Daily Report Friday, 21 May 2021 CONTENTS
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Draft Letter to the Prime Minister
HOUSE OF COMMONS LONDO sw 1A OAA Rt. Hon. David Cameron MP Prime Minister 10 Downing Street London SW1A2AA Dear Prime Minister, As Members of Parliament for Staffordshire, we write to express our deep concern at the withdrawal of 3rd Battalion, the Mercian Regiment (The Staffards) from the Order of Battle. The Battalion has a proud history which can be traced back to its first raising at the King's Head Inn, Lichfield, in 1705. It served in Martinique, South Africa, Flanders, Gallipoli, Anzio and Arnhem. More recently, photographs of 3 Mercian fighting in Basra, became defining images of the Iraq campaign. We all recognise the difficult financial climate and the constraints that imposes on the Ministry of Defence. We understand that savings must be made. However, we also know that the decision to withdraw 3 Mercian will be distressing for all those currently serving, particularly those that might face redundancy, for their families and for those former Staffards who proudly recall their service. We know that it is the responsibility of the Mercian Regiment, as reorganised, to decide how best to reflect its history and antecedents. But as there is no longer any senior former Stafford serving on its staff, we hope that you will do all you can to encourage the Regiment to preserve and cherish the symbols, traditions and heritage of 3 Mercian within its ranks. 2 Mercian is known now as the Worcester and Sherwood Foresters as a result of previous amalgamations and we hope that a similar formula can be found to remember the Staffords. -
Surgery Reconfiguration Public Engagement Report
Surgery Reconfiguration Public Engagement Report PB March 2015 Executive Summary After an extended period of public engagement, over 18 weeks from 16thOctober 2014 to 9th February 2015, the feedback has been collated in this report. Overall, there appears to be an acceptance that the Trust cannot continue to provide surgical services in the current form given the external factors influencing healthcare delivery and the evidence that centralisation of services improves clinical outcomes. It is clear that the population is passionate about the retention of their local hospitals and the proposal to keep all outpatient appointments and investigation services delivered locally is popular. Concern remains over transport and travel and whilst the Trust is exploring possible solutions to this there is a degree of public scepticism that the issues will be resolved satisfactorily, which is likely to remain until such time as concrete plans have been developed and implemented. There has been almost no feedback from patients or the public relating to how the changes will affect the likely outcomes of undergoing surgery. This was explained at events with provision of the evidence on the website and so the lack of feedback may indicate it is not a contentious issue. There is little difference between the feedback received from each site although there has been a better response from Good Hope in terms of numbers, possibly due to the additional awareness created by local lobby groups. Whilst there appears to be acknowledgement that redesigning surgical services is the right approach, it is likely that individuals will resist change when it directly affects them or the services they access. -
View Questions Tabled on PDF File 0.16 MB
Published: Friday 23 October 2020 Questions tabled on Thursday 22 October 2020 Includes questions tabled on earlier days which have been transferred. T Indicates a topical oral question. Members are selected by ballot to ask a Topical Question. † Indicates a Question not included in the random selection process but accepted because the quota for that day had not been filled. N Indicates a question for written answer on a named day under S.O. No. 22(4). [R] Indicates that a relevant interest has been declared. Questions for Answer on Friday 23 October Questions for Written Answer 1 N Kirsten Oswald (East Renfrewshire): To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Minister for the Cabinet Office, when (a) Ministers and (b) officials in his Department last met with representatives of each of the devolved Administrations to discuss the implementation of the 10 year Veterans Strategy. [Transferred] (106379) 2 N Dr Julian Lewis (New Forest East): To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, pursuant to Secretary of State for Health and Social Care's oral contribution of 19 October 2020, Official Report, column 785 on vaccine production schedules, what the respective (a) starting dates were and (b) planned end dates are for the current trials of the (i) AstraZeneca, (ii) Imperial College and (iii) Novavax vaccines; and if he will list any factors, other than adverse reactions by subjects receiving these vaccines on an experimental basis, which may delay the completion of the trials beyond the planned end -
Communications and Engagement Strategy
Communications and Engagement Strategy Clinically Led, Quality Driven Communications and Engagement Strategy 3 Communication and Engagement Strategy Contents 1. Executive Summary 4 2. Background 5 3. Duty to Engage 8 4. Principles of Good Practice 10 5. Conclusion of our Situational Analysis 12 6. Engaging with Stakeholders 13 7. Key Messages 30 8. Positioning 32 9. Branding 33 10. Emergency Planning and Business Continuity 34 11. Risks 35 12. Roles and Responsibilities 36 13. Equality 37 14. Monitoring and Evaluation 38 15. Communications and Engagement Plan 39 Appendices A-H Appendix A: Stakeholder Analysis 44 Appendix B: PEST Analysis 46 Appendix C: Competitor Analysis 51 Appendix D: Mosaic Profiling 52 Appendix E: Measuring Our Effectiveness 55 Appendix F: Media Handling Protocol 57 Appendix G: Summary of Stakeholder Event September 2012 59 Appendix H: How Patient Insight and Engagement Informs 61 Decision-Making NHS South East Staffordshire & Seisdon Peninsula CCG 4 1. Executive Summary 1.1 This Communications and Engagement Strategy sets out how South East Staffordshire and Seisdon Peninsula Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) is and will in the future engage and communicate at all levels with its stakeholders. The Strategy sets a framework for current and intended communications and engagement that will support and achieve five key aims developed by the CCG, which are to: • Ensure that for all those involved in the work of the CCG that they buy into the principle of a ‘quality led organisation’ • Understand the profile of the local -
View Future Day Orals PDF File 0.11 MB
Published: Tuesday 23 March 2021 Questions for oral answer on a future day (Future Day Orals) Questions for oral answer on a future day as of Tuesday 23 March 2021. The order of these questions may be varied in the published call lists. [R] Indicates that a relevant interest has been declared. Questions for Answer on Wednesday 24 March Oral Questions to the Minister for Women and Equalities Margaret Ferrier (Rutherglen and Hamilton West): What assessment she has made of the ability of same-sex couples to access insemination services in the UK. (913999) Mrs Sheryll Murray (South East Cornwall): What assessment she has made of the effect of the covid-19 outbreak on female employment. (914000) Julie Marson (Hertford and Stortford): What steps the Government is taking to promote the role of women during the UK’s G7 Presidency. (914001) Simon Fell (Barrow and Furness): What steps she is taking to ensure that good practice on making streets safer for women is shared. (914002) Ian Levy (Blyth Valley): What steps she is taking to promote female participation in STEM. (914004) Paul Howell (Sedgefield): What steps she is taking to promote female participation in STEM. (914005) Debbie Abrahams (Oldham East and Saddleworth): What steps the Government is taking to help protect disabled people from the effects of the covid-19 outbreak. (914006) Peter Aldous (Waveney): What steps she is taking to promote female participation in STEM. (914007) John Lamont (Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk): What steps she is taking to ban conversion therapy. (914008) 2 Tuesday 23 March 2021 QUESTIONS FOR ORAL ANSWER ON A FUTURE DAY Michael Fabricant (Lichfield): What steps she is taking to ban conversion therapy; and if she will make a statement. -
Our Today, Their Tomorrow
Our Their Today, Tomorrow Our Today, Their Tomorrow | How British leadership can build a better world for children How British leadership can build a better world for children Our Today, Their Tomorrow How British leadership can build a better world for children Our today, their tomorrow. How British leadership can build a better world for children Contents Acknowledgements 4 Contributor Biographies 5 Introduction 10 Part 1: Our global leadership, values and traditions 13 1. Rt Hon Andrew Mitchell MP: A Development Agenda for 14 the 21st Century 2. Dr Karin von Hippel: The UK’s role in disrupting ISIL 21 3. Dr Sanjay Pradhan and Joe Powell: British leadership on 28 open government 4. Dr John Bew: Maintaining our traditions as an activist 35 humanitarian nation 5. Professor Tom Fletcher: Post-Brexit Britain as an 42 international powerhouse for liberty, creativity and humanity 6. Christian Guy: Building public confidence in Britain’s 50 moral mission Part 2: Protecting the most vulnerable children 56 1. Sir John Holmes: Britain’s future humanitarian policy 57 2 Contents 2. Flick Drummond MP: Protecting children affected 64 by conflict 3. Jamie Cooper: Leading the way on eradicating 70 child malnutrition 4. Baroness Jenkin: A development agenda with girls at its heart 77 5. Nick Grono: Modern-day abolitionists: Putting Britain at the 84 forefront of fighting slavery Part 3: The role of innovation 91 1. Sir Andrew Witty: Using innovation, technology and 92 research to deliver a world free from poverty 2. Paul Polman: The business case for sustainable development 99 3. Joe Cerrell: Driving innovation in global health 105 4. -
Tuition Fees Debate They Say That Your Time Spent at University Is Some of the Best in Your Life
Bell Ribeiro-Addy MP Monthly Report, November 2020 Out of the frying pan, into the fire It would be nice to think that the Government was willing to learn lessons from past failures but with the end of the second England-wide lockdown, we have now returned to the tiers system that led to us locking down again. History repeats itself first as tragedy, then as farce. Of course, there’s nothing funny about the deadly coronavirus, which has now claimed over 60,000 lives in the UK alone. Once again, people will die because of this Government’s failures. Their record on combating coronavirus is one of abject and deadly failure. We have one of the worst per capita death tolls among advanced industrialised countries and we are already feeling the ill effects of a recession exacerbated by Tory mismanagement. This is a reminder that there is not and ever was a trade-off between public health and the economy, because people are the most important element of any economy. I opposed the latest measures not because I am against restrictions, but because the ones the Government keeps coming up with are inconsistent, ineffective and come with wholly inadequate financial support. Because the Government keep getting it wrong, we have become trapped in a cycle of lockdowns. The success of various vaccines comes as good news but with full immunisation still months away, we cannot pin all our hopes on this. If we are serious about containing the virus to save lives and protect our economy, then half measures won’t cut it. -
Victoria Prentis MP Presents a Bill
Victoria Prentis MP presents a bill "to make provision about mandatory local consultation in relation to changes in services proposed by NHS Trusts and healthcare commissioning authorities;and for connected purposes" 25 October 2016 Source: https://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2016-10- 25a.190.8&s=victoria+prentis#g191.2 On Tuesday 25 October, North Oxfordshire MP Victoria Prentis, presented her first Ten Minute Rule Motion to the House on the subject of the Horton General Hospital. The National Health Service Provision (Local Consultation) Bill was a direct response to events over the summer at the Horton General Hospital, which saw the downgrade of the maternity unit to a midwife-only service with no public consultation. During her speech, Victoria voiced her concerns about the way in which the decision was taken and emphasised the need for public consultation whenever there is a change to NHS services, even when it is in response to an emergency situation. Presenting her Bill to the Commons, Victoria said in the Chamber: I do find it encouraging to have paternal, maternal and, indeed, filial support in this place, Mr Speaker. I beg to move, That leave be given for to bring in a bill to make provision about mandatory local consultation in relation to changes in services proposed by NHS Trusts and healthcare commissioning authorities; and for connected purposes. The Bill is the result of our experience in Oxfordshire this summer when the Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust suspended consultant-led maternity services at our local general hospital with no warning and no consultation. -
The Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP 30 January 2020 Prime Minister 10 Downing Street London SW1A 2AA
The Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP 30 January 2020 Prime Minister 10 Downing Street London SW1A 2AA Dear Prime Minister, We are writing to you as a group of cross-party parliamentarians to express our grave concern over the contents of US President Donald Trump’s so-called ‘peace plan’ for Israel and the Palestinians. The plan presented on 28 January shows contempt for the rights of the Palestinian people and international law, and provides no realistic basis for a return to negotiations. Instead, it makes peace less likely, and threatens to undermine a fundamental principle of the post-WWII international legal order: the prohibition of annexation and territorial conquest. The long-standing position of the UK is that a negotiated peace settlement must be agreed to achieve a two-state solution based on the 1967 borders, leading to a safe and secure Israel living alongside a viable and sovereign Palestinian state that has secure and recognised borders, and with Jerusalem as a shared capital of both states. The vision presented by the US administration is one where Palestinians would have none of these: no true shared capital in Jerusalem, no sovereign control of its borders or security, and with Israeli control far beyond the Green Line. As a group of 16 UK charities warned this week: “if implemented [the plan] will lead to the formal annexation of Palestinian land, perpetual Israeli occupation, and the negation of Palestinians’ collective right to self-determination.” It is a plan that the Palestinians have no choice but to reject if they wish to maintain their fundamental rights, but that they will be punished for not accepting. -
Tuesday 20 April 2021 COMMITTEE of the WHOLE HOUSE PROCEEDINGS
1 SUPPLEMENT TO THE VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS Tuesday 20 April 2021 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE HOUSE PROCEEDINGS FINANCE (No. 2) BILL (Clauses 1 to 5; Clauses 6 to 14 and Schedule 1; Clauses 24 to 26; Clause 28; Clause 30 and Schedule 6; Clauses 31 to 33; Clause 36 and Schedule 7; Clause 40; Clause 41; Clause 86; Clauses 87 to 89 and Schedules 16 and 17; Clauses 90 and 91; Clauses 92 to 96 and Schedule 18; Clause 97 and Schedule 19; Clauses 109 to 111 and Schedules 21 and 22; Clause 115 and Schedule 27; Clauses 117 to 121 and Schedules 29 to 32; Clauses 128 to 130; any new Clauses or new Schedules relating to: the impact of any provision on the financial resources of families or to the subject matter of Clauses 1 to 5, 24 to 26, 28, 31 to 33, 40 and 86; the subject matter of Clauses 6 to 14 and Schedule 1; the impact of any provision on regional economic development; tax avoidance or evasion; the subject matter of Clauses 87 to 89 and Schedules 16 and 17 and Clauses 90 and 91; the subject matter of Clauses 92 to 96 and Schedule 18, Clause 97 and Schedule 19 and Clauses 128 to 130) [FIRST AND SECOND DAY] GLOSSARY This document shows the fate of each clause, schedule, amendment and new clause. The following terms are used: Added: New Clause agreed without a vote and added to the Bill. Agreed to: agreed without a vote. Agreed to on division: agreed following a vote. -
Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, As Amended (Amendment Paper)
Report Stage: Monday 5 July 2021 Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, As Amended (Amendment Paper) This document lists all amendments tabled to the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill. Any withdrawn amendments are listed at the end of the document. The amendments are arranged in the order in which it is expected they will be decided. NEW CLAUSES, NEW SCHEDULES AND AMENDMENTS RELATING TO PARTS 1 TO 4 AND 10, OTHER THAN ANY NEW CLAUSES RELATING TO OFFENCES CONCERNING PETS OR ANY NEW CLAUSES RELATING TO VOYEURISM Ms Harriet Harman NC1 Caroline Nokes Sir Peter Bottomley Wera Hobhouse Caroline Lucas Liz Saville Roberts Stella Creasy Julie Elliott Taiwo Owatemi Maria Eagle Helen Hayes Dame Diana Johnson Emma Hardy Rosie Cooper Rushanara Ali Tonia Antoniazzi Rosie Duffield Yvonne Fovargue Bell Ribeiro-Addy Barbara Keeley Anne Marie Morris Mohammad Yasin Andrew Gwynne Karin Smyth Paul Blomfield Debbie Abrahams Dame Margaret Hodge Sir Mark Hendrick Kevin Brennan Mr Andrew Mitchell Clive Efford Mr Virendra Sharma Clive Lewis Sarah Champion Claire Hanna Florence Eshalomi Simon Hoare Navendu Mishra Chris Bryant Kim Johnson Catherine McKinnell Geraint Davies Claudia Webbe Paula Barker Darren Jones Mr David Davis Jamie Stone Ed Davey Jackie Doyle-Price Derek Twigg Yvette Cooper Christina Rees Apsana Begum Stephen Farry Ben Lake Jonathan Edwards Jeremy Corbyn To move the following Clause— “Harassment in a public place (1) A person must not engage in any conduct in a public place— (a) which amounts to harassment of another, and (b) which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other. -
Daily Report Monday, 9 November 2020 CONTENTS
Daily Report Monday, 9 November 2020 This report shows written answers and statements provided on 9 November 2020 and the information is correct at the time of publication (07:12 P.M., 09 November 2020). For the latest information on written questions and answers, ministerial corrections, and written statements, please visit: http://www.parliament.uk/writtenanswers/ CONTENTS ANSWERS 8 Licensed Premises: BUSINESS, ENERGY AND Coronavirus 20 INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY 8 Life Sciences 20 Beer: Small Businesses 8 Low Pay: Coronavirus 21 Bounce Back Loan Scheme: Nuclear Power 22 Sussex 8 Nuclear Power Stations: Business: Coronavirus 9 Finance 22 Carbon Emissions 11 Nuclear Reactors 22 Consumer Goods: Safety 11 Overseas Students: EU Coronavirus: Disease Control 12 Nationals 23 Coronavirus: Remote Working 12 Personal Care Services: Coronavirus 23 Coronavirus: Social Distancing 13 Political Parties: Coronavirus 24 Debenhams: Coronavirus 13 Post Office: Legal Costs 24 Economic Situation: Coronavirus 14 Post Offices: ICT 25 Electronic Commerce: Renewable Energy 25 Regulation 14 Research: Public Consultation 27 Energy Supply 15 Research: Publishing 27 Energy: Meters 15 Retail Trade: Coventry 28 Erasmus+ Programme and Shipping: Tees Valley 28 Horizon Europe 16 Solar power: Faversham 29 Fireworks: Safety 16 Unemployment: Coronavirus 29 Green Homes Grant Scheme 17 Weddings: Coronavirus 30 Horizon Europe 18 Wind Power 31 Housing: Energy 19 Hydrogen 20 CABINET OFFICE 31 Musicians: Coronavirus 44 Ballot Papers: Visual Skateboarding: Coronavirus 44 Impairment 31