Scription by Using Q Coherent States

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Scription by Using Q Coherent States Quantum Field Theory I by Prof. Michael G. Schmidt 24 October 2007 Processed and LATEX-ed by Olivier Tieleman Supported by Adisorn Adulpravitchai and Jenny Wagner This is a first version of the lecture notes for professor Michael Schmidt’s course on quantum field theory as taught in the 2006/2007 winter semester. Comments and error reports are welcome; please send them to: o.tieleman at students.uu.nl 2 Contents 1 Introduction 5 1.1 Particle field duality ....................... 5 1.2 Short repetition of QM ...................... 5 1.2.1 Mechanics ........................ 6 1.2.2 QM States ........................ 6 1.2.3 Observables ........................ 7 1.2.4 Position and momentum ................. 7 1.2.5 Hamilton operator .................... 8 1.3 The need for QFT ........................ 9 1.4 History .............................. 12 1.5 Harmonic oscillator, coherent states .............. 12 1.5.1 Classical mechanics .................... 12 1.5.2 Quantization ....................... 13 1.5.3 Coherent states ...................... 14 1.6 The closed oscillator chain .................... 18 1.6.1 The classical system ................... 18 1.6.2 Quantization ....................... 19 1.6.3 Continuum limit ..................... 21 1.6.4 Ground state energy ................... 23 1.7 Summary ............................. 24 1.8 Literature ............................. 24 2 Free EM field, Klein-Gordon eq, quantization 27 2.1 The free electromagnetic field .................. 27 2.1.1 Classical Maxwell theory ................ 27 2.1.2 Quantization ....................... 30 2.1.3 Application: emission, absorption ............ 31 2.1.4 Coherent states ...................... 32 2.2 Klein-Gordon equation ...................... 32 2.2.1 Lagrange formalism for field equations ......... 32 2.2.2 Wave equation, Klein-Gordon equation ......... 35 2.2.3 Quantization ....................... 36 2.2.4 The Maxwell equations in Lagrange formalism .... 37 3 4 CONTENTS 3 The Schr¨odingerequation in the language of QFT 41 3.1 Second Quantization ....................... 41 3.1.1 Schr¨odinger equation ................... 41 3.1.2 Lagrange formalism for the Schr¨odinger equation ... 42 3.1.3 Canonical quantization ................. 43 3.2 Multiparticle Schr¨odinger equation ............... 45 3.2.1 Bosonic multiparticle space ............... 45 3.2.2 Interactions ........................ 47 3.2.3 Fermions ......................... 48 4 Quantizing covariant field equations 51 4.1 Lorentz transformations ..................... 51 4.2 Klein-Gordon equation for spin 0 bosons ............ 52 4.2.1 Klein-Gordon equation .................. 52 4.2.2 Solving the Klein-Gordon equation in 4-momentum space ........................... 53 4.2.3 Quantization: canonical formalism ........... 55 4.2.4 Charge conjugation .................... 58 4.3 Microcausality .......................... 59 4.4 Nonrelativistic limit ....................... 60 5 Interacting fields, S-matrix, LSZ 63 5.1 Non-linear field equations .................... 63 5.1.1 Relation to observation ................. 64 5.2 Interaction of particles in QFT ................. 64 5.2.1 The Yang-Feldman equations .............. 65 5.3 Green’s functions ......................... 66 5.4 Spectral representation of commutator vev ........... 69 5.5 LSZ reduction formalism ..................... 69 5.5.1 Generating functional .................. 71 6 Invariant Perturbation Theory 73 6.1 Dyson expansion, Gell-Mann-Low formula ........... 73 6.2 Interaction picture ........................ 76 6.2.1 Transformation ...................... 76 6.2.2 Scattering theory ..................... 78 6.2.3 Background field ..................... 80 6.3 Haag’s theorem .......................... 82 7 Feynman rules, cross section 83 7.1 Wick theorem ........................... 83 7.1.1 Φ4-theory ......................... 85 7.2 Feynman graphs ......................... 86 7.2.1 Feynman rules in x-space ................ 86 CONTENTS 5 7.2.2 Feynman rules in momentum space ........... 90 7.2.3 Feynman rules for complex scalars ........... 91 7.3 Functional relations ....................... 92 7.4 Back to S-matrix elements .................... 93 7.4.1 2-point functions ..................... 93 7.4.2 General Wightman functions .............. 95 7.5 From S-matrix to cross section ................. 96 7.5.1 Derivation ......................... 96 7.5.2 Scattering amplitudes and cross sections: an example 98 7.5.3 The optical theorem ................... 100 8 Path integral formulation of QFT 103 8.1 Path integrals in QM ....................... 103 8.1.1 Vacuum expectation values ............... 107 8.2 Path integrals in QFT ...................... 108 8.2.1 Framework ........................ 108 8.2.2 QFT path integral calculations ............. 110 8.2.3 Perturbation theory ................... 112 9 Lorentz group 115 9.1 Classification of Lorentz transformations ............ 115 9.2 Poincar´egroup .......................... 119 10 Dirac equation 123 10.1 Spinor representation of the Lorentz group ........... 123 10.2 Spinor fields, Dirac equation ................... 125 10.3 Representation matrices in spinor space ............ 126 10.3.1 Rotations ......................... 126 10.3.2 Lorentz transformations ................. 127 10.3.3 Boosts ........................... 128 10.4 Field equation ........................... 130 10.4.1 Derivation ......................... 130 10.4.2 Choosing the γ-matrices ................. 131 10.4.3 Relativistic covariance of the Dirac equation ...... 132 10.5 Complete solution of the Dirac equation ............ 133 10.6 Lagrangian formalism ...................... 135 10.6.1 Quantization ....................... 136 10.6.2 Charge conjugation .................... 137 11 Fermion Feynman Rules 139 11.1 Bilinear Covariants ........................ 139 11.2 LSZ reduction ........................... 140 11.3 Feynman rules .......................... 141 11.3.1 The Dirac propagator .................. 141 6 CONTENTS 11.4 Simple example in Yukawa theory ................ 144 12 QM interpretation of Dirac equation 149 12.1 Interpretation as Schr¨odinger equation ............. 149 12.2 Non-relativistic limit ....................... 152 12.2.1 Pauli equation ...................... 152 12.2.2 Foldy-Wouthousen transformation ........... 154 12.2.3 F.-W. representation with constant field ........ 155 12.3 The hydrogen atom ........................ 156 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Particle field duality From classical physics we know both particles and fields/waves. These are two different concepts with different characteristics. But some experiments show, that there exists a duality between both. 1. electromagnetic waves waves ↔ photons (photoelectric effect, E = hν = ~ω) fields are quantized, consisting of particles called photons. 2. particles (e.g. electrons) may exhibit interference phenomena, like waves. Thus, particles must be described by a wavefunction ψ. How- ever, this has a probabilistic interpretation, it is not like an electro- magnetic field. The latter leads to quantum mechanics (QM), the former to quantum field theory (QFT). QM is nonrelativistic, and describes systems with fixed particle number. The quantization of the electromagnetic field requires quantum field theory, but is based on the same principles as quantum me- chanics. 1.2 Short repetition of QM QM cannot be derived from mechanics; rather, mechanics should follow from QM. But in obtaining appropriate Hamiltonians in QM, the correspondence principle, which substitutes quantities from mechanics by quantum mechan- ical operators, plays a key role. 7 8 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1.2.1 Mechanics In the Lagrangian formulation of mechanics, we substitute the equations of motion by an extremal postulate for an action functional Z t S[L] = dtL (1.1) t0 of the Lagrange function L(qi, q˙i), where the qi are the (finitely many) gener- alized coordinates in the specific problem. Postulating δS = 0 for variations in the qi(t) and keeping the endpoints fixed, we obtain the Lagrange equa- tions ∂L d ∂L − = 0 (1.2) ∂qi dt ∂q˙i Here, ∂L/∂q˙i = pi are the generalized canonical momenta. The Hamiltonian H(pi, qi) is the Legendre transform of L: X H = q˙ipi − L (1.3) i and the Hamiltonian equations in phase space follow: ∂H ∂H p˙i = − , q˙i = (1.4) ∂qi ∂pi The Poisson bracket of two functions f(pi, qi), g(pi, qi) in phase space is defined as X ∂f ∂g ∂f ∂g {f(p , q ), g(p , q )} = − (1.5) i i i i P oisson ∂p ∂q ∂q ∂p i i i i i We have {pi, qj}P oisson = δij (1.6) and the Hamiltonian equations can be generalized to d f(p , q ) = {H, f} (1.7) dt i i P oisson ˙ In case of explicitly time-dependent f we have f(pi, qi) = {H, f}P oisson + ∂f/∂t. For these formal aspects see e.g. F. Scheck, “Mechanik”. Continuum mechanics can be obtained by taking the number of coordi- nates N to infinity, as will be seen in a specific example in QM. 1.2.2 QM States States are described by Hilbert space (ket) vectors |ψi ∈ H (or by the density matrix ρ; see below) with the following properties: 1.2. SHORT REPETITION OF QM 9 1. representation space: ψ(~x) = h~x|ψi are functions in the L2 Hilbert space H. These are coordinates in the h~x|-basis. 2. probabilistic interpretation: • |ψ(~x)|2 d3x is the probability to find the particle in the state |ψi in volume element d3x. • hϕ|ψi = R d3x ϕ∗(~x) ψ(~x) = R d3p ϕ∗(~p) ψ(~p) is called the inner product of ψ and ϕ • | hϕ|ψi |2 is the probability to find the state |ψi in |ϕi, and vice versa. 1.2.3 Observables Observables are described by self-adjoint linear operators A
Recommended publications
  • A New Renormalization Scheme of Fermion Field in Standard Model
    A New Renormalization Scheme of Fermion Field in Standard Model Yong Zhoua a Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 2735, Beijing 100080, China (Jan 10, 2003) In order to obtain proper wave-function renormalization constants for unstable fermion and consist with Breit-Wigner formula in the resonant region, We have assumed an extension of the LSZ reduction formula for unstable fermion and adopted on-shell mass renormalization scheme in the framework of without field renormaization. The comparison of gauge dependence of physical amplitude between on-shell mass renormalization and complex-pole mass renormalization has been discussed. After obtaining the fermion wave-function renormalization constants, we extend them to two matrices in order to include the contributions of off-diagonal two-point diagrams at fermion external legs for the convenience of calculations of S-matrix elements. 11.10.Gh, 11.55.Ds, 12.15.Lk I. INTRODUCTION We are interested in the LSZ reduction formula [1] in the case of unstable particle, for the purpose of obtaining a proper wave function renormalization constant(wrc.) for unstable fermion. In this process we have demanded the form of the unstable particle’s propagator in the resonant region resembles the relativistic Breit-Wigner formula. Therefore the on-shell mass renormalization scheme is a suitable choice compared with the complex-pole mass renormalization scheme [2], as we will discuss in section 2. We also discard the field renormalization constants which have been proven at question in the case of having fermions mixing [3]. The layout of this article is as follows.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory
    AN INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM FIELD THEORY By Dr M Dasgupta University of Manchester Lecture presented at the School for Experimental High Energy Physics Students Somerville College, Oxford, September 2009 - 1 - - 2 - Contents 0 Prologue....................................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Lagrangian formalism in classical mechanics......................................... 6 1.2 Quantum mechanics................................................................................... 8 1.3 The Schrödinger picture........................................................................... 10 1.4 The Heisenberg picture............................................................................ 11 1.5 The quantum mechanical harmonic oscillator ..................................... 12 Problems .............................................................................................................. 13 2 Classical Field Theory............................................................................. 14 2.1 From N-point mechanics to field theory ............................................... 14 2.2 Relativistic field theory ............................................................................ 15 2.3 Action for a scalar field ............................................................................ 15 2.4 Plane wave solution to the Klein-Gordon equation ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Masses and the Vacuum Expectation Value
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE PHYSICAL MASSES AND THE VACUUM EXPECTATION VALUE provided by CERN Document Server OF THE HIGGS FIELD Hung Cheng Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A. and S.P.Li Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica Nankang, Taip ei, Taiwan, Republic of China Abstract By using the Ward-Takahashi identities in the Landau gauge, we derive exact relations between particle masses and the vacuum exp ectation value of the Higgs eld in the Ab elian gauge eld theory with a Higgs meson. PACS numb ers : 03.70.+k; 11.15-q 1 Despite the pioneering work of 't Ho oft and Veltman on the renormalizability of gauge eld theories with a sp ontaneously broken vacuum symmetry,a numb er of questions remain 2 op en . In particular, the numb er of renormalized parameters in these theories exceeds that of bare parameters. For such theories to b e renormalizable, there must exist relationships among the renormalized parameters involving no in nities. As an example, the bare mass M of the gauge eld in the Ab elian-Higgs theory is related 0 to the bare vacuum exp ectation value v of the Higgs eld by 0 M = g v ; (1) 0 0 0 where g is the bare gauge coupling constant in the theory.We shall show that 0 v u u D (0) T t g (0)v: (2) M = 2 D (M ) T 2 In (2), g (0) is equal to g (k )atk = 0, with the running renormalized gauge coupling constant de ned in (27), and v is the renormalized vacuum exp ectation value of the Higgs eld de ned in (29) b elow.
    [Show full text]
  • B1. the Generating Functional Z[J]
    B1. The generating functional Z[J] The generating functional Z[J] is a key object in quantum field theory - as we shall see it reduces in ordinary quantum mechanics to a limiting form of the 1-particle propagator G(x; x0jJ) when the particle is under thje influence of an external field J(t). However, before beginning, it is useful to look at another closely related object, viz., the generating functional Z¯(J) in ordinary probability theory. Recall that for a simple random variable φ, we can assign a probability distribution P (φ), so that the expectation value of any variable A(φ) that depends on φ is given by Z hAi = dφP (φ)A(φ); (1) where we have assumed the normalization condition Z dφP (φ) = 1: (2) Now let us consider the generating functional Z¯(J) defined by Z Z¯(J) = dφP (φ)eφ: (3) From this definition, it immediately follows that the "n-th moment" of the probability dis- tribution P (φ) is Z @nZ¯(J) g = hφni = dφP (φ)φn = j ; (4) n @J n J=0 and that we can expand Z¯(J) as 1 X J n Z Z¯(J) = dφP (φ)φn n! n=0 1 = g J n; (5) n! n ¯ so that Z(J) acts as a "generator" for the infinite sequence of moments gn of the probability distribution P (φ). For future reference it is also useful to recall how one may also expand the logarithm of Z¯(J); we write, Z¯(J) = exp[W¯ (J)] Z W¯ (J) = ln Z¯(J) = ln dφP (φ)eφ: (6) 1 Now suppose we make a power series expansion of W¯ (J), i.e., 1 X 1 W¯ (J) = C J n; (7) n! n n=0 where the Cn, known as "cumulants", are just @nW¯ (J) C = j : (8) n @J n J=0 The relationship between the cumulants Cn and moments gn is easily found.
    [Show full text]
  • PHY 2404S Lecture Notes
    PHY 2404S Lecture Notes Michael Luke Winter, 2003 These notes are perpetually under construction. Please let me know of any typos or errors. Once again, large portions of these notes have been plagiarized from Sidney Coleman’s field theory lectures from Harvard, written up by Brian Hill. 1 Contents 1 Preliminaries 3 1.1 Counterterms and Divergences: A Simple Example . 3 1.2 CountertermsinScalarFieldTheory . 11 2 Reformulating Scattering Theory 18 2.1 Feynman Diagrams with External Lines off the Mass Shell . .. 18 2.1.1 AnswerOne: PartofaLargerDiagram . 19 2.1.2 Answer Two: The Fourier Transform of a Green Function 20 2.1.3 Answer Three: The VEV of a String of Heisenberg Fields 22 2.2 GreenFunctionsandFeynmanDiagrams. 23 2.3 TheLSZReductionFormula . 27 2.3.1 ProofoftheLSZReductionFormula . 29 3 Renormalizing Scalar Field Theory 36 3.1 The Two-Point Function: Wavefunction Renormalization .... 37 3.2 The Analytic Structure of G(2), and1PIGreenFunctions . 40 3.3 Calculation of Π(k2) to order g2 .................. 44 3.4 The definition of g .......................... 50 3.5 Unstable Particles and the Optical Theorem . 51 3.6 Renormalizability. 57 4 Renormalizability 60 4.1 DegreesofDivergence . 60 4.2 RenormalizationofQED. 65 4.2.1 TroubleswithVectorFields . 65 4.2.2 Counterterms......................... 66 2 1 Preliminaries 1.1 Counterterms and Divergences: A Simple Example In the last semester we considered a variety of field theories, and learned to calculate scattering amplitudes at leading order in perturbation theory. Unfor- tunately, although things were fine as far as we went, the whole basis of our scattering theory had a gaping hole in it.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 12 from Correlation Functions to Amplitudes
    Lecture 12 From Correlation Functions to Amplitudes Up to this point we have been able to compute correlation functions up to a given order in perturbation theory. Our next step is to relate these to amplitudes for physical processes that we can use to compute observables such as scattering cross sections and decay rates. For instance, assuming given initial and final states, we want to compute the amplitude to go from one to the other in the presence of interactions. In order to be able to define initial and final states we consider a situation where the interaction takes place at a localized region of spacetime and the initial state is defined at t ! −∞, whereas the final state is defined at t ! +1. These asymptotic states are well defined particle states. That is, if we have a two-particle state of momentum jp1p2i, this means that the wave- packets associated with each of the particles are strongly peaked at p1 and p2, and are well separated in momentum space. This assumption simplifies our treatment of asymptotic states. The same will be assumed of the final state jp3 : : : pni. We will initially assume these states far into the past and into the future are eigenstates of the free theory. The fact is they are not, even if they are not interacting say through scattering. The reason is that the presence of interactions modifies the parameters of the theory, so even the unperturbed propagation from the far past or to the far future is not described by free eigenstates. However, the results we will derive for free states will still hold with some modifications associated with the shift of the paramenters of the theory (including the fields) in the presence of interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Mechanics Propagator
    Quantum Mechanics_propagator This article is about Quantum field theory. For plant propagation, see Plant propagation. In Quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, the propagator gives the probability amplitude for a particle to travel from one place to another in a given time, or to travel with a certain energy and momentum. In Feynman diagrams, which calculate the rate of collisions in quantum field theory, virtual particles contribute their propagator to the rate of the scattering event described by the diagram. They also can be viewed as the inverse of the wave operator appropriate to the particle, and are therefore often called Green's functions. Non-relativistic propagators In non-relativistic quantum mechanics the propagator gives the probability amplitude for a particle to travel from one spatial point at one time to another spatial point at a later time. It is the Green's function (fundamental solution) for the Schrödinger equation. This means that, if a system has Hamiltonian H, then the appropriate propagator is a function satisfying where Hx denotes the Hamiltonian written in terms of the x coordinates, δ(x)denotes the Dirac delta-function, Θ(x) is the Heaviside step function and K(x,t;x',t')is the kernel of the differential operator in question, often referred to as the propagator instead of G in this context, and henceforth in this article. This propagator can also be written as where Û(t,t' ) is the unitary time-evolution operator for the system taking states at time t to states at time t'. The quantum mechanical propagator may also be found by using a path integral, where the boundary conditions of the path integral include q(t)=x, q(t')=x' .
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Field Theory Koichi Hamaguchi Last Updated: July 31, 2017 Contents
    2017 S-semester Quantum Field Theory Koichi Hamaguchi Last updated: July 31, 2017 Contents x 0 Introduction 1 x 0.1 Course objectives . 2 x 0.2 Quantum mechanics and quantum field theory . 2 x 0.3 Notation and convention . 3 x 0.4 Various fields . 4 x 0.5 Outline: what we will learn . 4 x 0.6 S-matrix, amplitude M =) observables (σ and Γ) . 5 x 1 Scalar (spin 0) Field 16 x 1.1 Lorentz transformation . 16 x 1.1.1 Lorentz transformation of coordinates . 16 x 1.1.2 Lorentz transformation of quantum fields . 17 x 1.2 Lagrangian and Canonical Quantization of Real Scalar Field . 18 x 1.3 Equation of Motion (EOM) . 22 x 1.4 Free scalar field . 23 x 1.4.1 Solution of the EOM . 23 x 1.4.2 Commutation relations . 25 x 1.4.3 ay and a are the creation and annihilation operators. 25 x 1.4.4 Consistency check . 29 x 1.4.5 vacuum state . 30 x 1.4.6 One-particle state . 30 x 1.4.7 Lorentz transformation of a and ay ................... 31 x 1.4.8 [ϕ(x); ϕ(y)] for x0 =6 y0 .......................... 32 x 1.5 Interacting Scalar Field . 34 x 1.5.1 What is ϕ(x)?............................... 34 x 1.5.2 In/out states and the LSZ reduction formula . 36 x 1.5.3 Heisenberg field and Interaction picture field . 42 x 1.5.4 a and ay (again) . 45 x 1.5.5 h0jT(ϕ(x1) ··· ϕ(xn)) j0i =? ......................
    [Show full text]
  • The Quantum Vacuum and the Cosmological Constant Problem
    The Quantum Vacuum and the Cosmological Constant Problem S.E. Rugh∗and H. Zinkernagel† Abstract - The cosmological constant problem arises at the intersection be- tween general relativity and quantum field theory, and is regarded as a fun- damental problem in modern physics. In this paper we describe the historical and conceptual origin of the cosmological constant problem which is intimately connected to the vacuum concept in quantum field theory. We critically dis- cuss how the problem rests on the notion of physical real vacuum energy, and which relations between general relativity and quantum field theory are assumed in order to make the problem well-defined. Introduction Is empty space really empty? In the quantum field theories (QFT’s) which underlie modern particle physics, the notion of empty space has been replaced with that of a vacuum state, defined to be the ground (lowest energy density) state of a collection of quantum fields. A peculiar and truly quantum mechanical feature of the quantum fields is that they exhibit zero-point fluctuations everywhere in space, even in regions which are otherwise ‘empty’ (i.e. devoid of matter and radiation). These zero-point arXiv:hep-th/0012253v1 28 Dec 2000 fluctuations of the quantum fields, as well as other ‘vacuum phenomena’ of quantum field theory, give rise to an enormous vacuum energy density ρvac. As we shall see, this vacuum energy density is believed to act as a contribution to the cosmological constant Λ appearing in Einstein’s field equations from 1917, 1 8πG R g R Λg = T (1) µν − 2 µν − µν c4 µν where Rµν and R refer to the curvature of spacetime, gµν is the metric, Tµν the energy-momentum tensor, G the gravitational constant, and c the speed of light.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Field Theory: Spin Zero
    Quantum Field Theory Part I: Spin Zero Mark Srednicki Department of Physics University of California Santa Barbara, CA 93106 [email protected] This is a draft version of Part I of a three-part introductory textbook on quantum field theory. arXiv:hep-th/0409035v1 2 Sep 2004 1 Part I: Spin Zero 0) Preface 1) Attempts at Relativistic Quantum Mechanics (prerequisite: none) 2) Lorentz Invariance (prerequisite: 1) 3) Relativistic Quantum Fields and Canonical Quantization (2) 4) The Spin-Statistics Theorem (3) 5) The LSZ Reduction Formula (3) 6) Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics (none) 7) The Path Integral for the Harmonic Oscillator (6) 8) The Path Integral for Free Field Theory (3, 7) 9) The Path Integral for Interacting Field Theory (8) 10) Scattering Amplitudes and the Feynman Rules (5, 9) 11) Cross Sections and Decay Rates (10) 12) The Lehmann-K¨all´en Form of the Exact Propagator (9) 13) Dimensional Analysis withh ¯ = c = 1 (3) 14) Loop Corrections to the Propagator (10, 12, 13) 15) The One-Loop Correction in Lehmann-K¨all´en Form (14) 16) Loop Corrections to the Vertex (14) 17) Other 1PI Vertices (16) 18) Higher-Order Corrections and Renormalizability (17) 19) Perturbation Theory to All Orders: the Skeleton Expansion (18) 20) Two-Particle Elastic Scattering at One Loop (10, 19) 21) The Quantum Action (19) 22) Continuous Symmetries and Conserved Currents (8) 23) Discrete Symmetries: P , C, T , and Z (22) 24) Unstable Particles and Resonances (10, 14) 25) Infrared Divergences (20) 26) Other Renormalization Schemes (25) 27) Formal Development of the Renormalization Group (26) 28) Nonrenormalizable Theories and Effective Field Theory (26) 29) Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking (3) 30) Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking and Loop Corrections (19, 29) 31) Spontaneous Breakdown of Continuous Symmetries (29) 32) Nonabelian Symmetries (31) 2 Quantum Field Theory Mark Srednicki 0: Preface This is a draft version of Part I of a three-part introductory textbook on quantum field theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Path Integral in Quantum Field Theory Alexander Belyaev (Course Based on Lectures by Steven King) Contents
    Path Integral in Quantum Field Theory Alexander Belyaev (course based on Lectures by Steven King) Contents 1 Preliminaries 5 1.1 Review of Classical Mechanics of Finite System . 5 1.2 Review of Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics . 7 1.3 Relativistic Quantum Mechanics . 14 1.3.1 Relativistic Conventions and Notation . 14 1.3.2 TheKlein-GordonEquation . 15 1.4 ProblemsSet1 ........................... 18 2 The Klein-Gordon Field 19 2.1 Introduction............................. 19 2.2 ClassicalScalarFieldTheory . 20 2.3 QuantumScalarFieldTheory . 28 2.4 ProblemsSet2 ........................... 35 3 Interacting Klein-Gordon Fields 37 3.1 Introduction............................. 37 3.2 PerturbationandScatteringTheory. 37 3.3 TheInteractionHamiltonian. 43 3.4 Example: K π+π− ....................... 45 S → 3.5 Wick’s Theorem, Feynman Propagator, Feynman Diagrams . .. 47 3.6 TheLSZReductionFormula. 52 3.7 ProblemsSet3 ........................... 58 4 Transition Rates and Cross-Sections 61 4.1 TransitionRates .......................... 61 4.2 TheNumberofFinalStates . 63 4.3 Lorentz Invariant Phase Space (LIPS) . 63 4.4 CrossSections............................ 64 4.5 Two-bodyScattering . 65 4.6 DecayRates............................. 66 4.7 OpticalTheorem .......................... 66 4.8 ProblemsSet4 ........................... 68 1 2 CONTENTS 5 Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics 69 5.1 Introduction............................. 69 5.2 The Point to Point Transition Amplitude . 70 5.3 ImaginaryTime........................... 74 5.4 Transition Amplitudes With an External Driving Force . ... 77 5.5 Expectation Values of Heisenberg Position Operators . .... 81 5.6 Appendix .............................. 83 5.6.1 GaussianIntegration . 83 5.6.2 Functionals ......................... 85 5.7 ProblemsSet5 ........................... 87 6 Path Integral Quantisation of the Klein-Gordon Field 89 6.1 Introduction............................. 89 6.2 TheFeynmanPropagator(again) . 91 6.3 Green’s Functions in Free Field Theory .
    [Show full text]
  • Lehmann-Symanzik-Zimmermann S-Matrix Elements on the Moyal Plane
    Preprint typeset in JHEP style - HYPER VERSION SU-4252-916 Lehmann-Symanzik-Zimmermann S-Matrix elements on the Moyal Plane A. P. Balachandran Department of Physics, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244-1130, USA E-mail: [email protected] Pramod Padmanabhan Department of Physics, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244-1130, USA E-mail: [email protected] Amilcar R. de Queiroz Instituto de Fisica, Universidade de Brasilia, Caixa Postal 04455, 70919-970, Brasilia, DF, Brazil E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Field theories on the Groenewold-Moyal(GM) plane are studied using the Lehmann-Symanzik-Zimmermann(LSZ) formalism. The example of real scalar fields is treated in detail. The S-matrix elements in this non-perturbative approach are shown to be equal to the interaction representation S-matrix elements. This is a new non-trivial result: in both cases, the S-operator is independent of the noncommutative deformation parameter θ and the change in scattering amplitudes due to noncommutativity is just a arXiv:1104.1629v3 [hep-th] 6 Sep 2011 µν time delay. This result is verified in two different ways. But the off-shell Green’s functions do depend on θµν. In the course of this analysis, unitarity of the non-perturbative S-matrix is proved as well. Keywords: Non-Commutative Geometry, QFT. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Twisted Relativistic Quantum Fields on the Moyal plane θ 3 A 3. The Untwisted and Twisted LSZ Reduction Formula 5 4. Non-perturbative Computations of the Scattering Amplitudes 7 5. Remarks 13 6. Acknowledgements 14 1. Introduction Spacetime at the Planck scale is possibly noncommutative.
    [Show full text]