Auction Program

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Auction Program Reverse Auction Program Design & Prioritization Workshop Department of Government Services Bureau of Procurement December 9, 2014 Reverse Auction Program Design & Prioritization workshop Agenda Topics Start Time Objectives 10:00 Project approach & status 10:05 BOP current state 10:10 Leading practices 10:30 Recommendations: Governance Initiatives 11:00 Recommendations: Category Roadmap 11:40 Wrap-up 12:25 2 Reverse Auction Program Design & Prioritization workshop Objectives ■ Share key findings from BOP’s current procedures and processes related to reverse auctions (RA) ■ Share leading practices and recommendations to implement a successful RA program Workshop ■ Gain further direction and insight from senior management to tailor recommendations to Objectives BOP’s environment: ■ Confirming multi-year strategy roadmap ■ Refining reverse auction category candidates analysis 3 Reverse Auction Program Design & Prioritization workshop Project approach & status Phases Activities Identify stakeholders Mobilize Gather BOP data Finalize project cadence 1 week Data Capture Conduct spend analysis & contract review Interview BOP commodity manager & specialist & Analysis Assess the Commonwealth's T&C’s against industries leading practices 2 weeks Conduct workshops to validate findings Design Identify areas of opportunity & risk in the RA Identify gap analysis between BOP & leading practice procedures 3 weeks Identify commodity candidates for RA Technology Establish technology requirements Assess existing technology capabilities Review Conduct GAP assessment for SAP SRM 7.02 1 week Conduct design & prioritization workshop Implement Provide leading practice for RA Planning Recommend multi-Year Strategy for RA 1 week Recommend RA implementation plan 4 Reverse Auction Program Design & Prioritization workshop: Current State Spend analysis overview The BOP managed $1.9B in contract spend in CY2013, but none of this spend leveraged reverse auctions . Initial spend analyzed Out-of-Scope: amounted $2.3B $2.3B • Exclude Per • Surplus $1.9B Contract database BOP’s Request • WC Claims Contract spend in scope . Out-of-Scope items were Total (1) • Master • Active Contracts managed by BOP removed after discussing Agreement Total (2) with Mike and Commodity Manager’s . *Surplus* was removed from the scope because it is misclassified spend Initial Total (1): $2,259M Exclude Per BOP's Request $115M Master Agreement $50M Surplus $3M WC Claim $67M Expired Contracts $129M Total (2): $1,896M 5 Reverse Auction Program Design & Prioritization workshop: Current State Spend Analysis by sub-category (top 86%) breakdown 86% of BOP spend is represented in the top 26 sub-categories, 5 of which are IT (33%) Hardware & Services $182.5M Validated by Software & Services Category Sub-Category $179.5M Comm Mgr Professional IT Staffing $175.0M Coal Knerr Work & Dump Trucks $84.6M Energy Print $84.1M Fuels Knerr Hardware $80.6M Construction Reinoehl Roadway Materials $78.4M Equipment Pharmaceutical $57.8M Mail Reinoehl Commercial - Furniture $51.2M Tree Trimming & Stump Cutting Svc. Kleeman Facilities Medical - Staffing $48.2M Materials - Other Myslewicz Truck, Tractors & Trailers $46.5M Financial Credit Card Services Gaul Fuels $44.6M Professional Services $30.1M Food Non-Perishable Gaul Construction $26.0M Furniture Commercial - Furniture Reinoehl Police & Specialty $23.6M Hardware & Services Teprovich IT Service $20.5M Non-Perishable $18.4M Software & Services Teprovich Mail $13.8M IT Professional IT Staffing Teprovich Mail Processing $13.5M Hardware Teprovich Tires $13.0M IT Service Tree Trimming & Stump… $12.0M Teprovich Materials - Other $11.9M Pharmaceutical Gaul Medical Media Planning Services $10.7M Staffing Gaul Lab Supplies $10.5M Professional Services Gaul Coal $10.0M NSA Vegetables &… $7.2M Operation Print Reinoehl Credit Card Services $7.2M Mail Processing Services Kleeman $.0M $50.0M $100.0M $150.0M $200.0M Road Roadway Materials Myslewicz Maintenance . $1.9B total spend in 149 sub-categories Work & Dump Trucks Reinoehl Truck, Tractors, and Trailers Reinoehl . $1.6B (86%) of total spend analyzed in the top 26 sub-categories Vehicles . Credit Card services spend reflects only fee(1) Police & Specialty Reinoehl Tires Reinoehl . Contracts where estimated spend is different than contract value Marketing Media Planning Services Kleeman were adjusted through the interview process Supplies Lab Supplies Knerr Note: (1) Consider analyzing underlying credit card spend to determine if there are additional spend leverage opportunities 6 Reverse Auction Program Design & Prioritization workshop: Current State Contract review . C ontract review focus on 2015 to 2017 by quarters . 2,183 contracts are going to expire in 2015, 2016 & 2017 which accounts for $1.9B in spend . Before 2015, 336 contracts expired, accounting for $150M in spend . After 2017, 176 contracts will expire, accounting for $54M in spend . We received the original data dump from Janice on 10/27, and we applied updates based on interview feedback we received from Mike & the commodity managers during the week of 11/10 461 385 Contract Spend $/Year in $Millions # of Vendor's 306 # of Service Goods $574M 264 $436M 223 199 $222M 90 94 $136M $158M 60 67 $122M 60 52 $85M $86M $57M $17M $32M 26 28 20 21 7 13 $16M 6 6 12 7 138 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2015 2016 2017 Contract Expiration By Quarter: 7 Reverse Auction Program Design & Prioritization workshop: Current State SWOT analysis Strengths Weaknesses . High spend within sourcing categories . No established reverse auction policies or procedures . Strong supplier database . Lack of reverse auction skills or required training . Good relationship with suppliers . Lack of technical experience managing SAP SRM . SAP SRM reverse auction cockpit already in place reverse auction cockpit . No incentive to conduct reverse auction Opportunities Threats . Recognize DGS as a strategic and value generating . No commitment by high level stakeholders agency . No commitment across agencies . Optimize negotiation cycle time . Politically sensitive suppliers (relationships, voting . Provide transparency in the sourcing process blocks, economic impact, etc.) . Increase spend managed under BOP . In some cases, a reverse auction can harm the . Achieve savings supplier relationship . Optimize supplier database 8 Reverse Auction Program Design & Prioritization workshop: Current State Leading practice dimensions Dimensions Description ■ Effectiveness and completeness of the documented or implied reverse auction strategy that supports Strategy & Change the organizational procurement strategy as well as the mechanisms for delivering change through the Management procurement function in the methods and processes used to purchase goods and services ■ Appropriate spend policies and guidelines for the appropriate use of reverse auctions, associated Strategy Governance & approvals, terms and conditions and risk management processes exist to efficiently and effectively Controls operate reverse auctions as part of a broader set of category strategies ■ The organizational design includes specific roles and responsibilities, workflows, metrics and Structure incentives to drive appropriate adoption of reverse auctions ■ Personnel are trained in the appropriate use, applicability and adoption of reverse auction tools and People Organization capabilities Category ■ The procedures and activities of the reverse auction program will identify opportunities, develop Management Cycle strategies, and plan categories through the evaluation of market supply and demand drivers ■ Appropriate processes to conduct reverse auctions, aligned with the category management cycle, Operational Processes including communication, event management, award completion and management of product and Processes service delivery based upon the terms, conditions and pricing of the award Systems & ■ Appropriate IT application to support the operational process and category management cycle Technology focused on efficient reverse auction event management ■ P resence of clean and organized spend data that has the ability to provide visibility and track results Enablers Master Data & BI-PI for the reverse auction program 9 Reverse Auction Program Design & Prioritization workshop: Current State Qualitative interviews and workshop Dimensions Quotes "I remember a reverse auction "Squeezing the margin "if I tell my vendors Reverse "Agency Strategy & Change done many years ago for Salt, could cause our bigger Auction - they aren't going support Management I don't think it went well" suppliers to drop out" to want to participate" is crucial" "multiple agencies "it is very difficult "T&C's are Strategy Governance & requesting different ways to satisfy all the sometimes hard for Controls to procure same item" vendors” suppliers to agree to" "PennDOT is the main "Each agency has different specs "PC's was one we really Structure driver on this, they would for their purchases which would considered for reverse auction have to be convinced" make it difficult for reverse auction" because they have the specs" “Good training will be key for “My category has a million items, I People suppliers and staff for can't see it being a good category Organization reverse auction to work” for reverse auction” "A lot of vendor participation “Getting usage, volume "I would like to find Category is regionalized. They only commitments and prices from more suppliers for Management Cycle want to cover their area" Agencies (for fuel)
Recommended publications
  • Obviousness Around the Clock
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Breitmoser, Yves; Schweighofer-Kodritsch, Sebastian Working Paper Obviousness around the clock WZB Discussion Paper, No. SP II 2019-203 Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Breitmoser, Yves; Schweighofer-Kodritsch, Sebastian (2019) : Obviousness around the clock, WZB Discussion Paper, No. SP II 2019-203, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/195919 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Yves Breitmoser Sebastian Schweighofer-Kodritsch Obviousness around the clock Put your Research Area and Unit Discussion Paper SP II 2019–203 March 2019 WZB Berlin Social Science Center Research Area Markets and Choice Research Unit Market Behavior Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung gGmbH Reichpietschufer 50 10785 Berlin Germany www.wzb.eu Copyright remains with the author(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Handout 21: “You Can't Handle the Truth!”
    CSCE 475/875 Multiagent Systems Handout 21: “You Can’t Handle the Truth!” October 24, 2017 (Based on Shoham and Leyton-Brown 2011) Independent Private Value (IPV) To analyze properties of the various auction protocols, let’s first consider agents’ valuations of goods: their utilities for different allocations of the goods. Auction theory distinguishes between a number of different settings here. One of the best-known and most extensively studied is the independent private value (IPV) setting. In this setting all agents’ valuations are drawn independently from the same (commonly known) distribution, and an agent’s type (or “signal”) consists only of its own valuation, giving itself no information about the valuations of the others. An example where the IPV setting is appropriate is in auctions consisting of bidders with personal tastes who aim to buy a piece of art purely for their own enjoyment. (Note: Also think about the common-value assumption. Resale value!) Second-price, Japanese, and English auctions Theorem 11.1.1 In a second-price auction where bidders have independent private values, truth telling is a dominant strategy. Proof. Assume that all bidders other than i bid in some arbitrary way, and consider i’s best response. First, consider the case where i’s valuation is larger than the highest of the other bidders’ bids. In this case i would win and would pay the next-highest bid amount. Could i be better off by bidding dishonestly in this case? • If i bid higher, i would still win and would still pay the same amount. • If i bid lower, i would either still win and still pay the same amount or lose and pay zero.
    [Show full text]
  • CS395T Agent-Based Electronic Commerce Fall 2003
    CS395T Agent-Based Electronic Commerce Fall 2003 Peter Stone Department or Computer Sciences The University of Texas at Austin Week 2a, 9/2/03 Logistics • Mailing list and archives Peter Stone Logistics • Mailing list and archives • Submitting responses to readings Peter Stone Logistics • Mailing list and archives • Submitting responses to readings − no attachments, strange formats − use specific subject line (see web page) Peter Stone Logistics • Mailing list and archives • Submitting responses to readings − no attachments, strange formats − use specific subject line (see web page) − by midnight; earlier raises probability of response Peter Stone Logistics • Mailing list and archives • Submitting responses to readings − no attachments, strange formats − use specific subject line (see web page) − by midnight; earlier raises probability of response • Presentation dates to be assigned soon Peter Stone Logistics • Mailing list and archives • Submitting responses to readings − no attachments, strange formats − use specific subject line (see web page) − by midnight; earlier raises probability of response • Presentation dates to be assigned soon • Any questions? Peter Stone Klemperer • A survey • Purpose: a broad overview of terms, concepts and the types of things that are known Peter Stone Klemperer • A survey • Purpose: a broad overview of terms, concepts and the types of things that are known − Geared more at economists; assumes some terminology − Results stated with not enough information to verify − Apolgies if that was frustrating Peter Stone
    [Show full text]
  • Hiding Information in Open Auctions with Jump Bids David Ettinger, Fabio Michelucci
    Hiding Information in Open Auctions with Jump Bids David Ettinger, Fabio Michelucci To cite this version: David Ettinger, Fabio Michelucci. Hiding Information in Open Auctions with Jump Bids. Economic Journal, Wiley, 2016, 126 (594), pp.1484 - 1502. 10.1111/ecoj.12243. hal-01432853 HAL Id: hal-01432853 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01432853 Submitted on 12 Jan 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Hiding Information in Open Auctions with Jump Bids∗ David Ettinger and Fabio Michelucci We analyse a rationale for hiding information in open ascending auction formats. We focus on the incentives for a bidder to call a price higher than the highest standing one in order to prevent the remaining active bidders from aggregating more accurate information by observing the exact drop out values of the opponents who exit the auction. We show that the decision whether to allow jump bids or not can have a drastic impact on revenue and efficiency. Economists have focused extensive attention on market environments where the aggregation of new information is important.1 The possibility of aggregating new information is also the key feature of open auction formats, which often leads auction theorists and designers to advocate the use of open auction formats as opposed to sealed bid auction formats.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanism Design for Multiagent Systems
    Mechanism Design for Multiagent Systems Vincent Conitzer Assistant Professor of Computer Science and Economics Duke University [email protected] Introduction • Often, decisions must be taken based on the preferences of multiple, self-interested agents – Allocations of resources/tasks – Joint plans – … • Would like to make decisions that are “good” with respect to the agents’ preferences • But, agents may lie about their preferences if this is to their benefit • Mechanism design = creating rules for choosing the outcome that get good results nevertheless Part I: “Classical” mechanism design • Preference aggregation settings • Mechanisms • Solution concepts • Revelation principle • Vickrey-Clarke-Groves mechanisms • Impossibility results Preference aggregation settings • Multiple agents… – humans, computer programs, institutions, … • … must decide on one of multiple outcomes… – joint plan, allocation of tasks, allocation of resources, president, … • … based on agents’ preferences over the outcomes – Each agent knows only its own preferences – “Preferences” can be an ordering ≥i over the outcomes, or a real-valued utility function u i – Often preferences are drawn from a commonly known distribution Elections Outcome space = { , , } > > > > Resource allocation Outcome space = { , , } v( ) = $55 v( ) = $0 v( ) = $0 v( ) = $32 v( ) = $0 v( ) = $0 So, what is a mechanism? • A mechanism prescribes: – actions that the agents can take (based on their preferences) – a mapping that takes all agents’ actions as input, and outputs the chosen outcome
    [Show full text]
  • Hiding Information in Open Auctions with Jump Bids∗
    Hiding information in open auctions with jump bids∗ David Ettinger y Fabio Michelucciz PSL, Universite Paris Dauphine CERGE-EI March 7, 2013 Abstract We analyze a rationale for hiding information in open auction formats. We focus on the incentives for a bidder to call a price higher than the highest standing one in order to prevent the remaining active bidders from aggregating more accurate information that could be gathered by observing the exact drop out values of the exiting bidders. Necessary conditions for the existence of jump bids with such motivations are provided. Finally, we show that there is no clear-cut effect of jump bids on efficiency and expected revenue and introduce several specific results. JEL Classification Numbers: D44, D82. Keywords: auctions, efficiency, jump bids. ∗We would like to thank Levent C¸elik, Fran¸coiseForges, Philippe Jehiel, Marco Pagnozzi, Margaret Meyer, Jakub Steiner and the participants to the Transatlantic Theory Workshop, PET 2012, Dauphine, Naples, Salerno and Lille seminars for helpful discussions and feedback on earlier drafts of this paper. yPSL, Universite Paris Dauphine, LEDa, CEREMADE. Place du Mar´echal de Lattre de Tassigny 75775 Paris Cedex 16 France, [email protected] zFabio Michelucci, CERGE-EI, P.O. Box 882 Politickych veznu 7 111 21 Praha 1 Czech Republic. Email: [email protected]. CERGE-EI, a joint workplace of Charles University and the Economics Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Politickych veznu 7, 111 21 Prague, Czech Republic. 1 1 Introduction One of the main characteristics of an open ascending auction format is that it allows partici- pants to aggregate new information on top of the information available ex-ante.
    [Show full text]
  • A Primer on Auction Design, Management, and Strategy∗
    A Primer on Auction Design, Management, and Strategy∗ David J. Salant TSE 31000 Toulouse December 23, 2013 DRAFT 2 Contents 1 Introduction 11 1.1 Goals of this Primer . 11 1.2 What are Auctions? . 14 1.2.1 Why Auctions? . 16 1.2.2 Types of Auctions . 17 1.3 A New Age of Auctions . 19 1.3.1 New Types of Auctions . 20 1.3.2 Auctions Replacing Regulation . 22 1.3.3 Auctions in the Private Sector . 24 1.4 Why Auction Design (and Management) Matters . 25 1.5 Outline of This Primer . 27 2 Game Theory, Auction Design, and Strategy 29 2.1 Game Theory and Auctions . 29 2.2 Noncooperative Games . 30 2.2.1 One-Shot Auctions . 30 3 4 CONTENTS 2.2.2 Normal Form Games . 31 2.2.3 Equilibrium in Normal Form Games . 32 2.2.4 Mixed Equilibrium in Spectrum Auctions: Some Ex- amples . 33 2.2.5 Equilibrium in Multi-attribute Auctions . 34 2.3 Multi-stage and Sequential Auctions . 36 2.3.1 Subgame Perfect Equilibrium . 36 2.3.2 Signaling Games . 38 2.4 Repeated Games . 39 2.4.1 Finitely Repeated Games . 40 2.4.2 Infinitely Repeated Games . 41 2.4.3 Overlapping Generations of Players . 42 2.5 Summary . 42 3 Revenue Equivalence 45 3.1 The Four Basic Auction Types for Single-Object Auctions . 45 3.2 Auction Strategy in the Four Basic Auction Types . 47 3.3 Strategic Equivalence . 48 3.4 Revenue Equivalence of English and Dutch Auctions . 51 3.5 Summary .
    [Show full text]
  • Speeding up Ascending-Bid Auctions*
    Speeding Up Ascending-Bid Auctions* Yuzo Fujishimaj, David Mc Adams J, and Yoav Shohamj Computer Science Department (f) and Graduate School of Business (J) Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305 Abstract well as other market mechanisms are used in parts con• figuration design, factory scheduling, operating system In recent years auctions have grown in inter- memory allocation, ATM network bandwidth alloca• est within the AI community as innovative tion, and distributed QoS allocation. [Clearwater, 1996; mechanisms for resource allocation. The pri• Yarnaki et al., 1996]. Within AI, market-oriented pro• mary contribution of this paper is to iden• gramming (MOP) [Wellman, 1993; Mullen and Wellman, tify a family of hybrid auctions, called sur• 1996] has excited many researchers with the prospect of vival auctions, which combine the benefits of market-based control. both sealed-bid auctions (namely, quick and MOP and related approaches leverage ideas from eco• predictable termination time) and ascending- nomics and game theory, but these ideas provide little bid auctions (namely, more information revela• help with computational issues. This paper is concerned tion often leading, among other things, to bet• with the speed with which an auction terminates. (In the ter allocations and greater expected revenue). following we assume familiarity with some auction the• Survival auctions are multi-round sealed-bid ory. Unfamiliar readers should consult the brief primer auctions with an information-revelation com• provided in Section 2.) ponent, in which some bidders are eliminated from the auction from one round to the next. Sealed-bid auctions are attractive since they last ex• These auctions are intuitive, easy to imple• actly one round, but in some situations they have sub• ment, and most importantly provably opti• stantial disadvantages.
    [Show full text]
  • Reverse Auction Bidding: an Analysis of Case Study for Bid
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Texas A&M Repository REVERSE AUCTION BIDDING: AN ANALYSIS OF CASE STUDY FOR BID TIMING A Thesis by APOORV KUMAR Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Chair of Committee, John M. Nichols Committee Members, Edelmiro F. Escamilla John A. Walewski Head of Department, Joseph P. Horlen August 2014 Major Subject: Construction Management Copyright 2014 Apoorv Kumar ABSTRACT Reverse Auction Bidding is utilized by a significant number of enterprises for supply of materials and in part construction. This thesis investigates aspects of the Reverse Auction system using the web site developed by others to continue the work on understanding aspects of the impact of human personality types on the bidding results for a standard game. A game theory was developed for the Reverse Auction Bidding framework used at TAMU to study the results of the bids collected in a standard game. This theory postulated two sub-games exist inside the main Reverse Auction Bidding game. The main sub-game is between the buyer and the set of bidders. The second sub-game is between the bidders. The theory exists that the buyer seeks minimal costs, which must be acknowledged as prima facie correct for this study. Extent studies at TAMU have indicated that the costs distribution is non-Gaussian, indicating that the buyer’s objective is not achieved for all bidders. The second sub-game is between the bidders, they utilize the non-Gaussian component of the profit distribution to amplify individual returns.
    [Show full text]
  • Sourcing Auction User Manual
    SOURCING AUCTION USER MANUAL SOURCING AUCTION USER MANUAL Table of Contents Chapter 1: Getting Started ___________________________________________________________________ 1 ® 1.1 Logging in to SMART by GEP ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1.1.1 Recovering Username and Password...........................................................................................1 ® 1.2 Logging out of SMART by GEP --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Chapter 2: Introduction _____________________________________________________________________ 4 Chapter 3: Overview ________________________________________________________________________ 5 3.1 Types of Auctions --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 3.1.1 Regular Auction.................................................................................................................................6 3.1.2 Dutch Auction....................................................................................................................................6 3.1.3 Japanese Auction.............................................................................................................................7 3.1.4 Sealed Auction ..................................................................................................................................7 3.2 Event Method ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • It's Time You Try Something New with Your Eauctions
    It’s time you try something new with your eAuctions Choosing the right eAuction format If you ever want to start a heated debate in procurement circles, for your project: just start talking about auction strategy. While eAuctions are a proven strategy for conducting negotiations, there are miscon- Reverse vs. Dutch vs. Japanese ceptions about their efficacy and applicability. It’s always worth addressing these questions head on because the benefits of eAuctions are significant: Lower prices eAuctions generally provide savings of more than 10% compared to previously negotiated prices. The primary reason for the large savings is increased competition Time savings Market intelligence from previous auctions and the use of tem- plates saves a significant amount of time. Negotiations are con- ducted simultaneously with all suppliers, and full negotiations are typically completed in less than an hour, including extensions. Market transparency All bidders receive the same information and are bidding against the same target. Process improvement When all potential suppliers are approached the same way, the buying organization appears more professional. Bids are only accepted within the system, and the use of templates ensures structured and uniform corporate working procedures. All data and communications are stored in one place and automatically compiled. Additional read: Get our latest eAuction statistics report 1 To get the best results, eAuction practitioners will vary their strat- Consistency of Specifications and Qualifications egy depending on market conditions. However, even with orga- Despite efforts to standardize specifications, do some of your nizations that have eAuctions as an established negotiation tool, qualified bidders have unique capabilities? These can be both most have barely scratched the surface to explore all options positive (e.
    [Show full text]
  • Precluding Collusion in the Vickrey Auction
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Gorelkina, Olga Working Paper Precluding collusion in the Vickrey auction Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, No. 2014/10 Provided in Cooperation with: Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods Suggested Citation: Gorelkina, Olga (2014) : Precluding collusion in the Vickrey auction, Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, No. 2014/10, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/102663 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die
    [Show full text]