DOCSLIB.ORG

Surrey Police Board Regular Meeting Agenda

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

VENUE: Virtual SURREY POLICE BOARD Tuesday, September 15, 2020 Time: 9:00 AM REGULAR MEETING AGENDA ITEM PRESENTER TIME A. CALL TO ORDER Chair McCallum 5 minutes The Surrey Police Board recognizes that our work takes place on the ancestral, traditional, and unceded territories of the Coast Salish Peoples. B. ADOPTIONS 1. Adoption of the Agenda – September 15, 2020 Chair McCallum 5 minutes 2. Adoption of Minutes – August 6, 2020 Chair McCallum 5 minutes C. DELEGATIONS No delegations. D. REPORTS 1. Establishing the Surrey Police – A Framework for Terry Waterhouse 15 minutes Critical Decisions – For Information Report No. 2020-R004 (Presentation available) 2. Communicating the City of Surrey Priorities, Goals Terry Waterhouse 15 minutes and Objectives for Policing Report No. 2020-R005 – For Information (Presentation available) 3. Surrey Policing Transition – Interim Financial Terry Waterhouse 20 minutes Procedures Report No. 2020-R006 – for Decision (Presentation available) 4. Procedural Change – Approval of Delegations Melissa Granum 5 minutes Report No. 2020-R007 – For Decision 5. Freedom of Information Overview Melissa Granum 5 minutes Report No. 2020-R008 – For Information 6. Association Memberships – For Decision Melissa Granum 10 minutes Report No. 2020-R009 E. INFORMATION https://surreybc.sharepoint.com/sites/ptpoliceboard/board admin/board agendas/regular agenda 2020 09 15.docx MC 9/10/20 6:12 PM Page 1 Surrey Police Board - Agenda No information. Memos 1. Election Results of Vice Chair Position – Melissa Granum For Information 5 minutes Memo No. 2020-M002 2. Meeting Location Options – Melissa Granum For Information 5 minutes Memo No. 2020-M003 F. CORRESPONDENCE 1. Letter from Surrey Urban Indigenous Leadership Melissa Granum 5 minutes Committee and Mayor's response. G. NEW BUSINESS No new business. H. NEXT MEETING The next meeting of the Surrey Police Board will be held on October 13, 2020. I. MOTION TO HOLD A MEETING IN A CLOSED SESSION It is in order for the Board to pass a motion to close the Chair McCallum meeting to the public pursuant to Section 69 (2) (b), (c), and (d) of the Police Act, which states: (2) if it believes that any of the following matters will arise in a meeting or hearing held by it, a board or committee may order that the portion of the meeting during which the matter will arise be held in private: (b) a matter concerning a person's financial or personal affairs, if the person's interest in the matter outweighs the public's interest in the matter; (c) a matter concerning labour contract discussions, labour management relations, layoffs or another personnel matter; (d) a matter concerning information that a person has requested he or she be allowed to give in private to the board or committee. J. ADJOURNMENT Chair McCallum Page 2 https://surreybc.sharepoint.com/sites/ptpoliceboard/board admin/board agendas/regular agenda 2020 09 15.docx MC 9/10/20 6:12 PM SURREY POLICE BOARD City Hall – 2E Meeting Room Thursday, August 6, 2020 Regular Meeting Minutes Time: 10:00 AM Present: Regrets: Staff Present: Doug McCallum, Chair Terry Waterhouse, GM, Policing Transition Bob Rolls Melissa Granum, Executive Director Cheney Cloke Marion Chow Elizabeth Model Harley Chappell James Carwana Jessie Sunner Manav Gill Meena Brisard A. CALL TO ORDER 1. First Nation Welcome 2. Opening Remarks 3. Oath of Office Memo 2020-M001 -Inauguration Oath of Office, Surrey Police Board Judge Therese Alexander administered the oaths of office to the Surrey Police Board. 4. Motion to Create the Surrey Police Service: That the Surrey Police Board, pursuant to its authority under section 26(1) of the Police Act, hereby establishes a municipal police department to be known as the “Surrey Police Service” to provide policing and law enforcement in the City of Surrey. It was Moved by Elizabeth Model Seconded by Bob Rolls That the motion to create the Surrey Police Service be approved. Carried B. ADOPTIONS 1. Adoption of the Agenda – August 6, 2020 It was Moved by Bob Rolls Seconded by Jessie Sunner Page 1 Surrey Police Board – Regular Minutes That the agenda of the Surrey Police Board regular meeting of August 6, 2020 be adopted. Carried C. DELEGATIONS No delegations. D. REPORTS 1. Surrey Police Transition Process to Date Report No. 2020-R001 – Receive for Information It was Moved by Bob Rolls Seconded by Jessie Sunner That the Board receive this report for information. Carried 2. Category 1 Status for Surrey Police Service Report No. 2020-R002 – For Decision It was Moved by Board Member Jim Carwana Seconded by Board Member Jessie Sunner That the Board receive the report and endorse the recommendations as outlined in the report. Carried 3. Board Committee Assignments a. Governance b. Human Resources c. Finance d. Freedom of Information Report No. 2020-R003 – For Decision It was Moved by Board Member Bob Rolls Seconded by Board Member Cheney Cloke That the Board receive this report for information and deal with the appointment of committee members for the FOI committee in “New Business”. Carried Page 2 Surrey Police Board – Regular Minutes E. INFORMATION No information. F. CORRESPONDENCE No correspondence. G. NEW BUSINESS Discussion on FOI committee appointments to appoint someone at this time or wait for a couple of meetings. The Board is satisfied with Executive Director’s response that these requests will be dealt with expeditiously, and not being held until the next Board meeting. Motion to the table is carried. H. NEXT MEETING The next meeting of the Surrey Police Board will be held on September 15, 2020. I. MOTION TO HOLD A MEETING IN A CLOSED SESSION It is in order for the Board to pass a motion to close the meeting to the public pursuant to Section 69 (2) (b), (c), and (d) of the Police Act, which states: It was Moved by Elizabeth Model Seconded by Manav Gill That the Board close the meeting to the public pursuant to Section 69 (2) (b), (c), and (d) of the Police Act, which states: (2) if it believes that any of the following matters will arise in a meeting or hearing held by it, a board or committee may order that the portion of the meeting during which the matter will arise be held in private: (b) a matter concerning a person's financial or personal affairs, if the person's interest in the matter outweighs the public's interest in the matter; (c) a matter concerning labour contract discussions, labour management relations, layoffs or another personnel matter; (d) a matter concerning information that a person has requested he or she be allowed to give in private to the board or committee. Carried Page 3 Surrey Police Board – Regular Minutes J. ADJOURNMENT It was Moved by Elizabeth Model Seconded by Manav Gill That the August 6, 2020 Surrey Police Board meeting be adjourned. Carried The Surrey Police Board meeting adjourned at 10:49 AM. Certified correct: __________________________________ ___________________________________ Melissa Granum, Executive Director Doug McCallum, Chair Page 4 REPORT DATE: September 10, 2020 REGULAR BOARD MEETING DATE: September 15, 2020 BOARD REPORT # 2020-R004 TO: Surrey Police Board FROM: General Manager, Policing Transition FILE: 7400-01 SUBJECT: Establishing the Surrey Police – A Framework for Critical Decisions RECOMMENDATION The General Manager, Policing Transition recommends that the Board receive this report for information. PURPOSE This report outlines a framework for the key critical decisions which will take place in coming months to establish and operate the Surrey Police Service (SPS). BACKGROUND On August 6, 2020, the Board adopted a motion to create the SPS. The BC Police Act [RSPC 1996] (the Police Act) defines roles and responsibilities for the Board, the Chief Constable, the municipality and others in making decisions regarding a municipal police service. Decision-making on issues related to the establishment and operation of the SPS must be consistent with the Police Act. Creating a municipal police service requires multiple complex and interrelated decisions and the Police Act provides guidance as to the appropriate authorities for decision making on several issues. However, the Police Act does not provide explicit direction for the transfer of policing responsibilities from a contracted policing model under the Municipal Police Unit Agreement (MPUA) to an independent municipal police service. Therefore, the critical decisions required in coming months are derived from the Police Act as well as the practical considerations required during a transition of this type. DISCUSSION A corresponding City of Surrey Corporate Report has also been prepared and forwarded to Council for the September 14, 2020 Council meeting. Broadly speaking, the Police Act defines the decision-making authority of the Board regarding matters of governance, accountability and transparency. Specifically, the Board’s powers include: • Employing all sworn and civilian staff of the SPS; • Setting policy and providing direction to the Chief Constable; • Overseeing the budget; and - 2 - • Authority for Service or Policy Complaints against the SPS1. Similarly, the Police Act defines the decision-making authority of the Chief Constable as focused on operational and organizational matters regarding how policing services are delivered. Specifically, the Chief Constable’s powers include: • Exercising powers and performing duties assigned to the Chief Constable; • Ensuring compliance with the Director of Police Services’ standards as they relate to a municipal police department; • Performing the duties and functions respecting the preservation of peace, the prevention of crime and offences against the law; and • Overseeing the operation of the municipal police department2. The Police Act also defines the decision-making authority of the municipality as focused on matters regarding funding of police services. Specifically, the municipality’s authority includes: • Bearing the expenses necessary to generally maintain law and order in the municipality; • Providing adequate accommodation, equipment and supplies for the operation of and use by the municipal police service and the detention of persons in police custody3; and • Providing to the Board advice on the municipality’s priorities, goals and objectives4.
Recommended publications
  • Economic Development

    Economic Development

    Phone 0161 604 7711 Email [email protected] Rt Hon Mike Penning MP Via email 15 September 2015 Dear Mike, I am writing in response to the recently issued ‘Consultation on reform of police funding’. The outcome of this consultation is critical for the sustainability of the modern police service and one which we must get right. I did write to the Home Secretary on 24 July requesting further information and was disappointed not to receive a response or the requested exemplifications. This lack of information coupled with the short consultation time scales and the timing of the release over the summer, while Parliament is in recess, has prevented me from making an informed response thus undermining the consultation process. I would be grateful if you would consider issuing the exemplifications requested and re-starting the consultation process to allow for an informed and transparent exchange with those in the police service to take place. In the absence of exemplifications I have asked my office to calculate the potential impact of the proposed model on Greater Manchester Police using the data sources quoted in the consultation document. Our best estimates show that Greater Manchester Police would lose £52m (12.7%) per annum under the proposed model. Other police areas have estimated losses of up to 20% and, when coupled with the impact of the impending Spending Review, cuts at these levels could call in to question the viability of a sustainable policing service in Greater Manchester and other areas. Furthermore, I note that the combined impact of cuts that will impact on demand on policing from the Spending Review to the Home Office and other Government departments has not been addressed in these proposals.
  • Call for Nominations

    Call for Nominations

    SURREY POLICE BOARD Regular Meeting Agenda ITEM PRESENTER A. CALL TO ORDER Chair McCallum The Surrey Police Board recognizes that our work takes place on the ancestral, traditional, and unceded territories of the Coast Salish Peoples. B. ADOPTIONS 1. Adoption of the Agenda – July 20, 2021 Chair McCallum 2. Adoption of Minutes – June 22, 2021 Chair McCallum C. DELEGATIONS 1. No Delegations. D. REPORTS CHIEF CONSTABLE REPORTS 1. Chief Constable Updates– Standing Report Chief Lipinski Report No. 2021-R018 – For Information 2. SPS Sworn Officer Status Chief Lipinski Report No. 2021-R019 – For Information 3. Systemic Racism in Policing in Canada: Report of the Standing Chief Lipinski Committee on Public Safety and National Security Report No. 2021-R020 – For Information COMMITTEE REPORTS FINANCE COMMITTEE 1. One-time Policing Transition Project - Budget Update Year to Elizabeth Model Date Expenditures Report No. 2021-FIN013 – For Information (Presentation) E. INFORMATION 1. Service or Policy Complaint Melissa Granum 2. Canadian Association of Police Governance (CAPG) Annual General Melissa Granum Meeting and Call for Nominations Accountability through Civilian Oversight Page 1 Surrey Police Board – Regular Agenda 3. Surrey Police Board Reappointments Melissa Granum 4. OPCC Bulletin – Information Bulletin #19 – Impact of COVID-19 Melissa Granum Pandemic on Police Complaints Process F. CORRESPONDENCE 1. Letter from Director of Police Services – Approval of Sworn Officer Chief Lipinski Status G. NEW BUSINESS No new business. H. NEXT MEETING The
  • City of Surrey 2012 - 2021 Dog Off Leash Area Strategy

    City of Surrey 2012 - 2021 Dog Off Leash Area Strategy

    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 3 4.0 OPERATE 93 1.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 4.1 MAINTENANCE 94 1.2 SUSTAINABILITY CHARTER 21 4.2 WASTE MANAGEMENT 95 4.3 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 100 2.0 PLAN 23 4.4 PRIVATELY-RUN DOG PARKS 102 2.1 RATIONALE FOR OFF LEASH AREAS 25 4.5 OFF LEASH AREA CODE OF CONDUCT 103 2.2 learning from surrey’s 4.6 ENFORCEMENT + SELF-POLICING 104 EXISTING OFF LEASH AREAS 26 4.6 MONITORING + ASSESSMENT 106 2.3 QUALITIES OF SUCCESSFUL DOG PARKS 30 4.7 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR 2.4 HEALTH, SAFETY AND THE SURREY OFF LEASH AREAS 108 ENVIRONMENT 32 4.8 SUGGESTED PILOT PROJECTS: 2.5 USE OF HYDRO RIGHT OF WAYS 37 OFF-SITE COMPOSTING OF DOG WASTE + ANAEROBIC DIGESTION 110 2.6 LOCATION AND PROVISION GUIDELINE PRECEDENTS 39 2.7 PROVISION + LOCATION GUIDELINES 40 5.0 RESOURCES 113 2.8 RECOMMENDED LOCATIONS FOR SURREY 5.1 REFERENCES 114 OFF LEASH AREAS 42 5.2 MUNICIPALITIES WITH DOG PARK PLANS 116 3.0 DESIGN 49 6.0 APPENDICES 119 3.1 OFF LEASH AREA AMENITIES 50 APPENDIX 1.0: STAFF WORKSHOP 121 3.2 SPACE ALLOCATION 52 APPENDIX 2.0: STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP 141 3.3 SURFACE MATERIALS 54 APPENDIX 3.0: PHONE SURVEY 155 3.4 EDGE CONDITIONS 58 APPENDIX 4.0: ONLINE SURVEY 179 3.5 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR CITY OF SURREY OFF LEASH AREAS 60 APPENDIX 5.0: OPEN HOUSE SERIES 1 185 3.6 OFF LEASH AREA DESIGN CONCEPTS 64 APPENDIX 6.0: OPEN HOUSE SERIES 2 211 3.7 SUGGESTED PILOT PROJECT: REPURPOSING ARTIFICIAL TURF 91 Cover page photo source: flickr user nruebotham CITY OF SURREY 2012 - 2021 DOG OFF LEASH AREA STRATEGY ABOUT ONE-THIRD OF ALL SURREY DOG OWNERS VISIT A DESIGNATED OFF LEASH AREA IN SURREY EACH WEEK.
  • Successful Bids to the Police Innovation Fund 2016 to 2017

    Successful Bids to the Police Innovation Fund 2016 to 2017

    SUCCESSFUL BIDS TO THE POLICE INNOVATION FUND 2016/17 Bid 2016/17 Lead Force Other partners Bid Name / Details No. Award National Centre for Cyberstalking Research (NCCR) – University of Bedfordshire Cyberharassment: University of Liverpool Bedfordshire Platform for Evidence Nottingham Trent University £461,684.00 47 Gathering, Assessing Police Victim Support Risk & Managing Hampshire Stalking Policing Consultancy Clinic Paladin Greater Manchester Police Dyfed-Powys PCC Cambridgeshire Constabulary University of Cambridge BeNCH Community Rehabilitation Company Crown Prosecution Service Evidence-based Local authorities Cambridgeshire approach to deferred Health system £250,000.00 36 prosecution linked to Constabulary Criminal Justice Board devolution in West Midlands Police Cambridgeshire. Hampshire Constabulary Hertfordshire Constabulary Leicestershire Police Staffordshire Police West Yorkshire Police Ministry of Justice/NOMS Warwickshire Police Cheshire Integrated Force West Mercia Police £303,000.00 122 Communications Constabulary West Mercia Fire and Rescue Solution Cheshire Fire and Rescue Fire and Rescue Services Cheshire (FRS) through the Chief Fire National Air Service for 140 £120,100.00 Constabulary Officers’ Association (CFOA) emergency services Association of Ambulance (Category 1 and 2) Chief Executives (AACE) City of London Metropolitan Police Service False identity data £525,000.00 62 Warwickshire Police Police capture and sharing Barclays Bank Metropolitan Police Service Serious Fraud Office Public/private Crown Prosecution
  • Policing Surrey 2020/21 How Your Council Tax Helps Fund Surrey Police

    Policing Surrey 2020/21 How Your Council Tax Helps Fund Surrey Police

    Policing Surrey 2020/21 How your Council Tax helps fund Surrey Police Employee information Budgeted as at 31 March 2020/21 2019/20 Police officers 2,022 1,917 Operational and support police staff – this includes Police Community 1,911 1,824 Support Officers (PCSOs) Total 3,933 3,741 Volunteers In addition to our officers and staff, Surrey Police has 470 volunteers who contribute thousands of valuable hours of support to policing across the county every year. These include Police Support Volunteers (130), Volunteer Police Cadets (220) and Volunteer Police Officers (Special Constables, 120). Be In The Know If you want to know what’s happening in Surrey - sign up to the Surrey Police In The Know community messaging service at: www.intheknow.community Contact us surrey-pcc.gov.uk [email protected] @SurreyPCC 01483 630200 facebook.com/SurreyPCC PO Box 412, Guildford, Surrey GU3 1YJ Photos courtesy of Charlotte Cooke, Surrey Police. Over 200 officers and staff in What will you pay for policing in Surrey in 2020/21? How the money is spent and funded two years… Band A Band B Band C Band D 2020/21 2019/20 180.38 210.44 240.51 270.57 Employees 204.1 192.1 Your contributions through the policing Band E Band F Band G Band H Premises 11.0 9.2 element of the council tax mean Surrey Supplies and Services 40.8 39.8 Police can continue to strengthen their 330.70 390.82 450.95 541.14 service by putting more officers back into our Transport 5.4 5.4 communities.
  • BC Police Act Reform

    BC Police Act Reform

    City of Richmond Report to Committee To: General Purposes Committee Date: March 28, 2021 From: Cecilia Achiam File: 09-5355-00Nol 01 General Manager, Community Safety Re: BC Police Act Reform Staff Recommendation That the feedback set out in the staffreport titled "BC Police Act Reform", dated March 28, 2021, fromthe General Manager of Community Safety, be approved for submission to Special Committee on Reforming the Police Act. chiam General Manager, Community Safety (604-276-4122) REPORT CONCURRENCE SENIOR STAFF REPORT REVIEW 7 A0LY� It�.., 6649966 GP - 84 March 28, 2021 - 2 - Staff Report Origin Under the Constitution Act section 91 (27) the Federal Government has the authority to create criminal laws and criminal procedures. Provincial Governmentshave broad constitutional authority forthe administration of justice and policing per section 92 (14 ). In British Columbia (BC) the Province captures this authorityover policing in the Police Act. Introduced in 1974, the Police Act sets the goals, mandate, and standards for the ministry to oversee effective policing in BC. However, this act has not undergone a comprehensive review since its inception. In response to a growing tide of socio-political and economic protest movements centred on issues of police funding, structural racism, and mental health and wellness checks, the Province announced the formation of the Legislative Assembly Special Committee (Special Committee) on Refonning the Police Act on July 8, 2020. Prior to the delivery of its finalreport to the House on May 14, 2021, the Special Committeehas launched a public consultation campaign. Of note, all submissions to the Special Committee will be made public and must be made prior to April 30 via a website submission.
  • Jeff Harris Surrey Deputy Police and Crime Commissioner Month: December 2013

    Jeff Harris Surrey Deputy Police and Crime Commissioner Month: December 2013

    Name: Jeff Harris Surrey Deputy Police and Crime Commissioner Month: December 2013 Less home to Total Mileage @ Receipt Reference Place of Category Class of Number business miles 0.45p per Length of Category of Amount Amount not Reason not Value for Date Number Reason for claim origin Place of destination of journey travel of miles miles claimed mile hotel stay hotel reimbursed reimbursed reimbursed Money Total claim Youth Justice Seminar/Chief Constable's Awards Fetcham/Guildford/ 04/12/2013 N/A Ceremony HQ Home Own car 51 20 31 13.95 13.95 05/12/2013 N/A Youth Justice Board Home Addlestone/HQ Own car 33 20 13 5.85 5.85 16/12/2013 N/A Mtg with Chief Exec/Leader of Spelthorne BC Home Staines/HQ Own car 40 20 20 9.00 9.00 17/12/2013 N/A Tandridge Crime Summit HQ Oxted/Home Own car 46 20 26 11.70 11.70 19/12/2013 N/A Community Safety Board HQ Godalming/HQ Own car 6 0 6 2.70 2.70 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 176 80 96 43.2 0 0 43.2 Name: Jeff Harris Surrey Deputy Police and Crime Commissioner Month: November 2013 Less home to Total Mileage @ Receipt Reference Place of Category Class of Number business miles 0.45p per Length of Category of Amount Amount not Reason not Value for Date Number Reason for claim origin Place of destination of journey travel of miles miles
  • 1999 Annual Conference Report

    1999 Annual Conference Report

    ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. 1999 Annual Conference Report Tenth Annual Meeting and Conference, Niagara Falls, Ontario, August 18-21, 1999 The Canadian Association of Police Boards held its Tenth Annual Meeting and Conference in Niagara Falls, Ontario from August 18-21, 1999. This publication documents the proceedings of the Annual Meeting, including Resolutions passed, and provides a summary of each of the presentations and discussion groups that took place at the Conference.
  • Review of BME Recruitment, Retention and Progression

    Review of BME Recruitment, Retention and Progression

    SURREY POLICE - PAPER FOR JULY PCC MANAGEMENT MEETING Review of BME recruitment, retention and progression 1. PURPOSE 1.1. The purpose of this paper is to brief the Police and Crime Commissioner on the current position regarding police constable recruitment at Surrey Police and on efforts to improve Black Minority Ethnic (BME) representation at all ranks. 1.2. The content presented within this paper originally formed part of a larger review paper commissioned by the Deputy Chief Constable and presented to the Equality, Diversity and Human Rights (EDHR) Board on 16th May 2014. 2. BACKGROUND REPRESENTATION 2.1. The Police Service has struggled nationally to attract and retain a diverse workforce and is not reflective of national BME representation with current statistics showing 5% representation within officers and 7.6% within staff, compared to 14% BME representation across the population of England and Wales. 2.2. Specifically in Surrey the demographic of the county has continued to evolve and BME representation has almost doubled over recent years according to census data, from 5% in 2001 to 9.6% in 2011. 2.3. By comparison, total BME representation across Surrey Police is currently recorded as 4%, with projected growth not expected to exceed 5% over the next 10 years if all factors remain stable. 2.4. Surrey Police does historically achieve higher levels of BME representation across police staff and has 4.7% representation currently compared to 3.8% BME representation amongst police officers. 2.5. In terms of looking to the future, it is appropriate to note that whilst improvements in BME representation were the focus for this piece of work, ‘white-other’ is the fastest growing ethnic group in Surrey.
  • Rfq 2021-006

    Rfq 2021-006

    SURREY POLICE SERVICE REQUEST FOR QUOTATIONS (Supply of Goods) Reference Number: 1220-041-2021-006 Title: Supply of Air Purifier Respirators and Related Accessories Issue Date: June 17, 2021 SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS Email only Submit your quotation in pdf format (unless otherwise set out in the Form of Quotation) to the following email address: [email protected] Emails should state the Reference Number and Contractor name in the subject line. Quotations submitted in any other manner will not be accepted. Confirmation Promptly contact procurement at the Address for Inquiries below if you do not receive a of Receipt receipt confirmation email upon submitting a quotation. File Size The maximum file size limit per email is 10MB. You should partition and number large Restrictions emails and identify the number of transmissions. KEY DATES Submission The Surrey Police Service would prefer to receive Quotations on or before July 8, 2021 (the Date: “Submission Date”) ADDENDA AVAILABILITY Method of Addenda will be posted to: www.bcbid.gov.bc.ca and www.surrey.ca . If SPS delivered this Delivery: RFQ directly to Contractors, SPS may deliver addenda directly to those Contractors. INQUIRIES Inquiries should be submitted to [email protected] (the “Address for Inquiries”) no later than 7 business days prior to the Submission Date, quoting the Reference Number above. No telephone inquiries, please. This Request for Quotation is comprised of the following parts: COVER PAGE PART 4 FORM OF QUOTATION PART 1 INSTRUCTIONS TO CONTRACTORS Cover letter PART 2 SCOPE/SPECIFICATIONS Attachment 1 – Quotation Details PART 3 CONTRACT TERMS Attachment 2 – Contractor Questionnaire Schedule A –SCOPE/SPECIFICATIONS Schedule B – PRICING AND ADDITIONAL TERMS PART 1 – INSTRUCTIONS TO CONTRACTORS SECTION A - GENERAL 6.0 FORM AND CONTENTS OF QUOTATION 1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 6.1 Contractors should complete and submit Part 4 - Form of 1.1 Through this Request for Quotations (RFQ), Surrey Police Quotation, signed by its authorized signatory(ies).
  • Hawthorne Park.Pdf

    Hawthorne Park.Pdf

    From: Sarah F. Alger To: Andrew Vorce Cc: Vicki S. Marsh ([email protected]); Megan Trudel; Holly Visco; Terry Sanford ([email protected]); Judith Wegner Subject: Hawthorne Park Date: Friday, March 6, 2020 12:22:29 AM Dear Andrew, I was surprised to learn that the Hawthorne Park matter was discussed by the Board at its meeting today. Based upon my conversation with staff and a review of the agenda, I understood that this matter was continued until Monday night. My experience has been that when an item on the agenda is specifically marked as being continued to a date certain, as was the case here, that is notice to the public and applicants alike that the matter is off the agenda for that meeting and will not be discussed. Had we known that the matter would be discussed at today’s meeting, both my client and I certainly would have attended. That said, I understand that the Board has raised the following questions that it hopes can be addressed at or before the meeting Monday evening. We are happy to answer any questions that the Board or any interested party might have. The questions posed by the Board are below in blue, and my responses are in red. 1. What are the consequences if the Board declines to approve signing this document? I do not believe that there would be any consequences if the Board declined to approve the proposed document. The language of the special permit is clear that the permit is not affected by the failure of the applicant to find a holder for the Conservation Restriction (“CR”) as long as the Board finds that the applicant has made a good faith effort.
  • DELTA POLICE BOARD Regular Meeting Agenda Wednesday, April 21, 2021 at 09:00 Delta Council Chambers, Zoom 4500 Clarence Taylor Crescent Delta, BC V4K 3E2

    DELTA POLICE BOARD Regular Meeting Agenda Wednesday, April 21, 2021 at 09:00 Delta Council Chambers, Zoom 4500 Clarence Taylor Crescent Delta, BC V4K 3E2

    RG A.1 DELTA POLICE BOARD Regular Meeting Agenda Wednesday, April 21, 2021 at 09:00 Delta Council Chambers, Zoom 4500 Clarence Taylor Crescent Delta, BC V4K 3E2 A. Adoption of Agenda 1. Adoption of the Regular Agenda of April 21, 2021 B. Consent Items 1. Approval of Minutes ● a. Approval of Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 17, 2021 2. *Crime Statistics & Map of March 2021 ● 3. *Financial Reports of January 2021 ● 4. *Correspondence a. Compliments from the Public ● 5. *For Information a. Surrey Police Service Recruitment Concerns by National Police Force ● b. Amendments to the BC Provincial Policing Standards - 2.1.1 Recruit and Advanced Training ● c. Information from Cathy Peters, BC Anti-Human Trafficking Educator ● d. Letter to Health Minister Adrian Dix re: Immunization for Delta First Responders e. New President of the BCAPB ● f. Special Committee on Reforming the Police Act Update – Committee’s Report New Deadline ● C. Delegations/Presentations 1. *Public Delegations 2. *Delta Police Association 3. Appreciation for S/Sgt Sukh Sidhu’s Work with the Board ● S/Sgt Sukh Sidhu D. Business Arising out of Minutes 1. *Action Document ● E. Priority Items 1. *Chief’s Report 2. CAPG Call for Resolutions ● 3. 2021 Q1 Community Safety Plan (CSP) Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) ● 4. Submission of Recommendations to the Special Committee on Reforming the Police Act (SCRPA) ● F. Reports 1. 30x30 Pledge ● 2. Education Opportunity – Bias Free Training Hosted by Vancouver Police Board ● 3. Education Opportunity – CAPG Governance Summit ● ● Attachment *Standing Item RG A.1 G. Other/New Business 1. Items as requested by the Board Resolution to Terminate the Meeting.