Meeting Notice and Agenda

Board Members Steve Vaus, Chair Mayor, Poway Catherine Blakespear, Vice Chair Mayor, Encinitas Cori Schumacher Councilmember, Carlsbad Mary Salas Mayor, Chula Vista Richard Bailey Board of Directors Mayor, Coronado Ellie Haviland Deputy Mayor, Del Mar Agenda Bill Wells Mayor, El Cajon Friday, July 26, 2019 Paul McNamara Mayor, Escondido 9 a.m. to 12 noon Serge Dedina SANDAG Board Room Mayor, Imperial Beach Kristine Alessio 401 B Street, 7th Floor Councilmember, La Mesa San Diego Racquel Vasquez Mayor, Lemon Grove Alejandra Sotelo-Solis Mayor, National City Agenda Highlights Jack Feller Deputy Mayor, Oceanside Kevin Faulconer • TransNet Major Corridors Program Update Mayor, City of San Diego Georgette Gomez Council President, City of San Diego • Regional Housing Needs Assessment Draft Jim Desmond Methodology Supervisor, County of San Diego Kristin Gaspar Supervisor, County of San Diego Rebecca Jones Please silence all electronic devices during the meeting Mayor, San Marcos John Minto You can listen to the Board of Directors Mayor, Santee David A. Zito meeting by visiting our website at sandag.org Mayor, Solana Beach Judy Ritter Mayor, Vista Message from the Clerk Advisory Members In compliance with Government Code §54952.3, the Clerk hereby announces that the Hon. Jesus Escobar, Supervisor, District 1 Imperial County compensation for legislative body members attending the following simultaneous or serial Bob Franzoia, Acting Director meetings is: Executive Committee (EC) $100, Board of Directors (BOD) $150, and Regional California Department of Transportation Transportation Commission (RTC) $100. Compensation rates for the EC and BOD are set Mona Rios, Vice Chair Metropolitan Transit System pursuant to the SANDAG Bylaws, and the compensation rate for the RTC is set pursuant to Tony Kranz, Chair state law. North County Transit District Joe Stuyvesant, Navy Region Southwest Executive Director U.S. Department of Defense Mission Statement Garry Bonelli, Chairman The 18 cities and county government are SANDAG serving as the forum for regional Port of San Diego decision-making. SANDAG builds consensus; makes strategic plans; obtains and allocates Ron Morrison, Director resources; plans, engineers, and builds public transit; and provides information on a broad San Diego County Water Authority range of topics pertinent to the region’s quality of life. Cody Martinez, Chairman Southern California Tribal Chairmen’s Association San Diego Association of Governments ⋅ 401 B Street, Suite 800, San Diego, CA 92101-4231 April Boling, Chair (619) 699-1900 ⋅ Fax (619) 699-1905 ⋅ sandag.org San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Hon. Carlos González Gutiérrez Consul General, Mexico

Hasan Ikhrata Executive Director, SANDAG

Welcome to SANDAG. Members of the public may speak to the Board of Directors on any item at the time the Board is considering the item. Please complete a Request to Comment form located in the lobby. Members of the public may address the Board on any issue under the agenda item entitled Public Comments/Communications/Member Comments. Public speakers are limited to three minutes or less per person. The Board may take action on any item appearing on the agenda.

Both agenda and non-agenda comments should be sent to the Clerk of the Board via [email protected]. Please include the meeting date, agenda item, your name, and your organization. Any comments, handouts, presentations, or other materials from the public intended for distribution at the meeting should be received by the Clerk no later than 5 p.m. two working days prior to the meeting. All public comments and materials received by the deadline become part of the official public record and will be provided to the members for their review at the meeting.

In order to keep the public informed in an efficient manner and facilitate public participation, SANDAG also provides access to all agenda and meeting materials online at sandag.org/meetings. Additionally, interested persons can sign up for email notifications at sandag.org/subscribe.

SANDAG operates its programs without regard to race, color, and national origin in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. SANDAG has developed procedures for investigating and tracking Title VI complaints, and the procedures for filing a complaint are available to the public upon request. Questions concerning SANDAG nondiscrimination obligations or complaint procedures should be directed to the SANDAG General Counsel, John Kirk, at (619) 699-1997 or [email protected]. Any person who believes himself or herself or any specific class of persons to be subjected to discrimination prohibited by Title VI also may file a written complaint with the Federal Transit Administration.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), SANDAG will accommodate persons who require assistance in order to participate in SANDAG meetings. If such assistance is required, please contact SANDAG at (619) 699-1900 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. To request this document or related reports in an alternative format, please call (619) 699-1900 or (619) 699-1904 (TTY), or fax (619) 699-1905.

SANDAG agenda materials can be made available in alternative languages. To make a request, call (619) 699-1900 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting.

Los materiales de la agenda de SANDAG están disponibles en otros idiomas. Para hacer una solicitud, llame al (619) 699-1900 al menos 72 horas antes de la reunión.

如有需要, 我们可以把SANDAG议程材料翻译成其他語言.

请在会议前至少 72 小时打电话 (619) 699-1900 提出请求.

SANDAG offices are accessible by public transit. Phone 511 or visit 511sd.com for route information. Bicycle parking is available in the parking garage of the SANDAG offices.

2 120718 Board of Directors Friday, July 26, 2019 Item No. Recommendation +1. Approval of Meeting Minutes Approve

The Board of Directors is asked to approve the minutes from its June 28, 2019, meeting.

2. Public Comments/Communications/Member Comments

Public comments under this agenda item will be limited to five public speakers. Members of the public shall have the opportunity to address the Board on any issue within the jurisdiction of SANDAG that is not on this agenda. Other public comments will be heard during the items under the heading “Reports.” Anyone desiring to speak shall reserve time by completing a “Request to Speak” form and giving it to the Clerk of the Board prior to speaking. Public speakers should notify the Clerk of the Board if they have a handout for distribution to Board members. Public speakers are limited to three minutes or less per person. Board members also may provide information and announcements under this agenda item.

3. Policy Advisory Committee Chairs' Report Information

Policy Advisory Committee Chairs will provide updates on key Committee activities.

4. Executive Director's Report Discussion Hasan Ikhrata, SANDAG

An update on key programs, projects, and agency initiatives, including San Diego Forward: The 2021 Regional Plan and the Airport Connectivity Subcommittee will be provided.

Consent +5. 2020 Census Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group Approve Darlanne Hoctor Mulmat, SANDAG

The 2020 Census Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group was established in June 2019. The Working Group recommends that the Board of Directors approve the 2020 Census Complete Count Strategic Plan, including funding allocations available to the jurisdictions for Census outreach.

+6. Approval of Contract Awards Approve Julie Wiley, SANDAG The Board of Directors is asked to authorize the Executive Director to execute contract awards for Job Order Contract – General Civil Construction, and the North Park/Mid-City: Landis and Georgia-Meade Bikeways project.

3 +7. Policy Advisory Committee Actions, Including California Approve Environmental Quality Act Exemption Tessa Lero, SANDAG The Board of Directors is asked to ratify the delegated actions taken by the Policy Advisory Committees, including California Environmental Quality Act exemption for the Orange Bikeway project.

+8. Proposed Amendments to SANDAG Conflict of Interest Code Approve John Kirk, SANDAG

The Board of Directors is asked to approve proposed amendments to the SANDAG Conflict of Interest Code.

+9. Proposed FY 2020 Program Budget Amendments: Caltrans Approve Planning Grants April Petonak, SANDAG

The Executive Committee recommends that the Board of Directors approve the proposed amendments to the FY 2020 Program Budget, accepting $1,625,502 in Caltrans Transportation Planning Grant funding.

+10. FY 2020 SANDAG Financial and Compliance Audit* Approve Lisa Kondrat-Dauphin, SANDAG The Audit Committee recommends that the Board of Directors exercise the option under the existing agreement with Crowe LLP to conduct the FY 2020 SANDAG Financial and Compliance Audit.

+11. iCommute Rideshare Week Adopt Jay Faught, SANDAG

The Board of Directors is asked to adopt Resolution No. 2020-05 in support of Rideshare Week September 30 – October 4, 2019.

+12. Requested Time Extensions: TransNet Smart Growth Incentive Approve Program and TransNet Active Transportation Program Climate Action Plan Requirement Tracy Ferchaw, SANDAG

The Board of Directors is asked to approve a six-month time extension for the City of Lemon Grove and City of Santee to complete their Climate Action Plan requirements under the TransNet Smart Growth Incentive Program and TransNet Active Transportation Program respectively.

4 +13. Proposed FY 2020 Program Budget Amendment: Fiber Optic Approve Information Network Gap Closure Project Dinara Ussenova, SANDAG The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors approve an amendment to the FY 2020 Program Budget to: 1. create a new Capital Improvement Program (CIP) project (CIP project No. 1131500) to establish the Fiber Optic Information Network Gap Closure Project; 2. transfer $430,000 of SANDAG toll revenues to CIP Project No. 1131500; and 3. accept $90,000 from the North County Transit District to fund CIP Project No. 1131500.

+14. Proposed FY 2020 Program Budget Amendment: El Portal Approve Undercrossing Bruce Smith, SANDAG The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors approve an amendment to the FY 2020 Program Budget to: 1. create a new Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project (CIP Project No. 1146900) to establish the El Portal Undercrossing Project; and 2. accept $8.937 million in funding from the City of Encinitas and State Active Transportation Program to fully fund construction.

+15. SB 1 State of Good Repair Program: North County Transit District Adopt Project List Michelle Smith, SANDAG

The Board of Directors is asked to adopt Resolution No. 2020-04, authorizing the submittal of the North County Transit District project listing under the FY 2019-2020 SB 1 State of Good Repair Program.

+16. Proposition 68 Department of Conservation Local and Regional Adopt Planning Grant Program: SANDAG Project Submission Allison Wood and Sarah Pierce, SANDAG

The Board of Directors is asked to adopt Resolution No. 2020-03, approving the submission of an application to the Department of Conservation’s Local and Regional Planning Grant Program and authorizing SANDAG to accept award funding and enter into an agreement with the Department of Conservation.

+17. Equal Employment Opportunity Program Information Rachel Nycholat, SANDAG

In accordance with SANDAG Board Policy No. 007: Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Program, this report summarizes employment results for FY 2019 and reviews EEO Program goals for the upcoming year.

5 +18. San Diego Forward: The 2020 Federal Regional Transportation Information Plan Draft Transportation Network Rachel Kennedy, SANDAG

This report provides an update on the proposed draft transportation network for the 2020 Federal Regional Transportation Plan, which will be available for public review through August 21, 2019.

+19. Executive Director Delegated Actions* Information André Douzdjian, SANDAG

In accordance with various SANDAG Board Policies, this report summarizes delegated actions taken by the Executive Director since the last Board Business meeting.

+20. Meetings and Events Attended on Behalf of SANDAG Information Tessa Lero, SANDAG

Board members will report on external meetings and events attended on behalf of SANDAG since the last Board Business meeting.

+21. Quarterly Finance Investments as of June 30, 2019* Information André Douzdjian and Ray Major, SANDAG

This quarterly report provides an update on SANDAG investments, including all money under the direction or care of SANDAG as of June 30, 2019.

Reports

+22. TransNet Major Corridors Program Update* Information José Nuncio, SANDAG

An overview of cost and anticipated revenue information for the TransNet Major Corridor Program, through 2048, will be presented.

+23. Regional Housing Needs Assessment Draft Methodology Approve Vice Chair Catherine Blakespear Seth Litchney, SANDAG The Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) Subcommittee recommends that the Board of Directors release the draft RHNA methodology for public review.

6 +24. Memorandum of Agreement with City of Imperial Beach: Approve TransNet Debt Financing Program* Supervisor Jim Desmond, Transportation Committee Chair Lisa Kondrat-Dauphin, SANDAG The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors, acting as the Regional Transportation Commission, authorize the Executive Director to execute a Memorandum of Agreement with the City of Imperial Beach to issue $1.3 million in Commercial Paper through the TransNet Debt Financing Program.

+25. Regional Transportation Improvement Program Delegation of Adopt Authority* Supervisor Jim Desmond, Transportation Committee Chair Sue Alpert, SANDAG The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors, acting as the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission (RTC), adopt RTC Resolution No. RTC-2020-01: 1. requesting delegation of approval for administrative modifications to the Regional Transportation Improvement Program; and 2. delegating that approval to the Executive Director.

+26. 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Adopt Amendment No. 5* Supervisor Jim Desmond, Transportation Committee Chair Sue Alpert, SANDAG

The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors, acting as the Regional Transportation Commission (RTC), adopt RTC Resolution No. 2020-02, approving Amendment No. 5 to the 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program.

27. Risk Consideration: An Invitation from the Independent Information Performance Auditor to Board Members Regarding Risk Discussions Mary Khoshmashrab, Independent Performance Auditor

The SANDAG Independent Performance Auditor is in the process of performing an organizational-wide risk assessment (consideration of audit, fraud, and business risk). This item will outline next steps for Board Members to engage in a discussion with the Independent Performance Auditor on high-level risk concerns for the agency, including risk tolerance and risk appetite.

7 +28. Closed Session: Conference with Legal Counsel - Significant Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(D)(2) (One Potential Case) Amberlynn Griffin and Jim Linthicum, SANDAG

The Board of Directors will be briefed on construction claims related to the Los Peñasquitos Bridge project located in the City of San Diego.

29. Continued Public Comments

If the five-speaker limit for public comments was exceeded at the beginning of this agenda, other public comments will be taken at this time. Subjects of previous agenda items may not again be addressed under public comment.

30. Upcoming Meetings Information

The next Board Policy meeting is scheduled for Friday, August 9, 2019, at 10 a.m. The next Board Business meeting is scheduled for Friday, August 23, 2019, at 9 a.m.

Adjournment + next to an agenda item indicates an attachment

* next to an agenda item indicates that the Board of Directors also is acting as the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission for that item

8 Item: 1 Board of Directors July 26, 2019

June 28, 2019, Board of Directors Meeting Minutes

Chair Steve Vaus (Poway) called the meeting of the Action: Approve SANDAG Board of Directors to order at 9:02 a.m. The Board of Directors is asked to approve the minutes from its June 28, 2019, meeting. 1. Approval of the Meeting Minutes Action: Upon a motion by Supervisor Jim Desmond (County of San Diego), and a second by Councilmember Kristine Alessio (La Mesa), the Board of Directors approved the minutes from its May 10, 2019, Board Policy meeting, and its May 24, 2019, Board Business meeting. Yes: Chair Vaus, Councilmember Cori Schumacher (Carlsbad), Mayor Mary Salas (Chula Vista), Councilmember Mike Donovan (Coronado), Deputy Mayor Ellie Haviland (Del Mar), Mayor Bill Wells (El Cajon), Councilmember Joe Mosca (Encinitas), Mayor Paul McNamara (Escondido), Councilmember Mark West (Imperial Beach), Councilmember Alessio, Mayor Racquel Vasquez (Lemon Grove), Councilmember Mona Rios (National City), Deputy Mayor Jack Feller (Oceanside), Mayor Kevin Faulconer (City of San Diego), Mayor Rebecca Jones (San Marcos), Mayor John Minto (Santee), Mayor David Zito (Solana Beach), Supervisor Desmond, and Councilmember John Franklin (Vista). No: None. Abstain: None. Absent: None.

2. Public Comments/Communications/Member Comments Barry Jantz, East County Economic Development Council (EDC), stated that the East County EDC will remain engaged in the Regional Plan process and will continue to work with SANDAG on the process. Dan Summers, Ramona Community Planning Group, spoke regarding safety concerns on State Route 67. Jim Cooper, Ramona Community Planning Group, spoke regarding safety concerns on State Route 67. Martha Welch, a member of the public, spoke regarding the TransNet Ordinance and how the funds are allocated. Pierre Cochet Weinandt, a member of the public, spoke regarding the 5 Big Moves. Nicole Burgess, a member of the public, spoke regarding support for transit priorities in the region. Sean Chanez, Pedego Electric Bikes, spoke regarding support for electric bikes. Dan McMillan, Helix Water District, East County Economic Development Council, spoke regarding inclusion of east county roads in the Regional Plan. Chair Vaus recognized outgoing Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee (ITOC) member Jonathan Tibbitts and thanked him for his service with the ITOC. Chair Vaus stated that SANDAG received three awards from the San Diego American Planning Association Chapter. Chair Vaus recognized SANDAG staff members for their outstanding work on the SANDAG Regional Mobility Hub Strategy, the Regional Climate Action Planning Framework, also known as ReCAP, and the Plug-In San Diego Regional Needs Assessment Mapping Tool. Chair Vaus stated that SANDAG received two awards recently from the California Association of Public Information Officials: the 511 Roadside Assistance Registration Wallet received an Epic Award for Marketing and Promotional Items and the 2018 San Diego Regional Bike to Work Day effort was also recognized with an Epic Award for a Recurring Special or Community Event. He recognized the project teams for their outstanding work. Chair Vaus recognized Pam Scanlon who earned an international award for her work with the Automated Regional Justice Information System. Pam received the G. Thomas Steele Excellence in Law Enforcement Information and Technology Award, which is presented annually at the International Association of Chiefs of Police, Law Enforcement Information and Technology Section Conference.

3. Policy Advisory Committee Chairs' Report (Information) No reports Action: Information only.

4. Executive Director's Report (Information) Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director, provided an update on key programs, projects, and agency initiatives, including San Diego Forward: The 2021 Regional Plan and the Airport Connectivity Subcommittee. Action: Information only.

6. Policy Advisory Committee Actions (Approve) The Board of Directors was asked to ratify the delegated actions taken by the Policy Advisory Committees. Action: Upon a motion by Supervisor Desmond, and a second by Mayor Jones, the Board of Directors approved Consent Item No. 6, amending the Transportation Committee action on the Federal Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development Grant Program project submittals. Yes: Chair Vaus, Councilmember Donovan, Mayor Wells, Mayor McNamara, Councilmember Alessio, Councilmember Rios, Deputy Mayor Feller, Mayor Faulconer, Mayor Jones, Mayor Minto, Councilmember Franklin, and Supervisor Desmond. No: Councilmember Schumacher, Mayor Salas, Deputy Mayor Haviland, Councilmember Mosca, Councilmember West, Mayor Vasquez, and Mayor Zito. Abstain: None. Absent: None. Action: Upon a motion by Supervisor Kristin Gaspar (County of San Diego), and a second by Supervisor Desmond, the Board of Directors approved Consent Item No. 6, amending the Executive Committee action regarding draft Board of Directors agendas. Yes: Chair Vaus, Councilmember Schumacher, Mayor Salas, Councilmember Donovan, Deputy Mayor Haviland, Mayor Wells, Councilmember Mosca, Mayor McNamara, Councilmember Alessio, Mayor Vasquez, Deputy Mayor Feller, Mayor Faulconer, Mayor Jones, Mayor Minto, Mayor Zito, Supervisor Desmond, and Councilmember Franklin. No: Councilmember West and Councilmember Rios. Abstain: None. Absent: None. Consent

5. Approval of Proposed Contract Award (Approve) The Board of Directors was asked to authorize the Executive Director to execute a contract award for iCommute services.

7. Transportation Development Act Triennial Performance Audits (Approve) The Transportation Committee recommended that the Board of Directors authorize the Executive Director to: 1. transmit the performance audit report of SANDAG to the Caltrans Director as required; 2. certify in writing to the Caltrans Director that the performance audits of transit operators located in the area under its jurisdiction have been completed;

2 3. implement the performance audit recommendations pertaining to SANDAG Transportation Development Act activities; and 4. transmit the other recommendations to the transit operators for implementation.

8. Annual Report to Legislature on Public Transit (Approve) The Transportation Committee recommended that the Board of Directors approve the FY 2018 Public Transit Report for submission to the California Legislature.

9. TransNet Smart Growth Incentive Program Amendment Request* (Approve) The Board of Directors was asked to approve a Smart Growth Incentive Program schedule extension for the City of La Mesa’s North Spring Street Smart Growth Corridor Project.

10. Interstate 5/Voigt Drive Improvements Project* (Approve) The Board of Directors was asked to: 1. approve the Guaranteed Maximum Price negotiated between Mid-Coast Transit Constructors and SANDAG for Supplement 6 to the Construction Manager/General Contractor Construction Service Agreement for the Interstate 5 (I-5)/Voigt Drive Improvements Project in the amount of $35.9 million; 2. authorize the Executive Director to execute Supplement 6; 3. approve an amendment to the FY 2020 Program Budget, adding $12 million in SB 1 Local Partnership Program funding and $4.4 million in project savings from Elvira to Morena and San Diego River Bridge Double Track projects (Capital Improvement Program [CIP] Project Nos. 1239811 and 1239815) to fully fund the I-5/Voigt Drive Improvement Project (CIP Project No. 1200507); and 4. approve an amendment to the FY 2020 Program Budget, accepting $14 million from UC San Diego for the UC San Diego Mid-Coast Improvements (CIP Project No. 1146700) to fund improvements along the corridor.

11. Transportation Development Act and State Transit Assistance Claims (Adopt) The Transportation Committee recommended that the Board of Directors:

1. adopt Resolution Nos. 2019-19 through 2019-24, approving the FY 2020 Transportation Development Act and State Transit Assistance (STA) claims; and 2. adopt the STA findings as certified by North County Transit District.

12. Annual Review of Committees and Working Groups (Information) This report provided an update on the status of all standing and temporary committees and working groups.

13. Executive Director Delegated Actions* (Information) In accordance with various SANDAG Board Policies, this report summarized delegated actions taken by the Executive Director since the last Board Business meeting.

14. Meetings and Events Attended on Behalf of SANDAG (Information) Board members provided brief reports on external meetings and events attended on behalf of SANDAG since the last Board Business meeting. Action: Upon a motion by Councilmember Mosca, and a second by Mayor Zito, the Board of Directors approved Consent Items Nos. 5, and 7 through 14, as amended. Yes: Chair Vaus, Councilmember Schumacher, Mayor Salas, Councilmember Donovan, Deputy Mayor Haviland, Mayor Wells, Councilmember Mosca, Mayor McNamara, Councilmember West, Councilmember Alessio, Mayor Vasquez, Councilmember Rios,

3 Deputy Mayor Feller, Mayor Faulconer, Mayor Jones, Mayor Minto, Mayor Zito, Supervisor Desmond, and Councilmember Franklin. No: None. Abstain: None. Absent: None. Reports

16. Proposed Final FY 2020 Program Budget* (Adopt) The Executive Committee recommended that the Board of Directors adopt Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) Resolution No. RTC-2019-04, adopting the Final FY 2020 Program Budget. André Douzdjian, Finance Director; and Sandi Craig, Senior Budget Program Analyst, presented the item. Action: Upon a motion by Supervisor Desmond, and a second by Mayor Minto, the Board of Directors adopted RTC Resolution No. RTC-2019-04, adopting the Final FY 2020 Program Budget. Yes: Chair Vaus, Councilmember Schumacher, Mayor Salas, Councilmember Donovan, Deputy Mayor Haviland, Mayor Wells, Councilmember Mosca, Mayor McNamara, Councilmember West, Councilmember Alessio, Mayor Vasquez, Councilmember Rios, Deputy Mayor Feller, Mayor Faulconer, Mayor Jones, Mayor Minto, Mayor Zito, Supervisor Desmond, and Councilmember Franklin. No: None. Abstain: None. Absent: None.

15. 2019 Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee Annual Report* (Information) In accordance with the TransNet Extension Ordinance, Dustin Fuller, TransNet Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee Chair, presented the 2019 Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee Annual Report, including the results of the annual FY 2018 TransNet Fiscal and Compliance Audit. Action: Information only.

17. Grant Anticipation Notes Issuance: Review of Draft Documents (Adopt) The Board of Directors was asked to adopt SANDAG Resolution No. 2019-25, authorizing the issuance of up to $335 million of bonds to advance implementation of the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project funding strategy; and the execution and distribution of the documents. Mr. Douzdjian; Peter Shellenberger, Public Financial Management; Victor Hsu, Norton Rose Fulbright, LLP; and Devin Brennan, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP, presented the item. Action: Upon a motion by Mayor Minto, and a second by Deputy Mayor Feller, the Board of Directors adopted SANDAG Resolution No. 2019-25, authorizing the issuance of up to $335 million of bonds to advance implementation of the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project funding strategy; and the execution and distribution of the documents. Yes: Chair Vaus, Councilmember Schumacher, Mayor Salas, Councilmember Donovan, Deputy Mayor Haviland, Mayor Wells, Councilmember Mosca, Mayor McNamara, Councilmember West, Councilmember Alessio, Mayor Vasquez, Councilmember Rios, Deputy Mayor Feller, Council President Georgette Gomez (City of San Diego), Mayor Jones, Mayor Minto, Mayor Zito, Supervisor Desmond, and Councilmember Franklin. No: None. Abstain: None. Absent: None.

18. Proposed New Board Policy No. 040: Unsolicited Proposals and Partnership Requests (Approve) The Executive Committee recommended that the Board of Directors approve proposed new Board Policy No. 040: Unsolicited Proposals and Partnership Requests. Julie Wiley, Special Counsel and Manager of Contracts and Procurement, presented the item. Action: Upon a motion by Chair Vaus, and a second by Councilmember Mosca, the Board of Directors approved proposed new Board Policy No. 040: Unsolicited Proposals and Partnership Requests. Yes: Chair Vaus, Councilmember Schumacher, Mayor Salas, Councilmember Donovan, Deputy Mayor Haviland, Councilmember Mosca, Mayor McNamara, Councilmember West, Councilmember Alessio, Mayor Vasquez, Councilmember Rios, Deputy Mayor Feller, Mayor Faulconer, Mayor Jones, Mayor Minto, Mayor Zito, Supervisor Desmond, and Councilmember Franklin. No: None. Abstain: None. Absent: El Cajon. 4 19. Buena Vista Lagoon Enhancement Plan Status (Information) Keith Greer, Principal Regional Planner, presented an update on the status of the Buena Vista Lagoon Enhancement Plan. Action: Information only.

20. Continued Public Comments There were no continued comments.

21. Upcoming Meetings The next Board Policy meeting is scheduled for Friday, July 12, 2019, at 10 a.m. The next Board Business meeting is scheduled for Friday, July 26, 2019, at 9 a.m.

22. Adjournment Chair Vaus adjourned the joint meeting at 11:02 a.m.

5 Meeting Start Time: 9:02 a.m. Meeting Adjourned Time: 11:02 a.m. Confirmed Attendance at SANDAG Board of Directors Meeting May 24, 2019

Attended Jurisdiction Name Open Session City of Carlsbad Cori Schumacher (Primary) Yes City of Chula Vista Mary Salas (Primary) Yes City of Coronado Mike Donovan (2nd Alt.) Yes City of Del Mar Ellie Haviland (Primary) Yes City of El Cajon Bill Wells (Primary) Yes City of Encinitas Joe Mosca (2nd Alt.) Yes City of Escondido Paul McNamara (Primary) Yes City of Imperial Beach Mark West (1st Alt.) Yes City of La Mesa Kristine Alessio (Primary) Yes City of Lemon Grove Racquel Vasquez (Primary) Yes City of National City Mona Rios (2nd Alt.) Yes City of Oceanside Jack Feller (Primary) Yes City of Poway Steve Vaus (Primary) Yes City of San Diego Kevin Faulconer (Primary) Yes City of San Diego Georgette Gomez (Primary) Yes City of San Marcos Rebecca Jones (Primary) Yes City of Santee John Minto (Primary) Yes City of Solana Beach David Zito (Primary) Yes City of Vista John Franklin (1st Alt.) Yes County of San Diego Jim Desmond (Primary) Yes County of San Diego Kristin Gaspar (Primary) Yes Caltrans Ann Fox (2nd. Alt.) Yes Metropolitan Transit System Mona Rios (Primary) No North County Transit District Tony Kranz (Primary) Yes Imperial County Sup. Jesus Escobar (Primary) Yes U.S. Department of Defense Joe Stuyvesant (Primary) Yes Port of San Diego Garry Bonelli (Primary) Yes San Diego County Water Authority Ron Morrison (Primary) Yes San Diego County Regional Airport Authority April Boling (Primary) Yes Mexico Marcela Celorio (Primary) No Southern California Tribal Chairmen’s Association Cody Martinez (Primary) No

6 Item: 5 Board of Directors July 26, 2019

2020 Census Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group

Overview Action: Approve On March 22, 2019, the Board of Directors approved a The 2020 Census Complete Count resolution to enter into an agreement with the Stakeholder Working Group was established in 2020 California Complete Count Census Office to June 2019. The Working Group recommends coordinate 2020 Census outreach efforts, including that the Board of Directors approve the allocation of available funding, throughout the 2020 Census Complete Count Strategic Plan, San Diego region. In June 2019, the SANDAG Chair including funding allocations available to the approved the establishment of the 2020 Census jurisdictions for Census outreach. Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group to oversee the development and execution of a 2020 Census Strategic Plan and Implementation Plan. Fiscal Impact: Key Considerations SANDAG is receiving $1.56 million from the 2020 California Complete Count Census The membership of the 2020 Census Complete Count Office to coordinate 2020 Census outreach Stakeholder Working Group includes a voting efforts throughout the San Diego region. representative from each SANDAG subregion, the Schedule/Scope Impact: City of San Diego, and the County of San Diego. Additional nonvoting advisory members are included to The 2020 Census Complete Count foster input from other public agencies, the business Stakeholder Working Group held its first community, the education community, and meeting on June 26, 2019, and will meet as Community-Based Organizations (Attachment 1). needed through December 2020. The Working Group is intended to review, provide guidance, and recommend approval of a Strategic Plan, which includes allocation of $1.56 million from the California Complete Count Census 2020 Office that SANDAG is administering (Attachment 2). The Strategic Plan recommended by the Working Group would distribute funding to each of the 18 cities and the County to conduct Census outreach. The methodology used to determine the funding level for each jurisdiction includes a $1,000 minimum and is based on each jurisdiction’s proportion of the region’s hard-to-count populations. Funding can be used for the following outreach purposes: special events, leasing equipment for kiosks, targeted advertising, and assistance from community-based agencies (Attachment 3). As part of its review of the Strategic Plan, the Working Group focused on the importance of collaboration between SANDAG, state, federal, and local efforts to reach populations that are hard to count and the need to locate assistance centers within hard to count communities. Requests also were made to ensure there is sufficient time in the funding process for the jurisdictions to design their outreach programs and flexibility in the contracting process to allow jurisdictions to work within their respective structures. Next Steps Pending approval of the Strategic Plan, the jurisdictions will have approximately three weeks to submit proposed implementation plans. Funds will be distributed based on approved deliverables through September 2020.

Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director Key Staff Contact: Darlanne Hoctor Mulmat, (619) 699-7326, [email protected] Attachments: 1. 2020 Census Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group Membership Roster 2. 2020 Census Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group Charter 3. 2020 Census Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group Draft Strategic Plan

Attachment 1

2020 Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group

The 2020 Census Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group oversees the development and execution of outreach efforts in the San Diego region for the 2020 Census to ensure that everyone is counted once, only once, and in the right place.

Staff contact: Darlanne Hoctor Mulmat, (619) 699-7326, [email protected]

Voting Members

Primary Members Alternates

Angelica Davis, Chair Reyna Ayala City of Chula Vista City of Imperial Beach Representing South County Representing South County Lyn Dedmon Lorena Cordova City of La Mesa City of El Cajon Representing East County Representing East County Kerry Jezisek Cecilia Barandiaran City of Carlsbad City of Oceanside Representing North County Coastal Representing North County Coastal Dulce Salazar Keith Gemmell City of Escondido City of San Marcos Representing North County Inland Representing North County Inland Sylvia Daniels City of Vista Representing North County Inland Gloria Cruz-Cardenas San Diego City Council Tiffany Harrison President Georgette Gómez's office Councilmember Monica Montgomery's Office Representing the City of San Diego Representing the City of San Diego

Geoff Patnoe Tiffany Anderson Representing the County of San Diego Representing the County of San Diego

2 Advisory Members

Primary Members Alternates Ellen Nash Michele Silverthorn Black American Political Association of California United Way (BAPAC), San Diego Chapter Representing Count Me 2020 Coalition Representing Count Me 2020 Coalition Chevelle Tate Lee Hernandez California State President pro Tempore Toni Atkins’ CA State Assemblymember Shirley Weber's Office Office (District 79) Representing State Elected Officials Representing State Elected Officials Rudy Vargas Gabriela Tenorio Senator Kamala Harris’ Office Senator Kamala Harris’ Office Representing Federal Elected Officials Representing Federal Elected Officials Music Watson Andrew Sharp San Diego County Office of Education San Diego Unified School District Representing K-12 Education Representing K-12 Education

TBD TBD Representing Higher Education Representing Higher Education

Chris Nejo Marcus Orozco Pala Band of Mission Indians Pala Band of Mission Indians Representing Native Americans/Tribal Governments Representing Native Americans/Tribal Governments Megan Thomas TBD San Diego Grantmakers Representing Philanthropy Representing Philanthropy Sara Kamiab Jaymie Bradford San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce Representing Business Community Representing Business Community Haney Hong Kelly Batten San Diego Taxpayers Association San Diego Taxpayers Association Representing Taxpayers Representing Taxpayers

Elana Metz TBD Representing Workforce Development Representing Workforce Development

Kimy Wall TBD North County Transit District Representing Transit Agencies Representing Transit Agencies Liz Vagani Missy Solis County of San Diego Public Library County of San Diego Public Library Representing Libraries Representing Libraries Monnee Tong City of San Diego Public Library Representing Libraries

3 Primary Members Alternates

Jennifer Avina Nancy Telford League of Women Voters League of Women Voters – North County Representing Voters Representing Voters

Connie Hernandez Regional Program Manager N/A Representing California Census Complete Count Office Roberto Garcia Andrew Amorao Partnership Specialist Partnership Specialist Representing U.S. Census Bureau Representing U.S. Census Bureau Nataly Schlafer Partnership Specialist Representing U.S. Census Bureau

4 Attachment 2

2020 Census Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group Charter

Working Group Charter Purpose The purpose of the 2020 Census Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group (Working Group) is to involve community leaders throughout the San Diego region in developing a strategic plan and implementation plan for how the county-allocated funds provided by the California Complete Count Census 2020 Office (through SANDAG Contract 5005761) will be used to best encourage all people to respond to the 2020 census, particularly those who have historically been difficult to count. Line of Reporting The Working Group will provide one or more progress reports on its efforts to the SANDAG Board of Directors. Responsibilities Oversee the development and execution of the strategic plan, which is the framework for the 2020 Census Complete Count outreach efforts in the San Diego region, and the implementation plan, which will further refine the action steps necessary to execute the strategic plan. These plans include allocation of the available funding across various outreach activities. Membership Each SANDAG subregion, as well as the City of San Diego and the County of San Diego, shall have a voting representative on the Working Group. The primary member of that subregion on the SANDAG Executive Committee shall appoint an elected official or staff member from one of the member agencies within that subregion, as well as one or more alternates, to represent the subregion as a voting member on the Working Group. Additional nonvoting advisory members may be added at the discretion of the Working Group Chair to foster input from other public agencies, the business community, the education community, and community-based organizations. Selection of Chair The voting members shall elect a Chair of the Working Group from among themselves. The Working Group chair may appoint a Vice Chair as needed to help manage the group’s workload and responsibilities. Meeting Time and Location The Working Group will meet at SANDAG as frequently as needed to achieve its responsibilities as determined by the Chair. Duration of Existence The work of the Working Group will conclude by December 2020 when the agreement with the California Complete Count Census 2020 Office expires.

Revised: June 2019 5 Attachment 3

2020 Census Complete Count Strategic Plan

Information County San Diego Agreement # CCC-18-20001 Contact person Darlanne Hoctor Mulmat Telephone (619) 699-7326 Email [email protected] Submittal Date to State July 30, 2019

Contents 1.1 Outreach Plan ...... 2 1.2 Approach ...... 3 Table 1: Resources for Potential Outreach Activities ...... 7 1.3 Partnership Coordination ...... 8 Figure 1: 2020 Census Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group Organizational Chart ...... 8 Figure 2: CCC Subcommittee Structure ...... 9 1.4 Resources and Infrastructure ...... 10 1.5 Location of Hard to Count Populations ...... 10 Figure 3: SANDAG SwORD ...... 12 1.6 Language Access Plan ...... 13 Table 2: Limited English Proficient Population in the San Diego Region ...... 14 1.7 Local Complete Count Committee (CCC) ...... 14 1.8 Workforce Development ...... 15 1.9 Budget ...... 15 Table 3: Budget ...... 16 Table 4: Deliverables Schedule ...... 17 1.11 Measuring Results ...... 19 Appendix A: ...... 20 Appendix B: ...... 22

1.1 Outreach Plan For more than 200 years, the U.S. Census Bureau has endeavored to count every resident in the nation to determine the number of seats each state has in the U.S. House of Representatives and distribute federal funding to local communities (e.g., Head Start programs, public transportation, road rehabilitation and construction). In support of this effort, the California Legislature has appropriated $26.5 million for California counties to conduct outreach for the 2020 Census to ensure that every resident is counted once, only once, and in the right place. Serving as the State-designated Regional Census Data Center for San Diego since the late 1970s, the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) is actively supporting the Census Bureau and member agencies in preparing for the 2020 Census. With a goal to achieve a complete count of all residents in the San Diego region, SANDAG will coordinate local outreach efforts throughout the San Diego region and administer $1,565,350 in grant funding from the state to support a grassroots approach to reaching communities least likely to self-respond to the 2020 Census (i.e., complete the Census upon receiving an initial invitation). Historically, these “hard to count communities” have primarily included, but are not limited to:  People without broadband internet access  Children under the age of 5  Individuals with limited English proficiency

There are four primary organizations actively working in the San Diego region to support and encourage a complete count of every resident: 1. The U.S. Census Bureau conducts the count by administering the survey, following up door-to-door at residences that do not self-respond, and deploying a media campaign to publicize the Census process that asks residents to electronically submit their responses after receiving a postcard in the mail specifying a link and user ID. 2. The California Complete Count Office provides funding as appropriated by the State legislature for outreach. Funding is allocated to local governments through SANDAG and to community-based organizations through the United Way, as explained below. 3. SANDAG serves as the fiscal agent for funding from the State and coordinates outreach by the local governments. 4. The United Way (the Administrative Community-Based Organization, or ACBO) administers funding for grassroots outreach by convening Count Me 2020, a coalition comprised of over 100 community-based organization and civic groups (see Appendix A for a list of partners as of July 16, 2019).

This strategic plan is being developed to guide local government efforts to reach people in the San Diego region who are least likely to respond to the 2020 Census. This document outlines specific strategies, tactics, and timeline(s) – and describes the specific partnership(s) and how resources will be leveraged – to achieve the highest self-response rate on the Census 2020 questionnaire. It involves close coordination with the Count Me 2020 coalition. While this plan focuses on the efforts led by SANDAG with the local jurisdictions, the collaborative relationship between the ACBO and SANDAG is viewed as a single effort. In addition, there continues to be close coordination with the California Complete Count Office and the U.S. Census Bureau. More details will be provided through the Implementation Plan, which will be completed by the end of September. The plan includes an “air” and “on the ground” communications campaign involving trusted messengers1, which will begin with an umbrella strategy to reach all residents, followed by an emphasis on hard to count populations. The process will be guided by the SANDAG 2020 Census Complete Count (CCC) Stakeholder Working Group, providing high level oversight of outreach to ensure that duplication is avoided, and any gaps are addressed. In addition, members will encourage participation the 2020 Census, serving as ambassadors. Through regular meetings, they will provide input

1 Trusted messengers frequently work with and understand how to successfully engage community members. Trusted messengers are often representatives from community-based organizations. 2

on the strategic and implementation plans, recommend approve for funding allocations, receive news and updates, and monitor outreach progress. This working group will be supported by subcommittees to get the work done. All the work will be completed in close collaboration with the ACBO. See Figures 1 and 2 for the organizational charts. Goal: While the Census response rate in the San Diego region was 78 percent in 2000, it dropped to 72 percent in 2010. The goal of this outreach program is to combat this downward trend, surpass the 2010 rate, and reach the 2000 level or better.

1.2 Approach The Statewide Outreach and Rapid Deployment (SwORD) mapping tool developed by the California Complete Count Office was used to identify the areas and populations least likely to respond to the 2020 Census. The tool includes a hard to count (HTC) index modeled on the U.S. Census Bureau’s hard to count score of past censuses and includes 14 demographic, housing and socioeconomic variables correlated with an area being difficult to enumerate (i.e., count). This index helps to identify areas with high concentrations of the people who are least likely to respond to the Census. An HTC index of 37 served as the minimum threshold for Census tracts or block groups requiring outreach. This level was chosen because it is the average statewide. The region’s 18 cities, along with the County of San Diego, (which are all SANDAG member agencies) have participated in the creation of this strategic plan and have been invited to assist in implementing the outreach. The ACBO also has supported strategic plan development to ensure alignment with the efforts of the Count Me 2020 Coalition. Outreach will be deployed in three phases, consistent with the recommendations of the California Complete Count Office and the U.S. Census Bureau: Educate, Motivate, and Activate. Specific details regarding activities in each phase by will be coordinated through the SANDAG 2020 CCC Stakeholder Working Group and subcommittees. The lists below reflect some of the possible activities the Working Group may choose to deploy. Much of the strategy can be completed through existing resources within the local governments. Activities involving State funding are noted in italics and summarized in Table 1. Additional information regarding the media strategy can be found in Appendix B.

Educate (October – December 2019): The public education phase will raise awareness that the 2020 Census is happening and convey the importance of participating. Activities that may occur during this phase include the following.  Promote Census Job Openings o Publicize available Census jobs to assist with the 2020 Census count (e.g., census takers or enumerators). o Promote Census job openings through local workforce development agencies and community colleges. These groups will be asked to identify viable candidates and provide application assistance.  Amplify Census Messaging o Remind constituents why participation in the 2020 Census is important during presentations by elected officials, as well as in newsletters and other communications. o Include Census messages during community celebrations, festivals, and events (e.g., parades, fairs, festivals, and other gatherings). o Spread Census information through community centers (e.g., Boys and Girls Clubs, YMCA, churches, etc.), community block grant recipients, community collaboratives, social service agencies, etc. o Share Census messages in San Diego County Office of Education (SDCOE) channels, such as newsletters, social media, and the SDCOE website. o Targeted efforts by libraries among hard to count populations to encourage Census participation as part of their regular operations. o The County of San Diego is committed to promoting an accurate Census count and is considering the following outreach strategies, especially among the hard to count communities of the unincorporated areas of the region. 3

. Targeted messaging in existing County-controlled media channels such as publications, newsletters, social media or other customer communications. . Encourage existing Live Well San Diego partners to engage in the Census effort. . Place signage in County offices, community centers, family resource centers, and animal shelters. The budget includes funds to support the production of signage. . Provide Census information to County staff who interact with HTC populations in their regular duties. o Partner with the San Diego Housing Commission and other trusted organizations to include signage about the Census and messaging in regular communication channels. The budget includes funds to support the production of signage. o Solicit support from developers, the Housing Federation, and property owners to broadcast Census messages. o Reach out to mobile home parks through mailings regularly sent to residents (e.g., when administrative fees are due).

 Teach Students About the Census o Work with pre-schools, K-12, and colleges to incorporate “Statistics in Schools” curricula and send messages home. o Share the California Schools-based Communication Outreach Toolkit resources in multiple languages through the 42 local school districts and the SDCOE. o Provide training in San Diego County for history and social studies teachers through the SDCOE on the “Census 2020 Count Me In: Taking Informed Action Today” and “Census 2020 Count Me In: A Historical Perspective” curricula for grades 5, 8, 11, and 12. o Promote a window poster contest in the schools; ask local businesses to display posters. Incorporate these activities into after school and park and recreation programs.

 Educate staff o Provide training on how to encourage participation in the 2020 Census, aligned with training provided through the ACBO to ensure consistency. o Promote ACBO trainings to reach as many organizations as possible.

 Develop an ambassador program o Solicit volunteers in the community that are passionate about having an accurate 2020 Census count, active in their community and local organizations, and excited to engage others with information about the Census, similar to the program in Virginia2. o The budget includes funds to support the coordination of this program that will continue through the motivate and activate phases.

2 commonwealth.virginia.gov/advisory-boards/virginia-complete-count-commission/ways-to-engage/ 4

Motivate (January - February 2020): In early 2020, outreach will focus on motivating participation in the Census overall and particularly in HTC communities and may include the following. These activities will be closely coordinated with the ACBO to ensure cohesive messaging and avoid duplication.  Continue amplifying the message and teaching students about the Census, as described in the education phase.  Include alerts and reminders in public agency notices, mailers, inserts, utility and other bills, signage, newsletters, website pages (including link to the Count Me 2020 website and the Census 2020 home page), social media3, etc. This strategy is intended to reach all residents, including HTC populations.  Targeted efforts by libraries among HTC populations to encourage 2020 Census participation as part of their regular operations.  Use postage meters to stamp Census messages on outgoing public agency mail.  Hold special events and town halls focusing on the 2020 Census. The budget includes funds to support these events held exclusively for Census outreach, including incentives to increase attendance (e.g., refreshments, promotional materials, activities for kids, items to create a fun and inviting atmosphere, etc.).  Hold events at affordable housing properties. The budget includes funds to support these events.

Activate (March – April 2020): As Census postcards are scheduled to arrive from the U.S. Census Bureau in March 20204, the activation phase will focus on self-response. Similar to the motivation phase, these activities will be closely coordinated with the ACBO and may include the following.  Hold ceremonial kick-off and media event to publicize the delivery of Census materials. The budget includes funds to support these kick-off events (including incentives to increase attendance), which will be held in collaboration with the Count Me 2020 Coalition.  Have a “Census Marathon” on public access stations or via social media channels (e.g., live Twitter chat on the Count Me 2020 webpages) where people can call in or comment with questions about the Census and get help filling out their form. The budget includes funds to support these events (including incentives to increase participation), which will be held in collaboration with the Count Me 2020 Coalition.  Connect youth groups with seniors to complete the Census.  Continue amplifying the message as described in the education phase.  Utilize existing public internet access points as questionnaire assistance kiosks at locations such as libraries, affordable housing community centers, schools, community recreation centers/parks, senior centers, or other community hubs. Auto launch these devices to the Census webpage for survey completion. The U.S. Census Bureau will provide training to staff at these locations to provide assistance in filling out the Census.  Augment availability of internet access (e.g., at libraries, affordable housing community centers, schools, community recreation centers/parks, senior centers, or other community hubs) by leasing additional devices dedicated to Census completion in specific HTC locations. The budget includes funds to support equipment leasing.  Establish and staff questionnaire assistance centers/kiosks (including mobile) in areas where no public internet access points are available and personal broadband internet access does not already exist (e.g., libraries, resource centers available through schools, churches, senior centers, etc.). The budget includes funds to support equipment leasing.  Hold “Fill Out the Census” events at questionnaire assistance centers/kiosks, at schools using computer banks, and using computer work rooms in affordable housing units, senior centers, LGBTQ centers, etc. The budget includes funds to support these activities (including incentives to increase participation), which will be held in collaboration with the Count Me 2020 Coalition.

3 Social media includes Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn, and NextDoor. 4 Consider timing of the primary election (March 3) when scheduling events and other outreach. 5

 Publicize the Census Bureau’s toll-free Census Help Line for questionnaire assistance.  Coordinate with Count Me 2020 to establish a help desk system to answer Census-related questions, assist in Census completion, and handle misinformation. One option under consideration is to develop a Memorandum of Understanding between the United Way and 211 San Diego. The Partnership Specialist from the U.S. Census Bureau would provide training to 211 staff. Another idea is to leverage the statewide contract with CommunityConnect Labs for tools like the Help Desk, Misinformation Reporter, and Community Motivator.  Support phone banking and door-to-door outreach efforts by CBOs through an “Adopt a Block” program (similar to the program in Los Angeles County). The budget includes funds to support these efforts.  Develop a Public-Private Partnership to provide mobile WiFi hot spots for outreach at community events or door-to- door efforts, to facilitate Census participation outside of existing public internet access points.  Encourage local elected officials, influencers, and other prominent community members to share information about the Census through social media, promoting participation.  Conduct a hyper-focused advertising campaign to reach people in HTC areas through outdoor and digital advertising, and through advertising in print publications whose audiences include hard to count populations.  Conduct an earned media campaign (i.e., soliciting media coverage outside of a traditional advertising buy through media events, press releases, etc.) to share details about how to participate in the Census.  Explore running videos about the Census on iTV, the SDCOE-operated television channel.

Non-Response Follow-Up (May – July 2020): The Activate Phase concludes with non-response follow-up, which may include the following.  Inform law enforcement, emergency response and dispatch services, including 211 San Diego, about enumerators (i.e., census takers) going door-to-door to follow-up on non-respondents so they can be prepared to handle calls from the community that may arise during this time.  Hold press conferences with influential leaders to alert the community that the Census Bureau enumerators, or Census takers, will visit homes of persons who have not responded. Key community stakeholders will be included to provide linguistically appropriate messaging for HTC communities.  Show how enumerators, or Census takers, can be identified and encourage participation through agency and department notices, mailers, inserts, utility and other bills, signage, newsletters, websites, and social media.  Assist Census Bureau staff in identifying tenant and homeowner representatives who can facilitate access to gated and high security areas.  In areas where response rates remain low following the initial enumeration period: o Collaborate with the Count Me 2020 Coalition to host events. The budget includes funds to support these events (including incentives to increase participation), which will be held in collaboration with the Count Me 2020 Coalition. o Redeploy previously acquired questionnaire assistance centers/kiosk resources to areas with low response rates if not already in place.

Table 1: Resources for Potential Outreach Activities Existing Public Activity Agency Budget State Funding Resources Educate Promote Census Job Openings X Amplify Census Messaging X Signage production X Teach Students About Census X Educate Staff X Ambassador Program X Motivate Amplify Census Messaging X Alerts/Reminders X Targeted Outreach by Libraries X Census message stamped on outgoing mail X Special Events and Press Outreach X Activate Kick Off Event X Census Marathon X Amplify Census Messaging through Existing X Communication Channels Existing Public Internet Access Points as Kiosks X Lease Additional Devices for Libraries X Establishing Kiosks in Areas with No Internet Access X Fill Out the Census Events X Help Desk X Phone Banking/Door-to-Door Outreach X Mobile WiFi hot spots through Public-Private Partnerships X Participation Promotion by Community Influencers X Targeted Advertising Campaign X Earned Media Campaign X Non-Response Follow-Up Inform Emergency Response/Dispatch X Press Conferences X Encourage Participation X Identify Tenant/Homeowner Representatives X Host Events in Areas with Low Response Rates X Move Kiosks to Areas with Low Response Rates X

1.3 Partnership Coordination The outreach strategy will be guided by the 2020 Complete Count Census Stakeholder Working Group5 to avoid duplication and ensure any gaps are addressed. The proposed structure is shown in Figure 1. One group will be convened by SANDAG with representation from the jurisdictions, elected officials, business community, educators, health and human services, and the media. The ACBO will convene another group that will focus on the community agencies working directly with groups that can be hard to count. SANDAG and the ACBO will participate in both groups, as will the US Census Bureau Partnership Specialists and the California Complete Count Office Regional Program Manager. The red arrow at the top of Figure 1 signifies the close collaboration between the effort led by SANDAG and the one through the ACBO.

Figure 1: 2020 Census Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group Organizational Chart

5 sandag.org/2020censuswg 8

Subcommittees will help to ensure that all stakeholders are represented, and all perspectives are incorporated. Potential subcommittees are listed in Figure 2. SANDAG will take the lead by convening subcommittees related to outreach through the region’s transportation agencies (i.e., MTS and NCTD), the existing SANDAG CBO group, Native Americans and tribal governments, and hard to count communities in the unincorporated/rural area. The ACBO has active working groups to: 1) support the execution of the strategic plan, including in Imperial County, 2) work alongside philanthropy to identify additional funding sources to supplement the work, and 3) investigate opportunities to serve as the help desk and information hub. Both organizations will have subcommittees (many of which could be joint working groups) that focus on the strategic plan, implementation, media and events, language access, recruitment, assistance centers and kiosks, non-response follow-up, and volunteers.

Figure 2: CCC Subcommittee Structure

14 1.4 Resources and Infrastructure As required by the State, this section describes the use of the Statewide Outreach and Rapid Deployment (SwORD) mapping portal and location of questionnaire assistance centers/kiosks. SANDAG will be the primary designee to interface with SwORD. SANDAG will work with all partners to maintain updated information in the system so that all outreach efforts are entered in SwORD in a timely manner. To facilitate this process, all contracts for funding will require SwORD data entry.

Questionnaire Assistance Centers/Questionnaire Assistance Kiosks In collaboration with the Count Me 2020 Coalition led by the United Way and the jurisdictions, Questionnaire Assistance Centers/Kiosks (QAC/QAK) will be established and managed throughout the San Diego region in HTC communities, staffed with trained personnel who can guide people through survey completion in at least 12 languages, with options for others depending on language prevalence in a given location (see Table 2). These locations will be in areas where hard to count populations live, with particular attention to areas where there are no centers operated by the U.S. Census Bureau. QAC/QAK locations will be publicized online, in printed material, and through the media campaign (e.g., social media, press releases, etc.). The locations and details regarding events will be logged into SwORD for tracking purposes. Through the strategic planning process, the cities and County have identified 48 libraries in block groups with an HTC Index greater than 37 (Appendix A). All existing publicly accessible devices (e.g., computers or tablets) at each of these libraries will automatically open the Census webpage for survey completion. Additional laptop stations equipped with privacy screens are being considered for select locations to alleviate privacy concerns or where existing public access devices are already in high demand. In addition to libraries, the following institutions are being considered for QACs/QAKs: churches, recreation and community centers, health clinics, multi-unit housing complexes, schools, etc. The goal is to locate QACs/QAKs in community spaces where members of HTC communities congregate and feel safe. Any identified gaps will be filled through mobile kiosks, mobile WiFi hot spots, or tablets with data connections, which also can be taken to events or other outreach activities. Staff at each QAC/QAK location will receive training on how to answer questions from residents, how to engage residents, what information can be provided, and where to go for additional resources or support. QAC/QAK locations also may host events where trained Census workers will be available to assist the public. Every effort will be made to ensure that culturally and linguistically appropriate volunteers or staff are available.

1.5 Location of Hard to Count Populations Strategic planning by local governments and stakeholders in the San Diego region has focused on identifying locations of HTC communities. Using SwORD, SANDAG distributed data to each jurisdiction and the County describing the Census block groups with an HTC index greater than 37 to inform their local plans. The data included the following:  The Census Bureau code for block groups (i.e., the smallest geographical unit used by the U.S. Census Bureau for publishing data)  The description of the Census Bureau code for block groups  The city or Census Designated Place (CDP) - This field is blank when the block group does not reside in a city or CDP  Total population  The California Hard to Count Index  Top three reasons the block group is hard to count based on the 14 factors included in the California hard to count index (i.e., demographic, housing, and socioeconomic variables correlated with an area being difficult to count)  Percent of total housing units that are vacant  Percent of total housing units with 3 or more units in a multi-unit structure 10

 Percent of occupied housing units that are renter-occupied  Percent of occupied housing units with more than 1.5 persons per room  Percent of households that are non-family  Percent of adults (25 or older) who are not high-school graduates  Percent of persons who moved from outside county in past year  Percent of population under 5 years of age  Percent of households receiving public assistance income  Percent of population with income below 150 percent of poverty level  Percent of persons (ages 16 or older) unemployed  Percent of households in which no person age 14 years or older speaks English very well  Low Response Score (percentage)  2010 Mail Return Rate (percentage)  Percent African American  Percent American Indian/Alaskan Native  Percent Asian  Percent Hispanic  Percent Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander  Percent White  Percent another race  Up to eight Community Anchor Institutions6 (name, address, and type of institution)

In addition, SANDAG created a public facing mapping tool (SANDAG SwORD) by adapting the statewide SwORD tool to focus on San Diego and Imperial counties (Figure 3). SANDAG provided training sessions to jurisdictions, the ACBO, and the Count Me 2020 Coalition that included guidance on using the tool and how to overlay predominant non-English language information with the hard to count data. SANDAG SwORD tool will help local jurisdictions and community- based organizations successfully conduct outreach focused in HTC areas. In addition, SANDAG has provided hard copy maps from SwORD and data in spreadsheets for planning meetings. These SANDAG services will continue as planning continues and plans are implemented.

6 Community anchor institutions include fire stations, health care facilities, police stations, libraries, and schools. 11

Figure 3: SANDAG SwORD

The goal is to create partnerships with leaders in the HTC communities who can act as trusted messengers that are linguistically and culturally the same as the audience. As such, outreach and materials will be culturally and linguistically appropriate for each HTC community (beyond simple translation). Outreach will be guided, but not limited, by the following recommendations drawn from the Census Policy Advocacy Network (CPAN), a collaborative effort among multiple statewide organizations in California to help shape policy concerning the 2020 Census.

Messaging  Use tested messages that have been shown to engage each community to participate in the 2020 Census.  Deliver messages through in-language trusted messengers.  Emphasize confidentiality and privacy procedures.  Emphasize the desirability of self-response.  Emphasize the safety of responding to enumerators (i.e., Census takers).  Emphasize the connection between Census participation and funding (e.g., special education, vocational rehabilitation, community mental health services, disabled veteran outreach, and pro bono legal services).  Stress the importance of counting all household members regardless of age, including infants.

Outreach Strategies  Tailor strategies and tactics based on the different demographics within larger HTC populations (e.g., religion, sexual identity, sexual orientation, housing status (renter, homeowner, homeless), U.S. born versus foreign born).  Translate materials into all relevant languages through coordination with the Count Me 2020 Coalition and statewide efforts.  Provide information to faith-based organizations or religious leaders so they can encourage Census participation, when appropriate.  Use a population-based strategy rather than geographic when the hard to count group is a dispersed community. That is, focusing on the type of hard to count population rather than specific neighborhood.  Partner with community representatives and gatekeepers (e.g., through the Count Me 2020 Coalition), including tribal governments, to ensure that messages are appropriate and reach the intended audience.  Publicize Census job opportunities in HTC communities.  Conduct events with necessary physical accommodations, assistive technology, and/or translation or interpretation to meet the needs of people with disabilities.  Create a robust list of outdoor, service-based, and transitory locations that Census takers should visit to achieve a complete count of the homeless population (e.g., soup kitchens, out of the way places people seek shelter).  Partner with trusted messengers for to provide advice and guidance to the U.S. Census Bureau regarding how to achieve a complete count of the homeless population.

Media7  Broadcast messages through traditional media (print, broadcast, and radio), as well as social and digital, particularly through media outlets that seek to serve specific ethnic groups.  Develop social media content to reach younger members of hard to count groups.  Develop an earned media strategy to ensure the Census 2020 message is delivered through trusted messengers, including multi-lingual and media outlets that seek to serve specific ethnic groups.  Provide a toolkit to stakeholders with social media resources.

Questionnaire Assistance Centers/Kiosks  Locate questionnaire assistance centers/kiosks in trusted spaces (e.g., libraries, school computer labs, health clinics, community-based organizations, health and human services organizations) within neighborhoods with HTC populations.

1.6 Language Access Plan In collaboration with the Count Me 2020 Coalition led by the United Way, materials and messages will be translated and culturally interpreted in the required 13 languages listed below (which is consistent with the ACBO’s strategic plan previously submitted to the State in May 2019). This list is supported by data from the American Community Survey (ACS) displayed in Table 2.  Spanish (paper surveys and field enumeration will be provided by the Census Bureau)*  Tagalog*  Filipino  Chinese*

7 Additional detail regarding the media strategy can be found in Appendix B. 13

 Vietnamese*  Arabic*  Somali  Korean*  Farsi  Japanese*  Mandarin  Russian*  Chaldean Neo-Aramaic *Internet self-response and questionnaire assistance provided by the Census Bureau.

Table 2: Limited English Proficient Population in the San Diego Region Language Population Spanish 266,778 Tagalog/Filipino 30,036 Chinese 24,021 Vietnamese 23,321 Arabic 10,007 Somali, Amharic or other Afro-Asiatic languages 8,861 Korean 7,867 Farsi/Persian, including Dari 6,757 Japanese 5,460 Russian 3,175 Source: 2017 ACS 5-year file, Table B16001

Efforts to meet language access will follow the lead of the Count Me 2020 Coalition and rely on their expertise and trusted messengers as the following examples illustrate.  Coordinating with the Count Me 2020 Coalition to provide bilingual teams with interpreters and translated materials at events where limited English proficiency populations are expected.  Holding primary language events, eliminating simultaneous translation, which reduces costs.  Enhancing as many events and activities of the jurisdictions with primary language speakers for the community in which the event/activity is located.  Partnering with the Count Me 2020 Coalition to distribute information through trusted messengers that are linguistically and culturally the same as the audience.  Staffing QACs/QAKs in collaboration with the Count Me 2020 Coalition to ensure appropriate language support.  Utilizing written language materials, visual materials, and automated announcements produced by the Count Me 2020 Coalition. As noted in the ACBO’s strategic plan, the California Census Complete Count Office guidelines and requirements for translation and interpretation services will be followed (i.e., as outlined in the Language and Communication Access Plan), including accommodations for disabled persons. SANDAG will leverage previous translation efforts by the state and Count Me 2020 Coalition where possible to avoid duplication of efforts.

1.7 Local Complete Count Committee (CCC) The structure and organization of the CCC Stakeholder Working Group was previously described in section 1.3 Partnership Coordination.

1.8 Workforce Development Three U.S. Census offices will operate in San Diego County with a capacity of up to 3,000 temporary workers. The outreach plan includes assistance to the U.S. Census Bureau in hiring local Census enumerators (i.e., Census takers) and other personnel to assist with the process of establishing trusted messengers for enumeration. Specifically, public agencies, in collaboration with the Count Me 2020 Coalition, will share job announcements via social media, engage residents in conversation, communicate with departments that assist with employment, post on the Count Me 2020 website, and follow through on requests by the Regional Program Manager.

1.9 Budget Table 3 summarizes the plan of expenditures and the following descriptions provide more details for each line item.  Administrative Costs: SANDAG staff time required for oversight, coordination, and fiscal agent tasks.  Media: These funds will support media buys and contracting with marketing firm (to augment the statewide outreach and public relations campaign).  Outreach: The following are examples of eligible expenses. o Efforts by community-based organizations as requested by the local jurisdictions. o Promotional materials including incentives to increase event attendance and remind people about the Census. o Items to create a fun and inviting atmosphere (e.g., activities for kids). o Equipment for Kiosks, which will be leased and coordinated across agencies to maximize efficiencies and minimize costs. o Non-Response Follow-Up events and outreach in areas with low response rates after April 1, 2020.

Table 3: Budget Category Cost Administrative Costs $156,535.00 Media $156,535.00 Outreach Carlsbad $10,257.07 Chula Vista $89,162.11 Coronado $6,904.44 Del Mar $1,000.00 El Cajon $60,210.97 Encinitas $7,281.20 Escondido $73,397.78 Imperial Beach $20,882.07 La Mesa $31,854.41 Lemon Grove $3,877.55 National City $46,400.13 Oceanside $33,802.01 Poway $7,583.40 San Diego $647,137.16 San Marcos $29,221.95 Santee $1,000.00 Solana Beach $5,914.44 Vista $30,956.64 County-Unincorporated $145,436.66 Subtotal-Outreach $1,252,280.00 Total $1,565,350.00 Note: The allocation across categories is an estimate and may shift as outreach evolves and needs arise. For example, jurisdictions can opt out of the funding or request a reduced amount.

When contracts are in place, the point of contact will be shared to facilitate coordination. In addition, local companies will be asked to sponsor the effort to augment the budget for promotional materials. The methodology for allocating funding to local jurisdictions is based on the hard to count population as follows.  Using the statewide average HTC index of 37, the population of each census tract with an HTC greater than 37 is totaled for each jurisdiction.  The percentage HTC is based on this number divided by the total regional population.  For any jurisdiction without any census tracts meeting the threshold, $1,000 is set as the minimum allocation. For the remainder, the percentage is applied to the total funding available (Table 3).

The allocation across categories is an estimate and may shift as outreach evolves and needs arise. For example, jurisdictions can opt out of the funding or request a reduced amount. Payments will be based on deliverables rather than reimbursements as shown in Table 4.

Table 4: Deliverables Schedule Milestone Payment Amount Timeline 1. Implementation Plan 50% of Total Contract Amount Upon Contract Execution 2. First Progress Report 20% of Total Contract Amount Upon Contract Execution 3. Second Progress Report 20% of Total Contract Amount December 31, 2019 4. Third Progress Report 5% of Total Contract Amount March 31, 2020 5. Final Report 5% of Total Contract Amount September 1, 2020

1.10 Timeline

2019 2020

Activity Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep RPM Meetings Form CCC CCC meetings Submit Strategic Plan Subcommittee meetings Contracts for outreach Determine QAC/QAK locations Quarterly Written Report Implementation Plan Outreach: Education Phase Outreach: Motivation Phase Be Counted California Events April 1, 2020: National Day of Action Outreach: Activation Phase Non-Response Follow-Up Plan Outreach: Non-Response Follow-Up Final Report Close Out/Thank You

18 23

1.11 Measuring Results Information regarding outreach activities will be collected throughout the 2020 Census Complete Count effort. Specific metrics to define success of the advertising effort and local outreach efforts will be determined by subcommittees, further identified in the Implementation Plan, and reflected in contracts with jurisdictions. As activities are planned and implemented, they will be reported by jurisdictions and recorded in SwORD, including all the data elements specified in the online tool as follows.  Reporter Details: Reporter name, organization name, parent organization  Activity Details: Activity type, start and end date and time, location, description, number of staff/volunteers  Collaboration: Primary organizer, additional organizers  Impressions (i.e., the number of times a message is seen or heard): o Portion of Impressions specific to HTC audiences o Portion of Impressions in each language  Feedback and Documentation: Website activity, Facebook link, YouTube/Video link, venue rating, participate engagement rating, interaction quality rating, overall effectiveness, what went well, what could be improved, audience questions/concerns  Funding Sources and Volunteer Hours To gauge effectiveness, SANDAG staff and the 2020 CCC Stakeholder Working Group and its related subcommittees will track all related activities against commitments made in this strategic plan, the implementation plan, and individual outreach plans developed by the various participating agencies.

19 24

Appendix A: Count Me 2020 Coalition Partners as of July 16, 2019 . ACCE Institute . City of Oceanside . 211 San Diego . City of San Diego . ACLU of San Diego and Imperial Counties . City of San Marcos . African Coalition Workforce . City of Vista . Alianza Comunitaria . Comité Cívico del Valle . Alliance for African Assistance . Community Housing Works . Alliance for Community Engagement . Council of Philippine American Organizations . Alliance San Diego (COPAO) . American Friends Service Committee . County of Imperial . Asian Pacific Islander Initiative . County of San Diego – HHSA . Asian Solidarity Collective . Digital Impact And Inc. . Bayside Community Center . Disability Rights San Diego . Black American Political Association of California . Employee Rights Center . Brawley Get Together Senior Citizen Club . Engage San Diego . Brown Bag Coalition . Environmental Health Coalition . Building Skills Partnership . Farmworker CARE Coalition . CA State Assembly . Feeding San Diego . CA State Assembly 76th District, Tasha Boerner . Fern Street Community Arts Horvath . Filipino Press . CA State Assembly 79th District, Shirley Weber . Friends of El Centro Community Services . CA State Assembly 80th District, Lorena Gonzalez Foundation . CA State Senate . Gov House . CA State Senate 39th District, Toni Atkins . Hanana Community Center . Cal Organize . Health Education Advocacy Leadership, Inc. . Calexico Neighborhood House . Home Start . California Rural Legal Assistance, Inc. (CRLA) . Home Start, Inc. . California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) . Horn of Africa . California State University San Marcos . House of China . Campesinos Unidos . Huda Community Center . Casa Familiar . Imperial Valley Food Bank . Center for Community Integration San Diego . Imperial Valley LGBT Resource Center . Center for Social Advocacy (CSA) . Include People . Center for Social Advocates San Diego . Interfaith Community Services . Center on Policy Initiatives . International Rescue Committee . Central Labor Council (AFL-CIO) . Islamic Center of SD . Central San Diego Black Chamber of Commerce . IWJSD . Chula Vista Community Collaborative . J. Walcher . City Heights Community Development . JOB Corporation . Justice Overcoming Boundaries . City of Carlsbad . Karama . City of Chula Vista . Karen Organization of San Diego . City of Escondido . Kitchens for Good 20 25

. Korean American Coalition - San Diego . San Diego Urban Warriors Inc. . La Maestra Community Health Centers . San Diego Youth Services . Lao Community Cultural Center . San Pascual Band of Mission Indians . Latinos y Latinas en Accion . SEIU 221 . League of Women Voters of North County . Social Advocates for Youth (SAY) San Diego . League of Women Voters, San Diego . Somali Bantu Association of America . License to Freedom . Somali Bantu Association of America (SBAOA) . Logan Heights Community Development . Somali Bantu Community of San Diego Corporation . Somali Family Service of San Diego . MAAC . Somali Family Services . Mabuhay Foundation . South Sudanese Community Center . Majdal Community Center . Spread The Love Charity IV . Mano a Mano Foundation . St. Vincent de Paul Village, Inc. (dba Father Joe's . Mas Pace Villages) . MEChA organizations . Survivors of Torture, International . Mid-City CAN . Swift Solutions Consulting . Migrant Education Region IX . The California Endowment . MiraCosta College . The Chicano Federation of San Diego County . Muslim American Society-San Diego . The Filipino School . NALEO Educational Fund . The Global Action Research Center . National Latino Research Center, CSUSM . The San Diego Foundation . Naval Support Services . The San Diego LGBT Community Center . Neighborhood House Association . The San Diego LGBT Community Center (The . New Neighbor Relief Center) . Nile Sisters Development Initiative . Think Dignity . North County Health Services . U.S. Census Bureau . North County Lifeline . U.S. Senator Kamala Harris . Nunez Law Corporation . Union of Pan Asian Communities (UPAC) . Open Heart Leaders . United Missionary Churches/Connecting Hope . Operation Samahan . United Taxi Workers of San Diego (UTWSD) . Our Roots . United Way of Imperial County . Palomar College . United Way of San Diego . Partnership for the Advancement of New . United Women of East Africa Americans (PANA) . United Women of East Africa Support Team . Paving Great Futures . Universidad Popular . Pillars of the Community . University of California, San Diego . Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest . Urban League of San Diego County . Poder Popular para la Salud del Pueblo . UURISE . Rincon Band of Luiseño Indians . Viet Vot . RISE San Diego . Vision Y Compromiso . San Diego Alliance for Asian Pacific Islander . Vista Community Clinic . San Diego Association of Governments . Vista Neighbors in Action . San Diego Council on Literacy . Woman Haven . San Diego County Library Branches in North . Women Give County . YMCA of San Diego County, Childcare Resource . San Diego Grantmakers Service . San Diego Hunger Coalition . Youth Will . San Diego Organizing Project (SDOP)

Appendix B: Media Strategy

A media subcommittee will be formed, led by the Count Me 2020 Coalition and SANDAG, to coordinate development of a robust earned and paid media campaign. Messaging will emphasize the importance of the Census and confidentiality to assure people that it is safe to participate. Message and brand consistency will help improve recall rates, encourage participation, and maximize the value of advertising investment. To measure the impact of media strategies, specific goals/targets will be established (e.g., number of impressions, click-thru rates on digital advertising, and website analytics such as page views). The budget includes funds for SANDAG to contract with a marketing firm in conjunction with the Count Me 2020 Coalition to develop the branding, messaging, and outreach campaign, including message testing for HTC populations (to augment the statewide outreach and public relations campaign). The public information and public affairs officers from each jurisdiction will be asked to participate on the media subcommittee to facilitate amplification of messages through local government channels. For example, messages from the U.S. Census Bureau, the California Complete Count Office, and the Count Me 2020 Coalition will be broadcast through city communication channels (e.g., newsletters, events, website pages, signage, social media, email blasts, etc.). In addition, representatives from the Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) and North County Transit District (NCTD), the two local transit agencies, will be included in the CCC Stakeholder Working Group to coordinate publicity on transit vehicles and through their newsletters and social media. Messaging to people using streaming services is being researched. Telecommunications companies may be approached for public service announcements, as well as mobile applications and radio outlets. Since the Major League Baseball season begins simultaneously with the Census, the San Diego Padres may similarly be approached for public service announcements (e.g., create a video of the Padres’ mascot completing a Census survey). Stories from local residents may be collected for media spots. For example, a young man was interviewed on April 1, 2019 as part of the 2020 Census Call to Action, and shared that his parents did not participate in 2010 and indicated his commitment to outreach so his community is counted. The regional effort will leverage and coordinate with the statewide media campaign and may include the following.  Public service announcements, airport marketing, and highway communications.  Media buys (March through June 2020): o Outdoor: Gas pump toppers, bus placards, bus wraps, bus shelter/bench ads, billboards, etc. in HTC communities o Print: Local ethnic media outlets specializing in HTC populations o Digital: Geo-targeted, social media, pre-roll video o Radio: Peak hour traffic announcements and segments  Census 2020 messages shown along with other advertisements that precede movies (in theaters within hard to count areas in multiple languages).  Produce Census educational/motivational videos (using U.S. Census Bureau videos, material from the California Census Office, and locally produced spots) shown on social media, digital advertising, public access television, and in waiting areas in health care facilities, employment centers, and other areas that people spend time waiting.  Giveaways at events in HTC neighborhoods. Careful consideration will be made in choosing the specific giveaways to ensure that they resonate with the intended audience.

 Promotional materials: Signs/posters and fliers in different languages8. The budget includes funds to cover the costs of producing promotional materials.  Messaging to reach transit specific users (e.g., Flex services, ADA paratransit, etc.).  Earned media: o Community leaders will be invited to serve as spokespeople to appear on radio/TV talk shows to discuss subjects such as confidentiality and the benefits of the Census to individuals and their communities. o Local sports and entertainment personalities appearances on radio/TV stations and social media urging quick response. o Press releases and media events to share information about major Census 2020 milestones and activities.

All messages will meet the following requirements:  Immediately relevant  Consistent  Simple language  Pictures used to convey information whenever possible  Clear messaging (i.e., clear call to action and individual next steps)  Personal touch included  Proper translation, culturally relevant, and accommodates disabilities  Cognizant and appropriate for individuals with disabilities  Mandatory response stated

8 Translations will be vetted with organizations serving specific communities to ensure that they are culturally relevant. 23

28 Item: 6 Board of Directors July 26, 2019

Approval of Contract Awards

Overview Action: Approve Pursuant to direction from the Board of Directors, The Board of Directors is asked to authorize construction awards valued at $5 million or more require the Executive Director to execute contract Board approval. awards for Job Order Contract – General Civil Key Considerations Construction, and the North Park/Mid-City: Landis and Georgia-Meade Bikeways project. In May 2019, SANDAG advertised an invitation for bids (IFB) to seek qualified firms to provide on-call general civil services that consist primarily of, but not limited to, Fiscal Impact: general civil and site improvements, earthwork, utilities, Funding for the proposed construction awards paving, concrete, drainage, building facilities, is included in the FY 2020 Program Budget landscaping mitigation, site clearing and all required through Capital Improvement Program Project incidental professional and technical services for No. 1223082; Overall Work Program Elements SANDAG and its member agencies, Caltrans, Nos. 1210030, 3312100, 1201507, 1200201; Metropolitan Transit System, and North County Transit Bike Program Capital Improvement Program District at locations throughout San Diego County. projects; and other projects as needed. Four bids were received, and staff proposes to award Schedule/Scope Impact: PUB Construction, Inc., the lowest responsive and The Job Order Contract agreement will provide responsible bidder, an agreement for Job Order construction services from 2019 through Contract – General Civil Construction with a maximum 2022. The Landis and Georgia-Meade capacity of $6 million. Considerations in developing the Bikeways project will take approximately independent cost estimate of needed capacity include 550 working days to complete. historical use of contractors to provide these services and staff knowledge of future needs to support the job order construction needs of the agency. In April 2019, SANDAG issued an IFB to seek qualified contractors that could construct the North Park Mid-City: Landis and Georgia-Meade Bikeway Project. As required by SANDAG Board Policy No. 024: Procurement and Contracting – Construction as well as federal provisions, an independent cost estimate resulting in $15,186,026.49 was prepared by SANDAG for the project. The project consists of constructing bikeways in the City of San Diego along Landis Street between Alabama Street and Chamoune Avenue, as well as Georgia Street between Robinson Avenue and Howard Avenue. The scope of the work includes buffered bike lanes, neighborhood traffic circles, raised crosswalks, signal modification, Americans with Disabilities Act-compliant ramps, curb extensions, road lumps, and other traffic calming measures linked to signage and striping. Two bids were received as a result of the IFB. SANDAG staff proposes to award West Coast General Group, a Joint Venture, the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, a construction agreement for the project in the amount of $16,489,746.66. The award amount is within ten percent of the estimate and sufficient budget exists in the project budget. Next Steps Upon approval by the Board of Directors, agreements will be sent to the contractors for signature.

Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director Key Staff Contact: Julie Wiley, (619) 699-6966, [email protected]

Item: 7 Board of Directors July 26, 2019

Policy Advisory Committee Actions, Including California Environmental Quality Act Exemption

Overview Action: Approve Board Policy No. 001: Allocation of Responsibilities, The Board of Directors is asked to ratify the delegates certain responsibilities to the Policy Advisory delegated actions taken by the Policy Advisory Committees to allow SANDAG to effectively address key Committees, including California public policy and funding responsibilities. All items Environmental Quality Act exemption for the delegated to the Policy Advisory Committees are subject Orange Bikeway project. to Board ratification. Below are the delegated actions taken by the Policy Advisory Committees subject to ratification.

Executive Committee: July 12, 2019 Approved the submission of the Mobility as a Service Proof of Concept for Mobility Hubs project to the Federal Highway Administration Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment Grant Program. Approved the Board Business agenda for July 26, 2019, meeting, and canceled the August 9, 2019, Board Policy meeting. Approved an amendment to Overall Work Program Element No. 3101500 (Airport Connectivity Planning), returning $380,000 to the SANDAG Contingency reserve.

Transportation Committee: July 19, 2019 Approved the California Environmental Quality Act exemption for the Orange Bikeway.

Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director Key Staff Contact: Tessa Lero, (619) 595-5629, [email protected]

Item: 8 Board of Directors July 26, 2019

Proposed Amendments to SANDAG Conflict of Interest Code

Overview Action: Approve Every two years, or as needed, staff reviews the The Board of Directors is asked to approve SANDAG Conflict of Interest Code to determine if proposed amendments to the SANDAG updates are needed. Conflict of Interest Code.

Key Considerations The proposed amendments to the Code shown in Fiscal Impact: Attachment 1 reflect updates to existing job titles and None the addition of new positions to the list of designated Schedule/Scope Impact: positions. These are consistent with the adopted None FY 2020 Program Budget. The Board of Directors last approved changes to the Conflict of Interest Code in March 2018.

Next Steps The proposed amendments will implement updates to the list of designated employee and consultant positions subject to filing annual economic disclosure statements.

Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director Key Staff Contact: John Kirk, General Counsel, (619) 699-1997, [email protected] Attachment: 1. SANDAG Conflict of Interest Code with Proposed Amendments

Attachment 1

Conflict of Interest Code

The Political Reform Act, Government Code Sections 81000, et seq., requires SANDAG to adopt and promulgate a Conflict of Interest Code. The Fair Political Practices Commission has adopted a regulation, 2 Cal. Code of Regs. Section 18730, which contains the terms of a standard model Conflict of Interest Code, which can be incorporated by reference, and which may be amended by the Fair Political Practices Commission to conform to amendments in the Political Reform Act after public notice and hearings. Therefore, the terms of 2 Cal. Code of Regs. Section 18730 and any amendments to it duly adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission along with the attached Appendices in which officials, consultants and employees are designated and disclosure categories are set forth, are hereby incorporated by reference and constitute the Conflict of Interest Code of SANDAG.

The persons holding positions listed in the Appendix are designated employees, consultants, or officials. It has been determined that these persons make or participate in the making of decisions that may foreseeably have a material effect on financial interests. Designated persons shall file statements of economic interests with SANDAG when assuming or leaving their position and annually while holding the position. SANDAG will make the statements available for public inspection and reproduction (Gov. Code Section 81008). Statements for all designated employees will be retained by SANDAG and provided to the Code Reviewing Body, the County of San Diego.

2 Appendix A Table 1

Disclosure Designated Positions Categories (see Appendix B)

Members, and alternates, and advisory members of the Board of Directors 1, 2, 4

Members, and alternates, and advisory members of the Policy Advisory 1, 2, 4 Committees Members, and alternates, and advisory members of committees or working groups making decisions influencing expenditure of public 1, 2, 4 funds

Account Executive (I, II, Associate) 3, 4

Accountant (I, II, Associate, Senior) 3, 4

Administrative Analyst (I, II, Associate, Senior) 3, 4

Administrative Office Specialist 3, 4

Borders Program Manager 3, 4

Business Analyst (I, II, Associate, Senior, Principal) 3, 4

Business Services ManagerManager of Business Administration and 2, 4 Operations

Business Services Supervisor 2, 4

Capital Development Project Analyst 1, 3, 4

Capital Development Project Manager 1, 3, 4

Chief Deputy Executive Director 1, 2, 4

Chief Economist 2, 4

Clerk of the Board 1, 2, 4

Communications Manager 3, 4

Contracts and Procurement Analyst (I, II, Associate, Senior) 1, 2, 4

Counsel (Legal I, II; Associate Legal; Senior Legal; Deputy General; Special; 1, 2, 4 General)

Creative Services Manager 3, 4

Customer Service Manager 3, 4

Customer Service Supervisor 3, 4

Department Director 1, 2, 4

Division Director 1, 2, 4

Document Processing Specialist III 3, 4

Economic Research Analyst (I, II, Associate, Senior, Principal) 3, 4

3 Disclosure Designated Positions Categories (see Appendix B) Engineer (I, II, Associate, Senior, Principal) 1, 3, 4

Executive Assistant (I, II, Senior)/Clerk of the Board 1, 2, 4

Executive Director 1, 2, 4

Facilities/Maintenance Coordinator 3, 4

Finance Manager 1, 2, 4

Financial Analyst (I, II, Associate) 3, 4

Financial Programming Manager 1, 2, 4

GIS Analyst (I, II, Associate, Senior) 3, 4

Goods Movement Policy Manager 1, 3, 4

Government Relations Analyst (I, II, Associate, Senior, Principal) 1, 2, 4

Human Resources Analyst (I, II, Associate, Senior) 3, 4

Independent Performance Auditor 1, 2, 4

Information Systems Manager 3, 4

Information Systems Analyst (I, II, Associate, Senior) 3, 4

Information Systems Specialist (I, II, III) 3, 4

Landscape Maintenance Supervisor 3, 4

Maintenance and Facilities Supervisor 3, 4

Maintenance Field Technician (Senior) 3, 4

Management Internal Auditor (Senior, Principal) 1, 2, 4

Manager of Business Administration and Operations 2, 4

Manager of Contracts and Procurement 1, 2, 4

Manager of Financial Programming and Project Control 1, 2, 4

Manager of Human Resources 3, 4

Manager of Software Development SolutionsRegional Information Services 3, 4

Manager of Transportation Analysis and ModelingRegional Models 3, 4

Manager of Small Business Development 2, 4

Marketing Analyst (I, II, Associate, Senior) 3, 4

Office Administrator 3, 4

4 Disclosure Designated Positions Categories (see Appendix B) Office Services Specialist (II, III) 3, 4

Operations Manager 3, 4

Paralegal 1, 2, 4

Principal Technology Program Manager 3, 4

Senior Budget Program Analyst 2, 4

Senior Financial Programming and Project Control Analyst 1, 2, 4

Special Project Director

Strategic Advisor (Executive, Principal) 1, 2, 4

Programmer Analyst (I, II, Associate, Senior) 3, 4

Project Control Manager 1, 2, 4

Project Coordinator 3, 4

Project Development Program Manager 1, 2, 4

Public Communications Officer (I, II, Associate, Senior) 3, 4

Regional Planner (I, II, Associate, Senior, Principal) 1, 3, 4

Research Analyst (I, II, Associate, Senior, Principal) 3, 4

Researcher and Modeler (I, II, Associate, Senior, Principal) 3, 4

Senior Budget Program Analyst 2, 4

Senior Financial Programming and Project Control Analyst 1, 2, 4

Special Project Director 1, 2, 4

Senior Risk Program Analyst 3, 4

Roadway Operations Manager 3, 4

Systems Engineer (I, II, Associate Senior) 3, 4

Technology Program Analyst (I, II, Associate, Senior) 3, 4

Toll Operations Supervisor 3, 4

Pursuant to California Government Code Section 82019, SANDAG consultants who pursuant to a contract with SANDAG, perform the same functions that would otherwise be performed by the persons designated in Table 1 of this document; who manage public investments; who grant agency approval to a contract or to the specifications for such a contract; or who decide whether the policies, standards, or guidelines for SANDAG have been met, also are required to fill out and submit a disclosure of financial interests. Those consultants are required to report in accordance with the disclosure categories shown in

5 Table 2. Consultants will be designated and informed of their obligation to file disclosures whenever any person who, in the opinion of SANDAG, may reasonably be expected to make, participate in making, or in any way attempt to use his/her position as a “consultant” to influence a governmental decision in which the person might reasonably be expected to have a financial interest or perform services that entail the making or participation in the making of decisions that may foreseeably have a material effect on any financial interest.

6 Table 2

Disclosure Categories Type of Consultant Designated Position Title (see Appendix B)

Bond Counsel Consultant 2, 4

Disclosure Counsel Consultant 2, 4

Lobbying Consultant 1, 2, 4

Project Oversight Consultant 1, 2, 4

Disadvantaged Business Consultant 2, 4 Enterprise Advisor

Labor Compliance Advisor Consultant 2, 4

Financial Management Advisor Consultant 1, 2, 4

Auditor Consultant 1, 2, 4

7 Public Officials Who Manage Public Investments

The following positions also are listed below because the individuals holding these positions must file under Government Code Section 87200 as they are involved in the investment of public funds. These positions are listed here for informational purposes only:

Table 3

Public Official Description

Members and alternate members of the Board of Directors

Members and alternate members of the Policy Advisory Committees

Members and alternate members of committees or working groups making decisions influencing expenditure of public funds

Executive Director

Chief Deputy Executive Director

Director of Finance

General Counsel

Financial Management Consultant, Project Managers

8 Appendix B

When a designated person is required to disclose investment and sources of income, he or she need to disclose investments in business entities and sources of income that do business in SANDAG’s jurisdiction, plan to do business in the jurisdiction, or have done business in the jurisdiction in the past two years. In addition to other activities, a business entity is doing business within the jurisdiction if it owns real property within the jurisdiction. Persons designated in Appendix A shall disclose their financial interests pursuant to the appropriate disclosure categories described in the table below.

Table 4

Disclosure Description Category

Interests in real property located within the jurisdiction or within two miles of the 1 boundaries of the jurisdiction or within two miles of any land owned or used by SANDAG.

Investments and business positions in business entities, and income, including loans, 2 gifts,* and travel payments, from sources that provide services, supplies, materials, machinery, or equipment of the type utilized by SANDAG.

Investments and business positions in business entities, and income, including loans, gifts,* and travel payments, from sources that provide services, supplies, materials, 3 machinery, or equipment of the type utilized by the department or division to which the filer is assigned duties.

Investments and business positions in business entities, and income, including loans, 4 gifts,* and travel payments, from sources that have filed a claim against SANDAG in the previous two years, or have a claim pending.

* Gifts with a value of less than $50 aggregate per year are not reportable financial interests at SANDAG

Amended January 2010 Amended March 2012 Amended December 2013 Amended March 2015 Amended January 2016 Amended September 2016 Amended March 2018 Amended

9 Item: 9 Board of Directors July 26, 2019

Proposed FY 2020 Program Budget Amendments: Caltrans Planning Grants

Overview Action: Approve In spring 2019, Caltrans announced the award of five The Executive Committee recommends that planning grants to SANDAG totaling $1,625,502. These the Board of Directors approve the proposed grants were approved by the Board of Directors as amendments to the FY 2020 Program Budget, FY 2020 Pending Discretionary Grants. Acceptance of accepting $1,625,502 in Caltrans the awards requires amendments to the FY 2020 Transportation Planning Grant funding. Program Budget and Overall Work Program (OWP) for the grant amounts and required matching funds. Fiscal Impact: Key Considerations Adds approximately $1.6 million in grant funds to the FY 2020 Program Budget. Table 1 below lists the work element number, the title of Schedule/Scope Impact: each awarded project, the award amount, and local match requirement. Amendments must be submitted to Caltrans no later than November 1, 2019, to begin grant work.

Table 1

Work Local / Amount Total Element Project Title In-kind Awarded Project Cost Number Match

Update of SANDAG’s Cross Border Travel Model 2302400 $200,000 $118,753 $318,753 Component of the Activity Based Model

3101501 San Diego Airport Transit Corridor Study 458,102 59,352 517,454

Congestion Pricing Feasibility Study and Concept 3102400 302,400 75,600 378,000 of Operations: I-805 Direct Access Ramps Holistic Implementation of Adaptation and 3201800 440,000 57,007 497,007 Transportation Resilience Strategies

3401100 State Route 94 Multiuse Pathway Feasibility Study $225,000 $29,151 $254,151

Total $1,625,502 $339,863 $1,965,365

Next Steps Pending approval, staff will coordinate with Caltrans District 11 to amend the FY 2020 Program Budget and the OWP Agreement to accept the funds. Planning work will commence in FY 2020 and be completed by FY 2022.

Charles “Muggs” Stoll, Director of Land Use and Transportation Planning Key Staff Contact: April Petonak, (619) 699-7322, [email protected] Attachments: 1. Update of Cross Border Travel Model Component of the Activity Based Model – New Work Element No. 2302400 2. San Diego Airport Transit Corridor Study – New Work Element No. 3101501 3. Congestion Pricing Feasibility Study and Concept of Operations: I-805 Direct Access Ramps – New Work Element No. 3102400 4. Holistic Implementation of Adaptation and Transportations Resilience Strategies – New Work Element No. 3201800 5. State Route 94 Multiuse Pathway Feasibility Study – New Work Element No. 3401100

2 Attachment 1 WORK ELEMENT: 2302400 NEW-Update of SANDAG’s Cross Border Travel Mode Component of the Activity Based Model FY 2020 BUDGET: $116,753 AREA OF EMPHASIS: Modeling and Research

Amendment Title: Update of SANDAG's Cross Border Model

Funds Source

Prior FY 2020 FY 2021 Total

SB1 Sustainable Communities $0 $106,763 $93,237 $200,000 Grant TDA Planning/Administration $0 $9,990 $108,763 $118,753

TOTAL $0 $116,753 $202,000 $318,753

Funds Application

Prior FY 2020 FY 2021 Total

Salaries, Benefits, Indirect $0 $48,753 $70,000 $118,753

Contracted Services $0 $68,000 $132,000 $200,000

TOTAL $0 $116,753 $202,000 $318,753

OBJECTIVE The objective of this work element is to update SANDAG's Cross Border Model using a 2020 Cross Border Survey to ensure regional planning processes can rely on quantitative analysis tools adequate for border policy, investment, and travel behavioral challenges. The updated Cross Border Model will be a key component of SANDAG's third generation of Activity-Based Model (ABM3), designed for applications in the San Diego Forward: The 2025 Regional Plan. Emphasis in FY 2020 will be on developing scope of work, model structural design, survey data processing, and software implementation.

PREVIOUS ACCOMPLISHMENTS This is a new work element funded by the Caltrans Planning Grant. SANDAG has an existing Cross Border Model developed from a 2010 cross border survey. In FY 2020 OWP 2301100, a new cross border travel behavior survey is included, which will be used to update the Cross Border Model. JUSTIFICATION SANDAG is required by state and federal law to maintain a transportation modeling system that addresses regional planning needs. One of the unique travel demand markets in San Diego are Mexican residents who cross the U.S-Mexican border and make trips in San Diego. Modeling travel behaviors and evaluating Mexican residents' travel demand impact on San Diego's transportation systems is critical for border investment, operation, and environmental decision-making process, one of SANDAG's core functions. 3 Project Manager: Wu Sun Committee(s): Transportation Committee Working Group(s): None

PRODUCTS, TASKS, AND SCHEDULES FOR FY2020 Task % of Task Description / Product / Schedule No. Effort 1 20 Task Develop Scope of Work & Select Description: Consultant Product: Scope of work Completion 4/1/2020 Date:

2 10 Task Propose a Model Design Structure Description: Product: Memo of model design structure Completion 5/1/2020 Date:

3 15 Task Project Management Description: Product: Weekly project team meetings Completion 6/30/2020 Date:

4 25 Task Cross border survey data processing and Description: cleaning. Product: Processed survey data. Completion 6/30/2020 Date:

5 30 Task Software update from Java-Based CT- Description: RAMP to Python-Based ActivitySim Product: Updated software Completion 6/30/2020 Date:

FUTURE ACTIVITIES Continue work to develop, implement, calibrate, and validate the updated Cross Border Model, including updating model software from a Java-Based CT-RAMP platform to a Python-Based ActivitySim Platform. Additionally, a series of sensitivity and scenario tests will be performed to test the suitableness of the updated Cross Border Model in border decision-making process.

Note: This is a new work element funded by the Caltrans Planning Grant. This project is to update SANDAG's existing Cross Border Model from a 2010 cross border survey to a 2020 cross border survey. The updated Cross Border Model will be a key component of SANDAG's third generation of Activity-Based Model (ABM3), designed for applications in the San Diego Forward: The 2025 Regional Plan.

Attachment 2 WORK ELEMENT: 3101501 NEW-San Diego Airport Transit Corridor Study FY 2020 BUDGET: $517,454 AREA OF EMPHASIS: Sustainable Development: Planning and Funding Strategies

Amendment Title: Caltrans Strategic Partnerships Grant - San Diego Airport Transit Corridor Study

Prior FY 2020 Total FTA 5304 Strategic Partnerships Transit $0 $458,102 $458,102 TDA Planning/Administration $0 $59,352 $59,352

TOTAL $0 $517,454 $517,454

Prior FY 2020 Total

Salaries, Benefits, Indirect $0 $59,601 $59,601 Contracted Services $0 $457,853 $457,853

TOTAL $0 $517,454 $517,454

OBJECTIVE The objective of the San Diego Airport Transit Corridor Study will create a regional, long-term transit vision for the two critical transportation corridors that service the San Diego International Airport (SDIA); Harbor Drive and Pacific Highway; through the lens of comprehensive multi-modal corridor plans. Utilizing project recommendations from SANDAG's newly formed Airport Steering Committee coupled with CTC-approved corridor planning guidelines, this study will actively engage regional stakeholders, including the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority, Port of San Diego, City of San Diego, County of San Diego, MTS, and Coastal Commission, to identify a shared vision and implementation strategy for transit projects to SDIA that will compete competitively for various federal, state, and local discretionary funds.

PREVIOUS ACCOMPLISHMENTS SANDAG and its partner agencies have completed numerous planning studies which were analyzed and discussed at various inter-agency team meetings as well as several Airport Steering Committee meetings. Additionally, SANDAG submitted a Request for Information to the Department of the Navy for information related to further development of the NAVWAR site to include transportation projects to the SDIA. Additionally, SANDAG released a RFI for Airport Connectivity Concepts and the proposals were analyzed by an expert review panel for consideration into further planning. Several land use concepts have been presented, sites narrowed for further study, and now modeling work has begun to inform staff and the Airport Steering Committee on identifying a shared vision and implementation strategy.

JUSTIFICATION With direction from the SANDAG Board of Directors and its newly formed Airport Steering Committee, SANDAG has committed to be the lead agency for the collaborative effort between the Port of San Diego, the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority, the City of San Diego, the two transit operators, as well as other stakeholders to continue its work assessing and evaluating concepts for further planning and design.

Project Manager: Jennifer Williamson Committee(s): None Working Group(s): Airport Connectivity Subcommittee

PRODUCTS, TASKS, AND SCHEDULES FOR FY2020 Task % of Task Description / Product / Schedule No. Effort

1 2 Task Working Group Prioritization Description: Product: SANDAG and Working Group staff will develop a summary of key findings. Completion 1/31/2020 Date:

2 3 Task Description: Project Management Product: SANDAG will work to complete a task order for consultant assistance on airport transit corridor study and report quarterly on efforts. Completion 6/30/2020 Date:

3 12 Task Public Participation and Outreach Description: Product: Staff with develop a working group charter, create public involvement and outreach materials in addition to hosting and managing all stakeholder meetings. Completion 6/30/2020 Date:

4 65 Task Airport Corridor Study Description: Product: A feasibility study will be conducted and will include a prioritized list of projects. Siting, ROW needs, alignments, and priority measures will be conducted and modeled. The projects will then be moved into 30% design for public review and stakeholder use. Lastly, an analysis of capital and operating costs will be conducted. Completion 6/30/2020 Date:

5 10 Task Collaborative Funding to Facilitate Airport Ground Access Description: Product: A case studies white paper will be developed consisting of recommendations and a matrix of cost-sharing alternatives to be considered. Completion 6/30/2020 Date:

6 8 Task Draft and Final Report Description: Product: A draft report will be completed for review and then a final report submitted. SANDAG will then present the final report. Completion 6/30/2020 Date:

6 FUTURE ACTIVITIES The main goal of this study is to develop airport transit corridor plans that will prioritize and identify implementation strategies for the region’s preferred SDIA transit projects. A critical component to this study will be the collaborative funding strategies analysis, preferred financial strategy, and multi-agency partnership agreements that will determine how partner agencies will fund any necessary project initiation documents and ultimately program the preferred transit projects.

Note: SANDAG was awarded a Caltrans Strategic Partnership Grant in the amount of $458,102 for FY 2020.

7 Attachment 3 WORK ELEMENT: 3102400 NEW-Congestion Pricing Feasibility Study and Concept of Operations: I-805 Direct Access Ramp FY 2020 BUDGET: $57,350 AREA OF EMPHASIS: Sustainable Development: Planning and Funding Strategies

Amendment Title: Amendment to Accept Grant Funds

Funds Source

Prior FY 2020 FY 2021 - 2022 Total FHWA Strategic Partnership $0 $45,880 $256,520 $302,400 for Sustainable Transportation TDA Planning/Administration $0 $11,470 $64,130 $75,600

TOTAL $0 $57,350 $320,650 $378,000

Funds Application

Prior FY 2020 FY 2021 - 2022 Total

Salaries, Benefits, Indirect $0 $14,350 $27,650 $42,000 Contracted Services $0 $43,000 $293,000 $336,000

TOTAL $0 $57,350 $320,650 $378,000

OBJECTIVE The objective of the project is to develop a feasibility study and concept of operations to assess the operational and financial viability of implementing congestion pricing on the two existing Interstate 805 (I-805) Direct Access Ramps (DARs). The proposed study will also evaluate how Active Transportation and Demand Management (ATDM) strategies can be applied to the DARs to optimize the overall efficiency of the transportation system and will evaluate possible project delivery methods.

PREVIOUS ACCOMPLISHMENTS This is a new OWP Element.

JUSTIFICATION

This project will help examine the implementation of congestion pricing as part of the I-805 Express Lanes project, which is an integral part of the San Diego region's plan to deploy a system of interconnected managed lanes that can effectively meet the changing and diverse needs of travelers along the corridor. The study supports SANDAG's ongoing effort and collaboration with state, regional, and local entities, as well as with transit operators, to improve tolling operations and promote ATDM strategies to maximize the efficiency to the existing transportation system.

8 Project Manager: Alex Estrella Committee(s): Transportation Committee Working Group(s): None

PRODUCTS, TASKS, AND SCHEDULES FOR FY2020 Task % of Task Description / Product / Schedule No. Effort 1 30 Task Project Initiation and Project Administration and Management Description: Product: Grant kick-off meeting, executed consultant contracts, quarterly reports. Completion 6/30/2020 Date:

2 70 Task Assess Existing Conditions and Operational Performance Description: Product: Inventory of Existing and Planned Transportation Infrastructure and Operational Analysis and Findings. Completion 6/30/2020 Date:

FUTURE ACTIVITIES This is a multi-year project and future activities include the identification and assessment of ATDM and congestion pricing concepts, completion of a sketch level tolling revenue assessment and financial plan, and completion of a congestion pricing implementation plan for the I-805 DARs.

9 Attachment 4 WORK ELEMENT: 3201800 NEW-Holistic Implementation of Adaptation and Transportation Resilience Strategies FY 2020 BUDGET: $119,996 AREA OF EMPHASIS: Sustainable Development: Planning and Funding Strategies

Amendment Title: NEW-Holistic Implementation of Adaptation & Transportation Resilience Strategies

Funds Source

Prior FY 2020 FY 2021 - 2022 Total Public Transportation Account - $0 $115,027 $324,973 $440,000 Adaptation Planning Grant TDA Planning/Administration $0 $4,969 $14,038 $19,007

TOTAL $0 $119,996 $339,011 $459,007 In-kind Match $0 $9,934 $28,066 $38,000 Total Project Cost $497,007 Note: In-kind match of $38,000 will be provided by San Diego Regional Climate Collaborative

Funds Application

Prior FY 2020 FY 2021 - 2022 Total Salaries, Benefits, Indirect $0 $9,996 $19,011 $29,007 Contracted Services $0 $15,000 $120,000 $135,000 Pass Through to Other $0 $95,000 $200,000 $295,000 Agencies TOTAL $0 $119,996 $339,011 $459,007

In-kind Match $0 $9,934 $28,066 $38,000 Total Project Cost $497,007

OBJECTIVE The objective of this grant-funded work element is to support SANDAG member agencies that are transitioning from planning to implementation of their climate planning work. In addition, this work element will help jurisdictions identify synergies among existing local, regional, and state mitigation, transportation, and adaptation policies, plans, and projects to maximize co-benefits and investment efficiencies. The major project deliverables include: (1) a methodology to help local jurisdictions prioritize adaptation strategies (Comprehensive Prioritization Tool); (2) a regional economic guidance document; (3) a guidance document for integrating equity into adaptation and transportation resilience planning; and, (4) an adaptation implementation toolkit that incorporates previously- funded Senate Bill 1 grants to help jurisdictions build capacity to implement strategies that will provide their communities the most co-benefits.

Emphasis in FY 2020 will be on consultant procurement, beginning preparation of the regional economic guidance document, performing a review of existing equity indicators and local and regional climate and transportation planning documents, and beginning development of an engagement strategy to involve new partners and stakeholders. 10

PREVIOUS ACCOMPLISHMENTS This new work element would leverage results from related SANDAG initiatives. With previously awarded SB 1 funding, SANDAG is currently developing a Regional Sea-Level Rise Adaptation Guidance Document and a Regional Adaptation Needs Assessment. In addition, the SANDAG Roadmap Program has provided technical assistance and regional guidance to local jurisdictions for the development, implementation, and monitoring of Climate Action Plans. This project will leverage these previous and current adaptation and mitigation efforts to support member agencies in prioritizing implementation of adaptation strategies that link mitigation, adaptation, and broader community benefits.

JUSTIFICATION

The San Diego region has made strides in achieving climate change mitigation goals through local Climate Action Plans (CAPs), with 18 of the region’s 19 jurisdictions either developing, updating, or adopting CAPs that focus on climate mitigation. However, planning for climate change adaptation in the region is still relatively nascent, and is often conducted in a silo separate from more advanced climate action planning. There are numerous opportunities to leverage existing CAP efforts to rapidly advance our local and regional capacity to adapt to and prepare for climate impacts that affect our regional transportation infrastructure and communities, while simultaneously addressing mitigation priorities. However, jurisdictions need tools and guidance on how to holistically implement local climate strategies before large investments are made without full consideration of synergies among transportation, mitigation, and adaptation efforts. This project will build on SANDAG’s previous SB 1-funded adaptation work and Roadmap Program activities to provide member agencies with tangible guidance on how to prioritize identified climate risks and adaptation needs.

Project Manager: Anna Lowe Committee(s): Regional Planning Committee Working Group(s): Regional Energy Working Group, Regional Planning Technical Working Group, Environmental Mitigation Program Working Group

PRODUCTS, TASKS, AND SCHEDULES FOR FY2020 Task % of Task Description / Product / Schedule No. Effort 1 3 Task Project management, administration, and coordination. Description: Prepare meeting materials and notes invoice packages and quarterly reports Product: and develop case studies. Completion 6/30/2020 Date:

2 38 Task Develop economic guidance document for climate planning and Description: transportation professionals. Summary of existing local and regional climate and transportation Product: planning documents; draft regional economic guidance document. Completion 6/30/2020 Date:

3 17 Task Integration of equity into climate and transportation planning and Description: implementation. Assessment of equity indicators in climate and transportation Product: planning and implementation documents. Completion 6/30/2020 Date:

11 4 30 Task Develop a Comprehensive Prioritization Tool to support moving from planning to Description: implementation. Product: Begin development of the Comprehensive Prioritization Tool. Completion 6/30/2020 Date:

5 12 Develop, implement and track an engagement strategy to involve Task new partners, specifically equity and community organizations as well Description: as new regional and statewide audiences. Product: Develop engagement strategy; track engagement. Completion 6/30/2020 Date:

FUTURE ACTIVITIES Future activities include development of a methodology for prioritizing adaptation and transportation resilience strategies (Comprehensive Prioritization Tool); development of a regional economic guidance document; development of a guidance document for integrating equity into adaptation and transportation resilience planning; development of an adaptation implementation toolkit; and, related trainings, and outreach and engagement.

12 Attachment 5 WORK ELEMENT: 3401100 NEW-State Route 94 Multiuse Pathway Feasibility Study FY 2020 BUDGET: $53,708 AREA OF EMPHASIS: Sustainable Development: Planning and Funding Strategies

Amendment Title: State Route 94 Multiuse Pathway Feasibility Study

Funds Source

Prior FY 2020 FY 2021 - 2022 Total

State Highway Account - $0 $53,708 $171,292 $225,000 Sustainable Communities

TOTAL $0 $53,708 $171,292 $225,000 In-kind Match $0 $6,958 $22,193 $29,151 Total Project Cost $254,151 Note: In-kind match of $29,151 will be provided by Jamul Indian Village of California.

Funds Application

Prior FY 2020 FY 2021 - 2022 Total

Salaries, Benefits, Indirect $0 $3,708 $2,605 $6,313

Contracted Services $0 $50,000 $168,687 $218,687

TOTAL $0 $53,708 $171,292 $225,000 In-kind Match $0 $6,958 $22,193 $29,151 Total Project Cost $254,151

OBJECTIVE The objective of this grant-funded work element is to study alternatives for a multi-use path along SR 94 between Jamacha Road/Campo Road and the Jamul Indian Village (Jamul). Through this study, Jamul Indian Village plans to address a missing active transportation link by looking at multi-use path alternatives to increase access to key community destinations and improve safety for residents, employees, and tribal members. This study will include the involvement of stakeholders and members of historically disadvantaged rural communities along the corridor. The study will complete a multi-use pathway concept plan, planning-level cost estimates, and a feasibility analysis. The core project team will include Caltrans, the County of San Diego, Grossmont Union High School District, and SANDAG with Jamul as a lead.

Emphasis in FY 2020 will include procurement of the consulting services and development of existing conditions.

13 PREVIOUS ACCOMPLISHMENTS This project was identified by the Jamul Indian Village of California and local stakeholders through the Intraregional Tribal Transportation Strategy (ITTS). It builds upon previous community engagement efforts made by the ITTS and the County Trails Master Plan.

JUSTIFICATION The 2018 Intraregional Tribal Transportation Strategy (ITTS) identified SR 94 as a major commuter facility that provides access into and out of the Jamul Indian Village (Jamul). As a result of community input, SR 94 has been identified as a corridor that should provide increased mobility options. SR 94 serves as the only access to and from the reservation, which is one of the largest employment centers within the project area. With the newly completed gaming facility, there is an increase in vehicles along SR 94 due to visitors and employees coming to the site. However, the only existing method to and from the reservation is by driving or taking transit. To provide mobility options for employees and tribal members of the reservation. The study will address a missing active transportation link for the entire community as there are no existing bike or pedestrian facilities along SR 94 today.

Project Manager: Tracy Ferchaw Committee(s): Transportation Committee, Borders Committee Working Group(s): Interagency Technical Working Group on Tribal Transportation Issues

PRODUCTS, TASKS, AND SCHEDULES FOR FY2020 Task % of Task Description / Product / Schedule No. Effort 1 50 Task Project Management: Description: Consultant task order, PM meeting agenda and summaries, Project Product: Development Team (PDT) notes, monthly invoices, and quarterly progress reports Completion 6/30/2020 Date:

2 10 Task Existing Conditions Analysis Description: Product: Existing Plan Review, Collision Analysis, Opportunities and Constraints Map Completion 6/30/2020 Date:

3 15 Task Concept Development Description: Alternative Alignments (up to 5), Intersection Designs, Cost Analysis, and Product: Funding Opportunities Completion 6/30/2020 Date:

4 25 Task Stakeholder Engagement Description: Open House and Workshop Events (up to 4) and Stakeholder Interviews Product: (up to 4) Completion 6/30/2020 Date:

14 FUTURE ACTIVITIES The study will ultimately result in a preferred alternative alignment and concept for the multi-use path along SR 94 that will improve access to key community resources for students, employees, tribal members, and residents. After the selection of a preferred alignment, the study will create an action plan that identifies steps to move towards project implementation. As funding sources are identified, steps to work towards project implementation include on-going coordination with project stakeholders, preliminary engineering to develop 30% plans, right-of-way considerations, environmental permits, and development of final design plans.

Note: The purpose of this amendment is to create an OWP to accept a Sustainable Communities Caltrans grant. SANDAG will be the Grantee with Jamul Indian Village of California as Sub-Recipient.

15 Item: 10 Board of Directors July 26, 2019

FY 2020 SANDAG Financial and Compliance Audit

Overview Action: Approve Board Policy No. 039: Audit Policy Advisory Committee The Audit Committee recommends that the and Audit Activities, authorizes the Audit Committee to Board of Directors exercise the option under recommend to the Board of Directors which firm to the existing agreement with Crowe LLP to contract with to conduct the annual financial statement conduct the FY 2020 SANDAG Financial and audit. To keep the FY 2018 interim audit on schedule, Compliance Audit. however, a procurement to select an audit firm was

necessary prior to the formation of the Fiscal Impact: Audit Committee. This procurement resulted in the The Crowe LLP agreement annual cost was execution of a five-year on-call contract with the negotiated at the time of procurement. The independent audit firm Crowe LLP. The auditor has $227,920 annual cost is funded from federal, completed the FY 2018 audit and has commenced work state, TransNet, toll, member assessment, and on the FY 2019 audit. other revenues.

Key Considerations Schedule/Scope Impact: With approval, the FY 2020 audit will The Crowe LLP five-year on-call contract provides the commence May 2020. Board of Directors the option to either continue with Crowe LLP each fiscal year or issue a new task order for auditing services. The standard timing for Audit Committee review and Board approval would be approximately one year prior to fiscal year end to account for the option of a new procurement. For the FY 2019 audit, that decision would have been in early FY 2019, around the time the auditor was completing the interim phase of the FY 2018 financial and compliance audit. To keep the FY 2019 interim audit on schedule, the agreement for year two was executed in May 2019. Annual review and approvals have been scheduled in all future May meetings to provide the opportunity for the Audit Committee and Board to review options and make a decision in accordance with Board Policy No. 039. At its July 12, 2019, meeting, the Audit Committee reviewed options for the FY 2020 SANDAG Financial and Compliance Audit and recommended the Board of Directors continue with Crowe LLP for the FY 2020 audit.

Next Steps Crowe LLP is scheduled to present the Statement on Auditing Standards 114, which is a required communication, to the Audit Committee at its August 9, 2019, meeting.

Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director Key Staff Contact: Lisa Kondrat-Dauphin, (619) 699-1942, [email protected] Item: 11 Board of Directors July 26, 2019

iCommute Rideshare Week

Overview Action: Adopt The SANDAG iCommute program will promote The Board of Directors is asked to adopt Rideshare Week September 30 – October 4, 2019. Resolution No. 2020-05 in support of The purpose of Rideshare Week is to encourage the use Rideshare Week September 30 – of transportation alternatives to driving alone. October 4, 2019.

Key Considerations Fiscal Impact: Rideshare Week is a nationally recognized annual event Rideshare Week activities were approved in held in October to promote transportation alternatives the FY 2020 budget. to driving alone, including carpool, vanpool, and transit. SANDAG will promote ridesharing to employers and Schedule/Scope Impact: commuters during this week to increase awareness and Rideshare Week promotions and events take participation in iCommute programs and services. place between September 30 and Rideshare Week coincides with Free Ride Day, hosted by October 4, 2019. the Metropolitan Transit System and North County Transit District in conjunction with California Clean Air Day, on October 2, 2019.

Next Steps Member agencies are asked to issue their own proclamation for Rideshare Week 2019 modeled after Attachment 1 to promote Rideshare Week within their own jurisdictions. Employers will be invited to register to participate in Rideshare Week activities and receive promotional resources and recognition. Commuters across the region will be invited to participate in commuter-related promotions.

Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director Key Staff Contact: Jay Faught, (619) 619-7324, [email protected] Attachment: 1. Resolution No. 2020-05, Rideshare 2019 Proclamation

Attachment 1

401 B Street, Suite 800 Resolution No. 2020-05 San Diego, CA 92101 Phone (619) 699-1900 Fax (619) 699-1905 sandag.org

Rideshare Week 2019 Proclamation

WHEREAS, reducing traffic congestion and providing alternatives to driving alone are key components of the region’s quality of life; and

WHEREAS, Rideshare Week 2019 is a national event to promote alternative commute choices including carpool, vanpool, and transit; and

WHEREAS, SANDAG is committed to increasing awareness of sustainable transportation choices for the region’s commuters and employers; and

WHEREAS, SANDAG is encouraging employers to register to participate, and commuters to share the ride; NOW THEREFORE

BE IT RESOLVED that SANDAG hereby proclaims September 30 – October 4, 2019, as Rideshare Week, and encourages employers and commuters throughout the region to share the ride during this week and throughout the year.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th of July 2019.

Attest:

Chair Secretary

Member Agencies: Cities of Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, El Cajon, Encinitas, Escondido, Imperial Beach, La Mesa, Lemon Grove, National City, Oceanside, Poway, San Diego, San Marcos, Santee, Solana Beach, Vista, and County of San Diego. Advisory Members: California Department of Transportation, Metropolitan Transit System, North County Transit District, Imperial County, U.S. Department of Defense, San Diego Unified Port District, San Diego County Water Authority, Southern California Tribal Chairmen’s Association, and Mexico.

2 Item: 12 Board of Directors July 26, 2019

Requested Time Extensions: TransNet Smart Growth Incentive Program and TransNet Active Transportation Program Climate Action Plan Requirement

Overview Action: Approve In October 2018, the Board of Directors awarded The Board of Directors is asked to approve a $2.5 million to the City of Lemon Grove in TransNet six-month time extension for the City of Smart Growth Incentive Program (SGIP) funds for its Lemon Grove and City of Santee to complete Connect Main Street project and $306,999 to the their Climate Action Plan requirements under City of Santee in TransNet Active Transportation Grant the TransNet Smart Growth Incentive Program Program (ATGP) funds for its Prospect Avenue and and TransNet Active Transportation Program, Mesa Road Improvements project. The SGIP and ATGP respectively. grants require that a Climate Action Plan (CAP) be adopted by the jurisdiction within one year of the Board of Directors’ approval of the grant. Failure to do Fiscal Impact: so could result in funding being awarded to the next If the time extension is approved by the eligible project(s) in ranked order. Board of Directors, the City of Lemon Grove would remain eligible to receive its Due to various constraints, the City of Santee and the $2.5 million Smart Growth Incentive Program City of Lemon Grove are unable to complete their CAPs award for the Connect Main Street project and by the one-year deadline and are at risk of losing the City of Santee would be eligible to receive funding for their SGIP and ATGP projects. its $303,999 Active Transportation Grant Program award. Key Considerations Schedule/Scope Impact: In December 2017, the Board of Directors approved the The City of Santee will complete its Climate requirement that a local jurisdiction must have an Action Plan by September 2019. The City of adopted CAP to be eligible to receive SGIP and ATGP Lemon Grove is committed to completing its funding. The intention of the CAP requirement in the Climate Action Plan by April 2020. SGIP and ATGP call for projects is based on commitments made in San Diego Forward: The 2015 Regional Plan to implement climate action planning in the San Diego region. In May 2018, the City of Lemon Grove completed the Broadway Downtown Village Specific Expansion which was funded with a prior SGIP planning grant. The prior project identified needed improvements that support new planned land uses that will revitalize downtown Lemon Grove. Funding for the Connect Main Street project, which is the current SGIP project subject to the CAP adoption requirement, will implement the improvements identified in the Downtown Village Specific Plan by providing for vibrant, pedestrian-friendly, and transit-oriented neighborhoods. These elements further the goals of the SGIP grant program. The City of Santee’s Prospect Avenue and Mesa Road ATGP project will modify a downtown intersection and improve visibility, reduce pedestrian crossing distance, add a bicycle connection, and improve safety at an existing school crossing. To maintain eligibility for the two projects’ funding, the City of Lemon Grove and the City of Santee have requested a six-month extension to complete and adopt their Climate Action Plans. Attachments 1 and 2 details the City of Lemon Grove’s and the City of Santee’s climate action planning efforts to date as well as milestones achieved.

Next Steps If approved, work by the City of Santee and the City of Lemon Grove on their CAP efforts will be monitored and a grant agreement for their projects would be executed upon approval of the CAP. If the extensions are not approved, the City of Santee and the City of Lemon Grove will not be eligible to receive funding for their projects. The $2.5 million awarded to the City of Lemon Grove would be allocated to the two partially-awarded SGIP projects that received a lower ranking (projects highlighted in Pink in Attachment 3). The $306,999 awarded to the City of Santee would be allocated to a partially funded ATGP project (SD Streamview Drive, highlighted in Pink in Attachment 4).

Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director Key Staff Contact: Tracy Ferchaw, (619) 699-1977, [email protected] Attachments: 1. Letter from the City of Lemon Grove 2. Letter from the City of Santee 3. Smart Growth Incentive Program Capital Grants – Final Project Rankings and Funding Recommendations – October 2018 4. Active Transportation Grant Program Capital Grants – Final Project Rankings and Funding Recommendations

2 , .. Attachment 1

CITY OF LEMON GROVE "Best Climate On Earth" Community Development Department

Tracy Ferchaw SANDAG 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101

July 9, 2019

Dear Ms. Ferchaw,

The City of Lemon Grove (City) is currently participating in SANDAG's Energy Roadmap Program to develop a Climate Action Plan (Plan). The Plan is required for the City to be eligible to receive a $2.5 million grant from the Trans Net Smart Growth Incentive Program (SGIP) for the City's Connect Main Street project. The SGIP grant eligibility requires that a Plan must be adopted within one year of the SANDAG Board of Director's approval or by October 26, 2019. The City would like to request a six-month extension to complete the Plan and allow time for City staff to present the final Plan to the City Council.

Previous efforts undertaken to maintain the project schedule. The City has completed initial data collection to quantify emissions and responded to questions related to City procedures. In conjunction with this data collection, City staff conducted multiple meetings with SANDAG staffand their consultants to develop preliminary measure scenarios and provide feedback. The City has also initiated work on a public outreach plan to inform the development of the draft Plan.

Detailed explanation on the reason for the delay, and how it was unavoidable. During the second half of 2018, the City experienced personnel issues that resulted in insufficient time allocation to data collection and project management. The unforeseen lack of City resources resulted in delays that prevented the Plan from moving forward.

Demonstrate the ability to succeed in the timeframe proposed. On June 5, 2019 a new Community Development Manager began service with the City. The new Community Development Manager will be responsible for completing the Plan. The requested six-month extension will allow the Community Development Manager to finalize the Plan and present the final Plan to the City Council by April, 2020. With additional resources in place, the City is committed to completing the Plan according to the proposed schedule and to completing improvements associated the Connect Main Street SGIP grant according to the approved schedule. The City acknowledges that failure to do so could result in a loss of SGIP grant funding for the Connect Main Street project.

Community Development Manager Community Development Department City of Lemon Grove

3 Attachment 2

MAYOR

John W. Minto '"" ------�•f-<7 ""'1"\��-"..... CITY OF SANTEE CITY COUNCIL Ronn Hall Stephen Houlahan Laura Koval Rob McNelis

July 17, 2019

Tracy Ferchaw SANDAG 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101

Dear Ms. Ferchaw,

The City of Santee is currently developing a Climate Action Plan (CAP). The Plan is required for the City to be eligible to receive a $306,999.00 grant from the TransNet Active Transportation Grant Program (ATGP). The ATGP grant Eligibility requires that a Plan must be adopted within one year of the SAN DAG Board of Director's approval or by July 27, 2019. The City would like to request a six-month extension to complete the Plan and allow time for City staff to present the final Plan to the City Council. Previous efforts undertaken to maintain the project schedule. The City of Santee has developed a climate action plan, entitled "Sustainable Santee Plan." This plan is designed to help Santee achieve State-targets on greenhouse gas ("GHG") emission reductions. An Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). The Sustainable Santee Plan and the EIR were made available for public and agency review and comment for 45 days. Staff is currently responding to comments and preparing for a City Council Hearing on the EIR and the Sustainable Santee Plan in August 2019.

A detailed explanation on the reason for delay, and how it was unavoidable.

The City Council public hearing to request adoption of the Sustainable Santee Plan was delayed by the ever-changing regulatory framework for GHG reductions in California. In September 2018, then-Governor Brown signed Executive Order EO B-55-18 which established a State wide policy of achieving carbon-neutrality by 2045. There was uncertainty on whether or how to incorporate this goal into the essentially completed Sustainable Santee Plan. Another unavoidable delay was that the plan required more public outreach and education than was originally anticipated. Several stakeholder groups requested changes to the plan. City staff has met with the Climate Action Campaign on several occasions to negotiate the final draft of the Sustainable Santee Plan.

4 10601 Magnolia Avenue • Santee, California 92071 • (619) 258-4100 • www.cityofsanteeca.gov

�t Printed on recycled paper Santee Grant Extension Request July 17, 2019 Page 2 of 2

Demonstrate the ability to succeed in the timeframe proposed. The project to develop and adopt a climate action plan required ten (10) steps. Most of the work on this project has been completed. The City of Santee has completed seven of the below ten steps, with steps 8 through 10 remaining:

1. Developed the Sustainable Santee Plan 2. Published the Notice of Preparation in accordance with CEQA 3. Held a Scoping Meeting in accordance with CEQA 4. Refined the plan based on public input 5. Developed the EIR 6. Published a Notice of Availability for the Sustainable Santee Plan and EIR. The plan and EIR were available for agency and public review and comment from March 15, 2019 to April 29, 2019 7. The City received nine (9) comment letters on the Plan and EIR 8. Complete responses to public and agency comments on the plan and the EIR 9. Complete final plan and final EIR 10. Conduct public hearing, certify the EIR and adopt the Sustainable Santee Plan no later than August 28, 2019

With the additional time, staff intends to place the Sustainable Santee Plan and EIR on the City Council Agenda no later than August 28, 2019. We appreciate the San Diego Association of Government's consideration in this matter.

Respe 1 8 �

i:.:QQ, lanie Kush, AICP Development Services Director cc: Carl Schmitz, Principal Engineer File

5 Attachment 3

Smart Growth Incentive Program Capital Grants - Final Project Rankings and Funding Recommendations - October 2018 Initial Total Available: $ 20,800,000 Rollover from SGIP Planning*: SGIP Capital $ 632,909 Rollover from CAP & CS: $ 850,000 New Total Available: $ 22,282,909 Climate Complete Additional Sum Final Action Streets Final Match Fund Requested Recommended Cumulative Remaining Match Req. to Jurisdiction Abbreviated Project Name of Rank Plan Policy Rank Amount Funding Project Funding Funds Allocated Funding Accept Partial Ranks (CAP)? (CS)? Funding 1 National City Roosevelt Ave SG Revit. Plan Yes Yes 17 1 $625,000 $ 2,080,000 $ 2,080,000 $ 2,080,000 $ 20,202,909 2 Vista Paseo Santa Fe Phase 3 Yes Yes 18 2$ 6,370,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 4,580,000 $ 17,702,909 3 San Diego DT Mobility Cycle Way P1&2 Yes Yes 21 3$ 2,100,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 7,080,000 $ 15,202,909 4 El Cajon El Cajon Transit Ctr. Connections Underway Underway 22 4 $301,200 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 9,580,000 $ 12,702,909 5 El Cajon Main St-Green St Gateway Underway Underway 26 5 $1,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 12,080,000 $ 10,202,909 6 Lemon Grove Connect Main St Phase 1&2 Underway Underway 33 6 $1,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 14,580,000 $ 7,702,909 7 Chula Vista TASIP Phase 3 Yes Yes 41 7$ 2,200,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 17,080,000 $ 5,202,909 8 San Diego DT Wayfinding-Cycle Network Yes Yes 50 8 $180,000 $220,000 $220,000 $ 17,300,000 $ 4,982,909 9 National City Highland Ave Mob. Mini-Hubs Yes Yes 51 9 $ 1,000 $ 1,863,665 $ 1,863,665 $ 19,163,665 $ 3,119,244 10 (tie) National City Sweetwater Protected BW Yes Yes 52 10 $278,906 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 19,800,000 $ 2,482,909 10 (tie) San Diego East Village Green Park Yes Yes 52 10$ 2,100,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 1,039,748 $ 20,839,748 $ 1,443,161 $ 1,460,252 10 (tie) Escondido Grand Ave CS 1 (Rd Diet,SW,Env) Yes Yes 52 10 $ 0 $ 2,500,000 $ 1,443,161 $ 22,282,909 $ 0 $ 1,056,839 13 National City 8th St Transit Ctr. Mobility Hub Yes Yes 56 13 $1,000 $ 2,175,945 $ 0 $ 24,458,854 $ (2,175,945) 14 National City National City Wayfinding Yes Yes 60 14 $1,000 $ 1,376,948 $ 0 $ 25,835,802 $ (3,552,893) 15 Escondido Grand Ave CS 2 (RDBT & Ped X) Yes Yes 66 15 $300,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 0 $ 28,335,802 $ (6,052,893) 16 La Mesa DT Village Streetscape Phase 2 Yes Yes 71 16 $309,870 $ 2,065,800 $ 0 $ 30,401,602 $ (8,118,693) 17 La Mesa Grossmont Center Dr Bridge Yes Yes 80 17$ 2,483,267 $ 2,085,900 $ 0 $ 32,487,502 $ (10,204,593) 18 Santee SD River Trail-Town Center Underway Yes 86 18 $ 0 $ 2,460,525 $ 0 $ 34,948,027 $ (12,665,118)

Recommended for full funding Summary Recommended for partial funding SGIP Capital Grants- Fully Funded: $ 19,800,000 Recommended for no funding SGIP Capital Grants- Partially Funded: $ 2,482,909 Total SGIP Capital Grant Funds Awarded: $ 22,282,909 *Rollover from SGIP Planning includes unspent funds of $292,909 and an additional $165,000 from St. Joseph's Park and Unspent Capital Funds (Rollover to SGIP Planning): $ 0 $175,000 from Valley Center, totaling $632,909.

Notes: 1. The SANDAG Board of Directors deemed the City of San Diego FRED Fleet Expansion project as ineligible on July 27, 2018. This project is not shown on the table. 2. The City of Chula Vista requested the withdrawal of its F Street Promenade Phase 1 application. This project is not shown on the table. 3. The City of National City has declined funding of its Highland Avenue Mobility Mini-Hub application. This project is crossed out in red.

Jurisdictions must have an adopted Climate Action Plan (CAP) and an adopted Complete Streets (CS) Policy to receive grant funding. Jurisdictions that have not yet adopted these documents have up to one year from the Board's action on the final funding awards to adopt them before funding is transferred to the next highest-ranked project .

6 Attachment 4

Project Rankings and Funding Recommendations Active Transportation Grant Program (ATGP) Capital ($2.7 million available, 75% of ATGP) Overall ATGP Capital Funding Available: $ 2,700,000

Initial Total Available (60% of ATGP Capital): $ 1,620,000 Rollover from ATGP Non‐Capital (60%): $ 84,000 ATGP Capital ‐ Large Category Rollover from Small Category: $ 0 New Total Available: $ 1,704,000 Project Final Sum of Final Match Fund Requested Recommended Cumulative Funds Remaining Jurisdiction Abbreviated Project Name CAP? CS Policy? ID Rank Ranks Rank Amount Funding Project Funding Requested Funding 21La Mesa LM University Ave Ped Bike Yes Yes 6 1 $ 466,000 $ 502,000 $ 502,000 $ 502,000 $ 1,202,000 6 2 Solana Beach SB Lomas Santa Fe Active Trans. Yes Yes 12 2 $ 68,450 $ 616,050 $ 616,050 $ 1,118,050 $ 585,950 5 3 San Diego SD Streamview Dr Yes Yes 19 3 $ 200,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 585,950 $ 2,618,050 $ (914,050) 1 4 Del Mar Del Mar Streetscape Yes Yes 25 4$ 1,735,000 $ 665,000 $ 0 $ 3,283,050 $ (1,579,050) 3 5 National City National City Bicycle Wayfinding Yes Yes 28 5 $ 1,000 $ 826,800 $ 0 $ 4,109,850 $ (2,405,850) 4 6 San Diego SD CH Ped. Improvements Yes Yes 36 6$ 1,000,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 0 $ 5,309,850 $ (3,605,850)

Initial Total Available (40% of ATGP Capital): $ 1,080,000 Rollover from ATGP Non‐Capital (40%): $ 56,000 ATGP Capital ‐ Small Category Rollover from Large Category: $ 0 New Total Available: $ 1,136,000 Project Final Sum of Final Match Fund Requested Recommended Cumulative Funds Remaining Jurisdiction Abbreviated Project Name CAP? CS Policy? ID Rank Ranks Rank Amount Funding Project Funding Requested Funding 17 1 National City National City Division St Yes Yes 6 1 $ 100,000 $ 312,000 $ 312,000 $ 312,000 $ 824,000 18 2 National City National City Blvd Bike Conn. Yes Yes 12 2 $ 1,000 $ 394,001 $ 394,001 $ 706,001 $ 429,999 16 3 La Mesa La Mesa Mass. Ave Yes Yes 19 3 $ 39,000 $ 123,000 $ 123,000 $ 829,001 $ 306,999 19 4 Santee Santee Prospect Ave Underway Yes 23 4 $ 174,120 $ 348,760 $ 306,999 $ 1,177,761 $ (41,761)

Recommended for full funding Recommended for partial funding Summary Recommended for no funding ATGP Large Category Grants ‐ Fully Funded: $ 1,118,050 ATGP Large Category Grants ‐ Partially Funded: $ 585,950 Jurisdictions must have an adopted Climate Action Plan (CAP) and an adopted Complete Streets (CS) Policy to receive grant ATGP Small Category Grants ‐ Fully Funded: $ 829,001 funding. Jurisdictions that have not yet adopted these documents have up to one year from the Board's action on the final ATGP Small Category Grants ‐ Partially Funded: $ 306,999 funding awards to adopt them before funding is transferred to the next highest‐ranked project. Total ATGP Capital Grant Funds Awarded: $ 2,840,000 Unspent Funds (Rollover to ATGP Non‐Capital): $ 0

7 Item: 13 Board of Directors July 26, 2019

Proposed FY 2020 Program Budget Amendment: Fiber Optic Information Network Gap Closure Project

Overview Action: Approve In 2017, the Metropolitan Transit System (MTS), The Transportation Committee recommends North County Transit District (NCTD), Caltrans, and that the Board of Directors approve an SANDAG entered into an Inter-Agency Fiber Optic Cable amendment to the FY 2020 Program Budget Sharing Agreement Memorandum of Understanding to: (MOU) to share spare fiber capacity. Spare capacity in 1. create a new Capital Improvement the fiber optic cables is being used to expand each Program (CIP) project (CIP project No. agency’s information network, and to create network 1131500) to establish the Fiber Optic redundancy. These partnerships allow agencies to save Information Network Gap Closure Project; taxpayers’ dollars through strand exchange instead of 2. transfer $430,000 of SANDAG toll installing costly new infrastructure. revenues to CIP Project No. 1131500; and 3. accept $90,000 from the North County Key Considerations Transit District to fund CIP Project To utilize the spare capacity, gaps between existing No. 1131500. cables must be closed. Since the MOU was executed, many of the gaps in the fiber optic network have been or are being closed as part of existing projects. However, Fiscal Impact: gaps remain in both Escondido and Oceanside. The $430,000 of SANDAG tolling revenues will be taken from reserves and will not impact The Fiber Optic Information Network Gap Closure operations or the delivery of other projects. Project will close these two gaps. Attachment 1 shows the completed fiber optic network. Schedule/Scope Impact: Construction of the Fiber Optic Information The cost of closing the gaps is estimated at $520,000. Network Gap Closure project is expected to The transfer of $430,000 from SANDAG toll revenues begin in late 2019 and be completed within and acceptance of $90,000 from NCTD`s positive train one year. control (PTC) network project will fund the Fiber Optic Information Network Gap Closure Project (Attachment 2). When the fiber optic redundant ring is complete, the South Bay Expressway Operation Center will connect to tolling systems throughout the San Diego region, improving toll road management and reliability of network connections. In addition, the fiber optic redundant ring will provide a secondary communications path for the Positive Train Control system and increase network reliability. MTS is planning to contribute $100,000 in this fiscal year, increasing the total project budget to $620,000. Concurrently, Caltrans is developing a project to establish connections to the Otay Mesa Transit Center and State Route 11 as its contribution to regional connectivity. Next Steps Project completion will enable a high-speed redundant information network for all four agencies. Highway, Managed Lanes, railroad, and bus Rapid transit control centers will have the capability to view and communicate without interruption through various surveillance methods to improve the safety and reliability of all systems. This project also will establish a reliable high-speed high bandwidth information network infrastructure to support future transportation applications on the technological horizon.

Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director Key Staff Contacts: Dinara Ussenova, (619) 699-7339, [email protected] Chip Finch, (619) 595-5617, [email protected] Attachments: 1. Project Map: Fiber Optic Communication Network Expansion through Partnerships 2. Proposed Budget Amendment for Capital Improvement Program Project No. 1131500, Fiber Optic Information Network Gap Closure

2 Fiber Optic Communication Network Attachment 1 Expansion Through Partnerships

Map Area 76 San Diego Region Camp Pendleton

5 76

Vista Oceanside NCTD SPRINTER FIBER

78 ESCONDIDO GAP OCEANSIDE GAP CLOSURE CLOSURE San Marcos

Carlsbad Escondido

NCTD COASTER FIBER

Encinitas 5

Solana Beach Poway

Del Mar 56 67 CALTRANS I-15 FASTRAK TOLL LANES 144 STRAND FIBER

County of San Diego

805 5

52 Santee 8 52

67 San 125 Diego 15 La Mesa 163 El Cajon MTS GREEN LINE 8

805 Lemon Grove

125 MTS ORANGE LINE

282 LEGEND 94 54 Caltrans Fiber Coronado 125 Caltrans Fiber (Future) 75 National NCTD Fiber City MEDIA 3 COMMUNICATION FIBER MTS Fiber MTS SOUTH BAY BRT SANDAG Tolling Fiber (Future) Media 3 Chula Vista

San Caltrans Hub Diego 805 Imperial

Caltrans Interface Beach 905 UNITED STATES Cabinet MEXICO 5 Map Not To Scale 2-D 2

1-D Tijuana, B.C. 1

3 4892 4/19 Attachment 2 Project Number: 1131500 Corridor Director: Chip Finch RTIP Number: N/A Project Manager: Dinara Ussenova Project Name: Fiber Optic Information Network Gap Closures PM Phone Number: (619) 699-7339

Project Scope Site Location Progress to Date The Fiber Optic Information Network Gap Closure Project will close New Project the remaining gaps in Escondido and Oceanside. When completed, the fiber optic ring will extend from Downtown San Diego to Oceanside over to Escondido and back to Downtown San Diego.

Project Limits Major Milestones Escondido (I-15 & West Washington) and Oceanside Transit Centers Draft Environmental Document N/A Final Environmental Document N/A Ready to Advertise Aug-19 Begin Construction Oct-19 Open to Public Oct-20 Construction Complete Jan-21

SANDAG Expenditure Plan ($000)

Budget Phase Prior Years FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 TOTAL Administration $0 $0 $35,000 $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000 Environmental Document 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Design 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right-of-Way Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right-of-Way Capital 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Construction Support 0 0 35,000 0 5,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40,000 Construction Capital 0 0 400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 400,000 Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Legal Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Communications 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Project Contingency 0 0 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40,000 Total SANDAG $0 $0 $510,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $520,000

CALTRANS Expenditure Plan ($000)

Prior Years FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 TOTAL Environmental Document $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right-of-Way Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right-of-Way Capital 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Construction Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Construction Capital 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Caltrans $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Total Proposed SANDAG & Caltrans $0 $0 $510,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $520,000

TransNet Pass-Through $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Caltrans RE Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Funding Plan ($000)

Funding Source Prior Years FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 TOTAL Local 91060000 NCTD $0 $0 $90,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $90,000 93140001 SR 125 Toll Revenues $0 $0 $210,000 $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $215,000 92140001 I-15 FasTrak® Revenues $0 $0 $210,000 $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $215,000 Total $0 $0 $510,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $520,000

4 Item: 14 Board of Directors July 26, 2019

Proposed FY 2020 Program Budget Amendment: El Portal Undercrossing

Overview Action: Approve The City of Encinitas is completing the design of the The Transportation Committee recommends El Portal Undercrossing Project (Project) for the the Board of Directors approve an amendment Los Angeles-San Diego-San Luis Obispo (LOSSAN) Rail to the FY 2020 Program Budget to: Corridor and has asked SANDAG to manage the 1. create a new Capital Improvement construction phase of the Project. The Project will Program (CIP) Project (CIP Project No. provide a direct connection to the Coastal Rail Trail, a 1146900) to establish the El Portal Class I facility for pedestrian and bike use and a key Undercrossing Project; and active transportation corridor in the region. 2. accept $8.937 million in funding from the Key Considerations City of Encinitas and State Active Transportation Program to fully fund In May 2009, the City of Encinitas environmentally construction. cleared three grade-separated pedestrian undercrossings of the LOSSAN railway tracks at Santa Fe Drive, El Portal Street, and Montgomery Avenue. In 2012 and Fiscal Impact: 2013, SANDAG constructed the Santa Fe Drive All costs associated with the construction of undercrossing for the City. the El Portal Undercrossing Project, including design support and construction management, In 2015, the City was awarded a California would be funded by the City of Encinitas. Transportation Commission Active Transportation Program grant of $3.802 million to construct the Schedule/Scope Impact: undercrossing at El Portal Street. The City has Construction is expected to start in mid-2020 contributed another $5.135 million, bringing the total and the facility is scheduled to open in budget to $8.937 million (Attachment 1). spring 2022. The City will be responsible for 100 percent of the cost of the Project and negotiation for a Memorandum of Understanding defining roles and responsibilities for delivery of the Project is underway.

Next Steps Staff will work with the City of Encinitas to finalize project design and to advertise the Project for bid. Construction is expected to start in fall 2020.

Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director Key Staff Contact: Bruce Smith, (619) 699 1907, [email protected] Attachment: 1. Proposed FY 2020 Budget Amendment for Capital Improvement Program Project No. 1146900, El Portal Undercrossing

Attachment 1 Project Number: 1146900 Corridor Director: Bruce Smith RTIP Number: ENC46 Project Manager: To be advised Project Name: El Portal Undercrossing PM Phone Number: (619) 699-1907

Project Scope Site Location Progress to Date Complete final design and construct pedestrian undercrossing Project has been environmentally cleared and designed to underneath the existing NCTD operated railroad at the El Portal the 95% level by the City of Encinitas. Permitting is in location described in the Project Limits below. progress.

Project Limits Major Milestones The project is located at MP 237.1 on the LOSSAN Rail Corridor. Draft Environmental Document Mar-09 The undercrossing will connecting Highway 101 to Vulcan Ave, Final Environmental Document May-09 within the City of Encinitas and is located East of El Portal street. Ready to Advertise Mar-20 Begin Construction Sep-20 Open to Public Apr-22 Construction Complete Oct-22

SANDAG Expenditure Plan ($000)

Budget Phase Prior Years FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 FY 27 FY 28 Total Administration $0 $0 $100 $153 $161 $25 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $439 Environmental Document 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Design 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 Right-of-Way Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right-of-Way Capital 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Construction Support 0 0 75 1,092 977 162 0 0 0 0 0 2,306 Construction Capital 0 0 0 2,800 2,200 367 0 0 0 0 0 5,367 Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Legal Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Communications 0 0 25 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 225 Project Contingency 0 0 0 200 200 100 0 0 0 0 0 500 Total SANDAG $0 $0 $300 $4,345 $3,638 $654 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,937

Outside Agency Expenditure Plan ($000)

Budget Phase Prior Years FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 FY 27 FY 28 Total Environmental Document $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right-of-Way Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right-of-Way Capital 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Construction Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Construction Capital 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Outside Agency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total SANDAG & Outside Agency $0 $0 $300 $4,345 $3,638 $654 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,937

TransNet Pass-Through $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Caltrans RE Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Funding Plan ($000)

Funding Source Prior Years FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 FY 27 FY 28 Total State ATP - FHWA $0 $0 $97 $1,800 $1,800 $105 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,802 Local 91030151 City of Encinitas 0 0 203 2,545 1,838 549 0 0 0 0 0 $5,135 Total $0 $0 $300 $4,345 $3,638 $654 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,937

2 Item: 15 Board of Directors July 26, 2019

SB 1 State of Good Repair Program: North County Transit District Project List Action: Adopt Overview The Board of Directors is asked to adopt The SB 1 State of Good Repair (SGR) Program includes Resolution No. 2020-04, authorizing the $107.6 million in funding statewide in FY 2019-2020 on submittal of the North County Transit District a formula basis to transit operators for eligible transit project listing under the FY 2019-2020 maintenance, rehabilitation, and capital projects. Of that SB 1 State of Good Repair Program. amount, $6.2 million is expected to be available to the San Diego region—$1.6 million to North County Transit Fiscal Impact: District (NCTD) and $4.5 million to Metropolitan Transit System (MTS). The State of Good Repair Program is expected to provide $6.2 million to the San Diego Under the SGR guidelines, recipients must submit to region in FY 2019-2020 —$1.6 million to Caltrans a list of projects proposed for SGR program North County Transit District and $4.5 million funding to receive an allocation from the State to Metropolitan Transit System. Controller’s Office (SCO). Schedule/Scope Impact: Per the SGR Program guidelines, SANDAG is responsible Updated estimates for the State of Good for submitting claims on behalf of NCTD while MTS may Repair Program are expected to be provided in receive its funds directly. Additional information on the August 2019. Pending approval by the Board SGR Program may be found at: at that time, SANDAG would pass the SGR www.dot.ca.gov/drmt/docs/spsgr/finalguidelines.pdf funds on to NCTD for implementation of the Key Considerations Locomotive Replacement project. On December 20, 2018, the NCTD Board of Directors approved the use of SGR Program funds for the Locomotive Replacement project located in the cities of Carlsbad, Del Mar, Encinitas, Oceanside, San Diego, and Solana Beach, as well as at the Marine Corps Base at Camp Pendleton. This project will replace seven Tier 0 and two Tier 2 COASTER locomotives with cleaner, more efficient Tier 4 locomotives. Project benefits include more efficient operations, decreased emissions, and fuel savings. The total project cost is $53.2 million and includes $5 million in SGR Program funding and $8.1 million in State Transit Assistance Program funds. The remaining project costs ($40.1 million) would be funded through a $22 million Carl Moyer Air Pollution Control District grant, State Rail Assistance, and local Transportation Development Act funding.

Next Steps Pending approval by the Board of Directors, the NCTD project listing for FY 2019-2020 will be submitted to Caltrans as required per SGR Program guidelines by the September 1, 2019, deadline. The Board is scheduled to consider the NCTD SGR claim at its September 27, 2019, meeting following updated estimates provided in August 2019. Pending action at that time, SANDAG would pass the SGR funds on to NCTD for implementation of the Locomotive Replacement project.

Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director Key Staff Contact: Michelle Smith, (619) 595-5608, [email protected] Attachments: 1. SANDAG Board Resolution No. 2020-04

Attachment 1

401 B Street, Suite 800 Resolution No. 2020-04 San Diego, CA 92101 Phone (619) 699-1900 Fax (619) 699-1905 sandag.org

Authorization for Submittal of FY 2019-2020 Project Listing to the State of California for the State of Good Repair Program

WHEREAS, the San Diego Association of Governments is an eligible project sponsor and may receive State Transit Assistance funding from the State of Good Repair Account (SGR) now or sometime in the future for transit projects; and

WHEREAS, the statutes related to state-funded transit projects require a local or regional implementing agency to abide by various regulations; and

WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (Beall, 2017) named the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) as the administrative agency for the SGR; and

WHEREAS, Caltrans has developed guidelines for the purpose of administering and distributing SGR funds to eligible project sponsors (local agencies); NOW THEREFORE

BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the San Diego Association of Governments as follows:

1. That the attached SGR FY 2019-20 project listing for the North County Transit District (Exhibit A), is hereby approved; and

2. That the SANDAG Executive Director is hereby authorized to submit the SGR FY 2019-2020 project listing for the North County Transit District to the State of California.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of July 2019.

Attest:

Chair Secretary

2 Exhibit A

State of Good Repair Project Information Legislative Districts Project Dates SGR Costs Non‐SGR Costs Total Project Current Project Title Useful Life Project Start Project Total Recipient/Region Sub‐Recipient/Operator Project Description Asset Type Project Category Condition of Project Location Project Location Existing State of 2019‐20 2019‐20 Total Total Total Notes, Comments, Additional Information # Project Titles must match if appearing on a previous list. Max 300 Characters If applicable Date Completion STA Costs ‐ Total Auto‐Populated Dropdown Selection Dropdown Selection Dropdown Selection Asset City County Good Repair Project SGR Costs SGR Costs SGR Costs SGR Costs Other SB1 Costs Congressional Senate Assembly Max 75 Characters If you need more space place additional information in Notes In Years Date Please Identify Not Including All Other Funds Dropdown Selection 99313 99314 99313 99314 MM/DD/YYYY MM/DD/YYYY Program in Notes SGR Auto‐Populated from Regional Entity Info Tab New

Oceanside, Carlsbad, Encinitas, This project will replace seven Tier 0 COASTER locomotives Solana Beach, Del with cleaner, more efficient Tier 4 locomotives. Project Mar, San Diego, benefits include more efficient operations, decreased Marine Corps Base A total of $15,621,000 is projected for State Rail Assistance (SRA). 1San Diego Association of Governments North County Transit District Locomotive Replacement Project emissions and fuel savings. Operational Equipment Replacement Poor 25 06/21/2018 12/31/2021 Camp Pendleton San Diego Yes $ 1,303,339 $ 340,986 $ 3,853,576 $ 1,144,990 $ 8,130,450 $ 40,155,440 $ 53,284,456 49,50,52 36,38,39 75,76,78 $22,627,226 is projected through Carl Moyer. 2San Diego Association of Governments $ ‐ 3San Diego Association of Governments $ ‐ 4San Diego Association of Governments $ ‐ 5San Diego Association of Governments $ ‐ 6San Diego Association of Governments $ ‐

3 Item: 16 Board of Directors July 26, 2019

Proposition 68 Department of Conservation Local and Regional Planning Grant Program: SANDAG Project Submission

Overview Action: Adopt The California Drought, Water, Parks, Climate, Coastal The Board of Directors is asked to adopt Protection, and Outdoor Access for All Act of 2018 Resolution No. 2020-03, approving the (Proposition 68) allocates funding to several State submission of an application to the agencies including the Department of Conservation. Department of Conservation’s Local and The Department of Conservation issued a grant Regional Planning Grant Program and solicitation notice for Local and Regional Planning authorizing SANDAG to accept award funding Projects on May 31, 2019. and enter into an agreement with the Department of Conservation. This grant program allocates $950,000 for projects that integrate natural and working lands into local and regional planning documents to optimize greenhouse Fiscal Impact: gas (GHG) reductions. If awarded funding, $100,000 in grant funds Key Considerations would be added to the FY 2020 budget. Eligible applicants include counties, cities, councils of Schedule/Scope Impact: governments, municipal planning organizations, regional If awarded funding, this project would be transportation planning agencies, resource conservation completed in FY 2020 and FY 2021, with data districts, other regional planning agencies, municipally incorporated into San Diego Forward: owned special districts, water districts, other special The 2021 Regional Plan. districts, and tribal governments. There is no match required. Based on the grant guidelines and evaluation criteria, the following regional project is recommended for submission: San Diego Region TerraCount Assessment – SANDAG would request $100,000 to fund an on-call environmental planning consultant to collect data and run TerraCount, a scenario planning tool that can quantify the carbon stocks and other benefits of the region’s natural and working lands. The San Diego region has approximately 1,336,000 acres of conserved lands, approximately 8,700 acres of which have been conserved through the SANDAG Environmental Mitigation Program. Using the TerraCount tool would allow SANDAG to explore how the region’s conservation efforts are helping the region meet California’s GHG reduction targets. Next Steps SANDAG would submit an application to the Department of Conservation’s Local and Regional Planning Grant Program on or before the grant deadline of July 31, 2019. Grant awards are tentatively scheduled to be announced in September 2019. If awarded funding, SANDAG would enter into a grant agreement with the Department of Conservation in fall/winter 2019.

Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director Key Staff Contacts: Sarah Pierce, (619) 699-7312, [email protected] Allison Wood, (619) 699-1973, [email protected] Attachment: 1. Resolution No. 2020-03

Attachment 1

401 B Street, Suite 800 Resolution No. 2020-03 San Diego, CA 92101 Phone (619) 699-1900 Fax (619) 699-1905 sandag.org

Resolution of the San Diego Association of Governments to Apply for and Receive Funds from the Department of Conservation’s Local and Regional Planning Grants Program

WHEREAS, the State of California has a greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 and a carbon neutrality goal for 2045; and

WHEREAS, carbon sequestration from natural and working lands is a State-identified strategy to meet these goals; and

WHEREAS, Proposition 68 (The California Drought, Water, Parks, Climate Coastal Protection, and Outdoor Access for All Act of 2018) allocates a total of $30 million to the Department of Conservation (Department); and

WHEREAS, the Department is allocating $950,000 of Proposition 68 funding to the Local and Regional Planning Grants Program to support the integration of natural and working lands into local and regional planning documents; and

WHEREAS, funding from the Local and Regional Planning Grants Program can be used for the TerraCount tool, which models the GHG and natural resource implications of different development patterns and management activities; and

WHEREAS, outputs from the TerraCount tool may inform San Diego Forward: The 2021 Regional Plan and the extent to which natural and working lands help the San Diego region meet State GHG targets; NOW THEREFORE

BE IT RESOLVED, that the SANDAG Board of Directors:

1. Authorizes the submittal of a grant application for a Local and Regional Planning Grants Program.

2. Certifies that SANDAG understands the assurances and certification in the application.

3. Authorizes SANDAG to enter into a grant agreement with the Department for the project and accept the template terms and conditions, if the project is awarded funding.

2 4. Authorize SANDAG’s Executive Director, or his authorized delegate, to accept the award of grant funding and to execute tasks, such as signing documents related to the application, grant agreement, payment requests, and so on if the project is awarded funding.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26 of July 2019.

Attest:

Chair Secretary

3 Item: 17 Board of Directors July 26, 2019

Equal Employment Opportunity Program

Overview Action: Information SANDAG is committed to values such as diversity, In accordance with SANDAG Board Policy fairness, equity, and inclusion. While federal and state No. 007: Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) laws describe obligations SANDAG must adhere to, Program, this report summarizes employment there is a shared philosophy among the Board of results for FY 2019 and reviews EEO Program Directors, management, and employees that engaging, goals for the upcoming year. representing, and serving all residents of the San Diego region as well as making employment opportunities Fiscal Impact: broadly available makes the organization more None responsive to its stakeholders and ultimately more effective in the delivery of programs, projects, and Schedule/Scope Impact: services. None

Key Considerations FY 2019 Employment Results Board Policy No. 007: Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Program, describes the agency’s commitment to hiring and staffing practices. The following is a summary of employment results for the period July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2019.

Recruitments and New Hires

• 37 recruitments were conducted to fill 66 positions. 92 percent of job openings were advertised externally and available to both internal and external candidates; 8 percent were internal and open only to current employees. All recruitments are conducted in an open, competitive manner.

• Job notices for full-time positions were sent to more than 200 regional contacts as part of the agency’s efforts to reach qualified female, minority, and veteran candidates.

• Approximately 1,300 applications were received for job openings. Based on voluntary data provided by candidates, 51 percent identified as female and 53 percent identified as belonging to a minority group.

• 66 new employees were hired. 23 individuals were hired to fill core positions; the remaining 43 filled contingent positions.

• Of the 66 new employees hired, 62 percent were female, and 50 percent were from minority groups.

Promotions

• 48 employees were promoted; 21 individuals were promoted after successfully competing in either an internal or external recruitment.

• Of the 48 promoted employees, 69 percent were female, and 38 percent represented minority groups. Employee Demographics

• As of June 30, 2019, 57 percent of agency employees were female, and 48 percent were from minority groups. Overall, the reported statistics compare favorably to the San Diego Region Civilian Labor Force (derived from Census 2010 data), in which 46 percent of the population is female and 47 percent are from minority groups.

EEO Program Goals In addition to reviewing annual employment results, SANDAG evaluates the effectiveness of its EEO Program by comparing the proportion of women and minorities in each of five defined job categories. The following chart represents FY 2019 EEO Program results compared to labor force availability. The agency’s FY 2020 goal is for females and minorities to be represented in approximately the same proportion as the availability of females and minorities within the San Diego Region Labor Force.

San Diego Region Labor SANDAG No. of Job Category Force* FY 2019 Results Employees Female Minority Female Minority Officials/Administrators 19 41% 31% 42% 11% Professionals 196 50% 35% 55% 38% Technicians 74 47% 48% 55% 53% Admin. Support 69 60% 46% 81% 68% Service-Maintenance 17 44% 66% 6% 88% * Source: U.S. Census Bureau. Census 2006-2010 EEO Tabulation; compiled by SANDAG, December 2012

Next Steps It is anticipated the number of opportunities to fill job openings within the next year will be similar to previous years. When such opportunities are available, SANDAG will continue its efforts to communicate the availability of positions to female and minority candidates through gender-neutral and race-neutral outreach and advertising strategies in support of its goal of reaching parity with the local labor force.

Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director Key Staff Contact: Rachel Nycholat, (619) 699-1962, [email protected]

2 Item: 18 Board of Directors July 26, 2019

San Diego Forward: The 2020 Federal Regional Transportation Plan - Proposed Draft Transportation Network

Overview Action: Information In February 2019, the Board of Directors unanimously This report provides an update on the approved an action plan to develop the 2021 Regional proposed draft transportation network for the Plan. To preserve the region’s eligibility for 2020 Federal Regional Transportation Plan, transportation funding and other compliance which will be available for public review requirements, this action plan included two key through August 21, 2019. components:

1. Pursuing state legislation to ensure the current Fiscal Impact: 2015 Regional Plan remains valid for state funding SANDAG will enter a 12-month air quality eligibility and other consistency purposes until the conformity grace period in December 2019. new plan is adopted in 2021. (Assembly Bill 1730, Adoption of the 2020 Federal Regional [AB 1730] Gonzalez) Transportation Plan (2020 Federal RTP) within 2. Submitting San Diego Forward: The 2020 Federal the grace period will help to preserve eligibility Regional Transportation Plan (2020 Federal RTP) to for local, state, and federal funding. the federal government without significant Schedule/Scope Impact: modification of the projects in the 2015 Regional It is anticipated that the final 2020 Federal RTP plan while the region continues to work on will be presented to the Board of Directors for developing the 2021 Regional Plan. adoption in spring 2020. Once the 2021 Regional Plan is adopted by the Board of Directors, it would be submitted to both the state and federal governments. In the meantime, SANDAG will continue to take action to improve mobility and reduce emissions in the region; including through the development of a Regional Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Program; implementation of the Environmental Mitigation Program; assistance to local jurisdictions for Climate Action Plan implementation; and delivery of major transit projects like the Mid-Coast Corridor Trolley extension and LOSSAN Double-Tracking.

Key Considerations SANDAG will enter a 12-month air quality conformity grace period in December 2019. During this time, projects in the current Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) can proceed; however, SANDAG will be unable to process formal RTIP amendments. Adoption of the 2020 Federal RTP within the grace period will help to preserve eligibility for local, state, and federal funding up until the time the 2021 Regional Plan is adopted. Consistent with the direction provided by the Board of Directors in February 2019, the proposed draft transportation network largely includes the same projects, programs, and policies included in the 2015 Regional Plan to ensure the 2020 Federal RTP remains consistent with the results of the 2015 Regional Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and avoid the need to revisit that EIR. In addition, AB 1730 as currently proposed includes an exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act for the 2020 Federal RTP in reliance on the use of the 2015 Regional Plan network. The only modifications made were to remove projects that have been completed since the 2015 Regional Plan was adopted; make minor schedule updates to align with the current RTIP; and update the cost estimates and financial assumptions as required by federal law. The list of transit, highway and Managed Lane projects, and active transportation projects is detailed in Attachment 1 and mapped in Attachment 2. Investments that support goods movement (shared rail and Managed Lane and highway improvements); transportation demand and system management; technologies; operations, maintenance, and rehabilitation; and local streets and roads also are components of the 2020 Federal RTP. The proposed draft transportation network for the 2020 Federal RTP meets both federal Title VI and air quality conformity requirements. The 2020 Federal RTP uses the current travel demand model and growth forecast1 as well as the performance measures from the 2015 Regional Plan. Staff modeled the performance of the proposed draft transportation network, the results of which are detailed in Attachment 3.

Next Steps Public comments about the proposed draft transportation network for the 2020 Federal RTP will be gathered through August 21, 2019. Information about upcoming outreach efforts is posted on SDForward.com/2020FederalRTP. Members of the public can provide comments on the proposed draft network via letter, email, phone, and an online comment tool; at SANDAG working group meetings; and during an August 2019 Vision Lab open house. Input received will be considered in the development of the proposed preferred transportation network. The Board will be asked to accept the preferred transportation network for use in development of the Draft 2020 Federal RTP in fall 2019. This Draft plan would be available for review and comment in late 2019. Staff anticipates that the 2020 Federal RTP will be provided to the Board for adoption in April 2020. This schedule would result in SANDAG being within the grace period for purposes of air quality conformity for an interval of approximately five to six months. If the 2020 Federal RTP is not adopted during the 12-month grace period, SANDAG will enter a conformity lapse. During a conformity lapse, federal transportation funds can only be used on exempt projects, safety and certain transit projects; transportation control measures, including ridesharing, transit improvements, traffic flow improvements, and bicycle facilities and programs; and project phases previously authorized by the U.S. Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration.

Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director Key Staff Contact: Rachel Kennedy, (619) 699-1929, [email protected] Attachments: 1. 2020 Federal RTP Proposed Draft Transportation Network 2. 2020 Federal RTP Proposed Draft Transportation Network Maps 3. 2020 Federal RTP Proposed Draft Transportation Network Performance Measure Results

1 Activity Based Model version 2, and Series 14.17 Regional Growth Forecast 2 Attachment 1 2020 Federal RTP Proposed Draft Phased Revenue Constrained Projects Transit Facilities

Capital Capital Year Cost Cost Service Route Description Built By ($2019); ($YOE); millions millions Double tracking (20-minute peak frequencies and 120-minute 2025 COASTER 398 $609 $693 off-peak frequencies)

2025 Trolley 510 Mid-Coast Trolley Extension $1,273 $919

2025 Rapid 2 North Park to Downtown San Diego via 30th St, Golden Hill $54 $62

2025 Rapid 10 La Mesa to Ocean Beach via Mid-City, Hillcrest, Old Town $57 $65 2025 Rapid 120 Kearny Mesa to Downtown via Mission Valley $127 $145 SDSU to Palomar Station via East San Diego, Southeast 2025 Rapid 550 $112 $126 San Diego, National City H St Trolley Station to Millennia via H St Corridor, 2025 Rapid 709 $89 $101 Southwestern College Extension of Iris Trolley Station to Otay Mesa Port of Entry 950 (formerly 2025 Rapid (POE) route with new service to Otay Mesa East POE and $3 $3 905) Imperial Beach Kearny Mesa to Downtown via SR 163. Stations at SR 163 DARs 2025 Rapid Sharp/Children's Hospital, University Ave, and Fashion Valley $204 $215 (Transit Only) Transit Center

2025 Streetcar 554 Hillcrest/Balboa Park/Downtown San Diego Loop3 $39 $45 2025 Shuttle 448/449 San Marcos Shuttle1 $0 $0 Airport 2025 -- Airport Express Routes2 $71 $82 Express San Diego International Airport ITC and I-5 Direct Connector 2025 ITC -- $231 $258 Ramps Other Improvements (Vehicles, transit system rehabilitation, 2025 Other -- maintenance facilities, ITS, regulatory compliance, Park and $721 $798 Ride, transit center expansions) 2025 -- -- Local Bus Routes - 15 minutes in key corridors -- -- Double tracking (20-minute peak frequencies and 60-minute off-peak frequencies, grade separations at Leucadia Blvd, 2035 COASTER 398 $1,224 $1,488 stations/platforms at Convention Center/Gaslamp Quarter and Del Mar Fairgrounds, and extension to Camp Pendleton)

SPRINTER efficiency improvements (20-minute frequencies by 2025); double tracking Oceanside to Escondido for 10- 2035 SPRINTER 399 minute frequencies and six rail grade separations at El $1,287 $1,604 Camino Real, Melrose Dr, Vista Village Dr/Main St, North Dr, Civic Center, Auto Pkwy and Mission Ave

Phase I - Blue Line Frequency Enhancements and rail grade 2035 Trolley 510 separations at 28th St, 32nd St, E St, H St, Palomar St, and $279 $339 Blue/Orange Track Connection at 12th/Imperial

3 Transit Facilities

Capital Capital Year Cost Cost Service Route Description Built By ($2019); ($YOE); millions millions Orange Line Frequency Enhancements and four rail grade 2035 Trolley 520 separations at Euclid Ave, Broadway/Lemon Grove Ave, $363 $464 Allison Ave/University Ave, Severin Dr 2035 Trolley 561 UTC to COASTER Connection (extension of Route 510) $467 $676 Phase I - San Ysidro to Kearny Mesa via Chula Vista via 2035 Trolley 562 Highland Ave/4th Ave, National City, Southeast San Diego, $4,575 $6,613 Mid-City, and Mission Valley Spring Valley to SDSU via Southeast San Diego, Downtown, 2035 Rapid 11 $154 $199 Hillcrest, Mid-City 2035 Rapid 28 Point Loma to Kearny Mesa via Old Town, Linda Vista $67 $86 2035 Rapid 30 Old Town to Sorrento Mesa via Pacific Beach, La Jolla, UTC $143 $185 Fashion Valley to UTC/UC San Diego via Linda Vista and 2035 Rapid 41 $75 $102 Clairemont El Cajon Transit Center to San Diego International Airport ITC 2035 Rapid 90 $27 $32 via SR 94, City College (peak only) Phase I - Solana Beach to UTC/UC San Diego via Hwy 101 2035 Rapid 473 $58 $76 Coastal Communities, Carmel Valley 2035 Rapid 635 Eastlake to Palomar Trolley via Main St Corridor $105 $139 Iris Trolley Station to Otay Mesa via Otay, Airway Dr, SR 905 2035 Rapid 638 $52 $67 Corridor Route 640A: I-5 - San Ysidro to Old Town Transit Center via 640A 2035 Rapid City College; 640B: I-5 Iris Trolley/Palomar to Kearny Mesa $208 $229 /640B via Chula Vista, National City and City College Route 688: San Ysidro to Sorrento Mesa via I-805/I-15/SR 52 688/ Corridors (Peak Only); Route 689:Otay Mesa POE to 2035 Rapid 689/ UTC/Torrey Pines via Otay Ranch/Millennia, I-805 Corridor $623 $757 690 (Peak Only); Route 690: Mid-City to Sorrento Mesa via I- 805 Corridor (Peak Only) 2035 Rapid 910 Coronado to Downtown via Coronado Bridge $54 $70 2035 Streetcar 553 Downtown San Diego: Little Italy to East Village3 $15 $20

2035 Streetcar 555 30th St to Downtown San Diego via North Park/ Golden Hill3 $23 $29 2035 ITC -- Phase I - San Ysidro ITC $129 $165 Other Improvements (Vehicles, transit system rehabilitation, 2035 Other -- maintenance facilities, ITS, regulatory compliance, Park and $2,872 $3,843 Ride, transit center expansions) 2035 -- -- Local Bus Routes - 10 minutes in key corridors Double tracking (completes double tracking; includes Del Mar 2050 COASTER 398 $3,921 $8,258 Tunnel) plus 2 grade separations 2050 SPRINTER 399 Branch Extension to Westfield North County $239 $479

2050 SPRINTER 588 SPRINTER Express $332 $545 Phase II - Blue Line rail grade separations at Taylor St and 2050 Trolley 510 $307 $505 Ash St 2050 Trolley 520 Orange Line Frequency Enhancements $0 $0 2050 Trolley 530 Green Line Frequency Enhancements $0 $0

4 Transit Facilities

Capital Capital Year Cost Cost Service Route Description Built By ($2019); ($YOE); millions millions SDSU to Downtown via El Cajon Blvd/Mid-City (transition of 2050 Trolley 560 $3,251 $6,192 Mid-City Rapid to Trolley) 2050 Trolley 562 Phase II - Kearny Mesa to Carmel Valley $2,191 $4,071 2050 Trolley 563 Phase I: Pacific Beach to El Cajon Transit Center $1,579 $2,860 Solana Beach to Sabre Springs Rapid station via Carmel 2050 Rapid 103 $91 $152 Valley 2050 Rapid 440 Carlsbad to Escondido Transit Center via Palomar Airport Rd $140 $234 2050 Rapid 471 Downtown Escondido to East Escondido $46 $94 Phase II - Oceanside to Solana Beach via Hwy 101 Coastal 2050 Rapid 473 $118 $197 Communities 2050 Rapid 474 Oceanside to Vista via Mission Ave/Santa Fe Rd Corridor $99 $202 Camp Pendleton to Carlsbad Village via College Blvd, Plaza 2050 Rapid 477 $109 $181 Camino Real Temecula (peak only) Extension of Escondido to Downtown 2050 Rapid 235 $133 $222 Rapid (formerly Route 610) SDSU to Spring Valley via East San Diego, Lemon Grove, 2050 Rapid 636 $53 $88 Skyline 2050 Rapid 637 North Park to 32nd St Trolley Station via Golden Hill $60 $101 Chula Vista to Palomar Airport Rd Business Park via I-805/ I- 2050 Rapid 650 $112 $186 5 (peak only) 2050 Rapid 653 Mid-City to Palomar Airport Rd via Kearny Mesa/I-805/I-5 $14 $23 2050 Rapid 870 El Cajon to UTC via Santee, SR 52, I-805 $100 $190 2050 Rapid 890 El Cajon to Sorrento Mesa via SR 52, Kearny Mesa $16 $31 2050 Streetcar 565 Mission Beach to La Jolla via Pacific Beach3 $34 $57 2050 ITC -- Phase II - San Ysidro ITC $31 $51 Other Improvements (Vehicles, transit system rehabilitation, 2050 Other -- maintenance facilities, ITS, regulatory compliance, Park and $3,724 $6,839 Ride, transit center expansions) Subtotal $33,090 $52,453 1 Capital cost to be funded by the City of San Marcos. 2 Implementation of these services is dependent upon funding from aviation and other private sources. 3 Streetcar cost is representative of 10 percent of the total capital cost.

5 2020 Federal RTP Proposed Draft Phased Revenue Constrained Projects Managed Lanes/Toll Lanes

Capital Capital Cost RTP Phase With Transit Cost Freeway From To Existing ($YOE); Year Improvements Route ($2019); millions millions 2025 I-5 Manchester Ave SR 78 8F 8F+2ML 650, 653 $51 $51 2025 I-5 SR 78 Vandegrift Blvd 8F 8F+2ML $116 $131 235, 610, 2025 I-15 I-8 SR 163 8F 8F+2ML $64 $72 653, 690 225, 650, 2025 I-805 SR 94 SR 15 8F 8F+2ML $234 $264 688, 689 SR 11/ Otay 2025 Mesa East Port of SR 125 Mexico -- 4T+POE 905 $472 $472 Entry (POE) 2035 I-5 SR 905 SR 54 8F 8F+2ML 640 $542 $627 2035 I-5 SR 54 SR 15 8F 10F+2ML 640 $467 $540 2035 I-5 La Jolla Village Dr I-5/805 Merge 8F/14F 8F/14F+2ML 650, 653 $422 $513 I-5/I-805 Merge SR 56 8F/14F+ 2ML 8F/14F+4ML 2035 I-5 SR 56 SR 78 8F+2ML 8F+4ML 650, 653 $2,082 $3,020 2035 SR 15 SR 94 I-805 6F 6F+2ML 235, 610 $41 $59 2035 SR 78 I-5 I-15 6F 6F+2ML $1,621 $2,127 90, 225, 2035 SR 94 I-5 I-805 8F 8F+2ML $728 $955 235, 610, 2035 I-805 SR 905 Palomar St 8F 8F+2ML 688 $235 $316 225, 650, 2035 I-805 SR 54 SR 94 8F+2ML 8F+4ML $742 $998 688, 689 650, 688, 2035 I-805 SR 163 SR 52 8F 8F+2ML $195 $269 689, 690 30, 650, 653, 688, 2035 I-805 SR 52 Carroll Canyon Rd 8F+2ML 8F+4ML $778 $996 689, 690, 870, 890 2050 I-5 I-8 La Jolla Village Dr 8F/10F 8F/10F+2ML $978 $2,067 2050 I-5 SR 78 Vandegrift Blvd 8F+2ML 8F+4ML $632 $1,336 2050 I-5 Vandegrift Blvd Orange County 8F 8F+4T* $3,165 $6,687 2050 SR 15 I-5 SR 94 6F 8F+2ML $185 $391 235, 610, 2050 I-15 Viaduct -- 8F 8F+2ML $1,040 $2,197 653, 690 2050 I-15 SR 78 Riverside County 8F 8F+4T* 610 $1,744 $3,684 653, 870, 2050 SR 52 I-805 I-15 6F 6F+2ML $238 $503 890 2050 SR 52 I-15 SR 125 4F/6F 4F/6F+2ML(R) 870, 890 $405 $856 2050 SR 54 I-5 SR 125 6F 6F+2ML $151 $319 2050 SR 94 I-805 SR 125 8F 8F+2ML 90 $501 $1,057 2050 SR 125 SR 54 I-8 6F/8F 6F/10F+2ML $690 $1,457 225, 650, 2050 I-805 SR 94 SR 15 8F+2ML 8F+4ML $83 $175 688, 690 650, 688, 2050 I-805 SR 15 SR 163 8F/10F 8F/10F+4ML $1,567 $3,310 689, 690 650, 688, 2050 I-805 SR 163 SR 52 8F+2ML 8F+4ML $438 $925 689, 690 Subtotal $20,607 $36,374

6 2020 Federal RTP Proposed Draft Phased Revenue Constrained Projects Highway Projects

Capital Capital Year With Cost Cost Freeway From To Existing Built By Improvements ($2019); ($YOE); millions millions 2025 SR 67 Mapleview St Gold Bar Ln 2C 4C $82 $92 2035 SR 52 Mast Blvd SR 125 4F 6F $103 $146 2050 I-8 2nd St Los Coches 4F/6F 6F $44 $94 2050 SR 52 I-5 I-805 4F 6F $151 $319 2050 SR 56 I-5 I-15 4F 6F $192 $405 2050 SR 67 Gold Bar Ln Dye Rd 2C/4C 4C $591 $1,248 2050 SR 94 SR 125 Avocado Blvd 4F 6F $190 $401 2050 SR 94 Jamacha Steele Canyon Rd 2C/4C 4C $54 $115 2050 SR 94 Avocado Blvd Jamacha 4C 6C $124 $261 2050 SR 125 SR 905 San Miguel Rd 4T 8F $439 $741 2050 SR 125 San Miguel Rd SR 54 4F 8F $241 $509 Subtotal $2,211 $4,331

7 2020 Federal RTP Proposed Draft Phased Revenue Constrained Projects Operational Improvements

Capital Capital Cost Year Built Cost Freeway From To Existing With Improvements ($YOE); By ($2019); millions millions 2050 I-5 I-15 I-8 8F 8F+Operational $1,985 $4,194 2050 I-8 I-5 SR 125 8F/10F 8F/10F+Operational $907 $1,917 2050 I-8 SR 125 2nd St 6F/8F 6F/8F+Operational $227 $480 2050 SR 76 I-15 Couser Canyon 2C/4C 4C/6C+Operational $178 $376 Subtotal $3,297 $6,967

8 2020 Federal RTP Proposed Draft Phased Revenue Constrained Projects Managed Lane Connectors

Capital Capital Year Intersecting Cost Cost Freeway Movement Built By Freeway ($2019); ($YOE); millions millions 2025 SR 15 I-805 North to North and South to South $110 $124 2035 I-5 SR 78 South to East and West to North, North to East and West to South $344 $451 2035 I-5 I-805 North to North and South to South * * 2035 I-15 SR 78 East to South and North to West $144 $189 2035 SR 15 SR 94 South to West and East to North $97 $127 2035 I-805 SR 94 North to West and East to South $137 $180 2050 I-15 SR 52 West to North and South to East $177 $374 2050 I-805 SR 52 West to North and South to East * * Subtotal $1,009 $1,445 * Project cost included in associated Managed Lane project

9 2020 Federal RTP Proposed Draft Phased Revenue Constrained Projects Freeway Connectors

Capital Cost Capital Cost Year Freeway Intersecting Freeway Movement ($2019); ($YOE); Built By millions millions

2025 SR 94 SR 125 South to East $94 $106 2035 I-5 SR 56 West to North and South to East $371 $452 2035 I-5 SR 78 South to East and West to South $371 $487 2035 SR 94 SR 125 West to North $110 $134 2050 I-15 SR 56 North to West $104 $219 Subtotal $1,050 $1,398

10 2020 Federal RTP Proposed Draft Phased Revenue Constrained Projects Active Transportation Projects Capital Cost Capital Cost Year Project Project Jurisdiction(s) ($2019); ($YOE); Built By Phase millions millions 2025 Uptown - Fashion Valley to Downtown San Diego San Diego Const. $13.0 $13.0 2025 Uptown - Old Town to Hillcrest San Diego Const. $1.0 $1.0 2025 Uptown - Hillcrest to Balboa Park San Diego Const. $2.0 $2.0 2025 North Park - Mid-City - City Heights San Diego Const. $7.0 $7.0 North Park - Mid-City - Hillcrest to City Heights (City 2025 San Diego Const. $5.0 $5.0 Heights - Old Town Corridor) 2025 North Park - Mid-City - City Heights to Rolando San Diego Const. $3.0 $3.0 Chula Vista/ 2025 Bayshore Bikeway - Main St to Palomar Const. $1.0 $1.0 Imperial Beach 2025 Pershing and El Prado - Cross-Park San Diego Const. $1.0 $1.0 2025 Terrace Dr/Central Ave - Adams to Wightman San Diego Const. $4.0 $4.0 2025 San Diego River Trail – I-805 to Fenton San Diego Const. $3.0 $3.0 2025 San Diego River Trail - Short gap connections San Diego Const. $2.0 $2.0 2025 Coastal Rail Trail Encinitas - Leucadia to G St Encinitas Const. $7.0 $7.0 San Ysidro to Imperial Beach - Bayshore Bikeway Imperial Beach/ 2025 Const. $8.0 $8.0 Connection San Diego 2035 Downtown to Southeast connections - East Village San Diego ROW $1.1 $2.0 Downtown to Southeast connections - Downtown 2035 San Diego ROW $4.1 $6.0 San Diego to Encanto Downtown to Southeast connections - Downtown 2035 San Diego ROW $3.6 $6.0 San Diego to Golden Hill Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - Pac Hwy (W Washington 2035 San Diego Const. $7.0 $11.0 St to Laurel St) Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - Pac Hwy (Laurel St to 2035 San Diego Const. $13.9 $21.0 Santa Fe Depot) Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - Encinitas Chesterfield to 2035 Encinitas Const. $4.8 $7.0 Solana Beach Coastal Rail Trail San Diego – Pac Hwy (Taylor St to W 2035 San Diego Const. $7.0 $11.0 Washington St) Coastal Rail Trail San Diego- Pac Hwy (Fiesta Island Rd 2035 San Diego Const. $12.2 $18.0 to Taylor St) San Diego River Trail - Father Junipero Serra Trail to 2035 Santee Const. $9.5 $14.0 Santee 2035 Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - UTC San Diego Const. $0.8 $1.0 Lemon Grove/ 2035 City Heights /Encanto/Lemon Grove Const. $12.2 $18.0 San Diego 2035 City Heights/Fairmount Corridor San Diego Const. $20.9 $28.0 La Mesa/ 2035 Rolando to Grossmont/La Mesa El Cajon/ Const. $3.5 $5.0 San Diego Lemon Grove/ 2035 La Mesa/Lemon Grove/El Cajon connections Const. $10.4 $16.0 La Mesa 2035 Coastal Rail Trail - Rose Canyon San Diego Const. $8.7 $13.0 2035 San Diego River Trail - Qualcomm Stadium to Ward Rd San Diego Const. $3.5 $5.0 San Diego River Trail - Rancho Mission Rd to Camino 2035 San Diego Const. $0.5 $1.0 Del Rio North Coastal Rail Trail Carlsbad - Reach 4 Cannon to 2035 Carlsbad Const. $8.7 $13.0 Palomar Airport Rd Coastal Rail Trail Carlsbad - Reach 5 Palomar Airport 2035 Carlsbad Const. $5.2 $8.0 Rd to Poinsettia Station 2035 Coastal Rail Trail Encinitas - Carlsbad to Leucadia Encinitas Const. $12.2 $18.0 2035 Coastal Rail Trail Del Mar Del Mar Const. $0.7 $1.0

11 Active Transportation Projects Capital Cost Capital Cost Year Project Project Jurisdiction(s) ($2019); ($YOE); Built By Phase millions millions Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - Del Mar to Sorrento via Del Mar/ 2035 Const. $0.7 $1.0 Carmel Valley San Diego Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - Carmel Valley to Roselle 2035 San Diego Const. $1.6 $2.0 via Sorrento 2035 Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - Roselle Canyon San Diego Const. $8.7 $13.0 Chula Vista/ 2035 Chula Vista/National City connections Const. $19.1 $25.0 National City 2035 Pacific Beach to Mission Beach San Diego Const. $17.4 $23.0 2035 Ocean Beach to Mission Bay San Diego Const. $41.8 $51.0 San Diego River Trail - Bridge connection (Sefton Field 2035 San Diego Const. $12.2 $18.0 to Mission Valley YMCA) San Diego River Trail - Mast Park to Lakeside baseball 2035 Santee Const. $17.4 $23.0 park 2035 I-8 Flyover - Camino del Rio S to Camino del Rio N San Diego Const. $17.4 $23.0 2035 Coastal Rail Trail Oceanside - Broadway to Eaton Oceanside Const. $0.7 $1.0 El Cajon/ 2035 El Cajon - Santee connections Const. $20.9 $28.0 La Mesa/ Santee San Diego River Trail - Father Junipero Serra Trail to 2035 San Diego Const. $5.2 $8.0 West Hills Pkwy 2035 Inland Rail Trail Oceanside Oceanside Const. $33.1 $44.0 Coastal Rail Trail Carlsbad - Reach 3 Tamarack to 2035 Carlsbad Const. $8.7 $13.0 Cannon 2035 Clairemont Dr (Mission Bay to Burgener) San Diego Const. $13.9 $21.0 2035 Harbor Dr (Downtown to Ocean Beach) San Diego Const. $12.2 $18.0 2035 Mira Mesa Bike Blvd San Diego Const. $7.0 $11.0 2035 Sweetwater River Bikeway Ramps National City Const. $15.7 $24.0 2035 Coastal Rail Trail Oceanside - Alta Loma Marsh bridge Oceanside Const. $8.7 $13.0 Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - Mission Bay (Clairemont 2035 San Diego Const. $5.2 $8.0 to Tecolote) 2035 Bayshore Bikeway Coronado - Golf course adjacent Coronado Const. $5.2 $8.0 Oceanside, 2050 San Luis Rey River Trail Const. $64.4 $122.0 Unincorporated Encinitas-San Marcos Corridor – Double Peak Dr to 2050 San Marcos Const. $20.9 $48.0 San Marcos Blvd 2050 Escondido Creek Bikeway – Quince St to Broadway Escondido Const. $3.5 $8.0 Escondido Creek Bikeway – Escondido Creek to 2050 Escondido Const. $1.7 $4.0 Washington Ave 2050 Escondido Creek Bikeway – 9th Ave to Escondido Creek Escondido Const. $1.7 $4.0 Escondido Creek Bikeway – El Norte Pkwy to northern 2050 Escondido Const. $10.4 $24.0 bikeway terminus Encinitas to San Marcos Corridor – Leucadia Blvd to 2050 Carlsbad, Encinitas Const. $3.5 $8.0 El Camino Real 2050 I-15 Bikeway – Via Rancho Pkwy to Lost Oak Ln Escondido Const. $7.0 $16.0 I-15 Bikeway – Rancho Bernardo Community Park to 2050 San Diego Const. $5.2 $12.0 Lake Hodges Bridge 2050 I-15 Bikeway – Camino del Norte to Aguamiel Rd San Diego Const. $22.6 $39.0 I-15 Bikeway – Poway Rd interchange to Carmel 2050 San Diego Const. $29.6 $51.0 Mountain Rd SR 56 Bikeway – Azuaga St to Rancho Penasquitos 2050 San Diego Const. $3.5 $8.0 Blvd 2050 I-15 Bikeway – Murphy Canyon Rd to Affinity Ct San Diego Const. $69.6 $115.0

12 Active Transportation Projects Capital Cost Capital Cost Year Project Project Jurisdiction(s) ($2019); ($YOE); Built By Phase millions millions

2050 SR 56 Bikeway – El Camino Real to Caminito Pointe San Diego Const. $3.5 $8.0 2050 SR 52 Bikeway – I-5 to Santo Rd San Diego Const. $52.2 $104.0 SR 52 Bikeway – SR 52/Mast Dr to San Diego River 2050 San Diego Const. $3.5 $8.0 Trail 2050 I-8 Corridor – San Diego River Trail to Riverside Dr Unincorporated Const. $3.5 $8.0 Chula Vista, 2050 I-805 Connector – Bonita Rd to Floyd Ave Const. $10.5 $24.0 Unincorporated Chula Vista, San 2050 SR 125 Connector – Bonita Rd to U.S.-Mexico Border Const. $67.9 $118.0 Diego SR 905 Connector – E Beyer Blvd to U.S.-Mexico San Diego, 2050 Const. $59.2 $103.0 Border Unincorporated 2050 El Camino Real Bike Lanes – Douglas Dr to Mesa Dr Oceanside Const. $1.7 $4.0 Vista, 2050 Vista Way Connector from Arcadia Const. $3.7 $8.0 Unincorporated 2050 I-15 Bikeway – W Country Club Ln to Nutmeg St Escondido Const. $7.0 $16.0 El Camino Real Bike Lanes – Marron Rd to SR 78 off 2050 Carlsbad Const. $0.5 $1.0 ramp Carlsbad to San Marcos Corridor – Paseo del Norte to 2050 Carlsbad Const. $0.7 $2.0 Avenida Encinas Encinitas to San Marcos Corridor – Kristen Ct to Ecke 2050 Encinitas Const. $0.7 $2.0 Ranch Rd Encinitas to San Marcos Corridor – Encinitas Blvd/ I- 2050 Encinitas Const. $0.3 $1.0 5 Interchange 2050 Mira Mesa Corridor – Reagan Rd to Parkdale Ave San Diego Const. $0.7 $2.0 2050 Mira Mesa Corridor – Scranton Rd to I-805 San Diego Const. $0.7 $2.0 Mira Mesa Corridor – Sorrento Valley Rd to Sorrento 2050 San Diego Const. $1.4 $3.0 Valley Blvd 2050 Mid-County Bikeway – I-5/Via de la Valle Interchange San Diego Const. $0.5 $1.0 San Diego, 2050 Mid-County Bikeway – Rancho Santa Fe segment Const. $5.2 $12.0 Unincorporated El Camino Real Bike Lanes – Manchester Ave to Tennis 2050 Encinitas Const. $0.9 $2.0 Club Dr Mid-County Bikeway – Manchester Ave/I-5 Interchange 2050 Encinitas Const. $1.4 $3.0 to San Elijo Ave 2050 Central Coast Corridor – Van Nuys St to San Rafael Pl San Diego Const. $1.7 $4.0 Clairemont – Centre-City Corridor – Coastal Rail Trail to 2050 San Diego Const. $3.5 $8.0 Genesee Ave 2050 SR 125 Corridor – Mission Gorge Rd to Glen Vista Way Santee Const. $0.5 $1.0 2050 SR 125 Corridor – Prospect Ave to Weld Blvd Santee, El Cajon Const. $1.4 $3.0 2050 I-8 Corridor – Lakeside Ave to SR 67 Unincorporated Const. $0.9 $2.0 2050 I-8 Corridor – Willows Rd to SR 79 Unincorporated Const. $8.7 $20.0 E County Northern Loop – N Marshall Ave to El Cajon 2050 El Cajon Const. $0.5 $1.0 Blvd 2050 E County Northern Loop – Washington Ave to Dewitt Ct El Cajon Const. $1.7 $4.0

2050 E County Northern Loop – SR 94 onramp to Del Rio Rd Unincorporated Const. $0.3 $1.0

2050 E County Southern Loop – Pointe Pkwy to Omega St Unincorporated Const. $1.4 $3.0 2050 SR 125 Corridor – SR 94 to S of Avocado St Unincorporated Const. $1.9 $4.0

13 Active Transportation Projects Capital Cost Capital Cost Year Project Project Jurisdiction(s) ($2019); ($YOE); Built By Phase millions millions Centre City – La Mesa Corridor – Gateside Rd to Campo La Mesa, 2050 Const. $0.7 $2.0 Rd Unincorporated Bay to Ranch Bikeway – River Ash Dr to Paseo 2050 Chula Vista Const. $0.9 $2.0 Ranchero 2050 Mid-County Bikeway – San Elijo Ave to 101 Terminus Encinitas Const. $1.7 $4.0 2050 Central Coast Corridor – Van Nuys St San Diego Const. $0.3 $1.0 E County Northern Loop – El Cajon Blvd to Washington 2050 El Cajon Const. $1.7 $4.0 Ave E County Northern Loop – Calavo Dr to Sweetwater 2050 Unincorporated Const. $1.2 $3.0 Springs Blvd 2050 Central Coast Corridor – Torrey Pines Rd to Nautilus St San Diego Const. $10.4 $24.0

2050 Central Coast Corridor – Via Del Norte to Van Nuys St San Diego Const. $8.7 $20.0 Kearny Mesa to Beaches Corridor – Ingraham St from 2050 San Diego Const. $3.5 $8.0 Garnet Ave to Pacific Beach Dr Kearny Mesa to Beaches Corridor – Clairemont Dr to 2050 San Diego Const. $17.4 $30.0 Genesee Ave Kearny Mesa to Beaches Corridor – Genesee Ave to 2050 San Diego Const. $10.4 $24.0 Linda Vista Dr Bay to Ranch Bikeway – E J St from 2nd Ave to Paseo 2050 Chula Vista Const. $20.9 $36.0 Del Rey 2050 Chula Vista Greenbelt – Bay Blvd to Oleander Ave Chula Vista Const. $29.6 $51.0 Other Active Transportation Programs and Projects1 Safe Routes to School $78 $123 Safe Routes to Transit $1,230 $1,943 Regional Programs $34 $54 Local Bike Projects $1,399 $2,211 TDM/TSM $1,989 $3,143 Subtotal $5,810 $9,281 1Includes Safe Routes to Transit projects at new transit station areas, local bike projects, local pedestrian/safety/traffic calming projects, regional bicycle and pedestrian programs and the Regional Safe Routes to School implementation

14 Attachment 2 Map Area San Diego Region Pauma and Yuima Reservation Pala Reservation Camp Pendleton

5 15

Rincon 76 Reservation La Jolla Reservation

Oceanside Vista San Pasqual 78 San Reservation Marcos County of San Diego

Santa Ysabel Carlsbad Reservation Escondido

Mesa Grande 78 Reservation

Encinitas 67 5 Solana Beach Poway

Del Mar 56 Barona Reservation

15 Capitan Grande Reservation

Figure A.1

2025 805 Santee Proposed Draft 52 67 52 Revenue Constrained 8 Transit Network 5 July 2019 San 125 Diego La Sycuan Mesa Reservation El Cajon COASTER/AMTRAK/Metrolink 163 8 Trolley/SPRINTER Rapid Transit 15 Shuttle/Streetcar Lemon 94 Grove Airport Express 125 Jamul Indian Local Bus Village 282 San Diego-Coronado Ferry

Coronado 54 Intermodal Transit Center National Safe Routes to Transit City 125 94

75 805 MILES Chula Vista KILOMETERS San Diego 5 Imperial 905 11 UNITED STATES Beach MEXICO 2-D 2 1-D Tijuana, B.C. 1 5050 FRTP 15 Map Area San Diego Region Pauma and Yuima Reservation Pala Reservation Camp Pendleton

5 15

Rincon 76 Reservation La Jolla Reservation

Oceanside Vista San Pasqual 78 San Reservation Marcos County of San Diego

Santa Ysabel Carlsbad Reservation Escondido

Mesa Grande 78 Reservation

Encinitas 67 5 Solana Beach Poway

Del Mar 56 Barona Reservation

15 Capitan Grande Reservation

Figure A.2

2035 805 Santee 52 67 Proposed Draft 52 Revenue Constrained 8 Transit Network 5 July 2019 San 125 Diego La Sycuan Mesa Reservation El Cajon COASTER/AMTRAK/Metrolink 163 8 Trolley/SPRINTER Rapid Transit 15 Lemon Streetcar/Shuttle 94 Grove Airport Express 125 Jamul Indian Local Bus Village 282 San Diego-Coronado Ferry

Coronado 54 Intermodal Transit Center National Safe Routes to Transit City 125 94

75 805 MILES Chula Vista

KILOMETERS San Diego 5 Imperial 905 11 UNITED STATES Beach MEXICO 2-D 2 1-D Tijuana, B.C. 1 5051 FRTP 16 Map Area San Diego Region Pauma and Yuima Reservation Pala Reservation Camp Pendleton

5 15

Rincon 76 Reservation La Jolla Reservation

Oceanside Vista San Pasqual 78 San Reservation Marcos County of San Diego

Santa Ysabel Carlsbad Reservation Escondido

Mesa Grande 78 Reservation

Encinitas 67 5 Solana Beach Poway

Del Mar 56 Barona Reservation Figure A.3 15 2050 Capitan Grande Reservation Proposed Draft Revenue Constrained Transit Network 805 Santee July 2019 52 67 52 8 High Speed Rail 5 COASTER/AMTRAK/Metrolink San 125 Diego Sycuan Trolley/SPRINTER La Mesa Reservation El Cajon SPRINTER Express 163 8 Rapid Transit

Shuttle/Streetcar 15 Lemon Airport Express 94 Grove Local Bus 125 Jamul Indian San Diego-Coronado Ferry Village 282

Intermodal Transit Center Coronado 54 Safe Routes to Transit National City 125 94

75 805 MILES Chula Vista

KILOMETERS San Diego 5 Imperial 905 11 UNITED STATES Beach MEXICO 2-D 2 1-D Tijuana, B.C. 1 5052 FRTP 17 Map Area San Diego Region Pauma and Yuima Reservation Pala 2C Reservation Camp Pendleton 4C

5 15

8F Rincon 76 Reservation La Jolla Reservation 2C

4C 76

Oceanside Vista 8F+2ML San Pasqual 78 San Reservation 6F Marcos County of San Diego

Santa Ysabel Carlsbad Reservation Escondido

8F+4ML 2C Mesa Grande 8F+2ML 78 Reservation

Encinitas 10F+4ML 67 5 Solana Figure A.4 Beach Poway 2025 8F+2ML Proposed Draft Del 4F 56 Revenue Constrained Mar 2C Barona Managed Lanes and Reservation Highway Network 15 Capitan Grande July 2019 10F+4ML Reservation

Existing Managed Lanes 8F+2ML 4C Managed Lanes 805 6F Santee 4F 4F 52 67 General Purpose Lanes 52 4F Toll Lanes 8 5 8F+2ML Existing Facility San 125 Diego Sycuan Bicycle/Pedestrian Improvements La 8F/10F Mesa Reservation at Freeway Interchanges El Cajon 163 8 8F 8F+2TL Freeway Connectors 15 94 Managed Lanes Connectors 8F+2ML 4C Lemon Grove 125 Jamul Indian C = Conventional Highway Village 282 F= Freeway 8F+2ML

ML = Managed Lanes Coronado 6F 54 T = Toll Lanes National TL = Transit Lanes City 125 94

75 8F 805 4T MILES Chula Vista

KILOMETERS San Diego 4F 5 6F Imperial 905 11 4T UNITED STATES Beach MEXICO 2-D 2 1-D Tijuana, B.C. 1 5067 FRTP 18 Map Area San Diego Region Pauma and Yuima Reservation Pala 2C Reservation Camp Pendleton 4C

5 15

8F Rincon 76 Reservation La Jolla Reservation 2C

4C 76

Oceanside 6F+2ML Vista 8F+2ML San Pasqual 78 San Reservation Marcos County of San Diego

Santa Ysabel Carlsbad Reservation Escondido

8F+4ML 8F+4ML 2C Mesa Grande 78 Reservation

Encinitas 10F+4ML 67 Figure A.5 5 Solana 8F+4ML 2035 Beach Proposed Draft Poway Revenue Constrained Del 56 Managed Lanes and Mar 4F 2C Highway Network Barona 10F+4ML Reservation July 2019 8F/14F+4ML 15 Capitan Grande Existing Managed Lanes Reservation Managed Lanes 8F/14F+ 2ML 8F+4ML 4C General Purpose Lanes 805 Santee 4F Toll Lanes 52 67 52 6F 6F Existing Facility 8F+2ML 8 5 Bicycle/Pedestrian Improvements San 8F+2ML 125 at Freeway Interchanges Diego La Sycuan 8F/10F Mesa Reservation 163 El Cajon Freeway Connectors 8 8F 8F+2TL Managed Lanes Connectors 6F+ 15 94 Freeway & Managed Lanes 2ML 4C Connectors 8F+2ML Lemon Grove 8F+ 125 Jamul Indian C = Conventional Highway 2ML Village 282 F = Freeway 8F+ 10F+ 4ML ML = Managed Lanes Coronado 2ML 54 T = Toll Road National TL = Transit Lanes City 8F+ 8F+2ML 2ML 125 94

75 805 MILES 8F+ Chula 8F+ 2ML Vista 4T 2ML KILOMETERS San Diego 4F 5 Imperial 905 11 4T UNITED STATES Beach MEXICO 2-D 2 1-D Tijuana, B.C. 1 5068 FRTP 19 Map Area San Diego Region Pauma and Yuima Reservation Pala 2C Reservation Camp Pendleton 4C 4C/6C+OPS

5 15

Rincon Reservation 76 8F+4T 8F+4T La Jolla 4C Reservation 2C

Oceanside 6F+2ML Vista 8F+4ML San Pasqual 78 San Reservation Marcos County of San Diego

Santa Ysabel Carlsbad Reservation Escondido

8F+4ML Mesa Grande 8F+4ML 78 Reservation

Figure A.6 Encinitas 10F+4ML 2050 5 Solana 8F+4ML 67 Proposed Draft Beach Revenue Constrained Poway Managed Lanes and Del Highway Network 6F 4C Mar 56 July 2019 Barona Reservation

Existing Managed Lanes 8F/14F 15 Capitan Grande +4ML Managed Lanes Reservation

General Purpose Lanes 8F+4ML 8F+2ML Toll Lanes 6F+2ML(R) 4C 805 Santee 4F Operational Improvements 52 67 52 6F+2ML 6F+2ML(R) 6F Existing Facility 8 5 Freeway Connectors 6F/8F 8F+ 8F+2ML 125 6F San 4ML +OPS ML Connectors Diego Sycuan 8F/10F+2ML 8F/10F La +OPS Mesa Reservation Freeway & ML Connectors El Cajon 8F/10F 163 8 Bicycle/Pedestrian Improvements +OPS 8F+2TL 10F+2ML at Freeway Interchanges 8F+2ML 15 8F+ 8F+OPS 4ML 6F 6F+ 6C C = Conventional Highway 94 Lemon 2ML Grove F = Freeway 8F+ 125 4C Jamul Indian 8F+2ML ML = Managed Lanes 2ML Village 282 6F+2ML T = Toll Road 8F+ 8F/10F 4ML 2C R = Reversible Lanes Coronado +2ML 54 8F 6F+2ML OPS = Operational Improvements National TL = Transit Lanes City 8F+2ML 8F+ 125 94 2ML 75 805 MILES 8F 8F+ Chula 2ML Vista 8F+ KILOMETERS 2ML San Diego 4F 5 6F Imperial 905 11 4T UNITED STATES Beach MEXICO 2-D 2 1-D Tijuana, B.C. 1 5069 FRTP 20 Map Area San Diego Region Pauma and Yuima Reservation Pala Reservation Camp Pendleton

5 15

Rincon 76 Reservation La Jolla Reservation

Oceanside Vista San Pasqual 78 San Reservation Marcos County of San Diego

Santa Ysabel Carlsbad Reservation Escondido

Mesa Grande 78 Reservation

Encinitas 67 5 Solana Beach Poway

Del Mar 56 Barona Reservation

15 Capitan Grande Reservation

805 Santee 52 67 52 Figure A.7 8 5 2025 San 125 Proposed Draft Diego La Sycuan Mesa Reservation Revenue Constrained El Cajon Regional Bike 163 8 Network July 2019 15

94 Lemon Class I - Bike Path Grove 125 Jamul Indian Cycle Track Village Bike Boulevard 282 Enhanced Class II - Bike Lane Coronado 54 Enhanced Class III - Bike Route Freeways and Highways National City Regional Arterials 125 94 805 MILES 75 Chula Vista

KILOMETERS San Diego 5 Imperial 905 11 UNITED STATES Beach MEXICO 2-D 2 1-D Tijuana, B.C. 1 5071 FRTP 21 Map Area San Diego Region Pauma and Yuima Reservation Pala Reservation Camp Pendleton

5 15

Rincon 76 Reservation La Jolla Reservation

Oceanside Vista San Pasqual 78 San Reservation Marcos County of San Diego

Santa Ysabel Carlsbad Reservation Escondido

Mesa Grande 78 Reservation

Encinitas 67 5 Solana Beach Poway

Del Mar 56 Barona Reservation

15 Capitan Grande Reservation

805 Santee 52 67 52 Figure A.8 8 5 2035 San 125 Proposed Draft Diego La Sycuan Mesa Reservation Revenue Constrained El Cajon Regional Bike 163 8 Network July 2019 15 94 Lemon Class I - Bike Path Grove 125 Jamul Indian Cycle Track Village Bike Boulevard 282 Enhanced Class II - Bike Lane Coronado 54 Enhanced Class III - Bike Route Freeways and Highways National City Regional Arterials 125 94 805 MILES 75 Chula Vista

KILOMETERS San Diego 5 Imperial 905 11 UNITED STATES Beach MEXICO 2-D 2 1-D Tijuana, B.C. 1 5072 FRTP 22 Map Area San Diego Region Pauma and Yuima Reservation Pala Reservation Camp Pendleton

5 15

Rincon 76 Reservation La Jolla Reservation

Oceanside Vista San Pasqual 78 San Reservation Marcos County of San Diego

Santa Ysabel Carlsbad Reservation Escondido

Mesa Grande 78 Reservation

Encinitas 67 5 Solana Beach Poway

Del Mar 56 Barona Reservation

15 Capitan Grande Reservation

805 Santee 52 67 52 Figure 2.14 8 5 2050 San 125 Proposed Draft Diego La Sycuan Mesa Reservation Revenue Constrained El Cajon Regional Bike 163 8 Network July 2019 15 94 Lemon Class I - Bike Path Grove 125 Jamul Indian Cycle Track Village Bike Boulevard 282 Enhanced Class II - Bike Lane Coronado 54 Enhanced Class III - Bike Route Freeways and Highways National City Regional Arterials 125 94 805 MILES 75 Chula Vista

KILOMETERS San Diego 5 Imperial 905 11 UNITED STATES Beach MEXICO 2-D 2 1-D Tijuana, B.C. 1 5073 FRTP 23 Attachment 3

2020 Federal RTP: Proposed Draft Transportation Network Performance Measures Evaluation and Results

The proposed draft transportation network was evaluated using the performance measures from the 2015 Regional Plan, which were approved by the Board of Directors on March 28, 2014. The performance evaluation was conducted for the network phase years of the plan: 2025, 2035, and 2050. Performance was compared to current conditions (2016)1. The Activity Based Model 2 and Series 14.17 Regional Growth Forecast were used for the analysis of the proposed draft transportation network.

Summary of Overall Findings x The proposed draft transportation network would perform better than 2016 in most areas. x Work trips by carpool, transit, and bike and walk would increase from 18.7 percent in 2016 to 24.6 percent in 2050, with the transit mode share more than doubling from 3.6 percent in 2016 to 7.5 percent in 2050. x More modest increases are seen in the combined carpool, transit, and bike and walk mode share for all trips. Walk and bike mode share is projected to increase from 8.1 percent in 2016 to 10.6 percent in 2035 and 11.6 percent in 2050. Transit mode share for all trips is anticipated to increase from 1.5 percent in 2016 to 2.9 percent in 2050. x With the opening of the South Bay Rapid, Mid-Coast Trolley, and several Rapid routes serving the South Bay and central San Diego, the percentage of the population within a half-mile of high-frequency transit is anticipated to increase over the life of the plan from 32 percent in 2016 to 46 percent in 2025, 52 percent in 2035, and 55 percent in 2050. Similar increases are seen for the percentage of employment located near to high-frequency transit, with 43 percent of jobs being located near high-frequency transit in 2016 and 69 percent in 2050. x Vehicle delay per capita would stay relatively flat though the horizon of the plan with 10 minutes daily in 2016 and 2025 and 11 minutes daily in 2035 and 2050. x Average daily physical activity per capita would increase from 6 minutes in 2016 to 10 minutes in 2050. x The region’s air quality is projected to improve. Smog-forming pollutants per capita would be reduced below 2016 levels. x Similar to non-disadvantaged communities, low-income, minority, and senior populations would experience an increase in physical activity and improved access to high frequency transit stops. Low-income population and minorities also see reduction in travel time to work by transit. x The Title VI analysis demonstrates that there are no disparate impacts or disproportionate effects for minority or low-income individuals respectively.

1 The base year of the current Activity Based Model is 2016

24 Revenue Constrained Network Performance Measures 2025 2035 2050 2025 No 2035 No 2050 No Proposed Proposed Proposed Number Performance Measure 2016 Build Build Build Draft Draft Draft Network Network Network 1 Are travel times reduced? Average peak-period travel time to work 1A 27 27 27 28 27 28 28 (minutes) drive alone 25 25 26 26 25 26 26 carpool 2 23 23 23 24 23 25 24 carpool 3+ 23 23 24 24 23 23 23 transit 63 62 61 62 61 56 55 bike 22 22 22 22 22 23 24 walk 23 22 22 22 22 22 22 1B Daily vehicle delay per capita (minutes) 10 10 11 12 10 11 11 2 #TGOQTGRGQRNGYCNMKPIDKMKPIWUKPIVTCPUKVCPFUJCTKPITKFGU!| Walk, bike, transit, and carpool mode share 2A 54.3% 55.0% 53.9% 54.3% 55.1% 54.5% 55.1% (all trips) carpool 44.7% 43.9% 41.4% 41.0% 43.7% 41.2% 40.6% transit 1.5% 1.8% 2.0% 1.9% 2.1% 2.7% 2.9% bike & walk 8.1% 9.3% 10.5% 11.4% 9.3% 10.6% 11.6% Walk, bike, transit, and carpool mode share 2B 18.7% 20.2% 20.7% 20.8% 20.7% 23.3% 24.6% (work trips) carpool 12.4% 12.2% 11.6% 11.5% 12.1% 12.6% 12.8% transit 3.6% 4.5% 5.0% 5.0% 5.1% 6.6% 7.5% bike & walk 2.7% 3.5% 4.1% 4.3% 3.5% 4.1% 4.3% 3 Is the transportation system safer? Annual projected number of vehicle 3A injury/fatal collisions per thousand vehicle 0.1262 0.1270 0.1267 0.1260 0.1269 0.1268 0.1258 miles traveled (VMT) Annual projected number of bike/pedestrian 3B injury/fatal collisions per thousand 1.3634 1.2299 1.1722 1.1161 1.2144 1.1259 1.0517 bike/pedestrian miles traveled (BPMT) 4 Do the transportation investments help to improve the regional economy? Benefit/cost ratio of transportation 4A 0.68 (preliminary, using 4% discount rate) investments Average truck/commercial vehicle travel times 4B to and around regional gateways and 19 19 20 21 19 20 20 distribution hubs (minutes) 5 Are the relative costs of transportation changing similarly for all communities? Change in the percent of income consumed 5A N/A 1.1% 0.2% -0.2% 1.2% 0.3% -0.2% by out-of-pocket transportation costs 6 #TGEQPPGEVKQPUVQPGKIJDQTKPIEQWPVKGU/GZKEQVTKDCNNCPFUCPFOKNKVCT[DCUGUKPUVCNNCVKQPUKORTQXGF!| Average travel times to/from tribal lands 6A 29 29 30 30 29 29 29 (minutes) 6B Average travel times to/from Mexico (minutes) San Ysidro 22 23 25 26 24 24 25 Otay Mesa 25 25 23 21 26 25 24 Otay Mesa East N/A 22 22 22 19 20 21 Tecate 54 54 55 55 53 54 53 Average travel times to/from neighboring 6C counties (Imperial, Orange, Riverside) 53 53 54 56 53 54 54 (minutes) Average travel times to/from military 6D 19 20 20 21 20 20 20 bases/installations (minutes) 7 &QGUVJGVTCPURQTVCVKQPPGVYQTMUWRRQTVUOCTVITQYVJ!|

25 Revenue Constrained Network Performance Measures 2025 2035 2050 2025 No 2035 No 2050 No Proposed Proposed Proposed Number Performance Measure 2016 Build Build Build Draft Draft Draft Network Network Network

Percentage of population within 0.5 mile of a high frequency (<=15 min peak and midday) 7A-1 32% 36% 38% 39% 46% 52% 55% transit stop (communities of concern and non̻communities of concern) Percentage of employment within 0.5 mile of 7A-2 a high frequency (<=15 min peak and 43% 46% 46% 44% 63% 66% 69% midday) transit stop Percentage of population within 0.5 mile of a 7B-1 67% 66% 67% 67% 68% 69% 70% transit stop Percentage of employment within 0.5 mile of 7B-2 82% 81% 81% 79% 85% 86% 85% a transit stop Percentage of population within 0.25 mile of 7C-1 a bike facility (class I and II, cycletrack, and 63% 64% 63% 63% 66% 68% 69% bike boulevard) Percentage of employment within 0.25 mile 7C-2 of a bike facility (class I and II, cycletrack, and 76% 77% 77% 77% 78% 79% 81% bike boulevard) Average travel distance to work (drive alone, 7D 11.4 11.1 11.1 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.3 carpool, transit, bike, and walk) (miles) drive alone 11.8 11.6 11.7 11.8 11.6 11.7 11.8 carpool 11.0 10.9 10.9 10.9 10.9 11.7 11.9 transit 11.8 12.4 12.0 12.0 12.5 12.1 12.2 bike 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.4 4.6 walk 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 Total time engaged in transportation-related 7E 6 7898910 physical activity per capita (minutes) Percent of population engaging in more than 7F 20 minutes of daily transportation related 10.9% 12.3% 13.5% 14.3% 12.6% 14.4% 15.6% physical activity 8 +UCEEGUUVQLQDUCPFMG[FGUVKPCVKQPUKORTQXKPIHQTCNNEQOOWPKVKGU!| Percent of population within 30 minutes of 8A. jobs and higher education Auto 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Transit 81.5% 81.3% 81.3% 81.2% 83.6% 83.7% 84.1% Percent of population within 15 minutes of 8B-1 retail Drive alone 99.6% 99.7% 99.7% 99.7% 99.7% 99.7% 99.7% Transit 57.5% 57.8% 58.6% 58.7% 58.8% 60.2% 61.1% Percent of population within 15 minutes of 8B-2 health care Drive alone 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% Transit 58.5% 58.7% 59.6% 59.8% 59.7% 61.1% 61.7% Percent of population within 15 minutes of 8B-3 parks Drive alone 99.1% 99.1% 98.9% 98.8% 99.1% 98.9% 98.8% Transit 34.3% 34.9% 35.6% 36.2% 35.4% 37.1% 38.8% Percent of population within 15 minutes of 8B-4 beaches Drive alone 39.2% 39.2% 36.3% 35.1% 39.6% 38.7% 35.6% Transit 3.8% 3.8% 3.9% 4.0% 3.9% 4.0% 4.2% 9 +UVJGTGIKQP UCKTSWCNKV[KORTQXKPI!| On-road smog-forming pollutants 9A 0.045 0.019 0.014 0.012 0.019 0.014 0.012 (pounds/day) per capita * 10 Are GHG emissions reduced?

10A-1 Total on-road CO2 emissions (tons/day) 43,623 34,440 31,410 32,877 34,351 31,192 32,711

26 Revenue Constrained Network Performance Measures 2025 2035 2050 2025 No 2035 No 2050 No Proposed Proposed Proposed Number Performance Measure 2016 Build Build Build Draft Draft Draft Network Network Network Total on-road CO emissions (pounds/day) per 10A-2 2 26.31 19.43 16.74 16.39 19.38 16.62 16.31 capita

27 Social Equity Performance Measures: Revenue Constrained Network 2025 2035 2050 2025 No 2035 No 2050 No Proposed Proposed Proposed Performance Measure 2016 Build Build Build Draft Draft Draft Network Network Network SE-1 Average Peak Period Travel to Work All Modes Combined (minutes) Low Income 24252525252626 Non-Low Income 27 28 28 29 28 28 29 Minority 27 27 28 28 27 28 28 Non-Minority 26 26 27 28 26 27 28 Auto, Drive Alone (minutes) Low Income 22212122212121 Non-Low Income 26 26 27 27 26 27 27 Minority 25 25 26 26 25 26 25 Non-Minority 25 25 26 27 25 26 26 Auto, Carpool 2 (minutes) Low Income 21212222212323 Non-Low Income 24 24 24 25 24 25 25 Minority 23 23 23 24 23 25 24 Non-Minority 23 23 23 24 23 25 25 Auto, Carpool 3 (minutes) Low Income 22212222212121 Non-Low Income 24 24 24 25 24 24 23 Minority 23 23 24 24 23 23 23 Non-Minority 23 24 24 24 23 23 23 Transit (minutes) Low Income 61626161615654 Non-Low Income 64 63 61 62 62 56 55 Minority 62 62 61 62 61 56 55 Non-Minority 65 63 61 62 62 57 54 Bike (minutes) Low Income 18191919191920 Non-Low Income 25 25 24 25 25 26 27 Minority 21 23 23 23 23 24 25 Non-Minority 22 21 20 22 21 22 24 Walk (minutes) Low Income 22222222222121 Non-Low Income 25 23 22 22 22 22 22 Minority 24 23 23 22 23 23 22 Non-Minority 22 21 21 20 20 20 20 SE-2 Change in percent of income consumed by out-of-pocket transportation costs | Low Income 2.9% 1.8% 1.6% 3.0% 1.9% 1.7% Non-Low Income 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% Minority 1.1% 0.0% -0.6% 1.2% 0.0% -0.6% Non-Minority 1.0% 0.3% 0.1% 1.0% 0.3% 0.0% Senior 0.7% 0.0% -0.2% 0.7% 0.0% -0.2% Non-Senior 1.3% 0.5% 0.1% 1.3% 0.5% 0.1% SE-3 2GTEGPVCIGQHRQRWNCVKQPYKVJKPOKNGQHJKIJHTGSWGPE[VTCPUKVUVQRU| Low Income 41% 46% 48% 49% 57% 62% 64% Non-Low Income 27% 32% 34% 36% 42% 48% 51% Minority 39% 42% 43% 44% 53% 58% 60% Non-Minority 24% 29% 31% 33% 38% 44% 46% Senior 29% 32% 35% 38% 42% 48% 53% Non-Senior 32% 37% 38% 40% 47% 53% 55% SE-4 Percentage of population within 0.5 mile of transit stops | Low Income 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 78% 78% Non-Low Income 62% 62% 63% 64% 64% 65% 67% Minority 72% 71% 71% 71% 72% 73% 74%

28 Social Equity Performance Measures: Revenue Constrained Network 2025 2035 2050 2025 No 2035 No 2050 No Proposed Proposed Proposed Performance Measure 2016 Build Build Build Draft Draft Draft Network Network Network Non-Minority 61% 61% 61% 62% 62% 63% 64% Senior 64% 63% 64% 66% 64% 66% 68% Non-Senior 67% 67% 67% 67% 68% 69% 70% SE-5 Percentage of population within 0.25 mile of a bike facility | Low Income 60% 62% 62% 62% 65% 68% 69% Non-Low Income 64% 65% 64% 63% 66% 68% 69% Minority 63% 64% 63% 63% 67% 68% 70% Non-Minority 63% 64% 63% 63% 65% 66% 68% Senior 62% 64% 64% 64% 65% 68% 70% Non-Senior 63% 64% 63% 63% 66% 68% 69% SE-6 2GTEGPVCIGQHRQRWNCVKQPYKVJKPOKPWVGUQHLQDUJKIJGTGFWECVKQP CWVQVTCPUKV | Auto Low Income 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Non-Low Income 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Minority 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Non-Minority 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Senior 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Non-Senior 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Transit Low Income 87.5% 87.6% 87.4% 87.2% 88.4% 88.3% 88.4% Non-Low Income 78.9% 78.7% 79.1% 79.2% 81.6% 82.0% 82.6% Minority 85.7% 84.8% 84.5% 84.1% 86.9% 86.8% 87.1% Non-Minority 77.4% 77.3% 77.3% 77.2% 79.8% 79.7% 79.7% Senior 79.9% 78.8% 79.2% 80.3% 81.0% 81.7% 83.3% Non-Senior 81.6% 81.6% 81.7% 81.5% 83.9% 84.1% 84.2% SE-7 Percentage of population within 15 minutes of retail (auto/transit) Auto Low Income 99.5% 99.6% 99.6% 99.6% 99.6% 99.6% 99.6% Non-Low Income 99.7% 99.8% 99.7% 99.7% 99.8% 99.7% 99.7% Minority 99.7% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% Non-Minority 99.5% 99.7% 99.6% 99.6% 99.7% 99.6% 99.6% Senior 99.5% 99.7% 99.7% 99.7% 99.7% 99.7% 99.7% Non-Senior 99.6% 99.7% 99.7% 99.7% 99.7% 99.7% 99.7% Transit Low Income 67.7% 68.0% 68.7% 68.9% 68.5% 69.3% 70.1% Non-Low Income 52.7% 53.2% 54.5% 55.0% 54.4% 56.5% 57.8% Minority 63.5% 62.8% 63.0% 62.5% 63.7% 64.9% 65.2% Non-Minority 50.5% 51.4% 52.6% 53.2% 52.5% 53.8% 54.9% Senior 54.3% 53.9% 55.6% 57.5% 55.0% 57.2% 59.8% Non-Senior 57.7% 58.1% 59.0% 58.9% 59.1% 60.6% 61.3% SE-8 Percentage of population within 15 minutes of healthcare (auto/transit) Auto Low Income 99.7% 99.7% 99.8% 99.8% 99.7% 99.8% 99.8% Non-Low Income 99.8% 99.9% 99.8% 99.8% 99.9% 99.8% 99.9% Minority 99.8% 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% Non-Minority 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% Senior 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% Non-Senior 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% Transit Low Income 68.4% 69.0% 69.7% 69.9% 69.4% 70.2% 70.8% Non-Low Income 53.9% 54.2% 55.5% 56.0% 55.3% 57.4% 58.3% Minority 64.9% 64.1% 64.2% 63.7% 64.9% 66.0% 65.9% Non-Minority 51.1% 51.9% 53.4% 53.9% 53.0% 54.6% 55.4% Senior 55.5% 54.7% 56.5% 58.5% 55.7% 58.1% 60.5%

29 Social Equity Performance Measures: Revenue Constrained Network 2025 2035 2050 2025 No 2035 No 2050 No Proposed Proposed Proposed Performance Measure 2016 Build Build Build Draft Draft Draft Network Network Network Non-Senior 58.7% 59.1% 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% 61.5% 61.9% SE-9 Percentage of population within 15 minutes of active park (auto/transit) Auto Low Income 98.9% 98.9% 98.7% 98.6% 98.9% 98.7% 98.6% Non-Low Income 99.2% 99.2% 98.9% 98.9% 99.2% 98.9% 98.9% Minority 99.3% 99.3% 99.1% 99.0% 99.3% 99.1% 99.0% Non-Minority 98.8% 98.8% 98.5% 98.5% 98.8% 98.5% 98.5% Senior 98.9% 98.9% 98.7% 98.8% 98.9% 98.7% 98.8% Non-Senior 99.1% 99.1% 98.9% 98.8% 99.1% 98.9% 98.8% Transit Low Income 40.5% 41.5% 42.2% 43.1% 41.7% 43.3% 45.8% Non-Low Income 31.3% 31.9% 32.9% 33.7% 32.5% 34.6% 36.2% Minority 39.4% 39.4% 39.5% 39.6% 39.7% 40.9% 42.1% Non-Minority 28.3% 29.1% 30.4% 31.2% 29.9% 31.9% 33.8% Senior 31.9% 32.4% 33.9% 36.0% 32.9% 35.4% 38.1% Non-Senior 34.4% 35.1% 35.8% 36.3% 35.6% 37.3% 38.9% SE-10 Percentage of population within 15 minutes of active beach (auto/transit) Auto Low Income 42.4% 42.6% 39.5% 38.0% 43.0% 42.6% 38.7% Non-Low Income 37.7% 37.7% 35.0% 34.0% 38.0% 37.2% 34.5% Minority 36.9% 36.5% 33.4% 32.1% 37.1% 36.3% 32.8% Non-Minority 41.9% 42.5% 40.3% 39.5% 42.7% 42.0% 39.8% Senior 39.1% 38.9% 37.3% 36.1% 39.2% 39.4% 36.6% Non-Senior 39.2% 39.2% 36.2% 34.9% 39.6% 38.6% 35.4% Transit Low Income 3.0% 3.1% 3.2% 3.2% 3.2% 3.2% 3.3% Non-Low Income 4.1% 4.1% 4.2% 4.4% 4.2% 4.3% 4.6% Minority 2.3% 2.5% 2.7% 2.9% 2.6% 2.7% 3.0% Non-Minority 5.5% 5.4% 5.6% 5.8% 5.6% 5.7% 6.1% Senior 4.2% 4.4% 4.6% 4.6% 4.5% 4.7% 4.8% Non-Senior 3.7% 3.8% 3.9% 4.0% 3.9% 3.9% 4.1% SE-11 Average Particulate Matter (PM) Exposure

PM10 Low Income 12.91 12.88 14.44 15.81 12.85 14.30 15.56 Non-Low Income 11.79 11.63 12.98 14.21 11.60 12.82 13.93 Minority 12.97 12.70 14.09 15.37 12.67 13.93 15.08 Non-Minority 11.19 11.14 12.46 13.57 11.12 12.33 13.32 Senior 11.62 11.50 13.12 14.66 11.47 12.97 14.37 Non-Senior 12.18 12.06 13.44 14.64 12.03 13.28 14.37

PM2.5 Low Income 6.04 5.45 5.94 6.44 5.43 5.88 6.34 Non-Low Income 5.52 4.91 5.34 5.79 4.90 5.27 5.67 Minority 6.06 5.37 5.80 6.26 5.35 5.73 6.14 Non-Minority 5.25 4.71 5.13 5.53 4.70 5.07 5.43 Senior 5.44 4.86 5.40 5.97 4.85 5.34 5.86 Non-Senior 5.70 5.10 5.53 5.96 5.08 5.47 5.85

30 Summary of Findings from Social Equity Analysis (Check indicates no disparity found) Social Equity Performance Measures Low-Income Minority Seniors

Average Peak Period Travel to Work – all modes 9 9 N/A

Change in percent of income consumed by out-of-pocket transportation costs 9 9 9

Percentage of population within 0.5 mile of high frequency transit stops 9 9 9

Percentage of population within 0.5 mile of transit stops 9 9 9

Percentage of population within 0.25 mile of a bike facility 9 9 9

Percentage of population within 30 minutes of jobs/higher education 9 9 9 (auto/transit)

Percentage of population within 15 minutes of goods/services (auto/transit):

Access to Retail 9 9 9

Access to Healthcare 9 9 9

Access to Active Parks 9 9 9

Access to Beaches 9 9 9

Exposure to PM10 9 9 9

Additional Performance Measure with Social Equity Analysis Low-Income Minority Seniors

Exposure to PM2.5 9 9 9

9 = No Disparate Impact or Disproportionate Effect

31 Item: 19 Board of Directors July 26, 2019

Executive Director Delegated Actions

Overview Action: Information Various Board Policies require the Executive Director to In accordance with various SANDAG Board report certain actions to the Board of Directors on a Policies, this report summarizes delegated monthly basis or upon taking specified actions. actions taken by the Executive Director since the last Board Business meeting. Delegated Actions Investment Transactions: Board Policy No. 003: Investment Policy, states that a monthly report of all Highlights: investment transactions shall be submitted to the Board. Seventeen securities reached maturity and four Attachment 1 contains the reportable investment securities were sold in June for a total of transactions for June 2019. $42.1 million and five securities were purchased for $23.3 million, providing approximately Legal Matters: Board Policy No. 008: Legal Matters, $18.8 million of liquidity to SANDAG. authorizes the Office of the General Counsel or outside counsel to file documents and make appearances on behalf of SANDAG in court proceedings. In the matter of Quintero v. SANDAG (Superior Court Case No. 2019-00017834), the following action was taken by Nossaman on behalf of SANDAG:

• On June 24, 2019, a Notice of Rescheduled Hearing and Case Reassignment was filed.

In the matter of SANDAG v. 8650 Villa La Jolla (Superior Court Case No. 2017-00039831), the following action was taken by Nossaman on behalf of SANDAG:

• On June 7, 2019, a Joint Status Conference Brief was filed. • On June 27, 2019, an appearance was made for a Status Conference.

In the matter of SANDAG v. Costa Verde Hotel (Superior Court Case No. 2018-00030194), the following action was taken by Nossaman on behalf of SANDAG:

• On June 27, 2019, a Stipulation for Protective Order Re Confidentiality of Documents and Information was filed.

In the matter of Wahlstrom v. SANDAG (Superior Court Case No. 2019-00027143), the following action was taken by Best Best & Krieger on behalf of SANDAG:

• On July 1, 2019, an Answer was filed.

Board Policy No. 008 also authorizes the Executive Director to take action on claims filed against SANDAG:

• On May 29, 2019, the Chief Deputy Executive Director authorized the settlement of the Claim of Rafael Galicot in the amount of $537. Mr. Galicot claimed damages to his vehicle after it was struck by debris allegedly kicked up by a lawnmower operated by SANDAG staff alongside the South Bay Expressway. Upon investigation of the claim, it was determined that SANDAG was likely liable for the alleged damages. Budget Modifications: Board Policy No. 017: Delegation of Authority, authorizes the Executive Director to enter into agreements currently not incorporated in the budget, and to make other budget modifications in an amount up to $300,000 per transaction so long as the overall budget remains in balance. Attachment 2 contains the actions for June 2019.

Right-of-Way: Board Policy No. 017, Section 4.15, authorizes the Executive Director to execute all right-of-way property transfer documents, including rights of entry, licenses, leases, deeds, easements, escrow instructions, and certificates of acceptance. The list below reflects the approved documents for this reporting period.

Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project – Capital Improvement Program Project No. 1257001 No. Address Nature of Activity (4.15) Date

4320 and 4330 La Jolla Village Drive, Settlement Agreement (compensation 1. San Diego, CA 92122; UTC Properties, for acquired property between 6/24/19 LLC SANDAG and Irvine Management) 4250, 4270, and 4275 Executive Settlement Agreement (compensation 2. Square, La Jolla, CA 92037; Irvine 6/24/19 for property damages), Joint Escrow Company, LLC

Elvira to Morena Double Track Project – Capital Improvement Program Project No. 1239811 No. Address Nature of Activity (4.15) Date

7744 Hershel Avenue, San Diego, CA Settlement Agreement (property 1. 92037; La Jolla Colony Community rights between SANDAG and the 6/26/19 Association La Jolla Community Association)

Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director Key Staff Contact: André Douzdjian, (619) 699-6931, [email protected] Attachments: 1. June 2019 Investment Securities Transactions Activity 2. June 2019 Budget Transfers and Amendments

2 Attachment 1

MONTHLY ACTIVITY FOR INVESTMENT SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS JUNE 1 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2019

Transaction Par Original Date Security/Coupon/Maturity Date Value Cost

BOUGHT 6/13/2019 U S TREASURY NT 1.375% 8/31/23 $ 4,000,000.00 $ 3,925,794.65 6/24/2019 F F C B DEB 2.250% 2/08/23 5,000,000.00 5,082,900.00 6/24/2019 F H L B DEB 2.125% 3/10/23 5,000,000.00 5,063,453.45 6/24/2019 U S TREASURY NT 1.625% 5/31/23 5,000,000.00 4,980,078.15 6/24/2019 U S TREASURY NT 1.375% 9/30/23 4,300,000.00 4,235,500.00

TOTAL BOUGHT: $ 23,300,000.00 $ 23,287,726.25

MATURED 6/3/2019 PFIZER INC 1.450% 6/03/19 $ 6,000,000.00 $ 6,018,300.00 6/15/2019 U S TREASURY NT 0.875% 6/15/19 3,700,000.00 3,652,449.22 6/15/2019 TOYOTA AUTO 1.730% 2/16/21 16,277.26 16,275.34 6/15/2019 TOYOTA AUTO 1.140% 8/17/20 27,378.12 27,377.38 6/15/2019 NISSAN AUTO 1.320% 1/15/21 21,301.54 21,298.24 6/15/2019 JOHN DEERE OWNER 1.780% 4/15/21 30,865.76 30,861.36 6/15/2019 HYUNDAI AUTO 1.770% 1/18/22 20,199.11 20,195.61 6/15/2019 HYUNDAI AUTO 1.760% 8/16/21 26,307.23 26,305.10 6/15/2019 HYUNDAI AUTO 1.560% 9/15/20 34,104.31 34,097.70 6/15/2019 HYUNDAI AUTO 1.290% 4/15/21 63,067.70 63,059.21 6/15/2019 ALLY AUTO 1.990% 3/15/22 82,579.92 82,573.51 6/15/2019 ALLY AUTO 1.700% 6/15/21 39,747.17 39,743.69 6/15/2019 ALLY AUTO 1.780% 8/16/21 42,839.78 42,834.73 6/21/2019 HONDA AUTO 1.720% 7/21/21 21,926.89 21,925.59 6/21/2019 HONDA AUTO 2.050% 11/22/21 68,936.12 68,926.41 6/21/2019 F H L B DEB 1.125% 6/21/19 12,610,000.00 12,604,703.80 6/25/2019 F N M A GTD REMIC 1.646% 9/25/19 57,838.02 58,417.20

TOTAL MATURED: $ 22,863,368.93 $ 22,829,344.09

SOLD 6/24/2019 U S TREASURY NT 0.750% 7/15/19 $ 5,000,000.00 $ 4,946,679.69 1 6/24/2019 U S TREASURY NT 0.750% 8/15/19 5,000,000.00 4,938,476.56 1 6/24/2019 F H L M C DEB 1.250% 8/01/19 5,000,000.00 4,956,985.60 1 6/24/2019 F N M A 1.000% 8/28/19 4,217,000.00 4,164,751.37 1

TOTAL SOLD: $ 19,217,000.00 $ 19,006,893.22

1 Proceeds from this sale were used to purchase new securities that would provide higher returns over a longer holding period.

3 Attachment 2

JULY 2019 BUDGET TRANSFERS AND AMENDMENTS in '000s

PROJECT CURRENT NEW NUMBER PROJECT NAME BUDGET BUDGET CHANGE EXPLANATION

7500000 Service Bureau - Main Project FY 2020 $185.2 $87.2 ($98.0) Transferred funds from the Main Service Bureau project (7500000) to 2021 Border Master Plan Update (7515100) for FY 2020 administration costs.

7515100 2021 Border Master Plan Update $280.0 $378.0 $98.0 Additional budget for FY 2020 administration costs.

7500000 Service Bureau - Main Project FY 2020 $87.2 $63.2 ($24.0) Transferred funds from the Main Service Bureau project (7500000) to establish a new project.

7515300 Transportation Modeling for San Marcos University District Phase $0.0 $24.0 $24.0 New Service Bureau project for Transportation Modeling for San Marcos University District Phase II

Item: 20 Board of Directors July 26, 2019

Meetings and Events Attended on Behalf of SANDAG

Since the last Board of Directors meeting, Board Action: Information members participated in the following meetings and events on behalf of SANDAG. Key topics of discussion Board members will provide brief reports on also are summarized. external meetings and events attended on behalf of SANDAG. June 9-12, 2019: National Association of Regional Councils Omaha, NE National City Councilmember Ron Morrison participated in the annual National Association of Regional Councils (NARC) Conference as the SANDAG representative. The conference presented sessions on changing demographics; engaging the private sector; updates on current Supreme Court cases; disaster preparation; the intersection of land use, transportation, and urban design; regional funding initiatives; and surface transportation reauthorization.

June 17, 2019: Los Angeles-San Diego-San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Agency Board Meeting Orange, CA Del Mar Deputy Mayor Ellie Haviland participated in the Los Angeles-San Diego-San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor (LOSSAN) Agency Board Meeting as the SANDAG representative. The LOSSAN Board participated in discussions related to ridership, revenue, on-time performance, and marketing efforts. The Board approved mid-year amendments to the budget and the annual business plan. Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director Key Staff Contact: Tessa Lero, (619) 595-5629, [email protected]

Item: 21 Board of Directors July 26, 2019

Quarterly Investments as of June 30, 2019

Overview Action: Information Board Policy No. 003: Investment Policy follows the This quarterly report provides an update on requirements of California Government Code SANDAG investments, including all money Section 53646, which requires the chief fiscal officer to under the direction or care of SANDAG as of render a quarterly report on investments to the June 30, 2019. legislative body within 30 days following the end of the quarter. Highlights: SANDAG held $944.1. million in several Key Considerations investment accounts as of June 30, 2019. The quarterly report on investments includes the following information:

• The type of investment, issuer, date of maturity, par and dollar amount invested on all securities, investments, and moneys held by SANDAG

• Description of funds and investments under management of a contracted party • Current market value as of the date of the report and source of the valuation for all securities under management of any outside party that is not a local agency or in State of California Local Agency Investment Fund) The Director of Finance reports that the SANDAG investment portfolio (Attachment 1), together with the authorized short-term Commercial Paper Program, will provide the necessary liquidity to meet the expenditure requirements of SANDAG, the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission, and SourcePoint for the next six months. The Director of Finance reports that there has not been any material event involving outstanding swap agreements, nor has there been any default by a swap counterparty or counterparty termination.

Investment Holdings The following tables provide the portfolio cash and investments balances for all money under the direction or care of SANDAG, including funds of the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission, SourcePoint, and Automated Regional Justice Information System. Additional detail can be found in the attachments to this report. Cash and Investment Balances By Agency/Unit (Market Value) $711,044,948 75.31%

$117,971,056 $105,966,433 12.50% 11.22% $8,658,327 $207,501 $286,938 0.92% 0.02% 0.03%

SANDAG OTHER SANDAG SR125 ARJIS FUNDS SOURCEPOINT FUNDS CORONADO BRIDGE SDCRTC FUNDS FUNDS TOLL FUNDS (COMMISSION) FUNDS

$6,658,183 $459,109 0.71% $18,962,196 0.05% 2.01% Investments Held By Institution $69,527,748 $98,705,418 (Market Value) 7.36% 10.45% US BANK, N.A. $154,389,736 $43,545 LAIF 0.00% 16.35% CAMP IP CAMP CASH RESERVE $219,322,338 US BANK 23.24% US BANK IP US BANK CASH RESERVE COSD TREASURER'S POOL CALIFORNIA BANK AND TRUST WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

$92,099,720 $283,967,209 9.75% 30.08%

Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director Key Staff Contacts: André Douzdjian, (619) 699-6931, [email protected] Lisa Kondrat-Dauphin, (619) 699-1942, [email protected] Attachments: 1. Investment Portfolio Summary 2. Investment Securities Portfolio

2 Attachment 1

SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Account) as of June 30, 2019

Percent Book of Market Market Unrealized Yield on Institution / Account Value Portfolio Value Price Gain/(Loss) Cost

US BANK, N.A.: Checking - TransNet Sales Tax (RTC) $ 664,737.02 0.07% $ 664,737.02 100.00% $ - N/A Checking - SANDAG General 7,672,438.72 0.81% 7,672,438.72 100.00% - N/A Checking - SANDAG Flexible Spending Acct (FSA) 47,117.43 0.00% 47,117.43 100.00% - N/A Checking - SANDAG Interstate 15 (I-15) FasTrak ® 4,847,338.02 0.51% 4,847,338.02 100.00% - N/A Checking - SANDAG SAFE Program Acct 629,821.00 0.07% 629,821.00 100.00% - N/A Checking - SourcePoint 31,993.40 0.00% 31,993.40 100.00% - N/A Checking - ARJIS 392,732.12 0.04% 392,732.12 100.00% - N/A Checking - State Route 125 (SR 125) Payment Account 4,534,224.23 0.48% 4,534,224.23 100.00% - N/A Checking - State Route 125 (SR 125) Collection Account 141,793.65 0.02% 141,793.65 100.00% - N/A

TOTAL US BANK, N.A. $ 18,962,195.59 2.01% $ 18,962,195.59 100.00% $ - N/A

STATE OF CA LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF): TransNet (RTC) $ 62,202,239.48 6.60% $ 62,202,239.48 100.00% $ - 2.45% SANDAG 7,325,508.45 0.78% 7,325,508.45 100.00% - 2.45%

TOTAL LAIF $ 69,527,747.93 7.38% $ 69,527,747.93 100.00% $ - 2.45%

Funds Managed by PFM Asset Management, LLC: INDIVIDUAL SECURITIES PORTFOLIO: TransNet Sales Tax (RTC) $ 107,069,102.22 11.36% $ 106,701,695.89 99.66% $ (367,406.33) 1.74% TransNet Program Reserve (RTC) 33,914,667.45 3.60% 33,955,318.05 100.12% 40,650.60 1.64% TransNet 2008 Bond Proceeds A/B/C/D Reserve Fund (RTC) 12,843,049.34 1.36% 12,910,527.07 100.53% 67,477.73 2.33% Sage Hill Endowment (RTC) 821,139.00 0.09% 822,195.00 100.13% 1,056.00 1.63%

TOTAL INDIVIDUAL SECURITIES PORTFOLIO $ 154,647,958.01 16.41% $ 154,389,736.01 99.83% $ (258,222.00) 1.76%

CALIFORNIA ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CAMP) - CASH PORTFOLIO: I-15 FasTrak $ 650,996.97 0.07% $ 650,996.97 100.00% $ - 2.48% ARJIS 5,717,622.49 0.61% 5,717,622.49 100.00% - 2.48% California Coastal Commission 1,029,961.20 0.11% 1,029,961.20 100.00% - 2.48% SANDAG SR 125 75,986,433.52 8.06% 75,986,433.52 100.00% - 2.48% Coronado Bridge Toll Funds 286,938.08 0.03% 286,938.08 100.00% - 2.48% SANDAG Shoreline Management Account 169,328.98 0.02% 169,328.98 100.00% - 2.48% Sales Tax Account - TransNet Extension (RTC) 110,481,660.10 11.72% 110,481,660.10 100.00% - 2.48% Wetland Mitigation TransNet Sales Tax (RTC) 305,745.60 0.03% 305,745.60 100.00% - 2.48%

3 SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Account) as of June 30, 2019

Percent Book of Market Market Unrealized Yield on Institution / Account Value Portfolio Value Price Gain/(Loss) Cost

Sage Hill Endowment (RTC) 31,869.29 0.00% 31,869.29 100.00% - 2.48% TransNet Program Reserve (RTC) 21,060,036.64 2.23% 21,060,036.64 100.00% - 2.48% 2008 Bond Series A/B/C/D Reserve Account (RTC) 4,341,164.33 0.46% 4,341,164.33 100.00% - 2.48% 2010 Bond Series A/B Accounts (RTC) 5,266,347.60 0.56% 5,266,347.60 100.00% - 2.48% 2012 Bond Series A Accounts (RTC) 8,406,753.98 0.89% 8,406,753.98 100.00% - 2.48% 2014 Bond Series A Accounts (RTC) 5,454,908.93 0.58% 5,454,908.93 100.00% - 2.48% 2016 Bond Series A Accounts (RTC) 5,179,705.84 0.55% 5,179,705.84 100.00% - 2.48% 2018 Bond Series A Accounts (RTC) 35,002,779.47 3.71% 35,002,779.47 100.00% - 2.48% 2018 Swap Overlay Custody Account (RTC) 4,594,956.33 0.49% 4,594,956.33 100.00% - 2.48%

TOTAL CAMP - CASH PORTFOLIO $ 283,967,209.35 30.12% $ 283,967,209.35 100.00% $ - 2.48%

TOTAL PORTFOLIO (Managed by PFM Asset Management, LLC) $ 438,615,167.36 46.53% $ 438,356,945.36 99.94% $ - 2.22%

US BANK: Capital Project Retention Account $ 40,613,042.78 4.31% $ 40,613,042.78 100.00% $ - 1.65% SANDAG SR 125 First Senior Lien bonds 2017 Series A 219,442.13 0.02% 219,442.13 100.00% - 0.85% SANDAG SR 125 First Senior Lien bonds 2017 Series A Reserve Account 13,870,500.31 1.47% 13,870,500.31 100.00% - 0.85% SANDAG SR 125 First Senior Lien bonds 2017 Series A Interest Account 4,857,822.65 0.52% 4,857,822.65 100.00% - 0.85% SANDAG SR 125 First Senior Lien bonds 2017 Series A Principal Account 4,333,947.65 0.46% 4,333,947.65 100.00% - 0.85% SANDAG SR 125 FasTrak Customer Prepaid Fund 2,022,268.86 0.21% 2,022,268.86 100.00% - 0.85% 2008 Bond Series A/B/C/D Main Interest (RTC) 1,231,414.40 0.13% 1,231,414.40 100.00% - 0.30% Commercial Paper Series B - NCTD Interest (RTC) 226,793.69 0.02% 226,793.69 100.00% - 0.30% NCTD Certificates of Participation 24,300,000.00 2.58% 24,300,000.00 100.00% - 1.42% Commercial Paper Notes Series B Interest (RTC) 7,818.37 0.00% 7,818.37 100.00% - 1.79% Commercial Paper Notes Series B Principal (RTC) 416,669.33 0.04% 416,669.33 100.00% - 1.79%

TOTAL US BANK $ 92,099,720.17 9.77% $ 92,099,720.17 100.00% $ - 1.35%

Funds Managed by Insight North America, LLC: US BANK - Custodian INDIVIDUAL SECURITIES PORTFOLIO: TransNet Extension (RTC) $ 217,791,874.78 23.10% $ 219,322,338.00 100.70% $ 1,530,463.22 2.03%

TOTAL INDIVIDUAL SECURITIES PORTFOLIO $ 217,791,874.78 23.10% $ 219,322,338.00 100.70% $ 1,530,463.22 2.03%

4 SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Account) as of June 30, 2019

Percent Book of Market Market Unrealized Yield on Institution / Account Value Portfolio Value Price Gain/(Loss) Cost

CASH PORTFOLIO: TransNet Extension (RTC) $ 43,545.34 0.00% $ 43,545.34 100.00% $ - 0.00%

TOTAL CASH PORTFOLIO $ 43,545.34 0.00% $ 43,545.34 100.00% $ - 0.00%

TOTAL PORTFOLIO (Managed by Insight North America, LLC) $ 217,835,420.12 23.11% $ 219,365,883.34 100.70% $ 1,530,463.22 2.03%

SAN DIEGO COUNTY TREASURER'S POOLED MONEY FUND: SourcePoint Cash Reserve Fund $ 175,507.10 0.02% $ 175,507.10 100.00% $ - 2.43% SANDAG I-15 FasTrak 38,980,823.01 4.14% 38,980,823.01 100.00% - 2.43% TransNet Extension (RTC) 48,113,728.24 5.10% 48,113,728.24 100.00% - 2.43% ARJIS 2,547,971.90 0.27% 2,547,971.90 100.00% - 2.43% SANDAG SAFE Program 8,887,387.66 0.94% 8,887,387.66 100.00% - 2.43%

TOTAL SAN DIEGO COUNTY TREASURER'S POOLED MONEY FUND $ 98,705,417.91 10.47% $ 98,705,417.91 100.00% $ - 2.43%

CALIFORNIA BANK AND TRUST: Capital Project Retention Accounts $ 459,109.38 0.05% $ 459,109.38 100.00% $ - 0.27%

TOTAL CALIFORNIA BANK AND TRUST $ 459,109.38 0.05% $ 459,109.38 100.00% $ - 0.27%

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.: SANDAG Section 115 Pension Trust $ 6,425,034.64 0.68% $ 6,658,182.68 103.63% $ 233,148.04 2.36%

TOTAL WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. $ 6,425,034.64 0.68% $ 6,658,182.68 103.63% $ 233,148.04 2.36%

TOTAL SANDAG Portfolio $ 942,629,813.10 100.00% $ 944,135,202.36 100.16% $ 1,505,389.26 2.13%

Legend: Automated Regional Justice Information System (ARJIS) Commercial Paper (CP) State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) North County Transit District (NCTD) San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission (RTC)

5 Attachment 2

SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Investment Type) as of June 30, 2019

Maturity Moodys S&P Managing CUSIP ID Issuer/Investment Issue Date Book Value Market Value Pricing Date EOM Price Shares/Par Yield Date Rating Rating Institution

US Treasury and Agency Obligations: 3137EAEB1 F H L M C M T N 07/20/16 07/19/19 $ 9,209,711.30 $ 9,227,519.65 06/28/19 99.8 $ 9,235,000.00 0.88 AAA AA+ 1 3135G0N33 F N M A 08/02/16 08/02/19 6,529,012.80 6,532,086.60 06/28/19 99.739 6,540,000.00 0.88 AAA AA+ 1 3135G0P49 F N M A 09/02/16 08/28/19 11,605,444.00 11,597,922.00 06/28/19 99.666 11,620,000.00 1.00 AAA AA+ 1 3135G0R39 F N M A 10/25/16 10/24/19 4,155,357.75 4,199,446.65 06/28/19 99.455 4,215,000.00 1.00 AAA AA+ 1 3137EAEF2 F H L M C M T N 04/20/17 04/20/20 1,729,066.30 1,726,186.20 06/28/19 99.232 1,735,000.00 1.38 AAA AA+ 1 3137EAEH8 F H L M C 07/19/17 08/15/19 3,459,906.45 3,461,292.45 06/28/19 99.785 3,465,000.00 1.38 AAA AA+ 1 912828L99 U S TREASURY NOTE 11/02/15 10/31/20 1,409,080.08 1,415,766.00 06/28/19 99.035 1,425,000.00 1.38 AAA N/A 1 3137EAEE5 F H L M C M T N 01/17/17 01/17/20 7,720,983.00 7,697,653.50 06/28/19 99.49 7,725,000.00 1.51 AAA AA+ 1 912828X21 U S TREASURY NOTE 04/15/17 04/15/20 1,990,781.25 1,991,720.00 06/28/19 99.324 2,000,000.00 1.51 AAA N/A 1 3135G0T60 F N M A DEB 08/01/17 07/30/20 3,623,985.95 3,616,861.35 06/28/19 99.235 3,635,000.00 1.51 AAA AA+ 1 3137EAEJ4 F H L M C 09/29/17 09/29/20 821,139.00 822,195.00 06/28/19 99.427 825,000.00 1.63 AAA AA+ 1 912828NT3 U S TREASURY NOTE 08/16/10 08/15/20 604,858.01 589,568.85 06/28/19 100.57 585,000.00 2.61 AAA N/A 1 3136AQDQ0 F N M A GTD R E M I C PASS THRU 10/01/15 09/25/19 3,725.74 3,681.98 06/28/19 99.705 3,688.80 1.65 N/A N/A 1 912828C57 U S TREASURY NOTE 03/31/14 03/31/21 3,541,276.64 3,568,513.57 06/28/19 100.461 3,541,000.00 2.23 AAA N/A 1 3130ADUJ9 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BKS 03/16/18 03/30/20 9,301,772.70 9,342,013.50 06/28/19 100.058 9,315,000.00 2.37 AAA AA+ 1 3130ACE26 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BKS 09/08/17 09/28/20 6,181,623.30 6,248,486.00 06/28/19 99.094 6,290,000.00 1.38 AAA AA+ 1 3135G0T29 F N M A DEB 02/28/17 02/28/20 9,976,713.93 9,961,600.00 06/28/19 99.46 10,000,000.00 1.51 AAA AA+ 1 3135G0T60 F N M A DEB 08/01/17 07/30/20 6,539,677.37 6,517,315.50 06/28/19 99.235 6,550,000.00 1.51 AAA AA+ 1 3137EAEK1 F H L M C M T N 11/15/17 11/17/20 4,087,167.00 4,098,729.00 06/28/19 99.763 4,100,000.00 1.88 AAA AA+ 1 912828TR1 U S TREASURY NOTE 10/01/12 09/30/19 4,998,437.50 4,985,750.00 06/28/19 99.539 5,000,000.00 1.00 AAA N/A 2 912828UF5 U S TREASURY NOTE 12/31/12 12/31/19 4,810,125.00 4,776,768.00 06/28/19 99.289 4,800,000.00 1.13 AAA N/A 2 3136G4DB6 F N M A M T N 09/30/16 03/30/20 5,097,450.00 5,071,593.00 06/28/19 99.207 5,100,000.00 1.26 AAA AA+ 2 3137EADM8 F H L M C M T N 10/02/12 10/02/19 4,943,250.00 4,987,900.00 06/28/19 99.638 5,000,000.00 1.25 AAA AA+ 2 3134G9AV9 F H L M C M T N 04/28/16 10/28/19 5,000,000.00 4,984,050.00 06/28/19 99.556 5,000,000.00 1.25 AAA AA+ 2 3134GAMB7 F H L M C M T N 10/06/16 07/06/20 5,498,625.00 5,467,880.00 06/28/19 99.256 5,500,000.00 1.38 AAA AA+ 2 9128282D1 U S TREASURY NOTE 08/31/16 08/31/23 3,925,794.65 3,941,880.00 06/28/19 97.738 4,000,000.00 1.40 AAA N/A 2 912828T26 U S TREASURY NOTE 09/30/16 09/30/23 4,235,500.00 4,235,500.00 06/28/19 97.66 4,300,000.00 1.40 AAA N/A 2 3130AA3R7 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BKS 11/17/16 11/15/19 9,471,914.10 9,573,696.00 06/28/19 99.565 9,600,000.00 1.38 AAA AA+ 2 3133EHGA5 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BKS 04/21/17 10/21/19 6,131,118.00 6,189,646.00 06/28/19 99.691 6,200,000.00 1.44 AAA AA+ 2 3137EAEE5 F H L M C M T N 01/17/17 01/17/20 4,921,800.00 4,982,300.00 06/28/19 99.49 5,000,000.00 1.51 AAA AA+ 2 3135G0T29 F N M A DEB 02/28/17 02/28/20 5,511,408.00 5,578,496.00 06/28/19 99.46 5,600,000.00 1.51 AAA AA+ 2 912828R69 U S TREASURY NOTE 05/31/16 05/31/23 4,980,078.15 4,980,300.00 06/28/19 98.856 5,000,000.00 1.63 AAA N/A 2 313379RB7 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BKS 06/05/12 06/11/21 4,924,100.00 5,001,350.00 06/28/19 99.725 5,000,000.00 1.88 AAA AA+ 2 3130AABG2 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BKS 11/30/16 11/29/21 4,915,300.00 5,010,550.00 06/28/19 99.758 5,000,000.00 1.87 AAA AA+ 2 313382AX1 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BKS 02/08/13 03/10/23 5,063,453.45 5,057,450.00 06/28/19 100.518 5,000,000.00 2.10 AAA AA+ 2 3130A12B3 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BKS 02/24/14 03/13/20 4,956,225.00 5,000,400.00 06/28/19 99.847 5,000,000.00 2.12 AAA AA+ 2 3133EKKT2 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BKS 05/08/19 02/08/23 5,082,900.00 5,072,400.00 06/28/19 101.448 5,000,000.00 2.22 AAA AA+ 2 3133EKGC4 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BKS 04/05/19 04/05/23 6,968,500.00 7,089,390.00 06/28/19 101.02 7,000,000.00 2.22 AAA AA+ 2 3135G0V59 F N M A DEB 04/12/19 04/12/22 4,982,050.00 5,062,800.00 06/28/19 100.74 5,000,000.00 2.22 AAA AA+ 2 3133EKKU9 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BKS 05/08/19 11/08/23 6,022,560.00 6,106,140.00 06/28/19 101.149 6,000,000.00 2.26 AAA AA+ 2

6 SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Investment Type) as of June 30, 2019

Maturity Moodys S&P Managing CUSIP ID Issuer/Investment Issue Date Book Value Market Value Pricing Date EOM Price Shares/Par Yield Date Rating Rating Institution

3130A0XD7 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BKS 02/12/14 03/12/21 4,979,485.00 5,038,300.00 06/28/19 100.618 5,000,000.00 2.36 AAA AA+ 2 3133EKAJ5 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BKS 02/11/19 02/11/21 4,999,029.10 5,053,550.00 06/28/19 100.797 5,000,000.00 2.48 AAA AA+ 2 3130AEWA4 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BKS 09/07/18 10/01/20 5,008,150.00 5,042,850.00 06/28/19 100.727 5,000,000.00 2.60 AAA AA+ 2 9128285R7 U S TREASURY NOTE 12/15/18 12/15/21 5,013,298.00 5,109,550.00 06/28/19 101.781 5,000,000.00 2.57 AAA N/A 2 3133XN4B2 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BKS 11/09/07 12/09/22 3,648,843.00 3,671,085.00 06/28/19 111.127 3,300,000.00 4.73 AAA AA+ 2

Total US Treasury and Agency Obligations $ 228,580,676.52 $ 229,690,131.80 $ 229,204,688.80

Corporate Obligations: 084664CK5 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY FIN 08/15/16 08/15/19 $ 959,068.80 $ 958,867.20 06/28/19 99.74 $ 960,000.00 1.30 AA2 AA 1 44932HAA1 IBM CREDIT CORP 09/08/17 09/06/19 1,678,723.20 1,677,732.00 06/28/19 99.767 1,680,000.00 1.63 A1 A 1 437076BQ4 HOME DEPOT INC 06/05/17 06/05/20 1,044,393.90 1,041,373.85 06/28/19 99.305 1,045,000.00 1.81 A2 A 1 438516BQ8 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL 10/30/17 10/30/19 544,574.90 544,040.80 06/28/19 99.725 545,000.00 1.80 A2 A 1 857477AS2 STATE STREET CORP 08/18/15 08/18/20 3,063,060.00 3,013,320.00 06/28/19 100.166 3,000,000.00 2.54 A1 A 1 0258M0EE5 AMERICAN EXPRESSCREDIT 03/03/17 03/03/20 3,024,630.00 2,996,850.00 06/28/19 99.819 3,000,000.00 2.20 A2 A- 1 05531FAZ6 BB T CORPORATION 10/26/17 02/01/21 999,540.00 998,240.00 06/28/19 99.392 1,000,000.00 2.16 A2 A- 1 14913Q2A6 CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE 09/07/17 09/04/20 1,463,769.40 1,459,843.20 06/28/19 99.314 1,465,000.00 1.86 A3 A 1 24422ETZ2 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 01/08/18 01/08/21 419,781.60 421,255.80 06/28/19 100.009 420,000.00 2.34 A2 A 1 36962G2T0 GENERAL ELEC CAP CORP 05/04/07 05/04/20 3,829,770.00 3,580,710.00 06/28/19 102.418 3,500,000.00 5.42 BAA1 BBB+ 1 89236TDU6 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CPROP 04/17/17 04/17/20 2,039,061.60 2,036,083.20 06/28/19 99.526 2,040,000.00 1.95 AA3 AA- 1 037833CK4 APPLE INC 02/09/17 02/07/20 3,503,282.55 3,497,604.45 06/28/19 99.637 3,505,000.00 1.90 AA1 AA+ 1 94974BGF1 WELLS FARGO COMPANY 02/02/15 01/30/20 3,626,203.30 3,631,583.10 06/28/19 99.776 3,635,000.00 2.15 A2 A- 1 713448DJ4 PEPSICO INC 10/06/16 10/04/19 3,881,748.00 3,890,211.00 06/28/19 99.605 3,900,000.00 1.35 A1 A+ 2 44932HAA1 IBM CREDIT CORP 09/08/17 09/06/19 4,950,750.00 4,993,250.00 06/28/19 99.767 5,000,000.00 1.63 A1 A 2 17275RBJ0 CISCO SYSTEMS INC 09/20/16 09/20/21 3,914,240.00 3,976,520.00 06/28/19 98.702 4,000,000.00 1.86 A1 AA- 2 48127HAA7 JPMORGAN CHASE 10/22/14 10/22/19 3,971,480.00 3,998,680.00 06/28/19 99.883 4,000,000.00 2.20 A2 A- 2 693506BH9 PPG INDUSTRIES INC 11/12/14 11/15/19 2,577,146.00 2,597,790.00 06/28/19 99.865 2,600,000.00 2.30 A3 A- 2 68389XBB0 ORACLE CORP 05/05/15 05/15/22 3,993,280.00 4,042,840.00 06/28/19 100.033 4,000,000.00 2.48 A1 AA- 2 166764AH3 CHEVRON CORP 06/24/13 06/24/23 5,118,900.00 5,189,400.00 06/28/19 102.716 5,000,000.00 3.08 AA2 AA 2 437076BV3 HOME DEPOT INC 12/06/18 03/01/22 4,275,054.00 4,334,526.00 06/28/19 102.798 4,200,000.00 3.15 A2 A 2 17325FAQ1 CITIBANK NA 07/23/18 07/23/21 6,158,234.50 6,178,744.00 06/28/19 101.741 6,050,000.00 3.33 AA3 A+ 2 0258M0EE5 AMERICAN EXPRESSCREDIT 03/03/17 03/03/20 2,822,876.00 2,797,060.00 06/28/19 99.819 2,800,000.00 2.20 A2 A- 2 02665WAU5 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 03/13/15 03/13/20 2,366,640.00 2,397,312.00 06/28/19 99.817 2,400,000.00 2.15 A2 A 2 14913Q2S7 CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE 12/07/18 12/07/23 3,121,890.00 3,165,420.00 06/28/19 104.086 3,000,000.00 3.46 A3 A 2 14913Q2T5 CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE 02/26/19 02/26/22 4,019,240.00 4,084,480.00 06/28/19 101.272 4,000,000.00 2.89 A3 A 2 89236TBP9 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 07/18/14 07/18/19 6,039,300.00 5,999,400.00 06/28/19 99.93 6,000,000.00 2.13 AA3 AA- 2 94988J5G8 WELLS FARGO BANK NA 12/08/16 12/06/19 5,679,752.33 5,694,642.00 06/28/19 99.825 5,700,000.00 2.15 AA2 A+ 2

Total Corporate Obligations $ 89,086,390.08 $ 89,197,778.60 $ 88,445,000.00

Supra-National Agency Bond/Note: 45905UP32 INTERNATIONAL BANK M T N 09/19/17 09/12/20 $ 3,666,180.00 $ 3,656,514.75 06/28/19 99.248 $ 3,675,000.00 1.57 AAA N/A 1 459058DW0 INTERNATIONAL BANK 10/07/14 10/07/19 1,844,909.00 1,833,697.15 06/28/19 99.817 1,835,000.00 1.88 AAA AAA 1 4581X0CD8 INTER AMERICAN DEVEL BK 11/08/13 11/09/20 3,638,415.12 3,613,940.40 06/28/19 100.064 3,605,000.00 2.12 AAA AAA 1

7 SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Investment Type) as of June 30, 2019

Maturity Moodys S&P Managing CUSIP ID Issuer/Investment Issue Date Book Value Market Value Pricing Date EOM Price Shares/Par Yield Date Rating Rating Institution

45950KCM0 INTERNATIONAL BANK M T N 01/25/18 01/25/21 1,540,457.70 1,553,173.05 06/28/19 100.303 1,545,000.00 2.24 AAA AAA 1 45905UP32 INTERNATIONAL BANK M T N 09/19/17 09/12/20 4,922,860.00 4,974,850.00 06/28/19 99.248 5,000,000.00 1.57 AAA N/A 2 459058FZ1 INTERNATIONAL BANK M T N 03/21/17 04/21/20 5,025,900.00 4,990,300.00 06/28/19 99.67 5,000,000.00 1.88 AAA AAA 2 4581X0DB1 INTER AMERICAN DEVEL BK 04/19/18 04/19/21 3,898,440.00 3,950,739.00 06/28/19 101.026 3,900,000.00 2.59 AAA AAA 2 45950KCD0 INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORP 07/10/14 09/16/19 4,964,750.00 4,994,600.00 06/28/19 99.814 5,000,000.00 1.75 AAA AAA 2

Total Supra-National Agency Bond/Note $ 29,501,911.82 $ 29,567,814.35 $ 29,560,000.00

Certificates of Deposits: 06539RGM3 BANK OF TKYO MTBSHI LTD 09/27/17 09/25/19 $ 1,950,000.00 $ 1,947,192.00 06/28/19 99.753 $ 1,950,000.00 2.07 P-1 A-1 1 22549LFR1 CREDIT SUISSE NEW YORK 02/08/18 02/07/20 1,920,000.00 1,925,241.60 06/28/19 100.108 1,920,000.00 2.66 P-1 A-1 1 65590ASN7 NORDEA BK AB PUBL 02/22/18 02/20/20 2,875,000.00 2,885,321.25 06/28/19 100.205 2,875,000.00 2.71 P-1 A-1+ 1 83050FXT3 SKANDIN ENS BANKEN 08/04/17 08/02/19 3,898,479.00 3,897,465.00 06/28/19 99.871 3,900,000.00 1.84 P-1 A-1 1 87019U6D6 SWEDBANK SPARBANK 11/17/17 11/16/20 2,905,000.00 2,896,430.25 06/28/19 99.278 2,905,000.00 2.28 Aa2 AA- 1 96121T4A3 WESTPAC BKING CORP NY 08/07/17 08/03/20 3,500,000.00 3,495,100.00 06/28/19 99.523 3,500,000.00 2.05 Aa3 AA- 1

Total Certificates of Deposits $ 17,048,479.00 $ 17,046,750.10 $ 17,050,000.00

Asset-Backed Security: 89237WAD9 TOYOTA AUTO RECEIVABLES OWNER TRUST 08/10/16 08/17/20 $ 95,465.21 $ 95,301.66 06/28/19 99.748 $ 95,467.77 1.14 AAA AAA 1 02007PAC7 ALLY AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 01/31/17 06/15/21 335,375.25 334,613.02 06/28/19 99.653 335,404.57 1.70 AAA N/A 1 43814TAC6 HONDA AUTO RECEIVABLES OWNER 03/28/17 07/21/21 234,223.83 233,544.43 06/28/19 99.607 234,237.77 1.73 AAA N/A 1 02007HAC5 ALLY AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 03/29/17 08/16/21 415,776.32 414,981.22 06/28/19 99.661 415,825.35 1.78 AAA N/A 1 43813FAC7 HONDA AUTO RECEIVABLES OWNER 11/29/17 11/22/21 971,339.87 970,194.41 06/28/19 99.794 971,476.76 2.05 AAA N/A 1 02007YAC8 ALLY AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 11/22/17 03/15/22 1,422,309.70 1,420,329.12 06/28/19 99.707 1,422,420.08 1.99 AAA AAA 1 44931PAD8 HYUNDAI AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 03/29/17 08/16/21 287,752.94 287,076.92 06/28/19 99.608 287,776.22 1.76 N/A AAA 1 47787XAC1 JOHN DEERE OWNER TRUST 03/02/17 04/15/21 248,669.75 248,205.26 06/28/19 99.701 248,705.16 1.78 AAA N/A 1 89238MAD0 TOYOTA AUTO RECEIVABLES OWNER 03/15/17 02/16/21 127,498.52 127,213.87 06/28/19 99.68 127,513.53 1.73 AAA AAA 1 44932GAD7 HYUNDAI AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 08/16/17 01/18/22 1,234,586.90 1,231,380.49 06/28/19 99.552 1,234,800.89 1.78 AAA AAA 1 89238KAD4 TOYOTA AUTO RECEIVABLES OWNER 11/15/17 01/18/22 1,229,886.59 1,227,232.50 06/28/19 99.579 1,230,000.00 1.93 AAA AAA 1 89238BAD4 TOYOTA AUTO RECEIVABLES OWNER 01/31/18 05/16/22 999,988.50 1,001,840.00 06/28/19 100.033 1,000,000.00 2.35 AAA AAA 1 44930UAD8 HYUNDAI AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 03/30/16 09/15/20 37,875.76 37,867.20 06/28/19 99.905 37,883.11 1.56 AAA AAA 1 44891EAC3 HYUNDAI AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 09/21/16 04/15/21 458,132.56 456,640.95 06/28/19 99.492 458,194.23 1.29 AAA AAA 1 65478VAD9 NISSAN AUTO RECEIVABLES OWNER TRUST 04/27/16 01/15/21 123,493.67 123,178.11 06/28/19 99.66 123,512.83 1.32 AAA N/A 1

Total Asset-Backed Security $ 8,222,375.37 $ 8,209,599.16 $ 8,223,218.27

Total Investments $ 372,439,832.79 $ 373,712,074.01 $ 372,482,907.07

Note: Market value of securities are provided by SANDAG's custodian, U.S. Bank

1 Managed by PFM Asset Management, LLC 2 Managed By Insight North America, LLC

8 Item: 22 Board of Directors July 26, 2019

TransNet Major Corridors Program Update

Overview Action: Information The Board of Directors requested at its June 28, 2019, An overview of cost and anticipated revenue meeting that an item providing a “one-page summary” information for the TransNet Major Corridor of costs and revenues associated with completion of the Program, through 2048, will be presented. TransNet Major Corridors Program be provided. This report provides additional detail regarding anticipated funding in the near-, mid-, and long-term (FY 2019-23, Fiscal Impact: FY 2024-35, FY 2036-48, respectively), initially reported Approximately $8.6 billion is estimated to be in summarized form to the Board on February 22, 2019. available to finish TransNet Major Corridors Program projects through 2048. An additional Key Considerations $6 billion could also become available if the region is successful in competitive grant cycles. Current costs for remaining, unprogrammed TransNet The current estimated cost to deliver these Major Corridors Program projects only (i.e., not including projects by 2048 is $24.4 billion. debt service) are estimated to be about $24.4 billion. These cost estimates were prepared as part of an update Schedule/Scope Impact: to the Regional Plan. Based on current estimates, approximately $9.8 billion in new matching funds and Attachment 1 shows the available TransNet and state/ $6 billion in potential competitive funds are federal formula funds that are estimated to become needed to address a funding gap of available in the near-, mid-, and long-term, totaling $15.8 billion to complete all TransNet Major approximately $8.6 billion through 2048. In addition to Corridor projects by 2048. these formula funds, it is estimated that an additional $6 billion could become available from successful grant applications in existing competitive funding programs.

• This leaves a funding gap of approximately $15.8 billion to complete all TransNet Major Corridor projects by 2048, including about $6 billion that could potentially be raised through competitive funding cycles. This means that every TransNet dollar used to deliver a project would need to be matched by $9.60 of other funds to complete the program. Funding availability in the next five years is constrained due to SANDAG debt obligations. Of the $8.6 billion in TransNet and state and federal formula funds expected to be available through 2048, only about $291 million is estimated to be available between now and the end of FY 2023 (Attachment 2). This amount does not include TransNet and state and federal formula funds that the Board already has programmed through FY 2023 to other ongoing projects, nor the TransNet funding needed to cover debt service in this time period.

• Of the $291 million expected to be available through FY 2023, approximately $47 million is from TransNet and $244 million is from state and federal sources.

Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director Key Staff Contact: José A. Nuncio, (619) 699-1908, [email protected] Attachments: 1. Costs and revenues needed to complete TransNet Major Corridors projects, through 2048 2. Estimated Revenues ($YOE billions), FY 2019-2048

Attachment 1

Costs and Revenues Needed to Complete TransNet Major Corridors Program Projects through 2048

($YOE billions) Costs (Mid-Point of Range) TransNet Major Corridors Remaining Capital Projects ($21.7B to $27.1B)1 $24.4 Total Costs $24.4

More Certain Revenues

TransNet Major Corridors ($2.1B to $2.4B) ($2.3B in YOE$ equates to approximately $1.4B in constant 2019$. Over 80% of $2.3 the TransNet funds would be available after FY 2030.)2

State/Federal Anticipated Formula Funds – $6.3 Existing programs including RSTP, CMAQ, STIP, LPP ($5.7B to $6.9B)3

Sub-Total ($7.8B to $9.3B) $8.6

Less Certain Revenues

Additional potential competitive funds from existing sources, including SB 1, $6.0 BUILD, and others ($5.4B to $6.5B)4

Sub-Total Less Certain Revenues ($5.4B to $6.5B) $6.0

Funding Gap ($9.3B to $10.4B) + Additional Potential Competitive Funds ($5.4B $15.8 to $6.5B)5

Current TransNet to Non-TransNet Leveraging Ratio Needed to Complete 1:9.6 Major Corridors Program

Notes: 1. Does not include TransNet funds set-aside for debt service 2. Does not include TransNet funds programmed on other ongoing TransNet projects 3. Does not include state/federal formula funds already programmed on other ongoing projects 4. Does not include competitive funds already programmed on other ongoing projects 5. The size of the funding gap would depend to a large extent on the region’s ability to be successful in competitive funding cycles

2 Attachment 2

Estimated Revenues ($YOE millions), FY 2019-2048

Total Funding Source FY 2019-23 2019-2048 TransNet Major Corridors1 47 2,305 Sub-Total TransNet Major Corridors 47 2,305

State/Federal Formula Federal RSTP2 189 2,477 Federal CMAQ 18 1,763 State STIP3 6 1,380 State LPP 32 732 Sub-Total State/Federal Formula4 244 6,352

TOTAL REVENUES 291 8,657

Notes:

1. TransNet Major Corridors receive 38% of Net Revenues. TransNet funds not shown on this table: All other programs, including Local Streets and Roads, Active Transportation, and Transit Operations. 2. Includes approximately $16 million in miscellaneous federal Highway Infrastructure Program and Corridor and Border Infrastructure funding 3. Includes approximately $6 million in miscellaneous FY 2020 state funds 4. Totals may not add up due to rounding

Estimated Revenues ($YOE millions), FY 2019-2023

Funding Source FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Total TransNet Major Corridors 0.9 2.7 6.7 10.8 25.7 46.8 Federal formula (RSTP/CMAQ) 2.7 46.0 46.2 46.2 65.1 203.2 State formula (STIP/LPP) 9.0 9.7 9.7 9.7 32.1 Total 3.6 57.7 62.6 66.7 100.5 291.1

3 Item: 23 Board of Directors July 26, 2019

Regional Housing Needs Assessment Draft Methodology

Overview Action: Approve On July 5, 2018, the State Department of Housing and The Regional Housing Needs Assessment Community Development (HCD) determined the (RHNA) Subcommittee recommends that the San Diego region would need to plan for Board of Directors release the draft RHNA 171,685 housing units during the 6th Housing Element methodology for public review. Cycle (2021-2029). On December 21, 2018, the Board of Directors formed Fiscal Impact: the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) Subcommittee to review and provide input and guidance Development of the RHNA Plan is funded through Overall Work Program No. 3102000 on potential policy and technical options for developing in the FY 2019 Program Budget. the RHNA methodology, which is then used for the allocation of housing units to each jurisdiction. Schedule/Scope Impact: The RHNA methodology and draft allocation is Based upon objectives in state law, the RHNA scheduled to be adopted by the Board of Subcommittee identified priorities to be used in drafting Directors in late 2019. Local governments will the RHNA methodology and allocation. This information have until April 2021 to update their housing was shared with the Regional Planning Technical elements to accommodate the housing unit Working Group (TWG), consisting of the planning and allocations. community development directors from each jurisdiction in the region and interested housing stakeholders. At the June 14, 2019, meeting, the RHNA Subcommittee voted to recommend a methodology to the Board of Directors (Attachment 1). At its June 27, 2019, meeting, the TWG recommended the same methodology as the RHNA Subcommittee. Staff has determined that the recommended methodology furthers the five objectives listed in Government Code Section 65584. Key Considerations State law requires the SANDAG housing unit methodology further five objectives; however, state law does not dictate how those objectives should be prioritized. The RHNA Subcommittee determined the priorities for the methodology include increasing transit use, improving the jobs and housing relationship, providing an equitable distribution, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Attachment 3 summarizes the RHNA Subcommittee’s discussions during each of its meetings. Attachment 4 summarizes TWG and stakeholder meetings held to solicit input on the methodology. Each objective can be prioritized and adjusted to consider other factors or data sets. The RHNA Subcommittee and TWG discussed several adjustments that could be made to the methodology based on local conditions and priorities, including adjusting the manner in which jobs were counted for each jurisdiction and determining what should qualify as a major transit stop. As described in the June 14, 2019, report to the RHNA Subcommittee, SANDAG staff recommended using the total number of jobs in the methodology. The RHNA Subcommittee included an adjustment to the total number of jobs to account for military jobs housed on base, since those jobs did not require off-base housing in the jurisdiction. The RHNA Subcommittee members directed staff to focus on a methodology that was transparent and not overly complicated so that it could be easily understood by the public. Due to the Regional Plan’s inclusion of smart growth principles, which call for housing near transit and in urban areas, existing density, available space within each jurisdiction, the cost of land, airport land use regulations, and other limiting factors within each jurisdiction were not identified as priorities warranting an adjustment to the methodology.

Ultimately, the RHNA Subcommittee and TWG recommended that the following methodology be released for public review.

1. 65 percent of the total housing units should be allocated to jurisdictions with access to transit, including rail stations, Rapid bus stations, and major transit stops. Significant investments in transit have been made throughout the region, and the RHNA methodology prioritizes housing growth in those areas with access to transit. Encouraging housing growth near transit can help the allocation promote infill development and preserve open space, as most transit is located in urbanized areas. Improved access to transit also can lower the vehicle miles traveled in a car and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

2. Within the housing units allocated for jurisdictions with access to transit, 75 percent of the units should be allocated to jurisdictions with rail stations and Rapid bus stations and 25 percent should be allocated to jurisdictions with major transit stops. To ensure future growth is located near transit, the methodology prioritizes 75 percent of the housing units in areas with rail and Rapid bus stations. Rail stations and Rapid bus stations usually are located along fixed routes that require significant capital investment to construct. Unlike bus stops or routes, rail and Rapid stations and routes are not amended or eliminated on regular basis. The remaining 25 percent of the housing units would be allocated in jurisdictions with major transit stops. Major transit stops, as defined in state law, have two intersecting bus routes that arrive at 15-minute intervals during peak commute hours.

3. 35 percent of the total housing units should be allocated to jurisdictions based on the total number of jobs in their jurisdiction adjusted to account for military housing on bases. Jurisdictions should plan for housing to provide opportunities for more residents to live near their place of employment. The RHNA Subcommittee and TWG recommended the number of jobs in each jurisdiction with a military base be reduced to account for military jobs housed directly on a base.

4. The allocation should apply an equity adjustment. The HCD’s RHNA Determination divided the number of housing units needed in the region into four income categories based on the region’s current percentages of households in each income category. To promote equity and fair housing, the RHNA methodology would allocate more housing units of an income category to jurisdictions with a percentage of households in that category that is lower than the regional percentage. Following a public hearing and public comment period, the draft RHNA methodology must be sent to HCD for a 60-day review period. If no changes to the methodology are required by HCD, the Board of Directors can adopt the final methodology and release a draft version of the allocation resulting from the methodology for a 45-day appeal period. Attachment 2 shows how the recommended methodology would be used to allocate housing units to each jurisdiction if no changes are made to the methodology between July and final adoption. Next Steps The Board of Directors is asked to release a draft of the RHNA methodology for public review. A public hearing will be conducted and the draft RHNA methodology will be sent to the HCD for its review following the Board’s acceptance of the draft at the end of the public review period. The Board of Directors will be asked to approve a final RHNA Methodology and draft allocation based upon any comments from the public and HCD. Local governments will have until April 2021 to update their housing elements to accommodate the housing unit allocations.

Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director Key Staff Contact: Seth Litchney, (619)699-1943, [email protected] Attachments: 1. Development Background for the Draft RHNA Methodology 2. Draft RHNA Methodology Recommended by RHNA Subcommittee and TWG 3. Summary of RHNA Subcommittee meetings 4. Summary of Additional Public Meetings Held to Solicit Input on the Draft Methodology

2 Attachment 1

DEVELOPMENT BACKGROUND FOR THE DRAFT RHNA METHODOLOGY

Introduction State housing element law requires SANDAG to provide a discussion of the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) allocation methodology that includes the data and assumptions relied upon, and an explanation of how information about local government conditions and how each of the factors required by law was used to develop the proposed methodology. (See Government Code Section 65584.04.) In addition, SANDAG is required to describe how the draft methodology would further the five objectives in Government Code Section 65584. This document and the other attachments to the SANDAG Board Report concerning RHNA dated July 26, 2019, is intended to provide the information needed for the public to comment on the proposed draft methodology.

Data, Assumptions, and Information on Local Government Conditions Prior to and during the development of the methodology, the RHNA Subcommittee, which was established by the Board of Directors, the Regional Planning Technical Working Group (including planning directors from each jurisdiction and housing stakeholders), the SANDAG Regional Planning Committee, and the Board of Directors held public meetings to obtain input on the data, assumptions and local condition information that SANDAG should use to develop the draft methodology. At these meetings, stakeholders, staff from the cities and the County of San Diego, and elected officials were asked to help determine the priorities for the methodology, and discuss the data needed to prepare the methodology. The Regional Planning Technical Working Group (TWG) held a workshop to discuss the RHNA objectives and factors in state law. The TWG members provided feedback on relevant data to consider approaches to the methodology. Attendees at each meeting provided information regarding the types of data SANDAG should use, assumptions that should be made, as well as information regarding conditions in their individual jurisdictions that should be taken into consideration. For example, the RHNA Subcommittee members were surveyed to determine which objectives and factors were highest priority for the region, and the draft RHNA methodology was developed based on that data and input. The TWG members provided written comments on the development of the methodology throughout the process. There was general consensus at the meetings that the approach chosen should keep the allocation methodology simple and easy to explain to the public. Nuanced adjustments that may have modified the methodology in marginal ways in relation to the overall objectives and factors were discussed and considered. Factors and adjustments that would have created a complicated formula, however, ultimately were not pursued since the draft methodology was developed with the intent to keep it transparent and understandable.

RHNA Objectives The RHNA methodology and allocation furthers the five objectives listed in Government Code Section 65584.

1. Increasing the housing supply and the mix of housing types, tenure, and affordability in all cities and counties within the region in an equitable manner, which shall result in each jurisdiction receiving an allocation of units for low-and very low-income households. Per state law, the RHNA methodology allocates units in all four income categories to each of the region’s 19 jurisdictions. The methodology does so equitably, ensuring each jurisdiction receives an allocation for low-and very low-income units, and further, allocating a higher share of low-and very low units to jurisdictions that currently have a smaller share of low-and very low-income households than the regional share. State law requires jurisdictions to zone at higher densities to accommodate its low-and very low- income housing allocation. As jurisdictions plan for and build housing, the mix of housing types will increase. 3 2. Promoting infill development and socioeconomic equity, the protection of environmental and agricultural resources, the encouragement of efficient development patterns, and the achievement of the region’s greenhouse gas reductions targets provided by the State Air Resources Board pursuant to Section 65080. The RHNA methodology prioritizes “proximity to transit” and “proximity to jobs” to encourage efficient development patterns and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. By allocating housing units based on these two factors, SANDAG sets a guiding principle for local jurisdictions to zone and build housing near transit and jobs. Transit and job centers are located in the urbanized areas of the region. Therefore, an allocation based on the proximity of transit and jobs will lead to more infill development while protecting natural resources and open space. Because infill development does not rely on available space and can occur in areas that already have a dense population, the methodology supports provision of housing even in areas that are currently considered built-out. SANDAG’s GHG reduction target, as set by the California Air Resources Board, is to reduce the region’s per capita emissions of GHG from cars and light trucks by 15 percent by 2020, compared with a 2005 baseline. By 2035, the target is to reduce GHG emissions by 19 percent per capita. The RHNA methodology encourages the development of housing near jobs and transit, which will provide the region’s residents with opportunities to live where they work and/or readily access transit, which can facilitate shorter commutes, reduce vehicle miles traveled, and increase trip-taking by transit or alternative modes. 3. Promoting an improved intraregional relationship between jobs and housing, including an improved balance between the number of low-wage jobs and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction. SANDAG conducted an analysis of the number of low-wage jobs and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction. The analysis shows that the number of low-wage jobs far exceeds the number of existing housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction. The RHNA methodology allocates 35 percent of the 171,685-unit regional housing need based on each jurisdiction’s share of existing regional total jobs to encourage development of housing near job centers so that jurisdictions can improve the jobs-housing relationship. The draft RHNA methodology’s Equity Adjustment (see Objective 4) also improves the balance between the number of low-wage jobs and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction by allocating a higher share of low- and very low-income housing units to jurisdictions that currently have a smaller share of low-and very low-income households than the regional share.

4. Allocating a lower proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately high share of households in that income category, as compared to the countywide distribution of households in that category from the most recent American Community Survey. This objective guided the development of the Equity Adjustment used to ensure the methodology will result in allocation of housing units to each of the income categories. This adjustment results in a jurisdiction receiving a lower proportion of its total housing units within an income category when it has a higher share of households within that income category compared to the region. This method shifts units across income categories, rather than adding units to a jurisdiction’s total housing unit allocation, allowing for a mix of housing types and affordability near transit and jobs.

5. Affirmatively furthering fair housing. For purposes of this section, “affirmatively furthering fair housing” means taking meaningful actions, in addition to combating discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity based on protected characteristics. Specifically, affirmatively furthering fair housing means taking meaningful actions that, taken together, address significant disparities in housing needs and in access to opportunity, replacing segregated living patterns with truly integrated and balanced living patterns, transforming 4 racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty into areas of opportunity, and fostering and maintaining compliance with civil rights and fair housing laws. During development of the RHNA methodology, SANDAG reviewed the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) 2019 Opportunity Map for the San Diego region. The TCAC map demonstrates how public and private resources are spatially distributed within the region. The map is part of a larger study that shows how communities with better air quality, higher educational attainment, and better economic indicators are communities that have higher “opportunity”, or pathways that offer low-income children and adults the best chance at economic advancement. The study finds that historically communities with higher opportunity – through plans, policies, and practices – may have systematically denied equal opportunity to low socioeconomic and minority populations. Areas of “low resource” and “high segregation & poverty” on the TCAC maps are also many of the same areas with a high concentration of low-income households in the San Diego region. The Equity Adjustment within the RHNA methodology addresses the disparities in access to resource-rich areas by providing housing opportunities for people in all income levels to reside in any given community. This is meant to foster and maintain compliance with civil rights and fair housing laws. The Equity Adjustment in the RHNA methodology assists in overcoming patterns of discrimination and transforming racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty into areas of opportunity by allocating a higher proportion of low-income housing units to jurisdictions with a lower share of low-income households, which tend to be jurisdictions with a high concentration of resource-rich areas.

California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) Opportunity Map

5 RHNA Factors In addition to furthering the objectives outlined above, state law requires that SANDAG consider several factors in the development of the RHNA methodology, to the extent sufficient data is available pertaining to each factor. See Government Code Section 65584.04(e). The RHNA factors and how each were considered in the development of the draft RHNA methodology are described below.

1. Each jurisdiction’s existing and projected jobs and housing relationship. This shall include an estimate based on readily available data on the number of low-wage jobs within the jurisdiction and how many housing units within the jurisdiction are affordable to low-wage workers as well as an estimate based on readily available data, of projected job growth and projected household growth by income level within each member jurisdiction during the planning period. The RHNA methodology prioritizes “proximity to jobs” as a factor in allocating the regional housing need. The jobs factor seeks to encourage development of housing near job centers so that jurisdictions can achieve greater jobs-housing balance. The jobs factor uses current data on existing jobs instead of a projection. Given the housing shortage within the region, it is critical that housing is built where existing jobs are located to begin to address the current jobs-housing imbalance. Although data for projected job and household growth by income level for the next Regional Plan update is not yet available, SANDAG used the most recent readily available data for projected job growth and projected household growth by income level within each member jurisdiction to conduct its analysis. SANDAG analyzed the number of low-wage jobs and the number of housing units affordable to low- wage workers in each jurisdiction. The analysis showed that the number of low-wage jobs far exceeds the number of existing housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction. The draft RHNA methodology is expected to increase the supply of affordable housing by allocating each jurisdiction low- and very low-income housing units. The draft RHNA methodology’s Equity Adjustment (see Objective 4) should also improve the balance between the number of low-wage jobs and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction by allocating a higher share of low- and very low-income housing units to jurisdictions that currently have a smaller share of low-and very low-income households than the regional share.

2. The opportunities and constraints to development of additional housing in each member jurisdiction, including all of the following:

a. Lack of capacity for sewer or water service due to federal or state laws, regulations or regulatory actions, or supply and distribution decisions made by a sewer or water service provider other than the local jurisdiction that preclude the jurisdiction from providing necessary infrastructure for additional development during the planning period. SANDAG notes that general plans for some jurisdictions may account for constraints to housing development arising from lack of capacity for sewer or water service. For example, rural areas may rely more heavily on well water and septic systems, which constrains housing development due to lack of sufficient infrastructure. For the draft methodology, however, the “proximity to transit” factor allocates housing units based on each jurisdiction’s share of regional rail and Rapid bus stations as well as major transit stops. Rail and Rapid bus stations are located in the region’s more developed areas where land uses generate enough ridership to support the investment to the transit infrastructure. Major transit stops also are located in the region’s urbanized areas and surrounded by land uses that support higher service frequencies. By prioritizing transit connectivity, the methodology encourages infill development in urban areas that are likely to have existing capacity for sewer or water service.

6 c. The availability of land suitable for urban development or for conversion to residential use, the availability of underutilized land, and opportunities for infill development and increased residential densities. The council of governments may not limit its consideration of suitable housing sites or land suitable for urban development to existing zoning ordinances and land use restrictions of a locality, but shall consider the potential for increased residential development under alternative zoning ordinances and land use restrictions. The determination of available land suitable for urban development may exclude lands where the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) or the Department of Water Resources has determined that the flood management infrastructure designed to protect that land is not adequate to avoid the risk of flooding. The draft RHNA methodology is not constrained by existing zoning ordinances and land use restrictions. Instead the methodology prioritizes “proximity to transit” and “proximity to jobs”, which aligns with several beneficial land use planning principles, such as promoting infill and increasing residential densities. The availability of land suitable for urban development or for conversion to residential use, the availability of underutilized land, and opportunities for infill development and increased residential densities are accounted for due to the methodology’s use of the proximity to jobs and transit factors. When development of housing is promoted near transit and jobs in areas that are already more densely populated and developed than other areas of each jurisdiction, it allows the jurisdictions to focus on infill development that can occur without reliance on the availability of additional land, but instead on underutilized land that can be converted to uses that allow for increased residential density. The “proximity to transit” factor allocates housing units based on each jurisdiction’s share of regional rail and Rapid bus stations as well as major transit stops. Rail and Rapid bus stations are located in the region’s urbanized areas where land uses generate enough ridership to support the investment to the transit infrastructure. Major transit stops are also located in the region’s urbanized areas and surrounded by land uses that support higher service frequencies. By prioritizing transit, the methodology encourages infill development in areas that are suitable for urban development. A transit-focused methodology also promotes increased densities as jurisdictions must plan for housing in urban areas already served by high quality transit. The RHNA methodology aligns with the region’s priorities for growth. As shown in Figure 3.1, general plans in the San Diego region have focused growth and development in existing urban areas, preserved more land for habitat and open space, and looked to accommodate more housing near transit and key destinations.

7 Figure 3.1: Priorities for Growth Then and Now

d. Lands preserved or protected from urban development under existing federal or state programs, or both, designed to protect open space, farmland, environmental habitats, and natural resources on a long-term basis, including land zoned or designated for agricultural protection or preservation that is subject to a local ballot measure that was approved by the voters of that jurisdiction that prohibits or restricts conversion to non-agricultural uses. General plans for individual jurisdictions may account for constraints to housing development arising from lands preserved or protected from urban development under existing federal or state programs. As shown in the figures below though, preserved land, farmland, and habitats are primarily in the eastern portion of San Diego County. The draft RHNA methodology focuses housing units in areas with access to transit and jobs, which are located in the existing urbanized areas. Therefore, the draft methodology will not encourage encroachment upon open space areas.

e. County policies to preserve prime agricultural land, as defined pursuant to Section 56064, within an unincorporated and land within an unincorporated area zoned or designated for agricultural protection or preservation that is subject to a local ballot measure that was approved by the voters of that jurisdiction that prohibits or restricts its conversion to non-agricultural uses. The County of San Diego General Plan accounts for some constraints to housing development arising from policies to preserve prime agricultural land and incorporates local ballot measure provisions prohibiting or restricting the conversion of agricultural to non-agricultural uses. The draft RHNA methodology allocates housing units based on access to jobs and transit, which are located in existing urbanized areas. Therefore, this constraint is not expected to impact the methodology’s capacity to allow for development of additional housing.

3. The distribution of household growth assumed for purposes of a comparable period of regional transportation plans and opportunities to maximize the use of public transportation and existing transportation infrastructure. As shown in Figure 3.1, plans for growth are focused on the urbanized areas of the region. The RHNA methodology prioritizes “proximity to transit” as a factor—specifically high-quality transit, which is located in the urbanized area. The emphasis on proximity to transit allows local jurisdictions that have invested in transit the opportunity to maximize the use of existing transportation infrastructure.

4. Agreements between a county and cities in a county to direct growth toward incorporated areas of the county, and land within an unincorporated area zoned or designated for agricultural protection or preservation that is subject to a local ballot measure that was approved by the voters of the jurisdiction that prohibits or restricts conversion to non-agricultural uses. Regional planning undertaken by SANDAG and its member agencies during the past 15 to 20 years, has focused the region’s growth in the western third of the region, primarily in its incorporated cities and near transit service (Figure 3.1). SANDAG has funded “smart growth” grants to encourage growth in incorporated areas of the county with sufficient density to support transit-oriented development. Consistent with this, the draft RHNA methodology prioritizes “proximity to transit” and “proximity to jobs”. High-quality transit service and a high concentration of the region’s jobs are located in the urbanized, incorporated areas of the region. Thus, the methodology is consistent with agreements between SANDAG, the County of San Diego, and the cities to develop public transportation infrastructure and supporting land uses away from areas that are zoned or designated for agricultural protection or preservation. Interjurisdictional agreements may account for some development constraints; however, those agreements are not expected to be in conflict with the draft methodology due to the prioritization of proximity to transit and jobs.

5. The loss of units contained in assisted housing developments, as defined in paragraph (9) of subdivision (a) of Section 65583, that changed to non-low-income use through mortgage prepayment, subsidy contract expirations, or termination of use restrictions. The data for these units is not readily available and varies by jurisdiction. The loss of assisted housing developments for lower income households is an issue that should be addressed by the jurisdictions when preparing their housing elements.

6. The percentage of existing households at each of the income levels listed in subdivision (e) of Section 65584 that are paying more than 30 percent and more than 50 percent of their income in rent. This factor was not included in state law at the time the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) was making its determination on the regional housing need of the San Diego region, and sufficient data for this factor is not readily available. The San Diego region received its largest RHNA Determination this cycle, however, and it is expected that an influx of housing units in each income category will help alleviate the rent burden in the region. 10 7. The rate of overcrowding. HCD used the 2012-2016 American Community Survey to determine the rate of overcrowding in the San Diego region when making its RHNA Determination. HCD then compared the San Diego region’s overcrowding rate (6.43% of all households) to the national rate (3.34% of all households). To address the needs of overcrowding in the region, HCD’s RHNA Determination included an overcrowding adjustment of 3.09 percent, which added 38,700 housing units to the regional housing need to alleviate overcrowding in the region. Thus, this factor has already been accounted for in the draft methodology.

8. The housing needs of farmworkers. The draft RHNA methodology prioritizes “proximity to jobs” as a factor in allocating the regional housing need. Farmworkers are included in the data on existing jobs. Therefore, their housing needs along with the housing needs of all the region’s workers are considered. The draft methodology increases the supply of affordable housing by allocating each jurisdiction low- and very low-income housing units. The RHNA methodology’s Equity Adjustment (see Objective 4) also improves the balance between the number of low-wage jobs, including farming jobs, and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction by allocating a higher share of low- and very low-income housing units to jurisdictions that currently have a smaller share of low-and very low-income households than the regional share. Although the low-income housing needs of farmworkers are unique given their low wages and job locations, the allocation expected from the draft methodology is expected to provide more low-income housing in every jurisdiction and accordingly should provide farmworkers the ability to live in more areas of the region and commute shorter distances to their seasonal jobs.

9. The housing needs generated by the presence of a private university or a campus of the California State University or the University of California within any member jurisdiction. The major universities and community colleges in the San Diego region are located in urban areas served by the existing transportation network. The City of San Diego is home to San Diego State University; University of California San Diego; University of San Diego; Point Loma Nazarene University; various smaller, private universities; and three community colleges: San Diego City College, San Diego Mesa College, and San Diego Miramar College. It also has the greatest share of the region’s transportation system in part because of transportation investments near universities and colleges located within its jurisdiction. Similarly, the cities of Chula Vista (Southwestern Community College), El Cajon (Cuyamaca College), Oceanside (MiraCosta College), and San Marcos (California State University San Marcos and Palomar College) have made transportation investments to improve access to transit near colleges and universities. By prioritizing transit proximity, the draft RHNA methodology encourages housing development near existing transit and the key destinations that transit links, including the region’s universities and colleges. The draft methodology will result in additional housing units being allocated based on proximity to transit. This will help these jurisdictions address the housing needs of students, faculty, and staff beyond what these colleges or universities may provide.

10. The loss of units during a state of emergency that was declared by the Governor pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act (Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 8550) of Division 1 of Title 2), during the planning period immediately preceding the relevant revision pursuant to Section 65588 that have yet to be rebuilt or replaced at the time of the analysis. Jurisdictions report demolished units to the Department of Finance on an annual basis. Demolished units include those lost during a state of emergency. Between 2011 and 2018, states of emergency in the San Diego region declared by the Governor pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act, and in which homes were lost, include the following wildfires: the 2014 wildfires (Cocos Fire and Poinsettia Fire), 2017 Lilac Fire, and 2018 West Fire.

11 HCD analyzed the most recent ten-year average rate of demolition within the San Diego region based on jurisdictions’ annual reports to the Department of Finance. The ten-year average rate of demolition in the San Diego region is 0.32 percent of the total housing stock. The RHNA Determination included HCD’s minimum replacement adjustment of 0.5 percent, which exceeds the region’s demolition rate. This adjustment added 6,255 housing units to the RHNA Determination. SANDAG does not have readily available data broken down by jurisdiction to use for this factor and has therefore relied on HCD’s data and adjustment to address this factor at a regional level.

11. The region’s greenhouse gas emissions targets provided by the State Air Resources Board pursuant to Section 65080. SANDAG’s GHG reduction target, as set by the California Air Resources Board, is to reduce the region’s per capita emissions of GHG from cars and light trucks by 15 percent by 2020, compared with a 2005 baseline. By 2035, the target is to reduce GHG emissions by 19 percent per capita. The RHNA methodology encourages the development of housing near jobs and transit, which will provide the region’s residents with opportunities to live where they work and/or readily access transit, which can facilitate shorter commutes, reduce GHG emissions, and increase trip-taking by transit or alternative modes.

12. Any other factors adopted by the council of governments, that further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584, provided that the council of governments specifies which of the objectives each additional factor is necessary to further. The council of governments may include additional factors unrelated to furthering the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 so long as the additional factors do not undermine the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 and are applied equally across all household income levels as described in subdivision (f) of Section 65584 and the council of governments makes a finding that the factor is necessary to address significant health and safety conditions. The presence of a significant number of military jobs in certain jurisdictions was taken in consideration in the development of the draft methodology. Information was sought from representatives of the military branches in the region and the number of on-base housing units provided by the military were taken into account during the development of the methodology. The number of jobs in each jurisdiction with a military base was reduced to account for military jobs housed directly on a base.

12 RHNA Calculator Tool Attachment 2 with RHNA Subcommittee Recommendations

This Calculator Tool is intended to allow stakeholders to try out various methodologies to distribute the total regional housing allocation of: 171,685

Step 1: Assign weighting to each variable category A. B. Total Units to be allocated based on the two priority categories (transit and jobs) is determined by multiplying the RHNA Determination Units Transit Jobs (171,685) by the percentages entered into each of the yellow boxes in this step. Note, there is an opportunity to assign weighting to Weighting 65% 35% 100% "Transit" subfactors in Step 2 and choose a specific "Job" variable in Step 3. Units 111,595 60,090 171,685

Step 2: Assign weighting to each Transit subfactor A. Weighting Units Subfactor 1: Rail & Rapid Rail & Rapid 75% 83,696 Subfactor 2: Select from: i. High-Frequency Transit Stop (served by at least one local bus with 15 min. peak-period frequency) Major transit stops 25% 27,899 ii. Major Transit Stop (served by at least two local buses with 15 min. peak-period frequency) 100% 111,595

Step 3: Select options for "Jobs" Variable 3a. Variable: Select between: Select from drop-down: (a.) Number of Jobs B. Number of Jobs (b.) Number of Jobs with a Jobs-Housing adjustment

3b. If applicable, assign weighting to Jobs subfactors: [If greyed out, skip this step!] If Variable (b.) "Number of Jobs with a Jobs-Housing adjustment" was selected above, select weighting for "Jobs-Housing Adjustment". The Jobs-Housing Adjustment adjusts a jurisdiction's jobs-based unit allocation (based on share of regional jobs) up or down based on the relative difference between a jurisdiction's job-housing ratio and the regional ratio. For example, if a jurisdiction has a higher jobs-housing ratio than the region, it would receive a upward adjustment (higher housing unit allocation). Weighting Units Jobs-Housing Ratio

3c. Select Jobs Dataset: Select between: 1. Total Jobs Select from drop-down: 2. Civilian Jobs (excludes active duty military; includes civilian defense jobs) B. 3. Total Excluding Housed Military (excludes active duty military for which on-base military housing is provided; Total Excluding Housed Military 1 housing unit = 1 job reduction)

Calculator Tool A. B. Number of Jobs Jobs with J-H Adjustment Jurisdiction Total Allocation1 Transit Total Excluding w/ Total Excluding Total Jobs Civilian Jobs w/ Total Jobs w/ Civilian Jobs Housed Military Housed Military Carlsbad 1,087 2,860 3,947 Chula Vista 8,478 2,697 11,175 Coronado - 808 808 Del Mar - 167 167 El Cajon 1,630 1,694 3,324 Encinitas 543 1,038 1,581 Escondido 7,609 2,051 9,660 Imperial Beach 1,196 184 1,380 La Mesa 2,717 1,109 3,826 Lemon Grove 1,087 279 1,366 National City 4,076 1,327 5,403 Oceanside 3,804 1,683 5,487 Poway - 1,354 1,354 San Diego 74,478 33,962 108,440 San Marcos 1,630 1,526 3,156 Santee 543 694 1,237 Solana Beach 543 341 884 Unincorporated 1,087 4,802 5,889 Vista 1,087 1,514 2,601 Region 111,595 - - 60,090 - - - 171,685

Notes: 1. The total number of units per jurisdiction assigned within each of the priority categories (transit and jobs) is determined by multiplying the number of units to be allocated for the specific priority category (See Step 1) by each jurisdiction's share (as a percentage) of the total regional count for each variable and subfactor.

Step 4: Equity Adjustment To avoid an overconcentration of low income households and comply with Government Code 65584 (d), this draft RHNA Allocation Methodology assigns more housing units of an income category to jurisdictions with a percentage of households in that category that is lower than the regional percentage.

Income Category Very Low Low Moderate Above Mod. Total HCD Determination Units 42,332 26,627 29,734 72,992 171,685

Income Category Allocations Considering Equity Total Allocation Very Low Low Moderate Above Mod. Carlsbad 1,336 798 764 1,049 3,947 Chula Vista 2,770 1,788 1,922 4,695 11,175 Coronado 277 150 141 240 808 Del Mar 38 64 33 32 167 El Cajon 487 419 526 1,892 3,324 Encinitas 477 376 313 415 1,581 Escondido 1,875 1,256 1,536 4,993 9,660 Imperial Beach 234 128 190 828 1,380 La Mesa 865 491 582 1,888 3,826 Lemon Grove 298 166 194 708 1,366 National City 642 503 706 3,552 5,403 Oceanside 1,279 724 890 2,594 5,487 Poway 480 275 247 352 1,354 San Diego 27,667 17,390 19,391 43,992 108,440 San Marcos 738 537 549 1,332 3,156 Santee 412 203 191 431 1,237 Solana Beach 320 161 160 243 884 Unincorporated 1,614 872 1,024 2,379 5,889 Vista 523 326 375 1,377 2,601 Region 42,332 26,627 29,734 72,992 171,685

Revised July 19, 2019 13 RHNA Subcommittee Meeting Summaries Attachment 3

Meeting Date Materials Presented Comments/Direction

• Requested 5th Cycle RHNA Progress • RHNA Subcommittee Charter • Inquired about the impact of recent state legislation on the February 8, 2019 • RHNA Plan Timeline RHNA process • RHNA Statutory Objectives and Factors • Requested definitions of housing terms and information on commuting patterns.

• SANDAG 2017 Regional Housing Progress Report • 5th Cycle RHNA Progress • Housing Legislative Update • Requested a list of RHNA Objectives and Factors to prioritize February 22, 2019 • SANDAG 2016 Commuting Patterns in the • In addition to transit-oriented development, the allocation San Diego Region should assign housing to job-rich areas • Housing Definitions • SANDAG Smart Growth Concept Map • Discussed the definitions used for the transit calculation • RHNA Subcommittee Survey Results including the rail, Rapid bus, and high frequency transit. March 22, 2019 • Potential RHNA Methodology Framework • Requested to pursue an allocation methodology based on the potential framework

• How should accessory dwelling units be considered in the allocation? • Should a jurisdiction size or other constraints be considered in • RHNA Allocation Calculator Tool the allocation? April 26, 2019 • Regional Planning Technical Working Group (TWG) • Population should not be a factor in the methodology. Comments on RHNA Calculator Tool • Transit should receive a higher prioritization to reduce VMT. • Allocation should provide 65% of the units to areas with transit and 35% of the units based on jobs in the jurisdiction.

• Consider military housing as part of the jobs count for each • Revised RHNA Allocation Calculator Tool jurisdiction. May 24, 2019 • Additional TWG Comments on RHNA Calculator Tool • Keep the allocation methodology simple and easy to explain • Consider the type of job in each jurisdiction.

• Staff Recommended RHNA Methodology • Discussed whether to adjust the jobs total to account for on- • On-Base Military Housing Data base military housing. June 14, 2019 • Calculation of Methodology Adjusted for On-Base • Discussed transit calculation Military Housing • Recommended a methodology to the Board of Directors

14 Summary of Additional Public Meetings Held to Solicit Input on the Draft Methodology Attachment 4

Meeting Date Discussion

Board of Directors September 14, 2018 Board of Directors Asked to Provide Ideas on RHNA Priorities

Regional Planning Committee October 5, 2018 RHNA Update on Board of Directors RHNA Priorities Board Direction on the RHNA and the Role of the Regional Planning TWG and Housing Stakeholders October 11, 2018 Technical Working Group TWG and Housing Stakeholders December 13, 2018 RHNA Workshop Update on RHNA Subcommittee, RHNA Work Plan, and Recap of the RHNA TWG and Housing Stakeholders January 10, 2019 Workshop Regional Planning Committee February 1, 2019 RHNA Update

TWG and Housing Stakeholders February 14, 2019 RHNA Update

TWG and Housing Stakeholders March 14, 2019 RHNA Methodology Discussion

TWG and Housing Stakeholders April 3, 2019 RHNA Methodology Workshop

TWG and Housing Stakeholders May 9, 2019 RHNA Methodology Calculation Tool Amendments Discussion

Board of Directors May 10, 2019 Update on the RHNA Subcommittee

TWG and Housing Stakeholders June 6, 2019 Update on RHNA Subcommittee and Discussion on Methodology

TWG and Housing Stakeholders June 13, 2019 RHNA Update and Discussion on Methodology

TWG and Housing Stakeholders June 27, 2019 RHNA Methodology Recommendation

15 Item: 24 Board of Directors July 26, 2019

Memorandum of Agreement with City of Imperial Beach: TransNet Debt Financing Program Overview Action: Approve As permitted by the TransNet Extension Ordinance, the The Transportation Committee recommends City of Imperial Beach has requested to borrow that the Board of Directors, acting as the $1.3 million of commercial paper through the TransNet Regional Transportation Commission, Debt Financing Program to provide needed funding for authorize the Executive Director to execute a the Imperial Beach Boulevard Enhancement Project. The Memorandum of Agreement with the City of city would use its annually-allocated TransNet Local Imperial Beach to issue $1.3 million in Street Improvement (LSI) funds for debt repayment and Commercial Paper through the TransNet Debt costs associated with the advance funding subject to Financing Program. approval by the Board of Directors and execution of a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) (Attachment 1). Fiscal Impact: Key Considerations Pending approval by the Board of Directors, • Based on the 2020 five-year projection, the City has there will be $27.4 million, out of a total ample capacity (Attachment 2) to cover all debt $100 million, available (uncommitted) obligations while continuing to use a portion of its commercial paper under the TransNet Debt annually-allocated TransNet LSI funds for other Financing Program. scheduled projects. Schedule/Scope Impact: • The Imperial Beach City Council approved the terms SANDAG Board Policy No. 031: TransNet of the MOA and borrowing of up to $1.5 million at Ordinance and Expenditure Plan Rules its June 5, 2019, meeting (Attachment 3). Since (Rule No. 16) provides local jurisdictions access then, the City has requested to remove one of the to commercial paper through the TransNet two projects listed in the resolution, which reduces Debt Financing Program, subject to approval the borrowing to $1.3 million. by the Board of Directors and execution of a Memorandum of Agreement. • Using commercial paper on the project will benefit the general public in the projects high-use areas, including 45,000 square feet of new sidewalk and three new pedestrian crossings. • The project meets all eligibility requirements (Attachment 4) of the TransNet Debt Financing Program.

Next Steps With Board approval of this request and the 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5, the Executive Director will execute an MOA with the City of Imperial Beach.

Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director Key Staff Contact: Lisa Kondrat-Dauphin, (619) 699-1942, [email protected] Attachments: 1. Draft Memorandum of Agreement 2. City of Imperial Beach Capacity Analysis 3. City of Imperial Beach Resolution No. 2019-8044 4. Commercial Paper Requirements

Attachment 1

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS, ACTING AS THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AND THE CITY OF IMPERIAL BEACH REGARDING DEBT FINANCING THROUGH THE TRANSNET PROGRAM SANDAG AGREEMENT NO. 5005762

This Memorandum of Agreement (“MOA”) is made and entered into effective as of this ____ day of ______, 201X, by and between the San Diego Association of Governments, acting as the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission (“SANDAG”) and the City of Imperial Beach (City).

RECITALS

The following recitals are a substantive part of this Agreement:

WHEREAS, SANDAG serves as the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission, and in that role is responsible for the administration of programs under the TransNet Extension Ordinance (Proposition A, November 2004), which sets forth permitted uses for revenues from a ½ cent transactions and use tax in San Diego County (TransNet Extension Program); and

WHEREAS, in order to accelerate the implementation of TransNet tax funded projects, SANDAG has established a debt financing program to provide advanced funding for eligible projects under the TransNet Extension Ordinance; and

WHEREAS, SANDAG requires that an agency receiving proceeds from the TransNet debt financing program shall be responsible for its proportionate share of the issuance costs, as well as the ongoing interest and related administrative costs from the date the proceeds are issued until the principal amount of the loan is fully repaid; and

WHEREAS, the City wishes to borrow one million three hundred thousand dollars ($1,300,000) through the TransNet debt financing program for its Imperial Beach Boulevard Enhancement Project, or other projects eligible under the terms of this MOA and applicable SANDAG policies that have been approved in the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) and hereinafter called “PROJECTS”; and

WHEREAS, the parties wish to memorialize their agreement in this MOA to carry out the purposes set forth above;

C-70229 (Rev 03/19) OHSUSA:767407459.1 2 AGREEMENT

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:

SANDAG AGREES:

1. To lend the City one million three hundred thousand dollars ($1,300,000) through the TransNet debt financing program for the PROJECTS subject to certain conditions set forth below and SANDAG Board Policy 031 (TransNet Ordinance and Expenditure Plan Rules) concerning TransNet Extension Program loans.

2. SANDAG will transfer the borrowed funds to the City within 30 days following a request for reimbursement of valid expenditures for the PROJECTS.

THE CITY AGREES:

1. The governing body of the City at its June 5, 2019, meeting approved the request to borrow an amount not to exceed one million five hundred thousand dollars ($1,500,000) through the TransNet debt financing program for the PROJECTS.

2. The City agrees to use the funding provided under this MOA solely for the PROJECTS. The PROJECTS consist of the acquisition or construction of public capital improvements that will be owned by the City or a state or local governmental agency. The City will not allow the funding provided by this MOA or the PROJECTS to be used (for example, by lease or contract) in the trade or business of any non-governmental persons other than in their roles as members of the general public (i.e., no private business use of the PROJECTS). The City expects to use the PROJECTS for the purposes described above for the entire useful life of the PROJECTS and will consult with SANDAG prior to any change in use of the PROJECTS.

3. The City has not and will not finance any of the costs of the PROJECTS that will be reimbursed under this MOA with proceeds of other debt issued by the City or any other entity. The City will submit a request for reimbursement of valid expenditures on a timely basis following the City’s expenditures for the PROJECTS, and the City understands that federal income tax restrictions generally limit the ability to use TransNet debt financing program to reimburse costs paid within the prior 18 months or with respect to an asset placed in service in the prior eighteen (18) months.

4. The City agrees to submit a request for reimbursement with all applicable documentation no more than one time per quarter with a minimum amount of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) and in one thousand dollars ($1,000) increments thereafter. If a reimbursement request includes an increment amount of less than one thousand dollars ($1,000), after the first one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) requested, the amount in excess of a one-thousand dollar ($1,000) increment will be carried forward to the next reimbursement request.

C-70229 (Rev 03/19) OHSUSA:767407459.1 3 5. The City will pay its proportionate share of the commercial paper issuance costs, and annual debt service costs which include principal and interest payments, and annual administrative costs from the date the debt is issued until the final principal and interest amounts of the applicable commercial paper are fully repaid.

6. Repayment of the principal amount shall commence within three years of the receipt of the proceeds and shall be completed within five years. Repayment of the proceeds may be accomplished by rolling the outstanding amount into a long-term bond issued during the five- year repayment period if the opportunity for the conversion exists and is agreed to by SANDAG. In such cases, the City would be responsible for their proportionate share of bond issuance costs and annual debt service costs. The repayment of debt, in all cases, is the first priority on the use of the City’s annual TransNet revenues. The accounts may be deducted and the terms of repayment are estimated in the Repayment Schedule, Exhibit A hereto.

7. The City pledges that payment of the amounts set forth in paragraphs five (5) and six (6) above, in all cases, shall be the first priority use of the monies SANDAG would otherwise provide to the City as its annual TransNet revenues. The City is not able to, and agrees not to or be deemed to, subordinate SANDAG’s lien on the TransNet revenues or establish, transfer, pledge or assign any other claim upon such funds. The amounts to be deducted and the terms of repayment (if appropriate) are estimated and set forth in the Repayment Schedule, which is Exhibit A hereto.

8. The City agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend SANDAG, the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission, and all officers and employees thereof against all causes of action or claims related to projects financed through funding provided under this MOA.

THE PARTIES MUTUALLY AGREE:

1. That all obligations of SANDAG under the terms of this MOA are subject to the appropriation of the required resources by SANDAG and the approval of the SANDAG Board of Directors.

2. Any notice required or permitted under this MOA may be personally served on the other party, by the party giving notice, or may be served by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the following addresses:

For SANDAG: For City of Imperial Beach: 401 B Street, Suite 800 825 Imperial Beach Boulevard San Diego, CA 92101 Imperial Beach, CA 91932 Attn: Director of Finance Attn: City Manager

3. That unless it is amended by the parties in writing, this MOA shall terminate on ______or on such earlier or later date as the parties may agree to in writing.

4. The indemnification provisions of this MOA shall survive termination of the MOA.

5. This MOA shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. If any action is brought to interpret or enforce any term of this MOA, the action shall be brought in a state or federal court situated in the County of San Diego, State of California.

C-70229 (Rev 03/19) OHSUSA:767407459.1 4 6. All terms, conditions, and provisions hereof shall inure to and shall bind each of the parties hereto, and each of their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns.

7. For purposes of this MOA, the relationship of the parties is that of independent entities and not as agents of each other or as joint venturers or partners. The parties shall maintain sole and exclusive control over their personnel, agents, consultants, and operations.

8. No alteration or variation of the terms of this MOA shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto, and no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein shall be binding on any of the parties hereto.

9. Nothing in the provisions of this MOA is intended to create duties or obligations to or rights in third parties to this MOA or affect the legal liability of the parties to this MOA to third parties.

10. This MOA may be executed in any number of identical counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and all of which together shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument when each party has signed one such counterpart.

11. This MOA may be executed and delivered by facsimile signature, and a facsimile signature shall be treated as an original.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this MOA effective on the day and year first above written. SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF CITY OF IMPERIAL BEACH GOVERNMENTS

KIM KAWADA ANDY HALL Chief Deputy Executive Director City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Office of General Counsel Legal Counsel

C-70229 (Rev 03/19) OHSUSA:767407459.1 5 Exhibit A

FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25

Annual Estimated Revenue 752,392 778,405 806,420 833,434 861,449 861,449

CP Interest is estimated at 2.5% (.38% monthly)

Principal Borrowed 1,300,000 Term (Years) 5 60 Estimated Interest Rate 2.5%

Assume Draw starting Aug 2019 $300K Draw Principal Interest Total D/S August-19 300,000$ $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 September-19 300,000 5,000 625 5,625 595,000 October-19 300,000 10,085 1,240 11,324 884,915 November-19 300,000 15,257 1,844 17,101 1,169,658 December-19 100,000 20,520 2,437 22,957 1,249,138 January-20 22,306 2,602 24,908 1,226,832 February-20 22,306 2,556 24,862 1,204,526 March-20 22,306 2,509 24,815 1,182,220 April-20 22,306 2,463 24,769 1,159,914 May-20 22,306 2,416 24,723 1,137,608 June-20 22,306 2,370 24,676 1,115,302 July-20 22,306 2,324 24,630 1,092,996 August-20 22,306 2,277 24,583 1,070,690 September-20 22,306 2,231 24,537 1,048,383 October-20 22,306 2,184 24,490 1,026,077 November-20 22,306 2,138 24,444 1,003,771 December-20 22,306 2,091 24,397 981,465 January-21 22,306 2,045 24,351 959,159 February-21 22,306 1,998 24,304 936,853 March-21 22,306 1,952 24,258 914,547 April-21 22,306 1,905 24,211 892,241 May-21 22,306 1,859 24,165 869,935 June-21 22,306 1,812 24,118 847,629 July-21 22,306 1,766 24,072 825,323 August-21 22,306 1,719 24,025 803,017 September-21 22,306 1,673 23,979 780,711 October-21 22,306 1,626 23,933 758,405 November-21 22,306 1,580 23,886 736,099 December-21 22,306 1,534 23,840 713,793 January-22 22,306 1,487 23,793 691,487 February-22 22,306 1,441 23,747 669,181 March-22 22,306 1,394 23,700 646,875 April-22 22,306 1,348 23,654 624,569 May-22 22,306 1,301 23,607 602,263 June-22 22,306 1,255 23,561 579,957 July-22 22,306 1,208 23,514 557,651 August-22 22,306 1,162 23,468 535,345 September-22 22,306 1,115 23,421 513,039 October-22 22,306 1,069 23,375 490,733 November-22 22,306 1,022 23,328 468,427 December-22 22,306 976 23,282 446,121 January-23 22,306 929 23,235 423,815 February-23 22,306 883 23,189 401,509 March-23 22,306 836 23,143 379,203 April-23 22,306 790 23,096 356,897 May-23 22,306 744 23,050 334,590 June-23 22,306 697 23,003 312,284 July-23 22,306 651 22,957 289,978 August-23 22,306 604 22,910 267,672 September-23 22,306 558 22,864 245,366 October-23 22,306 511 22,817 223,060 November-23 22,306 465 22,771 200,754 December-23 22,306 418 22,724 178,448 January-24 22,306 372 22,678 156,142 February-24 22,306 325 22,631 133,836 March-24 22,306 279 22,585 111,530 April-24 22,306 232 22,538 89,224 May-24 22,306 186 22,492 66,918 June-24 22,306 139 22,445 44,612 July-24 22,306 93 22,399 22,306 August-24 22,306 46 22,353 0 $ 1,300,000 $ 80,312 $ 1,380,312 Note: Amounts shown in whole dollars; may need to adjust for rounding.

6 Attachment 2

City of Imperial Beach Capacity Analysis $1.3 Million Commercial Paper

FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Total

Beginning Balance (est) $20,000 $ 69,732 $ 121,250 $ 169,674 $ 214,003 $ 803,040 $ 20,000 Estimated Allocations1 752,392 778,405 806,420 833,434 861,449 861,449 2 4,893,549 CP Proceeds 1,300,000 - - - - - 1,300,000 CP Principal Repayment (184,698) (267,672) (267,672) (267,672) (267,672) (44,614) (1,300,000) CP Interest/Other Fees3 (21,062) (24,815) (18,124) (11,432) (4,740) (139) (80,313) CP Disbursement (1,300,000) - - - - - (1,300,000) RTIP programmed projects (496,900) (434,400) (472,200) (510,000) - - (1,913,500) Ending Balance $ 69,732 $ 121,250 $ 169,674 $ 214,003 $ 803,040 $ 1,619,736 $ 1,619,736

Notes: 1. Estimated revenues are based on proposed fiscal year 2020 projections for the next five years, updated on an annual basis. Assumes 100% of estimated revenues are programmed for Congestion Relief projects. 2. Estimated revenues are projected for five years; therefore FY 2025 uses the estimated amount for FY 2024. 3. Interest repayments are calculated at 2.5% for the capacity analysis, but are paid based on actual costs. This includes interest costs and the City's proportionate share of CP program administrative fees.

7 Attachment 3

8 9 Attachment 4

Commercial Paper Requirements The TransNet Debt Financing Program includes certain eligibility requirements to advance-fund projects with either bond proceeds or commercial paper. To be eligible for these funds, the City must meet the following requirements: Eligibility Requirement Results

Congestion Relief Project • The Imperial Beach Boulevard Enhancement Project includes major rehabilitation and reconstruction of the entirety of Imperial Beach Boulevard from Seacoast Boulevard to 14th Street. The Project includes 160,000 square feet of roadway grinding and overlay and 12,000 square feet of new structural pavement. Additionally, more than 45,000 square feet of new sidewalk and three new pedestrian crossings are included in the Project.

Useful life exceeds repayment term – The expected useful life of the Project is 50+ years. at least five years

Debt service requirements met prior to The City intends to use its annual TransNet LSI allocations to allocating TransNet to other projects cover all debt obligations first with remaining available annual funds used for other programmed projects.

Project cannot include private use The Project would be entirely for public use.

Commercial paper will be paid to City The City agrees to these terms. on reimbursement basis based on Project-eligible expenditures

Economic and/or community benefit The Project enjoys strong positive community support and will include new sidewalks and pedestrian crossings in heavily- traveled pedestrian thoroughfares.

Capacity available in the TransNet Debt Of the $100 million of commercial paper within the TransNet Financing Program Debt Financing Program, there currently is $28.7 million available (uncommitted). There would be $27.4 million remaining if the Board of Directors approves the request.

Project must be programmed in the Amendment No. 5 of the 2018 RTIP (Amendment) is scheduled RTIP for a public hearing and consideration of the proposed final Amendment at the July 19, 2019, Transportation Committee meeting. Adoption of the proposed final Amendment is scheduled for consideration by the Board of Directors at its July 26, 2019, meeting.

10 Item: 25 Board of Directors July 26, 2019

Delegation of Approval for Administrative Modifications to the Regional Transportation Improvement Program

Overview Action: Adopt The Regional Transportation Improvement Program The Transportation Committee recommends (RTIP) is the five-year program of transportation projects that the Board of Directors, acting as the in the San Diego region. San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) adopt RTC Resolution Federal guidelines allow the California Department of No. RTC-2020-01: Transportation (Caltrans) to approve administrative modifications to the RTIP. Caltrans, in turn, can delegate 1. requesting delegation of approval for this authority to Metropolitan Planning Organizations administrative modifications to the (MPOs) upon request and allow the MPO to delegate the Regional Transportation Improvement approval to its Executive Director or designee. Program; and (Attachment 1). 2. delegating that approval to the Executive Director. Administrative modifications are changes which the federal government considers minor and include: Fiscal Impact: 1. revising a project description without changing the Delegated approval of administrative scope; modifications would make funds available to 2. revising funding for a project or phase, including the member agencies’ projects sooner. addition of funding that is limited to the lesser of 40 percent of the total project cost or $10 million; Schedule/Scope Impact: This action would reduce the time required to 3. a cost decrease with no limit as long as a phase is make minor changes to the Regional still fully funded; and Transportation Improvement Program by an 4. adding or deleting a project from the grouped average of 10 weeks. project listings within the funding limits shown above and other minor changes. These changes do not require a financial analysis, are available to the public during the review period prior to approval, and are posted on the SANDAG and Caltrans websites once approved. With delegated approval, these minor changes could be made in as little as eight weeks, making funds available an average of ten weeks sooner. More significant increases, scope changes, and new projects would still need to be through a formal amendment. A formal amendment is posted for a 15-day public comment period, presented to the Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee (ITOC) for comments, approved by the Transportation Committee, and ratified by the Board of Directors before being sent to Caltrans, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) for final approval. This process would continue to take about four to six months.

Key Considerations Delegating authority to the Executive Director would streamline and shorten the process of revising minor changes to the RTIP for most projects, helping local agencies access funds more quickly. It also would result in formal amendments with fewer projects, which would continue to be prepared for Transportation Committee approval, allowing for a more focused review on projects with more significant changes. This change would result in an amendment to Chapter 2 (Attachment 2) of the 2018 RTIP which was approved by the Board of Directors on September 28, 2018. Updates which reflect the 2015 Ozone Standard Conformity Demonstration, approved by the Board on May 24, 2019, are also included in Chapter 2. Amendments to the chapter, including information on the proposed delegation, were released for public comment on June 12, 2019, as part of Amendment No. 5 and no comments were received. The proposed change in delegation enacted by Resolution No. 2020-01 (Attachment 3) would be amended in Board Policy No. 017 during the annual policy update process. The ITOC strongly supported this proposal at its June 12, 2019, meeting and recommended that SANDAG continue to notify interested parties when an administrative modification is being prepared and provide a link to view the proposed changes throughout the process.

Next Steps Pending approval by the Board of Directors, SANDAG would submit a letter to Caltrans requesting delegated authority to allow the Executive Director to approve administrative modifications.

Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director Key Staff Contact: Sue Alpert, (619) 595-5318, [email protected] Attachments: 1. Revised FSTIP/FTIP Amendments and Administrative Modification Procedures 2. 2018 RTIP Chapter 2 Revisions 3. RTC Resolution No. RTC-2020-01: Delegation of Authority to Approve Administrative Modifications to the Regional Transportation Improvement Program and Delegating that Authority to the Executive Director

2 Attachment

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Attachment 2

Chapter 2 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Development Process

12 13

Chapter 2

Regional Transportation Improvement Program Development Process

This chapter discusses the federal, state, and TransNet programming requirements and the process used by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) to develop this update. It also describes the process for amendments during this cycle.

Federal Transportation Requirements

SANDAG is designated by the United States Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the San Diego region.

As the MPO, SANDAG must have a continuing, comprehensive, and coordinated transportation planning process in order to receive federal capital or operating funds. The planning process includes the development of: (1) a long-range, minimum of 20 years, transportation plan describing the policies, strategies, and transportation facility needs; and (2) a Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) covering at least a four-year period. As both the MPO and the state designated Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA), the SANDAG Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) is equivalent to the FTIP.

Consistent with these requirements, the Board of Directors, in October 2015, adopted the Revenue Constrained Regional Plan, San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan (Regional Plan), and on December 2, 2015, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) issued a finding of conformity for the Revenue Constrained Regional Plan. Both the Regional Plan and the RTIP documents fulfill federal requirements.

Federal and state regulations identify the development process and required content for the programming document. In general, the RTIP must include all major projects receiving certain categories of federal or state transportation funding, which need federal and/or state approval. The RTIP also must include Capacity Increasing (CI) projects and those projects which are identified as regionally significant. A regionally significant project (defined in 23 CFR 450.104) is a transportation project that is on a facility which serves regional transportation needs and would normally be included in the modeling of the metropolitan area's transportation network. The 2018 RTIP also includes the Program of Projects (POP) funded by TransNet, the local transportation sales tax program administered by SANDAG.

The 2018 RTIP indicates the region’s priorities for the implementation of transportation projects. It is required to include realistic estimates of project costs and anticipated program revenue. It also must be a financially constrained program. This means that funding must be available and committed to implement the projects listed in this document. As a result, all projects in the first two fiscal years must have dedicated funding, and projects in the out-years either must have a firm funding commitment or a reasonable strategy or expectation that funds will be available. In addition, all projects within the 2018 RTIP must be consistent with the Regional Plan.

2-1 14

Air Quality Conformity

On April 15, 2004, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) designated the San Diego air basin as nonattainment for the 1997 Eight-Hour Ozone Standard, effective June 15, 2004. However, several areas that are tribal lands in eastern San Diego County were excluded from the nonattainment designation.

The air basin initially was classified as a basic nonattainment area under Subpart 1 of the Clean Air Act, and the attainment date for the 1997 Eight-Hour Ozone Standard was set as June 15, 2009. In cooperation with SANDAG, the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District (APCD) developed an Eight-Hour Ozone Attainment Plan for the 1997 Eight-Hour Ozone Standard, which was submitted to the U.S. EPA on June 15, 2007. The budgets in the Eight-Hour Ozone Attainment Plan for San Diego County were found adequate for transportation conformity purposed by the U.S. EPA, effective June 9, 2008.

However, on April 27, 2012, in response to a court decision, the U.S. EPA ruled that the San Diego basic nonattainment area be reclassified as a Subpart 2 moderate nonattainment area, with an attainment date of June 15, 2010. This reclassification became effective on June 13, 2012. Air quality data for 2009, 2010, and 2011 demonstrated that the San Diego air basin attained the 1997 Eight-Hour Ozone Standard; APCD prepared a Maintenance Plan, with a request for redesignation to attainment/maintenance. On December 6, 2012, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) approved the Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan for the 1997 National Ozone Standard for San Diego County for submittal to the U.S. EPA as a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision. Effective July 5, 2013, the U.S. EPA approved California’s request to redesignate the San Diego County ozone nonattainment area to attainment for the 1997 Eight-hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) and its plan for continuing to attain the 1997 ozone standard for ten years beyond redesignation.

On May 21, 2012, the U.S. EPA designated the San Diego air basin as a nonattainment area for the 2008 Eight- Hour Ozone Standard and classified it as a marginal area with an attainment date of December 31, 2015. Tribal areas that were previously excluded are now included as part of the San Diego region nonattainment designation. This designation became effective on July 20, 2012. SANDAG determined conformity to the new standard on May 24, 2013, using the applicable model approved by the U.S. EPA to forecast regional emissions (EMFAC2011). The U.S. DOT, in consultation with the U.S. EPA, made its conformity determination on June 28, 2013. The U.S. EPA’s final rule also provides for the revocation of the 1997 Eight-Hour Ozone NAAQS for transportation conformity purposes, effective July 20, 2013. On December 23, 2014, a D.C. Circuit Court decision (NRDC v. EPA No. 12-1321), determined that the attainment date for marginal areas would be set for July 20, 2015. On February 16, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals ruled against parts of the EPA’s 2015 Ozone Implementation Rule related to the revocation of the 1997 ozone standard and the relevant “anti-backsliding” requirements. However, according to Transportation Conformity Guidance for the South Coast II Court Decision, nonattainment areas with existing 2008 ozone conformity budgets are not required to address the 1997 ozone standards for conformity purposes.

Effective June 3, 2016, the U.S. EPA determined that 11 areas, including the San Diego air basin, failed to attain the 2008 ozone NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of July 20, 2015, and thus, are reclassified by operation of law as “Moderate” for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. States containing any portion of these new Moderate areas were required to submit SIP revisions that meet the statutory and regulatory requirements that

2-2 15

apply to 2008 ozone nonattainment areas classified as Moderate by January 1, 2017. The San Diego APCD submitted a SIP revision addressing Moderate area requirements to CARB on December 27, 2016. Effective December 4, 2017, the U.S. EPA found the motor vehicle emission budgets for the Reasonable Further Progress milestone year of 2017 from the 2008 Eight-Hour Ozone Attainment Plan for San Diego County adequate for transportation conformity purposes for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.

On October 26, 2015, the U.S. EPA published in the Federal Code of Regulation a new ozone standard, referred to as the 2015 Ozone standard. The new standard revised the allowable ozone level to 0.070 parts per million. The 2015 ozone standard became effective on December 28, 2015. On June 4, 2018, U.S. EPA published a final rule that designated the San Diego region as nonattainment, with a classification of moderate, for the 2015 ozone NAAQS. The designation became effective on August 3, 2018, and started a one-year grace period, during which time affected MPOs must demonstrate conformity of their transportation plans and transportation improvement programs to the 2015 ozone standard. On May 24, 2019, the SANDAG Board of Directors adopted the 2015 Ozone NAAQs conformity demonstration for the 2015 Regional Plan and the 2018 RTIP, and found that the 2015 Regional Plan and the 2018 RTIP, as amended, are in conformity with the requirements of the federal Clean Air Act and applicable SIP for air quality. This conformity finding is pending federal approval.

The San Diego region was designated by the U.S. EPA as a federal maintenance area for the Carbon Monoxide (CO) standard. On November 8, 2004, CARB submitted the 2004 revision to the California SIP for CO to the U.S. EPA, which extended the maintenance plan demonstration to 2018. Effective January 30, 2006, the U.S. EPA approved this maintenance plan as a SIP revision. On March 21, 2018, the U.S. EPA documented in a letter that transportation conformity requirement for CO will cease to apply after June 1, 2018.

The 2018 RTIP must be evaluated for conformity with the SIP for air quality attainment. The SIP requires that the 2018 RTIP satisfy a number of specific tests to indicate that the program will achieve certain air quality emissions reductions and require the RTIP to implement agreed-upon transportation control measures (Transportation Tactics). Chapter 5 further describes the air quality conformity process.

Congestion Management Process

FHWA 23 CFR 450.322 requires that each Transportation Management Area (TMA) address congestion management through a process involving an analysis of multimodal metropolitan-wide strategies. SANDAG, as the designated TMA for the San Diego region, monitors the Congestion Management Process (CMP) for those federally eligible projects. The passage of Assembly Bill 2419 (Bowler, 1996) allows TMAs to “opt-out” of the state CMP. In October 2009, the San Diego region elected to be exempt from the state CMP, and since this decision, SANDAG has been abiding by the federal requirement to ensure the region’s continued compliance with the federal CMP.

The Regional Plan discusses several elements for use in the analysis of multimodal strategies including: (1) performance monitoring and measurement of the regional transportation system; (2) multimodal alternatives and non-Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) analysis; (3) land use impact analysis; (4) the provision of congestion management tools; and (5) integration with the RTIP process. For the 2018 RTIP, SANDAG monitors projects that add general purpose lanes by requiring sponsors of these projects seeking federal funds to submit

2-3 16

documentation that demonstrates the project was evaluated for multimodal alternatives, including non-SOV capacity improvements. The most recent federal congestion management process can be found in Appendix U.7 to the Regional Plan and in Appendix G to this document. Further information also can be found on the CMP web page at sandag.org/cmp.

Federal Funding Programs

Federal funds programmed are based on the federal authorizing legislation, Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act, which was signed into law by the President on December 4, 2015. The FAST Act includes anticipated appropriations through FY 2019/20 and funding levels are conservatively estimated to continue at the same levels as it is assumed the Congress will enact continuing resolutions or new legislation upon the expiration of the FAST Act. These federal funding programs include the following:

• Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (CMAQ)

• FTA Sections 5307 (Urbanized Formula Grant), 5310 (Capital Program), 5311 (Rural Transit) Programs, 5337 (State of Good Repair), and 5339 (Bus and Bus Facilities)

• Highway Safety Improvement Program/High Risk Rural Roads Program

• Surface Transportation Block Grant Program, which is administered through the state and includes Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) and Highway Bridge Program funds

• Infrastructure for Rebuilding America (INFRA) Grants Program

• Highway Infrastructure Program

Federal funding for the CMAQ and RSTP programs is apportioned by the state to the San Diego region by formula. As the MPO, SANDAG is responsible for administering the program and project selection based on priority established in the Regional Plan (see Expedited Project Selection Process in Appendix C).

CMAQ funds can be used for most categories of transportation projects that improve air quality, such as purchase of alternative-fuel transit vehicles, Transportation Demand Management (TDM) activities, transit operations, and high occupancy vehicle facilities as provided in federal law. CMAQ funds cannot be used for projects that increase the transportation system’s capacity for SOVs. RSTP funds can be used for state highway, local street and road, transit, bicycle, traffic signal, and TDM projects. Highway Infrastructure Program funds were apportioned by the U.S. DOT Appropriations Act of 2018 and 2019 and can be used similarly to RSTP funds.

Federal Submittal Requirements

Following approval by the SANDAG Board, the final 2018 RTIP will be submitted to Caltrans for inclusion in the Federal State Transportation Improvement Program (FSTIP), which incorporates the Transportation Improvement Programs (TIPs) from other MPOs around the state. The 2018 RTIP also will be submitted to the

2-4 17

FHWA, FTA, and U.S. EPA for federal approval of the air quality conformity determination. The FHWA and FTA approve the RTIP project programming as an element of the FSTIP.

The U.S. EPA acts as a commenting agency to the FHWA and FTA in the RTIP air quality conformity process. The 2018 RTIP may be amended by SANDAG, as needed. However, any revisions that add or modify capacity-increasing, non-exempt projects require an air quality conformity re-determination. A listing of projects that are typically exempt from the air quality conformity determination is provided in Appendix E.

State Transportation Requirements

In addition to serving as the federal MPO, SANDAG is designated by the State of California as an RTPA. RTPAs are responsible for implementing state laws regarding transportation planning and funding and to ensure coordinated planning efforts meet both state and federal requirements. The 2018 RTIP is a document which meets both federal and state regulations and includes major projects receiving state transportation funds.

State Transportation Improvement Program

The 2018 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) adopted by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) in March 2018 is the state’s spending plan. The FAST Act continues a program to provide for a variety of alternative transportation projects, including many that were previously eligible activities under separately funded programs. The Active Transportation Program (ATP) was created by Senate Bill 99 (Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review, 2013) and Assembly Bill 101 (Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review, 2013) to encourage increased use of active modes of transportation, such as biking and walking. The ATP consolidates existing federal and state transportation programs, including the Transportation Alternatives Program, Bicycle Transportation Account, and State Safe Routes to School into a single program. ATP funds are administered by the CTC, with a separate program administered by the designated MPO, and projects are selected through a competitive process.

Pursuant to Senate Bill 45 (Kopp, 1997) (SB 45), the STIP is comprised of the Regional Improvement Program (RIP) and the Interregional Improvement Program (IIP). Under SB 45, SANDAG, as the RTPA, submits the RIP projects while Caltrans submit its IIP projects, in cooperation with SANDAG, to the CTC by December 15 of each odd-numbered year.

The CTC develops the STIP Fund Estimate (FE), which includes the RIP “County Share” and IIP fund allocations. The program is updated every two years and currently covers the five-year period 2018/19 to 2022/23. STIP-funded projects, like all other state and federally funded projects, must be listed in the RTIP in order for the sponsor agencies to access funding. The STIP consists of funds from the Transportation Investment Fund as well as from the Public Transportation Account and State Highway Account. Figure 2-1 illustrates the funding distribution.

2-5 18

Figure 2-1: State Transportation Fund Allocation Process

STATE HIGHWAY ACCOUNT (State and Federal Funds)

70% 30%

Non-STIP Projects STIP Projects

 State Highway Operations and  Highways

Protection Program (SHOPP):  Transit

 Maintenance/Operations  Local Projects

 Rehabilitation/Safety  Support/Engineering

 Administration

 Local Assistance

 Support Engineering

 Other

75% 25%

RIP IIP

40% 60% 60% 40% State North South Interregional Discretionary Counties Counties Program Program

SANDAG Share (Approximately 6.4% of total RIP)

Seventy-five percent of the STIP funds flow to the regions by formula whereby the regional planning agencies are charged with developing an expenditure plan for the funds. Eligible project types include improvements to state highways, local roads, public transit, intercity rail, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, grade separations, transportation system management, TDM, soundwall projects, intermodal facilities, and safety. The regional share is further divided between northern (40%) and southern (60%) areas of the state.

The remaining 25 percent of the funds flow through the IIP, which is a statewide competitive program administered by Caltrans. Sixty percent (of the IIP shares) is directed to projects that improve interregional transportation and 40 percent is programmed at the discretion of the CTC, subject to the north/south ratio identified above. Eligible project types include intercity passenger rail, mass transit guideways, grade separations, and state highways.

2-6 19

As the RTPA for the San Diego region, SANDAG is responsible for nominating projects to receive the region’s share of regional STIP (STIP-RIP) funding (as discussed above). These projects in total must be constrained to the “County Share” or “target” funding amount specified in the STIP FE published by the CTC. Caltrans is responsible for nominating projects to be funded under the interregional STIP (STIP-IIP) statewide program. The CTC must approve the local projects proposed in the RIP and IIP by including them in the adopted STIP or a STIP amendment in order for these projects to receive funding.

SANDAG also nominates projects to receive state funds under the ATP, the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program, the Trade Corridor Enhancement Program, the Local Partnership Program, and the Solutions for Congested Corridors Program.

For state-funded programs, including the STIP and SHOPP, the revenues and program are based on the revised 2018 FE adopted by the CTC on August 16, 2017. The fund estimate included $2.2 billion in new STIP funding capacity from the adoption of Senate Bill 1 (SB 1) (Beall), signed into law on April 28, 2017, which reset the price-based excise tax to a traditional excise tax of 17.3 cents per gallon, with the provision to adjust the tax annually for inflation beginning in 2019-20. This will stabilize the funding in the State Highway Account and the STIP. SB 1 does not provide additional funding for the ATP portion of the STIP, creating a negative capacity for Rail and Transit projects, which must be funded through other eligible STIP fund types.

For SANDAG, the priority for STIP-funded projects continues to be based upon the criteria approved by the Transportation Committee at its October 21, 2005, meeting. These criteria include:

• Complete projects currently programmed in the STIP

• Place particular emphasis on programming and completing TransNet Early Action projects

• Program projects at the earliest possible time they can be constructed or implemented

• Maintain existing STIP funding levels as a minimum on existing programmed projects

• Reflect the efforts by the region and Caltrans to complete some of these projects outside the STIP through other funding sources

Along with the Regional Plan, the SANDAG Board adopted the Sustainable Communities Strategy, which details how the region will reduce greenhouse gas emissions to state-mandated levels over time. The state- administered portion of the ATP is one of the components that would help the region meet its greenhouse gas emissions targets, with the expectation that this program will help fund a number of regionally significant bike projects. The final funding allocation for the state-wide-funded ATP projects included in the 2018 RTIP rests with the CTC. The approval of the region-wide ATP is ultimately approved by the SANDAG Board.

A major element of active transportation is the implementation of the Regional Bikeway Program. On September 27, 2013, the SANDAG Board approved the Regional Bike Plan Early Action Program (Bike EAP), which prioritized regional bike projects to be funded with, among other programs, the TransNet Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Neighborhood Safety (BPNS) Program and the Transportation Development Act (TDA) Bike Program.

2-7 20

In addition, Caltrans develops the 2018 SHOPP, which is divided into six project groupings – bridge preservation, collision reduction, mandates, mobility, and roadway/roadside preservation. Projects funded with STIP and SHOPP are programmed in the 2018 RTIP based upon the final CTC adoption.

State Submittal Requirements

The RTIP, which includes the entire San Diego region STIP-funded projects and all other federal and locally funded projects, must be submitted to Caltrans by October 1, 2018. Once submitted, the state will post for a 30-day public notice review before federal submittal.

TransNet Requirements

TransNet is the local half-cent transportation sales tax funding program that was approved by San Diego voters in November 2004. As part of the TransNet Ordinance, all local agencies are required to submit a five-year TransNet POP for inclusion in the RTIP. Serving as the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission (RTC), SANDAG is required to approve a multi-year TransNet POP, consistent with the RTIP update schedule, which identifies all major transportation projects proposed to use the sales tax funds over the multi-year period. In order to receive TransNet revenue, transportation projects must be included in the approved RTIP/TransNet POP.

The TransNet Program includes several subprograms. After deducting for administrative expenses (1%), 2 percent for BPNS Program projects, and $250,000 (plus consumer price index) for the Independent Taxpayers Oversight Committee (ITOC), the remainder of the revenues is divided between Major Corridors, Local System Improvements, and Transit System Improvements. Under the TransNet Ordinance, the highway and transit major corridor projects were specified in the approved ballot measure. The schedule and funding of the major TransNet highway and transit projects are developed cooperatively by SANDAG, Caltrans, and the region’s transit operators.

The Board of Directors adopted Bike EAP prioritized regional bike projects to be funded with, among other programs, the TransNet BPNS and the TDA Bike Program. Additionally, the Board of Directors approved to set- aside $1 million per year to support local, non-motorized projects. Projects funded under the call for projects process with local agencies as the lead agency are generally listed as a grouped-project listing in the RTIP as Various Agencies. EAP projects are listed under SANDAG as the lead agency, which can be either group-project listing or individually listed. If a bike project is funded with federal or state funds in addition to the local TransNet or TDA bike funds, those projects can be listed individually by the sponsoring agency.

The San Diego region’s 18 cities and the County developed the TransNet Program of local street and road projects. The local TransNet five-year POP are identified as part of the project listing located in Chapter 3. Per Section 6 of the TransNet Ordinance, the projects within each jurisdiction must be approved by each city council or the County Board of Supervisors, after holding a public hearing, in the form of a signed resolution.

RTIP Development Process for TransNet

Designated as the region’s MPO and RTPA and as the RTC, SANDAG has the overall responsibility for developing the required RTIP document. In a memo dated January 16, 2018, SANDAG requested that project sponsors

2-8 21

review and update the projects for submittal for inclusion into the 2018 RTIP. The individual project listings included in Chapter 3 have been submitted by the project sponsors and reviewed for compliance by SANDAG.

The 2018 RTIP has been prepared with input and cooperation from Caltrans, the cities and County of San Diego, the Metropolitan Transit System, the North County Transit District, and the SANDAG Transportation Committee, as well as other technical and advisory working groups.

Public Participation

SANDAG has provided ample opportunity for community involvement and interagency consultation in the development of the 2018 RTIP, and the SANDAG public participation process provides additional opportunity for public review and comment on the draft document prior to its adoption. Opportunities for community involvement and interagency consultation on the transportation projects included in the 2018 RTIP were provided through public meetings of the various SANDAG committees and working groups that are responsible for the development and oversight of the projects. These committees include the Transportation Committee, the Cities/County Transportation Advisory Committee, the Community-Based Organization Working Group, the Interagency Technical Working Group on Tribal Transportation Issues, the ITOC, and the San Diego Region Conformity Working Group.

At its July 27, 2018, meeting, the Board of Directors approved the distribution of the draft 2018 RTIP for a 30- day public comment period. A public hearing on the Proposed Final 2018 RTIP was held at the Transportation Committee meeting on September 7, 2018. Public comments were received and their corresponding SANDAG responses will be included in Appendix J of this document. At its September 28, 2018, meeting, the Board of Directors adopted the Final 2018 RTIP. The 2018 RTIP also will be available on the 2018 RTIP web page at sandag.org/RTIP.

RTIP Amendment Process

On occasion, circumstances may dictate changes to the current RTIP following its adoption. Federal regulations allow changes, or amendments, if the procedures are consistent with federal requirements for TIP development and consistent with federal procedures for revisions to the FSTIP. SANDAG will consider such amendments when the circumstances prompting the amendments are compelling, and when the changes will not adversely affect air quality conformity or financial constraint of the TIP. The proposed changes to projects also must be consistent with the rules of the particular funding program.

There are two types of processes to update the RTIP: (1) Administrative Modifications; and (2) Amendments (described in detail below). SANDAG processes amendments generally on a quarterly basis and administrative modifications on an as-needed basis. Both the 2018 RTIP and any amendment requests during the 2018 RTIP cycle that involve the TransNet Program must include the sponsor’s governing board/council approval in the form of a signed resolution. The 2018 RTIP quarterly amendment schedule can be found on the RTIP web page at sandag.org/RTIP.

Caltrans currently approves Administrative Modifications in their entirety and Amendments prior to federal approval, and is unable to approve an amendment with exceptions to specific projects. There are circumstances, however, in which SANDAG may need to revise the amended projects after SANDAG approval should Caltrans

2-9 22

object to the approval of a specific project. In such instances, SANDAG can revise the original submittal and resubmit the amendment.

Administrative Modifications

Administrative Modifications require the approval of the Board of Directors, which has delegated its authority to the Executive Director and has requested that the state delegate approval to SANDAG. Administrative modifications do not require federal approval. Federal agencies are notified of the amendments for informational purposes. The streamlined approach helps expedite the approval process. Project requests that fall within the following criteria can be administratively amended:

• Revise a project description which does not change the scope of the project or is in conflict with the project environmental document and wherein the project does not affect air quality or the timely implementation of Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) or impacts financial constraint

• Increase the funding amount up to 40 percent of the project cost, or $10 million, whichever is less

• Change in funding source

• Change a project lead agency

• Split or combine individually listed projects as long as cost, schedule, and scope remain unchanged

• Change required information for grouped-project (lump sum) listings

• Add or delete projects from grouped-project (lump sum) listings as long as the funding amount stays within the guidelines indicated above

Amendments

Project requests that do not meet the Administrative Modification criteria require Amendments. The conditions for amendments include but are not limited to the following:

• Add a new federal- or state-funded project or delete an existing federal- or state-funded project

• Shift funds from beyond the first four years (FY 22/2023) to the quadrennial element (FY 2018/19 through FY 2021/22), or vice versa

• The request would affect air quality conformity or the timely implementation of TCMs

• The request would require additional air quality emissions analysis and/or a new finding of air quality conformity by adding a new CI project or deleting an existing CI project

• The request would impact the financial constraint of the RTIP

• The request would result in major changes in scope, design, and/or concept

2-10 23

Amendments require an action by the Transportation Committee (Board of Directors if the amendment requires redetermination of air quality), Caltrans, FHWA, FTA, and the U.S. EPA. Due to the lengthy process involved in determining air quality conformity, amendment requests for regionally significant CI projects requiring new emissions analysis will be scheduled on an as-needed basis (not on any regular schedule).

Grouped Project Listings

Grouped projects or lump sum line items are projects grouped under a specified work type (projects must be exempt from air quality conformity). The purpose is to provide flexibility where the individual implementation priorities are unclear. In cooperation with the MPOs around the state, Caltrans, FHWA, and the FTA, and based upon 40 CFR 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and 3, an agreed upon list of grouped-project listings was developed for use in the RTIP. Examples of some of the groupings include but are not limited to the following:

• Bike and Pedestrian Facilities/ATP

• Highway Bridge Program

• Highway Safety Improvement Program

• Highway Maintenance

• Minor Safety and Hazard Projects (SHOPP)

• Pavement Resurfacing and/or Rehabilitation (SHOPP)

• Rehabilitation/Reconstruction of Track Structures and Trackbed (Coastal Rail Corridor)

• TransNet Smart Growth and Senior Mini-Grant Programs

For each grouped-project listing in the RTIP, SANDAG maintains a detailed list of projects that comprise the grouped project, which can be found in Appendix A and also is available on the RTIP web page at sandag.org/RTIP or sandag.org/rtipgroupedprojects.

Participation by Federal Agencies

This report was funded in part through grants from the FHWA, FTA, and U.S. DOT. The views and opinions of SANDAG expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. DOT.

2-11 24 Attachment 3 Regional Transportation Commission

401 B Street, Suite 800 Resolution No. 2020-01 San Diego, CA 92101 Phone (619) 699-1900 Fax (619) 699-1905 sandag.org Delegation of Authority to Approve Administrative Modifications to the Regional Transportation Improvement Program and Delegating that Authority to the Executive Director

WHEREAS, the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) is a Regional Transportation Planning Agency and Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for San Diego County pursuant to state and federal designation; and WHEREAS, federal planning regulations require MPOs to prepare and adopt a long-range Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) for their region; and WHEREAS, SANDAG prepares and submits a Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) which serves as its Federal Transportation Improvement Plan (FTIP); and WHEREAS, SANDAG is responsible for preparing and processing administrative modifications and amendments to the RTIP; and WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, in consultation with the California Department of Transportation, has provided Revised Federal Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (FSTIP) and Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) Amendment and Administrative Modifications Procedures (dated June 3, 2011); and WHEREAS, these federal procedures allow minor changes to the FTIP to be made in an administrative modification; and WHEREAS, minor changes are defined as follows: 1. Revise a description of a project or grouped project listing without changing the project scope or without conflicting with the approved environmental documents; 2. Revise funding amount listed for a project or a project phase. Additional funding is limited to the lesser of 40 percent of the total project cost or $10 million; 3. Program Preliminary Engineering (PE) phase, provided Right of Way and/or Construction phase(s) are already programmed in the current FTIP and additional funding amounts stay within the limits specified; 4. A cost decrease, as long as the reduction in cost does not result in the deletion of a project or a phase, and the affected project phase is still fully funded; 5. Change source of funds; 6. Change a project lead agency; 7. Program federal funds for AC conversion if capacity exists; 8. Changed the program year of funds within the current FTIP; 9. Split or combine an individually listed project or projects, provided that the schedule and scope remain unchanged; 10. Change grouped project listings description as long as it is consistent with the Programming Grouped Project Listings in the Air Quality Non-Attainment or Maintenance Areas guidance;

25 11. Add or delete a project from a grouped project listing, provided the funding amounts stay within the limits specified; 12. Program emergency repair projects on the state highways as a result of a natural disaster or catastrophic failure from an external cause, and that are not covered by the Emergency Relief Program, provided that these projects are exempt from Air Quality Conformity Requirements; 13. Re-program a project for which FHWA funds were transferred to FTA in the prior FTIP and FTA has not approved the grant yet; 14. Program an FTA funded project from the prior FTIP into the current FTIP provided there is no change in the original scope or cost; and 15. Make minor changes to an FTA funded grouped project listing. Minor changes include changing the number of transit vehicles purchased by 20 percent or less and changing the fuel type of transit vehicles.

WHEREAS, these federal procedures also delegate approval of administrative modifications to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and allow Caltrans to delegate to the SANDAG Board, as the MPO, and subsequently to the Executive Director (or designee); and

WHEREAS, delegating approval of administrative modifications to the Executive Director will benefit SANDAG by improving efficiency, expediting minor changes to the RTIP and making funds available to member agencies’ projects sooner; NOW THEREFORE

BE IT RESOLVED that the SANDAG Board of Directors, ALSO ACTING AS THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: that the SANDAG Board of Directors accepts the delegation of authority from Caltrans to approve administrative modifications to the RTIP in accordance with the attached FSTIP/FTIP Administrative Modifications and Amendments Procedures and delegates authority to the Executive Director (or designee) to approve administrative modifications to the Federal Transportation Improvement Program on behalf of the Board.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th of July 2019.

Ayes

Noes

Absent

Chair of the Board of Directors of the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission

[Seal]

Attest

Secretary of the Board of Directors of the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission

Item: 26 Board of Directors July 26, 2019

2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program: Amendment No. 5

Overview Action: Adopt The Regional Transportation Improvement Program The Transportation Committee recommends (RTIP) is a five-year document that reflects funding that the Board of Directors, acting as the sources, project phases, and fiscal years of Regional Transportation Commission (RTC), implementation for all transportation-related projects in adopt RTC Resolution No. 2020-02, approving Amendment No. 5 to the 2018 Regional the San Diego region that: (1) use federal, state, or Transportation Improvement Program. TransNet funds; (2) increase capacity of the transportation system; or (3) are regionally significant. SANDAG develops the RTIP based on projects included Fiscal Impact: in San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan, as submitted Amendment No. 5 reflects an increase of by member agencies (local jurisdictions, transit agencies, $453 million to the 2018 Regional Caltrans). Transportation Improvement Program. The Board of Directors approved the 2018 RTIP, Schedule/Scope Impact: covering FY 2019 – FY 2023, on September 28, 2018. Amendment No. 5 reflects one new project, The 2018 RTIP is fiscally constrained, meaning that one deleted project, and the carry-over of one sufficient revenue is committed or reasonably assumed closed project. to be available from local, state, and/or federal sources for each phase of the project included in the RTIP. Amendments are made to the RTIP on a quarterly (or as- needed) basis to reflect funding or scope changes. Amendment No.5 is a quarterly amendment to the 2018 RTIP.

Key Considerations Major changes are highlighted in Attachment 2. These changes include the programming of the SANDAG FY 2020 Program Budget approved by the Board of Directors on June 28, 2019, which added $22.4 million in Bike funds and $13 million into the Environmental Mitigation Program. The total increase of $453 million in programming primarily is in prior funds due to the State Route 905 project returning to the RTIP to pay final close-out expenses. Other changes include the programming of $1.3 million in TransNet Commercial Paper for the City of Imperial Beach (Agenda Item No. 20) and a new project, added to the grouped listing for State Highway Operation and Protection Program Mandates, to relinquish a 1.1-mile segment of State Route 75 to the City of San Diego. Attachment 3 provides the detail of the proposed amendments and the 2018 RTIP in its entirety is available at sandag.org/2018RTIP. The Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee reviewed the TransNet-funded projects included in Amendment No. 5 on July 10, 2019. No significant comments were received. Following federal regulations, it has been determined that the 2018 RTIP would remain in compliance with regional plan consistency, emissions, transportation control measure (TCM) implementation, inter-agency consultation and public involvement, fiscal constraint as illustrated in Attachment 4, and performance management requirements upon approval of Amendment No. 5 (Attachment 5). Beginning on May 20, 2019, all Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) actions must address how the TIP supports the achievement of targets set for the Federal Performance Management rules for Pavement and Bridge Condition (PM2) as well as System Performance, Freight, and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (PM3). Appendix H to the 2018 RTIP has been amended to include this information and is included as Attachment 6.

Next Steps Approval of Amendment No. 5 to the 2018 RTIP would enable access to funds for the included projects to complete project delivery and implement the SANDAG FY 2020 Program Budget.

Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director Key Staff Contact: Sue Alpert, (619) 595-5318, [email protected] Attachments: 1. Resolution No. RTC-2020-02: Approving Amendment No. 5 to the 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program 2. Table 1 – Summary of Changes Report – Amendment No. 5 3. Table 2 – 2018 RTIP – Amendment No. 5 4. Table 3a-3c Financial Summary – Amendment No. 5 5. Federal Requirements Analysis – Amendment No. 5 6. Appendix H – Federal Performance Management 7. Table 4 – Changes during the Public Comment Period

2 Attachment 1 Regional Transportation Commission

401 B Street, Suite 800 Resolution No. RTC-2020-02 San Diego, CA 92101 Phone (619) 699-1900 Fax (619) 699-1905 sandag.org

Approving Amendment No. 5 to the 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program

WHEREAS, on September 28, 2018, SANDAG adopted the 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) and found the 2018 RTIP in conformance with the applicable State Implementation Plans (SIP), and with the 2016 Regional Air Quality Strategy (RAQS), in accordance with California law; and

WHEREAS, on December 17, 2018, the U.S. Department of Transportation determined the 2018 RTIP and the San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan (Regional Plan) in conformance to the applicable SIP in accordance with the provisions of 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts 51 and 93; and

WHEREAS, member agencies have requested various changes to existing projects for inclusion into the 2018 RTIP as shown in Table 2; and

WHEREAS, this amendment is consistent with the metropolitan transportation planning regulations per 23 CFR Part 450 including the performance-based planning requirements; and

WHEREAS, this amendment is consistent with the Regional Plan, which conforms to the applicable SIP and to the emissions budgets from the 2008 Eight-Hour Ozone Attainment Plan for San Diego County, which were found adequate for transportation conformity purposes by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in December 2017; and

WHEREAS, this amendment is consistent with the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard Conformity Demonstration for San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan and the 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement, which was adopted by the SANDAG Board of Directors on May 24, 2019 and which received a conformity determination from U.S. DOT on June 21, 2019; and

WHEREAS, the regionally significant, capacity increasing projects have been incorporated into the quantitative air quality emissions analysis and conformity findings conducted for the Regional Plan and the 2018 RTIP; and

WHEREAS, Amendment No. 5 to the 2018 RTIP continues to provide for timely implementation of transportation control measures contained in the adopted RAQS/SIP for air quality and a quantitative emissions analysis demonstrates that the implementation of the RTIP projects and programs meet all the federally required emissions budget targets; and

WHEREAS, projects in Amendment No. 5 satisfy the transportation conformity provisions of 40 CFR 93.122(g) and all applicable transportation planning requirements per 23 CFR Part 450 including all performance-based planning requirements and are expected to support the achievement of approved targets; and

WHEREAS, all other projects in Amendment No. 5 are either non-capacity increasing or exempt from the requirements to determine conformity; and 3 WHEREAS, the projects in 2018 RTIP Amendment No. 5 are fiscally constrained; and

WHEREAS, the projects in 2018 RTIP Amendment No. 5 are consistent with the Public Participation Policy adopted by the SANDAG Board of Directors; NOW THEREFORE

BE IT RESOLVED, that the SANDAG Board of Directors, ALSO ACTING AS THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, DOES HEREBY: approve Amendment No. 5 to the 2018 RTIP; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the SANDAG finds the 2018 RTIP, including Amendment No. 5, is consistent with the Regional Plan, is in conformance with the applicable SIP, and with the 2016 RAQS for the San Diego region, is consistent with SANDAG Intergovernmental Review Procedures, is consistent with all federal performance planning requirements, and is consistent with SANDAG Public Participation Policy, as amended.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th of July 2019.

Ayes

Noes

Absent

Chair of the Board of Directors of the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission

[Seal]

Attest

Secretary of the Board of Directors of the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission

4 Attachment 2

Table 1 - Summary of Changes Report ($000) LEGEND: Amendment No. 5 ↑ Increase Total Total ↓ Reduce Percent Project ID Lead Agency Project Title Programmed Programmed Cost Difference ↔ Revise Change Description Change Before Revised California Department of Transportation ↑ Other Fed ‐ HIP; ↔ TransNet‐MC and MC AC; ↔ CMAQ and CMAQ CAL09 * Caltrans Interstate 5 ‐ HOV/Managed Lanes $906,249 $906,249 $0 0% Conversion; ↓ Earmark repurposing; ↑ RSTP

CAL09A * Caltrans I‐5 Lomas Santa Fe Interchange/HOV lanes $51,516 $51,516 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years

CAL09C * Caltrans I‐805 Direct Access Ramp and HOV at Carroll Canyon $84,237 $83,950 ($287) 0% ↓ TransNet‐MC

CAL18B * Caltrans I‐15 Managed Lanes‐ South Segment and Mira Mesa Transit Center $396,353 $396,118 ($235) 0% ↓ TransNet‐MC

CAL26 * Caltrans State Route 52 Freeway (E&F) $452,117 $452,117 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years

CAL29 * Caltrans SR 76 Middle $152,867 $152,867 ($0) 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years

CAL29B * Caltrans SR 76 East $202,499 $202,499 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC and TransNet ‐ MC AC between fiscal years

↔ TransNet ‐BORDER between fiscal years; Project Carried Over from CAL38 * Caltrans SR‐905 New Freeway $419,916 $419,916 $0 0% Amendment 16‐30 to make payments for close‐out

Grouped Projects for Bridge Rehabilitation and Reconstruction ‐ CAL44 Caltrans $202,718 $202,718 $0 0% ↔ HBP & ↔ Local Funds between fiscal years Highway Bridge Program

Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements ‐ SHOPP Collision Reduction CAL46B Caltrans $106,317 $104,634 ($1,683) ‐2% ↓ SHOPP ‐ CR‐ NHS (AC) and SHOPP ‐ CR‐ STP (AC) (CR) Program

Grouped Projects for Shoulder Improvements ‐ SHOPP Roadside CAL46C Caltrans $33,339 $32,915 ($424) ‐1% ↓ SHOPP (AC) ‐ Roadside Preserv NHS Preservation Program

Grouped Projects for Pavement Resurfacing and/or Rehabilitation ‐ CAL46E Caltrans $448,764 $450,829 $2,065 0% ↑ SHOPP (AC) ‐ Roadway Preserv NHS SHOPP Roadway Preservation Program

Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements ‐ SHOPP Mandates ↑ SHOPP (AC) ‐ Mandates; new project to relinquish 1 mile segment of SR 75 CAL46I Caltrans $45,669 $51,197 $5,528 12% Program between Georgia Street and I‐5 to the City of San Diego

CAL67 * Caltrans State Route 94 Corridor Improvements $22,600 $22,100 ($500) ‐2% ↓ TransNet‐MC

CAL75 * Caltrans I‐5 Genesee Interchange and Widening $102,324 $103,741 $1,417 1% ↑ TransNet‐MC

* indicates change due to SANDAG FY20 Budget

5 Table 1 - Summary of Changes Report ($000) LEGEND: Amendment No. 5 ↑ Increase Total Total ↓ Reduce Percent Project ID Lead Agency Project Title Programmed Programmed Cost Difference ↔ Revise Change Description Change Before Revised

CAL78B * Caltrans I‐805 HOV/Managed Lanes ‐ North $126,572 $126,572 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years

CAL78C * Caltrans I‐805 HOV/Managed Lanes ‐ South $226,533 $226,615 $82 0% + SHOPP (AC)‐Misc

CAL78D * Caltrans I‐805 South Soundwalls ‐ Unit 1 $38,829 $39,244 $415 1% ↑TransNet‐MC; ↑ RSTP funds

CAL114 * Caltrans I‐5/SR 56 Interchange $15,884 $15,884 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years

CAL277 * Caltrans I‐15/SR‐78 HOV Connectors $7,937 $7,937 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years

CAL325A * Caltrans State Routes 905/125/11 Southbound Connectors. $68,947 $73,947 $5,000 7% ↑Local Funds ‐ Toll Funds

CAL398A * Caltrans La Jolla Village Drive to Genesee Avenue Auxiliary Lane $6,750 $6,750 $0 0% Revise Footnote to add funds outside of the RTIP

CAL502 * Caltrans I‐805 North Construct Operational Improvements $4,242 $4,242 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years

City of Coronado

COR04 Coronado, City of Street and Road Preventive Maintenance; Minor Drainage Repair $6,264 $6,264 $0 0% ↔ Revise fund source between TransNet ‐ LSI Carry Over and Local Funds

Street and Road Major Rehabilitation; Major Drainage; Traffic COR07 Coronado, City of $15,819 $15,819 $0 0% ↔ Revise fund source Operations

City of Escondido

+ TransNet‐LSI; ↔ TransNet‐LSI Carry Over; ↑ Local Funds ; ↓ Local RTCIP ESC04 Escondido, City of Citracado Parkway II $38,023 $40,311 $2,288 6% funds

ESC06 Escondido, City of El Norte Parkway Bridge at Escondido Creek $5,402 $5,652 $250 5% ↑ Local Funds

ESC08 Escondido, City of Felicita Ave/Juniper Street $4,951 $5,201 $250 5% ↑ TransNet ‐LSI Carry Over

ESC24 Escondido, City of Centre City Parkway $2,209 $2,209 $0 0% ↔ TransNet ‐LSI Carry Over between fiscal years

ESC37 Escondido, City of Pavement Maintenance $31,992 $32,234 $242 1% ↑ TransNet‐LSI; ↓ Local funds

* indicates change due to SANDAG FY20 Budget

6 Table 1 - Summary of Changes Report ($000) LEGEND: Amendment No. 5 ↑ Increase Total Total ↓ Reduce Percent Project ID Lead Agency Project Title Programmed Programmed Cost Difference ↔ Revise Change Description Change Before Revised

ESC38 Escondido, City of Pavement Rehabilitation/Reconstruction $17,177 $15,457 ($1,720) ‐10% ↓ TransNet‐LSI; ↓ TransNet‐LSI Carry Over

ESC39 Escondido, City of Traffic Signals $1,480 $1,480 $0 0% ↔ Revise fund source between TransNet ‐ LSI Carry Over and TransNet ‐ LSI

ESC42 Escondido, City of Streetlight Retrofit $330 $1,622 $1,292 392% ↑ Local funds per the Escondido City Budget approved 6/12/19

City of Imperial Beach

IB02 Imperial Beach, City of Street Maintenance Operations $5,135 $5,173 $38 1% ↑ TransNet‐LSI

IB12 Imperial Beach, City of Major Street Improvements $7,588 $6,399 ($1,189) ‐16% ↓ TransNet‐LSI

City of La Mesa

LAM32 La Mesa, City of Pavement Management System $50 $50 $0 0% ↔ TransNet ‐LSI between fiscal years

LAM33 La Mesa, City of Curb and Gutter, Sidewalk, Ped Ramps $1,250 $1,654 $404 32% ↑ TransNet ‐LSI

LAM37 La Mesa, City of Traffic Signal Upgrades $500 $700 $200 40% ↑TransNet ‐LSI; Funds transferred from LAM44

LAM39 La Mesa, City of Traffic Calming Improvements & Active Transportation Improvements $500 $410 ($90) ‐18% ↓ TransNet ‐LSI

LAM40 La Mesa, City of Street Reconstruction (CR) $2,524 $3,502 $978 39% ↑ TransNet ‐LSI and ↑ TransNet ‐LSI Carry Over

↓ TransNet ‐LSI; ↓ TransNet ‐LSI Carry Over; + Local funds; funding moved to LAM44 La Mesa, City of Roadway Drainage Improvements $1,450 $350 ($1,100) ‐76% LAM33, LAM40 and LAM37

LAM48 La Mesa, City of West La Mesa Pedestrian and Bicycle Connectivity Project $6,422 $6,131 ($291) ‐5% ↓ TransNet ‐LSI Carry Over; ↓ ATP‐R

City of Oceanside

O40 Oceanside, City of Railroad Crossing Safey Improvements $5,650 $5,650 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐CP between fiscal years

7 Table 1 - Summary of Changes Report ($000) LEGEND: Amendment No. 5 ↑ Increase Total Total ↓ Reduce Percent Project ID Lead Agency Project Title Programmed Programmed Cost Difference ↔ Revise Change Description Change Before Revised

San Diego Association of Governments All changes due to SANDAG FY20 Budget

San Diego Association of SAN13 Joint Transit Operations Center $2,086 $3,222 $1,136 54% ↑ Local Funds ‐ Toll Funds; SANDAG FY20 Budget Governments

San Diego Association of SAN23 Mid‐Coast LRT Corridor Project $2,171,201 $2,171,201 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC and MC AC between fiscal years Governments

San Diego Association of SAN26B Downtown BRT Stations $20,979 $20,979 ($0) 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years Governments

San Diego Association of SAN26C SR 15 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Mid‐City Centerline Stations $64,844 $63,844 ($1,000) ‐2% ↓ TransNet‐MC Governments

San Diego Association of SAN27 San Ysidro Intermodal Freight Facility/South Line Rail $88,987 $87,987 ($1,000) ‐1% ↓ TransNet ‐BORDER; ↓ TransNet‐MC Governments

San Diego Association of SAN29 Sorrento to Miramar Double Track/Realign $74,851 $74,851 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years Governments

San Diego Association of SAN31 Escondido Maintenance Facility $7,516 $7,516 ($0) 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years Governments

San Diego Association of SAN40 Metropolitan Planning $63,694 $64,136 $442 1% + FTA 5310 Governments

San Diego Association of SAN46 Super Loop $36,071 $36,071 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years Governments

San Diego Association of SAN47 South Bay BRT $121,772 $123,672 $1,900 2% ↑ TransNet‐MC; ↓ Local funds Governments

San Diego Association of SAN64 Eastbrook to Shell Double Track $10,920 $10,526 ($394) ‐4% ↓ FRA‐PRIIA Governments

San Diego Association of Grouped Projects for Rehabilitation or Reconstruction of Track SAN66 $162,319 $162,319 $0 0% ↓ TransNet‐MC; ↑ FTA 5307; ↓ Prop 1A ‐ High Speed Rail; ↓ Prop 1B ‐ SLPP Governments Structures, Track, and Trackbed ‐ Blue Line Corridor

San Diego Association of SAN73 San Elijo Lagoon Double Track $79,692 $79,351 ($341) 0% ↓ TransNet‐MC Governments

San Diego Association of SAN78 Mid‐City Rapid Bus $44,478 $44,526 $48 0% ↑ TransNet‐MC Governments

San Diego Association of SAN80 TransNet Major Transit Corridor Operations $124,519 $120,094 ($4,426) ‐4% ↓ TransNet‐BRT/Rail Ops Governments

8 Table 1 - Summary of Changes Report ($000) LEGEND: Amendment No. 5 ↑ Increase Total Total ↓ Reduce Percent Project ID Lead Agency Project Title Programmed Programmed Cost Difference ↔ Revise Change Description Change Before Revised

San Diego Association of Grouped Projects for Rehabilitation or Reconstruction of Track SAN114 $191,993 $191,995 $2 0% ↑ TransNet‐MC Governments Structures, Track, and Trackbed ‐ Coastal Rail Corridor

San Diego Association of SAN119 Sorrento Valley Double Track $32,989 $32,989 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years Governments

San Diego Association of SAN123 University Town Center (UTC) Transit Center $5,700 $5,700 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years Governments

San Diego Association of SAN129 Downtown Multiuse and Bus Stopover Facility $45,975 $45,975 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years Governments

San Diego Association of SAN131 Mira Mesa Blvd. Bus Rapid Transit Priority Treatments $3,737 $3,971 $234 6% ↑ TransNet‐MC Governments

San Diego Association of SAN132 Elvira to Morena Double Track $193,760 $193,899 $139 0% ↑ TDA Governments

San Diego Association of SAN133 South Bay BRT Maintenance Facility $60,030 $60,030 $0 0% ↔ Revise fund source Governments

San Diego Association of Grouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities ‐ Bayshore SAN147 $38,752 $48,620 $9,868 25% ↑ TransNet‐BPNS; ↔ ATP‐R Governments Bikeway

San Diego Association of Grouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities ‐ Coastal Rail SAN148 $33,905 $34,657 $752 2% ↑TransNet‐BPNS Governments Trail

San Diego Association of SAN153 The Inland Rail Trail $44,084 $45,885 $1,800 4% ↑ TransNet‐BPNS Governments

San Diego Association of Grouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities ‐ San Diego River SAN196 $4,608 $4,856 $248 5% ↑TransNet‐BPNS Governments Trail

San Diego Association of SAN208 Clairemont Mesa Blvd BRT Stations $1,774 $1,774 ($0) 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years Governments

San Diego Association of Grouped Projects for Operating Assistance ‐ FTA Section 5310 SAN213 $2,306 $2,481 $175 8% ↑ FTA 5310 Governments Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities

San Diego Association of SAN224 I‐805/SR 94 Bus on Shoulder Demonstration Project $30,900 $30,900 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years Governments

San Diego Association of Grouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities ‐ North Park/Mid‐ SAN227 $42,358 $43,108 $750 2% ↑TransNet‐BPNS; ↑TDA‐Bicycles Governments City Bikeways

San Diego Association of Grouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities ‐ Uptown SAN228 $29,819 $31,674 $1,855 6% ↑ TransNet‐BPNS Governments Bikeways

9 Table 1 - Summary of Changes Report ($000) LEGEND: Amendment No. 5 ↑ Increase Total Total ↓ Reduce Percent Project ID Lead Agency Project Title Programmed Programmed Cost Difference ↔ Revise Change Description Change Before Revised

County of San Diego

CNTY24 San Diego County Cole Grade Road $29,777 $26,381 ($3,396) ‐11% ↓ TransNet‐LSI Carry Over

CNTY34 San Diego County Dye Road Extension $2,792 $2,782 ($10) 0% ↓ TransNet‐LSI

CNTY35 San Diego County Ramona Street Extension $1,772 $1,757 ($15) ‐1% ↓ TransNet‐LSI

CNTY84 San Diego County Stage Coach Lane / Reche Road Intersection Improvements $2,006 $1,446 ($560) ‐28% ↓ TransNet‐LSI Carry Over

CNTY86 San Diego County Roadway Maintenance and Overlay $42,980 $42,980 $0 0% ↔ Revise funding between phases

CNTY88 San Diego County Ashwood Street Corridor Improvements (Mapleview to Willow) $23,773 $21,366 ($2,407) ‐10% ↓ TransNet‐LSI

CNTY89 San Diego County East Vista Way At Gopher Canyon Intersection Improvements $1,918 $1,870 ($48) ‐3% ↓ TransNet‐LSI Carry Over; ↑ Local RTCIP funds

↑ TransNet‐LSI; ↓ TransNet‐LSI Carry Over; construcon funds which were CNTY90 San Diego County Camino Del Rey Drainage Improvements $4,443 $7,275 $2,832 64% outside of the current period were moved in to fully fund construction

City of San Diego

SD208 San Diego, City of Juan Street Reconstruction $7,208 $7,133 ($75) ‐1% ↓ TransNet‐LSI Carry Over

SD209 San Diego, City of Torrey Pines Road Slope Restoration $3,847 $4,251 $405 11% ↓ TransNet‐LSI Carry Over; ↑ Local RTCIP funds

SD235 San Diego, City of Torrey Pines Road Improvement Phase 2 $1,600 $1,850 $250 16% + TransNet‐LSI (Cash); ↑ TransNet ‐LSI Carry Over

City of Santee

SNT04 Santee, City of Pavement Repair and Rehabilitation $26,035 $26,403 $368 1% ↓TransNet‐LSI; ↑ Local Funds

SNT20 Santee, City of Regional Arterial Management System $67 $74 $7 11% ↑ TransNet‐LSI

SNT22 Santee, City of Pavement Roadway Maintenance $5,066 $5,973 $907 18% ↓TransNet‐LSI; ↑ Local Funds

10 Table 1 - Summary of Changes Report ($000) LEGEND: Amendment No. 5 ↑ Increase Total Total ↓ Reduce Percent Project ID Lead Agency Project Title Programmed Programmed Cost Difference ↔ Revise Change Description Change Before Revised

↑ Local RTCIP; ↑ Local Funds ; Project costs increased due to delay in design SNT26 Santee, City of SR‐67 Improvements/Woodside Avenue Interchange Improvements $2,914 $4,065 $1,151 40% approval

SNT28 Santee, City of Pavement Condition Report $70 $70 $0 0% ↔ TransNet ‐LSI between fiscal years

Various Agencies TransNet ‐LEMP added for regional land management and biological V08 Various Agencies Regional Habitat Conservation Fund $44,520 $57,960 $13,440 30% monitoring, per MOA aopted by BOD on 2‐22‐2019; ↓↔ TransNet ‐REMP; SANDAG FY20 Budget

V10 Various Agencies Grouped Projects for TransNet Smart Growth Incentive Program $66,303 $66,346 $43 0% ↑ TransNet ‐LSI; ↓ Local funds

V11 Various Agencies State Route 11 $681,747 $681,747 $0 0% ↔ TransNet ‐MC and TransNet ‐Border between fiscal years

↑ TransNet ‐BPNS; SANDAG FY20 Budget ‐ funds construction of Central Avenue V12 Various Agencies Grouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities. $21,482 $39,835 $18,353 85% Bikeway (SAN204) and Pershing Bikeway (SAN205)

Grouped Projects for Bicycle and pedestrian facilities ‐ Active ↑ TransNet ‐BPNS; +TransNet ‐CP; ↑ Local Funds; CP added for Imperial Beach V14 Various Agencies $49,783 $54,657 $4,874 10% Transportation Program (ATP) Blvd Safe Routes to School (IB18)

V15 Various Agencies I‐5/Gilman Drive Bridge $24,607 $24,607 ($0) 0% ↔ TransNet ‐MC between fiscal years

V18 Various Agencies I‐5/Voigt Drive Improvements $29,380 $29,380 $0 0% ↔ TransNet ‐MC between fiscal years and phases

11 Table 1 - Summary of Changes Report ($000) LEGEND: Amendment No. 5 ↑ Increase Total Total ↓ Reduce Percent Project ID Lead Agency Project Title Programmed Programmed Cost Difference ↔ Revise Change Description Change Before Revised

Additional explanation is provided for those projects that have a change of more than $10M or 40% based on the federal guidelines that determine what consists of a minor change and is considered an administrative modification.

Abbreviation Fund Type ATP‐R Active Transportation Program ‐ Regional ATP‐S Active Transportation Program ‐ Statewide CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality FRA PRIAA Federal Railroad Administration ‐ Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act FTA 5310 Federal Transit Administration Elderly & Disabled Program FTA 5309 NS Federal Transit Administration Capital Investment Grants New Starts HIP Highway Infrastructure Program Local Funds Funds available from other sources such as developer fees, fare revenue or general fund Local Funds‐Toll Funds Funds provided by SR 125 Tolls Prop 1A High‐ Speed Rail Act (2008) Prop 1B California Bond Programs RSTP Regional Surface Transportation Block Grant RTCIP Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program SHOPP (AC) State Highway Operation and Protection Program Advanced Construction TDA Transportation Development Act TDA ‐ Bike Transportation Development Act for Bicycles TransNet ‐ Border Prop A Extension ‐ Border TransNet ‐ BPNS Prop A Extension ‐ Bicycle, Pedestrian and Neighborhood Safety Program TransNet ‐ BRT/Rail Ops Prop A Extension ‐ Bus Rapid Tranist and Rail Operations TransNet ‐ CP Prop A Extension ‐ Commercial Paper TransNet ‐ LEMP Prop A Extension ‐ Local Environmental Mitigation Program TransNet ‐ LSI Prop A Extension ‐ Local System Improvements TransNet ‐ MC Prop A Extension ‐ Major Corridors TransNet ‐ REMP Prop A Extension ‐ Regional Environmental Mitigation Program TransNet ‐ SGIP Prop A Extension ‐ Smart Growth Incentive Program TransNet ‐ SS Prop A Extension ‐ Senior Services

12 Attachment 3 Table 2 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Caltrans MPO ID: CAL09 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Interstate 5 - HOV/Managed Lanes EA NO: 235800 PPNO: 0615CDE, 0615 Project Description: Interstate 5 - construct High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV)/Managed Lanes RTP PG NO: A-16, B-30 on I-5; construct Phase 1: Construct HOV from Lomas Santa Fe to SANDAG ID: 1200511, Birmingham and replace San Elijo Bridge; Construct Phase 2: construct 1200501, 1200504, 1200510, HOV lanes from Birmingham to SR78; Construct Phase 3: Soundwalls 1200509 on private property from Manchester to SR-78. Toll Credits will be used to match federal funds for the PE phase, ROW phase and the CON phase Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years, Revise funding between phases RT:5 Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $953,266 Open to Traffic: Phase 1: Sep 2020 Phase 2: Sep 2024 Phase 3: Sep 2024

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $168,842 $154,195 $3,724 $2,721 $6,000 $1,202 $1,000 $122,612 $36,718 $9,512 TransNet - MC AC $0 $5,642 $37,824 $(14,580) $(22,182) $(6,704) CBI $416 $416 $416 CMAQ $138,725 $113,584 $25,142 $26,021 $8,800 $103,904 CMAQ - Conversion $43,467 $14,580 $22,182 $6,704 $2,050 $41,417 Earmark Repurposing $1,220 $1,220 $1,220 IM $3,886 $3,886 $3,886 Other Fed - HIP $19,610 $19,610 $19,610 RSTP $104,620 $66,694 $33,426 $4,500 $48,169 $10,118 $46,333 STP $751 $751 $751 SB1 - CCP $195,000 $195,000 $195,000 STIP-RIP AC $229,084 $68,943 $71,078 $89,063 $9,561 $219,523 STIP-RIP State Cash $628 $628 $628 TOTAL $906,249 $415,959 $289,584 $103,441 $6,000 $1,202 $90,063 $215,314 $55,636 $635,299 * $5.324M programmed in CAL46A; $299K provided outside of the RTIP; $12.035M programmed in CAL443; $22.616M programmed in CAL468; Demo IDs CA653, CA676 repurposed to FHWA transfer number CAT 16-070 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-03 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $169,972 $154,195 $4,568 $5,023 $6,186 $122,608 $36,718 $10,646 TransNet - MC AC $0 $5,642 $73,138 $(22,633) $(24,870) $(24,589) $(6,688) CBI $416 $416 $416 CMAQ $117,973 $113,584 $4,390 $23,515 $8,800 $85,658 CMAQ - Conversion $62,789 $6,642 $24,870 $24,589 $6,688 $2,050 $4,012 $56,727 Earmark Repurposing $1,520 $1,220 $300 $1,220 $300 IM $3,886 $3,886 $3,886 Other Fed - HIP $8,118 $8,118 $8,118 RSTP $100,120 $66,694 $33,426 $50,674 $6,106 $43,340 RSTP - AC Conversion $15,992 $15,992 $15,992 STP $751 $751 $751 SB1 - CCP $195,000 $195,000 $195,000 STIP-RIP AC $229,084 $68,943 $71,078 $89,063 $9,561 $219,523 STIP-RIP State Cash $628 $628 $628 TOTAL $906,249 $415,959 $314,072 $71,079 $4,568 $5,023 $95,549 $215,309 $55,636 $635,304

Page 1 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

13 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Caltrans MPO ID: CAL09A RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: I-5 Lomas Santa Fe Interchange/HOV lanes EA NO: 07760, 2358U, 2T177 PPNO: 0701 Project Description: I-5 from Via De La Valle to San Elijo Lagoon Milepost begins at 35.7 RTP PG NO: A-9, 14, 18, 19, ends at 38.5 (2.8 miles) - construct interchange and High Occupancy 22 Vehicle (HOV) lane SANDAG ID: 1200502

Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years RT:5 Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $67,720 Open to Traffic: Mar 2009

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $21,016 $20,894 $44 $79 $2,832 $94 $18,090 Prop 1B - CMIA $24,500 $24,500 $24,500 TCRP $6,000 $6,000 $6,000 TOTAL $51,516 $51,394 $44 $79 $2,832 $94 $48,590 * State contribution of $16.204M outside of the RTIP in prior years PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $21,016 $21,001 $15 $2,832 $94 $18,090 Prop 1B - CMIA $24,500 $24,500 $24,500 TCRP $6,000 $6,000 $6,000 TOTAL $51,516 $51,501 $15 $2,832 $94 $48,590

MPO ID: CAL09C RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: I-805 Direct Access Ramp and HOV at Carroll Canyon EA NO: 2T040, 2T041 PPNO: 0716 Project Description: I-805 from Carroll Canyon Road to I- 5 Milepost begins at 49.9 ends at RTP PG NO: 51.7 (1.8 miles) - construct Direct Access Ramps (DARs) and HOV A-16,27,B-30,31,34 lanes to Carroll Canyon Road on I-805 and extend Carroll Canyon Road SANDAG ID: 1280505 as a four-lane arterial from Scranton Road to Sorrento Valley Road.

Change Reason: Reduce funding, Revise funding between fiscal years RT:805 Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $95,443 Open to Traffic: Apr 2014

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $32,133 $31,593 $502 $38 $16,606 $2,703 $12,824 Other Fed - ARRA-RSTP $51,817 $51,817 $51,817 TOTAL $83,950 $83,410 $502 $38 $16,606 $2,703 $64,641 * Additional local contribution of $11.491M programmed in SD32 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $32,420 $31,955 $464 $1 $16,615 $2,703 $13,102 Other Fed - ARRA-RSTP $51,817 $51,817 $51,817 TOTAL $84,237 $83,772 $464 $1 $16,615 $2,703 $64,919

Page 2 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

14 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Caltrans MPO ID: CAL18B RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: I-15 Managed Lanes- South Segment and Mira Mesa Transit Center EA NO: 081501 PPNO: 0672G Project Description: In San Diego on I-15 from just south of SR 52 to SR 56 and on SR 163 RTP PG NO: A-9 from SR 52 to I-15. - construct managed lanes, south segment including SANDAG ID: 1201501, Direct Access Ramps and BRT Station: construct auxiliary lane along 1201506, 1201518 northbound I-15 from Pomerado Rd. overcrossing to Carroll Canyon Rd. overcrossing, construct transit center at Miramar College near Hillery Dr. Change Reason: Reduce funding, Revise funding between fiscal years RT:15 Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $396,118 Open to Traffic: Jun 2011

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $80,982 $78,466 $1,909 $607 $36,359 $14,366 $30,257 CMAQ $11,744 $11,744 $11,744 Prop 1B - CMIA $288,972 $288,972 $288,972 STIP-RIP NHS $8,853 $8,853 $8,853 STIP-RIP State Cash $1,147 $1,147 $1,147 Local Funds $4,420 $4,420 $692 $3,728 TOTAL $396,118 $393,602 $1,909 $607 $58,103 $15,058 $322,957 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-03 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $81,217 $78,466 $2,751 $36,535 $14,366 $30,316 CMAQ $11,744 $11,744 $11,744 Prop 1B - CMIA $288,972 $288,972 $288,972 STIP-RIP NHS $8,853 $8,853 $8,853 STIP-RIP State Cash $1,147 $1,147 $1,147 Local Funds $4,420 $4,420 $692 $3,728 TOTAL $396,353 $393,602 $2,751 $58,279 $15,058 $323,016

Page 3 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

15 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Caltrans MPO ID: CAL26 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: State Route 52 Freeway (E&F) EA NO: 010611 PPNO: 0260 Project Description: In San Diego, Santee and Lakeside, from SR 125 to Cuyamaca Street to RTP PG NO: A-5 SR 67 - construct 4 lane freeway SANDAG ID: 1205203 EARMARK NO: CA424/604, HPP 1134/2735

Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years, Revise funding between phases RT:52 Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $460,509 Open to Traffic: Mar 2011

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - H $44,945 $44,945 $671 $44,274 TransNet - MC $66,529 $65,165 $1,021 $343 $14,102 $33,538 $18,889 DEMO $2,234 $2,234 $2,234 HPP $10,409 $10,409 $10,409 RSTP $53,238 $53,238 $22,837 $30,401 TCSP $1,228 $1,228 $1,228 STIP-IIP NHS $3,010 $3,010 $2,125 $885 STIP-IIP State Cash $5,355 $5,355 $4,732 $623 STIP-RIP NHS $26,558 $26,558 $5,848 $20,710 STIP-RIP Prior NHS $16,375 $16,375 $16,375 STIP-RIP Prior State Cash $802 $802 $802 STIP-RIP State Cash $177,501 $177,501 $10,825 $19,274 $147,402 TCRP $43,700 $43,700 $43,700 Local Funds $233 $233 $233 TOTAL $452,117 $450,753 $1,021 $343 $38,303 $206,713 $207,101 * State contributed $8.392M in additional funds outside of the RTIP PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - H $44,945 $44,945 $671 $44,274 TransNet - MC $66,529 $66,186 $5 $338 $13,999 $32,271 $20,259 DEMO $2,234 $2,234 $2,234 HPP $10,409 $10,409 $10,409 RSTP $53,238 $53,238 $22,837 $30,401 TCSP $1,228 $1,228 $1,228 STIP-IIP NHS $3,010 $3,010 $2,125 $885 STIP-IIP State Cash $5,355 $5,355 $4,732 $623 STIP-RIP NHS $26,558 $26,558 $5,848 $20,710 STIP-RIP Prior NHS $16,375 $16,375 $16,375 STIP-RIP Prior State Cash $802 $802 $802 STIP-RIP State Cash $177,501 $177,501 $10,825 $19,274 $147,402 TCRP $43,700 $43,700 $43,700 Local Funds $233 $233 $233 TOTAL $452,117 $451,774 $5 $338 $38,200$205,446 $208,471

Page 4 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

16 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Caltrans MPO ID: CAL29 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: SR 76 Middle EA NO: 08010, 08017 PPNO: 0759 Project Description: SR 76 from Melrose Dr. to So. Mission Rd. Milepost begins at 7.5 ends RTP PG NO: A-9 at 12.5 (4.8 miles) - in San Diego County in and near Oceanside - widen SANDAG ID: 1207602 from 2 to 4 lanes EARMARK NO: CA603/2719

Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years RT:76 Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $165,244 Open to Traffic: Nov 2012

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - H $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 TransNet - MC $48,807 $46,361 $1,878 $568 $9,772 $30,189 $8,846 TransNet - REMP $6,146 $6,146 $6,146 DEMO - TEA 21 $5,519 $5,519 $2,680 $2,839 HPP $4,006 $4,006 $4,006 Other Fed - ARRA-RSTP $76,613 $76,613 $76,613 RSTP $6,314 $6,314 $6,314 STP $949 $949 $949 Local Funds $1,513 $1,513 $1,513 TOTAL $152,867 $150,421 $1,878 $568 $17,035 $36,875 $98,957 * State contribution of $13.452M outside of RTIP PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-01 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - H $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 TransNet - MC $48,807 $47,920 $887 $9,772 $30,189 $8,846 TransNet - REMP $6,146 $6,146 $6,146 DEMO - TEA 21 $5,519 $5,519 $2,680 $2,839 HPP $4,006 $4,006 $4,006 Other Fed - ARRA-RSTP $76,613 $76,613 $76,613 RSTP $6,314 $6,314 $6,314 STP $949 $949 $949 Local Funds $1,513 $1,513 $1,513 TOTAL $152,867 $151,980 $887 $17,035 $36,875 $98,957

Page 5 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

17 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Caltrans MPO ID: CAL29B RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: SR 76 East EA NO: 25715 RTP PG NO: B-32 Project Description: SR 76 from Mission Rd. to I-15 Milepost begins at 5 ends at 9.77 (4.77 SANDAG ID: 1207606 miles) - In and near Oceanside from Mission Rd to I-15, widen from 2 to 4 lanes. Toll Credits will be used to match federal funds for the CON phase Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years, Revise funding between phases RT:76 Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $202,499 Open to Traffic: Phase 1: Aug 2013 Phase 2: May 2017

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - H $12,139 $12,139 $12,139 TransNet - MC $34,057 $33,028 $148 $60 $634 $125 $62 $11,487 $17,590 $4,980 TransNet - MC AC $0 $15,178 $4,760 $(19,938) TransNet - REMP $8,133 $8,133 $8,133 RSTP $93,686 $90,436 $3,250 $7,436 $86,250 TPFP $300 $300 $300 Prop 1B - CMIA $27,387 $27,387 $27,387 Local Funds $26,797 $6,859 $19,938 $3,264 $7,962 $15,571 TOTAL $202,499 $193,460 $8,158 $60 $634 $125 $62 $34,326 $25,552 $142,621 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-01 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - H $12,139 $12,139 $12,139 TransNet - MC $34,057 $32,930 $771 $63 $144 $48 $101 $11,818 $16,170 $6,069 TransNet - MC AC $0 $16,294 $3,644 $(19,938) TransNet - REMP $8,133 $8,133 $8,133 RSTP $93,686 $90,436 $3,250 $7,436 $86,250 TPFP $300 $300 $300 Prop 1B - CMIA $27,387 $27,387 $27,387 Local Funds $26,797 $6,859 $19,938 $3,024 $8,802 $14,971 TOTAL $202,499 $194,478 $7,665 $63 $144 $48 $101 $34,417 $24,972 $143,110

Page 6 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

18 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Caltrans MPO ID: CAL38 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: SR-905 New Freeway EA NO: 093160, 28880 PPNO: 0374K Project Description: SR 905 from I-805 to Otay Mesa Port of Entry - construct 6-lane freeway RTP PG NO: A-6 (Phase 1). Toll Credits will be used to match federal funds for the CON SANDAG ID: 1390501 phase EARMARK NO: CA281, CA297, CA612, HPP 2813

Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years RT:905 Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $419,916 Open to Traffic: Aug 2012

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - Border $1,582 $1,282 $300 $4 $195 $1,383 CBI $105,342 $105,342 $105,342 DEMO - Sec 115 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 DEMO - TEA 21 $40,485 $40,485 $40,485 HPP $5,836 $5,836 $499 $5,337 Other Fed - ARRA-STP $73,931 $73,931 $73,931 STP $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 STP - Sec 117 $1,067 $1,067 $1,067 STIP-IIP Interstate $100,666 $100,666 $12,944 $28,087 $59,635 STIP-IIP Prior NHS $6,406 $6,406 $1,976 $4 $4,426 STIP-IIP Prior State Cash $12,966 $12,966 $7,000 $5,966 STIP-IIP State Cash $23,296 $23,296 $1,933 $9,176 $12,187 STIP-RIP Interstate $20,974 $20,974 $11,912 $9,062 TCRP $23,365 $23,365 $23,365 TOTAL $419,916 $419,616 $300 $24,356 $228,532 $167,028 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-30 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - Border $1,582 $1,582 $1,582 CBI $105,342 $105,342 $105,342 DEMO - Sec 115 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 DEMO - TEA 21 $40,485 $40,485 $40,485 HPP $5,836 $5,836 $499 $5,337 Other Fed - ARRA-STP $73,931 $73,931 $73,931 STP $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 STP - Sec 117 $1,067 $1,067 $1,067 STIP-IIP Interstate $100,666 $100,666 $12,944 $28,087 $59,635 STIP-IIP Prior NHS $6,406 $6,406 $1,976 $4 $4,426 STIP-IIP Prior State Cash $12,966 $12,966 $7,000 $5,966 STIP-IIP State Cash $23,296 $23,296 $1,933 $9,176 $12,187 STIP-RIP Interstate $20,974 $20,974 $11,912 $9,062 TCRP $23,365 $23,365 $23,365 TOTAL $419,916 $419,916 $24,352 $228,337 $167,227

Page 7 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

19 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Caltrans MPO ID: CAL44 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Grouped Projects for Bridge Rehabilitation and Reconstruction - Highway Bridge Program

Project Description: Countywide - projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 2 categories - widen narrow pavements or reconstructing bridges (no additional travel lanes) Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Non capacity widening or bridge reconstruction Est Total Cost: $202,718

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON HBP $193,319 $37,741 $19,911 $2,513 $1,789 $8,294 $123,071 $193,319 Prop 1B - LBSRA $1,319 $1,319 $1,319 Local Funds $8,080 $2,018 $146 $37 $232 $337 $5,311 $8,080 Local Funds AC $0 $17,260 $(17,260) TOTAL $202,718 $57,019 $2,797 $2,550 $2,021 $8,631 $129,701 $202,718 * Local Funds are programmed separately for Cities of Carlsbad, Del Mar, San Diego and San Marcos PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-01 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON HBP $193,319 $37,741 $20,241 $5,289 $15,418 $114,630 $193,319 Prop 1B - LBSRA $1,319 $1,319 $1,319 Local Funds $8,080 $2,018 $146 $397 $1,302 $4,217 $8,080 Local Funds AC $0 $17,260 $(17,260) TOTAL $202,718 $57,019 $3,127 $5,686 $16,720 $120,166 $202,718

MPO ID: CAL46B RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements - SHOPP Collision Reduction (CR) Program

Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Railroad/highway crossing, Safer non-Federal-aid system roads, Shoulder improvements, traffic control devices and operating assistance other than signalization projects, Intersection signalization projects at individual intersections, Pavement marking demonstration, Truck climbing lanes outside the urbanized area, Lighting improvements, Emergency truck pullovers Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Hazard elimination program Est Total Cost: $104,634

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON SHOPP - CR - NHS (AC) $78,907 $6,696 $25,944 $12,593 $28,894 $4,780 $78,907 SHOPP - CR - STP (AC) $25,727 $1,493 $2,612 $6,494 $15,128 $25,727 TOTAL $104,634 $8,189 $28,556 $19,087 $44,022 $4,780 $104,634 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-01 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON SHOPP - CR - NHS (AC) $80,039 $6,696 $25,944 $13,725 $28,894 $4,780 $80,039 SHOPP - CR - STP (AC) $26,278 $1,493 $2,612 $7,045 $15,128 $26,278 TOTAL $106,317 $8,189 $28,556 $20,770 $44,022 $4,780 $106,317

Page 8 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

20 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Caltrans MPO ID: CAL46C RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Grouped Projects for Shoulder Improvements - SHOPP Roadside Preservation Program

Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 2 categories - fencing, safety roadside rest area Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Shoulder Improvements Est Total Cost: $32,915

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON SHOPP (AC)-Rdside Preserv NHS $32,915 $995 $3,656 $28,264 $32,915 TOTAL $32,915 $995 $3,656 $28,264 $32,915 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON SHOPP (AC)-Rdside Preserv NHS $33,339 $1,299 $3,776 $28,264 $33,339 TOTAL $33,339 $1,299 $3,776 $28,264 $33,339

MPO ID: CAL46E RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Grouped Projects for Pavement Resurfacing and/or Rehabilitation - SHOPP Roadway Preservation Program

Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 2 categories – pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation, emergency relief (23 USC 125), widening narrow pavements or reconstructing bridges (no additional travel lanes) Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $450,829

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON SHOPP (AC)-Rdway Presrv NHS $450,829 $8,925 $21,059 $85,724 $110,186 $224,935 $450,829 TOTAL $450,829 $8,925 $21,059 $85,724 $110,186 $224,935 $450,829 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-01 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON SHOPP (AC)-Rdway Presrv NHS $448,764 $8,925 $21,059 $83,659 $110,186 $224,935 $448,764 TOTAL $448,764 $8,925 $21,059 $83,659 $110,186 $224,935 $448,764

Page 9 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

21 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Caltrans MPO ID: CAL46I RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements - SHOPP Mandates Program Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Parts 93.126 and 93.127 Exempt Tables 2 and 3 categories -railroad/highway crossing, safer non-federal-aid system roads, shoulder improvements, traffic control devices and operating assistance other than signalization projects, intersection signalization projects at individual intersections, pavement marking demonstration, truck climbing lanes outside the urbanized area, lighting improvements, emergency truck pullovers, hazard elimination program Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Safety Improvement Program Est Total Cost: $51,197

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON SHOPP (AC)-Mandates $51,197 $2,099 $16,730 $17,366 $9,063 $5,939 $51,197 TOTAL $51,197 $2,099 $16,730 $17,366 $9,063 $5,939 $51,197 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON SHOPP (AC)-Mandates $45,669 $2,099 $16,630 $11,938 $9,063 $5,939 $45,669 TOTAL $45,669 $2,099 $16,630 $11,938 $9,063 $5,939 $45,669

MPO ID: CAL67 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: State Route 94 Corridor Improvements EA NO: 28710 PPNO: T0770 Project Description: In San Diego on SR 94 between I-805 and Downtown - Engineering study RTP PG NO: A-5,A-16,B-30 for various corridor improvements to include Managed Lanes(ML)/Bus SANDAG ID: 1280508 Rapid Transit(BRT) lanes and connectors between SR 94 and I-805; future phases are outside of RTIP cycle, but included in the long range Regional Plan Change Reason: Reduce funding, Revise funding between fiscal years RT:94 Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Engineering studies Est Total Cost: $22,100

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $12,100 $11,301 $2 $4 $793 $12,100 TCRP $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 TOTAL $22,100 $21,301 $2 $4 $793 $22,100 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $12,600 $11,297 $3 $1,300 $12,600 TCRP $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 TOTAL $22,600 $21,297 $3 $1,300 $22,600

Page 10 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

22 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Caltrans MPO ID: CAL75 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: I-5 Genesee Interchange and Widening EA NO: 0223U, 06500 PPNO: 0129P Project Description: Interchange on I-5 at Genesee Avenue and Sorrento Valley Road - RTP PG NO: A-28,B-39 reconstruct I-5 Genesee Bridge and interchange including ramps, SANDAG ID: 1200506 retaining walls; add type 1 bicycle facility between Voigt Drive and EARMARK NO: 3086 Sorrento Valley Road. Toll Credits will be used to match federal funds for the CON phase Change Reason: Increase funding, Revise funding between fiscal years RT:5 Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $119,154 Open to Traffic: Jun 2018

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $19,672 $14,959 $2,460 $1,798 $442 $6 $7 $1,252 $7,270 $11,150 HPP $1,600 $1,600 $1,600 RSTP $51,284 $47,643 $3,641 $51,284 Prop 1B - SLPP $8,000 $8,000 $8,000 SHOPP (AC)-Mobility $12,987 $12,987 $2,467 $500 $10,020 Local Funds $10,198 $10,198 $10 $1,688 $8,500 TOTAL $103,741 $95,387 $6,101 $1,798 $442 $6 $7 $3,729 $9,458 $90,554 * $14.4M of City of San Diego contribution programmed under SD103; additional state funds of $1.013M outside the RTIP PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $18,255 $15,910 $1,617 $711 $6 $5 $6 $1,304 $6,233 $10,718 HPP $1,600 $1,600 $1,600 RSTP $51,284 $47,643 $3,641 $51,284 Prop 1B - SLPP $8,000 $8,000 $8,000 SHOPP (AC)-Mobility $12,987 $12,987 $2,467 $500 $10,020 Local Funds $10,198 $10,198 $10 $1,688 $8,500 TOTAL $102,324 $96,338 $5,258 $711 $6 $5 $6 $3,781 $8,421 $90,122

Page 11 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

23 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Caltrans MPO ID: CAL78B RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: I-805 HOV/Managed Lanes - North EA NO: 08163, 2T200,2T330 PPNO: 0732 Project Description: On I-805 from the I-805/SR 52 to Sorrento Valley on SR 52 at the RTP PG NO: B-30 I-805/SR 52 separation - preliminary engineering for construction of SANDAG ID: 1280503, managed lanes; design and construct Phase 1 - one High Occupancy 1280511 Vehicle (HOV) lane in the median in each direction including the south facing Direct Access Ramps at Carroll Canyon Rd. Phase 1 Post Miles 23.7-27.6 Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years RT:805 Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $126,572 Open to Traffic: Sep 2016

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $20,931 $12,604 $5,178 $324 $306 $303 $2,216 $11,757 $515 $8,659 CMAQ $61,870 $61,870 $1,000 $60,870 RSTP $1,775 $1,775 $1,775 Prop 1B - CMIA $40,638 $40,638 $40,638 Prop 1B - SLPP $1,358 $1,358 $1,358 TOTAL $126,572 $118,245 $5,178 $324 $306 $303 $2,216 $14,532 $515 $111,525 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-03 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $20,931 $12,604 $5,449 $300 $300 $300 $1,978 $11,757 $515 $8,659 CMAQ $61,870 $61,870 $1,000 $60,870 RSTP $1,775 $1,775 $1,775 Prop 1B - CMIA $40,638 $40,638 $40,638 Prop 1B - SLPP $1,358 $1,358 $1,358 TOTAL $126,572 $118,245 $5,449 $300 $300 $300 $1,978 $14,532 $515 $111,525

Page 12 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

24 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Caltrans MPO ID: CAL78C RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: I-805 HOV/Managed Lanes - South EA NO: 08161 PPNO: 0730A-B Project Description: I-805 Freeway - environmental document for I-805 widening in San Diego, RTP PG NO: A-16,B-30,B-31 Chula Vista, and National City from Palomar Street to State Route 94; SANDAG ID: 1280501, design and construct 2 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes in the 1280514, 1280510 median of I-805 including a Direct Access Ramp (DAR) and a transit station at Palomar Street; design and construct one auxiliary lane on northbound I-805 from Grove Street to 16th Street in National City; design and construct one auxiliary lane on southbound I-805 from 20th Street to Plaza Boulevard in National City; design one HOV lane in each direction from Hilltop Drive to Landis Street and a direct HOV connector from I-805 to I-15.... Change Reason: Add new funding source, Increase funding RT:805 Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $226,615 Open to Traffic: Phase 1: Feb 2016 Phase 2: Jan 2017

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $158,512 $141,200 $13,996 $3,158 $103 $19 $36 $56,842 $8,515 $93,155 TransNet - Transit $42 $42 $42 IM $975 $975 $975 RSTP $9,661 $9,661 $9,661 Prop 1B - CMIA $56,763 $56,763 $56,763 SHOPP (AC)-Misc $82 $82 $82 Local Funds $580 $348 $232 $180 $400 TOTAL $226,615 $208,989 $14,310 $3,158 $103 $19 $36 $67,700 $8,597 $150,318 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-01 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $158,512 $141,200 $14,145 $2,686 $477 $2 $2 $56,842 $8,515 $93,155 TransNet - Transit $42 $42 $42 IM $975 $975 $975 RSTP $9,661 $9,661 $9,661 Prop 1B - CMIA $56,763 $56,763 $56,763 Local Funds $580 $348 $232 $180 $400 TOTAL $226,533 $208,989 $14,377 $2,686 $477 $2 $2 $67,700 $8,515 $150,318

Page 13 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

25 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Caltrans MPO ID: CAL78D RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: I-805 South Soundwalls - Unit 1 EA NO: 2T260, 43018 SANDAG ID: 1280515 Project Description: From Naples Street to I- 805/SR 54 Separation - construct soundwalls; preliminary engineering and right of way for Sweetwater River Bridge upgrade.. Toll Credits will be used to match federal funds for the PE phase, ROW phase, and the CON phase Change Reason: Increase funding, Revise funding between fiscal years RT:805 Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Noise attenuation Est Total Cost: $39,244

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $7,942 $3,184 $1,701 $2,303 $459 $182 $113 $3,845 $249 $3,848 RSTP $31,302 $29,029 $2,273 $12,611 $2,402 $16,289 TOTAL $39,244 $32,213 $3,974 $2,303 $459 $182 $113 $16,456 $2,651 $20,137 * $72k of SHOPP contribution programmed under CAL371; Construction of Sweetwater River Bridge programmed under CAL484 in grouped listing CAL46D PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-01 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $7,527 $3,184 $3,012 $892 $259 $107 $73 $3,779 $249 $3,499 TransNet - MC AC $0 $2,273 $(2,273) RSTP $29,029 $29,029 $12,611 $2,402 $14,016 RSTP - AC Conversion $2,273 $2,273 $2,273 TOTAL $38,829 $32,213 $5,285 $892 $259 $107 $73 $16,390 $2,651 $19,788

Page 14 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

26 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Caltrans MPO ID: CAL114 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: I-5/SR 56 Interchange EA NO: 17790 RTP PG NO: Project Description: At I-5/SR 56 interchange - in San Diego, construct freeway to freeway A-7,19,33,39,40,B-33 interchange, associated operational improvements, and the relocation of SANDAG ID: 1200503, the fiber optic cable line; future phases are outside of TIP cycle but 1200513 included in the long range plan. Phase I: To construct one additional auxiliary lane in the east and westbound directions on SR-56 from El Camino Real to Carmel Country Rd. Phase II: Construct the west to north connector, extend the NB I-5 local bypass, and reconstruct the Del Mar Heights O.C. Phase III - Construct the south to east connector, extend the SB I-5 local bypass, and construct the Carmel Creek Dr. slip ramp Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years RT:5 Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $17,958 Open to Traffic: Phase 1: Jan 2026 Phase 2: Jan 2035 Phase 3: Jan 2035

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $1,854 $502 $130 $520 $440 $262 $1,854 CBI $1,942 $1,942 $1,942 DEMO - Sec 115 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 DEMO - TEA 21 $375 $375 $375 HPP $4,529 $4,529 $4,529 IM $1,927 $1,927 $1,927 STP $2,952 $2,952 $2,952 STP - Sec 112 $396 $396 $396 Local Funds $909 $909 $909 TOTAL $15,884 $14,532 $130 $520 $440 $262 $15,884 * State contributed $2.073M in additional funds outside of the RTIP PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $1,854 $613 $482 $472 $287 $1,854 CBI $1,942 $1,942 $1,942 DEMO - Sec 115 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 DEMO - TEA 21 $375 $375 $375 HPP $4,529 $4,529 $4,529 IM $1,927 $1,927 $1,927 STP $2,952 $2,952 $2,952 STP - Sec 112 $396 $396 $396 Local Funds $909 $909 $909 TOTAL $15,884 $14,643 $482 $472 $287 $15,884

Page 15 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

27 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Caltrans MPO ID: CAL277 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: I-15/SR-78 HOV Connectors EA NO: 2T240 RTP PG NO: A-19 Project Description: SR-78 from Post Mile 15.49 to R16.6 and on I-15 from Post Mile R30.63 SANDAG ID: 1207802 to R31.56 - preliminary engineering for northbound I-15 to westbound SR-78 and eastbound SR-78 to southbound I-15 HOV connectors and operational improvements Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years RT:15 Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Engineering studies Est Total Cost: $340,000

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $937 $816 $5 $64 $44 $8 $937 STIP-RIP AC $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 TOTAL $7,937 $816 $7,005 $64 $44 $8 $7,937 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $937 $816 $46 $55 $20 $937 STIP-RIP AC $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 TOTAL $7,937 $816 $7,046 $55 $20 $7,937

MPO ID: CAL325A RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: State Routes 905/125/11 Southbound Connectors. EA NO: 28882 RTP PG NO: A-7,B-33 Project Description: Southbound SR 125 to southbound SR 905 and southbound SR 125 to SANDAG ID: 1390505 eastbound SR 11 - in San Diego County, in and near San Diego at Route 905/125/11 separation, construct southbound connectors from State Route 125 to SR 905 and SR 11 Change Reason: Increase funding RT:905 Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $73,947 Open to Traffic: May 2021

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON SHOPP Augmentation - Mobility $49,747 $49,747 $49,747 Loc Funds - Toll Funds $24,200 $7,162 $600 $7,818 $7,448 $887 $285 $7,385 $115 $16,700 TOTAL $73,947 $56,909 $600 $7,818 $7,448 $887 $285 $7,385 $115 $66,447 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON SHOPP Augmentation - Mobility $49,747 $49,747 $49,747 Loc Funds - Toll Funds $19,200 $7,162 $1,389 $7,231 $3,017 $400 $1 $7,385 $115 $11,700 TOTAL $68,947 $56,909 $1,389 $7,231 $3,017 $400 $1 $7,385 $115 $61,447

Page 16 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

28 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Caltrans MPO ID: CAL398A RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: La Jolla Village Drive to Genesee Avenue Auxiliary Lane EA NO: 2T215 PPNO: 1136 Project Description: I-5 from La Jolla Village Drive to Genesee Avenue Milepost begins at RTP PG NO: 28.6 ends at 29.3 (.7 miles) - in the city of San Diego construct a A-5,16,31,38,B-30 one-half mile southbound auxiliary lane SANDAG ID: 1200512

Change Reason: Other, Revise footnote RT:5 Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $6,750 Open to Traffic: Jul 2021

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON SHOPP (AC)-Mobility $6,750 $1,000 $5,750 $1,000 $5,750 TOTAL $6,750 $1,000 $5,750 $1,000 $5,750 * Environmental Clearance completed under I-5/Genesee project (CAL75); additional $499K of state funds outside of the RTIP PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON SHOPP (AC)-Mobility $6,750 $1,000 $5,750 $1,000 $5,750 TOTAL $6,750 $1,000 $5,750 $1,000 $5,750

MPO ID: CAL502 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: I-805 North Construct Operational Improvements EA NO: 43039 PPNO: 1285 Project Description: I-805 from Just South of Governor Drive to Just North of Governor Drive SANDAG ID: 1280516 Milepost begins at 24 ends at 25 (1 miles) - along I-805 from SR-52 to Nobel Drive. Construct one northbound (.5 miles) and one southbound (.4 miles) auxiliary lane Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years RT:805 Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Hazard elimination program Est Total Cost: $4,242

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $42 $32 $10 $42 STIP-RIP AC $4,200 $4,200 $4,200 TOTAL $4,242 $4,200 $32 $10 $4,242 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $42 $25 $15 $2 $42 STIP-RIP AC $4,200 $4,200 $4,200 TOTAL $4,242 $4,225 $15 $2 $4,242

Page 17 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

29 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Coronado, City of MPO ID: COR04 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Street and Road Preventive Maintenance; Minor Drainage Repair TransNet - LSI: Maint Project Description: Acacia Way (Coronado Ave-Cabrillo Ave); Alder St. (Coronado Ave-10th St); Balboa Ave. (6th St.-Acacia Way); Carob Way (Cabrillo Ave. -Coronado Ave.); Pine Ct. (Pine St. - End); 10th St. (Pine St.-Alameda Blvd.); Strand Way (Pomona-442 Fts/Tulagi Rd.); Marina Ave. (Alameda Blvd.-Ocean Blvd.); Encino Row (10th St.-FAve.): Tolita Ave. (Alameda Blvd.-Isabella Ave.); Alamdea Blvd.(Olive Ave.-Ocean Blvd.); 1st St. (Alameda-Orange) 1st St. (Orange-East End); G Ave. (10th St.-Ocean Blvd.); and Bayshore Bikeway (Leyte-Coronado Blvd.) - In Coronado, citywide annual preventive maintenance program that slurry seals approximately one-seventh of City streets on a rotating basis. Slurry sealing extends the life of the road by protecting it from oxidation and revitalizes old bituminous-wearing surfaces to make slippery surfaces. Pavement markings are also repainted, improving visibility at night and enhancing pedestrian and bicyclist safety Change Reason: Revise Fund Source Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $6,264

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - L $1,581 $1,581 $138 $1,443 TransNet - LSI $206 $206 $36 $170 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $579 $259 $320 $40 $539 Local Funds $3,898 $2,738 $310 $250 $300 $300 $242 $3,656 TOTAL $6,264 $4,784 $320 $310 $250 $300 $300 $456 $5,808 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - L $1,581 $1,581 $138 $1,443 TransNet - LSI $206 $206 $36 $170 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $259 $259 $20 $239 Local Funds $4,218 $2,738 $320 $310 $250 $300 $300 $262 $3,956 TOTAL $6,264 $4,784 $320 $310 $250 $300 $300 $456 $5,808

Page 18 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

30 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Coronado, City of MPO ID: COR07 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Street and Road Major Rehabilitation; Major Drainage; Traffic Operations TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: St. Kitts, Port Royale, Bridgetown Bend, Cajon Place, Country Club, Coronado Avenue - In Coronado, as-needed city wide rehabilitation of roadways including removal and replacement of severely damaged areas, grinding and overlays of 1 1/2". Pavement markings are also repainted, improving visibility at night and enhancing pedestrian and bicyclist safety Change Reason: Revise Fund Source Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $15,819

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - L $1,665 $1,665 $165 $1,500 TransNet - LSI $5,854 $3,293 $132 $583 $606 $609 $630 $1,298 $4,556 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $3,439 $2,615 $500 $70 $70 $90 $93 $339 $3,100 Local Funds $4,861 $2,191 $770 $690 $660 $275 $275 $63 $4,798 TOTAL $15,819 $9,764 $1,402 $1,343 $1,336 $974 $998 $1,865 $13,954 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - L $1,665 $1,665 $165 $1,500 TransNet - LSI $6,677 $3,293 $632 $653 $676 $699 $723 $1,298 $5,379 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $2,616 $2,615 $339 $2,277 Local Funds $4,861 $2,191 $770 $690 $660 $275 $275 $63 $4,798 TOTAL $15,819 $9,764 $1,402 $1,343 $1,336 $974 $998 $1,865 $13,954

Page 19 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

31 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Escondido, City of MPO ID: ESC04 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Citracado Parkway II RTP PG NO: B-37 RAS (M-40) Project Description: Citracado Parkway from West Valley to Andreason (.5 miles) - widen TransNet - LSI: CR from 2 to 4 lanes with raised medians, construct bridge over Escondido Creek Change Reason: Increase funding, Revise Fund Source Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $40,311 Open to Traffic: Dec 2021

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - L $581 $581 $581 TransNet - LSI $1,600 $1,350 $250 $1,600 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $988 $988 $988 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,700 $15 $1,685 $1,700 HUD $908 $908 $908 SB1 - LPP Comp $12,500 $12,500 $12,500 Local Funds $20,351 $17,272 $534 $1,445 $1,100 $5,608 $1,000 $13,743 Local RTCIP $1,683 $953 $730 $1,683 TOTAL $40,311 $20,702 $1,279 $16,980 $1,350 $6,516 $1,581 $32,214 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - L $581 $581 $581 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $988 $988 $988 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,700 $1,700 $1,700 HUD $908 $908 $908 SB1 - LPP Comp $12,500 $12,500 $12,500 Local Funds $17,272 $17,272 $5,608 $1,000 $10,664 Local RTCIP $4,074 $953 $1,264 $1,857 $4,074

TOTAL $38,023 $20,702 $2,964 $14,357 $6,516 $1,581 $29,926

Page 20 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

32 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Escondido, City of MPO ID: ESC06 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: El Norte Parkway Bridge at Escondido Creek RTP PG NO: B-37 RAS (M-40) Project Description: Bridge 57C0356 (1 miles) - construct a two lane bridge and street TransNet - LSI: CR improvements on both sides of bridge to match adjacent street segments. The project includes construction of new medians with landscaping, rehabilitation of existing pavement, and striping upgrades to match the completed alignment. A pedestrian signal will be installed in the vicinity of the bridge to accommodate pedestrians and cyclists using the Escondido Creek Trail. Change Reason: Increase funding, Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $5,652 Open to Traffic: Mar 2020

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - L $2,000 $2,000 $50 $1,950 TransNet - L (Cash) $167 $167 $167 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $808 $808 $808 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $2,021 $2,021 $2,021 Local Funds $656 $406 $250 $656 TOTAL $5,652 $3,381 $2,271 $50 $5,602 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - L $2,000 $2,000 $50 $1,950 TransNet - L (Cash) $167 $167 $167 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $808 $808 $808 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $2,021 $1,872 $149 $2,021 Local Funds $406 $406 $406 TOTAL $5,402 $3,381 $1,872 $149 $50 $5,352

Page 21 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

33 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Escondido, City of MPO ID: ESC08 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Felicita Ave/Juniper Street RTP PG NO: B-38 RAS (M-40) Project Description: Juniper Street between Chestnut Street and Vermont Avenue; Felicita TransNet - LSI: CR Avenue between Juniper Street and Escondido Boulevard - widen from 2 to 4 lanes with left turn pockets; traffic signal modifications at Felicita/Escondido Blvd., pin on curb median on Felicita Avenue, street improvements that will accommodate curb and gutter, sidewalk, street crossings, class II bike lanes, and active transportation education/encouragement activities at Juniper, Oak Hill, and Central Elementary Schools; construction for ATP project only Change Reason: Increase funding, Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $5,201 Open to Traffic: Jul 2022

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - L (Cash) $115 $115 $115 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $300 $300 $21 $279 ATP - R $1,286 $86 $93 $1,107 $179 $1,107 Local Funds $3,500 $3,500 $3,500 TOTAL $5,201 $3,701 $93 $1,407 $200 $3,615 $1,386 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - L (Cash) $115 $115 $115 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $50 $50 $21 $29 ATP - R $1,286 $86 $93 $1,107 $179 $1,107 Local Funds $3,500 $3,500 $3,500 TOTAL $4,951 $3,701 $143 $1,107 $200 $3,615 $1,136

Page 22 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

34 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Escondido, City of MPO ID: ESC24 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Centre City Parkway RTP PG NO: B-38 RAS (M-40) Project Description: Intersection at W. Mission Ave. and Centre City Pkwy - reconfigure TransNet - LSI: CR existing street lane alignment, extend center median, and replace two existing traffic signals to accommodate one additional left turn lane and adjusted lane alignment to eastbound W. Mission Avenue at its intersection with Centre City Parkway Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $2,209 Open to Traffic: Jun 2020

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - L $974 $974 $974 TransNet - L (Cash) $374 $374 $374 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $589 $110 $479 $589 Local Funds $272 $272 $272 TOTAL $2,209 $1,730 $479 $272 $1,937 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - L $974 $974 $974 TransNet - L (Cash) $374 $374 $374 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $589 $110 $279 $200 $589 Local Funds $272 $272 $272 TOTAL $2,209 $1,730 $279 $200 $272 $1,937

Page 23 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

35 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Escondido, City of MPO ID: ESC37 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Pavement Maintenance TransNet - LSI: Maint Project Description: various streets primarily in the maintenance zone of focus, and those classified as Collector and above throughout the city; the city's maintenance zones can be identified in the uploaded Maintenance Zone Map; FY19 - Maintenance Zone SO - this is an annual project that includes maintenance (crackseal, chipseal, slurry, sidewalk repairs) of various street elements citywide Change Reason: Increase funding, Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $32,234

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $8,614 $2,046 $1,677 $1,158 $1,200 $1,244 $1,289 $8,614 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $7 $7 $7 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $3,118 $2,046 $1,072 $3,118 Local Funds $20,495 $7,652 $2,510 $2,476 $2,559 $2,636 $2,661 $20,495 TOTAL $32,234 $11,751 $5,259 $3,634 $3,759 $3,880 $3,950 $32,234 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $8,034 $2,046 $1,114 $1,154 $1,196 $1,240 $1,285 $8,034 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $7 $7 $7 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $3,118 $2,046 $1,072 $3,118 Local Funds $20,833 $7,652 $2,510 $2,590 $2,667 $2,693 $2,719 $20,833 TOTAL $31,992 $11,751 $4,696 $3,744 $3,863 $3,933 $4,004 $31,992

Page 24 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

36 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Escondido, City of MPO ID: ESC38 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Pavement Rehabilitation/Reconstruction TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Includes rehabilitation of various streets primarily in the maintenance zone of focus, and those classified as Collector and above throughout the City; the City's maintenance zones can be identified in the uploaded Maintenance Zone Map: FY19 - Maintenance Zone SO - annual project to rehabilitate existing pavement greater than 1" in depth within the city's 8 maintenance zones. Each year the project rotates to a new zone, and identified roads in poor condition are treated Change Reason: Reduce funding, Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $15,457

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - L (Cash) $2,843 $2,843 $2,843 TransNet - LSI $9,758 $4,927 $685 $1,135 $1,051 $1,004 $957 $9,758 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $9 $9 $9 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $2,847 $646 $2,202 $2,847 TOTAL $15,457 $8,425 $2,887 $1,135 $1,051 $1,004 $957 $15,457 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - L (Cash) $2,843 $2,843 $2,843 TransNet - LSI $11,149 $4,927 $1,248 $1,242 $1,191 $1,244 $1,297 $11,149 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $9 $9 $9 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $3,176 $646 $2,530 $3,176 TOTAL $17,177 $8,425 $3,778 $1,242 $1,191 $1,244 $1,297 $17,177

MPO ID: ESC39 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Traffic Signals TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: In Escondido citywide as shown in attached priority list - construction of new signals and modification of existing signals citywide; signals will be constructed in accordance with the adopted traffic signal priority list. With these funds new signals are anticipated at Rock Springs/Lincoln Ave, Rock Springs/Mission Ave., Metcalf/Mission, and traffic signal modification at Mary Lane/Bear Valley Pkwy Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Intersection signalization projects Est Total Cost: $1,480

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $1,087 $250 $87 $250 $250 $250 $1,087 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $393 $150 $10 $233 $30 $363 TOTAL $1,480 $150 $260 $320 $250 $250 $250 $30 $1,450 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $1,250 $250 $250 $250 $250 $250 $1,250 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $230 $150 $80 $30 $200 TOTAL $1,480 $150 $330 $250 $250 $250 $250 $30 $1,450

Page 25 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

37 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Escondido, City of MPO ID: ESC42 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Streetlight Retrofit Project Description: Locations of streetlights retrofitted will be throughout the City of Escondido - This project will retrofit existing street lights throughout the city with new, LED lighting. The number of streetlights retrofitted will be dependent upon pricing of each fixture. Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Lighting improvements Est Total Cost: $1,622

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON Local Funds $1,622 $130 $292 $300 $300 $300 $300 $1,622 TOTAL $1,622 $130 $292 $300 $300 $300 $300 $1,622 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON Local Funds $330 $130 $200 $330 TOTAL $330 $130 $200 $330

Page 26 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

38 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Imperial Beach, City of MPO ID: IB02 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Street Maintenance Operations TransNet - LSI: Maint Project Description: Various locations - preventative maintenance - slurry seals and localized pavement repairs Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $5,173

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - L $1,655 $1,655 $1,655 TransNet - LSI $3,011 $1,850 $210 $226 $234 $242 $250 $3,011 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $507 $507 $507 TOTAL $5,173 $4,012 $210 $226 $234 $242 $250 $5,173 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - L $1,655 $1,655 $1,655 TransNet - LSI $2,973 $1,850 $210 $217 $224 $232 $240 $2,973 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $507 $507 $507 TOTAL $5,135 $4,012 $210 $217 $224 $232 $240 $5,135

MPO ID: IB12 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Major Street Improvements TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Various Locations - work includes but not limited to overlay greater than 1", new sidewalks, curbs and gutters, ramps, and storm drain Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $6,399

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - L (Cash) $200 $200 $200 TransNet - LSI $4,108 $2,675 $470 $271 $201 $230 $260 $782 $3,326 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $2,091 $1,763 $328 $503 $1,588 TOTAL $6,399 $4,638 $798 $271 $201 $230 $260 $1,285 $5,114 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-01 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - L (Cash) $200 $200 $200 TransNet - LSI $5,297 $2,675 $490 $506 $524 $542 $560 $899 $4,398 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $2,091 $1,763 $328 $503 $1,588 TOTAL $7,588 $4,638 $818 $506 $524 $542 $560 $1,402 $6,186

Page 27 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

39 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

La Mesa, City of MPO ID: LAM32 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Pavement Management System TransNet - LSI: Maint Project Description: Citywide - Preparation of pavement management system; this information is used to determine the condition of City streets and help prioritize street projects. Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Engineering studies Est Total Cost: $50

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $50 $50 $50 TOTAL $50 $50 $50 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $50 $10 $40 $50 TOTAL $50 $10 $40 $50

MPO ID: LAM33 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Curb and Gutter, Sidewalk, Ped Ramps TransNet - LSI: Maint Project Description: Citywide - remove and replace identified and prioritized tripping hazards; installation of and replacement of pedestrian ramps, in order to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act; replace or install new sidewalks, curbs and gutters Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Hazard elimination program Est Total Cost: $1,654

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $1,654 $354 $300 $300 $350 $350 $1,654 TOTAL $1,654 $354 $300 $300 $350 $350 $1,654 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $1,250 $250 $250 $250 $250 $250 $1,250 TOTAL $1,250 $250 $250 $250 $250 $250 $1,250

Page 28 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

40 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

La Mesa, City of MPO ID: LAM37 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Traffic Signal Upgrades TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: In La Mesa, various locations citywide - Traffic signal upgrades including protected left turns, overhead signals in lieu of island signals and pedestrian ramps for improved pedestrian access. Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Intersection signalization projects Est Total Cost: $700

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $700 $300 $100 $100 $100 $100 $700 TOTAL $700 $300 $100 $100 $100 $100 $700 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $500 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $500 TOTAL $500 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $500

MPO ID: LAM39 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Traffic Calming Improvements & Active Transportation Improvements TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Citywide - implement traffic calming measures including signage and striping, speed humps and other tools in locations throughout the City in accordance with the City's Neighborhood Traffic Management Program Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Non signalization traffic control and operating Est Total Cost: $410

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $410 $10 $100 $100 $100 $100 $200 $210 TOTAL $410 $10 $100 $100 $100 $100 $200 $210 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $500 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $250 $250 TOTAL $500 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $250 $250

Page 29 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

41 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

La Mesa, City of MPO ID: LAM40 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Street Reconstruction (CR) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: In La Mesa, various locations citywide - street reconstruction including construction of a new structural pavement surface greater than 1" in depth, to provide a smooth travel surface Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $3,502

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $2,501 $647 $391 $413 $488 $562 $2,501 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,001 $1,001 $1,001 TOTAL $3,502 $1,648 $391 $413 $488 $562 $3,502 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-01 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $1,799 $541 $213 $251 $362 $433 $1,799 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $725 $725 $725 TOTAL $2,524 $1,266 $213 $251 $362 $433 $2,524

MPO ID: LAM44 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Roadway Drainage Improvements TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Various locations citywide - improvements to address inadequate street drainage by constructing new or improving existing storm drain or surface improvements, reducing roadway flooding Change Reason: Add new funding source, Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $350

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $30 $30 $30 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $90 $90 $90 Local Funds $230 $230 $230 TOTAL $350 $120 $230 $350 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $1,350 $350 $250 $250 $250 $250 $1,350 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $100 $100 $100 TOTAL $1,450 $450 $250 $250 $250 $250 $1,450

Page 30 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

42 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

La Mesa, City of MPO ID: LAM48 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: West La Mesa Pedestrian and Bicycle Connectivity Project TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Various streets in the City - Enhance safety in West La Mesa by completing more than 4.8 miles of bicycle and pedestrian enhancements linking four schools and a City park. An educational campaign will further promote active transportation as a viable mode Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Est Total Cost: $6,131

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - CP $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $639 $639 $639 ATP - R $1,894 $1,894 $450 $1,444 Local Funds $1,598 $1,598 $1,598 TOTAL $6,131 $1,894 $4,237 $450 $5,681 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - CP $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $905 $905 $905 ATP - R $1,919 $450 $1,469 $450 $1,469 Local Funds $1,598 $1,598 $1,598 TOTAL $6,422 $450 $5,972 $450 $5,972

Page 31 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

43 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Oceanside, City of MPO ID: O40 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Railroad Crossing Safey Improvements TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Coastal railroad corridor at the following streets: Surfrider Avenue, Mission Avenue, Wisconsin Avenue, Oceanside Boulevard, and Cassidy Street - in the City of Oceanside, rail crossing safety improvements; including upgrades to the railroad signaling and communication systems, queue-cutter traffic signals at Mission Avenue, pedestrian crossing gates, sidewalk and median reconstruction, and fencing Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Railroad/highway crossing Est Total Cost: $5,650

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - CP $5,000 $1,064 $1,417 $2,519 $5,000 TransNet - LSI $650 $650 $650 TOTAL $5,650 $1,714 $1,417 $2,519 $650 $5,000 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - CP $5,000 $3,312 $1,688 $5,000 TransNet - LSI $650 $650 $650 TOTAL $5,650 $3,962 $1,688 $650 $5,000

Page 32 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

44 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN13 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Joint Transit Operations Center SANDAG ID: 1142600 EARMARK NO: Project Description: Regionwide - operations facility/control center to coordinate and integrate E2008-BUSP-0111 several Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) deployments; part of ITS regional architecture Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Construction or renovation of power, signal, and communications systems Est Total Cost: $3,222

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - H $1 $1 $1 FTA 5309 (Bus) $1,668 $1,668 $1,668 Loc Funds - Toll Funds $1,553 $5 $173 $1,257 $118 $1,549 $4 TOTAL $3,222 $1,674 $173 $1,257 $118 $1,549 $1,673 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - H $1 $1 $1 FTA 5309 (Bus) $1,668 $1,668 $1,668 Loc Funds - Toll Funds $417 $5 $409 $3 $1 $416 TOTAL $2,086 $1,674 $409 $3 $1 $2,085

Page 33 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

45 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN23 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Mid-Coast LRT Corridor Project PPNO: 7307 RTP PG NO: A-13; B-26 Project Description: On and along existing coastal rail corridor from Old Town Transit Center SANDAG ID: 1257001 to Gilman Drive, along I-5 from Gilman Drive to UC San Diego, and along Voigt Drive and Genesee Avenue to Westfield UTC. - construct new 10.9-mile extension of the Trolley Blue Line with stations at Tecolote Road, Clairemont Drive, Balboa Avenue, Nobel Drive, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Pepper Canyon and Voigt Drive on theUC San Diego campus, Executive Drive, and Westfield UTC Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $2,171,201 Open to Traffic: Sep 2021

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $1,127,692 $331,714 $136,289 $173,061 $200,070 $127,093 $159,465 $11,777 $53,321 $1,062,594 TransNet - MC AC $0 $316,243 $93,353 $130,038 $(25,000)$(132,941) $(381,693) TransNet - MC TIFIA Payback $(537,484) $(537,484) $(537,484) FTA 5307 $129 $129 $129 FTA 5309 (NS) $1,043,380 $330,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $313,380 $1,043,380 Other Fed -TIFIA $537,484 $537,484 $537,484 TOTAL $2,171,201 $978,086 $329,642 $403,099 $812,554 $94,152 $(446,332) $11,906 $53,321 $2,105,974 * TIFIA loan/payback and FFGA funding are outside of this RTIP cycle; the funding is shown in the last fiscal year in order to demonstrate full funding for the project PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-02 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $1,127,692 $331,714 $117,135 $172,616 $191,140 $68,661 $246,426 $11,777 $53,321 $1,062,594 TransNet - MC AC $0 $347,930 $93,353 $10,038 $(37,941)$(100,000)$(313,380) TransNet - MC TIFIA Payback $(537,484) $(537,484) $(537,484) FTA 5307 $129 $129 $129 FTA 5309 (NS) $1,043,380 $330,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $313,380 $1,043,380 Other Fed -TIFIA $537,484 $537,484 $537,484 TOTAL $2,171,201 $1,009,773 $310,488 $282,654 $790,683 $68,661(291,058) $11,906 $53,321 $2,105,974

MPO ID: SAN26B RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Downtown BRT Stations SANDAG ID: 1201509 Project Description: Broadway corridor; Park Blvd, 11th Ave, Kettner Street and India Street - construct new and modify existing transit stations in downtown San Diego for Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) services Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $20,979 Open to Traffic: Oct 2016

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $20,979 $20,842 $101 $36 $4,551 $16,428 TOTAL $20,979 $20,842 $101 $36 $4,551 $16,428 * $135K applied to CIP 1201507 - SAN26C PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $20,979 $20,974 $5 $4,551 $16,428 TOTAL $20,979 $20,974 $5 $4,551 $16,428 Page 34 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

46 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN26C RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: SR 15 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Mid-City Centerline Stations RTP PG NO: A-20 SANDAG ID: 1201507 Project Description: On SR 15 at University Avenue and El Cajon Boulevard. - construct two new BRT transit stations in the median of SR-15 Change Reason: Reduce funding, Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $63,844 Open to Traffic: Feb 2018

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $40,694 $36,861 $3,171 $662 $8,056 $48 $32,590 CMAQ $21,428 $21,428 $21,428 FTA 5307 $1,722 $1,722 $761 $961 TOTAL $63,844 $60,011 $3,171 $662 $8,817 $48 $54,979 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-01 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $41,694 $36,861 $4,759 $74 $8,056 $48 $33,590 CMAQ $21,428 $21,428 $21,428 FTA 5307 $1,722 $1,722 $761 $961 TOTAL $64,844 $60,011 $4,759 $74 $8,817 $48 $55,979

MPO ID: SAN27 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: San Ysidro Intermodal Freight Facility/South Line Rail RTP PG NO: A-5 SANDAG ID: 1300601, Project Description: On trolley system from Palomar Street station to San Ysidro station - 1300602 SD&AE freight facility and South Line Mainline in San Ysidro - expansion of freight yard including adding storage racks and construction of truck-loading staging area; upgrading of freight railway including crossovers and signals Change Reason: Reduce funding, Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Track rehabilitation in existing right of way Est Total Cost: $89,577

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - Border $12,382 $11,789 $275 $318 $3,537 $398 $8,447 TransNet - MC $500 $113 $320 $67 $500 CBI $600 $600 $600 DEMO - TEA 21 $8,996 $8,996 $3,232 $2,105 $3,659 Prop 1B - TCIF $65,433 $65,433 $65,433 Local Funds $76 $76 $76 TOTAL $87,987 $87,007 $595 $385 $7,369 $2,503 $78,115 * $1.2M of federal DEMO funds included in OWP 34200; $390K contribution from Chula Vista included in CHV60 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - Border $12,882 $11,789 $1,093 $3,537 $398 $8,947 TransNet - MC $1,000 $85 $915 $1,000 CBI $600 $600 $600 DEMO - TEA 21 $8,996 $8,996 $3,232 $2,105 $3,659 Prop 1B - TCIF $65,433 $65,433 $65,433 Local Funds $76 $76 $76 TOTAL $88,987 $86,979 $2,008 $7,369 $2,503 $79,115

Page 35 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

47 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN29 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Sorrento to Miramar Double Track/Realign EA NO: R690SA PPNO: 7301 Project Description: Phase 1: Control Point (CP) Pines (Mile Post (MP) 249.8) to CP Miramar RTP PG NO: A-5 (MP 251)Phase 2: CP Miramar (MP 251) to CP Cumbres (MP 252.9) - SANDAG ID: 1239801, realign curve and construct second main track; fully funds PE and design 1239812 for both Phase 1 and Phase 2; construction for Phase 1 only

Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Track rehabilitation in existing right of way Est Total Cost: $74,851

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $43,529 $33,722 $1,321 $7,146 $1,340 $8,634 $6,187 $28,708 Fed Rail Admin (FRA-PRIIA) $3,102 $3,102 $3,102 Prop 1B - TCIF $10,800 $10,800 $10,800 SB1 - LPP Formula $1,720 $1,720 $1,720 SB1 - TCEP $10,500 $10,500 $10,500 STIP-IIP PTA $3,900 $3,900 $3,900 STIP-IIP State Cash $1,300 $1,300 $1,300 TOTAL $74,851 $54,544 $1,321 $17,646 $1,340 $18,656 $16,687 $39,508 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $43,529 $33,849 $2,615 $5,725 $1,340 $8,168 $6,730 $28,631 Fed Rail Admin (FRA-PRIIA) $3,102 $3,102 $3,102 Prop 1B - TCIF $10,800 $10,800 $10,800 SB1 - LPP Formula $1,720 $1,720 $1,720 SB1 - TCEP $10,500 $10,500 $10,500 STIP-IIP PTA $3,900 $3,900 $3,900 STIP-IIP State Cash $1,300 $1,300 $1,300 TOTAL $74,851 $54,671 $2,615 $16,225 $1,340 $18,190 $17,230 $39,431

Page 36 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

48 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN31 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Escondido Maintenance Facility SANDAG ID: 1142300 Project Description: Escondido at Washington and Centre City - improvements to maintenance facility including electronic gates, surveillance systems, video cameras, security Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Const of new bus or rail storage/maint facilities excluded in 23 CFR part 771 Est Total Cost: $7,516

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $2,233 $1,983 $153 $96 $2,233 FTA 5307 $3,183 $3,183 $411 $2,772 FTA 5309 (Bus) $902 $902 $902 Local Funds $1,198 $1,198 $107 $1,091 TOTAL $7,516 $7,266 $153 $96 $518 $6,998 * STIP-TransNet swap PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $2,233 $1,983 $250 $2,233 FTA 5307 $3,183 $3,183 $411 $2,772 FTA 5309 (Bus) $902 $902 $902 Local Funds $1,198 $1,198 $107 $1,091 TOTAL $7,516 $7,266 $250 $518 $6,998

Page 37 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

49 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN40 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Metropolitan Planning SANDAG ID: 33001, 33201, 33202& 33203, 33003, 33216, Project Description: Countywide - ongoing regional transportation planning as well as 34200, 23016 administrative oversight for various TransNet and FTA-funded programs

Change Reason: Add new funding source, Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Non construction related activities Est Total Cost: $64,136

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - BPNS $542 $248 $147 $147 $542 TransNet - MC $395 $395 $395 TransNet - SGIP $542 $248 $147 $147 $542 TransNet - SS $540 $280 $130 $130 $540 CBI $250 $250 $250 FTA 5307 $49,350 $24,692 $4,931 $4,931 $4,931 $4,931 $4,931 $49,350 FTA 5309TOD $239 $239 $239 FTA 5310 $442 $442 $442 ITS $231 $231 $231 Local Funds $11,605 $5,441 $1,233 $1,233 $1,233 $1,233 $1,233 $11,605 TOTAL $64,136 $32,024 $7,030 $6,588 $6,164 $6,164 $6,164 $64,136 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-02 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - BPNS $542 $248 $147 $147 $542 TransNet - MC $395 $395 $395 TransNet - SGIP $542 $248 $147 $147 $542 TransNet - SS $540 $280 $130 $130 $540 CBI $250 $250 $250 FTA 5307 $49,350 $24,692 $4,931 $4,931 $4,931 $4,931 $4,931 $49,350 FTA 5309TOD $239 $239 $239 ITS $231 $231 $231 Local Funds $11,605 $5,441 $1,233 $1,233 $1,233 $1,233 $1,233 $11,605 TOTAL $63,694 $32,024 $6,588 $6,588 $6,164 $6,164 $6,164 $63,694

Page 38 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

50 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN46 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Super Loop RTP PG NO: A-5 SANDAG ID: 1041502 Project Description: In University City along Voigt Drive, Genesee Avenue, Nobel Drive, Gilman Drive, and Executive Drive - new Rapid bus service, traffic signal priority measures, signalized intersections, street modifications, rapid bus vehicles, and enhanced transit stops Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $36,071 Open to Traffic: Jun 2012

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $34,033 $32,821 $1,203 $10 $9,930 $595 $23,508 TransNet - Transit $699 $699 $699 FTA 5309 (NS) $617 $617 $617 Local Funds $722 $722 $722 TOTAL $36,071 $34,859 $1,203 $10 $11,246 $595 $24,230 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $34,033 $31,757 $2,276 $9,930 $644 $23,459 TransNet - Transit $699 $699 $699 FTA 5309 (NS) $617 $617 $617 Local Funds $722 $722 $722 TOTAL $36,071 $33,795 $2,276 $11,246 $644 $24,181

Page 39 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

51 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN47 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: South Bay BRT RTP PG NO: A-13, A-35, B-26 Project Description: From the Otay Mesa Border Crossing to Downtown San Diego along SR SANDAG ID: 1280504 125, Palomar Street, I-805, and SR 94 - Rapid transit service from the I-805/Palomar Direct Access Ramp (DAR) to the Otay Mesa Border, including the construction of a guideway on East Palomar over SR 125, around Otay Ranch Town Center Mall and through the new Millenia development; construction of 7 new Rapid transit stations Change Reason: Increase funding, Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $123,672 Open to Traffic: Mar 2019

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $102,112 $67,945 $29,175 $4,992 $22,021 $3,530 $76,561 TransNet - Transit $148 $148 $148 FTA 5307 $545 $545 $545 FTA 5309 (Bus) $1,827 $1,827 $1,827 CAP-TRADE $11,000 $11,000 $11,000 Other State - LCTOP $376 $376 $376 Loc Funds - Toll Funds $6,500 $6,500 $6,500 Local Funds $1,164 $1,164 $180 $984 TOTAL $123,672 $89,505 $29,175 $4,992 $24,721 $3,530 $95,421 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-03 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $100,057 $67,779 $31,268 $1,010 $21,860 $3,525 $74,672 TransNet - Transit $148 $148 $148 FTA 5307 $545 $545 $545 FTA 5309 (Bus) $1,827 $1,827 $1,827 CAP-TRADE $11,000 $11,000 $11,000 Other State - LCTOP $376 $376 $376 Loc Funds - Toll Funds $6,500 $6,500 $6,500 Local Funds $1,319 $1,319 $335 $984 TOTAL $121,772 $89,494 $31,268 $1,010 $24,715 $3,525 $93,532

Page 40 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

52 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN64 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Eastbrook to Shell Double Track PPNO: 2074 SANDAG ID: 1239809 Project Description: On coastal rail corridor from Control Point (CP) Eastbrook near Harbor Drive to CP Shell near Surfrider Way - in Oceanside, design to add a new 0.6 mile section of double track, add new signals and replace the San Luis Rey River Bridge over San Luis Rey River Change Reason: Reduce funding, Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Track rehabilitation in existing right of way Est Total Cost: $10,526

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $5,000 $2,674 $671 $1,656 $5,000 Fed Rail Admin (FRA-PRIIA) $3,526 $3,526 $3,526 SB1 - LPP Formula $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 TOTAL $10,526 $8,200 $671 $1,656 $10,526 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $5,000 $2,649 $1,251 $1,100 $5,000 Fed Rail Admin (FRA-PRIIA) $3,920 $3,920 $3,920 SB1 - LPP Formula $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 TOTAL $10,920 $8,569 $1,251 $1,100 $10,920

MPO ID: SAN66 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Grouped Projects for Rehabilitation or Reconstruction of Track Structures, SANDAG ID: 1210030, Track, and Trackbed in Existing Rights-of-Way: Blue Line Corridor 1210040

Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and 3 categories - rehabilitation or reconstruction of track structures, track and trackbed in existing rights-of-way (non-capacity increasing) Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Reconstruction or renovation of transit structures Est Total Cost: $162,319

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $48,738 $47,293 $990 $400 $55 $48,738 FTA 5309 (NS) $335 $335 $335 FTA Funds - AR-5307 $7,798 $7,798 $7,798 Prop 1A - High Speed Rail $57,837 $57,837 $57,837 Prop 1B - SLPP $35,648 $35,648 $35,648 Local Funds $11,963 $11,963 $11,963 TOTAL $162,319 $160,874 $990 $400 $55 $162,319 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-01 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $48,743 $47,493 $1,172 $78 $48,743 FTA 5309 (NS) $335 $335 $335 FTA Funds - AR-5307 $7,772 $7,772 $7,772 Prop 1A - High Speed Rail $57,855 $57,855 $57,855 Prop 1B - SLPP $35,651 $35,651 $35,651 Local Funds $11,963 $11,963 $11,963 TOTAL $162,319 $161,069 $1,172 $78 $162,319

Page 41 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

53 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN73 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: San Elijo Lagoon Double Track SANDAG ID: 1239806, 3310708 Project Description: On coastal rail corridor in Cardiff and across San Elijo Lagoon from MP 239.2 near Montgomery Ave to MP 241.3 in Solana Beach - install 1.5 miles of new double track, replace Bridge 240.4, reconfigure Control Point (CP) Cardiff with double crossovers, install new signals and drainage structures Change Reason: Reduce funding, Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Track rehabilitation in existing right of way Est Total Cost: $79,351

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $25,595 $17,105 $7,532 $916 $42 $2,324 $1,018 $22,253 RSTP $9,413 $9,413 $5,263 $422 $3,728 Prop 1B - TCIF $4,343 $4,343 $4,343 STIP-RIP AC $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 TOTAL $79,351 $70,861 $7,532 $916 $42 $7,587 $1,440 $70,324 * $735.6K paid towards OWP 33107.08 and 33107.01 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-01 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $25,935 $17,105 $8,016 $774 $41 $2,324 $1,018 $22,593 RSTP $9,413 $9,413 $5,263 $422 $3,728 Prop 1B - TCIF $4,343 $4,343 $4,343 STIP-RIP AC $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 TOTAL $79,691 $70,861 $8,016 $774 $41 $7,587 $1,440 $70,664

Page 42 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

54 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN78 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Mid-City Rapid Bus SANDAG ID: 1240001 Project Description: From San Diego State University to Downtown San Diego along El Cajon Boulevard, College Avenue, Park Boulevard, and Broadway - provide new Rapid Bus service including: consolidated transit stops, SR 15 transit plaza, synchronized traffic signals with extended green lights for buses, new low-floor vehicles, new shelters, improved waiting areas, real-time next-bus arrival signs, service frequency upgrade to every 10 minutes in the peak period, and every 15 minutes off-peak Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $44,526 Open to Traffic: Oct 2014

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $21,654 $21,473 $25 $156 $3,650 $214 $17,790 TransNet - Transit $173 $173 $173 FTA 5307 $320 $320 $320 FTA 5309 (NS) $22,379 $22,379 $729 $21,650 TOTAL $44,526 $44,345 $25 $156 $4,872 $214 $39,440 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $21,606 $21,529 $77 $3,650 $214 $17,742 TransNet - Transit $173 $173 $173 FTA 5307 $320 $320 $320 FTA 5309 (NS) $22,379 $22,379 $729 $21,650 TOTAL $44,478 $44,401 $77 $4,872 $214 $39,392

MPO ID: SAN80 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: TransNet Major Transit Corridor Operations SANDAG ID: 1139601, 1139602, 1139603, 1139604, Project Description: Countywide - I-15 BRT, SuperLoop, Mid-City, South Bay BRT, Otay 1139607 Mesa BRT and Mira Mesa BRT operating and maintenance costs

Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Transit operating assistance Est Total Cost: $120,094

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - BRT/Rail Ops $120,094 $16,479 $19,948 $27,098 $28,019 $28,550 $120,094 TOTAL $120,094 $16,479 $19,948 $27,098 $28,019 $28,550 $120,094 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - BRT/Rail Ops $124,519 $15,405 $26,000 $26,846 $27,718 $28,550 $124,519 TOTAL $124,519 $15,405 $26,000 $26,846 $27,718 $28,550 $124,519

Page 43 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

55 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN114 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Grouped Projects for Rehabilitation or Reconstruction of Track Structures, SANDAG ID: 1239803, Track, and Trackbed in Exisiting Rights-of-Way: Coastal Rail Corridor 1239805, 1239810, 1239813, 1239814, 1239815, 1239816 Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Parts 93.126 and 93.127 Exempt Tables 2 and 3 categories: rehabilitation or reconstruction of track structures, track, and trackbed in existing right-of-way (non-capacity increasing)- from Oceanside to San Diego along the Coastal Rail Corridor; design track improvements Change Reason: Increase funding, Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Track rehabilitation in existing right of way Est Total Cost: $191,995

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $71,160 $39,059 $12,696 $16,835 $1,846 $500 $225 $71,160 CMAQ $64,154 $64,154 $64,154 FTA 5307 $6,711 $6,711 $6,711 FTA 5339 $5,321 $5,321 $5,321 Fed Rail Admin (FRA-PRIIA) $7,085 $7,085 $7,085 Other Fed - ARRA - FRA $3,360 $3,360 $3,360 RSTP $25,136 $25,136 $25,136 CAP-TRADE $4,017 $4,017 $4,017 SB1 - LPP Formula $4,750 $4,750 $4,750 Local Funds $301 $301 $301 TOTAL $191,995 $159,894 $12,696 $16,835 $1,846 $500 $225 $191,995 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-01 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $71,158 $38,520 $15,816 $14,295 $2,369 $158 $71,158 CMAQ $64,154 $64,154 $64,154 FTA 5307 $6,711 $6,711 $6,711 FTA 5339 $5,321 $5,321 $5,321 Fed Rail Admin (FRA-PRIIA) $7,085 $7,085 $7,085 Other Fed - ARRA - FRA $3,360 $3,360 $3,360 RSTP $25,136 $25,136 $25,136 CAP-TRADE $4,017 $4,017 $4,017 SB1 - LPP Formula $4,750 $3,500 $1,250 $4,750 Local Funds $301 $301 $301 TOTAL $191,993 $158,105 $17,066 $14,295 $2,369 $158 $191,993

Page 44 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

56 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN119 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Sorrento Valley Double Track SANDAG ID: 1239807 Project Description: From MP 247.8 to MP 248.9 north of Sorrento Valley Coaster Station - convert 1.1 miles of single-track to double-track, raise tracks to minimize flooding during storms, construct two new bridges, expand parking lot at Sorrento Valley Station, and install new signals - does not add additional transit service Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Track rehabilitation in existing right of way Est Total Cost: $32,989

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $3,900 $3,577 $278 $45 $803 $323 $2,774 CMAQ $3,867 $3,867 $3,867 RSTP $12,861 $12,861 $5,156 $7,705 Prop 1B - TCIF $12,055 $12,055 $12,055 Local Funds $306 $306 $306 TOTAL $32,989 $32,666 $278 $45 $5,959 $323 $26,707 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $3,900 $3,818 $76 $6 $803 $323 $2,774 CMAQ $3,867 $3,867 $3,867 RSTP $12,861 $12,861 $5,156 $7,705 Prop 1B - TCIF $12,055 $12,055 $12,055 Local Funds $306 $306 $306 TOTAL $32,989 $32,907 $76 $6 $5,959 $323 $26,707

MPO ID: SAN123 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: University Town Center (UTC) Transit Center SANDAG ID: 1143200 Project Description: Within the parking area of the UTC shopping mall area - off street transit center for existing Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) and North County Transit District (NCTD) for local and express service for SuperLoop, Mid-Coast and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Reconstruction or renovation of transit structures Est Total Cost: $5,700

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $5,700 $5,378 $315 $7 $267 $5,433 TOTAL $5,700 $5,378 $315 $7 $267 $5,433 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $5,700 $5,361 $339 $267 $5,433 TOTAL $5,700 $5,361 $339 $267 $5,433

Page 45 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

57 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN129 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Downtown Multiuse and Bus Stopover Facility SANDAG ID: 1201514 Project Description: Downtown San Diego - block bounded by A Street , B Street, State Street and Union Street - environmental certification and land acquisition for bus stopover facility and potentially a multi-use facility that could include office, residential and retail development. Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:All Projects - Bus terminal and transfer points Est Total Cost: $45,975

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $45,975 $7,807 $10,475 $27,693 $4,483 $41,492 TOTAL $45,975 $7,807 $10,475 $27,693 $4,483 $41,492 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $45,975 $43,954 $2,021 $4,935 $41,040 TOTAL $45,975 $43,954 $2,021 $4,935 $41,040

MPO ID: SAN131 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Mira Mesa Blvd. Bus Rapid Transit Priority Treatments SANDAG ID: 1201511 Project Description: On Mira Mesa Boulevard from I-15 to UC San Diego - bus rapid transit priority treatments on Mira Mesa Blvd. Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Traffic signal synchronization projects Est Total Cost: $3,971

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $3,971 $3,383 $25 $303 $260 $1,386 $2,585 TOTAL $3,971 $3,383 $25 $303 $260 $1,386 $2,585 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $3,737 $3,612 $125 $1,386 $2,351 TOTAL $3,737 $3,612 $125 $1,386 $2,351

Page 46 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

58 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN132 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Elvira to Morena Double Track SANDAG ID: 1146500, 1239811 Project Description: On coastal rail corridor from Control Point (CP) Elvira near SR 52 to CP Friar near Friars Road - convert 2.6 miles of single-track to double-track and install new signals. Replace 1 mile of double track. Construct new/replacement bridges at MP 260.4, 259.6, 259.1, 258.6, and 257.2. Construct new water/sewer facilites for the City of San Diego between Friars Road and SR 52 - does not add additional transit service Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Track rehabilitation in existing right of way Est Total Cost: $193,899

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $42,111 $20,413 $12,173 $3,217 $6,120 $187 $6,098 $987 $35,026 TransNet - MC AC $0 CMAQ $24,878 $24,878 $2,776 $22,102 FTA 5307 $3,636 $3,636 $2,080 $1,556 Fed Rail Admin (FRA-PRIIA) $9,920 $9,920 $6,082 $3,838 RSTP $29,688 $29,688 $4,688 $927 $24,073 CAP-TRADE $61,983 $61,983 $61,983 STA $520 $520 $520 TCRP $4,052 $4,052 $4,052 Local Funds $16,722 $15,021 $1,701 $16,722 TDA $389 $389 $389 TOTAL $193,899 $169,591 $14,783 $3,217 $6,120 $187 $22,244 $1,914 $169,741 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-02 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $42,111 $20,413 $12,173 $3,217 $6,120 $187 $6,098 $987 $35,026 TransNet - MC AC $0 CMAQ $24,878 $24,878 $2,776 $22,102 FTA 5307 $3,636 $3,636 $2,080 $1,556 Fed Rail Admin (FRA-PRIIA) $9,920 $9,920 $6,082 $3,838 RSTP $29,688 $29,688 $4,688 $927 $24,073 CAP-TRADE $61,983 $61,983 $61,983 STA $520 $520 $520 TCRP $4,052 $4,052 $4,052 Local Funds $16,722 $15,021 $1,701 $16,722 TDA $250 $250 $250 TOTAL $193,760 $169,591 $14,644 $3,217 $6,120 $187 $22,244 $1,914 $169,602

Page 47 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

59 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN133 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: South Bay BRT Maintenance Facility SANDAG ID: 1201513 Project Description: At South Bay Maintenance Facility on Main Street in the city of Chula Vista - expansion of maintenance facility to accommodate maintenance of BRT vehicles - property acquisition, site preparation, lighting, parking, fencing and bus servicing facilities Change Reason: Revise Fund Source Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Const of new bus or rail storage/maint facilities excluded in 23 CFR part 771 Est Total Cost: $60,030

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $30,935 $30,894 $40 $1 $427 $173 $30,336 FTA 5307 $8,846 $8,846 $2,996 $4,840 $1,010 FTA 5339 $3,122 $3,122 $3,122 STA $5,250 $5,250 $1,052 $2,300 $1,898 Local Funds $9,658 $9,658 $9,658 TDA $2,218 $2,218 $629 $1,189 $400 TOTAL $60,030 $59,988 $40 $1 $5,104 $8,502 $46,424 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-01 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $30,934 $30,894 $40 $427 $172 $30,336 FTA 5307 $8,846 $8,846 $2,996 $4,840 $1,010 FTA 5339 $3,122 $3,122 $3,122 STA $5,250 $5,250 $1,052 $2,300 $1,898 Local Funds $9,658 $9,658 $9,658 TDA $2,219 $2,219 $629 $1,190 $401 TOTAL $60,030 $59,988 $40 $5,104 $8,502 $46,425

Page 48 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

60 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN147 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Grouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities - Bayshore Bikeway SANDAG ID: 1129900, 1143700, 1223055, 1223056

Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities (both motorized and Non-motorized) Change Reason: Increase funding, Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Est Total Cost: $48,620

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - BPNS $29,501 $6,444 $2,867 $1,790 $7,519 $10,208 $673 $29,501 ATP - R $10,221 $1,280 $8,941 $10,221 ATP - S $4,944 $4,944 $4,944 Coastal Conservancy $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 STIP-RIP Prior State Cash $7 $7 $7 STIP-RIP STP TE $1,340 $1,340 $1,340 STIP-RIP State Cash $37 $37 $37 Local Funds $70 $70 $70 TOTAL $48,620 $10,398 $4,147 $6,734 $16,460 $10,208 $673 $48,620 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-04 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - BPNS $19,633 $6,717 $6,322 $5,926 $544 $122 $2 $19,633 ATP - R $10,221 $10,221 $10,221 ATP - S $4,944 $4,944 $4,944 Coastal Conservancy $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 STIP-RIP Prior State Cash $7 $7 $7 STIP-RIP STP TE $1,340 $1,340 $1,340 STIP-RIP State Cash $37 $37 $37 Local Funds $70 $70 $70 TOTAL $38,752 $10,671 $16,543 $10,870 $544 $122 $2 $38,752

Page 49 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

61 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN148 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Grouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities - Coastal Rail Trail SANDAG ID: 1223016, 1223017, 1223018

Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 2 categories - bicycle and pedestrian facilities (both motorized and non-motorized) Change Reason: Increase funding, Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Est Total Cost: $34,657

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - BPNS $30,609 $10,122 $14,117 $5,126 $1,238 $3 $3 $30,609 ATP - R $1,025 $1,025 $1,025 STIP-RIP STP TE $587 $587 $587 STIP-RIP State Cash $47 $47 $47 Local Funds $250 $250 $250 TDA - Bicycles $2,139 $2,139 $2,139 TOTAL $34,657 $12,031 $16,256 $5,126 $1,238 $3 $3 $34,657 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-01 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - BPNS $29,857 $11,179 $14,039 $4,628 $5 $3 $3 $29,857 ATP - R $1,025 $1,025 $1,025 STIP-RIP STP TE $587 $587 $587 STIP-RIP State Cash $47 $47 $47 Local Funds $250 $250 $250 TDA - Bicycles $2,139 $2,139 $2,139 TOTAL $33,905 $13,088 $16,178 $4,628 $5 $3 $3 $33,905

Page 50 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

62 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN153 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: The Inland Rail Trail PPNO: 7421W RTP PG NO: A-19 Project Description: On and along the North County Transit District rail corridor from North SANDAG ID: 1223023 Melrose Drive in Oceanside to North Pacific Street in San Marcos - Construct seven miles of new bike path. Construction is funded through phase 3 Change Reason: Increase funding, Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Est Total Cost: $63,321

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - BPNS $12,449 $7,393 $2,115 $1,500 $698 $742 $2,152 $2,945 $7,352 ATP - R $5,603 $500 $5,103 $500 $5,103 STIP-RIP AC $16,322 $16,322 $16,322 STIP-RIP STP TE $1,414 $1,414 $1,414 STIP-RIP State Cash $2,298 $2,298 $183 $2,115 Local Funds $1,080 $1,080 $1,080 TDA - Bicycles $6,719 $6,719 $2,025 $4,694 TOTAL $45,885 $35,226 $2,615 $6,603 $698 $742 $7,354 $2,945 $35,586 * $1.461M of BTA programmed under County of San Diego CNTY78 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-03 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - BPNS $10,648 $7,393 $1,600 $1,655 $2,088 $2,090 $6,470 ATP - R $5,603 $500 $5,103 $500 $5,103 STIP-RIP AC $16,322 $16,322 $16,322 STIP-RIP STP TE $1,414 $1,414 $1,414 STIP-RIP State Cash $2,298 $2,298 $183 $2,115 Local Funds $1,080 $1,080 $1,080 TDA - Bicycles $6,719 $6,719 $2,025 $4,694 TOTAL $44,084 $35,226 $2,100 $6,758 $7,290 $2,090 $34,704

Page 51 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

63 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN196 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Grouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities - San Diego River Trail SANDAG ID: 1223052, 1223053

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - BPNS $4,356 $908 $614 $2,800 $34 $4,356 Coastal Conservancy $500 $500 $500 TOTAL $4,856 $1,408 $614 $2,800 $34 $4,856 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - BPNS $4,108 $1,078 $2,859 $171 $4,108 Coastal Conservancy $500 $500 $500 TOTAL $4,608 $1,578 $2,859 $171 $4,608

MPO ID: SAN208 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Clairemont Mesa Blvd BRT Stations SANDAG ID: 1201515 Project Description: Clairemont Mesa Boulevard from State Route 163 to Interstate 15 (1.2 miles) - traffic Signal Priority on Clairemont Mesa Boulevard and transit station improvements at eastbound Ruffin Road stop Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Construction or renovation of power, signal, and communications systems Est Total Cost: $13,774

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $1,774 $1,646 $19 $109 $980 $794 TOTAL $1,774 $1,646 $19 $109 $980 $794 * Total estimated cost reflects final design and construction of five additional transit stations PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $1,774 $1,764 $10 $690 $1,084 TOTAL $1,774 $1,764 $10 $690 $1,084

Page 52 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

64 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN213 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Grouped Projects for Operating Assistance - FTA Section 5310 Enhanced SANDAG ID: Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities 1271000,1271800, 1272000, 3321400 Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 2 categories: operating assistance to transit operators - operating assistance to transit agencies Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Transit operating assistance Est Total Cost: $2,481

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - SS $1,466 $98 $684 $685 $1,466 FTA 5310 $651 $651 $651 Local Funds $364 $181 $184 $364 TOTAL $2,481 $749 $865 $869 $2,481 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-03 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - SS $1,466 $98 $684 $685 $1,466 FTA 5310 $476 $476 $476 Local Funds $364 $181 $184 $364 TOTAL $2,306 $574 $865 $869 $2,306

MPO ID: SAN224 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: I-805/SR 94 Bus on Shoulder Demonstration Project SANDAG ID: 1280513 Project Description: In Chula Vista, on East Palomar Street between Heritage Road and I-805, on I-805 between East Palomar Street and SR 94 and on SR 94 between I-805 and Downtown San Diego. - design and construct new freeway shoulder infrastructure on East Palomar, I-805 and SR 94; implement technology improvements within the corridor to support freeway bus operation; procurement of 16 new Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) buses. - no additional lanes Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Purchase new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or minor expansions of fleet Est Total Cost: $30,900

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $16,816 $3,510 $1,788 $8,837 $2,422 $204 $55 $744 $16,072 FTA 5309 (Bus) $14,084 $14,084 $1,455 $12,629 TOTAL $30,900 $17,594 $1,788 $8,837 $2,422 $204 $55 $2,199 $28,701 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $16,816 $15,478 $1,323 $5 $5 $5 $832 $15,984 FTA 5309 (Bus) $14,084 $14,084 $1,455 $12,629 TOTAL $30,900 $29,562 $1,323 $5 $5 $5 $2,287 $28,613

Page 53 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

65 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN227 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Grouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities - North Park/Mid-City SANDAG ID: 1223020, Bikeways 1223078, 1223079; 1223087, 1223080, 1223081, 1223082 Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities (both motorized and Non-motorized) Change Reason: Increase funding, Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Est Total Cost: $43,108

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - BPNS $34,629 $4,988 $3,300 $13,639 $11,926 $760 $16 $34,629 SB1 - TIRCP $5,872 $5,872 $5,872 TDA - Bicycles $2,607 $1,807 $800 $2,607 TOTAL $43,108 $6,795 $4,100 $19,511 $11,926 $760 $16 $43,108 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-03 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - BPNS $33,879 $5,104 $2,946 $13,931 $11,718 $166 $14 $33,879 SB1 - TIRCP $5,872 $5,872 $5,872 TDA $1,000 $216 $440 $115 $229 $1,000 TDA - Bicycles $1,607 $1,607 $1,607 TOTAL $42,358 $6,927 $3,386 $19,918 $11,947 $166 $14 $42,358

MPO ID: SAN228 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Grouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities - Uptown Bikeways SANDAG ID: 1223022, 1223083, 1223084, 1223085, 1223086 Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities (both motorized and Non-motorized) Change Reason: Increase funding, Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Est Total Cost: $31,674

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - BPNS $27,576 $6,239 $2,015 $9,814 $8,610 $898 $27,576 TransNet - SGIP $648 $609 $39 $648 Local Funds $2,200 $361 $979 $860 $2,200 TDA - Bicycles $1,250 $1,250 $1,250 TOTAL $31,674 $8,098 $2,415 $10,793 $9,470 $898 $31,674 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-03 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - BPNS $25,721 $5,937 $3,254 $10,058 $5,620 $852 $25,721 TransNet - SGIP $648 $648 $648 Local Funds $2,200 $361 $729 $1,110 $2,200 TDA - Bicycles $1,250 $1,250 $1,250 TOTAL $29,819 $7,187 $4,263 $10,787 $6,730 $852 $29,819

Page 54 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

66 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego Association of Governments DELETED MPO ID: SAN246 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Signal Respacing and Optimization SANDAG ID: 1239818 Project Description: Along the LOSSAN Corridor in San Diego County - Design of rail signals at key locations along the LOSSAN Corridor within San Diego County to increase service efficiency Change Reason: Delete project Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Construction or renovation of power, signal, and communications systems Est Total Cost: $0

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON

TOTAL

PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $1,000 $500 $500 $1,000 SB1 - LPP Formula $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 SB1 - TIRCP $15,900 $15,900 $15,900 TOTAL $17,900 $1,000 $500 $500 $15,900 $2,000 $15,900

Page 55 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

67 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

San Diego County MPO ID: CNTY24 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Cole Grade Road RTP PG NO: B-36 RAS (M-46) Project Description: Cole Grade Road from N. of Horse Creek to South of Pauma Heights TransNet - LSI: CR Road (2.9 miles) - widen to accommodate 14-ft traffic lane in both direction, 12-ft center 2-way left turn, 6-ft bike lane & 10-ft pathway Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $26,381 Open to Traffic: Jan 2022

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - L $350 $350 $350 TransNet - L (Cash) $335 $335 $335 TransNet - LSI $19,716 $1,194 $6,504 $6,638 $3,370 $2,010 $1,698 $18,018 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $5,980 $1,980 $4,000 $1,730 $4,250 TOTAL $26,381 $3,859 $4,000 $6,504 $6,638 $3,370 $2,010 $4,113 $4,250 $18,018 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - L $350 $350 $350 TransNet - L (Cash) $335 $335 $335 TransNet - LSI $19,716 $1,194 $6,504 $6,638 $3,370 $2,010 $1,698 $18,018 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $9,376 $5,376 $4,000 $1,750 $4,750 $2,876 TOTAL $29,777 $7,255 $4,000 $6,504 $6,638 $3,370 $2,010 $4,133 $4,750 $20,894

MPO ID: CNTY34 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Dye Road Extension RTP PG NO: A-29; B-36 RAS (M-46) Project Description: Dye Road to San Vicente Road from 500 ft west of Ramona Street to TransNet - LSI: CR Intersection of Warnock Dr and San Vicente Rd (1.15 miles) - in Ramona - study, design and construct a 2-lane community collector road with intermittent turn lanes, bike lanes, curb, gutter, and pathway/walkway Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $13,981 Open to Traffic: Jun 2024

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - L $300 $300 $300 TransNet - L (Cash) $250 $250 $250 TransNet - LSI $2,122 $879 $10 $11 $11 $11 $1,200 $1,848 $274 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $110 $100 $10 $110 TOTAL $2,782 $1,529 $20 $11 $11 $11 $1,200 $2,508 $274 * construction funds are outside of the the 5-year RTIP cycle PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - L $300 $300 $300 TransNet - L (Cash) $250 $250 $250 TransNet - LSI $2,132 $889 $10 $11 $11 $11 $1,200 $1,858 $274 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $110 $100 $10 $110 TOTAL $2,792 $1,539 $20 $11 $11 $11 $1,200 $2,518 $274

Page 56 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

68 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

San Diego County MPO ID: CNTY35 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Ramona Street Extension RTP PG NO: B-36 TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Ramona Street from Boundary Ave. to Warnock Dr. (.25 miles) - in the community of Ramona, construct new road extension; 2 lanes with intermittent turn lanes, bike lanes and walkway/pathway Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $6,258 Open to Traffic: Jun 2024

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - L $287 $287 $233 $54 TransNet - LSI $1,436 $830 $14 $14 $14 $14 $550 $1,286 $150 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $19 $19 $19 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $15 $15 $15 TOTAL $1,757 $1,136 $29 $14 $14 $14 $550 $1,553 $204 * Construction funds are outside of the 5-year RTIP cycle PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - L $287 $287 $233 $54 TransNet - LSI $1,451 $845 $14 $14 $14 $14 $550 $1,301 $150 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $19 $19 $19 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $15 $15 $15 TOTAL $1,772 $1,151 $29 $14 $14 $14 $550 $1,568 $204

MPO ID: CNTY84 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Stage Coach Lane / Reche Road Intersection Improvements TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Intersection at Stage Coach Lane and Reche Rd - in unincorporated Fallbrook: widen intersection approaches to provide additional turn lanes and relieve congestion at the intersection Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:All Projects - Intersection channelization projects Est Total Cost: $1,446

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $356 $206 $150 $171 $35 $150 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,090 $1,040 $50 $1,090 TOTAL $1,446 $1,246 $200 $171 $35 $1,240 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $356 $206 $150 $171 $35 $150 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,650 $1,600 $50 $1,650 TOTAL $2,006 $1,806 $200 $171 $35 $1,800

Page 57 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

69 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

San Diego County MPO ID: CNTY86 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Roadway Maintenance and Overlay TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Countywide - annual maintenance project that includes maintenance of various street elements (crackseal, chip seal, AC overlay greater than 1" thick, sidewalk repairs, etc.) Change Reason: Revise funding between phases Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $42,980 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $27,516 $2,316 $2,400 $5,700 $5,700 $5,700 $5,700 $13,899 $13,617 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $82 $82 $82 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,532 $1,532 $1,111 $421 Local Funds $13,850 $9,296 $4,554 $760 $13,090 TOTAL $42,980 $13,226 $6,954 $5,700 $5,700 $5,700 $5,700 $15,852 $27,128 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $27,516 $2,316 $2,400 $5,700 $5,700 $5,700 $5,700 $14,632 $12,884 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $82 $82 $82 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,532 $1,532 $1,379 $153 Local Funds $13,850 $9,296 $4,554 $760 $13,090 TOTAL $42,980 $13,226 $6,954 $5,700 $5,700 $5,700 $5,700 $16,853 $26,127

MPO ID: CNTY88 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Ashwood Street Corridor Improvements (Mapleview to Willow) RTP PG NO: A-29 AND B-37 TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Ashwood Street/Wildcat Canyon Road from Mapleview Street to 1100 feet north of Willow Road (1.1 miles) - in the unincorporated community of Lakeside - traffic signal improvements at Mapleview and Ashwood; traffic signal installation at Willow and Ashwood/Wildcat Canyon; and the addition of turn lanes, addition of a passing lane in a non-urbanized area, bike lanes, and pedestrian facilities Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $21,366 Open to Traffic: Jul 2022

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $13,434 $3,949 $4,894 $4,591 $13,434 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $6,069 $3,100 $2,969 $1,494 $2,575 $2,000 Local Funds $1,863 $1,863 $1,863 TOTAL $21,366 $1,863 $3,100 $2,969 $3,949 $4,894 $4,591 $3,357 $2,575 $15,434 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $15,841 $2,407 $3,949 $4,894 $4,591 $2,407 $13,434 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $6,069 $3,100 $2,969 $1,494 $2,575 $2,000 Local Funds $1,863 $1,863 $1,863 TOTAL $23,773 $4,270 $3,100 $2,969 $3,949 $4,894 $4,591 $5,764 $2,575 $15,434

Page 58 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

70 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

San Diego County MPO ID: CNTY89 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: East Vista Way At Gopher Canyon Intersection Improvements RAS (M-46) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Intersection at East Vista Way and Gopher Canyon Road - in the unincorporated Bonsall: this is a congested intersection leading into the Bonsall community and this improvement is on the Community Sponsor Group's priority list; adding turn lanes at this intersection Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:All Projects - Interchange reconfiguration projects Est Total Cost: $1,870

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $243 $243 $214 $29 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,000 $840 $160 $1,000 Local RTCIP $627 $628 $218 $409 TOTAL $1,870 $1,711 $160 $432 $29 $1,409 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $243 $243 $214 $29 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,210 $1,050 $160 $1,210 Local RTCIP $465 $466 $218 $247 TOTAL $1,918 $1,759 $160 $432 $29 $1,457

MPO ID: CNTY90 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Camino Del Rey Drainage Improvements TransNet - LSI: Maint Project Description: Camino Del Rey from 500 feet west of Golf Club Drive to 2700 feet east of Golf Club Drive (.9 miles) - in unincorporated Bonsall: the project will upgrade the existing drainage system so that it will accommodate a 100-year flood Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Hazard elimination program Est Total Cost: $7,275

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $5,356 $1,000 $3,000 $1,356 $5,356 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,919 $415 $1,000 $504 $1,415 $504 TOTAL $7,275 $415 $1,000 $504 $1,000 $3,000 $1,356 $1,415 $504 $5,356 * additional construction funds beyond 5 year RTIP PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $1,969 $949 $10 $10 $1,000 $400 $569 $1,000 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $2,474 $970 $1,000 $504 $1,970 $504 TOTAL $4,443 $1,919 $1,000 $504 $10 $10 $1,000 $2,370 $1,073 $1,000

Page 59 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

71 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD208 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Juan Street Reconstruction TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Juan St from Taylor St to Sunset Road (1 miles) - this project provides for the replacement of the existing concrete pavement, curb, gutter and sidewalk on Juan Street from Taylor Street to Sunset Road; Phase I (Taylor Street to Harney Street) will provide new asphalt cement and cement treated base pavement; Phase II (Harney Street to Sunset Road) will provide new Portland cement concrete pavement - Project No. S-00602 (52-729.0) Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $7,133 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - L (Cash) $2,259 $2,259 $2,259 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $90 $90 $90 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $2,084 $2,043 $41 $2,084 Local Funds $2,700 $2,700 $1,000 $1,700 TOTAL $7,133 $7,092 $41 $1,000 $6,133 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - L (Cash) $2,259 $2,259 $2,259 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $90 $90 $90 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $2,159 $2,043 $116 $2,159 Local Funds $2,700 $2,700 $1,000 $1,700 TOTAL $7,208 $7,092 $116 $1,000 $6,208

MPO ID: SD209 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Torrey Pines Road Slope Restoration RAS (M-45) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Torrey Pines Road from Little St to Roseland Dr (.1 miles) - this project provides for reconstructing a 350-foot section of earthen slope along the south side of Torrey Pines Road between Lookout Drive and Roseland Drive(S-00877) Change Reason: Increase funding, Revise Fund Source Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Safety Improvement Program Est Total Cost: $4,251

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI Carry Over $694 $694 $694 Local Funds $280 $280 $280 Local RTCIP $3,277 $2,852 $425 $3,277 TOTAL $4,251 $3,826 $425 $280 $3,971 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI Carry Over $714 $694 $20 $714 Local Funds $280 $280 $280 Local RTCIP $2,852 $2,852 $2,852 TOTAL $3,846 $3,826 $20 $280 $3,566

Page 60 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

72 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD235 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Torrey Pines Road Improvement Phase 2 RAS (M-45) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Torrey Pines Road from Amalfi to Hillside Drive (1 miles) - in San Diego, on Torrey Pines Road between Hillside Drive and Amalfi Street, provides path of travel for pedestrians and bicyclists (S15023) Change Reason: Add new funding source, Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Est Total Cost: $1,850

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $1,075 $1,075 $1,075 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $155 $155 $155 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $320 $320 $320 Local RTCIP $300 $300 $300 TOTAL $1,850 $1,375 $475 $300 $1,550 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $1,075 $1,075 $1,075 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $225 $225 $225 Local RTCIP $300 $300 $300 TOTAL $1,600 $1,375 $225 $300 $1,300

Page 61 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

73 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Santee, City of MPO ID: SNT04 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Pavement Repair and Rehabilitation TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Multiple locations as recommended by Pavement Management Analysis report. - Reconstruction and rehabilitation in the form of removal and replacement of existing pavement sections 2 inches minimum, 1.5 inch minimum overlay, pedestrian ramps, sidewalk improvements, and drainage improvements as part of the rehabilitation improvements. Change Reason: Increase funding, Revise project description Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $26,403

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - Bond $9,855 $9,856 $343 $9,512 TransNet - L $7,729 $7,729 $7,729 TransNet - LSI $2,473 $627 $332 $339 $376 $347 $453 $213 $2,260 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $1 $1 $1 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $3,001 $3,001 $157 $2,844 Local Funds $3,344 $1,186 $279 $614 $422 $422 $422 $15 $3,329 TOTAL $26,403 $22,400 $611 $953 $798 $769 $875 $728 $25,675 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - Bond $9,855 $9,856 $343 $9,512 TransNet - L $7,729 $7,729 $7,729 TransNet - LSI $2,607 $627 $332 $366 $355 $445 $482 $220 $2,387 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $1 $1 $1 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $3,001 $3,001 $157 $2,844 Local Funds $2,842 $1,186 $279 $416 $475 $485 $15 $2,827 TOTAL $26,035 $22,400 $611 $782 $830 $930 $482 $735 $25,300

Page 62 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

74 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Santee, City of MPO ID: SNT20 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Regional Arterial Management System TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: This will be implemented on all citywide traffic signals through the RAMS program - ability to coordinate signal plan development across jurisdictional boundaries with a common time source and a common platform to build an integrated corridor management system; this will include software maintenance, hardware maintenance, and communication infrastructure through the Regional Arterial Management System (RAMS). TransNet - LSI RAMS of $7 is programmed through FY 2022 Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Traffic signal synchronization projects Est Total Cost: $74

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $74 $37 $7 $7 $7 $7 $7 $74 TOTAL $74 $37 $7 $7 $7 $7 $7 $74 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $67 $37 $7 $7 $7 $7 $67 TOTAL $67 $37 $7 $7 $7 $7 $67

MPO ID: SNT22 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Pavement Roadway Maintenance TransNet - LSI: Maint Project Description: Various locations as defined in Santee's Pavement Management Analysis Report - Maintenance repair in the form of crack filling, grind and patch failed areas followed by Cape seal or Slurry seal of the street. Change Reason: Increase funding, Revise project description Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $5,973

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $1,964 $1,129 $142 $149 $164 $182 $197 $134 $1,830 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,434 $1,434 $78 $1,356 Local Funds $2,575 $279 $1,030 $422 $422 $422 $9 $2,566 TOTAL $5,973 $2,563 $421 $1,179 $586 $604 $619 $221 $5,752 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $1,976 $1,129 $142 $157 $152 $191 $206 $140 $1,836 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,434 $1,434 $78 $1,356 Local Funds $1,656 $279 $416 $475 $485 $1,656 TOTAL $5,066 $2,563 $421 $573 $627 $676 $206 $218 $4,848

Page 63 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

75 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Santee, City of MPO ID: SNT26 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: SR-67 Improvements/Woodside Avenue Interchange Improvements RAS (M-48) Project Description: Intersection at SR-67 and Woodside Ave - This project proposes to improve traffic circulation at the intersection of Woodside Avenue at State Route 67 and make a sidewalk connection to North Woodside Avenue. It includes replacing the stop sign controlled intersection with medians, sidewalks, roundabout and/or other traffic signal improvements. The project will also require improvements within the Caltrans right-of-way on the State Route 67 off-ramp. Change Reason: Increase funding, Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Changes in vertical and horizontal alignment Est Total Cost: $4,065

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON Local Funds $1,363 $1,363 $1,363 Local RTCIP $2,702 $569 $146 $1,987 $715 $1,987 TOTAL $4,065 $569 $146 $3,350 $715 $3,350 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON Local Funds $490 $490 $490 Local RTCIP $2,424 $569 $1,855 $569 $1,855 TOTAL $2,914 $569 $2,345 $569 $2,345

MPO ID: SNT28 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Pavement Condition Report TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: All local streets city wide - The pavement condition report will be prepared by an assets management consultant to conduct a complete survey of all city streets, and propose repair and funding strategies in order to maintain current and future pavement conditions Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Engineering studies Est Total Cost: $70

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $70 $70 $70 TOTAL $70 $70 $70 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $70 $70 $70 TOTAL $70 $70 $70

Page 64 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

76 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Various Agencies

MPO ID: V08 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Regional Habitat Conservation Fund SANDAG ID: 1200300 Project Description: Countywide - regional habitat management and monitoring

Change Reason: Add new funding source, Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Plantings, landscaping, etc Est Total Cost: $77,960

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - LEMP $13,441 $1,441 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $13,075 $366 TransNet - REMP $44,176 $38,124 $4,261 $1,791 $25,004 $19,172 Local Funds $343 $343 $343 TOTAL $57,960 $38,467 $4,261 $3,232 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $38,079 $19,881 * Local EMP has additional $20M in the CIP not programmed PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-00 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - REMP $44,177 $38,502 $4,100 $1,574 $24,302 $19,875 Local Funds $343 $343 $343 TOTAL $44,520 $38,845 $4,100 $1,574 $24,302 $20,218

Page 65 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

77 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Various Agencies MPO ID: V10 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Grouped Projects for TransNet Smart Growth Incentive Program SANDAG ID: 12240036, 1224021, 1224028, 1224029, 1224030, 1224031, 1224032, Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and 1224033, 1224034, 1224035, Table 3 categories - Transportation enhancement activities (except 1224039, 1224041, 1224042, rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings, 1224043, 1224046, 1224047, structures, or facilities) 1224048, 1224049, 1224050, 1224051, 1224052, 1224053, 1224054, 1224055, 1224056, 1224057, 1224058, 1224059, 1224060, 1224061, 1224062, 1224063, 1224064, 1224065, 1224066, 1224067, 1224068 Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Transportation enhancement activities Est Total Cost: $66,346

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - BPNS $3,700 $1,698 $2,002 $3,700 TransNet - LSI $3,424 $1,424 $915 $129 $101 $443 $412 $3,424 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $307 $307 $307 TransNet - SGIP $32,118 $4,151 $6,599 $9,414 $8,013 $3,408 $531 $32,118 Local Funds $26,797 $7,565 $6,645 $5,633 $5,665 $1,290 $26,797 TOTAL $66,346 $14,838 $16,468 $15,176 $13,779 $5,141 $943 $66,346 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-03 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - BPNS $3,700 $1,698 $2,002 $3,700 TransNet - LSI $2,324 $1,424 $900 $2,324 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $307 $307 $307 TransNet - SGIP $32,118 $4,151 $6,599 $9,414 $8,013 $3,408 $531 $32,118 Local Funds $27,854 $7,565 $6,660 $5,762 $5,766 $1,732 $369 $27,854 TOTAL $66,303 $14,838 $16,468 $15,176 $13,779 $5,140 $900 $66,303

Page 66 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

78 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Various Agencies MPO ID: V11 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: State Route 11 EA NO: 05631 PPNO: 0999 Project Description: On new alignment from SR 125 to the U.S.-Mexico Border - Construction RTP PG NO: A-6; B-5 of four-lane toll highway facility, CVEF and POE in three segments: SANDAG ID: 1201101, Segment 1: SR-11/905 to Enrico Fermi; Segment 2: SR-11 from Enrico 1201102, 1201103 Fermi to Siempre Viva; Segment 3: POE from Siempre Viva to Mexico EARMARK NO: CA393/740 Border.. Toll Credits will be used to match federal funds for the ROW phase Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years, Revise funding between phases RT:11 Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $681,747 Open to Traffic: Phase 1: Mar 2016 Phase 2: Sep 2021 Phase 3: Nov 2022

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - Border $7,988 $1,860 $5,628 $500 $3,360 $4,628 TransNet - MC $4,843 $2,056 $2,287 $500 $2,983 $1,860 CBI $127,139 $123,789 $3,350 $29,698 $94,091 $3,350 HPP $800 $800 $800 INFRA $49,278 $49,278 $49,278 ITS $439 $439 $439 Prop 1B - TCIF $74,155 $71,625 $2,530 $74,155 SB1 - TCEP $42,168 $42,168 $8,710 $1,150 $32,308 STIP-IIP NHS $6,882 $6,882 $6,882 STIP-IIP Prior State Cash $5,200 $5,200 $5,200 STIP-IIP State Cash $919 $919 $919 Local Funds $361,936 $247,001 $114,935 $3,858 $358,078 TOTAL $681,747 $213,570 $105,241 $1,000 $247,001 $114,935 $62,849 $101,729 $517,169 * Environmental Document funded from STIP-IPP of PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-01 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - Border $7,488 $1,860 $5,628 $2,860 $4,628 TransNet - MC $4,343 $2,056 $2,287 $2,483 $1,860 CBI $127,139 $123,789 $3,350 $29,698 $94,091 $3,350 HPP $800 $800 $800 INFRA $49,278 $49,278 $49,278 ITS $439 $439 $439 Prop 1B - TCIF $74,155 $71,625 $2,530 $74,155 SB1 - TCEP $42,168 $42,168 $8,710 $1,150 $32,308 STIP-IIP NHS $6,882 $6,882 $6,882 STIP-IIP Prior State Cash $5,200 $5,200 $5,200 STIP-IIP State Cash $919 $919 $919 Local Funds $362,936 $4,858 $2,489 $240,654 $114,935 $4,858 $358,078 TOTAL $681,747 $213,570 $110,099 $2,489 $240,654 $114,935 $62,849$101,729 $517,169

Page 67 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

79 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Various Agencies MPO ID: V12 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Grouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities. SANDAG ID: 1223054, 1223057, 1223058, 1223059, Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 2 1223060, 1223062 categories - bicycle and pedestrian facilities (both motorized and non-motorized) Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Est Total Cost: $39,835

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - B $500 $500 $500 TransNet - BPNS $32,786 $4,461 $2,967 $1,791 $18,259 $5,217 $91 $32,786 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $980 $980 $980 ATP - S $4,450 $4,450 $4,450 Local Funds $1,105 $1,100 $5 $1,105 Local RTCIP $14 $14 $14 TOTAL $39,835 $7,055 $2,967 $6,241 $18,259 $5,217 $96 $39,835 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-03 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - B $500 $500 $500 TransNet - BPNS $14,433 $5,339 $2,881 $1,963 $4,071 $180 $14,433 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $980 $980 $980 ATP - S $4,450 $4,450 $4,450 Local Funds $1,105 $1,100 $5 $1,105 Local RTCIP $14 $14 $14 TOTAL $21,482 $7,933 $2,881 $6,413 $4,071 $180 $5 $21,482

Page 68 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

80 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Various Agencies MPO ID: V14 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Grouped Projects for Bicycle and pedestrian facilities - Active Transportation SANDAG ID: 1223014 Program (ATP)

Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities (both motorized and Non-motorized) Change Reason: Add new funding source, Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Est Total Cost: $54,657

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - BPNS $3,285 $3,017 $148 $94 $26 $3,285 TransNet - CP $1,300 $1,300 $1,300 TransNet - LSI $200 $200 $200 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $50 $50 $50 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $48 $48 $48 ATP - R $17,664 $13,698 $1,080 $2,886 $17,664 ATP - S $20,365 $4,024 $9,740 $1,951 $1,182 $3,468 $20,365 Local Funds $11,745 $2,062 $3,419 $5,908 $164 $183 $10 $11,745 TOTAL $54,657 $22,851 $14,635 $12,139 $1,372 $3,651 $10 $54,657 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-03 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - BPNS $3,230 $3,076 $72 $62 $20 $3,230 TransNet - LSI $200 $200 $200 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $50 $50 $50 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $48 $48 $48 ATP - R $17,664 $13,698 $1,080 $2,886 $17,664 ATP - S $20,365 $4,024 $9,740 $1,951 $1,182 $3,468 $20,365 Local Funds $8,226 $2,062 $5,800 $7 $164 $183 $10 $8,226 TOTAL $49,783 $22,910 $16,940 $4,906 $1,366 $3,651 $10 $49,783

MPO ID: V15 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: I-5/Gilman Drive Bridge EA NO: 2T175 SANDAG ID: 1200508 Project Description: I-5 Bridge 57-1084 - In San Diego, construct new overcrossing over I-5 between Gilman Drive and Medical Center Drive Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years RT:5 Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $24,607 Open to Traffic: Feb 2019

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $15,000 $8,802 $4,411 $1,545 $242 $439 $14,561 Local Funds $9,607 $5,608 $2,474 $1,525 $9,607 TOTAL $24,607 $14,410 $6,885 $3,070 $242 $439 $24,168 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-03 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $15,000 $8,802 $4,421 $1,777 $439 $14,561 Local Funds $9,607 $5,608 $2,474 $1,525 $9,607 TOTAL $24,607 $14,410 $6,895 $3,302 $439 $24,168

Page 69 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

81 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

Various Agencies MPO ID: V18 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: I-5/Voigt Drive Improvements EA NO: 2T215 RTP PG NO: Project Description: between La Jolla Village Drive and Genesee Avenue - in San Diego, on A-5,16,31,38,B-30 Interstate 5, construction of the realignment of both Campus Point and SANDAG ID: 1200507 Voigt Drive between I-5 and Genesee Avenue

Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years, Revise funding between phases RT:5 Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $29,380 Open to Traffic: Jan 2021

TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $21,370 $4,844 $1,480 $4,443 $5,297 $5,305 $1 $5,751 $3,980 $11,639 SB1 - LPP Formula $4,130 $4,130 $4,130 Local Funds $3,880 $3,880 $880 $3,000 TOTAL $29,380 $8,724 $5,610 $4,443 $5,297 $5,305 $1 $6,631 $3,980 $18,769 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-01 TOTAL PRIOR 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $21,370 $5,674 $5,486 $5,465 $4,698 $47 $6,211 $4,000 $11,159 SB1 - LPP Formula $4,130 $4,130 $4,130 Local Funds $3,880 $3,880 $3,880 TOTAL $29,380 $9,554 $9,616 $5,465 $4,698 $47 $6,211 $4,000 $19,169

Page 70 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

82 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

RTIP Fund Types

Federal Funding ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Federal Stimulus Program) BIP/CBI Border Infrastructure Program/Corridors and Borders Infrastructure Program CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality DEMO - TEA 21 High Priority Demonstration Program under TEA-21 DEMO-Sec 115 High Priority Demonstration Program under FY 2004 Appropriations DEMO-Sec 117/STP Surface Transportation Program under FHWA Administrative Program (congressionally directed appropriations) EARREPU Earmark Repurposing INFRA/FASTLANE Infrastructure for Rebuilding America (INFRA) Grant FRA-ARRA Federal Railroad Administration (Federal Stimulus) FRA-PRIIA Federal Railroad Administration Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 FTA Section 5307 Federal Transit Administration Urbanized Area Formula Program FTA Section 5309 (Bus) Federal Transit Administration Discretionary Program FTA Section 5309 (NS) Federal Transit Administration Discretionary - New Starts Program FTA Section 5310 Federal Transit Administration Elderly & Disabled Program FTA Section 5339 Federal Transit Administration Bus and Bus Facilities Formula Grant Program HBP Highway Bridge Program under SAFETEA-LU HPP High Priority Program under SAFETEA-LU ITS Intelligent Transportation System NHS National Highway System (administered by Caltrans) RSTP Regional Surface Transportation Program STP-RL Surface Transportation Program - Highway Railway Crossings Program (Section 130) TCSP Transportation, Community & System Preservation TE Transportation Enhancement Program TIFIA Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (Federal Loan Program) TPFP Truck Parking Facilities Program (Federal Discretionary) CMAQ/RSTP Conversion Reimbursement of advanced federal funds which have been advanced with local funds in earlier years State Funding ATP Active Transportation Program (Statewide and Regional) CMIA Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (State Prop. 1B) Coastal Conservancy California Coastal Conservancy Fund LBSRA Local Bridge Seismic Retrofit Account (State Prop. 1B) Prop 1A - High Speed Rail High Speed Passenger Train Bond Program (State Prop. 1A) PTA Public Transportation Account SB1 - CCP Senate Bill 1 - Congested Corridors Program

Page 71 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

83 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5 San Diego Region (in $000s)

SB1 - TCEP Senate Bill 1 - Trade Corridor Enhancement Program SB1 - LPP Formula Senate Bill 1 - Local Parternship Formula Program SB1 - LPP Comp Senate Bill 1 - Local Parternship Competitive Program SB1 - TIRCP Senate Bill 1 - Transit and Intercity Rail Program SHOPP (AC) State Highway Operation & Protection Program STA State Transit Assistance STIP-IIP State Transportation Improvement Program - Interregional Program STIP-RIP State Transportation Improvement Program - Regional Improvement Program TCIF Trade Corridor Improvement Fund (State Prop. 1B) TIRCP Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program TCRP Traffic Congestion Relief Program Local Funding Local Funds AC Local Funds - Advanced Construction; mechanism to advance local funds to be reimbursed at a later fiscal year with federal/state funds RTCIP Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program TDA Transportation Development Act TransNet-Border Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Border TransNet-BPNS Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Bicycle, Pedestrian and Neighborhood Safety Program TransNet-CP Prop. A Local Transportation Sales Tax - Commercial Paper TransNet-H Prop. A Local Transportation Sales Tax - Highway TransNet-L Prop. A Local Transportation Sales Tax - Local Streets & Roads TransNet-L (Cash) TransNet - L funds which agencies have received payment, but have not spent TransNet-LSI Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Local System Improvements TransNet-LSI Carry Over TransNet - LSI funds previously programmed but not requested/paid in year of allocation TransNet-LSI (Cash) TransNet - LSI funds which agencies have received payment, but have not spent TransNet-MC Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Major Corridors TransNet-MC AC TransNet - Major Corridors - Advanced Construction; mechanism to advance TransNet funds to be reimbursed at a later fiscal year with federal/state funds TransNet-REMP Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Regional Environmental Mitigation Program TransNet-SGIP Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Regional Smart Growth Incentive Program TransNet-SS Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Senior Services

Page 72 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

84 Attachment 4 Table 3a: Revenues Legend Yellow Highlighting indicates a change from San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) the prior amendment 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (in $000s) - Amendment No. 5

2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021 2021/2022 2022/2023 TOTAL Prior Years Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Sales Tax $2,834,889 $679,732 $685,549 $506,968 $566,655 $454,752 $499,765 $281,701 $359,149 $423,517 $332,791 $5,248,325 $5,278,797 -- County $2,834,889 $679,732 $685,549 $506,968 $566,655 $454,752 $499,765 $281,701 $359,149 $423,517 $332,791 $5,248,325 $5,278,797 Other Local Funds $505,849 $150,215 $143,467 $101,528 $107,421 $300,326 $307,845 $150,932 $149,766 $55,741 $56,508 $1,264,591 $1,270,856 -- City General Funds $356,775 $108,896 $107,006 $88,267 $96,649 $52,218 $53,390 $26,997 $25,831 $29,103 $29,870 $662,256 $669,521 -- Street Taxes and Developer Fees $149,074 $41,319 $36,461 $13,261 $10,772 $248,108 $254,455 $123,935 $123,935 $26,638 $26,638 $602,335 $601,335 -- RSTP Exchange funds Other $679,936 $99,859 $97,221 $96,356 $102,094 $86,716 $92,258 $104,824 $105,684 $101,897 $103,024 $1,172,437 $1,180,216 Local Total $4,020,674 $929,806 $926,236 $704,852 $776,170 $841,793 $899,868 $537,457 $614,599 $581,156 $492,323 $7,685,353 $7,729,869 State Highway Operations and Protection Program $98,382 $121,521 $121,399 $167,210 $172,900 $223,358 $223,358 $267,164 $267,164 $2,877 $2,877 $880,512 $886,080 SHOPP (Including Augmentation) $98,382 $121,521 $121,399 $167,210 $172,900 $223,358 $223,358 $267,164 $267,164 $2,877 $2,877 $880,512 $886,080 SHOPP Prior State Transportation Improvement Program $559,651 $20,753 $20,753 $72,183 $72,183 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $89,668 $89,668 $580,157 $744,465 STIP (Including Augmentation) $517,894 $20,753 $20,753 $72,183 $72,183 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $89,668 $89,668 $557,772 $702,708 STIP Prior $41,756 $22,384 $41,756 Proposition 1 A $99,680 $99,698 $99,680 Proposition 1 B $675,274 $2,530 $2,530 $1,319 $1,319 $679,126 $679,123 Active Transportation Program $20,872 $22,570 $13,440 $20,614 $20,614 $1,964 $10,905 $3,468 $3,468 $69,324 $69,299 STATE LOCAL Highway Maintenance (HM) $6,311 $6,311 $6,311 $6,311 Highway Bridge Program (HBP) $55,163 $40,706 $40,376 $24,987 $22,211 $20,000 $21,789 $35,518 $28,394 $217,097 $225,539 $393,471 $393,471 Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1) $12,713 $280,449 $279,199 $102,579 $102,579 $38,548 $22,648 $10,204 $10,204 $10,204 $10,204 $454,448 $437,548 Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) $101,298 $77,933 $101,298 State Transit Assistance (e.g., population/revenue based, Prop 42) $117,898 $40,342 $40,342 $22,040 $22,040 $19,672 $19,672 $19,672 $19,672 $19,672 $19,672 $239,295 $239,295 Other $91,702 $11,587 $11,587 $8,935 $8,935 $8,935 $8,935 $8,935 $8,935 $8,935 $8,935 $139,029 $139,029 State Total $1,832,633 $546,770 $535,938 $418,548 $421,462 $313,582 $308,412 $346,066 $338,942 $349,773 $358,214 $3,619,305 $3,795,600 5307 - Urbanized Area Formula Program $638,912 $71,000 $71,000 $70,418 $70,418 $70,418 $70,418 $70,418 $70,418 $70,418 $70,418 $991,584 $991,584 5309a - Fixed Guideway Modernization $97,086 $97,086 $97,086 5309b - New and Small Starts (Capital Investment Grants) $353,331 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $313,380 $313,380 $1,066,711 $1,066,711 5309c - Bus and Bus Related Grants $58,636 $58,636 $58,636 5310 - Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities $4,287 $3,895 $4,512 $8,181 $8,798 5311 - Nonurbanized Area Formula Program $8,674 $903 $903 $903 $903 $903 $903 $903 $903 $903 $903 $13,188 $13,188 5337 - State of Good Repair $207,504 $48,914 $48,914 $43,173 $43,173 $43,173 $43,173 $43,173 $43,173 $43,173 $43,173 $429,109 $429,109 5339 - Bus and Bus Facilites Program $24,038 $13,559 $13,559 $6,540 $6,540 $6,540 $6,540 $6,540 $6,540 $6,540 $6,540 $63,756 $63,756 FEDERAL TRANSIT Other $50,572 $50,546 $50,572 Federal Transit Total $1,443,040 $238,271 $238,888 $221,033 $221,033 $221,033 $221,033 $221,033 $221,033 $434,413 $434,413 $2,778,798 $2,779,441 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ)1,2,3 $344,793 $13,129 $8,250 $15,319 $33,819 $33,807 $23,517 $33,794 $31,387 $33,794 $33,794 $474,635 $475,560 Coordinated Border Infrastructure (SAFETEA-LU Sec.1303) $232,339 $3,350 $3,350 $130,347 $235,689 GARVEE Bonds (Includes Debt Service Payments) Highway Infrastructure Program (HIP) $8,118 $19,610 $8,118 $19,610 High Priority Projects (HPP) and Demo $105,994 $580 $580 $57,253 $106,574 Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) $3,117 $9,226 $9,226 $10,914 $10,914 $3,833 $3,833 $9,533 $9,533 $4,549 $4,549 $41,172 $41,172 National Significant Freight & Highway Projects (FASTLANE/INFRA) $49,278 $49,278 $49,278 $49,278 Public Lands Highway $3,260 $3,260 $3,260 $3,260 $6,519 $6,519 Surface Transportation Program (Regional) $389,499 $42,591 $42,591 $43,985 $43,985 $43,970 $43,970 $43,955 $43,955 $43,955 $43,955 $607,956 $607,956 FEDERAL HIGHWAY Other $247,867 $5,425 $5,425 $9 $9 $300 $177,603 $253,301 Federal Highway Total $1,323,609 $134,957 $141,570 $73,477 $91,977 $81,619 $71,329 $87,282 $84,875 $82,599 $82,299 $1,552,882 $1,795,659 Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (PRIIA) $25,870 $26,264 $25,870 Other FRA Federal Railroad Administration Total $25,870 $26,264 $25,870

Federal Total $2,792,519 $373,228 $380,458 $294,510 $313,010 $302,652 $292,362 $308,316 $305,909 $517,012 $516,712 $4,357,944 $4,600,970 TIFIA (Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act) $537,484 $537,484 $537,484 $537,484 VE VATI FINA

INNO Innovative Financing Total $537,484 $537,484 $537,484 $537,484 REVENUES TOTAL $8,645,826 $1,849,803 $1,842,632 $1,417,910 $1,510,642 $1,995,512 $2,038,126 $1,191,839 $1,259,449 $1,447,940 $1,367,249 $16,200,086 $16,663,923

1 2019/2019 Reflects repayment of Loaned CMAQ apportionment to OCTA of $20,197 and Caltrans of $18,590 and includes loans from other MPOs totalling $12,697 and a $1,000 deobligation 2 2019/2020 Reflects repayment of Loaned CMAQ apportionment to STANCOG of $6,393 and MCAG of $3,896 3 2020/2021 Reflects repayment of Loaned CMAQ apportionment to Madera CTC of $2,407 $16,663,923 85 Table 3b: Program Legend Yellow Highlighting indicates a change from the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) prior amendment 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (in $000s) - Amendment No. 5

2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021 2021/2022 2022/2023 TOTAL Funding Source Prior Years Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Sales Tax $2,834,889 $648,856 $654,632 $498,330 $554,255 $451,813 $498,470 $266,970 $351,463 $403,398 $316,661 $5,171,021 $5,210,369 -- TransNet $2,834,889 $648,856 $654,632 $498,330 $554,255 $451,813 $498,470 $266,970 $351,463 $403,398 $316,661 $5,171,021 $5,210,369 Other Local Funds $505,849 $150,215 $143,467 $101,528 $107,421 $300,326 $307,845 $150,932 $149,766 $55,741 $56,508 $1,264,591 $1,270,856 -- City General Funds $356,775 $108,896 $107,006 $88,267 $96,649 $52,218 $53,390 $26,997 $25,831 $29,103 $29,870 $662,256 $669,521 -- Street Taxes and Developer Fees $149,074 $41,319 $36,461 $13,261 $10,772 $248,108 $254,455 $123,935 $123,935 $26,638 $26,638 $602,335 $601,335 LOCAL Other $679,936 $99,859 $97,221 $96,356 $102,094 $86,716 $92,258 $104,824 $105,684 $101,897 $103,024 $1,172,437 $1,180,216 Local Total $4,020,674 $898,930 $895,319 $696,213 $763,770 $838,854 $898,572 $522,726 $606,912 $561,037 $476,194 $7,608,049 $7,661,440 State Highway Operations and Protection Program $98,382 $121,521 $121,399 $167,210 $172,900 $223,358 $223,358 $267,164 $267,164 $2,877 $2,877 $880,512 $886,080 SHOPP (Including Augmentation) $98,382 $121,521 $121,399 $167,210 $172,900 $223,358 $223,358 $267,164 $267,164 $2,877 $2,877 $880,512 $886,080 State Transportation Improvement Program $559,651 $20,753 $20,753 $72,183 $72,183 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $89,668 $89,668 $580,157 $744,465 STIP (Including Augmentation) $517,894 $20,753 $20,753 $72,183 $72,183 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $89,668 $89,668 $557,772 $702,708 STIP Prior $41,756 $22,384 $41,756 Proposition 1 A $99,680 $99,698 $99,680 Proposition 1 B $675,274 $2,530 $2,530 $1,319 $1,319 $679,126 $679,123 Active Transportation Program $20,872 $22,570 $13,440 $20,614 $20,614 $1,964 $10,905 $3,468 $3,468 $69,324 $69,299 Highway Maintenance (HM) $6,311 $6,311 $6,311 $6,311 STATE Highway Bridge Program (HBP) $55,163 $40,706 $40,376 $24,987 $22,211 $20,000 $21,789 $35,518 $28,394 $217,097 $225,539 $393,471 $393,471 Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1) $12,713 $280,449 $279,199 $102,579 $102,579 $38,548 $22,648 $10,204 $10,204 $10,204 $10,204 $454,448 $437,548 Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) $101,298 $77,933 $101,298 State Transit Assistance (STA)(e.g., population/revenue based, Prop 42 $117,898 $40,342 $40,342 $22,040 $22,040 $19,672 $19,672 $19,672 $19,672 $19,672 $19,672 $239,295 $239,295 State Emergency Repair Program Other $91,702 $11,587 $11,587 $8,935 $8,935 $8,935 $8,935 $8,935 $8,935 $8,935 $8,935 $139,029 $139,029 State Total $1,832,633 $546,770 $535,938 $418,548 $421,462 $313,582 $308,412 $346,066 $338,942 $349,773 $358,214 $3,619,305 $3,795,600 5307 - Urbanized Area Formula Program $638,912 $71,000 $71,000 $70,418 $70,418 $70,418 $70,418 $70,418 $70,418 $70,418 $70,418 $991,584 $991,584 5309a - Fixed Guideway Modernization $97,086 $97,086 $97,086 5309b - New and Small Starts (Capital Investment Grants) $353,331 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $313,380 $313,380 $1,066,711 $1,066,711 5309c - Bus and Bus Related Grants $58,636 $58,636 $58,636 5310 - Elderly & Persons with Disabilities Formula Program $4,287 $3,895 $4,512 $8,181 $8,798 5311 - Nonurbanized Area Formula Program $8,674 $903 $903 $903 $903 $903 $903 $903 $903 $903 $903 $13,188 $13,188 5337 - State of Good Repair $207,504 $48,914 $48,914 $43,173 $43,173 $43,173 $43,173 $43,173 $43,173 $43,173 $43,173 $429,109 $429,109 5339 - Bus and Bus Facilites Program $24,038 $13,559 $13,559 $6,540 $6,540 $6,540 $6,540 $6,540 $6,540 $6,540 $6,540 $63,756 $63,756 FEDERAL TRANSIT Other $50,572 $50,546 $50,572 Federal Transit Total $1,443,040 $238,271 $238,888 $221,033 $221,033 $221,033 $221,033 $221,033 $221,033 $434,413 $434,413 $2,778,798 $2,779,441 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) $344,793 $12,640 $8,250 $15,319 $33,819 $33,807 $23,517 $33,794 $31,387 $16,169 $16,185 $456,521 $457,951 Coordinated Border Infrastructure (SAFETEA-LU Sec.1303) $232,339 $3,350 $3,350 $130,347 $235,689 GARVEE Bonds (Includes Debt Service Payments) Highway Infrastructure Program (HIP) $8,118 $19,610 $8,118 $19,610 High Priority Projects (HPP) and Demo $105,994 $580 $580 $57,253 $106,574 Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) $3,117 $9,226 $9,226 $10,914 $10,914 $3,833 $3,833 $9,533 $9,533 $4,549 $4,549 $41,172 $41,172 Public Lands Highway $3,260 $3,260 $3,260 $3,260 $6,519 $6,519 National Significant Freight & Highway Projects (FASTLANE/INFRA) $49,278 $49,278 $49,278 $49,278 Surface Transportation Program (Regional) $389,499 $40,318 $42,591 $18,265 $4,500 $448,082 $436,590 FEDERAL HIGHWAY Other $247,867 $5,425 $5,425 $9 $9 $300 $177,603 $253,301 Federal Highway Total $1,323,609 $132,195 $141,570 $47,757 $52,492 $37,649 $27,359 $43,327 $40,920 $21,018 $20,734 $1,374,893 $1,606,684 Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (PRIIA) $26,264 $26,264 $26,264 Other FRA Federal Railroad Administration Total $25,870 $26,264 $26,264

Federal Total $2,792,519 $370,465 $380,458 $268,790 $273,525 $258,682 $248,392 $264,360 $261,954 $455,431 $455,148 $4,179,955 $4,412,390 TIFIA (Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act) $537,484 $537,484 $537,484 $537,484 INN TIVE OVA FINA Innovative Financing Total $537,484 $537,484 $537,484 $537,484 PROGRAM TOTAL $8,645,826 $1,816,165 $1,811,715 $1,383,552 $1,458,756 $1,948,603 $1,992,860 $1,133,152 $1,207,808 $1,366,241 $1,289,555 $15,944,794 $16,406,520

*Negative programming amount is reflective of the need to show the TIFIA loan payback in the five-year RTIP. Payback will begin in future years. $752,071 $15,869,035

86 Table 3c: Revenues versus Program Legend Yellow Highlighting indicates a San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) change from the prior amendment 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (in $000s) - Amendment No. 5

2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021 2021/2022 2022/2023 TOTAL Funding Source Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current

Local Total $30,876 $30,917 $8,638 $12,400 $2,939 $1,295 $14,731 $7,686 $20,119 $16,130 $77,304 $68,428 LOCAL State Highway Operations and Protection Program SHOPP (Including Augmentation) SHOPP Prior State Transportation Improvement Program STIP (Including Augmentation) STIP Prior Proposition 1 A Proposition 1 B Active Transportation Program STATE Highway Maintenance (HM) Highway Bridge Program (HBP) Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1) Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) State Transit Assistance (STA)(e.g., population/revenue based, Prop 42) Other State Total 5307 - Urbanized Area Formula Program 5309a - Fixed Guideway Modernization 5309b - New and Small Starts (Capital Investment Grants) 5309c - Bus and Bus Related Grants 5310 - Elderly & Persons with Disabilities Formula Program 5311 - Nonurbanized Area Formula Program 5337 - State of Good Repair 5339 - Bus and Bus Facilites Program FEDERAL TRANSIT Other Federal Transit Total Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) $489 $17,625 $17,609 $18,114 $17,609 Coordinated Border Infrastructure (SAFETEA-LU Sec.1303) GARVEE Bonds (Includes Debt Service Payments) Highway Infrastructure Program (HIP) High Priority Projects (HPP) and Demo Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) National Significant Freight & Highway Projects (FASTLANE/INFRA) Surface Transportation Program (Regional) $2,273 $25,720 $39,485 $43,970 $43,970 $43,955 $43,955 $43,955 $43,955 $159,874 $171,366

FEDERAL HIGHWAY Other Federal Highway Total $2,762 $25,720 $39,485 $43,970 $43,970 $43,955 $43,955 $61,580 $61,564 $177,988 $188,975 Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (PRIIA) Other FRA Federal Railroad Administration Total Federal Total $2,762 $25,720 $39,485 $43,970 $43,970 $43,955 $43,955 $61,580 $61,564 $177,988 $188,975 TIFIA (Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act) INN TIVE OVA FINA Innovative Financing Total REVENUES - PROGRAM TOTAL $33,638 $30,917 $34,358 $51,885 $46,909 $45,266 $58,687 $51,642 $81,700 $77,694 $255,292 $257,403

87 Attachment 5

Federal Requirements Analysis for 2018 RTIP Amendment No. 5

Metropolitan Planning and Transportation Conformity The U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) Metropolitan Planning Regulations1 and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) Transportation Conformity Regulations2 establish six criteria requirements which the RTIP must satisfy. The metropolitan planning regulations require that: (1) the RTIP be financially constrained and (2) make progress toward achieving federal performance targets. The transportation conformity regulations state that the RTIP must: (3) be consistent with San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan (2015 Regional Plan); (4) meet regional emissions tests; (5) include timely implementation of transportation control measures (TCMs); and 6) include inter-agency consultation and public involvement.

The 2018 RTIP meets all six tests required under federal metropolitan planning and transportation conformity regulations. SANDAG made these findings for the 2018 RTIP under the required federal tests on September 28, 2018. On December 17, 2018, Federal Highways and the Federal Transit Administration jointly found that the 2018 RTIP conforms with the provisions of 40 CFR Parts 51 and 93. Amendment No. 5 continues to meet all federal requirements.

Financial Constraint Test Federal regulations 23 CFR Section 450.326(j) require the 2018 RTIP to be a revenue-constrained document with programmed projects based upon available or committed funding and/or reasonable estimates of future funding. Chapter 4 of the 2018 RTIP discusses in detail the financial capacity analysis of major program areas, including a discussion of available revenues.

Finding: The projects contained within the 2018 RTIP, including Amendment No. 5, are reasonable when considering available funding sources as demonstrated in Tables 3a through 3c, including a comparison from the prior approved version (changes are highlighted in yellow.)

Performance Management Test Federal regulations 23 CFR Section 450.326(c) require the 2018 RTIP to be designed such that once implemented, it makes progress toward achieving the performance targets established under 450.306(d) and shall include, to the maximum extent practicable, a description of the anticipated effect of the RTIP toward achieving the performance targets identified in the transportation plan, linking investment priorities to those performance targets. Appendix H of the 2018 RTIP provides information on the projects which support safety and transit asset management performance management requirements. The 2015 Ozone Conformity Demonstration, which was federally approved on June 21, 2019, includes Appendix B. This appendix updates the description of SANDAG’s implementation of Federal Performance Management planning requirements to address the Pavement and Bridge Condition Performance Measure (PM2) Final Rule and the System Performance, Freight, and CMAQ Performance Measures (PM3) Final Rule as required after the two-year phase-in date of May 20, 2019. This information will be submitted with Amendment No. 5 as an amendment to Appendix H.

Finding: The projects contained within the 2018 RTIP, including Amendment No. 5, make progress toward achieving the 2018 and 2019 performance targets for safety (PM1) established by the Board of Directors, on January 26, 2018 and January 25, 2019 respectively. Progress toward targets will be achieved through investment in projects with the primary purpose of improving safety, active transportation projects, and safety features within larger transportation projects.

Finding: The projects contained within the 2018 RTIP, including Amendment No. 5, make progress toward achieving the 2020 and 2022 performance targets for pavement and bridge condition (PM2) through investment in projects with the primary purpose of improving pavement conditions on the National Highway System. These targets, set by the state, were approved by the Transportation Committee on October 5, 2018

Finding: The projects contained within the 2018 RTIP, including Amendment No. 5, make progress toward achieving the approved performance targets for the system performance, freight, and CMAQ performance measures (PM3) through investment in projects that provide travel choices, promote non-single occupant vehicle travel, reduce excessive delay and pollutant emissions.

Finding: The projects contained within the 2018 RTIP, including Amendment No. 5, make progress toward achieving the 2019 regional performance targets for transit asset management approved by the Board on September 28, 2018. The program includes investments in the four key categories for transit asset management: equipment, facilities, infrastructure, and rolling stock.

Consistency with San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan Test Finding: The 2018 RTIP, through Amendment No. 5, is consistent with the 2015 Regional Plan adopted in October 2015 (policies, programs, and projects). All projects conform to the scope, cost, and schedule included in the 2015 Regional Plan.

Regional Emissions Tests These findings are based on the regional emissions analysis tests shown in Table 5-2 in Chapter 5 of the 2018 RTIP and Table 9 of the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard Conformity Demonstration for the 2015 Regional Plan and 2018 RTIP.

Finding: The regional emissions analyses for the 2018 RTIP are an update to the regional emissions analyses for the 2015 Regional Plan.

Finding: The regional emissions analyses included in the 2015 Ozone Standard Conformity Demonstration are an update to the regional emissions analyses for the 2018 RTIP.

Finding: The proposed amendment does not reflect a change in the design, concept, or scope of the projects or the conformity analysis years as modeled for the regional emissions analysis of the 2018 RTIP and 2015 Ozone Standard Conformity Demonstration.

Finding: The 2018 RTIP, including Amendment No. 5, remains in conformance with the applicable State Implementation Plan3 (SIP).

Timely Implementation of TCM Test Finding: The TCMs, established as Transportation Tactics in the 1982 SIP, have been fully implemented and Amendment No. 5 continues to fund the four TCMs, which include: (1) ridesharing; (2) transit improvements; (3) traffic flow improvements; and (4) bicycle facilities and programs.

89 Inter-Agency Consultation and Public Involvement Test Finding: The 2018 RTIP complies with all federal and state requirements for public involvement by following the strategies described in Board Policy No. 025: Public Participation Plan Policy. Amendment No. 5 was posted for a 15-day public comment period from June 12, 2019, through July 2, 2019.

Finding: The SANDAG Conformity Working Group (CWG), including members from the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District, Caltrans, California Air Resources Board, SANDAG, U.S. DOT, and U.S. EPA, serve as a forum to meet the federal and state requirements for interagency consultation for the 2018 RTIP. All exempt projects in Amendment No. 5 were submitted to the CWG on June 13, 2019, for its review and members concurred with the exempt categorization.

1 23 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Part 450, subpart C 2 40 CFR part 93, subpart A 3 2008 Eight-Hour Ozone Attainment Plan for San Diego County (December 2016)

90 Attachment 6

Appendix H Federal Performance Management

Appendix H

Federal Performance Management

Transportation Performance Management

Introduction

Signed into law in 2012, the federal surface transportation bill Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) included provisions for the establishment of a performance and outcome based program, which includes national performance goals for the Federal-Aid Highway Program in seven areas: safety, infrastructure condition, congestion reduction, system reliability, freight movement and economic vitality, environmental sustainability, and reduced project delivery delays (23 USC 150(b)). This act significantly advanced the application of performance-based planning and programming in the field of transportation. It established a system to further inform transportation planning and programming with the unified application of observed data, performance measures, and performance targets in the areas of safety, asset condition, and system performance.

The subsequent surface transportation bill, Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act continued these performance provisions. Starting in 2016, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) issued a series of Final Rules to implement the performance provisions of MAP-21 and FAST Act. These rules establish the protocols, including the timelines, processes, data, and reporting requirements to comply with the performance provisions. The rules were designed to be applicable nationwide and to provide meaningful information at regional scales and larger. FHWA released three rules that are commonly referred to as PM 1 for safety, PM 2 for asset condition, and PM 3 for system performance, freight movement, and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (23 CFR Part 490). FTA released a transit asset management (TAM) rule establishing procedures to help maintain key transit assets in a state of good repair. A separate transportation planning rule (23 CFR Parts 450, 771 and 49 CFR Part 613), jointly released by FHWA and FTA, guides how performance is integrated into planning and programming processes and documents. This rule states that the regional Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) shall be designed such that it “makes progress towards achieving performance targets” and that it includes, “to the maximum extent practicable, a description of the anticipated effect of the TIP towards achieving the performance targets.”

In support of these rules, SANDAG has entered into data sharing and target setting coordination agreements with Caltrans, the San Diego Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) and the North County Transit District (NCTD). In March 2018, SANDAG and Caltrans signed an addendum to the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on Planning and Programming to meet the performance-based planning and programming requirements established in MAP-21. In April 2018 SANDAG and Caltrans entered into a data concurrence agreement to enable the use of mutually agreed upon datasets for target setting purposes. In May 2018 SANDAG, MTS, and NCTD signed an addendum to the master MOU adding coordination efforts on data collection and data sharing to support transit asset management regional targets.

As the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the San Diego region, SANDAG is required to set targets for the performance measures in these rules. Appendix H of the 2018 RTIP includes the PM 1 2018 safety targets and 2019 regional TAM targets set by SANDAG and a description of efforts underway to help achieve the established targets. Appendix H has been amended to include the 2019 PM 1 safety targets and 2019 TAM targets, and additionally documents the performance management targets established for PM 2 and PM 3 as well as regional investments which help to support achievement of all of these targets.

PM 1: Transportation Safety

Target Setting Process The target setting process consists of Caltrans, in consultation with California MPOs and the Office of Transportation Safety, establishing statewide safety targets. The statewide safety target setting process is informed by safety plans including the Caltrans State Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) and Office of Traffic Safety Highway Safety Plan (HSP). Once Caltrans has established statewide targets, SANDAG has 180 days to take action to support the statewide targets or develop and support regional targets. PM 1 requires annually updated targets .

On January 26, 2018, the SANDAG Board of Directors approved supporting the 2018 statewide safety targets. On January 25, 2019, the Board approved support of the 2019 statewide safety targets established by Caltrans and continued SANDAG efforts to plan and program projects that will help to contribute to achievement of the statewide safety targets. Both the 2018 and 2019 statewide safety targets for the PM 1 performance measures are shown in Table H-1.

Table H-1: Statewide Performance Management 1 Safety Targets 2018 Statewide PM 1 2019 Statewide PM 1 Performance Measure Safety Target Safety Target Number of Fatalities 3,590.8 3,445.4

Rate of Fatalities per 100 Million 1.029 0.995 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)

Number of Serious Injuries 12,823.4 12,688.1

Rate of Serious Injuries per 100 3.831 3.661 Million VMT Number of Nonmotorized 4,271.1 3,929.8 Fatalities and Serious Injuries

Source: Caltrans, 2017 and 2018

Measures and Methodology The performance measures included in PM 1 are applicable to all public roads regardless of ownership or maintenance responsibility. Table H-2 provides an overview of the calculations and data sources for each performance measure included in PM 1.

Table H-2: PM 1 Performance Measure Methodology

PM 1 PERFORMANCE MEASURE METHODOLOGY

Performance Measure Calculation Data Source

• Fatality Analysis Reporting 1. Number of Fatalities Five year rolling average System (FARS)

• FARS 2. Rate of Fatalities per 100 Five year rolling average of • Highway Performance Million VMT annual fatality rate Monitoring System (HPMS)

• Statewide Integrated Traffic 3. Number of Serious Injuries Five year rolling average Records System (SWITRS)

4. Rate of Serious Injuries per Five year rolling average of • SWITRS 100 Million VMT annual serious injury rate • HPMS

Five year rolling average of the 5. Number of Non-motorized annual sum of non-motorized • FARS Fatalities and Non-motorized fatalities and non-motorized • SWITRS Serious Injuries serious injuries

Source: 23 CFR 490

San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan (2015 Regional Plan) and 2018 RTIP Investments The 2015 Regional Plan includes as a policy objective the provision of safe, and secure travel choices. This policy is supported by the Regional Plan’s Active Transportation Implementation Strategy and Urban Area Transit Study which include safety strategies for active transportation. For development of the 2018 RTIP, additional fields were added to the RTIP Database (ProjectTrak) to allow project sponsors to provide project information related to investments in safety. The 2018 RTIP includes approximately 300 safety related projects. These projects were identified by the project sponsors and include over $1 billion dollars in investments for the five-year RTIP program (FY 2019 - FY 2023). Just under half of these projects are considered categorical safety projects under the conformity rule, with safety improvements being the main project goal. These safety category projects account for approximately 55 percent of the programmed safety dollars. The remaining projects include a variety of project categories and include projects where only a portion of the overall investment includes safety related elements such as the addition of bike lanes as part of a roadway widening project. Table H-3 summarizes the 2018 RTIP safety investments by project category.

Table H-3: 2018 RTIP Safety Program Summary by Project Category

2018 RTIP SAFETY PROGRAM SUMMARY BY PROJECT AREA

Project Category Safety Programming ($000)

Safety Focused Projects1 $822,738

Intersection and Interchange Projects2 $28,104

Studies, Landscaping, and Enhancement Projects3 $43,671

Additional Safety Improvements Included in other projects4 $282,937

Public Transit5 $91,005

Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements6 $230,469

TOTAL $1,498,924

Source: ProjectTrak, July 2019

Notes: 1 Examples of projects in this category include Safety Improvement Program projects, railroad/highway crossings, pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation, non-signalization traffic control, lighting improvements, increasing sight distance, hazard elimination program, guardrails, median barriers, crash cushions, and adding medians. 2 Projects in this category include, traffic signal synchronization projects, intersection signalization, interchange channelization, and interchange reconfiguration. 3 Some examples of projects contained within this category include engineering studies, landscaping, and transportation enhancement projects. 4 This category includes safety elements that are part of a larger project. 5 This category includes safety elements related to public transit. 6 This category includes bicycle and pedestrian projects.

Interagency Coordination SANDAG coordinates and collaborates on safety related concerns and projects with local jurisdictions, Caltrans, public transit providers, public safety agencies, and the public through a number of working groups and committees. The following committees and working groups were involved in the development of the 2018 and 20191 safety target setting process:

Public Safety Committee: Composed of both elected officials and public safety representatives, the goals of the Public Safety Committee include improving the quality of life in the region by promoting public safety and justice through collaboration, information sharing, effective technology, and objective monitoring and assessment.

Transportation Committee: Composed of elected officials and partner agencies, the Transportation Committee provides oversight for the preparation and implementation of San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan (Regional Plan), which merges the Regional Transportation Plan, the Sustainable Communities Strategy,

1 The Active Transportation Working Group and Interagency Technical Working Group on Tribal Transportation Issues did not convene during the 2019 target review period.

and the Regional Comprehensive Plan, and assists with other regional transportation planning and programming efforts. It provides oversight for the major highway, transit, regional arterial, and regional bikeway projects funded under the RTIP, including the TransNet Program of Projects.

Active Transportation Working Group: This group provides input on regional active transportation policy, planning, and implementation activities. The Active Transportation Working Group makes recommendations and fosters cooperation among the jurisdictions, agencies, and stakeholders within the San Diego region to plan for and support the development of local and regional improvements for active transportation modes (bicycling and walking), including Safe Routes to Transit, Safe Routes to School, facility development, operation and maintenance, education, encouragement, and evaluation.

Cities/County Transportation Advisory Committee: Comprised of local jurisdiction public works directors, the Cities/County Transportation Advisory Committee reviews and advises on the development and maintenance of the regional road system. The Cities/County Transportation Advisory Committee prioritizes project funding requests and makes recommendations to the Transportation Committee.

Interagency Technical Working Group on Tribal Transportation Issues: This group serves as a forum for regional tribal governments to discuss and coordinate transportation issues of mutual concern with the various public planning agencies in the region, including SANDAG, Caltrans, the County of San Diego, and the transit operators.

Regional Planning Technical Working Group: This group provides advice to the Regional Planning Committee and the Board of Directors on the development and implementation of the Regional Plan. The Regional Planning Technical Working Group consists of the planning or community development director from each member agency and representatives from other single-purpose regional agencies. The working group also provides coordination on regional growth management issues among member agencies.

San Diego Regional Traffic Engineers' Council: This group serves as the agency's technical advisory committee on regional traffic engineering matters. Membership consists of a traffic engineering representative from each of the region's cities, the County of San Diego, and Caltrans.

SANDAG also provides guidance and funding to local jurisdictions to improve safety for all roadway users, including a Regional Complete Streets Policy and funding through the Smart Growth Incentive Program and Active Transportation Grant Programs.

Target Achievement and Future Target Setting The Board of Directors approved supporting the 2018 and 2019 statewide safety targets, established by Caltrans. Once safety data is available for 2018 and 2019, the FHWA will determine if California has made significant progress toward meeting the established safety targets. SANDAG will continue to collaborate with Caltrans, FHWA, and other California MPOs on future safety targets.

PM 2: Pavement and Bridge condition

Target Setting Process Similar to the process for PM 1, for the performance measures included in PM 2, SANDAG and all MPOs have the option of supporting the state department of transportation’s pavement and bridge condition targets or developing regional targets. On May 20, 2018 Caltrans established statewide targets for the PM 2 performance measures, shown in Table H-4. The statewide targets were informed by Caltrans Transportation Asset Management Plan which considers life-cycle costs, risk and cost effectiveness. On October 5, 2018 the SANDAG Transportation Committee approved supporting the statewide targets for pavement and bridge condition established by Caltrans in accordance with the FAST Act.

Targets for PM 2 are based on a four-year performance period. The current performance period spans from 2018 to 2022. In addition to the four-year target, a midcycle two-year target is established. At the midpoint of the performance period, Caltrans and MPOs can evaluate the progress to the four-year target and may elect to update the four-year target at that point.

Table H-4: Statewide Performance Management 2 Pavement and Bridge Condition Targets

PM 2 STATEWIDE PERFORMANCE TARGETS FOR PAVEMENT AND BRIDGE CONDITION 2-Year NHS Targets 4-Year NHS Targets Performance Measures 2020 2022 Good Poor Good Poor Pavements on the NHS Interstate 45.1% 3.5% 44.5% 3.8% Non-Interstate 28.2% 7.3% 29.9% 7.2% Bridges on the NHS 69.1% 4.6% 70.5% 4.4%

Source: Caltrans, 2018

Measures and Methodology The performance measures included in PM 2 are applicable to the National Highway System (NHS). In general pavement condition for PM 2 is based on roughness, cracking, and rutting for asphalt pavement. Faulting is used for concrete pavement. The pavement measures are aggregated to lane miles based on measurement and observation of the curb lane.

Bridge condition is based on engineering assessment of the deck and support structures. The bridge measures are aggregated to the bridge deck area. This section, including Tables H-5 and H-6, summarizes the calculation and data sources for each performance measure included in PM 2.

For performance monitoring, pavement is categorized into asphalt, Jointed Concrete Pavement (JCP) and Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement (CRCP). Each category of pavement is assessed using various rating systems as listed below. The pavement category rating system is included in Table H-6.

• Asphalt: International Roughness Index (IRI), rutting, cracking percent • JCP: IRI, faulting, cracking percent • CRCP: IRI, cracking percent

Table H-5: PM 2 Performance Measure Methodology PM 2 PERFORMANCE MEASURE METHODOLOGY

Performance Measure Calculation Data Source

1. Pavement on the Interstate in good condition Lane miles with all metrics rated Highway Performance as good Monitoring System (HPMS)

2. Pavement on the interstate in poor condition Lane miles with two or more HPMS metric rated poor

3. Pavement on the non-interstate NHS in good Lane miles with all metrics rated HPMS condition as good

4. Pavement on the non-interstate NHS in poor Lane miles with two or more HPMS condition metric rated poor

5. Percentage of NHS bridges by deck area in Deck area of NHS bridges with National Bridge Good condition condition index of 7 or above Inventory (NBI) (deck, superstructure, and substructure) divided by deck area of all NHS bridges

6. Percentage of NHS bridges by deck area in Deck area of NHS bridges with NBI Poor condition any condition index of below 5 (deck, superstructure, and substructure) divided by deck area of all NHS bridges

Source: 23 CFR 490

Table H-6: Pavement Category Rating System

Source: FHWA, Transportation Performance Management (TPM)

2015 Regional Plan and 2018 RTIP Investments The 2015 Regional Plan includes $204 billion dollars2 for major project expenditures; 21 percent of that is established for maintenance and operations on highway and local streets and roads. As projects transition from the Regional Plan and are programmed into the SANDAG RTIP, project sponsors provide information that allow summary statistics of investments on the NHS. The 2018 RTIP includes investments that are anticipated to help preserve, maintain, or enhance the condition of NHS facilities. This includes 36 pavement and 16 bridge projects on the NHS totaling over $620 million dollars. Tables H-7 and H-8 summarize the investments currently programmed in the 2018 RTIP that support the pavement and bridge performance targets respectively.

Table H-7: 2018 RTIP Pavement Program Summary

2018 RTIP NHS PAVEMENT INVESTMENTS Investment Project Phase ($000) Environmental / Preliminary Engineering / Design $41,000 Right of Way $7,000 Construction $403,000 $451,000 Source: ProjectTrak, April 2019

2 Year of expenditure dollars

Table H-8: 2018 RTIP Bridge Program Summary

2018 RTIP NHS BRIDGE INVESTMENTS Investment Project Phase ($000) Environmental / Preliminary Engineering / Design $11,000 Right of Way $2,000 Construction $164,000 $177,000

Source: ProjectTrak, April 2019

Interagency Coordination SANDAG coordinates and collaborates on transportation infrastructure related concerns and projects with local jurisdictions, Caltrans, and the public through several working groups and committees. The PM 2 targets on pavement and bridge conditions were developed in coordination with the Transportation Committee, Cities/County Transportation Advisory Committee, and San Diego Regional Traffic Engineer Council. For more information on these groups see Interagency Coordination under PM 1: Transportation Safety.

Target Achievement and Future Target Setting On October 5, 2018, the Transportation Committee approved supporting the 2020 and 2022 statewide pavement and bridge condition targets, established by Caltrans. Once the full performance period has elapsed FHWA will determine if California has made significant progress toward meeting the pavement and bridge condition targets. SANDAG continues to collaborate with Caltrans, FHWA, and other California MPOs on the monitoring of progress towards targets.

PM 3: System Performance, Freight, and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality

Target Setting Process PM 3 consists of six performance measures that support three federal programs, National Highway Performance Program (NHPP), freight movement, and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ). The target setting process and timeframe is specific to each of these programs. This section summarizes the target setting timeframes, processes, and performance periods for the performance measures included in PM 3.

Three of the performance measures included in PM 3 allow SANDAG and all MPOs the option of supporting the state department of transportation’s targets or developing regional targets. For these performance measures, SANDAG chose to support the statewide targets. These measures include: percent of reliable person- miles traveled on the interstate, percent of reliable person-miles traveled on the non-interstate NHS, and percent of interstate system mileage providing reliable truck travel time.

The performance measure related to total emissions reductions by applicable pollutants under the CMAQ Program allows MPOs to establish regional targets based on emissions anticipated to be reduced from CMAQ- funded projects.

For the following two performance measures Caltrans and SANDAG are required to establish a single, unified target for the urbanized area within the SANDAG planning area. Figure H-1 shows SANDAG’s Urbanized Area.

• Annual Hours of Peak-Hour Excessive Delay per Capita • Percent of Non-Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) Travel

100

Figure H-1

101

The target setting timeframes for PM 3 performance measures vary by the associated federal program. Table H-9 summarizes the target setting dates for each of the PM 3 performance measures. On October 5, 2018, the SANDAG Transportation Committee approved supporting the statewide targets for system performance, freight, and CMAQ established by Caltrans in accordance with the FAST Act.

The CMAQ emissions reduction measure four-year performance period follows the federal fiscal year and spans from October 1, 2017, to September 30, 2021. The remaining performance measures follow the follow the calendar year, starting in January 1, 2018, and ending December 31, 2021.

Table H-9: Statewide and Regional Performance Management 3 System Performance, Freight and CMAQ Target Setting Approvals PM 3 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TARGET APPROVAL DATES FOR SYSTEM PERFORMANCE, FREIGHT, AND CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY Program Performance Measure Dates Targets Established

Percent of Reliable Person-Miles Traveled on the Interstate National Highway Performance Program (NHPP) Percent of Reliable Person-Miles Traveled on the Non-Interstate NHS October 5, 2018

Percent of Interstate System Mileage Freight Movement on the Providing Reliable Truck Travel Time Interstate System (Truck Travel Time Reliability Index)

Percent of Non-Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) Travel May 4, 2018 Annual Hours of Peak-Hour Excessive Congestion Mitigation and Air Delay per Capita Quality (CMAQ) Total Emissions Reductions by Applicable Pollutants under the September 15, 2018 CMAQ Program

Source: 23 CFR 490, SANDAG

The CMAQ Total emission reduction performance target reflects the anticipated cumulative emission reduction to be reported in the CMAQ Public Access System.

102

Table H-10: Statewide and Regional Performance Management 3 System Performance, Freight, and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Targets

PM 3 STATEWIDE AND REGIONAL TARGETS

2017 2-Year Target 4-Year Target Performance Measures Baseline Data 2020 2022 Percent of Reliable Person-Miles Traveled on 64.6% 65.1% (+0.5%) 65.6% (+1%) the Interstate Percent of Reliable Person-Miles Traveled on 73.0% N/A 74.0% (+1%) the Non-Interstate NHS Percent of Interstate System Mileage Providing Reliable Truck Travel Time (Truck Travel Time 1.69 1.68 (-0.01) 1.67 (-0.02) Reliability Index) Total Emissions Reductions by Applicable

Pollutants under the CMAQ Program San Diego Urban Area (UA)1 VOC (kg/day) 66 137 CO (kg/day) 0 0 NOx (kg/day) 82 168 Statewide VOC (kg/day) 951.83 961.35 (+1%) 970.87 (+2%)

CO (kg/day) 6,863.26 6,931.90 (+1%) 7,000.54 (+2%)

NOx (kg/day) 1,753.36 1,770.89 (+1%) 1,788.43 (+2%)

PM10 (kg/day) 2,431.21 2,455.52 (+1%) 2,479.83 (+2%)

PM 2.5 (kg/day) 904.25 913.29 (+1%) 922.34 (+2%) Annual Hours of Peak-Hour Excessive Delay

per Capita2 San Diego UA 18.4 hours N/A 18.0 (-2.0%) Percent of Non-Single Occupancy Vehicle

(SOV) Travel3 San Diego UA 23.8% 24.8% (+1%) 25.2 (1.4%)

Source: Caltrans, and SANDAG 2018

Notes: 1 The CMAQ targets were established in the CMAQ Performance Plan on September 15, 2018, and include emission reductions from projects reported in the CMAQ Public Access System. 2 Source: NPMRDS Analytics Tool (https://npmrds.ritis.org/analytics/) 3 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

103

Measures and Methodology For the reliable person miles traveled performance measures the Level of Travel Time Reliability (LOTTR) is first calculated for each applicable roadway segment for four time periods. 6 a.m. to 10 a.m., 10 a.m. to 4 p.m., and 4 p.m. to 8 p.m. on weekdays and 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. during weekends. The LOTTR is the 80th percentile travel time divided by the 50th percentile travel time. The LOTTR is weighed by the facility segment length, annual traffic volume, and vehicle occupancy value.

Freight movement is assessed by a Truck Travel Time Reliability (TTTR) Index. Reporting is divided into five periods: morning peak (6 to 10 a.m.), midday (10 a.m. to 4 p.m.) and afternoon peak (4 to 8 p.m.) Mondays through Fridays; weekends (6 a.m. to 8 p.m.); and overnights for all days (8 p.m. to 6 a.m.). The TTTR ratio is generated by dividing the 95th percentile time by the normal time (50th percentile) for each segment. Then, the TTTR Index is generated by multiplying each segment’s largest ratio of the five periods by its length, then dividing the sum of all length-weighted segments by the total length of Interstate.

The Annual Hours of Peak Hour Excessive Delay per Capita is the amount of time spent in congested conditions, which are defined as conditions that result in excess delay at speeds of 20 miles per hour (mph) or 60 percent of the posted speed limit, whichever is greater. Travel time data is aggregated in 15-minute intervals per vehicle. The morning period is 6 to 10 a.m. on weekdays. The afternoon period is 3 to 7 p.m. or 4 to 8 p.m., providing flexibility to State DOTs and MPOs.

Additional details on the methodology used in calculating the six performance measures included in PM 3 are summarized in Table H-11.

104

Table H-11: PM 3 Performance Measure Methodology

PM 3 PERFORMANCE MEASURE METHODOLOGY

Performance Measure Calculation Data Source

1. Percent of Reliable Person-Miles Traveled on Percent of Interstate by length National Performance the Interstate with an LOTTR less than 1.5 Measure Research Data Set (NPMRDS) 2. Percent of Reliable Person-Miles Traveled on Percent of non-Interstate NHS NPMRDS the Non-Interstate NHS by length with an LOTTR less than 1.5 3. Percent of Interstate System Mileage Weighted sum of reliable NPMRDS Providing Reliable Truck Travel Time (Truck segments divided by all Travel Time Reliability Index) segments 4. Total Emissions Reductions by Applicable Daily Kilograms of Emission CMAQ Public Access Pollutants under the CMAQ Program Reductions System 5. Annual Hours of Peak-Hour Excessive Delay Time of excess delay weighted NPMRDS, Highway per Capita by average vehicle volume and Performance occupancy by vehicle class Monitoring System (HPMS) 6. Percent of Non-Single Occupancy Vehicle Commute to work totaled by American Community (SOV) Travel mode, 5-year estimate Survey (ACS)

Source: 23 CFR 490

2015 Regional Plan and 2018 RTIP Investments A foundational element of the 2015 Regional Plan is the continued development of a regional transportation system that provides multimodal transportation options to the traveling public. Fostering travel choices between the places where people live, work, and play supports travel time reliability, promotes non-SOV travel, and reduces excessive delay and pollutant emissions. Of the nearly $16 billion dollars programmed in the 2018 RTIP $7.2 billion dollars are programmed for multimodal facilities, transit, active transportation, transportation systems and demand management including over $44 million in the region’s rideshare programs.

Interagency Coordination SANDAG coordinates and collaborates on transportation infrastructure related concerns and projects with local jurisdictions, Caltrans, and the public through established working groups and committees. The PM 3 targets on System Performance, Freight, and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality were developed in coordination with the Transportation Committee, Cities/County Transportation Advisory Committee, and San Diego Regional Traffic Engineer Council. For more information on these groups see Interagency Coordination under PM 1: Transportation Safety.

Target Achievement and Future Target Setting At the end of the performance period, FHWA will determine if California has made significant progress toward meeting the targets established for Interstate and non-Interstate NHS travel time reliability and freight reliability measures. SANDAG continues to collaborate with Caltrans, FHWA, and other California MPOs on

105

the monitoring of progress towards targets. At the midpoint of the four-year performance period, SANDAG, Caltrans and other California MPOs will evaluate progress towards achieving the 2022 targets. At the midpoint, MPOs and Caltrans can elect to update the 2022 target.

Data for the travel time reliability measures under PM 3 will become available on an annual basis and inform agencies on progress toward performance targets. SANDAG, Caltrans and member jurisdictions have significantly invested in projects that are anticipated to support the achievement of PM 3 targets.

Transit Asset Management

Target Setting Process There are two types of targets for Transit Asset Management (TAM), provider targets, and regional targets. The SANDAG planning area includes two providers of public transportation subject to this target setting requirement, the San Diego Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) and North County Transit District (NCTD). The provider targets are established by MTS and NCTD separately for their service area during the development of their four-year TAM Plan. The provider targets are updated annually. MPOs, in coordination with providers, are responsible for developing regional TAM targets. MPOs are required to set TAM targets with each update of their Regional Transportation Plan.

The TAM Final Rule includes four asset categories: equipment, facilities, infrastructure, and rolling stock. There is one performance measure for each asset category. Each asset category may contain several asset types which are calculated separately. Regional TAM targets are required for each asset type. The performance measures are calculated such that a value of zero indicates that the asset type is in a state of good repair. The 2019 regional TAM targets are shown in Table H-12.

106

Table H-12: Regional TAM Targets

REGIONAL TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND TARGETS 2019 Asset Category Performance Measure Asset Type Regional Target Automobiles 33.3% Equipment: Percentage of nonrevenue Trucks and other Non-revenue support-service vehicles met or exceeded Useful 50.5% Rubber Tire Vehicles and maintenance vehicles Life Benchmark (ULB)1 Steel Wheel Vehicles 0.0% Passenger Facilities 0.0% Facilities: Percentage of assets with Passenger Parking Maintenance and condition rating below 3.0 on 0.0% administrative facilities; and FTA Transit Economic Facilities passenger stations (buildings) Requirements Model (TERM) Maintenance Facilities 0.0% and parking facilities Scale2 Administrative Facilities 0.0% Infrastructure: Percentage of track segments Commuter Rail 2.0% Only rail fixed-guideway, track, with performance restrictions signals and systems Light Rail 1.8% Articulated bus 0.0% Over-the-road bus 0.0% Bus 13.8% Cutaway Bus 7.2%

Percentage of revenue vehicles Light rail vehicle 0.0% Rolling Stock: met or exceeded Useful Life Revenue vehicles by mode Minivan 100.0% Benchmark Commuter rail 71.0% locomotive Commuter rail 57.0% passenger coach

Vintage trolley/streetcar 0.0%

Source: 49 CFR 625; SANDAG, MTS, and NCTD

Notes: 1 Useful Life Benchmark (ULB) is a value used with lifecycle cost to assess when an asset costs more to maintain than to replace. MTS and NCTD used the same ULB. 2 TERM is a five-point scale (1-5) with one signifying poor condition and five excellent.

To coordinate the development of regional TAM targets, MTS and NCTD provided SANDAG with their respective target values and inventory quantities by asset type. MTS and NCTD target and inventory values were applied in developing regional TAM targets using a weighted average calculation.3

3 The calculation involved multiplying each provider’s target by their inventory. The results were added together, divided by the sum of the inventories, and multiplied by 100.

107

Measures and Methodology The performance measures and their calculations are specified in the TAM Final Rule. Additionally, the asset types that are included in each asset category are established by FTA and detailed in the FTA Asset Inventory Module. The infrastructure asset category assesses performance restrictions on rail segments. A performance restriction exists when the permissible speed is less than the guideway’s full-service speed. For more details on infrastructure performance refer to the FTA Performance Restriction (Slow Zone) Calculation.

2015 Regional Plan and 2018 RTIP Investments The 2015 Regional Plan includes $204 billion dollars4 in transportation investments; 50 percent of that is for transit consisting of 29 percent for transit capital and 21 percent for transit operations and maintenance. Transit capital investments include construction of transit facilities and procurement of transit fleet vehicles. Transit operations and maintenance includes costs associated with running the transit system, repairs, and preventative maintenance. The 2018 RTIP was reviewed for projects sponsored by SANDAG, MTS and NCTD that include elements that corresponded to a TAM asset category as shown in Table B-13. The 2018 RTIP includes over 40 projects totaling more than $2 billion dollars in support of TAM targets.

Table H-13: 2018 RTIP Regional TAM Programming 2018 RTIP TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY CATEGORY

TOTAL TAM Project Asset Category MTS NCTD SANDAG Programming ($000)

Equipment $- $- $941 $941

Facilities $143,886 $146,784 $77,624 $368,294

Infrastructure $35,441 $13,822 $1,287,753 $1,337,016

Rolling Stock $821,515 $108,054 $14,700 $944,269

TOTAL $1,000,842 $268,660 $1,381,018 $2,650,520

Source: ProjectTrak, July 2019

Interagency Coordination In 2018 SANDAG, MTS and NCTD updated their master MOU agreements to include provisions on the sharing of TAM and performance data including targets, inventory and asset conditions. SANDAG continues to coordinate and collaborate with the MTS, NCTD, and FTA to support TAM objectives.

Target Achievement and Future Target Setting The Board of Directors approved the 2019 regional TAM targets at its September 28, 2018, meeting. As data is shared by MTS and NCTD, in alignment with their annual updates, SANDAG will continue to work with the providers and FTA to monitor progress on achievement of regional TAM targets.

4 Year of expenditure dollars

108 Attachment 7

Table 4 Changes During Public Comment Period Amendment No. 5

Project ID Change Reason

V07 Project deleted during the public comment period due to a programming error - will be included in Amendment No. 7

CNTY21 Project removed from the RTIP at the request of the County - will be included in Amendment No. 6

IB20 Project removed from the RTIP at the request of the City.

109