (CCR) and Division 3, Chapter 1.5, Article 2 of the California Fish and Game Code (Sections 2070 et seq.) relating to listing and delisting endangered and threatened species of plants and animals. I. SPECIES BEING PETITIONED: Species Name: Mountain Lion (Puma concolor). Southern California/Central Coast Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) II. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Listing as Threatened or Endangered The Center for Biological Diversity and the Mountain Lion Foundation submit this petition to list mountain lions (Puma concolor) in Southern and Central California as Threatened or Endangered pursuant to the California Endangered Species Act (California Fish and Game Code §§ 2050 et seq., “CESA”). This petition demonstrates that Southern and Central California mountain lions are eligible for and warrant listing under CESA based on the factors specified in the statute and implementing regulations. Specifically, petitioners request listing as Threatened an Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) comprised of the following recognized mountain lion subpopulations:
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Friday, April 3, 2009
    Welcome back to the 28th Annual Wildflower Hotline, brought to you by the Theodore Payne Foundation, a non-profit plant nursery, seed source, book store, and education center dedicated to the preservation of wildflowers and native California plants. Things are warming up in southern and central California, but if you head to higher ground or protected canyons an abundance of wildflowers can still be seen. The wildflowers at Anza-Borrego Desert State Park are now decorating Culp Valley and Blair Valley, while the valley floor is still beautiful with ocotillo (Fouquieria splendens), palo verde (Cercidium floridum (Parkinsonia florida)), and a number of different cacti species. As the flowers thaw out at the Cuyamaca Rancho State Park, off HWY 79, many beauties are coming out to enjoy the warmer weather. In the meadows look for Parish’s meadowfoam (Limnanthes gracilis ssp. parishii), false baby stars (Linanthus (Leptosiphon) androsaceus), goldfields (Lasthenia californica), golden rayed pentachaeta (Pentachaeta aurea), mountain violet (Viola purpurea), purple owl’s clover (Castilleja exserta ssp. exserta), tidy tips (Layia platyglossa), California primrose (Camissonia californica), scarlet bugler (Penstemon centranthifolius), slender phlox (Microsteris gracilis), and checker mallow (Sidalcea malviflora). In the light woods discover a profusion of California peony (Paeonia californica) along with summer snow (Linanthus (Leptosiphon) floribundus ssp. glaber), baby blue eyes (Nemophila menziesii), and wallflower (Erysimum capitatum). Along the San Diego coastline, the Torrey Pines State Natural Reserve is still a treat as splendid mariposa lilies (Calochortus splendens) line Beach Trail and sand verbena (Abronia umbellata), ground pink (Linanthus dianthiflorus), California groundsel (Senecio californicus), climbing milkweed (Sarcostemma (Funastrum) cynanchoides), and California poppies (Eschscholzia californica) adorn the Guy Fleming Trail.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Cenozoic Tectonics of the Central and Southern Coast Ranges of California
    OVERVIEW Late Cenozoic tectonics of the central and southern Coast Ranges of California Benjamin M. Page* Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2115 George A. Thompson† Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2215 Robert G. Coleman Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2115 ABSTRACT within the Coast Ranges is ascribed in large Taliaferro (e.g., 1943). A prodigious amount of part to the well-established change in plate mo- geologic mapping by T. W. Dibblee, Jr., pre- The central and southern Coast Ranges tions at about 3.5 Ma. sented the areal geology in a form that made gen- of California coincide with the broad Pa- eral interpretations possible. E. H. Bailey, W. P. cific–North American plate boundary. The INTRODUCTION Irwin, D. L. Jones, M. C. Blake, and R. J. ranges formed during the transform regime, McLaughlin of the U.S. Geological Survey and but show little direct mechanical relation to The California Coast Ranges province encom- W. R. Dickinson are among many who have con- strike-slip faulting. After late Miocene defor- passes a system of elongate mountains and inter- tributed enormously to the present understanding mation, two recent generations of range build- vening valleys collectively extending southeast- of the Coast Ranges. Representative references ing occurred: (1) folding and thrusting, begin- ward from the latitude of Cape Mendocino (or by these and many other individuals were cited in ning ca. 3.5 Ma and increasing at 0.4 Ma, and beyond) to the Transverse Ranges. This paper Page (1981).
    [Show full text]
  • The Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Bird Conservation Plan
    The Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Bird Conservation Plan A Strategy for Protecting and Managing Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Habitats and Associated Birds in California A Project of California Partners in Flight and PRBO Conservation Science The Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Bird Conservation Plan A Strategy for Protecting and Managing Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Habitats and Associated Birds in California Version 2.0 2004 Conservation Plan Authors Grant Ballard, PRBO Conservation Science Mary K. Chase, PRBO Conservation Science Tom Gardali, PRBO Conservation Science Geoffrey R. Geupel, PRBO Conservation Science Tonya Haff, PRBO Conservation Science (Currently at Museum of Natural History Collections, Environmental Studies Dept., University of CA) Aaron Holmes, PRBO Conservation Science Diana Humple, PRBO Conservation Science John C. Lovio, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, U.S. Navy (Currently at TAIC, San Diego) Mike Lynes, PRBO Conservation Science (Currently at Hastings University) Sandy Scoggin, PRBO Conservation Science (Currently at San Francisco Bay Joint Venture) Christopher Solek, Cal Poly Ponoma (Currently at UC Berkeley) Diana Stralberg, PRBO Conservation Science Species Account Authors Completed Accounts Mountain Quail - Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest. Greater Roadrunner - Pete Famolaro, Sweetwater Authority Water District. Coastal Cactus Wren - Laszlo Szijj and Chris Solek, Cal Poly Pomona. Wrentit - Geoff Geupel, Grant Ballard, and Mary K. Chase, PRBO Conservation Science. Gray Vireo - Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest. Black-chinned Sparrow - Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest. Costa's Hummingbird (coastal) - Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest. Sage Sparrow - Barbara A. Carlson, UC-Riverside Reserve System, and Mary K. Chase. California Gnatcatcher - Patrick Mock, URS Consultants (San Diego). Accounts in Progress Rufous-crowned Sparrow - Scott Morrison, The Nature Conservancy (San Diego).
    [Show full text]
  • Fremont Earthquake Exhibit WALKING TOUR of the HAYWARD FAULT (Tule Ponds at Tyson Lagoon to Stivers Lagoon)
    Fremont Earthquake Exhibit WALKING TOUR of the HAYWARD FAULT (Tule Ponds at Tyson Lagoon to Stivers Lagoon) BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Hayward Fault is part of the San Andreas Fault system that dominates the landforms of coastal California. The motion between the North American Plate (southeastern) and the Pacific Plate (northwestern) create stress that releases energy along the San Andreas Fault system. Although the Hayward Fault is not on the boundary of plate motion, the motion is still relative and follows the general relative motion as the San Andreas. The Hayward Fault is 40 miles long and about 8 miles deep and trends along the east side of San Francisco Bay. North to south, it runs from just west of Pinole Point on the south shore of San Pablo Bay and through Berkeley (just under the western rim of the University of California’s football stadium). The Berkeley Hills were probably formed by an upward movement along the fault. In Oakland the Hayward Fault follows Highway 580 and includes Lake Temescal. North of Fremont’s Niles District, the fault runs along the base of the hills that rise abruptly from the valley floor. In Fremont the fault runs within a wide fault zone. Around Tule Ponds at Tyson Lagoon the fault splits into two traces and continues in a downwarped area and turns back into one trace south of Stivers Lagoon. When a fault takes a “side step” it creates pull-apart depressions and compression ridges which can be seen in this area. Southward, the fault lies between the 1 lowest, most westerly ridge of the Diablo Range and the main mountain ridge to the east.
    [Show full text]
  • Tidal Marsh Recovery Plan Habitat Creation Or Enhancement Project Within 5 Miles of OAK
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California California clapper rail Suaeda californica Cirsium hydrophilum Chloropyron molle Salt marsh harvest mouse (Rallus longirostris (California sea-blite) var. hydrophilum ssp. molle (Reithrodontomys obsoletus) (Suisun thistle) (soft bird’s-beak) raviventris) Volume II Appendices Tidal marsh at China Camp State Park. VII. APPENDICES Appendix A Species referred to in this recovery plan……………....…………………….3 Appendix B Recovery Priority Ranking System for Endangered and Threatened Species..........................................................................................................11 Appendix C Species of Concern or Regional Conservation Significance in Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California….......................................13 Appendix D Agencies, organizations, and websites involved with tidal marsh Recovery.................................................................................................... 189 Appendix E Environmental contaminants in San Francisco Bay...................................193 Appendix F Population Persistence Modeling for Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California with Intial Application to California clapper rail …............................................................................209 Appendix G Glossary……………......................................................................………229 Appendix H Summary of Major Public Comments and Service
    [Show full text]
  • Coyote Valley
    PROJECT: COYOTE VALLEY CONSERVATION AREAS MASTER REQUEST PLAN The Authority is issuing this Request for Proposals for Ecological Restoration & FOR Landscape-Scale Master Planning Consulting Services. PROPOSALS DUE: JUNE 16, 2021 by 5 PROPOSALS P.M. PACIFIC DAYLIGHT TIME #RFP-2021-10 Request for Proposals Coyote Valley Conservation Areas Master Plan Background Purpose of Request for Proposals (RFPs) The Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority (“Authority”) is soliciting proposals for professional services for the Coyote Valley Conservation Areas Master Plan (“Master Plan”). The Authority is seeking a consultant team to provide a comprehensive spectrum of skills and expertise needed to create an innovative, integrated, science- based, community-informed plan for the recently conserved lands in Coyote Valley; a unique natural and rural landscape, within an urban setting, located between the cities of San Jose and Morgan Hill, in Santa Clara County, California. The Authority is seeking proposals from an experienced prime firm and their subconsultants that would be responsible for conducting the work outlined in this RFP, culminating in a final Master Plan document and construction documents for the first round of implementation projects identified through the planning process. Consultant work will be authorized and funded on as “as needed” basis over the course of a six-year term through a series of Authority-authorized task orders. The selected firms will be asked to respond to any number of task orders, issued as the planning process progresses and funding is available. The selected professionals will have proven experience working on habitat/ecological and hydrological restoration, green infrastructure solutions for water management, wildlife connectivity, public use and access, and many related and associated skills for public agencies and be fully qualified to perform services requested by the Authority in this RFP.
    [Show full text]
  • Nchrp Program Synthesis 305
    NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH NCHRP PROGRAM SYNTHESIS 305 Interaction Between Roadways and Wildlife Ecology A Synthesis of Highway Practice NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM NCHRP SYNTHESIS 305 Interaction Between Roadways and Wildlife Ecology A Synthesis of Highway Practice CONSULTANT GARY L. EVINK Ecologist Tallahassee, Florida TOPIC PANEL GREGG ERICKSON, California Department of Transportation PAUL GARRETT, Federal Highway Administration MARY E. GRAY, Federal Highway Administration ALEX LEVY, Federal Highway Administration JOEL MARSHIK, Montana Department of Transportation PATRICK MCGOWEN, Western Transportation Institute PAUL J. WAGNER, Washington State Department of Transportation JON WILLIAMS, Transportation Research Board SUBJECT AREAS Energy and Environment, and Safety and Human Performance Research Sponsored by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials in Cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD — THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES WASHINGTON, D.C. 2002 www.TRB.org NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM NCHRP SYNTHESIS 305 Systematic, well-designed research provides the most effective Project 20-5 FY 2000 (Topic 32-11) approach to the solution of many problems facing highway ad- ISSN 0547-5570 ministrators and engineers. Often, highway problems are of local ISBN 0-309-06923-8 interest and can best be studied by highway departments indi- Library of Congress Control No. 2002111522 vidually or in cooperation with their state universities and others. © 2002 Transportation Research Board However, the accelerating growth of highway transportation de- velops increasingly complex problems of wide interest to high- way authorities. These problems are best studied through a coor- Price $16.00 dinated program of cooperative research. In recognition of these needs, the highway administrators of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation NOTICE Officials initiated in 1962 an objective national highway research program employing modern scientific techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • A Teacher's Guide and Study Kit on the Santa Rosa Plateau Ecological Reserve for Middle School Students
    California State University, San Bernardino CSUSB ScholarWorks Theses Digitization Project John M. Pfau Library 1998 A teacher's guide and study kit on the Santa Rosa Plateau Ecological Reserve for middle school students Katharine Marie Havert Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project Part of the Environmental Education Commons Recommended Citation Havert, Katharine Marie, "A teacher's guide and study kit on the Santa Rosa Plateau Ecological Reserve for middle school students" (1998). Theses Digitization Project. 1399. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/1399 This Project is brought to you for free and open access by the John M. Pfau Library at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses Digitization Project by an authorized administrator of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A TEACHER'S GUIDE AND STUDY KIT ON THE SANTA ROSA PLATEAU ECOLOGICAL RESERVE FOR MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS A Project Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Masters of Arts in Education: Environmental Education Option by Katharine Marie Havert June 1998 A TEACHER'S GUIDE AND STUDY KIT ON THE SANTA ROSA PLATEAU ECOLOGICAL RESERVE FOR MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS A Project Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino Katharine Marie Havert June 1998 Approved by: Darleen Stoner, Ph.D., Date First Reader Ujf Bonnie Trusler, M.A., San Bernardino Date City Unified School District, Second Reader ABSTRACT The need for a study kit with activity-based lessons for before, during, and after a visit to the Santa Rosa Piateau Ecological Reserve is the basis for this project.
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Review of the Great Valley Sequence, Eastern Diablo Range and Northern San
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Review of the Great Valley sequence, eastern Diablo Range and northern San Joaquin Valley, central California by J. Alan Bartow1 and TorH.Nilsen2 Open-File Report 90-226 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 1990 , Menlo Park, California 2Applied Earth Technologies, Inc, Redwood City, California ABSTRACT The Great Valley sequence of the eastern Diablo Range and northern San Joaquin Valley consists of a thick accumulation of marine and nonmarine clastic rocks of Jurassic to early Paleocene age deposited in a forearc basin that was situated between the Sierran magmatic arc to the east and the Franciscan subduction complex to the west. In the western part of the basin, the sequence rests conformably on the Jurassic Coast Range Ophiolite or is faulted against the structurally underlying Franciscan Complex. Beneath the eastern San Joaquin Valley, the sequence unconformably onlaps igneous and metamorphic rocks of the Sierran magmatic arc. The sequence generally thickens westward to as much as 8-9 km in the Diablo Range, where it is unconformably overlain by late Paleocene and younger strata. The stratigraphy of the Great Valley sequence has been the subject of much work, but problems, particularly nomenclatural, remain. Lithostratigraphic subdivisions of the sequence have not gained widespread acceptance because of the lenticularity of most sandstone bodies, abrupt fades changes in subsurface and outcrops, and the lack of detailed subsurface information from closely spaced or deep wells.
    [Show full text]
  • Carnivore Survey Report 2009
    Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Biological Monitoring Program Carnivore Survey Report 2009 23 April 2010 Carnivore Survey Report 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................................1 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ...................................................................................................................2 METHODS ....................................................................................................................................................3 TRANSECT SURVEYS..........................................................................................................................3 SURVEY DESIGN ..................................................................................................................6 FIELD PROCEDURE...............................................................................................................6 DATA ANALYSIS..................................................................................................................7 CAMERA STATIONS............................................................................................................................8 HABITAT LINKAGE SURVEYS...........................................................................................................11 INCIDENTAL OBSERVATIONS ...........................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]