DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Annual Review 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Annual Review 2020 Review 2020 THE HONOURABLE SOCIETY OF LINCOLN’S INN ANNUAL REVIEW 2020 Contents Officers of the Inn 2021 1 Annual Report from the Bar Representation Committee 46-47 Message from the Treasurer 2-3 2020 – a Qualified Success 48 From the Under Treasurer 3 The Bar Representation Committee 49-51 Editor’s Note 4 Chapel: A Year of the Unexpected 52-53 Judicial and Other Appointments 5 The Bicentenary of the First Chapel Organ 54-57 Great Hall, Library and Ostler’s Hut External Work 6-11 Catering for a Pandemic 58-59 The Work of the Estates Department 12-14 Deck The Halls 61 Dates to Note 15 The History of Tony Payne: A Butler 62-63 2020 in Numbers 16 Tony Payne – A Tribute 65 Reorganisation of the Treasury Office 17 The Black Books Society 67 Membership and Education 18-19 Chattels Committee Report 68-71 Student Law Journal 2020 and Debating Shield 20 The Library in 2020 72-73 A Model of Modern Marshalling 21 ‘Come to London, The Pandemic and International Practice 21 to plaguey London’ surviving plague at the Inn 74-77 The ICCA Bar Course 22-23 Early Printed Law Books From the Nicolas Bratza Scholar at the European Court Holy Roman Empire 1484-1534 78-82 Of Human Rights 25-27 Extra Mural 83-85 Call to the Bar 2020 28-29 A Year in the Garden 86-89 Scholars and Prize Winners 2020 30-31 Wildlife at the Inn 90-93 All the Law’s a Stage! Shakespearean Our International Community 94-95 Insights and Their Resonance Today 32-33 Equality, Diversity and Inclusivity in 2020 34-35 Wellbeing at the Bar 37 New Ordinary Benchers 38-40 New Honorary Benchers 41 Masters and Representatives on the Circuits 43 Remembering Justice Ginsburg 44-45 Front cover: Three figures present at the signing of Magna Carta: The Earls of Salisbury and Pembroke and Archbishop Stephen Langton, from the Watts Fresco in the Great Hall. (Photograph: Sam Whittaker / Opus Conservation). Inside back cover: The portrait of Lord Neuberger by Keith Breeden in the Ashworth Centre (Photograph: Mark Leonard). Officers of the Inn 2021 Treasurer Master of the Library The Rt Hon Lord Justice Jonathan Crow QC David Richards Lord Justice David Richards was Called to the Bar in 1974 by Inner Jonathan Crow QC was Called to the Bar by this Inn in 1981. He was Temple and joined Lincoln’s Inn, ad eundem in 1977. He was in Treasury Counsel (Chancery) from 1994 until 1998, and then First practice at the Bar from 1975 to 2003. He was Junior Counsel to the Treasury Counsel (Chancery) from 1998 until 2006, when he took Silk. Department of Trade and Industry (Chancery) 1989 to 1992 and was He was appointed as a Deputy High Court judge in 2001, as Attorney appointed Queen’s Counsel in 1992. He was appointed a High Court General to HRH the Prince of Wales in 2006, as a Court of Appeal Judge (Chancery Division) in 2003 and a chair of the Competition judge in Guernsey and in Jersey in 2011, and as a Deputy Deemster in Appeal Tribunal in 2004. He was the Chancery Supervising Judge for the the Isle of Man in 2017. He was elected a Bencher in 1998, since when Northern and North Eastern Circuits and Vice-Chancellor of the County he has served on the Treasurer’s Committee and the University Liaison Palatine of Lancaster from 2008 to 2011. He was Chair of the Insolvency Executive Committee (2000-2004) and the Estates Committee and Rules Committee from 2005 to 2015 and was, until 2018, Building Executive Committee (2007-2013). He is a member of the co-chair of the Judicial Committee of the International Insolvency Institute. Finance and General Purposes Committee and of the Planning and On 16 November 2015 he was appointed a Lord Justice of Appeal. Development Group. He has been on the Committee of the Denning Society since its formation, taking on the Chair in 2016. He was elected a Bencher of Lincoln’s Inn in 2000. He was a longstanding member of the Finance and General Purposes Committee and was Chair from 2014 - 2018. He is a Director of the Inn’s Corporate Trust and a Trustee of the Heritage Fund. He is a member of the Planning and Development Group. He has served on the Chattels Committee, the Investment Committee and the Staff Committee, and has been a member of the Wine Committee since 2002. Keeper of the Black Book Master of the Walks The Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey Vos and Dean of Chapel The Rt Hon Lord Briggs of Westbourne The Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey Vos was Called to the Bar by Inner Temple in The Rt Hon Lord Briggs of Westbourne was Called to the Bar by this Inn 1977 and joined Lincoln’s Inn, ad eundem in 1979. He was appointed in 1978 and elected a Bencher in 2001. He is a longstanding member of Chancellor of the High Court of England and Wales on 24 October the Chapel Committee and has been its Chair since 2019. 2016. Sir Geoffrey holds responsibility for the conduct of business in the Business and Property Courts. Prior to this role, he was appointed Lord Briggs grew up around Portsmouth and Plymouth, following his a Lord Justice of Appeal in 2013 and acted as President of the European naval officer father between ships, before spending his later childhood Network of Councils for the Judiciary from June 2014 to June 2016. He in West Sussex. He attended Charterhouse and Magdalen College, was appointed a Justice of the High Court in October 2009. He sat as Oxford. A keen sailor and the first lawyer in his family, he practised a judge internationally, in the Courts of Appeal of Jersey and Guernsey in commercial and chancery work before being appointed to the High between 2005 and 2009, and in the Court of Appeal of the Cayman Court in 2006. He was the judge in charge of the extensive Lehman Islands between 2008 and 2009, having begun his judicial career as a insolvency litigation from 2009 to 2013. deputy High Court Judge in 1999. Lord Briggs was appointed as a Lord Justice of Appeal in 2013. He was He was the Chair of the Chancery Bar Association from 1999 to 2001 the judge in charge of the Chancery Modernisation Review in 2013, and and of the Bar Council in 2007, having taken Silk in 1993 after a career led the Civil Courts Structure Review from 2015-2016. In January 2016 practising at the Chancery-Commercial Bar, both domestically and he was appointed Deputy Head of Civil Justice, and in October 2017 he internationally. He is Editor in Chief of the White Book. became a Justice of the Supreme Court. LINCOLN’S INN ANNUAL REVIEW 2020 1 Message from the Treasurer The Rt Hon other since our early days together at the Library meant that the Library staff Lord Justice the Chancery Bar and I knew he would were fully occupied, working remotely David Richards be a great Treasurer, and so it proved for much of the time. to be. The Inn was in a strong position in every way when he handed over and There followed a flowering of thank goodness for that in view of the online activity. Qualifying and other pressures to come. education sessions re-started and a Throughout 2020, the Inn full programme has been provided continued to offer a wide range of The new Treasurer’s year got off to a since May. Committees were soon services to its members, students wonderful start, culminating in supper meeting via Zoom or Starleaf. Chapel and practitioners alike. Qualifying in Hall for Benchers and their partners. services were held, at first pre-recorded Sessions and many other It was a hugely enjoyable occasion, and later live online. I was particularly educational and member events – made more memorable still by the pleased that we were able to hold, 115 in all – have been held. fact that it was our twin daughters’ outside in front of the Inn’s War The Library has been as busy as birthday, which was celebrated by Memorial, a simple but moving service ever, perhaps busier. There have a surprise cake and a spontaneous on Remembrance Sunday, one of the been regular chapel services, rendering of Happy Birthday by the most important events of the Inn’s year. with a great range of fine music. assembled Benchers. There is a deep warmth and fellowship in the Inn which From June, Council has been holding All of the above is entirely true, underpins all we do. its regular monthly meetings on a but it is, of course, far from the remote basis. I have chaired these, in whole truth. In January and February, there were the splendid isolation, from the Council expected events, including dinners in Room. Joining Council meetings No one reading this will need Hall, a Call Day and two educational remotely has led to higher attendance reminding that on 23 March 2020 the weekends which I attended, the first among Benchers than would normally whole country went into lockdown as for students at West Dean and the be the case. The number attending has a defence against the rapid spread second for pupils at Highgate House. never been below 70. We must learn of the Covid-19 virus. Tragedy was to These weekends were very enjoyable from this for the future. follow, with deaths attributable to the but also very impressive in the quality virus now estimated at over 120,000 of the sessions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conseil De L'europe Council of Europe Cour Européenne Des Droits De L
    CONSEIL COUNCIL DE L’EUROPE OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS GRAND CHAMBER CASE OF O’HALLORAN AND FRANCIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (Applications nos. 15809/02 and 25624/02) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 29 June 2007 2 O’HALLORAN AND FRANCIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM JUDGMENT In the case of O’Halloran and Francis v. the United Kingdom, The European Court of Human Rights, sitting as a Grand Chamber composed of: Jean-Paul Costa, President, Luzius Wildhaber, Christos Rozakis, Nicolas Bratza, Boštjan M. Zupančič, Rıza Türmen, Volodymyr Butkevych, Josep Casadevall, Matti Pellonpää, Snejana Botoucharova, Stanislav Pavlovschi, Lech Garlicki, Javier Borrego Borrego, Alvina Gyulumyan, Ljiljana Mijović, Egbert Myjer, Ján Šikuta, judges, and Vincent Berger, Jurisconsult, Having deliberated in private on 27 September 2006 and on 23 May 2007, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on the last- mentioned date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in two applications (nos. 15809/02 and 25624/02) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two British nationals, Mr Gerard O’Halloran and Mr Idris Richard Francis (“the applicants”), on 3 April 2002 and 15 November 2001 respectively. 2. The applicants, one of whom had been granted legal aid, were represented by Mr J. Welch of Liberty, London. The United Kingdom Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr D. Walton of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. 3. Mr O’Halloran alleged that he had been convicted solely or mainly on account of the statement he had been compelled to provide under threat of a penalty similar to the offence itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Days at the Inns of Court
    STUDENT DAYS AT THE INNS OF COURT.* Fortescue tells us that when King John fixed the Court of Common Pleas at Westminster, the professors of the municipal law who heretofore had been scattered about the kingdom formed themselves into an aggregate body "wholly addicted to the study of the law." This body, having been excluded from Oxford and Cambridge where the civil and canon laws alone were taught, found it necessary to establish a university of its own. This it did by purchasing at various times certain houses between the City of Westminster, where the King's courts were held, and the City of London, where they could obtain their provisions. The nearest of these institutions to the City of London was the Temple. Passing through Ludgate, one came to the bridge over the Fleet Brook and continued down Fleet Street a short distance to Temple Bar where were the Middle, Inner and Outer Temples. The grounds of the Temples reached to the bank of the Thames and the barges of royalty were not infrequently seen drawn up to the landing, when kings and queens would honor the Inns with their presence at some of the elaborate revels. For at Westminster was also the Royal Palace and the Abbey, and the Thames was an easy highway from the market houses and busi- ness offices of London to the royal city of Westminster. Passage on land was a far different matter and at first only the clergy dared risk living beyond the gates, and then only in strongly-walled dwellings. St.
    [Show full text]
  • Careers at the Chancery Bar
    Careers at the Chancery Bar With the right qualifications, where you come from doesn’t matter, where you’re going does. “if you are looking for a career which combines intellectual firepower, communication skills and the ability to provide practical solutions to legal problems, then your natural home is the Chancery Bar” 2 Chancery Bar Association Chancery Bar Association 1 Welcome to the Chancery Bar Do you enjoy unravelling the knottiest of legal problems? Would you relish the prospect of your appearances in court helping to develop cutting-edge areas of law? How does advising major commercial concerns to put together a complex transaction appeal? Would you like to assist organisations to achieve their commercial goals, and support and guide individuals at times of great personal stress? If your answer to any of these questions is “Yes”, then the Chancery Bar may be the career for you. Barristers who specialise in the areas of property, business and finance law most closely associated with the Chancery Division of the High Court are called “Chancery barristers” and, collectively, the “Chancery Bar”. Of the 15,000 barristers practising in England and Wales, about 1,200 specialise in Chancery work. Most are based in London but there are other important regional centres, such as Birmingham, Bristol, Cardiff, Leeds and Manchester. In recent years the nature of Chancery work has changed dramatically. It still includes the important work traditionally undertaken in the Chancery Division, but the expansion and development of commercial activity, together with the increasingly complex matters that arise out of that activity, have widened its scope significantly.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inns of Court and the Impact on the Legal Profession in England
    SMU Law Review Volume 4 Issue 4 Article 2 1950 The Inns of Court and the Impact on the Legal Profession in England David Maxwell-Fyfe Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr Recommended Citation David Maxwell-Fyfe, The Inns of Court and the Impact on the Legal Profession in England, 4 SW L.J. 391 (1950) https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr/vol4/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in SMU Law Review by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. 19501 THE INNS OF COURT THE INNS OF COURT AND THE IMPACT ON THE LEGAL PROFESSION IN ENGLAND The Rt. Hon. Sir David Maxwell-Fyfe, K.C., M.P., London, England A TTHE present day there are many eminent lawyers who have received a part, perhaps the greater part, of their legal grounding at Oxford or Cambridge or other universities, but there was a time when no legal teaching of any consequence, except in Canon and Roman law, was obtainable anywhere outside the Inns of Court. Sir Wm. Blackstone called them "Our Judicial Univer- sity." In them were taught and trained the barristers and the judges who molded and developed the common law and the principles of equity. The Inns were not in earlier times, as they are now, inhabited merely during the daytime by lawyers and students who dispersed in all directions to their homes every night.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Profession in the Middle Ages Roscoe Pound
    Notre Dame Law Review Volume 19 | Issue 3 Article 2 3-1-1944 Legal Profession in the Middle Ages Roscoe Pound Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Roscoe Pound, Legal Profession in the Middle Ages, 19 Notre Dame L. Rev. 229 (1944). Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol19/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Law Review by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "Copyright in the Pound lectures is reserved by Dean Emeritus Roscoe Pound, Harvard Law School, Harvard University." II THE LEGAL PROFESSION IN THE MIDDLE AGES 1 PROCTORS AND ADVOCATES IN THE CIVIL AND THE CANON LAW W E have seen that in Roman law the three functions of V agency or representation in litigation, advocacy, and advice -the functions of procurator or attorney, advocate, and jurisconsult-had become differentiated and had each attained a high degree of development. Also we have seen how by the time of Justinian the jurisconsult had become a law teacher, so that for the future, in continental Europe, the advocate's function and the jurisconsult's function of advis- ing were merged and the term jurisconsult was applied only to teachers and writers. Germanic law brought back into western Europe the ideas of primitive law as to representation in litigation. Parties were required to appear in person and conduct their cases in person except in case of dependents.
    [Show full text]
  • “Making Time Their King”: the Christmas Culture and Politics of the Early Modern Inns of Court in Thomas Middleton’S Masque of Heroes
    중세르네상스영문학 20권 2호 (2012): 265-293 “Making Time their king”: The Christmas Culture and Politics of the Early Modern Inns of Court in Thomas Middleton’s Masque of Heroes Bomin Kim New York University Probably no other demographic is more frequently mentioned in the history of early modern English drama, besides the monarch and the people who created and performed the dramatic works, than the Inns of Court men. They were creators and performers of plays; they frequented the theaters (especially the indoor playhouses within the liberties [Gurr 77]) as audience and routinely hired playing companies to perform in their main halls; singly and collectively they were often dedicatees of playwrights and poets; and, most relevant to my present topic, they were also creators, connoisseurs, sponsors and performers of masques. In the scholarship of early modern literature, however, the masques produced or performed by Inns of Court men are under-represented, most studies preoccupied with specimens of the genre produced in the context of the royal court with issues of high politics and religion as their subject matters. 266 Bomin Kim In the spirit of what Patricia Fumerton has usefully, if schematically, called “a new new historicism” which is “not so much ‘political’ as ‘social’ historicism” (4), this article participates in the revisionary trend in scholarship to bring due attention to the “the complexity and multifariousness of masque” (Laskowski 12) with a case study on Thomas Middleton’s Masque of Heroes, performed at the Inner Temple during the 1618/9 Christmas season.1 Masque of Heroes has been recipient of only a limited amount of critical attention from scholars, most of them stopping short at merely introducing the masque in a summary fashion.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2013 Prov
    European Court of Human Rights Annual Report 2013 Provisional Version Registry of the European Court of Human Rights Strasbourg, 2014 All or part of this document may be freely reproduced with acknowledgment of the source “Annual Report 2013 of the European Court of Human Rights, Council of Europe”. Photographs: Council of Europe Cover: the Human Rights Building (Architects: Richard Rogers Partnership and Atelier Claude Bucher) – Photograph: Michel Christen, Council of Europe CONTENTS Foreword 5 I. The Court in 2013 7 II. Composition of the Court 15 III. Composition of the Sections 19 IV. Speech given by Mr Dean Spielmann, President of the European Court of Human Rights, on the occasion of the opening of the judicial year, 25 January 2013 23 V. Speech given by Ms Christiane Taubira, Garde des Sceaux, French Minister of Justice, on the occasion of the opening of the judicial year, 25 January 2013 31 VI. Speech given by Mr Theodor Meron, President of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, President of the Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals, on the occasion of the opening of the judicial year, 25 January 2013 39 VII. President’s Diary 49 VIII. Activities of the Grand Chamber, Sections and single- judge formations 59 IX. Case-law information, training and outreach 63 X. Summary of the main judgments and decisions delivered by the Court in 2013 77 XI. Cases reported in the Court’s Case-law Information Notes in 2013 147 XII. Statistical information 191 Events in total (2012-2013) 193 Pending cases allocated
    [Show full text]
  • Case of Jussila V. Finland
    CONSEIL COUNCIL DE L’EUROPE OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS Case of Jussila v. Finland (Application no. 73053/01) Judgment Strasbourg, 23 November 2006 CONSEIL COUNCIL DE L’EUROPE OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME EUROPEAN COURT O F HUMAN RIGHTS CASE OF JUSSILA v. FINLAND (Application no. 73053/01) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 23 November 2006 2 JUSSILA v. FINLAND JUDGMENT In the case of Jussila v. Finland, The European Court of Human Rights, sitting as a Grand Chamber composed of: Jean-Paul Costa, President, Nicolas Bratza, Boštjan M. Zupančič, Peer Lorenzen, Lucius Caflisch, Loukis Loucaides, Ireneu Cabral Barreto, Volodymyr Butkevych, Josep Casadevall, Matti Pellonpää, Kristaq Traja, Mindia Ugrekhelidze, Antonella Mularoni, Elisabet Fura-Sandström, Ljiljana Mijović, Dean Spielmann, Ján Šikuta, judges, and Erik Fribergh, Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 5 July and 25 October 2006, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on the last- mentioned date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in an application (no. 73053/01) against the Republic of Finland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Finnish national, Mr Esa Jussila (“the applicant”), on 21 June 2001. 2. The applicant, who had been granted legal aid, was represented by Mr P. Lappalainen, a lawyer practising in Nokia. The Finnish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr A. Kosonen of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs. 3. The applicant alleged that he had not received a fair hearing in the proceedings in which a tax surcharge was imposed as he had not been given an oral hearing.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2012 of the European Court of Human Rights, Council of Europe”
    European Court of Human Rights Annual Report 2012 Provisional Version Registry of the European Court of Human Rights Strasbourg, 2013 All or part of this document may be freely reproduced with acknowledgment of the source “Annual Report 2012 of the European Court of Human Rights, Council of Europe”. Photographs: Council of Europe Cover: the Human Rights Building (Architects: Richard Rogers Partnership and Atelier Claude Bucher) – Photograph: Michel Christen, Council of Europe – Graphic design: Publications Unit of the Registry of the Court CONTENTS Foreword 5 I. The Court in 2012 9 II. Composition of the Court 17 III. Composition of the Sections 21 IV. Speech given by Sir Nicolas Bratza, President of the European Court of Human Rights, on the occasion of the opening of the judicial year, 27 January 2012 29 V. Speech given by Mr Thomas Hammarberg, Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, on the occasion of the opening of the judicial year, 27 January 2012 39 VI. Visits 51 VII. Activities of the Grand Chamber, Sections and single- judge formations 57 VIII. Publication of information on the Court and its case-law 61 IX. Short survey of the main judgments and decisions delivered by the Court in 2012 71 X. Cases reported in the Court’s Case-law Information Notes in 2012 103 XI. Statistical information 147 Pending cases allocated to a judicial formation at 31 December 2012 (respondent States) 149 Pending cases allocated to a judicial formation at 31 December 2012 (main respondent States) 150 Court’s workload by state of proceedings and application type at 31 December 2012 151 Violations by Article and by respondent State (2012) 152 Violations by Article and by respondent State (2012) (continued) 153 Applications allocated to a judicial formation (1999-2012) 154 Judgments (1999-2012) 155 European Court of Human Rights – Annual Report 2012 Allocated applications by State and by population (2009-2012) 156 4 FOREWORD The year 2012 almost exactly corresponded to the term of office of my predecessor Sir Nicolas Bratza.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of British Barristers and American Legal Practice and Education Marilyn J
    Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business Volume 5 Issue 3 Fall Fall 1983 A Comparative Study of British Barristers and American Legal Practice and Education Marilyn J. Berger Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njilb Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Marilyn J. Berger, A Comparative Study of British Barristers and American Legal Practice and Education, 5 Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 540 (1983-1984) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. A Comparative Study of British Barristers and American Legal Practice and Education Mariyn J Berger* I. INTRODUCTION The conduct of a trial in England is undeniably an impressive un- dertaking. Costume alone transports the viewer to Elizabethan time. Counsel and judges, bewigged and gowned,' appear in a cloistered, re- gal setting, strewn with leather-bound books. Brightly colored ribbons of red, green, yellow and white, rather than metal clips and staples fasten the legal papers.2 After comparison with the volatile atmosphere and often unruly conduct of a trial in a United States courtroom, it is natural to assume that the British model of courtroom advocacy pro- * B.S., 1965, Cornell University; J.D., University of California at Berkeley. Associate Profes- sor of Law, University of Puget Sound School of Law. This article is based on the author's obser- vations and interviews while a Visiting Professor of Law at the Polytechnic of the South Bank in London, 1981-82, and a scholar-in-residence at King's College, December-June, 1982.
    [Show full text]
  • European Court of Human Rights
    CONSEIL COUNCIL DE L’EUROPE OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS GRAND CHAMBER CASE OF ANDREJEVA v. LATVIA (Application no. 55707/00) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 18 February 2009 ANDREJEVA v. LATVIA JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Andrejeva v. Latvia, The European Court of Human Rights, sitting as a Grand Chamber composed of: Jean-Paul Costa, President, Christos Rozakis, Nicolas Bratza, Peer Lorenzen, Françoise Tulkens, Josep Casadevall, Ireneu Cabral Barreto, Corneliu Bîrsan, Nina Vajić, Alvina Gyulumyan, Dean Spielmann, Davíd Thór Björgvinsson, Ján Šikuta, Ineta Ziemele, Mark Villiger, Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, Zdravka Kalaydjieva, judges, and Michael O’Boyle, Deputy Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 25 June 2008 and on 14 January 2009, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on the last- mentioned date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in an application (no. 55707/00) against the Republic of Latvia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a “permanently resident non-citizen” (nepilsone) of Latvia who was previously a national of the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), Ms Natālija Andrejeva (“the applicant”), on 27 February 2000. 2. The applicant was represented before the Court by Mr V. Buzajevs, Member of Parliament. The Latvian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms I. Reine. 3. The applicant alleged, in particular, that by refusing to grant her a State pension in respect of her employment in the former Soviet Union prior to 1991 on the ground that she did not have Latvian citizenship, the national authorities had discriminated against her in the exercise of her pecuniary rights.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beginning, Flourishing and Decline of the Inns of Court: the Consolidation of the English Legal Profession After 1400
    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 10 Issue 1 Issue 1 - December 1956 Article 3 12-1956 The Beginning, Flourishing and Decline of the Inns of Court: The Consolidation of the English Legal Profession after 1400 Anton Hermann Chroust Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Legal Profession Commons Recommended Citation Anton Hermann Chroust, The Beginning, Flourishing and Decline of the Inns of Court: The Consolidation of the English Legal Profession after 1400, 10 Vanderbilt Law Review 79 (1956) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol10/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE BEGINNING, FLOURISHING AND DECLINE OF THE INNS OF COURT: THE CONSOLIDATION OF THE ENGLISH LEGAL PROFESSION AFTER 1400 ANTON-HERMANN CHROUST* Wherever the common law is studied and practiced [the Inns of Court] must be regarded as the original fountainhead of the law, toward which the true lawyer must feel as a Jew does toward Jerusalem and a Mus- sulman towards Mecca. The four Inns of Court-Lincoln's Inn, Gray's Inn, the Middle Tem- ple and the Inner Temple-may well be called one single legal univer- sity composed of four relatively independent colleges. In their long and illustrious history these Inns have discharged important func- tions in the domains of legal education and professional discipline. As the depository of splendid professional traditions which date back to the Middle Ages, they were for a long time the guardian as well as the gateway to the higher English Bar.
    [Show full text]