DOCSLIB.ORG

MATH 131 (2017), DAY-BY-DAY CONTENT Week 1. Day 1, Thurs., Aug 31: 1) Metric Spaces: (A) Recall the Notion of Continuous Map Rn

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MATH 131 (2017), DAY-BY-DAY CONTENT Week 1. Day 1, Thurs., Aug 31: 1) Metric Spaces: (A) Recall the Notion of Continuous Map Rn MATH 131 (2017), DAY-BY-DAY CONTENT Week 1. Day 1, Thurs., Aug 31: 1) Metric spaces: (a) Recall the notion of continuous map Rn ! R; (b) The notion of metric space; (c) Examples; (d) Continuity for maps of metric spaces. 2) Open subsets in a metric space: (a) The notion of open subset; (b) Continuity via open subsets. 3) Topological spaces: (a) The notion of topological space; (b) Examples. Week 2. Day 1, Tue., Sept 5: 1) Continuous maps between topological spaces: (a) Definition of continuous maps; (b) Maps from discrete; (c) Maps to trivial; (d) Maps out of disjoint union. 2) Product topology: (a) Basic for a topology; (b) Continuity via a basis; (c) Definition of the product topology; (d) Definition by a universal property. 3) Separation axioms: (a) T1 axiom, counterexamples; (b) T2 (Hausdorff), Zariski topology. Date: November 21, 2017. 1 2 MATH 131 (2017), DAY-BY-DAY CONTENT Day 2, Thurs., Sept 7: 1) Homeomorphisms: (a) Definition; (b) Examples. 2) Compactness: (a) Definition; (b) Heine-Borel (the unit interval is compact); (c) Image of compact in Hausdorff is closed. Week 3. Day 1, Tue., Sept 12: 1) 1st countability: (a) Definition; (b) Closedness via sequential closedness. 2) 2nd countability: (a) Definition; (b) Examples; (c) Compatness vs sequential compactness. Day 2, Thurs., Sept 14: 1) Compactness for metric spaces: (a) Compatness=sequential compactness; (b) Compatness=complete+totally bounded. 2) Topologies on R1: (a) `1, `2; `1; (b) Non-compactness of the cube in any of the above; (c) The Hilbert cube. 3) Infinite products (introduction): (a) Introduce topology on the infinite product; (b) Mention universal property; (c) State Tychonoff; (d) Topology on the Hilbert cube. MATH 131 (2017), DAY-BY-DAY CONTENT 3 Week 4. Day 1, Tue., Sept 19: 1) Topology on an infinite product: (a) Definition, mention universal property; (b) Hilbert cube; (c) State Tychonoff's theorem. 2) Proof of Tychonoff: (a) Compactness via pre-base; (b) Check pre-base compactness condition; (c) Zorn's lemma (proof for countable); (d) Proof of compactness via pre-base. Day 2, Thurs., Sept 21: 1) The space of continuous functions from a compact to a metric: (a) Definition; (b) Why we need X compact; (c) Completeness; (d) Non-compactness. 2) Equicontinuity: (a) Definition; (b) Continuous function on a compact is equicontinuous. 3) Construction of the intergal: (a) Piece-wise continuous and constant functions; (b) Integral as a functional on piece-wise constant functions; (c) Density of piece-wise constant in piece-wise continuous via equicontinuity. Week 5. Review 4 MATH 131 (2017), DAY-BY-DAY CONTENT Week 6. Day 1, Tue., Oct. 3: 1) Normal spaces: (a) Definition; (b) Compact + Hausdorff ) normal; (c) Metric spaces are normal. 2) Urysohn's lemma and metrization: (a) Urysohn's lemma; (b) Metrization for normal and 2nd countable: statement; (c) Proof via embedding into Hilbert cube. Day 2, Tue., Oct. 5: 1) Locally compact spaces: (a) Definition; (b) 1-point compactification: construction; (c) 1-point compactification: Hausdorff; (d) 1-point compactification: universal property for mapping in. 2) Compact-open topology: (a) Reminder: topology of uniform convergence on C(X; Y ); (b) Definition of compact-open topology; (c) Comparison with uniform for X compact; (d) Continuity of the evaluation map. MATH 131 (2017), DAY-BY-DAY CONTENT 5 Week 7. Day 1, Tues., Oct. 10: 1) Connectedness: (a) Definition; (b) [0,1] is connected; (c) Image of connected is connected; (d) Intermediate value theorem. 2) Path-connectedness: (a) Definition; (b) sin counter-example; (c) Decomposition of locally path-connected into path-connected components; (d) Equivalence of connectedness and path-connected for locally path-connected, example of domains in Rn. 3) Decomposition into connected components: (a) Construction of decomposition; (b) Totally disconnected spaces; (c) Q is totally disconnected. Day 2, Thurs., Oct. 12: 1) The notion of homotopy: (a) Definition; (b) Equivalence relation; (c) Homotopy as a path in the space of maps. 2) Homotopy equivalences: (a) Definition; (b) Contraction of Rn to pt; (c) Contraction of Rn − 0 to Sn−1, (d) Contraction of R2 − {−1; 1g to figure 8. 3) The fundamental group: (a) Loops and homotopies of loops; (b) The operation of concatenation; (c) Unit for the group law. 6 MATH 131 (2017), DAY-BY-DAY CONTENT Week 8. Day 1, Tues., Oct. 17: 1) The fundamental group, continued: (a) Recap: the multiplication; (b) Inverse; (c) Associativity. 2) Properties: (a) Functoriality for maps of spaces; (b) Change of base point; (c) Behavior under homotopies. Day 2, Thurs., Oct. 19: 1) Covering spaces: (a) Definition; (b) Example of R ! S1; (c) Homotopy lifting property (with proof for pt). 2) Action of paths on fibers of a covering space: (a) Moving between fibers along a path; (b) Independence up to homotopy; (c) Action of π1 on the fiber. (d) Identification of the stabilizer. MATH 131 (2017), DAY-BY-DAY CONTENT 7 Week 9. Day 1, Tues., Oct. 24: 1) Recap: (a) Homotopy lifting property; (b) Lifting of paths and identification of fibers. 2) Covering spaces and the action of π1 on the fiber: (a) Connectedness via transitivity; (b) Detect isomorphismsms; (c) Identify stabilizer of a point. Day 2, Thurs., Oct. 26: 1) Breaking a covering space into connected components: (a) Connected components are covering; (b) Orbits on the fiber and connected components. 2) Fully faithfulness of the functor of fiber: (a) Injectivity; (b) Interlude: fiber products; (c) Proof of surjectivity. Week 10. Day 1, Tues., Oct. 31: 1) Existence of covers corresponding to a given set with an action of π1(X; x). Day 2, Tues., Nov 2: Review 8 MATH 131 (2017), DAY-BY-DAY CONTENT Week 11. Day 1, Tues., Nov. 7: No class{was sick. Day 2, Tues., Nov. 9: 1) Solve midterm. 2) Applications of the fundamental group: (a) No retraction of disc on circle; (b) Fixed points on 2-ball; (c) Fundamental theorem of algebra. 3) Subgroups and covering spaces. 4) Proof of homotopy lifting property (just for paths). Week 12. Day 1, Tues., Nov. 14: 1) Proof of the existence of the universal cover. Day 2, Tues., Nov. 16: 1) The Klein bottle: (a) Construction as a quotient of a torus; (b) Semi-direct products; (c) Covering by R2 and description of the fundamental group; (d) Description of subcovers (incl. Moebius strip). 2) Push-outs of groups: (a) Products and coproducts in various categories; (b) Coproducts of groups; (c) Push-outs of groups. MATH 131 (2017), DAY-BY-DAY CONTENT 9 Week 13. Day 1, Tues., Nov. 21: 1) Van Kampen theorem: (a) Recall push-outs of groups; (b) Statement of Van Kampen; (c) Pushouts of topological spaces along open embeddings. 2) Applications of Van Kampen: (a) Simply-connectedness of S2; (b) n-punctured plane; (c) Genus n surfaces with one puncture; (d) Non-punctured genus n surfaces; (e) Genus n surfaces with multiple punctures. 3) Proof of Van Kampen via covering spaces: (a) Universal property of push-out via actions; (b) Reformulation of VK via covering spaces; (c) Proof via gluing of covering spaces. Day 2, Tues., Nov. 23: Thanksgiving break..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Homogeneous Property of the Hilbert Cube 3
    THE HOMOGENEOUS PROPERTY OF THE HILBERT CUBE DENISE M. HALVERSON AND DAVID G. WRIGHT Abstract. We demonstrate the homogeneity of the Hilbert Cube. In partic- ular, we construct explicit self-homeomorphisms of the Hilbert cube so that given any two points, a homeomorphism moving one to the other may be realized. 1. Introduction It is well-known that the Hilbert cube is homogeneous, but proofs such as those in Chapman’s CBMS Lecture Notes [1] show the existence of a homeomorphism rather than an explicit homeomorphism. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how to construct explicit self-homeomorphisms of the Hilbert cube so that given any two points, a homeomorphism moving one to the other may be realized. This is a remarkable fact because in a finite dimensional manifold with boundary, interior points are topologically distinct from boundary points. Hence, the n-dimensional cube n n C = Π Ii, i=1 where Ii = [−1, 1], fails to be homogeneous because there is no homeomorphism of Cn onto itself mapping a boundary point to an interior point and vice versa. Thus, the fact that the Hilbert cube is homogeneous implies that there is no topological distinction between what we would naturally define to be the boundary points and the interior points, based on the product structure. Formally, the Hilbert cube is defined as ∞ Q = Π Ii i=1 where each Ii is the closed interval [−1, 1] and Q has the product topology. A point arXiv:1211.1363v1 [math.GT] 6 Nov 2012 p ∈ Q will be represented as p = (pi) where pi ∈ Ii.
    [Show full text]
  • Topological Properties of the Hilbert Cube and the Infinite Product of Open Intervals
    TOPOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF THE HILBERT CUBE AND THE INFINITE PRODUCT OF OPEN INTERVALS BY R. D. ANDERSON 1. For each i>0, let 7, denote the closed interval O^x^ 1 and let °I¡ denote the open interval 0<*< 1. Let 7°°=fli>o 7 and °7°°= rii>o °h- 7°° is the Hilbert cube or parallelotope sometimes denoted by Q. °7°° is homeomorphic to the space sometimes called s, the countable infinite product of lines. The principal theorems of this paper are found in §§5, 7, 8, and 9. In §5 it is shown as a special case of a somewhat more general theorem that for any countable set G of compact subsets of °7°°, °7eo\G* is homeomorphic to °7°° (where G* denotes the union of the elements of G)(1). In §7, it is shown that a great many homeomorphisms of closed subsets of 7" into 7" can be extended to homeomorphisms of 7™ onto itself. The conditions are in terms of the way in which the sets are coordinatewise imbedded in 7°°. A corol- lary is the known fact (Keller [6], Klee [7], and Fort [5]) that if jf is a countable closed subset of 7°°, then every homeomorphism of A"into 7 e0can be extended to a homeomorphism of 7°° onto itself. In a further paper based on the results and methods of this paper, the author will give a topological characterization in terms of imbeddings of those closed subsets X of 7 e0 for which homeomorphisms of X into Wx={p \pelx and the first coordinate of p is zero} can be extended to homeomorphisms of X onto itself.
    [Show full text]
  • 2' Is Homeomorphic to the Hilbert Cube1
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 78, Number 3, May 1972 2' IS HOMEOMORPHIC TO THE HILBERT CUBE1 BY R. SCHORI AND J. E. WEST Communicated by Steve Armentrout, November 22, 1971 1. Introduction. For a compact metric space X, let 2X be the space of all nonempty closed subsets of X whose topology is induced by the Hausdorff metric. One of the well-known unsolved problems in set-theoretic topology has been to identify the space 21 (for I = [0,1]) in terms of a more man­ ageable definition. Professor Kuratowski has informed us that the con­ jecture that 21 is homeomorphic to the Hilbert cube Q was well known to the Polish topologists in the 1920's. In 1938 in [7] Wojdyslawski specifically asked if 2* « Q and, more generally, he asked if 2X « Q where X is any nondegenerate Peano space. In this paper we outline our rather lengthy proof that 21 « Q, announce some generalizations to some other 1- dimensional X9 and give some of the technical details. 2. Preliminaries. If X is a compact metric space, then the Hausdorff metric D on 2X can be defined as D(A, B) = inf{e :A c U(B, e) and B a U(A9 e)} where, for C c X, U(C9 s) is the e-neighborhood of C in X. An inverse sequence (Xn, ƒ„) will have, for n^l, bonding maps fn:Xn + l -• X„ and the inverse limit space will be denoted by lim(ZM, ƒ„). The theory of near-homeomorphisms is very important in this work (see §5).
    [Show full text]
  • Hyperspaces of Compact Convex Sets
    Pacific Journal of Mathematics HYPERSPACES OF COMPACT CONVEX SETS SAM BERNARD NADLER,JR., JOSEPH E. QUINN AND N. STAVRAKAS Vol. 83, No. 2 April 1979 PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol. 83, No. 2, 1979 HYPERSPACES OF COMPACT CONVEX SETS SAM B. NADLER, JR., J. QUINN, AND NICK M. STAVRAKAS The purpose of this paper is to develop in detail certain aspects of the space of nonempty compact convex subsets of a subset X (denoted cc(X)) of a metric locally convex T V.S. It is shown that if X is compact and dim (X)^2then cc(X) is homeomorphic with the Hubert cube (denoted o,c{X)~IJ). It is shown that if w^2, then cc(Rn) is homeomorphic to 1^ with a point removed. More specialized results are that if XaR2 is such that ccCX)^ then X is a two cell; and that if XczRz is such that ccCX)^/^ and X is not contained in a hyperplane then X must contain a three cell. For the most part we will be restricting ourselves to compact spaces X although in the last section of the paper, § 7, we consider some fundamental noncompact spaces. We will be using the following definitions and notation. For each n = 1,2, , En will denote Euclidean w-space, Sn~ι = {xeRn: \\x\\ = 1}, Bn = {xeRn: \\x\\ ^ 1}, and °Bn = {xeRn: \\x\\<l}. A continuum is a nonempty, compact, connected metric space. An n-cell is a continuum homeomorphic to Bn. The symbol 1^ denotes the Hilbert cube, i.e., /«, = ΠΓ=i[-l/2*, 1/2*].
    [Show full text]
  • Set Known As the Cantor Set. Consider the Clos
    COUNTABLE PRODUCTS ELENA GUREVICH Abstract. In this paper, we extend our study to countably infinite products of topological spaces. 1. The Cantor Set Let us constract a very curios (but usefull) set known as the Cantor Set. Consider the 1 2 closed unit interval [0; 1] and delete from it the open interval ( 3 ; 3 ) and denote the remaining closed set by 1 2 G = [0; ] [ [ ; 1] 1 3 3 1 2 7 8 Next, delete from G1 the open intervals ( 9 ; 9 ) and ( 9 ; 9 ), and denote the remaining closed set by 1 2 1 2 7 8 G = [0; ] [ [ ; ] [ [ ; ] [ [ ; 1] 2 9 9 3 3 9 9 If we continue in this way, at each stage deleting the open middle third of each closed interval remaining from the previous stage we obtain a descending sequence of closed sets G1 ⊃ G2 ⊃ G3 ⊃ · · · ⊃ Gn ⊃ ::: T1 The Cantor Set G is defined by G = n=1 Gn, and being the intersection of closed sets, is a closed subset of [0; 1]. As [0; 1] is compact, the Cantor Space (G; τ) ,(that is, G with the subspace topology), is compact. It is useful to represent the Cantor Set in terms of real numbers written to basis 3, that is, 5 ternaries. In the ternary system, 76 81 would be written as 2211:0012, since this represents 2 · 33 + 2 · 32 + 1 · 31 + 1 · 30 + 0 · 3−1 + 0 · 3−2 + 1 · 3−3 + 2 · 3−4 So a number x 2 [0; 1] is represented by the base 3 number a1a2a3 : : : an ::: where 1 X an x = a 2 f0; 1; 2g 8n 2 3n n N n=1 Turning again to the Cantor Set G, it should be clear that an element of [0; 1] is in G if 1 5 and only if it can be written in ternary form with an 6= 1 8n 2 N, so 2 2= G 81 2= G but 1 1 1 3 2 G and 1 2 G.
    [Show full text]
  • Measures from Infinite-Dimensional Gauge Integration Cyril Levy
    Measures from infinite-dimensional gauge integration Cyril Levy To cite this version: Cyril Levy. Measures from infinite-dimensional gauge integration. 2019. hal-02308813 HAL Id: hal-02308813 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02308813 Preprint submitted on 8 Oct 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Measures from infinite-dimensional gauge integration Cyril Levy IMT Toulouse – INUC Albi Email address: [email protected] January 2019 Abstract We construct and investigate an integration process for infinite products of compact metrizable spaces that generalizes the standard Henstock–Kurzweil gauge integral. The integral we define here relies on gauge functions that are valued in the set of divisions of the space. We show in particular that this integration theory provides a unified setting for the study of non- T absolute infinite-dimensional integrals such as the gauge integrals on R of Muldowney and the con- struction of several type of measures, such as the Lebesgue measure, the Gaussian measures on Hilbert spaces, the Wiener measure, or the Haar measure on the infinite dimensional torus. Furthermore, we characterize Lebesgue-integrable functions for those measures as measurable absolutely gauge inte- grable functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Hilbert Cubes: General Methods and Their Application to Hyperspaces by Schori and West
    Toposym 3 James E. West Identifying Hilbert cubes: general methods and their application to hyperspaces by Schori and West In: Josef Novák (ed.): General Topology and its Relations to Modern Analysis and Algebra, Proceedings of the Third Prague Topological Symposium, 1971. Academia Publishing House of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Praha, 1972. pp. 455--461. Persistent URL: http://dml.cz/dmlcz/700806 Terms of use: © Institute of Mathematics AS CR, 1972 Institute of Mathematics of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic provides access to digitized documents strictly for personal use. Each copy of any part of this document must contain these Terms of use. This paper has been digitized, optimized for electronic delivery and stamped with digital signature within the project DML-CZ: The Czech Digital Mathematics Library http://project.dml.cz 455 mENTIFYING HILBERT CUBES: GENERAL METHODS AND THEIR APPLICATION TO HYPERSPACES BY SCHORI AND WEST J. E. WEST Ithaca In the past several years new methods of identifying Hilbert cubes have been discovered, and they have been applied by R. M. Schori and the author to hyper- spaces of some one-dimensional Peano continua. In particular, we have solved affirmatively the conjecture of M. Wojdyslawski [11] that the hyperspace 2* of all non-void, closed subsets of the interval is a Hilbert cube, when topologized by the Hausdorff metric. I am informed by Professor Kuratowski that the conjecture was originally posed in the 1920's and was well-known to topologists ip Warsaw and other places at that time. This report outlines some of these methods and the Schori- West proof of this conjecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Rigid Sets in the Hilbert Cube
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Topology and its Applications 22 (1986) 85-96 85 North-Holland RIGID SETS IN THE HILBERT CUBE Jack W. LAMOREAUX and David G. WRIGHT Department of Mathematics, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA Received 27 November 1984 Revised 29 March 1985 Let X be a compact metric space with no isolated points. Then we may embed X as a subset of the Hilbert cube Q (Xc Q) so that the only homeomorphism of X onto itself that extends to a homeomorphism of Q is the identity homeomorphism. Such an embedding is said to be rigid. In fact, there are uncountably many rigid embeddings X, of X in Q so that for (I f /!I and any homeomorphism h of Q, h(X,) fl X, is a Z-set in Q and a nowhere dense subset of each of h(X,) and X,. AMS (MOS) Subj. Class.: Primary 54C25, 57N35; 1. Introduction Let X be a subset of a space Y. We say that X is rigid in Y if the only homeomorphism of X onto itself that is extendable to a homeomorphism of Y is the identity homeomorphism. Examples of interesting rigid sets in 3-space have been given by Martin [lo], Bothe [4], and Shilepsky [ 141. Shilepsky’s example was based on work of Sher [13]. More recently, Wright [15] has made a study of rigid sets in Euclidean n-space which generalizes the 3-dimensional results mentioned above. The program outlined in [15] leads one to make the following conjecture about the Hilbert cube.
    [Show full text]
  • BOUNDARY SETS in the HILBERT CUBE 1. Introduction
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Topology and its Applications 20(1985) 201-221 201 North-Holland BOUNDARY SETS IN THE HILBERT CUBE D.W. CURTIS Department of Mathematics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA Received 16 January 1984 Revised 20 March 1984 We study properties of those aZ-sets in the Hilbert cube whose complements are homeomorphic to Hilbert space. A characterization of such sets is obtained in terms of a proximate local connectedness property and a dense imbedding condition. Some examples and applications are given, including the formulation of a tower condition useful for recognizing (f-d) cap sets. AMS (MOS) Subj. Class.: Primary 57N20; Secondary 54C99, 54D40, 54F35 oZ-sets in the Hilbert cube Hilbert space (f-d) cap sets proximately LC” spaces 1. Introduction Let Q=ny[-l/i,l/i] be the Hilbert cube. The subsets s=ny(-l/i,l/i) and B(Q) = Q\s are usually referred to as the pseudo-interior and pseudo-boundary, respectively. Generalizing from B(Q), we will consider subsets B c Q which satisfy the following conditions: (1) ForeveryE>Othereexistsamapn:Q+Q\Bwithd(v,id)<E; (2) Q\B is homeomorphic to s (which is homeomorphic to Hilbert space). The homogeneity of the Hilbert cube precludes any topological notion of boundary point. However, by analogy with the finite-dimensional case, in which the topological boundary of an n-cell is the only subset satisfying the analogues of (1) and (2), we will call any subset B c Q satisfying the above conditions a boundary set.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1707.07760V2 [Math.GT] 5 Jan 2018 N.Mr Eea Ramnsaecmol on Nteliteratur the in Found Commonly Are Treatments General More ANR
    PROPER HOMOTOPY TYPES AND Z-BOUNDARIES OF SPACES ADMITTING GEOMETRIC GROUP ACTIONS CRAIG R. GUILBAULT AND MOLLY A. MORAN Abstract. We extend several techniques and theorems from geometric group the- ory so they apply to geometric actions on arbitrary proper metric ARs (absolute retracts). Previous versions often required actions on CW complexes, manifolds, or proper CAT(0) spaces, or else included a finite-dimensionality hypothesis. We remove those requirements, providing proofs that simultaneously cover all of the usual variety of spaces. A second way that we generalize earlier results is by elim- inating a freeness requirement often placed on the group actions. In doing so, we allow for groups with torsion. The main theorems are new in that they generalize results found in the literature, but a significant aim is expository. Toward that end, brief but reasonably compre- hensive introductions to the theories of ANRs (absolute neighborhood retracts) and Z-sets are included, as well as a much shorter short introduction to shape theory. Here is a sampling of the theorems proved here. Theorem. If quasi-isometric groups G and H act geometrically on proper metric ARs X and Y , resp., then X is proper homotopy equivalent to Y . Theorem. If quasi-isometric groups G and H act geometrically on proper metric ARs X and Y , resp., and Y can be compactified to a Z-structure Y,Z for H, then the same boundary can be added to X to obtain a Z-structure for G. Theorem. If quasi-isometric groups G and H admit Z-structures X,Z1 and Y,Z2 , resp., then Z1 and Z2 are shape equivalent.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing Infinite Dimensional Manifolds Topologically
    SÉMINAIRE N. BOURBAKI ROBERT D. EDWARDS Characterizing infinite dimensional manifolds topologically Séminaire N. Bourbaki, 1980, exp. no 540, p. 278-302 <http://www.numdam.org/item?id=SB_1978-1979__21__278_0> © Association des collaborateurs de Nicolas Bourbaki, 1980, tous droits réservés. L’accès aux archives du séminaire Bourbaki (http://www.bourbaki. ens.fr/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisa- tion (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commer- ciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright. Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques http://www.numdam.org/ Séminaire BOURBAKI 31e annee, 1978/79, nO 540 Juin 1979 CHARACTERIZING INFINITE DIMENSIONAL MANIFOLDS TOPOLOGICALLY [after Henryk TORU0143CZYK] by Robert D. EDWARDS § 1. Introduction . In the last twenty-or-so years there has been remarkable progress made in the study of the topology of manifolds, both finite dimensional and infinite dimensional. The infinite dimensional theory has reached a particularly satisfactory state because it is now quite complete, with no loose ends to speak of (the same cannot be said for the finite dimensional theory). Before starting on the topic at hand, it may be worthwhile to recall some of the basic aspects of infinite dimensional manifold theory. We will focus on two types of infinite dimensional manifolds : Hilbert cube manifolds and Hilbert space manifolds. A Hilbert cube manifold [respectively, Hilbert 00 space manifold], abbreviated I -manifold [ 12-manifold], is a separable metric space each point of which has a neighborhood homeomorphic to the Hilbert cube I [to Hilbert space 12] (these definitions are amplified in § 3).
    [Show full text]
  • Topology (H) Lecture 13 Lecturer: Zuoqin Wang Time: April 22, 2021 the AXIOMS of COUNTABILITY 1. Axioms of Countability As We Ha
    Topology (H) Lecture 13 Lecturer: Zuoqin Wang Time: April 22, 2021 THE AXIOMS OF COUNTABILITY 1. Axioms of countability As we have seen, compactness can be regard as a \continuous version" of finiteness. We can think of compact spaces as those spaces that are built-up using only finitely many \building blocks" in topology, namely, open sets. Finiteness is important because it allows us to construct things by hand, and as a result we combine local results to global results for compact spaces. Now we turn to countability features in topology. In topology, an axiom of count- ability is a topological property that asserts the existence of a countable set with certain properties. There are several different topological properties describing countability. { First countable spaces. Let's recall (from Lecture 7) Definition 1.1. A topological space (X; T ) is called first countable, or an (A1)-space, if it has a countable neighbourhood basis, i.e. For any x 2 X; there exists a countable family of open x x x (A1) neighborhoods of x; fU1 ;U2 ;U3 ; · · · g; such that for any x open neighborhood U of x; there exists n s.t. Un ⊂ U: Remark 1.2. If (X; T ) is first countable, then for each point one can choose a countable x neighborhood base fUn g satisfying x x x U1 ⊃ U2 ⊃ U3 ⊃ · · · ; x x since if one has a countable neighbourhood base V1 ;V2 ; ··· at x, then one can take x x x x x x x x x U1 = V1 ;U2 = V1 \ V2 ;U3 = V1 \ V2 \ V3 ; ··· : We have seen Proposition 1.3.
    [Show full text]