Offsetting Carbon Emissions the Concept of Offsetting Your Carbon Emissions Is Controversial but Beginning to Take Hold

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Offsetting Carbon Emissions the Concept of Offsetting Your Carbon Emissions Is Controversial but Beginning to Take Hold ON TEST Offsetting carbon emissions The concept of offsetting your carbon emissions is controversial but beginning to take hold. James Fair explains how it works and assesses the main players in the market. WHAT DOES ‘OFFSETTING current rates. The impact this will bought really are being achieved, but carbon calculators assume CARBON EMISSIONS’ MEAN? have on both people and wildlife but only one – atmosfair – adheres optimum fuel effi ciency for all Every day, we release carbon scarcely bears thinking about. 100 per cent to principles laid fl ights. They also fail to take into dioxide, the gas that is the biggest down by the ‘Gold Standard’ – a account emissions of other gases, cause of climate change, into the SO YOU HAND OVER SOME MONEY sort of Soil Association for carbon such as nitrous oxide. atmosphere as a result of burning AND THE PROBLEM’S SOLVED? offset schemes. fossil fuels and deforestation. To Of course not. Everyone has to do WHAT ABOUT CALCULATING THE offset these emissions, we can pay more to reduce their emissions. HOW DO I CALCULATE EMISSIONS OFFSET? IS THAT SIMPLE? an organisation to absorb or But say you’re an avid wildlife FOR A FLIGHT, SAY, TO KENYA? Theoretically, yes. Take a scheme reduce emissions elsewhere – enthusiast and you dream of taking Any of the organisations overleaf that invests in green technology, either by planting trees or investing a trip to see the Masai Mara can do it with their ‘carbon such as fuel-effi cient cooking in energy-effi ciency or renewable- migration. By seeing wildlife in its calculators’, but there is a stoves. “All you have to do is work energy schemes. native country, you are giving it a problem – estimates for a return out how much energy the scheme value and helping to conserve it. fl ight from London to Nairobi vary creates and therefore how much BUT IS CLIMATE CHANGE But you are also contributing to from 1.26 to 4.68 tonnes of carbon carbon has been prevented from REALLY SUCH A BIG DEAL? carbon emissions, and this is dioxide. Dietrich Brockhagen of escaping into the atmosphere,” The consensus of climate where offsetting comes in. atmosfair, the organisation that says Dominick Spracklen, an scientists is that artifi cial levels of comes up with the higher number, expert in carbon offset schemes carbon dioxide and other HOW DO I KNOW MY PAYMENT says other carbon calculators are from Harvard University. greenhouse gases are raising the WILL OFFSET MY EMISSIONS? too simplistic and therefore temperature of the Earth’s Choosing the right offset massively underestimate the true WHAT ABOUT TREE PLANTING? atmosphere. One accepted organisation (see overleaf) is fi gure. Most aeroplanes, for Again, theoretically yes. According scenario is that temperatures will crucial. Most are monitored by instance, achieve greatest fuel to Spracklen, research has shown rise by between 2 and 3˚C by 2050 independent bodies that check the effi ciency when fl ying a distance that one hectare of forest that is Illustration by Flatliner/Debut Art Illustration if emissions continue to increase at emissions reductions you have of between 2,000 and 4,000km, planted will remove about 100 76 BBC Wildlife January 2007 ON TEST ON TEST HUMMINGBIRDS OR TIGERS? WHERE YOUR MONEY GOES The money you pay to offset your carbon emissions can go to a huge range of different projects – here we profi le three particular schemes, two of which greatly benefi t wildlife. Hummingbird: World Land Trust; solar lighting: CarbonNeutral; tiger: ShinYoshino/FLPA tiger: ShinYoshino/FLPA solar lighting: CarbonNeutral; Land Trust; World Hummingbird: ECUADOR TREE PLANTING INDIA AND SRI LANKA SOLAR LIGHTING INDIA BIOGAS DIGESTERS The World Land Trust is carrying out The CarbonNeutral Company is using carbon The Co-op Bank (via Climate Care) is funding a reforestation for the purpose of creating carbon offset payments to support solar-powered project outside Ranthambore National Park that offsets in two of its reserves in Ecuador – lighting installations in rural homes in southern is tackling deforestation within the park and Buenaventura in the south and Yanacocha in the India and Sri Lanka. Many people in the project helping to preserve tiger habitat. Funds from north. Both harbour bird species that are areas have no access to grid electricity and offsetting the Co-op’s mortgages – one tonne of classed as critically endangered by the IUCN – therefore use kerosene lamps. These produce carbon dioxide per house per year – buy biogas the el oro parakeet and the black-breasted carbon emissions, are responsible for causing digesters, which produce methane from cattle puffl eg, a type of hummingbird (above). Both respiratory infections and other illnesses in dung to fuel cooking stoves. Carbon emissions areas consist of degraded montane and home owners and are a fi re risk. It’s estimated are offset because it results in fewer trees being subtropical forests that have been reduced to that the project will reduce carbon emissions by unsustainably harvested for fuel wood. Methane 10 per cent of their original cover in Ecuador. about 12,500 tonnes between 2004 and 2008. is also regarded as a renewable energy source. tonnes of carbon (or 367 tonnes of SO I SHOULDN’T PLANT TREES go for tree planting in a tropical JARGON BUSTER carbon dioxide) from the TO OFFSET MY EMISSIONS? country (see the World Land Trust atmosphere over about 50 years, Well, it’s not that simple. About 40 and Envirotrade). Third, double the CARBON EMISSIONS though these fi gures will vary per cent of the increase in carbon estimates for carbon emissions This is really a shortening of according to the tree species, dioxide levels since 1850 can be from aviation if you want to be ‘carbon dioxide emissions’, the climate and other factors. attributed to deforestation – it is, certain (unless you use atmosfair). main greenhouse gas. Some in other words, a major driver of organisations talk about tonnes IS THIS SCIENCE ACCEPTED? climate change. Spracklen argues WHERE DOES THAT LEAVE US? of carbon, some about tonnes of Not completely. The Gold that buying carbon offsets could Don’t rely on carbon offsetting to carbon dioxide – the important Standard does not endorse tree give considerable impetus to the salve a guilty conscience. You thing is that 3.67 tonnes of carbon planting, according to conservation of tropical should aim to reduce energy dioxide = 1 tonne of carbon. spokesperson Michael Schlup, rainforests. Organisations such as consumption in all areas of your CARBON CALCULATOR because “the science behind the the World Land Trust (see above) life. “It should not be a licence to All the offset organisations have calculation is not that simple.” offset your emissions to benefi t pollute for guilt-free motoring or devices of differing complexity There are other problems, too. wildlife and biodiversity. fl ying,” says Greenpeace UK’s on their websites that calculate How do you know that someone climate campaigner Charlie how much carbon you emit won’t cut the trees down again or HOW DO I CHOOSE A GOOD Kronick. Guardian writer George either from a fl ight, your home that they would not have been OFFSET SCHEME? Monbiot is a trenchant critic of or your car. planted anyway? Some carbon Look at how the organisation is carbon offset schemes, describing offsets have been achieved by monitored and by whom. The Gold them as the equivalent of buying CARBON TRADING replanting previously deforested Standard would appear best at “complacency, political apathy This refers to people or land with vast monocultures. this stage because it is rigorous and self-satisfaction.” Others companies buying and selling and independent of the schemes it argue that the very act of the right to emit carbon dioxide. assesses. Second, all these calculating your emissions is the This ties in with offsetting your projects have broader benefi ts. If fi rst step to reducing them, and carbon emissions, because in a you want social gains, go for that offset schemes could help to sense you are buying the right to energy-effi ciency schemes in stimulate emissions reductions. emit the amount you have offset. developing countries (see The One thing’s for sure – both the In the business, these are known Carbon Neutral Company, above). issue of climate change and as ‘voluntary retail offsets’. If biodiversity is more important, carbon offsetting are here to stay. January 2007 BBC Wildlife 77 ON TEST CARBON EMISSIONS: THE FACTS There are some things we can say with certainty about carbon emissions: WORLD LAND TRUST CLIMATE CARE 300% ☎ 0845 054 4422; www.worldlandtrust.org ☎ 01865 207 000; www.climatecare.org AVIATION Status Registered charity. Status Not-for-profi t company trust, limited Friends of the Earth has calculated that if Offsetting activities Tree planting. by guarantee, owned by a private company. aviation use grows as forecast, then carbon What does it invest in and where? Offsetting activities 80 per cent goes into emissions from air travel will increase by Rainforest regeneration in developing renewable-energy and energy-saving projects 300 per cent between 1990 and 2030. By countries such as Ecuador. and 20 per cent into rainforest restoration. 2050, aviation could represent 15 per cent of Scale of offsetting activities Offset 8,000 What does it invest in and where? A wide global carbon dioxide emissions. It’s range of projects, from energy-effi cient stoves tonnes of CO2 in 2005 and expects to offset estimated that a tax of €0.125 (about 8p) per between 500,000 and 700,000 tonnes in 2006. in Bangladesh and Madagascar to biogas litre – one fi fth of the tax on petrol for road Is there any independent certifi cation? Yes digesters in India.
Recommended publications
  • Atmosfair JB 2017 Korr Susanne X.Indd
    ANNUAL REPORT 2017 Südfrika. Kuyasa, in Solarthermieanlage einer Installation Energy for refugees 21st century Climate Trek Nepal technology How does carbon offsetting work? Carb Carbon emissions remain in the atmosphere for many years and atmosfair spart mit seinen Projekten CO2 spread around the world as greenhouse gases. atmosfair offsets ein und baut erneuerbare Energien vor Ort auf. CO2-Emissionen activities that produce carbon emissions and for which there are werden in gleicher Menge an anderer Stelle eingespart. not yet any climate-friendly alternatives. Es ist egal, wo weltweit CO2 eingespart wird, es entlastet immer das Klima. urch 2°target • d UN rt -P e r Ziel: i ü l l f Limit global e o r ärmung r t warming • n K o o K to 2°C renzen n • t r t o r l e l i + 1 t CO2 + 4 t CO2 + CO2 - 68 t CO2 - 3 t CO2 - 4 t CO2 - 300 kg CO2 for participants from Round-trip flight to for the production of goods Einsparung proTag Einsparung Einsparung Einsparung pro Solar Home System Europe per conference Nepal per passenger pro Ofen und Jahr: pro Anlage und Jahr pro Jahr CO2 Conference A flight from Production and location Kleinwasserkraftwerk Biogasanlagen und Solarenergie und attendance Düsseldorf to Nepal of a company in Honduras Biomasse Windkraft Conferences can only be Far-away destinations Energy efficiency and renewable Das kleine, von atmosfair Die Verwendung von Holz als Milchbauern erhalten Erneuerbare Energien sind in replaced by video can usually only be reached by energy can reduce carbon Energieträger führt zu sauberes Biogas rund um die Deutschland weit verbreitet, conferences to a limited plane.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2012 Standards
    Annual Report 2012 Standards atmosfair was founded in 2004 in a research project of the German Federal Ministry of the Environment. In this project, fastidious standards for voluntary CO2 compensation were developed. Standards Approach Compensation is only the second-best option; direct CO2 avoidance is more effective Climate protection is more important than maxi- mising donations If I fly – I fly atmos- Essential component: raising awareness leads to fair. direct CO2 avoidance in the longer term Climate protec- Enduring CO2 reduction tion projects Contribution to North-South technology transfer Direct help for the local population Contribution to local environmental protection Complete CO2- calculation Scientifically based Documented Reviewed Organisation Non-profit and finances Independent Efficient Transparent Responsible 2 atmosfair Annual Report 2012 Standards atmosfair’s standards act as a quality benchmark for the offsetting industry. atmosfair is the many-time test winner of international comparative studies. atmosfair wind power project in South Africa Implementation Cooperation with business travel specialists for travel optimisation, including videoconferencing No cooperation with partners that do not comply with atmosfair standards (e.g., in CO2 calculati- on), even if atmosfair would have earned significant revenues No compensation of activities for which there are better and simpler solutions to avoid CO2 (e.g., private car use or power consumption) Presentation of the actual climate burden (see CO2 calculation),
    [Show full text]
  • Afghan Refugee Women Attend an English Class at the Schistos Site in Greece
    Afghan refugee women attend an English class at the Schistos site in Greece. © UNHCR/Achilleas Zavallis 134 UNHCR Global Appeal 2017 Update BUILDING BETTER FUTURES While the number of people displaced globally has continued to rise dramatically, durable solutions for refugees are becoming ever-more elusive. Despite some positive examples, voluntary repatriation is at its lowest level in three decades and possibilities for local integration remain limited. With so many refugees and IDPs facing years of displacement complicated by few prospects of improved conditions, a growing number of them has sought protection and solutions by undertaking dangerous onward journeys to other States, giving rise to significant protection risks. On 19 September 2016, UN Member States adopted the “New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants”, committing to develop a Comprehensive Refugee Response Framework for emergencies, as well as long-standing situations of forced displacement. A key goal of the Framework is to encourage greater international cooperation to find solutions for refugees, including through the predictable and timely expansion of resettlement and complementary pathways to provide protection and solutions for refugees. UNHCR’s “Global strategy for livelihoods” (2014-2018) continues to transform the organization’s approach to fostering self- reliance among refugees and other people of concern, as well as to achieve comprehensive solutions. The ultimate goal of the Office’s livelihood interventions is to enable all people of concern to earn a safe and sustainable living that allows them to meet their basic needs, contributes to their dignity and provides for the full enjoyment of their rights. In addition, it also contributes to comprehensive solutions that address social, cultural, civil and political rights, as well as economic.
    [Show full text]
  • Broschure "Flying Is ..." [PDF, 596
    Facts about flying you shouldn't miss Flying is… …shopping in London …carnival in Rio …business as usual …cappuccino in Rome …Christmas under palm trees …bananas the whole year round ➔ 2 Flying is the most climate-damaging way to travel …unfortunately climate-damaging 3 Why is flying so climate-damaging? To keep climate warming and thus climate change within I Carbon dioxide is not the only climate-damaging tolerable limits we must drastically reduce worldwide emission caused by modern-day aviation. Among greenhouse gas emissions. other things, condensation trails and cirrus clouds that build up at higher altitudes can also affect the The average human being is responsible for the emission regional climate. Cirrus clouds account for about half of approximately 4 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2) per of the air traffic's contribution to climate warming. year. I One single tourist flying from Germany to the Carib- bean and back causes the short-term equivalent warming effect of approximately 4 tonnes of CO2. ➔ ➔ 4 One return flight to Tenerife is as climate-damaging as driving a car for one year 1 return flight from Germany to the Caribbean Driving a car 1 return flight from for 1 year Finland to Tenerife Using an efficient (approx. 14,000 km) refrigerator for 1 year 100 kg CO2 2,000 kg CO2* 2,000 kg CO2* 4,000 kg CO2* represents annual 2 inhabitants 1 inhabitant of the 4 inhabitants 80 inhabitants CO2 emissions of of Ethiopia Dominican Republic of Vietnam of Tanzania * Emissions from airplanes and cars do not only consist of CO2.
    [Show full text]
  • CARICOM Toolkit
    ECOKRAFT LLC & SUSTAINABLE TRAVEL CONSULTING CARICOM Toolkit Trainers Manual for the Caribbean Hotel Sector on Climate Responsibility, Carbon Credits and Participation in Carbon Offset Programmes Peter Krahenbuhl & Björn D. Fischer 2013 Learning Kit for the Caribbean Hotel Sector on Climate Responsibility, Carbon Credits and Participation in Carbon Offset Programmes Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Expected outcomes and usability ................................................................................................. 4 2. Why sustainability matters to Caribbean hotel operators ................................................................... 5 2.1 Tourism on the rise ....................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Climate change cause and effects and measures to mitigate and adapt ..................................... 6 2.3 Actual and potential impacts of climate change and climate variability on the Caribbean tourism sector ........................................................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Linkage between tourism, climate change and energy and water ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • CDM-SSC-Poa-DD-FORM Version 03.0 Page 1 of 62
    CDM-SSC-PoA-DD-FORM Programme design document form for small-scale CDM programmes of activities (Version 03.0) Complete this form in accordance with the Attachment “Instructions for filling out the programme design document form for small-scale CDM programmes of activities” at the end of this form. PROGRAMME DESIGN DOCUMENT (POA-DD) Title of the PoA Improved Cook Stoves programme for Rwanda Version number of the PoA-DD 7.0 Completion date of the PoA-DD 23/06/2014 Coordinating/ managing entity atmosfair gGmbH Rwanda Host Party(ies) Cameroon Sectoral scope(s) and selected methodology(ies), and where II.G AMS-II.G. Energy Efficiency Measures in Thermal applicable, selected standardized Applications of Non-Renewable Biomass Version 03 baseline(s) Version 03.0 Page 1 of 62 CDM-SSC-PoA-DD-FORM PART I. Programme of activities (PoA) SECTION A. General description of PoA A.1. Title of the PoA >> Title: Improved Cook Stoves programme for Rwanda Version: 7.0 Date of Completion: 23/06/2014 A.2. Purpose and general description of the PoA >> 1. General operating and implementing framework The programme will replace traditional stoves with high efficiency biomass fired cook stoves (hereafter referred to as “Improved Cookstoves” or “ICS1”) in Rwanda and Cameroon. Rwanda is amongst the Least Developed Countries (LDCs) in the world2. The use of woody biomass (wood and charcoal which is derived from wood) leads to deforestation, erosion and environmental problems. The use of charcoal also leads to high cost for households for cooking. The purpose of the PoA is to use carbon finance for the dissemination of ICS to the people of Rwanda and Cameroon, replacing less efficient charcoal or wood cook stoves currently in use, thereby reducing the use of non-renewable biomass.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaii Visitor Air Travel Emissions As Contributor to Global Warming
    HAWAII VISITOR AIR TRAVEL EMISSIONS AS CONTRIBUTOR TO GLOBAL WARMING This paper attempts to answer the question “How much global warming emissions are generated though air travel of visitors to Hawaii?” Though discussion and criticism will appropriately arise, the core answer will be 18 million tons of CO2(equivalent) emissions arose from air travel of visitors in 2019. To gain perspective on this number, the emissions from all of Hawaii’s Stationary Combustion (electricity generation from power plants, petroleum refineries, etc.) was 7.8 million tons CO2(e), and all emissions from ground transportation in the islands reached 4 million tons CO2(e). (Hawaii State Greenhouse Gas Inventory) It is therefore proposed that Hawaii’s imperative efforts toward conversion of power generation and ground transportation to zero emissions sources will make only modest improvement in the state’s emissions profile if we continue to host the current numbers of visitors. The derivation of the figure of 18 million tons CO2(e) from visitor transport must be understood. REGION # of VISITORS ORIGIN CITY ROUND TRIP MILES EMISSIONS -CO2(e) U.S. West 4,600,000 Portland 5,200 6,440,000 tons U.S. East 2,300,000 Washington 9,600 5,750,000 tons D.C. Japan 1,600,000 Tokyo 7,600 1,600,000 tons Canada 500,000 Vancouver B.C. 5,400 700,000 tons Europe 140,000 London 14,000 546,000 tons Oceania 360,000 Sydney 10,000 972,000 tons Korea 230,000 Seoul 9,200 552,000 tons China 90,000 Shanghai 9,800 234,000 tons EMISSIONS (EQUIVALENTS CO2) TOTAL: 18,394,000 tons The above table, in it’s first two columns, collates information from the Hawaii Tourism Authority 2019 data regarding numbers of visitors from each of 8 ‘Regions of Origin’.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2009 Standards
    Annual Report 2009 Standards atmosfair was created in 2004 in a research project of the Federal Ministry for the Environment. In the framework of this project, principled standards were develo- ped for voluntary CO2 compensation. Standards Approach Compensation is only the 2nd option; direct CO2 avoidance is more effective Climate protection is more important than the If I fly – maximization of donation revenues Creation of greater public awareness I fly atmosfair. Climate protec- Permanent CO2 reduction tion projects Contribution to North-South technology transfer Additional benefits for local population Contribution to local environmental protection CO2 calculation Complete Scientific Documented Reviewed Organization & Non-profit, registered charity finances Independent Efficient Transparent Responsible 2 atmosfair Annual Report 2009 The atmosfair standards serve as a yardstick within the CO2 compensation market. Everey year since 2005, atmosfair has received top rankings in international comparative studies. atmosfair solar project in India Implementation Cooperation with business travel specialists for travel optimization, including the use of video conferences No cooperation with partners who do not comply with atmosfair standards (e.g. CO2 calculation), even though atmosfair would generate high revenues No compensation for activities for which there are better solutions (e.g. automobile driving, power consumption) Complete information concerning donors, independence from industry 100 % CDM + Gold Standard CO2 -offset projects Calculation and monitoring of CO2 reduction according to UN standards Qualified and UN-approved assessors (e.g. TÜV) who must accept liability Documentation via Web site of the Climate Change Secretariat of the United Nations No afforestation projects, only renewable energy and energy efficiency Formal approval of the government of the host country Inclusion of all climate impacts of air travel (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Carbon Market Standards for REDD+ Projects
    THINK TANK & RESEARCH ANALYSIS A comparison of carbon market standards for REDD+ projects Lars Schmidt & Kristin Gerber A comparison of carbon market standards for REDD+ projects GERMANWATCH Imprint Authors: Lars Schmidt (independent consultant) & Kristin Gerber Layout: Daniela Baum Publisher: Germanwatch e.V. Office Bonn: Office Berlin: Kaiserstr. 201 Stresemannstr. 72 D-53113 Bonn D-10963 Berlin Phone +49 (0)228 / 60 492-0, Fax -19 Phone +49 (0)30 / 28 88 356-0, Fax -1 Internet: www.germanwatch.org E-mail: [email protected] Version 1.3, January 15, 2016 Purchase order number: 16-1-02e This publication can be downloaded at: www.germanwatch.org/en/12479 This project is part of the International Climate Initiative. The Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety supports this initiative on the basis of a decision adopted by the German Bundestag We thank for the constructive input of Dietrich Brockhagen (atmosfair), Norbert Gorißen (BMUB) and Christoph Bals (Germanwatch) 2 A comparison of carbon market standards for REDD+ projects GERMANWATCH Content List of tables and figures ...................................................................................................... 4 Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................... 5 Summary ............................................................................................................................. 6 Results ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE GOLD STANDARD MICRO-SCALE SCHEME PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM - Version 2.2
    THE GOLD STANDARD MICRO-SCALE SCHEME PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM - Version 2.2 CONTENTS A. General description of the micro scale project activity B. Application of an existing or new baseline and monitoring methodology C. Duration of the project activity and crediting period D. Stakeholders’ comments Annexes Annex 1: Contact information on participants in the proposed micro scale project activity Annex 2: Information regarding Public Funding Annex 3: ODA Declaration Form 1 SECTION A. General description of micro-scale project activity A.1 Title of the micro-scale project activity: Title: India One Solar Thermal Power Project Date & Version of the PDD: 05th of April 2017, Version 2 A.2. Project participants: Name of Party involved (*) Private and/or public entity (ies) Kindly indicate if the Party ((host) indicates a host project participants (*) involved wishes to be Party) (as applicable) considered as project participant (Yes/No) India (host) World Renewal Spiritual Trust (WRST) No Germany atmosfair gGmbH No A.3 Description of the micro-scale project activity: A.3.1. Location of the micro-scale project activity: A.3.1.1. Host Country: India A.3.1.2. Region/State/Province etc.: Rajasthan A.3.1.3. City/Town/Community etc: District: Sirohi Block: Abu Road 2 A.3.1.4. Details of physical location, including information allowing the unique identification of this micro-scale project activity: ‘India One Solar Thermal Power Project’ referred to as the ‘Project Activity’ is located in Rajasthan, India in the district of Sirohi. The project activity lies at a distance of around 2 km and 8 km from Brahma Kumaris campus and Abu Road Railway Station respectively, at 24.5° N to 72.8° E.
    [Show full text]
  • Outsourcing Hot Air the Push for Sub-National REDD Offsets in California’S Carbon Market from Mexico and Beyond
    Outsourcing Hot Air The push for sub-national REDD offsets in California’s carbon market from Mexico and beyond September 2012 Contents 01 Introduction: Good intention & misdirection 5 For more information contact: [email protected] 02 The fatal flaws of sub-national REDD+ offsets 7 Art Direction and Design by: Atomo Design 03 Chiapas as a Case Study for REDD+: What is known so far 15 Cover photograph: 04 The way forward 27 A tree in La Cojolita Communal Reserve, located in the Lacandona Rainforest, Appendix 28 State of Chiapas, Mexico. © Ginnette Riquelme / Greenpeace Endnotes 30 Back cover photograph: Detail of a Ceiba tree in Lacanja Chansayab, a community located in the limits of Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve, in the Lacandona Rainforest, State of Chiapas, Mexico. © Ginnette Riquelme / Greenpeace JN 431 Published in September 2012 by Greenpeace International Ottho Heldringstraat 5 1066 AZ Amsterdam The Netherlands greenpeace.org What is REDD? REDD is an acronym for Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation in Developing Countries. The concept is simple: Developed countries provide incentives that help developing countries who need help protecting their forests, thereby reducing the carbon emissions caused by forest destruction. A good REDD deal would help conserve forests nationwide, while protecting biodiversity and benefiting indigenous peoples and local communities in a manner that fully respects their rights and needs. A bad deal would allow corporations to continue destroying forests while claiming to protect them, and risks worsening the situation for forest communities. Significant funding must be made available to ensure that REDD is designed and implemented in a proper manner that delivers real reductions, protects biodiversity, and respects human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • In Focus: Rural Electrification Content
    Annual Report 2018 In focus: Rural electrification Content 3 ______ Editorial 4 ______ atmosfair projects worldwide 6 ______ Rural electrification 14 ____ Efficient cookstoves 18 ____ Light and shadows 20 ____ Opening the Climate Trek in Nepal 22 ____ From market waste to fertilizer 24 ____ Project partners – selection 26 ____ Project news 28 ____ The climate, chocolate and I 30 ____ Nepal: biogas over firewood 32 ____ Carbon offsetting after 2020 36 ____ Our standards Impressum 38 ____ Driving transformation Published by 42 ____ From donation to results atmosfair gGmbH | Dr. Dietrich Brockhagen 46 ____ Financial report Author Ursula Schmidt | ursulaschmidt.com 52 ____ References & partners 53 ____ Best in class Title Annual Report 2018 54 ____ Meet the team Graphic design 55 ____ atmosfair in the media Anna Gabriel | annagabriel.berlin Mia Sedding | Indivisual Circulation 1.000 copies Print Oktoberdruck AG Certified EMAS, 100% recycled paper Certified “Blue Angel“ Copyright for all photos and illustrations atmos- fair gGmbH, unless indicated otherwise. Content Editorial Dear readers, 2018 was the year Greta thunberg launched her climate strike. When she sat down in front of the Swedish parliament to demonstrate against climate change, she probably did not foresee the stir her actions would cause all over the world. the “Fridays for Future” movement, which was inspired by thunberg, took to the streets of Germany, expanding far beyond the initial schoolyard beginnings. Following the example of school kids, Scientists for Future, Parents for Future, Entrepreneurs for Future and other initiatives have gained increasing numbers of supporters who demand the adoption of policies for global decarbonisation.
    [Show full text]