Orange County Business Council's Legislative Action Guide 2009
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
STAFF REPORT William Pevsner, Commissioner
Bob Spears, Chair John C. Hutt, Vice-Chair Joe Catalano, Commissioner Thomas Denison, Commissioner Planning Commission Manish Desai, Commissioner Gina Frierman-Hunt, Commissioner STAFF REPORT William Pevsner, Commissioner Vincent Gonzalez, Director Planning & Community Preservation DATE: August 2, 2018 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Vincent Gonzalez, Director – Planning & Community Preservation SUBJECT: Historic Designation – An application to consider a nomination as a local Historic Cultural Landmark for the property located at 500 Mariposa Avenue Executive Summary The applicant, Ara Zenobians, is requesting that the Planning Commission consider approving a request to nominate the property known as the Becker Residence, located at 500 Mariposa Avenue, as a Historic Cultural Landmark to be included in the City’s Designated Historical Landmark List. Pursuant to Code Section 17.82.050 (“Designation Criteria”), a property may be designated a historical landmark if it meets prescribed historic or architectural criteria. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council of the Historic Cultural Landmark designation of the Becker Residence, as an architectural type specimen, pursuant to Planning Commission Resolution 18-08 included herein. BACKGROUND The current property owner, Ara Zenobians submitted an application to nominate the property located at 500 Mariposa Avenue as a Historic Cultural Landmark. Pursuant to Code Section 17.80.050, (“Designation Criteria”) the City Council may approve a request for designation upon recommendation by the Planning Commission if the property meets the required findings based on historic or architectural criteria. Historic Designation – Becker Residence 2 500 Mariposa Avenue August 2, 2018 ANALYSIS Historical Resources Evaluation Report According to the Historical Resource Evaluation report (Report) prepared by Charles J. -
Destructive Discourse
Destructive Discourse ‘Japan-bashing’ in the United States, Australia and Japan in the 1980s and 1990s This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Murdoch University 2006 Narrelle Morris (LLB, BAsian St., BA (Hons), Murdoch University) I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution. ...................... ABSTRACT By the 1960s-70s, most Western commentators agreed that Japan had rehabilitated itself from World War II, in the process becoming on the whole a reliable member of the international community. From the late 1970s onwards, however, as Japan’s economy continued to rise, this premise began to be questioned. By the late 1980s, a new ‘Japan Problem’ had been identified in Western countries, although the presentation of Japan as a dangerous ‘other’ was nevertheless familiar from past historical eras. The term ‘Japan-bashing’ was used by opponents of this negative view to suggest that much of the critical rhetoric about a ‘Japan Problem’ could be reduced to an unwarranted, probably racist, assault on Japan. This thesis argues that the invention and popularisation of the highly-contested label ‘Japan-bashing’, rather than averting criticism of Japan, perversely helped to exacerbate and transform the moderate anti-Japanese sentiment that had existed in Western countries in the late 1970s and early 1980s into a widely disseminated, heavily politicised and even encultured phenomenon in the late 1980s and 1990s. Moreover, when the term ‘Japan-bashing’ spread to Japan itself, Japanese commentators were quick to respond. -
2014 Environmental Justice Scorecard 2 Championing Solutions to the Environmental Health and Climate Change Issues Facing Working Class Communities of Color
CEJA’s 2nd Environmental Justice Scorecard The California Environmental Justice Alliance (CEJA) is proud to release our 2nd Environmental Justice Score- card for the 2014 Legislative Session. This scorecard is the only one in the state to assess how well California’s elected officials supported actions to address environmental issues that impact low-income communities and communities of color. Scorecard Methodology and Scoring We selected bills that CEJA as a coalition or our members publicly supported or opposed. We chose bills that were significant: they would either make important contributions to addressing environmental justice, or would enact policies detrimental to communities of color. In total, CEJA scored 13 bills. Senators were scored on a total of 11 bills and Assemblymembers on a total of 12 bills. Of the ten bills that made it to the Governor’s desk, he signed eight of them. Unfortunately, due to rule restrictions, Senate pro Tem De León was unable to cast his vote on a couple of measures included in our scorecard because he was engaged in helping to move other important measures on the Assembly floor, thus impacting his score. However, none of these bills were close votes and in both instances he had previously voted for the bills in committee. We believe his score would have been different if the Senate Rules had similar rules as the Assembly on such matters. About the California Environmental Justice Alliance The California Environmental Justice Alliance (CEJA) is a statewide coalition of grassroots, environmental jus- tice organizations. We are working to achieve environmental justice by organizing in low-income communities and communities of color – those most impacted by environmental hazards – and by pushing for policies at the federal, state, regional and local levels that protect public health and the environment. -
PPIC Statewide Survey
ppic statewide sur vey M AY 2 0 1 0 Californians their government MarkBaldassare& DeanBonner SonjaPetek NicoleWillcoxon CONTENTS About the Survey 2 Press Release 3 2010 Election Context 6 California State Budget 16 Regional Map 24 Methodology 25 Questionnaire and Results 27 in collaboration with The James Irvine Foundation ABOUT THE SURVEY The PPIC Statewide Survey series provides policymakers, the media, and the public with objective, advocacy-free information on the perceptions, opinions, and public policy preferences of California residents. Inaugurated in April 1998, this is the 107th PPIC Statewide Survey in a series that has generated a database of responses from more than 228,000 Californians. This survey is the 41st in the Californians and Their Government series, which is conducted periodically to examine the social, economic, and political trends that influence public policy preferences and ballot choices. The series is supported with funding from The James Irvine Foundation. This survey seeks to raise public awareness, inform decisionmakers about public opinions, and stimulate public discussion and debate about important state and national issues. This survey was conducted in the weeks prior to the June primary and as the 2010 election season gets into full swing; as the weak economy and high unemployment continue to weigh on the minds of Californians; and as more grim news about the state’s budget deficit—that revenues will not meet projections in the May budget revision—is released. The national backdrop includes President Obama and Congress debating Wall Street reform and considering whether to address comprehensive immigration reform and new climate change policies this year. -
California First Amendment Coalition 10Th Annual Open Government Assembly California State University, Fullerton—Titan Student Union
California First Amendment Coalition 10th Annual Open Government Assembly California State University, Fullerton—Titan Student Union Friday, October 14, 2005 12:30 to 2 p.m. Registration. Atrium 1:15 to 3:15 p.m. Workshop: Fundamentals of California access law A two-hour “super course” on state access laws and practices. Topics include the Brown Act and other open-meeting laws, as well as the California Public Records Act and rules governing access to court records. The discussion also will cover recent court cases, attorney general opinions and state administrative actions. Attention will also be given to Proposition 59, the November 2004 state ballot initiative establishing a constitutional right of access. (2 HOURS MCLE CREDIT) Moderator . Maureen S. Rubin, CSU NORTHRIDGE Panelists . James M. Chadwick, DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY LLP William Nottingham, LOS ANGELES TIMES Kelli L. Sager, DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP Dennis A. Winston, MOSKOWITZ, BRESTOFF, WINSTON & BLINDERMAN LLP 3:30 to 4:45 p.m. Panel discussion: Great news stories found in government databases This panel, primarily for working journalists and editors, will feature reporters who have worked on groundbreaking articles using computer-assisted research of databases obtained from state agencies through the California Public Records Act. Work to be highlighted includes stories about wasteful government spending, excessive government overtime pay, quality of care at hospitals and performance of teachers in local public schools. The panel also will explore the legalities of requesting copies of government databases, including how much agencies may charge to recover the cost of furnished data, and whether officials may resist database requests by characterizing them as “fishing expeditions.” (1.25 HOURS MCLE CREDIT) Moderator . -
CWA San Diego Action Alert Concerned Women for America of California - San Diego/Imperial Counties Thursday, May 13, 2004
CWA San Diego Action Alert Concerned Women for America of California - San Diego/Imperial Counties Thursday, May 13, 2004 Thank you for continuing to pray and act on behalf of traditional marriage. AB 1967, the same-sex "marriage" bill, was placed in the Assembly Appropriations Committee suspense file on May 12, having passed the Assembly Judiciary Committee on April 20. This means the bill must be reviewed again because of its significant fiscal impact. If the bill is voted out of the suspense file by the committee, it will move to the Assembly floor before the end of the month. Action: Please encourage your congregation, friends, family and co-workers to take action for marriage before May 19, when the committee is scheduled to vote on its suspense file. While this is the next "deadline," our legislature's current composition sometimes results in unexpected rule changes, and deadlines are not always what they seem. Thus, it is only safe to say that AB 1967 will not be officially "dead" until May 28, when all bills must be through their house of origin. An updated bulletin insert is attached for use in churches this weekend. Please tell your assemblymember and our governor that same-sex "marriage" is a dangerous proposition for our society, our children and our religious freedom. Below is a sample letter to be used for e-mail purposes or as talking points for a phone call. You may cut, paste and amend this text or draft your own. Please be respectful. Your point is better made with strong arguments, rather than strong words. -
2015 Early June
COMMUNITY ullerto♥ n bsCAeLENrDAvR Paege 12r -15 FFULLERTON’S INDEPENDENT NEWS • Est.1978 (prOinted on 20% recycled paper) • YEAR 37 #10 • EARLY JUNE 2015 Submissions: [email protected] • Contact: (714) 525-6402 • Read Online at : www.fullertonobserver.com UPDATE : Y EAR ROUND HOMELESS SHELTER The real estate division of the County of Orange will bring consideration of a pro - posed purchase and sale agreement for 1000 N. Kramer Place, Anaheim at the 9:30am Tuesday, June 2nd meeting of the OC Board of Supervisors. Board approval of the $4.25 million agreement for office space, storage and a possible year-round homeless emergency center does not commit the county to a definite course of action. Any additional decisions about the use of the property would be brought back for consideration by the board. If later approved as a year-round home - less shelter the location, in an industrial park, would replace the current partial- year use of the National Guard Armory on Brookhurst which is located in a resi - dential neighborhood. The board meets in the Hall of Administration (NW corner of Broadway and Santa Ana Blvd.) in Santa Ana. Groups working with the homeless population, including the OC Human Relations Commission and the Fullerton Homeless Task Force, strongly support a year-round multi-service shelter as a criti - The pie chart above shows the water used by various categories within the city. cal solution to getting people off the The Landscape Irrigation category is what industries use in outdoor watering. Fun Upcoming Events streets, out of the parks and neighbor - The Commercial category includes water to businesses and schools. -
Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012
VERIZON POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS JANUARY – DECEMBER 2012 1 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012 A Message from Craig Silliman Verizon is affected by a wide variety of government policies ‐‐ from telecommunications regulation to taxation to health care and more ‐‐ that have an enormous impact on the business climate in which we operate. We owe it to our shareowners, employees and customers to advocate public policies that will enable us to compete fairly and freely in the marketplace. Political contributions are one way we support the democratic electoral process and participate in the policy dialogue. Our employees have established political action committees at the federal level and in 20 states. These political action committees (PACs) allow employees to pool their resources to support candidates for office who generally support the public policies our employees advocate. This report lists all PAC contributions, corporate political contributions, support for ballot initiatives and independent expenditures made by Verizon in 2012. The contribution process is overseen by the Corporate Governance and Policy Committee of our Board of Directors, which receives a comprehensive report and briefing on these activities at least annually. We intend to update this voluntary disclosure twice a year and publish it on our corporate website. We believe this transparency with respect to our political spending is in keeping with our commitment to good corporate governance and a further sign of our responsiveness to the interests of our shareowners. Craig L. Silliman Senior Vice President, Public Policy 2 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012 Political Contributions Policy: Our Voice in the Political Process What are the Verizon Good Government Clubs? and the government agencies administering the federal and individual state election laws. -
SB 1440 – PADILLA Student Transfer Achievement Reform Act
SB 1440 – PADILLA Student Transfer Achievement Reform Act Principal Co-Authors Speaker John Pérez, Assembly Members Paul Fong, Jim Beall, & Sam Blakeslee, Senate Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, Senator Gloria Romero Co-Authors Senators Roy Ashburn, Gilbert Cedillo, Lou Correa, Dave Cox, Bill Emmerson, Loni Hancock, Bob Huff, Carol Liu, Alan Lowenthal, Gloria Negrete McLeod, Fran Pavley, Curren Price, Audra Strickland, and Mark Wyland & Assembly Members Juan Arambula, Marty Block, Steven Bradford, Julia Brownley, Wilmer Amina Carter, Wesley Chesbro, Connie Conway, Mike Davis, Noreen Evans, Felipe Fuentes, Warren Furutani, Ted Gaines, Isadore Hall, Alyson Huber, Bonnie Lowenthal, Fiona Ma, Tony Mendoza, Bill Monning, Jim Nielsen, V. Manuel Perez, Anthony Portantino, Ira Ruskin, Jim Silva, Cameron Smyth, Sandré Swanson, and Tom Torlakson Summary As many as 100,000 state employees will be eligible to retire in the next five years. The U.S. SB 1440, The Student Transfer Achievement Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that 43% of Reform (STAR) Act, would increase the number the U.S. private labor force is also eligible to retire of students who successfully transfer from between 2004 and 2012. California Community Colleges (CCC) to the California State University system by establishing In addition, eight of the top ten fastest growing transfer degrees. Those who earn the new transfer occupations require postsecondary education and degree would be guaranteed admission to the six require a bachelor’s degree. California State University (CSU) with junior status. Clarifying and streamlining the process Since the adoption of the 1960 Master Plan for would result in students graduating more quickly Higher Education, preparing students to transfer to allowing community colleges and the CSU to a four-year university has been a core function of serve more students. -
Border 2020 Quarterly Newsletter Region 9 California, Baja California, Arizona and Sonora Summer-Fall 2013
Border 2020 Quarterly Newsletter Region 9 California, Baja California, Arizona and Sonora Summer-Fall 2013 www. epa. gov/bor der 2 020 This newsletter provides a summa r y of pa st quarter activities General Updates EPA and Cal/EPA Border Teams Brief Congressional & State Legislative Staff On July 30th, the Region 9 Border Team and Cal/EPA briefed Staff from 11 California Federal and State Congressional/Legislative Offices along the California-Mexico Border, in the EPA San Diego Border Office. Key briefing items included a brief showing of the Border 2012 accomplishments video, a summary of the new Border 2020 Program, 2-year action plans, upcoming programmatic priorities, and the Border Request for Proposal. Cal/EPA, represented by the leadership of the San Diego and Colorado River Water Boards, presented on current bi-national efforts focused on the New River and Tijuana River watersheds. The eleven representatives in attendance, included staff from the offices of Senators Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer; Representatives Juan Vargas and Scott Peters; State Assembly Members Brian Jones, Shirley Weber, Lorena Gonzales, Toni Atkins and State Senators Marty Block, Mark Wyland and Ben Hueso. Contact: Brent Maier, 415-947-4256 EPA Border Program Engages HHS on Border Environmental Health Efforts On August 16th, members of the EPA Border Team briefed the new Executive Director of the U.S. Section of the U.S.-Mexico Border Health Commission (USMBHC), Jose Luis Velasco, on the draft Collaborative agreement between EPA, Border 2020, HHS and the USMBHC to improve the Environment and Public Health along the U.S. -
Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery & Storage Project
CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY & STORAGE PROJECT Support List GOVERNMENT Federal Ken Calvert, U.S. House of Representatives, R-Corona, CD-42 John Campbell, U.S. House of Representatives, R-Irvine, CD-45, retired Tony Cardenas, U.S. House of Representatives, D- Panorama City, CD-29 Paul Cook, U.S. House of Representatives, R-Yucca Valley, CD-8 Jim Costa, U.S. House of Representatives, D-Fresno, CD-16 Duncan Hunter, U.S. House of Representatives, R-El Cajon, CD-50 Darrell Issa, U.S. House of Representatives, R-Vista, CD-49 Doug LaMalfa, U.S. House of Representatives, R-Auburn, CD-1 Tom McClintock, U.S. House of Representatives, R-Roseville, CD-4 Gary Miller, U.S. House of Representatives, R- Redlands, CD-31, retired Gloria Negrete-McLeod, U.S. House of Representatives, D-Ontario, CD-35, retired Scott Peters, U.S. House of Representatives, D-San Diego, CD-52 Collin Peterson, U.S. House of Representatives, D-Minnesota, CD-7 Dana Rohrabacher, U.S. House of Representatives, R-Huntington Beach, CD-48 Ed Royce, U.S. House of Representatives, R-Hacienda Heights, CD-39 Linda Sanchez, U.S. House of Representatives, D-Cerritos, CD-38 Loretta Sanchez, U.S. House of Representatives, D-Santa Ana, CD-46 Norma Torres, U.S. House of Representatives, D – Ontario, CD-35 Mimi Walters, U.S. House of Representatives, R-Laguna Niguel, CD-45 State Patricia Bates, California State Senate, District 36, R-San Diego/Orange Counties Bill Brough, California State Assembly, District 72, R-Dana Point Ling Ling Chang, California State Assembly, District 55, -
Marijuana Business Tax Ballot Measure Would Result in Voter Consideration of the Measure at the November 2, 2010 General Municipal Election
COUNCIL AGENDA: 8-3-10 ITEM: 3.3C CITY OF ~ SAN JOSE Memorandum CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR FROM: Deanna J. Santana AND CITY COUNCIL Scott P. Johnson SUBJECT: MARIJUANA BUSINESS TAX DATE: July 23, 2010 BALLOT MEASURE Date Approv~ RECOMMENDATION a) Council discussion and consideration of a proposed Marijuana Business Tax measure for the November 2, 2010 Election; b) If the Council wishes to proceed, adoption of a resolution of the City Council calling and giving notice of, on its own motion, a Special Municipal Election to be held on November 2, 2010, to submit to the electors of the City of San Jose the following measure: MEASURE Marijuana Business Tax In order to provide funding for essential City services such as police, fire, emergency response, street maintenance, YES pothole repair, parks, libraries, and youth and senior programs, shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a tax at the rate of 10% of gross receipts on marijuana businesses NO in San Jos6, subject to existing independent financial audits, with all revenue controlled by the City.’? c) Council discussion and consideration of adopting of provisions to permit rebuttal arguments in the November 2010 Voter’s Sample Ballot, pursuant to Elections Code Section 9285. OUTCOME Approval by the City Council of the proposed marijuana business tax ballot measure would result in voter consideration of the measure at the November 2, 2010 General Municipal Election. HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Subject: Marijuana Business Tax Ballot Measure July 23, 2010 Page 2 EXECUTIVESUMMARY