DOCSLIB.ORG

CTA Comments Canada Labour Code Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CTA Comments Canada Labour Code Review Canadian Trucking Alliance CTA CTA Comments Canada Labour Code Review February 2018 Canadian Trucking Alliance 555 Dixon Road, Toronto, ON M9W 1H8 Tel: 416-249-7401 – email: [email protected] Follow us on Twitter @cantruck and on the internet at www.cantruck.ca Introduction Promoting good quality jobs for Canadians is a core mandate of the Minister of Employment, Workforce Development and Labour. As workplaces and the nature of work evolves, it is important that federal labour standards are also reviewed and updated a necessary. As a result, the Minister has launched a review of key elements of the Canada Labour Code (such as hours of work, wages, leaves and holidays). The Canadian Trucking Alliance (CTA) is pleased to provide input into this review. Background The following provides key relevant background on the trucking industry: • Employment- The trucking industry employs about 400,000 Canadians in a variety of occupations. Of this, commercial vehicle operators represent the largest single cohort. Moreover, the characteristics of vehicle operator occupation are quite unique compared to those of most other occupations in both the trucking industry and the federal workforce overall. The vehicle operator occupation does not fit easily into the traditional 9 to 5/stationary work scenario. It is for that reason, CTA will focus its comments on commercial vehicle operators. • Driver Shortage & Demographics- According to a 2016 study conducted by the consulting firm CPCS, the Canadian for-hire trucking industry is facing a long-term, chronic driver shortage that could reach 48,000 by 2024. The demand for truck drivers will continue to increase, while supply is shrinking. There are many reasons for this, not the least of which is that the industry is at the precipice of a demographic cliff, reflecting a workforce that is older and aging more rapidly than the total Canadian workforce and a paucity of younger people seeking to enter the occupation. • Driver Compensation- Levels of compensation in every sector are driven by the market, by supply and demand. This is also true in trucking. The driver shortage is reflected in upward pressure on wages in many markets. Trucking companies must compete for labour not only amongst themselves but with other sectors. Notwithstanding, truck driving is a high wage occupation. Currently, truck drivers in Canada make on average the equivalent (since most are paid by the mile or a combination of miles and hours) of over $20 per hour which well over the national individual median wage. Long distance drivers, for example, can typically make $70,000 to $80,000 a year. Drivers operating special trucks and trailers and/or handle special commodities can earn even more. Those that prefer shorter or more regular routes, less away time, fewer hours etc., can make wages in a broad range from $40,000 to $70,000. • Industry Structure and Why It’s Important- The structure of the trucking industry is also quite different and unique compared to most other federally-regulated sectors which are typically highly concentrated with a relatively few, mostly large-sized companies. 1 Trucking is a low-margin, hyper-competitive sector dominated by thousands of small, many family-owned, establishments. Even a spate of mergers and acquisitions in recent years has had little impact on increasing the level of industrial concentration. Trucking is not a homogeneous industry; it is fragmented not only by size but by the type of commodities transported, the type of equipment deployed, and the regions and markets served. Trucking is also an industry which physically crosses borders. All this needs to be considered when reviewing federal labour standards. A one size fits all approach for all federally-regulated employers is highly problematic. Key Federal Labour Standards Under Review CTA provides comments on each of the following Federal Labour standards: • Hours of Work- The trucking industry is subject to two sets of standards governing vehicle operator hours of work: (1) The Canada Labour Code administered by ESDC; and (2) the federal hours of service regulations administered by Transport Canada. The latter prescribe when and for how long a driver can drive or be on-duty, take breaks, rest, reset the clock, etc., and were designed to balance productivity with fatigue management principles. In this sense, there are few comparable occupations in the other federally-regulated sectors with such tight parameters on an employee’s hours of work. The hours of service regulations are deeply entrenched in the fabric of our industry and are themselves the product of nearly a decade of negotiations. Taken together, the restriction on the hours of work for commercial vehicle operators is well defined and thoroughly accepted by the industry. Furthermore, now that Transport Canada has initiated the Gazette process for the mandating of Electronic Logging Devices (ELDs) CTA expects that when the process is complete any cheating that may exist under the paper log-book regime will be dramatically reduced and the rules governing commercial vehicle hours of service will be as clear and consistently enforced as they have ever been. • Overtime- The regulation of overtime for truck drivers – how and when it must be paid, reconciling productivity-based pay vs an hourly-based regulation, different forms of payment for different types of work, defining city vs highway drivers, etc. – is a long- standing topic of discussion in the trucking industry. In turn, ESDC has traditionally enforced the rules on a complaint driven basis. Over time is has become evident the rules are not clear to many carriers and the industry’s pay systems do not easily lend themselves to consistent enforcement. Both the Canadian Trucking Alliance (CTA) and Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) recognize this is likely a contributing factor to non-compliance. In the Commissioner’s Report, Arthurs lays a good deal of the blame for Part III noncompliance on what he calls the “impenetrable language” found in much of Part III. To begin to address this issue, in 2016 CTA formed a Carrier Committee on Overtime – comprised of trucking executives from across the country – and in March 2017 CTA submitted a document to ESDC outlining 2 where carriers believed further guidance is needed. Since that time, ESDC and CTA have continued to collaborate on developing guidance material for industry. When this process is complete, CTA expects we will have much more clarity and consistency nationally on the calculation of overtime in our sector. This process in our view has been an excellent example of industry-government collaboration and CTA does not see the need for added intervention on this topic. • Flex-Time- The industry recognizes issues pertaining to lifestyle (e.g., time away from home) and work-life balance can be a challenge as it pertains to recruiting new drivers. However, it is equally true that many if not most existing drivers do not want a reduction in hours. The federal hours of service regulations by their very nature restrict the flexibility available for drivers/employers, at least while “on shift.” Nevertheless, industry employers do offer their drivers a variety of flex-work arrangements, though not all forms of flexibility are practical -- working from home. Typically, flex-time in trucking means extended time-off at the end of a ‘run’; route planning and optimization (companies are investing heavily in GPS and other systems to help better position drivers to get them home more often and/or time off to deal with personal/family matters, etc.). There is much more flexibility in this regard than the industry is given credit for. Quite simply, trucking companies must do this if they want to attract and keep drivers as driving skills are easily transferable and drivers will and do gravitate to companies who they feel will best accommodate their needs. This is especially so with the current shortage of drivers. There is an expression often used in the industry: “the company that has the drivers wins.” In our view, the market is responding appropriately without legislation. • Employee/Contractor Status- A person providing driving services to a company is either an employee or a contractor (commonly known as an owner-operator in trucking). Employees can work for trucking companies, or an owner-operator, or a driver agency. Owner-operators are typically one-person/one-truck operations (owned by the driver) that operate as a small independent business that may be incorporated or not and that may contract with one or more carriers. They are not subject to the Canada Labour Code, employee payroll tax deductions, etc. While there have from time-to-time been disputes over whether a driver is an employee or an owner-operator, generally-speaking if the driver owns his/her own vehicle he/she is considered an owner-operator. During the Commission consultations for the Arthurs’ report, CTA maintained that Part III should not attempt to define an employee or independent contractor, arguing carriers and owner-operators should be given the scope to set out their business relationship in a written contract and that owner-operators as independent contractors should continue to be excluded from Part III coverage. CTA maintains this position. As Arthurs’ himself noted in his report, this is a point both management and independent contractors agree on in our sector. 3 • So-Called Independent Drivers- Different from the previous discussion on contractor status, a trend has emerged where some trucking companies are engaging “independent drivers” either directly or through driver agencies. These individuals solely provide driving services. They do not own their own vehicle. The driver has none of the protections of an employee, nor do they have the responsibilities of an employee (e.g., declare all income for tax purposes, pay CPP, EI, etc.).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Implementing 10 Days of Paid Sick Leave
    May 28, 2020 Implementing 10 days of paid sick leave: What workers' need Recommendations from the Fight for $15 and Fairness, Workers’ Action Centre, and Parkdale Community Legal Services 1. Introduction Public Health Officers across the country are telling people to stay home from work when sick. The government proposal for 10 days paid sick leave across the country is a crucial step to enable workers, particularly in the midst of the COVID recession, to actually go home, or stay home from work when sick. 2. What do people need to be able to stay home from work when sick? Sick days must be paid by the employer • Paid sick days must be received in regular paychecks because bills and rent are due regularly; • CERB program sick pay would have to be a paid on a flat rate amount to be timely such as $500 per week – i.e., one paid sick day is $100. This may not be appropriate for paid sick days (too little for people earning more than minimum wage which in Ontario would be over $100 per day). This may be inadequate to achieve the public health objective of enabling people to stay home from work when sick due to loss in earnings. • It is unlikely that the EI system will have the capacity to process and payout individual worker’s sick day pay. The requirement for sick days are often intermittent, requiring multiple applications to an already overloaded system. Paid sick leave must be job protected • Any paid sick leave provision would have to provide employees with a job- protected right to take leave without reprisals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Occupational Health Services in Psychosocial Risk Management and the Promotion of Mental Health and Well-Being at Work
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Review The Role of Occupational Health Services in Psychosocial Risk Management and the Promotion of Mental Health and Well-Being at Work Aditya Jain 1 , Juliet Hassard 2 , Stavroula Leka 2,3,* , Cristina Di Tecco 4 and Sergio Iavicoli 4 1 Nottingham University Business School, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG8 1BB, UK; [email protected] 2 School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG8 1BB, UK; [email protected] 3 Cork University Business School, University College Cork, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland 4 Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, Italian Workers’ Compensation Authority INAIL), 00078 Rome, Italy; [email protected] (C.D.T.); [email protected] (S.I.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The development and enhancement of occupational health services (OHS) at the national level is central to ensuring the sustainable health, well-being and work engagement of the work- ing population. However, due to differences in national health, social security and occupational safety and health systems, the content, capacity, coverage and provisions of OHS vary considerably across national contexts. Obtaining a better understanding in terms of such similarities and varia- tions internationally is essential as such comparative information can help inform evidenced-based decision-making on OHS at both policy and practice levels. This paper therefore reviews and analyses Citation: Jain, A.; Hassard, J.; Leka, the key policies, standards and approaches in OH systems and services, using both academic and S.; Di Tecco, C.; Iavicoli, S. The Role of grey literature, across 12 industrialised countries (Australia, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Occupational Health Services in Ireland, Italy, Japan, The Netherlands, Poland, United Kingdom and the United States of America).
    [Show full text]
  • E-Journal of International and Comparative LABOUR STUDIES Volume 1, No
    OPEN ACCESS I S S N 1 4 2 2 - 0067 E-Journal of International and Comparative LABOUR STUDIES Volume 1, No. 1-2 March-June 2012 UNIVERSITY PRESS Working Time Regulation in Georgia Zakaria Shvelidze * Introduction In 2006, the Parliament of Georgia passed the new Labour Code. Before that, employment relations in the country were governed by the Soviet Labour Code, in force since 1 October 1973. However, and notwithstanding the amendments made in 1997, existing labour legislation faced serious difficulty in keeping up with recent developments within employment relationships. Starting from the period 2003-2004, a series of sweeping political changes led to the rise of the liberal economy, with trade liberalisation that significantly marked national labour laws. The newly-adopted Labour Code is mainly oriented towards favouring employers’ interests, as it waters down regulatory restrictions and standardises labour law provisions. In passing employer-friendly laws, the Georgian government aims at creating a more attractive and liberal economic environment, which, in turn, should encourage job creation and employment. In this connection, this paper discusses the new patterns of working time regulation introduced by the Georgian Labour Code. A comparative analysis between the working time regulation now in place, the Soviet Labour Code previously in force, and the European Union Directive 2003/88/EC concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time will be carried out. This is done to assess the harmonisation of the new Labour Code with the EU Working Time Directive, also as an instrument to facilitate European integration. On 1 July 1999, the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA) between Georgia, the European Communities, and their Member States entered into force.
    [Show full text]
  • The Overtime Game: Select Issues in Working Past the Clock—Part I
    EMPLOYMENT LAW CONFERENCE 2018 PAPER 7.1 The Overtime Game: Select Issues in Working Past the Clock—Part I If you enjoyed this Practice Point, you can access all CLEBC course materials by subscribing to the Online Course Materials Library These materials were prepared by Melissa Vander Houwen, Moore Edgar Lyster, Vancouver, BC, for the Continuing Legal Education Society of British Columbia, May 2018. © Melissa Vander Houwen 7.1.1 THE OVERTIME GAME: SELECT ISSUES IN WORKING PAST THE CLOCK—PART I I. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 II. Legislative Overview ..................................................................................................................... 2 A. The Employment Standards Act, RSBC 1996, c 113 (the “ESA”) and Employment Standards Regulation, BC Reg 396/95 (the “ESA Regs”) ............................. 2 1. Exclusions ........................................................................................................................ 2 2. Maximum hours of work ................................................................................................ 2 3. Overtime Banks ............................................................................................................... 3 4. Averaging Agreements .................................................................................................... 3 5. Variances .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Code Slovak Republic
    Labour Code Slovak Republic - Slovakia Collection of Laws Years 2001 - 2012 Full Wording 1 Capitulation of the Slovak Labour Code – full wording (2012) FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES Articles 1 – 11 Part One GENERAL PROVISIONS Scope of the Labour Code § 1 – 6 Employer § 7 – 10 Employee § 11 Employees´ representatives § 11 a Employees´ representatives § 12 Prohibition of discrimination–Title is deleted with effect from 1 July 2004 § 13 Settlement of disputes § 14 Legal actions § 15 – 16 Invalidity of legal action § 17 Contract § 18 – 19 Securing of rights and obligations resulting from labour-law relations § 20 Employees‟ claims resulting from labour-law relations in the event of § 21 insolvency of employer Obligation to provide information § 22 Sections 23 to 26 are deleted with effect from 1 January 2004 § 23 – 26 Transfer of rights and obligations resulting from labour-law relations § 27 – 31 Agreement on disputed claims § 32 – 34 Death of employee § 35 Extinction of a right § 36 Calculation of time § 37 Delivery § 38 Interpretation of selected terms § 39 – 40 Part Two EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP Pre-contractual relations § 41 Employment contract § 42 – 44 Probationary period § 45 Establishing of employment relationship § 46 Obligations resulting from employment relationship § 47 Fixed term employment relationship § 48 2 Employment relationship with reduced working time § 49 – 50 Job sharing § 49a Section 51 is deleted with effect from 1 July 2003 § 51 Home work and telework § 52 Employee performing a clerical activity § 52a Conclusion of an employment
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook on Code on Wages
    HANDBOOK ON THE CODE ON WAGES, 2019 i November, 2020 Price : Rs.175/- (excluding postage) © THE INSTITUTE OF COMPANY SECRETARIES OF INDIA All rights reserved. No part of this Publication may be translated or copied in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of The Institute of Company Secretaries of India. DISCLAIMER Although due care and diligence have been taken in preparation of this Publication, the Institute shall not be responsible for any loss or damage, resulting from any action taken on the basis of the contents of this Publication. Anyone wishing to act on the basis of the material contained herein should do so after cross checking with the original source. Issued by : THE INSTITUTE OF COMPANY SECRETARIES OF INDIA ICSI House, 22, Institutional Area, Lodi Road, New Delhi 110 003 Phones : 011-4534 1000 • Fax +91-11-2462 6727 E-mail : [email protected] • Website : www.icsi.edu ii Foreword I am happy to learn that the Institute of Company Secretaries of India is releasing the publication Handbook on the Code on Wages, 2019 and extending its whole hearted support in spreading awareness about various initiatives of the Government of India including labour laws reforms. The Ministry with a view to facilitate ease of doing business, generate employment and safeguard interest of workers and employers, has taken various legislative, administrative and e-governance initiatives relating to labour laws in India. The Ministry has been working towards simplifying, amalgamating and rationalizing the relevant provisions of the Central Labour Laws and consolidating the same into four labour codes for bringing out reforms in the provisions relating to minimum wages, bonus, industrial relations, social security and safe working environment, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Abolishing Slavery and Its Contemporary Forms
    HR/PUB/02/4 Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights OHCHR Abolishing Slavery and its Contemporary Forms David Weissbrodt and Anti-Slavery International* United Nations New York and Geneva 2002 * Michael Dottridge, Director NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations Secretariat con- cerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Copyright © United Nations 2002 All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely quoted or reproduced or stored in a retrieval system for non-commercial purposes, provided that credit is given and a copy of the publication containing the reprinted material is sent to the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Palais des Nations, CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland. No part of this publica- tion may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form without the prior permission of the copyright owner if the purpose relates to profit-making ventures. The licensing of rights for commercial purposes is encouraged by the United Nations. HR/PUB/02/4 CONTENTS Page Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... v Paragraphs Introduction ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LABOR CODE of the REPUBLIC of ARMENIA (Unofficial Translation) Adopted on November 9, 2004
    LABOR CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA (unofficial translation) Adopted on November 9, 2004 PART 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS CHAPTER 1. LABOR CODE AND THE RELATIONS REGULATED BY IT Article 1. Relations regulated by Labor Code of the Republic of Armenia 1. This code regulates collective and individual working relations, defines the bases for the establishment, modification and termination of these relations and the order for their realizations, rights, obligations and responsibilities of subjects of the labor relations, as well as conditions for the providing of security and maintenance of the health of employees. 2. The peculiarities for regulating the individual spheres of labor relations may be determined by other laws. Article 2.The objective of the labor legislation The objective of the labor legislation is: 1) Establish state guaranties for labor rights and freedoms for natural persons, i.e., citizens of RA, citizens of foreign country, persons without citizenship (hereinafter citizen) , 2) Contribute to the creation of favorable labor conditions, 3) Protect the rights and interests of the employees and employers. Article 3. Principles of Labor Legislation 1. The main principles of the labor legislation are: 1) freedom of employment, including the right to employment, which should be freely selected or agreed upon by each person; the right to administer the labor capacities, choose the profession and type of activity; 2) prohibition of any type of compulsory work and violence with respect to employees; 3) Legal equality of parties of labor
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Standards Code
    Labour Standards Code CHAPTER 246 OF THE REVISED STATUTES, 1989 as amended by 1991, c. 14; 2000, c. 35; 2001, c. 6, s. 110; 2003 (2nd Sess.), c. 4, ss. 1, 2; 2003 (2nd Sess.), c. 7, ss. 4-14; 2004, c. 6, ss. 15-20; 2005, c. 38, ss. 3, 4; 2006, c. 10, ss. 1-5; 2006, c. 13, ss. 8, 9; 2006, c. 32; 2007, c. 11, s. 3; 2009, c. 18; 2010, c. 37, ss. 84-116; 2011, cc. 19, 64; 2013, c. 11; 2013, c. 35, s. 4; 2015, cc. 41, 42; 2016, c. 11; 2018, c. 1, Sch. A, s. 121; 2018, cc. 13, 36; 2020, cc. 13, 14 © 2020 Her Majesty the Queen in right of the Province of Nova Scotia Published by Authority of the Speaker of the House of Assembly Halifax This page is intentionally blank. CHAPTER 246 OF THE REVISED STATUTES, 1989 amended 1991, c. 14; 2000, c. 35; 2001, c. 6, s. 110; 2003 (2nd Sess.), c. 4, ss. 1, 2; 2003 (2nd Sess.), c. 7, ss. 4-14; 2004, c. 6, ss. 15-20; 2005, c. 38, ss. 3, 4; 2006, c. 10, ss. 1-5; 2006, c. 13, ss. 8, 9; 2006, c. 32; 2007, c. 11, s. 3; 2009, c. 18; 2010, c. 37, ss. 84-116; 2011, cc. 19, 64; 2013, c. 11; 2013, c. 35, s. 4; 2015, cc. 41, 42; 2016, c. 11; 2018, c. 1, Sch. A, s. 121; 2018, cc. 13, 36; 2020, cc. 13, 14 An Act to Provide for a Labour Standards Code Table of Contents (The table of contents is not part of the statute) Section Short title..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Termination of Employment Relationship: the Legal Situation in Poland
    Termination of Employment Relationship: The Legal Situation in Poland Prof. dr hab. Andrzej SWIATKOWSKI 1 Table of contents Table of contents ........................................................................................................................ 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 4 1. Sources of law .................................................................................................................... 5 (1) Constitutional status of the rules on the right to work.................................................. 5 (2) International agreements and conventions ................................................................... 5 (3) Sources of law and their hierarchy ............................................................................... 5 (4) Role of judge-made law and custom ............................................................................ 7 2. Scope of rules governing the termination of employment relationships, special arrangements .......................................................................................................................... 7 (1) Ways of terminating an employment relationship........................................................ 7 (2) Exceptions or specific requirements for certain employees or sectors......................... 8 (3) Exceptions or specific requirements for certain types of contract................................ 8 (4) Exceptions or
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Protection in a Transforming World of Work
    ILC.104/VI International Labour Conference, 104th Session, 2015 Report VI Labour protection in a transforming world of work A recurrent discussion on the strategic objective of social protection (labour protection) Sixth item on the agenda International Labour Office, Geneva ISBN 978-92-2-129023-0 (print) ISBN 978-92-2-129024-7 (Web pdf) ISSN 0074-6681 First edition 2015 The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Reference to names of firms and commercial products and processes does not imply their endorsement by the International Labour Office, and any failure to mention a particular firm, commercial product or process is not a sign of disapproval. ILO publications can be obtained through major booksellers or ILO local offices in many countries, or direct from ILO Publications, International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland. Catalogues or lists of new publications are available free of charge from the above address, or by email: [email protected]. Visit our website: www.ilo.org/publns. Formatted by TTE: Confrep-ILC104-VI[WORKQ-150124-2]-En.docx Printed by the International Labour Office, Geneva, Switzerland Contents Page Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................... v Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1. Issues and challenges for labour protection in a transforming world of work ... 3 1.1. A transforming world of work ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fairness at Work, but Not Efficiency Or Voice
    Forthcoming in Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal FAIRNESS AT WORK, AND MAYBE EFFICIENCY BUT NOT VOICE: AN EVALUATION OF THE ARTHURS’ COMMISSION REPORT John W. Budd Industrial Relations Center University of Minnesota 3-300 Carlson School of Management 321 19th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55455-0438 [email protected] (612) 624-0357 fax: (612) 624-8360 Version Date: September 30, 2007 I. INTRODUCTION Against a backdrop of intense competitive pressures in a global economy, employment and labor law reform is on the public policy agenda in many countries. The approach to such reforms is, unsurprisingly, quite diverse. Germany has attempted to reduce unemployment by loosening labor market regulations and lowering unemployment benefits. Australia has similarly tried to promote labor market flexibility by aggressively deregulating its system of workplace law and exempting a number of employees from its unjust dismissal laws. In contrast, China recently enacted new legislation requiring written employment contracts and other employee protections. The United States increased the national minimum wage in 2007 and debates continue over health care insurance, paid family leave, union recognition procedures, strike replacements, and other contentious issues. Similar debates have occurred in Canada, with a number of employment and labor law reforms enacted by various provinces. The Canadian federal sector has taken a particularly thoughtful approach to the issue of labor standards reform. Specifically, the distinguished law professor Harry W. Arthurs was commissioned in 2004 by the Minister of Labour to review Part III of the Canada Labour Code. Along with his expert advisors—Daphne Taras, Gilles Trudeau, and Sherry Liang—and supported by management and labor advisors as well as a number of independent research studies and public consultations, Professor Arthurs has produced a 295 page report entitled Fairness at Work: Federal Labour Standards for the 21st Century1 that is valuable for anyone interested in the critical issue of contemporary employment and labor law reform.
    [Show full text]