DOCSLIB.ORG

A Practical Guide to Applying IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Practical Guide to Applying IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements Under control? A practical guide to applying IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements February 2017 Under control? A practical guide to IFRS 10 Contents Introduction 4 1 Overview 6 1.1 Summary of IFRS 10’s main requirements 7 1.2 Areas where IFRS 10 can affect the scope of consolidation 9 1.3 IFRS 10 in the context of the overall ‘consolidation package’ 10 1.4 Effective date and Transition of IFRS 10 11 2 Scope and consolidation exemptions 12 2.1 Scope of IFRS 10 13 2.2 Consolidation exceptions and exemptions 14 3 The control definition and guidance 16 3.1 The practical implications of the control definition 18 3.2 The three key elements of control in more detail 19 3.3 Purpose and design of investee 30 3.4 Situations where the control assessment is unclear 31 3.5 Summary of the control assessment process 32 3.6 Continuous assessment 33 Under control? A practical guide to IFRS 10 4 Applying the control model in specific circumstances 34 4.1 Majority holdings in an investee 35 4.2 Large minority holdings in an investee 36 4.3 Potential voting rights 40 4.4 Special purpose and structured entities 43 4.5 Principal-agent situations 50 4.6 Franchises 58 5 Consolidation procedures 60 5.1 The consolidation process 61 5.2 Changes in non-controlling interests 71 5.3 Losing control of a subsidiary 73 6 Investment Entities 76 6.1 Definition of an investment entity 77 6.2 Applying the definition 81 6.3 Accounting treatment for an investment entity 86 Appendix – Disclosures under IFRS 12: Understanding the requirements 92 Introduction Assessing when one entity controls another (in other words, when a parent-subsidiary relationship exists) is essential to the preparation of financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The control assessment determines which entities are consolidated in a parent’s financial statements and therefore affects a group’s reported results, cash flows and financial position – and the activities that are ‘on’ and ‘off’ the group’s balance sheet. Under IFRS, this control assessment is accounted for in accordance with IFRS 10 ‘Consolidated financial statements’. Under control? A practical guide to IFRS 10 IFRS 10 was issued in May 2011, and was part of a package of changes addressing different levels of involvement with other entities. IFRS 10 redefines ‘control’ and provides extensive guidance on applying the definition. IFRS 10 applies both to traditional entities and to special The Guide is organised as follows: purpose (or structured) entities and replaced the corresponding • Section 1 provides an overview of IFRS 10 and areas requirements of both IAS 27 ‘Consolidated and Separate where IFRS 10 can impact the scope of consolidation. It Financial Statements’ (IAS 27) (2008) and SIC-12 ‘Consolidation also explains how IFRS 10 fits into the overall package of – Special Purpose Entities’ (SIC-12). Standards on involvement with other entities. It is unusual for IFRS 10 to affect the scope of consolidation • Section 2 explains the scope of IFRS 10 from an investor in simple situations involving control through ownership of a and investee perspective, and the situations in which a majority of the voting power in an investee. However, more parent entity is exempt from presenting consolidated complex and borderline control assessments need to be financial statements. reviewed carefully. • Section 3 sets out IFRS 10’s control definition and its key The member firms within Grant Thornton International Ltd elements, and identifies key practical issues in applying the (‘GTIL’) have gained extensive insights into the application of guidance. IFRS 10. GTIL, through its IFRS team, develops general • Section 4 discusses the specific situations and types of guidance that supports its member firms’ commitment to high investee for which IFRS 10 can affect control conclusions quality, consistent application of IFRS. We are pleased to share and the scope of consolidation in practice. these insights by publishing ‘Under Control? A Practical Guide to • Section 5 discusses consolidation procedures and the Applying IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements’ (the Guide). requirements on changes in ownership and loss of control. • Section 6 explains the consolidation exception for Using the Guide investment entities. The Guide has been written to assist management in applying • Appendix A summarises the disclosure requirements in IFRS 10. More specifically it aims to assist in: IFRS 12 ‘Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities’ and • understanding IFRS 10’s requirements provides selected application examples. • identifying situations in which IFRS 10 can impact control Grant Thornton International Ltd assessments February 2017 • identifying and addressing the key practical application issues and judgements. When applying IFRS 10, complex and borderline control assessments need to be reviewed carefully. February 2017 5 1 Overview IFRS 10 establishes a single, control-based model for assessing control and determining the scope of consolidation. It applies to all entities, including ‘structured entities’, which were previously referred to as ‘special purpose entities’ under SIC-12. Under control? A practical guide to IFRS 10 This section summarises IFRS 10’s main requirements, provides insights into areas where IFRS 10 most often impacts consolidation assessments and explains how IFRS 10 fits into the broader ‘consolidation package’. 1.1 Summary of IFRS 10’s main requirements Summary of IFRS 10’s main requirements IFRS 10 establishes principles for the presentation and preparation of consolidated financial statements. To meet this objective it: • requires an entity that controls another (a parent) to present consolidated financial Objective statements (subject to limited exemptions – see below) • defines ‘control’, and confirms control as the basis for consolidation • provides guidance on how to apply the definition • provides guidance on preparing consolidated financial statements. IFRS 10 applies to all entities (including structured entities) except long-term employment benefit plans within the scope of IAS 19 ‘Employee Benefits’. A parent that is itself a subsidiary of another entity (an intermediate parent) need not present consolidated financial statements if it meets strict conditions, including that: • none of its owners object • its shares/debt instruments are not traded in a public market Scope and exemptions • a higher-level parent produces publicly-available IFRS consolidated financial statements. A parent that is an investment entity must not present consolidated financial statements if it is required to measure all of it subsidiaries at fair value through profit or loss. IFRS 10 applies only to consolidated financial statements. Requirements on preparing separate financial statements are retained in IAS 27. An investor controls an investee when it is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the investee. Control requires: Control definition • power over the investee • exposure, or rights, to variable returns • ability to use power to affect returns. February 2017 7 Under control? A practical guide to IFRS 10 Summary of IFRS 10’s main requirements IFRS 10 includes additional guidance on the elements of the control definition and their interaction, including: • purpose and design of the investee • the ‘relevant activities’ of an investee • whether the rights of the investor give it the current ability to direct the relevant activities Applying the • whether the investor is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns. control definition IFRS 10 includes guidance on more difficult control assessments including: • agency relationships • control over structured entities • potential voting rights • control without a majority of voting rights. IFRS 10 retains established principles on consolidation procedures, including • elimination of intra-group transactions and the parent’s investment: • uniform accounting policies Preparing consolidated • the need for financial statements used in consolidation to have the same reporting date financial statements • the allocation of comprehensive income and equity to non-controlling interests • accounting for changes in ownership interests without loss of control • accounting for losing control of a subsidiary. IFRS 10 came into effect for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. Transition was mainly retrospective but was subject to reliefs for situations in which: • the control assessment was the same as under IAS 27 (2008) Effective date and transition • a fully retrospective consolidation or de-consolidation would be impracticable. Early adoption was permitted as long as the other standards in the consolidation package were adopted at the same time. IFRS 10 does not include any disclosure requirements but an entity that applies Disclosures IFRS 10 is also required to apply IFRS 12 – which sets out comprehensive disclosure principles. Terminology – ‘special purpose entities’ (SPEs) and ‘structured entities’ The Guide makes extensive references to ‘special purpose entities’ (SPEs). These references are used to broadly describe entities which used to be considered within the scope of SIC-12. SIC-12 described SPEs only in general terms, so deciding whether a particular entity is an SPE required judgement. IFRS 10 does not refer to SPEs, but instead refers to entities that have been designed so that voting or similar rights
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Business Combinations and Consolidated Financial Reporting
    Business Combinations and Consolidated Financial Reporting Business Combinations and Consolidated Financial Reporting Copyright 2014 by DELTACPE LLC All rights reserved. No part of this course may be reproduced in any form or by any means, without permission in writing from the publisher. The author is not engaged by this text or any accompanying lecture or electronic media in the rendering of legal, tax, accounting, or similar professional services. While the legal, tax, and accounting issues discussed in this material have been reviewed with sources believed to be reliable, concepts discussed can be affected by changes in the law or in the interpretation of such laws since this text was printed. For that reason, the accuracy and completeness of this information and the author's opinions based thereon cannot be guaranteed. In addition, state or local tax laws and procedural rules may have a material impact on the general discussion. As a result, the strategies suggested may not be suitable for every individual. Before taking any action, all references and citations should be checked and updated accordingly. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional service. If legal advice or other expert advice is required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought. —-From a Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations. All numerical values in this course are examples subject to change.
    [Show full text]
  • Close, Consolidate and Report
    Close, Consolidate and Report Point of view on Enabling Technologies December 2016 © 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands 1 Introduction Finance Organization of the future Wheel of Finance The future of Finance: As we look at What does the future hold for the the future of Finance, it’s important to Finance function? Today’s Finance consider two things: How Finance organizations are more then ever under delivers value to the organization, and pressure to deliver value to the business what enables the Finance function to do and in parallel operate within a highly so. cost-efficient and most-effective delivery model. The introduction of new Digital How Finance delivers value: In our technologies is likely to be the view, Finance delivers value through most important factor impacting the three types of services: Operational Finance function. Finance, Business Finance and Specialized Finance. Think transactional, Digital technologies radically transform strategic and highly specialized. how the business and it’s Finance function delivers value. Digital Finance What enables Finance: Underpinning utilizes disruptive technology, data, these three services are what we call innovation, and people to elevate and Finance enablers. These enablers differentiate the capabilities of the include the organizational structure and Finance function. Digital requires the Finance team’s talent; the organizations to think and act differently information, systems and data available in order to generate value. to the Finance group, and the processes and policies that enable the Finance The ability of CFOs to leverage Digital team to monitor risk and stay on top of technologies to position their future regulatory obligations. Finance function will determine the future of their organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Combinations and Changes in Ownership Interests
    25263 bd IFRS3 IAS27:25263 IFRS3/IAS27 bd 4/7/08 10:02 Page a Business combinations and changes in ownership interests A guide to the revised IFRS 3 and IAS 27 Audit.Tax.Consulting.Financial Advisory. 25263 bd IFRS3 IAS27:25263 IFRS3/IAS27 bd 4/7/08 10:02 Page b Contacts Global IFRS leadership team IFRS global office Global IFRS leader Ken Wild [email protected] IFRS centres of excellence Americas Robert Uhl [email protected] Asia Pacific Hong Kong Melbourne Stephen Taylor Bruce Porter [email protected] [email protected] Europe-Africa Copenhagen Johannesburg London Paris Jan Peter Larsen Graeme Berry Veronica Poole Laurence Rivat [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Deloitte’s www.iasplus.com website provides comprehensive information about international financial reporting in general and IASB activities in particular. Unique features include: • daily news about financial reporting globally. • summaries of all Standards, Interpretations and proposals. • many IFRS-related publications available for download. • model IFRS financial statements and checklists. • an electronic library of several hundred IFRS resources. • all Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu comment letters to the IASB. • links to several hundred international accounting websites. • e-learning modules for each IAS and IFRS – at no charge. • complete history of adoption of IFRSs in Europe and information about adoptions of IFRSs elsewhere around the world. • updates on developments in national accounting standards. 25263 bd IFRS3 IAS27:25263 IFRS3/IAS27 bd 4/7/08 10:02 Page c Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Summary of major changes 1 1.2 Convergence of IFRSs and US GAAP 3 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Accrual and Deferral Handout
    Name Principles of Financial Accounting I Adjusting the Accounts "Cash" Basis vs. "Accrual" Basis: Cash Accrual Revenue Expenses Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) require using the basis. Why make Adjusting Journal Entries?____________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ Recall previous "promises." New Promise: Every adjusting entry will have ______________________ Balance Sheet and one_________________________________________________________ effect. INCOME STATEMENT attempts to accomplish: ____________________________________________ ESSENTIALS OF CONCEPT 1. 2. 3. I. Identifying accounts to be adjusted: Accruals and Deferrals A. Perhaps the best way to distinguish deferrals and accruals is the timing of cash changing hands: CA$H accruals deferrals cash AFTER event cash BEFORE event Deferrals have been recorded; accruals have not. B. Definitions An ACCRUAL is an expense or a revenue . Examples of accruals: Expense: Revenue: Copyright © 1999 by M. Ray Gregg. All Rights reserved. A DEFERRAL is a already paid or of a revenue . Examples of deferrals: Expense: Revenue: II. Accruals A. Expenses 1. Example Salaries increase as employees work each day, yet, for convenience, salaries are recorded when . Since the cash is paid the event, salaries are an example of . The adjusting entry necessary when payday and the end of the fiscal period are on different days would be: 2. Decision tree conclusion If this is the entry required for this , other accrued expense items must follow a similar format: B. Revenue 1. Example Your CPA firm is auditing a client's records; the engagement begins in mid-November and lasts through the end of February. Each day as work is being performed, revenue is earned. Since the cash will not be collected until completion of the engagement (after the event), this is an example of .
    [Show full text]
  • Publication 538, Accounting Periods and Methods
    Userid: CPM Schema: tipx Leadpct: 100% Pt. size: 10 Draft Ok to Print AH XSL/XML Fileid: … ons/P538/201901/A/XML/Cycle04/source (Init. & Date) _______ Page 1 of 21 15:46 - 28-Feb-2019 The type and rule above prints on all proofs including departmental reproduction proofs. MUST be removed before printing. Department of the Treasury Contents Internal Revenue Service Future Developments ....................... 1 Publication 538 Introduction .............................. 1 (Rev. January 2019) Photographs of Missing Children .............. 2 Cat. No. 15068G Accounting Periods ........................ 2 Calendar Year .......................... 2 Fiscal Year ............................. 3 Accounting Short Tax Year .......................... 3 Improper Tax Year ....................... 4 Periods and Change in Tax Year ...................... 4 Individuals ............................. 4 Partnerships, S Corporations, and Personal Methods Service Corporations (PSCs) .............. 5 Corporations (Other Than S Corporations and PSCs) .............................. 7 Accounting Methods ....................... 8 Cash Method ........................... 8 Accrual Method ........................ 10 Inventories ............................ 13 Change in Accounting Method .............. 18 How To Get Tax Help ...................... 19 Future Developments For the latest information about developments related to Pub. 538, such as legislation enacted after it was published, go to IRS.gov/Pub538. What’s New Small business taxpayers. Effective for tax years beginning
    [Show full text]
  • Training Material on Extensible Business Reporting Langauge (XBRL)
    Training Material on Extensible Business Reporting Langauge (XBRL) Prepared By: XBRL INDIA DISCLAIMER 1. The material contained herein is for private circulation and reference purposes only. 2. The views expressed in the background material should not be construed as the views of the XBRL India, or any of its Committee or Board of Directors. 3. The copyrights in respect of the material included in the Background Material rest with XBRL India. Published by : Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL), India Website www.xbrl.org/in Printed by : Sahitya Bhawan Publications, Hospital Road, Agra - 282 003. FOREWORD In the recent times, XBRL has emerged as a popular, effective, alternative for effective reporting and analysis and being recognized as a global standard for exchanging business information. XBRL is now in India with a bang, presenting a lot of professional opportunities for Chartered A ccountants. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, the premier accounting and auditing standards setting body in India, recognizing the importance of XBRL in the reporting requirements, in the year 2007 had taken a lead on XBRL by constituting a group comprising of the regulators viz. SEBI/RBI/IRDA/MCA for undertaking the Development and promotion of XBRL in India. Now, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, the regulators of companies in India vide circular No. 09/ 2011 dated 31st March, 2011, has mandated the filing of financial statements in XBRL formats for the year ended 31st March, 2011, covering more than 25000 Companies in their first phase of implementation. The circular, however, does not cover in its ambit Banking, Insurance, NBFCs and Power Sector Companies for filing their Financial Statements in XBRL formats.
    [Show full text]
  • IESBA Agenda Paper 8-B June 15-17, 2011
    IESBA Agenda Paper 8‐B June 15‐17, 2011 – Warsaw, Poland DRAFT V3.4 for discussion Prepared as at May 2011 COMPARISON BY TOPIC OF THE INDEPENDENCE REQUIREMENTS IN THE IESBA CODE RELATING TO THE AUDIT OF PIEs TO THOSE OF CERTAIN JURISDICTION This draft document has been prepared for IESBA discussion purposes as part of its convergence efforts. The draft comparison and the details have not been prepared by the respective regulator or professional body nor validated by them. IESBA Agenda Paper 8‐B June 15‐17, 2011 – Warsaw, Poland Introduction – Understanding this document The Independence requirements set out in Section 290 of the IESBA Code have been compared to the jurisdictional requirements of the following: • USA (SEC/PCAOB) • Australia • Germany • UK (APB) • Brazil • France • Japan • Hong Kong The comparison was based on the ‘long document’ presented to the Board (which contains a synopsis of the Code’s provisions and not, in most cases, the full text of the Code) and focuses only on those relationships and circumstances that are either ‘prohibited’ or ‘permitted only if certain conditions exist or specified safeguards are applied’. This document summarises by topic the results of the comparison. It details: • the IESBA requirement • the jurisdictional requirement if substantively more restrictive than the Code, and • in a few places, it also identifies where the jurisdictional requirement is substantively less restrictive than the Code (these are identified in italics). Where there is no detail for a jurisdiction in the topic this is because the relevant jurisdictional requirement is deemed to be similar or equivalent to that in the IESBA code.
    [Show full text]
  • Ixbrl Filing - Are You Ready?
    iXBRL Filing - Are you ready? What does this mean for your business? In July 2012 Revenue announced that from What is XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting 23 November 2012 all companies would Language and iXBRL (Inline eXtensible Business Reporting Language)? have the option to file iXBRL financial statements with Revenue and that the XBRL is a computer-readable language for reporting submission of iXBRL financial statements financial information. It is similar to bar-coding financial information within a set of financial statements so that it would be mandatory for all companies becomes computer-readable. “Tags” are assigned to each dealt with by the Large Cases Division piece of information within the financial statements and (“LCD”) of Revenue in respect of tax returns this assignment allows the information to be read by the filed on or after 1 October 2013, relating to Revenue’s computer system. accounting periods ending on or after 31 iXBRL combines “human-readable” information and December 2012. computer readable data with the output being a document (i.e. financial statements) that looks like a Word or Excel In June 2013 Revenue announced that the document but which has electronic tags embedded within it. This allows smarter data handling by the Revenue and submission of iXBRL financial statements should lead to the Revenue focussing their attention on will be mandatory for non-LCD companies in identified risk areas. respect of tax returns filed on or after 1 October Tax computations 2014, relating to accounting periods ending on or after 31 December 2013. This mandation Unlike the practice in the UK, the Irish Revenue has date will not apply to entities who meet all decided that there will be no obligation to file iXBRL tax computations for the foreseeable future.
    [Show full text]
  • Announcement on Change of the Accounting Period (Closing Date of Fiscal Year)
    July 31, 2014 To whom it may concern, Company name: Nabtesco Corporation Representative: Kazuaki Kotani, Representative Director, President & CEO (Code: 6268, 1st Section of TSE) Contact: Toshihiro Matsumoto, General Manager, General Administration Dept. (Telephone: +81-3-5213-1133) Announcement on Change of the Accounting Period (Closing Date of Fiscal Year) Nabtesco Corporation (hereinafter, “the Company”) hereby announces that it has resolved at its Board of Directors’ meeting held today that it will change the accounting period as detailed below, on the condition that the proposal of “Partial Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation” will be approved at the 12th Annual General Meeting of Shareholders to be held in late June 2015. 1. Reasons for the change The Company’s fiscal year-end shall be changed from March to December for the purpose of aligning the period with that of the consolidated overseas subsidiaries, thereby improving efficiency in the management and business operations including the compilation of budgets and business performance management. Also, the Company considers that this change will meet the requirement for alignment of fiscal year of consolidated companies as set forth under the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) of which the future application is under consideration. 2. Details of the change Current fiscal year-end: March 31 of each year New fiscal year-end after change: December 31 of each year Notes: 1. When the relevant change has been implemented, the 13th fiscal period shall be transitional, covering the nine months from April 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015. 2. Consolidated domestic subsidiaries will also adopt the same change.
    [Show full text]
  • TIR 98-7: Change in Accounting Period from Calendar Year To
    BENJAMIN J. CAYETANO RAY K. KAMIKAWA GOVERNOR DIRECTOR OF TAXATION MAZIE HIRONO SUSAN K. INOUYE LT. GOVERNOR DEPUTY DIRECTOR STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION P.O. BOX 259 HONOLULU, HAWAII 96809 July 9, 1998 TAX INFORMATION RELEASE NO. 98-7 RE: Change in Accounting Period From Calendar Year to Fiscal Year For Public Service Companies This Tax Information Release (TIR) provides guidance to a public service company (PSC) subject to the tax under chapter 239, Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS), which changes its accounting period from a calendar year to a fiscal year. The amount of the tax which is assessed for the calendar year and the PSC’s payment schedule for the tax that is established at the beginning of the calendar year are not affected or canceled when the PSC changes its accounting period to a fiscal year. A PSC’s tax liability for the current taxable year is due on the first day of the taxable year. The PSC tax is a means of taxing the real and personal property owned by a PSC, tangible and intangible, including going concern value. HRS §§ 239-5 and 239-6 (1993). The tax is based upon the PSC’s taxable gross income for the preceding taxable year and is reported and paid on a public service company tax return (Form U-6). HRS § 239-4, (1993). The PSC however, may elect to pay the tax in quarterly installments unless the total tax liability exceeds $100,000, in which case the tax must instead be paid in equal monthly installments. The amount of the tax which is assessed, the return due date, and the payment schedule, therefore, are not affected or canceled when a PSC changes its accounting period from a calendar year to a fiscal year.
    [Show full text]
  • AU-C Section 315 Understanding the Entity and Its Environment and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement
    Understanding the Entity and Its Environment 287 AU-C Section 315 Understanding the Entity and Its Environment and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement Source: SAS No. 122; SAS No. 128; SAS No. 130; SAS No. 134; SAS No. 135. Effective for audits of financial statements for periods ending on or after December 15, 2012, unless otherwise indicated. Introduction Scope of This Section .01 This section addresses the auditor's responsibility to identify and as- sess the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements through understanding the entity and its environment, including the entity's internal control. Effective Date .02 This section is effective for audits of financial statements for periods ending on or after December 15, 2012. Objective .03 The objective of the auditor is to identify and assess the risks of ma- terial misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, at the financial statement and relevant assertion levels through understanding the entity and its envi- ronment, including the entity's internal control, thereby providing a basis for designing and implementing responses to the assessed risks of material mis- statement. Definitions .04 For purposes of generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS), the fol- lowing terms have the meanings attributed as follows: Assertions. Representations by management, explicit or otherwise, that are embodied in the financial statements as used by the au- ditor to consider the different types of potential misstatements that may occur. Business risk. A risk resulting from significant conditions, events, circumstances, actions, or inactions that could adversely affect an entity's ability to achieve its objectives and execute its strategies or from the setting of inappropriate objectives and strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Accounting Rules and Regulations
    Chapter 2 Accounting rules and regulations A principled approach FSA should avoid ‘lengthy rule book’ says ICAEW Paul Grant The Financial Services Authority approach deals better with changing needs to avoid drawing up a ‘lengthy financial markets than a lengthy rule rule book’ in response to the finan- book,’ said PwC partner and chair cial crisis and instead adopt a of the ICAEW Financial Service principles-based approach in its Faculty’s Risk and Regulation reform of banking regulation. Committee, John Tattersall. In its submitted response to the Iain Coke, head of Financial Turner Review, the ICAEW said the Services Faculty, added: ‘Communica- City regulator should instead address tion, cooperation and coordination operational fallings as well as weak- between the tripartite authorities can, nesses in system design and and should, be improved. It is vital, regulatory policy. It should also strive however the system is structured, that to avoid losing the positive aspects of it is made to work effectively at both the work it had previously under- policy and operational levels. Part taken from the pressure to change. of the solution here is for there to ‘The arguments that the FSA be closer dialogue between the FSA should move towards a more and the audit profession on system- principles-based approach remain atic risks.’ valid not least in that such an Accountancy Age, 17 June 2009. Source: Reproduced with permission from Incisive Media Ltd. Questions relating to this news story can be found on page 41 ² About this chapter In this chapter we outline the conventional accounting rules that are commonly adopted in practice and the legislation that governs accounting.
    [Show full text]