DOCSLIB.ORG

HISTORY of TAHOE NATIONAL FOREST: 1840-1940 a Cultural Resources Overview History

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

HISTORY OF TAHOE NATIONAL FOREST: 1840-1940 A Cultural Resources Overview History Prepared by: W. Turrentine Jackson Rand Herbert Stephen Wee Report Number 15 1982 Jackson Research Projects 702 Miller Drive Davis, California 95616 Contract Number 43-9A63-1-1745 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I: Introduction Purpose of the Historical Overview Historical Perspectives on the Development of the Tahoe National Forest Region CHAPTER II: The Environmental and Historical Context of the Tahoe National Forest Region Physical Characteristics of the Area Encompassed by the Tahoe National Forest Pre-Gold Rush History of the Northern Sierra Nevada Region Gold Rush California, 1848-1849: A Regional Overview CHAPTER III: The Era of Individual Enterprise: Mining and Settlement on Tahoe National Forest Lands, 1848-1859 Introduction Gold Mining in Tahoe National Forest, 1848-1859 Mining Settlement and Community Development Supplying the Mines, 1848-1859 Logging and Agricultural Development CHAPTER IV: Era of Development and Diversification, 1859-1906 The Mining Industry on the Forest Transportation Within Tahoe National Forest Logging Industry Within the Tahoe National Forest, 1859-1906 Agriculture in the Forest, 1859-1906 Other Pre-National Forest Industries CHAPTER V: Era of National Forest Management, 1906-1940 Establishment of Tahoe Forest Reserve Tahoe National Forest Administration of Tahoe National Forest Lands, 1906-1940 Logging on the Tahoe National Forest, 1906-1940 Mining on the Tahoe National Forest, 1906-1940 Water Development in the Tahoe National Forest, 1906-1940 Grazing on the Tahoe National Forest, 1906-1940 Recreation on the Tahoe National Forest, 1906-1940 Forest Service Recreational Developments Other Forest Service Improvements CHAPTER VI: Concluding Statements CHAPTER VII: Research Problems and Directions CHAPTER VIII: Management Recommendations CHAPTER IX: Research Locations BIBLIOGRAPHY ILLUSTRATIONS AND PHOTOGRAPHS 1. The Miner's Sunday 2. A Sunday's Amusements 3. A Daily Pleasure 4. Occupation for Rainy Days 5. The Mountain Expressman 6. Residence and Farm of A. P. Chapman 7. "The Expressman Has Arrived" 8. Lodgings About 1855 9. Residence and Ranch of H. H. Kennedy, Goodyear's Bar, Sierra County, California 10. Hidden Treasure Mine, Sunny South, Placer County, California 11. Forty-Stamp Gold Mill 12. Cross-Section Forty-Stamp Gold Mill 13. Batea For Gold Mill 14. Battery Frame 15. Schematic View, Malakoff Diggings, Ca. 1880 16. English (Rudyard) Dam 17. Omega Mine, Washington Ridge 18. Truckee Hotel 19. Bear Valley Mill, Towle Brothers, Dutch Flat 20. Kearsarge Mill, Towle Brothers, Dutch Flat 21. M. L. Marsh Ox-Teams and Barns 22. M. L. Marsh Sawmill 23. Gold Lake Ranger Station, Ca. 1922 24. Sierra Valley Ranger Station, 1915 25. Logging Engine 26. Steam Donkey 27. Steam Donkey Yarding, Ca. 1900 28. Railroad Logging Engine, Cars; Loader in Background 29. Auburn Ski Club C.C.C. Camp 30. Sattley C.C.C. Camp 31. Temporary Logging Structure 32. Fir Camp, Forest Hill; 1924. Fire Fighter's Payday MAPS 1. Tahoe National Forest 2. Ancient and Modern River System 3. Main Routes to the Gold Fields 4. Yuba Basin Mining Water Supply, 1850-53 5. Location of Gold Districts 6. Geologic Map of Sierra City and Johnsville Districts, Plumas Counties 7. Meadow Lake Mining District 8. North Bloomfield Area, Ca. 1875 9. Yuba Basin Hydraulic Mining Ditch System 1854-1884 10. Routes Across the Tahoe National Forest 11. Stagecoach Routes, 1902 12. Truckee Basin Logging Railroads (1868-1930) 13. Geologic Map of Alleghany District, Sierra County 14. P.G.& E. Facilities in the Yuba Basin, 1911 15. Tahoe National Forest - Cattle - 1915 16. Tahoe National Forest - Sheep - 1915 17. Tahoe National Forest - Grazing, 1939 TABLES 1. Population by County 2. Ethnicity, Ca. 1852 3. Sierra County Sawmills 4. Cattle, 1860-1900 5. Sheep, 1860-1900 6. Placer Gold Production by Mining Type, T.N.F., 1937 7. Livestock Permitted on the Tahoe National Forest 8. Estimated Population within Tahoe National Forest Boundaries, 1850-1940 CHAPTER I Introduction Purpose of the Historical Overview This historical study is one component of a general cultural resources overview being prepared by the Tahoe National Forest as part of its forest land management plan. The purposes of the overview are threefold. Our primary objective is to provide U. S. Forest Service personnel with an analytical and narrative historical overview to aid in identifying and measuring the potential significance of historic buildings, sites or objects located on forest lands that are representative of major themes, eras, activities or cultural processes in the area. Second, we hope to raise new research questions for future study and interpretation and to develop some research hypotheses to be tested by future work. Third, we will suggest management recommendations for enhancing identification and evaluation of historic site types and material remains likely to be discovered on Tahoe National Forest lands. Cultural resources management is a relatively new and vital field that has developed largely in the last fifteen years as a result of intensified federal efforts to identify, evaluate and manage cultural resources as an element of the environment. Federal policies are based upon and implemented by a series of laws, regulations and presidential directives dating from the Antiquities Act of 1906 (16 USC 431). A positive national policy for the preservation of the cultural environment was provided in the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (16 USC 470). The act mandated protection of properties on or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places and established processes designed to ensure that avoidance or mitigation of damage to such properties be considered in the planning process of Federal agencies. The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 USC 4321) further declared it the policy of the federal government to preserve important historic, cultural, and natural aspects of our national heritage. Compliance with NEPA requires consideration of adverse impacts on cultural resources during project planning and execution. Executive Order 11593 (1971) went further than either of these acts by requiring federal agencies to assume a leadership role "in preserving, restoring and maintaining the historic and cultural environment of the nation." The Order charged agencies with the task of locating, inventorying and nominating to the Secretary of the Interior all historic properties under their jurisdiction that appear to qualify for listing on the National Register. Until such inventories are completed, the presidential order directs agencies to "execute caution" to ensure that such resources are not transferred, sold, demolished or substantially altered. Traditionally the term "cultural resources" has been used rather narrowly to refer to archeological remains and to historical structures. Archeologists, anthropologists, historians, architects, sociologists, folklorists, geographers, planners, and others have in recent years increasingly pooled their resources and talents to respond to the new federal requirements for protection and enhancement of our cultural environment. Archeologists led the way for other disciplines in bringing about public awareness of the irreplaceable and non-renewable quality of our national heritage. They were largely responsible for forcing passage of the current legislation requiring an assessment of resources to be impacted by federal projects. The preservation of significant historical properties has long been a concern of historians and historical architects as evidenced by passage of the Historic Sites Act of 1935 which authorized establishment of the National Landmarks Program. Recently historians have followed archeologists in taking a more activist role in inventorying historic resources and in working with private and public agencies to preserve structures and sites of local and regional historical significance. Landscape architects have exhibited a keen interest in utilizing their expertise in land use planning to conserve historical and cultural rural landscapes (Zube 1977). Sociologists and folklorists have also demonstrated a concern for the impact of programs on all forms of traditional cultural expression (verbal, artifactual and behavioral) among all social classes (Bartis 1979). Each of these disciplines has its separate spheres of interest and methodological approaches. We also share many concerns and goals. Historical resources management, as a profession and a movement, has broadened its interests considerably in recent years. The American historic preservation movement has strong roots in the eastern states; its philosophy and approach has traditionally been molded by an urban, elitists bias demonstrated by its orientation toward prestigious architectural monuments and grand homes. The National Register of Historic Places, the official list of the nation's cultural resources worthy of preservation, reflects this orientation. Critics of its policies have pointed out that rural America and a distinct anti-urban tradition have also played an important role in forming our national values. In dealing with the cultural resources of remote, mountainous settlements significant historical remains can be expected of a type significantly different than those in urban areas. Any meaningful program of rural or mountain community preservation would require placing great importance on preserving the best remaining examples of vernacular architecture.
Recommended publications

  • Capitol Cover 10.5

    California State Capitol Museum n a e c O c i f i c a P Kathy Katranis Fotopoulos, M.A. Ed., author Berndt Stolfi, M.A. (History), and Ann Fry, B.A. (Environmental studies), co-authors Acknowledgments This school packet was made possible with the support and cooperation of the following people: Donna McGuire, Jonathan Williams, Jeanne Ekstrom, Michelle Edwards, Sally Smock, Miriam Meidam, Jenan Saunders, Gail Dudding, California State Capitol Museum staff and California State Parks Interpretive Publications Section. California State Parks does not discriminate against individuals with disabilities. Prior to arrival, visitors with disabilities who need assistance should contact the park at: 916-324-0312. To receive this publication in an alternate format, write to the Communications Office at: California State Parks, P.O. Box 942896, Sacramento, CA 94296-0001. © 2005 California State Parks Table of Contents Page Standards Contents Number Met Table of Contents .................................................................... i Student Activity Packet Introductory Information Your Pathway to Sacramento ....................................... 3 ............................ 4.1 California Counties ....................................................... 4 ............................ 4.1 State Capitol Vocabulary .............................................. 5 ............................ 4.5 History of California History of California and the State Capitol ................... 6 ............................ 4.5 History of the Capitals and
  • State of Sierra Frogs

    State of Sierra Frogs

    State of Sierra Frogs A report on the status of frogs & toads in the Sierra Nevada & California Cascade Mountains State of Sierra Frogs A report on the status of frogs & toads in the Sierra Nevada & California Cascade Mountains By Marion Gee, Sara Stansfield, & Joan Clayburgh July 2008 www.sierranevadaalliance.org State of Sierra Frogs 1 Acknowledgements The impetus for this report was the invaluable research on pesticides by Carlos Davidson, professor at San Francisco State University. Davidson, along with Amy Lind (US Forest Service), Curtis Milliron (California Department of Fish and Game), David Bradford (United States Environmental Protection Agency) and Kim Vincent (Graduate Student, San Francisco State University), generously donated their time and expertise to speak at two public workshops on the topics of Sierra frogs and toads as well as to provide comments for this document. Our thanks to the other reviewers of this manuscripts including Bob Stack (Jumping Frog Research Institute), Katie Buelterman, Dan Keenan, and Genevieve Jessop Marsh. This project was fortunate to receive contributions of photography and artwork from John Muir Laws, Elena DeLacy, Bob Stack, Ralph & Lisa Cutter and Vance Vredenburg. Photo credits are found with each caption. This work was made possible by generous grants from the Rose Foundation for Communities and the Environment and the State Water Resources Control Board. Funding for this project has been provided in part through an Agreement with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) pursuant to the Costa-Machado Water Act of 2000 (Proposition 13) and any amendments thereto for the implementation of California’s Non-point Source Pollution Control Program.
  • Building 27, Suite 3 Fort Missoula Road Missoula, MT 59804

    Building 27, Suite 3 Fort Missoula Road Missoula, MT 59804

    Photo by Louis Kamler. www.nationalforests.org Building 27, Suite 3 Fort Missoula Road Missoula, MT 59804 Printed on recycled paper 2013 ANNUAL REPORT Island Lake, Eldorado National Forest Desolation Wilderness. Photo by Adam Braziel. 1 We are pleased to present the National Forest Foundation’s (NFF) Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2013. During this fourth year of the Treasured Landscapes campaign, we have reached $86 million in both public and private support towards our $100 million campaign goal. In this year’s report, you can read about the National Forests comprising the centerpieces of our work. While these landscapes merit special attention, they are really emblematic of the entire National Forest System consisting of 155 National Forests and 20 National Grasslands. he historical context for these diverse and beautiful Working to protect all of these treasured landscapes, landscapes is truly inspirational. The century-old to ensure that they are maintained to provide renewable vision to put forests in a public trust to secure their resources and high quality recreation experiences, is National Forest Foundation 2013 Annual Report values for the future was an effort so bold in the late at the core of the NFF’s mission. Adding value to the 1800’s and early 1900’s that today it seems almost mission of our principal partner, the Forest Service, is impossible to imagine. While vestiges of past resistance what motivates and challenges the NFF Board and staff. to the public lands concept live on in the present, Connecting people and places reflects our organizational the American public today overwhelmingly supports values and gives us a sense of pride in telling the NFF maintaining these lands and waters in public ownership story of success to those who generously support for the benefit of all.
  • THE EXPLORERS by Richard F. Pourade CHAPTER ONE: BEFORE

    THE EXPLORERS by Richard F. Pourade CHAPTER ONE: BEFORE

    THE EXPLORERS By Richard F. Pourade CHAPTER ONE: BEFORE THE EXPLORERS San Diego was a well populated area before the first Spanish explorers arrived. The climate was wetter and perhaps warmer, and the land more wooded than now. The remnant of a great inland lake covered most of Imperial Valley. The San Diego River wandered back and forth over the broad delta it had formed between Point Loma and Old Town, alternately emptying into Mission Bay and San Diego Bay. The natural food supply was so abundant that the state as a whole supported an Indian population far greater than any equal area in the United States. The native population of the southern counties alone must have been at least 10,000. The early maps made of San Diego Bay by the Spanish explorers show the same general configuration as of today, except, of course, for the many changes in the shoreline made by dredging and filling in recent years. The maps, crudely drawn without proper surveys, vary considerably in detail. Thousands of years ago, in the late part of the Ice Age, Point Loma was an island, as were Coronado and North Island. Coronado used to be known as South Island. There was no bay, as we think of it now. A slightly curving coastline was protected by the three islands, of which, of course, Point Loma was by far the largest. What we now know as Crown Point in Mission Bay was a small peninsula projecting into the ocean. On the mainland, the San Diego and Linda Vista mesas were one continuous land mass.
  • Land Stewardship Proposal, Tahoe National Forest, Bear River

    Land Stewardship Proposal, Tahoe National Forest, Bear River

    Land Stewardship Proposal for the Lake Spaulding, Bear River, & Fordyce Lake Planning Units of the Yuba Bear Watershed by the USDA Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest PART 1 - ORGANIZATIONAL INFORMATION Contact Information: Primary Contact: Fran Herbst Lands Program Manager 631 Coyote Street Nevada City, CA 95959 (530) 478-6852 [email protected] Fax (530) 478-6109 Secondary Contact: Heather Newell (New Secondary Contact) Yuba River Ranger District Assistant Public Service Officer 15924 Highway 49 Camptonville, CA 95922 (530) 288-0727 [email protected] Fax (530) 478-6109 Executive Director: Tom Quinn Forest Supervisor 631 Coyote Street Nevada City, CA 95959 (530) 478-6200 [email protected] Fax (530) 478-6109 1 2. Executive Summary The Tahoe National Forest (TNF) is managed by the United States Forest Service (USFS) which is a federal agency in the Department of Agriculture. National Forest System (NFS) lands are generally managed with similar goals and objectives as the Beneficial Public Values (BPVs) identified for Stewardship lands. Some of the laws requiring the protection of these values include the National Forest Management Act, National Environmental Policy Act, Multiple Use Sustained Yield Act, Endangered Species Act, Clean Water Act, National Historic Preservation Act, and Archaeological Resources Protection Act. The Forest Service was established in 1905. The Forest Service manages 193 million acres of public lands, known collectively as the National Forest System. Currently, a critical emphasis of the USFS is to retain and restore ecological resilience of the NFS lands to achieve sustainable ecosystems that provide a broad range of services to humans and other organisms.
  • City of South Lake Tahoe Municipal Services Review and Sphere of Influence Update

    City of South Lake Tahoe Municipal Services Review and Sphere of Influence Update

    Agenda Item #4E Page 1 of 99 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT EL DORADO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE MUNICIPAL SERVICES REVIEW AND SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE MAY 2016 Agenda Item #4E Page 2 of 99 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE MUNICIPAL SERVICES REVIEW AND SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE Prepared for: El Dorado Local Agency Formation Commission 550 Main Street Placerville, CA 95667 Contact Person: Jose Henriquez, Executive Officer Phone: (530) 295-2707 Consultant: 6051 N. Fresno Street, Suite 200 Contact: Steve Brandt, Project Manager Phone: (559) 733-0440 Fax: (559) 733-7821 May 2016 © Copyright by Quad Knopf, Inc. Unauthorized use prohibited. Cover Photo: City of South Lake Tahoe 150245 Agenda Item #4E Page 3 of 99 EL DORADO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION Commissioners Shiva Frentzen, El Dorado County Representative Brian Veerkamp, El Dorado County Representative Mark Acuna, City Representative Austin Sass, City Representative Dale Coco, MD, Special District Representative Ken Humphreys, Chair, Special District Representative Dyana Anderly, Public Member Representative Alternate Commissioners John Clerici, City Representative Niles Fleege, Public Member Representative Holly Morrison, Special District Representative Michael Ranalli, El Dorado County Representative Staff Jose Henriquez, Executive Officer Erica Sanchez, Policy Analyst Denise Tebaldi, Interim Commission Clerk Legal Counsel Kara Ueda, LAFCO Counsel Consultant 6051 N. Fresno, Suite 200 Fresno, CA 93710 Copyright by Quad Knopf, Inc. Unauthorized use prohibited. © 150245 Agenda Item #4E Page 4 of 99 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 - Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 - Role and Responsibility of Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) ...... 1-1 1.2 - Municipal Service Review Purpose ...................................................................................
  • He Politics of Business in California 1890-1920 SI 2.50

    He Politics of Business in California 1890-1920 SI 2.50

    he Politics of Business in California 1890-1920 SI 2.50 The Politics of Business in California. 1890-1920 Manse/ G. Blackford The American experience between the Civil War and World War I can perhaps be best understood as an attempt to reorder national life in the wake of a radical social and eco­ nomic disruption that was brought on by rapid industrialization. In California, even more than in other areas of the nation, fundamental and dramatic changes were to occur throughout the period as various sectors of the state's rapidly ex­ panding economy became both increasingly differentiated and more closely interdependent. Through a series of mergers and consolida­ tions, large, diversified, integrated, and multi­ level firms came to replace smaller, more specialized, independent, and single-level companies. Trade associations, marketing com­ bines, and other affiliations served to organize these emergent firms within each industry; and businessmen, acutely aware of a need for recognition of their status as members of a profession, began increasingly to act in con­ cert as a special-interest group, both in public, in their representations to legislative bodies, and in private, as apologists for commercial practice and as agents working to suppress competition and increase efficiency. Professor Blackford examines three of Cali­ fornia's more important basic productive in­ dustries—agriculture, oil, and lumber—and three of its principal supportive businesses — banking, investment banking, and insurance — together with two major issues that cut across industry lines: the growing movement to bring about state regulation of railroads and public utilities, and the effort to effect tax reform.
  • HISTORY of the TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST a Compilation

    HISTORY of the TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST a Compilation

    HISTORY OF THE TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST A Compilation Posting the Toiyabe National Forest Boundary, 1924 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Chronology ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Bridgeport and Carson Ranger District Centennial .................................................................... 126 Forest Histories ........................................................................................................................... 127 Toiyabe National Reserve: March 1, 1907 to Present ............................................................ 127 Toquima National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ....................................................... 128 Monitor National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ........................................................ 128 Vegas National Forest: December 12, 1907 – July 2, 1908 .................................................... 128 Mount Charleston Forest Reserve: November 5, 1906 – July 2, 1908 ................................... 128 Moapa National Forest: July 2, 1908 – 1915 .......................................................................... 128 Nevada National Forest: February 10, 1909 – August 9, 1957 .............................................. 128 Ruby Mountain Forest Reserve: March 3, 1908 – June 19, 1916 ..........................................
  • Mining's Toxic Legacy

    Mining's Toxic Legacy

    Mining’s Toxic Legacy An Initiative to Address Mining Toxins in the Sierra Nevada Acknowledgements _____________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The Sierra Fund would like to thank Dr. Carrie Monohan, contributing author of this report, and Kyle Leach, lead technical advisor. Thanks as well to Dr. William M. Murphy, Dr. Dave Brown, and Professor Becky Damazo, RN, of California State University, Chico for their research into the human and environmental impacts of mining toxins, and to the graduate students who assisted them: Lowren C. McAmis and Melinda Montano, Gina Grayson, James Guichard, and Yvette Irons. Thanks to Malaika Bishop and Roberto Garcia for their hard work to engage community partners in this effort, and Terry Lowe and Anna Reynolds Trabucco for their editorial expertise. For production of this report we recognize Elizabeth “Izzy” Martin of The Sierra Fund for conceiving of and coordinating the overall Initiative and writing substantial portions of the document, Kerry Morse for editing, and Emily Rivenes for design and formatting. Many others were vital to the development of the report, especially the members of our Gold Ribbon Panel and our Government Science and Policy Advisors. We also thank the Rose Foundation for Communities and the Environment and The Abandoned Mine Alliance who provided funding to pay for a portion of the expenses in printing this report. Special thanks to Rebecca Solnit, whose article “Winged Mercury and
  • Sierra Nevada Framework FEIS Chapter 3

    Sierra Nevada Framework FEIS Chapter 3

    table of contrents Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment – Part 4.6 4.6. Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, and Fungi4.6. Fungi Introduction Part 3.1 of this chapter describes landscape-scale vegetation patterns. Part 3.2 describes the vegetative structure, function, and composition of old forest ecosystems, while Part 3.3 describes hardwood ecosystems and Part 3.4 describes aquatic, riparian, and meadow ecosystems. This part focuses on botanical diversity in the Sierra Nevada, beginning with an overview of botanical resources and then presenting a more detailed analysis of the rarest elements of the flora, the threatened, endangered, and sensitive (TES) plants. The bryophytes (mosses and liverworts), lichens, and fungi of the Sierra have been little studied in comparison to the vascular flora. In the Pacific Northwest, studies of these groups have received increased attention due to the President’s Northwest Forest Plan. New and valuable scientific data is being revealed, some of which may apply to species in the Sierra Nevada. This section presents an overview of the vascular plant flora, followed by summaries of what is generally known about bryophytes, lichens, and fungi in the Sierra Nevada. Environmental Consequences of the alternatives are only analyzed for the Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive plants, which include vascular plants, several bryophytes, and one species of lichen. 4.6.1. Vascular plants4.6.1. plants The diversity of topography, geology, and elevation in the Sierra Nevada combine to create a remarkably diverse flora (see Section 3.1 for an overview of landscape patterns and vegetation dynamics in the Sierra Nevada). More than half of the approximately 5,000 native vascular plant species in California occur in the Sierra Nevada, despite the fact that the range contains less than 20 percent of the state’s land base (Shevock 1996).
  • Historic Resources of the Santa Fe Trail (Revised)

    Historic Resources of the Santa Fe Trail (Revised)

    NPS Form 10-900-b (Rev. 01/2009) OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NPS Approved – April 3, 2013 National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (formerly 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items New Submission X Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Historic Resources of the Santa Fe Trail (Revised) B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) I. The Santa Fe Trail II. Individual States and the Santa Fe Trail A. International Trade on the Mexican Road, 1821-1846 A. The Santa Fe Trail in Missouri B. The Mexican-American War and the Santa Fe Trail, 1846-1848 B. The Santa Fe Trail in Kansas C. Expanding National Trade on the Santa Fe Trail, 1848-1861 C. The Santa Fe Trail in Oklahoma D. The Effects of the Civil War on the Santa Fe Trail, 1861-1865 D. The Santa Fe Trail in Colorado E. The Santa Fe Trail and the Railroad, 1865-1880 E. The Santa Fe Trail in New Mexico F. Commemoration and Reuse of the Santa Fe Trail, 1880-1987 C. Form Prepared by name/title KSHS Staff, amended submission; URBANA Group, original submission organization Kansas State Historical Society date Spring 2012 street & number 6425 SW 6th Ave.
  • Hallelujah Junction Wildlife Area Land Management Plan

    Hallelujah Junction Wildlife Area Land Management Plan

    Hallelujah Junction Wildlife Area Land Management Plan PREPARED BY SUSTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL INC FOR THE California Department of Fish and Game North Central Region December 2009 SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE rptfic'iii Printed on sustainable paper products COVER: Appleton Utopia Forest Stewardship Council certified by Smartwood (a Rainforest Alliance program), ISO 14001 Registered Environmental Management System, EPA SmartWay Transport Partner Interior pages: Navigator Hybrid 85%-100% recycled post consumer waste blended with virgin fiber, Forest Stewarship Council certified chain of custody, ISO 14001 Registered Environmental Management System, 80% energy from renewable resources Divider pages (main body): Domtar Colors Sustainable Forest Initiative fiber sourcing certified, 30% post consumer waste Divider pages (appendices): Hammermill Fore MP 30% post consumer waste PDF VERSION DESIGNED FOR DUPLEX PRINTING State of California The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Hallelujah Junction Wildlife Area Land Management Plan Sierra and Lassen Counties, California UPDATED: DECEMBER 2009 PREPARED FOR: California Department of Fish and Game North Central Region Headquarters 1701 Nimbus Road, Suite A Rancho Cordova, California 95670 Attention: Terri Weist 530.644.5980 PREPARED BY: Sustain Environmental Inc. 3104 "O" Street #164 Sacramento, California 95816 916.457.1856 APPRnvFn RY- Hallelujah Junction Wildlife Area Land Management Plan Table of Contents................................................................................................................................................i