Australian Energy and Resources Update 1

Briefing note September 2015

Australian Energy and Resources Update Welcome to our monthly update on Australian energy and resources-related legal developments.

Highlights this month include the substantial changes to the Federal Government Ministry in the wake of 's appointment as Prime Minister and the release of long – awaited safeguard rules under the Direct Action Plan.

This update is intended as a snapshot and not specific legal advice (nor an exhaustive coverage of all relevant issues). If you would like further information on any specific issue, please let us know.

New Federal Ministry replacing the long-serving Industry Minister, Ian Macfarlane. announced The express inclusion of On 20 September 2015, the new innovation and science reflects Prime Minister of , Malcolm Prime Minister Turnbull's focus Key issues Turnbull, announced a number of on innovation as a key  New Federal Ministry changes to the Federal Ministry. The component of reshaping the announced changes followed his successful Australian economy. Australia's  Draft rules on safeguard challenge to for the youngest Federal parliamentarian, mechanism for the Emissions leadership of the and , has been appointed Reduction Fund released subsequent swearing in as Australia's as Assistant Minister for 29th Prime Minister on Innovation  's "Innovative Resources Tenures 15 September 2015. Mr Turnbull was  Former Assistant Treasurer Josh Framework" released for formerly the Minister for Frydenberg has been appointed comment Communications. the Minister for Resources,  NOPSEMA's environmental The key points for the energy and Energy and Northern Australia. management process resources sector are as follows: This position had no immediate predecessor in the previous endorsed after 12 months of  Warren Truss, Leader of the , although Ian operation National Party, remains as Macfarlane had responsibility for  NSW Swamp Offset Policy for Minister for Infrastructure and energy and resources matters longwall coal applied to new Regional Development and  National Party deputy leader, mine expansion Deputy Prime Minister remains the  has been Minister for Agriculture and, as appointed the Minister for part of a renewed agreement Industry, Innovation and Science, between the Liberal and National

2 Australian Energy and Resources Update

Parties, is now also be emissions below certain baseline baseline will be established using responsible for Water Resources. levels. Public comment on the certain benchmark emissions Water was previously dealt with documents closed in mid-September.  Baselines for electricity sector: A under the Environment portfolio The key elements of the proposed separate approach will apply to  retains responsibility safeguard mechanism are as follows: grid-connected electricity for Environment but, as noted generators including the National above, without responsibility for  Commencement: The safeguard Electricity Market. A sector Water mechanism will commence baseline of 198 million tonnes of  is the new Federal operation on 1 July 2016 carbon dioxide equivalence will Treasurer, taking over from Joe  Coverage: Large facilities with apply to all grid-connected Hockey who announced his direct emissions of more than electricity generators. The Clean retirement from the Parliament 100,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide Energy Regulator will publish a soon after the ministerial equivalence will be required to statement on its website if this reshuffle. keep their net emissions at or baseline is exceeded. Individual The full list of Ministers can be below certain baseline levels. baselines will also apply, accessed here: The entity with operational calculated on the basis of the http://www.dpmc.gov.au/sites/default/f control of the facility will be facility's highest annual iles/files/ministry_List_21_Sept.pdf. responsible for meeting these emissions between 2009-10 and requirements 2013-14, if the sector baseline no Draft rules on safeguard  Baselines for existing facilities: longer applies mechanism for the Baselines for existing facilities  Flexible compliance will be set using historical data arrangements: Entities may seek Emissions Reduction which reflects the highest level of to avail themselves of certain Fund released reported emissions over the flexibilities under the safeguard The Federal Government's Direct period 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 mechanism including the use of Action Plan adopts a carrot and stick and adjusted to accommodate ACCUs purchased through the approach to achieving its objectives to (amongst other things) facility Emissions Reduction Fund to cut greenhouse gas emissions to 5% expansions or emissions offset emissions (given emissions below 2000 levels by 2020 and 26- variability associated with are based on "net" rather than 28% below 2005 levels by 2020 – the extraction of the natural resource "gross" numbers); exemptions if carrot being the purchasing and or reserve emissions are exceeded due to crediting of Australian Carbon Credit  Baselines for new investments: (amongst other things) a natural Units (ACCUs) through the Emissions Baselines for new investments disaster or criminal activity; and Reduction Fund (details of which can will depend upon whether the multi-year monitoring whereby a be found in our September update new facility is already underway facility could exceed the baseline here and our March update here) and (and therefore limited scope to in one year but avoid a breach if the stick being the "safeguard change design) or entirely new. If its average emissions over 3 mechanism". the facility exceeds the years were below the baseline. designated large facility threshold  Administration: The Clean On 2 September 2015, the (ie 100,000 tonnes of carbon Energy Regulator will administer Department of Environment released dioxide equivalence) before 1 the safeguard mechanism. The a number of draft legislative July 2020 the baseline will reflect operation of the Emissions instruments and explanatory the audited emissions forecast Reduction Fund including the statements relating to the safeguard provided by the facility operator safeguard mechanism will be mechanism. The mechanism aims to with a true-up after the forecast reviewed by the Government in "safeguard" the emissions reductions period based on actual 2017 / 2018 to ensure its ongoing achieved through the Emissions performance. If the facility does effectiveness. Reduction Fund by requiring large not exceed the threshold, the businesses to keep their net

Australian Energy and Resources Update 3

More information about the Emissions The key changes proposed in the NOPSEMA's Reduction Fund and the safeguard paper are related to the exploration mechanism can be found here: phase of resource projects. The environmental http://www.environment.gov.au/climat paper considers that an effective and management process e-change/emissions-reduction- targeted exploration effort will lead to endorsed after 12 months fund/about/safeguard- expansion in the geological mechanism?utm_source=Clean+Ener knowledge of the state and in some of operation gy+Regulator+- instances a profitable resource The process used by the National +Update&utm_campaign=2eec4586a operation and the associated Offshore Petroleum Safety and 6- economic benefits. Environmental Management Authority Consultation_on_safeguard_legislativ (NOPSEMA) to assess and authorise In the interests of promoting certainty, e_instruments&utm_medium=email& the environmental impacts of offshore the paper proposes that resource utm_term=0_56e080d9b7- petroleum and greenhouse gas exploration authorities (or titles) be 2eec4586a6-51741477. activities has been endorsed by the capped, with default maximum terms Federal Environment Minister. Queensland's "Innovative of: In February 2014, NOPSEMA  8 years for minerals Resources Tenures became the sole assessor of the Framework" released for  10 years for coal; and environmental impacts associated comment  12 years for petroleum, with petroleum and greenhouse gas geothermal and greenhouse gas. activities in Australian waters On 4 September 2015, the Other key proposals include: following a strategic environmental Queensland Minister for State impact assessment and approval  introducing uniform tenure types Development and Minister for Natural process carried out under the across the different Acts Resources and Mines, Dr Anthony Environment Protection and Lynham, released a policy paper  removing the ability to renew the Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 outlining proposals for modernising term of a resource exploration (Cth). Queensland's resources tenure authority (other than where system. The Innovative Resources proponents have applied for less A condition of NOPSEMA's Tenures Framework is the most than the maximum term) designation as sole regulator was the recent development in a reform  removing the requirement for periodic independent review of project that started under the Labor prescriptive work programs and NOPSEMA's compliance with its Government six years ago which is instead requiring proponents to approved environmental management expected to culminate in legislation provide a work plan which details authorisation process. The first being introduced in the second half of the proposed exploration review was to take place after 12 2016. Submissions on the policy objective and geological model to months of operation. This review paper close on 16 October 2015. be used for the resource commenced in April 2015 and the review report was endorsed by the The paper seeks to address a number exploration authority up to the mid-term Commonwealth Environment Minister of issues with the existing tenure (via delegate) on 4 September 2015. framework which is currently  introducing a default regulated by six different Acts. relinquishment requirement of The objective of NOPSEMA's Among the issues identified by 50% of the area granted at the environmental management industry stakeholders is the mid-term; and authorisation process is to ensure requirement for strict compliance with  removing statutory maximum offshore petroleum and greenhouse prescriptive exploration permit work areas. gas activities are carried out in a plans and relinquishment provisions A copy of the paper is available at: manner in which impacts on the at intervals that are too short to https://www.dnrm.qld.gov.au/our- environment are reduced to as low as achieve effective exploration results. department/policies-initiatives/mining- reasonably practicable and are of an resources/legislative-reforms/tenure- acceptable level. The review report reforms. determined that NOPSEMA is

4 Australian Energy and Resources Update

meeting all of its commitments under applications that are already on conditions. Thus, it is unclear how its authorisation process. It also foot, and to all new extraction much, if any, change will be made to found that the necessary procedures plans approved after 31 October the Swamp Offset Policy. are in place for NOPSEMA to 2015 In relation to the Springvale mine continue to meet its commitments in  Nil or negligible impact threshold: expansion, the development consent the future. Where 'nil' or 'negligible' issued by the PAC predicted The review report identified a number environmental consequences for negligible consequences to the first of opportunities for improvement upland swamps and threatened swamps to be undermined by the (largely relating to inter-agency liaison species are predicted, no up-front expansion project, but imposed the and greater communication with offset is required meeting of these negligible stakeholders) which NOPSEMA has  Maximum predicted offset liability: consequences as a performance undertaken to implement. If an offset is required, it should measure in the consent. This means be assessed as a potential that breach of this performance The next review of the Program is maximum (ie a 'worst case measure by Centennial Coal in the required in five years. Further scenario') because of the future will constitute a breach of the information on the review and difficulty and uncertainty in consent which could result in NOPSEMA's response can be found predicting subsidence and its penalties or offences under the New here: impacts on upland swamps South Wales Environmental Planning http://www.nopsema.gov.au/environm  Monitoring: A minimum of two and Assessment Act. It could also ental-management/. years pre-mining piezometric result in offsets being imposed on the NSW Swamp Offset Policy data should be used to establish project if the consequences cannot be the baseline shallow groundwater satisfactorily remediated. A A$2 for longwall coal applied regime in every swamp within million offset bond must be paid to new mine expansion 400m of longwall mining. If later before mining can commence, unless Centennial Coal's proposed monitoring demonstrates that the otherwise agreed by the Secretary of expansion of its Springvale mine shallow groundwater aquifer is the Department for Planning and received development consent from impacted, then there is a Environment. presumption of long-term impacts the independent NSW Planning Subsequent mining under other on the swamp. If monitoring Assessment Commission (PAC) on swamps is predicted to cause greater identifies that the predicted 21 September 2015. The PAC's than negligible environmental impacts have not occurred within development consent gives an consequences and so Centennial 12 months of completion of all indication as to how the NSW Coal has to demonstrate that it can mining within 400m of a swamp, Government will apply its proposed satisfy the maximum predicted offset then the proponent can seek to new Policy Framework for Biodiversity liability for these swamps prior to the have the offset deducted from the Offsets for Upland Swamps and commencement of mining those project's overall offset liability. Associated Threatened Species areas. (Swamp Offset Policy). The Swamp Offset Policy has been one of the most controversial aspects A copy of the PAC's decision can be The draft Swamp Offset Policy of the New South Wales accessed here: provides for the calculation and Government's proposed new http://www.pac.nsw.gov.au/Projects/ta provision of offsets for subsidence Integrated Mining Policy. bid/77/ctl/viewreview/mid/462/pac/498 impacts of longwall coal mining on Consultation on the Integrated Mining /view/readonly/myctl/rev/Default.aspx. upland swamps and associated Policy is not complete. At least two of threatened species. The key parts of most anticipated aspects of the policy the policy are: have yet to be released: the  Application of policy extends to Guidelines for the Economic existing projects: The policy will Assessment of Mining and Coal be applied to all new applications Seam Gas Projects and the for longwall mining, to standardised development consent

Australian Energy and Resources Update 5

Contacts

Sydney Perth Mark Pistilli Jon Carson Partner, M&A and Corporate, Resources Partner, M&A and Corporate, Resources, Projects T: +61 2 8922 8001 T: +61 8 9262 5510 E: [email protected] E: [email protected] Dave Poddar Justin Harris Partner, Competition, Regulatory Access Partner, M&A and Corporate, Resources T: +61 2 8922 8033 T: +61 8 9262 5503 E: [email protected] E: [email protected] Richard Graham Paul Lingard Partner, M&A and Corporate, Resources, Partner, M&A and Corporate, Resources, Projects Infrastructure T: +61 8 9262 5575 T: +61 2 8922 8017 E: [email protected] E: [email protected] Tracey Renshaw Diana Chang Partner, M&A and Corporate, Resources, Partner, Litigation and Dispute Resolution T: +61 8 9262 5505 T: +61 2 8922 8003 E: [email protected] E: [email protected] Philip Sealey Jane Ann Gray Partner, Project Finance Special Counsel, M&A and Corporate, Resources, T: +61 8 9262 5542 Infrastructure E: [email protected] T: +61 2 8922 8013 Paul Vinci E: [email protected] Partner, M&A and Corporate, Resources Amelia Horvath T: +61 8 9262 5504 Counsel, M&A and Corporate, Resources E: [email protected] T: +61 2 8922 8023 Robyn Glindemann E: [email protected] Counsel, Environmental, Projects, Resources Nadia Kalic T: +618 9262 5558 Counsel, M&A and Corporate, Infrastructure E: [email protected] T: +61 2 8922 8095 Jenni Hill E: [email protected] Partner, Litigation and Dispute Resolution T: +61 8 9262 5582 E: [email protected]

This publication does not necessarily deal with every important topic Clifford Chance, Level 7, 190 St Georges Terrace, or cover every aspect of the topics with which it deals. It is not Perth, WA 6000, Australia designed to provide legal or other advice. © Clifford Chance 2015 Liability limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation We use the word 'partner' to refer to a member of Clifford Chance LLP, or an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications www.cliffordchance.com

Abu Dhabi ■ Amsterdam ■ Bangkok ■ Barcelona ■ Beijing ■ Brussels ■ Bucharest ■ Casablanca ■ Doha ■ Dubai ■ Düsseldorf ■ Frankfurt ■ Hong Kong ■ Istanbul ■ Jakarta* ■ Kyiv ■ London ■ Luxembourg ■ Madrid ■ Milan ■ Moscow ■ Munich ■ New York ■ Paris ■ Perth ■ Prague ■ Riyadh ■ Rome ■ São Paulo ■ Seoul ■ Shanghai ■ Singapore ■ ■ Tokyo ■ Warsaw ■ Washington, D.C.

*Linda Widyati & Partners in association with Clifford Chance.